AML

Photo by Rhoda Baer

SAN DIEGO—A study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has revealed misperceptions about treatment risks and the likelihood of cure.

Investigators surveyed 100 AML patients receiving intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy, as well as the patients’ oncologists.

The results showed that patients tended to overestimate both the risk of dying due to treatment and the likelihood of cure.

These findings were presented at the 2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium (abstract 43).

“Patients with AML face very challenging treatment decisions that are often placed upon them within days after being diagnosed,” said study investigator Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Because they face a grave decision, they need to understand what the risks of treatment are versus the possibility of a cure.”

For this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues enrolled 50 patients who were receiving intensive care for AML (which usually meant hospitalization for 4 to 6 weeks) and 50 patients who were receiving non-intensive care (often given as outpatient treatment).

The patients’ median age was 71 (range, 60-100), and 92% were white. Six percent of patients had low-risk disease, 48% had intermediate-risk, and 46% had high-risk disease.

Within 3 days of starting treatment, both the patients and their physicians were given a questionnaire to assess how they perceived the likelihood of the patient dying from treatment.

One month later, patients and physicians completed a follow-up questionnaire to assess perceptions of patient prognosis. Within that time frame, most patients received laboratory results that more definitively established the type and stage of cancer.

At 24 weeks, the investigators asked patients if they had discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists.

Results

Initially, most of the patient population (91.3%) thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would die from their treatment. However, only 22% of treating oncologists said the same.

One month later, a majority of patients in both treatment groups thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured of their AML.

Specifically, 82.1% of patients receiving non-intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, while 10% of their oncologists said the same.

Meanwhile, 97.6% of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, and 42% of their oncologists said the same.

Overall, 77.8% of patients said they had not discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists at 24 weeks.

“There were several very important factors we were not able to capture in our study, including what was actually discussed between patients and their oncologists and whether patients simply misunderstood or misheard the information conveyed to them,” Dr El-Jawahri said.

“Perhaps most importantly, we did not audio-record the discussions between the patients and their physicians, which could provide additional details regarding barriers to accurate prognostic understanding in these conversations.”

Related research and next steps

Prior to this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues had looked at similar perceptions in patients with solid tumor malignancies as well as in patients with hematologic malignancies who were receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

The gaps in perception of treatment risk and cure for patients compared to their physicians were not as large in those cases as in the AML patients in this study. The investigators attribute this to higher levels of distress seen in AML patients due to the urgency of their treatment decisions.

Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues have found that early consideration of palliative care in a treatment plan for patients with solid tumors improves patients’ understanding of the prognosis. The team hopes to implement a similar study in patients with AML.

“Clearly, there are important communication gaps between oncologists and their patients,” Dr El-Jawahri said. “We need to find ways to help physicians do a better job of communicating with their patients, especially in diseases like AML where stress levels are remarkably high.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

SAN DIEGO—A study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has revealed misperceptions about treatment risks and the likelihood of cure.

Investigators surveyed 100 AML patients receiving intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy, as well as the patients’ oncologists.

The results showed that patients tended to overestimate both the risk of dying due to treatment and the likelihood of cure.

These findings were presented at the 2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium (abstract 43).

“Patients with AML face very challenging treatment decisions that are often placed upon them within days after being diagnosed,” said study investigator Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Because they face a grave decision, they need to understand what the risks of treatment are versus the possibility of a cure.”

For this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues enrolled 50 patients who were receiving intensive care for AML (which usually meant hospitalization for 4 to 6 weeks) and 50 patients who were receiving non-intensive care (often given as outpatient treatment).

The patients’ median age was 71 (range, 60-100), and 92% were white. Six percent of patients had low-risk disease, 48% had intermediate-risk, and 46% had high-risk disease.

Within 3 days of starting treatment, both the patients and their physicians were given a questionnaire to assess how they perceived the likelihood of the patient dying from treatment.

One month later, patients and physicians completed a follow-up questionnaire to assess perceptions of patient prognosis. Within that time frame, most patients received laboratory results that more definitively established the type and stage of cancer.

At 24 weeks, the investigators asked patients if they had discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists.

Results

Initially, most of the patient population (91.3%) thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would die from their treatment. However, only 22% of treating oncologists said the same.

One month later, a majority of patients in both treatment groups thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured of their AML.

Specifically, 82.1% of patients receiving non-intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, while 10% of their oncologists said the same.

Meanwhile, 97.6% of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, and 42% of their oncologists said the same.

Overall, 77.8% of patients said they had not discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists at 24 weeks.

“There were several very important factors we were not able to capture in our study, including what was actually discussed between patients and their oncologists and whether patients simply misunderstood or misheard the information conveyed to them,” Dr El-Jawahri said.

“Perhaps most importantly, we did not audio-record the discussions between the patients and their physicians, which could provide additional details regarding barriers to accurate prognostic understanding in these conversations.”

Related research and next steps

Prior to this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues had looked at similar perceptions in patients with solid tumor malignancies as well as in patients with hematologic malignancies who were receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

The gaps in perception of treatment risk and cure for patients compared to their physicians were not as large in those cases as in the AML patients in this study. The investigators attribute this to higher levels of distress seen in AML patients due to the urgency of their treatment decisions.

Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues have found that early consideration of palliative care in a treatment plan for patients with solid tumors improves patients’ understanding of the prognosis. The team hopes to implement a similar study in patients with AML.

