Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Experts have published updated guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis for adults with cancer-related immunosuppression.

The guidelines include antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis recommendations, along with additional precautions, such as hand hygiene, that may reduce infection risk.

The guidelines were developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

For the most part, the expert panel that created these guidelines endorsed the previous ASCO recommendations, published in 2013.

However, the panel considered six new studies and six new or updated meta-analyses to make modifications and add some new recommendations.

Recommendations

The ASCO/IDSA guidelines say health care providers should systematically assess the risk of febrile neutropenia, taking into account patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is recommended for patients at high risk of febrile neutropenia or profound, protracted neutropenia. This includes most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who are treated with myeloablative conditioning regimens.

Antifungal prophylaxis with an oral triazole or parenteral echinocandin is recommended for patients at risk of profound, protracted neutropenia, which includes HSCT recipients and most patients with AML/MDS.

However, neither antifungal nor antibiotic prophylaxis are routinely recommended for patients with solid tumors.

Prophylaxis with a nucleoside analog, such as acyclovir, is recommended in patients who are herpes simplex virus–seropositive and are undergoing allogeneic HSCT or leukemia induction.

Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens associated with a greater than 3.5% risk for pneumonia from P jirovecii.

Treatment with a nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor, such as entecavir or tenofovir, is recommended for patients at high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation.

Yearly influenza vaccination with an inactivated quadrivalent vaccine is recommended for all patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignancy as well as their family members, household contacts, and health care providers.

Health care workers should follow hand hygiene and respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette to reduce the risk of pathogen transmission, according to the guidelines.

The guidelines also note that outpatients who develop neutropenia following cancer therapy should avoid prolonged contact with environments that have high concentrations of airborne fungal spores.

The guidelines do not recommend interventions such as neutropenic diet, footwear exchange, nutritional supplements, and surgical masks. “Evidence of clinical benefit is lacking” for those interventions, the expert panel said.

Members of the expert panel disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Merck, Chimerix, GlyPharma Therapeutic, Pfizer, Cidara Therapeutics, Celgene, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, and Allergan, among other entities.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Experts have published updated guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis for adults with cancer-related immunosuppression.

The guidelines include antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis recommendations, along with additional precautions, such as hand hygiene, that may reduce infection risk.

The guidelines were developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

For the most part, the expert panel that created these guidelines endorsed the previous ASCO recommendations, published in 2013.

However, the panel considered six new studies and six new or updated meta-analyses to make modifications and add some new recommendations.

Recommendations

The ASCO/IDSA guidelines say health care providers should systematically assess the risk of febrile neutropenia, taking into account patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is recommended for patients at high risk of febrile neutropenia or profound, protracted neutropenia. This includes most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who are treated with myeloablative conditioning regimens.

Antifungal prophylaxis with an oral triazole or parenteral echinocandin is recommended for patients at risk of profound, protracted neutropenia, which includes HSCT recipients and most patients with AML/MDS.

However, neither antifungal nor antibiotic prophylaxis are routinely recommended for patients with solid tumors.

Prophylaxis with a nucleoside analog, such as acyclovir, is recommended in patients who are herpes simplex virus–seropositive and are undergoing allogeneic HSCT or leukemia induction.

Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens associated with a greater than 3.5% risk for pneumonia from P jirovecii.

Treatment with a nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor, such as entecavir or tenofovir, is recommended for patients at high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation.

Yearly influenza vaccination with an inactivated quadrivalent vaccine is recommended for all patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignancy as well as their family members, household contacts, and health care providers.

Health care workers should follow hand hygiene and respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette to reduce the risk of pathogen transmission, according to the guidelines.

The guidelines also note that outpatients who develop neutropenia following cancer therapy should avoid prolonged contact with environments that have high concentrations of airborne fungal spores.

The guidelines do not recommend interventions such as neutropenic diet, footwear exchange, nutritional supplements, and surgical masks. “Evidence of clinical benefit is lacking” for those interventions, the expert panel said.

Members of the expert panel disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Merck, Chimerix, GlyPharma Therapeutic, Pfizer, Cidara Therapeutics, Celgene, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, and Allergan, among other entities.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Experts have published updated guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis for adults with cancer-related immunosuppression.

The guidelines include antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis recommendations, along with additional precautions, such as hand hygiene, that may reduce infection risk.

The guidelines were developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

For the most part, the expert panel that created these guidelines endorsed the previous ASCO recommendations, published in 2013.

However, the panel considered six new studies and six new or updated meta-analyses to make modifications and add some new recommendations.

Recommendations

The ASCO/IDSA guidelines say health care providers should systematically assess the risk of febrile neutropenia, taking into account patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related factors.

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is recommended for patients at high risk of febrile neutropenia or profound, protracted neutropenia. This includes most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) who are treated with myeloablative conditioning regimens.

