MDedge Dermatology

In the opinion of R. Rox Anderson, MD, it’s only a matter of time before true robots make further inroads in dermatology.

“We humans just can’t do everything perfectly,” Dr. Anderson, a dermatologist who directs the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “We have limited speed and special accuracy and are not good at repetitive tasks. We can’t see in the UV or infrared, and we’re qualitative, not quantitative. ... We’re good at high-level visual assessment.”

During a presentation at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center, he distinguished between robotics and true robots. A prime example of robotics in medicine is the Da Vinci Surgical System in which a human user “is controlling every movement of this device with capabilities that humans don’t have, such as fine movement and high magnification of imaging,” said Dr. Anderson, who conceived and developed many of the nonscarring laser treatments now widely used in dermatology. “In the military, we have drone aircraft. The pilot is perhaps thousands of miles away; it’s still run by a human being in every way.”

By contrast, true robots are devices in which a human being programs the rules for action but the action itself is not exactly predictable. Artificial intelligence enables robots to perform certain tasks. “If you look at an Amazon warehouse, there’s barely anyone there; robots are packing and unpacking the shelves,” Dr. Anderson said.

Currently, he said, one true robot exists in dermatology: the Food and Drug Administration–cleared ARTAS Robotic Hair Restoration System, which precisely dissects follicular units from the donor area and eliminates the potential for human error. The device “extracts single follicular units from the occipital scalp and makes them available to the surgeon to do an artistic human job of implanting them in the frontal scalp,” Dr. Anderson said.

He predicts that a Mohs surgery robot with image-guided laser ablation would “launch a sea change in the whole field of surgical oncology, and I believe we are in a good position to do it. Everything for this is now sitting on the shelf and it’s unbelievable to me that a company hasn’t accomplished it yet.”

He would also like to see a true laser robot for surgery of tumors that would enable clinicians to download an app for their existing laser instead of having to buy a new device. Currently, “it takes about a half second to make a good optical coherence tomography image of basal cell carcinoma,” he said. “That image could be used for real-time robotic human control of, say, a laser to extirpate the tumor.”

Dr. Anderson’s “wish list” of applications for treatment with a robotic fractional laser includes those that target the sweat glands, sebaceous glands, nerves, inflammatory cells, white hair, blood vessels, lymphatics, hair, tumors, nevi, cysts, and surface contour. “It might be possible to have one software-programmable laser robot for many different applications in dermatology,” he added.

Dr. Anderson reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.





 

In the opinion of R. Rox Anderson, MD, it’s only a matter of time before true robots make further inroads in dermatology.

“We humans just can’t do everything perfectly,” Dr. Anderson, a dermatologist who directs the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “We have limited speed and special accuracy and are not good at repetitive tasks. We can’t see in the UV or infrared, and we’re qualitative, not quantitative. ... We’re good at high-level visual assessment.”

During a presentation at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center, he distinguished between robotics and true robots. A prime example of robotics in medicine is the Da Vinci Surgical System in which a human user “is controlling every movement of this device with capabilities that humans don’t have, such as fine movement and high magnification of imaging,” said Dr. Anderson, who conceived and developed many of the nonscarring laser treatments now widely used in dermatology. “In the military, we have drone aircraft. The pilot is perhaps thousands of miles away; it’s still run by a human being in every way.”

By contrast, true robots are devices in which a human being programs the rules for action but the action itself is not exactly predictable. Artificial intelligence enables robots to perform certain tasks. “If you look at an Amazon warehouse, there’s barely anyone there; robots are packing and unpacking the shelves,” Dr. Anderson said.

Currently, he said, one true robot exists in dermatology: the Food and Drug Administration–cleared ARTAS Robotic Hair Restoration System, which precisely dissects follicular units from the donor area and eliminates the potential for human error. The device “extracts single follicular units from the occipital scalp and makes them available to the surgeon to do an artistic human job of implanting them in the frontal scalp,” Dr. Anderson said.

He predicts that a Mohs surgery robot with image-guided laser ablation would “launch a sea change in the whole field of surgical oncology, and I believe we are in a good position to do it. Everything for this is now sitting on the shelf and it’s unbelievable to me that a company hasn’t accomplished it yet.”