“Clearly, there are important communication gaps between oncologists and their patients,” Dr El-Jawahri said. “We need to find ways to help physicians do a better job of communicating with their patients, especially in diseases like AML where stress levels are remarkably high.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

SAN DIEGO—A study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has revealed misperceptions about treatment risks and the likelihood of cure.

Investigators surveyed 100 AML patients receiving intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy, as well as the patients’ oncologists.

The results showed that patients tended to overestimate both the risk of dying due to treatment and the likelihood of cure.

These findings were presented at the 2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium (abstract 43).

“Patients with AML face very challenging treatment decisions that are often placed upon them within days after being diagnosed,” said study investigator Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

“Because they face a grave decision, they need to understand what the risks of treatment are versus the possibility of a cure.”

For this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues enrolled 50 patients who were receiving intensive care for AML (which usually meant hospitalization for 4 to 6 weeks) and 50 patients who were receiving non-intensive care (often given as outpatient treatment).

The patients’ median age was 71 (range, 60-100), and 92% were white. Six percent of patients had low-risk disease, 48% had intermediate-risk, and 46% had high-risk disease.

Within 3 days of starting treatment, both the patients and their physicians were given a questionnaire to assess how they perceived the likelihood of the patient dying from treatment.

One month later, patients and physicians completed a follow-up questionnaire to assess perceptions of patient prognosis. Within that time frame, most patients received laboratory results that more definitively established the type and stage of cancer.

At 24 weeks, the investigators asked patients if they had discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists.

Results

Initially, most of the patient population (91.3%) thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would die from their treatment. However, only 22% of treating oncologists said the same.

One month later, a majority of patients in both treatment groups thought it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured of their AML.

Specifically, 82.1% of patients receiving non-intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, while 10% of their oncologists said the same.

Meanwhile, 97.6% of patients receiving intensive chemotherapy said it was “somewhat” or “extremely” likely they would be cured, and 42% of their oncologists said the same.

Overall, 77.8% of patients said they had not discussed their end-of-life wishes with their oncologists at 24 weeks.

“There were several very important factors we were not able to capture in our study, including what was actually discussed between patients and their oncologists and whether patients simply misunderstood or misheard the information conveyed to them,” Dr El-Jawahri said.

“Perhaps most importantly, we did not audio-record the discussions between the patients and their physicians, which could provide additional details regarding barriers to accurate prognostic understanding in these conversations.”

Related research and next steps

Prior to this study, Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues had looked at similar perceptions in patients with solid tumor malignancies as well as in patients with hematologic malignancies who were receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

The gaps in perception of treatment risk and cure for patients compared to their physicians were not as large in those cases as in the AML patients in this study. The investigators attribute this to higher levels of distress seen in AML patients due to the urgency of their treatment decisions.

Dr El-Jawahri and her colleagues have found that early consideration of palliative care in a treatment plan for patients with solid tumors improves patients’ understanding of the prognosis. The team hopes to implement a similar study in patients with AML.

“Clearly, there are important communication gaps between oncologists and their patients,” Dr El-Jawahri said. “We need to find ways to help physicians do a better job of communicating with their patients, especially in diseases like AML where stress levels are remarkably high.”

Photo by Aaron Logan

Targeting two pathways simultaneously—one critical for oncogenesis and one essential for cell survival—may be an effective strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The team studied mouse models of FLT3-ITD AML and found an inhibitor targeting the FLT3 pathway was largely effective against the disease.

However, targeting the BCL-2 pathway as well proved even more effective, completely eliminating AML in most cases.

Fumihiko Ishikawa, MD, PhD, of RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, and his colleagues described this work in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers noted that mutations observed in AML patients have also been observed in elderly people without AML. So the team set out to determine which mutations actually contribute to the disease.

The researchers obtained bone marrow or blood samples from patients with FLT3-ITD AML and transplanted different cellular populations from each individual into mice. The team then examined how the cells behaved.

They were surprised to find that cells with similar surface marker profiles behaved differently. Therefore, the team used single-cell genomic sequencing to correlate mutational profiles with malignant potential.

The researchers said their results suggest that FLT3-ITD is “a critical trigger for leukemia initiation,” and it cooperates with accumulated mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, NPM1, and/or WT1.

The team went on to treat the FLT3-ITD AML mice with RK-20449, a FLT3/HCK inhibitor, and they observed “significant responses.”

In fact, RK-20449 eradicated leukemia originating from 5 different patients. The recipient mice experienced complete elimination of AML cells, in spite of the fact that they also carried mutations not directly targeted by RK-20449.

However, the researchers also noted the presence of RK-20449-resistant AML cells in some mice. The team therefore theorized that co-inhibition of an antiapoptotic signal—BCL-2—might remedy this.

So they treated resistant mice with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax as well as RK-20449. The combination produced responses in all mice treated and completely eliminated AML cells in 9 of 12 cases.

“This shows that determining which of the mutations in a diverse landscape are critical in leukemia onset and which of the pathways are critical for therapeutic resistance in leukemia, and simultaneously targeting those pathways, is an encouraging way to treat difficult cancers such as AML,” Dr Ishikawa said.

Photo by Aaron Logan

Targeting two pathways simultaneously—one critical for oncogenesis and one essential for cell survival—may be an effective strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The team studied mouse models of FLT3-ITD AML and found an inhibitor targeting the FLT3 pathway was largely effective against the disease.

However, targeting the BCL-2 pathway as well proved even more effective, completely eliminating AML in most cases.

