Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Key clinical point: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly older adults and women, had a modestly reduced risk of developing migraine over a 16-year follow-up period.

Major finding: During the 16-year follow-up, patients with vs without CKD had an 11% lower risk for migraine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; P = .006), with the risk being prominently lower among older adults (age ≥ 70 years; aHR 0.69; P < .001) and women (aHR 0.84; P = .006).

Study details: This nationwide, 16-year longitudinal follow-up study included 15,443 participants with CKD, of whom 349 (2.26%) had migraine, and 61,772 participants without CKD, of whom 1901 (3.08%) had migraine.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Bracco Imaging Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwon MJ, Kim J-K, Kim M-J, et al. Associations between chronic kidney disease and migraine incidence: Findings from a Korean longitudinal big data study. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):356 (Mar 28).  doi: 10.3390/jpm14040356 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly older adults and women, had a modestly reduced risk of developing migraine over a 16-year follow-up period.

Major finding: During the 16-year follow-up, patients with vs without CKD had an 11% lower risk for migraine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; P = .006), with the risk being prominently lower among older adults (age ≥ 70 years; aHR 0.69; P < .001) and women (aHR 0.84; P = .006).

Study details: This nationwide, 16-year longitudinal follow-up study included 15,443 participants with CKD, of whom 349 (2.26%) had migraine, and 61,772 participants without CKD, of whom 1901 (3.08%) had migraine.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Bracco Imaging Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwon MJ, Kim J-K, Kim M-J, et al. Associations between chronic kidney disease and migraine incidence: Findings from a Korean longitudinal big data study. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):356 (Mar 28).  doi: 10.3390/jpm14040356 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly older adults and women, had a modestly reduced risk of developing migraine over a 16-year follow-up period.

Major finding: During the 16-year follow-up, patients with vs without CKD had an 11% lower risk for migraine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; P = .006), with the risk being prominently lower among older adults (age ≥ 70 years; aHR 0.69; P < .001) and women (aHR 0.84; P = .006).

Study details: This nationwide, 16-year longitudinal follow-up study included 15,443 participants with CKD, of whom 349 (2.26%) had migraine, and 61,772 participants without CKD, of whom 1901 (3.08%) had migraine.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Bracco Imaging Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwon MJ, Kim J-K, Kim M-J, et al. Associations between chronic kidney disease and migraine incidence: Findings from a Korean longitudinal big data study. J Pers Med. 2024;14(4):356 (Mar 28).  doi: 10.3390/jpm14040356 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with migraine, any oral prophylactic therapy significantly improved sleep quality, but anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) had significantly better effects than other oral prophylactic therapies.

Major finding: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score significantly reduced from 6.84 at baseline to 5.581 at 3 months with any oral prophylactic therapy and from 8.913 at baseline to 6.491 at 3 months with anti-CGRP mAbs. Among oral therapies, calcium channel blockers (P = .042) and antidepressants (P = .049) showed higher efficacy in reducing PSQI scores.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 214 patients with migraine, with or without aura, who received any oral prophylactic therapy (n = 143) or anti-CGRP mAb (n = 71).

Disclosures: This study was partially supported by Fondazione Giorgini, Italy. Mauro Silvestrini declared receiving financial support from the Giorgini Foundation. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Viticchi G, Di Stefano V, Altamura C, et al. Effects of prophylactic drug therapies and anti-calcitonin peptide-related monoclonal antibodies on subjective sleep quality: An Italian multicenter study. Sleep Med. 2024;117:87-94 (Mar 17). doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.03.026 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with migraine, any oral prophylactic therapy significantly improved sleep quality, but anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) had significantly better effects than other oral prophylactic therapies.

Major finding: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score significantly reduced from 6.84 at baseline to 5.581 at 3 months with any oral prophylactic therapy and from 8.913 at baseline to 6.491 at 3 months with anti-CGRP mAbs. Among oral therapies, calcium channel blockers (P = .042) and antidepressants (P = .049) showed higher efficacy in reducing PSQI scores.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 214 patients with migraine, with or without aura, who received any oral prophylactic therapy (n = 143) or anti-CGRP mAb (n = 71).

Disclosures: This study was partially supported by Fondazione Giorgini, Italy. Mauro Silvestrini declared receiving financial support from the Giorgini Foundation. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Viticchi G, Di Stefano V, Altamura C, et al. Effects of prophylactic drug therapies and anti-calcitonin peptide-related monoclonal antibodies on subjective sleep quality: An Italian multicenter study. Sleep Med. 2024;117:87-94 (Mar 17). doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.03.026 Source

Key clinical point: In patients with migraine, any oral prophylactic therapy significantly improved sleep quality, but anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) had significantly better effects than other oral prophylactic therapies.

