Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two monoclonal antibodies that block the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway are showing promise in early phase trials in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Nivolumab prompted an 87% overall response rate (ORR) in heavily pretreated patients, and pembrolizumab elicited a 66% ORR in patients who had failed prior treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

These results were presented in 2 abstracts at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The rationale for using PD-1 blockade in cHL is that these patients frequently have an alteration in chromosome 9p24.1, which leads to increased expression of the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. The ligands engage the PD-1 receptors on activated T cells, inducing T-cell exhaustion. More than 85% of cHL tumors overexpress PD-L1.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, who presented the data on pembrolizumab at the meeting, sees nivolumab and pembrolizumab as being very similar.

“My gut feeling is that, at the end of the day, the response rates will be very similar,” he said. “The complete response rates will be similar. I think the toxicity profiles may be slightly dissimilar, and we’ll have to see what happens when these studies are both peer-reviewed.”

Nivolumab

Philippe Armand, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented data on nivolumab in cHL (abstract 289), which was an independent expansion cohort of a phase 1b study in hematologic malignancies.

The 23 cHL patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg on weeks 1 and 4, then every 2 weeks.

Patients were a median age of 35 years (range, 20 to 54), and about two-thirds had received 4 or more prior systemic therapies. Seventy-eight percent had prior autologous stem cell transplant, and 78% had prior treatment with brentuximab.

“These were extensively pretreated patients” Dr Armand said, “with few options available.”

Twenty patients responded, for an ORR of 87%. Four patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), 16 (70%) had a partial response, and 3 (13%) had stable disease.

There were no progressions. And, at 24 weeks, the progression-free survival was 86%.

There were no life-threatening adverse events (AEs), no drug-related deaths, and no drug-related grade 4 AEs. Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced an AE, 18 (78%) had a drug-related AE, 5 (22%) had a grade 3 drug-related AE, and 2 (9%) patients discontinued treatment due to a drug-related AE.

The 2 events leading to discontinuation were myelodysplastic syndromes with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 pancreatitis. The other grade 3 drug-related AEs were lymphopenia, increased lipase, GI inflammation, pneumonitis, colitis, and stomatitis.

“Overall, nivolumab has been used in thousands of patients already on clinical trials in solid tumors,” Dr Armand said. “And, overall, this safety profile mirrors that from what we expected in solid tumors.”

“But the interesting thing about that, from our standpoint, is that there was no apparent increase in the incidence of lung toxicity, which is something we worry about for those patients because many of them had had radiation or other drugs that can cause lung injury.”

This study was recently published in NEJM. It was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab, and others.

Based on results of this study, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted nivolumab breakthrough therapy designation to treat HL. The drug recently gained FDA approval to treat advanced melanoma.

Pembrolizumab

Dr Moskowitz, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, presented data on pembrolizumab as abstract 290.*

Investigators enrolled 31 patients onto the cHL cohort of the Keynote 013 trial. Patients were a median age of 32 years (range, 20 to 67).

All patients had failed therapy with brentuximab vedotin, 69% failed prior stem cell transplant, and 28% were transplant ineligible. Patients had to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and could not have autoimmune disease or interstitial lung disease.

Patients received 10 mg/kg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 2 weeks for up to 24 months or until progression.

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 66%, with a CR rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 45%. Twenty-one percent of patients had stable disease, and 14% had progressive disease. So the clinical benefit rate was 86%.

The median time to response was 12 weeks, and the median duration of response ranged from 1 to 185 days, but the median had not yet been reached.

Nine patients (31%) discontinued therapy, 1 (3%) due to an AE, 7 (24%) due to disease progression, and 1 (3%) after achieving a CR. Twenty patients (69%) were still on therapy at the time of the presentation, and 1 patient went on to transplant.

Sixteen patients (55%) experienced 1 or more treatment-related AE of any grade. Those occurring in 2 or more patients included hypothyroidism (10%), pneumonitis (10%), constipation (7%), diarrhea (7%), nausea (7%), hypercholesterolemia (7%), hypertriglyceridemia (7%), and hematuria (7%).

Treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher included axillary pain (3%), hypoxia (3%), joint swelling (3%), and pneumonitis (3%). Three patients experienced 4 grade 3 or higher AEs. There were no grade 4 treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths.

“In my opinion,” Dr Moskowitz concluded, “these results support continued development of pembrolizumab in Hodgkin lymphoma.”

“I think that these drugs are here to stay. Where we are going to put them in the armamentarium in Hodgkin lymphoma remains to be seen.”

This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the company developing pembrolizumab.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two monoclonal antibodies that block the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway are showing promise in early phase trials in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Nivolumab prompted an 87% overall response rate (ORR) in heavily pretreated patients, and pembrolizumab elicited a 66% ORR in patients who had failed prior treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

These results were presented in 2 abstracts at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The rationale for using PD-1 blockade in cHL is that these patients frequently have an alteration in chromosome 9p24.1, which leads to increased expression of the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. The ligands engage the PD-1 receptors on activated T cells, inducing T-cell exhaustion. More than 85% of cHL tumors overexpress PD-L1.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, who presented the data on pembrolizumab at the meeting, sees nivolumab and pembrolizumab as being very similar.

“My gut feeling is that, at the end of the day, the response rates will be very similar,” he said. “The complete response rates will be similar. I think the toxicity profiles may be slightly dissimilar, and we’ll have to see what happens when these studies are both peer-reviewed.”

Nivolumab

Philippe Armand, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented data on nivolumab in cHL (abstract 289), which was an independent expansion cohort of a phase 1b study in hematologic malignancies.

The 23 cHL patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg on weeks 1 and 4, then every 2 weeks.

Patients were a median age of 35 years (range, 20 to 54), and about two-thirds had received 4 or more prior systemic therapies. Seventy-eight percent had prior autologous stem cell transplant, and 78% had prior treatment with brentuximab.

“These were extensively pretreated patients” Dr Armand said, “with few options available.”

Twenty patients responded, for an ORR of 87%. Four patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), 16 (70%) had a partial response, and 3 (13%) had stable disease.

There were no progressions. And, at 24 weeks, the progression-free survival was 86%.

There were no life-threatening adverse events (AEs), no drug-related deaths, and no drug-related grade 4 AEs. Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced an AE, 18 (78%) had a drug-related AE, 5 (22%) had a grade 3 drug-related AE, and 2 (9%) patients discontinued treatment due to a drug-related AE.

The 2 events leading to discontinuation were myelodysplastic syndromes with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 pancreatitis. The other grade 3 drug-related AEs were lymphopenia, increased lipase, GI inflammation, pneumonitis, colitis, and stomatitis.

“Overall, nivolumab has been used in thousands of patients already on clinical trials in solid tumors,” Dr Armand said. “And, overall, this safety profile mirrors that from what we expected in solid tumors.”

“But the interesting thing about that, from our standpoint, is that there was no apparent increase in the incidence of lung toxicity, which is something we worry about for those patients because many of them had had radiation or other drugs that can cause lung injury.”

This study was recently published in NEJM. It was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab, and others.

Based on results of this study, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted nivolumab breakthrough therapy designation to treat HL. The drug recently gained FDA approval to treat advanced melanoma.

Pembrolizumab

Dr Moskowitz, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, presented data on pembrolizumab as abstract 290.*

Investigators enrolled 31 patients onto the cHL cohort of the Keynote 013 trial. Patients were a median age of 32 years (range, 20 to 67).

All patients had failed therapy with brentuximab vedotin, 69% failed prior stem cell transplant, and 28% were transplant ineligible. Patients had to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and could not have autoimmune disease or interstitial lung disease.

Patients received 10 mg/kg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 2 weeks for up to 24 months or until progression.

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 66%, with a CR rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 45%. Twenty-one percent of patients had stable disease, and 14% had progressive disease. So the clinical benefit rate was 86%.

The median time to response was 12 weeks, and the median duration of response ranged from 1 to 185 days, but the median had not yet been reached.

Nine patients (31%) discontinued therapy, 1 (3%) due to an AE, 7 (24%) due to disease progression, and 1 (3%) after achieving a CR. Twenty patients (69%) were still on therapy at the time of the presentation, and 1 patient went on to transplant.

Sixteen patients (55%) experienced 1 or more treatment-related AE of any grade. Those occurring in 2 or more patients included hypothyroidism (10%), pneumonitis (10%), constipation (7%), diarrhea (7%), nausea (7%), hypercholesterolemia (7%), hypertriglyceridemia (7%), and hematuria (7%).

Treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher included axillary pain (3%), hypoxia (3%), joint swelling (3%), and pneumonitis (3%). Three patients experienced 4 grade 3 or higher AEs. There were no grade 4 treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths.

“In my opinion,” Dr Moskowitz concluded, “these results support continued development of pembrolizumab in Hodgkin lymphoma.”

“I think that these drugs are here to stay. Where we are going to put them in the armamentarium in Hodgkin lymphoma remains to be seen.”

This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the company developing pembrolizumab.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two monoclonal antibodies that block the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway are showing promise in early phase trials in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Nivolumab prompted an 87% overall response rate (ORR) in heavily pretreated patients, and pembrolizumab elicited a 66% ORR in patients who had failed prior treatment with brentuximab vedotin.

These results were presented in 2 abstracts at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

The rationale for using PD-1 blockade in cHL is that these patients frequently have an alteration in chromosome 9p24.1, which leads to increased expression of the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. The ligands engage the PD-1 receptors on activated T cells, inducing T-cell exhaustion. More than 85% of cHL tumors overexpress PD-L1.

Craig H. Moskowitz, MD, who presented the data on pembrolizumab at the meeting, sees nivolumab and pembrolizumab as being very similar.

“My gut feeling is that, at the end of the day, the response rates will be very similar,” he said. “The complete response rates will be similar. I think the toxicity profiles may be slightly dissimilar, and we’ll have to see what happens when these studies are both peer-reviewed.”

Nivolumab

Philippe Armand, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented data on nivolumab in cHL (abstract 289), which was an independent expansion cohort of a phase 1b study in hematologic malignancies.

The 23 cHL patients received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg on weeks 1 and 4, then every 2 weeks.

Patients were a median age of 35 years (range, 20 to 54), and about two-thirds had received 4 or more prior systemic therapies. Seventy-eight percent had prior autologous stem cell transplant, and 78% had prior treatment with brentuximab.

“These were extensively pretreated patients” Dr Armand said, “with few options available.”

Twenty patients responded, for an ORR of 87%. Four patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), 16 (70%) had a partial response, and 3 (13%) had stable disease.

There were no progressions. And, at 24 weeks, the progression-free survival was 86%.

There were no life-threatening adverse events (AEs), no drug-related deaths, and no drug-related grade 4 AEs. Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced an AE, 18 (78%) had a drug-related AE, 5 (22%) had a grade 3 drug-related AE, and 2 (9%) patients discontinued treatment due to a drug-related AE.

The 2 events leading to discontinuation were myelodysplastic syndromes with grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 pancreatitis. The other grade 3 drug-related AEs were lymphopenia, increased lipase, GI inflammation, pneumonitis, colitis, and stomatitis.

“Overall, nivolumab has been used in thousands of patients already on clinical trials in solid tumors,” Dr Armand said. “And, overall, this safety profile mirrors that from what we expected in solid tumors.”

“But the interesting thing about that, from our standpoint, is that there was no apparent increase in the incidence of lung toxicity, which is something we worry about for those patients because many of them had had radiation or other drugs that can cause lung injury.”

