User login
Restless Legs Syndrome Among Veterans With Spinal Cord Lesions (FULL)
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are common in veteran populations.1 Veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) also may have concurrent sleep disturbances. Spinal cord injury typically causes spasticity.2,3 Hypersensitivity of the flexor reflex pathways is believed to cause painful muscle spasms in patients with SCI.4 Neuropathic pain at or below the level of the lesion also is common.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sleep disorder that affects sleep quality and can occur concomitantly with spinal cord lesions.5 In about 80% of RLS cases, involuntary movements of legs across hip, knee, and ankle joints during sleep, known as periodic limb movement during sleep (PLMS), occurs.6 Several studies showed increased prevalence of PLMS in patients with SCI, and some case reports suggest an increased prevalence of RLS in this population.7,8 One small study showed that 100% of patients with SCI had symptoms of RLS.6 Another study found that SCI could trigger PLMS.8
The pathophysiology of RLS and PLMS in patients with SCI is not fully understood, but case reports describing PLM in SCI patients points to a possible role of central pattern generators and the flexor reflex afferents in the pathophysiology of PLMS.9,10 Changes of the tissue microstructure in the midbrain and upper cervical spinal cord have been described in patients with RLS.11The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of RLS in a veteran population with SCI/D and
Methods
The institutional review and ethical approval boards of the Minneapolis VA Health Care System approved the study. Within the VA system, 666 patients with SCI/D were identified using a national database. Of the 666 people, 316 were excluded, 199 were included, and 151 were deceased.
Patients aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study. Charts of patients who had been discharged with the diagnosis of SCI from 2002 to 2008 were studied. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with evidence of brain pathology (eg, stroke), concurrent neurologic condition associated with RLS (Parkinson disease, spinocerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy), concurrent psychiatric condition within the setting of treatment with dopamine antagonists, secondary causes of RLS (renal failure/uremia, iron deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, and pregnancy) and a recent history of alcohol or drug misuse or current evidence of substance use of < 1 year.
A patient list was compiled that included the etiology of the SCI (vascular injury, multiple sclerosis [MS], trauma, unknown, and other), the level(s) and completeness of the SCI per radiology report, RLS pharmacotherapies, and pertinent medical history.
Axial T2-weighted images on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively reviewed. Sagittal T1/T2-weighted and axial T2-weighted sequences were performed routinely on all patients with spinal cord lesions. The analysis included the extension of the lesion on both sagittal and axial distributions. The anatomic location of the cord lesion was categorized by the following: (1) pure gray matter (central cord); (2) white matter (dorsal [D], dorsolateral [DL], ventral [V], ventrolateral areas [VL]).
A questionnaire using standard diagnostic criteria for RLS was mailed to the 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria (Appendix A).
All analyses were carried out using StataCorp STATA 13 (College Station, TX). Descriptive statistics were used. The analyses were carried out using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Differences between the groups were considered statistically significant at P < .05. The data were analyzed to obtain point prevalence among patients with SCI, and comparisons were made among the different subgroups.
Results
Of the 162 patients who chose to participate in the study, the sleep specialists confirmed 31 (19%) to have RLS, 112 (69%) were confirmed negative for RLS, and an additional 19 (12%) screened positive for RLS but were not confirmed to have RLS by the sleep specialists (Figure 1).
The etiology of SCI was subdivided into 4 groups: MS, trauma, vascular, and other/unknown. Within each group (– RLS vs + RLS), MS and trauma were the most common etiologies with 55% MS and 36% trauma in the + RLS group.
When comparing RLS among the spinal cord levels (cervical, thoracic, lumbar and cervical + thoracic), only the cervical + thoracic subgroup (18% + RLS vs 5% – RLS) showed a significant difference (Figure 2).
There was no significant difference found with the prevalence of RLS in the axial plane of the spinal cord lesions (ventral/ventro-lateral/central cord vs dorsal/dorsolateral) or by the completeness of spinal cord lesions, P = .76. There was a higher prevalence of incomplete cord injury, however, within each subgroup of RLS.
The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the burden of disease in both groups (+ RLS vs – RLS). Moderate level of burden was most frequently reported with a higher prevalence within the + RLS group. Of those receiving treatment for RLS, 71% were + RLS vs 46% – RLS with a P value of .01. Symptoms of RLS after cord injury were 89% + RLS vs 55% – RLS with a P value of .03.
Discussion
This study represents one of the first studies to determine the prevalence of RLS in veterans with spinal cord disease. Research in this area is important to raise awareness of RLS among the veteran population with and without SCI and disorders. Restless legs syndrome often escapes diagnosis because of difficulty understanding the patient’s descriptions of their sensations. In addition, RLS may cause debilitating symptoms of sleep deprivation, daytime sleepiness, discomfort, and fatigue, which often results in decreased quality of life (QOL). Proper screening and treatment may improve QOL.
