Surgical Site Infections

Surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients in Hawaii decreased by approximately 62% after hospital participation in a national safety program.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) designed the program to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs), which are harmful to patients and expensive for the health care system, wrote Della M. Lin, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and the department of surgery at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, the researchers reviewed data from a statewide intervention conducted at 15 hospitals in Hawaii from January 2013 to June 2015. The intervention included the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program and individualized interventions for each hospital to help reduce SSIs. The primary outcome was the number of colorectal SSIs. A secondary outcome of hospital safety culture was assessed using the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. The participating hospitals ranged from a 25-bed critical-access hospital to a 533-bed academic medical center.

Overall, the colorectal SSI rate decreased significantly (from 12% to 5%) from the first quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2015, with a significant linear decrease over the study period. The rate of superficial SSIs decreased significantly, falling from 8% to 3%. However, the rate of deep SSIs was not significantly different before and after the intervention program (2% vs. 0%), nor was the organ space SSI rate (3% vs. 2%). The standardized infection ratio decreased from 1.83 to 0.92.

The culture of safety in the hospitals improved, but more modestly, in 10 of 12 areas that were measured over the study period.

The overall perception of patient safety improved from 49% to 53%, teamwork across different units improved from 49% to 54%, management and support for patient safety improved from 53% to 60%, and nonpunitive response to errors improved from 36% to 40%.

In addition, communication and openness improved from 50% to 53%, frequency of reported events improved from 51% to 60%, feedback and communication about errors improved from 52% to 59%, organizational learning and continuous improvement increased from 59% to 70%, teamwork within units improved from 68% to 75%, and expectations and actions by supervisors and managers to promote safety improved from 58% to 64%. Staff responses reflect agreement on improvement in the areas of issues of communication, feedback mechanisms, and teamwork, but the change in culture was not on the order of the SSI change.

The most common interventions to reduce SSIs were the use of reliable chlorhexidine wash or wipe before surgery/surgical prep; appropriate use of antibiotics with respect to selection, dosage, and timing; standardized postsurgical debriefing; and differentiating clean/dirty/clean in the use of anastomosis trays and closing trays.

One bundle component, the implementation of the standard operating room debrief, was found to be of particular value to participants. The investigators noted that debrief questions such as “What went well?” and “What needs to be improved?” had “encouraged new processes of thinking beyond first-order problem solving. The debrief challenge embraced by the teams emphasized that ‘bundles’ did not consist of only technical interventions [e.g. clean/dirty trays, chlorhexidine gluconate wipes in preop], but embedded culture interventions—new processes for problem solving.”

The study findings were limited by several factors, such as the use of public SSI data that were not audited for accuracy and the inability to monitor the reliability of the implementation of the various interventions, the researchers said. In addition, “In this current study, there was a change in SSI rates and a change in safety culture, but correlations between the two were negligible or weak for most domains of safety culture,” they noted. The question of sustainability of the SSI improvement without the concomitant staff support of culture change was not addressed by the investigators.

However, the results suggest that a 62% decrease is robust, and that for some hospitals with a low volume of colorectal cases, “teams could attend to iteratively reduce surgical harm beyond SSI,” the researchers wrote.

The study was supported in part by the AHRQ. Dr. Lin disclosed serving as a board member and as a paid independent contractor to the Hawaii Medical Service Association. Her coauthors had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Lin DM et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.031.

Surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients in Hawaii decreased by approximately 62% after hospital participation in a national safety program.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) designed the program to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs), which are harmful to patients and expensive for the health care system, wrote Della M. Lin, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and the department of surgery at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, the researchers reviewed data from a statewide intervention conducted at 15 hospitals in Hawaii from January 2013 to June 2015. The intervention included the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program and individualized interventions for each hospital to help reduce SSIs. The primary outcome was the number of colorectal SSIs. A secondary outcome of hospital safety culture was assessed using the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. The participating hospitals ranged from a 25-bed critical-access hospital to a 533-bed academic medical center.

Overall, the colorectal SSI rate decreased significantly (from 12% to 5%) from the first quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2015, with a significant linear decrease over the study period. The rate of superficial SSIs decreased significantly, falling from 8% to 3%. However, the rate of deep SSIs was not significantly different before and after the intervention program (2% vs. 0%), nor was the organ space SSI rate (3% vs. 2%). The standardized infection ratio decreased from 1.83 to 0.92.

The culture of safety in the hospitals improved, but more modestly, in 10 of 12 areas that were measured over the study period.

The overall perception of patient safety improved from 49% to 53%, teamwork across different units improved from 49% to 54%, management and support for patient safety improved from 53% to 60%, and nonpunitive response to errors improved from 36% to 40%.

In addition, communication and openness improved from 50% to 53%, frequency of reported events improved from 51% to 60%, feedback and communication about errors improved from 52% to 59%, organizational learning and continuous improvement increased from 59% to 70%, teamwork within units improved from 68% to 75%, and expectations and actions by supervisors and managers to promote safety improved from 58% to 64%. Staff responses reflect agreement on improvement in the areas of issues of communication, feedback mechanisms, and teamwork, but the change in culture was not on the order of the SSI change.

The most common interventions to reduce SSIs were the use of reliable chlorhexidine wash or wipe before surgery/surgical prep; appropriate use of antibiotics with respect to selection, dosage, and timing; standardized postsurgical debriefing; and differentiating clean/dirty/clean in the use of anastomosis trays and closing trays.

One bundle component, the implementation of the standard operating room debrief, was found to be of particular value to participants. The investigators noted that debrief questions such as “What went well?” and “What needs to be improved?” had “encouraged new processes of thinking beyond first-order problem solving. The debrief challenge embraced by the teams emphasized that ‘bundles’ did not consist of only technical interventions [e.g. clean/dirty trays, chlorhexidine gluconate wipes in preop], but embedded culture interventions—new processes for problem solving.”

The study findings were limited by several factors, such as the use of public SSI data that were not audited for accuracy and the inability to monitor the reliability of the implementation of the various interventions, the researchers said. In addition, “In this current study, there was a change in SSI rates and a change in safety culture, but correlations between the two were negligible or weak for most domains of safety culture,” they noted. The question of sustainability of the SSI improvement without the concomitant staff support of culture change was not addressed by the investigators.