This study was recently published in NEJM. It was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, the company developing nivolumab, and others.

Based on results of this study, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted nivolumab breakthrough therapy designation to treat HL. The drug recently gained FDA approval to treat advanced melanoma.

Pembrolizumab

Dr Moskowitz, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, presented data on pembrolizumab as abstract 290.*

Investigators enrolled 31 patients onto the cHL cohort of the Keynote 013 trial. Patients were a median age of 32 years (range, 20 to 67).

All patients had failed therapy with brentuximab vedotin, 69% failed prior stem cell transplant, and 28% were transplant ineligible. Patients had to have an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and could not have autoimmune disease or interstitial lung disease.

Patients received 10 mg/kg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 2 weeks for up to 24 months or until progression.

Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 66%, with a CR rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 45%. Twenty-one percent of patients had stable disease, and 14% had progressive disease. So the clinical benefit rate was 86%.

The median time to response was 12 weeks, and the median duration of response ranged from 1 to 185 days, but the median had not yet been reached.

Nine patients (31%) discontinued therapy, 1 (3%) due to an AE, 7 (24%) due to disease progression, and 1 (3%) after achieving a CR. Twenty patients (69%) were still on therapy at the time of the presentation, and 1 patient went on to transplant.

Sixteen patients (55%) experienced 1 or more treatment-related AE of any grade. Those occurring in 2 or more patients included hypothyroidism (10%), pneumonitis (10%), constipation (7%), diarrhea (7%), nausea (7%), hypercholesterolemia (7%), hypertriglyceridemia (7%), and hematuria (7%).

Treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or higher included axillary pain (3%), hypoxia (3%), joint swelling (3%), and pneumonitis (3%). Three patients experienced 4 grade 3 or higher AEs. There were no grade 4 treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths.

“In my opinion,” Dr Moskowitz concluded, “these results support continued development of pembrolizumab in Hodgkin lymphoma.”

“I think that these drugs are here to stay. Where we are going to put them in the armamentarium in Hodgkin lymphoma remains to be seen.”

This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the company developing pembrolizumab.

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who receive high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) after they’ve responded to chemotherapy can achieve long-term cancer-free survival, new research suggests.

The study showed that many patients transplanted in complete remission (CR) did not relapse and could be considered cured.

Patients transplanted in their first CR fared the best, as median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were not reached.

But even patients transplanted in their second/third CR or in their first partial remission (PR) survived a median of 15 years or more, although their PFS times were shorter, at about 14 years and 3 years, respectively.

Carlos Grande García, MD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre in Madrid, Spain, presented these results at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 675.)*

“In follicular lymphoma patients, intensification with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell support offers an advantage in terms of progression-free survival in comparison with conventional chemo,” he said. “But, so far, no randomized studies have yet shown any overall survival advantage.”

“Follicular lymphoma has a long natural course, and most patients have received different salvage therapies. Probably, this is why the available phase 3 studies have had insufficient time to confirm the impact on OS.”

To investigate the impact of HDT/ASCT on OS, Dr Grande García and his colleagues conducted a retrospective study of 655 FL patients who received HDT/ASCT from 1989 to 2007. Patients with histological transformation, those undergoing a second transplant, and those with a follow-up of less than 7 years were excluded.

Patient characteristics

The median follow-up was 12 years from HDT/ASCT and 14.4 years from diagnosis. At diagnosis, the median patient age was 47, 49.6% of patients were male, and 90% had stage III/IV disease.

According to FLIPI, 33% of patients were good risk, 36% were intermediate risk, and 31% were poor risk. According to FLIPI-2, the percentages were 22%, 38%, and 40%, respectively. Thirty percent of patients had received rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=203) were in their first CR at the time of transplant, 43% of whom required more than one line of therapy to reach first CR.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=202) were in second or third CR, 21.5% (n=149) were in first PR, 12.5% (n=81) were in sensitive relapse (defined as a response other than CR or first PR), and 5% (n=29) had overt disease (which included untreated relapsed disease, first refractory disease, and second refractory disease).

Patients received a variety of conditioning regimens, including total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide), and other regimens. They received stem cells from peripheral blood (81%), bone marrow (14%), or both sources (5%).

There were 4 graft failures and 17 early toxic deaths. Thirty-one percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities.

PFS and OS

In all patients, the median PFS was 9.25 years, and the median OS was 19.5 years.

When the researchers looked at outcomes according to patients’ status at transplant, they found the median OS and PFS were not reached among patients in first CR. At a median follow-up of 12.75 years, the OS rate was 72%, and the PFS rate was 68%.

“Beginning at 10 years from transplantation, only 6 patients have died,” Dr Grande García noted, “one from disease progression, 3 from second malignancy, [and] 2 from unrelated causes.”

For patients in second or third CR, the median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 13.9 years. For those in first PR, the median OS was 15 years, and the median PFS was 2.6 years.

For patients with sensitive disease, the median OS was 5.1 years, and the median PFS was 2 years. For those with overt disease, the median OS was 4.4 years, and the median PFS was 0.5 years.

In multivariate analysis, the following characteristics were significant predictors of OS: being older than 47 years of age (hazard ratio [HR]=1.74, P=0.0001), female sex (HR=0.58, P=0.00004), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.06, P<10^-5), and receipt of rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT (HR=0.61, P=0.004).

Significant predictors of PFS included age (HR=1.34, P=0.01), sex (HR=0.64, P<10^-5), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.15, P<10^-5), and rituximab use (HR=0.67, P=0.003).

For patients transplanted in first CR, only sex was a significant predictor of PFS (HR=0.48, P=0.008) and OS (HR=0.43, P=0.007).

Secondary malignancies

Overall, 13% of patients developed secondary malignancies, of which 46% were solid neoplasias, 44% were myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemias, and 10% were other malignancies.

The incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 3.5%, and the median time from HDT/ASCT to diagnosis was 16 years. There were no significant differences in the rate of secondary malignancy according to a patient’s status at HDT/ASCT or according to the use of rituximab.

“The incidence of second malignancies is not higher than that reported in other series without transplantation,” Dr Grande García noted.

“[HDT/ASCT] is highly effective, even for patients with poor initial features. A significant number of patients transplanted in CR never relapse and may be considered cured.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who receive high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) after they’ve responded to chemotherapy can achieve long-term cancer-free survival, new research suggests.

The study showed that many patients transplanted in complete remission (CR) did not relapse and could be considered cured.

Patients transplanted in their first CR fared the best, as median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were not reached.

But even patients transplanted in their second/third CR or in their first partial remission (PR) survived a median of 15 years or more, although their PFS times were shorter, at about 14 years and 3 years, respectively.

Carlos Grande García, MD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre in Madrid, Spain, presented these results at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 675.)*

“In follicular lymphoma patients, intensification with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell support offers an advantage in terms of progression-free survival in comparison with conventional chemo,” he said. “But, so far, no randomized studies have yet shown any overall survival advantage.”

“Follicular lymphoma has a long natural course, and most patients have received different salvage therapies. Probably, this is why the available phase 3 studies have had insufficient time to confirm the impact on OS.”

To investigate the impact of HDT/ASCT on OS, Dr Grande García and his colleagues conducted a retrospective study of 655 FL patients who received HDT/ASCT from 1989 to 2007. Patients with histological transformation, those undergoing a second transplant, and those with a follow-up of less than 7 years were excluded.

Patient characteristics

The median follow-up was 12 years from HDT/ASCT and 14.4 years from diagnosis. At diagnosis, the median patient age was 47, 49.6% of patients were male, and 90% had stage III/IV disease.

According to FLIPI, 33% of patients were good risk, 36% were intermediate risk, and 31% were poor risk. According to FLIPI-2, the percentages were 22%, 38%, and 40%, respectively. Thirty percent of patients had received rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=203) were in their first CR at the time of transplant, 43% of whom required more than one line of therapy to reach first CR.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=202) were in second or third CR, 21.5% (n=149) were in first PR, 12.5% (n=81) were in sensitive relapse (defined as a response other than CR or first PR), and 5% (n=29) had overt disease (which included untreated relapsed disease, first refractory disease, and second refractory disease).

Patients received a variety of conditioning regimens, including total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide), and other regimens. They received stem cells from peripheral blood (81%), bone marrow (14%), or both sources (5%).

There were 4 graft failures and 17 early toxic deaths. Thirty-one percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities.

PFS and OS

In all patients, the median PFS was 9.25 years, and the median OS was 19.5 years.

When the researchers looked at outcomes according to patients’ status at transplant, they found the median OS and PFS were not reached among patients in first CR. At a median follow-up of 12.75 years, the OS rate was 72%, and the PFS rate was 68%.

“Beginning at 10 years from transplantation, only 6 patients have died,” Dr Grande García noted, “one from disease progression, 3 from second malignancy, [and] 2 from unrelated causes.”

For patients in second or third CR, the median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 13.9 years. For those in first PR, the median OS was 15 years, and the median PFS was 2.6 years.

For patients with sensitive disease, the median OS was 5.1 years, and the median PFS was 2 years. For those with overt disease, the median OS was 4.4 years, and the median PFS was 0.5 years.

In multivariate analysis, the following characteristics were significant predictors of OS: being older than 47 years of age (hazard ratio [HR]=1.74, P=0.0001), female sex (HR=0.58, P=0.00004), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.06, P<10^-5), and receipt of rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT (HR=0.61, P=0.004).

Significant predictors of PFS included age (HR=1.34, P=0.01), sex (HR=0.64, P<10^-5), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.15, P<10^-5), and rituximab use (HR=0.67, P=0.003).

For patients transplanted in first CR, only sex was a significant predictor of PFS (HR=0.48, P=0.008) and OS (HR=0.43, P=0.007).

Secondary malignancies

Overall, 13% of patients developed secondary malignancies, of which 46% were solid neoplasias, 44% were myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemias, and 10% were other malignancies.

The incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 3.5%, and the median time from HDT/ASCT to diagnosis was 16 years. There were no significant differences in the rate of secondary malignancy according to a patient’s status at HDT/ASCT or according to the use of rituximab.

“The incidence of second malignancies is not higher than that reported in other series without transplantation,” Dr Grande García noted.

“[HDT/ASCT] is highly effective, even for patients with poor initial features. A significant number of patients transplanted in CR never relapse and may be considered cured.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients who receive high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) after they’ve responded to chemotherapy can achieve long-term cancer-free survival, new research suggests.

The study showed that many patients transplanted in complete remission (CR) did not relapse and could be considered cured.

Patients transplanted in their first CR fared the best, as median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were not reached.

But even patients transplanted in their second/third CR or in their first partial remission (PR) survived a median of 15 years or more, although their PFS times were shorter, at about 14 years and 3 years, respectively.

Carlos Grande García, MD, of Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre in Madrid, Spain, presented these results at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 675.)*

“In follicular lymphoma patients, intensification with high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell support offers an advantage in terms of progression-free survival in comparison with conventional chemo,” he said. “But, so far, no randomized studies have yet shown any overall survival advantage.”

“Follicular lymphoma has a long natural course, and most patients have received different salvage therapies. Probably, this is why the available phase 3 studies have had insufficient time to confirm the impact on OS.”

To investigate the impact of HDT/ASCT on OS, Dr Grande García and his colleagues conducted a retrospective study of 655 FL patients who received HDT/ASCT from 1989 to 2007. Patients with histological transformation, those undergoing a second transplant, and those with a follow-up of less than 7 years were excluded.