A study by Kumru and colleagues showed a similar rate of RLS in patients with SCI and RLS symptoms presented in the first year after SCI as did this study (18% vs 19%, respectively).4 In that study, RLS was more common in patients with lesions in lumbosacral area. Kumru and colleagues also showed that a dopaminergic medication improved symptoms of RLS in this population, whereas this study did not explore treatment outcomes.4
The pathogenesis of RLS is not fully known, but hereditary factors, iron metabolism, and the brain dopaminergic system are thought to be involved.11 It is hypothesized that spinal cord lesions allow the appearance of RLS symptoms and spinal leg movement generator by blocking descending inhibitory spinal pathways.12 One hypothesis is that damage to A11 nuclei (the main source of dopamine in the spinal cord or its diencephalospinal tract in animals) causes hyperexcitability of the spinal cord and leads to PLM and RLS symptoms.13 As the axons of A11 nuclei are present along the whole span of the spinal cord, SCI/D in patients with RLS might interrupt this dopaminergic tract and produce the RLS symptoms.
Limitations
This study included only veterans, so the prevalence may not apply to the nonveteran SCI population. Also, the population mainly was male, and there was no accurate information on race. Ferritin levels of the patients were not checked and is a major factor in RLS. The reported onset of RLS after the SCI could be due to recall bias.
Conclusion
The prevalence of RLS in veterans with SCI is above that reported in the general population (19% vs 10%, respectively). Furthermore, those with RLS have symptoms that often started after the SCI (suggesting causality) and required therapy due to their level of RLS symptom burden. A spectrum of severity of symptoms is present among those with RLS, with 83% having moderate-to-severe RLS affecting their QOL.
Although there was not a statistically significant relationship between RLS and spinal cord lesion level, there was a slightly higher prevalence of RLS at the cervical and thoracic levels, which may be relevant for future studies. There was no difference found between the RLS subgroups with respect to the location of the lesion within the spinal cord; however, a larger sample size may be needed to determine whether this would reach statistical significance. Prompt search for symptoms of RLS in veterans with SCI is warranted to provide adequate treatment to improve sleep health and QOL in this population.
1. Lasfargues JE, Custis D, Morrone F, Carswell J, Nguyen T. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Paraplegia. 1995;33(2):62-68.
2. Sjölund BH. Pain and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: the case of sensory spasticity? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002;40(1-3):250-256.
3. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(10):577-586.
4. Kumru H, Vidal J, Benito J, et al. Restless leg syndrome in patients with spinal cord injury. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(12):1461-1464.
5. Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Ouellette J, et al. Pharmacologic therapy for primary restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505.
6. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. (AASM ICSD-3). 3rd ed. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
7. Telles SC, Alves RC, Chadi G. Periodic limb movements during sleep and restless legs syndrome in patients with ASIA A spinal cord injury. J Neurol Sci. 2011;303(1-2):119-123.
8. Telles SC, Alves RS, Chadi G. Spinal cord injury as a trigger to develop periodic leg movements during sleep: an evolutionary perspective. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70(11):880-884.
9. Tings T, Baier PC, Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Restless legs syndrome induced by impairment of sensory spinal pathways. J Neurol. 2003;250(4):499-500.
10. Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Less is more: pathophysiology of dopaminergic-therapy-related augmentation in restless legs syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(10):878-886.
11. Silber MH, Ehrenberg BL, Allen RP, et al; Medical Advisory Board of the Restless Legs Syndrome Foundation. An algorithm for the management of restless legs syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(7):916-922.
12. Hartmann M, Pfister R, Pfadenhauer K. Restless legs syndrome associated with spinal cord lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(5):688-689.
13. Clemens S, Rye D, Hochman S. Restless legs syndrome: revisiting the dopamine hypothesis from the spinal cord perspective. Neurology. 2006;67(1):125-130.
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are common in veteran populations.1 Veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) also may have concurrent sleep disturbances. Spinal cord injury typically causes spasticity.2,3 Hypersensitivity of the flexor reflex pathways is believed to cause painful muscle spasms in patients with SCI.4 Neuropathic pain at or below the level of the lesion also is common.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sleep disorder that affects sleep quality and can occur concomitantly with spinal cord lesions.5 In about 80% of RLS cases, involuntary movements of legs across hip, knee, and ankle joints during sleep, known as periodic limb movement during sleep (PLMS), occurs.6 Several studies showed increased prevalence of PLMS in patients with SCI, and some case reports suggest an increased prevalence of RLS in this population.7,8 One small study showed that 100% of patients with SCI had symptoms of RLS.6 Another study found that SCI could trigger PLMS.8
The pathophysiology of RLS and PLMS in patients with SCI is not fully understood, but case reports describing PLM in SCI patients points to a possible role of central pattern generators and the flexor reflex afferents in the pathophysiology of PLMS.9,10 Changes of the tissue microstructure in the midbrain and upper cervical spinal cord have been described in patients with RLS.11The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of RLS in a veteran population with SCI/D and
Methods
The institutional review and ethical approval boards of the Minneapolis VA Health Care System approved the study. Within the VA system, 666 patients with SCI/D were identified using a national database. Of the 666 people, 316 were excluded, 199 were included, and 151 were deceased.
Patients aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study. Charts of patients who had been discharged with the diagnosis of SCI from 2002 to 2008 were studied. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with evidence of brain pathology (eg, stroke), concurrent neurologic condition associated with RLS (Parkinson disease, spinocerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy), concurrent psychiatric condition within the setting of treatment with dopamine antagonists, secondary causes of RLS (renal failure/uremia, iron deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, and pregnancy) and a recent history of alcohol or drug misuse or current evidence of substance use of < 1 year.
A patient list was compiled that included the etiology of the SCI (vascular injury, multiple sclerosis [MS], trauma, unknown, and other), the level(s) and completeness of the SCI per radiology report, RLS pharmacotherapies, and pertinent medical history.
