Hodgkin Lymphoma

Photo by Luis Alvaz

Patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) for lymphoma or myeloma have an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to a retrospective study.

The study suggested these patients have 10 to 100 times the risk of AML or MDS as the general population.

The elevated risk also exceeds that of similar lymphoma and myeloma patients largely untreated with auto-HSCT.

Tomas Radivoyevitch, PhD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia Research.

The investigators noted that exposure to DNA-damaging drugs and ionizing radiation—both used in auto-HSCT—is known to increase the risk of AML and MDS.

With this in mind, the team analyzed data on auto-HSCT recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).

Analyses were based on 9028 patients undergoing auto-HSCT from 1995 to 2010 for Hodgkin lymphoma (n=916), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=3546), or plasma cell myeloma (n=4566). Their median duration of follow-up was 90 months, 110 months, and 97 months, respectively.

Overall, 3.7% of the cohort developed AML or MDS after their transplant.

More aggressive transplant protocols increased the likelihood of this outcome. The risk of developing AML or MDS was higher for:

• Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received conditioning with total body radiation versus chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0)
• NHL patients who received conditioning with total body radiation (HR, 1.7) or with busulfan and melphalan or cyclophosphamide (HR, 1.8) versus the BEAM regimen (bischloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan)
• NHL or myeloma patients who received 3 or more lines of chemotherapy versus 1 line (HR, 1.9 for NHL and 1.8 for myeloma)
• NHL patients who underwent transplant in 2005 to 2010 versus 1995 to 1999 (HR, 2.1).

Patients reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database with the same lymphoma and myeloma diagnoses, few of whom underwent auto-HSCT, had risks of AML and MDS that were 5 to 10 times higher than the background level in the population.

However, the study auto-HSCT cohort had a risk of AML that was 10 to 50 times higher and a relative risk of MDS that was roughly 100 times higher than the background level.

“These increases may be related to exposure to high doses of DNA-damaging drugs given for [auto-HSCT], but this hypothesis can only be tested in a prospective study,” Dr Radivoyevitch and his coinvestigators wrote.

The reason for the greater elevation of MDS risk, compared with AML risk, is unknown.

“One possible explanation is that many cases of MDS evolve to AML, and that earlier diagnosis from increased post-transplant surveillance resulted in a deficiency of AML,” the investigators wrote. “A second is based on steeper MDS versus AML incidences versus age . . . and the possibility that transplantation recipient marrow ages (ie, marrow biological ages) are perhaps decades older than calendar ages.”

The study authors said they had no relevant conflicts of interest. The CIBMTR is supported by several US government agencies and numerous pharmaceutical companies. 

Photo by Luis Alvaz

Patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) for lymphoma or myeloma have an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to a retrospective study.

The study suggested these patients have 10 to 100 times the risk of AML or MDS as the general population.

The elevated risk also exceeds that of similar lymphoma and myeloma patients largely untreated with auto-HSCT.

Tomas Radivoyevitch, PhD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia Research.

The investigators noted that exposure to DNA-damaging drugs and ionizing radiation—both used in auto-HSCT—is known to increase the risk of AML and MDS.

With this in mind, the team analyzed data on auto-HSCT recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).

Analyses were based on 9028 patients undergoing auto-HSCT from 1995 to 2010 for Hodgkin lymphoma (n=916), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=3546), or plasma cell myeloma (n=4566). Their median duration of follow-up was 90 months, 110 months, and 97 months, respectively.

Overall, 3.7% of the cohort developed AML or MDS after their transplant.

More aggressive transplant protocols increased the likelihood of this outcome. The risk of developing AML or MDS was higher for:

• Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received conditioning with total body radiation versus chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0)
• NHL patients who received conditioning with total body radiation (HR, 1.7) or with busulfan and melphalan or cyclophosphamide (HR, 1.8) versus the BEAM regimen (bischloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan)
• NHL or myeloma patients who received 3 or more lines of chemotherapy versus 1 line (HR, 1.9 for NHL and 1.8 for myeloma)
• NHL patients who underwent transplant in 2005 to 2010 versus 1995 to 1999 (HR, 2.1).

Patients reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database with the same lymphoma and myeloma diagnoses, few of whom underwent auto-HSCT, had risks of AML and MDS that were 5 to 10 times higher than the background level in the population.

However, the study auto-HSCT cohort had a risk of AML that was 10 to 50 times higher and a relative risk of MDS that was roughly 100 times higher than the background level.

“These increases may be related to exposure to high doses of DNA-damaging drugs given for [auto-HSCT], but this hypothesis can only be tested in a prospective study,” Dr Radivoyevitch and his coinvestigators wrote.

The reason for the greater elevation of MDS risk, compared with AML risk, is unknown.

“One possible explanation is that many cases of MDS evolve to AML, and that earlier diagnosis from increased post-transplant surveillance resulted in a deficiency of AML,” the investigators wrote. “A second is based on steeper MDS versus AML incidences versus age . . . and the possibility that transplantation recipient marrow ages (ie, marrow biological ages) are perhaps decades older than calendar ages.”

The study authors said they had no relevant conflicts of interest. The CIBMTR is supported by several US government agencies and numerous pharmaceutical companies. 

Photo by Luis Alvaz

Patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) for lymphoma or myeloma have an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to a retrospective study.

The study suggested these patients have 10 to 100 times the risk of AML or MDS as the general population.

The elevated risk also exceeds that of similar lymphoma and myeloma patients largely untreated with auto-HSCT.

Tomas Radivoyevitch, PhD, of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Leukemia Research.

The investigators noted that exposure to DNA-damaging drugs and ionizing radiation—both used in auto-HSCT—is known to increase the risk of AML and MDS.

With this in mind, the team analyzed data on auto-HSCT recipients reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).

Analyses were based on 9028 patients undergoing auto-HSCT from 1995 to 2010 for Hodgkin lymphoma (n=916), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=3546), or plasma cell myeloma (n=4566). Their median duration of follow-up was 90 months, 110 months, and 97 months, respectively.

Overall, 3.7% of the cohort developed AML or MDS after their transplant.

More aggressive transplant protocols increased the likelihood of this outcome. The risk of developing AML or MDS was higher for:

• Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received conditioning with total body radiation versus chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 4.0)
• NHL patients who received conditioning with total body radiation (HR, 1.7) or with busulfan and melphalan or cyclophosphamide (HR, 1.8) versus the BEAM regimen (bischloroethylnitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan)
• NHL or myeloma patients who received 3 or more lines of chemotherapy versus 1 line (HR, 1.9 for NHL and 1.8 for myeloma)
• NHL patients who underwent transplant in 2005 to 2010 versus 1995 to 1999 (HR, 2.1).

Patients reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database with the same lymphoma and myeloma diagnoses, few of whom underwent auto-HSCT, had risks of AML and MDS that were 5 to 10 times higher than the background level in the population.

However, the study auto-HSCT cohort had a risk of AML that was 10 to 50 times higher and a relative risk of MDS that was roughly 100 times higher than the background level.

“These increases may be related to exposure to high doses of DNA-damaging drugs given for [auto-HSCT], but this hypothesis can only be tested in a prospective study,” Dr Radivoyevitch and his coinvestigators wrote.

The reason for the greater elevation of MDS risk, compared with AML risk, is unknown.

“One possible explanation is that many cases of MDS evolve to AML, and that earlier diagnosis from increased post-transplant surveillance resulted in a deficiency of AML,” the investigators wrote. “A second is based on steeper MDS versus AML incidences versus age . . . and the possibility that transplantation recipient marrow ages (ie, marrow biological ages) are perhaps decades older than calendar ages.”

The study authors said they had no relevant conflicts of interest. The CIBMTR is supported by several US government agencies and numerous pharmaceutical companies. 

Woman sunbathing

New research suggests people who develop frequent cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have an increased risk of leukemias, lymphomas, and other cancers.

“We discovered that people who develop 6 or more basal cell carcinomas during a 10-year period are about 3 times more likely than the general population to develop other, unrelated cancers,” said Kavita Sarin, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

“We’re hopeful that this finding could be a way to identify people at an increased risk for a life-threatening malignancy before those cancers develop.”

Dr Sarin and her colleagues reported their findings in JCI Insight.

Stanford cohort

The researchers first studied 61 patients treated at Stanford Health Care for unusually frequent BCCs—an average of 11 per patient over a 10-year period. The team investigated whether these patients may have mutations in 29 genes that code for DNA damage repair proteins.

“We found that about 20% of the people with frequent basal cell carcinomas have a mutation in one of the genes responsible for repairing DNA damage, versus about 3% of the general population,” Dr Sarin said. “That’s shockingly high.”