He would also like to see a true laser robot for surgery of tumors that would enable clinicians to download an app for their existing laser instead of having to buy a new device. Currently, “it takes about a half second to make a good optical coherence tomography image of basal cell carcinoma,” he said. “That image could be used for real-time robotic human control of, say, a laser to extirpate the tumor.”

Dr. Anderson’s “wish list” of applications for treatment with a robotic fractional laser includes those that target the sweat glands, sebaceous glands, nerves, inflammatory cells, white hair, blood vessels, lymphatics, hair, tumors, nevi, cysts, and surface contour. “It might be possible to have one software-programmable laser robot for many different applications in dermatology,” he added.

Dr. Anderson reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.





 

In the opinion of R. Rox Anderson, MD, it’s only a matter of time before true robots make further inroads in dermatology.

“We humans just can’t do everything perfectly,” Dr. Anderson, a dermatologist who directs the Wellman Center for Photomedicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said during a virtual course on laser and aesthetic skin therapy. “We have limited speed and special accuracy and are not good at repetitive tasks. We can’t see in the UV or infrared, and we’re qualitative, not quantitative. ... We’re good at high-level visual assessment.”

During a presentation at the meeting, which was sponsored by Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Wellman Center, he distinguished between robotics and true robots. A prime example of robotics in medicine is the Da Vinci Surgical System in which a human user “is controlling every movement of this device with capabilities that humans don’t have, such as fine movement and high magnification of imaging,” said Dr. Anderson, who conceived and developed many of the nonscarring laser treatments now widely used in dermatology. “In the military, we have drone aircraft. The pilot is perhaps thousands of miles away; it’s still run by a human being in every way.”

By contrast, true robots are devices in which a human being programs the rules for action but the action itself is not exactly predictable. Artificial intelligence enables robots to perform certain tasks. “If you look at an Amazon warehouse, there’s barely anyone there; robots are packing and unpacking the shelves,” Dr. Anderson said.

Currently, he said, one true robot exists in dermatology: the Food and Drug Administration–cleared ARTAS Robotic Hair Restoration System, which precisely dissects follicular units from the donor area and eliminates the potential for human error. The device “extracts single follicular units from the occipital scalp and makes them available to the surgeon to do an artistic human job of implanting them in the frontal scalp,” Dr. Anderson said.

He predicts that a Mohs surgery robot with image-guided laser ablation would “launch a sea change in the whole field of surgical oncology, and I believe we are in a good position to do it. Everything for this is now sitting on the shelf and it’s unbelievable to me that a company hasn’t accomplished it yet.”

He would also like to see a true laser robot for surgery of tumors that would enable clinicians to download an app for their existing laser instead of having to buy a new device. Currently, “it takes about a half second to make a good optical coherence tomography image of basal cell carcinoma,” he said. “That image could be used for real-time robotic human control of, say, a laser to extirpate the tumor.”

Dr. Anderson’s “wish list” of applications for treatment with a robotic fractional laser includes those that target the sweat glands, sebaceous glands, nerves, inflammatory cells, white hair, blood vessels, lymphatics, hair, tumors, nevi, cysts, and surface contour. “It might be possible to have one software-programmable laser robot for many different applications in dermatology,” he added.

Dr. Anderson reported having received research funding and/or consulting fees from numerous device and pharmaceutical companies.





 

To the Editor:

Atopic diseases, specifically atopic dermatitis (AD) and alopecia areata (AA), are at the forefront of a new era in dermatology involving molecular-directed therapy. Dupilumab is one specific example, having received US Food and Drug Administration approval in March 2017 for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe AD.¹ It currently is being investigated for use in pediatric AD. The most commonly reported side effects associated with the use of dupilumab include headaches, conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis, nasopharyngitis, and injection-site reactions.² We discuss a case of hair regrowth in a patient who was previously diagnosed with AA after treatment with dupilumab for refractory AD.

A 65-year-old White man presented with a history of AD since childhood. Additional medical history included hyperlipidemia; herpes simplex virus infection; asthma; and a diagnosis of AA 6 years prior, which eventually progressed to alopecia universalis. Physical examination demonstrated scattered erythematous lichenified plaques with excoriations involving the arms, legs, and trunk. The patient’s face and scalp were spared of lesions. Complete loss of body hair including the eyelashes and eyebrows also was noted, which was consistent with alopecia universalis.