Axial T2-weighted images on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively reviewed. Sagittal T1/T2-weighted and axial T2-weighted sequences were performed routinely on all patients with spinal cord lesions. The analysis included the extension of the lesion on both sagittal and axial distributions. The anatomic location of the cord lesion was categorized by the following: (1) pure gray matter (central cord); (2) white matter (dorsal [D], dorsolateral [DL], ventral [V], ventrolateral areas [VL]).
A questionnaire using standard diagnostic criteria for RLS was mailed to the 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria (Appendix A).
All analyses were carried out using StataCorp STATA 13 (College Station, TX). Descriptive statistics were used. The analyses were carried out using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Differences between the groups were considered statistically significant at P < .05. The data were analyzed to obtain point prevalence among patients with SCI, and comparisons were made among the different subgroups.
Results
Of the 162 patients who chose to participate in the study, the sleep specialists confirmed 31 (19%) to have RLS, 112 (69%) were confirmed negative for RLS, and an additional 19 (12%) screened positive for RLS but were not confirmed to have RLS by the sleep specialists (Figure 1).
The etiology of SCI was subdivided into 4 groups: MS, trauma, vascular, and other/unknown. Within each group (– RLS vs + RLS), MS and trauma were the most common etiologies with 55% MS and 36% trauma in the + RLS group.
When comparing RLS among the spinal cord levels (cervical, thoracic, lumbar and cervical + thoracic), only the cervical + thoracic subgroup (18% + RLS vs 5% – RLS) showed a significant difference (Figure 2).
There was no significant difference found with the prevalence of RLS in the axial plane of the spinal cord lesions (ventral/ventro-lateral/central cord vs dorsal/dorsolateral) or by the completeness of spinal cord lesions, P = .76. There was a higher prevalence of incomplete cord injury, however, within each subgroup of RLS.
The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the burden of disease in both groups (+ RLS vs – RLS). Moderate level of burden was most frequently reported with a higher prevalence within the + RLS group. Of those receiving treatment for RLS, 71% were + RLS vs 46% – RLS with a P value of .01. Symptoms of RLS after cord injury were 89% + RLS vs 55% – RLS with a P value of .03.
Discussion
This study represents one of the first studies to determine the prevalence of RLS in veterans with spinal cord disease. Research in this area is important to raise awareness of RLS among the veteran population with and without SCI and disorders. Restless legs syndrome often escapes diagnosis because of difficulty understanding the patient’s descriptions of their sensations. In addition, RLS may cause debilitating symptoms of sleep deprivation, daytime sleepiness, discomfort, and fatigue, which often results in decreased quality of life (QOL). Proper screening and treatment may improve QOL.
A study by Kumru and colleagues showed a similar rate of RLS in patients with SCI and RLS symptoms presented in the first year after SCI as did this study (18% vs 19%, respectively).4 In that study, RLS was more common in patients with lesions in lumbosacral area. Kumru and colleagues also showed that a dopaminergic medication improved symptoms of RLS in this population, whereas this study did not explore treatment outcomes.4
The pathogenesis of RLS is not fully known, but hereditary factors, iron metabolism, and the brain dopaminergic system are thought to be involved.11 It is hypothesized that spinal cord lesions allow the appearance of RLS symptoms and spinal leg movement generator by blocking descending inhibitory spinal pathways.12 One hypothesis is that damage to A11 nuclei (the main source of dopamine in the spinal cord or its diencephalospinal tract in animals) causes hyperexcitability of the spinal cord and leads to PLM and RLS symptoms.13 As the axons of A11 nuclei are present along the whole span of the spinal cord, SCI/D in patients with RLS might interrupt this dopaminergic tract and produce the RLS symptoms.
Limitations
This study included only veterans, so the prevalence may not apply to the nonveteran SCI population. Also, the population mainly was male, and there was no accurate information on race. Ferritin levels of the patients were not checked and is a major factor in RLS. The reported onset of RLS after the SCI could be due to recall bias.
Conclusion
The prevalence of RLS in veterans with SCI is above that reported in the general population (19% vs 10%, respectively). Furthermore, those with RLS have symptoms that often started after the SCI (suggesting causality) and required therapy due to their level of RLS symptom burden. A spectrum of severity of symptoms is present among those with RLS, with 83% having moderate-to-severe RLS affecting their QOL.
Although there was not a statistically significant relationship between RLS and spinal cord lesion level, there was a slightly higher prevalence of RLS at the cervical and thoracic levels, which may be relevant for future studies. There was no difference found between the RLS subgroups with respect to the location of the lesion within the spinal cord; however, a larger sample size may be needed to determine whether this would reach statistical significance. Prompt search for symptoms of RLS in veterans with SCI is warranted to provide adequate treatment to improve sleep health and QOL in this population.
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are common in veteran populations.1 Veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) also may have concurrent sleep disturbances. Spinal cord injury typically causes spasticity.2,3 Hypersensitivity of the flexor reflex pathways is believed to cause painful muscle spasms in patients with SCI.4 Neuropathic pain at or below the level of the lesion also is common.