Antifungal prophylaxis with an oral triazole or parenteral echinocandin is recommended for patients at risk of profound, protracted neutropenia, which includes HSCT recipients and most patients with AML/MDS.

However, neither antifungal nor antibiotic prophylaxis are routinely recommended for patients with solid tumors.

Prophylaxis with a nucleoside analog, such as acyclovir, is recommended in patients who are herpes simplex virus–seropositive and are undergoing allogeneic HSCT or leukemia induction.

Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, is recommended for patients receiving chemotherapy regimens associated with a greater than 3.5% risk for pneumonia from P jirovecii.

Treatment with a nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor, such as entecavir or tenofovir, is recommended for patients at high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation.

Yearly influenza vaccination with an inactivated quadrivalent vaccine is recommended for all patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignancy as well as their family members, household contacts, and health care providers.

Health care workers should follow hand hygiene and respiratory hygiene/cough etiquette to reduce the risk of pathogen transmission, according to the guidelines.

The guidelines also note that outpatients who develop neutropenia following cancer therapy should avoid prolonged contact with environments that have high concentrations of airborne fungal spores.

The guidelines do not recommend interventions such as neutropenic diet, footwear exchange, nutritional supplements, and surgical masks. “Evidence of clinical benefit is lacking” for those interventions, the expert panel said.

Members of the expert panel disclosed potential conflicts of interest related to Merck, Chimerix, GlyPharma Therapeutic, Pfizer, Cidara Therapeutics, Celgene, Astellas Pharma, Gilead Sciences, and Allergan, among other entities.

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has authorized use of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah™), making it the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy to receive regulatory approval in Canada.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is approved to treat patients ages 3 to 25 with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) or are otherwise ineligible for SCT, have experienced second or later relapse, or have refractory disease.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved in Canada to treat adults who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy and have relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high grade B-cell lymphoma, or DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma.

Novartis, the company marketing tisagenlecleucel, said it is working with qualified treatment centers in Canada to prepare for the delivery of tisagenlecleucel. Certification and training are underway at these centers, and Novartis is enhancing manufacturing capacity to meet patient needs.

Tisagenlecleucel has been studied in a pair of phase 2 trials—ELIANA and JULIET.

JULIET trial

JULIET enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached with a median follow-up of 13.9 months. At last follow-up, none of the responders had gone on to SCT.

The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

These results were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

ELIANA trial

ELIANA included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi. All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to SCT while in remission. At last follow-up, four were still in remission, and four had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

Ninety-five percent of patients had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in February.

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has authorized use of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah™), making it the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy to receive regulatory approval in Canada.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is approved to treat patients ages 3 to 25 with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) or are otherwise ineligible for SCT, have experienced second or later relapse, or have refractory disease.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved in Canada to treat adults who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy and have relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high grade B-cell lymphoma, or DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma.

Novartis, the company marketing tisagenlecleucel, said it is working with qualified treatment centers in Canada to prepare for the delivery of tisagenlecleucel. Certification and training are underway at these centers, and Novartis is enhancing manufacturing capacity to meet patient needs.

Tisagenlecleucel has been studied in a pair of phase 2 trials—ELIANA and JULIET.

JULIET trial

JULIET enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached with a median follow-up of 13.9 months. At last follow-up, none of the responders had gone on to SCT.

The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

These results were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

ELIANA trial

ELIANA included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi. All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to SCT while in remission. At last follow-up, four were still in remission, and four had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

Ninety-five percent of patients had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in February.

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has authorized use of tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah™), making it the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy to receive regulatory approval in Canada.

Tisagenlecleucel (formerly CTL019) is approved to treat patients ages 3 to 25 with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) or are otherwise ineligible for SCT, have experienced second or later relapse, or have refractory disease.

Tisagenlecleucel is also approved in Canada to treat adults who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy and have relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high grade B-cell lymphoma, or DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma.

Novartis, the company marketing tisagenlecleucel, said it is working with qualified treatment centers in Canada to prepare for the delivery of tisagenlecleucel. Certification and training are underway at these centers, and Novartis is enhancing manufacturing capacity to meet patient needs.

Tisagenlecleucel has been studied in a pair of phase 2 trials—ELIANA and JULIET.

JULIET trial

JULIET enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Ninety-two percent of patients received bridging therapy, and 93% received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to tisagenlecleucel.

The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. The median duration of response was not reached with a median follow-up of 13.9 months. At last follow-up, none of the responders had gone on to SCT.

The 12-month overall survival (OS) rate was 49%, and the median OS was 11.7 months. The median OS was not reached for patients in CR.

Within 8 weeks of tisagenlecleucel infusion, 22% of patients had developed grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Other adverse events (AEs) of interest included grade 3/4 neurologic events (12%), grade 3/4 cytopenias lasting more than 28 days (32%), grade 3/4 infections (20%), and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (15%).

These results were presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Hematology Association in June (abstract S799).

