HCV Hub

Two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques topped transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis and steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to a first-in-kind study.

Magnetic resonance elastography surpassed all other methods for staging fibrosis, while MRI-based measurement of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was superior for grading steatosis, with liver biopsy used as the comparative gold standard, said Dr. Kento Imajo at Yokohama (Japan) City University Graduate School of Medicine and his associates. “Magnetic resonance imaging–based noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis is a potential alternative to liver biopsy in clinical practice,” the investigators wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / "Nephron" / Creative Commons License

Assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis is important for staging NAFLD. Although “useful” overall, transient elastography can be unreliable in morbidly obese NAFLD patients or those with ascites because of low-frequency vibrations created by the probe, the researchers noted. To compare TE with MRI-based magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF, they evaluated 142 patients with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD and 10 controls, all of whom they also assessed with five clinical scoring systems for fibrosis – the FIB4 index, the NAFLD fibrosis score, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio, the AST-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio, and the BARD score (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048).

Magnetic resonance elastography detected stage 2 or higher hepatic fibrosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve value of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96), compared with 0.82 (0.74-0.89) for transient elastography (P = .001), the investigators reported. The AUROC for MRE also significantly exceeded the AUROCs for all five clinical indexes of fibrosis severity. Furthermore, MRI-based measurement of PDFF identified hepatic steatosis of grade 2 or higher with an AUROC curve value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97), which was significantly greater than the AUROC obtained by using TE to measure the controlled attenuation parameter (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81; P less than .001).

Adding a measure for serum keratin 18 fragments or ALT did not significantly improve the detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or macrovesicular steatosis affecting at least 5% of hepatocytes by either MRI or TE, the researchers noted. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard for assessing NAFLD, it is associated with sampling errors and intra- and interobserver variability, and these errors could have affected their study results, they acknowledged. The study also did not account for hepatic perfusion, which can elevate liver stiffness measurement independently from liver disease.

Both the magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF techniques require specialized hardware and software that are available from several commercial suppliers, the researchers also noted.

The study was partially supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, the Japanese Science and Technology Agency, and Kiban-B, Shingakujuturyouiki. The investigators had no disclosures.

Two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques topped transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis and steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to a first-in-kind study.

Magnetic resonance elastography surpassed all other methods for staging fibrosis, while MRI-based measurement of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was superior for grading steatosis, with liver biopsy used as the comparative gold standard, said Dr. Kento Imajo at Yokohama (Japan) City University Graduate School of Medicine and his associates. “Magnetic resonance imaging–based noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis is a potential alternative to liver biopsy in clinical practice,” the investigators wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / "Nephron" / Creative Commons License

Assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis is important for staging NAFLD. Although “useful” overall, transient elastography can be unreliable in morbidly obese NAFLD patients or those with ascites because of low-frequency vibrations created by the probe, the researchers noted. To compare TE with MRI-based magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF, they evaluated 142 patients with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD and 10 controls, all of whom they also assessed with five clinical scoring systems for fibrosis – the FIB4 index, the NAFLD fibrosis score, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio, the AST-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio, and the BARD score (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048).

Magnetic resonance elastography detected stage 2 or higher hepatic fibrosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve value of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96), compared with 0.82 (0.74-0.89) for transient elastography (P = .001), the investigators reported. The AUROC for MRE also significantly exceeded the AUROCs for all five clinical indexes of fibrosis severity. Furthermore, MRI-based measurement of PDFF identified hepatic steatosis of grade 2 or higher with an AUROC curve value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97), which was significantly greater than the AUROC obtained by using TE to measure the controlled attenuation parameter (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81; P less than .001).

Adding a measure for serum keratin 18 fragments or ALT did not significantly improve the detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or macrovesicular steatosis affecting at least 5% of hepatocytes by either MRI or TE, the researchers noted. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard for assessing NAFLD, it is associated with sampling errors and intra- and interobserver variability, and these errors could have affected their study results, they acknowledged. The study also did not account for hepatic perfusion, which can elevate liver stiffness measurement independently from liver disease.

Both the magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF techniques require specialized hardware and software that are available from several commercial suppliers, the researchers also noted.

The study was partially supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, the Japanese Science and Technology Agency, and Kiban-B, Shingakujuturyouiki. The investigators had no disclosures.

Two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques topped transient elastography (TE) for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis and steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to a first-in-kind study.

Magnetic resonance elastography surpassed all other methods for staging fibrosis, while MRI-based measurement of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was superior for grading steatosis, with liver biopsy used as the comparative gold standard, said Dr. Kento Imajo at Yokohama (Japan) City University Graduate School of Medicine and his associates. “Magnetic resonance imaging–based noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis is a potential alternative to liver biopsy in clinical practice,” the investigators wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.

Courtesy of Wikimedia / "Nephron" / Creative Commons License

Assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis is important for staging NAFLD. Although “useful” overall, transient elastography can be unreliable in morbidly obese NAFLD patients or those with ascites because of low-frequency vibrations created by the probe, the researchers noted. To compare TE with MRI-based magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF, they evaluated 142 patients with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD and 10 controls, all of whom they also assessed with five clinical scoring systems for fibrosis – the FIB4 index, the NAFLD fibrosis score, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio, the AST-to-alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio, and the BARD score (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048).