Patient characteristics

The median follow-up was 12 years from HDT/ASCT and 14.4 years from diagnosis. At diagnosis, the median patient age was 47, 49.6% of patients were male, and 90% had stage III/IV disease.

According to FLIPI, 33% of patients were good risk, 36% were intermediate risk, and 31% were poor risk. According to FLIPI-2, the percentages were 22%, 38%, and 40%, respectively. Thirty percent of patients had received rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=203) were in their first CR at the time of transplant, 43% of whom required more than one line of therapy to reach first CR.

Thirty-one percent of patients (n=202) were in second or third CR, 21.5% (n=149) were in first PR, 12.5% (n=81) were in sensitive relapse (defined as a response other than CR or first PR), and 5% (n=29) had overt disease (which included untreated relapsed disease, first refractory disease, and second refractory disease).

Patients received a variety of conditioning regimens, including total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan), BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide), and other regimens. They received stem cells from peripheral blood (81%), bone marrow (14%), or both sources (5%).

There were 4 graft failures and 17 early toxic deaths. Thirty-one percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities.

PFS and OS

In all patients, the median PFS was 9.25 years, and the median OS was 19.5 years.

When the researchers looked at outcomes according to patients’ status at transplant, they found the median OS and PFS were not reached among patients in first CR. At a median follow-up of 12.75 years, the OS rate was 72%, and the PFS rate was 68%.

“Beginning at 10 years from transplantation, only 6 patients have died,” Dr Grande García noted, “one from disease progression, 3 from second malignancy, [and] 2 from unrelated causes.”

For patients in second or third CR, the median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 13.9 years. For those in first PR, the median OS was 15 years, and the median PFS was 2.6 years.

For patients with sensitive disease, the median OS was 5.1 years, and the median PFS was 2 years. For those with overt disease, the median OS was 4.4 years, and the median PFS was 0.5 years.

In multivariate analysis, the following characteristics were significant predictors of OS: being older than 47 years of age (hazard ratio [HR]=1.74, P=0.0001), female sex (HR=0.58, P=0.00004), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.06, P<10^-5), and receipt of rituximab prior to HDT/ASCT (HR=0.61, P=0.004).

Significant predictors of PFS included age (HR=1.34, P=0.01), sex (HR=0.64, P<10^-5), status at HDT/ASCT (HR=2.15, P<10^-5), and rituximab use (HR=0.67, P=0.003).

For patients transplanted in first CR, only sex was a significant predictor of PFS (HR=0.48, P=0.008) and OS (HR=0.43, P=0.007).

Secondary malignancies

Overall, 13% of patients developed secondary malignancies, of which 46% were solid neoplasias, 44% were myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemias, and 10% were other malignancies.

The incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 3.5%, and the median time from HDT/ASCT to diagnosis was 16 years. There were no significant differences in the rate of secondary malignancy according to a patient’s status at HDT/ASCT or according to the use of rituximab.

“The incidence of second malignancies is not higher than that reported in other series without transplantation,” Dr Grande García noted.

“[HDT/ASCT] is highly effective, even for patients with poor initial features. A significant number of patients transplanted in CR never relapse and may be considered cured.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—New research suggests complex metaphase karyotype (CKT) is a stronger predictor of inferior outcome than 17p deletion in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who are treated with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib.

The study showed that CKT, defined as 3 or more distinct chromosomal abnormalities, was independently associated with inferior event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), but del(17p) was not.

According to investigators, this suggests that del(17p) patients without CKT could be managed with long-term ibrutinib and close monitoring, as these patients have similar outcomes as patients without del(17p).

However, patients with CKT will likely require treatment-intensification strategies after ibrutinib-based therapy.

“We believe that patients with a complex karyotype represent an ideal group in whom to study novel treatment approaches, including ibrutinib-based combination regimens and/or consolidated approaches after initial ibrutinib response,” said investigator Philip A. Thompson, MBBS, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Thompson presented his group’s findings at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 22.* Investigators involved in this study received research funding or consultancy fees from Pharmacyclics, Inc., makers of ibrutinib.

Patient characteristics

Dr Thompson and his colleagues analyzed 100 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who received treatment with ibrutinib-based regimens—50 with ibrutinib alone, 36 with ibrutinib and rituximab, and 14 with ibrutinib, rituximab, and bendamustine.

The median age was 65 (range, 35-83), patients received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-12), and 19% were fludarabine-refractory. Sixty percent of patients had Rai stage III-IV disease, 52% had bulky adenopathy, 81% had unmutated IGHV, and 56% had β2-microglobulin ≥ 4.0 mg/L.

FISH was available for 94 patients, and metaphase analysis was available for 65 patients. Forty-two percent (27/65) of patients had CKT, 28% (26/94) had del(11q), and 48% (45/94) had del(17p).

Of the 45 patients who had del(17p), 23 also had CKT. And of the 49 patients who did not have del(17p), 4 had CKT.

Event-free survival

The median follow-up in surviving patients was 27 months (range, 11-48). Eight patients had planned allogeneic stem cell transplant and were censored for the EFS analysis.

“As has been shown previously, patients with 17p deletion by FISH did have inferior event-free survival,” Dr Thompson said. “And when we looked at those patients with complex metaphase karyotype, there was a highly significant inferior event-free survival in these patients, compared to those with complex karyotype.”

EFS was 78% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 69% in patients with del(11q), and 60% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.014).

EFS was 82% in patients without CKT and 44% in those with CKT (P<0.0001). In patients with del(17p), EFS was 78% in those without CKT and 48% in those with CKT (P=0.047).

In patients without CKT, EFS was 79% in those without del(17p) or del(11q), 90% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.516).

“Interestingly, when we looked at the events that occurred in those patients without complex karyotype, none were due to CLL progression or Richter’s transformation,” Dr Thompson said.

In multivariable analysis, CKT was significantly associated with EFS (P=0.011), but del(17p) was not (P=0.887).

Overall survival

There was no significant difference in OS according to the presence of del(17p) or del(11q). OS was 87% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 81% in patients with del(11q), and 67% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.054).

However, there was a significant difference in OS for patients with and without CKT. OS was 82% in patients without CKT and 56% in patients with CKT (P=0.006).

Among patients without CKT, OS was 84% in those with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 80% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.52).

In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly associated with CKT (P=0.011) and fludarabine-refractory disease (P=0.004) but not del(17p) (P=0.981).

“So, in summary, complex karyotype appears to be a more important predictor of outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL treated with ibrutinib-based regimens than the presence of del(17p) by FISH,” Dr Thompson said.

“Patients without complex karyotype have a low rate of disease progression, including those who have del(17p). Most progressions during ibrutinib therapy occur late, beyond the 12-month time point, but survival is short after disease progression.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—New research suggests complex metaphase karyotype (CKT) is a stronger predictor of inferior outcome than 17p deletion in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who are treated with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib.

The study showed that CKT, defined as 3 or more distinct chromosomal abnormalities, was independently associated with inferior event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), but del(17p) was not.

According to investigators, this suggests that del(17p) patients without CKT could be managed with long-term ibrutinib and close monitoring, as these patients have similar outcomes as patients without del(17p).

However, patients with CKT will likely require treatment-intensification strategies after ibrutinib-based therapy.

“We believe that patients with a complex karyotype represent an ideal group in whom to study novel treatment approaches, including ibrutinib-based combination regimens and/or consolidated approaches after initial ibrutinib response,” said investigator Philip A. Thompson, MBBS, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Thompson presented his group’s findings at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 22.* Investigators involved in this study received research funding or consultancy fees from Pharmacyclics, Inc., makers of ibrutinib.

Patient characteristics

Dr Thompson and his colleagues analyzed 100 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who received treatment with ibrutinib-based regimens—50 with ibrutinib alone, 36 with ibrutinib and rituximab, and 14 with ibrutinib, rituximab, and bendamustine.

The median age was 65 (range, 35-83), patients received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-12), and 19% were fludarabine-refractory. Sixty percent of patients had Rai stage III-IV disease, 52% had bulky adenopathy, 81% had unmutated IGHV, and 56% had β2-microglobulin ≥ 4.0 mg/L.

FISH was available for 94 patients, and metaphase analysis was available for 65 patients. Forty-two percent (27/65) of patients had CKT, 28% (26/94) had del(11q), and 48% (45/94) had del(17p).

Of the 45 patients who had del(17p), 23 also had CKT. And of the 49 patients who did not have del(17p), 4 had CKT.

Event-free survival

The median follow-up in surviving patients was 27 months (range, 11-48). Eight patients had planned allogeneic stem cell transplant and were censored for the EFS analysis.

“As has been shown previously, patients with 17p deletion by FISH did have inferior event-free survival,” Dr Thompson said. “And when we looked at those patients with complex metaphase karyotype, there was a highly significant inferior event-free survival in these patients, compared to those with complex karyotype.”

EFS was 78% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 69% in patients with del(11q), and 60% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.014).

EFS was 82% in patients without CKT and 44% in those with CKT (P<0.0001). In patients with del(17p), EFS was 78% in those without CKT and 48% in those with CKT (P=0.047).

In patients without CKT, EFS was 79% in those without del(17p) or del(11q), 90% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.516).

“Interestingly, when we looked at the events that occurred in those patients without complex karyotype, none were due to CLL progression or Richter’s transformation,” Dr Thompson said.

In multivariable analysis, CKT was significantly associated with EFS (P=0.011), but del(17p) was not (P=0.887).

Overall survival

There was no significant difference in OS according to the presence of del(17p) or del(11q). OS was 87% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 81% in patients with del(11q), and 67% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.054).

However, there was a significant difference in OS for patients with and without CKT. OS was 82% in patients without CKT and 56% in patients with CKT (P=0.006).

Among patients without CKT, OS was 84% in those with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 80% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.52).

In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly associated with CKT (P=0.011) and fludarabine-refractory disease (P=0.004) but not del(17p) (P=0.981).

“So, in summary, complex karyotype appears to be a more important predictor of outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL treated with ibrutinib-based regimens than the presence of del(17p) by FISH,” Dr Thompson said.

“Patients without complex karyotype have a low rate of disease progression, including those who have del(17p). Most progressions during ibrutinib therapy occur late, beyond the 12-month time point, but survival is short after disease progression.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

SAN FRANCISCO—New research suggests complex metaphase karyotype (CKT) is a stronger predictor of inferior outcome than 17p deletion in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who are treated with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib.

The study showed that CKT, defined as 3 or more distinct chromosomal abnormalities, was independently associated with inferior event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), but del(17p) was not.

According to investigators, this suggests that del(17p) patients without CKT could be managed with long-term ibrutinib and close monitoring, as these patients have similar outcomes as patients without del(17p).

However, patients with CKT will likely require treatment-intensification strategies after ibrutinib-based therapy.

“We believe that patients with a complex karyotype represent an ideal group in whom to study novel treatment approaches, including ibrutinib-based combination regimens and/or consolidated approaches after initial ibrutinib response,” said investigator Philip A. Thompson, MBBS, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Dr Thompson presented his group’s findings at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting as abstract 22.* Investigators involved in this study received research funding or consultancy fees from Pharmacyclics, Inc., makers of ibrutinib.

Patient characteristics

Dr Thompson and his colleagues analyzed 100 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL who received treatment with ibrutinib-based regimens—50 with ibrutinib alone, 36 with ibrutinib and rituximab, and 14 with ibrutinib, rituximab, and bendamustine.