However, the results suggest that a 62% decrease is robust, and that for some hospitals with a low volume of colorectal cases, “teams could attend to iteratively reduce surgical harm beyond SSI,” the researchers wrote.

The study was supported in part by the AHRQ. Dr. Lin disclosed serving as a board member and as a paid independent contractor to the Hawaii Medical Service Association. Her coauthors had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Lin DM et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.031.

Surgical site infections among colorectal surgery patients in Hawaii decreased by approximately 62% after hospital participation in a national safety program.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) designed the program to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs), which are harmful to patients and expensive for the health care system, wrote Della M. Lin, MD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and the department of surgery at the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, the researchers reviewed data from a statewide intervention conducted at 15 hospitals in Hawaii from January 2013 to June 2015. The intervention included the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program and individualized interventions for each hospital to help reduce SSIs. The primary outcome was the number of colorectal SSIs. A secondary outcome of hospital safety culture was assessed using the AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. The participating hospitals ranged from a 25-bed critical-access hospital to a 533-bed academic medical center.

Overall, the colorectal SSI rate decreased significantly (from 12% to 5%) from the first quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2015, with a significant linear decrease over the study period. The rate of superficial SSIs decreased significantly, falling from 8% to 3%. However, the rate of deep SSIs was not significantly different before and after the intervention program (2% vs. 0%), nor was the organ space SSI rate (3% vs. 2%). The standardized infection ratio decreased from 1.83 to 0.92.

The culture of safety in the hospitals improved, but more modestly, in 10 of 12 areas that were measured over the study period.

The overall perception of patient safety improved from 49% to 53%, teamwork across different units improved from 49% to 54%, management and support for patient safety improved from 53% to 60%, and nonpunitive response to errors improved from 36% to 40%.

In addition, communication and openness improved from 50% to 53%, frequency of reported events improved from 51% to 60%, feedback and communication about errors improved from 52% to 59%, organizational learning and continuous improvement increased from 59% to 70%, teamwork within units improved from 68% to 75%, and expectations and actions by supervisors and managers to promote safety improved from 58% to 64%. Staff responses reflect agreement on improvement in the areas of issues of communication, feedback mechanisms, and teamwork, but the change in culture was not on the order of the SSI change.

The most common interventions to reduce SSIs were the use of reliable chlorhexidine wash or wipe before surgery/surgical prep; appropriate use of antibiotics with respect to selection, dosage, and timing; standardized postsurgical debriefing; and differentiating clean/dirty/clean in the use of anastomosis trays and closing trays.

One bundle component, the implementation of the standard operating room debrief, was found to be of particular value to participants. The investigators noted that debrief questions such as “What went well?” and “What needs to be improved?” had “encouraged new processes of thinking beyond first-order problem solving. The debrief challenge embraced by the teams emphasized that ‘bundles’ did not consist of only technical interventions [e.g. clean/dirty trays, chlorhexidine gluconate wipes in preop], but embedded culture interventions—new processes for problem solving.”

The study findings were limited by several factors, such as the use of public SSI data that were not audited for accuracy and the inability to monitor the reliability of the implementation of the various interventions, the researchers said. In addition, “In this current study, there was a change in SSI rates and a change in safety culture, but correlations between the two were negligible or weak for most domains of safety culture,” they noted. The question of sustainability of the SSI improvement without the concomitant staff support of culture change was not addressed by the investigators.

However, the results suggest that a 62% decrease is robust, and that for some hospitals with a low volume of colorectal cases, “teams could attend to iteratively reduce surgical harm beyond SSI,” the researchers wrote.

The study was supported in part by the AHRQ. Dr. Lin disclosed serving as a board member and as a paid independent contractor to the Hawaii Medical Service Association. Her coauthors had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Lin DM et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 May 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.031.

MADRID – Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen

Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

MADRID – Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen

Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

MADRID – Patients who are carriers of extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-B) before colorectal surgery are at more than double the risk of surgical site infection, despite a standard prophylactic antibiotic regimen.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) occurred in 23% of those who tested positive for the pathogens preoperatively, compared with 10.5% of ESBL-B–negative patients – a significant increased risk of 2.25, Yehuda Carmeli, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

ESBL-B was not the infective pathogen in most infection cases, but being a carrier increased the likelihood of an ESBL-B SSI. ESBL-B was the pathogen in 7.2% of the carriers and 1.6% of the noncarriers. However, investigators are still working to determine if the species present in the wound infection are the same as the ones present at baseline, said Dr. Carmeli of Tel Aviv Medical Center.

CDC/James Arche/Illustrators: Alissa Eckert and Jennifer Oosthuizen

Michele G Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Carmeli et al, ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1133.

MADRID – Standard contact precautions for carriers of extended-spectrum, beta-lactamase–resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) didn’t impact the spread of that organism in non-ICU hospital wards, even when staff employed an active surveillance screening protocol to identify every carrier at admission.

The failure of precautions may have root in two thorny issues, said Friederike Maechler, MD, who presented the data at the the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

“Adherence to strict contact isolation and hand hygiene is never 100% in a real-life scenario,” said Dr. Maechler, of Charite University Hospital, Berlin. Also, she said, contact isolation can only be effective in a ward if all, or at least most, of the ESBL-E carriers are identified. “Even with an extensive surveillance screening program established, many carriers remained unknown to the health care staff.”

The 25-month study, dubbed R-Gnosis, was conducted in 20 Western European hospitals in Madrid, Berlin, Utrecht, and Geneva. It compared 12 months of contact precaution with standard precaution infection control strategies in medical and surgical non-ICUs.

The entire study hinged on a strict protocol to identify as many ESBL-E carriers as possible. This was done by screening upon admission to the unit, screening once per week during the hospital stay, and screening on discharge. Each patient underwent deep rectal swabs that were cultured on agar and screened for resistance.

The crossover design trial randomized each unit to either contact precautions or standard precautions for 12 months, followed by a 1-month washout period, after which they began the other protocol.

In all, 50,870 patients were entered into the study. By the end, Dr. Maechler had data on 11,367 patients with full screening and follow-up.

SOURCE: Maechler F et al. ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1130.

MADRID – Standard contact precautions for carriers of extended-spectrum, beta-lactamase–resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) didn’t impact the spread of that organism in non-ICU hospital wards, even when staff employed an active surveillance screening protocol to identify every carrier at admission.