Magnetic resonance elastography detected stage 2 or higher hepatic fibrosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve value of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.96), compared with 0.82 (0.74-0.89) for transient elastography (P = .001), the investigators reported. The AUROC for MRE also significantly exceeded the AUROCs for all five clinical indexes of fibrosis severity. Furthermore, MRI-based measurement of PDFF identified hepatic steatosis of grade 2 or higher with an AUROC curve value of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.97), which was significantly greater than the AUROC obtained by using TE to measure the controlled attenuation parameter (0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81; P less than .001).

Adding a measure for serum keratin 18 fragments or ALT did not significantly improve the detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or macrovesicular steatosis affecting at least 5% of hepatocytes by either MRI or TE, the researchers noted. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard for assessing NAFLD, it is associated with sampling errors and intra- and interobserver variability, and these errors could have affected their study results, they acknowledged. The study also did not account for hepatic perfusion, which can elevate liver stiffness measurement independently from liver disease.

Both the magnetic resonance elastography and PDFF techniques require specialized hardware and software that are available from several commercial suppliers, the researchers also noted.

The study was partially supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, the Japanese Science and Technology Agency, and Kiban-B, Shingakujuturyouiki. The investigators had no disclosures.

A Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of 2 – indicating mild residual staining and small stool fragments – was as good as the optimal preparation score of 3 for visualizing polyps and adenomas larger than 5 mm and advanced adenomas during colonoscopy, researchers said.

A score of 2 might increase the chances of missing smaller polyps, but is adequate for detecting clinically significant masses, Dr. Brian Clark of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and his associates reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology. But a score of 1 – meaning that there is enough staining or stool to obscure the mucosa – significantly increased the chances of missing adenomas larger than 5 mm, they said. Patients should undergo early repeat colonoscopy if their BBPS score is 1 or 0 in any colon segment, they emphasized.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is considered adequate if endoscopists can detect polyps larger than 5 mm, but no prior study had quantified the amount of preparation needed. This prospective observational study assessed adequate preparation in terms of the BBPS, which scores each of three colon segments on a scale of 0 (solid stool covering the mucosa) to 3 points (entire mucosa seen well, with no residual staining). Study participants included 438 men aged 50-75 years who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a single Veterans Affairs center, followed by repeat colonoscopies within 60 days performed by different blinded endoscopists. The investigators excluded patients who scored 0 in all colon segments or had familial polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, polyps so large that they could not be completely removed, or a history of colonic or rectal resection. In all, they analyzed 1,161 colon segments (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041).

Endoscopists missed about 5% of adenomas greater than 5 mm, regardless of whether BBPS scores were 2 or 3 in a model that accounted for age, reason for colonoscopy, colon segment, number of polyps removed in the first examination, and endoscopist performing the procedure, the researchers said. But when BBPS scores were 1, endoscopists missed 16% of adenomas larger than 5 mm, a difference of about 10%. Furthermore, 43% of screening and surveillance intervals would have been incorrect had they been based solely on an initial examination for which scores were 1 in at least one segment. In contrast, only about 15% of intervals would have been incorrect for patients who scored 2 or 3 in all segments.

In all, 80% of patients were sufficiently prepared, having scored at least 2 in all segments on the first examination. “Determining whether a patient’s preparation quality is adequate is one of the most common and important decisions made by gastroenterologists each day,” the researchers said. Between 25% and 30% of screening and surveillance colonoscopies occur at “inappropriately shortened intervals,” often because of uncertainty about what constitutes adequate visualization, they added. Defining adequate visualization based on bowel preparation could save billions of dollars in health care costs every year, minimize complications from unnecessary procedures, and pinpoint those patients who truly need an early repeat colonoscopy to help prevent interval colorectal cancer, they emphasized.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators had no disclosures.

A Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of 2 – indicating mild residual staining and small stool fragments – was as good as the optimal preparation score of 3 for visualizing polyps and adenomas larger than 5 mm and advanced adenomas during colonoscopy, researchers said.

A score of 2 might increase the chances of missing smaller polyps, but is adequate for detecting clinically significant masses, Dr. Brian Clark of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and his associates reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology. But a score of 1 – meaning that there is enough staining or stool to obscure the mucosa – significantly increased the chances of missing adenomas larger than 5 mm, they said. Patients should undergo early repeat colonoscopy if their BBPS score is 1 or 0 in any colon segment, they emphasized.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is considered adequate if endoscopists can detect polyps larger than 5 mm, but no prior study had quantified the amount of preparation needed. This prospective observational study assessed adequate preparation in terms of the BBPS, which scores each of three colon segments on a scale of 0 (solid stool covering the mucosa) to 3 points (entire mucosa seen well, with no residual staining). Study participants included 438 men aged 50-75 years who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a single Veterans Affairs center, followed by repeat colonoscopies within 60 days performed by different blinded endoscopists. The investigators excluded patients who scored 0 in all colon segments or had familial polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, polyps so large that they could not be completely removed, or a history of colonic or rectal resection. In all, they analyzed 1,161 colon segments (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041).