Specifically, there were 12 BCC patients (19.7%) who had 13 pathogenic mutations in 12 genes—APC, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, and PALB2. And 3.0% of non-Finnish European subjects in the Exome Aggregation Consortium had pathogenic mutations in these 12 genes.

Furthermore, 21 of the 61 BCC patients (64.4%) had a history of additional cancers. This included 5 hematologic malignancies (leukemia/lymphoma), 5 invasive melanomas, and 2 breast, 2 colon, and 5 prostate cancers.

When the researchers compared the cancer prevalence in these patients to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-estimated prevalence of cancer in the 60- to 69-year-old population of European descent, the BCC cohort had an increased risk of any cancer—a relative risk (RR) of 3.5 (P<0.001).

The RR was 3.5 for leukemia and lymphoma (P=0.004), 11.9 for invasive melanoma (P<0.001), 4.5 for colon cancer (P=0.030), 5.6 for breast cancer (P=0.009), and 4.7 for prostate cancer (P<0.001).

Insurance cohort

To confirm the findings in the Stanford cohort, the researchers applied a similar analysis to a large medical insurance claims database, Truven MarketScan.

The database contained 111,562 patients with 1 case of BCC, 13,264 patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 2920 patients with 12 or more BCCs. Truven patients with no history of BCC served as controls.

The researchers adjusted for age and sex and found that patients with 1 BCC, 6 or more BCCs, and 12 or more BCCs had an increased risk of any cancer compared to controls.

The odds ratio (OR) for any cancer was 1.61 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.12 for those with 6 or more BCCs, and 4.15 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for Hodgkin lymphoma was 2.27 for patients with 1 BCC, 8.94 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 15.41 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was 1.40 for patients with 1 BCC, 2.59 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 3.10 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for leukemia was 1.76 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.23 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 5.78 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The researchers pointed out that, the more BCCs an individual had, the more likely that person was to have had other cancers as well.

“I was surprised to see such a strong correlation, but it’s also very gratifying,” Dr Sarin said. “Now, we can ask patients with repeated basal cell carcinomas whether they have family members with other types of cancers and perhaps suggest that they consider genetic testing and increased screening.”

The researchers are continuing to enroll Stanford patients in their study to learn whether particular mutations in genes responsible for repairing DNA damage are linked to the development of specific malignancies. The team would also like to conduct a similar study in patients with frequent melanomas.

The current study was supported by the Dermatology Foundation, the Stanford Society of Physician Scholars, the American Skin Association, and Pellepharm Inc.

Woman sunbathing

New research suggests people who develop frequent cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have an increased risk of leukemias, lymphomas, and other cancers.

“We discovered that people who develop 6 or more basal cell carcinomas during a 10-year period are about 3 times more likely than the general population to develop other, unrelated cancers,” said Kavita Sarin, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

“We’re hopeful that this finding could be a way to identify people at an increased risk for a life-threatening malignancy before those cancers develop.”

Dr Sarin and her colleagues reported their findings in JCI Insight.

Stanford cohort

The researchers first studied 61 patients treated at Stanford Health Care for unusually frequent BCCs—an average of 11 per patient over a 10-year period. The team investigated whether these patients may have mutations in 29 genes that code for DNA damage repair proteins.

“We found that about 20% of the people with frequent basal cell carcinomas have a mutation in one of the genes responsible for repairing DNA damage, versus about 3% of the general population,” Dr Sarin said. “That’s shockingly high.”

Specifically, there were 12 BCC patients (19.7%) who had 13 pathogenic mutations in 12 genes—APC, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, and PALB2. And 3.0% of non-Finnish European subjects in the Exome Aggregation Consortium had pathogenic mutations in these 12 genes.

Furthermore, 21 of the 61 BCC patients (64.4%) had a history of additional cancers. This included 5 hematologic malignancies (leukemia/lymphoma), 5 invasive melanomas, and 2 breast, 2 colon, and 5 prostate cancers.

When the researchers compared the cancer prevalence in these patients to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-estimated prevalence of cancer in the 60- to 69-year-old population of European descent, the BCC cohort had an increased risk of any cancer—a relative risk (RR) of 3.5 (P<0.001).

The RR was 3.5 for leukemia and lymphoma (P=0.004), 11.9 for invasive melanoma (P<0.001), 4.5 for colon cancer (P=0.030), 5.6 for breast cancer (P=0.009), and 4.7 for prostate cancer (P<0.001).

Insurance cohort

To confirm the findings in the Stanford cohort, the researchers applied a similar analysis to a large medical insurance claims database, Truven MarketScan.

The database contained 111,562 patients with 1 case of BCC, 13,264 patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 2920 patients with 12 or more BCCs. Truven patients with no history of BCC served as controls.

The researchers adjusted for age and sex and found that patients with 1 BCC, 6 or more BCCs, and 12 or more BCCs had an increased risk of any cancer compared to controls.

The odds ratio (OR) for any cancer was 1.61 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.12 for those with 6 or more BCCs, and 4.15 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for Hodgkin lymphoma was 2.27 for patients with 1 BCC, 8.94 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 15.41 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was 1.40 for patients with 1 BCC, 2.59 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 3.10 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for leukemia was 1.76 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.23 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 5.78 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The researchers pointed out that, the more BCCs an individual had, the more likely that person was to have had other cancers as well.

“I was surprised to see such a strong correlation, but it’s also very gratifying,” Dr Sarin said. “Now, we can ask patients with repeated basal cell carcinomas whether they have family members with other types of cancers and perhaps suggest that they consider genetic testing and increased screening.”

The researchers are continuing to enroll Stanford patients in their study to learn whether particular mutations in genes responsible for repairing DNA damage are linked to the development of specific malignancies. The team would also like to conduct a similar study in patients with frequent melanomas.

The current study was supported by the Dermatology Foundation, the Stanford Society of Physician Scholars, the American Skin Association, and Pellepharm Inc.

Woman sunbathing

New research suggests people who develop frequent cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) have an increased risk of leukemias, lymphomas, and other cancers.

“We discovered that people who develop 6 or more basal cell carcinomas during a 10-year period are about 3 times more likely than the general population to develop other, unrelated cancers,” said Kavita Sarin, MD, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in California.

“We’re hopeful that this finding could be a way to identify people at an increased risk for a life-threatening malignancy before those cancers develop.”

Dr Sarin and her colleagues reported their findings in JCI Insight.

Stanford cohort

The researchers first studied 61 patients treated at Stanford Health Care for unusually frequent BCCs—an average of 11 per patient over a 10-year period. The team investigated whether these patients may have mutations in 29 genes that code for DNA damage repair proteins.

“We found that about 20% of the people with frequent basal cell carcinomas have a mutation in one of the genes responsible for repairing DNA damage, versus about 3% of the general population,” Dr Sarin said. “That’s shockingly high.”

Specifically, there were 12 BCC patients (19.7%) who had 13 pathogenic mutations in 12 genes—APC, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NBN, and PALB2. And 3.0% of non-Finnish European subjects in the Exome Aggregation Consortium had pathogenic mutations in these 12 genes.

Furthermore, 21 of the 61 BCC patients (64.4%) had a history of additional cancers. This included 5 hematologic malignancies (leukemia/lymphoma), 5 invasive melanomas, and 2 breast, 2 colon, and 5 prostate cancers.

When the researchers compared the cancer prevalence in these patients to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-estimated prevalence of cancer in the 60- to 69-year-old population of European descent, the BCC cohort had an increased risk of any cancer—a relative risk (RR) of 3.5 (P<0.001).

The RR was 3.5 for leukemia and lymphoma (P=0.004), 11.9 for invasive melanoma (P<0.001), 4.5 for colon cancer (P=0.030), 5.6 for breast cancer (P=0.009), and 4.7 for prostate cancer (P<0.001).

Insurance cohort

To confirm the findings in the Stanford cohort, the researchers applied a similar analysis to a large medical insurance claims database, Truven MarketScan.

The database contained 111,562 patients with 1 case of BCC, 13,264 patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 2920 patients with 12 or more BCCs. Truven patients with no history of BCC served as controls.

The researchers adjusted for age and sex and found that patients with 1 BCC, 6 or more BCCs, and 12 or more BCCs had an increased risk of any cancer compared to controls.

The odds ratio (OR) for any cancer was 1.61 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.12 for those with 6 or more BCCs, and 4.15 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for Hodgkin lymphoma was 2.27 for patients with 1 BCC, 8.94 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 15.41 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was 1.40 for patients with 1 BCC, 2.59 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 3.10 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The OR for leukemia was 1.76 for patients with 1 BCC, 3.23 for patients with 6 or more BCCs, and 5.78 for patients with 12 or more BCCs.

The researchers pointed out that, the more BCCs an individual had, the more likely that person was to have had other cancers as well.

