User login
AGA Clinical Practice Update: PPIs should be prescribed sparingly, carefully
Updated best practice statements regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors first detail what types of patients should be using short and long-term PPIs.
“When PPIs are appropriately prescribed, their benefits are likely to outweigh their risks [but] when PPIs are inappropriately prescribed, modest risks become important because there is no potential benefit,” wrote the authors of the updated guidance, published in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
“There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend specific strategies for mitigating PPI adverse effects,” noted Daniel E. Freedberg, MD, of Columbia University, New York, and his colleagues.
PPIs should be used on a short-term basis for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or conditions such as erosive esophagitis. These patients can also use PPIs for maintenance and occasional symptom management, but those with uncomplicated GERD should be weaned off PPIs if they respond favorably to them.
If a patient is unable to be weaned off PPIs, then ambulatory esophageal pH and impedance monitoring should be done, as this will allow clinicians to determine if the patient has a functional syndrome or GERD. Lifelong PPI treatment should not be considered until this step is taken, according to the new best practice statements.
“Short-term PPIs are highly effective for uncomplicated GERD [but] because patients who cannot reduce PPIs face lifelong therapy, we would consider testing for an acid-related disorder in this situation,” the authors explained. “However, there is no high-quality evidence on which to base this recommendation.”
Patients who have symptomatic GERD or Barrett’s esophagus, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, should be on long-term PPI treatment. Patients who are at a higher risk for NSAID-induced ulcer bleeding should be taking PPIs if they continue to take NSAIDs.
When recommending long-term PPI treatment for a patient, the patient need not use probiotics on a regular basis; there appears to be no need to routinely check the patient’s bone mineral density, serum creatinine, magnesium, or vitamin B12 level on a regular basis. In addition, they need not consume more than the Recommended Dietary Allowance of calcium, magnesium, or vitamin B12.
Finally, the authors state that “specific PPI formulations should not be selected based on potential risks.” This is because no evidence has been found indicating that PPI formulations can be ranked in any way based on risk.
These recommendations come from the AGA’s Clinical Practice Updates Committee, which pored through studies published through July 2016 in the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane library databases. Expert opinions and quality assessments on each study contributed to forming these best practice statements.
“In sum, the best current strategies for mitigating the potential risks of long-term PPIs are to avoid prescribing them when they are not indicated and to reduce them to their minimum dose when they are indicated,” Dr. Freedberg and his colleagues concluded.
The researchers did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
Updated best practice statements regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors first detail what types of patients should be using short and long-term PPIs.
“When PPIs are appropriately prescribed, their benefits are likely to outweigh their risks [but] when PPIs are inappropriately prescribed, modest risks become important because there is no potential benefit,” wrote the authors of the updated guidance, published in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
“There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend specific strategies for mitigating PPI adverse effects,” noted Daniel E. Freedberg, MD, of Columbia University, New York, and his colleagues.
PPIs should be used on a short-term basis for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or conditions such as erosive esophagitis. These patients can also use PPIs for maintenance and occasional symptom management, but those with uncomplicated GERD should be weaned off PPIs if they respond favorably to them.
If a patient is unable to be weaned off PPIs, then ambulatory esophageal pH and impedance monitoring should be done, as this will allow clinicians to determine if the patient has a functional syndrome or GERD. Lifelong PPI treatment should not be considered until this step is taken, according to the new best practice statements.
“Short-term PPIs are highly effective for uncomplicated GERD [but] because patients who cannot reduce PPIs face lifelong therapy, we would consider testing for an acid-related disorder in this situation,” the authors explained. “However, there is no high-quality evidence on which to base this recommendation.”
Patients who have symptomatic GERD or Barrett’s esophagus, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, should be on long-term PPI treatment. Patients who are at a higher risk for NSAID-induced ulcer bleeding should be taking PPIs if they continue to take NSAIDs.
When recommending long-term PPI treatment for a patient, the patient need not use probiotics on a regular basis; there appears to be no need to routinely check the patient’s bone mineral density, serum creatinine, magnesium, or vitamin B12 level on a regular basis. In addition, they need not consume more than the Recommended Dietary Allowance of calcium, magnesium, or vitamin B12.
Finally, the authors state that “specific PPI formulations should not be selected based on potential risks.” This is because no evidence has been found indicating that PPI formulations can be ranked in any way based on risk.
These recommendations come from the AGA’s Clinical Practice Updates Committee, which pored through studies published through July 2016 in the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane library databases. Expert opinions and quality assessments on each study contributed to forming these best practice statements.
“In sum, the best current strategies for mitigating the potential risks of long-term PPIs are to avoid prescribing them when they are not indicated and to reduce them to their minimum dose when they are indicated,” Dr. Freedberg and his colleagues concluded.
The researchers did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
Updated best practice statements regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors first detail what types of patients should be using short and long-term PPIs.
“When PPIs are appropriately prescribed, their benefits are likely to outweigh their risks [but] when PPIs are inappropriately prescribed, modest risks become important because there is no potential benefit,” wrote the authors of the updated guidance, published in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
“There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend specific strategies for mitigating PPI adverse effects,” noted Daniel E. Freedberg, MD, of Columbia University, New York, and his colleagues.
PPIs should be used on a short-term basis for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or conditions such as erosive esophagitis. These patients can also use PPIs for maintenance and occasional symptom management, but those with uncomplicated GERD should be weaned off PPIs if they respond favorably to them.
If a patient is unable to be weaned off PPIs, then ambulatory esophageal pH and impedance monitoring should be done, as this will allow clinicians to determine if the patient has a functional syndrome or GERD. Lifelong PPI treatment should not be considered until this step is taken, according to the new best practice statements.
“Short-term PPIs are highly effective for uncomplicated GERD [but] because patients who cannot reduce PPIs face lifelong therapy, we would consider testing for an acid-related disorder in this situation,” the authors explained. “However, there is no high-quality evidence on which to base this recommendation.”
Patients who have symptomatic GERD or Barrett’s esophagus, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, should be on long-term PPI treatment. Patients who are at a higher risk for NSAID-induced ulcer bleeding should be taking PPIs if they continue to take NSAIDs.
When recommending long-term PPI treatment for a patient, the patient need not use probiotics on a regular basis; there appears to be no need to routinely check the patient’s bone mineral density, serum creatinine, magnesium, or vitamin B12 level on a regular basis. In addition, they need not consume more than the Recommended Dietary Allowance of calcium, magnesium, or vitamin B12.
Finally, the authors state that “specific PPI formulations should not be selected based on potential risks.” This is because no evidence has been found indicating that PPI formulations can be ranked in any way based on risk.
These recommendations come from the AGA’s Clinical Practice Updates Committee, which pored through studies published through July 2016 in the PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane library databases. Expert opinions and quality assessments on each study contributed to forming these best practice statements.
“In sum, the best current strategies for mitigating the potential risks of long-term PPIs are to avoid prescribing them when they are not indicated and to reduce them to their minimum dose when they are indicated,” Dr. Freedberg and his colleagues concluded.
The researchers did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Unique, multi-omic profile found in children with autism and functional GI disorders
The gut microbiomes of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) had significantly higher levels of several Clostridium species and lower concentrations of other bacteria compared with neurotypical children with and without FGIDs, which correlated with increases in inflammatory cytokines, decreased tryptophan, and increased serotonin, according to a small, single-center, cross-sectional study.
This “unique multi-omic profile [was] specific to ASD-FGID and ASD-FGID with abdominal pain,” wrote Ruth Ann Luna, PhD, of Texas Children’s Microbiome Center at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, and her associates. The report was published online in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.11.008).
Children with ASD are at increased risk for FGIDs such as functional constipation, nonretentive fecal incontinence, functional abdominal pain, abdominal migraines, and irritable bowel syndrome, compared with their neurotypical peers. Changes in the gut microbiome can affect immunologic pathways and the balance between tryptophan and serotonin. This altered “microbial-gut-brain axis” has been reported in both ASD and FGID, suggesting “that altered gut-brain communications not only may play a role in the increased occurrence of FGIDs in ASD individuals, but could advance our understanding of potential risk factors for FGID in the ASD community,” the researchers wrote.
Previous studies of stool specimens have found higher levels of several species of Clostridium in pediatric ASD compared with neurotypical children. To confirm and expand on that work, the investigators examined microbial and neuroimmune markers in rectal biopsies and blood specimens from 14 children with ASD-FGID, 15 neurotypical children with FGID, and 6 asymptomatic neurotypical children. Participants were recruited from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. The researchers quantified microbial 16S ribosomal DNA community signatures, cytokines, chemokines, and serotonergic metabolites, and correlated results with parental responses to the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms–Rome III version.
The ASD-FGID group had significantly higher numbers for ribosomal DNA sequences for Clostridium lituseburense (P = .002), Lachnoclostridium bolteae (P = .02), Lachnoclostridium hathewayi (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .04), and Oscillospira plautii (P = .04), compared with neurotypical children with and without FGID. Children with ASD-FGID also had significantly lower levels of Dorea formicigenerans (P = .006), Blautia luti (P = .02), and Sutterella species (P = .03). “Overall, our identification of clostridial species aligns with previous autism studies that have identified microbiome alterations,” the researchers noted.
They also looked specifically at abdominal pain. Children with ASD-FGID and abdominal pain had significantly higher gut mucosal levels of Turicibacter sanguinis (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .004), Clostridium lituseburense (P = .003), Oscillospira plautii (P = .01), Clostridium disporicum (P = .049), and Clostridium tertium (P = .045) than did any other subgroup, the investigators found. Patients with both ASD-FGID and abdominal pain also had significantly higher levels of C. aldenense (P = .03), O. plautii (P = .04), Tyzzerella species (P = .045), and Parasutterella excrementihominis (P = .04) than did ASD-FGID patients without abdominal pain.
Both C. disporicum and C. tertium correlated with increases in the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and interferon-gamma. Levels of these cytokines were highest in patients with ASD-FGID, and IL6 was highest of all among children with ASD-FGID with abdominal pain. Another proinflammatory cytokine, IL17A, also correlated with Clostridia species that were enriched in children with ASD-FGID. Both IL6 and IL17A have been implicated in autism-like phenotypes in rodents, the researchers noted. Several other cytokines also were linked to ASD-FGID, and abdominal pain correlated significantly with increases in MCP-1 (P = .03) and eotaxin (P = .03).
Gut mucosal levels of tryptophan were significantly lower among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children, either with (P = .006) or without (P = .009) FGID. In contrast, gut mucosal levels of 5-HIAA, the primary metabolite of serotonin, were significantly higher among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children (P = .01). Increased 5-HIAA also correlated significantly with abdominal pain (P = .04). Six species of bacteria correlated significantly with tryptophan or serotonin, implicating the gut microbiome in the serotonin pathway.
“Although these initial findings are correlative, these data form the framework for future studies targeting tryptophan-serotonin metabolism and inflammatory pathways in FGID in ASD,” the researchers concluded.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the work. The investigators had no relevant disclosures.
Autism-spectrum disorder is a serious and increasingly prevalent developmental behavior disorder often accompanied and aggravated by a range of gastrointestinal and cognitive dysfunctions. Its etiology probably involves maternal diet and inflammatory events that alter central nervous system neurodevelopment critical to the cognition of social interaction. Candidate causal products of these events include the cytokines IL-6 and IL-17A, and certain bioactive amines, notably serotonin. Functional gastrointestinal disorders share these same molecules as biomarkers and disease modifiers, probably elicited in part by the intestinal microbiome. Hence, the comorbidity in ASD suggests these two disease processes are etiologically related.
The study by Luna and colleagues tightens the case for a microbial hub and serotonin and cytokine spokes in the gastrointestinal dysfunction of ASD: elevated mucosal tissue levels of select microbial taxa, mainly members of the genus Clostridium, and mucosal production of cytokines and serotonin-pathway bioamines associated with these and other select microbial species. Important and challenging questions loom ahead. What are the direct mucosal cell types and functions targeted of this network for the microbiota, and via what microbial products? Might they elicit epithelial or mucosal hematopoietic cell cytokine production that in turn causes mucosal bioamine secretion? And, what associated microbiota and products are just secondarily altered and not causally involved? The exciting study of Luna and colleagues raises confidence for this path ahead, and its promise for clarifying ASD pathogenesis and uncovering targetable elements for intervention.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
Autism-spectrum disorder is a serious and increasingly prevalent developmental behavior disorder often accompanied and aggravated by a range of gastrointestinal and cognitive dysfunctions. Its etiology probably involves maternal diet and inflammatory events that alter central nervous system neurodevelopment critical to the cognition of social interaction. Candidate causal products of these events include the cytokines IL-6 and IL-17A, and certain bioactive amines, notably serotonin. Functional gastrointestinal disorders share these same molecules as biomarkers and disease modifiers, probably elicited in part by the intestinal microbiome. Hence, the comorbidity in ASD suggests these two disease processes are etiologically related.
The study by Luna and colleagues tightens the case for a microbial hub and serotonin and cytokine spokes in the gastrointestinal dysfunction of ASD: elevated mucosal tissue levels of select microbial taxa, mainly members of the genus Clostridium, and mucosal production of cytokines and serotonin-pathway bioamines associated with these and other select microbial species. Important and challenging questions loom ahead. What are the direct mucosal cell types and functions targeted of this network for the microbiota, and via what microbial products? Might they elicit epithelial or mucosal hematopoietic cell cytokine production that in turn causes mucosal bioamine secretion? And, what associated microbiota and products are just secondarily altered and not causally involved? The exciting study of Luna and colleagues raises confidence for this path ahead, and its promise for clarifying ASD pathogenesis and uncovering targetable elements for intervention.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
Autism-spectrum disorder is a serious and increasingly prevalent developmental behavior disorder often accompanied and aggravated by a range of gastrointestinal and cognitive dysfunctions. Its etiology probably involves maternal diet and inflammatory events that alter central nervous system neurodevelopment critical to the cognition of social interaction. Candidate causal products of these events include the cytokines IL-6 and IL-17A, and certain bioactive amines, notably serotonin. Functional gastrointestinal disorders share these same molecules as biomarkers and disease modifiers, probably elicited in part by the intestinal microbiome. Hence, the comorbidity in ASD suggests these two disease processes are etiologically related.