ELIANA trial

ELIANA included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The patients’ median age was 11 (range, 3 to 23).

All patients received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel, and 72 received lymphodepleting chemotherapy.

The median duration of follow-up was 13.1 months. The study’s primary endpoint was overall remission rate, which was defined as the rate of a best overall response of either CR or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) within 3 months.

The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n=45) achieving a CR and 21% (n=16) achieving a CRi. All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.

Eight patients proceeded to SCT while in remission. At last follow-up, four were still in remission, and four had unknown disease status.

At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was 73%, and the OS rate was 90%. At 12 months, the rates were 50% and 76%, respectively.

Ninety-five percent of patients had AEs thought to be related to tisagenlecleucel. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs was 73%.

AEs of special interest included CRS (77%), neurologic events (40%), infections (43%), febrile neutropenia (35%), cytopenias not resolved by day 28 (37%), and tumor lysis syndrome (4%).

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in February.

follicular lymphoma

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) in a phase 3 trial.

Patients with previously untreated FL had similar complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates whether they received rituximab-based chemotherapy or rituximab plus lenalidomide.

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The trial, RELEVANCE, included 1,030 patients with previously untreated FL. They were randomized to receive rituximab plus chemotherapy (n=517) or rituximab plus lenalidomide (n=513) for 18 cycles.

Patients in the chemotherapy arm received one of three regimens—R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), rituximab and bendamustine, or R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone).

Patients in both treatment arms went on to receive rituximab maintenance every 8 weeks for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years.

The coprimary endpoints were CR (confirmed or unconfirmed) and PFS. After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the treatment arms.

CR was observed in 48% of the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 53% of the rituximab-chemotherapy arm (P=0.13).

The interim 3-year PFS rate was 77% in the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 78% in the rituximab-chemotherapy arm. The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (P=0.48).

The efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose disease was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas the efficacy of rituximab-lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some adverse events (AEs) being more common in one arm than the other.

AEs that were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide include cutaneous reactions (43% vs 24%), diarrhea (37% vs 19%), rash (29% vs 8%), abdominal pain (15% vs 9%), peripheral edema (14% vs 9%), muscle spasms (13% vs 4%), myalgia (14% vs 6%), and tumor flare reaction (6% vs <1%).

AEs that were more common with rituximab-chemotherapy were anemia (89% vs 66%), fatigue (29% vs 23%), nausea (42% vs 20%), vomiting (19% vs 7%), febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%), leukopenia (10% vs 4%), and peripheral neuropathy (16% vs 7%).

Grade 3/4 cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide (7% vs 1%), and grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab-chemotherapy (50% vs 32%).

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

follicular lymphoma

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) in a phase 3 trial.

Patients with previously untreated FL had similar complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates whether they received rituximab-based chemotherapy or rituximab plus lenalidomide.

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The trial, RELEVANCE, included 1,030 patients with previously untreated FL. They were randomized to receive rituximab plus chemotherapy (n=517) or rituximab plus lenalidomide (n=513) for 18 cycles.

Patients in the chemotherapy arm received one of three regimens—R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), rituximab and bendamustine, or R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone).

Patients in both treatment arms went on to receive rituximab maintenance every 8 weeks for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years.

The coprimary endpoints were CR (confirmed or unconfirmed) and PFS. After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the treatment arms.

CR was observed in 48% of the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 53% of the rituximab-chemotherapy arm (P=0.13).

The interim 3-year PFS rate was 77% in the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 78% in the rituximab-chemotherapy arm. The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (P=0.48).

The efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose disease was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas the efficacy of rituximab-lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some adverse events (AEs) being more common in one arm than the other.

AEs that were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide include cutaneous reactions (43% vs 24%), diarrhea (37% vs 19%), rash (29% vs 8%), abdominal pain (15% vs 9%), peripheral edema (14% vs 9%), muscle spasms (13% vs 4%), myalgia (14% vs 6%), and tumor flare reaction (6% vs <1%).

AEs that were more common with rituximab-chemotherapy were anemia (89% vs 66%), fatigue (29% vs 23%), nausea (42% vs 20%), vomiting (19% vs 7%), febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%), leukopenia (10% vs 4%), and peripheral neuropathy (16% vs 7%).

Grade 3/4 cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide (7% vs 1%), and grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab-chemotherapy (50% vs 32%).

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

follicular lymphoma

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) in a phase 3 trial.

Patients with previously untreated FL had similar complete response (CR) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates whether they received rituximab-based chemotherapy or rituximab plus lenalidomide.

These results were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The trial, RELEVANCE, included 1,030 patients with previously untreated FL. They were randomized to receive rituximab plus chemotherapy (n=517) or rituximab plus lenalidomide (n=513) for 18 cycles.

Patients in the chemotherapy arm received one of three regimens—R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), rituximab and bendamustine, or R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone).