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sleep disorder that affects sleep quality and can occur concomitantly with spinal cord lesions.5 In about 80% of RLS cases, involuntary movements of legs across hip, knee, and ankle joints during sleep, known as periodic limb movement during sleep (PLMS), occurs.6 Several studies showed increased prevalence of PLMS in patients with SCI, and some case reports suggest an increased prevalence of RLS in this population.7,8 One small study showed that 100% of patients with SCI had symptoms of RLS.6 Another study found that SCI could trigger PLMS.8
The pathophysiology of RLS and PLMS in patients with SCI is not fully understood, but case reports describing PLM in SCI patients points to a possible role of central pattern generators and the flexor reflex afferents in the pathophysiology of PLMS.9,10 Changes of the tissue microstructure in the midbrain and upper cervical spinal cord have been described in patients with RLS.11The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of RLS in a veteran population with SCI/D and
Methods
The institutional review and ethical approval boards of the Minneapolis VA Health Care System approved the study. Within the VA system, 666 patients with SCI/D were identified using a national database. Of the 666 people, 316 were excluded, 199 were included, and 151 were deceased.
Patients aged between 18 and 65 years were included in the study. Charts of patients who had been discharged with the diagnosis of SCI from 2002 to 2008 were studied. All patients met the inclusion criteria of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group diagnosis.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: Patients with evidence of brain pathology (eg, stroke), concurrent neurologic condition associated with RLS (Parkinson disease, spinocerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy), concurrent psychiatric condition within the setting of treatment with dopamine antagonists, secondary causes of RLS (renal failure/uremia, iron deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, and pregnancy) and a recent history of alcohol or drug misuse or current evidence of substance use of < 1 year.
A patient list was compiled that included the etiology of the SCI (vascular injury, multiple sclerosis [MS], trauma, unknown, and other), the level(s) and completeness of the SCI per radiology report, RLS pharmacotherapies, and pertinent medical history.
Axial T2-weighted images on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively reviewed. Sagittal T1/T2-weighted and axial T2-weighted sequences were performed routinely on all patients with spinal cord lesions. The analysis included the extension of the lesion on both sagittal and axial distributions. The anatomic location of the cord lesion was categorized by the following: (1) pure gray matter (central cord); (2) white matter (dorsal [D], dorsolateral [DL], ventral [V], ventrolateral areas [VL]).
A questionnaire using standard diagnostic criteria for RLS was mailed to the 199 patients who met the inclusion criteria (Appendix A).
All analyses were carried out using StataCorp STATA 13 (College Station, TX). Descriptive statistics were used. The analyses were carried out using chi-square and Fisher exact tests. Differences between the groups were considered statistically significant at P < .05. The data were analyzed to obtain point prevalence among patients with SCI, and comparisons were made among the different subgroups.
Results
Of the 162 patients who chose to participate in the study, the sleep specialists confirmed 31 (19%) to have RLS, 112 (69%) were confirmed negative for RLS, and an additional 19 (12%) screened positive for RLS but were not confirmed to have RLS by the sleep specialists (Figure 1).
The etiology of SCI was subdivided into 4 groups: MS, trauma, vascular, and other/unknown. Within each group (– RLS vs + RLS), MS and trauma were the most common etiologies with 55% MS and 36% trauma in the + RLS group.
When comparing RLS among the spinal cord levels (cervical, thoracic, lumbar and cervical + thoracic), only the cervical + thoracic subgroup (18% + RLS vs 5% – RLS) showed a significant difference (Figure 2).
There was no significant difference found with the prevalence of RLS in the axial plane of the spinal cord lesions (ventral/ventro-lateral/central cord vs dorsal/dorsolateral) or by the completeness of spinal cord lesions, P = .76. There was a higher prevalence of incomplete cord injury, however, within each subgroup of RLS.
The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the burden of disease in both groups (+ RLS vs – RLS). Moderate level of burden was most frequently reported with a higher prevalence within the + RLS group. Of those receiving treatment for RLS, 71% were + RLS vs 46% – RLS with a P value of .01. Symptoms of RLS after cord injury were 89% + RLS vs 55% – RLS with a P value of .03.
Discussion
This study represents one of the first studies to determine the prevalence of RLS in veterans with spinal cord disease. Research in this area is important to raise awareness of RLS among the veteran population with and without SCI and disorders. Restless legs syndrome often escapes diagnosis because of difficulty understanding the patient’s descriptions of their sensations. In addition, RLS may cause debilitating symptoms of sleep deprivation, daytime sleepiness, discomfort, and fatigue, which often results in decreased quality of life (QOL). Proper screening and treatment may improve QOL.
A study by Kumru and colleagues showed a similar rate of RLS in patients with SCI and RLS symptoms presented in the first year after SCI as did this study (18% vs 19%, respectively).4 In that study, RLS was more common in patients with lesions in lumbosacral area. Kumru and colleagues also showed that a dopaminergic medication improved symptoms of RLS in this population, whereas this study did not explore treatment outcomes.4
The pathogenesis of RLS is not fully known, but hereditary factors, iron metabolism, and the brain dopaminergic system are thought to be involved.11 It is hypothesized that spinal cord lesions allow the appearance of RLS symptoms and spinal leg movement generator by blocking descending inhibitory spinal pathways.12 One hypothesis is that damage to A11 nuclei (the main source of dopamine in the spinal cord or its diencephalospinal tract in animals) causes hyperexcitability of the spinal cord and leads to PLM and RLS symptoms.13 As the axons of A11 nuclei are present along the whole span of the spinal cord, SCI/D in patients with RLS might interrupt this dopaminergic tract and produce the RLS symptoms.