The failure of precautions may have root in two thorny issues, said Friederike Maechler, MD, who presented the data at the the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

“Adherence to strict contact isolation and hand hygiene is never 100% in a real-life scenario,” said Dr. Maechler, of Charite University Hospital, Berlin. Also, she said, contact isolation can only be effective in a ward if all, or at least most, of the ESBL-E carriers are identified. “Even with an extensive surveillance screening program established, many carriers remained unknown to the health care staff.”

The 25-month study, dubbed R-Gnosis, was conducted in 20 Western European hospitals in Madrid, Berlin, Utrecht, and Geneva. It compared 12 months of contact precaution with standard precaution infection control strategies in medical and surgical non-ICUs.

The entire study hinged on a strict protocol to identify as many ESBL-E carriers as possible. This was done by screening upon admission to the unit, screening once per week during the hospital stay, and screening on discharge. Each patient underwent deep rectal swabs that were cultured on agar and screened for resistance.

The crossover design trial randomized each unit to either contact precautions or standard precautions for 12 months, followed by a 1-month washout period, after which they began the other protocol.

In all, 50,870 patients were entered into the study. By the end, Dr. Maechler had data on 11,367 patients with full screening and follow-up.

SOURCE: Maechler F et al. ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1130.

MADRID – Standard contact precautions for carriers of extended-spectrum, beta-lactamase–resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) didn’t impact the spread of that organism in non-ICU hospital wards, even when staff employed an active surveillance screening protocol to identify every carrier at admission.

The failure of precautions may have root in two thorny issues, said Friederike Maechler, MD, who presented the data at the the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

“Adherence to strict contact isolation and hand hygiene is never 100% in a real-life scenario,” said Dr. Maechler, of Charite University Hospital, Berlin. Also, she said, contact isolation can only be effective in a ward if all, or at least most, of the ESBL-E carriers are identified. “Even with an extensive surveillance screening program established, many carriers remained unknown to the health care staff.”

The 25-month study, dubbed R-Gnosis, was conducted in 20 Western European hospitals in Madrid, Berlin, Utrecht, and Geneva. It compared 12 months of contact precaution with standard precaution infection control strategies in medical and surgical non-ICUs.

The entire study hinged on a strict protocol to identify as many ESBL-E carriers as possible. This was done by screening upon admission to the unit, screening once per week during the hospital stay, and screening on discharge. Each patient underwent deep rectal swabs that were cultured on agar and screened for resistance.

The crossover design trial randomized each unit to either contact precautions or standard precautions for 12 months, followed by a 1-month washout period, after which they began the other protocol.

In all, 50,870 patients were entered into the study. By the end, Dr. Maechler had data on 11,367 patients with full screening and follow-up.

SOURCE: Maechler F et al. ECCMID 2018, Oral Abstract O1130.

MADRID – A study designed to test the benefit of piperacillin-tazobactam in cephalosporin-resistant bloodstream infections has showed just the opposite: The combination can be fatal for these patients, conferring a threefold increased risk of death compared with meropenem.

The piperacillin-tazobactam combination (PTZ) was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality than that of meropenem (12.3% vs. 3.7%; RR 3.4), Patrick Harris, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

The number needed to harm with PTZ treatment was 12, said Dr. Harris of the University of Queensland, Australia.

“This was really not the result we wanted. We were expecting to show noninferiority, but the answer we did get was quite compelling. We have to say that in patients with these kinds of bloodstream infections, the use of piperacillin-tazobactam is definitely not supported.”

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Harris et al. ECCMID 2018, abstract O1121.

MADRID – A study designed to test the benefit of piperacillin-tazobactam in cephalosporin-resistant bloodstream infections has showed just the opposite: The combination can be fatal for these patients, conferring a threefold increased risk of death compared with meropenem.

The piperacillin-tazobactam combination (PTZ) was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality than that of meropenem (12.3% vs. 3.7%; RR 3.4), Patrick Harris, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

The number needed to harm with PTZ treatment was 12, said Dr. Harris of the University of Queensland, Australia.

“This was really not the result we wanted. We were expecting to show noninferiority, but the answer we did get was quite compelling. We have to say that in patients with these kinds of bloodstream infections, the use of piperacillin-tazobactam is definitely not supported.”

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Harris et al. ECCMID 2018, abstract O1121.

MADRID – A study designed to test the benefit of piperacillin-tazobactam in cephalosporin-resistant bloodstream infections has showed just the opposite: The combination can be fatal for these patients, conferring a threefold increased risk of death compared with meropenem.

The piperacillin-tazobactam combination (PTZ) was associated with a significantly higher 30-day mortality than that of meropenem (12.3% vs. 3.7%; RR 3.4), Patrick Harris, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

The number needed to harm with PTZ treatment was 12, said Dr. Harris of the University of Queensland, Australia.

“This was really not the result we wanted. We were expecting to show noninferiority, but the answer we did get was quite compelling. We have to say that in patients with these kinds of bloodstream infections, the use of piperacillin-tazobactam is definitely not supported.”

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

[email protected]

SOURCE: Harris et al. ECCMID 2018, abstract O1121.

MADRID – A targeted antibiotic strategy that employed ertapenem in carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae reduced infections after colorectal surgery by 41%, compared with routine treatment with cefuroxime and metronidazole.

The strategy was even more effective at preventing surgical site infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria, cutting the rate by 87%, Amir Nutman, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The primary outcome was surgical site infection at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the type of any surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ/space), and infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria.

ESBL screening was carried out on 3,626 patients; carriage prevalence was 13.8%, but varied by center from 9% to 29%. Of the carriers, 468 were included in the study; 247 received routine prophylaxis and 221 received ertapenem.

Patients were a mean of 63 years old; 98% were living at home before admission. About 20% had diabetes; 5% had some type of immunodeficiency. The most common surgical indication was colon cancer (68%), and about a third had undergone prior colon surgery. Most of the surgeries were open, and about half involved a colectomy.

Patients in the ertapenem group had overall better scores on the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Basic SSI Risk Index and were less likely to have an intraoperative finding of colon dilation (20.8% vs. 27%).There were no other clinically compelling intraoperative differences between the two groups, including bleeding, bowel spillage, the need for drains, or stoma placement.

