User login
Study examines intestinal microbiota role post liver transplant
WASHINGTON – During and after liver transplant, the reaction of the intestinal microbiota may be a critical determinant of outcomes; preliminary data from a cohort study may provide some clarification of what modulates gut microbiota post transplantation and shed light on predictive factors.
Anna-Catrin Uhlemann, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center, New York, noted that several studies in recent years sought to clarify influences on gut microbiota in people receiving liver transplants, but “there are still a number of important gaps in knowledge, including what exactly is the longitudinal evolution of the host transplant microbiome and what is the predictive value of pre- and early posttransplant dysbiosis on outcomes and complications.”
The researchers collected more than 1,000 samples to screen for colonization by the following MDR organisms: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (ESBL), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 19% (P =.031) of patients had CRE colonization associated with subsequent infection, 41% (P = .003) had ESBL colonization, and 46% (P = .021) had VRE colonization, Dr. Uhlemann said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The researchers then selected 484 samples for sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene to determine the composition of gut microbiota.
The study used two indexes to determine the alpha diversity of microbiota: the Chao index to estimate richness and the Shannon diversity index to determine the abundance of species in different settings. “We observed dynamic temporal evolution of alpha diversity and taxa abundance over the 1-year follow-up period,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “The diagnosis, the Child-Pugh class, and changes in perioperative antibiotics were important predictors of posttransplant alpha diversity.”
The study also found that Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci increased post transplant in general and as MDR organisms, and that a patient’s MDR status was an important modulator of the posttransplant microbiome, as was the lack of protective operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
The researchers evaluated the relative abundance of taxa and beta diversity. For example, pretransplant patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 25 showed enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae as well as different taxa of the Bacteroidiaceae, while those with MELD scores below 25 showed enrichment of Veillonellaceae. “The significance of this is not clear yet,” Dr. Uhlemann said.
Liver disease severity can also influence gut microbes. Those with Child-Pugh class C disease have the highest numbers in terms of richness and lowest in terms of diversity, Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, at the moment when we are looking at the differential abundance of the taxa, we don’t see quite as clear a pattern, although we noticed in the high group a higher abundance of Bacteroidiaceae,” she said.
Hepatitis B and C patients also presented divergent microbiota profiles. Hepatitis B virus patients “in general are always relatively healthy, and we actually see that these indices are relatively preserved,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “When we look at hepatitis C, however, we see that these patients are starting off quite low and then have an increase in alpha-diversity measures at around month 6.” A subset of patients with alcoholic liver disease also didn’t reach higher Chao and Shannon levels until 6 months after transplant.
“We also find that adjustment of periodic antibiotics for allergy or history of prior infection is significantly associated with a decrease in alpha diversity several months into the posttransplant course,” said Dr. Uhlemann. This is driven by an increase in the abundance of Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae. “And when we look at MDR colonization as a predictor of alpha diversity, we see that those who have MDR colonization, irrespective of the species, also have the lower alpha diversity.”
The researchers also started to look at pretransplant alpha diversity as a predictor of transplant outcomes, and while the analysis is still in progress, the Shannon indices were significantly different between patients who died and those who survived a year. “There was a trend for significant differences for posttransplant infection and the length of the hospital stay,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, we did not see any association with posttransplant ICU readmission, rejection, or VRE complications.”
She added that future analyses are needed to further evaluate the interaction between the clinical comorbidities in the microbiome and vice versa.
Dr. Uhlemann disclosed links to Merck.
WASHINGTON – During and after liver transplant, the reaction of the intestinal microbiota may be a critical determinant of outcomes; preliminary data from a cohort study may provide some clarification of what modulates gut microbiota post transplantation and shed light on predictive factors.
Anna-Catrin Uhlemann, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center, New York, noted that several studies in recent years sought to clarify influences on gut microbiota in people receiving liver transplants, but “there are still a number of important gaps in knowledge, including what exactly is the longitudinal evolution of the host transplant microbiome and what is the predictive value of pre- and early posttransplant dysbiosis on outcomes and complications.”
The researchers collected more than 1,000 samples to screen for colonization by the following MDR organisms: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (ESBL), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 19% (P =.031) of patients had CRE colonization associated with subsequent infection, 41% (P = .003) had ESBL colonization, and 46% (P = .021) had VRE colonization, Dr. Uhlemann said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The researchers then selected 484 samples for sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene to determine the composition of gut microbiota.
The study used two indexes to determine the alpha diversity of microbiota: the Chao index to estimate richness and the Shannon diversity index to determine the abundance of species in different settings. “We observed dynamic temporal evolution of alpha diversity and taxa abundance over the 1-year follow-up period,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “The diagnosis, the Child-Pugh class, and changes in perioperative antibiotics were important predictors of posttransplant alpha diversity.”
The study also found that Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci increased post transplant in general and as MDR organisms, and that a patient’s MDR status was an important modulator of the posttransplant microbiome, as was the lack of protective operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
The researchers evaluated the relative abundance of taxa and beta diversity. For example, pretransplant patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 25 showed enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae as well as different taxa of the Bacteroidiaceae, while those with MELD scores below 25 showed enrichment of Veillonellaceae. “The significance of this is not clear yet,” Dr. Uhlemann said.
Liver disease severity can also influence gut microbes. Those with Child-Pugh class C disease have the highest numbers in terms of richness and lowest in terms of diversity, Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, at the moment when we are looking at the differential abundance of the taxa, we don’t see quite as clear a pattern, although we noticed in the high group a higher abundance of Bacteroidiaceae,” she said.
Hepatitis B and C patients also presented divergent microbiota profiles. Hepatitis B virus patients “in general are always relatively healthy, and we actually see that these indices are relatively preserved,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “When we look at hepatitis C, however, we see that these patients are starting off quite low and then have an increase in alpha-diversity measures at around month 6.” A subset of patients with alcoholic liver disease also didn’t reach higher Chao and Shannon levels until 6 months after transplant.
“We also find that adjustment of periodic antibiotics for allergy or history of prior infection is significantly associated with a decrease in alpha diversity several months into the posttransplant course,” said Dr. Uhlemann. This is driven by an increase in the abundance of Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae. “And when we look at MDR colonization as a predictor of alpha diversity, we see that those who have MDR colonization, irrespective of the species, also have the lower alpha diversity.”
The researchers also started to look at pretransplant alpha diversity as a predictor of transplant outcomes, and while the analysis is still in progress, the Shannon indices were significantly different between patients who died and those who survived a year. “There was a trend for significant differences for posttransplant infection and the length of the hospital stay,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, we did not see any association with posttransplant ICU readmission, rejection, or VRE complications.”
She added that future analyses are needed to further evaluate the interaction between the clinical comorbidities in the microbiome and vice versa.
Dr. Uhlemann disclosed links to Merck.
WASHINGTON – During and after liver transplant, the reaction of the intestinal microbiota may be a critical determinant of outcomes; preliminary data from a cohort study may provide some clarification of what modulates gut microbiota post transplantation and shed light on predictive factors.
Anna-Catrin Uhlemann, MD, PhD, of Columbia University Medical Center, New York, noted that several studies in recent years sought to clarify influences on gut microbiota in people receiving liver transplants, but “there are still a number of important gaps in knowledge, including what exactly is the longitudinal evolution of the host transplant microbiome and what is the predictive value of pre- and early posttransplant dysbiosis on outcomes and complications.”
The researchers collected more than 1,000 samples to screen for colonization by the following MDR organisms: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (ESBL), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 19% (P =.031) of patients had CRE colonization associated with subsequent infection, 41% (P = .003) had ESBL colonization, and 46% (P = .021) had VRE colonization, Dr. Uhlemann said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The researchers then selected 484 samples for sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene to determine the composition of gut microbiota.
The study used two indexes to determine the alpha diversity of microbiota: the Chao index to estimate richness and the Shannon diversity index to determine the abundance of species in different settings. “We observed dynamic temporal evolution of alpha diversity and taxa abundance over the 1-year follow-up period,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “The diagnosis, the Child-Pugh class, and changes in perioperative antibiotics were important predictors of posttransplant alpha diversity.”
The study also found that Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci increased post transplant in general and as MDR organisms, and that a patient’s MDR status was an important modulator of the posttransplant microbiome, as was the lack of protective operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
The researchers evaluated the relative abundance of taxa and beta diversity. For example, pretransplant patients with a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 25 showed enrichment of Enterobacteriaceae as well as different taxa of the Bacteroidiaceae, while those with MELD scores below 25 showed enrichment of Veillonellaceae. “The significance of this is not clear yet,” Dr. Uhlemann said.