Endoscopists missed about 5% of adenomas greater than 5 mm, regardless of whether BBPS scores were 2 or 3 in a model that accounted for age, reason for colonoscopy, colon segment, number of polyps removed in the first examination, and endoscopist performing the procedure, the researchers said. But when BBPS scores were 1, endoscopists missed 16% of adenomas larger than 5 mm, a difference of about 10%. Furthermore, 43% of screening and surveillance intervals would have been incorrect had they been based solely on an initial examination for which scores were 1 in at least one segment. In contrast, only about 15% of intervals would have been incorrect for patients who scored 2 or 3 in all segments.

In all, 80% of patients were sufficiently prepared, having scored at least 2 in all segments on the first examination. “Determining whether a patient’s preparation quality is adequate is one of the most common and important decisions made by gastroenterologists each day,” the researchers said. Between 25% and 30% of screening and surveillance colonoscopies occur at “inappropriately shortened intervals,” often because of uncertainty about what constitutes adequate visualization, they added. Defining adequate visualization based on bowel preparation could save billions of dollars in health care costs every year, minimize complications from unnecessary procedures, and pinpoint those patients who truly need an early repeat colonoscopy to help prevent interval colorectal cancer, they emphasized.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators had no disclosures.

A Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of 2 – indicating mild residual staining and small stool fragments – was as good as the optimal preparation score of 3 for visualizing polyps and adenomas larger than 5 mm and advanced adenomas during colonoscopy, researchers said.

A score of 2 might increase the chances of missing smaller polyps, but is adequate for detecting clinically significant masses, Dr. Brian Clark of Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and his associates reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology. But a score of 1 – meaning that there is enough staining or stool to obscure the mucosa – significantly increased the chances of missing adenomas larger than 5 mm, they said. Patients should undergo early repeat colonoscopy if their BBPS score is 1 or 0 in any colon segment, they emphasized.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy is considered adequate if endoscopists can detect polyps larger than 5 mm, but no prior study had quantified the amount of preparation needed. This prospective observational study assessed adequate preparation in terms of the BBPS, which scores each of three colon segments on a scale of 0 (solid stool covering the mucosa) to 3 points (entire mucosa seen well, with no residual staining). Study participants included 438 men aged 50-75 years who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a single Veterans Affairs center, followed by repeat colonoscopies within 60 days performed by different blinded endoscopists. The investigators excluded patients who scored 0 in all colon segments or had familial polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, polyps so large that they could not be completely removed, or a history of colonic or rectal resection. In all, they analyzed 1,161 colon segments (Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec 7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.041).

Endoscopists missed about 5% of adenomas greater than 5 mm, regardless of whether BBPS scores were 2 or 3 in a model that accounted for age, reason for colonoscopy, colon segment, number of polyps removed in the first examination, and endoscopist performing the procedure, the researchers said. But when BBPS scores were 1, endoscopists missed 16% of adenomas larger than 5 mm, a difference of about 10%. Furthermore, 43% of screening and surveillance intervals would have been incorrect had they been based solely on an initial examination for which scores were 1 in at least one segment. In contrast, only about 15% of intervals would have been incorrect for patients who scored 2 or 3 in all segments.

In all, 80% of patients were sufficiently prepared, having scored at least 2 in all segments on the first examination. “Determining whether a patient’s preparation quality is adequate is one of the most common and important decisions made by gastroenterologists each day,” the researchers said. Between 25% and 30% of screening and surveillance colonoscopies occur at “inappropriately shortened intervals,” often because of uncertainty about what constitutes adequate visualization, they added. Defining adequate visualization based on bowel preparation could save billions of dollars in health care costs every year, minimize complications from unnecessary procedures, and pinpoint those patients who truly need an early repeat colonoscopy to help prevent interval colorectal cancer, they emphasized.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators had no disclosures.

A 12-week, ribavirin-free regimen achieved sustained virologic response for 85% of patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, researchers reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology.

“This represents one of the first applications of a highly effective HCV regimen outside clinical trials,” said Dr. Mark S. Sulkowski of John Hopkins University in Baltimore and his associates. Adding ribavirin to the simeprevir and sofosbuvir combination regimen did not improve sustained virologic response (SVR), but patients were less likely to achieve it if they had cirrhosis, current or prior hepatic decompensation, or a history of failing other protease inhibitors, the investigators said.

Novel hepatitis C therapies have yielded “substantially lower” rates of SVR and more side effects in everyday practice than in clinical trials, the investigators noted. To better understand how some of newest HCV drugs perform in the real world, they conducted an observational cohort study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for treating genotype 1 HCV infections in academic and nonacademic settings (HCV-TARGET) (Gastroenterology 2015 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.013).

A total of 836 patients received once-daily simeprevir (150 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg), and 169 of them also received ribavirin. Most (61%) patients had genotype 1a infection and were white (76%), male (61%), and cirrhotic (59%); 13% were black. Patients usually were treatment experienced, having failed peginterferon and ribavirin either with (12%) or without (46%) telaprevir or boceprevir, the researchers said.