Patients in both treatment arms went on to receive rituximab maintenance every 8 weeks for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years.

The coprimary endpoints were CR (confirmed or unconfirmed) and PFS. After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the treatment arms.

CR was observed in 48% of the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 53% of the rituximab-chemotherapy arm (P=0.13).

The interim 3-year PFS rate was 77% in the rituximab-lenalidomide arm and 78% in the rituximab-chemotherapy arm. The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (P=0.48).

The efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose disease was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas the efficacy of rituximab-lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some adverse events (AEs) being more common in one arm than the other.

AEs that were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide include cutaneous reactions (43% vs 24%), diarrhea (37% vs 19%), rash (29% vs 8%), abdominal pain (15% vs 9%), peripheral edema (14% vs 9%), muscle spasms (13% vs 4%), myalgia (14% vs 6%), and tumor flare reaction (6% vs <1%).

AEs that were more common with rituximab-chemotherapy were anemia (89% vs 66%), fatigue (29% vs 23%), nausea (42% vs 20%), vomiting (19% vs 7%), febrile neutropenia (7% vs 2%), leukopenia (10% vs 4%), and peripheral neuropathy (16% vs 7%).

Grade 3/4 cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab-lenalidomide (7% vs 1%), and grade 3/4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab-chemotherapy (50% vs 32%).

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

Micrograph showing CLL

Extended follow-up of the RESONATE-2 trial showed that first-line ibrutinib sustained efficacy in elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received ibrutinib had a long-term progression-free survival benefit over those who received chlorambucil.

The depth of response to ibrutinib improved over time, which meant there was a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response.

Additionally, rates of some serious adverse events associated with ibrutinib decreased over time.

Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and his colleagues reported these findings in Haematologica.

Previously reported results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in the risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) or chlorambucil (n=133).

At a median follow-up of 29 months, 79% (107/136) of patients remained on ibrutinib.

There was an 88% reduction in the risk of progression or death for patients randomized to ibrutinib (P<0.0001).

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months to 15% at 24 months and 18% at 36 months (maximum follow-up).

The overall response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 92%, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups. The ORR was 100% in patients with del(11q) and 95% in those with unmutated IGHV.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42%, compared to 7% of patients who received chlorambucil.

Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 52% in chlorambucil recipients, with complete resolution in 56% and 22%, respectively.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time.

The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia decreased from 8.1% in the first 12 months of treatment to 0% in the third year. The rate of grade 3 or higher anemia decreased from 5.9% to 1%. And the rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia decreased from 2.2% to 0%.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up. However, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse event were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

This study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

Micrograph showing CLL

Extended follow-up of the RESONATE-2 trial showed that first-line ibrutinib sustained efficacy in elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received ibrutinib had a long-term progression-free survival benefit over those who received chlorambucil.

The depth of response to ibrutinib improved over time, which meant there was a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response.

Additionally, rates of some serious adverse events associated with ibrutinib decreased over time.

Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and his colleagues reported these findings in Haematologica.

Previously reported results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in the risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) or chlorambucil (n=133).

At a median follow-up of 29 months, 79% (107/136) of patients remained on ibrutinib.

There was an 88% reduction in the risk of progression or death for patients randomized to ibrutinib (P<0.0001).

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months to 15% at 24 months and 18% at 36 months (maximum follow-up).

The overall response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 92%, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups. The ORR was 100% in patients with del(11q) and 95% in those with unmutated IGHV.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42%, compared to 7% of patients who received chlorambucil.

Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 52% in chlorambucil recipients, with complete resolution in 56% and 22%, respectively.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time.

The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia decreased from 8.1% in the first 12 months of treatment to 0% in the third year. The rate of grade 3 or higher anemia decreased from 5.9% to 1%. And the rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia decreased from 2.2% to 0%.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up. However, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse event were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

This study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

Micrograph showing CLL

Extended follow-up of the RESONATE-2 trial showed that first-line ibrutinib sustained efficacy in elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Patients who received ibrutinib had a long-term progression-free survival benefit over those who received chlorambucil.

The depth of response to ibrutinib improved over time, which meant there was a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response.

Additionally, rates of some serious adverse events associated with ibrutinib decreased over time.

Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester in New York, and his colleagues reported these findings in Haematologica.

Previously reported results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in the risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized to receive ibrutinib (n=136) or chlorambucil (n=133).

At a median follow-up of 29 months, 79% (107/136) of patients remained on ibrutinib.

There was an 88% reduction in the risk of progression or death for patients randomized to ibrutinib (P<0.0001).

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months to 15% at 24 months and 18% at 36 months (maximum follow-up).

The overall response rate (ORR) with ibrutinib was 92%, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups. The ORR was 100% in patients with del(11q) and 95% in those with unmutated IGHV.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42%, compared to 7% of patients who received chlorambucil.

Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 52% in chlorambucil recipients, with complete resolution in 56% and 22%, respectively.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time.