Patients who received prophylactic ertapenem had significantly better 30-day outcomes on all measures of infection than did patients who had standard prophylaxis, Dr. Nutman said.

There were 34 surgical site infections in the routine prophylaxis group and 19 in the ertapenem group. Among these, 17 in the routine group and three in the ertapenem group were caused by ESBL-producing bacteria. The ESBL-positive infections were as follows:

• E. coli (thirteen in the routine and one in the ertapenem group).
• Klebsiella species (four and one, respectively).
• Proteus species (one in the ertapenem group).

Other infections were caused by ESBL-nonproducers, including E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and other unspecified organisms. Polymicrobial infections occurred in 25 patients.

In an analysis that controlled for National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score and colon dilation, patients who received ertapenem were 41% less likely to develop any surgical site infection (15.8% vs. 22.7%; odds ratio, 0.59); 17% less likely to develop a deep infection (9.5% vs. 11.3%; OR, 0.83); and 87% less likely to develop an infection caused by an ESBL-producing bacteria (0.9% vs. 6.5%; OR, 0.13).

Dr. Nutman made no financial declarations.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nutman et al. ECCMID 2018, Abstract O1129.

MADRID – A targeted antibiotic strategy that employed ertapenem in carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae reduced infections after colorectal surgery by 41%, compared with routine treatment with cefuroxime and metronidazole.

The strategy was even more effective at preventing surgical site infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria, cutting the rate by 87%, Amir Nutman, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The primary outcome was surgical site infection at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the type of any surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ/space), and infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria.

ESBL screening was carried out on 3,626 patients; carriage prevalence was 13.8%, but varied by center from 9% to 29%. Of the carriers, 468 were included in the study; 247 received routine prophylaxis and 221 received ertapenem.

Patients were a mean of 63 years old; 98% were living at home before admission. About 20% had diabetes; 5% had some type of immunodeficiency. The most common surgical indication was colon cancer (68%), and about a third had undergone prior colon surgery. Most of the surgeries were open, and about half involved a colectomy.

Patients in the ertapenem group had overall better scores on the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Basic SSI Risk Index and were less likely to have an intraoperative finding of colon dilation (20.8% vs. 27%).There were no other clinically compelling intraoperative differences between the two groups, including bleeding, bowel spillage, the need for drains, or stoma placement.

Patients who received prophylactic ertapenem had significantly better 30-day outcomes on all measures of infection than did patients who had standard prophylaxis, Dr. Nutman said.

There were 34 surgical site infections in the routine prophylaxis group and 19 in the ertapenem group. Among these, 17 in the routine group and three in the ertapenem group were caused by ESBL-producing bacteria. The ESBL-positive infections were as follows:

• E. coli (thirteen in the routine and one in the ertapenem group).
• Klebsiella species (four and one, respectively).
• Proteus species (one in the ertapenem group).

Other infections were caused by ESBL-nonproducers, including E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and other unspecified organisms. Polymicrobial infections occurred in 25 patients.

In an analysis that controlled for National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score and colon dilation, patients who received ertapenem were 41% less likely to develop any surgical site infection (15.8% vs. 22.7%; odds ratio, 0.59); 17% less likely to develop a deep infection (9.5% vs. 11.3%; OR, 0.83); and 87% less likely to develop an infection caused by an ESBL-producing bacteria (0.9% vs. 6.5%; OR, 0.13).

Dr. Nutman made no financial declarations.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nutman et al. ECCMID 2018, Abstract O1129.

MADRID – A targeted antibiotic strategy that employed ertapenem in carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae reduced infections after colorectal surgery by 41%, compared with routine treatment with cefuroxime and metronidazole.

The strategy was even more effective at preventing surgical site infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria, cutting the rate by 87%, Amir Nutman, MD, said at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The primary outcome was surgical site infection at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the type of any surgical site infection (superficial, deep, or organ/space), and infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria.

ESBL screening was carried out on 3,626 patients; carriage prevalence was 13.8%, but varied by center from 9% to 29%. Of the carriers, 468 were included in the study; 247 received routine prophylaxis and 221 received ertapenem.

Patients were a mean of 63 years old; 98% were living at home before admission. About 20% had diabetes; 5% had some type of immunodeficiency. The most common surgical indication was colon cancer (68%), and about a third had undergone prior colon surgery. Most of the surgeries were open, and about half involved a colectomy.

Patients in the ertapenem group had overall better scores on the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance Basic SSI Risk Index and were less likely to have an intraoperative finding of colon dilation (20.8% vs. 27%).There were no other clinically compelling intraoperative differences between the two groups, including bleeding, bowel spillage, the need for drains, or stoma placement.

Patients who received prophylactic ertapenem had significantly better 30-day outcomes on all measures of infection than did patients who had standard prophylaxis, Dr. Nutman said.

There were 34 surgical site infections in the routine prophylaxis group and 19 in the ertapenem group. Among these, 17 in the routine group and three in the ertapenem group were caused by ESBL-producing bacteria. The ESBL-positive infections were as follows:

• E. coli (thirteen in the routine and one in the ertapenem group).
• Klebsiella species (four and one, respectively).
• Proteus species (one in the ertapenem group).

Other infections were caused by ESBL-nonproducers, including E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and other unspecified organisms. Polymicrobial infections occurred in 25 patients.

In an analysis that controlled for National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score and colon dilation, patients who received ertapenem were 41% less likely to develop any surgical site infection (15.8% vs. 22.7%; odds ratio, 0.59); 17% less likely to develop a deep infection (9.5% vs. 11.3%; OR, 0.83); and 87% less likely to develop an infection caused by an ESBL-producing bacteria (0.9% vs. 6.5%; OR, 0.13).

Dr. Nutman made no financial declarations.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Nutman et al. ECCMID 2018, Abstract O1129.

SEATTLE – Operative times are longer, and leaks and surgical site infections more common when surgeons opt for robotic instead of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, according to a review of 86,953 cases in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

“Robotic sleeve gastrectomy increases [use of] hospital resources. ... These findings may explain the low utilization rate of the robotic approach to sleeve gastrectomy,” said lead investigator Reza Alizadeh, MD, a surgery resident at the University of California, Irvine.