“I was surprised to see such a strong correlation, but it’s also very gratifying,” Dr Sarin said. “Now, we can ask patients with repeated basal cell carcinomas whether they have family members with other types of cancers and perhaps suggest that they consider genetic testing and increased screening.”

The researchers are continuing to enroll Stanford patients in their study to learn whether particular mutations in genes responsible for repairing DNA damage are linked to the development of specific malignancies. The team would also like to conduct a similar study in patients with frequent melanomas.

The current study was supported by the Dermatology Foundation, the Stanford Society of Physician Scholars, the American Skin Association, and Pellepharm Inc.

Hospital/Peter Barta

Health-related financial hardship is common among adult survivors of childhood cancer, according to a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Researchers analyzed more than 2800 long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) and found that 65% had financial challenges related to their cancer diagnosis.

“These findings suggest primary care doctors and oncologists should routinely screen childhood cancer survivors for possible financial hardship,” said I-Chan Huang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

Specifically, Dr Huang recommends that healthcare providers routinely ask CCSs if they are unable to purchase medications, ever skip appointments for economic reasons, or worry about how to pay their medical bills.

For this study, Dr Huang and his colleagues analyzed data from 2811 CCSs. The subjects had a mean age of 31.8 (range, 18 to 65) and were a mean of 23.6 years from cancer diagnosis. Most (57.8%) had been diagnosed with hematologic malignancies, 32.0% with solid tumors, and 10.1% with central nervous system malignancies.

All subjects had been treated at St. Jude and enrolled in the St. Jude LIFE study. Participants return to St. Jude periodically for several days of clinical and functional assessments. Data for this study were collected during the CCSs’ first St. Jude LIFE evaluations.

Assessing hardship

The researchers measured 3 types of financial hardship—material, psychological, and coping/behavioral.

About 1 in 5 CCSs (22.4%) reported material financial hardship. In other words, their cancer had an impact on their financial situation.

More than half of CCSs (51.1%) reported psychological hardship—concern about their ability to pay for medical expenses.

And 33% of CCSs reported coping/behavioral hardship—an inability to see a doctor or go to the hospital due to finances.

Roughly 65% of CCSs reported at least 1 type of financial hardship.

All 3 types of hardship were significantly associated with somatization (all P<0.001), anxiety (all P<0.001), depression (all P<0.001), suicidal thoughts (all P<0.05), and difficulty in retirement planning (all P<0.001).

Furthermore, CCSs who reported financial hardship had significantly lower health-related quality of life (P<0.001 for all 3 domains), sensation abnormality (all P<0.001), pulmonary symptoms (all P<0.05), and cardiac symptoms (all P<0.05).

Predicting hardship

Intensive cancer treatment, chronic health conditions, second cancers, age at the time of study evaluation, education level, and annual household income were all significantly associated with a greater risk of financial hardship.

CCSs age 40 and older had an increased risk of psychological and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001 for both domains).

CCSs with an annual household income of less than $40,000 had an increased risk of material, psychological, and coping/behavioral hardship, compared to CCSs with an income of $80,000 or more (P<0.001 for all domains).

CCSs who did not obtain a high school diploma had an increased risk of material (P<0.001), psychological (P<0.01), and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001) compared to college graduates.

CCSs who received cancer treatments associated with a high-risk disease burden (vs low-risk) had an increased risk of material (P=0.01) and psychological (P=0.004) hardship.

Health conditions associated with material financial hardship included grade 2-4 myocardial infarction (P<0.001), peripheral neuropathy (P<0.001), subsequent neoplasm (P<0.001), seizure (P=0.007), reproductive disorders (P=0.01), stroke (P=0.02), amputation (P=0.02), upper gastrointestinal disease (P=0.04), and hearing loss (P=0.05).

Grade 2-4 myocardial infarction and reproductive disorders were significantly associated with psychological financial hardship (P=0.02 for both).

“Severe late effects that emerge early in life and disrupt education and training opportunities are a double hit for survivors,” Dr Huang said. “These health problems decrease the survivors’ earning mobility and financial security later in life. The phenomenon leaves them at risk for poor health and psychological outcomes compared to healthier survivors.”

Hospital/Peter Barta

Health-related financial hardship is common among adult survivors of childhood cancer, according to a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Researchers analyzed more than 2800 long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) and found that 65% had financial challenges related to their cancer diagnosis.

“These findings suggest primary care doctors and oncologists should routinely screen childhood cancer survivors for possible financial hardship,” said I-Chan Huang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

Specifically, Dr Huang recommends that healthcare providers routinely ask CCSs if they are unable to purchase medications, ever skip appointments for economic reasons, or worry about how to pay their medical bills.

For this study, Dr Huang and his colleagues analyzed data from 2811 CCSs. The subjects had a mean age of 31.8 (range, 18 to 65) and were a mean of 23.6 years from cancer diagnosis. Most (57.8%) had been diagnosed with hematologic malignancies, 32.0% with solid tumors, and 10.1% with central nervous system malignancies.

All subjects had been treated at St. Jude and enrolled in the St. Jude LIFE study. Participants return to St. Jude periodically for several days of clinical and functional assessments. Data for this study were collected during the CCSs’ first St. Jude LIFE evaluations.

Assessing hardship

The researchers measured 3 types of financial hardship—material, psychological, and coping/behavioral.

About 1 in 5 CCSs (22.4%) reported material financial hardship. In other words, their cancer had an impact on their financial situation.

More than half of CCSs (51.1%) reported psychological hardship—concern about their ability to pay for medical expenses.

And 33% of CCSs reported coping/behavioral hardship—an inability to see a doctor or go to the hospital due to finances.

Roughly 65% of CCSs reported at least 1 type of financial hardship.

All 3 types of hardship were significantly associated with somatization (all P<0.001), anxiety (all P<0.001), depression (all P<0.001), suicidal thoughts (all P<0.05), and difficulty in retirement planning (all P<0.001).

Furthermore, CCSs who reported financial hardship had significantly lower health-related quality of life (P<0.001 for all 3 domains), sensation abnormality (all P<0.001), pulmonary symptoms (all P<0.05), and cardiac symptoms (all P<0.05).

Predicting hardship

Intensive cancer treatment, chronic health conditions, second cancers, age at the time of study evaluation, education level, and annual household income were all significantly associated with a greater risk of financial hardship.

CCSs age 40 and older had an increased risk of psychological and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001 for both domains).

CCSs with an annual household income of less than $40,000 had an increased risk of material, psychological, and coping/behavioral hardship, compared to CCSs with an income of $80,000 or more (P<0.001 for all domains).

CCSs who did not obtain a high school diploma had an increased risk of material (P<0.001), psychological (P<0.01), and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001) compared to college graduates.

CCSs who received cancer treatments associated with a high-risk disease burden (vs low-risk) had an increased risk of material (P=0.01) and psychological (P=0.004) hardship.

Health conditions associated with material financial hardship included grade 2-4 myocardial infarction (P<0.001), peripheral neuropathy (P<0.001), subsequent neoplasm (P<0.001), seizure (P=0.007), reproductive disorders (P=0.01), stroke (P=0.02), amputation (P=0.02), upper gastrointestinal disease (P=0.04), and hearing loss (P=0.05).

Grade 2-4 myocardial infarction and reproductive disorders were significantly associated with psychological financial hardship (P=0.02 for both).

“Severe late effects that emerge early in life and disrupt education and training opportunities are a double hit for survivors,” Dr Huang said. “These health problems decrease the survivors’ earning mobility and financial security later in life. The phenomenon leaves them at risk for poor health and psychological outcomes compared to healthier survivors.”

Hospital/Peter Barta

Health-related financial hardship is common among adult survivors of childhood cancer, according to a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Researchers analyzed more than 2800 long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) and found that 65% had financial challenges related to their cancer diagnosis.

“These findings suggest primary care doctors and oncologists should routinely screen childhood cancer survivors for possible financial hardship,” said I-Chan Huang, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

Specifically, Dr Huang recommends that healthcare providers routinely ask CCSs if they are unable to purchase medications, ever skip appointments for economic reasons, or worry about how to pay their medical bills.

For this study, Dr Huang and his colleagues analyzed data from 2811 CCSs. The subjects had a mean age of 31.8 (range, 18 to 65) and were a mean of 23.6 years from cancer diagnosis. Most (57.8%) had been diagnosed with hematologic malignancies, 32.0% with solid tumors, and 10.1% with central nervous system malignancies.

All subjects had been treated at St. Jude and enrolled in the St. Jude LIFE study. Participants return to St. Jude periodically for several days of clinical and functional assessments. Data for this study were collected during the CCSs’ first St. Jude LIFE evaluations.

Assessing hardship

The researchers measured 3 types of financial hardship—material, psychological, and coping/behavioral.