In all, 675 (84%) patients achieved SVR after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12; 95% confidence interval, 81%-87%). Adding ribavirin to the combination PI regimen did not improve SVR, regardless of cirrhosis status, genetic subtype, or treatment history. However, crude SVR12 rates were only 75% for patients with hepatic decompensation and 81% for those with cirrhosis, and these patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of achieving SVR, compared with other patients. In hindsight, decompensated and cirrhotic patients might have needed 24 weeks of treatment, as the Food and Drug Administration now recommends based on the COSMOS trial results (Lancet. 2014;384[9956]:1756-65), the investigators said.

The adjusted model did not uncover a link between genotype 1 subtype and SVR, but only about 10% of patients were tested for the Q80K polymorphism, which is more common in genotype 1a infections and is associated with treatment resistance, the investigators noted. Crude SVR12 rates were 92% for patients with genotype 1b infection and 86% for those with 1a infection, they said.

Only 3% of patients stopped treatment; 2% did so because of side effects, and ribavirin did not significantly affect rates of treatment discontinuation, said the investigators. The most common side effects were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and insomnia. Serious adverse events affected 5% of patients and included gastrointestinal bleeding (0.5%), hepatic failure or encephalopathy (1.2%), and infections (1.1%).

Taken together, these results show that simeprevir and sofosbuvir effectively translate from the clinical trial setting into clinical practice, said the researchers. “Additional research is needed to understand which patients may benefit from different treatment regimens or longer treatment durations,” they emphasized.

The study was supported by the University of Florida at Gainesville, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Kadmon, Merck, Vertex, and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Sulkowski reported grants and personal fees from Gilead, Janssen, Achillion, Abbvie, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Of 14 coinvestigators, 13 reported financial relationships with a number of pharmaceutical companies.

A 12-week, ribavirin-free regimen achieved sustained virologic response for 85% of patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, researchers reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology.

“This represents one of the first applications of a highly effective HCV regimen outside clinical trials,” said Dr. Mark S. Sulkowski of John Hopkins University in Baltimore and his associates. Adding ribavirin to the simeprevir and sofosbuvir combination regimen did not improve sustained virologic response (SVR), but patients were less likely to achieve it if they had cirrhosis, current or prior hepatic decompensation, or a history of failing other protease inhibitors, the investigators said.

Novel hepatitis C therapies have yielded “substantially lower” rates of SVR and more side effects in everyday practice than in clinical trials, the investigators noted. To better understand how some of newest HCV drugs perform in the real world, they conducted an observational cohort study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for treating genotype 1 HCV infections in academic and nonacademic settings (HCV-TARGET) (Gastroenterology 2015 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.013).

A total of 836 patients received once-daily simeprevir (150 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg), and 169 of them also received ribavirin. Most (61%) patients had genotype 1a infection and were white (76%), male (61%), and cirrhotic (59%); 13% were black. Patients usually were treatment experienced, having failed peginterferon and ribavirin either with (12%) or without (46%) telaprevir or boceprevir, the researchers said.

In all, 675 (84%) patients achieved SVR after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12; 95% confidence interval, 81%-87%). Adding ribavirin to the combination PI regimen did not improve SVR, regardless of cirrhosis status, genetic subtype, or treatment history. However, crude SVR12 rates were only 75% for patients with hepatic decompensation and 81% for those with cirrhosis, and these patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of achieving SVR, compared with other patients. In hindsight, decompensated and cirrhotic patients might have needed 24 weeks of treatment, as the Food and Drug Administration now recommends based on the COSMOS trial results (Lancet. 2014;384[9956]:1756-65), the investigators said.

The adjusted model did not uncover a link between genotype 1 subtype and SVR, but only about 10% of patients were tested for the Q80K polymorphism, which is more common in genotype 1a infections and is associated with treatment resistance, the investigators noted. Crude SVR12 rates were 92% for patients with genotype 1b infection and 86% for those with 1a infection, they said.

Only 3% of patients stopped treatment; 2% did so because of side effects, and ribavirin did not significantly affect rates of treatment discontinuation, said the investigators. The most common side effects were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and insomnia. Serious adverse events affected 5% of patients and included gastrointestinal bleeding (0.5%), hepatic failure or encephalopathy (1.2%), and infections (1.1%).

Taken together, these results show that simeprevir and sofosbuvir effectively translate from the clinical trial setting into clinical practice, said the researchers. “Additional research is needed to understand which patients may benefit from different treatment regimens or longer treatment durations,” they emphasized.

The study was supported by the University of Florida at Gainesville, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Kadmon, Merck, Vertex, and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Sulkowski reported grants and personal fees from Gilead, Janssen, Achillion, Abbvie, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Of 14 coinvestigators, 13 reported financial relationships with a number of pharmaceutical companies.

A 12-week, ribavirin-free regimen achieved sustained virologic response for 85% of patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, researchers reported in the February issue of Gastroenterology.

“This represents one of the first applications of a highly effective HCV regimen outside clinical trials,” said Dr. Mark S. Sulkowski of John Hopkins University in Baltimore and his associates. Adding ribavirin to the simeprevir and sofosbuvir combination regimen did not improve sustained virologic response (SVR), but patients were less likely to achieve it if they had cirrhosis, current or prior hepatic decompensation, or a history of failing other protease inhibitors, the investigators said.