Liver disease severity can also influence gut microbes. Those with Child-Pugh class C disease have the highest numbers in terms of richness and lowest in terms of diversity, Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, at the moment when we are looking at the differential abundance of the taxa, we don’t see quite as clear a pattern, although we noticed in the high group a higher abundance of Bacteroidiaceae,” she said.
Hepatitis B and C patients also presented divergent microbiota profiles. Hepatitis B virus patients “in general are always relatively healthy, and we actually see that these indices are relatively preserved,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “When we look at hepatitis C, however, we see that these patients are starting off quite low and then have an increase in alpha-diversity measures at around month 6.” A subset of patients with alcoholic liver disease also didn’t reach higher Chao and Shannon levels until 6 months after transplant.
“We also find that adjustment of periodic antibiotics for allergy or history of prior infection is significantly associated with a decrease in alpha diversity several months into the posttransplant course,” said Dr. Uhlemann. This is driven by an increase in the abundance of Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae. “And when we look at MDR colonization as a predictor of alpha diversity, we see that those who have MDR colonization, irrespective of the species, also have the lower alpha diversity.”
The researchers also started to look at pretransplant alpha diversity as a predictor of transplant outcomes, and while the analysis is still in progress, the Shannon indices were significantly different between patients who died and those who survived a year. “There was a trend for significant differences for posttransplant infection and the length of the hospital stay,” Dr. Uhlemann said. “However, we did not see any association with posttransplant ICU readmission, rejection, or VRE complications.”
She added that future analyses are needed to further evaluate the interaction between the clinical comorbidities in the microbiome and vice versa.
Dr. Uhlemann disclosed links to Merck.
AT THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Key clinical point: The presence or lack of specific modulators of gut microbiota may influence outcomes of liver transplantation.
Major finding: Over a 1-year follow-up period, 19% of patients had colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, 41% had Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, and 46% had vancomycin-resistant enterococci associated with subsequent infections.
Data source: A prospective longitudinal cohort study of 323 patients, 125 of whom completed 1 year of follow-up.
Disclosures: Dr. Uhlemann disclosed receiving research funding from Merck.
VIDEO: Rapid influenza test obviates empiric antivirals
TORONTO – A test that only requires a maximum 2-hour wait for results was highly accurate at detecting influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant patients, according to research presented at the CHEST annual meeting on Oct. 30.
This rapid and highly accurate test for detecting three common respiratory viruses has dramatically cut the need for empiric treatments and the risk for causing nosocomial infections in lung transplant patients who develop severe upper respiratory infections, Macé M. Schuurmans, MD, noted during the presentation.
This study involved 100 consecutive lung transplant patients who presented at Zurich University Hospital with signs of severe upper respiratory infection. The researchers ran the rapid and standard diagnostic tests for each patient and found that, relative to the standard test, the rapid test had positive and negative predictive values of 95%.
The number of empiric treatments with oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and ribavirin to treat a suspected influenza or respiratory syncytial virus infection (RSV) has “strongly diminished” by about two-thirds, noted Dr. Schuurmans, who is a pulmonologist at the hospital.
Until the rapid test became available, Dr. Shuurmans and his associates used a standard polymerase chain reaction test that takes 36-48 hours to yield a result. Using this test made treating patients empirically with oseltamivir and oral antibiotics for a couple of days a necessity, he said in a video interview. The older test also required isolating patients to avoid the potential spread of influenza or RSV in the hospital.
The rapid test, which became available for U.S. use in early 2017, covers influenza A and B and RSV in a single test with a single mouth-swab specimen.
“We now routinely use the rapid test and don’t prescribe empiric antivirals or antibiotics as often,” Dr. Schuurmans said. “There is much less drug cost and fewer potential adverse effects from empiric treatment.” Specimens still also undergo conventional testing, however, because that can identify eight additional viruses that the rapid test doesn’t cover.
Dr. Schuurmans acknowledged that further study needs to assess the cost-benefit of the rapid test to confirm that its added expense is offset by reduced expenses for empiric treatment and hospital isolation.
He had no disclosures. The study received no commercial support.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
TORONTO – A test that only requires a maximum 2-hour wait for results was highly accurate at detecting influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant patients, according to research presented at the CHEST annual meeting on Oct. 30.
This rapid and highly accurate test for detecting three common respiratory viruses has dramatically cut the need for empiric treatments and the risk for causing nosocomial infections in lung transplant patients who develop severe upper respiratory infections, Macé M. Schuurmans, MD, noted during the presentation.
This study involved 100 consecutive lung transplant patients who presented at Zurich University Hospital with signs of severe upper respiratory infection. The researchers ran the rapid and standard diagnostic tests for each patient and found that, relative to the standard test, the rapid test had positive and negative predictive values of 95%.
The number of empiric treatments with oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and ribavirin to treat a suspected influenza or respiratory syncytial virus infection (RSV) has “strongly diminished” by about two-thirds, noted Dr. Schuurmans, who is a pulmonologist at the hospital.
Until the rapid test became available, Dr. Shuurmans and his associates used a standard polymerase chain reaction test that takes 36-48 hours to yield a result. Using this test made treating patients empirically with oseltamivir and oral antibiotics for a couple of days a necessity, he said in a video interview. The older test also required isolating patients to avoid the potential spread of influenza or RSV in the hospital.
The rapid test, which became available for U.S. use in early 2017, covers influenza A and B and RSV in a single test with a single mouth-swab specimen.
“We now routinely use the rapid test and don’t prescribe empiric antivirals or antibiotics as often,” Dr. Schuurmans said. “There is much less drug cost and fewer potential adverse effects from empiric treatment.” Specimens still also undergo conventional testing, however, because that can identify eight additional viruses that the rapid test doesn’t cover.
Dr. Schuurmans acknowledged that further study needs to assess the cost-benefit of the rapid test to confirm that its added expense is offset by reduced expenses for empiric treatment and hospital isolation.
He had no disclosures. The study received no commercial support.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
TORONTO – A test that only requires a maximum 2-hour wait for results was highly accurate at detecting influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant patients, according to research presented at the CHEST annual meeting on Oct. 30.
This rapid and highly accurate test for detecting three common respiratory viruses has dramatically cut the need for empiric treatments and the risk for causing nosocomial infections in lung transplant patients who develop severe upper respiratory infections, Macé M. Schuurmans, MD, noted during the presentation.
This study involved 100 consecutive lung transplant patients who presented at Zurich University Hospital with signs of severe upper respiratory infection. The researchers ran the rapid and standard diagnostic tests for each patient and found that, relative to the standard test, the rapid test had positive and negative predictive values of 95%.
The number of empiric treatments with oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and ribavirin to treat a suspected influenza or respiratory syncytial virus infection (RSV) has “strongly diminished” by about two-thirds, noted Dr. Schuurmans, who is a pulmonologist at the hospital.
Until the rapid test became available, Dr. Shuurmans and his associates used a standard polymerase chain reaction test that takes 36-48 hours to yield a result. Using this test made treating patients empirically with oseltamivir and oral antibiotics for a couple of days a necessity, he said in a video interview. The older test also required isolating patients to avoid the potential spread of influenza or RSV in the hospital.
The rapid test, which became available for U.S. use in early 2017, covers influenza A and B and RSV in a single test with a single mouth-swab specimen.
“We now routinely use the rapid test and don’t prescribe empiric antivirals or antibiotics as often,” Dr. Schuurmans said. “There is much less drug cost and fewer potential adverse effects from empiric treatment.” Specimens still also undergo conventional testing, however, because that can identify eight additional viruses that the rapid test doesn’t cover.
Dr. Schuurmans acknowledged that further study needs to assess the cost-benefit of the rapid test to confirm that its added expense is offset by reduced expenses for empiric treatment and hospital isolation.
He had no disclosures. The study received no commercial support.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT CHEST 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The rapid test had positive and negative predictive values of 95%.
Data source: A single-center observational study of 100 consecutive lung transplant recipients who presented with severe, acute respiratory infection.
Disclosures: Dr. Schuurmans had no disclosures. The study received no commercial support.
VIDEO: Liver transplant center competition tied to delisting patients
WASHINGTON – Low market competition among liver transplant centers may affect which patients are considered too sick to transplant, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
With 20% of patients dying while on the transplant wait list, including those who were delisted, understanding the distribution of organs among donor service areas (DSAs) is crucial to lowering mortality during the current organ shortage, according to presenter Yanik Babekov, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Investigators studied 3,131 patients who were delisted after being classified as “too sick” from 116 centers in 51 DSAs, between 2002 and 2012.
Researchers used the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which analyzes the market share of each participant to determine the overall level of competition. Measurements on the HHI range between 0 and 1, with 0 being the most competitive and 1 being the least.