The patient was started on dupilumab for refractory AD after multiple courses of topical and systemic steroids failed. Prior treatment for AD did not include immunosuppressive or light therapy. The standard dosage of dupilumab was administered, which consisted of a 600-mg subcutaneous loading dose, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks. There was no concurrent topical corticosteroid or topical calcineurin inhibitor prescribed. After 1 month of treatment with dupilumab, near-complete resolution of the patient’s AD was noted, and after 10 months of treatment, the patient experienced regrowth of the eyelashes, terminal hairs of the beard area (Figure), and vellus hairs of the eyebrows. This hair regrowth persists today with continued dupilumab treatment, and the patient has experienced no additional side effects.

Multiple retrospective and meta-analysis studies have demonstrated a high occurrence of AD comorbid with AA, which strongly suggests a common pathogenesis.^3,4 Atopic dermatitis is an inflammatory skin disease mediated by IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 of the helper T-cell type 2 (T_H2) pathway.¹ Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to IL-4Rα, which also is found in IL-13 receptors. Dupilumab prevents T_H2 pathway-related downstream signaling effects of both cytokines. Although this effect was originally utilized to suppress the T_H2-mediated signaling in AD, our patient and others have demonstrated successful hair regrowth with dupilumab, which likely stems from a similar T_H2-related antagonism in AA.^5,6

The cause of AA is unknown, but IL-4 and IL-13 of the T_H2 pathway have been implicated, which renders support for the therapeutic effect of dupilumab in the treatment of AA. Scalp samples of patients with AA have demonstrated upregulation of T_H2, helper T-cell type 1 (T_H1), and IL-23 cytokines, suggesting efficacy with the use of anti-T_H2, anti-T_H1, and anti–IL-23 therapies.⁷ Polymerase chain reaction testing performed on serum samples in patients with AA displayed marked elevation of T_H2 cytokines, notably IL-13, which were reduced following intralesional corticosteroid treatment.⁸ It also has been demonstrated that multiple T_H2-related genes contribute to the genetic susceptibility of developing AA, specifically IL-4 and IL-13.^9,10

Prior case reports have shown contradicting effects (dupilumab-induced AA), which are speculated to be caused by a stronger T_H1 response from T_H2 suppression.^11,12 In one report, dupilumab was initiated for AD refractory to multiple topical and oral interventions. New-onset hair loss to the scalp was noted after 18 weeks of therapy. Twenty-six weeks into therapy with dupilumab, full hair regrowth was then reported.¹¹ Despite this report, our patient’s hair regrowth after the use of dupilumab for refractory AD further strengthens support for the use of dupilumab as a potential therapy for alopecia universalis and other lymphocyte-mediated hair loss conditions. However, a large disparity in response time and an overall slower progression of hair regrowth reported in our case separate it from other reports of rapid voluminous hair regrowth.^5,6 Our findings support the potential use of dupilumab in the treatment of patients with AA.

To the Editor:

Atopic diseases, specifically atopic dermatitis (AD) and alopecia areata (AA), are at the forefront of a new era in dermatology involving molecular-directed therapy. Dupilumab is one specific example, having received US Food and Drug Administration approval in March 2017 for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe AD.¹ It currently is being investigated for use in pediatric AD. The most commonly reported side effects associated with the use of dupilumab include headaches, conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis, nasopharyngitis, and injection-site reactions.² We discuss a case of hair regrowth in a patient who was previously diagnosed with AA after treatment with dupilumab for refractory AD.

A 65-year-old White man presented with a history of AD since childhood. Additional medical history included hyperlipidemia; herpes simplex virus infection; asthma; and a diagnosis of AA 6 years prior, which eventually progressed to alopecia universalis. Physical examination demonstrated scattered erythematous lichenified plaques with excoriations involving the arms, legs, and trunk. The patient’s face and scalp were spared of lesions. Complete loss of body hair including the eyelashes and eyebrows also was noted, which was consistent with alopecia universalis.