The median age was 65 (range, 35-83), patients received a median of 2 prior therapies (range, 1-12), and 19% were fludarabine-refractory. Sixty percent of patients had Rai stage III-IV disease, 52% had bulky adenopathy, 81% had unmutated IGHV, and 56% had β2-microglobulin ≥ 4.0 mg/L.

FISH was available for 94 patients, and metaphase analysis was available for 65 patients. Forty-two percent (27/65) of patients had CKT, 28% (26/94) had del(11q), and 48% (45/94) had del(17p).

Of the 45 patients who had del(17p), 23 also had CKT. And of the 49 patients who did not have del(17p), 4 had CKT.

Event-free survival

The median follow-up in surviving patients was 27 months (range, 11-48). Eight patients had planned allogeneic stem cell transplant and were censored for the EFS analysis.

“As has been shown previously, patients with 17p deletion by FISH did have inferior event-free survival,” Dr Thompson said. “And when we looked at those patients with complex metaphase karyotype, there was a highly significant inferior event-free survival in these patients, compared to those with complex karyotype.”

EFS was 78% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 69% in patients with del(11q), and 60% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.014).

EFS was 82% in patients without CKT and 44% in those with CKT (P<0.0001). In patients with del(17p), EFS was 78% in those without CKT and 48% in those with CKT (P=0.047).

In patients without CKT, EFS was 79% in those without del(17p) or del(11q), 90% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.516).

“Interestingly, when we looked at the events that occurred in those patients without complex karyotype, none were due to CLL progression or Richter’s transformation,” Dr Thompson said.

In multivariable analysis, CKT was significantly associated with EFS (P=0.011), but del(17p) was not (P=0.887).

Overall survival

There was no significant difference in OS according to the presence of del(17p) or del(11q). OS was 87% in patients with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 81% in patients with del(11q), and 67% in patients with del(17p) (P=0.054).

However, there was a significant difference in OS for patients with and without CKT. OS was 82% in patients without CKT and 56% in patients with CKT (P=0.006).

Among patients without CKT, OS was 84% in those with neither del(17p) nor del(11q), 80% in those with del(11q), and 78% in those with del(17p) (P=0.52).

In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly associated with CKT (P=0.011) and fludarabine-refractory disease (P=0.004) but not del(17p) (P=0.981).

“So, in summary, complex karyotype appears to be a more important predictor of outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL treated with ibrutinib-based regimens than the presence of del(17p) by FISH,” Dr Thompson said.

“Patients without complex karyotype have a low rate of disease progression, including those who have del(17p). Most progressions during ibrutinib therapy occur late, beyond the 12-month time point, but survival is short after disease progression.”

*Information in the abstract differs from that presented at the meeting.

Micrograph showing MCL

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the approval of bortezomib (Velcade) in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) to treat adults with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Bortezomib is already approved in the European Union to treat multiple myeloma, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment regimens.

The CHMP’s decision to expand the approved use of bortezomib is based on data from the phase 3 LYM-3002 study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8500).

LYM-3002 included 487 patients newly diagnosed with MCL who were ineligible, or not considered, for transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VR-CAP or R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).

The VR-CAP regimen significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, when compared to R-CHOP.

According to an independent review committee, there was a 59% improvement in PFS for the VR-CAP arm compared to the R-CHOP arm, with median PFS times of 24.7 months and 14.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.63; P<0.001).

Study investigators reported a 96% increase in PFS with VR-CAP compared to R-CHOP, with median PFS times of 30.7 months and 16.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.51, P<0.001).

VR-CAP was associated with additional, but manageable, toxicity when compared to R-CHOP. Serious adverse events (AE) were reported in 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. And grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 93% and 85%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 9% of patients in the VR-CAP arm and 7% in the R-CHOP arm. On-treatment, drug-related deaths occurred in 2% and 3%, respectively.

The CHMP’s positive opinion will be reviewed by the European Commission, which has the authority to grant a label extension for medicines in the European Economic Area. A final decision on the use of bortezomib in MCL is expected early next year.

Micrograph showing MCL

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the approval of bortezomib (Velcade) in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) to treat adults with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Bortezomib is already approved in the European Union to treat multiple myeloma, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment regimens.

The CHMP’s decision to expand the approved use of bortezomib is based on data from the phase 3 LYM-3002 study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8500).

LYM-3002 included 487 patients newly diagnosed with MCL who were ineligible, or not considered, for transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VR-CAP or R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).

The VR-CAP regimen significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, when compared to R-CHOP.

According to an independent review committee, there was a 59% improvement in PFS for the VR-CAP arm compared to the R-CHOP arm, with median PFS times of 24.7 months and 14.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.63; P<0.001).

Study investigators reported a 96% increase in PFS with VR-CAP compared to R-CHOP, with median PFS times of 30.7 months and 16.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.51, P<0.001).

VR-CAP was associated with additional, but manageable, toxicity when compared to R-CHOP. Serious adverse events (AE) were reported in 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. And grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 93% and 85%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 9% of patients in the VR-CAP arm and 7% in the R-CHOP arm. On-treatment, drug-related deaths occurred in 2% and 3%, respectively.

The CHMP’s positive opinion will be reviewed by the European Commission, which has the authority to grant a label extension for medicines in the European Economic Area. A final decision on the use of bortezomib in MCL is expected early next year.

Micrograph showing MCL

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has recommended the approval of bortezomib (Velcade) in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) to treat adults with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are unsuitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Bortezomib is already approved in the European Union to treat multiple myeloma, either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment regimens.

The CHMP’s decision to expand the approved use of bortezomib is based on data from the phase 3 LYM-3002 study. Results from this trial were presented at the 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 8500).

LYM-3002 included 487 patients newly diagnosed with MCL who were ineligible, or not considered, for transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VR-CAP or R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).

The VR-CAP regimen significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, when compared to R-CHOP.

According to an independent review committee, there was a 59% improvement in PFS for the VR-CAP arm compared to the R-CHOP arm, with median PFS times of 24.7 months and 14.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.63; P<0.001).

Study investigators reported a 96% increase in PFS with VR-CAP compared to R-CHOP, with median PFS times of 30.7 months and 16.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.51, P<0.001).

VR-CAP was associated with additional, but manageable, toxicity when compared to R-CHOP. Serious adverse events (AE) were reported in 38% and 30% of patients, respectively. And grade 3 or higher AEs were reported in 93% and 85%, respectively.

Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 9% of patients in the VR-CAP arm and 7% in the R-CHOP arm. On-treatment, drug-related deaths occurred in 2% and 3%, respectively.

The CHMP’s positive opinion will be reviewed by the European Commission, which has the authority to grant a label extension for medicines in the European Economic Area. A final decision on the use of bortezomib in MCL is expected early next year.

Attendees at ASH 2014

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two recent studies have shown combination therapy with brentuximab vedotin to be highly active in newly diagnosed patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and in relapsed or refractory patients after frontline therapy.

The first study evaluated brentuximab with ABVD or AVD and the second with bendamustine.

Objective response rates were 95% with ABVD, 96% with AVD, and 96% with bendamustine.

Both studies were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting, and both were sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., the company developing brentuximab vedotin.

Brentuximab with ABVD or AVD

Standard frontline therapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or AVD (the same regimen without bleomycin) fails to cure up to 30% of patients with HL.

So investigators decided to try a new approach to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity—combining brentuximab with standard therapy.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, presented long-term outcomes of the brentuximab-ABVD combination as abstract 292.*

Phase 1 dose-escalation study

The key initial study of the combination determined the maximum tolerated dose of brentuximab to be 1.2 mg/kg delivered on a 2-week schedule to match the other agents in the ABVD regimen. Brentuximab was delivered for up to 6 cycles.

Of the 50 patients treated, 75% were males with an ECOG status of 0 or 1. Their median age was 32.5 years (range, 18 to 59). Approximately 80% were stage III or IV.

“We learned several key lessons from that initial study,” Dr Connors said. “The first was that when one adds brentuximab vedotin to the full-dose combination ABVD, unacceptable levels of pulmonary toxicity occurred, with 44% of the patients eventually experiencing pulmonary toxicity, typically manifest between the third and sixth cycle of treatment.”

The toxicity resolved in 9 of the 11 patients, but was fatal in 2. The median time to resolution was 2.6 weeks.

Eight patients discontinued bleomycin but were able to complete treatment with AVD and brentuximab.

“When we dropped bleomycin from the combination and shifted to AVD without bleomycin, no patients experienced pulmonary toxicity,” Dr Connors added.

Ultimately, the combination produced a response rate of 95% with ABVD and 96% with AVD.

Long-term follow-up

Investigators then assessed the durability of the response and the time distribution of any relapses.

All but 1 patient was available for follow-up. Patients were followed for a median of 45 months in the ABVD arm and 36 months in the AVD arm.

In the ABVD arm, 22 of 24 patients are living, and all 26 patients in the AVD group are alive. Altogether, there have been 5 relapses—3 in the ABVD arm (occurring at 9, 22, and 23 months) and 2 in the AVD arm (occurring at 7 and 22 months).

The 3-year failure-free survival is 79% with ABVD and 92% with AVD.  And the 3-year overall survival is 92% in the ABVD arm and 100% in the AVD arm.

No deaths from HL have occurred, and all 5 relapsed patients have undergone autologous stem cell transplant. One of those has subsequently relapsed.

“So far,” Dr Connors said, “survival has been excellent.” And responses are durable.

“This has encouraged activation of the large, international trial,” Dr Connors said, comparing AVD plus brentuximab to standard ABVD in frontline treatment of HL.

Brentuximab with bendamustine

Brentuximab is also active as a single agent in relapsed/refractory HL, producing a 34% complete response (CR) rate. And the alkylating agent bendamustine produces a 33% CR rate in these patients. Furthermore, both agents have manageable safety profiles and different mechanisms of action.

Investigators therefore hypothesized that brentuximab in combination with bendamustine could induce more CRs in HL patients with relapsed or refractory disease after frontline therapy.

Ann LaCasce, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented the data at ASH as abstract 293.*

Ten patients were enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study to determine the optimal dose level of bendamustine and to assess safety and tolerability.

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. So the investigators used bendamustine at 90 mg/m² and brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 6) of combination therapy.

Patients had the option to proceed to an autologous stem cell transplant at any time after cycle 2 and could receive brentuximab monotherapy thereafter for up to 16 total doses.

The phase 2 expansion portion enrolled 44 patients and assessed the best response, duration of response, and progression-free survival.

Results

Patients were a median age of 37 years (range, 27 to 51), and 57% were male. Ninety-eight percent were ECOG status 0 or 1, and 54% had stage III or IV disease at diagnosis.

The majority of patients had received ABVD as frontline therapy, Dr LaCasce pointed out.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was infusion-related reactions, accounting for 96% of the events. Dyspnea (15%), chills (13%), and flushing (13%) were the most common symptoms, and hypotension requiring vasopressor support also occurred.

Most reactions occurred within 24 hours of the cycle 2 infusion and were considered related to both agents. However, delayed hypersensitivity reactions also occurred, Dr LaCasce said, the most common being rash in 14 patients up to 22 days after infusion.

“Based on the number of infusion-related reactions after 24 patients, the protocol was amended to require mandatory corticosteroids and anthistamine premedication,” Dr LaCasce explained. “[T]his resulted in a significant decrease in the severity of the infusion-related reactions.”

The best clinical response for the 48 evaluable patients was 83% CR and 13% partial remission, for an objective response rate of 96%.