About 1 in 5 CCSs (22.4%) reported material financial hardship. In other words, their cancer had an impact on their financial situation.

More than half of CCSs (51.1%) reported psychological hardship—concern about their ability to pay for medical expenses.

And 33% of CCSs reported coping/behavioral hardship—an inability to see a doctor or go to the hospital due to finances.

Roughly 65% of CCSs reported at least 1 type of financial hardship.

All 3 types of hardship were significantly associated with somatization (all P<0.001), anxiety (all P<0.001), depression (all P<0.001), suicidal thoughts (all P<0.05), and difficulty in retirement planning (all P<0.001).

Furthermore, CCSs who reported financial hardship had significantly lower health-related quality of life (P<0.001 for all 3 domains), sensation abnormality (all P<0.001), pulmonary symptoms (all P<0.05), and cardiac symptoms (all P<0.05).

Predicting hardship

Intensive cancer treatment, chronic health conditions, second cancers, age at the time of study evaluation, education level, and annual household income were all significantly associated with a greater risk of financial hardship.

CCSs age 40 and older had an increased risk of psychological and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001 for both domains).

CCSs with an annual household income of less than $40,000 had an increased risk of material, psychological, and coping/behavioral hardship, compared to CCSs with an income of $80,000 or more (P<0.001 for all domains).

CCSs who did not obtain a high school diploma had an increased risk of material (P<0.001), psychological (P<0.01), and coping/behavioral hardship (P<0.001) compared to college graduates.

CCSs who received cancer treatments associated with a high-risk disease burden (vs low-risk) had an increased risk of material (P=0.01) and psychological (P=0.004) hardship.

Health conditions associated with material financial hardship included grade 2-4 myocardial infarction (P<0.001), peripheral neuropathy (P<0.001), subsequent neoplasm (P<0.001), seizure (P=0.007), reproductive disorders (P=0.01), stroke (P=0.02), amputation (P=0.02), upper gastrointestinal disease (P=0.04), and hearing loss (P=0.05).

Grade 2-4 myocardial infarction and reproductive disorders were significantly associated with psychological financial hardship (P=0.02 for both).

“Severe late effects that emerge early in life and disrupt education and training opportunities are a double hit for survivors,” Dr Huang said. “These health problems decrease the survivors’ earning mobility and financial security later in life. The phenomenon leaves them at risk for poor health and psychological outcomes compared to healthier survivors.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Research has shown an increase in the global incidence of leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in recent years.

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study showed that, from 2006 to 2016, the incidence of NHL increased 45%, and the incidence of leukemia increased 26%.

These increases were largely due to population growth and aging.

Results from the GDB study were published in JAMA Oncology.

The study indicated that, in 2016, there were 17.2 million cases of cancer worldwide and 8.9 million cancer deaths.

One in 3 men were likely to get cancer during their lifetime, as were 1 in 5 women. Cancer was associated with 213.2 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

The following table lists the 2016 global incidence and mortality figures for all cancers combined and for individual hematologic malignancies.

Leukemia

In 2016, there were 467,000 new cases of leukemia and 310,000 leukemia deaths. Leukemia was responsible for 10.2 million DALYs. Leukemia developed in 1 in 118 men and 1 in 194 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, the global leukemia incidence increased by 26%—from 370,482 to 466,802 cases.

The researchers said the factors contributing to this increase were population growth (12%), population aging (10%), and an increase in age-specific incidence rates (3%).

NHL

In 2016, there were 461,000 new cases of NHL and 240,000 NHL deaths. NHL was responsible for 6.8 million DALYs. NHL developed in 1 in 110 men and 1 in 161 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, NHL increased by 45%, from 319,078 to 461,164 cases.

The factors contributing to this increase were increasing age-specific incidence rates (17%), changing population age structure (15%), and population growth (12%).

“A large proportion of the increase in cancer incidence can be explained by improving life expectancy and population growth—a development that can at least partially be attributed to a reduced burden from other common diseases,” the study authors wrote.

The authors also pointed out that prevention efforts are less effective for hematologic malignancies than for other cancers.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Research has shown an increase in the global incidence of leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in recent years.

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study showed that, from 2006 to 2016, the incidence of NHL increased 45%, and the incidence of leukemia increased 26%.

These increases were largely due to population growth and aging.

Results from the GDB study were published in JAMA Oncology.

The study indicated that, in 2016, there were 17.2 million cases of cancer worldwide and 8.9 million cancer deaths.

One in 3 men were likely to get cancer during their lifetime, as were 1 in 5 women. Cancer was associated with 213.2 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

The following table lists the 2016 global incidence and mortality figures for all cancers combined and for individual hematologic malignancies.

Leukemia

In 2016, there were 467,000 new cases of leukemia and 310,000 leukemia deaths. Leukemia was responsible for 10.2 million DALYs. Leukemia developed in 1 in 118 men and 1 in 194 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, the global leukemia incidence increased by 26%—from 370,482 to 466,802 cases.

The researchers said the factors contributing to this increase were population growth (12%), population aging (10%), and an increase in age-specific incidence rates (3%).

NHL

In 2016, there were 461,000 new cases of NHL and 240,000 NHL deaths. NHL was responsible for 6.8 million DALYs. NHL developed in 1 in 110 men and 1 in 161 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, NHL increased by 45%, from 319,078 to 461,164 cases.

The factors contributing to this increase were increasing age-specific incidence rates (17%), changing population age structure (15%), and population growth (12%).

“A large proportion of the increase in cancer incidence can be explained by improving life expectancy and population growth—a development that can at least partially be attributed to a reduced burden from other common diseases,” the study authors wrote.

The authors also pointed out that prevention efforts are less effective for hematologic malignancies than for other cancers.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Research has shown an increase in the global incidence of leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in recent years.

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study showed that, from 2006 to 2016, the incidence of NHL increased 45%, and the incidence of leukemia increased 26%.

These increases were largely due to population growth and aging.

Results from the GDB study were published in JAMA Oncology.

The study indicated that, in 2016, there were 17.2 million cases of cancer worldwide and 8.9 million cancer deaths.

One in 3 men were likely to get cancer during their lifetime, as were 1 in 5 women. Cancer was associated with 213.2 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

The following table lists the 2016 global incidence and mortality figures for all cancers combined and for individual hematologic malignancies.

Leukemia

In 2016, there were 467,000 new cases of leukemia and 310,000 leukemia deaths. Leukemia was responsible for 10.2 million DALYs. Leukemia developed in 1 in 118 men and 1 in 194 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, the global leukemia incidence increased by 26%—from 370,482 to 466,802 cases.

The researchers said the factors contributing to this increase were population growth (12%), population aging (10%), and an increase in age-specific incidence rates (3%).

NHL

In 2016, there were 461,000 new cases of NHL and 240,000 NHL deaths. NHL was responsible for 6.8 million DALYs. NHL developed in 1 in 110 men and 1 in 161 women worldwide.

Between 2006 and 2016, NHL increased by 45%, from 319,078 to 461,164 cases.

The factors contributing to this increase were increasing age-specific incidence rates (17%), changing population age structure (15%), and population growth (12%).

“A large proportion of the increase in cancer incidence can be explained by improving life expectancy and population growth—a development that can at least partially be attributed to a reduced burden from other common diseases,” the study authors wrote.

The authors also pointed out that prevention efforts are less effective for hematologic malignancies than for other cancers.

Children who undergo allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) remain at an elevated risk of premature death even 25 years after the procedure, results of large, retrospective cohort study suggest.

Despite a significant decrease over several decades, the risk of all-cause mortality remained elevated, compared with the general population, according to this study of individuals who had BMT performed in childhood between 1974 and 2010.

“These findings emphasize the need for lifelong follow-up care after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood,” reported Anna Sällfors Holmqvist, MD, PhD, of the department of clinical sciences at Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden, and her associates.

Screening, preventive care, and counseling need to be part of that long-term follow-up, Dr. Holmqvist and her colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

Their retrospective analysis included 1,388 individuals who lived at least 2 years after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood at one of three centers: the University of Alabama at Birmingham; the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.

There were 295 deaths over a median of 14.9 years of follow-up, for an overall survival rate of 79.3% at 20 years after BMT, reported Dr. Holmqvist and her associates. The three leading causes of death were infection or chronic graft-versus-host disease in 49.6% of cases, primary disease in 24.6%, and later malignancies in 18.4%.

Relative to the general population, the cohort had a 14.4-fold increased risk of premature death (95% confidence interval, 12.8-16.1), compared with the general population. Relative mortality was highest 2-5 years after BMT and dropped substantially after that but remained elevated – even 25 years or more after the procedure, the investigators noted.