The patient was started on dupilumab for refractory AD after multiple courses of topical and systemic steroids failed. Prior treatment for AD did not include immunosuppressive or light therapy. The standard dosage of dupilumab was administered, which consisted of a 600-mg subcutaneous loading dose, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks. There was no concurrent topical corticosteroid or topical calcineurin inhibitor prescribed. After 1 month of treatment with dupilumab, near-complete resolution of the patient’s AD was noted, and after 10 months of treatment, the patient experienced regrowth of the eyelashes, terminal hairs of the beard area (Figure), and vellus hairs of the eyebrows. This hair regrowth persists today with continued dupilumab treatment, and the patient has experienced no additional side effects.

Multiple retrospective and meta-analysis studies have demonstrated a high occurrence of AD comorbid with AA, which strongly suggests a common pathogenesis.^3,4 Atopic dermatitis is an inflammatory skin disease mediated by IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 of the helper T-cell type 2 (T_H2) pathway.¹ Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to IL-4Rα, which also is found in IL-13 receptors. Dupilumab prevents T_H2 pathway-related downstream signaling effects of both cytokines. Although this effect was originally utilized to suppress the T_H2-mediated signaling in AD, our patient and others have demonstrated successful hair regrowth with dupilumab, which likely stems from a similar T_H2-related antagonism in AA.^5,6

The cause of AA is unknown, but IL-4 and IL-13 of the T_H2 pathway have been implicated, which renders support for the therapeutic effect of dupilumab in the treatment of AA. Scalp samples of patients with AA have demonstrated upregulation of T_H2, helper T-cell type 1 (T_H1), and IL-23 cytokines, suggesting efficacy with the use of anti-T_H2, anti-T_H1, and anti–IL-23 therapies.⁷ Polymerase chain reaction testing performed on serum samples in patients with AA displayed marked elevation of T_H2 cytokines, notably IL-13, which were reduced following intralesional corticosteroid treatment.⁸ It also has been demonstrated that multiple T_H2-related genes contribute to the genetic susceptibility of developing AA, specifically IL-4 and IL-13.^9,10

Prior case reports have shown contradicting effects (dupilumab-induced AA), which are speculated to be caused by a stronger T_H1 response from T_H2 suppression.^11,12 In one report, dupilumab was initiated for AD refractory to multiple topical and oral interventions. New-onset hair loss to the scalp was noted after 18 weeks of therapy. Twenty-six weeks into therapy with dupilumab, full hair regrowth was then reported.¹¹ Despite this report, our patient’s hair regrowth after the use of dupilumab for refractory AD further strengthens support for the use of dupilumab as a potential therapy for alopecia universalis and other lymphocyte-mediated hair loss conditions. However, a large disparity in response time and an overall slower progression of hair regrowth reported in our case separate it from other reports of rapid voluminous hair regrowth.^5,6 Our findings support the potential use of dupilumab in the treatment of patients with AA.

To the Editor:

Atopic diseases, specifically atopic dermatitis (AD) and alopecia areata (AA), are at the forefront of a new era in dermatology involving molecular-directed therapy. Dupilumab is one specific example, having received US Food and Drug Administration approval in March 2017 for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe AD.¹ It currently is being investigated for use in pediatric AD. The most commonly reported side effects associated with the use of dupilumab include headaches, conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis, nasopharyngitis, and injection-site reactions.² We discuss a case of hair regrowth in a patient who was previously diagnosed with AA after treatment with dupilumab for refractory AD.

A 65-year-old White man presented with a history of AD since childhood. Additional medical history included hyperlipidemia; herpes simplex virus infection; asthma; and a diagnosis of AA 6 years prior, which eventually progressed to alopecia universalis. Physical examination demonstrated scattered erythematous lichenified plaques with excoriations involving the arms, legs, and trunk. The patient’s face and scalp were spared of lesions. Complete loss of body hair including the eyelashes and eyebrows also was noted, which was consistent with alopecia universalis.

The patient was started on dupilumab for refractory AD after multiple courses of topical and systemic steroids failed. Prior treatment for AD did not include immunosuppressive or light therapy. The standard dosage of dupilumab was administered, which consisted of a 600-mg subcutaneous loading dose, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks. There was no concurrent topical corticosteroid or topical calcineurin inhibitor prescribed. After 1 month of treatment with dupilumab, near-complete resolution of the patient’s AD was noted, and after 10 months of treatment, the patient experienced regrowth of the eyelashes, terminal hairs of the beard area (Figure), and vellus hairs of the eyebrows. This hair regrowth persists today with continued dupilumab treatment, and the patient has experienced no additional side effects.