The rate of grade 3 or higher neutropenia decreased from 8.1% in the first 12 months of treatment to 0% in the third year. The rate of grade 3 or higher anemia decreased from 5.9% to 1%. And the rate of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia decreased from 2.2% to 0%.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up. However, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse event were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

This study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

In older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), first-line treatment with ibrutinib resulted in a long-term progression-free survival benefit versus chemotherapy, according to extended follow-up results of a phase 3 trial.

The quality of response to ibrutinib continued to improve over time in the study, including a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response, the updated results of the RESONATE-2 trial show.

Rates of serious adverse events decreased over time in the study, while common reasons for initiating treatment, such as marrow failure and disease symptoms, all improved to a greater extent than with chlorambucil, reported Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.) and colleagues.

“These data support the use of ibrutinib in the first-line treatment of CLL as a chemotherapy-free option that can be taken continuously, achieving long-term disease control for the majority of patients, including those with high-risk features,” Dr. Barr and coauthors said in the journal Haematologica.

Previously reported primary results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil with a median follow-up of 18 months, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib or chlorambucil.

Out of 136 ibrutinib-treated patients, 107 (79%) remained on therapy at this extended analysis, which had a median follow-up of 29 months.

The extended analysis also showed an 88% reduction in risk of progression or death for those patients randomized to ibrutinib (P less than .0001), with significant improvements in subgroups evaluated, which include groups typically considered high risk, according to Dr. Barr and colleagues.

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months, to 15% at 24 months, and to 18% with a maximum of 36 months’ follow-up, they said.

The overall response rate for ibrutinib was 92% in this extended analysis, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups, including those with del(11q) at 100% and unmutated IGHV at 95%, according to the report.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42% versus 7% with chlorambucil. Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients versus 52% for chlorambucil, with complete resolution in 56% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 22% of chlorambucil-treated patients.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time. Rates of grade 3 or greater neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 8.1%, 5.9%, and 2.2%, respectively, in the first 12 months of treatment; those decreased to 0%, 1%, and 0% in the third year.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up; however, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse effect were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

SOURCE: Barr PM, et al. Haematologica. 2018;103(9):1502-10.

In older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), first-line treatment with ibrutinib resulted in a long-term progression-free survival benefit versus chemotherapy, according to extended follow-up results of a phase 3 trial.

The quality of response to ibrutinib continued to improve over time in the study, including a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response, the updated results of the RESONATE-2 trial show.

Rates of serious adverse events decreased over time in the study, while common reasons for initiating treatment, such as marrow failure and disease symptoms, all improved to a greater extent than with chlorambucil, reported Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.) and colleagues.

“These data support the use of ibrutinib in the first-line treatment of CLL as a chemotherapy-free option that can be taken continuously, achieving long-term disease control for the majority of patients, including those with high-risk features,” Dr. Barr and coauthors said in the journal Haematologica.

Previously reported primary results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil with a median follow-up of 18 months, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib or chlorambucil.

Out of 136 ibrutinib-treated patients, 107 (79%) remained on therapy at this extended analysis, which had a median follow-up of 29 months.

The extended analysis also showed an 88% reduction in risk of progression or death for those patients randomized to ibrutinib (P less than .0001), with significant improvements in subgroups evaluated, which include groups typically considered high risk, according to Dr. Barr and colleagues.

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months, to 15% at 24 months, and to 18% with a maximum of 36 months’ follow-up, they said.

The overall response rate for ibrutinib was 92% in this extended analysis, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups, including those with del(11q) at 100% and unmutated IGHV at 95%, according to the report.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42% versus 7% with chlorambucil. Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients versus 52% for chlorambucil, with complete resolution in 56% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 22% of chlorambucil-treated patients.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time. Rates of grade 3 or greater neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 8.1%, 5.9%, and 2.2%, respectively, in the first 12 months of treatment; those decreased to 0%, 1%, and 0% in the third year.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up; however, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse effect were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

SOURCE: Barr PM, et al. Haematologica. 2018;103(9):1502-10.

In older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), first-line treatment with ibrutinib resulted in a long-term progression-free survival benefit versus chemotherapy, according to extended follow-up results of a phase 3 trial.

The quality of response to ibrutinib continued to improve over time in the study, including a substantial increase in the proportion of patients achieving complete response, the updated results of the RESONATE-2 trial show.

Rates of serious adverse events decreased over time in the study, while common reasons for initiating treatment, such as marrow failure and disease symptoms, all improved to a greater extent than with chlorambucil, reported Paul M. Barr, MD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.) and colleagues.

“These data support the use of ibrutinib in the first-line treatment of CLL as a chemotherapy-free option that can be taken continuously, achieving long-term disease control for the majority of patients, including those with high-risk features,” Dr. Barr and coauthors said in the journal Haematologica.