Sleeve gastrectomy has eclipsed gastric bypass as the most common weight loss surgery in United States. While most are done laparoscopically, the use of robots is becoming more common, so the investigators wanted to compare outcomes in a large number of cases. They turned to the metabolic and bariatric surgery database, which is jointly maintained by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Emergent, converted, and revision cases were excluded from the analysis to avoid confounding.

Almost 94% of the cases were done laparoscopically, with the rest done robotically. Mean operative time was 101 min in the robotic arm, and 1.5% of patients developed anastomotic leaks. Mean operative time in the laparoscopic group was 74 minutes, and 0.5% of patients developed leaks. After adjustment for potential confounders, leaks were 3.4 times more likely with the robotic approach (95% confidence interval, 2.47-4.0; P less than .01). It wasn’t possible to determine whether there were any differences in the type of stapling done in the two groups.

Meanwhile, 0.8% of robotic surgery patients developed surgical site infections versus 0.6% of the laparoscopic cases. After adjustment, infections were 38% more likely with the robot (95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P = 0.03). Dr. Alizadeh noted that the database only goes out to 30 days, so “the true complication rates may be underestimated.”

The findings are consistent with previous investigations. It’s unclear whether there’s something inherently riskier about robotic sleeve gastrectomy itself or whether surgeons haven’t quite got the knack of it yet. The higher leak rate with robotic surgery, “I believe, is mostly related to the small number of [robotic] cases being done. We are still in the beginning stages of utilizing the robotic approach. Maybe there’s a learning curve, and we need more experience and more practice,” Dr. Alizadeh said at the World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery hosted by SAGES & CAGS.

Indeed, others have reported that it takes more than two dozen cases to become proficient in another procedure, robotic esophagectomy.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alizadeh RF et al. SAGES 2018, Abstract S024.

SEATTLE – Operative times are longer, and leaks and surgical site infections more common when surgeons opt for robotic instead of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, according to a review of 86,953 cases in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

“Robotic sleeve gastrectomy increases [use of] hospital resources. ... These findings may explain the low utilization rate of the robotic approach to sleeve gastrectomy,” said lead investigator Reza Alizadeh, MD, a surgery resident at the University of California, Irvine.

Sleeve gastrectomy has eclipsed gastric bypass as the most common weight loss surgery in United States. While most are done laparoscopically, the use of robots is becoming more common, so the investigators wanted to compare outcomes in a large number of cases. They turned to the metabolic and bariatric surgery database, which is jointly maintained by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Emergent, converted, and revision cases were excluded from the analysis to avoid confounding.

Almost 94% of the cases were done laparoscopically, with the rest done robotically. Mean operative time was 101 min in the robotic arm, and 1.5% of patients developed anastomotic leaks. Mean operative time in the laparoscopic group was 74 minutes, and 0.5% of patients developed leaks. After adjustment for potential confounders, leaks were 3.4 times more likely with the robotic approach (95% confidence interval, 2.47-4.0; P less than .01). It wasn’t possible to determine whether there were any differences in the type of stapling done in the two groups.

Meanwhile, 0.8% of robotic surgery patients developed surgical site infections versus 0.6% of the laparoscopic cases. After adjustment, infections were 38% more likely with the robot (95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P = 0.03). Dr. Alizadeh noted that the database only goes out to 30 days, so “the true complication rates may be underestimated.”

The findings are consistent with previous investigations. It’s unclear whether there’s something inherently riskier about robotic sleeve gastrectomy itself or whether surgeons haven’t quite got the knack of it yet. The higher leak rate with robotic surgery, “I believe, is mostly related to the small number of [robotic] cases being done. We are still in the beginning stages of utilizing the robotic approach. Maybe there’s a learning curve, and we need more experience and more practice,” Dr. Alizadeh said at the World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery hosted by SAGES & CAGS.

Indeed, others have reported that it takes more than two dozen cases to become proficient in another procedure, robotic esophagectomy.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alizadeh RF et al. SAGES 2018, Abstract S024.

SEATTLE – Operative times are longer, and leaks and surgical site infections more common when surgeons opt for robotic instead of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, according to a review of 86,953 cases in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

“Robotic sleeve gastrectomy increases [use of] hospital resources. ... These findings may explain the low utilization rate of the robotic approach to sleeve gastrectomy,” said lead investigator Reza Alizadeh, MD, a surgery resident at the University of California, Irvine.

Sleeve gastrectomy has eclipsed gastric bypass as the most common weight loss surgery in United States. While most are done laparoscopically, the use of robots is becoming more common, so the investigators wanted to compare outcomes in a large number of cases. They turned to the metabolic and bariatric surgery database, which is jointly maintained by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Emergent, converted, and revision cases were excluded from the analysis to avoid confounding.

Almost 94% of the cases were done laparoscopically, with the rest done robotically. Mean operative time was 101 min in the robotic arm, and 1.5% of patients developed anastomotic leaks. Mean operative time in the laparoscopic group was 74 minutes, and 0.5% of patients developed leaks. After adjustment for potential confounders, leaks were 3.4 times more likely with the robotic approach (95% confidence interval, 2.47-4.0; P less than .01). It wasn’t possible to determine whether there were any differences in the type of stapling done in the two groups.

Meanwhile, 0.8% of robotic surgery patients developed surgical site infections versus 0.6% of the laparoscopic cases. After adjustment, infections were 38% more likely with the robot (95% CI, 1.01-1.89; P = 0.03). Dr. Alizadeh noted that the database only goes out to 30 days, so “the true complication rates may be underestimated.”

The findings are consistent with previous investigations. It’s unclear whether there’s something inherently riskier about robotic sleeve gastrectomy itself or whether surgeons haven’t quite got the knack of it yet. The higher leak rate with robotic surgery, “I believe, is mostly related to the small number of [robotic] cases being done. We are still in the beginning stages of utilizing the robotic approach. Maybe there’s a learning curve, and we need more experience and more practice,” Dr. Alizadeh said at the World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery hosted by SAGES & CAGS.

Indeed, others have reported that it takes more than two dozen cases to become proficient in another procedure, robotic esophagectomy.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alizadeh RF et al. SAGES 2018, Abstract S024.