Mean delisting Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores considered to be “too sick to transplant” were 26.1, and average HHI among DSAs was 0.46, according to investigators. They found that, for every 1% increase in HHI, the delisting MELD score increased by 0.06, according to a risk-adjustment analysis.
“In other words, more competitive DSAs delist patients for [being] ‘too sick’ at lower MELD scores,” Dr. Babekov explained in a video interview. “Interestingly, race, education, citizenship, and other DSA factors also impacted delisting MELD for ‘too sick.’ ”
While market competition may not be the only factor to explain the phenomenon of patients delisted for being ‘too sick,’ it is important to identify how having more transplant centers in DSAs can help more patients be added to, and stay on, these wait lists, according to investigators.
Dr. Babekov had no relevant financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
WASHINGTON – Low market competition among liver transplant centers may affect which patients are considered too sick to transplant, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
With 20% of patients dying while on the transplant wait list, including those who were delisted, understanding the distribution of organs among donor service areas (DSAs) is crucial to lowering mortality during the current organ shortage, according to presenter Yanik Babekov, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Investigators studied 3,131 patients who were delisted after being classified as “too sick” from 116 centers in 51 DSAs, between 2002 and 2012.
Researchers used the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which analyzes the market share of each participant to determine the overall level of competition. Measurements on the HHI range between 0 and 1, with 0 being the most competitive and 1 being the least.
Mean delisting Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores considered to be “too sick to transplant” were 26.1, and average HHI among DSAs was 0.46, according to investigators. They found that, for every 1% increase in HHI, the delisting MELD score increased by 0.06, according to a risk-adjustment analysis.
“In other words, more competitive DSAs delist patients for [being] ‘too sick’ at lower MELD scores,” Dr. Babekov explained in a video interview. “Interestingly, race, education, citizenship, and other DSA factors also impacted delisting MELD for ‘too sick.’ ”
While market competition may not be the only factor to explain the phenomenon of patients delisted for being ‘too sick,’ it is important to identify how having more transplant centers in DSAs can help more patients be added to, and stay on, these wait lists, according to investigators.
Dr. Babekov had no relevant financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
WASHINGTON – Low market competition among liver transplant centers may affect which patients are considered too sick to transplant, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
With 20% of patients dying while on the transplant wait list, including those who were delisted, understanding the distribution of organs among donor service areas (DSAs) is crucial to lowering mortality during the current organ shortage, according to presenter Yanik Babekov, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Investigators studied 3,131 patients who were delisted after being classified as “too sick” from 116 centers in 51 DSAs, between 2002 and 2012.
Researchers used the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), which analyzes the market share of each participant to determine the overall level of competition. Measurements on the HHI range between 0 and 1, with 0 being the most competitive and 1 being the least.
Mean delisting Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores considered to be “too sick to transplant” were 26.1, and average HHI among DSAs was 0.46, according to investigators. They found that, for every 1% increase in HHI, the delisting MELD score increased by 0.06, according to a risk-adjustment analysis.
“In other words, more competitive DSAs delist patients for [being] ‘too sick’ at lower MELD scores,” Dr. Babekov explained in a video interview. “Interestingly, race, education, citizenship, and other DSA factors also impacted delisting MELD for ‘too sick.’ ”
While market competition may not be the only factor to explain the phenomenon of patients delisted for being ‘too sick,’ it is important to identify how having more transplant centers in DSAs can help more patients be added to, and stay on, these wait lists, according to investigators.
Dr. Babekov had no relevant financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
AT THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Nutrition status predicts outcomes in liver transplant
WASHINGTON – Efforts to improve nutritional status prior to transplant may lead to improved patient outcomes and economic benefits after orthotopic liver transplant.
Clinicians at Austin Health, a tertiary health center in Melbourne, reviewed prospectively acquired data on 390 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant at their institution between January 2009 and June 2016, according to Brooke Chapman, a dietitian on the center’s transplant team.
“Hand-grip strength test is a functional measure of upper-body strength,” Ms. Chapman said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. “It’s quick and cheap and reliable but importantly, it does respond quite readily to changes in nutritional intake and nutrition status.”
Assessments were made as patients were wait listed for liver transplant. Hand-grip strength and subjective global assessment were repeated at the time of transplant.
Patients with fulminant liver failure and those requiring retransplantation were excluded from the final analysis, leaving 321 patients in the cohort. More than two-thirds (69%) were men and the median age was 52 years old. About half of patients had a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatitis C infection. The median MELD (Model for Endstage Liver Disease) score was 18, with a range of 6-40, and the median time on the wait list was 140 days.
We saw a “high prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing liver transplant and the deterioration in nutritional status despite our best efforts while they are on the waiting list,” Ms. Chapman said.
At baseline, two-thirds of patients were malnourished – either mildly to moderately or severely; by transplantation, 77% were malnourished.
“At assessment, we are prescribing and educating patients on a high-calorie, high-protein diet initially, and we give oral nutrition support therapies,” she said. “We really try to get them to improve oral intake, but for patients who do require more aggressive intervention, we will feed them via nasogastric tube.”
Just over half (55%) of patients fell below the cutoff for sarcopenia on the hand-grip test at baseline and at transplant. More than a quarter of patients (27%) were not able to complete the 6-minute walk test.
“On univariate analysis, we saw malnutrition to be strongly associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay,” Ms. Chapman noted. Severely malnourished patients spent significantly more time in the ICU than did well-nourished patients – a mean 147 hours vs. 89 hours (P = .001). Mean length of stay also was significantly longer at 40 days vs. 16 days (P = .003).
There was also an increased incidence of infection in severely malnourished patients as compared with well-nourished patients – 55.2% vs. 33.8%, she said.
“Aggressive strategies to combat malnutrition and deconditioning in the pretransplant period may lead to improved outcomes after transplant,” Ms. Chapman concluded.
The study was funded by Austin Health. Ms. Chapman declared no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @denisefulton
WASHINGTON – Efforts to improve nutritional status prior to transplant may lead to improved patient outcomes and economic benefits after orthotopic liver transplant.
Clinicians at Austin Health, a tertiary health center in Melbourne, reviewed prospectively acquired data on 390 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant at their institution between January 2009 and June 2016, according to Brooke Chapman, a dietitian on the center’s transplant team.
“Hand-grip strength test is a functional measure of upper-body strength,” Ms. Chapman said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. “It’s quick and cheap and reliable but importantly, it does respond quite readily to changes in nutritional intake and nutrition status.”
Assessments were made as patients were wait listed for liver transplant. Hand-grip strength and subjective global assessment were repeated at the time of transplant.
Patients with fulminant liver failure and those requiring retransplantation were excluded from the final analysis, leaving 321 patients in the cohort. More than two-thirds (69%) were men and the median age was 52 years old. About half of patients had a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatitis C infection. The median MELD (Model for Endstage Liver Disease) score was 18, with a range of 6-40, and the median time on the wait list was 140 days.
We saw a “high prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing liver transplant and the deterioration in nutritional status despite our best efforts while they are on the waiting list,” Ms. Chapman said.
At baseline, two-thirds of patients were malnourished – either mildly to moderately or severely; by transplantation, 77% were malnourished.
“At assessment, we are prescribing and educating patients on a high-calorie, high-protein diet initially, and we give oral nutrition support therapies,” she said. “We really try to get them to improve oral intake, but for patients who do require more aggressive intervention, we will feed them via nasogastric tube.”
Just over half (55%) of patients fell below the cutoff for sarcopenia on the hand-grip test at baseline and at transplant. More than a quarter of patients (27%) were not able to complete the 6-minute walk test.
“On univariate analysis, we saw malnutrition to be strongly associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay,” Ms. Chapman noted. Severely malnourished patients spent significantly more time in the ICU than did well-nourished patients – a mean 147 hours vs. 89 hours (P = .001). Mean length of stay also was significantly longer at 40 days vs. 16 days (P = .003).
There was also an increased incidence of infection in severely malnourished patients as compared with well-nourished patients – 55.2% vs. 33.8%, she said.
“Aggressive strategies to combat malnutrition and deconditioning in the pretransplant period may lead to improved outcomes after transplant,” Ms. Chapman concluded.
The study was funded by Austin Health. Ms. Chapman declared no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @denisefulton
WASHINGTON – Efforts to improve nutritional status prior to transplant may lead to improved patient outcomes and economic benefits after orthotopic liver transplant.
Clinicians at Austin Health, a tertiary health center in Melbourne, reviewed prospectively acquired data on 390 adult patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant at their institution between January 2009 and June 2016, according to Brooke Chapman, a dietitian on the center’s transplant team.