Previously reported primary results of the RESONATE-2 trial, which showed an 84% reduction in risk of death for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil with a median follow-up of 18 months, led to the approval of ibrutinib for first-line CLL treatment, the authors said.

The study included 269 patients with untreated CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma who had active disease and were at least 65 years of age. They were randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib or chlorambucil.

Out of 136 ibrutinib-treated patients, 107 (79%) remained on therapy at this extended analysis, which had a median follow-up of 29 months.

The extended analysis also showed an 88% reduction in risk of progression or death for those patients randomized to ibrutinib (P less than .0001), with significant improvements in subgroups evaluated, which include groups typically considered high risk, according to Dr. Barr and colleagues.

The rate of complete response improved over time in ibrutinib-treated patients, from 7% at 12 months, to 15% at 24 months, and to 18% with a maximum of 36 months’ follow-up, they said.

The overall response rate for ibrutinib was 92% in this extended analysis, with comparable findings in high-risk subgroups, including those with del(11q) at 100% and unmutated IGHV at 95%, according to the report.

Lymphadenopathy improved in most ibrutinib-treated patients, with complete resolution in 42% versus 7% with chlorambucil. Splenomegaly improved by at least 50% in 95% of ibrutinib-treated patients versus 52% for chlorambucil, with complete resolution in 56% of ibrutinib-treated patients and 22% of chlorambucil-treated patients.

Adverse events of grade 3 or greater were generally seen more often in the first year of ibrutinib therapy and decreased over time. Rates of grade 3 or greater neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 8.1%, 5.9%, and 2.2%, respectively, in the first 12 months of treatment; those decreased to 0%, 1%, and 0% in the third year.

The rate of atrial fibrillation increased from 6% in the primary analysis to 10% in extended follow-up; however, investigators said ibrutinib dose reductions and discontinuations because of this adverse effect were uncommon and less frequent with extended treatment.

“Atrial fibrillation therefore appears manageable and does not frequently necessitate ibrutinib discontinuation,” they concluded.

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the MD Anderson Moon Shot Program in CLL. Pharmacyclics designed the study and performed analysis of the data. Several study authors reported funding from various companies, including Pharmacyclics.

SOURCE: Barr PM, et al. Haematologica. 2018;103(9):1502-10.

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.

This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.

After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).

In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.

“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.

This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.

After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).

In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.

“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.

Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.

This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.

After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).

In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.

Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.

“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.

The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.

An escalating methotrexate strategy provided superior survival outcomes compared with high-dose methotrexate in a chemotherapy regimen for children and young adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), results of a large, randomized trial show.

There were also fewer relapses reported for escalating versus high-dose methotrexate in the study, which evaluated the effects of these two intensification strategies in patients receiving an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (ABFM) chemotherapy regimen.

These findings come from a report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 trial, which to the knowledge of the investigators is the largest T-ALL study ever conducted.

The improved survival outcomes in AALL0434 are the “opposite effect” of what was observed in a parallel trial, AALL0232, showing that high-dose methotrexate was superior to the escalating strategy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the authors reported.

The parallel trial design was in fact used because of the known differences between T-ALL and B-ALL in sensitivity to methotrexate and pegaspargase, according to investigator Stuart S. Winter, MD, of Children’s Minnesota Cancer and Blood Disorders Program, Minneapolis, and his coauthors.

“Although treatment intensification has improved survival for children with ALL, the best timing and sequence of key therapeutic interventions, such as asparaginase and methotrexate, which seem to be particularly important for T-ALL, remain unclear,” Dr. Winter and his colleagues said.

In the AALL0434 study, a total of 1,031 T-ALL patients between 1 and 31 years of age without CNS3 disease or testicular leukemia were randomized to postinduction therapy that included either the so-called Capizzi-style escalating intravenous methotrexate or high-dose methotrexate.

The escalating intravenous regimen was superior to high-dose methotrexate, according to investigators. Respectively, the 5-year rate of disease-free survival was 91.5% versus 85.3% (P = .005) and the 5-year rate of overall survival was 93.7% versus 89.4% (P = .036).

Relapses were observed in 32 patients receiving the escalating regimen, versus 59 for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.

By contrast, the parallel AALL0232 study of B-ALL patients showed that high-dose methotrexate had superior 5-year event-free survival and overall survival, leading Dr. Winter and his colleagues to speculate on how the findings could be reconciled.

Neither trial was a strict comparison of two different methotrexate schedules, due to differences in doses of pegaspargase, 6-MP, and vincristine between arms, as well as differences in the timing of cranial radiation therapy.

Of note, patients randomized to escalated methotrexate had two additional doses of pegaspargase. As a result, enhanced asparagine depletion in that arm may have also prevented relapse events, the investigators said.

Differences in adherence could also have played a role, as the cost and time burden of the escalated approach are “substantially less” than the high-dose approach, they added.