The median progression-free survival has not yet been reached, and the combination has had no negative impact on stem cell mobilization or engraftment to date.

The response rate compares very favorably to historical data, Dr LaCasce said, and the combination represents a promising salvage regimen for HL patients.

*Data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Attendees at ASH 2014

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two recent studies have shown combination therapy with brentuximab vedotin to be highly active in newly diagnosed patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and in relapsed or refractory patients after frontline therapy.

The first study evaluated brentuximab with ABVD or AVD and the second with bendamustine.

Objective response rates were 95% with ABVD, 96% with AVD, and 96% with bendamustine.

Both studies were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting, and both were sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., the company developing brentuximab vedotin.

Brentuximab with ABVD or AVD

Standard frontline therapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or AVD (the same regimen without bleomycin) fails to cure up to 30% of patients with HL.

So investigators decided to try a new approach to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity—combining brentuximab with standard therapy.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, presented long-term outcomes of the brentuximab-ABVD combination as abstract 292.*

Phase 1 dose-escalation study

The key initial study of the combination determined the maximum tolerated dose of brentuximab to be 1.2 mg/kg delivered on a 2-week schedule to match the other agents in the ABVD regimen. Brentuximab was delivered for up to 6 cycles.

Of the 50 patients treated, 75% were males with an ECOG status of 0 or 1. Their median age was 32.5 years (range, 18 to 59). Approximately 80% were stage III or IV.

“We learned several key lessons from that initial study,” Dr Connors said. “The first was that when one adds brentuximab vedotin to the full-dose combination ABVD, unacceptable levels of pulmonary toxicity occurred, with 44% of the patients eventually experiencing pulmonary toxicity, typically manifest between the third and sixth cycle of treatment.”

The toxicity resolved in 9 of the 11 patients, but was fatal in 2. The median time to resolution was 2.6 weeks.

Eight patients discontinued bleomycin but were able to complete treatment with AVD and brentuximab.

“When we dropped bleomycin from the combination and shifted to AVD without bleomycin, no patients experienced pulmonary toxicity,” Dr Connors added.

Ultimately, the combination produced a response rate of 95% with ABVD and 96% with AVD.

Long-term follow-up

Investigators then assessed the durability of the response and the time distribution of any relapses.

All but 1 patient was available for follow-up. Patients were followed for a median of 45 months in the ABVD arm and 36 months in the AVD arm.

In the ABVD arm, 22 of 24 patients are living, and all 26 patients in the AVD group are alive. Altogether, there have been 5 relapses—3 in the ABVD arm (occurring at 9, 22, and 23 months) and 2 in the AVD arm (occurring at 7 and 22 months).

The 3-year failure-free survival is 79% with ABVD and 92% with AVD.  And the 3-year overall survival is 92% in the ABVD arm and 100% in the AVD arm.

No deaths from HL have occurred, and all 5 relapsed patients have undergone autologous stem cell transplant. One of those has subsequently relapsed.

“So far,” Dr Connors said, “survival has been excellent.” And responses are durable.

“This has encouraged activation of the large, international trial,” Dr Connors said, comparing AVD plus brentuximab to standard ABVD in frontline treatment of HL.

Brentuximab with bendamustine

Brentuximab is also active as a single agent in relapsed/refractory HL, producing a 34% complete response (CR) rate. And the alkylating agent bendamustine produces a 33% CR rate in these patients. Furthermore, both agents have manageable safety profiles and different mechanisms of action.

Investigators therefore hypothesized that brentuximab in combination with bendamustine could induce more CRs in HL patients with relapsed or refractory disease after frontline therapy.

Ann LaCasce, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented the data at ASH as abstract 293.*

Ten patients were enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study to determine the optimal dose level of bendamustine and to assess safety and tolerability.

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. So the investigators used bendamustine at 90 mg/m² and brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 6) of combination therapy.

Patients had the option to proceed to an autologous stem cell transplant at any time after cycle 2 and could receive brentuximab monotherapy thereafter for up to 16 total doses.

The phase 2 expansion portion enrolled 44 patients and assessed the best response, duration of response, and progression-free survival.

Results

Patients were a median age of 37 years (range, 27 to 51), and 57% were male. Ninety-eight percent were ECOG status 0 or 1, and 54% had stage III or IV disease at diagnosis.

The majority of patients had received ABVD as frontline therapy, Dr LaCasce pointed out.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was infusion-related reactions, accounting for 96% of the events. Dyspnea (15%), chills (13%), and flushing (13%) were the most common symptoms, and hypotension requiring vasopressor support also occurred.

Most reactions occurred within 24 hours of the cycle 2 infusion and were considered related to both agents. However, delayed hypersensitivity reactions also occurred, Dr LaCasce said, the most common being rash in 14 patients up to 22 days after infusion.

“Based on the number of infusion-related reactions after 24 patients, the protocol was amended to require mandatory corticosteroids and anthistamine premedication,” Dr LaCasce explained. “[T]his resulted in a significant decrease in the severity of the infusion-related reactions.”

The best clinical response for the 48 evaluable patients was 83% CR and 13% partial remission, for an objective response rate of 96%.

The median progression-free survival has not yet been reached, and the combination has had no negative impact on stem cell mobilization or engraftment to date.

The response rate compares very favorably to historical data, Dr LaCasce said, and the combination represents a promising salvage regimen for HL patients.

*Data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Attendees at ASH 2014

Photo courtesy of ASH

SAN FRANCISCO—Two recent studies have shown combination therapy with brentuximab vedotin to be highly active in newly diagnosed patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and in relapsed or refractory patients after frontline therapy.

The first study evaluated brentuximab with ABVD or AVD and the second with bendamustine.

Objective response rates were 95% with ABVD, 96% with AVD, and 96% with bendamustine.

Both studies were presented at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting, and both were sponsored by Seattle Genetics, Inc., the company developing brentuximab vedotin.

Brentuximab with ABVD or AVD

Standard frontline therapy with ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or AVD (the same regimen without bleomycin) fails to cure up to 30% of patients with HL.

So investigators decided to try a new approach to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity—combining brentuximab with standard therapy.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, of the BC Cancer Agency and University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, presented long-term outcomes of the brentuximab-ABVD combination as abstract 292.*

Phase 1 dose-escalation study

The key initial study of the combination determined the maximum tolerated dose of brentuximab to be 1.2 mg/kg delivered on a 2-week schedule to match the other agents in the ABVD regimen. Brentuximab was delivered for up to 6 cycles.

Of the 50 patients treated, 75% were males with an ECOG status of 0 or 1. Their median age was 32.5 years (range, 18 to 59). Approximately 80% were stage III or IV.

“We learned several key lessons from that initial study,” Dr Connors said. “The first was that when one adds brentuximab vedotin to the full-dose combination ABVD, unacceptable levels of pulmonary toxicity occurred, with 44% of the patients eventually experiencing pulmonary toxicity, typically manifest between the third and sixth cycle of treatment.”

The toxicity resolved in 9 of the 11 patients, but was fatal in 2. The median time to resolution was 2.6 weeks.

Eight patients discontinued bleomycin but were able to complete treatment with AVD and brentuximab.

“When we dropped bleomycin from the combination and shifted to AVD without bleomycin, no patients experienced pulmonary toxicity,” Dr Connors added.

Ultimately, the combination produced a response rate of 95% with ABVD and 96% with AVD.

Long-term follow-up

Investigators then assessed the durability of the response and the time distribution of any relapses.

All but 1 patient was available for follow-up. Patients were followed for a median of 45 months in the ABVD arm and 36 months in the AVD arm.

In the ABVD arm, 22 of 24 patients are living, and all 26 patients in the AVD group are alive. Altogether, there have been 5 relapses—3 in the ABVD arm (occurring at 9, 22, and 23 months) and 2 in the AVD arm (occurring at 7 and 22 months).

The 3-year failure-free survival is 79% with ABVD and 92% with AVD.  And the 3-year overall survival is 92% in the ABVD arm and 100% in the AVD arm.

No deaths from HL have occurred, and all 5 relapsed patients have undergone autologous stem cell transplant. One of those has subsequently relapsed.

“So far,” Dr Connors said, “survival has been excellent.” And responses are durable.

“This has encouraged activation of the large, international trial,” Dr Connors said, comparing AVD plus brentuximab to standard ABVD in frontline treatment of HL.

Brentuximab with bendamustine

Brentuximab is also active as a single agent in relapsed/refractory HL, producing a 34% complete response (CR) rate. And the alkylating agent bendamustine produces a 33% CR rate in these patients. Furthermore, both agents have manageable safety profiles and different mechanisms of action.

Investigators therefore hypothesized that brentuximab in combination with bendamustine could induce more CRs in HL patients with relapsed or refractory disease after frontline therapy.

Ann LaCasce, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, presented the data at ASH as abstract 293.*

Ten patients were enrolled in the phase 1 portion of the study to determine the optimal dose level of bendamustine and to assess safety and tolerability.

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. So the investigators used bendamustine at 90 mg/m² and brentuximab at 1.8 mg/kg. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 6) of combination therapy.

Patients had the option to proceed to an autologous stem cell transplant at any time after cycle 2 and could receive brentuximab monotherapy thereafter for up to 16 total doses.

The phase 2 expansion portion enrolled 44 patients and assessed the best response, duration of response, and progression-free survival.

Results

Patients were a median age of 37 years (range, 27 to 51), and 57% were male. Ninety-eight percent were ECOG status 0 or 1, and 54% had stage III or IV disease at diagnosis.

The majority of patients had received ABVD as frontline therapy, Dr LaCasce pointed out.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was infusion-related reactions, accounting for 96% of the events. Dyspnea (15%), chills (13%), and flushing (13%) were the most common symptoms, and hypotension requiring vasopressor support also occurred.

Most reactions occurred within 24 hours of the cycle 2 infusion and were considered related to both agents. However, delayed hypersensitivity reactions also occurred, Dr LaCasce said, the most common being rash in 14 patients up to 22 days after infusion.

“Based on the number of infusion-related reactions after 24 patients, the protocol was amended to require mandatory corticosteroids and anthistamine premedication,” Dr LaCasce explained. “[T]his resulted in a significant decrease in the severity of the infusion-related reactions.”

The best clinical response for the 48 evaluable patients was 83% CR and 13% partial remission, for an objective response rate of 96%.

The median progression-free survival has not yet been reached, and the combination has had no negative impact on stem cell mobilization or engraftment to date.

The response rate compares very favorably to historical data, Dr LaCasce said, and the combination represents a promising salvage regimen for HL patients.

*Data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

A study of lymphoma patients receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy showed that use of the antiviral drug entecavir resulted in a lower incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis and HBV reactivation, when compared with the drug lamivudine.

HBV reactivation is a well-documented complication of chemotherapy that can result in life-threatening liver failure, as well as delays in chemotherapy or

premature termination of treatment.

However, researchers have not identified an optimal approach to prevent HBV reactivation.

So He Huang, MD, of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and colleagues set out to do that. They reported their findings in JAMA alongside a related editorial.

The team enrolled 121 patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were receiving chemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen.

Patients were randomized to receive entecavir (n=61) or lamivudine (n=60). They began taking these drugs 1 week before the initiation of R-CHOP and continued until 6 months after they completed chemotherapy.

The study was conducted from February 2008 through December 2012 at 10 medical centers in China. This trial was a substudy of a parent study designed to compare a 3-week R-CHOP regimen with a 2-week R-CHOP regimen.