The study by Luna and colleagues tightens the case for a microbial hub and serotonin and cytokine spokes in the gastrointestinal dysfunction of ASD: elevated mucosal tissue levels of select microbial taxa, mainly members of the genus Clostridium, and mucosal production of cytokines and serotonin-pathway bioamines associated with these and other select microbial species. Important and challenging questions loom ahead. What are the direct mucosal cell types and functions targeted of this network for the microbiota, and via what microbial products? Might they elicit epithelial or mucosal hematopoietic cell cytokine production that in turn causes mucosal bioamine secretion? And, what associated microbiota and products are just secondarily altered and not causally involved? The exciting study of Luna and colleagues raises confidence for this path ahead, and its promise for clarifying ASD pathogenesis and uncovering targetable elements for intervention.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
The gut microbiomes of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) had significantly higher levels of several Clostridium species and lower concentrations of other bacteria compared with neurotypical children with and without FGIDs, which correlated with increases in inflammatory cytokines, decreased tryptophan, and increased serotonin, according to a small, single-center, cross-sectional study.
This “unique multi-omic profile [was] specific to ASD-FGID and ASD-FGID with abdominal pain,” wrote Ruth Ann Luna, PhD, of Texas Children’s Microbiome Center at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, and her associates. The report was published online in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.11.008).
Children with ASD are at increased risk for FGIDs such as functional constipation, nonretentive fecal incontinence, functional abdominal pain, abdominal migraines, and irritable bowel syndrome, compared with their neurotypical peers. Changes in the gut microbiome can affect immunologic pathways and the balance between tryptophan and serotonin. This altered “microbial-gut-brain axis” has been reported in both ASD and FGID, suggesting “that altered gut-brain communications not only may play a role in the increased occurrence of FGIDs in ASD individuals, but could advance our understanding of potential risk factors for FGID in the ASD community,” the researchers wrote.
Previous studies of stool specimens have found higher levels of several species of Clostridium in pediatric ASD compared with neurotypical children. To confirm and expand on that work, the investigators examined microbial and neuroimmune markers in rectal biopsies and blood specimens from 14 children with ASD-FGID, 15 neurotypical children with FGID, and 6 asymptomatic neurotypical children. Participants were recruited from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. The researchers quantified microbial 16S ribosomal DNA community signatures, cytokines, chemokines, and serotonergic metabolites, and correlated results with parental responses to the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms–Rome III version.
The ASD-FGID group had significantly higher numbers for ribosomal DNA sequences for Clostridium lituseburense (P = .002), Lachnoclostridium bolteae (P = .02), Lachnoclostridium hathewayi (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .04), and Oscillospira plautii (P = .04), compared with neurotypical children with and without FGID. Children with ASD-FGID also had significantly lower levels of Dorea formicigenerans (P = .006), Blautia luti (P = .02), and Sutterella species (P = .03). “Overall, our identification of clostridial species aligns with previous autism studies that have identified microbiome alterations,” the researchers noted.
They also looked specifically at abdominal pain. Children with ASD-FGID and abdominal pain had significantly higher gut mucosal levels of Turicibacter sanguinis (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .004), Clostridium lituseburense (P = .003), Oscillospira plautii (P = .01), Clostridium disporicum (P = .049), and Clostridium tertium (P = .045) than did any other subgroup, the investigators found. Patients with both ASD-FGID and abdominal pain also had significantly higher levels of C. aldenense (P = .03), O. plautii (P = .04), Tyzzerella species (P = .045), and Parasutterella excrementihominis (P = .04) than did ASD-FGID patients without abdominal pain.
Both C. disporicum and C. tertium correlated with increases in the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and interferon-gamma. Levels of these cytokines were highest in patients with ASD-FGID, and IL6 was highest of all among children with ASD-FGID with abdominal pain. Another proinflammatory cytokine, IL17A, also correlated with Clostridia species that were enriched in children with ASD-FGID. Both IL6 and IL17A have been implicated in autism-like phenotypes in rodents, the researchers noted. Several other cytokines also were linked to ASD-FGID, and abdominal pain correlated significantly with increases in MCP-1 (P = .03) and eotaxin (P = .03).
Gut mucosal levels of tryptophan were significantly lower among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children, either with (P = .006) or without (P = .009) FGID. In contrast, gut mucosal levels of 5-HIAA, the primary metabolite of serotonin, were significantly higher among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children (P = .01). Increased 5-HIAA also correlated significantly with abdominal pain (P = .04). Six species of bacteria correlated significantly with tryptophan or serotonin, implicating the gut microbiome in the serotonin pathway.
“Although these initial findings are correlative, these data form the framework for future studies targeting tryptophan-serotonin metabolism and inflammatory pathways in FGID in ASD,” the researchers concluded.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the work. The investigators had no relevant disclosures.
The gut microbiomes of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) had significantly higher levels of several Clostridium species and lower concentrations of other bacteria compared with neurotypical children with and without FGIDs, which correlated with increases in inflammatory cytokines, decreased tryptophan, and increased serotonin, according to a small, single-center, cross-sectional study.
This “unique multi-omic profile [was] specific to ASD-FGID and ASD-FGID with abdominal pain,” wrote Ruth Ann Luna, PhD, of Texas Children’s Microbiome Center at Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, and her associates. The report was published online in Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.11.008).
Children with ASD are at increased risk for FGIDs such as functional constipation, nonretentive fecal incontinence, functional abdominal pain, abdominal migraines, and irritable bowel syndrome, compared with their neurotypical peers. Changes in the gut microbiome can affect immunologic pathways and the balance between tryptophan and serotonin. This altered “microbial-gut-brain axis” has been reported in both ASD and FGID, suggesting “that altered gut-brain communications not only may play a role in the increased occurrence of FGIDs in ASD individuals, but could advance our understanding of potential risk factors for FGID in the ASD community,” the researchers wrote.
Previous studies of stool specimens have found higher levels of several species of Clostridium in pediatric ASD compared with neurotypical children. To confirm and expand on that work, the investigators examined microbial and neuroimmune markers in rectal biopsies and blood specimens from 14 children with ASD-FGID, 15 neurotypical children with FGID, and 6 asymptomatic neurotypical children. Participants were recruited from Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. The researchers quantified microbial 16S ribosomal DNA community signatures, cytokines, chemokines, and serotonergic metabolites, and correlated results with parental responses to the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms–Rome III version.
The ASD-FGID group had significantly higher numbers for ribosomal DNA sequences for Clostridium lituseburense (P = .002), Lachnoclostridium bolteae (P = .02), Lachnoclostridium hathewayi (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .04), and Oscillospira plautii (P = .04), compared with neurotypical children with and without FGID. Children with ASD-FGID also had significantly lower levels of Dorea formicigenerans (P = .006), Blautia luti (P = .02), and Sutterella species (P = .03). “Overall, our identification of clostridial species aligns with previous autism studies that have identified microbiome alterations,” the researchers noted.
They also looked specifically at abdominal pain. Children with ASD-FGID and abdominal pain had significantly higher gut mucosal levels of Turicibacter sanguinis (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .004), Clostridium lituseburense (P = .003), Oscillospira plautii (P = .01), Clostridium disporicum (P = .049), and Clostridium tertium (P = .045) than did any other subgroup, the investigators found. Patients with both ASD-FGID and abdominal pain also had significantly higher levels of C. aldenense (P = .03), O. plautii (P = .04), Tyzzerella species (P = .045), and Parasutterella excrementihominis (P = .04) than did ASD-FGID patients without abdominal pain.
Both C. disporicum and C. tertium correlated with increases in the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and interferon-gamma. Levels of these cytokines were highest in patients with ASD-FGID, and IL6 was highest of all among children with ASD-FGID with abdominal pain. Another proinflammatory cytokine, IL17A, also correlated with Clostridia species that were enriched in children with ASD-FGID. Both IL6 and IL17A have been implicated in autism-like phenotypes in rodents, the researchers noted. Several other cytokines also were linked to ASD-FGID, and abdominal pain correlated significantly with increases in MCP-1 (P = .03) and eotaxin (P = .03).
Gut mucosal levels of tryptophan were significantly lower among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children, either with (P = .006) or without (P = .009) FGID. In contrast, gut mucosal levels of 5-HIAA, the primary metabolite of serotonin, were significantly higher among children with ASD-FGID compared with neurotypical children (P = .01). Increased 5-HIAA also correlated significantly with abdominal pain (P = .04). Six species of bacteria correlated significantly with tryptophan or serotonin, implicating the gut microbiome in the serotonin pathway.
“Although these initial findings are correlative, these data form the framework for future studies targeting tryptophan-serotonin metabolism and inflammatory pathways in FGID in ASD,” the researchers concluded.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the work. The investigators had no relevant disclosures.
FROM CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point: The mucosal microbiome of children with comorbid autism spectrum disorder and functional gastrointestinal disorders significantly differed from that of neurotypical children with and without FGIDs, and these differences correlated with altered levels of inflammatory cytokines, tryptophan, and serotonin.
Major finding: Children with ASD-FGID had significant increases in Clostridium lituseburense (P = .002), Lachnoclostridium bolteae (P = .02), Lachnoclostridium hathewayi (P = .03), Clostridium aldenense (P = .04), and Oscillospira plautii (P = .04), and significant decreases in Dorea formicigenerans (P = .006), Blautia luti (P = .020), and Sutterella species (P = .025). The ASD-FGID phenotype was characterized by significantly lower gut levels of tryptophan, with higher levels of the serotonin metabolite 5-HIAA, and with several proinflammatory cytokines. Several bacterial species correlated with tryptophan, serotonin, or proinflammatory cytokines.
Data source: A single-center cross-sectional study of 14 children with ASD-FGID and 21 neurotypical children, of whom 15 had FGIDs.
Disclosures: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the work. The investigators had no relevant disclosures.
VIDEO: Infectious enteritis quadrupled short-term risk of IBS
More than 10% of patients developed irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) within a year after infectious enteritis, which gave them a more than fourfold greater risk than that of controls, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 studies.
“Protozoal and bacterial enteritis confer the greatest overall risk, although the magnitude of increased risk diminishes with time since exposure,” Fabiane B. Klem, MD, and Akhilesh Wadhwa, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and their associates wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology. Other significant risk factors for postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) included female sex, clinically severe infections, antibiotic therapy, and comorbid psychological distress, they said.
Postinfectious IBS can last at least a decade after resolution of campylobacteriosis, shigellosis, salmonellosis, giardiasis, and norovirus infections, even when patients have no other risk factors for IBS, the researchers noted. To update and expand the most recent meta-analysis of this topic (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:535-44), the investigators searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2006 through Aug. 31, 2015. This search yielded 45 studies, including 30 studies comparing infected patients with controls, who were usually matched by age, sex, and geographic location (Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.039).
In all, 10.1% of patients with infectious enteritis developed IBS in the next 12 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-14.1) – a 4.2-fold increase in risk, compared with that of controls (risk ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7). This risk subsequently dropped, but remained significantly elevated (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0), compared with controls. “Of patients with enteritis caused by protozoa or parasites, 41.9% developed IBS; of patients with enteritis caused by bacterial infection, 13.8% developed IBS,” the researchers emphasized. Patients with these infections remained at elevated risk of PI-IBS even after 1 year. Viral enteritis also significantly increased the risk of PI-IBS, but risk dropped to baseline levels after a year.
Among 10 pooled studies of IBS subtypes, 46% of patients had mixed IBS, 39% had diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 15% had constipation-predominant IBS. Female sex doubled the odds of PI-IBS (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.1) in 11 pooled studies. Significant clinical risk factors for PI-IBS included diarrhea lasting more than 7 days (eight studies; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6), bloody stool (four studies; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0), and antibiotic therapy during infectious enteritis (seven studies; OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4).
Multiple reports linked PI-IBS to clinical psychological distress at the time of infectious enteritis. Specific risk factors included depression based on the Hospitalization Anxiety and Depression Scale (five studies; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9), anxiety based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (four studies; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), somatization (four studies; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.7-6.0), and neuroticism (two studies; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.6). Isolated studies also implicated hypochondriasis, extroversion, negative illness beliefs, stress, sleep disturbance, and adverse life events in the preceding year, the researchers said.
They found no evidence of publication bias, but noted a substantial amount of heterogeneity among studies. Also, some studies did not report multivariate analyses, so individual odds ratios might reflect “a conglomeration of factors,” they said.
The National Institutes of Health and the American Gastroenterological Association funded the work. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
Source: American Gastroenterological Association
The phenomenon of IBS developing after a bout of gastroenteritis (postinfectious [PI]–IBS) was first reported in 1950 and subsequently elaborated by studies from Oxford (Q J Med. 1962;123:307-22), Sheffield (Gut. 1999;44:400-6), and Nottingham (BMJ 1997;314:779-82; Gut. 2000;47:804-11). It has proven to be a fertile area for research, which is the basis for this excellent meta-analysis.