Fumihiko Ishikawa, MD, PhD, of RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, and his colleagues described this work in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers noted that mutations observed in AML patients have also been observed in elderly people without AML. So the team set out to determine which mutations actually contribute to the disease.

The researchers obtained bone marrow or blood samples from patients with FLT3-ITD AML and transplanted different cellular populations from each individual into mice. The team then examined how the cells behaved.

They were surprised to find that cells with similar surface marker profiles behaved differently. Therefore, the team used single-cell genomic sequencing to correlate mutational profiles with malignant potential.

The researchers said their results suggest that FLT3-ITD is “a critical trigger for leukemia initiation,” and it cooperates with accumulated mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, NPM1, and/or WT1.

The team went on to treat the FLT3-ITD AML mice with RK-20449, a FLT3/HCK inhibitor, and they observed “significant responses.”

In fact, RK-20449 eradicated leukemia originating from 5 different patients. The recipient mice experienced complete elimination of AML cells, in spite of the fact that they also carried mutations not directly targeted by RK-20449.

However, the researchers also noted the presence of RK-20449-resistant AML cells in some mice. The team therefore theorized that co-inhibition of an antiapoptotic signal—BCL-2—might remedy this.

So they treated resistant mice with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax as well as RK-20449. The combination produced responses in all mice treated and completely eliminated AML cells in 9 of 12 cases.

“This shows that determining which of the mutations in a diverse landscape are critical in leukemia onset and which of the pathways are critical for therapeutic resistance in leukemia, and simultaneously targeting those pathways, is an encouraging way to treat difficult cancers such as AML,” Dr Ishikawa said.

Photo by Aaron Logan

Targeting two pathways simultaneously—one critical for oncogenesis and one essential for cell survival—may be an effective strategy for treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The team studied mouse models of FLT3-ITD AML and found an inhibitor targeting the FLT3 pathway was largely effective against the disease.

However, targeting the BCL-2 pathway as well proved even more effective, completely eliminating AML in most cases.

Fumihiko Ishikawa, MD, PhD, of RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, and his colleagues described this work in Science Translational Medicine.

The researchers noted that mutations observed in AML patients have also been observed in elderly people without AML. So the team set out to determine which mutations actually contribute to the disease.

The researchers obtained bone marrow or blood samples from patients with FLT3-ITD AML and transplanted different cellular populations from each individual into mice. The team then examined how the cells behaved.

They were surprised to find that cells with similar surface marker profiles behaved differently. Therefore, the team used single-cell genomic sequencing to correlate mutational profiles with malignant potential.

The researchers said their results suggest that FLT3-ITD is “a critical trigger for leukemia initiation,” and it cooperates with accumulated mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, NPM1, and/or WT1.

The team went on to treat the FLT3-ITD AML mice with RK-20449, a FLT3/HCK inhibitor, and they observed “significant responses.”

In fact, RK-20449 eradicated leukemia originating from 5 different patients. The recipient mice experienced complete elimination of AML cells, in spite of the fact that they also carried mutations not directly targeted by RK-20449.

However, the researchers also noted the presence of RK-20449-resistant AML cells in some mice. The team therefore theorized that co-inhibition of an antiapoptotic signal—BCL-2—might remedy this.

So they treated resistant mice with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax as well as RK-20449. The combination produced responses in all mice treated and completely eliminated AML cells in 9 of 12 cases.

“This shows that determining which of the mutations in a diverse landscape are critical in leukemia onset and which of the pathways are critical for therapeutic resistance in leukemia, and simultaneously targeting those pathways, is an encouraging way to treat difficult cancers such as AML,” Dr Ishikawa said.

SAN FRANCISCO – After years of stagnation in the field of acute myeloid leukemia – with most standard therapies developed in the 1970s – times are changing, Bruno Medeiros, MD, said at the annual congress on hematologic malignancies held by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

“2017 is the year of AML,” he said. Four new therapies have been approved by the FDA since April. They include midostaurin for newly diagnosed, FLT-3–mutated patients; enasidenib, for relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutated patients; CPX-351, for high-risk AML patients; and gemtuzumab ozogamicin for newly diagnosed, CD-33–positive patients.

SAN FRANCISCO – After years of stagnation in the field of acute myeloid leukemia – with most standard therapies developed in the 1970s – times are changing, Bruno Medeiros, MD, said at the annual congress on hematologic malignancies held by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

“2017 is the year of AML,” he said. Four new therapies have been approved by the FDA since April. They include midostaurin for newly diagnosed, FLT-3–mutated patients; enasidenib, for relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutated patients; CPX-351, for high-risk AML patients; and gemtuzumab ozogamicin for newly diagnosed, CD-33–positive patients.

SAN FRANCISCO – After years of stagnation in the field of acute myeloid leukemia – with most standard therapies developed in the 1970s – times are changing, Bruno Medeiros, MD, said at the annual congress on hematologic malignancies held by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

“2017 is the year of AML,” he said. Four new therapies have been approved by the FDA since April. They include midostaurin for newly diagnosed, FLT-3–mutated patients; enasidenib, for relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutated patients; CPX-351, for high-risk AML patients; and gemtuzumab ozogamicin for newly diagnosed, CD-33–positive patients.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.

“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.

At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.

A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.

For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.

Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.

This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.

This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.

“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.

At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.

A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.

For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.

Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.

This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.

This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.

“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.

At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.

A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.

