Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Child with cancer

Photo by Bill Branson

SAN DIEGO—In recent years, pediatric or pediatric-inspired protocols have become the preferred treatment approach for younger adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

These protocols include higher doses of steroids, vincristine, methotrexate, and L-asparaginase.

However, the upper age limit for this strategy has not been defined.

With the GRAALL-2005 study, investigators set out to determine how old is too old to be treated on pediatric protocols.

Their results suggest 55 is likely the upper age limit for patients with Ph-negative ALL.

The investigators also evaluated a hyper-fractionated (hyper-C) versus standard dose (standard-C) of cyclophosphamide during induction and late intensification.

They found that hyper-C did not provide an event-free survival (EFS) benefit in the overall study population, but patients age 55 and older did appear to benefit from hyper-C.

Françoise Huguet, MD, of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse in Toulouse, France, presented these findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 762).

GRAALL investigators had previously evaluated a pediatric-inspired protocol for adult patients in the GRAALL-2003 study, which validated the approach.

Study design

Patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative ALL were eligible to enroll if they were 18 to 59 years of age.

Treatment comprised a steroid pre-phase, a 5-drug induction, two 3-block dose-dense consolidation phases, a late intensification, a third consolidation phase, CNS irradiation, and a 2-year maintenance phase.

Patients could proceed to allogeneic transplant in first complete remission (CR) if eligible.

During induction and late intensification, patients received cyclophosphamide at 750 mg/m² on day 1 and were then randomized to hyper-C (300 mg/m²/every 12 hours on days 15 to 17) or standard-C (750 mg/m² on day 15).

The primary endpoint was EFS.

Patient population

Investigators randomized 787 evaluable patients—398 in the standard-C arm and 389 in the hyper-C arm.

Their median age was 36 years, 67% of patients had B-cell precursor ALL, and 33% had T-ALL.

Most had high-risk ALL, 72% of them receiving standard-C and 66% receiving hyper-C.

About a third of the patients in each arm proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR.

Results

The CR rate after induction therapy was 90.2% in the standard-C arm and 93.6% in the hyper-C arm, for an overall CR rate of 92%.

Most patients—87.5% in the standard-C arm and 91.8% in the hyper-C arm—achieved a response in 1 course of therapy.

Sixty percent of patients tested in the standard-C arm and 66% of those tested in the hyper-C arm were minimal residual disease negative at less than 10^-4.

There were 26 (6.5%) deaths in the standard-C arm and 18 (4.6%) in the hyper-C arm.

The 5-year EFS rate was 52% overall, and hyper-C treatment had no impact on EFS (hazard ratio=0.89 [range, 0.7-1.1]; P=0.26).

Impact of age

Investigators conducted a post-hoc subgroup analysis of 5 age groups—18-24 years (n=200), 25-34 (n=172), 35-44 (n=171), 45-54 (n=151), and 55+ (n=93).

Overall, the CR rate tended to decrease with age. The rates were 98.5% (18-24), 95.3% (25-34), 87.7% (35-44), 89.4% (45-54), and 79.6% (55+).

Induction death rates increased from 0.5% in the youngest group to 18.3% in the oldest, but the rate of cumulative incidences of failure at 5 years was similar among all the age groups.

The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality, without censoring for transplant, ranged from 7.6% in the youngest group to 39.7% in the oldest.

And the 5-year EFS for the youngest patients was 60%, while, for the oldest, it was 26%.

“Above 50 years, the increase in age became highly significant,” Dr Huguet emphasized. “There were fewer CRs and lower survival.”

Treatment compliance

In terms of treatment compliance and median dose received in the induction course, patients aged 55-59 received significantly less L-asparaginase than those aged 18-54 (P<0.001).

During all 3 consolidation phases, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of all medications—cytarabine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide—than patients aged 18-54.

And in late intensification, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin, and hyper-C than all other patients. The median doses of L-asparaginase and standard-C received were lower in the older patients but not significantly so.

EFS by age and randomization

The 5-year EFS for patients aged 18-54 was 57% with hyper-C, compared with 55% in the standard-C arm (P=0.66).

However, for older patients, there was a significant advantage for those receiving hyper-C. The 5-year EFS was 38% with hyper-C, compared to 12% with standard-C (P=0.007).

Dr Huguet explained that inferior compliance in patients 55 and older “might explain why a benefit associated with early hyper-C reinforcement became apparent in these older patients only.”

Dr Huguet concluded that the results “suggest that 55 years is likely to be the upper age limit to tolerate a pediatric-like therapy for younger adults with Ph-negative ALL.”

She added that patients over 54 might benefit from alternative front-line strategies.

Accordingly, investigators are planning to use new agents, such as blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin, in the next European Working Group on Adult ALL studies.

Child with cancer

Photo by Bill Branson

SAN DIEGO—In recent years, pediatric or pediatric-inspired protocols have become the preferred treatment approach for younger adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

These protocols include higher doses of steroids, vincristine, methotrexate, and L-asparaginase.

However, the upper age limit for this strategy has not been defined.

With the GRAALL-2005 study, investigators set out to determine how old is too old to be treated on pediatric protocols.

Their results suggest 55 is likely the upper age limit for patients with Ph-negative ALL.

The investigators also evaluated a hyper-fractionated (hyper-C) versus standard dose (standard-C) of cyclophosphamide during induction and late intensification.

They found that hyper-C did not provide an event-free survival (EFS) benefit in the overall study population, but patients age 55 and older did appear to benefit from hyper-C.

Françoise Huguet, MD, of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse in Toulouse, France, presented these findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 762).

GRAALL investigators had previously evaluated a pediatric-inspired protocol for adult patients in the GRAALL-2003 study, which validated the approach.

Study design

Patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative ALL were eligible to enroll if they were 18 to 59 years of age.

Treatment comprised a steroid pre-phase, a 5-drug induction, two 3-block dose-dense consolidation phases, a late intensification, a third consolidation phase, CNS irradiation, and a 2-year maintenance phase.

Patients could proceed to allogeneic transplant in first complete remission (CR) if eligible.

During induction and late intensification, patients received cyclophosphamide at 750 mg/m² on day 1 and were then randomized to hyper-C (300 mg/m²/every 12 hours on days 15 to 17) or standard-C (750 mg/m² on day 15).

The primary endpoint was EFS.

Patient population

Investigators randomized 787 evaluable patients—398 in the standard-C arm and 389 in the hyper-C arm.

Their median age was 36 years, 67% of patients had B-cell precursor ALL, and 33% had T-ALL.

Most had high-risk ALL, 72% of them receiving standard-C and 66% receiving hyper-C.

About a third of the patients in each arm proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR.

Results

The CR rate after induction therapy was 90.2% in the standard-C arm and 93.6% in the hyper-C arm, for an overall CR rate of 92%.

Most patients—87.5% in the standard-C arm and 91.8% in the hyper-C arm—achieved a response in 1 course of therapy.

Sixty percent of patients tested in the standard-C arm and 66% of those tested in the hyper-C arm were minimal residual disease negative at less than 10^-4.

There were 26 (6.5%) deaths in the standard-C arm and 18 (4.6%) in the hyper-C arm.

The 5-year EFS rate was 52% overall, and hyper-C treatment had no impact on EFS (hazard ratio=0.89 [range, 0.7-1.1]; P=0.26).

Impact of age

Investigators conducted a post-hoc subgroup analysis of 5 age groups—18-24 years (n=200), 25-34 (n=172), 35-44 (n=171), 45-54 (n=151), and 55+ (n=93).

Overall, the CR rate tended to decrease with age. The rates were 98.5% (18-24), 95.3% (25-34), 87.7% (35-44), 89.4% (45-54), and 79.6% (55+).

Induction death rates increased from 0.5% in the youngest group to 18.3% in the oldest, but the rate of cumulative incidences of failure at 5 years was similar among all the age groups.

The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality, without censoring for transplant, ranged from 7.6% in the youngest group to 39.7% in the oldest.

And the 5-year EFS for the youngest patients was 60%, while, for the oldest, it was 26%.

“Above 50 years, the increase in age became highly significant,” Dr Huguet emphasized. “There were fewer CRs and lower survival.”

Treatment compliance

In terms of treatment compliance and median dose received in the induction course, patients aged 55-59 received significantly less L-asparaginase than those aged 18-54 (P<0.001).

During all 3 consolidation phases, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of all medications—cytarabine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide—than patients aged 18-54.

And in late intensification, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin, and hyper-C than all other patients. The median doses of L-asparaginase and standard-C received were lower in the older patients but not significantly so.

EFS by age and randomization

The 5-year EFS for patients aged 18-54 was 57% with hyper-C, compared with 55% in the standard-C arm (P=0.66).

However, for older patients, there was a significant advantage for those receiving hyper-C. The 5-year EFS was 38% with hyper-C, compared to 12% with standard-C (P=0.007).

Dr Huguet explained that inferior compliance in patients 55 and older “might explain why a benefit associated with early hyper-C reinforcement became apparent in these older patients only.”

Dr Huguet concluded that the results “suggest that 55 years is likely to be the upper age limit to tolerate a pediatric-like therapy for younger adults with Ph-negative ALL.”

She added that patients over 54 might benefit from alternative front-line strategies.

Accordingly, investigators are planning to use new agents, such as blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin, in the next European Working Group on Adult ALL studies.

Child with cancer

Photo by Bill Branson

SAN DIEGO—In recent years, pediatric or pediatric-inspired protocols have become the preferred treatment approach for younger adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

These protocols include higher doses of steroids, vincristine, methotrexate, and L-asparaginase.

However, the upper age limit for this strategy has not been defined.

With the GRAALL-2005 study, investigators set out to determine how old is too old to be treated on pediatric protocols.

Their results suggest 55 is likely the upper age limit for patients with Ph-negative ALL.

The investigators also evaluated a hyper-fractionated (hyper-C) versus standard dose (standard-C) of cyclophosphamide during induction and late intensification.

They found that hyper-C did not provide an event-free survival (EFS) benefit in the overall study population, but patients age 55 and older did appear to benefit from hyper-C.

Françoise Huguet, MD, of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse in Toulouse, France, presented these findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 762).