The authors identified 45 studies, 29 in the last decade including a total of 21,421 participants with exposure to gastroenteritis. The pooled prevalence for PI-IBS was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-15.8%) but with considerable heterogeneity, which the authors attempted to explain by a number of subgroup analyses. The authors report that protozoal infection seems to have a higher rate of PI-IBS than bacterial or viral infection, though some caution is warranted, since these figures rely on reports from just one outbreak of giardiasis in Bergen, Norway (Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:956-61). However, if true, this might suggest that a different immune response could be responsible, a feature which others have suggested might predispose particular individuals to PI-IBS (Gut. 2016;65[8]1279-88).
The meta-analysis confirms the consistent increased risk in female patients (odds ratio, 1.69), anxiety (OR, 1.97), and somatization (greatest RR, 4.05), all common risks for the development of IBS but not specific to PI-IBS. Initial disease severity indicators, including bloody stool and more than 7 days of initial illness, which might indicate the severity of underlying damage to the gut, were shown to be significant risk factors. Animal studies of acute infection, particularly parasitic infestation, indicate that significant changes can be seen in both nerve and muscle, but routine histology in PI-IBS patients is normal. Infection produces a striking increase in gut permeability (Gut 2000;47:804-11), a feature of IBS whose molecular basis has been demonstrated by a series of elegant studies (Gut. 2017 Jan 12 [Epub ahead of print]; Gut. 2015;64:1379-88) demonstrating altered tight junctions and immune activation in IBS with diarrhea. The authors found treatment with antibiotics increased the risk of PI-IBS but whether this is attributable to confounding by indication is unclear.
This meta-analysis indicates that PI-IBS also potentially is the most common cause of IBS, given that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States and community surveys in the United Kingdom (BMJ. 1999;318:1046-50) indicate that gastroenteritis affects around 1 in 5 of the population each year. If the incidence of PI-IBS is around 10%, modeling suggests PI-IBS could account for the majority of new cases (J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:200-4).
Dr. Robin Spiller is professor of gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, England. He has no relevant conflicts of interest.
The phenomenon of IBS developing after a bout of gastroenteritis (postinfectious [PI]–IBS) was first reported in 1950 and subsequently elaborated by studies from Oxford (Q J Med. 1962;123:307-22), Sheffield (Gut. 1999;44:400-6), and Nottingham (BMJ 1997;314:779-82; Gut. 2000;47:804-11). It has proven to be a fertile area for research, which is the basis for this excellent meta-analysis.
The authors identified 45 studies, 29 in the last decade including a total of 21,421 participants with exposure to gastroenteritis. The pooled prevalence for PI-IBS was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-15.8%) but with considerable heterogeneity, which the authors attempted to explain by a number of subgroup analyses. The authors report that protozoal infection seems to have a higher rate of PI-IBS than bacterial or viral infection, though some caution is warranted, since these figures rely on reports from just one outbreak of giardiasis in Bergen, Norway (Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:956-61). However, if true, this might suggest that a different immune response could be responsible, a feature which others have suggested might predispose particular individuals to PI-IBS (Gut. 2016;65[8]1279-88).
The meta-analysis confirms the consistent increased risk in female patients (odds ratio, 1.69), anxiety (OR, 1.97), and somatization (greatest RR, 4.05), all common risks for the development of IBS but not specific to PI-IBS. Initial disease severity indicators, including bloody stool and more than 7 days of initial illness, which might indicate the severity of underlying damage to the gut, were shown to be significant risk factors. Animal studies of acute infection, particularly parasitic infestation, indicate that significant changes can be seen in both nerve and muscle, but routine histology in PI-IBS patients is normal. Infection produces a striking increase in gut permeability (Gut 2000;47:804-11), a feature of IBS whose molecular basis has been demonstrated by a series of elegant studies (Gut. 2017 Jan 12 [Epub ahead of print]; Gut. 2015;64:1379-88) demonstrating altered tight junctions and immune activation in IBS with diarrhea. The authors found treatment with antibiotics increased the risk of PI-IBS but whether this is attributable to confounding by indication is unclear.
This meta-analysis indicates that PI-IBS also potentially is the most common cause of IBS, given that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States and community surveys in the United Kingdom (BMJ. 1999;318:1046-50) indicate that gastroenteritis affects around 1 in 5 of the population each year. If the incidence of PI-IBS is around 10%, modeling suggests PI-IBS could account for the majority of new cases (J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:200-4).
Dr. Robin Spiller is professor of gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, England. He has no relevant conflicts of interest.
The phenomenon of IBS developing after a bout of gastroenteritis (postinfectious [PI]–IBS) was first reported in 1950 and subsequently elaborated by studies from Oxford (Q J Med. 1962;123:307-22), Sheffield (Gut. 1999;44:400-6), and Nottingham (BMJ 1997;314:779-82; Gut. 2000;47:804-11). It has proven to be a fertile area for research, which is the basis for this excellent meta-analysis.
The authors identified 45 studies, 29 in the last decade including a total of 21,421 participants with exposure to gastroenteritis. The pooled prevalence for PI-IBS was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2%-15.8%) but with considerable heterogeneity, which the authors attempted to explain by a number of subgroup analyses. The authors report that protozoal infection seems to have a higher rate of PI-IBS than bacterial or viral infection, though some caution is warranted, since these figures rely on reports from just one outbreak of giardiasis in Bergen, Norway (Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:956-61). However, if true, this might suggest that a different immune response could be responsible, a feature which others have suggested might predispose particular individuals to PI-IBS (Gut. 2016;65[8]1279-88).
The meta-analysis confirms the consistent increased risk in female patients (odds ratio, 1.69), anxiety (OR, 1.97), and somatization (greatest RR, 4.05), all common risks for the development of IBS but not specific to PI-IBS. Initial disease severity indicators, including bloody stool and more than 7 days of initial illness, which might indicate the severity of underlying damage to the gut, were shown to be significant risk factors. Animal studies of acute infection, particularly parasitic infestation, indicate that significant changes can be seen in both nerve and muscle, but routine histology in PI-IBS patients is normal. Infection produces a striking increase in gut permeability (Gut 2000;47:804-11), a feature of IBS whose molecular basis has been demonstrated by a series of elegant studies (Gut. 2017 Jan 12 [Epub ahead of print]; Gut. 2015;64:1379-88) demonstrating altered tight junctions and immune activation in IBS with diarrhea. The authors found treatment with antibiotics increased the risk of PI-IBS but whether this is attributable to confounding by indication is unclear.
This meta-analysis indicates that PI-IBS also potentially is the most common cause of IBS, given that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States and community surveys in the United Kingdom (BMJ. 1999;318:1046-50) indicate that gastroenteritis affects around 1 in 5 of the population each year. If the incidence of PI-IBS is around 10%, modeling suggests PI-IBS could account for the majority of new cases (J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:200-4).
Dr. Robin Spiller is professor of gastroenterology, NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, England. He has no relevant conflicts of interest.
More than 10% of patients developed irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) within a year after infectious enteritis, which gave them a more than fourfold greater risk than that of controls, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 studies.
“Protozoal and bacterial enteritis confer the greatest overall risk, although the magnitude of increased risk diminishes with time since exposure,” Fabiane B. Klem, MD, and Akhilesh Wadhwa, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and their associates wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology. Other significant risk factors for postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) included female sex, clinically severe infections, antibiotic therapy, and comorbid psychological distress, they said.
Postinfectious IBS can last at least a decade after resolution of campylobacteriosis, shigellosis, salmonellosis, giardiasis, and norovirus infections, even when patients have no other risk factors for IBS, the researchers noted. To update and expand the most recent meta-analysis of this topic (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:535-44), the investigators searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2006 through Aug. 31, 2015. This search yielded 45 studies, including 30 studies comparing infected patients with controls, who were usually matched by age, sex, and geographic location (Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.039).
In all, 10.1% of patients with infectious enteritis developed IBS in the next 12 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-14.1) – a 4.2-fold increase in risk, compared with that of controls (risk ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7). This risk subsequently dropped, but remained significantly elevated (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0), compared with controls. “Of patients with enteritis caused by protozoa or parasites, 41.9% developed IBS; of patients with enteritis caused by bacterial infection, 13.8% developed IBS,” the researchers emphasized. Patients with these infections remained at elevated risk of PI-IBS even after 1 year. Viral enteritis also significantly increased the risk of PI-IBS, but risk dropped to baseline levels after a year.
Among 10 pooled studies of IBS subtypes, 46% of patients had mixed IBS, 39% had diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 15% had constipation-predominant IBS. Female sex doubled the odds of PI-IBS (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.1) in 11 pooled studies. Significant clinical risk factors for PI-IBS included diarrhea lasting more than 7 days (eight studies; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6), bloody stool (four studies; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0), and antibiotic therapy during infectious enteritis (seven studies; OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4).
Multiple reports linked PI-IBS to clinical psychological distress at the time of infectious enteritis. Specific risk factors included depression based on the Hospitalization Anxiety and Depression Scale (five studies; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9), anxiety based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (four studies; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), somatization (four studies; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.7-6.0), and neuroticism (two studies; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.6). Isolated studies also implicated hypochondriasis, extroversion, negative illness beliefs, stress, sleep disturbance, and adverse life events in the preceding year, the researchers said.
They found no evidence of publication bias, but noted a substantial amount of heterogeneity among studies. Also, some studies did not report multivariate analyses, so individual odds ratios might reflect “a conglomeration of factors,” they said.
The National Institutes of Health and the American Gastroenterological Association funded the work. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
Source: American Gastroenterological Association
More than 10% of patients developed irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) within a year after infectious enteritis, which gave them a more than fourfold greater risk than that of controls, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 studies.
“Protozoal and bacterial enteritis confer the greatest overall risk, although the magnitude of increased risk diminishes with time since exposure,” Fabiane B. Klem, MD, and Akhilesh Wadhwa, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and their associates wrote in the April issue of Gastroenterology. Other significant risk factors for postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS) included female sex, clinically severe infections, antibiotic therapy, and comorbid psychological distress, they said.
Postinfectious IBS can last at least a decade after resolution of campylobacteriosis, shigellosis, salmonellosis, giardiasis, and norovirus infections, even when patients have no other risk factors for IBS, the researchers noted. To update and expand the most recent meta-analysis of this topic (Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:535-44), the investigators searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2006 through Aug. 31, 2015. This search yielded 45 studies, including 30 studies comparing infected patients with controls, who were usually matched by age, sex, and geographic location (Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan 6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.039).
In all, 10.1% of patients with infectious enteritis developed IBS in the next 12 months (95% confidence interval, 7.2-14.1) – a 4.2-fold increase in risk, compared with that of controls (risk ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.2-5.7). This risk subsequently dropped, but remained significantly elevated (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.8-3.0), compared with controls. “Of patients with enteritis caused by protozoa or parasites, 41.9% developed IBS; of patients with enteritis caused by bacterial infection, 13.8% developed IBS,” the researchers emphasized. Patients with these infections remained at elevated risk of PI-IBS even after 1 year. Viral enteritis also significantly increased the risk of PI-IBS, but risk dropped to baseline levels after a year.
Among 10 pooled studies of IBS subtypes, 46% of patients had mixed IBS, 39% had diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 15% had constipation-predominant IBS. Female sex doubled the odds of PI-IBS (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.1) in 11 pooled studies. Significant clinical risk factors for PI-IBS included diarrhea lasting more than 7 days (eight studies; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.6), bloody stool (four studies; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0), and antibiotic therapy during infectious enteritis (seven studies; OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4).
Multiple reports linked PI-IBS to clinical psychological distress at the time of infectious enteritis. Specific risk factors included depression based on the Hospitalization Anxiety and Depression Scale (five studies; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9), anxiety based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (four studies; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), somatization (four studies; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.7-6.0), and neuroticism (two studies; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.6). Isolated studies also implicated hypochondriasis, extroversion, negative illness beliefs, stress, sleep disturbance, and adverse life events in the preceding year, the researchers said.
They found no evidence of publication bias, but noted a substantial amount of heterogeneity among studies. Also, some studies did not report multivariate analyses, so individual odds ratios might reflect “a conglomeration of factors,” they said.
The National Institutes of Health and the American Gastroenterological Association funded the work. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
Source: American Gastroenterological Association
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point.
Major finding: A total of 10.1% of patients with infectious enteritis developed IBS in the next 12 months, a 4.2-fold increase in risk, compared with that of controls.
Data source: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 studies.
Disclosures: The National Institutes of Health and the American Gastroenterological Association funded the work. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
AGA Clinical Practice Update: Clostridium difficile in IBD
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) while CDI tends to complicate and worsen the clinical course of IBD, experts note in a clinical practice update.
Thus, it is crucial that clinicians pursue stool testing for toxigenic C. difficile infection whenever a patient with IBD presents with a colitis flare, regardless of the recent antibiotic history, wrote Sahil Khanna, MBBS, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his associates (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.024). Clinicians should also test for recurrent CDI if symptoms of colitis persist or return after antibiotic therapy for CDI, they emphasized.
CDI can present atypically in IBD. Underlying colitis leads to colonic dysbiosis and loss of resistance to bacterial colonization, which permits CDI to develop even when patients have not recently received antibiotics. Patients with IBD also tend to develop CDI starting at younger ages, more often acquire it from community settings, and may lack the typical colonoscopic features of CDI. Simple colonization of C. difficile without infection also is more common in patients with IBD than in those without IBD, the experts note.
The authors contradict guidelines from both the American College of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases Society of America by recommending consideration of vancomycin over metronidazole for treatment of CDI. Not only are C. difficile treatment failures with metronidazole rising, but vancomycin was more effective than was metronidazole in a recent post hoc analysis (Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59[3]:345-54) of two large multicenter phase III trials. Furthermore, another phase III trial (N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422-31) found vancomycin noninferior to fidaxomicin for CDI.