Major finding: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score significantly reduced from 6.84 at baseline to 5.581 at 3 months with any oral prophylactic therapy and from 8.913 at baseline to 6.491 at 3 months with anti-CGRP mAbs. Among oral therapies, calcium channel blockers (P = .042) and antidepressants (P = .049) showed higher efficacy in reducing PSQI scores.

Study details: This multicenter prospective study included 214 patients with migraine, with or without aura, who received any oral prophylactic therapy (n = 143) or anti-CGRP mAb (n = 71).

Disclosures: This study was partially supported by Fondazione Giorgini, Italy. Mauro Silvestrini declared receiving financial support from the Giorgini Foundation. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Viticchi G, Di Stefano V, Altamura C, et al. Effects of prophylactic drug therapies and anti-calcitonin peptide-related monoclonal antibodies on subjective sleep quality: An Italian multicenter study. Sleep Med. 2024;117:87-94 (Mar 17). doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.03.026 Source

Key clinical point: Early initiation of erenumab demonstrated better long-term efficacy, tolerability, and patient adherence than non-specific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPM) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and one or two previous preventive treatment failures.

Major finding: At month 12, significantly more patients in the erenumab vs OMPM group completed the initially assigned treatment and also achieved a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (odds ratio 6.48; P < .001). A smaller proportion of patients in the erenumab group vs the OMPM group switched medications (2.2% vs 34.6%) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (2.9% vs 23.3%).

Study details: Findings are from the APPRAISE trial that included 621 patients with EM (age ≥ 18 years) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments and were randomly assigned to receive erenumab (n = 413) and OMPM (n = 208).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Several authors declared themselves as employees of or holding stocks in Novartis, and the other authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, et al. Early use of erenumab vs nonspecific oral migraine preventives: The APPRAISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2024 (Mar 25). doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368 Source

Key clinical point: Early initiation of erenumab demonstrated better long-term efficacy, tolerability, and patient adherence than non-specific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPM) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and one or two previous preventive treatment failures.

Major finding: At month 12, significantly more patients in the erenumab vs OMPM group completed the initially assigned treatment and also achieved a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (odds ratio 6.48; P < .001). A smaller proportion of patients in the erenumab group vs the OMPM group switched medications (2.2% vs 34.6%) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (2.9% vs 23.3%).

Study details: Findings are from the APPRAISE trial that included 621 patients with EM (age ≥ 18 years) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments and were randomly assigned to receive erenumab (n = 413) and OMPM (n = 208).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Several authors declared themselves as employees of or holding stocks in Novartis, and the other authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, et al. Early use of erenumab vs nonspecific oral migraine preventives: The APPRAISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2024 (Mar 25). doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368 Source

Key clinical point: Early initiation of erenumab demonstrated better long-term efficacy, tolerability, and patient adherence than non-specific oral migraine preventive medications (OMPM) in patients with episodic migraine (EM) and one or two previous preventive treatment failures.

Major finding: At month 12, significantly more patients in the erenumab vs OMPM group completed the initially assigned treatment and also achieved a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days (odds ratio 6.48; P < .001). A smaller proportion of patients in the erenumab group vs the OMPM group switched medications (2.2% vs 34.6%) and discontinued treatment due to adverse events (2.9% vs 23.3%).

Study details: Findings are from the APPRAISE trial that included 621 patients with EM (age ≥ 18 years) who had previously failed 1 or 2 preventive treatments and were randomly assigned to receive erenumab (n = 413) and OMPM (n = 208).

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. Several authors declared themselves as employees of or holding stocks in Novartis, and the other authors declared ties with various sources, including Novartis.

Source: Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, et al. Early use of erenumab vs nonspecific oral migraine preventives: The APPRAISE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2024 (Mar 25). doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368 Source

Key clinical point: High-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) monotherapy for 12 weeks showed superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with episodic migraine (EM), emphasizing its potential as a promising prophylactic option for managing EM.

Major finding: At 12 weeks, EPA vs placebo significantly improved monthly migraine frequency (P = .001), frequency of acute headache medication usage (P = .035), and headache severity (P = .030). No serious adverse events (AE) were reported, and no patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable AE.

Study details: This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included 70 patients with EM who were randomly assigned to receive high-dose EPA (1800 mg/day; n = 70) or placebo (n = 70).