GRAALL investigators had previously evaluated a pediatric-inspired protocol for adult patients in the GRAALL-2003 study, which validated the approach.

Study design

Patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative ALL were eligible to enroll if they were 18 to 59 years of age.

Treatment comprised a steroid pre-phase, a 5-drug induction, two 3-block dose-dense consolidation phases, a late intensification, a third consolidation phase, CNS irradiation, and a 2-year maintenance phase.

Patients could proceed to allogeneic transplant in first complete remission (CR) if eligible.

During induction and late intensification, patients received cyclophosphamide at 750 mg/m² on day 1 and were then randomized to hyper-C (300 mg/m²/every 12 hours on days 15 to 17) or standard-C (750 mg/m² on day 15).

The primary endpoint was EFS.

Patient population

Investigators randomized 787 evaluable patients—398 in the standard-C arm and 389 in the hyper-C arm.

Their median age was 36 years, 67% of patients had B-cell precursor ALL, and 33% had T-ALL.

Most had high-risk ALL, 72% of them receiving standard-C and 66% receiving hyper-C.

About a third of the patients in each arm proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant in first CR.

Results

The CR rate after induction therapy was 90.2% in the standard-C arm and 93.6% in the hyper-C arm, for an overall CR rate of 92%.

Most patients—87.5% in the standard-C arm and 91.8% in the hyper-C arm—achieved a response in 1 course of therapy.

Sixty percent of patients tested in the standard-C arm and 66% of those tested in the hyper-C arm were minimal residual disease negative at less than 10^-4.

There were 26 (6.5%) deaths in the standard-C arm and 18 (4.6%) in the hyper-C arm.

The 5-year EFS rate was 52% overall, and hyper-C treatment had no impact on EFS (hazard ratio=0.89 [range, 0.7-1.1]; P=0.26).

Impact of age

Investigators conducted a post-hoc subgroup analysis of 5 age groups—18-24 years (n=200), 25-34 (n=172), 35-44 (n=171), 45-54 (n=151), and 55+ (n=93).

Overall, the CR rate tended to decrease with age. The rates were 98.5% (18-24), 95.3% (25-34), 87.7% (35-44), 89.4% (45-54), and 79.6% (55+).

Induction death rates increased from 0.5% in the youngest group to 18.3% in the oldest, but the rate of cumulative incidences of failure at 5 years was similar among all the age groups.

The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality, without censoring for transplant, ranged from 7.6% in the youngest group to 39.7% in the oldest.

And the 5-year EFS for the youngest patients was 60%, while, for the oldest, it was 26%.

“Above 50 years, the increase in age became highly significant,” Dr Huguet emphasized. “There were fewer CRs and lower survival.”

Treatment compliance

In terms of treatment compliance and median dose received in the induction course, patients aged 55-59 received significantly less L-asparaginase than those aged 18-54 (P<0.001).

During all 3 consolidation phases, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of all medications—cytarabine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide—than patients aged 18-54.

And in late intensification, patients aged 55-59 received significantly lower median doses of vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin, and hyper-C than all other patients. The median doses of L-asparaginase and standard-C received were lower in the older patients but not significantly so.

EFS by age and randomization

The 5-year EFS for patients aged 18-54 was 57% with hyper-C, compared with 55% in the standard-C arm (P=0.66).

However, for older patients, there was a significant advantage for those receiving hyper-C. The 5-year EFS was 38% with hyper-C, compared to 12% with standard-C (P=0.007).

Dr Huguet explained that inferior compliance in patients 55 and older “might explain why a benefit associated with early hyper-C reinforcement became apparent in these older patients only.”

Dr Huguet concluded that the results “suggest that 55 years is likely to be the upper age limit to tolerate a pediatric-like therapy for younger adults with Ph-negative ALL.”

She added that patients over 54 might benefit from alternative front-line strategies.

Accordingly, investigators are planning to use new agents, such as blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin, in the next European Working Group on Adult ALL studies.

Poster session at the

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

SAN DIEGO—Researchers have found evidence to suggest that mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes may contribute to the development of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML).

The team noted that CBF-AML is defined by the presence of either t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/CBFB-MYH11.

However, the fusion genes alone are not capable of causing CBF-AML.

“The hematology community has long sought to determine what other factors in addition to the fusion genes occur in this special type of leukemia,” said Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus.

“We are now the first to describe that mutations in CCND1—and among the first to describe that mutations in the sister gene CCND2—are unique features of CBF-AML with t(8;21). In addition, we have collected the first evidence that mutations in CCND2 lead to more aggressive growth of leukemia cell lines.”

Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues reported these findings in a paper published in Leukemia and in a poster presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 2740).

A previous study of genetic mutations in CBF-AML revealed the presence of at least 1 mutation in 85% of patients studied. This meant the remaining 15% of patients harbored other, undiscovered mutations.

For the current study, Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues searched CBF-AML samples for the missing mutations that, together with the fusion genes, might contribute to the leukemia in this subgroup of cases.

The team analyzed pretreatment bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from 177 adult CBF-AML patients who received similar treatment through a clinical trial conducted at multiple centers across the US.

Using a targeted, next-generation sequencing approach, the researchers looked for mutations in 84 leukemia- and/or cancer-associated genes. They also performed tests on blood or bone marrow cells to look for chromosomal irregularities.

The team discovered 2 significant mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes, representing the first dual evidence of these recurrent mutations in patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML.

CCND1 and CCND2 mutations were found in 15% (n=10) of patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML. Two patients had mutations in CCND1, and 8 had mutations in CCND2.

The researchers also found a single CCND2 mutation in 1 (0.9%) patient with inv(16)-positive CBF-AML.

In comparison, the incidence of CCND1 and CCND2 mutations was 0.77% (n=11) in a cohort of 1426 patients with non-CBF-AML.

“This is extremely valuable information that was previously unknown,” Dr Eisfeld said, “and it might help us develop targeted therapies more likely to help patients with [CBF-AML] in the near future.”

Poster session at the

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

SAN DIEGO—Researchers have found evidence to suggest that mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes may contribute to the development of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML).

The team noted that CBF-AML is defined by the presence of either t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/CBFB-MYH11.

However, the fusion genes alone are not capable of causing CBF-AML.

“The hematology community has long sought to determine what other factors in addition to the fusion genes occur in this special type of leukemia,” said Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus.

“We are now the first to describe that mutations in CCND1—and among the first to describe that mutations in the sister gene CCND2—are unique features of CBF-AML with t(8;21). In addition, we have collected the first evidence that mutations in CCND2 lead to more aggressive growth of leukemia cell lines.”

Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues reported these findings in a paper published in Leukemia and in a poster presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 2740).

A previous study of genetic mutations in CBF-AML revealed the presence of at least 1 mutation in 85% of patients studied. This meant the remaining 15% of patients harbored other, undiscovered mutations.

For the current study, Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues searched CBF-AML samples for the missing mutations that, together with the fusion genes, might contribute to the leukemia in this subgroup of cases.

The team analyzed pretreatment bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from 177 adult CBF-AML patients who received similar treatment through a clinical trial conducted at multiple centers across the US.

Using a targeted, next-generation sequencing approach, the researchers looked for mutations in 84 leukemia- and/or cancer-associated genes. They also performed tests on blood or bone marrow cells to look for chromosomal irregularities.

The team discovered 2 significant mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes, representing the first dual evidence of these recurrent mutations in patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML.

CCND1 and CCND2 mutations were found in 15% (n=10) of patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML. Two patients had mutations in CCND1, and 8 had mutations in CCND2.

The researchers also found a single CCND2 mutation in 1 (0.9%) patient with inv(16)-positive CBF-AML.

In comparison, the incidence of CCND1 and CCND2 mutations was 0.77% (n=11) in a cohort of 1426 patients with non-CBF-AML.

“This is extremely valuable information that was previously unknown,” Dr Eisfeld said, “and it might help us develop targeted therapies more likely to help patients with [CBF-AML] in the near future.”

Poster session at the

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

SAN DIEGO—Researchers have found evidence to suggest that mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes may contribute to the development of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML).

The team noted that CBF-AML is defined by the presence of either t(8;21)(q22;q22)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/CBFB-MYH11.

However, the fusion genes alone are not capable of causing CBF-AML.

“The hematology community has long sought to determine what other factors in addition to the fusion genes occur in this special type of leukemia,” said Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld, MD, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus.

“We are now the first to describe that mutations in CCND1—and among the first to describe that mutations in the sister gene CCND2—are unique features of CBF-AML with t(8;21). In addition, we have collected the first evidence that mutations in CCND2 lead to more aggressive growth of leukemia cell lines.”

Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues reported these findings in a paper published in Leukemia and in a poster presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 2740).

A previous study of genetic mutations in CBF-AML revealed the presence of at least 1 mutation in 85% of patients studied. This meant the remaining 15% of patients harbored other, undiscovered mutations.

For the current study, Dr Eisfeld and her colleagues searched CBF-AML samples for the missing mutations that, together with the fusion genes, might contribute to the leukemia in this subgroup of cases.

The team analyzed pretreatment bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from 177 adult CBF-AML patients who received similar treatment through a clinical trial conducted at multiple centers across the US.

Using a targeted, next-generation sequencing approach, the researchers looked for mutations in 84 leukemia- and/or cancer-associated genes. They also performed tests on blood or bone marrow cells to look for chromosomal irregularities.

The team discovered 2 significant mutations in the CCND1 and CCND2 genes, representing the first dual evidence of these recurrent mutations in patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML.

CCND1 and CCND2 mutations were found in 15% (n=10) of patients with t(8;21)-positive CBF-AML. Two patients had mutations in CCND1, and 8 had mutations in CCND2.

The researchers also found a single CCND2 mutation in 1 (0.9%) patient with inv(16)-positive CBF-AML.

In comparison, the incidence of CCND1 and CCND2 mutations was 0.77% (n=11) in a cohort of 1426 patients with non-CBF-AML.

“This is extremely valuable information that was previously unknown,” Dr Eisfeld said, “and it might help us develop targeted therapies more likely to help patients with [CBF-AML] in the near future.”