For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.

Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.

This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.

This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Red blood cells

Preclinical research has revealed a treatment that might preserve normal hematopoietic function in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Researchers found that AML suppresses adipocytes in the bone marrow, which leads to imbalanced regulation of endogenous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and impaired myelo-erythroid maturation.

However, a PPARγ agonist can induce adipogenesis, which suppresses AML cells and stimulates the regeneration of healthy blood cells.

Researchers reported these findings in Nature Cell Biology.

The team found that adipocytes in the bone marrow support myelo-erythroid maturation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. But AML has a negative effect on the maturation of adipocytes, which explains why deficient myelo-erythropoiesis is “a consistent feature” of AML.

The researchers also found that pro-adipogenesis therapy—treatment with the PPARγ agonist GW1929—protects healthy myelo-erythropoiesis and limits leukemic self-renewal.

“Our approach represents a different way of looking at leukemia and considers the entire bone marrow as an ecosystem, rather than the traditional approach of studying and trying to directly kill the diseased cells themselves,” said study author Allison Boyd, PhD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

“These traditional approaches have not delivered enough new therapeutic options for patients. The standard of care for this disease hasn’t changed in several decades.”

“The focus of chemotherapy and existing standard of care is on killing cancer cells, but, instead, we took a completely different approach, which changes the environment the cancer cells live in,” said study author Mick Bhatia, PhD, of McMaster University.

“This not only suppressed the ‘bad’ cancer cells but also bolstered the ‘good’ healthy cells, allowing them to regenerate in the new drug-induced environment. The fact that we can target one cell type in one tissue using an existing drug makes us excited about the possibilities of testing this in patients.”

“We can envision this becoming a potential new therapeutic approach that can either be added to existing treatments or even replace others in the near future. The fact that this drug activates blood regeneration may provide benefits for those waiting for bone marrow transplants by activating their own healthy cells.”

Red blood cells

Preclinical research has revealed a treatment that might preserve normal hematopoietic function in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Researchers found that AML suppresses adipocytes in the bone marrow, which leads to imbalanced regulation of endogenous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and impaired myelo-erythroid maturation.

However, a PPARγ agonist can induce adipogenesis, which suppresses AML cells and stimulates the regeneration of healthy blood cells.

Researchers reported these findings in Nature Cell Biology.

The team found that adipocytes in the bone marrow support myelo-erythroid maturation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. But AML has a negative effect on the maturation of adipocytes, which explains why deficient myelo-erythropoiesis is “a consistent feature” of AML.

The researchers also found that pro-adipogenesis therapy—treatment with the PPARγ agonist GW1929—protects healthy myelo-erythropoiesis and limits leukemic self-renewal.

“Our approach represents a different way of looking at leukemia and considers the entire bone marrow as an ecosystem, rather than the traditional approach of studying and trying to directly kill the diseased cells themselves,” said study author Allison Boyd, PhD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

“These traditional approaches have not delivered enough new therapeutic options for patients. The standard of care for this disease hasn’t changed in several decades.”

“The focus of chemotherapy and existing standard of care is on killing cancer cells, but, instead, we took a completely different approach, which changes the environment the cancer cells live in,” said study author Mick Bhatia, PhD, of McMaster University.

“This not only suppressed the ‘bad’ cancer cells but also bolstered the ‘good’ healthy cells, allowing them to regenerate in the new drug-induced environment. The fact that we can target one cell type in one tissue using an existing drug makes us excited about the possibilities of testing this in patients.”

“We can envision this becoming a potential new therapeutic approach that can either be added to existing treatments or even replace others in the near future. The fact that this drug activates blood regeneration may provide benefits for those waiting for bone marrow transplants by activating their own healthy cells.”

Red blood cells

Preclinical research has revealed a treatment that might preserve normal hematopoietic function in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Researchers found that AML suppresses adipocytes in the bone marrow, which leads to imbalanced regulation of endogenous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and impaired myelo-erythroid maturation.

However, a PPARγ agonist can induce adipogenesis, which suppresses AML cells and stimulates the regeneration of healthy blood cells.

Researchers reported these findings in Nature Cell Biology.

The team found that adipocytes in the bone marrow support myelo-erythroid maturation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. But AML has a negative effect on the maturation of adipocytes, which explains why deficient myelo-erythropoiesis is “a consistent feature” of AML.

The researchers also found that pro-adipogenesis therapy—treatment with the PPARγ agonist GW1929—protects healthy myelo-erythropoiesis and limits leukemic self-renewal.

“Our approach represents a different way of looking at leukemia and considers the entire bone marrow as an ecosystem, rather than the traditional approach of studying and trying to directly kill the diseased cells themselves,” said study author Allison Boyd, PhD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

“These traditional approaches have not delivered enough new therapeutic options for patients. The standard of care for this disease hasn’t changed in several decades.”

“The focus of chemotherapy and existing standard of care is on killing cancer cells, but, instead, we took a completely different approach, which changes the environment the cancer cells live in,” said study author Mick Bhatia, PhD, of McMaster University.

“This not only suppressed the ‘bad’ cancer cells but also bolstered the ‘good’ healthy cells, allowing them to regenerate in the new drug-induced environment. The fact that we can target one cell type in one tissue using an existing drug makes us excited about the possibilities of testing this in patients.”

“We can envision this becoming a potential new therapeutic approach that can either be added to existing treatments or even replace others in the near future. The fact that this drug activates blood regeneration may provide benefits for those waiting for bone marrow transplants by activating their own healthy cells.”