Multiple retrospective and meta-analysis studies have demonstrated a high occurrence of AD comorbid with AA, which strongly suggests a common pathogenesis.^3,4 Atopic dermatitis is an inflammatory skin disease mediated by IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 of the helper T-cell type 2 (T_H2) pathway.¹ Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to IL-4Rα, which also is found in IL-13 receptors. Dupilumab prevents T_H2 pathway-related downstream signaling effects of both cytokines. Although this effect was originally utilized to suppress the T_H2-mediated signaling in AD, our patient and others have demonstrated successful hair regrowth with dupilumab, which likely stems from a similar T_H2-related antagonism in AA.^5,6

The cause of AA is unknown, but IL-4 and IL-13 of the T_H2 pathway have been implicated, which renders support for the therapeutic effect of dupilumab in the treatment of AA. Scalp samples of patients with AA have demonstrated upregulation of T_H2, helper T-cell type 1 (T_H1), and IL-23 cytokines, suggesting efficacy with the use of anti-T_H2, anti-T_H1, and anti–IL-23 therapies.⁷ Polymerase chain reaction testing performed on serum samples in patients with AA displayed marked elevation of T_H2 cytokines, notably IL-13, which were reduced following intralesional corticosteroid treatment.⁸ It also has been demonstrated that multiple T_H2-related genes contribute to the genetic susceptibility of developing AA, specifically IL-4 and IL-13.^9,10

Prior case reports have shown contradicting effects (dupilumab-induced AA), which are speculated to be caused by a stronger T_H1 response from T_H2 suppression.^11,12 In one report, dupilumab was initiated for AD refractory to multiple topical and oral interventions. New-onset hair loss to the scalp was noted after 18 weeks of therapy. Twenty-six weeks into therapy with dupilumab, full hair regrowth was then reported.¹¹ Despite this report, our patient’s hair regrowth after the use of dupilumab for refractory AD further strengthens support for the use of dupilumab as a potential therapy for alopecia universalis and other lymphocyte-mediated hair loss conditions. However, a large disparity in response time and an overall slower progression of hair regrowth reported in our case separate it from other reports of rapid voluminous hair regrowth.^5,6 Our findings support the potential use of dupilumab in the treatment of patients with AA.

Key clinical point: Although proactive (PA) topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy did not show lower relapse rates in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission, it was more effective against itch and as safe as rank-down (RD) TCS therapy.

Major finding: There was no significant decrease in the relapse rate (8.33% vs 20.0%; P = .0859) in the PA vs RD treatment group; however, at week 4, the mean itching score increased significantly in the RD group (2.5 to 3.6; P = .0438) but not in the PA group (P = .1877). The safety profile was similar in both groups.

Study details: Findings are from an open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study including 49 pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had achieved remission with a very strong TCS therapy and were randomly assigned to receive PA or RD TCS therapy.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors declared receiving payments, honoraria, funds, research grants, or fees from several sources, including Torii Pharmaceutical.

Source: Kamiya K et al. Proactive versus rank-down topical corticosteroid therapy for maintenance of remission in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study (Anticipate study). J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6477 (Oct 31). Doi: 10.3390/jcm11216477

Key clinical point: Although proactive (PA) topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy did not show lower relapse rates in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission, it was more effective against itch and as safe as rank-down (RD) TCS therapy.

Major finding: There was no significant decrease in the relapse rate (8.33% vs 20.0%; P = .0859) in the PA vs RD treatment group; however, at week 4, the mean itching score increased significantly in the RD group (2.5 to 3.6; P = .0438) but not in the PA group (P = .1877). The safety profile was similar in both groups.

Study details: Findings are from an open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study including 49 pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had achieved remission with a very strong TCS therapy and were randomly assigned to receive PA or RD TCS therapy.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors declared receiving payments, honoraria, funds, research grants, or fees from several sources, including Torii Pharmaceutical.