Novel hepatitis C therapies have yielded “substantially lower” rates of SVR and more side effects in everyday practice than in clinical trials, the investigators noted. To better understand how some of newest HCV drugs perform in the real world, they conducted an observational cohort study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of simeprevir plus sofosbuvir for treating genotype 1 HCV infections in academic and nonacademic settings (HCV-TARGET) (Gastroenterology 2015 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.10.013).

A total of 836 patients received once-daily simeprevir (150 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg), and 169 of them also received ribavirin. Most (61%) patients had genotype 1a infection and were white (76%), male (61%), and cirrhotic (59%); 13% were black. Patients usually were treatment experienced, having failed peginterferon and ribavirin either with (12%) or without (46%) telaprevir or boceprevir, the researchers said.

In all, 675 (84%) patients achieved SVR after 12 weeks of treatment (SVR12; 95% confidence interval, 81%-87%). Adding ribavirin to the combination PI regimen did not improve SVR, regardless of cirrhosis status, genetic subtype, or treatment history. However, crude SVR12 rates were only 75% for patients with hepatic decompensation and 81% for those with cirrhosis, and these patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of achieving SVR, compared with other patients. In hindsight, decompensated and cirrhotic patients might have needed 24 weeks of treatment, as the Food and Drug Administration now recommends based on the COSMOS trial results (Lancet. 2014;384[9956]:1756-65), the investigators said.

The adjusted model did not uncover a link between genotype 1 subtype and SVR, but only about 10% of patients were tested for the Q80K polymorphism, which is more common in genotype 1a infections and is associated with treatment resistance, the investigators noted. Crude SVR12 rates were 92% for patients with genotype 1b infection and 86% for those with 1a infection, they said.

Only 3% of patients stopped treatment; 2% did so because of side effects, and ribavirin did not significantly affect rates of treatment discontinuation, said the investigators. The most common side effects were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and insomnia. Serious adverse events affected 5% of patients and included gastrointestinal bleeding (0.5%), hepatic failure or encephalopathy (1.2%), and infections (1.1%).

Taken together, these results show that simeprevir and sofosbuvir effectively translate from the clinical trial setting into clinical practice, said the researchers. “Additional research is needed to understand which patients may benefit from different treatment regimens or longer treatment durations,” they emphasized.

The study was supported by the University of Florida at Gainesville, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Kadmon, Merck, Vertex, and the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Sulkowski reported grants and personal fees from Gilead, Janssen, Achillion, Abbvie, Merck, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Of 14 coinvestigators, 13 reported financial relationships with a number of pharmaceutical companies.

Opt-out scheduling protocols and long appointment lead times contributed significantly to missed and canceled colonoscopy appointments at Veterans Health Administration facilities, researchers reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

These factors are within the control of the Veterans Affairs and could be altered to improve productivity and efficiency, said Melissa Partin, Ph.D., of the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Minneapolis, and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Missed and canceled medical appointments are always a concern, but particularly so for colonoscopy clinics, where they incur an average daily net loss of $725, the investigators noted. Most clinics have limited colonoscopy capacity, and even a 30-day wait for diagnostic colonoscopy has been linked to “modest but significantly elevated” chances of detecting cancer on exam, they added. To better understand these problems, they separately examined predictors of missed and canceled appointments among 27,994 patients who had positive fecal occult blood tests with diagnostic colonoscopies scheduled at 69 VA facilities between 2009 and 2011 (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 21. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.051).

Having a life expectancy of 6 months or less and no personal history of polyps best predicted missing an appointment, with odds ratios of 2.74 for each factor, the researchers said. However, only 0.47% of patients had such a short life expectancy. Other significant predictors of missed appointments included being seen at the largest and most complex facilities (odds ratio, 2.69; P = .007), having both psychiatric and substance abuse disorders (OR, 1.82; P less than .0001), and the use of opt-out scheduling, in which patients were automatically scheduled rather than having to schedule appointments themselves (OR, 1.57; P = .02). Canceled appointments also were linked to opt-out scheduling, as well as to older age and having no history of polyps.

Most appointment lead times were 28 days, and each 12-day increase in lead time increased the odds of missing or canceling appointments by about 15% (P less than .0001). The problem could be curtailed by the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which allows those who cannot schedule VA appointments within 30 days to receive care from eligible non–VA providers, the investigators said. “Future research should focus on assessing the effect of the Choice Act on colonoscopy appointment lead time and on developing and evaluating efficient and effective approaches to implementing the other clinic-level changes supported by our findings,” they added.

The study might have oversimplified or missed changes in protocols because it used single-item survey measures at one point in time, the investigators said. For some patients, the first appointment after the fecal occult blood test may have been for another procedure besides colonoscopy, they added. Furthermore, they did not distinguish between appointments canceled by patients versus clinics. “The VHA is a unique context, characterized by a predominantly male, low-income population with high rates of mental health and substance abuse diagnoses. Therefore, our findings may not generalize to other settings,” they added. “However, our findings do have important implications for a substantial population of health providers and consumers in this country, because the VHA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States.”