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.

Angelyn Nguyen/UCLA

Biophysicists have developed a new method to determine a cell’s mechanical properties, and they believe this method could provide insights regarding cancers, sickle cell anemia, and other diseases.

The method allows researchers to make standardized measurements of single cells, determine each cell’s stiffness, and assign it a number, generally between 10 and 20,000, in pascals.

“Measuring cells with our calibrated instrument is like measuring time with a standardized clock,” said Amy Rowat, PhD, of the University of California Los Angeles.

“Our method can be used to obtain stiffness measurements of hundreds of cells per second.”

Dr Rowat and her colleagues described their method in Biophysical Journal.

The method is called quantitative deformability cytometry (q-DC). It involves a small device (about 1 inch by 2 inches) made of a soft, flexible rubber that has integrated circuit chips like those in computers.

The researchers use gel particles containing molecules derived from seaweed to force cells through tiny pores in the device. As the cells flow through the device, the researchers take videos at thousands of frames per second—more than 100 times faster than standard video.

Dr Rowat and her colleagues used the device to analyze promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) and breast cancer cells.

The researchers believe this work will provide scientists with a more precise, standardized method to distinguish cancer cells from normal cells.

The team thinks that, in the future, their method could be used to track a cancer patient over time to see how a drug is affecting the patient’s cancer cells.

“By using q-DC, we can very rapidly assess how specific drug treatments affect physical properties of single cells—such as shape, size, and stiffness—and achieve calibrated, quantitative measurements,” Dr Rowat said.

She and her colleagues believe q-DC might also help predict how invasive a cancer cell could be and which drugs might be most effective in fighting the cancer, as well as revealing which proteins are important in regulating the invasion of a cancer cell.

The researchers are now applying q-DC to other types of cancer cells. The team would like to better understand the relationship between a cancer cell’s physical properties and how easily cancer cells can spread through the body.

Dr Rowat’s hypothesis is that properties such as stiffness, size, and a cell’s ability to change shape are important in enabling cancer cells to maneuver.

The researchers said they can also use q-DC to measure other types of cells, such as normal and sickled red blood cells.

Angelyn Nguyen/UCLA

Biophysicists have developed a new method to determine a cell’s mechanical properties, and they believe this method could provide insights regarding cancers, sickle cell anemia, and other diseases.

The method allows researchers to make standardized measurements of single cells, determine each cell’s stiffness, and assign it a number, generally between 10 and 20,000, in pascals.

“Measuring cells with our calibrated instrument is like measuring time with a standardized clock,” said Amy Rowat, PhD, of the University of California Los Angeles.

“Our method can be used to obtain stiffness measurements of hundreds of cells per second.”

Dr Rowat and her colleagues described their method in Biophysical Journal.

The method is called quantitative deformability cytometry (q-DC). It involves a small device (about 1 inch by 2 inches) made of a soft, flexible rubber that has integrated circuit chips like those in computers.

The researchers use gel particles containing molecules derived from seaweed to force cells through tiny pores in the device. As the cells flow through the device, the researchers take videos at thousands of frames per second—more than 100 times faster than standard video.

Dr Rowat and her colleagues used the device to analyze promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) and breast cancer cells.

The researchers believe this work will provide scientists with a more precise, standardized method to distinguish cancer cells from normal cells.

The team thinks that, in the future, their method could be used to track a cancer patient over time to see how a drug is affecting the patient’s cancer cells.

“By using q-DC, we can very rapidly assess how specific drug treatments affect physical properties of single cells—such as shape, size, and stiffness—and achieve calibrated, quantitative measurements,” Dr Rowat said.

She and her colleagues believe q-DC might also help predict how invasive a cancer cell could be and which drugs might be most effective in fighting the cancer, as well as revealing which proteins are important in regulating the invasion of a cancer cell.

The researchers are now applying q-DC to other types of cancer cells. The team would like to better understand the relationship between a cancer cell’s physical properties and how easily cancer cells can spread through the body.

Dr Rowat’s hypothesis is that properties such as stiffness, size, and a cell’s ability to change shape are important in enabling cancer cells to maneuver.

The researchers said they can also use q-DC to measure other types of cells, such as normal and sickled red blood cells.

Angelyn Nguyen/UCLA

Biophysicists have developed a new method to determine a cell’s mechanical properties, and they believe this method could provide insights regarding cancers, sickle cell anemia, and other diseases.

The method allows researchers to make standardized measurements of single cells, determine each cell’s stiffness, and assign it a number, generally between 10 and 20,000, in pascals.

“Measuring cells with our calibrated instrument is like measuring time with a standardized clock,” said Amy Rowat, PhD, of the University of California Los Angeles.

“Our method can be used to obtain stiffness measurements of hundreds of cells per second.”

Dr Rowat and her colleagues described their method in Biophysical Journal.

The method is called quantitative deformability cytometry (q-DC). It involves a small device (about 1 inch by 2 inches) made of a soft, flexible rubber that has integrated circuit chips like those in computers.

The researchers use gel particles containing molecules derived from seaweed to force cells through tiny pores in the device. As the cells flow through the device, the researchers take videos at thousands of frames per second—more than 100 times faster than standard video.

Dr Rowat and her colleagues used the device to analyze promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60) and breast cancer cells.

The researchers believe this work will provide scientists with a more precise, standardized method to distinguish cancer cells from normal cells.