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from Kuang Tien General Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in Taiwan, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang H-F, Liu W-C, Zailani H, et al. A 12-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial of eicosapentaenoic acid intervention in episodic migraine. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;18:459-467 (Mar 16). doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.03.019 Source

Key clinical point: High-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) monotherapy for 12 weeks showed superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with episodic migraine (EM), emphasizing its potential as a promising prophylactic option for managing EM.

Major finding: At 12 weeks, EPA vs placebo significantly improved monthly migraine frequency (P = .001), frequency of acute headache medication usage (P = .035), and headache severity (P = .030). No serious adverse events (AE) were reported, and no patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable AE.

Study details: This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included 70 patients with EM who were randomly assigned to receive high-dose EPA (1800 mg/day; n = 70) or placebo (n = 70).

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from Kuang Tien General Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in Taiwan, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang H-F, Liu W-C, Zailani H, et al. A 12-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial of eicosapentaenoic acid intervention in episodic migraine. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;18:459-467 (Mar 16). doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.03.019 Source

Key clinical point: High-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) monotherapy for 12 weeks showed superior efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with episodic migraine (EM), emphasizing its potential as a promising prophylactic option for managing EM.

Major finding: At 12 weeks, EPA vs placebo significantly improved monthly migraine frequency (P = .001), frequency of acute headache medication usage (P = .035), and headache severity (P = .030). No serious adverse events (AE) were reported, and no patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable AE.

Study details: This 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included 70 patients with EM who were randomly assigned to receive high-dose EPA (1800 mg/day; n = 70) or placebo (n = 70).

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from Kuang Tien General Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) in Taiwan, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang H-F, Liu W-C, Zailani H, et al. A 12-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial of eicosapentaenoic acid intervention in episodic migraine. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;18:459-467 (Mar 16). doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.03.019 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had severe vs non-severe disease according to the modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) showed higher disease activity, experienced more pain, and had higher disease impact both at baseline and during follow-up.

Major finding: At baseline, 36.1% of patients had severe PsA as assessed by mCPDAI. A significantly higher disease activity, disease impact, number of tender or swollen joints, and pain and reduced function were observed in patients with severe vs non-severe disease at baseline and follow-up (all P < .01). Male sex and severity of skin involvement at baseline were the factors associated with the severe PsA at last follow-up (both P ≤ .01).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of a longitudinal study included 177 patients with peripheral PsA who were followed for at least 1 year.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding or sponsorship. Ennio Lubrano and Fabio Perrotta declared being members of the editorial board of Rheumatology and Therapy. Silvia Scriffignano declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM. Clinical characteristics of "severe" peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 (Apr 9). doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00667-0  Source

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had severe vs non-severe disease according to the modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) showed higher disease activity, experienced more pain, and had higher disease impact both at baseline and during follow-up.

Major finding: At baseline, 36.1% of patients had severe PsA as assessed by mCPDAI. A significantly higher disease activity, disease impact, number of tender or swollen joints, and pain and reduced function were observed in patients with severe vs non-severe disease at baseline and follow-up (all P < .01). Male sex and severity of skin involvement at baseline were the factors associated with the severe PsA at last follow-up (both P ≤ .01).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of a longitudinal study included 177 patients with peripheral PsA who were followed for at least 1 year.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding or sponsorship. Ennio Lubrano and Fabio Perrotta declared being members of the editorial board of Rheumatology and Therapy. Silvia Scriffignano declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM. Clinical characteristics of "severe" peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 (Apr 9). doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00667-0  Source

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who had severe vs non-severe disease according to the modified Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (mCPDAI) showed higher disease activity, experienced more pain, and had higher disease impact both at baseline and during follow-up.

Major finding: At baseline, 36.1% of patients had severe PsA as assessed by mCPDAI. A significantly higher disease activity, disease impact, number of tender or swollen joints, and pain and reduced function were observed in patients with severe vs non-severe disease at baseline and follow-up (all P < .01). Male sex and severity of skin involvement at baseline were the factors associated with the severe PsA at last follow-up (both P ≤ .01).

Study details: This retrospective analysis of a longitudinal study included 177 patients with peripheral PsA who were followed for at least 1 year.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding or sponsorship. Ennio Lubrano and Fabio Perrotta declared being members of the editorial board of Rheumatology and Therapy. Silvia Scriffignano declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM. Clinical characteristics of "severe" peripheral psoriatic arthritis: A retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 (Apr 9). doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00667-0  Source

Key clinical point: Treatment with an interleukin-17A inhibitor (IL-17Ai) may be desirable in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as it proved to be more effective and safer compared with other biologics.