“Hand-grip strength test is a functional measure of upper-body strength,” Ms. Chapman said at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. “It’s quick and cheap and reliable but importantly, it does respond quite readily to changes in nutritional intake and nutrition status.”
Assessments were made as patients were wait listed for liver transplant. Hand-grip strength and subjective global assessment were repeated at the time of transplant.
Patients with fulminant liver failure and those requiring retransplantation were excluded from the final analysis, leaving 321 patients in the cohort. More than two-thirds (69%) were men and the median age was 52 years old. About half of patients had a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatitis C infection. The median MELD (Model for Endstage Liver Disease) score was 18, with a range of 6-40, and the median time on the wait list was 140 days.
We saw a “high prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing liver transplant and the deterioration in nutritional status despite our best efforts while they are on the waiting list,” Ms. Chapman said.
At baseline, two-thirds of patients were malnourished – either mildly to moderately or severely; by transplantation, 77% were malnourished.
“At assessment, we are prescribing and educating patients on a high-calorie, high-protein diet initially, and we give oral nutrition support therapies,” she said. “We really try to get them to improve oral intake, but for patients who do require more aggressive intervention, we will feed them via nasogastric tube.”
Just over half (55%) of patients fell below the cutoff for sarcopenia on the hand-grip test at baseline and at transplant. More than a quarter of patients (27%) were not able to complete the 6-minute walk test.
“On univariate analysis, we saw malnutrition to be strongly associated with increased ICU and hospital length of stay,” Ms. Chapman noted. Severely malnourished patients spent significantly more time in the ICU than did well-nourished patients – a mean 147 hours vs. 89 hours (P = .001). Mean length of stay also was significantly longer at 40 days vs. 16 days (P = .003).
There was also an increased incidence of infection in severely malnourished patients as compared with well-nourished patients – 55.2% vs. 33.8%, she said.
“Aggressive strategies to combat malnutrition and deconditioning in the pretransplant period may lead to improved outcomes after transplant,” Ms. Chapman concluded.
The study was funded by Austin Health. Ms. Chapman declared no relevant conflicts of interest.
[email protected]
On Twitter @denisefulton
AT THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Severely malnourished patients spent a mean of 147 hours in the ICU vs. 89 hours for well-nourished patients. Mean length of stay also was significantly longer at 40 days vs. 16 days (P = .003).
Data source: Retrospective review of data on 390 adults awaiting liver transplantation between Jan. 2009 and June 2016.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the institutions. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Post–liver transplant results similar in acute alcoholic hepatitis, stage 1a
WASHINGTON – Patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH) have similar early post–liver transplant outcomes to those listed with fulminant hepatic failure, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Patients with severe AAH have high mortality, but many are unable to survive the 6 months of sobriety required to be accepted as liver transplant candidates, said George Cholankeril, MD, of the gastroenterology and hepatology department at Stanford (Calif.) University.
He and his associates studied wait-list mortality and post–liver transplant survival among 1,912 patients listed for either AAH or fulminant hepatic failure on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry between 2011 and 2016.
A total of 193 patients were listed with AAH, 314 were listed with drug-induced liver injury including acetaminophen (DILI-APAP), and 1,405 were listed as non-DILI patients.
One-year post–liver transplant survival among AAH patients was 93.3%, compared with 87.75% for DILI-APAP patients and 88.4% among non-DILI patients (P less than .001). Survival remained the same among AAH patients 3 years following transplantation, but rates dropped for both the DILI-APAP group (80.8%) and the non-DILI group (81.4%), Dr. Cholankeril reported.
Patients were a median age of 45, 33, and 46 years among the AAH, DILI-APAP, and non-DILI, groups respectively. Patients were majority white among all three groups, with a significantly larger female population among the DILI-APAP group (80.6%) than the AAH (34.7%) or non-DILI (59.4%) groups. Patients in the AAH group had a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 32, compared with 34 for DILI-APAP and 21 for non-DILI.
AAH patients could potentially see significant improvement with a liver transplant, according to investigators; however, the current standards for candidacy have created treatment barriers.
“Patients with AAH have comparable early post-transplant outcomes to those with hepatic liver failure,” said Dr. Cholankeril. “However, there is no consensus or national guidelines for liver transplantation within this patient population.”
Wait-list trends have already started to shift toward more AAH patient acceptance. The number of AAH patients added to the transplant wait lists increased from 14 in 2011 to 58 in 2016. Investigators also found that the number of liver transplant centers accepting AAH patients to their transplant lists increased from 3 to 26.
Investigators were limited by the variations in protocols for each transplant center, as well as by the inconsistency of pre–liver transplant psychosocial metrics. The diagnostic criteria of AAH through UNOS was also a limitation for investigators, according to Dr. Cholankeril.
Although liver transplantation may be able to help some patients, it is only a small fix for a much larger problem. “This is only a solution for a minority of patients with the rising epidemic of alcoholic intoxication in the U.S.,” he said. “As the increasing mortality trends show alcohol-related mortality, and alcoholic liver disease is a contributor to it, we must recognize alcoholic liver disease remains an orphan disease and there is still an unmet need.”
Dr. Cholankeril reported no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
Transplanting patients with alcohol induced liver disease has been controversial since the earliest days of liver transplantation. Initially some programs were reluctant to transplant patients with a disease that was “self-inflicted” based on an ethical concern about using a scarce resource to save the lives of those whose disease was their own fault, while other patients may die waiting. There was also a concern that transplanting alcoholics would be bad publicity for organ donation and reduce the public’s willingness to donate organs. The highly publicized transplantation of baseball legend and known alcoholic Mickey Mantle in 1995 intensified this debate.
Over time it became clear that the concerns regarding transplanting alcoholics were unfounded. The outcomes were equal or better than for other diseases. Liver transplantation was termed “the ultimate eye opening experience” as serious recidivism turned out to be very uncommon. It was realized that a large percentage of all reasons for seeking medical care can be attributed to self-inflicted harm when one considers cigarette induced malignancy and cardiovascular disease and dietary indiscretion leading to obesity and diabetes. It also became clear that from a practical standpoint prohibiting transplantation of alcoholics simply drove patients to programs that would accept such patients, or caused them and their family to withhold disclosure of alcohol use.
While transplantation of patients with chronic liver disease due to alcohol use has become standard of care, transplanting patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis remains controversial and relatively uncommon. Many programs require a period of abstinence, which is impossible in the setting of acute alcoholic hepatitis. The concern is that it is impossible to discern among actively drinking candidates which ones will be able to achieve sobriety after the transplant. The report by Cholankeril and colleagues documents that the tide is changing. There are increasing numbers of patients being transplanted for acute alcoholic hepatitis, and outcomes are acceptable. However, as the authors point out, the numbers are small and represent a highly selected group of patients. Nevertheless, the pressure on programs to modify rigid abstinence criteria is likely to grow as the evidence accumulates showing selected patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis can do well.
Jeffrey Punch, MD, FACS, is transplant specialist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and on the Editorial Advisory Board of ACS Surgery News.
Transplanting patients with alcohol induced liver disease has been controversial since the earliest days of liver transplantation. Initially some programs were reluctant to transplant patients with a disease that was “self-inflicted” based on an ethical concern about using a scarce resource to save the lives of those whose disease was their own fault, while other patients may die waiting. There was also a concern that transplanting alcoholics would be bad publicity for organ donation and reduce the public’s willingness to donate organs. The highly publicized transplantation of baseball legend and known alcoholic Mickey Mantle in 1995 intensified this debate.
Over time it became clear that the concerns regarding transplanting alcoholics were unfounded. The outcomes were equal or better than for other diseases. Liver transplantation was termed “the ultimate eye opening experience” as serious recidivism turned out to be very uncommon. It was realized that a large percentage of all reasons for seeking medical care can be attributed to self-inflicted harm when one considers cigarette induced malignancy and cardiovascular disease and dietary indiscretion leading to obesity and diabetes. It also became clear that from a practical standpoint prohibiting transplantation of alcoholics simply drove patients to programs that would accept such patients, or caused them and their family to withhold disclosure of alcohol use.
While transplantation of patients with chronic liver disease due to alcohol use has become standard of care, transplanting patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis remains controversial and relatively uncommon. Many programs require a period of abstinence, which is impossible in the setting of acute alcoholic hepatitis. The concern is that it is impossible to discern among actively drinking candidates which ones will be able to achieve sobriety after the transplant. The report by Cholankeril and colleagues documents that the tide is changing. There are increasing numbers of patients being transplanted for acute alcoholic hepatitis, and outcomes are acceptable. However, as the authors point out, the numbers are small and represent a highly selected group of patients. Nevertheless, the pressure on programs to modify rigid abstinence criteria is likely to grow as the evidence accumulates showing selected patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis can do well.