Ofatumumab (Arzerra)

Photo courtesy of GSK

The European Commission (EC) has granted marketing authorization for ofatumumab (Arzerra®) to be used in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) in the treatment of adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Ofatumumab is a monoclonal antibody designed to target CD20. The drug is marketed under a collaboration agreement between Genmab and Novartis.

The EC previously authorized the use of ofatumumab as a single agent to treat CLL patients who are refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

The agency also authorized the use of ofatumumab in combination with chlorambucil or bendamustine in CLL patients who have not received prior therapy and are not eligible for fludarabine-based therapy.

The EC’s decision to approve the use of ofatumumab in combination with FC was based on results from the phase 3 COMPLEMENT 2 study, which were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma in October.

The trial enrolled 365 patients with relapsed CLL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to 6 cycles of ofatumumab in combination with FC or up to 6 cycles of FC alone.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee.

The median progression-free survival was 28.9 months for patients receiving ofatumumab plus FC, compared to 18.8 months for patients receiving FC only (hazard ratio=0.67, P=0.0032).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 74% in the ofatumumab-plus-FC arm and 69% in the FC-only arm. Neutropenia was the most common of these events, occurring in 49% and 36% of patients, respectively.

Ofatumumab (Arzerra)

Photo courtesy of GSK

The European Commission (EC) has granted marketing authorization for ofatumumab (Arzerra®) to be used in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) in the treatment of adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Ofatumumab is a monoclonal antibody designed to target CD20. The drug is marketed under a collaboration agreement between Genmab and Novartis.

The EC previously authorized the use of ofatumumab as a single agent to treat CLL patients who are refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

The agency also authorized the use of ofatumumab in combination with chlorambucil or bendamustine in CLL patients who have not received prior therapy and are not eligible for fludarabine-based therapy.

The EC’s decision to approve the use of ofatumumab in combination with FC was based on results from the phase 3 COMPLEMENT 2 study, which were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma in October.

The trial enrolled 365 patients with relapsed CLL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to 6 cycles of ofatumumab in combination with FC or up to 6 cycles of FC alone.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee.

The median progression-free survival was 28.9 months for patients receiving ofatumumab plus FC, compared to 18.8 months for patients receiving FC only (hazard ratio=0.67, P=0.0032).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 74% in the ofatumumab-plus-FC arm and 69% in the FC-only arm. Neutropenia was the most common of these events, occurring in 49% and 36% of patients, respectively.

Ofatumumab (Arzerra)

Photo courtesy of GSK

The European Commission (EC) has granted marketing authorization for ofatumumab (Arzerra®) to be used in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC) in the treatment of adults with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Ofatumumab is a monoclonal antibody designed to target CD20. The drug is marketed under a collaboration agreement between Genmab and Novartis.

The EC previously authorized the use of ofatumumab as a single agent to treat CLL patients who are refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.

The agency also authorized the use of ofatumumab in combination with chlorambucil or bendamustine in CLL patients who have not received prior therapy and are not eligible for fludarabine-based therapy.

The EC’s decision to approve the use of ofatumumab in combination with FC was based on results from the phase 3 COMPLEMENT 2 study, which were published in Leukemia & Lymphoma in October.

The trial enrolled 365 patients with relapsed CLL. The patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to 6 cycles of ofatumumab in combination with FC or up to 6 cycles of FC alone.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee.

The median progression-free survival was 28.9 months for patients receiving ofatumumab plus FC, compared to 18.8 months for patients receiving FC only (hazard ratio=0.67, P=0.0032).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 74% in the ofatumumab-plus-FC arm and 69% in the FC-only arm. Neutropenia was the most common of these events, occurring in 49% and 36% of patients, respectively.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SAN DIEGO – Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with a “safety switch” yielded high rates of complete response and an acceptable toxicity profile in chemotherapy-resistant B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, according to a multicenter phase I/II trial.

Importantly, high tumor burden did not increase the risk of cytokine release syndrome, said Lung-Ji Chang, PhD, of Shenzhen (China) Genoimmune Medical Institute and the University of Florida in Gainesville. “This reliable, standardized CAR T-cell preparation protocol has now served more than 30 major medical centers in China,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Anti-CD19 CAR T cells have shown dramatic potential for treating B-cell malignancies, but toxicities have been a concern. One potentially serious adverse reaction is cytokine release syndrome, in which patients develop marked rises in blood levels of several types of cytokines. Another problem is that anti-CD19 CAR T cells can trigger loss of CD19 B cells, ultimately leading to humoral deficiencies, Dr. Chang noted. Consequently, researchers have searched for ways to continue controlling the activity of CAR T cells even after infusing them into patients.

As part of that effort, Dr. Chang and his associates developed a standardized protocol for engineering next-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells based on the established concept of a “safety switch.” After collecting T cells from patients with chemotherapy-resistant ALL, they used a lentiviral vector to transform them into CAR T cells with fusion proteins consisting of a proapoptotic molecule called caspase-9 that is linked to modified human FK506-binding proteins, or FKBP. The addition of iCaspase9-FKBP enables clinicians to induce CAR T cell apoptosis by treating patients with a synthetic dimerizer called AP1903.

Apoptosis occurs about 45 minutes after this drug is given, according to Dr. Chang. This “safety switch” also enables clinicians to eliminate anti-CD19 CAR T cells after tumor cells are eradicated so that patients can recover their humoral immunity. He and his associates further modified these anti-CD19 CAR T cells by introducing four intracellular signaling domains that are associated with T-cell activation, survival, and longevity, he said.

A total of 22 treatment centers helped test this approach in a phase I/II trial of 110 leukemia patients, about half of whom were children with a median age of 9 years. The median age of adults was 37 years, and the oldest patient was 70. Cancer types included Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL, and chronic myeloid leukemia with blast crisis. About a third of patients had bone marrow samples with at least 50% blasts, and a similar proportion had already undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytokine release syndrome affected 86% of patients with low or no tumor burden, but only 53% of patients with bone marrow blasts exceeding 5%, Dr. Chang reported. He emphasized that patients with high tumor burden were no more likely to develop moderate or severe cytokine release syndrome than were patients with little or no tumor burden (P = .3). Furthermore, among 17 patients with more than 80% bone marrow involvement, only three developed grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome, while eight developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome.

A total of 96 patients (87%) had a complete response to this CAR T cell regimen, including 51 children and 45 adults, Dr. Chang reported. Median overall survival was 222 days (range, 23-1,041 days), and 60% of patients lived at least 400 days after treatment. Patients survived a median of 115 days without relapsing (range, 0-455 days), and 55% ultimately relapsed. Age did not appear to predict relapse, he noted.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no major differences in rates of overall survival (OS) between adults and children at 400-day data cutoff, Dr. Chang said. However, patients with more than 50% blast cells in their bone marrow had significantly lower rates of survival (P = .02) than did patients with less advanced ALL. A lower T-cell dose predicted lower survival in children (P = .04), but not in adults. Dr. Chang and his colleagues now dose patients of all ages with 106 cells per kilogram, he said.

Survival was significantly more likely when CAR T cell recipients went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (P = .0002) than otherwise. Based on the findings, Dr. Chang particularly recommends this approach for highly chemotherapy-resistant disease with a high tumor burden. Among patients who relapsed, repeating CAR T cell therapy led to better survival than administering combination chemotherapy-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (P = .01).

These safety and efficacy results suggest that CAR T cell immunotherapy can benefit patients if they have very high-burden leukemia, Dr. Chang concluded. Patients outcomes remained consistent across centers due to a “highly standardized CAR T cell preparation profile,” he said.

Dr. Chang did not report funding sources. He reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

Andy Futreal, PhD

Photo courtesy of

MD Anderson Cancer Center

SAN DIEGO―Clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify cancer patients at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs), according to researchers.

The team conducted a case-control study, which showed that patients who developed t-MNs—acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes—were significantly more likely than patients without t-MNs to have clonal hematopoiesis at the time of primary cancer diagnosis.

“Based on these findings, we believe pre-leukemic mutations may function as a new biomarker that would predict t-MN development,” said Andy Futreal, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Futreal and his colleagues reported these findings in The Lancet Oncology.

Co-author Koichi Takashi, MD, also of MD Anderson, presented the findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 38).

Initial cohort

The researchers analyzed data on patients treated at MD Anderson from 1997 to 2015.

The 14 cases the team identified had been treated for a primary cancer and later developed t-MNs. The 54 age-matched control subjects had been treated for lymphoma, received combination chemotherapy, and did not develop t-MNs after at least 5 years of follow-up.

For both cases and controls, the researchers performed gene sequencing on pre-treatment peripheral blood samples. For cases, the researchers also performed targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples taken at t-MN diagnosis.

“We found that prevalence of pre-leukemic mutations was significantly higher in patients who developed t-MNs versus those who did not,” Dr Futreal said.

Clonal hematopoiesis was present in 71% of cases (n=10) and 31% of controls (n=17).

“We found genetic mutations that are present in t-MNs leukemia samples actually could be found in blood samples obtained at the time of their original cancer diagnosis,” Dr Takashi noted.

Overall, the cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—30% and 7%, respectively (P=0.016).

Validation cohort

The researchers also assessed clonal hematopoiesis in an external cohort of 74 patients with lymphoma who were treated in a trial of front-line chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with or without melatonin.

In this cohort, 7% (n=5) of patients developed t-MNs. Eighty percent of these patients (n=4) had clonal hematopoiesis.

Of the 69 patients who did not develop t-MNs, 16% (n=11) had clonal hematopoiesis.

The cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 10 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—29% and 0%, respectively (P=0.0009).

Multivariate analysis suggested clonal hematopoiesis significantly increased the risk of t-MNs, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P=0.013).

“[W]e believe the data suggest potential approaches of screening for clonal hematopoiesis in cancer patients that may identify patients at risk of developing t-MNs, although further studies are needed,” Dr Takashi concluded.

Andy Futreal, PhD

Photo courtesy of

MD Anderson Cancer Center

SAN DIEGO―Clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify cancer patients at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs), according to researchers.

The team conducted a case-control study, which showed that patients who developed t-MNs—acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes—were significantly more likely than patients without t-MNs to have clonal hematopoiesis at the time of primary cancer diagnosis.