CHICAGO – Use of an enhanced recovery protocol for oncology patients has been shown to improve outcomes in colorectal surgery but has been largely unproven in other types of major oncology operations. That prompted researchers at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston to investigate enhanced recovery protocols in multispecialty, major oncologic procedures. They found that the enhanced recovery protocol led to a reduction in complication rates and a decrease in hospital stay with no increase in readmissions, according to an analysis of more than 3,000 oncologic operations presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Cancer Symposium here.

lyosha_nazarenko/Thinkstock

“Patients treated with enhanced recovery did better,” Rebecca Marcus, MD, said in reporting the results. “There were decreased rates of perioperative transfusions, decreased rates of surgical site infections, decreased rates of complications, including severe complications such as wound dehiscence, pneumonia, renal failure, and unintended returns to the operating room.” She noted that the shorter hospital stays – 4 days for patients on the enhanced recovery protocol versus 5 days for those on the traditional postoperative protocol – did not result in increased readmissions.

The study reviewed 3,256 operations performed during 2011-2016 in the MD Anderson institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The operations were colorectal (20.4%), gynecologic (19.5%), hepatobiliary (8.9%), thoracic (41.9%) and urologic (9.3%). Most employed the traditional postoperative protocol (53.4%). Colorectal and thoracic/vascular surgery were early adopters of the enhanced recovery protocol at MD Anderson.

Dr. Marcus noted that the overall complication rates were 21.9% for those treated with enhanced recovery–protocol versus 33.9% for those treated with traditional postoperative protocol (P less than .0001). The group treated with enhanced recovery protocol also had lower rates of severe complications: 8.7% vs. 11.7% (P =.0048). The study also noted a trend toward reduced National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-day mortality with the enhanced recover protocol (0.4% vs. 0.86%; P = .097). Readmission rates were similar between the two groups: 8.3% for enhanced recovery protocol versus 8.9% for traditional postoperative protocol.

SOURCE: Marcus RK et al. SSO 2018, Abstract 21.

CHICAGO – Use of an enhanced recovery protocol for oncology patients has been shown to improve outcomes in colorectal surgery but has been largely unproven in other types of major oncology operations. That prompted researchers at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston to investigate enhanced recovery protocols in multispecialty, major oncologic procedures. They found that the enhanced recovery protocol led to a reduction in complication rates and a decrease in hospital stay with no increase in readmissions, according to an analysis of more than 3,000 oncologic operations presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Cancer Symposium here.

lyosha_nazarenko/Thinkstock

“Patients treated with enhanced recovery did better,” Rebecca Marcus, MD, said in reporting the results. “There were decreased rates of perioperative transfusions, decreased rates of surgical site infections, decreased rates of complications, including severe complications such as wound dehiscence, pneumonia, renal failure, and unintended returns to the operating room.” She noted that the shorter hospital stays – 4 days for patients on the enhanced recovery protocol versus 5 days for those on the traditional postoperative protocol – did not result in increased readmissions.

The study reviewed 3,256 operations performed during 2011-2016 in the MD Anderson institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The operations were colorectal (20.4%), gynecologic (19.5%), hepatobiliary (8.9%), thoracic (41.9%) and urologic (9.3%). Most employed the traditional postoperative protocol (53.4%). Colorectal and thoracic/vascular surgery were early adopters of the enhanced recovery protocol at MD Anderson.

Dr. Marcus noted that the overall complication rates were 21.9% for those treated with enhanced recovery–protocol versus 33.9% for those treated with traditional postoperative protocol (P less than .0001). The group treated with enhanced recovery protocol also had lower rates of severe complications: 8.7% vs. 11.7% (P =.0048). The study also noted a trend toward reduced National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-day mortality with the enhanced recover protocol (0.4% vs. 0.86%; P = .097). Readmission rates were similar between the two groups: 8.3% for enhanced recovery protocol versus 8.9% for traditional postoperative protocol.

SOURCE: Marcus RK et al. SSO 2018, Abstract 21.

CHICAGO – Use of an enhanced recovery protocol for oncology patients has been shown to improve outcomes in colorectal surgery but has been largely unproven in other types of major oncology operations. That prompted researchers at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston to investigate enhanced recovery protocols in multispecialty, major oncologic procedures. They found that the enhanced recovery protocol led to a reduction in complication rates and a decrease in hospital stay with no increase in readmissions, according to an analysis of more than 3,000 oncologic operations presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology Annual Cancer Symposium here.

lyosha_nazarenko/Thinkstock

“Patients treated with enhanced recovery did better,” Rebecca Marcus, MD, said in reporting the results. “There were decreased rates of perioperative transfusions, decreased rates of surgical site infections, decreased rates of complications, including severe complications such as wound dehiscence, pneumonia, renal failure, and unintended returns to the operating room.” She noted that the shorter hospital stays – 4 days for patients on the enhanced recovery protocol versus 5 days for those on the traditional postoperative protocol – did not result in increased readmissions.

The study reviewed 3,256 operations performed during 2011-2016 in the MD Anderson institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The operations were colorectal (20.4%), gynecologic (19.5%), hepatobiliary (8.9%), thoracic (41.9%) and urologic (9.3%). Most employed the traditional postoperative protocol (53.4%). Colorectal and thoracic/vascular surgery were early adopters of the enhanced recovery protocol at MD Anderson.

Dr. Marcus noted that the overall complication rates were 21.9% for those treated with enhanced recovery–protocol versus 33.9% for those treated with traditional postoperative protocol (P less than .0001). The group treated with enhanced recovery protocol also had lower rates of severe complications: 8.7% vs. 11.7% (P =.0048). The study also noted a trend toward reduced National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-day mortality with the enhanced recover protocol (0.4% vs. 0.86%; P = .097). Readmission rates were similar between the two groups: 8.3% for enhanced recovery protocol versus 8.9% for traditional postoperative protocol.

SOURCE: Marcus RK et al. SSO 2018, Abstract 21.

The rate of major and minor 30-day complications from the treatment of uterine fibroids has increased significantly since the Food and Drug Administration’s black-box warning against the use of power morcellation, data suggest.

Researchers examined the incidence of 30-day posthysterectomy complications in 75,487 women who underwent treatment for benign gynecologic indications before and after November 2014, when the FDA’s edict was issued over concerns about the risk of disseminating benign or malignant disease. Of these women, 25,571 had uterine fibroids as the indication for hysterectomy.

The retrospective cohort study, published online April 11 in JAMA Surgery, showed that while the overall rate of complications in the cohort was relatively unchanged before and after the FDA’s warning, complication rates increased significantly in women undergoing treatment for uterine fibroids.