The study was funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Service and Health Services Research & Development Service. The investigators had no disclosures.

Opt-out scheduling protocols and long appointment lead times contributed significantly to missed and canceled colonoscopy appointments at Veterans Health Administration facilities, researchers reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

These factors are within the control of the Veterans Affairs and could be altered to improve productivity and efficiency, said Melissa Partin, Ph.D., of the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Minneapolis, and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Missed and canceled medical appointments are always a concern, but particularly so for colonoscopy clinics, where they incur an average daily net loss of $725, the investigators noted. Most clinics have limited colonoscopy capacity, and even a 30-day wait for diagnostic colonoscopy has been linked to “modest but significantly elevated” chances of detecting cancer on exam, they added. To better understand these problems, they separately examined predictors of missed and canceled appointments among 27,994 patients who had positive fecal occult blood tests with diagnostic colonoscopies scheduled at 69 VA facilities between 2009 and 2011 (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 21. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.051).

Having a life expectancy of 6 months or less and no personal history of polyps best predicted missing an appointment, with odds ratios of 2.74 for each factor, the researchers said. However, only 0.47% of patients had such a short life expectancy. Other significant predictors of missed appointments included being seen at the largest and most complex facilities (odds ratio, 2.69; P = .007), having both psychiatric and substance abuse disorders (OR, 1.82; P less than .0001), and the use of opt-out scheduling, in which patients were automatically scheduled rather than having to schedule appointments themselves (OR, 1.57; P = .02). Canceled appointments also were linked to opt-out scheduling, as well as to older age and having no history of polyps.

Most appointment lead times were 28 days, and each 12-day increase in lead time increased the odds of missing or canceling appointments by about 15% (P less than .0001). The problem could be curtailed by the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which allows those who cannot schedule VA appointments within 30 days to receive care from eligible non–VA providers, the investigators said. “Future research should focus on assessing the effect of the Choice Act on colonoscopy appointment lead time and on developing and evaluating efficient and effective approaches to implementing the other clinic-level changes supported by our findings,” they added.

The study might have oversimplified or missed changes in protocols because it used single-item survey measures at one point in time, the investigators said. For some patients, the first appointment after the fecal occult blood test may have been for another procedure besides colonoscopy, they added. Furthermore, they did not distinguish between appointments canceled by patients versus clinics. “The VHA is a unique context, characterized by a predominantly male, low-income population with high rates of mental health and substance abuse diagnoses. Therefore, our findings may not generalize to other settings,” they added. “However, our findings do have important implications for a substantial population of health providers and consumers in this country, because the VHA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States.”

The study was funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Service and Health Services Research & Development Service. The investigators had no disclosures.

Opt-out scheduling protocols and long appointment lead times contributed significantly to missed and canceled colonoscopy appointments at Veterans Health Administration facilities, researchers reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

These factors are within the control of the Veterans Affairs and could be altered to improve productivity and efficiency, said Melissa Partin, Ph.D., of the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System in Minneapolis, and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Missed and canceled medical appointments are always a concern, but particularly so for colonoscopy clinics, where they incur an average daily net loss of $725, the investigators noted. Most clinics have limited colonoscopy capacity, and even a 30-day wait for diagnostic colonoscopy has been linked to “modest but significantly elevated” chances of detecting cancer on exam, they added. To better understand these problems, they separately examined predictors of missed and canceled appointments among 27,994 patients who had positive fecal occult blood tests with diagnostic colonoscopies scheduled at 69 VA facilities between 2009 and 2011 (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 21. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.051).

Having a life expectancy of 6 months or less and no personal history of polyps best predicted missing an appointment, with odds ratios of 2.74 for each factor, the researchers said. However, only 0.47% of patients had such a short life expectancy. Other significant predictors of missed appointments included being seen at the largest and most complex facilities (odds ratio, 2.69; P = .007), having both psychiatric and substance abuse disorders (OR, 1.82; P less than .0001), and the use of opt-out scheduling, in which patients were automatically scheduled rather than having to schedule appointments themselves (OR, 1.57; P = .02). Canceled appointments also were linked to opt-out scheduling, as well as to older age and having no history of polyps.

Most appointment lead times were 28 days, and each 12-day increase in lead time increased the odds of missing or canceling appointments by about 15% (P less than .0001). The problem could be curtailed by the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014, which allows those who cannot schedule VA appointments within 30 days to receive care from eligible non–VA providers, the investigators said. “Future research should focus on assessing the effect of the Choice Act on colonoscopy appointment lead time and on developing and evaluating efficient and effective approaches to implementing the other clinic-level changes supported by our findings,” they added.

The study might have oversimplified or missed changes in protocols because it used single-item survey measures at one point in time, the investigators said. For some patients, the first appointment after the fecal occult blood test may have been for another procedure besides colonoscopy, they added. Furthermore, they did not distinguish between appointments canceled by patients versus clinics. “The VHA is a unique context, characterized by a predominantly male, low-income population with high rates of mental health and substance abuse diagnoses. Therefore, our findings may not generalize to other settings,” they added. “However, our findings do have important implications for a substantial population of health providers and consumers in this country, because the VHA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States.”