Jeffrey Punch, MD, FACS, is transplant specialist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and on the Editorial Advisory Board of ACS Surgery News.
Transplanting patients with alcohol induced liver disease has been controversial since the earliest days of liver transplantation. Initially some programs were reluctant to transplant patients with a disease that was “self-inflicted” based on an ethical concern about using a scarce resource to save the lives of those whose disease was their own fault, while other patients may die waiting. There was also a concern that transplanting alcoholics would be bad publicity for organ donation and reduce the public’s willingness to donate organs. The highly publicized transplantation of baseball legend and known alcoholic Mickey Mantle in 1995 intensified this debate.
Over time it became clear that the concerns regarding transplanting alcoholics were unfounded. The outcomes were equal or better than for other diseases. Liver transplantation was termed “the ultimate eye opening experience” as serious recidivism turned out to be very uncommon. It was realized that a large percentage of all reasons for seeking medical care can be attributed to self-inflicted harm when one considers cigarette induced malignancy and cardiovascular disease and dietary indiscretion leading to obesity and diabetes. It also became clear that from a practical standpoint prohibiting transplantation of alcoholics simply drove patients to programs that would accept such patients, or caused them and their family to withhold disclosure of alcohol use.
While transplantation of patients with chronic liver disease due to alcohol use has become standard of care, transplanting patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis remains controversial and relatively uncommon. Many programs require a period of abstinence, which is impossible in the setting of acute alcoholic hepatitis. The concern is that it is impossible to discern among actively drinking candidates which ones will be able to achieve sobriety after the transplant. The report by Cholankeril and colleagues documents that the tide is changing. There are increasing numbers of patients being transplanted for acute alcoholic hepatitis, and outcomes are acceptable. However, as the authors point out, the numbers are small and represent a highly selected group of patients. Nevertheless, the pressure on programs to modify rigid abstinence criteria is likely to grow as the evidence accumulates showing selected patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis can do well.
Jeffrey Punch, MD, FACS, is transplant specialist at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and on the Editorial Advisory Board of ACS Surgery News.
WASHINGTON – Patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH) have similar early post–liver transplant outcomes to those listed with fulminant hepatic failure, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Patients with severe AAH have high mortality, but many are unable to survive the 6 months of sobriety required to be accepted as liver transplant candidates, said George Cholankeril, MD, of the gastroenterology and hepatology department at Stanford (Calif.) University.
He and his associates studied wait-list mortality and post–liver transplant survival among 1,912 patients listed for either AAH or fulminant hepatic failure on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry between 2011 and 2016.
A total of 193 patients were listed with AAH, 314 were listed with drug-induced liver injury including acetaminophen (DILI-APAP), and 1,405 were listed as non-DILI patients.
One-year post–liver transplant survival among AAH patients was 93.3%, compared with 87.75% for DILI-APAP patients and 88.4% among non-DILI patients (P less than .001). Survival remained the same among AAH patients 3 years following transplantation, but rates dropped for both the DILI-APAP group (80.8%) and the non-DILI group (81.4%), Dr. Cholankeril reported.
Patients were a median age of 45, 33, and 46 years among the AAH, DILI-APAP, and non-DILI, groups respectively. Patients were majority white among all three groups, with a significantly larger female population among the DILI-APAP group (80.6%) than the AAH (34.7%) or non-DILI (59.4%) groups. Patients in the AAH group had a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 32, compared with 34 for DILI-APAP and 21 for non-DILI.
AAH patients could potentially see significant improvement with a liver transplant, according to investigators; however, the current standards for candidacy have created treatment barriers.
“Patients with AAH have comparable early post-transplant outcomes to those with hepatic liver failure,” said Dr. Cholankeril. “However, there is no consensus or national guidelines for liver transplantation within this patient population.”
Wait-list trends have already started to shift toward more AAH patient acceptance. The number of AAH patients added to the transplant wait lists increased from 14 in 2011 to 58 in 2016. Investigators also found that the number of liver transplant centers accepting AAH patients to their transplant lists increased from 3 to 26.
Investigators were limited by the variations in protocols for each transplant center, as well as by the inconsistency of pre–liver transplant psychosocial metrics. The diagnostic criteria of AAH through UNOS was also a limitation for investigators, according to Dr. Cholankeril.
Although liver transplantation may be able to help some patients, it is only a small fix for a much larger problem. “This is only a solution for a minority of patients with the rising epidemic of alcoholic intoxication in the U.S.,” he said. “As the increasing mortality trends show alcohol-related mortality, and alcoholic liver disease is a contributor to it, we must recognize alcoholic liver disease remains an orphan disease and there is still an unmet need.”
Dr. Cholankeril reported no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
WASHINGTON – Patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH) have similar early post–liver transplant outcomes to those listed with fulminant hepatic failure, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Patients with severe AAH have high mortality, but many are unable to survive the 6 months of sobriety required to be accepted as liver transplant candidates, said George Cholankeril, MD, of the gastroenterology and hepatology department at Stanford (Calif.) University.
He and his associates studied wait-list mortality and post–liver transplant survival among 1,912 patients listed for either AAH or fulminant hepatic failure on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry between 2011 and 2016.
A total of 193 patients were listed with AAH, 314 were listed with drug-induced liver injury including acetaminophen (DILI-APAP), and 1,405 were listed as non-DILI patients.
One-year post–liver transplant survival among AAH patients was 93.3%, compared with 87.75% for DILI-APAP patients and 88.4% among non-DILI patients (P less than .001). Survival remained the same among AAH patients 3 years following transplantation, but rates dropped for both the DILI-APAP group (80.8%) and the non-DILI group (81.4%), Dr. Cholankeril reported.
Patients were a median age of 45, 33, and 46 years among the AAH, DILI-APAP, and non-DILI, groups respectively. Patients were majority white among all three groups, with a significantly larger female population among the DILI-APAP group (80.6%) than the AAH (34.7%) or non-DILI (59.4%) groups. Patients in the AAH group had a median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 32, compared with 34 for DILI-APAP and 21 for non-DILI.
AAH patients could potentially see significant improvement with a liver transplant, according to investigators; however, the current standards for candidacy have created treatment barriers.
“Patients with AAH have comparable early post-transplant outcomes to those with hepatic liver failure,” said Dr. Cholankeril. “However, there is no consensus or national guidelines for liver transplantation within this patient population.”
Wait-list trends have already started to shift toward more AAH patient acceptance. The number of AAH patients added to the transplant wait lists increased from 14 in 2011 to 58 in 2016. Investigators also found that the number of liver transplant centers accepting AAH patients to their transplant lists increased from 3 to 26.
Investigators were limited by the variations in protocols for each transplant center, as well as by the inconsistency of pre–liver transplant psychosocial metrics. The diagnostic criteria of AAH through UNOS was also a limitation for investigators, according to Dr. Cholankeril.
Although liver transplantation may be able to help some patients, it is only a small fix for a much larger problem. “This is only a solution for a minority of patients with the rising epidemic of alcoholic intoxication in the U.S.,” he said. “As the increasing mortality trends show alcohol-related mortality, and alcoholic liver disease is a contributor to it, we must recognize alcoholic liver disease remains an orphan disease and there is still an unmet need.”
Dr. Cholankeril reported no relevant financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @eaztweets
AT THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Survival 1 and 3 years after liver transplant was comparable in patients with drug-induced liver injury including acetaminophen (P = .10) and significantly higher than other chronic alcoholic liver disease patients (P less that .001).
Data source: Retrospective study of 1,912 liver transplant patients listed for either AAH or status 1A registered on the UNOS registry between 2011 and 2016.
Disclosures: Presenter reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Early liver transplant good for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis
Early liver transplantation was associated with good short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, but a significant number of patients started consuming alcohol again, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
The study was a retrospective review of the ACCELERATE-AH trial, utilizing a cohort of 147 patients with severe AH who underwent liver transplant prior to a 6-month abstinence period and were discharged home after surgery, said Dr. Brian Lee of the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues. Patients also underwent a follow-up period with a median time of 1.6 years.
Pretransplant abstinence time was a median of 55 days, and 54% received steroids for alcoholic hepatitis before the surgery. A total of 141 patients were discharged home after surgery, and 132 survived past 3 months. Of the nine patients who died within 3 months of their liver transplant, eight had received steroid therapy, and five died from sepsis.