The team thinks that, in the future, their method could be used to track a cancer patient over time to see how a drug is affecting the patient’s cancer cells.

“By using q-DC, we can very rapidly assess how specific drug treatments affect physical properties of single cells—such as shape, size, and stiffness—and achieve calibrated, quantitative measurements,” Dr Rowat said.

She and her colleagues believe q-DC might also help predict how invasive a cancer cell could be and which drugs might be most effective in fighting the cancer, as well as revealing which proteins are important in regulating the invasion of a cancer cell.

The researchers are now applying q-DC to other types of cancer cells. The team would like to better understand the relationship between a cancer cell’s physical properties and how easily cancer cells can spread through the body.

Dr Rowat’s hypothesis is that properties such as stiffness, size, and a cell’s ability to change shape are important in enabling cancer cells to maneuver.

The researchers said they can also use q-DC to measure other types of cells, such as normal and sickled red blood cells.

Image by Lance Liotta

Researchers say they have discovered a compound that can overcome resistance to apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The compound, BTSA1, works by activating the BCL-2 family protein BAX.

BTSA1 prompted apoptosis in leukemia cells while sparing healthy cells. It also suppressed AML in mice without producing side effects.

Evripidis Gavathiotis, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York, and his colleagues described these results in Cancer Cell.

The team knew that apoptosis occurs when BAX is activated by pro-apoptotic proteins. However, cancer cells can avoid apoptosis by producing anti-apoptotic proteins that suppress BAX and the proteins that activate it.

“Our novel compound revives suppressed BAX molecules in cancer cells by binding with high affinity to BAX’s activation site,” Dr Gavathiotis said. “BAX can then swing into action, killing cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unscathed.”

Dr Gavathiotis was the lead author of a paper published in Nature in 2008 that first described the structure and shape of BAX’s activation site. He has since looked for small molecules that can activate BAX strongly enough to overcome cancer cells’ resistance to apoptosis.

His team initially screened more than 1 million compounds to reveal those with BAX-binding potential. The most promising 500 compounds were then evaluated in the lab.

“A compound dubbed BTSA1 (short for BAX Trigger Site Activator 1) proved to be the most potent BAX activator, causing rapid and extensive apoptosis when added to several different human AML cell lines,” said Denis Reyna, a doctoral student in Dr Gavathiotis’s lab.

The researchers also tested BTSA1 in blood samples from patients with high-risk AML. BTSA1 induced apoptosis in the patients’ AML cells but did not affect healthy hematopoietic stem cells.

Finally, the researchers generated mouse models of AML. BTSA1 was given to half the mice, while the other half served as controls.

On average, the BTSA1-treated mice survived significantly longer than the control mice—55 days and 40 days, respectively (P=0.0009). In fact, 43% of BTSA1-treated mice were still alive after 60 days and showing no signs of AML.

In addition, the mice treated with BTSA1 showed no evidence of toxicity.

“BTSA1 activates BAX and causes apoptosis in AML cells while sparing healthy cells and tissues, probably because the cancer cells are primed for apoptosis,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his colleagues found that AML cells contained significantly higher BAX levels than normal blood cells from healthy subjects.

“With more BAX available in AML cells, even low BTSA1 doses will trigger enough BAX activation to cause apoptotic death, while sparing healthy cells that contain low levels of BAX or none at all,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his team plan to determine if BTSA1 will elicit similar results in other cancer types.

Image by Lance Liotta

Researchers say they have discovered a compound that can overcome resistance to apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The compound, BTSA1, works by activating the BCL-2 family protein BAX.

BTSA1 prompted apoptosis in leukemia cells while sparing healthy cells. It also suppressed AML in mice without producing side effects.

Evripidis Gavathiotis, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York, and his colleagues described these results in Cancer Cell.

The team knew that apoptosis occurs when BAX is activated by pro-apoptotic proteins. However, cancer cells can avoid apoptosis by producing anti-apoptotic proteins that suppress BAX and the proteins that activate it.

“Our novel compound revives suppressed BAX molecules in cancer cells by binding with high affinity to BAX’s activation site,” Dr Gavathiotis said. “BAX can then swing into action, killing cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unscathed.”

Dr Gavathiotis was the lead author of a paper published in Nature in 2008 that first described the structure and shape of BAX’s activation site. He has since looked for small molecules that can activate BAX strongly enough to overcome cancer cells’ resistance to apoptosis.

His team initially screened more than 1 million compounds to reveal those with BAX-binding potential. The most promising 500 compounds were then evaluated in the lab.

“A compound dubbed BTSA1 (short for BAX Trigger Site Activator 1) proved to be the most potent BAX activator, causing rapid and extensive apoptosis when added to several different human AML cell lines,” said Denis Reyna, a doctoral student in Dr Gavathiotis’s lab.

The researchers also tested BTSA1 in blood samples from patients with high-risk AML. BTSA1 induced apoptosis in the patients’ AML cells but did not affect healthy hematopoietic stem cells.

Finally, the researchers generated mouse models of AML. BTSA1 was given to half the mice, while the other half served as controls.

On average, the BTSA1-treated mice survived significantly longer than the control mice—55 days and 40 days, respectively (P=0.0009). In fact, 43% of BTSA1-treated mice were still alive after 60 days and showing no signs of AML.

In addition, the mice treated with BTSA1 showed no evidence of toxicity.