Source: Kamiya K et al. Proactive versus rank-down topical corticosteroid therapy for maintenance of remission in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study (Anticipate study). J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6477 (Oct 31). Doi: 10.3390/jcm11216477

Key clinical point: Although proactive (PA) topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy did not show lower relapse rates in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in remission, it was more effective against itch and as safe as rank-down (RD) TCS therapy.

Major finding: There was no significant decrease in the relapse rate (8.33% vs 20.0%; P = .0859) in the PA vs RD treatment group; however, at week 4, the mean itching score increased significantly in the RD group (2.5 to 3.6; P = .0438) but not in the PA group (P = .1877). The safety profile was similar in both groups.

Study details: Findings are from an open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study including 49 pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD who had achieved remission with a very strong TCS therapy and were randomly assigned to receive PA or RD TCS therapy.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors declared receiving payments, honoraria, funds, research grants, or fees from several sources, including Torii Pharmaceutical.

Source: Kamiya K et al. Proactive versus rank-down topical corticosteroid therapy for maintenance of remission in pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study (Anticipate study). J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6477 (Oct 31). Doi: 10.3390/jcm11216477

Key clinical point: Regular application of a standardized skin care regimen during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in predisposed infants.

Major finding: In the first year of life, the overall cumulative incidence rate of AD was similar with regular standardized skin care and no predetermined skin care/skin care preferred by parents (odds ratio 1.0; P = .999).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective trial (ADAPI) including 150 infants who were at an enhanced risk of developing AD and were randomly assigned to receive a regular standardized skin care regimen or skin care as preferred by parents.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG, Germany. Two authors declared being employees of HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kottner J et al for the ADAPI Study Group. Effectiveness of a standardized skin care regimen to prevent atopic dermatitis in infants at risk for atopy: A randomized, pragmatic, parallel-group study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 (Oct 29). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18698

Key clinical point: Regular application of a standardized skin care regimen during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in predisposed infants.

Major finding: In the first year of life, the overall cumulative incidence rate of AD was similar with regular standardized skin care and no predetermined skin care/skin care preferred by parents (odds ratio 1.0; P = .999).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective trial (ADAPI) including 150 infants who were at an enhanced risk of developing AD and were randomly assigned to receive a regular standardized skin care regimen or skin care as preferred by parents.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG, Germany. Two authors declared being employees of HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kottner J et al for the ADAPI Study Group. Effectiveness of a standardized skin care regimen to prevent atopic dermatitis in infants at risk for atopy: A randomized, pragmatic, parallel-group study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 (Oct 29). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18698

Key clinical point: Regular application of a standardized skin care regimen during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in predisposed infants.

Major finding: In the first year of life, the overall cumulative incidence rate of AD was similar with regular standardized skin care and no predetermined skin care/skin care preferred by parents (odds ratio 1.0; P = .999).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective trial (ADAPI) including 150 infants who were at an enhanced risk of developing AD and were randomly assigned to receive a regular standardized skin care regimen or skin care as preferred by parents.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG, Germany. Two authors declared being employees of HiPP GmbH & Co Vertrieb KG. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kottner J et al for the ADAPI Study Group. Effectiveness of a standardized skin care regimen to prevent atopic dermatitis in infants at risk for atopy: A randomized, pragmatic, parallel-group study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 (Oct 29). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18698

Key clinical point: Daily continuous use of 10% phytosteryl/octyldodecyl lauroyl glutamate (POLG) nanoemulsion improved several dry skin symptoms and itchiness in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Significant improvement was observed with POLG nanoemulsion in itchiness as early as at 3 weeks (P < .05) and dryness at 6 weeks (P < .01). By 6 weeks, scaliness and smoothness of the skin were also significantly improved (P < .01).

Study details: Findings are from a clinical study including patients with AD who received 10% POLG nanoemulsion for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Takada M et al. A nano-emulsion containing ceramide-like lipo-amino acid cholesteryl derivatives improves skin symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis by ameliorating the water-holding function. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13362 (Nov 1). Doi: 10.3390/ijms232113362

Key clinical point: Daily continuous use of 10% phytosteryl/octyldodecyl lauroyl glutamate (POLG) nanoemulsion improved several dry skin symptoms and itchiness in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Significant improvement was observed with POLG nanoemulsion in itchiness as early as at 3 weeks (P < .05) and dryness at 6 weeks (P < .01). By 6 weeks, scaliness and smoothness of the skin were also significantly improved (P < .01).