The experts recommend “strong consideration” of hospitalization if patients with IBD and CDI present with profuse diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, a markedly increased peripheral blood leukocyte count, or other signs and symptoms of sepsis. Aggressive monitoring and treatment are especially important because it can be difficult to distinguish an IBD flare, which merits immunosuppression, from superimposed CDI, which might exacerbate the underlying infection, they noted. Few studies are available to help guide the decision about when to intensify steroids and other immunosuppressives in IBD patients with acute CDI. Thus, the experts suggest delaying this step until after starting therapy for CDI, but note that this decision should be individualized pending more robust data.
The authors emphasized the potential role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has been shown to be very effective in both immunocompetent patients with CDI and those who are immunosuppressed, including because of IBD therapies. They recommend considering referral for FMT as early as the first recurrence of CDI in patients with IBD, particularly because of the strong safety and efficacy profile of FMT, the risk of complications from CDI in IBD patients, and scarce data on antibiotic therapy for recurrent CDI in the setting of IBD.
Dr. Khanna disclosed consulting relationships with Rebiotix. and Summit Pharmaceuticals. Senior author Ciaran P. Kelly, MD, disclosed serving as a consultant to Merck, Seres Therapeutics, Summit Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The third author, Andrea Shin, MD, had no relevant disclosures.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) while CDI tends to complicate and worsen the clinical course of IBD, experts note in a clinical practice update.
Thus, it is crucial that clinicians pursue stool testing for toxigenic C. difficile infection whenever a patient with IBD presents with a colitis flare, regardless of the recent antibiotic history, wrote Sahil Khanna, MBBS, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his associates (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.024). Clinicians should also test for recurrent CDI if symptoms of colitis persist or return after antibiotic therapy for CDI, they emphasized.
CDI can present atypically in IBD. Underlying colitis leads to colonic dysbiosis and loss of resistance to bacterial colonization, which permits CDI to develop even when patients have not recently received antibiotics. Patients with IBD also tend to develop CDI starting at younger ages, more often acquire it from community settings, and may lack the typical colonoscopic features of CDI. Simple colonization of C. difficile without infection also is more common in patients with IBD than in those without IBD, the experts note.
The authors contradict guidelines from both the American College of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases Society of America by recommending consideration of vancomycin over metronidazole for treatment of CDI. Not only are C. difficile treatment failures with metronidazole rising, but vancomycin was more effective than was metronidazole in a recent post hoc analysis (Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59[3]:345-54) of two large multicenter phase III trials. Furthermore, another phase III trial (N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422-31) found vancomycin noninferior to fidaxomicin for CDI.
The experts recommend “strong consideration” of hospitalization if patients with IBD and CDI present with profuse diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, a markedly increased peripheral blood leukocyte count, or other signs and symptoms of sepsis. Aggressive monitoring and treatment are especially important because it can be difficult to distinguish an IBD flare, which merits immunosuppression, from superimposed CDI, which might exacerbate the underlying infection, they noted. Few studies are available to help guide the decision about when to intensify steroids and other immunosuppressives in IBD patients with acute CDI. Thus, the experts suggest delaying this step until after starting therapy for CDI, but note that this decision should be individualized pending more robust data.
The authors emphasized the potential role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has been shown to be very effective in both immunocompetent patients with CDI and those who are immunosuppressed, including because of IBD therapies. They recommend considering referral for FMT as early as the first recurrence of CDI in patients with IBD, particularly because of the strong safety and efficacy profile of FMT, the risk of complications from CDI in IBD patients, and scarce data on antibiotic therapy for recurrent CDI in the setting of IBD.
Dr. Khanna disclosed consulting relationships with Rebiotix. and Summit Pharmaceuticals. Senior author Ciaran P. Kelly, MD, disclosed serving as a consultant to Merck, Seres Therapeutics, Summit Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The third author, Andrea Shin, MD, had no relevant disclosures.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) while CDI tends to complicate and worsen the clinical course of IBD, experts note in a clinical practice update.
Thus, it is crucial that clinicians pursue stool testing for toxigenic C. difficile infection whenever a patient with IBD presents with a colitis flare, regardless of the recent antibiotic history, wrote Sahil Khanna, MBBS, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his associates (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.024). Clinicians should also test for recurrent CDI if symptoms of colitis persist or return after antibiotic therapy for CDI, they emphasized.
CDI can present atypically in IBD. Underlying colitis leads to colonic dysbiosis and loss of resistance to bacterial colonization, which permits CDI to develop even when patients have not recently received antibiotics. Patients with IBD also tend to develop CDI starting at younger ages, more often acquire it from community settings, and may lack the typical colonoscopic features of CDI. Simple colonization of C. difficile without infection also is more common in patients with IBD than in those without IBD, the experts note.
The authors contradict guidelines from both the American College of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases Society of America by recommending consideration of vancomycin over metronidazole for treatment of CDI. Not only are C. difficile treatment failures with metronidazole rising, but vancomycin was more effective than was metronidazole in a recent post hoc analysis (Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59[3]:345-54) of two large multicenter phase III trials. Furthermore, another phase III trial (N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422-31) found vancomycin noninferior to fidaxomicin for CDI.
The experts recommend “strong consideration” of hospitalization if patients with IBD and CDI present with profuse diarrhea, severe abdominal pain, a markedly increased peripheral blood leukocyte count, or other signs and symptoms of sepsis. Aggressive monitoring and treatment are especially important because it can be difficult to distinguish an IBD flare, which merits immunosuppression, from superimposed CDI, which might exacerbate the underlying infection, they noted. Few studies are available to help guide the decision about when to intensify steroids and other immunosuppressives in IBD patients with acute CDI. Thus, the experts suggest delaying this step until after starting therapy for CDI, but note that this decision should be individualized pending more robust data.
The authors emphasized the potential role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has been shown to be very effective in both immunocompetent patients with CDI and those who are immunosuppressed, including because of IBD therapies. They recommend considering referral for FMT as early as the first recurrence of CDI in patients with IBD, particularly because of the strong safety and efficacy profile of FMT, the risk of complications from CDI in IBD patients, and scarce data on antibiotic therapy for recurrent CDI in the setting of IBD.
Dr. Khanna disclosed consulting relationships with Rebiotix. and Summit Pharmaceuticals. Senior author Ciaran P. Kelly, MD, disclosed serving as a consultant to Merck, Seres Therapeutics, Summit Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. The third author, Andrea Shin, MD, had no relevant disclosures.
FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
AGA Guideline: Acute liver failure
Physicians should avoid routinely testing patients with acute liver failure for Wilson’s disease unless there is “high clinical suspicion” for the disorder, according to a new guideline from the AGA Institute.
Wilson’s disease so rarely accompanies acute liver failure that a positive test will have low predictive value, Steven L. Flamm, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, and his associates wrote in the February issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.026). Diagnosing Wilson’s disease also is unlikely to change treatment “because liver transplantation is the ultimate outcome,” they emphasize.
The guideline grades seven recommendations as “conditional” based on “very-low” quality evidence. These include the statement on Wilson’s disease testing, plus suggestions to test and treat patients with ALF for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, to test pregnant patients for hepatitis E virus infection, and to perform autoantibody testing for autoimmune hepatitis. Case series report only about a 1% prevalence of HSV infection in ALF, and there is little information on diagnostic accuracy or treatment in this setting, the guidelines state. Although acyclovir is relatively safe and inexpensive, data on efficacy is limited to “a suggestion on a case-report level that patients with acute hepatitis secondary to HSV do better with treatment than without.”
The guideline also conditionally recommends against routine testing for varicella zoster virus infection and routine liver biopsy in ALF. The authors note only about 10 case reports of varicella zoster–associated ALF and few data on how liver biopsy results in ALF alter treatment plan, outcome, or the choice to seek liver transplantation. The experts do recommend prognostic scoring with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, which pooled analyses have found to be more sensitive than King’s College Criteria, they wrote.
The guideline conditionally recommends against empirically treating elevated intracranial pressure in ALF, on the basis of five randomized trials that found no overall mortality benefit of moderate hypothermia, hypertonic saline, L-ornithine, L-aspartate, intravenous mannitol, or hyperventilation.
The experts cite insufficient evidence to recommend using N-acetyl cysteine in patients whose ALF is not associated with acetaminophen exposure. Likewise, they find inadequate data to make any recommendation about using extracorporeal liver support systems outside of the setting of clinical trials. Although such systems can “potentially” buy time for patients to either spontaneously recover without transplant or survive longer on the transplantation list, three systematic reviews found “no clear effect on mortality,” and randomized trials reported either null results or a “marginally significant survival benefit” in the face of steep costs and potentially significant toxicities, the authors emphasize.
None of the experts had relevant financial disclosures.
Physicians should avoid routinely testing patients with acute liver failure for Wilson’s disease unless there is “high clinical suspicion” for the disorder, according to a new guideline from the AGA Institute.
Wilson’s disease so rarely accompanies acute liver failure that a positive test will have low predictive value, Steven L. Flamm, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, and his associates wrote in the February issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.026). Diagnosing Wilson’s disease also is unlikely to change treatment “because liver transplantation is the ultimate outcome,” they emphasize.
The guideline grades seven recommendations as “conditional” based on “very-low” quality evidence. These include the statement on Wilson’s disease testing, plus suggestions to test and treat patients with ALF for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, to test pregnant patients for hepatitis E virus infection, and to perform autoantibody testing for autoimmune hepatitis. Case series report only about a 1% prevalence of HSV infection in ALF, and there is little information on diagnostic accuracy or treatment in this setting, the guidelines state. Although acyclovir is relatively safe and inexpensive, data on efficacy is limited to “a suggestion on a case-report level that patients with acute hepatitis secondary to HSV do better with treatment than without.”
The guideline also conditionally recommends against routine testing for varicella zoster virus infection and routine liver biopsy in ALF. The authors note only about 10 case reports of varicella zoster–associated ALF and few data on how liver biopsy results in ALF alter treatment plan, outcome, or the choice to seek liver transplantation. The experts do recommend prognostic scoring with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, which pooled analyses have found to be more sensitive than King’s College Criteria, they wrote.
The guideline conditionally recommends against empirically treating elevated intracranial pressure in ALF, on the basis of five randomized trials that found no overall mortality benefit of moderate hypothermia, hypertonic saline, L-ornithine, L-aspartate, intravenous mannitol, or hyperventilation.
The experts cite insufficient evidence to recommend using N-acetyl cysteine in patients whose ALF is not associated with acetaminophen exposure. Likewise, they find inadequate data to make any recommendation about using extracorporeal liver support systems outside of the setting of clinical trials. Although such systems can “potentially” buy time for patients to either spontaneously recover without transplant or survive longer on the transplantation list, three systematic reviews found “no clear effect on mortality,” and randomized trials reported either null results or a “marginally significant survival benefit” in the face of steep costs and potentially significant toxicities, the authors emphasize.
None of the experts had relevant financial disclosures.
Physicians should avoid routinely testing patients with acute liver failure for Wilson’s disease unless there is “high clinical suspicion” for the disorder, according to a new guideline from the AGA Institute.
Wilson’s disease so rarely accompanies acute liver failure that a positive test will have low predictive value, Steven L. Flamm, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago, and his associates wrote in the February issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.026). Diagnosing Wilson’s disease also is unlikely to change treatment “because liver transplantation is the ultimate outcome,” they emphasize.
The guideline grades seven recommendations as “conditional” based on “very-low” quality evidence. These include the statement on Wilson’s disease testing, plus suggestions to test and treat patients with ALF for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, to test pregnant patients for hepatitis E virus infection, and to perform autoantibody testing for autoimmune hepatitis. Case series report only about a 1% prevalence of HSV infection in ALF, and there is little information on diagnostic accuracy or treatment in this setting, the guidelines state. Although acyclovir is relatively safe and inexpensive, data on efficacy is limited to “a suggestion on a case-report level that patients with acute hepatitis secondary to HSV do better with treatment than without.”
The guideline also conditionally recommends against routine testing for varicella zoster virus infection and routine liver biopsy in ALF. The authors note only about 10 case reports of varicella zoster–associated ALF and few data on how liver biopsy results in ALF alter treatment plan, outcome, or the choice to seek liver transplantation. The experts do recommend prognostic scoring with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, which pooled analyses have found to be more sensitive than King’s College Criteria, they wrote.
The guideline conditionally recommends against empirically treating elevated intracranial pressure in ALF, on the basis of five randomized trials that found no overall mortality benefit of moderate hypothermia, hypertonic saline, L-ornithine, L-aspartate, intravenous mannitol, or hyperventilation.
The experts cite insufficient evidence to recommend using N-acetyl cysteine in patients whose ALF is not associated with acetaminophen exposure. Likewise, they find inadequate data to make any recommendation about using extracorporeal liver support systems outside of the setting of clinical trials. Although such systems can “potentially” buy time for patients to either spontaneously recover without transplant or survive longer on the transplantation list, three systematic reviews found “no clear effect on mortality,” and randomized trials reported either null results or a “marginally significant survival benefit” in the face of steep costs and potentially significant toxicities, the authors emphasize.
None of the experts had relevant financial disclosures.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
BOS beat placebo for eosinophilic esophagitis
Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) was safe and significantly outperformed placebo on validated measures of eosinophilic esophagitis, according to a first-in-kind, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II trial presented in the March issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.021).
The novel topical corticosteroid formulation yielded a significant histologic response and was associated with 3 fewer days of dysphagia over 2 weeks compared with placebo, reported Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. “There were no unexpected safety signals, and compliance with medication was high, suggesting that this formulation can be reliably used,” they wrote. Their findings earned BOS (SHP621) an FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation in June 2016. Although corticosteroids are first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis, symptom response in other studies has been mixed, and the Food and Drug Administration had approved neither fluticasone nor budesonide for this disease, the researchers noted. They formulated BOS to adhere better to the esophageal mucosa in order to enhance esophageal delivery while decreasing unwanted pulmonary deposition.