“BTSA1 activates BAX and causes apoptosis in AML cells while sparing healthy cells and tissues, probably because the cancer cells are primed for apoptosis,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his colleagues found that AML cells contained significantly higher BAX levels than normal blood cells from healthy subjects.

“With more BAX available in AML cells, even low BTSA1 doses will trigger enough BAX activation to cause apoptotic death, while sparing healthy cells that contain low levels of BAX or none at all,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his team plan to determine if BTSA1 will elicit similar results in other cancer types.

Image by Lance Liotta

Researchers say they have discovered a compound that can overcome resistance to apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The compound, BTSA1, works by activating the BCL-2 family protein BAX.

BTSA1 prompted apoptosis in leukemia cells while sparing healthy cells. It also suppressed AML in mice without producing side effects.

Evripidis Gavathiotis, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York, and his colleagues described these results in Cancer Cell.

The team knew that apoptosis occurs when BAX is activated by pro-apoptotic proteins. However, cancer cells can avoid apoptosis by producing anti-apoptotic proteins that suppress BAX and the proteins that activate it.

“Our novel compound revives suppressed BAX molecules in cancer cells by binding with high affinity to BAX’s activation site,” Dr Gavathiotis said. “BAX can then swing into action, killing cancer cells while leaving healthy cells unscathed.”

Dr Gavathiotis was the lead author of a paper published in Nature in 2008 that first described the structure and shape of BAX’s activation site. He has since looked for small molecules that can activate BAX strongly enough to overcome cancer cells’ resistance to apoptosis.

His team initially screened more than 1 million compounds to reveal those with BAX-binding potential. The most promising 500 compounds were then evaluated in the lab.

“A compound dubbed BTSA1 (short for BAX Trigger Site Activator 1) proved to be the most potent BAX activator, causing rapid and extensive apoptosis when added to several different human AML cell lines,” said Denis Reyna, a doctoral student in Dr Gavathiotis’s lab.

The researchers also tested BTSA1 in blood samples from patients with high-risk AML. BTSA1 induced apoptosis in the patients’ AML cells but did not affect healthy hematopoietic stem cells.

Finally, the researchers generated mouse models of AML. BTSA1 was given to half the mice, while the other half served as controls.

On average, the BTSA1-treated mice survived significantly longer than the control mice—55 days and 40 days, respectively (P=0.0009). In fact, 43% of BTSA1-treated mice were still alive after 60 days and showing no signs of AML.

In addition, the mice treated with BTSA1 showed no evidence of toxicity.

“BTSA1 activates BAX and causes apoptosis in AML cells while sparing healthy cells and tissues, probably because the cancer cells are primed for apoptosis,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his colleagues found that AML cells contained significantly higher BAX levels than normal blood cells from healthy subjects.

“With more BAX available in AML cells, even low BTSA1 doses will trigger enough BAX activation to cause apoptotic death, while sparing healthy cells that contain low levels of BAX or none at all,” Dr Gavathiotis said.

He and his team plan to determine if BTSA1 will elicit similar results in other cancer types.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection have higher cancer rates than countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection, according to a study published in Evolutionary Applications.

Researchers said this is because modern medicine is enabling people to survive cancers, and their genetic backgrounds are passing from one generation to the next.

The team said the rate of some cancers has doubled and even quadrupled over the past 100 to 150 years, and human evolution has moved away from “survival of the fittest.”

“Modern medicine has enabled the human species to live much longer than would otherwise be expected in the natural world,” said study author Maciej Henneberg, PhD, DSc, of the University of Adelaide in South Australia.

“Besides the obvious benefits that modern medicine gives, it also brings with it an unexpected side-effect—allowing genetic material to be passed from one generation to the next that predisposes people to have poor health, such as type 1 diabetes or cancer.”

“Because of the quality of our healthcare in western society, we have almost removed natural selection as the ‘janitor of the gene pool.’ Unfortunately, the accumulation of genetic mutations over time and across multiple generations is like a delayed death sentence.”

Country comparison

The researchers studied global cancer data from the World Health Organization as well as other health and socioeconomic data from the United Nations and the World Bank of 173 countries. The team compared the top 10 countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection to the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection.

“We looked at countries that offered the greatest opportunity to survive cancer compared with those that didn’t,” said study author Wenpeng You, a PhD student at the University of Adelaide. “This does not only take into account factors such as socioeconomic status, urbanization, and quality of medical services but also low mortality and fertility rates, which are the 2 distinguishing features in the ‘better’ world.”

“Countries with low mortality rates may allow more people with cancer genetic background to reproduce and pass cancer genes/mutations to the next generation. Meanwhile, low fertility rates in these countries may not be able to have diverse biological variations to provide the opportunity for selecting a naturally fit population—for example, people without or with less cancer genetic background. Low mortality rate and low fertility rate in the ‘better’ world may have formed a self-reinforcing cycle which has accumulated cancer genetic background at a greater rate than previously thought.”

Based on the researchers’ analysis, the 20 countries are:

Cancer incidence

The researchers found the rates of most cancers were higher in the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection. The incidence of all cancers was 2.326 times higher in the low-opportunity countries than the high-opportunity ones.

The increased incidences of hematologic malignancies were as follows:

• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma—2.019 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Hodgkin lymphoma—3.314 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Leukemia—3.574 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Multiple myeloma—4.257 times higher in the low-opportunity countries .

Dr Henneberg said that, having removed natural selection as the “janitor of the gene pool,” our modern society is faced with a controversial issue.