“Based on these findings, we believe pre-leukemic mutations may function as a new biomarker that would predict t-MN development,” said Andy Futreal, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Futreal and his colleagues reported these findings in The Lancet Oncology.

Co-author Koichi Takashi, MD, also of MD Anderson, presented the findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 38).

Initial cohort

The researchers analyzed data on patients treated at MD Anderson from 1997 to 2015.

The 14 cases the team identified had been treated for a primary cancer and later developed t-MNs. The 54 age-matched control subjects had been treated for lymphoma, received combination chemotherapy, and did not develop t-MNs after at least 5 years of follow-up.

For both cases and controls, the researchers performed gene sequencing on pre-treatment peripheral blood samples. For cases, the researchers also performed targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples taken at t-MN diagnosis.

“We found that prevalence of pre-leukemic mutations was significantly higher in patients who developed t-MNs versus those who did not,” Dr Futreal said.

Clonal hematopoiesis was present in 71% of cases (n=10) and 31% of controls (n=17).

“We found genetic mutations that are present in t-MNs leukemia samples actually could be found in blood samples obtained at the time of their original cancer diagnosis,” Dr Takashi noted.

Overall, the cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—30% and 7%, respectively (P=0.016).

Validation cohort

The researchers also assessed clonal hematopoiesis in an external cohort of 74 patients with lymphoma who were treated in a trial of front-line chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with or without melatonin.

In this cohort, 7% (n=5) of patients developed t-MNs. Eighty percent of these patients (n=4) had clonal hematopoiesis.

Of the 69 patients who did not develop t-MNs, 16% (n=11) had clonal hematopoiesis.

The cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 10 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—29% and 0%, respectively (P=0.0009).

Multivariate analysis suggested clonal hematopoiesis significantly increased the risk of t-MNs, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P=0.013).

“[W]e believe the data suggest potential approaches of screening for clonal hematopoiesis in cancer patients that may identify patients at risk of developing t-MNs, although further studies are needed,” Dr Takashi concluded.

Andy Futreal, PhD

Photo courtesy of

MD Anderson Cancer Center

SAN DIEGO―Clonal hematopoiesis could be used as a predictive marker to identify cancer patients at risk of developing therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs), according to researchers.

The team conducted a case-control study, which showed that patients who developed t-MNs—acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes—were significantly more likely than patients without t-MNs to have clonal hematopoiesis at the time of primary cancer diagnosis.

“Based on these findings, we believe pre-leukemic mutations may function as a new biomarker that would predict t-MN development,” said Andy Futreal, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Futreal and his colleagues reported these findings in The Lancet Oncology.

Co-author Koichi Takashi, MD, also of MD Anderson, presented the findings at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 38).

Initial cohort

The researchers analyzed data on patients treated at MD Anderson from 1997 to 2015.

The 14 cases the team identified had been treated for a primary cancer and later developed t-MNs. The 54 age-matched control subjects had been treated for lymphoma, received combination chemotherapy, and did not develop t-MNs after at least 5 years of follow-up.

For both cases and controls, the researchers performed gene sequencing on pre-treatment peripheral blood samples. For cases, the researchers also performed targeted gene sequencing on bone marrow samples taken at t-MN diagnosis.

“We found that prevalence of pre-leukemic mutations was significantly higher in patients who developed t-MNs versus those who did not,” Dr Futreal said.

Clonal hematopoiesis was present in 71% of cases (n=10) and 31% of controls (n=17).

“We found genetic mutations that are present in t-MNs leukemia samples actually could be found in blood samples obtained at the time of their original cancer diagnosis,” Dr Takashi noted.

Overall, the cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—30% and 7%, respectively (P=0.016).

Validation cohort

The researchers also assessed clonal hematopoiesis in an external cohort of 74 patients with lymphoma who were treated in a trial of front-line chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, with or without melatonin.

In this cohort, 7% (n=5) of patients developed t-MNs. Eighty percent of these patients (n=4) had clonal hematopoiesis.

Of the 69 patients who did not develop t-MNs, 16% (n=11) had clonal hematopoiesis.

The cumulative incidence of t-MNs at 10 years was significantly higher in patients with clonal hematopoiesis than in those without it—29% and 0%, respectively (P=0.0009).

Multivariate analysis suggested clonal hematopoiesis significantly increased the risk of t-MNs, with a hazard ratio of 13.7 (P=0.013).

“[W]e believe the data suggest potential approaches of screening for clonal hematopoiesis in cancer patients that may identify patients at risk of developing t-MNs, although further studies are needed,” Dr Takashi concluded.

Micrograph showing

acute myeloid leukemia

SAN DIEGO—A next-generation DNA hypomethylating agent has demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The agent, guadecitabine, produced a composite complete response (CRc) rate of 23% in a phase 2 study.

CRc was observed in all patient subgroups and was associated with longer survival, regardless of whether patients went on to receive a transplant.

Based on these results, researchers are initiating a phase 3 trial of the drug in relapsed/refractory AML.

Naval Daver, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the phase 2 results at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 904). The study was sponsored by Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Guadecitabine (formerly SGI-110) is a hypomethylating dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine that is resistant to cytidine deaminase degradation. It is administered as a small volume subcutaneous injection, which results in extended decitabine exposure.

“Rapid metabolization, elimination shortens the in vivo exposure and may limit the efficacy of decitabine,” Dr Daver noted. “Guadecitabine was engineered to improve the in vivo levels . . . and the efficacy of decitabine by blocking the rapid elimination.”

In the phase 2 trial, Dr Daver and his colleagues investigated guadecitabine in 103 patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients’ median age was 60 (range, 22-82), and 60% were male. Eighty-six percent of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and 41% had poor-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-7). All patients had received prior chemotherapy, 85% had received prior induction with 7+3 (a continuous infusion of cytarabine for 7 days plus daunorubicin for 3 days), and 18% had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Fifty-three percent of patients had a CR to first induction, and 47% were primary refractory.

Treatment

The researchers tested 2 different doses and schedules of guadecitabine. In the first cohort (5-day regimen), 50 patients were randomized (1:1) to either 60 mg/m²/day (n=24) or 90 mg/m²/day (n=26) on days 1-5.

In the second cohort (10-day regimen), 53 patients were assigned to treatment with 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 and days 8-12 for up to 4 cycles, followed by 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 in subsequent cycles.

Cycles were scheduled every 28 days for both regimens. Dose reductions and delays were allowed based on response and tolerability. And patients remained on treatment as long as they continued to benefit without unacceptable toxicity.

Response

The study’s primary endpoint was the CRc rate, which consisted of CR plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi).

The CRc rate was 16% in the 5-day cohort and 30% in the 10-day cohort. The CR rate was 6% and 19%, respectively. The CRp rate was 2% and 7%, respectively. And the CRi rate was 8% and 4%, respectively.

There was a trend toward a higher CR/CRc rate with the 10-day regimen (P=0.074 and 0.106, respectively).

There was no significant difference in CRc according to patient age (65 and older vs younger than 65), cytogenetics, prior HSCT, response to induction, or time from last therapy (less than 6 months vs 6 months or more).

However, the CRc rate was significantly lower for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 than for those with a status of 0-1 (P<0.001).

Survival

For the entire study cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months, the 1-year OS was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 19%.

The median OS was 7.1 months with the 10-day regimen and 5.7 months with the 5-day regimen. This difference was not significant (P=0.51).

The median OS was not reached for patients who achieved a CR or for those who achieved a CRp plus a CRi. For patients who did not achieve a CRc, the median OS was 5.6 months (P<0.01).

The median OS was not reached for patients who had a CRc, whether or not they received a subsequent HSCT. There was no significant difference between patients who received an HSCT post-guadecitabine and those who did not (P=0.87).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in OS according to patient age, prior HSCT, or response to induction.

However, OS was significantly worse for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (P<0.001), those with poor-risk cytogenetics (P<0.001), and those for whom 6 months or more had elapsed since their last therapy (P=0.015).

Safety

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of the relationship to therapy) were febrile neutropenia (60%), pneumonia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), anemia (31%), neutropenia (19%), and sepsis (16%).

The 30-day mortality rate was 3.9%, and the 60-day mortality rate was 11.7%.

Micrograph showing

acute myeloid leukemia

SAN DIEGO—A next-generation DNA hypomethylating agent has demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The agent, guadecitabine, produced a composite complete response (CRc) rate of 23% in a phase 2 study.

CRc was observed in all patient subgroups and was associated with longer survival, regardless of whether patients went on to receive a transplant.

Based on these results, researchers are initiating a phase 3 trial of the drug in relapsed/refractory AML.

Naval Daver, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the phase 2 results at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 904). The study was sponsored by Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Guadecitabine (formerly SGI-110) is a hypomethylating dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine that is resistant to cytidine deaminase degradation. It is administered as a small volume subcutaneous injection, which results in extended decitabine exposure.

“Rapid metabolization, elimination shortens the in vivo exposure and may limit the efficacy of decitabine,” Dr Daver noted. “Guadecitabine was engineered to improve the in vivo levels . . . and the efficacy of decitabine by blocking the rapid elimination.”

In the phase 2 trial, Dr Daver and his colleagues investigated guadecitabine in 103 patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients’ median age was 60 (range, 22-82), and 60% were male. Eighty-six percent of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and 41% had poor-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-7). All patients had received prior chemotherapy, 85% had received prior induction with 7+3 (a continuous infusion of cytarabine for 7 days plus daunorubicin for 3 days), and 18% had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Fifty-three percent of patients had a CR to first induction, and 47% were primary refractory.

Treatment

The researchers tested 2 different doses and schedules of guadecitabine. In the first cohort (5-day regimen), 50 patients were randomized (1:1) to either 60 mg/m²/day (n=24) or 90 mg/m²/day (n=26) on days 1-5.

In the second cohort (10-day regimen), 53 patients were assigned to treatment with 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 and days 8-12 for up to 4 cycles, followed by 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 in subsequent cycles.

Cycles were scheduled every 28 days for both regimens. Dose reductions and delays were allowed based on response and tolerability. And patients remained on treatment as long as they continued to benefit without unacceptable toxicity.