Limitations
This study included only veterans, so the prevalence may not apply to the nonveteran SCI population. Also, the population mainly was male, and there was no accurate information on race. Ferritin levels of the patients were not checked and is a major factor in RLS. The reported onset of RLS after the SCI could be due to recall bias.
Conclusion
The prevalence of RLS in veterans with SCI is above that reported in the general population (19% vs 10%, respectively). Furthermore, those with RLS have symptoms that often started after the SCI (suggesting causality) and required therapy due to their level of RLS symptom burden. A spectrum of severity of symptoms is present among those with RLS, with 83% having moderate-to-severe RLS affecting their QOL.
Although there was not a statistically significant relationship between RLS and spinal cord lesion level, there was a slightly higher prevalence of RLS at the cervical and thoracic levels, which may be relevant for future studies. There was no difference found between the RLS subgroups with respect to the location of the lesion within the spinal cord; however, a larger sample size may be needed to determine whether this would reach statistical significance. Prompt search for symptoms of RLS in veterans with SCI is warranted to provide adequate treatment to improve sleep health and QOL in this population.
1. Lasfargues JE, Custis D, Morrone F, Carswell J, Nguyen T. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Paraplegia. 1995;33(2):62-68.
2. Sjölund BH. Pain and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: the case of sensory spasticity? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002;40(1-3):250-256.
3. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(10):577-586.
4. Kumru H, Vidal J, Benito J, et al. Restless leg syndrome in patients with spinal cord injury. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(12):1461-1464.
5. Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Ouellette J, et al. Pharmacologic therapy for primary restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505.
6. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. (AASM ICSD-3). 3rd ed. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
7. Telles SC, Alves RC, Chadi G. Periodic limb movements during sleep and restless legs syndrome in patients with ASIA A spinal cord injury. J Neurol Sci. 2011;303(1-2):119-123.
8. Telles SC, Alves RS, Chadi G. Spinal cord injury as a trigger to develop periodic leg movements during sleep: an evolutionary perspective. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70(11):880-884.
9. Tings T, Baier PC, Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Restless legs syndrome induced by impairment of sensory spinal pathways. J Neurol. 2003;250(4):499-500.
10. Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Less is more: pathophysiology of dopaminergic-therapy-related augmentation in restless legs syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(10):878-886.
11. Silber MH, Ehrenberg BL, Allen RP, et al; Medical Advisory Board of the Restless Legs Syndrome Foundation. An algorithm for the management of restless legs syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(7):916-922.
12. Hartmann M, Pfister R, Pfadenhauer K. Restless legs syndrome associated with spinal cord lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(5):688-689.
13. Clemens S, Rye D, Hochman S. Restless legs syndrome: revisiting the dopamine hypothesis from the spinal cord perspective. Neurology. 2006;67(1):125-130.
1. Lasfargues JE, Custis D, Morrone F, Carswell J, Nguyen T. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Paraplegia. 1995;33(2):62-68.
2. Sjölund BH. Pain and rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: the case of sensory spasticity? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002;40(1-3):250-256.
3. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(10):577-586.
4. Kumru H, Vidal J, Benito J, et al. Restless leg syndrome in patients with spinal cord injury. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(12):1461-1464.
5. Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Ouellette J, et al. Pharmacologic therapy for primary restless legs syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):496-505.
6. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The International Classification of Sleep Disorders: Diagnostic and Coding Manual. (AASM ICSD-3). 3rd ed. Westchester, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
7. Telles SC, Alves RC, Chadi G. Periodic limb movements during sleep and restless legs syndrome in patients with ASIA A spinal cord injury. J Neurol Sci. 2011;303(1-2):119-123.
8. Telles SC, Alves RS, Chadi G. Spinal cord injury as a trigger to develop periodic leg movements during sleep: an evolutionary perspective. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70(11):880-884.
9. Tings T, Baier PC, Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Restless legs syndrome induced by impairment of sensory spinal pathways. J Neurol. 2003;250(4):499-500.
10. Paulus W, Trenkwalder C. Less is more: pathophysiology of dopaminergic-therapy-related augmentation in restless legs syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(10):878-886.
11. Silber MH, Ehrenberg BL, Allen RP, et al; Medical Advisory Board of the Restless Legs Syndrome Foundation. An algorithm for the management of restless legs syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(7):916-922.
12. Hartmann M, Pfister R, Pfadenhauer K. Restless legs syndrome associated with spinal cord lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(5):688-689.
13. Clemens S, Rye D, Hochman S. Restless legs syndrome: revisiting the dopamine hypothesis from the spinal cord perspective. Neurology. 2006;67(1):125-130.
Awakening to the dangers of obstructive sleep apnea
Estimates are that 50 to 70 million Americans suffer from a chronic disorder of sleep and wakefulness, hindering daily functioning and affecting health.1 Psychiatric illness is common among people who have a sleep disorder. The relationship between psychiatric illness and sleep disorders is bidirectional: People with mental illness often have sleep complaints, and a primary sleep disorder often results in neuropsychiatric complications.
What is obstructive sleep apnea?