Major finding: A higher number of patients achieved the composite endpoint of ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.56; 95% CI 1.29-1.88; P < .001) and enthesitis resolution (pooled RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02-1.47) with IL17Ai vs TNFi. The probability of adverse events was the lowest with phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor (PDE4i) followed by IL-17Ai.

Study details: Findings are from a network meta-analysis of 17 studies including biologic-naive patients with PsA treated with IL inhibitor, TNFi, PDE4i, and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lin J, Ren Y. Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1279525 (Mar 12). doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1279525  Source

Key clinical point: Treatment with an interleukin-17A inhibitor (IL-17Ai) may be desirable in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as it proved to be more effective and safer compared with other biologics.

Major finding: A higher number of patients achieved the composite endpoint of ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.56; 95% CI 1.29-1.88; P < .001) and enthesitis resolution (pooled RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02-1.47) with IL17Ai vs TNFi. The probability of adverse events was the lowest with phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor (PDE4i) followed by IL-17Ai.

Study details: Findings are from a network meta-analysis of 17 studies including biologic-naive patients with PsA treated with IL inhibitor, TNFi, PDE4i, and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lin J, Ren Y. Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1279525 (Mar 12). doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1279525  Source

Key clinical point: Treatment with an interleukin-17A inhibitor (IL-17Ai) may be desirable in biologic-naive patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as it proved to be more effective and safer compared with other biologics.

Major finding: A higher number of patients achieved the composite endpoint of ≥50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology and 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.56; 95% CI 1.29-1.88; P < .001) and enthesitis resolution (pooled RR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02-1.47) with IL17Ai vs TNFi. The probability of adverse events was the lowest with phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor (PDE4i) followed by IL-17Ai.

Study details: Findings are from a network meta-analysis of 17 studies including biologic-naive patients with PsA treated with IL inhibitor, TNFi, PDE4i, and Janus kinase inhibitors.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lin J, Ren Y. Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1279525 (Mar 12). doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1279525  Source

Key clinical point: Risankizumab led to considerable improvements in skin- and joint-associated clinical outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were followed-up for >28 weeks.

Major finding: Of the 31 patients with clinical disease activity index for PsA > 4 at baseline, 11 patients achieved remission at a follow-up visit between 28 and 40 weeks (P < .004). Risankizumab also led to a significant reduction in the mean psoriasis area severity index score between weeks 28 and 40 vs baseline (0.3 vs 8.4; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, multicenter real-world study including 40 patients with PsA who were treated with 150 mg risankizumab at week 0 and week 4 and every 12 weeks subsequently.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or honoraria from or having other ties with various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Graceffa D, Zangrilli A, Caldarola G, et al. Effectiveness of risankizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: A multicenter, real-world study. Int J Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 7). doi: 10.1111/ijd.17156 Source

Key clinical point: Risankizumab led to considerable improvements in skin- and joint-associated clinical outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were followed-up for >28 weeks.

Major finding: Of the 31 patients with clinical disease activity index for PsA > 4 at baseline, 11 patients achieved remission at a follow-up visit between 28 and 40 weeks (P < .004). Risankizumab also led to a significant reduction in the mean psoriasis area severity index score between weeks 28 and 40 vs baseline (0.3 vs 8.4; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, multicenter real-world study including 40 patients with PsA who were treated with 150 mg risankizumab at week 0 and week 4 and every 12 weeks subsequently.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or honoraria from or having other ties with various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Graceffa D, Zangrilli A, Caldarola G, et al. Effectiveness of risankizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: A multicenter, real-world study. Int J Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 7). doi: 10.1111/ijd.17156 Source

Key clinical point: Risankizumab led to considerable improvements in skin- and joint-associated clinical outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were followed-up for >28 weeks.

Major finding: Of the 31 patients with clinical disease activity index for PsA > 4 at baseline, 11 patients achieved remission at a follow-up visit between 28 and 40 weeks (P < .004). Risankizumab also led to a significant reduction in the mean psoriasis area severity index score between weeks 28 and 40 vs baseline (0.3 vs 8.4; P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, multicenter real-world study including 40 patients with PsA who were treated with 150 mg risankizumab at week 0 and week 4 and every 12 weeks subsequently.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or honoraria from or having other ties with various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Graceffa D, Zangrilli A, Caldarola G, et al. Effectiveness of risankizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: A multicenter, real-world study. Int J Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 7). doi: 10.1111/ijd.17156 Source

Key clinical point: A quarter of patients with early psoriatic arthritis who were naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) reported bone erosions, with a decreased prevalence being observed in patients with shorter duration of PsA symptoms (<8 months).