Results showed that, compared to the lamivudine group, patients in the entecavir group had significantly lower rates of hepatitis (8.2% vs 23.3%, P=0.02), HBV-related hepatitis (0% vs 13.3%, P=0.003), HBV reactivation (6.6% vs 30%, P=0.001), delayed hepatitis B (0% vs 8.3%, P=0.03), and chemotherapy disruption (1.6% vs 18.3%, P=0.002).

The rate of treatment-related adverse events was not significantly different between the groups. Such events occurred in 24.6% of patients in the entecavir group and 30.0% of patients in the lamivudine group (P=0.50).

The researchers noted that entecavir is more expensive than lamivudine, so additional studies are needed to determine whether all patients who are seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen and are receiving rituximab-based immunosuppressive therapy should be given entecavir.

Additional studies could also help pinpoint which patients will benefit most from entecavir prophylaxis. However, if these findings are replicated, they support the use of entecavir in these patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

A study of lymphoma patients receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy showed that use of the antiviral drug entecavir resulted in a lower incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis and HBV reactivation, when compared with the drug lamivudine.

HBV reactivation is a well-documented complication of chemotherapy that can result in life-threatening liver failure, as well as delays in chemotherapy or

premature termination of treatment.

However, researchers have not identified an optimal approach to prevent HBV reactivation.

So He Huang, MD, of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and colleagues set out to do that. They reported their findings in JAMA alongside a related editorial.

The team enrolled 121 patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were receiving chemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen.

Patients were randomized to receive entecavir (n=61) or lamivudine (n=60). They began taking these drugs 1 week before the initiation of R-CHOP and continued until 6 months after they completed chemotherapy.

The study was conducted from February 2008 through December 2012 at 10 medical centers in China. This trial was a substudy of a parent study designed to compare a 3-week R-CHOP regimen with a 2-week R-CHOP regimen.

Results showed that, compared to the lamivudine group, patients in the entecavir group had significantly lower rates of hepatitis (8.2% vs 23.3%, P=0.02), HBV-related hepatitis (0% vs 13.3%, P=0.003), HBV reactivation (6.6% vs 30%, P=0.001), delayed hepatitis B (0% vs 8.3%, P=0.03), and chemotherapy disruption (1.6% vs 18.3%, P=0.002).

The rate of treatment-related adverse events was not significantly different between the groups. Such events occurred in 24.6% of patients in the entecavir group and 30.0% of patients in the lamivudine group (P=0.50).

The researchers noted that entecavir is more expensive than lamivudine, so additional studies are needed to determine whether all patients who are seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen and are receiving rituximab-based immunosuppressive therapy should be given entecavir.

Additional studies could also help pinpoint which patients will benefit most from entecavir prophylaxis. However, if these findings are replicated, they support the use of entecavir in these patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

A study of lymphoma patients receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy showed that use of the antiviral drug entecavir resulted in a lower incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatitis and HBV reactivation, when compared with the drug lamivudine.

HBV reactivation is a well-documented complication of chemotherapy that can result in life-threatening liver failure, as well as delays in chemotherapy or

premature termination of treatment.

However, researchers have not identified an optimal approach to prevent HBV reactivation.

So He Huang, MD, of the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and colleagues set out to do that. They reported their findings in JAMA alongside a related editorial.

The team enrolled 121 patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were receiving chemotherapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and were seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen.

Patients were randomized to receive entecavir (n=61) or lamivudine (n=60). They began taking these drugs 1 week before the initiation of R-CHOP and continued until 6 months after they completed chemotherapy.

The study was conducted from February 2008 through December 2012 at 10 medical centers in China. This trial was a substudy of a parent study designed to compare a 3-week R-CHOP regimen with a 2-week R-CHOP regimen.

Results showed that, compared to the lamivudine group, patients in the entecavir group had significantly lower rates of hepatitis (8.2% vs 23.3%, P=0.02), HBV-related hepatitis (0% vs 13.3%, P=0.003), HBV reactivation (6.6% vs 30%, P=0.001), delayed hepatitis B (0% vs 8.3%, P=0.03), and chemotherapy disruption (1.6% vs 18.3%, P=0.002).

The rate of treatment-related adverse events was not significantly different between the groups. Such events occurred in 24.6% of patients in the entecavir group and 30.0% of patients in the lamivudine group (P=0.50).

The researchers noted that entecavir is more expensive than lamivudine, so additional studies are needed to determine whether all patients who are seropositive for the hepatitis B surface antigen and are receiving rituximab-based immunosuppressive therapy should be given entecavir.

Additional studies could also help pinpoint which patients will benefit most from entecavir prophylaxis. However, if these findings are replicated, they support the use of entecavir in these patients.

Donald Metcalf, MD

Photo courtesy of The Walter

and Eliza Hall Institute

of Medical Research

Donald Metcalf, MD, an Australian researcher who has been called “the father of hematopoietic cytokines,” has died at the age of 85.

Dr Metcalf’s studies of blood production led to his speculation that there must be a biological mechanism—one or more hormones—that control white blood cell production.

These substances, which he termed colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), were the focus of more than 50 years of research.

Over this time, Dr Metcalf led researchers to characterize and purify 4 separate CSFs—granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), macrophage CSF (M-CSF), and multi-CSF (now called interleukin-3).

Dr Metcalf recognized that CSFs had a potential role in clinical medicine, and his team was among the first in the world to discover the genes for CSFs.

Dr Metcalf was a central figure in the international clinical trials of CSFs in the 1980s, assessing whether CSFs could boost immune cell numbers in cancer patients whose immune system was weakened as a side effect of chemotherapy. On the basis of these studies, G-CSF (Neupogen) was approved for clinical use in 1991.

Now, an estimated 20 million people have been treated with CSFs. As well as boosting the immune system in patients who receive chemotherapy or have other immune deficiencies, CSFs are thought to have revolutionized hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

A man with many achievements

Dr Metcalf was born in 1929 and started school at the age of 3, by which time he was already reading. He entered university at the age of 16, ultimately obtaining bachelor’s and medical degrees from the University of Sydney.

After an internship at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Dr Metcalf joined the staff of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI) in Melbourne in 1954. He was supported by Cancer Council Victoria’s Carden Fellowship, an award he held until his retirement in 2014. (Dr Metcalf officially retired in 1996 but continued to do research until 2014.)

Dr Metcalf spent his early years at WEHI studying vaccinia virus. In 1965, he began studying blood cell formation and, by association, leukemia. In 1966, he became deputy director of WEHI and the head of its Cancer Research Unit.

Dr Metcalf took several sabbaticals from WEHI, serving as a visiting scientist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts; the Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo, New York; the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research in Lausanne, Switzerland; the Radiobiological Institute in Rijswijk, The Netherlands; and the University of Cambridge in the UK.

Among Dr Metcalf’s many honors and awards are the Companion of the Order of Australia (1993), the Albert Lasker Award for Clinical Medical Research (1993), the Gairdner Foundation International Award (1994), the Royal Medal of the Royal Society (1995), the Victoria Prize (2000), and the Prime Minister’s Prize for Science (2001).

Dr Metcalf is survived by his wife Jo; daughters Kate, Johanna, Penelope, and Mary-Ann; grandchildren James, Martin, Patrick, Elizabeth, Rose, and Robert; and their extended families.

Donald Metcalf, MD

Photo courtesy of The Walter

and Eliza Hall Institute

of Medical Research

Donald Metcalf, MD, an Australian researcher who has been called “the father of hematopoietic cytokines,” has died at the age of 85.

Dr Metcalf’s studies of blood production led to his speculation that there must be a biological mechanism—one or more hormones—that control white blood cell production.

These substances, which he termed colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), were the focus of more than 50 years of research.

Over this time, Dr Metcalf led researchers to characterize and purify 4 separate CSFs—granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), macrophage CSF (M-CSF), and multi-CSF (now called interleukin-3).

Dr Metcalf recognized that CSFs had a potential role in clinical medicine, and his team was among the first in the world to discover the genes for CSFs.

Dr Metcalf was a central figure in the international clinical trials of CSFs in the 1980s, assessing whether CSFs could boost immune cell numbers in cancer patients whose immune system was weakened as a side effect of chemotherapy. On the basis of these studies, G-CSF (Neupogen) was approved for clinical use in 1991.

Now, an estimated 20 million people have been treated with CSFs. As well as boosting the immune system in patients who receive chemotherapy or have other immune deficiencies, CSFs are thought to have revolutionized hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

A man with many achievements

Dr Metcalf was born in 1929 and started school at the age of 3, by which time he was already reading. He entered university at the age of 16, ultimately obtaining bachelor’s and medical degrees from the University of Sydney.

After an internship at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Dr Metcalf joined the staff of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI) in Melbourne in 1954. He was supported by Cancer Council Victoria’s Carden Fellowship, an award he held until his retirement in 2014. (Dr Metcalf officially retired in 1996 but continued to do research until 2014.)

Dr Metcalf spent his early years at WEHI studying vaccinia virus. In 1965, he began studying blood cell formation and, by association, leukemia. In 1966, he became deputy director of WEHI and the head of its Cancer Research Unit.

Dr Metcalf took several sabbaticals from WEHI, serving as a visiting scientist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts; the Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo, New York; the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research in Lausanne, Switzerland; the Radiobiological Institute in Rijswijk, The Netherlands; and the University of Cambridge in the UK.

Among Dr Metcalf’s many honors and awards are the Companion of the Order of Australia (1993), the Albert Lasker Award for Clinical Medical Research (1993), the Gairdner Foundation International Award (1994), the Royal Medal of the Royal Society (1995), the Victoria Prize (2000), and the Prime Minister’s Prize for Science (2001).

Dr Metcalf is survived by his wife Jo; daughters Kate, Johanna, Penelope, and Mary-Ann; grandchildren James, Martin, Patrick, Elizabeth, Rose, and Robert; and their extended families.

Donald Metcalf, MD

Photo courtesy of The Walter

and Eliza Hall Institute

of Medical Research

Donald Metcalf, MD, an Australian researcher who has been called “the father of hematopoietic cytokines,” has died at the age of 85.

Dr Metcalf’s studies of blood production led to his speculation that there must be a biological mechanism—one or more hormones—that control white blood cell production.

These substances, which he termed colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), were the focus of more than 50 years of research.

Over this time, Dr Metcalf led researchers to characterize and purify 4 separate CSFs—granulocyte CSF (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), macrophage CSF (M-CSF), and multi-CSF (now called interleukin-3).

Dr Metcalf recognized that CSFs had a potential role in clinical medicine, and his team was among the first in the world to discover the genes for CSFs.

Dr Metcalf was a central figure in the international clinical trials of CSFs in the 1980s, assessing whether CSFs could boost immune cell numbers in cancer patients whose immune system was weakened as a side effect of chemotherapy. On the basis of these studies, G-CSF (Neupogen) was approved for clinical use in 1991.

Now, an estimated 20 million people have been treated with CSFs. As well as boosting the immune system in patients who receive chemotherapy or have other immune deficiencies, CSFs are thought to have revolutionized hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

A man with many achievements

Dr Metcalf was born in 1929 and started school at the age of 3, by which time he was already reading. He entered university at the age of 16, ultimately obtaining bachelor’s and medical degrees from the University of Sydney.

After an internship at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Dr Metcalf joined the staff of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (WEHI) in Melbourne in 1954. He was supported by Cancer Council Victoria’s Carden Fellowship, an award he held until his retirement in 2014. (Dr Metcalf officially retired in 1996 but continued to do research until 2014.)