The AALL0434 trial also included a second randomization to an addition of five, 6-day cycles of nelarabine versus no nelarabine. Results of that randomization, reported earlier this year, showed that nelarabine improved disease-free survival, including a 91% 4-year disease-free survival rate for patients receiving both nelarabine and escalating-dose methotrexate.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and by St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Winter reported relationships with Amgen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Study coauthors reported relationships with Novo Nordisk, Tandem, Pfizer, Novartis, and TypeZero Technologies, among others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Winter SS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 23: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7250.

An escalating methotrexate strategy provided superior survival outcomes compared with high-dose methotrexate in a chemotherapy regimen for children and young adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), results of a large, randomized trial show.

There were also fewer relapses reported for escalating versus high-dose methotrexate in the study, which evaluated the effects of these two intensification strategies in patients receiving an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (ABFM) chemotherapy regimen.

These findings come from a report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 trial, which to the knowledge of the investigators is the largest T-ALL study ever conducted.

The improved survival outcomes in AALL0434 are the “opposite effect” of what was observed in a parallel trial, AALL0232, showing that high-dose methotrexate was superior to the escalating strategy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the authors reported.

The parallel trial design was in fact used because of the known differences between T-ALL and B-ALL in sensitivity to methotrexate and pegaspargase, according to investigator Stuart S. Winter, MD, of Children’s Minnesota Cancer and Blood Disorders Program, Minneapolis, and his coauthors.

“Although treatment intensification has improved survival for children with ALL, the best timing and sequence of key therapeutic interventions, such as asparaginase and methotrexate, which seem to be particularly important for T-ALL, remain unclear,” Dr. Winter and his colleagues said.

In the AALL0434 study, a total of 1,031 T-ALL patients between 1 and 31 years of age without CNS3 disease or testicular leukemia were randomized to postinduction therapy that included either the so-called Capizzi-style escalating intravenous methotrexate or high-dose methotrexate.

The escalating intravenous regimen was superior to high-dose methotrexate, according to investigators. Respectively, the 5-year rate of disease-free survival was 91.5% versus 85.3% (P = .005) and the 5-year rate of overall survival was 93.7% versus 89.4% (P = .036).

Relapses were observed in 32 patients receiving the escalating regimen, versus 59 for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.

By contrast, the parallel AALL0232 study of B-ALL patients showed that high-dose methotrexate had superior 5-year event-free survival and overall survival, leading Dr. Winter and his colleagues to speculate on how the findings could be reconciled.

Neither trial was a strict comparison of two different methotrexate schedules, due to differences in doses of pegaspargase, 6-MP, and vincristine between arms, as well as differences in the timing of cranial radiation therapy.

Of note, patients randomized to escalated methotrexate had two additional doses of pegaspargase. As a result, enhanced asparagine depletion in that arm may have also prevented relapse events, the investigators said.

Differences in adherence could also have played a role, as the cost and time burden of the escalated approach are “substantially less” than the high-dose approach, they added.

The AALL0434 trial also included a second randomization to an addition of five, 6-day cycles of nelarabine versus no nelarabine. Results of that randomization, reported earlier this year, showed that nelarabine improved disease-free survival, including a 91% 4-year disease-free survival rate for patients receiving both nelarabine and escalating-dose methotrexate.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and by St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Winter reported relationships with Amgen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Study coauthors reported relationships with Novo Nordisk, Tandem, Pfizer, Novartis, and TypeZero Technologies, among others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Winter SS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 23: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7250.

An escalating methotrexate strategy provided superior survival outcomes compared with high-dose methotrexate in a chemotherapy regimen for children and young adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), results of a large, randomized trial show.

There were also fewer relapses reported for escalating versus high-dose methotrexate in the study, which evaluated the effects of these two intensification strategies in patients receiving an augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (ABFM) chemotherapy regimen.

These findings come from a report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 trial, which to the knowledge of the investigators is the largest T-ALL study ever conducted.

The improved survival outcomes in AALL0434 are the “opposite effect” of what was observed in a parallel trial, AALL0232, showing that high-dose methotrexate was superior to the escalating strategy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), the authors reported.

The parallel trial design was in fact used because of the known differences between T-ALL and B-ALL in sensitivity to methotrexate and pegaspargase, according to investigator Stuart S. Winter, MD, of Children’s Minnesota Cancer and Blood Disorders Program, Minneapolis, and his coauthors.

“Although treatment intensification has improved survival for children with ALL, the best timing and sequence of key therapeutic interventions, such as asparaginase and methotrexate, which seem to be particularly important for T-ALL, remain unclear,” Dr. Winter and his colleagues said.

In the AALL0434 study, a total of 1,031 T-ALL patients between 1 and 31 years of age without CNS3 disease or testicular leukemia were randomized to postinduction therapy that included either the so-called Capizzi-style escalating intravenous methotrexate or high-dose methotrexate.

The escalating intravenous regimen was superior to high-dose methotrexate, according to investigators. Respectively, the 5-year rate of disease-free survival was 91.5% versus 85.3% (P = .005) and the 5-year rate of overall survival was 93.7% versus 89.4% (P = .036).