The most common type of sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by frequent cessations of breathing during sleep because of an obstruction of the upper airway. The obstruction occurs secondary to inadequate motor tone of the tongue or airway dilator muscles, or both.1 In addition, many people with OSA have central apneic episodes, in which breathing stops temporarily without airway blockage or respiratory effort.2
The prevalence of OSA is growing as obesity in the United States increases. Risk factors for OSA include obesity, a craniofacial abnormality, an upper-airway abnormality, heredity, smoking, and nasal congestion. OSA plays a role in causing and exacerbating medical illness in people with severe and persistent mental illness, contributing to a significantly shortened life span. Attending to the general health of people who suffer from severe mental illness—including effective treatment of illnesses such as OSA—is crucial.3
Clinical features of OSA
OSA is characterized by hypopnea (a decrease in breathing during sleep) or apnea (an actual pause in breathing). Pauses in breathing during sleep of at least 10 seconds, with obstruction of oronasal airflow despite continuous chest and abdominal movements, are referred to as obstructive apneas. These pauses are associated with a decrease in oxygen saturation or arousal from sleep, or both.1
Primary features of OSA include sleep fragmentation accompanied by nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercapnia, with resulting excessive daytime sleepiness, mood problems, and poor neurocognitive performance (Table 1). OSA often causes potentially serious organ system dysfunction, including adverse cardiovascular and metabolic effects. Studies have suggested that executive dysfunction can be a feature of OSA, which is thought to be related to prefrontal lobe dysfunction caused by intermittent hypoxia. All of these conditions can contribute significantly to decreased quality of life.1
The prevalence of OSA in the general population is approximately 20% when the condition is defined as an apnea-hypopnea index >5 events an hour. The index is the number of apnea and hypopnea episodes that occur during 1 hour of sleep.4
OSA and psychiatric illness
Psychiatric disorders often are comorbid with OSA. These include depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, and substance use disorder.
Depression. Several studies have documented that OSA and depressive disorder often are comorbid. Many symptoms are common to both, including fatigue, daytime sleepiness, poor concentration, irritability, and weight gain (Figure), although some core symptoms of depression (eg, sadness, anhedonia, guilt, and agitation) are clearly distinguishable from symptoms of OSA. The current recommendation is that a mood disorder should be considered secondary to OSA, and treated accordingly.5
Anxiety. OSA also has been linked to anxiety and nocturnal panic attacks. Frequent awakening due to choking from breathing cessation might play a role in the development of anxiety in patients with OSA, although the association is unproven. Studies have shown a correlation between anxiety disorders and excessive daytime sleepiness, one of the core symptoms of OSA.6 OSA is highly prevalent among combat veterans who have PTSD and complain of being overly vigilant at night; experiencing nightmares and frequent awakening; and having non-restorative sleep.7 Anecdotal reports suggest an association between OSA and bipolar disorder: namely, that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment (see “How is OSA treated?,” below) might switch depressed patients to mania.8
Schizophrenia. A strong association exists between OSA and schizophrenia. In a study,9 an OSA diagnosis was made 6 times more often in patients with schizophrenia than in patients with other psychiatric illnesses. Obesity, male sex, and chronic antipsychotic administration were risk factors for OSA in patients with
schizophrenia.9 OSA might be underdiagnosed in patients with schizophrenia because excessive daytime sleepiness, the most common daytime symptom of OSA, can be misattributed as a negative symptom of the disease or a side effect of pharmacotherapy.
OSA and medical illness
OSA can be comorbid with several medical conditions (Table 2). Sleep research in the past 15 years has demonstrated that chronic sleep deprivation has multiple untoward health consequences apart from excessive daytime sleepiness.10 Recent research suggests that chronic sleep loss (<7 hours a night), including sleep loss secondary to OSA, has wide-ranging effects on the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and nervous systems, including:
• obesity (adults and children)
• diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance
• cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Obesity is one of the primary and more modifiable risk factors for OSA (Box). Studies suggest that reducing the severity of obesity would likely benefit people with a sleep disorder, and that treating sleep deprivation and sleep disorders might benefit persons with obesity.12 Chronic sleep loss can have a deleterious influence on appetite regulation through effects on 2 hormones, leptin and ghrelin, that play a major role in appetite regulation. Chronic sleep loss causes and perpetuates obesity through its interplay with these, and other, hormones.12
Diabetes. The link between obesity and diabetes is well-established, as is the long-term morbidity and mortality of these 2 diseases.13 Evidence shows that OSA is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes.14
Cardiovascular disease. OSA has a strong association with cardiovascular disease, including systemic hypertension, possibly myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke.15 Institution of appropriate treatment for OSA including CPAP can minimize or reverse many of these effects.16
Making an OSA diagnosis
A diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG), or sleep study, is the standard test when OSA is suspected. It is performed most often at an attended sleep laboratory. Typically, a PSG measures several physiologic measures, including, but not limited to:
• airflow through mouth and nose
• stages of sleep (by means of electroencephalography channels)
• thoracic and abdominal movements (to assess effort of breathing)
• muscle activity of the chin
• oxyhemoglobin saturation (to monitor variability in oxygen saturation [SaO2] during OSA events).
Portable diagnostic instruments can provide reliable information when a patient cannot be studied in a laboratory. Assessments available on portable instruments include cardiopulmonary monitoring of respiration only; PSG; and peripheral arterial tonometry, which measures autonomic manifestations of respiratory obstructive events.17,18
The severity of OSA is established by the apnea/hypopnea index, which measures the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep.
How is OSA treated?