Response

The study’s primary endpoint was the CRc rate, which consisted of CR plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi).

The CRc rate was 16% in the 5-day cohort and 30% in the 10-day cohort. The CR rate was 6% and 19%, respectively. The CRp rate was 2% and 7%, respectively. And the CRi rate was 8% and 4%, respectively.

There was a trend toward a higher CR/CRc rate with the 10-day regimen (P=0.074 and 0.106, respectively).

There was no significant difference in CRc according to patient age (65 and older vs younger than 65), cytogenetics, prior HSCT, response to induction, or time from last therapy (less than 6 months vs 6 months or more).

However, the CRc rate was significantly lower for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 than for those with a status of 0-1 (P<0.001).

Survival

For the entire study cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months, the 1-year OS was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 19%.

The median OS was 7.1 months with the 10-day regimen and 5.7 months with the 5-day regimen. This difference was not significant (P=0.51).

The median OS was not reached for patients who achieved a CR or for those who achieved a CRp plus a CRi. For patients who did not achieve a CRc, the median OS was 5.6 months (P<0.01).

The median OS was not reached for patients who had a CRc, whether or not they received a subsequent HSCT. There was no significant difference between patients who received an HSCT post-guadecitabine and those who did not (P=0.87).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in OS according to patient age, prior HSCT, or response to induction.

However, OS was significantly worse for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (P<0.001), those with poor-risk cytogenetics (P<0.001), and those for whom 6 months or more had elapsed since their last therapy (P=0.015).

Safety

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of the relationship to therapy) were febrile neutropenia (60%), pneumonia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), anemia (31%), neutropenia (19%), and sepsis (16%).

The 30-day mortality rate was 3.9%, and the 60-day mortality rate was 11.7%.

Micrograph showing

acute myeloid leukemia

SAN DIEGO—A next-generation DNA hypomethylating agent has demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to researchers.

The agent, guadecitabine, produced a composite complete response (CRc) rate of 23% in a phase 2 study.

CRc was observed in all patient subgroups and was associated with longer survival, regardless of whether patients went on to receive a transplant.

Based on these results, researchers are initiating a phase 3 trial of the drug in relapsed/refractory AML.

Naval Daver, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, presented the phase 2 results at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 904). The study was sponsored by Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Guadecitabine (formerly SGI-110) is a hypomethylating dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine that is resistant to cytidine deaminase degradation. It is administered as a small volume subcutaneous injection, which results in extended decitabine exposure.

“Rapid metabolization, elimination shortens the in vivo exposure and may limit the efficacy of decitabine,” Dr Daver noted. “Guadecitabine was engineered to improve the in vivo levels . . . and the efficacy of decitabine by blocking the rapid elimination.”

In the phase 2 trial, Dr Daver and his colleagues investigated guadecitabine in 103 patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients’ median age was 60 (range, 22-82), and 60% were male. Eighty-six percent of patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, and 41% had poor-risk cytogenetics.

The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-7). All patients had received prior chemotherapy, 85% had received prior induction with 7+3 (a continuous infusion of cytarabine for 7 days plus daunorubicin for 3 days), and 18% had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Fifty-three percent of patients had a CR to first induction, and 47% were primary refractory.

Treatment

The researchers tested 2 different doses and schedules of guadecitabine. In the first cohort (5-day regimen), 50 patients were randomized (1:1) to either 60 mg/m²/day (n=24) or 90 mg/m²/day (n=26) on days 1-5.

In the second cohort (10-day regimen), 53 patients were assigned to treatment with 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 and days 8-12 for up to 4 cycles, followed by 60 mg/m²/day on days 1-5 in subsequent cycles.

Cycles were scheduled every 28 days for both regimens. Dose reductions and delays were allowed based on response and tolerability. And patients remained on treatment as long as they continued to benefit without unacceptable toxicity.

Response

The study’s primary endpoint was the CRc rate, which consisted of CR plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) plus CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi).

The CRc rate was 16% in the 5-day cohort and 30% in the 10-day cohort. The CR rate was 6% and 19%, respectively. The CRp rate was 2% and 7%, respectively. And the CRi rate was 8% and 4%, respectively.

There was a trend toward a higher CR/CRc rate with the 10-day regimen (P=0.074 and 0.106, respectively).

There was no significant difference in CRc according to patient age (65 and older vs younger than 65), cytogenetics, prior HSCT, response to induction, or time from last therapy (less than 6 months vs 6 months or more).

However, the CRc rate was significantly lower for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 than for those with a status of 0-1 (P<0.001).

Survival

For the entire study cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 6.6 months, the 1-year OS was 28%, and the 2-year OS was 19%.

The median OS was 7.1 months with the 10-day regimen and 5.7 months with the 5-day regimen. This difference was not significant (P=0.51).

The median OS was not reached for patients who achieved a CR or for those who achieved a CRp plus a CRi. For patients who did not achieve a CRc, the median OS was 5.6 months (P<0.01).

The median OS was not reached for patients who had a CRc, whether or not they received a subsequent HSCT. There was no significant difference between patients who received an HSCT post-guadecitabine and those who did not (P=0.87).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in OS according to patient age, prior HSCT, or response to induction.

However, OS was significantly worse for patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 (P<0.001), those with poor-risk cytogenetics (P<0.001), and those for whom 6 months or more had elapsed since their last therapy (P=0.015).

Safety

Common grade 3 or higher adverse events (regardless of the relationship to therapy) were febrile neutropenia (60%), pneumonia (36%), thrombocytopenia (36%), anemia (31%), neutropenia (19%), and sepsis (16%).

The 30-day mortality rate was 3.9%, and the 60-day mortality rate was 11.7%.

First month’s supply of venetoclax

(US version, Venclexta)

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The European Commission (EC) has granted conditional marketing authorization for the oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Venclyxto™) to treat certain patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

The drug is now approved as monotherapy to treat adults with CLL who have 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and are unsuitable for or have failed a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is also approved as monotherapy to treat CLL in the absence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in adults who have failed both chemoimmunotherapy and a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is the first BCL-2 inhibitor authorized for use in Europe.

Conditional marketing authorization represents an expedited path for approval. The EC grants conditional marketing authorization to products whose benefits are thought to outweigh their risks, products that address unmet needs, and products that are expected to provide a significant public health benefit.

Conditional marketing authorization is granted before pivotal registration studies of a product are completed, but the company developing the product is required to complete post-marketing studies showing that the product provides a clinical benefit.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The drug is jointly commercialized by the companies in the US and by AbbVie outside of the US.

Phase 2 trials

Venetoclax has produced high objective response rates (ORR) in two phase 2 trials of CLL patients.

In one of these trials, researchers tested venetoclax in 107 patients with previously treated CLL and 17p deletion. The results were published in The Lancet Oncology in June.

The ORR in this trial was 79%. At the time of analysis, the median duration of response had not been reached. The same was true for progression-free survival and overall survival.

The progression-free survival estimate for 12 months was 72%, and the overall survival estimate was 87%.

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 96%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 55%.

Grade 3 laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was reported in 5 patients. Three of these patients continued on venetoclax, but 2 patients required a dose interruption of 1 day each.

In the second trial, researchers tested venetoclax in 64 patients with CLL who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and/or idelalisib. Results from this trial were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The ORR was 67%. At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival was 80%.

The incidence of adverse events was 100%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 53%. No clinical TLS was observed, but 1 patient met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

First month’s supply of venetoclax

(US version, Venclexta)

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The European Commission (EC) has granted conditional marketing authorization for the oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Venclyxto™) to treat certain patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

The drug is now approved as monotherapy to treat adults with CLL who have 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and are unsuitable for or have failed a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is also approved as monotherapy to treat CLL in the absence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in adults who have failed both chemoimmunotherapy and a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is the first BCL-2 inhibitor authorized for use in Europe.

Conditional marketing authorization represents an expedited path for approval. The EC grants conditional marketing authorization to products whose benefits are thought to outweigh their risks, products that address unmet needs, and products that are expected to provide a significant public health benefit.

Conditional marketing authorization is granted before pivotal registration studies of a product are completed, but the company developing the product is required to complete post-marketing studies showing that the product provides a clinical benefit.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The drug is jointly commercialized by the companies in the US and by AbbVie outside of the US.

Phase 2 trials

Venetoclax has produced high objective response rates (ORR) in two phase 2 trials of CLL patients.

In one of these trials, researchers tested venetoclax in 107 patients with previously treated CLL and 17p deletion. The results were published in The Lancet Oncology in June.

The ORR in this trial was 79%. At the time of analysis, the median duration of response had not been reached. The same was true for progression-free survival and overall survival.

The progression-free survival estimate for 12 months was 72%, and the overall survival estimate was 87%.

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 96%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 55%.

Grade 3 laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was reported in 5 patients. Three of these patients continued on venetoclax, but 2 patients required a dose interruption of 1 day each.

In the second trial, researchers tested venetoclax in 64 patients with CLL who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and/or idelalisib. Results from this trial were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The ORR was 67%. At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival was 80%.

The incidence of adverse events was 100%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 53%. No clinical TLS was observed, but 1 patient met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

First month’s supply of venetoclax

(US version, Venclexta)

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The European Commission (EC) has granted conditional marketing authorization for the oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Venclyxto™) to treat certain patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

The drug is now approved as monotherapy to treat adults with CLL who have 17p deletion or TP53 mutation and are unsuitable for or have failed a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is also approved as monotherapy to treat CLL in the absence of 17p deletion or TP53 mutation in adults who have failed both chemoimmunotherapy and a B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor.

Venetoclax is the first BCL-2 inhibitor authorized for use in Europe.

Conditional marketing authorization represents an expedited path for approval. The EC grants conditional marketing authorization to products whose benefits are thought to outweigh their risks, products that address unmet needs, and products that are expected to provide a significant public health benefit.

Conditional marketing authorization is granted before pivotal registration studies of a product are completed, but the company developing the product is required to complete post-marketing studies showing that the product provides a clinical benefit.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The drug is jointly commercialized by the companies in the US and by AbbVie outside of the US.

Phase 2 trials

Venetoclax has produced high objective response rates (ORR) in two phase 2 trials of CLL patients.