For the study, they randomly assigned 93 patients aged 11-40 years with eosinophilic esophagitis to receive either placebo or 2 mg BOS twice daily. By week 12, Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire scores had fallen by 14.3 points with BOS group and by 7.5 points with placebo (P = .001). Endoscopic severity scores dropped by 3.8 points with BOS and rose by 0.4 points with placebo (P less than .0001). Rates of histologic response were 39% and 3%, respectively (P less than .0001). Nonresponders averaged 10 kg more body weight than responders, and had been diagnosed about 21 months earlier (average disease duration, 46 months and 25 months, respectively).
Rates of reported adverse effects were similar with BOS (47%) and placebo (50%). Individual rates of nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and oropharyngeal pain also were comparable between groups, but one patient stopped BOS after developing dyspnea, nausea, and vomiting that were considered treatment related. Esophageal candidiasis developed in two BOS recipients – a rate similar rate to that in a prior study of BOS (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.02), and a lower percentage than in other studies of topical steroids for eosinophilic esophagitis, according to the researchers. Morning cortisol levels were similar between groups, and there were no adverse laboratory effects, they added.
Patients in this trial had severe symptoms and histology and were highly compliant with treatment. They filled out at least 70% of their symptom diary, had at least 15 eosinophils per high-power frame from at least two esophageal levels on screening endoscopy, and reported at least 4 days of dysphagia during the second half of a 4-week, blinded placebo run-in period. Researchers should consider using these strict inclusion criteria in future trials of eosinophilic esophagitis, especially because previous studies have failed to show a treatment benefit for topical steroid therapy, the investigators noted.
Meritage Pharma, which is now a part of the Shire group, makes budesonide oral suspension and sponsored the study. Dr. Dellon disclosed ties to Meritage, Receptos, Regeneron, Aptalis, Banner Life Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. All five coinvestigators disclosed ties to industry, including Meritage, Shire, Receptos, Regeneron, and Biogen Idec.
Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) was safe and significantly outperformed placebo on validated measures of eosinophilic esophagitis, according to a first-in-kind, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II trial presented in the March issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.021).
The novel topical corticosteroid formulation yielded a significant histologic response and was associated with 3 fewer days of dysphagia over 2 weeks compared with placebo, reported Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. “There were no unexpected safety signals, and compliance with medication was high, suggesting that this formulation can be reliably used,” they wrote. Their findings earned BOS (SHP621) an FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation in June 2016. Although corticosteroids are first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis, symptom response in other studies has been mixed, and the Food and Drug Administration had approved neither fluticasone nor budesonide for this disease, the researchers noted. They formulated BOS to adhere better to the esophageal mucosa in order to enhance esophageal delivery while decreasing unwanted pulmonary deposition.
For the study, they randomly assigned 93 patients aged 11-40 years with eosinophilic esophagitis to receive either placebo or 2 mg BOS twice daily. By week 12, Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire scores had fallen by 14.3 points with BOS group and by 7.5 points with placebo (P = .001). Endoscopic severity scores dropped by 3.8 points with BOS and rose by 0.4 points with placebo (P less than .0001). Rates of histologic response were 39% and 3%, respectively (P less than .0001). Nonresponders averaged 10 kg more body weight than responders, and had been diagnosed about 21 months earlier (average disease duration, 46 months and 25 months, respectively).
Rates of reported adverse effects were similar with BOS (47%) and placebo (50%). Individual rates of nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and oropharyngeal pain also were comparable between groups, but one patient stopped BOS after developing dyspnea, nausea, and vomiting that were considered treatment related. Esophageal candidiasis developed in two BOS recipients – a rate similar rate to that in a prior study of BOS (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.02), and a lower percentage than in other studies of topical steroids for eosinophilic esophagitis, according to the researchers. Morning cortisol levels were similar between groups, and there were no adverse laboratory effects, they added.
Patients in this trial had severe symptoms and histology and were highly compliant with treatment. They filled out at least 70% of their symptom diary, had at least 15 eosinophils per high-power frame from at least two esophageal levels on screening endoscopy, and reported at least 4 days of dysphagia during the second half of a 4-week, blinded placebo run-in period. Researchers should consider using these strict inclusion criteria in future trials of eosinophilic esophagitis, especially because previous studies have failed to show a treatment benefit for topical steroid therapy, the investigators noted.
Meritage Pharma, which is now a part of the Shire group, makes budesonide oral suspension and sponsored the study. Dr. Dellon disclosed ties to Meritage, Receptos, Regeneron, Aptalis, Banner Life Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. All five coinvestigators disclosed ties to industry, including Meritage, Shire, Receptos, Regeneron, and Biogen Idec.
Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) was safe and significantly outperformed placebo on validated measures of eosinophilic esophagitis, according to a first-in-kind, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase II trial presented in the March issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.021).
The novel topical corticosteroid formulation yielded a significant histologic response and was associated with 3 fewer days of dysphagia over 2 weeks compared with placebo, reported Evan S. Dellon, MD, MPH, of University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his associates. “There were no unexpected safety signals, and compliance with medication was high, suggesting that this formulation can be reliably used,” they wrote. Their findings earned BOS (SHP621) an FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation in June 2016. Although corticosteroids are first-line therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis, symptom response in other studies has been mixed, and the Food and Drug Administration had approved neither fluticasone nor budesonide for this disease, the researchers noted. They formulated BOS to adhere better to the esophageal mucosa in order to enhance esophageal delivery while decreasing unwanted pulmonary deposition.
For the study, they randomly assigned 93 patients aged 11-40 years with eosinophilic esophagitis to receive either placebo or 2 mg BOS twice daily. By week 12, Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire scores had fallen by 14.3 points with BOS group and by 7.5 points with placebo (P = .001). Endoscopic severity scores dropped by 3.8 points with BOS and rose by 0.4 points with placebo (P less than .0001). Rates of histologic response were 39% and 3%, respectively (P less than .0001). Nonresponders averaged 10 kg more body weight than responders, and had been diagnosed about 21 months earlier (average disease duration, 46 months and 25 months, respectively).
Rates of reported adverse effects were similar with BOS (47%) and placebo (50%). Individual rates of nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infections, and oropharyngeal pain also were comparable between groups, but one patient stopped BOS after developing dyspnea, nausea, and vomiting that were considered treatment related. Esophageal candidiasis developed in two BOS recipients – a rate similar rate to that in a prior study of BOS (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan 13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.02), and a lower percentage than in other studies of topical steroids for eosinophilic esophagitis, according to the researchers. Morning cortisol levels were similar between groups, and there were no adverse laboratory effects, they added.
Patients in this trial had severe symptoms and histology and were highly compliant with treatment. They filled out at least 70% of their symptom diary, had at least 15 eosinophils per high-power frame from at least two esophageal levels on screening endoscopy, and reported at least 4 days of dysphagia during the second half of a 4-week, blinded placebo run-in period. Researchers should consider using these strict inclusion criteria in future trials of eosinophilic esophagitis, especially because previous studies have failed to show a treatment benefit for topical steroid therapy, the investigators noted.
Meritage Pharma, which is now a part of the Shire group, makes budesonide oral suspension and sponsored the study. Dr. Dellon disclosed ties to Meritage, Receptos, Regeneron, Aptalis, Banner Life Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. All five coinvestigators disclosed ties to industry, including Meritage, Shire, Receptos, Regeneron, and Biogen Idec.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point: Budesonide oral suspension (BOS) (2 mg twice daily) was safe and significantly outperformed placebo on validated measures of eosinophilic esophagitis.
Major finding: Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire scores decreased by 14.3 points with BOS and by 7.5 points with placebo (P = .001). Endoscopic severity scores decreased by 3.8 points and rose by 0.4 points, respectively (P less than .0001).
Data source: A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase II trial of 93 adolescents and adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.
Disclosures: Meritage Pharma, which is now a part of the Shire group, makes budesonide oral suspension and sponsored the study. Dr. Dellon disclosed ties to Meritage, Receptos, Regeneron, Aptalis, Banner Life Sciences, Novartis, and Roche. All five coinvestigators disclosed ties to industry, including Meritage, Shire, Receptos, Regeneron, and Biogen Idec.
VIDEO: Sofosbuvir with velpatasvir beat other HCV GT3 regimens
Regimens containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir were most effective for treating both cirrhotic and noncirrhotic genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection (HCV GT3), according to a meta-analysis reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.03).
“Our analyses indicated that ribavirin significantly increases SVR [sustained viral response] rates and should be considered, if tolerated,” added Floor A.C. Berden, MD, of Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and her associates.
SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
Direct-acting antiviral regimens successfully treat chronic HCV infection, but tend to perform suboptimally in HCV GT3, especially when patients are treatment experienced and have cirrhosis. Options for HCV GT3 infection include sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin, daclatasvir, or velpatasvir. But head-to-head trials of these regimens are lacking, and are unlikely to occur, in part because the Food and Drug Administration permits single-arm trials with historical controls as the comparator, the investigators said.
Therefore, they searched PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science database through March 15, 2016, for randomized trials and real-world studies of at least one direct-acting antiviral agent in adults with chronic HCV GT3 infection. They also manually searched abstracts presented at the 2015 conferences of the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This work yielded 27 studies: 16 randomized controlled trials, 6 single-arm studies, and 5 observational cohort studies. The researchers used a Bayesian analysis based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
For patients without cirrhosis, sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin yielded the highest estimated likelihood of SVR (99%; 95% confidence interval, 98%-100%), followed by sofosbuvir and velpatasvir without ribavirin (97%; 95% CI, 95%-99%), sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin (96%; 95% CI, 92%-98%), and sofosbuvir and peginterferon with ribavirin (95%; 95% CI, 91%-98%), all for 12 weeks, the investigators reported.
For patients with cirrhosis, the most effective regimen was sofosbuvir with velpatasvir for 24 weeks (estimated SVR, 96%; 95% CI, 92%-99%), followed by sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 87%-98%), sofosbuvir and velpatasvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 86%-98%). The estimated efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir held up in sensitivity analyses that honed in on studies with a low risk of bias, approved regimens, or those under regulatory evaluation, patients without decompensated cirrhosis, and patients without HIV coinfection.
Adding ribavirin to a direct-acting antiviral regimen improved the odds of SVR about 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.3-4.7) among noncirrhotic patients and by about 4.5 times in cirrhotic patients (95% CI, 2.5-7.7), the investigators reported. “In clinical practice, choice of treatment may depend on several factors, such as availability and price of direct-acting antivirals, tolerance of ribavirin, risk of adverse events or drug-drug interactions, and the presence of resistance-associated substitutions,” they added. Nonetheless, these findings can help prioritize therapies for HCV GT3 infection in both clinical guidelines and practice, they emphasized.
Dr. Berden and four coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures. Senior author Joost Drenth, MD, PhD, disclosed serving on advisory boards and receiving research grants from several pharmaceutical companies.
The rapid development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C has yielded many surprises and left some gaps in our knowledge.
One of the surprises was that genotype 3, previously considered “easier to treat,” proved quite resistant to the first generation of DAAs. One of the gaps in knowledge was a lack of randomized and head-to-head trials for current medications. One could argue that randomized trials have limited utility in a disease with essentially no spontaneous cures, and that head-to-head trials are pointless in a rapidly evolving field where regimens may be obsolete by the time the study is completed.
On the bright side, a hard endpoint like sustained virologic response (SVR) makes comparison between trials possible. The paper by Bergen et al. offers some guidance in closing the knowledge gap. Their meta-analysis using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods examined the effectiveness of currently available antiviral agents in 27 studies that focused entirely on genotype 3. All studies used antiviral agents that are currently available in the United States, and effectiveness was tested in both noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients.
The evolution of antiviral therapy has been amazing. After decades of incremental gains, we entered an era of dizzying progress. Genotype 3 went from great news to bad news, and genotype 1 went from a scourge to a piece of cake.
Norman L. Sussman, MD, is associate professor of surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; director, Project ECHO. He has received speaking and consulting fees for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, and Merck.
The rapid development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C has yielded many surprises and left some gaps in our knowledge.
One of the surprises was that genotype 3, previously considered “easier to treat,” proved quite resistant to the first generation of DAAs. One of the gaps in knowledge was a lack of randomized and head-to-head trials for current medications. One could argue that randomized trials have limited utility in a disease with essentially no spontaneous cures, and that head-to-head trials are pointless in a rapidly evolving field where regimens may be obsolete by the time the study is completed.
On the bright side, a hard endpoint like sustained virologic response (SVR) makes comparison between trials possible. The paper by Bergen et al. offers some guidance in closing the knowledge gap. Their meta-analysis using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods examined the effectiveness of currently available antiviral agents in 27 studies that focused entirely on genotype 3. All studies used antiviral agents that are currently available in the United States, and effectiveness was tested in both noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients.
The evolution of antiviral therapy has been amazing. After decades of incremental gains, we entered an era of dizzying progress. Genotype 3 went from great news to bad news, and genotype 1 went from a scourge to a piece of cake.
Norman L. Sussman, MD, is associate professor of surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; director, Project ECHO. He has received speaking and consulting fees for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, and Merck.
The rapid development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) to treat hepatitis C has yielded many surprises and left some gaps in our knowledge.