No deaths were reported between 3 months and 1 year post transplant, but nine deaths were reported after 1 year, seven of which were alcohol related. The probability of alcohol use after 1 year was 25% and was 34% after 3 years.
After adjustment, a lack of self-admission into a hospital was associated with alcohol usage post transplant, with a hazard ratio of 4.3. In multivariate analysis, any alcohol use post transplant was associated with death, with a hazard ratio of 3.9, Dr. Lee and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Lee, Dr. Mehta, Dr. Platt, Dr. Gurakar, Dr. Im, Dr. Han, Dr. Victor, Dr. Rinella, Dr. Maddur, Dr. Eswaran, Dr. Hause, Dr. Foley, Dr. Dodge, Dr. Li, and Dr. Terrault reported conflicts of interest.
Early liver transplantation was associated with good short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, but a significant number of patients started consuming alcohol again, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
The study was a retrospective review of the ACCELERATE-AH trial, utilizing a cohort of 147 patients with severe AH who underwent liver transplant prior to a 6-month abstinence period and were discharged home after surgery, said Dr. Brian Lee of the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues. Patients also underwent a follow-up period with a median time of 1.6 years.
Pretransplant abstinence time was a median of 55 days, and 54% received steroids for alcoholic hepatitis before the surgery. A total of 141 patients were discharged home after surgery, and 132 survived past 3 months. Of the nine patients who died within 3 months of their liver transplant, eight had received steroid therapy, and five died from sepsis.
No deaths were reported between 3 months and 1 year post transplant, but nine deaths were reported after 1 year, seven of which were alcohol related. The probability of alcohol use after 1 year was 25% and was 34% after 3 years.
After adjustment, a lack of self-admission into a hospital was associated with alcohol usage post transplant, with a hazard ratio of 4.3. In multivariate analysis, any alcohol use post transplant was associated with death, with a hazard ratio of 3.9, Dr. Lee and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Lee, Dr. Mehta, Dr. Platt, Dr. Gurakar, Dr. Im, Dr. Han, Dr. Victor, Dr. Rinella, Dr. Maddur, Dr. Eswaran, Dr. Hause, Dr. Foley, Dr. Dodge, Dr. Li, and Dr. Terrault reported conflicts of interest.
Early liver transplantation was associated with good short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, but a significant number of patients started consuming alcohol again, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
The study was a retrospective review of the ACCELERATE-AH trial, utilizing a cohort of 147 patients with severe AH who underwent liver transplant prior to a 6-month abstinence period and were discharged home after surgery, said Dr. Brian Lee of the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues. Patients also underwent a follow-up period with a median time of 1.6 years.
Pretransplant abstinence time was a median of 55 days, and 54% received steroids for alcoholic hepatitis before the surgery. A total of 141 patients were discharged home after surgery, and 132 survived past 3 months. Of the nine patients who died within 3 months of their liver transplant, eight had received steroid therapy, and five died from sepsis.
No deaths were reported between 3 months and 1 year post transplant, but nine deaths were reported after 1 year, seven of which were alcohol related. The probability of alcohol use after 1 year was 25% and was 34% after 3 years.
After adjustment, a lack of self-admission into a hospital was associated with alcohol usage post transplant, with a hazard ratio of 4.3. In multivariate analysis, any alcohol use post transplant was associated with death, with a hazard ratio of 3.9, Dr. Lee and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Lee, Dr. Mehta, Dr. Platt, Dr. Gurakar, Dr. Im, Dr. Han, Dr. Victor, Dr. Rinella, Dr. Maddur, Dr. Eswaran, Dr. Hause, Dr. Foley, Dr. Dodge, Dr. Li, and Dr. Terrault reported conflicts of interest.
FROM THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The survival rate post transplant was 94% after 1 year.
Data source: A retrospective review from the ACCELERATE-AH trial of 147 alcoholic hepatitis patients who received liver transplants.
Disclosures: Dr. Lee, Dr. Mehta, Dr. Platt, Dr. Gurakar, Dr. Im, Dr. Han, Dr. Victor, Dr. Rinella, Dr. Maddur, Dr. Eswaran, Dr. Hause, Dr. Foley, Dr. Dodge, Dr. Li, and Dr. Terrault reported conflicts of interest.
Asians have highest rate of herbal dietary supplement DILI liver transplantations
There is a significant relationship between race/ethnicity and drug-induced liver disease requiring liver transplantation caused by herbal and dietary supplements (HDS), according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Asian people had significantly higher rates of HDS DILI that required transplant than did blacks, Hispanics, whites, and others (American Indian/Alaskan native, multiracial, and native Hawaii/Pacific Islander). White people had significantly lower rates of HDS DILI than did blacks, Hispanics, and others.
While the proportion of white people with HDS DILI requiring transplant was much lower than other races/ethnicities, the rate from 2005 to 2015 was significantly higher in this population than in 1995-2005, Dr. Kesar and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Odin is a member of Intercept Pharmaceuticals advisory committees or review panels and is an AASLD member. Dr. Ahmad is an AASLD member.
There is a significant relationship between race/ethnicity and drug-induced liver disease requiring liver transplantation caused by herbal and dietary supplements (HDS), according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Asian people had significantly higher rates of HDS DILI that required transplant than did blacks, Hispanics, whites, and others (American Indian/Alaskan native, multiracial, and native Hawaii/Pacific Islander). White people had significantly lower rates of HDS DILI than did blacks, Hispanics, and others.
While the proportion of white people with HDS DILI requiring transplant was much lower than other races/ethnicities, the rate from 2005 to 2015 was significantly higher in this population than in 1995-2005, Dr. Kesar and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Odin is a member of Intercept Pharmaceuticals advisory committees or review panels and is an AASLD member. Dr. Ahmad is an AASLD member.
There is a significant relationship between race/ethnicity and drug-induced liver disease requiring liver transplantation caused by herbal and dietary supplements (HDS), according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Asian people had significantly higher rates of HDS DILI that required transplant than did blacks, Hispanics, whites, and others (American Indian/Alaskan native, multiracial, and native Hawaii/Pacific Islander). White people had significantly lower rates of HDS DILI than did blacks, Hispanics, and others.
While the proportion of white people with HDS DILI requiring transplant was much lower than other races/ethnicities, the rate from 2005 to 2015 was significantly higher in this population than in 1995-2005, Dr. Kesar and his colleagues noted.
Dr. Odin is a member of Intercept Pharmaceuticals advisory committees or review panels and is an AASLD member. Dr. Ahmad is an AASLD member.
FROM THE LIVER MEETING 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: People of Asian descent were most likely to require transplantation because of drug-induced liver injury from herbal dietary supplements.
Data source: Retrospective data analysis of 645 patients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database.
Disclosures: Dr. Odin is a member of Intercept Pharmaceuticals advisory committees or review panels and is an AASLD member. Dr. Ahmad is an AASLD member.
Hepatitis C falls as barrier to heart transplantation
DALLAS – The heart transplant team at Vanderbilt University has successfully placed hearts from deceased, hepatitis C virus–positive patients into recipients, and then eradicated the subsequent infection that appeared in most recipients using a standard regimen.
So far, five of nine heart transplant recipients who developed a posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection had the infection eradicated using one of the highly effective HCV drug regimens, and an additional three patients from the series are nearing their 12th week without detectable virus following treatment that marks a sustained response, Kelly H. Schlendorf, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America. The ninth patient died after developing a pulmonary embolism during the 7th week on antiviral therapy.
The recipients have been patients in a marginal clinical state and facing a long projected wait on the heart-recipient queue of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Dr. Schlendorf said in an interview.
These have been “patients with a morbidity and mortality risk from waiting that can be mitigated by expanding the donor pool.” She gave an example of a patient with a left ventricular assist device that required replacement by either a second device or transplant, “so getting the transplant quickly was a good thing,” said Dr. Schlendorf, a cardiologist at Vanderbilt in Nashville.
Based on her analysis of UNOS data, “upwards of 100” and perhaps as many as 300 additional donor hearts could be available annually for U.S. transplants if the organs weren’t excluded because of HCV infection.
The Vanderbilt team has so far approached 15 patients in their program wait-listed for hearts about the possibility of accepting an HCV-positive organ, and all 15 have given their consent, she said. “We spend a lot of time talking with patients and their caregivers about the risks and benefits and possible complications.”
The 13 recipients, starting in September 2016, included 12 patients who were HCV naive and 1 patient with a history of HCV exposure. All 13 received the program’s standard three-drug regimen for immunosuppression.
During close surveillance, 9 of the 13 developed an infection. Patients with genotype 1 HCV received 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir. Those infected with genotype 3 received 12-24 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir. Treatment with these direct-acting antivirals meant that patients had to adjust the time when they took their proton-pump inhibitors, and they needed to stop treatment with diltiazem and statins while on the antivirals.