Before the FDA’s announcement, the 30-day major complication rate in women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine fibroids was 1.9%, which increased to 2.4% after the FDA’s warning (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.47; P = .02). Similarly, the rate of minor 30-day complications increased from 2.7% before the warning to 3.3% after the warning (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; P = .01), after adjustment for factors such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, and other associated procedures.

“This 20% increase in the odds of major and minor complications could translate into a large number of additional complications among the 200,000 hysterectomies performed annually for uterine fibroids in the United States,” wrote Francesco Multinu, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his coauthors.

Overall, the researchers saw a much higher rate of major complications in women undergoing open abdominal surgery, compared with women who underwent minimally invasive surgery or vaginal hysterectomy (3.5% vs. 1.7% vs. 1.7%). A similar pattern was seen in the subgroup of women who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids (2.8% vs. 1.8% vs. 1.8%).

However, minor 30-day complication rates were higher in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (4.5%), compared with open abdominal surgery (4.1%) and minimally invasive surgery (3.2%). In women with uterine fibroids, the minor complication rates were slightly higher in those who underwent open hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy than in those who had minimally invasive surgery, but this was not statistically significant.

The type of surgery in women with uterine fibroids changed significantly after the FDA announcement. Before the black-box warning against power morcellation was issued, 37.2% of hysterectomy procedures for uterine fibroids were open, 56.1% were minimally invasive, and 6.7% were vaginal. After the announcement, the percentage that were open procedures increased to 43%, minimally invasive procedures decreased to 49.7%, and vaginal hysterectomies increased to 7.3% (P less than .001).

A similar but less pronounced trend was seen across all hysterectomies for benign gynecological indications.

The authors noted that the study analyzed data on 30-day complications, so they weren’t able to draw conclusions about longer-term outcomes.

“Although caution is required to avoid morcellation of unexpected uterine malignant neoplasms, our results should be considered by women and clinicians during the process of shared decision making and by medical societies and regulatory bodies when issuing safety communications,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and one author was supported by the University of Insubria, and by Fondo Miglierina, Varese, Italy. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Multinu F et al. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.

The rate of major and minor 30-day complications from the treatment of uterine fibroids has increased significantly since the Food and Drug Administration’s black-box warning against the use of power morcellation, data suggest.

Researchers examined the incidence of 30-day posthysterectomy complications in 75,487 women who underwent treatment for benign gynecologic indications before and after November 2014, when the FDA’s edict was issued over concerns about the risk of disseminating benign or malignant disease. Of these women, 25,571 had uterine fibroids as the indication for hysterectomy.

The retrospective cohort study, published online April 11 in JAMA Surgery, showed that while the overall rate of complications in the cohort was relatively unchanged before and after the FDA’s warning, complication rates increased significantly in women undergoing treatment for uterine fibroids.

Before the FDA’s announcement, the 30-day major complication rate in women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine fibroids was 1.9%, which increased to 2.4% after the FDA’s warning (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.47; P = .02). Similarly, the rate of minor 30-day complications increased from 2.7% before the warning to 3.3% after the warning (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; P = .01), after adjustment for factors such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, and other associated procedures.

“This 20% increase in the odds of major and minor complications could translate into a large number of additional complications among the 200,000 hysterectomies performed annually for uterine fibroids in the United States,” wrote Francesco Multinu, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his coauthors.

Overall, the researchers saw a much higher rate of major complications in women undergoing open abdominal surgery, compared with women who underwent minimally invasive surgery or vaginal hysterectomy (3.5% vs. 1.7% vs. 1.7%). A similar pattern was seen in the subgroup of women who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids (2.8% vs. 1.8% vs. 1.8%).

However, minor 30-day complication rates were higher in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (4.5%), compared with open abdominal surgery (4.1%) and minimally invasive surgery (3.2%). In women with uterine fibroids, the minor complication rates were slightly higher in those who underwent open hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy than in those who had minimally invasive surgery, but this was not statistically significant.

The type of surgery in women with uterine fibroids changed significantly after the FDA announcement. Before the black-box warning against power morcellation was issued, 37.2% of hysterectomy procedures for uterine fibroids were open, 56.1% were minimally invasive, and 6.7% were vaginal. After the announcement, the percentage that were open procedures increased to 43%, minimally invasive procedures decreased to 49.7%, and vaginal hysterectomies increased to 7.3% (P less than .001).

A similar but less pronounced trend was seen across all hysterectomies for benign gynecological indications.

The authors noted that the study analyzed data on 30-day complications, so they weren’t able to draw conclusions about longer-term outcomes.

“Although caution is required to avoid morcellation of unexpected uterine malignant neoplasms, our results should be considered by women and clinicians during the process of shared decision making and by medical societies and regulatory bodies when issuing safety communications,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and one author was supported by the University of Insubria, and by Fondo Miglierina, Varese, Italy. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Multinu F et al. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.

The rate of major and minor 30-day complications from the treatment of uterine fibroids has increased significantly since the Food and Drug Administration’s black-box warning against the use of power morcellation, data suggest.

Researchers examined the incidence of 30-day posthysterectomy complications in 75,487 women who underwent treatment for benign gynecologic indications before and after November 2014, when the FDA’s edict was issued over concerns about the risk of disseminating benign or malignant disease. Of these women, 25,571 had uterine fibroids as the indication for hysterectomy.

The retrospective cohort study, published online April 11 in JAMA Surgery, showed that while the overall rate of complications in the cohort was relatively unchanged before and after the FDA’s warning, complication rates increased significantly in women undergoing treatment for uterine fibroids.

Before the FDA’s announcement, the 30-day major complication rate in women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine fibroids was 1.9%, which increased to 2.4% after the FDA’s warning (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.47; P = .02). Similarly, the rate of minor 30-day complications increased from 2.7% before the warning to 3.3% after the warning (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; P = .01), after adjustment for factors such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, and other associated procedures.

“This 20% increase in the odds of major and minor complications could translate into a large number of additional complications among the 200,000 hysterectomies performed annually for uterine fibroids in the United States,” wrote Francesco Multinu, MD, of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., and his coauthors.