Major finding: Overall, 4655 hand and feet joints were assessed in 122 patients, of whom 24.6% patients had bone erosions at baseline, with higher Disease Activity features observed in patients who did vs did not have bone erosions (P < .05). Prevalence of erosion was less in patients who had a <8 months vs >24 months of PsA symptoms (17.5% vs 24.3%).

Study details: This study included 122 newly diagnosed, DMARD-naive patients with early PsA from the Leeds Spondyloarthropathy Register for Research and Observation cohort who were assessed for bone erosions using conventional radiography or ultrasound.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. Sayam R. Dubash received support from Leeds Cares charity. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hen O, Di Matteo A, Dubash SR, et al. High prevalence of radiographic erosions in early, untreated PsA: Results from the SpARRO cohort. RMD Open. 2024;10:e003841 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003841 Source

Key clinical point: A quarter of patients with early psoriatic arthritis who were naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) reported bone erosions, with a decreased prevalence being observed in patients with shorter duration of PsA symptoms (<8 months).

Major finding: Overall, 4655 hand and feet joints were assessed in 122 patients, of whom 24.6% patients had bone erosions at baseline, with higher Disease Activity features observed in patients who did vs did not have bone erosions (P < .05). Prevalence of erosion was less in patients who had a <8 months vs >24 months of PsA symptoms (17.5% vs 24.3%).

Study details: This study included 122 newly diagnosed, DMARD-naive patients with early PsA from the Leeds Spondyloarthropathy Register for Research and Observation cohort who were assessed for bone erosions using conventional radiography or ultrasound.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. Sayam R. Dubash received support from Leeds Cares charity. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hen O, Di Matteo A, Dubash SR, et al. High prevalence of radiographic erosions in early, untreated PsA: Results from the SpARRO cohort. RMD Open. 2024;10:e003841 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003841 Source

Key clinical point: A quarter of patients with early psoriatic arthritis who were naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) reported bone erosions, with a decreased prevalence being observed in patients with shorter duration of PsA symptoms (<8 months).

Major finding: Overall, 4655 hand and feet joints were assessed in 122 patients, of whom 24.6% patients had bone erosions at baseline, with higher Disease Activity features observed in patients who did vs did not have bone erosions (P < .05). Prevalence of erosion was less in patients who had a <8 months vs >24 months of PsA symptoms (17.5% vs 24.3%).

Study details: This study included 122 newly diagnosed, DMARD-naive patients with early PsA from the Leeds Spondyloarthropathy Register for Research and Observation cohort who were assessed for bone erosions using conventional radiography or ultrasound.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. Sayam R. Dubash received support from Leeds Cares charity. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hen O, Di Matteo A, Dubash SR, et al. High prevalence of radiographic erosions in early, untreated PsA: Results from the SpARRO cohort. RMD Open. 2024;10:e003841 (Apr 5). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003841 Source

Key clinical point: Deucravacitinib improved patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for physical and social functioning, mental health, fatigue, and pain in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 16, 6 mg deucravacitinib vs placebo led to significant changes in functional ability as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (−0.26; 95% CI −0.42 to −0.10) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (3.3; 95% CI 0.9 to 5.7), with similar outcomes for 12 mg deucravacitinib. Improvements were also noted in mental health and quality of life at week 16 with deucravacitinib vs placebo.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2, double-blind trial that included 203 patients with active PsA who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 6 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 70), 12 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 67), or placebo (n = 66) for 16 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Strand V, Gossec L, Coates LC, et al. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after treatment with deucravacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results from a randomized phase 2 trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1002/acr.25333  Source

Key clinical point: Deucravacitinib improved patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for physical and social functioning, mental health, fatigue, and pain in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 16, 6 mg deucravacitinib vs placebo led to significant changes in functional ability as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (−0.26; 95% CI −0.42 to −0.10) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (3.3; 95% CI 0.9 to 5.7), with similar outcomes for 12 mg deucravacitinib. Improvements were also noted in mental health and quality of life at week 16 with deucravacitinib vs placebo.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2, double-blind trial that included 203 patients with active PsA who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 6 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 70), 12 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 67), or placebo (n = 66) for 16 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Strand V, Gossec L, Coates LC, et al. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after treatment with deucravacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results from a randomized phase 2 trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1002/acr.25333  Source