“In the era of direct-acting antivirals, HCV-positive donors may provide a safe and effective way to expand the donor pool and reduce wait-list times,” Dr. Schlendorf said. She noted that in recent years an increased number of potential organ donors have been HCV positive. She also cautioned that so far follow-up has been relatively brief, with no patient yet followed as long as 1 year after transplant.
The direct-acting HCV antivirals are expensive, and some payers established clinical criteria that patients must meet to qualify for coverage of these regimens. “We have not encountered difficulties getting insurers to pay,” Dr. Schlendorf said. Despite the antivirals’ cost there are significant cost savings from fewer days in the ICU waiting for heart transplantation and a reduced need for mechanical support as a bridge to transplant, she noted.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
DALLAS – The heart transplant team at Vanderbilt University has successfully placed hearts from deceased, hepatitis C virus–positive patients into recipients, and then eradicated the subsequent infection that appeared in most recipients using a standard regimen.
So far, five of nine heart transplant recipients who developed a posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection had the infection eradicated using one of the highly effective HCV drug regimens, and an additional three patients from the series are nearing their 12th week without detectable virus following treatment that marks a sustained response, Kelly H. Schlendorf, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America. The ninth patient died after developing a pulmonary embolism during the 7th week on antiviral therapy.
The recipients have been patients in a marginal clinical state and facing a long projected wait on the heart-recipient queue of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Dr. Schlendorf said in an interview.
These have been “patients with a morbidity and mortality risk from waiting that can be mitigated by expanding the donor pool.” She gave an example of a patient with a left ventricular assist device that required replacement by either a second device or transplant, “so getting the transplant quickly was a good thing,” said Dr. Schlendorf, a cardiologist at Vanderbilt in Nashville.
Based on her analysis of UNOS data, “upwards of 100” and perhaps as many as 300 additional donor hearts could be available annually for U.S. transplants if the organs weren’t excluded because of HCV infection.
The Vanderbilt team has so far approached 15 patients in their program wait-listed for hearts about the possibility of accepting an HCV-positive organ, and all 15 have given their consent, she said. “We spend a lot of time talking with patients and their caregivers about the risks and benefits and possible complications.”
The 13 recipients, starting in September 2016, included 12 patients who were HCV naive and 1 patient with a history of HCV exposure. All 13 received the program’s standard three-drug regimen for immunosuppression.
During close surveillance, 9 of the 13 developed an infection. Patients with genotype 1 HCV received 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir. Those infected with genotype 3 received 12-24 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir. Treatment with these direct-acting antivirals meant that patients had to adjust the time when they took their proton-pump inhibitors, and they needed to stop treatment with diltiazem and statins while on the antivirals.
“In the era of direct-acting antivirals, HCV-positive donors may provide a safe and effective way to expand the donor pool and reduce wait-list times,” Dr. Schlendorf said. She noted that in recent years an increased number of potential organ donors have been HCV positive. She also cautioned that so far follow-up has been relatively brief, with no patient yet followed as long as 1 year after transplant.
The direct-acting HCV antivirals are expensive, and some payers established clinical criteria that patients must meet to qualify for coverage of these regimens. “We have not encountered difficulties getting insurers to pay,” Dr. Schlendorf said. Despite the antivirals’ cost there are significant cost savings from fewer days in the ICU waiting for heart transplantation and a reduced need for mechanical support as a bridge to transplant, she noted.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
DALLAS – The heart transplant team at Vanderbilt University has successfully placed hearts from deceased, hepatitis C virus–positive patients into recipients, and then eradicated the subsequent infection that appeared in most recipients using a standard regimen.
So far, five of nine heart transplant recipients who developed a posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection had the infection eradicated using one of the highly effective HCV drug regimens, and an additional three patients from the series are nearing their 12th week without detectable virus following treatment that marks a sustained response, Kelly H. Schlendorf, MD, said at the annual scientific meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America. The ninth patient died after developing a pulmonary embolism during the 7th week on antiviral therapy.
The recipients have been patients in a marginal clinical state and facing a long projected wait on the heart-recipient queue of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Dr. Schlendorf said in an interview.
These have been “patients with a morbidity and mortality risk from waiting that can be mitigated by expanding the donor pool.” She gave an example of a patient with a left ventricular assist device that required replacement by either a second device or transplant, “so getting the transplant quickly was a good thing,” said Dr. Schlendorf, a cardiologist at Vanderbilt in Nashville.
Based on her analysis of UNOS data, “upwards of 100” and perhaps as many as 300 additional donor hearts could be available annually for U.S. transplants if the organs weren’t excluded because of HCV infection.
The Vanderbilt team has so far approached 15 patients in their program wait-listed for hearts about the possibility of accepting an HCV-positive organ, and all 15 have given their consent, she said. “We spend a lot of time talking with patients and their caregivers about the risks and benefits and possible complications.”
The 13 recipients, starting in September 2016, included 12 patients who were HCV naive and 1 patient with a history of HCV exposure. All 13 received the program’s standard three-drug regimen for immunosuppression.
During close surveillance, 9 of the 13 developed an infection. Patients with genotype 1 HCV received 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir. Those infected with genotype 3 received 12-24 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir. Treatment with these direct-acting antivirals meant that patients had to adjust the time when they took their proton-pump inhibitors, and they needed to stop treatment with diltiazem and statins while on the antivirals.
“In the era of direct-acting antivirals, HCV-positive donors may provide a safe and effective way to expand the donor pool and reduce wait-list times,” Dr. Schlendorf said. She noted that in recent years an increased number of potential organ donors have been HCV positive. She also cautioned that so far follow-up has been relatively brief, with no patient yet followed as long as 1 year after transplant.
The direct-acting HCV antivirals are expensive, and some payers established clinical criteria that patients must meet to qualify for coverage of these regimens. “We have not encountered difficulties getting insurers to pay,” Dr. Schlendorf said. Despite the antivirals’ cost there are significant cost savings from fewer days in the ICU waiting for heart transplantation and a reduced need for mechanical support as a bridge to transplant, she noted.
[email protected]
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT THE HFSA ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Eight of nine patients who developed HCV infection had it eradicated by a direct-acting antiviral regimen.
Data source: A series of 13 patients treated at one U.S. center.
Disclosures: Dr. Schlendorf had no disclosures.
Study findings support uncapping MELD score
Uncapping the current Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score may provide a better path toward making sure that patients most in need of a liver transplant get one, results from a large, long-term analysis showed.
Established in 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system “was arbitrarily capped at 40 based on the presumption that transplanting patients with MELD greater than 40 would be futile,” researchers led by Mitra K. Nadim, MD, reported in the September 2017 issue of the Journal of Hepatology (67[3]:517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022). “As a result, patients with MELD greater than 40 receive the same priority as patients with MELD of 40, differentiated only by their time on the wait list.”
The mean age of patients was 53 years, and most were white men. The researchers reported that 3.3% of wait-listed patients had a MELD score of 40 or greater at registration, while 7.3% had MELD scores increase to 40 or greater after wait-list registration. In all, 30,369 patients (40.6%) underwent liver transplantation during the study period. Of these, 2,615 (8.6%) had a MELD score of 40 or greater at the time of their procedure. Compared with patients who had a MELD score of 40, those who had a MELD score of greater than 40 had an increased risk of death within 30 days, and the risk increased with rising scores. Specifically, the hazard ratio was 1.4 for those with a MELD score of 40-44, an HR of 2.6 for those with a MELD score of 45-49, and an HR of 5.0 for those with a MELD score of 50 or greater. There were no survival differences between the two groups at 1 and 3 years, but there was a survival benefit associated with liver transplantation as the MELD score increased above 40, the investigators reported.
“The arbitrary capping of the MELD at 40 has resulted in an unforeseen lack of objectivity for patients with MELD [score of greater than] 40 who are unjustifiably disadvantaged in a system designed to prioritize patients most in need,” they concluded. “Uncapping the MELD score is another necessary step in the evolution of liver allocation and patient prioritization.” They added that a significant number of patients with a MELD score of 40 or greater “likely suffer from acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a recently recognized syndrome characterized by acute liver decompensation, other organ system failures, and high short-term mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. A capped MELD score fails to capture acute liver decompensation adequately, and data suggest that a model incorporating sudden increases in MELD predicts wait-list mortality better.”
Dr. Nadim and her associates acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design “and that factors relating to a patient’s suitability for transplantation or to a center’s decision to accept or reject a liver allograft, both of which affect graft and patient survival, were not accounted for in the analysis. Despite these limitations, the study results have important implications for improving the current liver allocation policy.”