“It may be that the only way humankind can be rid of cancer once and for all is through genetic engineering—to repair our genes and take cancer out of the equation,” he said.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection have higher cancer rates than countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection, according to a study published in Evolutionary Applications.

Researchers said this is because modern medicine is enabling people to survive cancers, and their genetic backgrounds are passing from one generation to the next.

The team said the rate of some cancers has doubled and even quadrupled over the past 100 to 150 years, and human evolution has moved away from “survival of the fittest.”

“Modern medicine has enabled the human species to live much longer than would otherwise be expected in the natural world,” said study author Maciej Henneberg, PhD, DSc, of the University of Adelaide in South Australia.

“Besides the obvious benefits that modern medicine gives, it also brings with it an unexpected side-effect—allowing genetic material to be passed from one generation to the next that predisposes people to have poor health, such as type 1 diabetes or cancer.”

“Because of the quality of our healthcare in western society, we have almost removed natural selection as the ‘janitor of the gene pool.’ Unfortunately, the accumulation of genetic mutations over time and across multiple generations is like a delayed death sentence.”

Country comparison

The researchers studied global cancer data from the World Health Organization as well as other health and socioeconomic data from the United Nations and the World Bank of 173 countries. The team compared the top 10 countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection to the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection.

“We looked at countries that offered the greatest opportunity to survive cancer compared with those that didn’t,” said study author Wenpeng You, a PhD student at the University of Adelaide. “This does not only take into account factors such as socioeconomic status, urbanization, and quality of medical services but also low mortality and fertility rates, which are the 2 distinguishing features in the ‘better’ world.”

“Countries with low mortality rates may allow more people with cancer genetic background to reproduce and pass cancer genes/mutations to the next generation. Meanwhile, low fertility rates in these countries may not be able to have diverse biological variations to provide the opportunity for selecting a naturally fit population—for example, people without or with less cancer genetic background. Low mortality rate and low fertility rate in the ‘better’ world may have formed a self-reinforcing cycle which has accumulated cancer genetic background at a greater rate than previously thought.”

Based on the researchers’ analysis, the 20 countries are:

Cancer incidence

The researchers found the rates of most cancers were higher in the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection. The incidence of all cancers was 2.326 times higher in the low-opportunity countries than the high-opportunity ones.

The increased incidences of hematologic malignancies were as follows:

• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma—2.019 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Hodgkin lymphoma—3.314 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Leukemia—3.574 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Multiple myeloma—4.257 times higher in the low-opportunity countries .

Dr Henneberg said that, having removed natural selection as the “janitor of the gene pool,” our modern society is faced with a controversial issue.

“It may be that the only way humankind can be rid of cancer once and for all is through genetic engineering—to repair our genes and take cancer out of the equation,” he said.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection have higher cancer rates than countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection, according to a study published in Evolutionary Applications.

Researchers said this is because modern medicine is enabling people to survive cancers, and their genetic backgrounds are passing from one generation to the next.

The team said the rate of some cancers has doubled and even quadrupled over the past 100 to 150 years, and human evolution has moved away from “survival of the fittest.”

“Modern medicine has enabled the human species to live much longer than would otherwise be expected in the natural world,” said study author Maciej Henneberg, PhD, DSc, of the University of Adelaide in South Australia.

“Besides the obvious benefits that modern medicine gives, it also brings with it an unexpected side-effect—allowing genetic material to be passed from one generation to the next that predisposes people to have poor health, such as type 1 diabetes or cancer.”

“Because of the quality of our healthcare in western society, we have almost removed natural selection as the ‘janitor of the gene pool.’ Unfortunately, the accumulation of genetic mutations over time and across multiple generations is like a delayed death sentence.”

Country comparison

The researchers studied global cancer data from the World Health Organization as well as other health and socioeconomic data from the United Nations and the World Bank of 173 countries. The team compared the top 10 countries with the highest opportunities for natural selection to the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection.

“We looked at countries that offered the greatest opportunity to survive cancer compared with those that didn’t,” said study author Wenpeng You, a PhD student at the University of Adelaide. “This does not only take into account factors such as socioeconomic status, urbanization, and quality of medical services but also low mortality and fertility rates, which are the 2 distinguishing features in the ‘better’ world.”

“Countries with low mortality rates may allow more people with cancer genetic background to reproduce and pass cancer genes/mutations to the next generation. Meanwhile, low fertility rates in these countries may not be able to have diverse biological variations to provide the opportunity for selecting a naturally fit population—for example, people without or with less cancer genetic background. Low mortality rate and low fertility rate in the ‘better’ world may have formed a self-reinforcing cycle which has accumulated cancer genetic background at a greater rate than previously thought.”

Based on the researchers’ analysis, the 20 countries are:

Cancer incidence

The researchers found the rates of most cancers were higher in the 10 countries with the lowest opportunities for natural selection. The incidence of all cancers was 2.326 times higher in the low-opportunity countries than the high-opportunity ones.

The increased incidences of hematologic malignancies were as follows:

• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma—2.019 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Hodgkin lymphoma—3.314 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Leukemia—3.574 times higher in the low-opportunity countries
• Multiple myeloma—4.257 times higher in the low-opportunity countries .

Dr Henneberg said that, having removed natural selection as the “janitor of the gene pool,” our modern society is faced with a controversial issue.

“It may be that the only way humankind can be rid of cancer once and for all is through genetic engineering—to repair our genes and take cancer out of the equation,” he said.