Key clinical point: Deucravacitinib improved patient-reported outcomes (PRO) for physical and social functioning, mental health, fatigue, and pain in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 16, 6 mg deucravacitinib vs placebo led to significant changes in functional ability as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (−0.26; 95% CI −0.42 to −0.10) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (3.3; 95% CI 0.9 to 5.7), with similar outcomes for 12 mg deucravacitinib. Improvements were also noted in mental health and quality of life at week 16 with deucravacitinib vs placebo.

Study details: Findings are from a phase 2, double-blind trial that included 203 patients with active PsA who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 6 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 70), 12 mg deucravacitinib daily (n = 67), or placebo (n = 66) for 16 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Strand V, Gossec L, Coates LC, et al. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes after treatment with deucravacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results from a randomized phase 2 trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 (Mar 26). doi: 10.1002/acr.25333  Source

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive, guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis resolution (ER) was associated with dactylitis resolution (DR), and those achieving ER or DR showed improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

Major finding: At weeks 24, 52, and 100, guselkumab-treated patients who achieved DR were more likely to achieve ER, and vice versa (all P < .05). At week 24, a higher proportion of patients who did vs did not achieve ER reported minimal pain (30%-45% vs 11%-21%; all P < .001), with similar pain outcomes in patients who did vs did not achieve DR.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included 739 biologic-naive patients with PsA who were randomly assigned to receive guselkumab (100 mg every 4 or 8 weeks) or placebo with crossover to guselkumab (100 mg every 4 weeks) at week 24, of whom 68.6% and 44.9% of patients had enthesitis and dactylitis, respectively.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Six authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning Johnson and Johnson stock or stock options. The other authors declared receiving consulting fees from or having other ties with various sources, including Janssen.

Source: Rahman P, McInnes IB, Deodhar A, et al. Association between enthesitis/dactylitis resolution and patient-reported outcomes in guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2024;43:1591-1604 (Mar 12). doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06921-8  Source

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive, guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis resolution (ER) was associated with dactylitis resolution (DR), and those achieving ER or DR showed improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

Major finding: At weeks 24, 52, and 100, guselkumab-treated patients who achieved DR were more likely to achieve ER, and vice versa (all P < .05). At week 24, a higher proportion of patients who did vs did not achieve ER reported minimal pain (30%-45% vs 11%-21%; all P < .001), with similar pain outcomes in patients who did vs did not achieve DR.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included 739 biologic-naive patients with PsA who were randomly assigned to receive guselkumab (100 mg every 4 or 8 weeks) or placebo with crossover to guselkumab (100 mg every 4 weeks) at week 24, of whom 68.6% and 44.9% of patients had enthesitis and dactylitis, respectively.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Six authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning Johnson and Johnson stock or stock options. The other authors declared receiving consulting fees from or having other ties with various sources, including Janssen.

Source: Rahman P, McInnes IB, Deodhar A, et al. Association between enthesitis/dactylitis resolution and patient-reported outcomes in guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2024;43:1591-1604 (Mar 12). doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06921-8  Source

Key clinical point: Among biologic-naive, guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis resolution (ER) was associated with dactylitis resolution (DR), and those achieving ER or DR showed improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

Major finding: At weeks 24, 52, and 100, guselkumab-treated patients who achieved DR were more likely to achieve ER, and vice versa (all P < .05). At week 24, a higher proportion of patients who did vs did not achieve ER reported minimal pain (30%-45% vs 11%-21%; all P < .001), with similar pain outcomes in patients who did vs did not achieve DR.

Study details: This post hoc analysis included 739 biologic-naive patients with PsA who were randomly assigned to receive guselkumab (100 mg every 4 or 8 weeks) or placebo with crossover to guselkumab (100 mg every 4 weeks) at week 24, of whom 68.6% and 44.9% of patients had enthesitis and dactylitis, respectively.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Six authors declared being employees of Janssen and owning Johnson and Johnson stock or stock options. The other authors declared receiving consulting fees from or having other ties with various sources, including Janssen.

Source: Rahman P, McInnes IB, Deodhar A, et al. Association between enthesitis/dactylitis resolution and patient-reported outcomes in guselkumab-treated patients with psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2024;43:1591-1604 (Mar 12). doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06921-8  Source