One of the surprises was that genotype 3, previously considered “easier to treat,” proved quite resistant to the first generation of DAAs. One of the gaps in knowledge was a lack of randomized and head-to-head trials for current medications. One could argue that randomized trials have limited utility in a disease with essentially no spontaneous cures, and that head-to-head trials are pointless in a rapidly evolving field where regimens may be obsolete by the time the study is completed.
On the bright side, a hard endpoint like sustained virologic response (SVR) makes comparison between trials possible. The paper by Bergen et al. offers some guidance in closing the knowledge gap. Their meta-analysis using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods examined the effectiveness of currently available antiviral agents in 27 studies that focused entirely on genotype 3. All studies used antiviral agents that are currently available in the United States, and effectiveness was tested in both noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients.
The evolution of antiviral therapy has been amazing. After decades of incremental gains, we entered an era of dizzying progress. Genotype 3 went from great news to bad news, and genotype 1 went from a scourge to a piece of cake.
Norman L. Sussman, MD, is associate professor of surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; director, Project ECHO. He has received speaking and consulting fees for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, and Merck.
Regimens containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir were most effective for treating both cirrhotic and noncirrhotic genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection (HCV GT3), according to a meta-analysis reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.03).
“Our analyses indicated that ribavirin significantly increases SVR [sustained viral response] rates and should be considered, if tolerated,” added Floor A.C. Berden, MD, of Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and her associates.
SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
Direct-acting antiviral regimens successfully treat chronic HCV infection, but tend to perform suboptimally in HCV GT3, especially when patients are treatment experienced and have cirrhosis. Options for HCV GT3 infection include sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin, daclatasvir, or velpatasvir. But head-to-head trials of these regimens are lacking, and are unlikely to occur, in part because the Food and Drug Administration permits single-arm trials with historical controls as the comparator, the investigators said.
Therefore, they searched PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science database through March 15, 2016, for randomized trials and real-world studies of at least one direct-acting antiviral agent in adults with chronic HCV GT3 infection. They also manually searched abstracts presented at the 2015 conferences of the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This work yielded 27 studies: 16 randomized controlled trials, 6 single-arm studies, and 5 observational cohort studies. The researchers used a Bayesian analysis based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
For patients without cirrhosis, sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin yielded the highest estimated likelihood of SVR (99%; 95% confidence interval, 98%-100%), followed by sofosbuvir and velpatasvir without ribavirin (97%; 95% CI, 95%-99%), sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin (96%; 95% CI, 92%-98%), and sofosbuvir and peginterferon with ribavirin (95%; 95% CI, 91%-98%), all for 12 weeks, the investigators reported.
For patients with cirrhosis, the most effective regimen was sofosbuvir with velpatasvir for 24 weeks (estimated SVR, 96%; 95% CI, 92%-99%), followed by sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 87%-98%), sofosbuvir and velpatasvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 86%-98%). The estimated efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir held up in sensitivity analyses that honed in on studies with a low risk of bias, approved regimens, or those under regulatory evaluation, patients without decompensated cirrhosis, and patients without HIV coinfection.
Adding ribavirin to a direct-acting antiviral regimen improved the odds of SVR about 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.3-4.7) among noncirrhotic patients and by about 4.5 times in cirrhotic patients (95% CI, 2.5-7.7), the investigators reported. “In clinical practice, choice of treatment may depend on several factors, such as availability and price of direct-acting antivirals, tolerance of ribavirin, risk of adverse events or drug-drug interactions, and the presence of resistance-associated substitutions,” they added. Nonetheless, these findings can help prioritize therapies for HCV GT3 infection in both clinical guidelines and practice, they emphasized.
Dr. Berden and four coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures. Senior author Joost Drenth, MD, PhD, disclosed serving on advisory boards and receiving research grants from several pharmaceutical companies.
Regimens containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir were most effective for treating both cirrhotic and noncirrhotic genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection (HCV GT3), according to a meta-analysis reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.03).
“Our analyses indicated that ribavirin significantly increases SVR [sustained viral response] rates and should be considered, if tolerated,” added Floor A.C. Berden, MD, of Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and her associates.
SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
Direct-acting antiviral regimens successfully treat chronic HCV infection, but tend to perform suboptimally in HCV GT3, especially when patients are treatment experienced and have cirrhosis. Options for HCV GT3 infection include sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin, daclatasvir, or velpatasvir. But head-to-head trials of these regimens are lacking, and are unlikely to occur, in part because the Food and Drug Administration permits single-arm trials with historical controls as the comparator, the investigators said.
Therefore, they searched PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science database through March 15, 2016, for randomized trials and real-world studies of at least one direct-acting antiviral agent in adults with chronic HCV GT3 infection. They also manually searched abstracts presented at the 2015 conferences of the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This work yielded 27 studies: 16 randomized controlled trials, 6 single-arm studies, and 5 observational cohort studies. The researchers used a Bayesian analysis based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
For patients without cirrhosis, sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin yielded the highest estimated likelihood of SVR (99%; 95% confidence interval, 98%-100%), followed by sofosbuvir and velpatasvir without ribavirin (97%; 95% CI, 95%-99%), sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin (96%; 95% CI, 92%-98%), and sofosbuvir and peginterferon with ribavirin (95%; 95% CI, 91%-98%), all for 12 weeks, the investigators reported.
For patients with cirrhosis, the most effective regimen was sofosbuvir with velpatasvir for 24 weeks (estimated SVR, 96%; 95% CI, 92%-99%), followed by sofosbuvir and daclatasvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 87%-98%), sofosbuvir and velpatasvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks (94%; 95% CI, 86%-98%). The estimated efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir held up in sensitivity analyses that honed in on studies with a low risk of bias, approved regimens, or those under regulatory evaluation, patients without decompensated cirrhosis, and patients without HIV coinfection.
Adding ribavirin to a direct-acting antiviral regimen improved the odds of SVR about 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.3-4.7) among noncirrhotic patients and by about 4.5 times in cirrhotic patients (95% CI, 2.5-7.7), the investigators reported. “In clinical practice, choice of treatment may depend on several factors, such as availability and price of direct-acting antivirals, tolerance of ribavirin, risk of adverse events or drug-drug interactions, and the presence of resistance-associated substitutions,” they added. Nonetheless, these findings can help prioritize therapies for HCV GT3 infection in both clinical guidelines and practice, they emphasized.
Dr. Berden and four coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures. Senior author Joost Drenth, MD, PhD, disclosed serving on advisory boards and receiving research grants from several pharmaceutical companies.
FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point. Regimens containing sofosbuvir and velpatasvir were more effective than were other direct-acting antiviral combinations for treating genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infection, regardless of cirrhosis status.
Major finding: For patients without cirrhosis, sofosbuvir and velpatasvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks yielded the highest estimated likelihood of sustained viral response (99%). For patients with cirrhosis, the most effective regimen was sofosbuvir with velpatasvir for 24 weeks (estimated SVR, 96%).
Data source: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27 studies: 16 randomized controlled trials, 6 single-arm studies, and 5 observational cohort studies.
Disclosures: Dr. Berden and four coinvestigators had no relevant financial disclosures. Senior author Joost Drenth, MD, PhD, disclosed serving on advisory boards and receiving research grants from several pharmaceutical companies.
Sterile fecal filtrate effectively treated recurrent CDI
Sterile fecal filtrate transplantation (FFT) effectively treated five cases of symptomatic chronic-relapsing Clostridium difficile infection, investigators reported.
The procedure restored normal bowel habits and eliminated symptoms through the end of the study – that is, for at least 6 months – in all patients, Stephan J. Ott, MD, and his associates wrote (Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010).
Proteome analyses did not identify proteins likely to explain this efficacy, but 16S rRNA gene sequencing did demonstrate diverse bacterial DNA signatures in the filtrates, and tests of virus-like particles yielded “a complex signature of macrophages,” Dr. Ott and his associates reported. Additional tests suggested that recipients’ microbiomes continued to change weeks after FFT. “This open-label series strongly suggests that FFT should be evaluated in a controlled setting in comparison with standard fecal microbiota transplantation,” the researchers concluded.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but even “the most rigorous and costly donor screening procedures, or defined panels of bacteria, cannot exclude the risk of transferring unknown pathogens or undetectable functional characteristics within the living microorganisms to the recipient, including bacterial or viral risk factors for metabolic diseases, cancer, atopy, or autoimmunity,” the investigators wrote.
Therefore, they performed sterile FFT in five patients who were positive on at least two of three tests: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C. difficile–specific glutamate dehydrogenase; C. difficile toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; and culture of toxin-producing C. difficile. Patients chose their own stool donors, who were then screened based on published guidelines (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9[12]:1044-49). Next, “slurries” were prepared from donor stool and filtered with a custom-built air pressure filtration system, yielding a “light brown, clear liquid with a subjectively less unpleasant and intensive odor” than conventional FMT stool preparations. Bacterial cultures of these filtrates yielded no growth, whereas donor stool cultures showed profuse growth of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colonies, Dr. Ott and his associates said.
Patients became symptom-free 2-4 days after undergoing FFT. Notably, one patient had previously undergone FMT, which led to acute fever and diarrhea and recurrence of baseline symptoms after 3 months. This patient did not develop fever or diarrhea after FFT, was symptom-free after 3 days, and remained symptom-free until the study ended 2 years later, the researchers said. All other patients also remained symptom-free through the end of the study, that is, for 6 months to more than 2 years.
Analyses of 16S rRNA revealed substantial longitudinal shifts after FFT that often were present by week 1 and remained stable until week 6, the investigators said. Further tests confirmed marked shifts in bacterial phylotypes and in their relative abundance over time. Repeated virus analyses of one patient also showed that the phageome shifted over time to resemble that of the donor.
Patients were between 49 and 75 years old, three were female and two were male, and all had received more than one antibiotic before their first episode of CDI. Antibiotics for CDI had included metronidazole, vancomycin, and rifaximin. Comorbidities included pseudomembranous colitis, renal failure, HIV infection, epilepsy, and chronic heart failure, and medical histories included recurrent diverticulitis with sigmoid resection, gastric carcinoma, and colon cancer.
“It is important to keep in mind that, in contrast to conventional FMT, transferring sterile FFT filtrates cannot be expected to establish a microbiota similar to that of the donor in the receiving patient,” Dr. Ott and his associates noted. Instead, bacterial DNA in the filtrate might trigger the re-establishment of the recipient microbiome, they said. Bacterial cell wall fragments or bacteriophages also might play a role, they added.
The German Excellence Cluster and CONARIS Research Institute AG supported the work. Dr. Ott reported having lectured for Allergosan. Two coinvestigators reported employment with CONARIS. A third coinvestigator reported shareholder relationships with CONARIS, Allergosan, Danone, and Nestle and lectureship compensation from Allergosan. The other eight coinvestigators had no relevant conflicts of interest.
The remarkable efficacy of fecal microbial transplant in recurrent C. difficile infection provides a compelling example of ecologic microbiome-based therapy. Its mechanism is widely considered to be the restoration of select microbial species that suppress C. difficile colonization and virulence in healthy individuals. Identification of such suppressive microbiota is still at an early stage, with empirical studies revealing effective synthetic microbial consortia, and evidence of some modes of action, such as bile salt metabolism (Nature 2015;517:205-8; PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002995).
Clouding this elegant concept is the provocative new study of Dr. Ott and his colleagues. Prompted by long-term safety concerns, they evaluated the efficacy of a donor fecal microfiltrate lacking viable intact organisms. Indeed, in five patients, long-term eradication of C. difficile was achieved with a single dose. This observation indicates that the initial action of fecal transplant may not require restoration of viable organisms into the antibiotic-damaged ecosystem.
What mechanisms might account for the therapeutic action of organism-free fecal microfiltrate? First, this material is laden with a complex, potentially distinct mix of microbial products and particulates (Cell. 2016;165[5]:1106-19) from donor origin or ex vivo processing. These biologicals may induce immune processes to promote control of C. difficile directly or via changes in other commensals of the patient's microbiome. Second, the microfiltrate retains abundant and diverse bacteria-targeting viruses of the fecal stream. Perhaps certain viruses, deficient in patients, target C. difficile and/or beneficially reshape microbial composition (Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;1[1]:28-40). So, C. difficile challenges us once more into the breach with new insights ahead for the principles and practice of ecologic microbiome therapy.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
The remarkable efficacy of fecal microbial transplant in recurrent C. difficile infection provides a compelling example of ecologic microbiome-based therapy. Its mechanism is widely considered to be the restoration of select microbial species that suppress C. difficile colonization and virulence in healthy individuals. Identification of such suppressive microbiota is still at an early stage, with empirical studies revealing effective synthetic microbial consortia, and evidence of some modes of action, such as bile salt metabolism (Nature 2015;517:205-8; PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002995).
Clouding this elegant concept is the provocative new study of Dr. Ott and his colleagues. Prompted by long-term safety concerns, they evaluated the efficacy of a donor fecal microfiltrate lacking viable intact organisms. Indeed, in five patients, long-term eradication of C. difficile was achieved with a single dose. This observation indicates that the initial action of fecal transplant may not require restoration of viable organisms into the antibiotic-damaged ecosystem.
What mechanisms might account for the therapeutic action of organism-free fecal microfiltrate? First, this material is laden with a complex, potentially distinct mix of microbial products and particulates (Cell. 2016;165[5]:1106-19) from donor origin or ex vivo processing. These biologicals may induce immune processes to promote control of C. difficile directly or via changes in other commensals of the patient's microbiome. Second, the microfiltrate retains abundant and diverse bacteria-targeting viruses of the fecal stream. Perhaps certain viruses, deficient in patients, target C. difficile and/or beneficially reshape microbial composition (Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;1[1]:28-40). So, C. difficile challenges us once more into the breach with new insights ahead for the principles and practice of ecologic microbiome therapy.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
The remarkable efficacy of fecal microbial transplant in recurrent C. difficile infection provides a compelling example of ecologic microbiome-based therapy. Its mechanism is widely considered to be the restoration of select microbial species that suppress C. difficile colonization and virulence in healthy individuals. Identification of such suppressive microbiota is still at an early stage, with empirical studies revealing effective synthetic microbial consortia, and evidence of some modes of action, such as bile salt metabolism (Nature 2015;517:205-8; PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002995).