The study was funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Science Service and Health Services Research & Development Service. The investigators had no disclosures.

Incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C virus has increased recently in patients undergoing hemodialysis, according to a health advisory from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In 2014 and 2015, 36 cases of HCV infection were reported to the CDC from 19 clinics in eight states. While investigation is ongoing, HCV transmission between patients has been confirmed in at least nine facilities, and in several facilities, lapses in infection control were also identified. Better screening and awareness of HCV infection potential may also play a role in the increased disease incidence.

The CDC recommends that dialysis facilities assess current infection control practices, environmental cleaning, and disinfection practices to evaluate adherence to standards, address any gaps, screen patients for HCV, and to report all HCV infections to the CDC promptly.

“Dialysis facilities should actively assess and continuously improve their infection control, environmental cleaning and disinfection, and HCV screening practices, whether or not they are aware of infections in their clinic. Any case of new HCV infection in a patient undergoing hemodialysis is likely to be a health care–associated infection and should be reported to public health authorities in a timely manner,” the CDC said

Find the full health advisory on the CDC website.

[email protected]

Incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C virus has increased recently in patients undergoing hemodialysis, according to a health advisory from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In 2014 and 2015, 36 cases of HCV infection were reported to the CDC from 19 clinics in eight states. While investigation is ongoing, HCV transmission between patients has been confirmed in at least nine facilities, and in several facilities, lapses in infection control were also identified. Better screening and awareness of HCV infection potential may also play a role in the increased disease incidence.

The CDC recommends that dialysis facilities assess current infection control practices, environmental cleaning, and disinfection practices to evaluate adherence to standards, address any gaps, screen patients for HCV, and to report all HCV infections to the CDC promptly.

“Dialysis facilities should actively assess and continuously improve their infection control, environmental cleaning and disinfection, and HCV screening practices, whether or not they are aware of infections in their clinic. Any case of new HCV infection in a patient undergoing hemodialysis is likely to be a health care–associated infection and should be reported to public health authorities in a timely manner,” the CDC said

Find the full health advisory on the CDC website.

[email protected]

Incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C virus has increased recently in patients undergoing hemodialysis, according to a health advisory from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In 2014 and 2015, 36 cases of HCV infection were reported to the CDC from 19 clinics in eight states. While investigation is ongoing, HCV transmission between patients has been confirmed in at least nine facilities, and in several facilities, lapses in infection control were also identified. Better screening and awareness of HCV infection potential may also play a role in the increased disease incidence.

The CDC recommends that dialysis facilities assess current infection control practices, environmental cleaning, and disinfection practices to evaluate adherence to standards, address any gaps, screen patients for HCV, and to report all HCV infections to the CDC promptly.

“Dialysis facilities should actively assess and continuously improve their infection control, environmental cleaning and disinfection, and HCV screening practices, whether or not they are aware of infections in their clinic. Any case of new HCV infection in a patient undergoing hemodialysis is likely to be a health care–associated infection and should be reported to public health authorities in a timely manner,” the CDC said

Find the full health advisory on the CDC website.

[email protected]

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) almost tripled among United States veterans in a recent 9-year period, investigators reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The trend “was evident in all racial groups, across all age groups, and in both genders,” said Dr. Fasiha Kanwal of the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, both in Houston, and her associates. The increasing prevalence of NAFLD “is likely generalizable to nonveterans,” and will probably persist because of a “fairly steady” 2%-3% overall annual incidence and a steeper rise among younger individuals, they added. “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease will continue to remain a major public health problem in the United States, at least in the near and intermediate future.”

Although NAFLD is the leading cause of chronic liver failure in the United States, few studies have examined its incidence or prevalence over time, which are key to predicting future disease burden. Therefore, the investigators analyzed data for more than 9.78 million patients who visited the VA at least once between 2003 and 2011. They defined NAFLD as at least two elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values (greater than 40 IU/mL) separated by at least 6 months, with no history of positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C virus RNA, and no alcohol-related ICD-9 codes or positive AUDIT-C scores within a year of elevated ALT levels (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.010).

During the study period, more than 1.3 million patients, or 13.6%, met the definition of NAFLD, said the researchers. Age-adjusted incidence rates dropped slightly from 3.16% in 2003 to 2.5% in 2011, ranging between 2.3% and 2.7% in most years. Prevalence, however, rose from 6.3% in 2003 (95% confidence interval, 6.26%-6.3%) to 17.6% in 2011 (95% CI, 17.58%-17.65%), a 2.8-fold increase. Moreover, about one in five patients with NAFLD who visited the VA in 2011 was at risk for advanced fibrosis.

Among individuals who were younger than 45 years, the incidence of NAFLD rose from 2.3 to 4.3 cases per 100 persons (annual percentage change, 7.4%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 9.2%), the researchers also found. “Although recent studies show that the rate of increase in both obesity and diabetes, which are both major risk factors for NAFLD, may be slowing down in the U.S., this may not be the case in the VA, where the prevalence of obesity and diabetes is in fact higher than in the U.S. population,” they said.