In one of these trials, researchers tested venetoclax in 107 patients with previously treated CLL and 17p deletion. The results were published in The Lancet Oncology in June.

The ORR in this trial was 79%. At the time of analysis, the median duration of response had not been reached. The same was true for progression-free survival and overall survival.

The progression-free survival estimate for 12 months was 72%, and the overall survival estimate was 87%.

The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 96%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 55%.

Grade 3 laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was reported in 5 patients. Three of these patients continued on venetoclax, but 2 patients required a dose interruption of 1 day each.

In the second trial, researchers tested venetoclax in 64 patients with CLL who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and/or idelalisib. Results from this trial were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

The ORR was 67%. At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival was 80%.

The incidence of adverse events was 100%, and the incidence of serious adverse events was 53%. No clinical TLS was observed, but 1 patient met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

© Todd Buchanan 2016

SAN DIEGO—The oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax can produce high objective response rates (ORRs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who have failed treatment with at least one B-cell receptor inhibitor, according to investigators.

In a phase 2 study, venetoclax produced an ORR of 67% among all patients enrolled.

The drug produced a 70% ORR among patients who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and a 62% ORR among patients who had failed idelalisib.

“This represents the first prospective study in this patient population and does demonstrate high rates of durable responses, certainly making [venetoclax] a very viable option for a challenging group of patients to treat,” said study investigator Jeffrey Jones, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

Dr Jones presented results from this trial at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 637*). This study is sponsored by AbbVie in collaboration with Genentech/Roche.

The trial enrolled patients with CLL who relapsed after or were refractory to ibrutinib (arm A) or idelalisib (arm B). At the time of the data cut-off, 64 patients had been enrolled and treated with venetoclax, including 43 patients in arm A and 21 in arm B.

Patients received venetoclax via a recommended dose-titration schedule—20 mg once daily in week 1, 50 mg daily in week 2, 100 mg daily in week 3, 200 mg daily in week 4, and 400 mg daily from week 5 onward. Patients continued to receive the drug until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

To mitigate the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), patients received prophylaxis with uric acid lowering agents and hydration starting at least 72 hours before the first dose of venetoclax.

Patients with a high tumor burden were hospitalized for the first 20 mg dose and the first 50 mg dose, and they received intravenous hydration and rasburicase. Laboratory values were monitored at the first dose and all dose increases.

Patient characteristics: Arm A

Among patients who had failed ibrutinib, the median age was 66 (range, 48-80). Forty-nine percent of the patients had del(17p), and 35% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-12). All patients had received ibrutinib, but 9% had also received idelalisib. Ninety-one percent of patients were refractory to ibrutinib, and 5% were refractory to idelalisib.

The median time on ibrutinib was 17 months (range, 1-56), and the median time on idelalisib was 10 months (range, 2-31).

Patient characteristics: Arm B

Among patients who had failed idelalisib, the median age was 68 (range, 56-85). Ten percent of patients had del(17p), and 52% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range, 1-11). All patients had received idelalisib, but 24% had also received ibrutinib. Sixty-seven percent of patients were refractory to idelalisib, and 10% were refractory to ibrutinib.

The median time on idelalisib was 8 months (range, 1-27), and the median time on ibrutinib was 6 months (range, 2-11).

Results: Arm A

The median time on study in arm A was 13 months (range, 0.1-18). Eighteen patients in this arm discontinued the study—12 due to disease progression, 3 due to adverse events (AEs), 2 due to stem cell transplant, and 1 patient withdrew consent.

The ORR was 70% according to an independent review committee (IRC) and 67% according to investigators.

The rate of complete response (CR) was 0%, and the rate of CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) was 2% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 5%, and the CRi rate was 2%.

Sixty-seven percent of patients had a partial response (PR) according to the IRC, and 56% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Arm B

The median time on study in arm B was 9 months (range, 1.3-16). Four patients in this arm discontinued the study—3 related to disease progression and 1 for an “other” reason.

The ORR was 62% according to the IRC and 57% according to investigators.

The rate of CR/CRi was 0% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 10%, and the CRi rate was 5%.

Sixty-two percent of patients had a PR according to the IRC, and 43% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Overall

The ORR was 67% according to the IRC and 64% according to investigators.

Forty-five percent of patient samples analyzed (14/31) demonstrated minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood between weeks 24 and 48. Five patients with sustained MRD negativity had bone marrow evaluations, and 1 was MRD negative.

At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival for all patients was 80%.

“Venetoclax has been well-tolerated,” Dr Jones noted. “The toxicity profile in this study is consistent with previous reports. Most of the toxicity has been cytopenias, which can be managed with dose adjustments or supportive care interventions, such as G-CSF.”

All 64 patients experienced an AE. Common AEs were neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (44%), diarrhea (42%), nausea (41%), anemia (36%), fatigue (31%), decreased white blood cell count (22%), and hyperphosphatemia (22%).

Eighty-three percent of patients had grade 3/4 AEs, including neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (22%), decreased white blood cell count (13%), febrile neutropenia (11%), and pneumonia (11%).

Fifty-three percent of patients had serious AEs, including febrile neutropenia (9%), pneumonia (8%), multi-organ failure (3%), septic shock (3%), and increased potassium (3%).

There were no cases of clinical TLS. However, 1 patient with high tumor burden met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

© Todd Buchanan 2016

SAN DIEGO—The oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax can produce high objective response rates (ORRs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who have failed treatment with at least one B-cell receptor inhibitor, according to investigators.

In a phase 2 study, venetoclax produced an ORR of 67% among all patients enrolled.

The drug produced a 70% ORR among patients who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and a 62% ORR among patients who had failed idelalisib.

“This represents the first prospective study in this patient population and does demonstrate high rates of durable responses, certainly making [venetoclax] a very viable option for a challenging group of patients to treat,” said study investigator Jeffrey Jones, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

Dr Jones presented results from this trial at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 637*). This study is sponsored by AbbVie in collaboration with Genentech/Roche.

The trial enrolled patients with CLL who relapsed after or were refractory to ibrutinib (arm A) or idelalisib (arm B). At the time of the data cut-off, 64 patients had been enrolled and treated with venetoclax, including 43 patients in arm A and 21 in arm B.

Patients received venetoclax via a recommended dose-titration schedule—20 mg once daily in week 1, 50 mg daily in week 2, 100 mg daily in week 3, 200 mg daily in week 4, and 400 mg daily from week 5 onward. Patients continued to receive the drug until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

To mitigate the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), patients received prophylaxis with uric acid lowering agents and hydration starting at least 72 hours before the first dose of venetoclax.

Patients with a high tumor burden were hospitalized for the first 20 mg dose and the first 50 mg dose, and they received intravenous hydration and rasburicase. Laboratory values were monitored at the first dose and all dose increases.

Patient characteristics: Arm A

Among patients who had failed ibrutinib, the median age was 66 (range, 48-80). Forty-nine percent of the patients had del(17p), and 35% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-12). All patients had received ibrutinib, but 9% had also received idelalisib. Ninety-one percent of patients were refractory to ibrutinib, and 5% were refractory to idelalisib.

The median time on ibrutinib was 17 months (range, 1-56), and the median time on idelalisib was 10 months (range, 2-31).

Patient characteristics: Arm B

Among patients who had failed idelalisib, the median age was 68 (range, 56-85). Ten percent of patients had del(17p), and 52% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range, 1-11). All patients had received idelalisib, but 24% had also received ibrutinib. Sixty-seven percent of patients were refractory to idelalisib, and 10% were refractory to ibrutinib.

The median time on idelalisib was 8 months (range, 1-27), and the median time on ibrutinib was 6 months (range, 2-11).

Results: Arm A

The median time on study in arm A was 13 months (range, 0.1-18). Eighteen patients in this arm discontinued the study—12 due to disease progression, 3 due to adverse events (AEs), 2 due to stem cell transplant, and 1 patient withdrew consent.

The ORR was 70% according to an independent review committee (IRC) and 67% according to investigators.

The rate of complete response (CR) was 0%, and the rate of CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) was 2% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 5%, and the CRi rate was 2%.

Sixty-seven percent of patients had a partial response (PR) according to the IRC, and 56% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Arm B

The median time on study in arm B was 9 months (range, 1.3-16). Four patients in this arm discontinued the study—3 related to disease progression and 1 for an “other” reason.

The ORR was 62% according to the IRC and 57% according to investigators.

The rate of CR/CRi was 0% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 10%, and the CRi rate was 5%.

Sixty-two percent of patients had a PR according to the IRC, and 43% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Overall

The ORR was 67% according to the IRC and 64% according to investigators.

Forty-five percent of patient samples analyzed (14/31) demonstrated minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood between weeks 24 and 48. Five patients with sustained MRD negativity had bone marrow evaluations, and 1 was MRD negative.

At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival for all patients was 80%.

“Venetoclax has been well-tolerated,” Dr Jones noted. “The toxicity profile in this study is consistent with previous reports. Most of the toxicity has been cytopenias, which can be managed with dose adjustments or supportive care interventions, such as G-CSF.”

All 64 patients experienced an AE. Common AEs were neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (44%), diarrhea (42%), nausea (41%), anemia (36%), fatigue (31%), decreased white blood cell count (22%), and hyperphosphatemia (22%).

Eighty-three percent of patients had grade 3/4 AEs, including neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (22%), decreased white blood cell count (13%), febrile neutropenia (11%), and pneumonia (11%).

Fifty-three percent of patients had serious AEs, including febrile neutropenia (9%), pneumonia (8%), multi-organ failure (3%), septic shock (3%), and increased potassium (3%).

There were no cases of clinical TLS. However, 1 patient with high tumor burden met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.

2016 ASH Annual Meeting

© Todd Buchanan 2016

SAN DIEGO—The oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax can produce high objective response rates (ORRs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients who have failed treatment with at least one B-cell receptor inhibitor, according to investigators.

In a phase 2 study, venetoclax produced an ORR of 67% among all patients enrolled.

The drug produced a 70% ORR among patients who had failed treatment with ibrutinib and a 62% ORR among patients who had failed idelalisib.