Clouding this elegant concept is the provocative new study of Dr. Ott and his colleagues. Prompted by long-term safety concerns, they evaluated the efficacy of a donor fecal microfiltrate lacking viable intact organisms. Indeed, in five patients, long-term eradication of C. difficile was achieved with a single dose. This observation indicates that the initial action of fecal transplant may not require restoration of viable organisms into the antibiotic-damaged ecosystem.
What mechanisms might account for the therapeutic action of organism-free fecal microfiltrate? First, this material is laden with a complex, potentially distinct mix of microbial products and particulates (Cell. 2016;165[5]:1106-19) from donor origin or ex vivo processing. These biologicals may induce immune processes to promote control of C. difficile directly or via changes in other commensals of the patient's microbiome. Second, the microfiltrate retains abundant and diverse bacteria-targeting viruses of the fecal stream. Perhaps certain viruses, deficient in patients, target C. difficile and/or beneficially reshape microbial composition (Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;1[1]:28-40). So, C. difficile challenges us once more into the breach with new insights ahead for the principles and practice of ecologic microbiome therapy.
Jonathan Braun, MD, PhD, is professor and chair of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. He has no conflicts of interest.
Sterile fecal filtrate transplantation (FFT) effectively treated five cases of symptomatic chronic-relapsing Clostridium difficile infection, investigators reported.
The procedure restored normal bowel habits and eliminated symptoms through the end of the study – that is, for at least 6 months – in all patients, Stephan J. Ott, MD, and his associates wrote (Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010).
Proteome analyses did not identify proteins likely to explain this efficacy, but 16S rRNA gene sequencing did demonstrate diverse bacterial DNA signatures in the filtrates, and tests of virus-like particles yielded “a complex signature of macrophages,” Dr. Ott and his associates reported. Additional tests suggested that recipients’ microbiomes continued to change weeks after FFT. “This open-label series strongly suggests that FFT should be evaluated in a controlled setting in comparison with standard fecal microbiota transplantation,” the researchers concluded.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but even “the most rigorous and costly donor screening procedures, or defined panels of bacteria, cannot exclude the risk of transferring unknown pathogens or undetectable functional characteristics within the living microorganisms to the recipient, including bacterial or viral risk factors for metabolic diseases, cancer, atopy, or autoimmunity,” the investigators wrote.
Therefore, they performed sterile FFT in five patients who were positive on at least two of three tests: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C. difficile–specific glutamate dehydrogenase; C. difficile toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; and culture of toxin-producing C. difficile. Patients chose their own stool donors, who were then screened based on published guidelines (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9[12]:1044-49). Next, “slurries” were prepared from donor stool and filtered with a custom-built air pressure filtration system, yielding a “light brown, clear liquid with a subjectively less unpleasant and intensive odor” than conventional FMT stool preparations. Bacterial cultures of these filtrates yielded no growth, whereas donor stool cultures showed profuse growth of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colonies, Dr. Ott and his associates said.
Patients became symptom-free 2-4 days after undergoing FFT. Notably, one patient had previously undergone FMT, which led to acute fever and diarrhea and recurrence of baseline symptoms after 3 months. This patient did not develop fever or diarrhea after FFT, was symptom-free after 3 days, and remained symptom-free until the study ended 2 years later, the researchers said. All other patients also remained symptom-free through the end of the study, that is, for 6 months to more than 2 years.
Analyses of 16S rRNA revealed substantial longitudinal shifts after FFT that often were present by week 1 and remained stable until week 6, the investigators said. Further tests confirmed marked shifts in bacterial phylotypes and in their relative abundance over time. Repeated virus analyses of one patient also showed that the phageome shifted over time to resemble that of the donor.
Patients were between 49 and 75 years old, three were female and two were male, and all had received more than one antibiotic before their first episode of CDI. Antibiotics for CDI had included metronidazole, vancomycin, and rifaximin. Comorbidities included pseudomembranous colitis, renal failure, HIV infection, epilepsy, and chronic heart failure, and medical histories included recurrent diverticulitis with sigmoid resection, gastric carcinoma, and colon cancer.
“It is important to keep in mind that, in contrast to conventional FMT, transferring sterile FFT filtrates cannot be expected to establish a microbiota similar to that of the donor in the receiving patient,” Dr. Ott and his associates noted. Instead, bacterial DNA in the filtrate might trigger the re-establishment of the recipient microbiome, they said. Bacterial cell wall fragments or bacteriophages also might play a role, they added.
The German Excellence Cluster and CONARIS Research Institute AG supported the work. Dr. Ott reported having lectured for Allergosan. Two coinvestigators reported employment with CONARIS. A third coinvestigator reported shareholder relationships with CONARIS, Allergosan, Danone, and Nestle and lectureship compensation from Allergosan. The other eight coinvestigators had no relevant conflicts of interest.
Sterile fecal filtrate transplantation (FFT) effectively treated five cases of symptomatic chronic-relapsing Clostridium difficile infection, investigators reported.
The procedure restored normal bowel habits and eliminated symptoms through the end of the study – that is, for at least 6 months – in all patients, Stephan J. Ott, MD, and his associates wrote (Gastroenterology. 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010).
Proteome analyses did not identify proteins likely to explain this efficacy, but 16S rRNA gene sequencing did demonstrate diverse bacterial DNA signatures in the filtrates, and tests of virus-like particles yielded “a complex signature of macrophages,” Dr. Ott and his associates reported. Additional tests suggested that recipients’ microbiomes continued to change weeks after FFT. “This open-label series strongly suggests that FFT should be evaluated in a controlled setting in comparison with standard fecal microbiota transplantation,” the researchers concluded.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but even “the most rigorous and costly donor screening procedures, or defined panels of bacteria, cannot exclude the risk of transferring unknown pathogens or undetectable functional characteristics within the living microorganisms to the recipient, including bacterial or viral risk factors for metabolic diseases, cancer, atopy, or autoimmunity,” the investigators wrote.
Therefore, they performed sterile FFT in five patients who were positive on at least two of three tests: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C. difficile–specific glutamate dehydrogenase; C. difficile toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; and culture of toxin-producing C. difficile. Patients chose their own stool donors, who were then screened based on published guidelines (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9[12]:1044-49). Next, “slurries” were prepared from donor stool and filtered with a custom-built air pressure filtration system, yielding a “light brown, clear liquid with a subjectively less unpleasant and intensive odor” than conventional FMT stool preparations. Bacterial cultures of these filtrates yielded no growth, whereas donor stool cultures showed profuse growth of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colonies, Dr. Ott and his associates said.
Patients became symptom-free 2-4 days after undergoing FFT. Notably, one patient had previously undergone FMT, which led to acute fever and diarrhea and recurrence of baseline symptoms after 3 months. This patient did not develop fever or diarrhea after FFT, was symptom-free after 3 days, and remained symptom-free until the study ended 2 years later, the researchers said. All other patients also remained symptom-free through the end of the study, that is, for 6 months to more than 2 years.
Analyses of 16S rRNA revealed substantial longitudinal shifts after FFT that often were present by week 1 and remained stable until week 6, the investigators said. Further tests confirmed marked shifts in bacterial phylotypes and in their relative abundance over time. Repeated virus analyses of one patient also showed that the phageome shifted over time to resemble that of the donor.
Patients were between 49 and 75 years old, three were female and two were male, and all had received more than one antibiotic before their first episode of CDI. Antibiotics for CDI had included metronidazole, vancomycin, and rifaximin. Comorbidities included pseudomembranous colitis, renal failure, HIV infection, epilepsy, and chronic heart failure, and medical histories included recurrent diverticulitis with sigmoid resection, gastric carcinoma, and colon cancer.
“It is important to keep in mind that, in contrast to conventional FMT, transferring sterile FFT filtrates cannot be expected to establish a microbiota similar to that of the donor in the receiving patient,” Dr. Ott and his associates noted. Instead, bacterial DNA in the filtrate might trigger the re-establishment of the recipient microbiome, they said. Bacterial cell wall fragments or bacteriophages also might play a role, they added.
The German Excellence Cluster and CONARIS Research Institute AG supported the work. Dr. Ott reported having lectured for Allergosan. Two coinvestigators reported employment with CONARIS. A third coinvestigator reported shareholder relationships with CONARIS, Allergosan, Danone, and Nestle and lectureship compensation from Allergosan. The other eight coinvestigators had no relevant conflicts of interest.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point: Sterile fecal filtrate transplantation effectively treated symptomatic chronic-relapsing Clostridium difficile infection.
Major finding: For all patients, transplantation restored normal bowel habits within 2-4 days and eliminated symptoms for at least 6 months.
Data source: A single-center cases series of five patients with recurrent symptomatic CDI.
Disclosures: The German Excellence Cluster and CONARIS Research Institute AG supported the work. Dr. Ott reported having lectured for Allergosan. Two coinvestigators reported employment with CONARIS. A third coinvestigator reported shareholder relationships with CONARIS, Allergosan, Danone, and Nestle and lectureship compensation from Allergosan. The other eight coinvestigators had no relevant conflicts of interest.
Endoscopic resection alone sufficed in many T1 colorectal cancers
Patients with T1 colorectal cancer might not benefit from additional surgery after endoscopic resection unless they have positive or indeterminate resection margins or high-risk histology, according to a retrospective, population-based study of 1,315 patients.
After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence were 6.2% in patients who underwent endoscopic resection only and 6.4% in patients who also had additional surgery (P = .9), reported Tim D.G. Belderbos, MD, of University Medical Center Utrecht (the Netherlands). Rates of local recurrence also were similar between these groups (4.1% and 3.7%, P = .3), he and his associates reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.041).
Among high-risk patients, however, the rates of overall recurrence were 14% with endoscopic resection only and 7% with endoscopic resection plus additional surgery (P = .06), and the rates of local recurrence were 12% and 1%, respectively (P = .004). “Based on our study, we recommend performing additional surgery after initial endoscopic resection in cases of high-risk T1 CRC, determined by high-risk histology and/or positive resection margins,” the researchers concluded. Invasive CRCs confined to the colonic submucosa (T1 CRC) present a treatment dilemma – they are usually cured by complete endoscopic resection, but up to 13% involve lymph node metastases and need additional surgery, the investigators noted. To identify predictors of recurrence and metastasis, they studied all patients diagnosed with T1 CRC in the Southeast Netherlands from 1995 through 2011. A total of 370 patients (28%) underwent endoscopic resection only, 220 (17%) underwent endoscopic resection with additional surgery, and 725 (55%) had an initial surgical resection.
Surgery after endoscopic resection was more likely when patients had positive or doubtful resection margins (P less than .001), and this link remained significant after high-risk histology, tumor location, time period, age, sex, and comorbidities were controlled for. Endoscopic resection plus surgery did not reduce the risk of recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only (P = .3), after the investigators accounted for age, sex, year of procedure, tumor location, and margin characteristics. Initial surgery was associated with significantly lower rates of overall and local recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only, but the differences also lost significance in the multivariable analysis (P = .2).
Only the presence of positive resection margins significantly predicted recurrence among patients undergoing endoscopic resection (hazard ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-20.9). Positive or doubtful resection margins also predicted recurrence after initial surgery, with hazard ratios of 13.2 and 3.4, respectively. High-risk histology – that is, poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, or lymphangioinvasion – was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7; P less than .002), but not with recurrence after resection margins were accounted for. This might result from missing histology data or the fact that patients with high-risk histology tended to undergo surgical rather than endoscopic resection, the researchers said.
They noted several other study limitations, including a lack of details about lesions and procedures. Also, endoscopic submucosal resection was not practiced in the Netherlands during the study period, they said.
The investigators did not report funding sources and had no disclosures.
Patients with T1 colorectal cancer might not benefit from additional surgery after endoscopic resection unless they have positive or indeterminate resection margins or high-risk histology, according to a retrospective, population-based study of 1,315 patients.
After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence were 6.2% in patients who underwent endoscopic resection only and 6.4% in patients who also had additional surgery (P = .9), reported Tim D.G. Belderbos, MD, of University Medical Center Utrecht (the Netherlands). Rates of local recurrence also were similar between these groups (4.1% and 3.7%, P = .3), he and his associates reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.041).
Among high-risk patients, however, the rates of overall recurrence were 14% with endoscopic resection only and 7% with endoscopic resection plus additional surgery (P = .06), and the rates of local recurrence were 12% and 1%, respectively (P = .004). “Based on our study, we recommend performing additional surgery after initial endoscopic resection in cases of high-risk T1 CRC, determined by high-risk histology and/or positive resection margins,” the researchers concluded. Invasive CRCs confined to the colonic submucosa (T1 CRC) present a treatment dilemma – they are usually cured by complete endoscopic resection, but up to 13% involve lymph node metastases and need additional surgery, the investigators noted. To identify predictors of recurrence and metastasis, they studied all patients diagnosed with T1 CRC in the Southeast Netherlands from 1995 through 2011. A total of 370 patients (28%) underwent endoscopic resection only, 220 (17%) underwent endoscopic resection with additional surgery, and 725 (55%) had an initial surgical resection.