Study details: Findings are from a clinical study including patients with AD who received 10% POLG nanoemulsion for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Takada M et al. A nano-emulsion containing ceramide-like lipo-amino acid cholesteryl derivatives improves skin symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis by ameliorating the water-holding function. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13362 (Nov 1). Doi: 10.3390/ijms232113362

Key clinical point: Daily continuous use of 10% phytosteryl/octyldodecyl lauroyl glutamate (POLG) nanoemulsion improved several dry skin symptoms and itchiness in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: Significant improvement was observed with POLG nanoemulsion in itchiness as early as at 3 weeks (P < .05) and dryness at 6 weeks (P < .01). By 6 weeks, scaliness and smoothness of the skin were also significantly improved (P < .01).

Study details: Findings are from a clinical study including patients with AD who received 10% POLG nanoemulsion for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Takada M et al. A nano-emulsion containing ceramide-like lipo-amino acid cholesteryl derivatives improves skin symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis by ameliorating the water-holding function. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(21):13362 (Nov 1). Doi: 10.3390/ijms232113362

Key clinical point: Daily application of emollients during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the long term.

Major finding: A similar proportion of children in the emollient and standard skincare groups were clinically diagnosed with AD between 12 and 60 months (31% and 28%, respectively; adjusted relative risk 1.10; 95% CI 0.93-1.30).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter, parallel, Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention trial including 1394 infants at high risk of developing AD who were randomly assigned to receive emollient for the first year plus standard skincare or only standard skincare.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, grants, or research funding from or serving as an investigator or director for several sources.

Source: Bradshaw LE et al. Emollients for prevention of atopic dermatitis: 5-year findings from the BEEP randomized trial. Allergy. 2022 (Oct 19). Doi: 10.1111/all.15555

Key clinical point: Daily application of emollients during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the long term.

Major finding: A similar proportion of children in the emollient and standard skincare groups were clinically diagnosed with AD between 12 and 60 months (31% and 28%, respectively; adjusted relative risk 1.10; 95% CI 0.93-1.30).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter, parallel, Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention trial including 1394 infants at high risk of developing AD who were randomly assigned to receive emollient for the first year plus standard skincare or only standard skincare.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, grants, or research funding from or serving as an investigator or director for several sources.

Source: Bradshaw LE et al. Emollients for prevention of atopic dermatitis: 5-year findings from the BEEP randomized trial. Allergy. 2022 (Oct 19). Doi: 10.1111/all.15555

Key clinical point: Daily application of emollients during the first year of life did not prevent the development of atopic dermatitis (AD) in the long term.

Major finding: A similar proportion of children in the emollient and standard skincare groups were clinically diagnosed with AD between 12 and 60 months (31% and 28%, respectively; adjusted relative risk 1.10; 95% CI 0.93-1.30).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter, parallel, Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention trial including 1394 infants at high risk of developing AD who were randomly assigned to receive emollient for the first year plus standard skincare or only standard skincare.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment. Some authors declared receiving personal fees, grants, or research funding from or serving as an investigator or director for several sources.

Source: Bradshaw LE et al. Emollients for prevention of atopic dermatitis: 5-year findings from the BEEP randomized trial. Allergy. 2022 (Oct 19). Doi: 10.1111/all.15555

Key clinical point: A topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics was effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: After 15 weeks, the SCORing AD index (−59.2%; P < .001) and the PRURISCORE (−64.1%; P < .001) reduced significantly, with 68.0% of patients reporting the tolerability of the drug as “very good” or “excellent.”

Study details: Findings are from a study including 396 patients with mild or moderate AD who received a topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Istituto Ganassini di Ricerche Biochimiche, Italy. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gelmetti C et al. Topical prebiotics/postbiotics and PRURISCORE validation in atopic dermatitis. International study of 396 patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Oct 17). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2131703

Key clinical point: A topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics was effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: After 15 weeks, the SCORing AD index (−59.2%; P < .001) and the PRURISCORE (−64.1%; P < .001) reduced significantly, with 68.0% of patients reporting the tolerability of the drug as “very good” or “excellent.”