Mortality decreased significantly over the 3 decades evaluated in this study. The rate of all-cause, 10-year cumulative mortality was 18.9% before 1990, 12.9% from 1990 to 1999, and 11.0% from 2000 to 2010 (P = .002).

That decrease in cumulative mortality over time could not be explained by changes in transplant practice over those three time periods, according to results of a mediation analysis performed by Dr. Holmqvist and her associates.

That finding suggests that unmeasured variables might underlie the decrease in late mortality, the investigators said.

Those unmeasured variables might include supportive care strategies, management of chronic graft-versus-host disease, or improved patient selection, they noted.

Dr. Holmqvist and her associates cited as one limitation their reliance on death certificates for causes of death. In addition, the causes of death for 51 of the 295 deceased patients were lacking.

The study was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Leukemia Lymphoma Society, and the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation. Dr. Holmqvist and her associates reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Holmqvist AS et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2453.

Children who undergo allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) remain at an elevated risk of premature death even 25 years after the procedure, results of large, retrospective cohort study suggest.

Despite a significant decrease over several decades, the risk of all-cause mortality remained elevated, compared with the general population, according to this study of individuals who had BMT performed in childhood between 1974 and 2010.

“These findings emphasize the need for lifelong follow-up care after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood,” reported Anna Sällfors Holmqvist, MD, PhD, of the department of clinical sciences at Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden, and her associates.

Screening, preventive care, and counseling need to be part of that long-term follow-up, Dr. Holmqvist and her colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

Their retrospective analysis included 1,388 individuals who lived at least 2 years after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood at one of three centers: the University of Alabama at Birmingham; the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.

There were 295 deaths over a median of 14.9 years of follow-up, for an overall survival rate of 79.3% at 20 years after BMT, reported Dr. Holmqvist and her associates. The three leading causes of death were infection or chronic graft-versus-host disease in 49.6% of cases, primary disease in 24.6%, and later malignancies in 18.4%.

Relative to the general population, the cohort had a 14.4-fold increased risk of premature death (95% confidence interval, 12.8-16.1), compared with the general population. Relative mortality was highest 2-5 years after BMT and dropped substantially after that but remained elevated – even 25 years or more after the procedure, the investigators noted.

Mortality decreased significantly over the 3 decades evaluated in this study. The rate of all-cause, 10-year cumulative mortality was 18.9% before 1990, 12.9% from 1990 to 1999, and 11.0% from 2000 to 2010 (P = .002).

That decrease in cumulative mortality over time could not be explained by changes in transplant practice over those three time periods, according to results of a mediation analysis performed by Dr. Holmqvist and her associates.

That finding suggests that unmeasured variables might underlie the decrease in late mortality, the investigators said.

Those unmeasured variables might include supportive care strategies, management of chronic graft-versus-host disease, or improved patient selection, they noted.

Dr. Holmqvist and her associates cited as one limitation their reliance on death certificates for causes of death. In addition, the causes of death for 51 of the 295 deceased patients were lacking.

The study was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Leukemia Lymphoma Society, and the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation. Dr. Holmqvist and her associates reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Holmqvist AS et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2453.

Children who undergo allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) remain at an elevated risk of premature death even 25 years after the procedure, results of large, retrospective cohort study suggest.

Despite a significant decrease over several decades, the risk of all-cause mortality remained elevated, compared with the general population, according to this study of individuals who had BMT performed in childhood between 1974 and 2010.

“These findings emphasize the need for lifelong follow-up care after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood,” reported Anna Sällfors Holmqvist, MD, PhD, of the department of clinical sciences at Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden, and her associates.

Screening, preventive care, and counseling need to be part of that long-term follow-up, Dr. Holmqvist and her colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

Their retrospective analysis included 1,388 individuals who lived at least 2 years after allogeneic BMT performed in childhood at one of three centers: the University of Alabama at Birmingham; the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and City of Hope, Duarte, Calif.

There were 295 deaths over a median of 14.9 years of follow-up, for an overall survival rate of 79.3% at 20 years after BMT, reported Dr. Holmqvist and her associates. The three leading causes of death were infection or chronic graft-versus-host disease in 49.6% of cases, primary disease in 24.6%, and later malignancies in 18.4%.

Relative to the general population, the cohort had a 14.4-fold increased risk of premature death (95% confidence interval, 12.8-16.1), compared with the general population. Relative mortality was highest 2-5 years after BMT and dropped substantially after that but remained elevated – even 25 years or more after the procedure, the investigators noted.

Mortality decreased significantly over the 3 decades evaluated in this study. The rate of all-cause, 10-year cumulative mortality was 18.9% before 1990, 12.9% from 1990 to 1999, and 11.0% from 2000 to 2010 (P = .002).

That decrease in cumulative mortality over time could not be explained by changes in transplant practice over those three time periods, according to results of a mediation analysis performed by Dr. Holmqvist and her associates.

That finding suggests that unmeasured variables might underlie the decrease in late mortality, the investigators said.

Those unmeasured variables might include supportive care strategies, management of chronic graft-versus-host disease, or improved patient selection, they noted.

Dr. Holmqvist and her associates cited as one limitation their reliance on death certificates for causes of death. In addition, the causes of death for 51 of the 295 deceased patients were lacking.

The study was supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Leukemia Lymphoma Society, and the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation. Dr. Holmqvist and her associates reported no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Holmqvist AS et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2453.

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the leukocyte growth factor Nivestym™ (filgrastim-aafi), a biosimilar to Neupogen (filgrastim).

Nivestym is approved to treat patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or undergoing bone marrow transplant, acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving induction or consolidation chemotherapy, patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection, and patients with severe chronic neutropenia.

The FDA’s approval of Nivestym was based on a review of evidence suggesting the drug is highly similar to Neupogen, according to Pfizer, the company developing Nivestym.

The full approved indication for Nivestym is as follows:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe neutropenia with fever
• To reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of fever following induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
• To reduce the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related clinical sequelae (eg, febrile neutropenia) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplant
• For the mobilization of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for collection by leukapheresis
• For chronic administration to reduce the incidence and duration of sequelae of severe neutropenia (eg, fever, infections, oropharyngeal ulcers) in symptomatic patients with congenital neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia, or idiopathic neutropenia.

For more details on Nivestym, see the full prescribing information.

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the leukocyte growth factor Nivestym™ (filgrastim-aafi), a biosimilar to Neupogen (filgrastim).

Nivestym is approved to treat patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or undergoing bone marrow transplant, acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving induction or consolidation chemotherapy, patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection, and patients with severe chronic neutropenia.

The FDA’s approval of Nivestym was based on a review of evidence suggesting the drug is highly similar to Neupogen, according to Pfizer, the company developing Nivestym.

The full approved indication for Nivestym is as follows:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe neutropenia with fever
• To reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of fever following induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
• To reduce the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related clinical sequelae (eg, febrile neutropenia) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplant
• For the mobilization of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for collection by leukapheresis
• For chronic administration to reduce the incidence and duration of sequelae of severe neutropenia (eg, fever, infections, oropharyngeal ulcers) in symptomatic patients with congenital neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia, or idiopathic neutropenia.

For more details on Nivestym, see the full prescribing information.

Photo by Bill Branson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the leukocyte growth factor Nivestym™ (filgrastim-aafi), a biosimilar to Neupogen (filgrastim).

Nivestym is approved to treat patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy or undergoing bone marrow transplant, acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving induction or consolidation chemotherapy, patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection, and patients with severe chronic neutropenia.

The FDA’s approval of Nivestym was based on a review of evidence suggesting the drug is highly similar to Neupogen, according to Pfizer, the company developing Nivestym.

The full approved indication for Nivestym is as follows:

• To decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs associated with a significant incidence of severe neutropenia with fever
• To reduce the time to neutrophil recovery and the duration of fever following induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
• To reduce the duration of neutropenia and neutropenia-related clinical sequelae (eg, febrile neutropenia) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplant
• For the mobilization of autologous hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood for collection by leukapheresis
• For chronic administration to reduce the incidence and duration of sequelae of severe neutropenia (eg, fever, infections, oropharyngeal ulcers) in symptomatic patients with congenital neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia, or idiopathic neutropenia.

For more details on Nivestym, see the full prescribing information.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A review of data from more than 19 million people indicates that diabetes significantly raises a person’s risk of developing cancer.

When researchers compared patients with diabetes and without, both male and female diabetics had an increased risk of leukemias and lymphomas as well as certain solid tumors.

Researchers also found that diabetes conferred a higher cancer risk for women than men, both for all cancers combined and for some specific cancers, including leukemia.

“The link between diabetes and the risk of developing cancer is now firmly established,” said Toshiaki Ohkuma, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of New South Wales in Australia.

“We have also demonstrated, for the first time, that women with diabetes are more likely to develop any form of cancer and have a significantly higher chance of developing kidney, oral, and stomach cancers and leukemia.”

Dr Ohkuma and his colleagues reported these findings in Diabetologia.

The researchers conducted a systematic search in PubMed MEDLINE to identify reports on the links between diabetes and cancer. Additional reports were identified from the reference lists of the relevant studies.

Only those cohort studies providing relative risks (RRs) for the association between diabetes and cancer for both women and men were included. In total, 107 relevant articles were identified, along with 36 cohorts of individual participant data.

RRs for cancer were obtained for patients with diabetes (types 1 and 2 combined) versus those without diabetes, for both men and women. The women-to-men ratios of these relative risk ratios (RRRs) were then calculated to determine the excess risk in women if present.

Data on all-site cancer was available from 47 studies, involving 121 cohorts and 19,239,302 individuals.

Diabetics vs non-diabetics

Women with diabetes had a 27% higher risk of all-site cancer compared to women without diabetes (RR=1.27; 95% CI 1.21, 1.32; P<0.001).

For men, the risk of all-site cancer was 19% higher among those with diabetes than those without (RR=1.19; 95% CI 1.13, 1.25; P<0.001).

There were several hematologic malignancies for which diabetics had an increased risk, as shown in the following table.

Sex comparison

Calculation of the women-to-men ratio revealed that women with diabetes had a 6% greater excess risk of all-site cancer compared to men with diabetes (RRR=1.06; 95% CI 1.03, 1.09; P<0.001).

The women-to-men ratios also showed significantly higher risks for female diabetics for:

• Kidney cancer—RRR=1.11 (99% CI 1.04, 1.18; P<0.001)
• Oral cancer—RRR=1.13 (99% CI 1.00, 1.28; P=0.009)
• Stomach cancer—RRR=1.14 (99% CI 1.07, 1.22; P<0.001)
• Leukemia—RRR=1.15 (99% CI 1.02, 1.28; P=0.002).

However, women had a significantly lower risk of liver cancer (RRR=0.88; 99% CI 0.79, 0.99; P=0.005).

There are several possible reasons for the excess cancer risk observed in women, according to study author Sanne Peters, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of Oxford in the UK.

For example, on average, women are in the pre-diabetic state of impaired glucose tolerance 2 years longer than men.

“Historically, we know that women are often under-treated when they first present with symptoms of diabetes, are less likely to receive intensive care, and are not taking the same levels of medications as men,” Dr Peters said. “All of these could go some way into explaining why women are at greater risk of developing cancer, but, without more research, we can’t be certain.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A review of data from more than 19 million people indicates that diabetes significantly raises a person’s risk of developing cancer.

When researchers compared patients with diabetes and without, both male and female diabetics had an increased risk of leukemias and lymphomas as well as certain solid tumors.

Researchers also found that diabetes conferred a higher cancer risk for women than men, both for all cancers combined and for some specific cancers, including leukemia.

“The link between diabetes and the risk of developing cancer is now firmly established,” said Toshiaki Ohkuma, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of New South Wales in Australia.

“We have also demonstrated, for the first time, that women with diabetes are more likely to develop any form of cancer and have a significantly higher chance of developing kidney, oral, and stomach cancers and leukemia.”

Dr Ohkuma and his colleagues reported these findings in Diabetologia.

The researchers conducted a systematic search in PubMed MEDLINE to identify reports on the links between diabetes and cancer. Additional reports were identified from the reference lists of the relevant studies.

Only those cohort studies providing relative risks (RRs) for the association between diabetes and cancer for both women and men were included. In total, 107 relevant articles were identified, along with 36 cohorts of individual participant data.

RRs for cancer were obtained for patients with diabetes (types 1 and 2 combined) versus those without diabetes, for both men and women. The women-to-men ratios of these relative risk ratios (RRRs) were then calculated to determine the excess risk in women if present.

Data on all-site cancer was available from 47 studies, involving 121 cohorts and 19,239,302 individuals.

Diabetics vs non-diabetics

Women with diabetes had a 27% higher risk of all-site cancer compared to women without diabetes (RR=1.27; 95% CI 1.21, 1.32; P<0.001).

For men, the risk of all-site cancer was 19% higher among those with diabetes than those without (RR=1.19; 95% CI 1.13, 1.25; P<0.001).

There were several hematologic malignancies for which diabetics had an increased risk, as shown in the following table.

Sex comparison

Calculation of the women-to-men ratio revealed that women with diabetes had a 6% greater excess risk of all-site cancer compared to men with diabetes (RRR=1.06; 95% CI 1.03, 1.09; P<0.001).

The women-to-men ratios also showed significantly higher risks for female diabetics for:

• Kidney cancer—RRR=1.11 (99% CI 1.04, 1.18; P<0.001)
• Oral cancer—RRR=1.13 (99% CI 1.00, 1.28; P=0.009)
• Stomach cancer—RRR=1.14 (99% CI 1.07, 1.22; P<0.001)
• Leukemia—RRR=1.15 (99% CI 1.02, 1.28; P=0.002).

However, women had a significantly lower risk of liver cancer (RRR=0.88; 99% CI 0.79, 0.99; P=0.005).

There are several possible reasons for the excess cancer risk observed in women, according to study author Sanne Peters, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of Oxford in the UK.

For example, on average, women are in the pre-diabetic state of impaired glucose tolerance 2 years longer than men.

“Historically, we know that women are often under-treated when they first present with symptoms of diabetes, are less likely to receive intensive care, and are not taking the same levels of medications as men,” Dr Peters said. “All of these could go some way into explaining why women are at greater risk of developing cancer, but, without more research, we can’t be certain.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A review of data from more than 19 million people indicates that diabetes significantly raises a person’s risk of developing cancer.

When researchers compared patients with diabetes and without, both male and female diabetics had an increased risk of leukemias and lymphomas as well as certain solid tumors.

Researchers also found that diabetes conferred a higher cancer risk for women than men, both for all cancers combined and for some specific cancers, including leukemia.

“The link between diabetes and the risk of developing cancer is now firmly established,” said Toshiaki Ohkuma, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of New South Wales in Australia.

“We have also demonstrated, for the first time, that women with diabetes are more likely to develop any form of cancer and have a significantly higher chance of developing kidney, oral, and stomach cancers and leukemia.”

Dr Ohkuma and his colleagues reported these findings in Diabetologia.

The researchers conducted a systematic search in PubMed MEDLINE to identify reports on the links between diabetes and cancer. Additional reports were identified from the reference lists of the relevant studies.

Only those cohort studies providing relative risks (RRs) for the association between diabetes and cancer for both women and men were included. In total, 107 relevant articles were identified, along with 36 cohorts of individual participant data.

RRs for cancer were obtained for patients with diabetes (types 1 and 2 combined) versus those without diabetes, for both men and women. The women-to-men ratios of these relative risk ratios (RRRs) were then calculated to determine the excess risk in women if present.

Data on all-site cancer was available from 47 studies, involving 121 cohorts and 19,239,302 individuals.

Diabetics vs non-diabetics

Women with diabetes had a 27% higher risk of all-site cancer compared to women without diabetes (RR=1.27; 95% CI 1.21, 1.32; P<0.001).

For men, the risk of all-site cancer was 19% higher among those with diabetes than those without (RR=1.19; 95% CI 1.13, 1.25; P<0.001).

There were several hematologic malignancies for which diabetics had an increased risk, as shown in the following table.

Sex comparison

Calculation of the women-to-men ratio revealed that women with diabetes had a 6% greater excess risk of all-site cancer compared to men with diabetes (RRR=1.06; 95% CI 1.03, 1.09; P<0.001).

The women-to-men ratios also showed significantly higher risks for female diabetics for:

• Kidney cancer—RRR=1.11 (99% CI 1.04, 1.18; P<0.001)
• Oral cancer—RRR=1.13 (99% CI 1.00, 1.28; P=0.009)
• Stomach cancer—RRR=1.14 (99% CI 1.07, 1.22; P<0.001)
• Leukemia—RRR=1.15 (99% CI 1.02, 1.28; P=0.002).

However, women had a significantly lower risk of liver cancer (RRR=0.88; 99% CI 0.79, 0.99; P=0.005).

There are several possible reasons for the excess cancer risk observed in women, according to study author Sanne Peters, PhD, of The George Institute for Global Health at the University of Oxford in the UK.

For example, on average, women are in the pre-diabetic state of impaired glucose tolerance 2 years longer than men.

“Historically, we know that women are often under-treated when they first present with symptoms of diabetes, are less likely to receive intensive care, and are not taking the same levels of medications as men,” Dr Peters said. “All of these could go some way into explaining why women are at greater risk of developing cancer, but, without more research, we can’t be certain.”

CHICAGO – Positron emission tomography (PET) performed after two cycles of BEACOPP could help identify a subset of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients who can receive de-escalated treatment without compromising disease control, results of a phase 3 randomized trial show.

Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 85% not only for patients receiving six cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) but also for patients who were de-escalated to ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) chemotherapy based on negative PET results, according to the final analysis of the AHL2011 LYSA study, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

“This approach allows us to significantly reduce the treatment-related toxicity in most patients, and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalated treatment,” said Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of the University Hospital Le Bocage and Inserm, Dijon, France.

Previous studies have shown that BEACOPP may improve PFS, compared with ABVD, but is more toxic and associated with a higher risk of infertility and myelodysplasia or acute leukemia. Dr. Casasnovas and his colleagues sought to evaluate whether upfront BEACOPP followed by de-escalation to ABVD, when warranted by negative PET results, would improve outcomes without compromising efficacy.

The AHL2011 LYSA study included 823 patients (median age, 30 years; 63% male) with previously untreated advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma. All patients received PET at baseline, after cycle two of chemotherapy, and again after cycle four.

Patients were randomized either to six cycles of escalated BEACOPP, or to an experimental arm in which patients started with BEACOPP but were de-escalated to ABVD if PET results were negative after two or four cycles of treatment.

PET results after cycle two were negative for 87% of patients in the experimental arm, so on an intent-to-treat basis, 84% of them received two cycles of BEACOPP and four cycles of ABVD, Dr. Casasnovas reported.

PFS, with a median follow-up of 50.4 months, was not significantly different for the standard versus the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 1.084; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.59; P = .68). Five-year PFS was 85.7% in the experimental treatment de-escalation arm, compared with 86.2% in the standard arm.

Overall survival was likewise similar between arms, with 5-year overall survival exceeding 95% in both groups, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Although there was no significant difference overall in the incidence of adverse events, there was significantly less anemia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sepsis in the PET-driven de-escalation arm. Overall, 27% of patients in the standard chemotherapy arm experienced at least one serious adverse event, compared with 17% in the PET-driven arm (P less than .002).

The incidence of second primary malignancies was numerically lower in the experimental arm (1.2% vs. 2.4%), though that finding did not reach statistical significance.

On multivariate analysis, interim PET positivity after cycle two was associated with increased risk of disease progression for patients in this study (HR, 3.316). Risk of progression was even higher for patients with PET positivity after four cycles (HR, 12.968), identifying a subset of patients with “particularly poor outcome” who could benefit from development of new treatment options, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Dr. Casasnovas reported financial ties to AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda.

SOURCE: Casasnovas O et al. ASCO 2018, Abstract 7503.

CHICAGO – Positron emission tomography (PET) performed after two cycles of BEACOPP could help identify a subset of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients who can receive de-escalated treatment without compromising disease control, results of a phase 3 randomized trial show.

Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 85% not only for patients receiving six cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) but also for patients who were de-escalated to ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) chemotherapy based on negative PET results, according to the final analysis of the AHL2011 LYSA study, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

“This approach allows us to significantly reduce the treatment-related toxicity in most patients, and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalated treatment,” said Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of the University Hospital Le Bocage and Inserm, Dijon, France.

Previous studies have shown that BEACOPP may improve PFS, compared with ABVD, but is more toxic and associated with a higher risk of infertility and myelodysplasia or acute leukemia. Dr. Casasnovas and his colleagues sought to evaluate whether upfront BEACOPP followed by de-escalation to ABVD, when warranted by negative PET results, would improve outcomes without compromising efficacy.

The AHL2011 LYSA study included 823 patients (median age, 30 years; 63% male) with previously untreated advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma. All patients received PET at baseline, after cycle two of chemotherapy, and again after cycle four.

Patients were randomized either to six cycles of escalated BEACOPP, or to an experimental arm in which patients started with BEACOPP but were de-escalated to ABVD if PET results were negative after two or four cycles of treatment.

PET results after cycle two were negative for 87% of patients in the experimental arm, so on an intent-to-treat basis, 84% of them received two cycles of BEACOPP and four cycles of ABVD, Dr. Casasnovas reported.

PFS, with a median follow-up of 50.4 months, was not significantly different for the standard versus the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 1.084; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.59; P = .68). Five-year PFS was 85.7% in the experimental treatment de-escalation arm, compared with 86.2% in the standard arm.

Overall survival was likewise similar between arms, with 5-year overall survival exceeding 95% in both groups, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Although there was no significant difference overall in the incidence of adverse events, there was significantly less anemia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sepsis in the PET-driven de-escalation arm. Overall, 27% of patients in the standard chemotherapy arm experienced at least one serious adverse event, compared with 17% in the PET-driven arm (P less than .002).

The incidence of second primary malignancies was numerically lower in the experimental arm (1.2% vs. 2.4%), though that finding did not reach statistical significance.

On multivariate analysis, interim PET positivity after cycle two was associated with increased risk of disease progression for patients in this study (HR, 3.316). Risk of progression was even higher for patients with PET positivity after four cycles (HR, 12.968), identifying a subset of patients with “particularly poor outcome” who could benefit from development of new treatment options, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Dr. Casasnovas reported financial ties to AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda.

SOURCE: Casasnovas O et al. ASCO 2018, Abstract 7503.

CHICAGO – Positron emission tomography (PET) performed after two cycles of BEACOPP could help identify a subset of advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients who can receive de-escalated treatment without compromising disease control, results of a phase 3 randomized trial show.

Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) exceeded 85% not only for patients receiving six cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) but also for patients who were de-escalated to ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) chemotherapy based on negative PET results, according to the final analysis of the AHL2011 LYSA study, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

“This approach allows us to significantly reduce the treatment-related toxicity in most patients, and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalated treatment,” said Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of the University Hospital Le Bocage and Inserm, Dijon, France.

Previous studies have shown that BEACOPP may improve PFS, compared with ABVD, but is more toxic and associated with a higher risk of infertility and myelodysplasia or acute leukemia. Dr. Casasnovas and his colleagues sought to evaluate whether upfront BEACOPP followed by de-escalation to ABVD, when warranted by negative PET results, would improve outcomes without compromising efficacy.

The AHL2011 LYSA study included 823 patients (median age, 30 years; 63% male) with previously untreated advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma. All patients received PET at baseline, after cycle two of chemotherapy, and again after cycle four.

Patients were randomized either to six cycles of escalated BEACOPP, or to an experimental arm in which patients started with BEACOPP but were de-escalated to ABVD if PET results were negative after two or four cycles of treatment.

PET results after cycle two were negative for 87% of patients in the experimental arm, so on an intent-to-treat basis, 84% of them received two cycles of BEACOPP and four cycles of ABVD, Dr. Casasnovas reported.

PFS, with a median follow-up of 50.4 months, was not significantly different for the standard versus the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 1.084; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.59; P = .68). Five-year PFS was 85.7% in the experimental treatment de-escalation arm, compared with 86.2% in the standard arm.

Overall survival was likewise similar between arms, with 5-year overall survival exceeding 95% in both groups, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Although there was no significant difference overall in the incidence of adverse events, there was significantly less anemia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and sepsis in the PET-driven de-escalation arm. Overall, 27% of patients in the standard chemotherapy arm experienced at least one serious adverse event, compared with 17% in the PET-driven arm (P less than .002).

The incidence of second primary malignancies was numerically lower in the experimental arm (1.2% vs. 2.4%), though that finding did not reach statistical significance.

On multivariate analysis, interim PET positivity after cycle two was associated with increased risk of disease progression for patients in this study (HR, 3.316). Risk of progression was even higher for patients with PET positivity after four cycles (HR, 12.968), identifying a subset of patients with “particularly poor outcome” who could benefit from development of new treatment options, Dr. Casasnovas said.

Dr. Casasnovas reported financial ties to AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda.

SOURCE: Casasnovas O et al. ASCO 2018, Abstract 7503.

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

CHICAGO—Interim PET scans can identify a subset of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients with a better outcome suitable for de-escalation treatment after upfront BEACOPP without impairing disease control, according to final results of the AHL2011-LYSA study.

BEACOPP, compared to ABVD, improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) and is associated with a higher risk of myelodysplasia, acute leukemia, and infertility.

Investigators evaluated whether some patients might be able to reduce treatment intensity without compromising the effectiveness of their therapy.

Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of CHU Le Bocage Service d'Hématologie Clinique, Dijon, France,  presented the final analysis at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7503).

AHL2011-LYSA study (NCT01358747)

The randomized phase 3 study compared an early PET-driven treatment de-escalation to a non-PET-monitored strategy in patients with advanced-stage HL.