The study was supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
PRIMARY SOURCE: J Hepatol. 2017;67[3]:517-25. doi: 1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022
Uncapping the current Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score may provide a better path toward making sure that patients most in need of a liver transplant get one, results from a large, long-term analysis showed.
Established in 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system “was arbitrarily capped at 40 based on the presumption that transplanting patients with MELD greater than 40 would be futile,” researchers led by Mitra K. Nadim, MD, reported in the September 2017 issue of the Journal of Hepatology (67[3]:517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022). “As a result, patients with MELD greater than 40 receive the same priority as patients with MELD of 40, differentiated only by their time on the wait list.”
The mean age of patients was 53 years, and most were white men. The researchers reported that 3.3% of wait-listed patients had a MELD score of 40 or greater at registration, while 7.3% had MELD scores increase to 40 or greater after wait-list registration. In all, 30,369 patients (40.6%) underwent liver transplantation during the study period. Of these, 2,615 (8.6%) had a MELD score of 40 or greater at the time of their procedure. Compared with patients who had a MELD score of 40, those who had a MELD score of greater than 40 had an increased risk of death within 30 days, and the risk increased with rising scores. Specifically, the hazard ratio was 1.4 for those with a MELD score of 40-44, an HR of 2.6 for those with a MELD score of 45-49, and an HR of 5.0 for those with a MELD score of 50 or greater. There were no survival differences between the two groups at 1 and 3 years, but there was a survival benefit associated with liver transplantation as the MELD score increased above 40, the investigators reported.
“The arbitrary capping of the MELD at 40 has resulted in an unforeseen lack of objectivity for patients with MELD [score of greater than] 40 who are unjustifiably disadvantaged in a system designed to prioritize patients most in need,” they concluded. “Uncapping the MELD score is another necessary step in the evolution of liver allocation and patient prioritization.” They added that a significant number of patients with a MELD score of 40 or greater “likely suffer from acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a recently recognized syndrome characterized by acute liver decompensation, other organ system failures, and high short-term mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. A capped MELD score fails to capture acute liver decompensation adequately, and data suggest that a model incorporating sudden increases in MELD predicts wait-list mortality better.”
Dr. Nadim and her associates acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design “and that factors relating to a patient’s suitability for transplantation or to a center’s decision to accept or reject a liver allograft, both of which affect graft and patient survival, were not accounted for in the analysis. Despite these limitations, the study results have important implications for improving the current liver allocation policy.”
The study was supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
PRIMARY SOURCE: J Hepatol. 2017;67[3]:517-25. doi: 1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022
Uncapping the current Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score may provide a better path toward making sure that patients most in need of a liver transplant get one, results from a large, long-term analysis showed.
Established in 2002, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system “was arbitrarily capped at 40 based on the presumption that transplanting patients with MELD greater than 40 would be futile,” researchers led by Mitra K. Nadim, MD, reported in the September 2017 issue of the Journal of Hepatology (67[3]:517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022). “As a result, patients with MELD greater than 40 receive the same priority as patients with MELD of 40, differentiated only by their time on the wait list.”
The mean age of patients was 53 years, and most were white men. The researchers reported that 3.3% of wait-listed patients had a MELD score of 40 or greater at registration, while 7.3% had MELD scores increase to 40 or greater after wait-list registration. In all, 30,369 patients (40.6%) underwent liver transplantation during the study period. Of these, 2,615 (8.6%) had a MELD score of 40 or greater at the time of their procedure. Compared with patients who had a MELD score of 40, those who had a MELD score of greater than 40 had an increased risk of death within 30 days, and the risk increased with rising scores. Specifically, the hazard ratio was 1.4 for those with a MELD score of 40-44, an HR of 2.6 for those with a MELD score of 45-49, and an HR of 5.0 for those with a MELD score of 50 or greater. There were no survival differences between the two groups at 1 and 3 years, but there was a survival benefit associated with liver transplantation as the MELD score increased above 40, the investigators reported.
“The arbitrary capping of the MELD at 40 has resulted in an unforeseen lack of objectivity for patients with MELD [score of greater than] 40 who are unjustifiably disadvantaged in a system designed to prioritize patients most in need,” they concluded. “Uncapping the MELD score is another necessary step in the evolution of liver allocation and patient prioritization.” They added that a significant number of patients with a MELD score of 40 or greater “likely suffer from acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a recently recognized syndrome characterized by acute liver decompensation, other organ system failures, and high short-term mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. A capped MELD score fails to capture acute liver decompensation adequately, and data suggest that a model incorporating sudden increases in MELD predicts wait-list mortality better.”
Dr. Nadim and her associates acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design “and that factors relating to a patient’s suitability for transplantation or to a center’s decision to accept or reject a liver allograft, both of which affect graft and patient survival, were not accounted for in the analysis. Despite these limitations, the study results have important implications for improving the current liver allocation policy.”
The study was supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
PRIMARY SOURCE: J Hepatol. 2017;67[3]:517-25. doi: 1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022
FROM THE JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point: .
Major finding: Compared with patients who had a MELD score of 40, the increased risk of death within 30 days was 1.4 for those with a MELD score of 40-44.
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 65,776 patients listed for a liver transplant from February 2002 to December 2012.
Disclosures: The study was supported in part by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The researchers reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Mitra K. Nadim, MD, et al. Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease. J Hepatol. 2017;67(3):517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022.
NASH did not increase risk of poor liver transplantation outcomes
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities, according to the results of a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Major morbidity, mortality, and rates of graft survival after 90 days were similar between patients who underwent transplantation for NASH and those who underwent it for another cirrhotic liver condition, wrote Eline H. van den Berg, MD, of University Medical Center Groningen (the Netherlands) with her associates. “These results are comforting, considering the expected increase of patients with NASH cirrhosis in the near future,” the researchers concluded. “Future analysis regarding the recurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, development of long-term complications, long-term graft patency, and occurrence of comorbid diseases after LT [liver transplantation] is mandatory to better understand the natural history and risk profile of NASH patients and to prevent and treat its complications.” The findings were published online in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.022).
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease begins as steatosis and can progress to NASH, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The global obesity epidemic is amplifying its incidence, and about 26% of patients who develop NASH ultimately develop cirrhosis. Cirrhosis itself increases the risk of in-hospital death or prolonged length of postoperative stay, but patients with NASH also have obesity and cardiovascular disease, which might “tremendously increase” the risk of poor postoperative outcomes, the researchers said. Because prior research had focused mainly on mortality and had reported conflicting results, they used the Clavien-Dindo classification system to retrospectively study rates of complications among 169 adults who underwent liver transplantation at their center from 2009 through 2015, including 34 (20%) patients with NASH cirrhosis.
Patients with NASH were significantly older than other transplant recipients (59 versus 55 years, P = .01) and had markedly higher rates of obesity (62% versus 8%; P less than .01), diabetes mellitus (74% versus 20%; P less than .01), metabolic syndrome (83% versus 38%; P less than .01), hypertension (61% versus 30%; P less than .01), and cardiovascular disease (29% versus 11%; P less than .01). Despite these differences, the groups had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival posttransplantation (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications, including biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (3% and 7%), hepatic artery thrombosis (0% and 7%), relaparotomy (15% and 24%), primary nonfunction (0% and 1.6%), retransplantation (6% and 7%), sepsis (12% and 13%), gastrointestinal infection (24% and 36%), fever of unknown origin (18% and 14%), and renal replacement therapy (15% and 24%).
After accounting for age, sex, transplant year, and donor characteristics, NASH patients were at significantly increased risk of grade 2 urogenital infections, compared with other patients (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 10.6; P = .03). Grade 1 complications also were more common with NASH than otherwise (77% versus 59%), and the difference remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.63; P = .04).
The study used a strict, internationally accepted definition of NASH – all patients either had cases confirmed by biopsy, had metabolic syndrome, or had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and, further, none had hepatitis or alcoholic liver disease. None of the patients in the study received transplants for acute liver failure or noncirrhotic liver disease, and none were 70 years or older, which is the cutoff age for liver transplantation in the Netherlands.
The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.
FROM DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASES
Key clinical point: Adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) fared as well as on key outcome measures as other liver transplant recipients, despite having significantly more comorbidities.
Major finding: Patients with and without NASH had statistically similar rates of postoperative mortality (3% in both groups), 90-day graft survival (94% and 90%, respectively), and major postoperative complications.
Data source: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 169 adult liver transplant recipients, of whom 20% were transplanted for NASH cirrhosis.
Disclosures: The investigators received no funding for the study and reported having no conflicts of interest.