CPAP is still the gold standard for treating OSA. CPAP provides a pneumatic splint for the upper airway by administering positive pressure through a nasal or oronasal mask. CPAP distinctly improves daytime sleepiness.19,20
Pressure is determined initially by titration during PSG, although a number of automated CPAP machines are available in which pressure is adjusted based on the machine’s response to airflow obstruction. Advantages of using PSG to titrate CPAP are direct observation to control mask leak and the ability to observe the effects of body position and sleep stage and clearly distinguish periods of sleep from wakefulness.
Regrettably, adherence to a nightly regimen of CPAP is less than ideal for several reasons, including claustrophobia, interface failure, and other motivational variables. Some patients who experience claustrophobia can use desensitization techniques; others are, ultimately, unable to use the mask.
Oral appliances. A patient who has mild or moderate OSA but who cannot use the CPAP mask might be a good candidate for an oral appliance. These appliances, which hold the mandible in an advanced position during the night, can be effective in such cases.
CPAP autotitration changes the treatment pressure based on feedback from such patient measures as airflow and airway resistance. Autotitrating devices might have a role in beginning treatment in patients with OSA by means of a portable sleep study, in which CPAP titration is not performed. In addition, autotitrating offers the possibility of changing pressure over time—such as with changes in position during the night or over the longer term in response to weight loss or gain.
Surgery. In patients who are unable to use CPAP, surgery might be indicated to relieve an anatomical obstruction, such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy or other type of mass lesion.
Sleep positioning. A patient who demonstrates OSA exclusively while sleeping supine might benefit from being trained to sleep on either side only or arranging pillows so that he can only sleep on his side.
In conclusion
OSA is common and easily treatable. It coexists with, and exacerbates, medical and psychiatric illness. Treating OSA concomitantly with comorbid medical and psychiatric illness is essential to achieve full symptom remission and prevent associated long-term consequences of both medical and psychiatric illness.
BOTTOM LINE
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and psychiatric illness, especially depression, often co-exist. Screen depressed patients—especially those with risk factors for OSA, such as obesity, smoking, and an upper-airway abnormality—for a sleep disorder. This is especially important if a patient complains of daytime somnolence, fatigue, cognitive problems, poor concentration, or weight gain. For optimal results, treat comorbid psychiatric illness and OSA concurrently; the same is true for other sleep disorders.
Related Resources
- Babson KA, Del Re AC, Bonn-Miller MO, et al. The comorbidity of sleep apnea and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders among obese military veterans within the Veterans Health Administration. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013; 9(12):1253-1258.
- Karkoulias K, Lykouras D, Sampsonas F, et al. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome severity on physical performance and mental health. The use of SF-36 questionnaire in sleep apnea. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(4):531-536.
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Muhammad Awais Aftab, psychiatry resident at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, and Umair Amin, final year MBBS student at King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan, assisted with development of the manuscript of this article.
1. Institute of Medicine. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: an unmet public health problem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006:20.
2. Badr MS. Central sleep apnea. Prim Care. 2005;32(2):361-374.
3. Freedland KE, Carney RM, Hayano J, et al. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72(4):276-281.
4. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):136-143.
5. El-Sherbini AM, Bediwy AS, El-Mitwalli A. Association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and depression and the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:715-721.
6. Hasler G, Buysse DJ, Gamma A, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in young adults: a 20-year prospective community study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):521-529.
7. Yesavage JA, Kinoshita LM, Kimball T, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(3):199-204.
8. Plante D, Winkelman J. Sleep disturbance in bipolar disorder: therapeutic implications. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165(7):830-843.
9. Winkelman J. Schizophrenia, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(1):8-11.
10. Partinen M, Hublin C. Epidemiology of sleep disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
11. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, et al. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):357-363.
12. Romero-Corral A, Caples SM, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Interactions between obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: implications for treatment. Chest. 2010;137(3):711-719.
13. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, et al. Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, The Obesity Society. Obes Res. 2005;13(11):1849-1863.
14. Pamidi S, Aronsohn RS, Tasali E. Obstructive sleep apnea: role in the risk and severity of diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(5):703-715.
15. Malhotra A, Loscalzo J. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: an overview. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;51(4):279-284.
16. Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):82-93.
17. Chesson A, Berry R, Pack A. Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2003; 26(7):907-913.
18. Pittman S, Ayas N, MacDonald M, et al. Using a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea: in-laboratory and ambulatory validation. Sleep. 2004;27(1):923-933.
19. Ballester E, Badia J, Hernandez L, et al. Evidence of the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:495-501.
20. Jenkinson D, Davies J, Mullins R, et al. Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999;353:2100-2105.
Estimates are that 50 to 70 million Americans suffer from a chronic disorder of sleep and wakefulness, hindering daily functioning and affecting health.1 Psychiatric illness is common among people who have a sleep disorder. The relationship between psychiatric illness and sleep disorders is bidirectional: People with mental illness often have sleep complaints, and a primary sleep disorder often results in neuropsychiatric complications.
What is obstructive sleep apnea?