“This represents the first prospective study in this patient population and does demonstrate high rates of durable responses, certainly making [venetoclax] a very viable option for a challenging group of patients to treat,” said study investigator Jeffrey Jones, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

Dr Jones presented results from this trial at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 637*). This study is sponsored by AbbVie in collaboration with Genentech/Roche.

The trial enrolled patients with CLL who relapsed after or were refractory to ibrutinib (arm A) or idelalisib (arm B). At the time of the data cut-off, 64 patients had been enrolled and treated with venetoclax, including 43 patients in arm A and 21 in arm B.

Patients received venetoclax via a recommended dose-titration schedule—20 mg once daily in week 1, 50 mg daily in week 2, 100 mg daily in week 3, 200 mg daily in week 4, and 400 mg daily from week 5 onward. Patients continued to receive the drug until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

To mitigate the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), patients received prophylaxis with uric acid lowering agents and hydration starting at least 72 hours before the first dose of venetoclax.

Patients with a high tumor burden were hospitalized for the first 20 mg dose and the first 50 mg dose, and they received intravenous hydration and rasburicase. Laboratory values were monitored at the first dose and all dose increases.

Patient characteristics: Arm A

Among patients who had failed ibrutinib, the median age was 66 (range, 48-80). Forty-nine percent of the patients had del(17p), and 35% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 1-12). All patients had received ibrutinib, but 9% had also received idelalisib. Ninety-one percent of patients were refractory to ibrutinib, and 5% were refractory to idelalisib.

The median time on ibrutinib was 17 months (range, 1-56), and the median time on idelalisib was 10 months (range, 2-31).

Patient characteristics: Arm B

Among patients who had failed idelalisib, the median age was 68 (range, 56-85). Ten percent of patients had del(17p), and 52% had bulky nodal disease (5 cm or greater).

The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range, 1-11). All patients had received idelalisib, but 24% had also received ibrutinib. Sixty-seven percent of patients were refractory to idelalisib, and 10% were refractory to ibrutinib.

The median time on idelalisib was 8 months (range, 1-27), and the median time on ibrutinib was 6 months (range, 2-11).

Results: Arm A

The median time on study in arm A was 13 months (range, 0.1-18). Eighteen patients in this arm discontinued the study—12 due to disease progression, 3 due to adverse events (AEs), 2 due to stem cell transplant, and 1 patient withdrew consent.

The ORR was 70% according to an independent review committee (IRC) and 67% according to investigators.

The rate of complete response (CR) was 0%, and the rate of CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery (CRi) was 2% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 5%, and the CRi rate was 2%.

Sixty-seven percent of patients had a partial response (PR) according to the IRC, and 56% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Arm B

The median time on study in arm B was 9 months (range, 1.3-16). Four patients in this arm discontinued the study—3 related to disease progression and 1 for an “other” reason.

The ORR was 62% according to the IRC and 57% according to investigators.

The rate of CR/CRi was 0% according to the IRC. According to investigators, the CR rate was 10%, and the CRi rate was 5%.

Sixty-two percent of patients had a PR according to the IRC, and 43% had a PR according to investigators.

Results: Overall

The ORR was 67% according to the IRC and 64% according to investigators.

Forty-five percent of patient samples analyzed (14/31) demonstrated minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood between weeks 24 and 48. Five patients with sustained MRD negativity had bone marrow evaluations, and 1 was MRD negative.

At 11.8 months of follow-up, the median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival had not been reached. The estimated 12-month progression-free survival for all patients was 80%.

“Venetoclax has been well-tolerated,” Dr Jones noted. “The toxicity profile in this study is consistent with previous reports. Most of the toxicity has been cytopenias, which can be managed with dose adjustments or supportive care interventions, such as G-CSF.”

All 64 patients experienced an AE. Common AEs were neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (44%), diarrhea (42%), nausea (41%), anemia (36%), fatigue (31%), decreased white blood cell count (22%), and hyperphosphatemia (22%).

Eighty-three percent of patients had grade 3/4 AEs, including neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (22%), decreased white blood cell count (13%), febrile neutropenia (11%), and pneumonia (11%).

Fifty-three percent of patients had serious AEs, including febrile neutropenia (9%), pneumonia (8%), multi-organ failure (3%), septic shock (3%), and increased potassium (3%).

There were no cases of clinical TLS. However, 1 patient with high tumor burden met Howard criteria for laboratory TLS.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.

Cancer patient

receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Researchers have estimated the global incidence of 32 cancer types and deaths related to these malignancies in 2015.

The group’s data, published in JAMA Oncology, suggest there were 17.5 million cancer cases and 8.7 million cancer deaths last year.

There were 78,000 cases of Hodgkin lymphoma and 24,000 deaths from the disease, as well as 666,000 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 231,000 NHL deaths.

There were 154,000 cases of multiple myeloma and 101,000 deaths from the disease.

And there were 606,000 cases of leukemia, with 353,000 leukemia deaths. This included 161,000 cases of acute lymphoid leukemia (110,000 deaths), 191,000 cases of chronic lymphoid leukemia (61,000 deaths), 190,000 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (147,000 deaths), and 64,000 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (35,000 deaths).

The data also show that, between 2005 and 2015, cancer cases increased by 33%, mostly due to population aging and growth, plus changes in age-specific cancer rates.

Globally, the odds of developing cancer during a lifetime were 1 in 3 for men and 1 in 4 for women in 2015.

Prostate cancer was the most common cancer in men (1.6 million cases), although tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer deaths for men.

Breast cancer was the most common cancer for women (2.4 million cases) and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women.

The most common childhood cancers were leukemia, “other neoplasms,” NHL, and brain and nervous system cancers.

Cancer patient

receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Researchers have estimated the global incidence of 32 cancer types and deaths related to these malignancies in 2015.

The group’s data, published in JAMA Oncology, suggest there were 17.5 million cancer cases and 8.7 million cancer deaths last year.

There were 78,000 cases of Hodgkin lymphoma and 24,000 deaths from the disease, as well as 666,000 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 231,000 NHL deaths.

There were 154,000 cases of multiple myeloma and 101,000 deaths from the disease.

And there were 606,000 cases of leukemia, with 353,000 leukemia deaths. This included 161,000 cases of acute lymphoid leukemia (110,000 deaths), 191,000 cases of chronic lymphoid leukemia (61,000 deaths), 190,000 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (147,000 deaths), and 64,000 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (35,000 deaths).

The data also show that, between 2005 and 2015, cancer cases increased by 33%, mostly due to population aging and growth, plus changes in age-specific cancer rates.

Globally, the odds of developing cancer during a lifetime were 1 in 3 for men and 1 in 4 for women in 2015.

Prostate cancer was the most common cancer in men (1.6 million cases), although tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer deaths for men.

Breast cancer was the most common cancer for women (2.4 million cases) and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women.

The most common childhood cancers were leukemia, “other neoplasms,” NHL, and brain and nervous system cancers.

Cancer patient

receiving chemotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Researchers have estimated the global incidence of 32 cancer types and deaths related to these malignancies in 2015.

The group’s data, published in JAMA Oncology, suggest there were 17.5 million cancer cases and 8.7 million cancer deaths last year.

There were 78,000 cases of Hodgkin lymphoma and 24,000 deaths from the disease, as well as 666,000 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 231,000 NHL deaths.

There were 154,000 cases of multiple myeloma and 101,000 deaths from the disease.

And there were 606,000 cases of leukemia, with 353,000 leukemia deaths. This included 161,000 cases of acute lymphoid leukemia (110,000 deaths), 191,000 cases of chronic lymphoid leukemia (61,000 deaths), 190,000 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (147,000 deaths), and 64,000 cases of chronic myeloid leukemia (35,000 deaths).

The data also show that, between 2005 and 2015, cancer cases increased by 33%, mostly due to population aging and growth, plus changes in age-specific cancer rates.

Globally, the odds of developing cancer during a lifetime were 1 in 3 for men and 1 in 4 for women in 2015.

Prostate cancer was the most common cancer in men (1.6 million cases), although tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer deaths for men.

Breast cancer was the most common cancer for women (2.4 million cases) and the leading cause of cancer deaths in women.

The most common childhood cancers were leukemia, “other neoplasms,” NHL, and brain and nervous system cancers.

 

 

Attendees at the 2016

ASH Annual Meeting

 

SAN DIEGO—When patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cannot tolerate one Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, they may do well on another, according to a presentation at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Researchers conducting a phase 1/2 study found that acalabrutinib was “well-tolerated” and demonstrated “promising activity” in patients intolerant to ibrutinib.

Seventy-nine percent of patients responded to acalabrutinib.

And although 36% of patients had a recurrence of an adverse event (AE) they experienced while on ibrutinib, none of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Farrukh T. Awan, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 638.*

Dr Awan noted that integrating ibrutinib into standard CLL therapy has improved patient outcomes, but a lack of tolerability observed in some patients suggests that more selective BTK inhibition may be desirable.

“We know that around 10% to 20% of patients who are treated with ibrutinib would have to stop therapy because of an adverse event,” Dr Awan said. “Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor that has shown promising efficacy, and that [research] was published last year.”

In this ongoing, phase 1/2 study, Dr Awan and his colleagues are testing acalabrutinib in patients with CLL/small lymphocytic leukemia. The study has enrolled multiple cohorts of patients—relapsed/refractory, treatment-naïve, Richter’s transformation/prolymphocytic leukemia, and ibrutinib intolerant.

At this year’s ASH meeting, Dr Awan presented data on the 33 CLL patients who were ibrutinib intolerant. The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 50-82), 61% were male, 97% had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 52% had Rai stage III-IV, and 31% had bulky disease.

The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-13), and 91% of patients had ibrutinib as their last therapy. The median duration of prior ibrutinib treatment was 11.5 months (range, 1-62), and the median time from ending ibrutinib to starting acalabrutinib was 47 days (range, 3-331 days).

Treatment and safety

Patients received acalabrutinib at 100 mg twice daily (n=30) or 200 mg daily (n=3) until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason. The patients’ median time on therapy was 12.2 months (range, 0.2-23.6 months).