Overall, the researchers saw a much higher rate of major complications in women undergoing open abdominal surgery, compared with women who underwent minimally invasive surgery or vaginal hysterectomy (3.5% vs. 1.7% vs. 1.7%). A similar pattern was seen in the subgroup of women who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids (2.8% vs. 1.8% vs. 1.8%).

However, minor 30-day complication rates were higher in women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (4.5%), compared with open abdominal surgery (4.1%) and minimally invasive surgery (3.2%). In women with uterine fibroids, the minor complication rates were slightly higher in those who underwent open hysterectomy or vaginal hysterectomy than in those who had minimally invasive surgery, but this was not statistically significant.

The type of surgery in women with uterine fibroids changed significantly after the FDA announcement. Before the black-box warning against power morcellation was issued, 37.2% of hysterectomy procedures for uterine fibroids were open, 56.1% were minimally invasive, and 6.7% were vaginal. After the announcement, the percentage that were open procedures increased to 43%, minimally invasive procedures decreased to 49.7%, and vaginal hysterectomies increased to 7.3% (P less than .001).

A similar but less pronounced trend was seen across all hysterectomies for benign gynecological indications.

The authors noted that the study analyzed data on 30-day complications, so they weren’t able to draw conclusions about longer-term outcomes.

“Although caution is required to avoid morcellation of unexpected uterine malignant neoplasms, our results should be considered by women and clinicians during the process of shared decision making and by medical societies and regulatory bodies when issuing safety communications,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and one author was supported by the University of Insubria, and by Fondo Miglierina, Varese, Italy. No conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Multinu F et al. JAMA Surg. 2018 Apr 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141.

JACKSONVILLE, FLA. – Post-hospital care after major surgery is a significant driver of overall surgery-related spending, and hospitals are focused on reducing this spending as payers move away from the fee-for-service model.

Post-acute care following complications after major surgery can add from $1,700 to more than $4,000 to the patient’s bill, with a trend toward utilizing more expensive inpatient post-acute care and less outpatient care, according to an analysis of more than 700,000 Medicare procedures presented at the Association for Academic Surgery/Society of University Surgeons Academic Surgical Congress.

Hospitals’ efforts to reduce post-acute care spending must focus on preventing complications. “Thus, quality improvement efforts that reduce postoperative complications will be a key component of success in emerging payment reform,” Dr. Kanters noted

Session moderator Courtney Balentine, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, asked Dr. Kanters whether the research considered the incentives hospital systems have for referring patients to their own post-acute care facilities. “Post-acute care association with a single hospital has been documented as a likely incentive for discharge to a non-home destination,” Dr. Kanters replied, which leads to higher utilization of “certain” post-acute care facilities and higher costs. However, she said, this study’s dataset could not parse out that trend. “That’s certainly something that needs to be investigated,” she said.

Dr. Kanters and her coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Source: Kanters AE. Annual Academic Surgical Congress 2018.

JACKSONVILLE, FLA. – Post-hospital care after major surgery is a significant driver of overall surgery-related spending, and hospitals are focused on reducing this spending as payers move away from the fee-for-service model.

Post-acute care following complications after major surgery can add from $1,700 to more than $4,000 to the patient’s bill, with a trend toward utilizing more expensive inpatient post-acute care and less outpatient care, according to an analysis of more than 700,000 Medicare procedures presented at the Association for Academic Surgery/Society of University Surgeons Academic Surgical Congress.

Hospitals’ efforts to reduce post-acute care spending must focus on preventing complications. “Thus, quality improvement efforts that reduce postoperative complications will be a key component of success in emerging payment reform,” Dr. Kanters noted

Session moderator Courtney Balentine, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, asked Dr. Kanters whether the research considered the incentives hospital systems have for referring patients to their own post-acute care facilities. “Post-acute care association with a single hospital has been documented as a likely incentive for discharge to a non-home destination,” Dr. Kanters replied, which leads to higher utilization of “certain” post-acute care facilities and higher costs. However, she said, this study’s dataset could not parse out that trend. “That’s certainly something that needs to be investigated,” she said.

Dr. Kanters and her coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Source: Kanters AE. Annual Academic Surgical Congress 2018.

JACKSONVILLE, FLA. – Post-hospital care after major surgery is a significant driver of overall surgery-related spending, and hospitals are focused on reducing this spending as payers move away from the fee-for-service model.

Post-acute care following complications after major surgery can add from $1,700 to more than $4,000 to the patient’s bill, with a trend toward utilizing more expensive inpatient post-acute care and less outpatient care, according to an analysis of more than 700,000 Medicare procedures presented at the Association for Academic Surgery/Society of University Surgeons Academic Surgical Congress.

Hospitals’ efforts to reduce post-acute care spending must focus on preventing complications. “Thus, quality improvement efforts that reduce postoperative complications will be a key component of success in emerging payment reform,” Dr. Kanters noted

Session moderator Courtney Balentine, MD, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, asked Dr. Kanters whether the research considered the incentives hospital systems have for referring patients to their own post-acute care facilities. “Post-acute care association with a single hospital has been documented as a likely incentive for discharge to a non-home destination,” Dr. Kanters replied, which leads to higher utilization of “certain” post-acute care facilities and higher costs. However, she said, this study’s dataset could not parse out that trend. “That’s certainly something that needs to be investigated,” she said.

Dr. Kanters and her coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Source: Kanters AE. Annual Academic Surgical Congress 2018.

Wound protection devices could significantly decrease the risk of surgical site infections after lower gastrointestinal surgery, particularly dual-ring devices, new research suggests.

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials with 3,029 participants found that the use of wound protectors during surgery was associated with 34% lower odds of surgical site infection (95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.90; P less than .01).

SOURCE: Zhang L et al. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1111–22.

Wound protection devices could significantly decrease the risk of surgical site infections after lower gastrointestinal surgery, particularly dual-ring devices, new research suggests.

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials with 3,029 participants found that the use of wound protectors during surgery was associated with 34% lower odds of surgical site infection (95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.90; P less than .01).

SOURCE: Zhang L et al. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1111–22.

Wound protection devices could significantly decrease the risk of surgical site infections after lower gastrointestinal surgery, particularly dual-ring devices, new research suggests.

A meta-analysis of 12 randomized, controlled trials with 3,029 participants found that the use of wound protectors during surgery was associated with 34% lower odds of surgical site infection (95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.90; P less than .01).

SOURCE: Zhang L et al. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1111–22.