Surgery after endoscopic resection was more likely when patients had positive or doubtful resection margins (P less than .001), and this link remained significant after high-risk histology, tumor location, time period, age, sex, and comorbidities were controlled for. Endoscopic resection plus surgery did not reduce the risk of recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only (P = .3), after the investigators accounted for age, sex, year of procedure, tumor location, and margin characteristics. Initial surgery was associated with significantly lower rates of overall and local recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only, but the differences also lost significance in the multivariable analysis (P = .2).
Only the presence of positive resection margins significantly predicted recurrence among patients undergoing endoscopic resection (hazard ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-20.9). Positive or doubtful resection margins also predicted recurrence after initial surgery, with hazard ratios of 13.2 and 3.4, respectively. High-risk histology – that is, poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, or lymphangioinvasion – was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7; P less than .002), but not with recurrence after resection margins were accounted for. This might result from missing histology data or the fact that patients with high-risk histology tended to undergo surgical rather than endoscopic resection, the researchers said.
They noted several other study limitations, including a lack of details about lesions and procedures. Also, endoscopic submucosal resection was not practiced in the Netherlands during the study period, they said.
The investigators did not report funding sources and had no disclosures.
Patients with T1 colorectal cancer might not benefit from additional surgery after endoscopic resection unless they have positive or indeterminate resection margins or high-risk histology, according to a retrospective, population-based study of 1,315 patients.
After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence were 6.2% in patients who underwent endoscopic resection only and 6.4% in patients who also had additional surgery (P = .9), reported Tim D.G. Belderbos, MD, of University Medical Center Utrecht (the Netherlands). Rates of local recurrence also were similar between these groups (4.1% and 3.7%, P = .3), he and his associates reported in the March issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.041).
Among high-risk patients, however, the rates of overall recurrence were 14% with endoscopic resection only and 7% with endoscopic resection plus additional surgery (P = .06), and the rates of local recurrence were 12% and 1%, respectively (P = .004). “Based on our study, we recommend performing additional surgery after initial endoscopic resection in cases of high-risk T1 CRC, determined by high-risk histology and/or positive resection margins,” the researchers concluded. Invasive CRCs confined to the colonic submucosa (T1 CRC) present a treatment dilemma – they are usually cured by complete endoscopic resection, but up to 13% involve lymph node metastases and need additional surgery, the investigators noted. To identify predictors of recurrence and metastasis, they studied all patients diagnosed with T1 CRC in the Southeast Netherlands from 1995 through 2011. A total of 370 patients (28%) underwent endoscopic resection only, 220 (17%) underwent endoscopic resection with additional surgery, and 725 (55%) had an initial surgical resection.
Surgery after endoscopic resection was more likely when patients had positive or doubtful resection margins (P less than .001), and this link remained significant after high-risk histology, tumor location, time period, age, sex, and comorbidities were controlled for. Endoscopic resection plus surgery did not reduce the risk of recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only (P = .3), after the investigators accounted for age, sex, year of procedure, tumor location, and margin characteristics. Initial surgery was associated with significantly lower rates of overall and local recurrence, compared with endoscopic resection only, but the differences also lost significance in the multivariable analysis (P = .2).
Only the presence of positive resection margins significantly predicted recurrence among patients undergoing endoscopic resection (hazard ratio, 6.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-20.9). Positive or doubtful resection margins also predicted recurrence after initial surgery, with hazard ratios of 13.2 and 3.4, respectively. High-risk histology – that is, poor differentiation, deep submucosal invasion, or lymphangioinvasion – was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.7; P less than .002), but not with recurrence after resection margins were accounted for. This might result from missing histology data or the fact that patients with high-risk histology tended to undergo surgical rather than endoscopic resection, the researchers said.
They noted several other study limitations, including a lack of details about lesions and procedures. Also, endoscopic submucosal resection was not practiced in the Netherlands during the study period, they said.
The investigators did not report funding sources and had no disclosures.
FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point. Patients with T1 colorectal cancer might not benefit from additional surgery after endoscopic resection unless they have positive or indeterminate resection margins or high-risk histology.
Major finding: After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, rates of CRC recurrence were 6.2% in patients who underwent endoscopic resection only, and 6.4% in patients who also had additional surgery (P = .9). Among high-risk patients, these rates were 14% and 7%, respectively (P = .06).
Data source: A retrospective population-based study of 1,315 patients who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection of T1 colorectal cancer.
Disclosures: The investigators did not report funding sources and had no disclosures.
AGA Clinical Practice Update: Endoscope reprocessing guidelines are an improvement
While the 2016 Multi-Society Task Force Endoscope Reprocessing Guidelines are an improvement over the 2011 guidelines, some of its minor changes are unlikely to guarantee against prevention of future outbreaks, according to Susan Hutfless, PhD, and Anthony N. Kalloo, MD.*
“The prevention of future outbreaks is left to the manufacturers to modify their protocols and the endoscopy units to adopt the protocols rapidly,” the authors, both from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, wrote in a commentary about the 2016 guidelines, which contain 41 recommendations and were endorsed by the AGA. “If followed, the guidelines will make it possible to better track the source of future outbreaks if the tracking and monitoring suggested is performed.” They added that the current cleaning paradigm for duodenoscopes “is ineffective and these guidelines reflect changes to contain, rather than prevent, future outbreaks.”
Some of the specific changes to the 2016 guidelines include recommendation no. 5, which has been revised to recommend “strict adherence” to manufacturer guidance. “The expectation is that all personnel will remain up to date with the manufacturer guidelines and that there will be documentation of the training,” Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo wrote. The 2016 guidelines specifically state that a “single standard work process within one institution may be insufficient, given differences among manufacturers’ instructions and varied instrument designs.” However, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo point out that “an individual or group of individuals may need to be identified to keep up with the FDA, CDC, manufacturer and professional societies in order to modify and implement the changes to the cleaning and training protocols and update the training of all individuals in the unit. It is unclear from the guidelines what the minimum time should be between change in recommendations and updated training.”
Recommendation no. 24 is new and includes a suggestion consistent with the 2015 FDA endoscope reprocessing communications. “Beyond the reprocessing steps discussed in these recommendations, no validated methods for additional duodenoscope reprocessing currently exist,” the guidelines state. “However, units should review and consider the feasibility and appropriateness for their practice of employing one or more of the additional modalities suggested by the FDA for duodenoscopes: intermittent or per procedure culture surveillance of reprocessing outcomes, sterilization with ethylene oxide gas, repeat application of standard high level disinfection, or use of a liquid chemical germicide.” For their part, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo pointed out the limitations of these additional modalities. For example, they wrote, “the per procedure culture surveillance modality suggested by the FDA is not cost-effective unless the unit’s transmission probability of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is 24% or greater. Sterilization with ethylene oxide is problematic because a unit that used this approach still encountered an endoscope with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae detected by culture. This unit also incurred extra costs to purchase additional scopes due to the longer reprocessing time for sterilization and had a greater number of endoscopes with damage, although the damage was not directly attributable to sterilization” (Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84:259-62).
In 2016, the FDA approved the first disposable colonoscope, a product that is expected to be available in the United States in early 2017. Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo ended their commentary by suggesting that a disposable endoscope with an elevator mechanism, though not currently available, could be a solution to several of the unresolved issues that were present in the 2003, 2011, and 2016 guidelines. “These unresolved issues include interval of storage after reprocessing, microbiologic surveillance, and endoscope durability and longevity,” they wrote. “If the outbreaks persist after the use of disposable endoscopes it is possible that it is some other product or procedure within the endoscopic procedure that is the source of the infectious transmission.”
*This story was update on Jan. 26, 2017.
While the 2016 Multi-Society Task Force Endoscope Reprocessing Guidelines are an improvement over the 2011 guidelines, some of its minor changes are unlikely to guarantee against prevention of future outbreaks, according to Susan Hutfless, PhD, and Anthony N. Kalloo, MD.*
“The prevention of future outbreaks is left to the manufacturers to modify their protocols and the endoscopy units to adopt the protocols rapidly,” the authors, both from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, wrote in a commentary about the 2016 guidelines, which contain 41 recommendations and were endorsed by the AGA. “If followed, the guidelines will make it possible to better track the source of future outbreaks if the tracking and monitoring suggested is performed.” They added that the current cleaning paradigm for duodenoscopes “is ineffective and these guidelines reflect changes to contain, rather than prevent, future outbreaks.”
Some of the specific changes to the 2016 guidelines include recommendation no. 5, which has been revised to recommend “strict adherence” to manufacturer guidance. “The expectation is that all personnel will remain up to date with the manufacturer guidelines and that there will be documentation of the training,” Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo wrote. The 2016 guidelines specifically state that a “single standard work process within one institution may be insufficient, given differences among manufacturers’ instructions and varied instrument designs.” However, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo point out that “an individual or group of individuals may need to be identified to keep up with the FDA, CDC, manufacturer and professional societies in order to modify and implement the changes to the cleaning and training protocols and update the training of all individuals in the unit. It is unclear from the guidelines what the minimum time should be between change in recommendations and updated training.”
Recommendation no. 24 is new and includes a suggestion consistent with the 2015 FDA endoscope reprocessing communications. “Beyond the reprocessing steps discussed in these recommendations, no validated methods for additional duodenoscope reprocessing currently exist,” the guidelines state. “However, units should review and consider the feasibility and appropriateness for their practice of employing one or more of the additional modalities suggested by the FDA for duodenoscopes: intermittent or per procedure culture surveillance of reprocessing outcomes, sterilization with ethylene oxide gas, repeat application of standard high level disinfection, or use of a liquid chemical germicide.” For their part, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo pointed out the limitations of these additional modalities. For example, they wrote, “the per procedure culture surveillance modality suggested by the FDA is not cost-effective unless the unit’s transmission probability of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is 24% or greater. Sterilization with ethylene oxide is problematic because a unit that used this approach still encountered an endoscope with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae detected by culture. This unit also incurred extra costs to purchase additional scopes due to the longer reprocessing time for sterilization and had a greater number of endoscopes with damage, although the damage was not directly attributable to sterilization” (Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84:259-62).
In 2016, the FDA approved the first disposable colonoscope, a product that is expected to be available in the United States in early 2017. Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo ended their commentary by suggesting that a disposable endoscope with an elevator mechanism, though not currently available, could be a solution to several of the unresolved issues that were present in the 2003, 2011, and 2016 guidelines. “These unresolved issues include interval of storage after reprocessing, microbiologic surveillance, and endoscope durability and longevity,” they wrote. “If the outbreaks persist after the use of disposable endoscopes it is possible that it is some other product or procedure within the endoscopic procedure that is the source of the infectious transmission.”
*This story was update on Jan. 26, 2017.
While the 2016 Multi-Society Task Force Endoscope Reprocessing Guidelines are an improvement over the 2011 guidelines, some of its minor changes are unlikely to guarantee against prevention of future outbreaks, according to Susan Hutfless, PhD, and Anthony N. Kalloo, MD.*
“The prevention of future outbreaks is left to the manufacturers to modify their protocols and the endoscopy units to adopt the protocols rapidly,” the authors, both from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, wrote in a commentary about the 2016 guidelines, which contain 41 recommendations and were endorsed by the AGA. “If followed, the guidelines will make it possible to better track the source of future outbreaks if the tracking and monitoring suggested is performed.” They added that the current cleaning paradigm for duodenoscopes “is ineffective and these guidelines reflect changes to contain, rather than prevent, future outbreaks.”
Some of the specific changes to the 2016 guidelines include recommendation no. 5, which has been revised to recommend “strict adherence” to manufacturer guidance. “The expectation is that all personnel will remain up to date with the manufacturer guidelines and that there will be documentation of the training,” Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo wrote. The 2016 guidelines specifically state that a “single standard work process within one institution may be insufficient, given differences among manufacturers’ instructions and varied instrument designs.” However, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo point out that “an individual or group of individuals may need to be identified to keep up with the FDA, CDC, manufacturer and professional societies in order to modify and implement the changes to the cleaning and training protocols and update the training of all individuals in the unit. It is unclear from the guidelines what the minimum time should be between change in recommendations and updated training.”
Recommendation no. 24 is new and includes a suggestion consistent with the 2015 FDA endoscope reprocessing communications. “Beyond the reprocessing steps discussed in these recommendations, no validated methods for additional duodenoscope reprocessing currently exist,” the guidelines state. “However, units should review and consider the feasibility and appropriateness for their practice of employing one or more of the additional modalities suggested by the FDA for duodenoscopes: intermittent or per procedure culture surveillance of reprocessing outcomes, sterilization with ethylene oxide gas, repeat application of standard high level disinfection, or use of a liquid chemical germicide.” For their part, Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo pointed out the limitations of these additional modalities. For example, they wrote, “the per procedure culture surveillance modality suggested by the FDA is not cost-effective unless the unit’s transmission probability of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is 24% or greater. Sterilization with ethylene oxide is problematic because a unit that used this approach still encountered an endoscope with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae detected by culture. This unit also incurred extra costs to purchase additional scopes due to the longer reprocessing time for sterilization and had a greater number of endoscopes with damage, although the damage was not directly attributable to sterilization” (Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug;84:259-62).
In 2016, the FDA approved the first disposable colonoscope, a product that is expected to be available in the United States in early 2017. Dr. Hutfless and Dr. Kalloo ended their commentary by suggesting that a disposable endoscope with an elevator mechanism, though not currently available, could be a solution to several of the unresolved issues that were present in the 2003, 2011, and 2016 guidelines. “These unresolved issues include interval of storage after reprocessing, microbiologic surveillance, and endoscope durability and longevity,” they wrote. “If the outbreaks persist after the use of disposable endoscopes it is possible that it is some other product or procedure within the endoscopic procedure that is the source of the infectious transmission.”
*This story was update on Jan. 26, 2017.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY