Hodgkin Lymphoma

Micrograph showing CLL

Phase 1 trial results suggest umbralisib, a PI3Kδ/CK1ε inhibitor, can be safe and active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

Researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib “was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors,” as it produced few immune-mediated adverse events (AEs).

Umbralisib also produced an objective response rate of 37% in the entire study cohort, 80% in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 53% in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), and 31% in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The study was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc.

The trial enrolled 90 patients between January 17, 2013, and January 14, 2016.

There were 24 patients with CLL, 22 with FL, 16 with DLBCL, 11 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 with mantle cell lymphoma, 5 with marginal zone lymphoma, 3 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 2 with T-cell lymphoma, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5), and 49% of patients were refractory to previous therapy.

Treatment

Patients took umbralisib once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Initially, patients took the drug in a fasting state at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In April 2014, the researchers did a second dose-escalation with a micronized formulation of umbralisib, taken with food, at doses of 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In August, 2014, all patients who were still on the study transitioned to the 800 mg dose of the micronized formulation. This was the recommended phase 2 dose.

At the data cutoff in November 2016, 44 patients (49%) had received umbralisib for more than 6 cycles, and 23 (26%) had received the drug for more than 12 cycles. Thirteen patients (14%) were still taking umbralisib at the end of the study.

Most patients who stopped treatment did so because of disease progression (n=50, 56%) or AEs (n=9, 10%).

“We are pleased to have treated the first patient ever with umbralisib over 5 years ago and believe it has an important place in the treatment landscape for patients with hematologic malignancies,” said study author Howard A. Burris, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee.

“Several patients from this phase 1 study are still on study today, approaching 5 years of continuous daily therapy, speaking to both the safety and efficacy profile of this unique agent.”

Safety

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 4 patients. One DLT was grade 3 maculopapular rash in a patient receiving the 800 mg dose of the initial formulation.

Another DLT was grade 3 hypokalemia in a patient receiving 1800 mg of the initial formulation. A third DLT was grade 3 fatigue, which occurred in 2 patients receiving 1800 mg of the micronized formulation.

Because of these toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose was 1200 mg of the micronized formulation.

The most common treatment-emergent AEs were diarrhea (43%), nausea (42%), and fatigue (31%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (13%), anemia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (7%).

Serious AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib were pneumonia (3%), lung infection (1%), febrile neutropenia (1%), and colitis (2%).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib occurred in 6 patients (7%). Two patients had grade 3 colitis, 2 had increased ALT/AST (grade 1 and grade 4), 1 had grade 2 diarrhea, and 1 had grade 3 fatigue.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

The researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors, as patients in this trial had fewer occurrences of autoimmune-like toxicities, such as colitis.

“Preclinically, umbralisib has a very unique profile, selectively inhibiting both PI3Kδ and CK1ε,” said study author Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, New York.

“The clinical results in this paper support our thesis that the differentiated preclinical profile explains the differences seen in the clinic between umbralisib and the other PI3Kδ inhibitors.”

Response

The objective response rate was 37%, with 33 patients achieving a response and 3 patients having a complete response (CR).

Sixteen CLL patients responded (80%), all with partial responses (PRs). Four DLBCL patients responded (31%), all with PRs. And 9 FL patients responded (53%), 2 with CRs.

The remaining CR occurred in a Hodgkin lymphoma patient, and this was the only response in this patient group.

One patient with marginal zone lymphoma had a PR, as did 1 patient with mantle cell lymphoma. All other patients had stable disease or progressed.

The mean duration of response was 13.4 months in the CLL patients, 6.4 months in the DLBCL patients, and 9.3 months in the FL patients.

Micrograph showing CLL

Phase 1 trial results suggest umbralisib, a PI3Kδ/CK1ε inhibitor, can be safe and active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

Researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib “was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors,” as it produced few immune-mediated adverse events (AEs).

Umbralisib also produced an objective response rate of 37% in the entire study cohort, 80% in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 53% in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), and 31% in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The study was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc.

The trial enrolled 90 patients between January 17, 2013, and January 14, 2016.

There were 24 patients with CLL, 22 with FL, 16 with DLBCL, 11 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 with mantle cell lymphoma, 5 with marginal zone lymphoma, 3 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 2 with T-cell lymphoma, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5), and 49% of patients were refractory to previous therapy.

Treatment

Patients took umbralisib once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Initially, patients took the drug in a fasting state at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In April 2014, the researchers did a second dose-escalation with a micronized formulation of umbralisib, taken with food, at doses of 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In August, 2014, all patients who were still on the study transitioned to the 800 mg dose of the micronized formulation. This was the recommended phase 2 dose.

At the data cutoff in November 2016, 44 patients (49%) had received umbralisib for more than 6 cycles, and 23 (26%) had received the drug for more than 12 cycles. Thirteen patients (14%) were still taking umbralisib at the end of the study.

Most patients who stopped treatment did so because of disease progression (n=50, 56%) or AEs (n=9, 10%).

“We are pleased to have treated the first patient ever with umbralisib over 5 years ago and believe it has an important place in the treatment landscape for patients with hematologic malignancies,” said study author Howard A. Burris, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee.

“Several patients from this phase 1 study are still on study today, approaching 5 years of continuous daily therapy, speaking to both the safety and efficacy profile of this unique agent.”

Safety

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 4 patients. One DLT was grade 3 maculopapular rash in a patient receiving the 800 mg dose of the initial formulation.

Another DLT was grade 3 hypokalemia in a patient receiving 1800 mg of the initial formulation. A third DLT was grade 3 fatigue, which occurred in 2 patients receiving 1800 mg of the micronized formulation.

Because of these toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose was 1200 mg of the micronized formulation.

The most common treatment-emergent AEs were diarrhea (43%), nausea (42%), and fatigue (31%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (13%), anemia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (7%).

Serious AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib were pneumonia (3%), lung infection (1%), febrile neutropenia (1%), and colitis (2%).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib occurred in 6 patients (7%). Two patients had grade 3 colitis, 2 had increased ALT/AST (grade 1 and grade 4), 1 had grade 2 diarrhea, and 1 had grade 3 fatigue.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

The researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors, as patients in this trial had fewer occurrences of autoimmune-like toxicities, such as colitis.

“Preclinically, umbralisib has a very unique profile, selectively inhibiting both PI3Kδ and CK1ε,” said study author Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, New York.

“The clinical results in this paper support our thesis that the differentiated preclinical profile explains the differences seen in the clinic between umbralisib and the other PI3Kδ inhibitors.”

Response

The objective response rate was 37%, with 33 patients achieving a response and 3 patients having a complete response (CR).

Sixteen CLL patients responded (80%), all with partial responses (PRs). Four DLBCL patients responded (31%), all with PRs. And 9 FL patients responded (53%), 2 with CRs.

The remaining CR occurred in a Hodgkin lymphoma patient, and this was the only response in this patient group.

One patient with marginal zone lymphoma had a PR, as did 1 patient with mantle cell lymphoma. All other patients had stable disease or progressed.

The mean duration of response was 13.4 months in the CLL patients, 6.4 months in the DLBCL patients, and 9.3 months in the FL patients.

Micrograph showing CLL

Phase 1 trial results suggest umbralisib, a PI3Kδ/CK1ε inhibitor, can be safe and active in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.

Researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib “was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors,” as it produced few immune-mediated adverse events (AEs).

Umbralisib also produced an objective response rate of 37% in the entire study cohort, 80% in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 53% in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), and 31% in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

These results were published in The Lancet Oncology. The study was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, Inc.

The trial enrolled 90 patients between January 17, 2013, and January 14, 2016.

There were 24 patients with CLL, 22 with FL, 16 with DLBCL, 11 with Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 with mantle cell lymphoma, 5 with marginal zone lymphoma, 3 with Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, 2 with T-cell lymphoma, and 1 with hairy cell leukemia.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5), and 49% of patients were refractory to previous therapy.

Treatment

Patients took umbralisib once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

Initially, patients took the drug in a fasting state at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In April 2014, the researchers did a second dose-escalation with a micronized formulation of umbralisib, taken with food, at doses of 200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg, or 1800 mg.

In August, 2014, all patients who were still on the study transitioned to the 800 mg dose of the micronized formulation. This was the recommended phase 2 dose.

At the data cutoff in November 2016, 44 patients (49%) had received umbralisib for more than 6 cycles, and 23 (26%) had received the drug for more than 12 cycles. Thirteen patients (14%) were still taking umbralisib at the end of the study.

Most patients who stopped treatment did so because of disease progression (n=50, 56%) or AEs (n=9, 10%).

“We are pleased to have treated the first patient ever with umbralisib over 5 years ago and believe it has an important place in the treatment landscape for patients with hematologic malignancies,” said study author Howard A. Burris, MD, of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute in Nashville, Tennessee.

“Several patients from this phase 1 study are still on study today, approaching 5 years of continuous daily therapy, speaking to both the safety and efficacy profile of this unique agent.”

Safety

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 4 patients. One DLT was grade 3 maculopapular rash in a patient receiving the 800 mg dose of the initial formulation.

Another DLT was grade 3 hypokalemia in a patient receiving 1800 mg of the initial formulation. A third DLT was grade 3 fatigue, which occurred in 2 patients receiving 1800 mg of the micronized formulation.

Because of these toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose was 1200 mg of the micronized formulation.

The most common treatment-emergent AEs were diarrhea (43%), nausea (42%), and fatigue (31%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (13%), anemia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (7%).

Serious AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib were pneumonia (3%), lung infection (1%), febrile neutropenia (1%), and colitis (2%).

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs considered at least possibly related to umbralisib occurred in 6 patients (7%). Two patients had grade 3 colitis, 2 had increased ALT/AST (grade 1 and grade 4), 1 had grade 2 diarrhea, and 1 had grade 3 fatigue.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

The researchers said the safety profile of umbralisib was distinct from that of other PI3Kδ inhibitors, as patients in this trial had fewer occurrences of autoimmune-like toxicities, such as colitis.

“Preclinically, umbralisib has a very unique profile, selectively inhibiting both PI3Kδ and CK1ε,” said study author Owen O’Connor, MD, PhD, of Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center in New York, New York.

“The clinical results in this paper support our thesis that the differentiated preclinical profile explains the differences seen in the clinic between umbralisib and the other PI3Kδ inhibitors.”

Response

The objective response rate was 37%, with 33 patients achieving a response and 3 patients having a complete response (CR).

Sixteen CLL patients responded (80%), all with partial responses (PRs). Four DLBCL patients responded (31%), all with PRs. And 9 FL patients responded (53%), 2 with CRs.

The remaining CR occurred in a Hodgkin lymphoma patient, and this was the only response in this patient group.

One patient with marginal zone lymphoma had a PR, as did 1 patient with mantle cell lymphoma. All other patients had stable disease or progressed.

The mean duration of response was 13.4 months in the CLL patients, 6.4 months in the DLBCL patients, and 9.3 months in the FL patients.

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

Nivolumab can provide “long-term benefits” in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

Extended follow-up of the CheckMate-205 study showed that nearly 70% of patients responded to nivolumab.

The median duration of response was 17 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months.

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, infusion-related reactions, rash, nausea, and pruritus.

Philippe Armand, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Patients

This phase 2 trial enrolled 243 adults with relapsed or refractory cHL who had undergone autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Their median age was 34 (range, 26-46), and 58% were male. Fifty-seven percent had stage IV disease, 20% had stage III, 21% had stage II, and 2% had stage I.

Patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 3-5). The median time from diagnosis to first nivolumab dose was 4.5 years (range, 2.4-7.6), and the median time from most recent auto-HSCT to first nivolumab dose was 2.0 years (range, 0.9-4.9).

The researchers divided patients into 3 cohorts according to exposure to brentuximab vedotin (BV):

• Cohort A was BV-naïve (n=63)
• Cohort B received BV only after auto-HSCT (n=80)
• Cohort C received BV before and/or after auto-HSCT (n=100).

Baseline characteristics were generally similar across the cohorts. However, cohort A had fewer prior treatments (median of 2 vs 4 in cohorts B and C).

Cohort B had the longest interval between diagnosis and first nivolumab dose (6.2 years vs 3.1 in cohort A and 3.5 in C) and between most recent auto-HSCT and first nivolumab dose (3.4 years vs 1 in cohort A and 1.7 in C).

Treatment

All patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

In cohort C, patients who were in complete response (CR) for 1 year had to discontinue nivolumab, but they could resume treatment if they relapsed within 2 years.

A protocol amendment allowed patients to continue treatment despite progression if they had stable performance status and were deriving “perceived clinical benefit.”

At a median follow-up of 18 months, 40% percent of all patients were still on treatment, including 48% of patients in cohort A, 40% in cohort B, and 35% in cohort C.

Safety

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (15%), infusion-related reactions (14%), rash (12%), nausea (10%), and pruritus (10%).

The most common grade 3/4 drug-related AEs were lipase increase (5%), neutropenia (3%), ALT increase (2%), AST increase (2%), and amylase increase (2%).

The most common serious drug-related AEs were infusion-related reactions (2%), pneumonitis (1%), pneumonia (1%), pleural effusion (1%), and pyrexia (1%).

Seven percent of patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. The most common of these were pneumonitis (2%) and autoimmune hepatitis (1%).

There were no deaths due to drug-related AEs.

Efficacy

The objective response rate was 69% overall, 65% in cohort A, 68% in cohort B, and 73% in cohort C.

CR was the best response for 16% of all patients, 29% of cohort A, 13% of cohort B, and 12% of cohort C.

The median duration of response was 17 months overall, 20 months for cohort A, 16 months for cohort B, 15 months for cohort C, and 20 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The researchers said responses were similar irrespective of BV treatment sequence.

The median PFS was 15 months for all patients, 18 months for cohort A, 15 months for cohort B, 12 months for cohort C, and 22 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The median overall survival was not reached in any of the cohorts.

The 12-month overall survival was 92% overall, 93% in cohort A, 95% in cohort B, 90% in cohort C, and 100% in patients who achieved a CR.

Subsequent HSCT

Forty-four patients proceeded to allogeneic HSCT after nivolumab, and the median post-HSCT follow-up was 5.5 months (range, 2.9-11.8).

At 6 months, the rate of transplant-related mortality was 13%, and the rate of disease progression was 7%.

The rate of grade 2-4 acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 30%, the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 20%, and the rate of chronic GVHD was 15%.

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

Nivolumab can provide “long-term benefits” in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

Extended follow-up of the CheckMate-205 study showed that nearly 70% of patients responded to nivolumab.

The median duration of response was 17 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months.

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, infusion-related reactions, rash, nausea, and pruritus.

Philippe Armand, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Patients

This phase 2 trial enrolled 243 adults with relapsed or refractory cHL who had undergone autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Their median age was 34 (range, 26-46), and 58% were male. Fifty-seven percent had stage IV disease, 20% had stage III, 21% had stage II, and 2% had stage I.

Patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 3-5). The median time from diagnosis to first nivolumab dose was 4.5 years (range, 2.4-7.6), and the median time from most recent auto-HSCT to first nivolumab dose was 2.0 years (range, 0.9-4.9).

The researchers divided patients into 3 cohorts according to exposure to brentuximab vedotin (BV):

• Cohort A was BV-naïve (n=63)
• Cohort B received BV only after auto-HSCT (n=80)
• Cohort C received BV before and/or after auto-HSCT (n=100).

Baseline characteristics were generally similar across the cohorts. However, cohort A had fewer prior treatments (median of 2 vs 4 in cohorts B and C).

Cohort B had the longest interval between diagnosis and first nivolumab dose (6.2 years vs 3.1 in cohort A and 3.5 in C) and between most recent auto-HSCT and first nivolumab dose (3.4 years vs 1 in cohort A and 1.7 in C).

Treatment

All patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

In cohort C, patients who were in complete response (CR) for 1 year had to discontinue nivolumab, but they could resume treatment if they relapsed within 2 years.

A protocol amendment allowed patients to continue treatment despite progression if they had stable performance status and were deriving “perceived clinical benefit.”

At a median follow-up of 18 months, 40% percent of all patients were still on treatment, including 48% of patients in cohort A, 40% in cohort B, and 35% in cohort C.

Safety

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (15%), infusion-related reactions (14%), rash (12%), nausea (10%), and pruritus (10%).

The most common grade 3/4 drug-related AEs were lipase increase (5%), neutropenia (3%), ALT increase (2%), AST increase (2%), and amylase increase (2%).

The most common serious drug-related AEs were infusion-related reactions (2%), pneumonitis (1%), pneumonia (1%), pleural effusion (1%), and pyrexia (1%).

Seven percent of patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. The most common of these were pneumonitis (2%) and autoimmune hepatitis (1%).

There were no deaths due to drug-related AEs.

Efficacy

The objective response rate was 69% overall, 65% in cohort A, 68% in cohort B, and 73% in cohort C.

CR was the best response for 16% of all patients, 29% of cohort A, 13% of cohort B, and 12% of cohort C.

The median duration of response was 17 months overall, 20 months for cohort A, 16 months for cohort B, 15 months for cohort C, and 20 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The researchers said responses were similar irrespective of BV treatment sequence.

The median PFS was 15 months for all patients, 18 months for cohort A, 15 months for cohort B, 12 months for cohort C, and 22 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The median overall survival was not reached in any of the cohorts.

The 12-month overall survival was 92% overall, 93% in cohort A, 95% in cohort B, 90% in cohort C, and 100% in patients who achieved a CR.

Subsequent HSCT

Forty-four patients proceeded to allogeneic HSCT after nivolumab, and the median post-HSCT follow-up was 5.5 months (range, 2.9-11.8).

At 6 months, the rate of transplant-related mortality was 13%, and the rate of disease progression was 7%.

The rate of grade 2-4 acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 30%, the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 20%, and the rate of chronic GVHD was 15%.

Micrograph showing Hodgkin lymphoma

Nivolumab can provide “long-term benefits” in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), according to researchers.

Extended follow-up of the CheckMate-205 study showed that nearly 70% of patients responded to nivolumab.

The median duration of response was 17 months, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months.

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, diarrhea, infusion-related reactions, rash, nausea, and pruritus.

Philippe Armand, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and his colleagues reported these results in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

Patients

This phase 2 trial enrolled 243 adults with relapsed or refractory cHL who had undergone autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT).

Their median age was 34 (range, 26-46), and 58% were male. Fifty-seven percent had stage IV disease, 20% had stage III, 21% had stage II, and 2% had stage I.

Patients had received a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 3-5). The median time from diagnosis to first nivolumab dose was 4.5 years (range, 2.4-7.6), and the median time from most recent auto-HSCT to first nivolumab dose was 2.0 years (range, 0.9-4.9).

The researchers divided patients into 3 cohorts according to exposure to brentuximab vedotin (BV):

• Cohort A was BV-naïve (n=63)
• Cohort B received BV only after auto-HSCT (n=80)
• Cohort C received BV before and/or after auto-HSCT (n=100).

Baseline characteristics were generally similar across the cohorts. However, cohort A had fewer prior treatments (median of 2 vs 4 in cohorts B and C).

Cohort B had the longest interval between diagnosis and first nivolumab dose (6.2 years vs 3.1 in cohort A and 3.5 in C) and between most recent auto-HSCT and first nivolumab dose (3.4 years vs 1 in cohort A and 1.7 in C).

Treatment

All patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

In cohort C, patients who were in complete response (CR) for 1 year had to discontinue nivolumab, but they could resume treatment if they relapsed within 2 years.

A protocol amendment allowed patients to continue treatment despite progression if they had stable performance status and were deriving “perceived clinical benefit.”

At a median follow-up of 18 months, 40% percent of all patients were still on treatment, including 48% of patients in cohort A, 40% in cohort B, and 35% in cohort C.

Safety

The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (15%), infusion-related reactions (14%), rash (12%), nausea (10%), and pruritus (10%).

The most common grade 3/4 drug-related AEs were lipase increase (5%), neutropenia (3%), ALT increase (2%), AST increase (2%), and amylase increase (2%).

The most common serious drug-related AEs were infusion-related reactions (2%), pneumonitis (1%), pneumonia (1%), pleural effusion (1%), and pyrexia (1%).

Seven percent of patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. The most common of these were pneumonitis (2%) and autoimmune hepatitis (1%).

There were no deaths due to drug-related AEs.

Efficacy

The objective response rate was 69% overall, 65% in cohort A, 68% in cohort B, and 73% in cohort C.

CR was the best response for 16% of all patients, 29% of cohort A, 13% of cohort B, and 12% of cohort C.

The median duration of response was 17 months overall, 20 months for cohort A, 16 months for cohort B, 15 months for cohort C, and 20 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The researchers said responses were similar irrespective of BV treatment sequence.

The median PFS was 15 months for all patients, 18 months for cohort A, 15 months for cohort B, 12 months for cohort C, and 22 months for patients who achieved a CR.

The median overall survival was not reached in any of the cohorts.

The 12-month overall survival was 92% overall, 93% in cohort A, 95% in cohort B, 90% in cohort C, and 100% in patients who achieved a CR.

Subsequent HSCT

Forty-four patients proceeded to allogeneic HSCT after nivolumab, and the median post-HSCT follow-up was 5.5 months (range, 2.9-11.8).

At 6 months, the rate of transplant-related mortality was 13%, and the rate of disease progression was 7%.

The rate of grade 2-4 acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) was 30%, the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 20%, and the rate of chronic GVHD was 15%.

ORLANDO – Not all oncology drugs are equal when it comes to their risk of treatment-induced cardiac arrhythmias.

Indeed, compared with anthracycline-based regimens, long the workhorse in treating many forms of cancer, the novel targeted agents – tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies – were 40% less likely to result in a new arrhythmia diagnosis within 6 months of treatment initiation, in a large, single-center retrospective study reported by Andrew Nickel at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nickel A et al. ACC 18. Abstract 900-06.

ORLANDO – Not all oncology drugs are equal when it comes to their risk of treatment-induced cardiac arrhythmias.

Indeed, compared with anthracycline-based regimens, long the workhorse in treating many forms of cancer, the novel targeted agents – tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies – were 40% less likely to result in a new arrhythmia diagnosis within 6 months of treatment initiation, in a large, single-center retrospective study reported by Andrew Nickel at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nickel A et al. ACC 18. Abstract 900-06.

ORLANDO – Not all oncology drugs are equal when it comes to their risk of treatment-induced cardiac arrhythmias.

Indeed, compared with anthracycline-based regimens, long the workhorse in treating many forms of cancer, the novel targeted agents – tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies – were 40% less likely to result in a new arrhythmia diagnosis within 6 months of treatment initiation, in a large, single-center retrospective study reported by Andrew Nickel at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nickel A et al. ACC 18. Abstract 900-06.

Hodgkin lymphoma

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has adopted a positive opinion of Carmustine Obvius, a generic version of Carmubris.

The CHMP is recommending marketing authorization for Carmustine Obvius as second-line treatment for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as to treat new or recurrent brain tumors, including glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, and metastatic brain tumors.

The CHMP’s opinion on Carmustine Obvius will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC).

If the EC agrees with the CHMP’s recommendation, the commission will grant a centralized marketing authorization that will be valid in the European Union.

The EC typically makes a decision on a product within 67 days of the CHMP’s recommendation.

If approved, Carmustine Obvius will be available as a 100 mg powder and solvent for solution for infusion.

The active substance of Carmustine Obvius is carmustine, an alkylating antineoplastic agent of the nitrosourea type, which prevents DNA replication and transcription by alkylating reactive sites on nucleoproteins.

Carmustine Obvius is a generic of Carmubris, which has been authorized in the European Union since July 31, 1996.

Since Carmustine Obvius is administered intravenously and is 100% bioavailable, a bioequivalence study of the drug versus Carmubris was not required.

Carmustine Obvius is a product of Obvius Investment B.V.

Hodgkin lymphoma

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has adopted a positive opinion of Carmustine Obvius, a generic version of Carmubris.

The CHMP is recommending marketing authorization for Carmustine Obvius as second-line treatment for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as to treat new or recurrent brain tumors, including glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, and metastatic brain tumors.

The CHMP’s opinion on Carmustine Obvius will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC).

If the EC agrees with the CHMP’s recommendation, the commission will grant a centralized marketing authorization that will be valid in the European Union.

The EC typically makes a decision on a product within 67 days of the CHMP’s recommendation.

If approved, Carmustine Obvius will be available as a 100 mg powder and solvent for solution for infusion.

The active substance of Carmustine Obvius is carmustine, an alkylating antineoplastic agent of the nitrosourea type, which prevents DNA replication and transcription by alkylating reactive sites on nucleoproteins.

Carmustine Obvius is a generic of Carmubris, which has been authorized in the European Union since July 31, 1996.

Since Carmustine Obvius is administered intravenously and is 100% bioavailable, a bioequivalence study of the drug versus Carmubris was not required.

Carmustine Obvius is a product of Obvius Investment B.V.

Hodgkin lymphoma

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has adopted a positive opinion of Carmustine Obvius, a generic version of Carmubris.

The CHMP is recommending marketing authorization for Carmustine Obvius as second-line treatment for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma as well as to treat new or recurrent brain tumors, including glioblastoma, medulloblastoma, astrocytoma, and metastatic brain tumors.

The CHMP’s opinion on Carmustine Obvius will be reviewed by the European Commission (EC).

If the EC agrees with the CHMP’s recommendation, the commission will grant a centralized marketing authorization that will be valid in the European Union.

The EC typically makes a decision on a product within 67 days of the CHMP’s recommendation.

If approved, Carmustine Obvius will be available as a 100 mg powder and solvent for solution for infusion.

The active substance of Carmustine Obvius is carmustine, an alkylating antineoplastic agent of the nitrosourea type, which prevents DNA replication and transcription by alkylating reactive sites on nucleoproteins.

Carmustine Obvius is a generic of Carmubris, which has been authorized in the European Union since July 31, 1996.

Since Carmustine Obvius is administered intravenously and is 100% bioavailable, a bioequivalence study of the drug versus Carmubris was not required.

Carmustine Obvius is a product of Obvius Investment B.V.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a partial hold on clinical trials of tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat solid tumors and lymphomas.

The hold has halted enrollment in US-based trials of tazemetostat, but study subjects who have not experienced disease progression may continue to receive the drug.

The hold is due to an adverse event observed in a pediatric patient on a phase 1 study of tazemetostat.

The patient, who had advanced poorly differentiated chordoma, developed a secondary T-cell lymphoma while taking tazemetostat.

The patient had been on study for approximately 15 months and had achieved a confirmed partial response. Now, the patient has discontinued tazemetostat and is being treated for T-cell lymphoma.

More than 750 patients have been treated with tazemetostat to date, and this is the only case of secondary lymphoma that has been observed, according to Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The company also noted that doses of tazemetostat explored in its phase 1 pediatric study are higher than those used in the phase 2 adult studies.

Epizyme has begun taking steps to address the hold on tazemetostat trials—updating the informed consent, investigator’s brochure, and study protocols.

The company will need to confirm alignment with the FDA in order to resume US enrollment.

“We are working expeditiously with clinical trial investigators and regulatory authorities to initiate the appropriate steps to resume enrollment,” said Robert Bazemore, president and chief executive officer of Epizyme.

“Epizyme, along with our global investigator community, has been very encouraged by the clinical responses and tolerability of tazemetostat observed in pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors enrolled in our trials. We remain encouraged by the potential of tazemetostat to address the unmet needs of many patients living with cancer.”

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a partial hold on clinical trials of tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat solid tumors and lymphomas.

The hold has halted enrollment in US-based trials of tazemetostat, but study subjects who have not experienced disease progression may continue to receive the drug.

The hold is due to an adverse event observed in a pediatric patient on a phase 1 study of tazemetostat.

The patient, who had advanced poorly differentiated chordoma, developed a secondary T-cell lymphoma while taking tazemetostat.

The patient had been on study for approximately 15 months and had achieved a confirmed partial response. Now, the patient has discontinued tazemetostat and is being treated for T-cell lymphoma.

More than 750 patients have been treated with tazemetostat to date, and this is the only case of secondary lymphoma that has been observed, according to Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The company also noted that doses of tazemetostat explored in its phase 1 pediatric study are higher than those used in the phase 2 adult studies.

Epizyme has begun taking steps to address the hold on tazemetostat trials—updating the informed consent, investigator’s brochure, and study protocols.

The company will need to confirm alignment with the FDA in order to resume US enrollment.

“We are working expeditiously with clinical trial investigators and regulatory authorities to initiate the appropriate steps to resume enrollment,” said Robert Bazemore, president and chief executive officer of Epizyme.

“Epizyme, along with our global investigator community, has been very encouraged by the clinical responses and tolerability of tazemetostat observed in pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors enrolled in our trials. We remain encouraged by the potential of tazemetostat to address the unmet needs of many patients living with cancer.”

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed a partial hold on clinical trials of tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat solid tumors and lymphomas.

The hold has halted enrollment in US-based trials of tazemetostat, but study subjects who have not experienced disease progression may continue to receive the drug.

The hold is due to an adverse event observed in a pediatric patient on a phase 1 study of tazemetostat.

The patient, who had advanced poorly differentiated chordoma, developed a secondary T-cell lymphoma while taking tazemetostat.

The patient had been on study for approximately 15 months and had achieved a confirmed partial response. Now, the patient has discontinued tazemetostat and is being treated for T-cell lymphoma.

More than 750 patients have been treated with tazemetostat to date, and this is the only case of secondary lymphoma that has been observed, according to Epizyme, Inc., the company developing tazemetostat.

The company also noted that doses of tazemetostat explored in its phase 1 pediatric study are higher than those used in the phase 2 adult studies.

Epizyme has begun taking steps to address the hold on tazemetostat trials—updating the informed consent, investigator’s brochure, and study protocols.

The company will need to confirm alignment with the FDA in order to resume US enrollment.

“We are working expeditiously with clinical trial investigators and regulatory authorities to initiate the appropriate steps to resume enrollment,” said Robert Bazemore, president and chief executive officer of Epizyme.

“Epizyme, along with our global investigator community, has been very encouraged by the clinical responses and tolerability of tazemetostat observed in pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors enrolled in our trials. We remain encouraged by the potential of tazemetostat to address the unmet needs of many patients living with cancer.”

Photo courtesy of CDC

New research suggests a bedside visual art intervention (BVAI) can reduce pain and anxiety in inpatients with hematologic malignancies, including those undergoing transplant.

The BVAI involved an educator teaching patients art technique one-on-one for approximately 30 minutes.

After a single session, patients had significant improvements in positive mood and pain scores, as well as decreases in negative mood and anxiety.

Alexandra P. Wolanskyj, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues reported these results in the European Journal of Cancer Care.

The study included 21 patients, 19 of them female. Their median age was 53.5 (range, 19-75). Six patients were undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The patients had multiple myeloma (n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (n=5), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=2), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), amyloidosis (n=1), Gardner-Diamond syndrome (n=1), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=1), and Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1).

Nearly half of patients had relapsed disease (47.6%), 23.8% had active and new disease, 19.0% had active disease with primary resistance on chemotherapy, and 9.5% of patients were in remission.

Intervention

The researchers recruited an educator from a community art center to teach art at the patients’ bedsides. Sessions were intended to be about 30 minutes. However, patients could stop at any time or continue beyond 30 minutes.

Patients and their families could make art or just observe. Materials used included watercolors, oil pastels, colored pencils, and clay (all non-toxic and odorless). The materials were left with patients so they could continue to use them after the sessions.

Results

The researchers assessed patients’ pain, anxiety, and mood at baseline and after the patients had a session with the art educator.

After the BVAI, patients had a significant decrease in pain, according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The 14 patients who reported any pain at baseline had a mean reduction in VAS score of 1.5, or a 35.1% reduction in pain (P=0.017).

Patients had a 21.6% reduction in anxiety after the BVAI. Among the 20 patients who completed this assessment, there was a mean 9.2-point decrease in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score (P=0.001).

In addition, patients had a significant increase in positive mood and a significant decrease in negative mood after the BVAI. Mood was assessed in 20 patients using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scale.

Positive mood increased 14.6% (P=0.003), and negative mood decreased 18.0% (P=0.015) after the BVAI. Patients’ mean PANAS scores increased 4.6 points for positive mood and decreased 3.3 points for negative mood.

All 21 patients completed a questionnaire on the BVAI. All but 1 patient (95%) said the intervention was positive overall, and 85% of patients (n=18) said they would be interested in participating in future art-based interventions.

The researchers said these results suggest experiences provided by artists in the community may be an adjunct to conventional treatments in patients with cancer-related mood symptoms and pain.

Photo courtesy of CDC

New research suggests a bedside visual art intervention (BVAI) can reduce pain and anxiety in inpatients with hematologic malignancies, including those undergoing transplant.

The BVAI involved an educator teaching patients art technique one-on-one for approximately 30 minutes.

After a single session, patients had significant improvements in positive mood and pain scores, as well as decreases in negative mood and anxiety.

Alexandra P. Wolanskyj, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues reported these results in the European Journal of Cancer Care.

The study included 21 patients, 19 of them female. Their median age was 53.5 (range, 19-75). Six patients were undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The patients had multiple myeloma (n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (n=5), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=2), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), amyloidosis (n=1), Gardner-Diamond syndrome (n=1), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=1), and Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1).

Nearly half of patients had relapsed disease (47.6%), 23.8% had active and new disease, 19.0% had active disease with primary resistance on chemotherapy, and 9.5% of patients were in remission.

Intervention

The researchers recruited an educator from a community art center to teach art at the patients’ bedsides. Sessions were intended to be about 30 minutes. However, patients could stop at any time or continue beyond 30 minutes.

Patients and their families could make art or just observe. Materials used included watercolors, oil pastels, colored pencils, and clay (all non-toxic and odorless). The materials were left with patients so they could continue to use them after the sessions.

Results

The researchers assessed patients’ pain, anxiety, and mood at baseline and after the patients had a session with the art educator.

After the BVAI, patients had a significant decrease in pain, according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The 14 patients who reported any pain at baseline had a mean reduction in VAS score of 1.5, or a 35.1% reduction in pain (P=0.017).

Patients had a 21.6% reduction in anxiety after the BVAI. Among the 20 patients who completed this assessment, there was a mean 9.2-point decrease in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score (P=0.001).

In addition, patients had a significant increase in positive mood and a significant decrease in negative mood after the BVAI. Mood was assessed in 20 patients using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scale.

Positive mood increased 14.6% (P=0.003), and negative mood decreased 18.0% (P=0.015) after the BVAI. Patients’ mean PANAS scores increased 4.6 points for positive mood and decreased 3.3 points for negative mood.

All 21 patients completed a questionnaire on the BVAI. All but 1 patient (95%) said the intervention was positive overall, and 85% of patients (n=18) said they would be interested in participating in future art-based interventions.

The researchers said these results suggest experiences provided by artists in the community may be an adjunct to conventional treatments in patients with cancer-related mood symptoms and pain.

Photo courtesy of CDC

New research suggests a bedside visual art intervention (BVAI) can reduce pain and anxiety in inpatients with hematologic malignancies, including those undergoing transplant.

The BVAI involved an educator teaching patients art technique one-on-one for approximately 30 minutes.

After a single session, patients had significant improvements in positive mood and pain scores, as well as decreases in negative mood and anxiety.

Alexandra P. Wolanskyj, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and her colleagues reported these results in the European Journal of Cancer Care.

The study included 21 patients, 19 of them female. Their median age was 53.5 (range, 19-75). Six patients were undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The patients had multiple myeloma (n=5), acute myeloid leukemia (n=5), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=2), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1), amyloidosis (n=1), Gardner-Diamond syndrome (n=1), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=1), and Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (n=1).

Nearly half of patients had relapsed disease (47.6%), 23.8% had active and new disease, 19.0% had active disease with primary resistance on chemotherapy, and 9.5% of patients were in remission.

Intervention

The researchers recruited an educator from a community art center to teach art at the patients’ bedsides. Sessions were intended to be about 30 minutes. However, patients could stop at any time or continue beyond 30 minutes.

Patients and their families could make art or just observe. Materials used included watercolors, oil pastels, colored pencils, and clay (all non-toxic and odorless). The materials were left with patients so they could continue to use them after the sessions.

Results

The researchers assessed patients’ pain, anxiety, and mood at baseline and after the patients had a session with the art educator.

After the BVAI, patients had a significant decrease in pain, according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The 14 patients who reported any pain at baseline had a mean reduction in VAS score of 1.5, or a 35.1% reduction in pain (P=0.017).

Patients had a 21.6% reduction in anxiety after the BVAI. Among the 20 patients who completed this assessment, there was a mean 9.2-point decrease in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score (P=0.001).

In addition, patients had a significant increase in positive mood and a significant decrease in negative mood after the BVAI. Mood was assessed in 20 patients using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scale.

Positive mood increased 14.6% (P=0.003), and negative mood decreased 18.0% (P=0.015) after the BVAI. Patients’ mean PANAS scores increased 4.6 points for positive mood and decreased 3.3 points for negative mood.

All 21 patients completed a questionnaire on the BVAI. All but 1 patient (95%) said the intervention was positive overall, and 85% of patients (n=18) said they would be interested in participating in future art-based interventions.

The researchers said these results suggest experiences provided by artists in the community may be an adjunct to conventional treatments in patients with cancer-related mood symptoms and pain.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS) in combination with chemotherapy for adults with previously untreated, stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

This is the fifth approved indication for BV in the US and the first regimen approved for frontline, stage III/IV cHL in the US in more than 40 years.

“The standard of care for treating newly diagnosed, advanced Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed in more than 4 decades,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

“For years, the physician community has been conducting clinical trials to identify improved regimens that are both less toxic and more effective—to no avail.”

The ECHELON-1 study changed that, according to Dr Connors.

“The ECHELON-1 study results demonstrated superior efficacy of the ADCETRIS plus chemotherapy regimen, when compared to the standard of care, while removing bleomycin—an agent that can cause unpredictable and sometimes fatal lung toxicity—completely from the regimen,” he said. “This represents a meaningful advance for this often younger patient population.”

In the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial, researchers compared BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

In addition to supporting the new approval for BV in cHL, ECHELON-1 results also served to convert an accelerated approval of BV to standard approval. The drug now has standard FDA approval for the treatment of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

BV also has standard FDA approval for:

• Adults with cHL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• Post-auto-HSCT consolidation in adults with cHL at high risk of relapse or progression
• Adults with primary cutaneous ALCL or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared A+AVD to ABVD as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced cHL. The primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS) in combination with chemotherapy for adults with previously untreated, stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

This is the fifth approved indication for BV in the US and the first regimen approved for frontline, stage III/IV cHL in the US in more than 40 years.

“The standard of care for treating newly diagnosed, advanced Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed in more than 4 decades,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

“For years, the physician community has been conducting clinical trials to identify improved regimens that are both less toxic and more effective—to no avail.”

The ECHELON-1 study changed that, according to Dr Connors.

“The ECHELON-1 study results demonstrated superior efficacy of the ADCETRIS plus chemotherapy regimen, when compared to the standard of care, while removing bleomycin—an agent that can cause unpredictable and sometimes fatal lung toxicity—completely from the regimen,” he said. “This represents a meaningful advance for this often younger patient population.”

In the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial, researchers compared BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

In addition to supporting the new approval for BV in cHL, ECHELON-1 results also served to convert an accelerated approval of BV to standard approval. The drug now has standard FDA approval for the treatment of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

BV also has standard FDA approval for:

• Adults with cHL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• Post-auto-HSCT consolidation in adults with cHL at high risk of relapse or progression
• Adults with primary cutaneous ALCL or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared A+AVD to ABVD as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced cHL. The primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS) in combination with chemotherapy for adults with previously untreated, stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

This is the fifth approved indication for BV in the US and the first regimen approved for frontline, stage III/IV cHL in the US in more than 40 years.

“The standard of care for treating newly diagnosed, advanced Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed in more than 4 decades,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

“For years, the physician community has been conducting clinical trials to identify improved regimens that are both less toxic and more effective—to no avail.”

The ECHELON-1 study changed that, according to Dr Connors.

“The ECHELON-1 study results demonstrated superior efficacy of the ADCETRIS plus chemotherapy regimen, when compared to the standard of care, while removing bleomycin—an agent that can cause unpredictable and sometimes fatal lung toxicity—completely from the regimen,” he said. “This represents a meaningful advance for this often younger patient population.”

In the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial, researchers compared BV plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

In addition to supporting the new approval for BV in cHL, ECHELON-1 results also served to convert an accelerated approval of BV to standard approval. The drug now has standard FDA approval for the treatment of adults with systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

BV also has standard FDA approval for:

• Adults with cHL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens
• Post-auto-HSCT consolidation in adults with cHL at high risk of relapse or progression
• Adults with primary cutaneous ALCL or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared A+AVD to ABVD as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced cHL. The primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved brentuximab vedotin, in combination with chemotherapy, for previously untreated adults with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

The drug, which is marketed by Seattle Genetics as Adcetris, is already approved in classical Hodgkin lymphoma after relapse and after stem cell transplant when the patient is at risk of relapse or progression. The drug is also approved to treat both systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and primary cutaneous ALCL after failure on other treatments.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved brentuximab vedotin, in combination with chemotherapy, for previously untreated adults with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

The drug, which is marketed by Seattle Genetics as Adcetris, is already approved in classical Hodgkin lymphoma after relapse and after stem cell transplant when the patient is at risk of relapse or progression. The drug is also approved to treat both systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and primary cutaneous ALCL after failure on other treatments.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved brentuximab vedotin, in combination with chemotherapy, for previously untreated adults with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

The drug, which is marketed by Seattle Genetics as Adcetris, is already approved in classical Hodgkin lymphoma after relapse and after stem cell transplant when the patient is at risk of relapse or progression. The drug is also approved to treat both systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and primary cutaneous ALCL after failure on other treatments.

[email protected]

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

Photo courtesy of CDC

ORLANDO—Results of a retrospective study showed that survivors of lymphoma or breast cancer had a significantly greater risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) than patients who did not have cancer.

This increased risk was observed as early as a year after cancer diagnosis but was still present 20 years after diagnosis.

Overall, 1 in 10 cancer patients had CHF at the 20-year mark.

“The majority of patients do not develop heart failure, but our research helps us recognize the factors associated with it and the importance of appropriate heart care following cancer treatment,” said Carolyn Larsen, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

“Our research suggests that periodic cardiac imaging to monitor for heart damage may be needed for some cancer patients, even if they have no signs of heart damage initially after chemotherapy. Additionally, it emphasizes that working to live a heart-healthy lifestyle is important for cancer patients and survivors to reduce the overall risk of heart disease.”

Dr Larsen and her colleagues presented this research as a poster (abstract 1105-066) at the American College of Cardiology’s 67th Annual Scientific Session & Expo (ACC.18).

Patients

Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project, the researchers retrospectively tracked CHF cases in 900 cancer patients and 1550 non-cancer patients. Patients were treated in Olmsted County in Minnesota from 1985 to 2010.

For both patient groups, the median age at baseline was about 53, a little more than 90% of each group was white, and nearly 80% of each group was female.

Six to 7% of patients had diabetes, and about 30% of each group had hypertension. Thirty-eight percent of each group had hyperlipidemia, and 31% were obese.

Five percent of cancer patients and 2% of controls had coronary artery disease (P<0.001). This was the only significant difference in baseline characteristics.

Cancer patients had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (28%), Hodgkin lymphoma (9%), or breast cancer (64%). Forty-seven percent had received radiation, including right chest (21%), left chest (23%), and mediastinal (4%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received anthracycline therapy. The median doxorubicin isotoxic dose was 240 mg/m².

At baseline, 12% of cancer patients were on beta-blockers, 8% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 4% were on angiotensin receptor blockers, and 11% were on statins.

Results

Cancer patients were more than 3 times as likely as controls to develop CHF. The hazard ratio (HR) was 3.6 (P<0.01) in an analysis adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity at baseline.

The increased CHF risk among cancer patients was evident after the first year from cancer diagnosis and persisted at 20 years of follow-up.

“The risk of heart failure doesn’t go away after a couple of years,” Dr Larsen said. “It’s a long-term issue that patients need to discuss with their doctors and use as motivation to stay heart healthy.”

The incidence of CHF—in cancer patients and controls, respectively—was as follows:

• 1 year—1.5% vs 0.1%
• 5 years—3.1% vs 0.9%
• 10 years—5.0% vs 2%
• 20 years—10.1% vs 5.8%.

A multivariable analysis in the cancer patients revealed a few independent risk factors for CHF, including:

• Doxorubicin isotoxic dose ≥ 300 mg/m² (HR=2.34, P=0.003)
• Age at diagnosis (HR=3.06 for age ≥ 80 vs 60-69, P=0.01)
• Coronary artery disease at diagnosis (HR=2.27, P=0.04)
• Diabetes mellitus at diagnosis (HR=2.39, P<0.01).

Dr Larsen said additional research is needed to determine why diabetes carries a greater risk than other traditional risk factors, such as high blood pressure, in this group.

Mitigating risk

These findings raise important questions about what the appropriate surveillance should be for heart problems post-cancer treatment, Dr Larsen said. She believes more frequent cardiac imaging may be warranted in some patients to detect signs of CHF earlier.

“It’s an area that needs to be better defined,” Dr Larsen said. “An echocardiogram is usually done 6 to 12 months after cancer treatment with an anthracycline, but how often should it be done after that? We need to be more vigilant in making sure we try to prevent or control heart issues post-cancer care, especially in light of the growing appreciation of the connection between some cancer treatments and heart disease.”

Dr Larsen also noted that patients themselves can play a role in decreasing their risk of CHF, even if they are starting at a disadvantage.

A heart-healthy lifestyle—maintaining a normal body weight, regular exercise, and controlling other risk factors such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and high cholesterol—can help lower the risk of heart disease and CHF.

“If patients know they have received a drug treatment that might increase their risk of heart failure, it’s even more important to take care of the aspects of their life that they can control to reduce their risk as much as possible and to work with their medical care team to detect issues as early as possible,” Dr Larsen said.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the label for nivolumab (Opdivo®) to include new dosing and administration information.

Nivolumab can now be given at 480 mg infused every 4 weeks for most approved indications, in addition to the previously approved dosing schedule of 240 mg every 2 weeks.

The FDA also approved a shorter 30-minute infusion across all approved indications of nivolumab.

The 480 mg dose option can be used for nearly all approved indications of nivolumab. The exceptions are patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Nivolumab is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To treat adults with classical Hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT.
• As monotherapy for patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma as well as BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• In combination with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• To treat patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving nivolumab.
• For patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.
• To treat patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.
• For patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.
• To treat adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.
• For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have been previously treated with sorafenib.
• For the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the label for nivolumab (Opdivo®) to include new dosing and administration information.

Nivolumab can now be given at 480 mg infused every 4 weeks for most approved indications, in addition to the previously approved dosing schedule of 240 mg every 2 weeks.

The FDA also approved a shorter 30-minute infusion across all approved indications of nivolumab.

The 480 mg dose option can be used for nearly all approved indications of nivolumab. The exceptions are patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Nivolumab is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To treat adults with classical Hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT.
• As monotherapy for patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma as well as BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• In combination with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• To treat patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving nivolumab.
• For patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.
• To treat patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.
• For patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.
• To treat adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.
• For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have been previously treated with sorafenib.
• For the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated the label for nivolumab (Opdivo®) to include new dosing and administration information.

Nivolumab can now be given at 480 mg infused every 4 weeks for most approved indications, in addition to the previously approved dosing schedule of 240 mg every 2 weeks.

The FDA also approved a shorter 30-minute infusion across all approved indications of nivolumab.

The 480 mg dose option can be used for nearly all approved indications of nivolumab. The exceptions are patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Nivolumab is FDA-approved for the following indications:

• To treat adults with classical Hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed or progressed after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and brentuximab vedotin or after 3 or more lines of systemic therapy that includes autologous HSCT.
• As monotherapy for patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma as well as BRAF V600 wild-type unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• In combination with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
• To treat patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving nivolumab.
• For patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy.
• To treat patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with disease progression on or after platinum-based therapy.
• For patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy or have disease progression within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy.
• To treat adult and pediatric (12 years and older) patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan.
• For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have been previously treated with sorafenib.
• For the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.