Study details: Findings are from a study including 396 patients with mild or moderate AD who received a topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Istituto Ganassini di Ricerche Biochimiche, Italy. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gelmetti C et al. Topical prebiotics/postbiotics and PRURISCORE validation in atopic dermatitis. International study of 396 patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Oct 17). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2131703

Key clinical point: A topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics was effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: After 15 weeks, the SCORing AD index (−59.2%; P < .001) and the PRURISCORE (−64.1%; P < .001) reduced significantly, with 68.0% of patients reporting the tolerability of the drug as “very good” or “excellent.”

Study details: Findings are from a study including 396 patients with mild or moderate AD who received a topical formulation containing a mixture of prebiotics and postbiotics.

Disclosures: This work was supported by the Istituto Ganassini di Ricerche Biochimiche, Italy. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gelmetti C et al. Topical prebiotics/postbiotics and PRURISCORE validation in atopic dermatitis. International study of 396 patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 (Oct 17). Doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2131703

Key clinical point: A longer dupilumab dosing interval might be a good treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who have achieved good clinical response (GCR) or report treatment-related conjunctivitis with a previous dupilumab treatment (600 mg followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks).

Major finding: In the GCR group, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score was 28.22, which reduced significantly to 0.44 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and to 0.19 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) after >60 weeks (both P < .0001). EASI improved after 18 weeks in the treatment-resistant conjunctivitis group (P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are retrospectively collected data of 59 adult patients with AD who implemented Q3W (84.75%) or Q4W (15.25%) dupilumab dosing interval due to GCR or conjunctivitis.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Some authors declared serving as speakers, investigators, consultants, or advisory board members, or receiving personal fees from several sources.

Source: Patruno C et al. Dupilumab dose spacing after initial successful treatment or adverse events in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 13). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15933

Key clinical point: A longer dupilumab dosing interval might be a good treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who have achieved good clinical response (GCR) or report treatment-related conjunctivitis with a previous dupilumab treatment (600 mg followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks).

Major finding: In the GCR group, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score was 28.22, which reduced significantly to 0.44 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and to 0.19 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) after >60 weeks (both P < .0001). EASI improved after 18 weeks in the treatment-resistant conjunctivitis group (P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are retrospectively collected data of 59 adult patients with AD who implemented Q3W (84.75%) or Q4W (15.25%) dupilumab dosing interval due to GCR or conjunctivitis.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Some authors declared serving as speakers, investigators, consultants, or advisory board members, or receiving personal fees from several sources.

Source: Patruno C et al. Dupilumab dose spacing after initial successful treatment or adverse events in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 13). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15933

Key clinical point: A longer dupilumab dosing interval might be a good treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who have achieved good clinical response (GCR) or report treatment-related conjunctivitis with a previous dupilumab treatment (600 mg followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks).

Major finding: In the GCR group, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score was 28.22, which reduced significantly to 0.44 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and to 0.19 among patients receiving dupilumab once every 4 weeks (Q4W) after >60 weeks (both P < .0001). EASI improved after 18 weeks in the treatment-resistant conjunctivitis group (P < .0001).

Study details: Findings are retrospectively collected data of 59 adult patients with AD who implemented Q3W (84.75%) or Q4W (15.25%) dupilumab dosing interval due to GCR or conjunctivitis.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Some authors declared serving as speakers, investigators, consultants, or advisory board members, or receiving personal fees from several sources.

Source: Patruno C et al. Dupilumab dose spacing after initial successful treatment or adverse events in adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective analysis. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 13). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15933

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954

Key clinical point: Baricitinib demonstrated long-term (52 weeks) efficacy in reducing disease severity in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 52, >45% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), with a mean improvement of 56.8 points in the total EASI score.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3, BREEZE-AD5 study including 146 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were assigned to receive 2 mg baricitinib, of which 98 patients participated in the open-label extension, BREEZE-AD6 study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company, under license from Incyte Corporation. Five authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly, and the other authors reported ties with several sources, including Eli Lily.

Source: Simpson E et al. Baricitinib 2 mg for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in North America: Long-term efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. Dermatol Ther. 2022 (Oct 21). Doi: 10.1111/dth.15954