The study included 823 previously untreated patients, median age 30 years (range 16 – 60), with stage III, IV, or high-risk IIB HL.

The PET-driven strategy consisted of 2 BEACOPP* cycles (PET2), followed by 4 cycles of ABVD** for PET2-negative patients, and 4 cycles of BEACOPP for PET2-positive patients.

The experimental PET-driven strategy (410 patients) was randomly compared to a standard treatment delivering 6 cycles of BEACOPP (413 patients). PFS was the primary endpoint with a hypothesis of non-inferiority of the PET-driven arm compared to the standard arm.

Patients characteristics were well balanced between the arms, Dr Casasnovas said. PET2-positivity rate was similar in both arms (experimental 13%, standard 12%).

Based on PET2 results, 346 (84%) patients received 4 cycles of ABVD and 51 (12%) patients received 4 additional cycles of BEACOPP in the experimental arm.

Results

With a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year PFS was similar in the standard (86.2%) and the PET-driven arms (85.7%). The 5-year PFS for PET 2-negative/PET 4-negative patients was 90.9%, for PET 2-positive/PET4-negative patients was 75.4%, and for PET 4-positive patients was 46.5%.

The 5-year OS was similar in both arms (96.4% experimental, 95.2% standard).

The treatment toxicity was significantly higher in patients receiving 6 cycles of BEACOPP as compared to those who received 2 cycles of BEACOPP plus 4 cycles of ABVD.

Those who received more cycles of BEACOPP had more frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events than those with fewer cycles, including anemia (11% vs 2%), leukopenia (85% vs 74%), thrombocytopenia (44% vs 15%), and sepsis (7% vs 3%), as well as in serious adverse events (45% vs 28%).

“After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, it [PET positivity] identifies a subset of patients with a particularly poor outcome,” Dr Casasnovas said, “encouraging researchers to develop new treatment options in these patients.”

“PET performed after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalation can be safely used to guide subsequent treatment,” he concluded.

“This approach allows clinicians to reduce the treatment-related immediate toxicity in most patients,” he added, “and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalation treatment.” 

* Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone

**Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

CHICAGO—Interim PET scans can identify a subset of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients with a better outcome suitable for de-escalation treatment after upfront BEACOPP without impairing disease control, according to final results of the AHL2011-LYSA study.

BEACOPP, compared to ABVD, improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) and is associated with a higher risk of myelodysplasia, acute leukemia, and infertility.

Investigators evaluated whether some patients might be able to reduce treatment intensity without compromising the effectiveness of their therapy.

Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of CHU Le Bocage Service d'Hématologie Clinique, Dijon, France,  presented the final analysis at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7503).

AHL2011-LYSA study (NCT01358747)

The randomized phase 3 study compared an early PET-driven treatment de-escalation to a non-PET-monitored strategy in patients with advanced-stage HL.

The study included 823 previously untreated patients, median age 30 years (range 16 – 60), with stage III, IV, or high-risk IIB HL.

The PET-driven strategy consisted of 2 BEACOPP* cycles (PET2), followed by 4 cycles of ABVD** for PET2-negative patients, and 4 cycles of BEACOPP for PET2-positive patients.

The experimental PET-driven strategy (410 patients) was randomly compared to a standard treatment delivering 6 cycles of BEACOPP (413 patients). PFS was the primary endpoint with a hypothesis of non-inferiority of the PET-driven arm compared to the standard arm.

Patients characteristics were well balanced between the arms, Dr Casasnovas said. PET2-positivity rate was similar in both arms (experimental 13%, standard 12%).

Based on PET2 results, 346 (84%) patients received 4 cycles of ABVD and 51 (12%) patients received 4 additional cycles of BEACOPP in the experimental arm.

Results

With a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year PFS was similar in the standard (86.2%) and the PET-driven arms (85.7%). The 5-year PFS for PET 2-negative/PET 4-negative patients was 90.9%, for PET 2-positive/PET4-negative patients was 75.4%, and for PET 4-positive patients was 46.5%.

The 5-year OS was similar in both arms (96.4% experimental, 95.2% standard).

The treatment toxicity was significantly higher in patients receiving 6 cycles of BEACOPP as compared to those who received 2 cycles of BEACOPP plus 4 cycles of ABVD.

Those who received more cycles of BEACOPP had more frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events than those with fewer cycles, including anemia (11% vs 2%), leukopenia (85% vs 74%), thrombocytopenia (44% vs 15%), and sepsis (7% vs 3%), as well as in serious adverse events (45% vs 28%).

“After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, it [PET positivity] identifies a subset of patients with a particularly poor outcome,” Dr Casasnovas said, “encouraging researchers to develop new treatment options in these patients.”

“PET performed after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalation can be safely used to guide subsequent treatment,” he concluded.

“This approach allows clinicians to reduce the treatment-related immediate toxicity in most patients,” he added, “and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalation treatment.” 

* Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone

**Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

CHICAGO—Interim PET scans can identify a subset of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients with a better outcome suitable for de-escalation treatment after upfront BEACOPP without impairing disease control, according to final results of the AHL2011-LYSA study.

BEACOPP, compared to ABVD, improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) and is associated with a higher risk of myelodysplasia, acute leukemia, and infertility.

Investigators evaluated whether some patients might be able to reduce treatment intensity without compromising the effectiveness of their therapy.

Olivier Casasnovas, MD, of CHU Le Bocage Service d'Hématologie Clinique, Dijon, France,  presented the final analysis at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7503).

AHL2011-LYSA study (NCT01358747)

The randomized phase 3 study compared an early PET-driven treatment de-escalation to a non-PET-monitored strategy in patients with advanced-stage HL.

The study included 823 previously untreated patients, median age 30 years (range 16 – 60), with stage III, IV, or high-risk IIB HL.

The PET-driven strategy consisted of 2 BEACOPP* cycles (PET2), followed by 4 cycles of ABVD** for PET2-negative patients, and 4 cycles of BEACOPP for PET2-positive patients.

The experimental PET-driven strategy (410 patients) was randomly compared to a standard treatment delivering 6 cycles of BEACOPP (413 patients). PFS was the primary endpoint with a hypothesis of non-inferiority of the PET-driven arm compared to the standard arm.

Patients characteristics were well balanced between the arms, Dr Casasnovas said. PET2-positivity rate was similar in both arms (experimental 13%, standard 12%).

Based on PET2 results, 346 (84%) patients received 4 cycles of ABVD and 51 (12%) patients received 4 additional cycles of BEACOPP in the experimental arm.

Results

With a median follow-up of 50 months, the 5-year PFS was similar in the standard (86.2%) and the PET-driven arms (85.7%). The 5-year PFS for PET 2-negative/PET 4-negative patients was 90.9%, for PET 2-positive/PET4-negative patients was 75.4%, and for PET 4-positive patients was 46.5%.

The 5-year OS was similar in both arms (96.4% experimental, 95.2% standard).

The treatment toxicity was significantly higher in patients receiving 6 cycles of BEACOPP as compared to those who received 2 cycles of BEACOPP plus 4 cycles of ABVD.

Those who received more cycles of BEACOPP had more frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events than those with fewer cycles, including anemia (11% vs 2%), leukopenia (85% vs 74%), thrombocytopenia (44% vs 15%), and sepsis (7% vs 3%), as well as in serious adverse events (45% vs 28%).

“After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, it [PET positivity] identifies a subset of patients with a particularly poor outcome,” Dr Casasnovas said, “encouraging researchers to develop new treatment options in these patients.”

“PET performed after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalation can be safely used to guide subsequent treatment,” he concluded.

“This approach allows clinicians to reduce the treatment-related immediate toxicity in most patients,” he added, “and provides similar patient outcomes compared to standard BEACOPP escalation treatment.” 

* Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone

**Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine

A lifetime of physical inactivity could significantly increase the risk of developing both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a case-control study.

Researchers examined self-reported lifetime physical activity in 87 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and 236 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as 1,300 cancer-free controls.

pojoslaw/ThinkStock

SOURCE: Etter JL et al. Leuk Res. 2018 Mar 27;69:7-11.

A lifetime of physical inactivity could significantly increase the risk of developing both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a case-control study.

Researchers examined self-reported lifetime physical activity in 87 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and 236 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as 1,300 cancer-free controls.

pojoslaw/ThinkStock

SOURCE: Etter JL et al. Leuk Res. 2018 Mar 27;69:7-11.

A lifetime of physical inactivity could significantly increase the risk of developing both Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a case-control study.

Researchers examined self-reported lifetime physical activity in 87 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma and 236 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, as well as 1,300 cancer-free controls.

pojoslaw/ThinkStock

SOURCE: Etter JL et al. Leuk Res. 2018 Mar 27;69:7-11.