Nine patients discontinued treatment—3 due to disease progression, 3 due to AEs, 2 due to an increase in BTK C481S mutation frequency in the peripheral blood and central nervous system involvement, and 1 due to physician decision (because the patient had concurrent hemophilia).

The 3 AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were fatal hemorrhagic stroke, fatal fungal infection, and metastatic endometrial cancer. All 3 events were considered unrelated to acalabrutinib.

Serious AEs occurred in 11 patients (33%). A serious AE that occurred in more than 1 patient was pneumonia (n=2).

The most common AEs were diarrhea (52%, grade 1-2), headache (39%, grade 1-2), cough (24%, grade 1-2), increased weight (24%, grade 1-2), nausea (21%, grade 1-2), contusion (18%, grade 1-2), ecchymosis (18%, grade 1-2), fatigue (18%, grade 1-2), hypertension (18% overall, 6% ≥ grade 3), pyrexia (18% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), vomiting (18%, grade 1-2), myalgia (15% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), rash (15%, grade 1-2), stomatitis (15%, grade 1-2), upper respiratory tract infection (15%, grade 1-2), and urinary tract infection (15%, grade 1-2).

AE recurrence

Twelve patients (36%) had a recurrence of ibrutinib-related AEs—a total of 16 events. Fourteen of these events either decreased in severity or were unchanged with acalabrutinib treatment.

The events without a change in severity were atrial fibrillation (n=1), fatigue (n=1), muscle spasms (n=1), myalgia (n=1), peripheral edema (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that decreased in severity were diarrhea (n=2), arthralgia (n=1), ecchymosis (n=1), fatigue (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that increased in severity were contusion (n=1, grade 1 to 2) and fatigue (n=1, grade 1 to 2).

None of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Efficacy

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy.

The overall response rate was 79% (n=23). One patient had a complete response (3%), 15 had a partial response (52%), and 7 had a partial response with lymphocytosis (24%). Six patients had stable disease (21%).

The median time to response was 1.9 months. Eighty-one percent of responding patients have a response duration of 12 months or longer.

The median progression-free survival has not been reached.

The research is sponsored by Acerta Pharma.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.

 

 

Attendees at the 2016

ASH Annual Meeting

 

SAN DIEGO—When patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cannot tolerate one Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, they may do well on another, according to a presentation at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Researchers conducting a phase 1/2 study found that acalabrutinib was “well-tolerated” and demonstrated “promising activity” in patients intolerant to ibrutinib.

Seventy-nine percent of patients responded to acalabrutinib.

And although 36% of patients had a recurrence of an adverse event (AE) they experienced while on ibrutinib, none of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Farrukh T. Awan, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 638.*

Dr Awan noted that integrating ibrutinib into standard CLL therapy has improved patient outcomes, but a lack of tolerability observed in some patients suggests that more selective BTK inhibition may be desirable.

“We know that around 10% to 20% of patients who are treated with ibrutinib would have to stop therapy because of an adverse event,” Dr Awan said. “Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor that has shown promising efficacy, and that [research] was published last year.”

In this ongoing, phase 1/2 study, Dr Awan and his colleagues are testing acalabrutinib in patients with CLL/small lymphocytic leukemia. The study has enrolled multiple cohorts of patients—relapsed/refractory, treatment-naïve, Richter’s transformation/prolymphocytic leukemia, and ibrutinib intolerant.

At this year’s ASH meeting, Dr Awan presented data on the 33 CLL patients who were ibrutinib intolerant. The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 50-82), 61% were male, 97% had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 52% had Rai stage III-IV, and 31% had bulky disease.

The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-13), and 91% of patients had ibrutinib as their last therapy. The median duration of prior ibrutinib treatment was 11.5 months (range, 1-62), and the median time from ending ibrutinib to starting acalabrutinib was 47 days (range, 3-331 days).

Treatment and safety

Patients received acalabrutinib at 100 mg twice daily (n=30) or 200 mg daily (n=3) until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason. The patients’ median time on therapy was 12.2 months (range, 0.2-23.6 months).

Nine patients discontinued treatment—3 due to disease progression, 3 due to AEs, 2 due to an increase in BTK C481S mutation frequency in the peripheral blood and central nervous system involvement, and 1 due to physician decision (because the patient had concurrent hemophilia).

The 3 AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were fatal hemorrhagic stroke, fatal fungal infection, and metastatic endometrial cancer. All 3 events were considered unrelated to acalabrutinib.

Serious AEs occurred in 11 patients (33%). A serious AE that occurred in more than 1 patient was pneumonia (n=2).

The most common AEs were diarrhea (52%, grade 1-2), headache (39%, grade 1-2), cough (24%, grade 1-2), increased weight (24%, grade 1-2), nausea (21%, grade 1-2), contusion (18%, grade 1-2), ecchymosis (18%, grade 1-2), fatigue (18%, grade 1-2), hypertension (18% overall, 6% ≥ grade 3), pyrexia (18% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), vomiting (18%, grade 1-2), myalgia (15% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), rash (15%, grade 1-2), stomatitis (15%, grade 1-2), upper respiratory tract infection (15%, grade 1-2), and urinary tract infection (15%, grade 1-2).

AE recurrence

Twelve patients (36%) had a recurrence of ibrutinib-related AEs—a total of 16 events. Fourteen of these events either decreased in severity or were unchanged with acalabrutinib treatment.

The events without a change in severity were atrial fibrillation (n=1), fatigue (n=1), muscle spasms (n=1), myalgia (n=1), peripheral edema (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that decreased in severity were diarrhea (n=2), arthralgia (n=1), ecchymosis (n=1), fatigue (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that increased in severity were contusion (n=1, grade 1 to 2) and fatigue (n=1, grade 1 to 2).

None of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Efficacy

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy.

The overall response rate was 79% (n=23). One patient had a complete response (3%), 15 had a partial response (52%), and 7 had a partial response with lymphocytosis (24%). Six patients had stable disease (21%).

The median time to response was 1.9 months. Eighty-one percent of responding patients have a response duration of 12 months or longer.

The median progression-free survival has not been reached.

The research is sponsored by Acerta Pharma.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.

 

 

Attendees at the 2016

ASH Annual Meeting

 

SAN DIEGO—When patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cannot tolerate one Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, they may do well on another, according to a presentation at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

Researchers conducting a phase 1/2 study found that acalabrutinib was “well-tolerated” and demonstrated “promising activity” in patients intolerant to ibrutinib.

Seventy-nine percent of patients responded to acalabrutinib.

And although 36% of patients had a recurrence of an adverse event (AE) they experienced while on ibrutinib, none of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Farrukh T. Awan, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 638.*

Dr Awan noted that integrating ibrutinib into standard CLL therapy has improved patient outcomes, but a lack of tolerability observed in some patients suggests that more selective BTK inhibition may be desirable.

“We know that around 10% to 20% of patients who are treated with ibrutinib would have to stop therapy because of an adverse event,” Dr Awan said. “Acalabrutinib is a highly selective, potent BTK inhibitor that has shown promising efficacy, and that [research] was published last year.”

In this ongoing, phase 1/2 study, Dr Awan and his colleagues are testing acalabrutinib in patients with CLL/small lymphocytic leukemia. The study has enrolled multiple cohorts of patients—relapsed/refractory, treatment-naïve, Richter’s transformation/prolymphocytic leukemia, and ibrutinib intolerant.

At this year’s ASH meeting, Dr Awan presented data on the 33 CLL patients who were ibrutinib intolerant. The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 50-82), 61% were male, 97% had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, 52% had Rai stage III-IV, and 31% had bulky disease.

The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-13), and 91% of patients had ibrutinib as their last therapy. The median duration of prior ibrutinib treatment was 11.5 months (range, 1-62), and the median time from ending ibrutinib to starting acalabrutinib was 47 days (range, 3-331 days).

Treatment and safety

Patients received acalabrutinib at 100 mg twice daily (n=30) or 200 mg daily (n=3) until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason. The patients’ median time on therapy was 12.2 months (range, 0.2-23.6 months).

Nine patients discontinued treatment—3 due to disease progression, 3 due to AEs, 2 due to an increase in BTK C481S mutation frequency in the peripheral blood and central nervous system involvement, and 1 due to physician decision (because the patient had concurrent hemophilia).

The 3 AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were fatal hemorrhagic stroke, fatal fungal infection, and metastatic endometrial cancer. All 3 events were considered unrelated to acalabrutinib.

Serious AEs occurred in 11 patients (33%). A serious AE that occurred in more than 1 patient was pneumonia (n=2).

The most common AEs were diarrhea (52%, grade 1-2), headache (39%, grade 1-2), cough (24%, grade 1-2), increased weight (24%, grade 1-2), nausea (21%, grade 1-2), contusion (18%, grade 1-2), ecchymosis (18%, grade 1-2), fatigue (18%, grade 1-2), hypertension (18% overall, 6% ≥ grade 3), pyrexia (18% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), vomiting (18%, grade 1-2), myalgia (15% overall, 3% ≥ grade 3), rash (15%, grade 1-2), stomatitis (15%, grade 1-2), upper respiratory tract infection (15%, grade 1-2), and urinary tract infection (15%, grade 1-2).

AE recurrence

Twelve patients (36%) had a recurrence of ibrutinib-related AEs—a total of 16 events. Fourteen of these events either decreased in severity or were unchanged with acalabrutinib treatment.

The events without a change in severity were atrial fibrillation (n=1), fatigue (n=1), muscle spasms (n=1), myalgia (n=1), peripheral edema (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that decreased in severity were diarrhea (n=2), arthralgia (n=1), ecchymosis (n=1), fatigue (n=1), panniculitis (n=1), and rash (n=1).

The events that increased in severity were contusion (n=1, grade 1 to 2) and fatigue (n=1, grade 1 to 2).

None of the patients discontinued acalabrutinib due to AE recurrence.

Efficacy

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy.

The overall response rate was 79% (n=23). One patient had a complete response (3%), 15 had a partial response (52%), and 7 had a partial response with lymphocytosis (24%). Six patients had stable disease (21%).

The median time to response was 1.9 months. Eighty-one percent of responding patients have a response duration of 12 months or longer.

The median progression-free survival has not been reached.

The research is sponsored by Acerta Pharma.

*Information presented at the meeting differs from the abstract.