Dr Metcalf spent his early years at WEHI studying vaccinia virus. In 1965, he began studying blood cell formation and, by association, leukemia. In 1966, he became deputy director of WEHI and the head of its Cancer Research Unit.

Dr Metcalf took several sabbaticals from WEHI, serving as a visiting scientist at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts; the Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo, New York; the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research in Lausanne, Switzerland; the Radiobiological Institute in Rijswijk, The Netherlands; and the University of Cambridge in the UK.

Among Dr Metcalf’s many honors and awards are the Companion of the Order of Australia (1993), the Albert Lasker Award for Clinical Medical Research (1993), the Gairdner Foundation International Award (1994), the Royal Medal of the Royal Society (1995), the Victoria Prize (2000), and the Prime Minister’s Prize for Science (2001).

Dr Metcalf is survived by his wife Jo; daughters Kate, Johanna, Penelope, and Mary-Ann; grandchildren James, Martin, Patrick, Elizabeth, Rose, and Robert; and their extended families.

Genetically modified zebrafish

Investigators have identified compounds that appear to prevent the cardiac damage caused by the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin.

The compounds target MDH2, an enzyme key to the generation of cellular energy in mitochondria.

And preclinical experiments showed that inhibiting MDH2 could prevent doxorubicin-induced damage to cardiac cells without reducing the drug’s antitumor effects.

The investigators detailed these experiments in Science Translational Medicine.

“Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy limits the amount of the drug a patient can receive—which limits the ability to treat cancer—and even low, safer doses can lead to heart failure in up to 8% of patients,” explained study author Randall Peterson, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Charlestown.

“Finding an effective cardioprotective drug—essentially separating the good and bad effects of this form of chemotherapy—could increase the beneficial effects of doxorubicin against cancer while reducing the rate of heart failure in treated patients.”

To conduct a broad search for potential protective compounds, Dr Peterson and his colleagues developed a zebrafish model of doxorubicin-induced heart failure. They used this model to screen 3000 molecules from 2 chemical libraries for the ability to prevent the kind of cardiac damage caused by the drug.

Eight of the tested chemicals reduced damage to the hearts of zebrafish embryos, and two compounds—visnagin and diphenylurea—were the most potent in preventing both structural and functional damage.

Further in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed that either compound almost completely prevented the death of cardiac cells caused by doxorubicin. In mouse models of both high- and low-dose doxorubicin treatment, visnagin—a natural compound synthesized by the toothpick weed—was able to maintain cardiac function.

Investigation into the possible mechanism behind visnagin’s protective ability showed that the compound binds to and inhibits the action of MDH2, an enzyme essential to the generation of cellular energy by mitochondria.

Other agents that block MDH2 activity also protected zebrafish against doxorubicin-induced cardiac damage. And tests in both cellular and animal models of several types of cancer showed that neither visnagin nor diphenylurea reduced the antitumor action of doxorubicin.

“We are still trying to determine exactly how inhibition of MDH2 protects the heart, but one intriguing idea is that doxorubicin may kill cardiac and tumor cells in different ways,” Dr Peterson said. “Given the intense energy requirements of the beating heart, we speculate that cardiac cells may be especially susceptible to metabolic disturbance caused by doxorubicin and that inhibiting MDH2 may correct the metabolic imbalance and prevent the cells from dying.”

“It remains to be seen if visnagin’s protective effects are restricted to doxorubicin or if it can protect the heart from other kinds of damage. We are pursuing this question by testing its ability to protect heart muscle from oxygen deprivation during heart attacks and from the effects of other heart-damaging chemotherapy drugs.”

Genetically modified zebrafish

Investigators have identified compounds that appear to prevent the cardiac damage caused by the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin.

The compounds target MDH2, an enzyme key to the generation of cellular energy in mitochondria.

And preclinical experiments showed that inhibiting MDH2 could prevent doxorubicin-induced damage to cardiac cells without reducing the drug’s antitumor effects.

The investigators detailed these experiments in Science Translational Medicine.

“Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy limits the amount of the drug a patient can receive—which limits the ability to treat cancer—and even low, safer doses can lead to heart failure in up to 8% of patients,” explained study author Randall Peterson, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Charlestown.

“Finding an effective cardioprotective drug—essentially separating the good and bad effects of this form of chemotherapy—could increase the beneficial effects of doxorubicin against cancer while reducing the rate of heart failure in treated patients.”

To conduct a broad search for potential protective compounds, Dr Peterson and his colleagues developed a zebrafish model of doxorubicin-induced heart failure. They used this model to screen 3000 molecules from 2 chemical libraries for the ability to prevent the kind of cardiac damage caused by the drug.

Eight of the tested chemicals reduced damage to the hearts of zebrafish embryos, and two compounds—visnagin and diphenylurea—were the most potent in preventing both structural and functional damage.

Further in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed that either compound almost completely prevented the death of cardiac cells caused by doxorubicin. In mouse models of both high- and low-dose doxorubicin treatment, visnagin—a natural compound synthesized by the toothpick weed—was able to maintain cardiac function.

Investigation into the possible mechanism behind visnagin’s protective ability showed that the compound binds to and inhibits the action of MDH2, an enzyme essential to the generation of cellular energy by mitochondria.

Other agents that block MDH2 activity also protected zebrafish against doxorubicin-induced cardiac damage. And tests in both cellular and animal models of several types of cancer showed that neither visnagin nor diphenylurea reduced the antitumor action of doxorubicin.

“We are still trying to determine exactly how inhibition of MDH2 protects the heart, but one intriguing idea is that doxorubicin may kill cardiac and tumor cells in different ways,” Dr Peterson said. “Given the intense energy requirements of the beating heart, we speculate that cardiac cells may be especially susceptible to metabolic disturbance caused by doxorubicin and that inhibiting MDH2 may correct the metabolic imbalance and prevent the cells from dying.”

“It remains to be seen if visnagin’s protective effects are restricted to doxorubicin or if it can protect the heart from other kinds of damage. We are pursuing this question by testing its ability to protect heart muscle from oxygen deprivation during heart attacks and from the effects of other heart-damaging chemotherapy drugs.”

Genetically modified zebrafish

Investigators have identified compounds that appear to prevent the cardiac damage caused by the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin.

The compounds target MDH2, an enzyme key to the generation of cellular energy in mitochondria.

And preclinical experiments showed that inhibiting MDH2 could prevent doxorubicin-induced damage to cardiac cells without reducing the drug’s antitumor effects.

The investigators detailed these experiments in Science Translational Medicine.

“Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy limits the amount of the drug a patient can receive—which limits the ability to treat cancer—and even low, safer doses can lead to heart failure in up to 8% of patients,” explained study author Randall Peterson, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Charlestown.

“Finding an effective cardioprotective drug—essentially separating the good and bad effects of this form of chemotherapy—could increase the beneficial effects of doxorubicin against cancer while reducing the rate of heart failure in treated patients.”

To conduct a broad search for potential protective compounds, Dr Peterson and his colleagues developed a zebrafish model of doxorubicin-induced heart failure. They used this model to screen 3000 molecules from 2 chemical libraries for the ability to prevent the kind of cardiac damage caused by the drug.

Eight of the tested chemicals reduced damage to the hearts of zebrafish embryos, and two compounds—visnagin and diphenylurea—were the most potent in preventing both structural and functional damage.

Further in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed that either compound almost completely prevented the death of cardiac cells caused by doxorubicin. In mouse models of both high- and low-dose doxorubicin treatment, visnagin—a natural compound synthesized by the toothpick weed—was able to maintain cardiac function.

Investigation into the possible mechanism behind visnagin’s protective ability showed that the compound binds to and inhibits the action of MDH2, an enzyme essential to the generation of cellular energy by mitochondria.

Other agents that block MDH2 activity also protected zebrafish against doxorubicin-induced cardiac damage. And tests in both cellular and animal models of several types of cancer showed that neither visnagin nor diphenylurea reduced the antitumor action of doxorubicin.

“We are still trying to determine exactly how inhibition of MDH2 protects the heart, but one intriguing idea is that doxorubicin may kill cardiac and tumor cells in different ways,” Dr Peterson said. “Given the intense energy requirements of the beating heart, we speculate that cardiac cells may be especially susceptible to metabolic disturbance caused by doxorubicin and that inhibiting MDH2 may correct the metabolic imbalance and prevent the cells from dying.”

“It remains to be seen if visnagin’s protective effects are restricted to doxorubicin or if it can protect the heart from other kinds of damage. We are pursuing this question by testing its ability to protect heart muscle from oxygen deprivation during heart attacks and from the effects of other heart-damaging chemotherapy drugs.”

SAN FRANCISCO—The anti-CD19 antibody M0R208 has demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a presenter at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

“It is encouraging to see results in an NHL study that selects a different target than CD20,” said Kristie Blum, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

“In particular, it is good to see activity in elderly large-cell lymphoma patients.”

MOR208 is an Fc-engineered humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD19 antigen.

“It possesses significantly enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, a key mechanism for tumor cell killing,” Dr Blum explained. “We have seen previous responses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).”

In fact, MOR208 recently received fast-track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration to treat DLBCL.

At ASH, Dr Blum reported on a non-randomized, phase 2a study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent MOR208 in adults with relapsed or refractory NHL (abstract 3089). The trial was sponsored by MorphoSys AG, the company developing MOR208.

The study included 89 patients—35 with DLBCL, 31 with FL, 12 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 11 with other indolent NHLs (iNHLs). The patients had a median age of 67 years, were previously treated with rituximab, and were not candidates for high-dose therapy with stem cell support.

The patients were treated over 56 days. MOR208 was given intravenously at 12 mg/kg as 8 weekly doses on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Patients with at least stable disease continued treatment for another cycle.

After completing 12 weekly doses of treatment, responding patients received maintenance MOR208 every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the investigator’s decision, until progression.

The results showed overall response rates of 26% for DLBCL patients, 23% for FL patients, and 36% in iNHL patients. No MCL patients responded.

There were 2 complete responses in the DLBCL cohort and 1 complete response each in the FL and iNHL cohorts. Response duration reached 13.8 months.

The drug was well-tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile, Dr Blum said. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia, all at 9%.

Infusion-related reactions were reported in 9% of patients and were typically grade 1 or 2. There have been no treatment-related deaths.

Protocols are being developed for trials that combine MOR208 with other anti-lymphoma therapies, with plans to open phase 1/2 trials by mid-2015.

“We plan to take the drug forward in combination with bendamustine or lenalidomide plus rituximab,” Dr Blum said. “By adding the drug into a bendamustine-rituximab combination, we will hit 2 different targets and may see synergistic cell killing.”

SAN FRANCISCO—The anti-CD19 antibody M0R208 has demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a presenter at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

“It is encouraging to see results in an NHL study that selects a different target than CD20,” said Kristie Blum, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

“In particular, it is good to see activity in elderly large-cell lymphoma patients.”

MOR208 is an Fc-engineered humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD19 antigen.

“It possesses significantly enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, a key mechanism for tumor cell killing,” Dr Blum explained. “We have seen previous responses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).”

In fact, MOR208 recently received fast-track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration to treat DLBCL.

At ASH, Dr Blum reported on a non-randomized, phase 2a study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent MOR208 in adults with relapsed or refractory NHL (abstract 3089). The trial was sponsored by MorphoSys AG, the company developing MOR208.