In general, the findings mirror a recent analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;41[1]:65-76), according to the investigators. “The VA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States,” they added. “We believe that the sheer size of the veteran cohort, combined with a complete dearth of information regarding the burden of NAFLD in the VA, renders our findings highly significant. Furthermore, the VA is in a unique position to test and implement systemic changes in medical care delivery to improve the health care of NAFLD patients.”

The study was partially supported by the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The researchers had no disclosures.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) almost tripled among United States veterans in a recent 9-year period, investigators reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The trend “was evident in all racial groups, across all age groups, and in both genders,” said Dr. Fasiha Kanwal of the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, both in Houston, and her associates. The increasing prevalence of NAFLD “is likely generalizable to nonveterans,” and will probably persist because of a “fairly steady” 2%-3% overall annual incidence and a steeper rise among younger individuals, they added. “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease will continue to remain a major public health problem in the United States, at least in the near and intermediate future.”

Although NAFLD is the leading cause of chronic liver failure in the United States, few studies have examined its incidence or prevalence over time, which are key to predicting future disease burden. Therefore, the investigators analyzed data for more than 9.78 million patients who visited the VA at least once between 2003 and 2011. They defined NAFLD as at least two elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values (greater than 40 IU/mL) separated by at least 6 months, with no history of positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C virus RNA, and no alcohol-related ICD-9 codes or positive AUDIT-C scores within a year of elevated ALT levels (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.010).

During the study period, more than 1.3 million patients, or 13.6%, met the definition of NAFLD, said the researchers. Age-adjusted incidence rates dropped slightly from 3.16% in 2003 to 2.5% in 2011, ranging between 2.3% and 2.7% in most years. Prevalence, however, rose from 6.3% in 2003 (95% confidence interval, 6.26%-6.3%) to 17.6% in 2011 (95% CI, 17.58%-17.65%), a 2.8-fold increase. Moreover, about one in five patients with NAFLD who visited the VA in 2011 was at risk for advanced fibrosis.

Among individuals who were younger than 45 years, the incidence of NAFLD rose from 2.3 to 4.3 cases per 100 persons (annual percentage change, 7.4%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 9.2%), the researchers also found. “Although recent studies show that the rate of increase in both obesity and diabetes, which are both major risk factors for NAFLD, may be slowing down in the U.S., this may not be the case in the VA, where the prevalence of obesity and diabetes is in fact higher than in the U.S. population,” they said.

In general, the findings mirror a recent analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;41[1]:65-76), according to the investigators. “The VA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States,” they added. “We believe that the sheer size of the veteran cohort, combined with a complete dearth of information regarding the burden of NAFLD in the VA, renders our findings highly significant. Furthermore, the VA is in a unique position to test and implement systemic changes in medical care delivery to improve the health care of NAFLD patients.”

The study was partially supported by the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The researchers had no disclosures.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) almost tripled among United States veterans in a recent 9-year period, investigators reported in the February issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The trend “was evident in all racial groups, across all age groups, and in both genders,” said Dr. Fasiha Kanwal of the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, both in Houston, and her associates. The increasing prevalence of NAFLD “is likely generalizable to nonveterans,” and will probably persist because of a “fairly steady” 2%-3% overall annual incidence and a steeper rise among younger individuals, they added. “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease will continue to remain a major public health problem in the United States, at least in the near and intermediate future.”

Although NAFLD is the leading cause of chronic liver failure in the United States, few studies have examined its incidence or prevalence over time, which are key to predicting future disease burden. Therefore, the investigators analyzed data for more than 9.78 million patients who visited the VA at least once between 2003 and 2011. They defined NAFLD as at least two elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values (greater than 40 IU/mL) separated by at least 6 months, with no history of positive serology for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C virus RNA, and no alcohol-related ICD-9 codes or positive AUDIT-C scores within a year of elevated ALT levels (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug 7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.010).

During the study period, more than 1.3 million patients, or 13.6%, met the definition of NAFLD, said the researchers. Age-adjusted incidence rates dropped slightly from 3.16% in 2003 to 2.5% in 2011, ranging between 2.3% and 2.7% in most years. Prevalence, however, rose from 6.3% in 2003 (95% confidence interval, 6.26%-6.3%) to 17.6% in 2011 (95% CI, 17.58%-17.65%), a 2.8-fold increase. Moreover, about one in five patients with NAFLD who visited the VA in 2011 was at risk for advanced fibrosis.

Among individuals who were younger than 45 years, the incidence of NAFLD rose from 2.3 to 4.3 cases per 100 persons (annual percentage change, 7.4%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 9.2%), the researchers also found. “Although recent studies show that the rate of increase in both obesity and diabetes, which are both major risk factors for NAFLD, may be slowing down in the U.S., this may not be the case in the VA, where the prevalence of obesity and diabetes is in fact higher than in the U.S. population,” they said.

In general, the findings mirror a recent analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jan;41[1]:65-76), according to the investigators. “The VA is the largest integrated health care system in the United States,” they added. “We believe that the sheer size of the veteran cohort, combined with a complete dearth of information regarding the burden of NAFLD in the VA, renders our findings highly significant. Furthermore, the VA is in a unique position to test and implement systemic changes in medical care delivery to improve the health care of NAFLD patients.”

The study was partially supported by the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The researchers had no disclosures.