Relapses were observed in 32 patients receiving the escalating regimen, versus 59 for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.

By contrast, the parallel AALL0232 study of B-ALL patients showed that high-dose methotrexate had superior 5-year event-free survival and overall survival, leading Dr. Winter and his colleagues to speculate on how the findings could be reconciled.

Neither trial was a strict comparison of two different methotrexate schedules, due to differences in doses of pegaspargase, 6-MP, and vincristine between arms, as well as differences in the timing of cranial radiation therapy.

Of note, patients randomized to escalated methotrexate had two additional doses of pegaspargase. As a result, enhanced asparagine depletion in that arm may have also prevented relapse events, the investigators said.

Differences in adherence could also have played a role, as the cost and time burden of the escalated approach are “substantially less” than the high-dose approach, they added.

The AALL0434 trial also included a second randomization to an addition of five, 6-day cycles of nelarabine versus no nelarabine. Results of that randomization, reported earlier this year, showed that nelarabine improved disease-free survival, including a 91% 4-year disease-free survival rate for patients receiving both nelarabine and escalating-dose methotrexate.

The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and by St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Winter reported relationships with Amgen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Study coauthors reported relationships with Novo Nordisk, Tandem, Pfizer, Novartis, and TypeZero Technologies, among others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Winter SS et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 23: doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7250.

Image from Michael Bonert

Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”

The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.

Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.

The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.

“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said.

He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2—either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors—induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.

In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P<0.0001).

Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.

They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”

Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.

“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available . . . ,” said study author Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna.

“[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”

Image from Michael Bonert

Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”

The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.

Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.

The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.

“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said.

He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2—either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors—induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.

In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P<0.0001).

Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.

They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”

Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.

“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available . . . ,” said study author Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna.

“[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”

Image from Michael Bonert

Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”

The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.

Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.

The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.

“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said.

He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2—either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors—induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.

In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P<0.0001).

Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.

They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”

Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.

“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available . . . ,” said study author Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna.

“[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”

The European Commission has approved a new indication for daratumumab (Darzalex), according to the manufacturer.

The drug is now authorized for use in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) to treat adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, according to a press release published on the Genmab website.

Daratumumab was previously approved by the European Commission (EC) for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone or bortezomib and dexamethasone to treat adults with MM who have received at least one prior therapy.

In addition, daratumumab is approved by the EC as monotherapy for adults with relapsed and refractory MM whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent and who had disease progression on their last therapy.

The EC’s latest approval for daratumumab is based on results from the phase 3 ALCYONE trial. Results from this study were presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

ALCYONE enrolled 706 patients with newly diagnosed MM who were not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VMP or daratumumab plus VMP (D-VMP).

The overall response rates were 91% in the D-VMP arm and 74% in the VMP arm (P less than.0001), and rates of complete response were 43% and 24%, respectively. Rates of minimal residual disease negativity were 22% and 6%, respectively.

[email protected]

The European Commission has approved a new indication for daratumumab (Darzalex), according to the manufacturer.

The drug is now authorized for use in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) to treat adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, according to a press release published on the Genmab website.

Daratumumab was previously approved by the European Commission (EC) for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone or bortezomib and dexamethasone to treat adults with MM who have received at least one prior therapy.

In addition, daratumumab is approved by the EC as monotherapy for adults with relapsed and refractory MM whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent and who had disease progression on their last therapy.

The EC’s latest approval for daratumumab is based on results from the phase 3 ALCYONE trial. Results from this study were presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

ALCYONE enrolled 706 patients with newly diagnosed MM who were not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VMP or daratumumab plus VMP (D-VMP).

The overall response rates were 91% in the D-VMP arm and 74% in the VMP arm (P less than.0001), and rates of complete response were 43% and 24%, respectively. Rates of minimal residual disease negativity were 22% and 6%, respectively.

[email protected]

The European Commission has approved a new indication for daratumumab (Darzalex), according to the manufacturer.

The drug is now authorized for use in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) to treat adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, according to a press release published on the Genmab website.

Daratumumab was previously approved by the European Commission (EC) for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone or bortezomib and dexamethasone to treat adults with MM who have received at least one prior therapy.

In addition, daratumumab is approved by the EC as monotherapy for adults with relapsed and refractory MM whose prior therapy included a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent and who had disease progression on their last therapy.

The EC’s latest approval for daratumumab is based on results from the phase 3 ALCYONE trial. Results from this study were presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

ALCYONE enrolled 706 patients with newly diagnosed MM who were not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were randomized to receive VMP or daratumumab plus VMP (D-VMP).

The overall response rates were 91% in the D-VMP arm and 74% in the VMP arm (P less than.0001), and rates of complete response were 43% and 24%, respectively. Rates of minimal residual disease negativity were 22% and 6%, respectively.

[email protected]