The study included 89 patients—35 with DLBCL, 31 with FL, 12 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 11 with other indolent NHLs (iNHLs). The patients had a median age of 67 years, were previously treated with rituximab, and were not candidates for high-dose therapy with stem cell support.

The patients were treated over 56 days. MOR208 was given intravenously at 12 mg/kg as 8 weekly doses on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Patients with at least stable disease continued treatment for another cycle.

After completing 12 weekly doses of treatment, responding patients received maintenance MOR208 every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the investigator’s decision, until progression.

The results showed overall response rates of 26% for DLBCL patients, 23% for FL patients, and 36% in iNHL patients. No MCL patients responded.

There were 2 complete responses in the DLBCL cohort and 1 complete response each in the FL and iNHL cohorts. Response duration reached 13.8 months.

The drug was well-tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile, Dr Blum said. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia, all at 9%.

Infusion-related reactions were reported in 9% of patients and were typically grade 1 or 2. There have been no treatment-related deaths.

Protocols are being developed for trials that combine MOR208 with other anti-lymphoma therapies, with plans to open phase 1/2 trials by mid-2015.

“We plan to take the drug forward in combination with bendamustine or lenalidomide plus rituximab,” Dr Blum said. “By adding the drug into a bendamustine-rituximab combination, we will hit 2 different targets and may see synergistic cell killing.”

SAN FRANCISCO—The anti-CD19 antibody M0R208 has demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to a presenter at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

“It is encouraging to see results in an NHL study that selects a different target than CD20,” said Kristie Blum, MD, of The Ohio State University in Columbus.

“In particular, it is good to see activity in elderly large-cell lymphoma patients.”

MOR208 is an Fc-engineered humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the CD19 antigen.

“It possesses significantly enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, a key mechanism for tumor cell killing,” Dr Blum explained. “We have seen previous responses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).”

In fact, MOR208 recently received fast-track designation from the US Food and Drug Administration to treat DLBCL.

At ASH, Dr Blum reported on a non-randomized, phase 2a study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent MOR208 in adults with relapsed or refractory NHL (abstract 3089). The trial was sponsored by MorphoSys AG, the company developing MOR208.

The study included 89 patients—35 with DLBCL, 31 with FL, 12 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 11 with other indolent NHLs (iNHLs). The patients had a median age of 67 years, were previously treated with rituximab, and were not candidates for high-dose therapy with stem cell support.

The patients were treated over 56 days. MOR208 was given intravenously at 12 mg/kg as 8 weekly doses on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. Patients with at least stable disease continued treatment for another cycle.

After completing 12 weekly doses of treatment, responding patients received maintenance MOR208 every 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the investigator’s decision, until progression.

The results showed overall response rates of 26% for DLBCL patients, 23% for FL patients, and 36% in iNHL patients. No MCL patients responded.

There were 2 complete responses in the DLBCL cohort and 1 complete response each in the FL and iNHL cohorts. Response duration reached 13.8 months.

The drug was well-tolerated with an acceptable toxicity profile, Dr Blum said. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia, all at 9%.

Infusion-related reactions were reported in 9% of patients and were typically grade 1 or 2. There have been no treatment-related deaths.

Protocols are being developed for trials that combine MOR208 with other anti-lymphoma therapies, with plans to open phase 1/2 trials by mid-2015.

“We plan to take the drug forward in combination with bendamustine or lenalidomide plus rituximab,” Dr Blum said. “By adding the drug into a bendamustine-rituximab combination, we will hit 2 different targets and may see synergistic cell killing.”

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved denosumab (XGEVA) to treat hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) that is refractory to bisphosphonate therapy.

HCM results from cancer-driven increases in bone resorption. If left untreated, the condition can lead to renal failure, progressive mental impairment, coma, and death.

Denosumab works by binding to RANK ligand, a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts.

The drug prevents RANK ligand from activating its receptor, RANK, on the surface of osteoclasts, thereby decreasing bone destruction and calcium release.

Denosumab previously received FDA approval to treat giant cell tumor of the bone and for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

The FDA’s approval of denosumab for HCM is based on positive results from an open-label, single-arm study, which enrolled 33 patients with advanced cancer and persistent hypercalcemia after recent bisphosphonate treatment.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a response, defined as albumin-corrected serum calcium (CSC) < 11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L; adverse events grade < 1) within 10 days of the first dose of denosumab.

Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who experienced a complete response (defined as CSC < 10.8 mg/dL [2.7 mmol/L]) by day 10, time to response, and response duration (defined as the number of days from the first occurrence of CSC < 11.5 mg/dL).

The primary endpoint was met. At day 10, the response rate was 63.6%. Likewise, the overall complete response rate was 63.6%. The estimated median time to response was 9 days, and the median duration of response was 104 days.

The most common adverse events were nausea, dyspnea, decreased appetite, headache, peripheral edema, vomiting, anemia, constipation, and diarrhea.

Potential safety risks

Patients with HCM should receive 120 mg of denosumab as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with additional doses of 120 mg on days 8 and 15 of the first month of therapy.

Pre-existing hypocalcemia must be corrected prior to initiating denosumab therapy. The drug can cause severe, symptomatic hypocalcemia, and fatal cases have been reported.

Physicians should monitor patients’ calcium levels and administer calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D as necessary. Levels should be monitored more frequently when denosumab is given with other drugs that can lower calcium levels. Patients should be advised to contact a healthcare professional if they experience symptoms of hypocalcemia.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw can occur in patients receiving denosumab. Patients who are suspected of having or who develop osteonecrosis of the jaw while on treatment should receive care by a dentist or an oral surgeon.

Atypical femoral fracture has been reported with denosumab, so patients should be advised to report new or unusual thigh, hip, or groin pain. Patients presenting with an atypical femur fracture should be assessed for signs of fracture in the contralateral limb. Physicians should consider interrupting denosumab pending a risk/benefit assessment.

Denosumab can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Physicians should advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during therapy and for at least 5 months after the last dose of denosumab.

Amgen, the company developing denosumab, markets the drug as both XGEVA and Prolia (for different indications). Patients receiving XGEVA should not take Prolia.

For more information on denosumab (XGEVA), visit www.xgeva.com.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved denosumab (XGEVA) to treat hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) that is refractory to bisphosphonate therapy.

HCM results from cancer-driven increases in bone resorption. If left untreated, the condition can lead to renal failure, progressive mental impairment, coma, and death.

Denosumab works by binding to RANK ligand, a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts.

The drug prevents RANK ligand from activating its receptor, RANK, on the surface of osteoclasts, thereby decreasing bone destruction and calcium release.

Denosumab previously received FDA approval to treat giant cell tumor of the bone and for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

The FDA’s approval of denosumab for HCM is based on positive results from an open-label, single-arm study, which enrolled 33 patients with advanced cancer and persistent hypercalcemia after recent bisphosphonate treatment.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a response, defined as albumin-corrected serum calcium (CSC) < 11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L; adverse events grade < 1) within 10 days of the first dose of denosumab.

Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who experienced a complete response (defined as CSC < 10.8 mg/dL [2.7 mmol/L]) by day 10, time to response, and response duration (defined as the number of days from the first occurrence of CSC < 11.5 mg/dL).

The primary endpoint was met. At day 10, the response rate was 63.6%. Likewise, the overall complete response rate was 63.6%. The estimated median time to response was 9 days, and the median duration of response was 104 days.

The most common adverse events were nausea, dyspnea, decreased appetite, headache, peripheral edema, vomiting, anemia, constipation, and diarrhea.

Potential safety risks

Patients with HCM should receive 120 mg of denosumab as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with additional doses of 120 mg on days 8 and 15 of the first month of therapy.

Pre-existing hypocalcemia must be corrected prior to initiating denosumab therapy. The drug can cause severe, symptomatic hypocalcemia, and fatal cases have been reported.

Physicians should monitor patients’ calcium levels and administer calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D as necessary. Levels should be monitored more frequently when denosumab is given with other drugs that can lower calcium levels. Patients should be advised to contact a healthcare professional if they experience symptoms of hypocalcemia.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw can occur in patients receiving denosumab. Patients who are suspected of having or who develop osteonecrosis of the jaw while on treatment should receive care by a dentist or an oral surgeon.

Atypical femoral fracture has been reported with denosumab, so patients should be advised to report new or unusual thigh, hip, or groin pain. Patients presenting with an atypical femur fracture should be assessed for signs of fracture in the contralateral limb. Physicians should consider interrupting denosumab pending a risk/benefit assessment.

Denosumab can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Physicians should advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during therapy and for at least 5 months after the last dose of denosumab.

Amgen, the company developing denosumab, markets the drug as both XGEVA and Prolia (for different indications). Patients receiving XGEVA should not take Prolia.

For more information on denosumab (XGEVA), visit www.xgeva.com.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved denosumab (XGEVA) to treat hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) that is refractory to bisphosphonate therapy.

HCM results from cancer-driven increases in bone resorption. If left untreated, the condition can lead to renal failure, progressive mental impairment, coma, and death.

Denosumab works by binding to RANK ligand, a protein essential for the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts.

The drug prevents RANK ligand from activating its receptor, RANK, on the surface of osteoclasts, thereby decreasing bone destruction and calcium release.

Denosumab previously received FDA approval to treat giant cell tumor of the bone and for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

The FDA’s approval of denosumab for HCM is based on positive results from an open-label, single-arm study, which enrolled 33 patients with advanced cancer and persistent hypercalcemia after recent bisphosphonate treatment.

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a response, defined as albumin-corrected serum calcium (CSC) < 11.5 mg/dL (2.9 mmol/L; adverse events grade < 1) within 10 days of the first dose of denosumab.

Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients who experienced a complete response (defined as CSC < 10.8 mg/dL [2.7 mmol/L]) by day 10, time to response, and response duration (defined as the number of days from the first occurrence of CSC < 11.5 mg/dL).

The primary endpoint was met. At day 10, the response rate was 63.6%. Likewise, the overall complete response rate was 63.6%. The estimated median time to response was 9 days, and the median duration of response was 104 days.

The most common adverse events were nausea, dyspnea, decreased appetite, headache, peripheral edema, vomiting, anemia, constipation, and diarrhea.

Potential safety risks

Patients with HCM should receive 120 mg of denosumab as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with additional doses of 120 mg on days 8 and 15 of the first month of therapy.

Pre-existing hypocalcemia must be corrected prior to initiating denosumab therapy. The drug can cause severe, symptomatic hypocalcemia, and fatal cases have been reported.

Physicians should monitor patients’ calcium levels and administer calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D as necessary. Levels should be monitored more frequently when denosumab is given with other drugs that can lower calcium levels. Patients should be advised to contact a healthcare professional if they experience symptoms of hypocalcemia.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw can occur in patients receiving denosumab. Patients who are suspected of having or who develop osteonecrosis of the jaw while on treatment should receive care by a dentist or an oral surgeon.

Atypical femoral fracture has been reported with denosumab, so patients should be advised to report new or unusual thigh, hip, or groin pain. Patients presenting with an atypical femur fracture should be assessed for signs of fracture in the contralateral limb. Physicians should consider interrupting denosumab pending a risk/benefit assessment.

Denosumab can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Physicians should advise females of reproductive potential to use highly effective contraception during therapy and for at least 5 months after the last dose of denosumab.

Amgen, the company developing denosumab, markets the drug as both XGEVA and Prolia (for different indications). Patients receiving XGEVA should not take Prolia.

For more information on denosumab (XGEVA), visit www.xgeva.com.