The most common type of sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by frequent cessations of breathing during sleep because of an obstruction of the upper airway. The obstruction occurs secondary to inadequate motor tone of the tongue or airway dilator muscles, or both.1 In addition, many people with OSA have central apneic episodes, in which breathing stops temporarily without airway blockage or respiratory effort.2
The prevalence of OSA is growing as obesity in the United States increases. Risk factors for OSA include obesity, a craniofacial abnormality, an upper-airway abnormality, heredity, smoking, and nasal congestion. OSA plays a role in causing and exacerbating medical illness in people with severe and persistent mental illness, contributing to a significantly shortened life span. Attending to the general health of people who suffer from severe mental illness—including effective treatment of illnesses such as OSA—is crucial.3
Clinical features of OSA
OSA is characterized by hypopnea (a decrease in breathing during sleep) or apnea (an actual pause in breathing). Pauses in breathing during sleep of at least 10 seconds, with obstruction of oronasal airflow despite continuous chest and abdominal movements, are referred to as obstructive apneas. These pauses are associated with a decrease in oxygen saturation or arousal from sleep, or both.1
Primary features of OSA include sleep fragmentation accompanied by nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercapnia, with resulting excessive daytime sleepiness, mood problems, and poor neurocognitive performance (Table 1). OSA often causes potentially serious organ system dysfunction, including adverse cardiovascular and metabolic effects. Studies have suggested that executive dysfunction can be a feature of OSA, which is thought to be related to prefrontal lobe dysfunction caused by intermittent hypoxia. All of these conditions can contribute significantly to decreased quality of life.1
The prevalence of OSA in the general population is approximately 20% when the condition is defined as an apnea-hypopnea index >5 events an hour. The index is the number of apnea and hypopnea episodes that occur during 1 hour of sleep.4
OSA and psychiatric illness
Psychiatric disorders often are comorbid with OSA. These include depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, and substance use disorder.
Depression. Several studies have documented that OSA and depressive disorder often are comorbid. Many symptoms are common to both, including fatigue, daytime sleepiness, poor concentration, irritability, and weight gain (Figure), although some core symptoms of depression (eg, sadness, anhedonia, guilt, and agitation) are clearly distinguishable from symptoms of OSA. The current recommendation is that a mood disorder should be considered secondary to OSA, and treated accordingly.5
Anxiety. OSA also has been linked to anxiety and nocturnal panic attacks. Frequent awakening due to choking from breathing cessation might play a role in the development of anxiety in patients with OSA, although the association is unproven. Studies have shown a correlation between anxiety disorders and excessive daytime sleepiness, one of the core symptoms of OSA.6 OSA is highly prevalent among combat veterans who have PTSD and complain of being overly vigilant at night; experiencing nightmares and frequent awakening; and having non-restorative sleep.7 Anecdotal reports suggest an association between OSA and bipolar disorder: namely, that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment (see “How is OSA treated?,” below) might switch depressed patients to mania.8
Schizophrenia. A strong association exists between OSA and schizophrenia. In a study,9 an OSA diagnosis was made 6 times more often in patients with schizophrenia than in patients with other psychiatric illnesses. Obesity, male sex, and chronic antipsychotic administration were risk factors for OSA in patients with
schizophrenia.9 OSA might be underdiagnosed in patients with schizophrenia because excessive daytime sleepiness, the most common daytime symptom of OSA, can be misattributed as a negative symptom of the disease or a side effect of pharmacotherapy.
OSA and medical illness
OSA can be comorbid with several medical conditions (Table 2). Sleep research in the past 15 years has demonstrated that chronic sleep deprivation has multiple untoward health consequences apart from excessive daytime sleepiness.10 Recent research suggests that chronic sleep loss (<7 hours a night), including sleep loss secondary to OSA, has wide-ranging effects on the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and nervous systems, including:
• obesity (adults and children)
• diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance
• cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Obesity is one of the primary and more modifiable risk factors for OSA (Box). Studies suggest that reducing the severity of obesity would likely benefit people with a sleep disorder, and that treating sleep deprivation and sleep disorders might benefit persons with obesity.12 Chronic sleep loss can have a deleterious influence on appetite regulation through effects on 2 hormones, leptin and ghrelin, that play a major role in appetite regulation. Chronic sleep loss causes and perpetuates obesity through its interplay with these, and other, hormones.12
Diabetes. The link between obesity and diabetes is well-established, as is the long-term morbidity and mortality of these 2 diseases.13 Evidence shows that OSA is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes.14
Cardiovascular disease. OSA has a strong association with cardiovascular disease, including systemic hypertension, possibly myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke.15 Institution of appropriate treatment for OSA including CPAP can minimize or reverse many of these effects.16
Making an OSA diagnosis
A diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG), or sleep study, is the standard test when OSA is suspected. It is performed most often at an attended sleep laboratory. Typically, a PSG measures several physiologic measures, including, but not limited to:
• airflow through mouth and nose
• stages of sleep (by means of electroencephalography channels)
• thoracic and abdominal movements (to assess effort of breathing)
• muscle activity of the chin
• oxyhemoglobin saturation (to monitor variability in oxygen saturation [SaO2] during OSA events).
Portable diagnostic instruments can provide reliable information when a patient cannot be studied in a laboratory. Assessments available on portable instruments include cardiopulmonary monitoring of respiration only; PSG; and peripheral arterial tonometry, which measures autonomic manifestations of respiratory obstructive events.17,18
The severity of OSA is established by the apnea/hypopnea index, which measures the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep.
How is OSA treated?
CPAP is still the gold standard for treating OSA. CPAP provides a pneumatic splint for the upper airway by administering positive pressure through a nasal or oronasal mask. CPAP distinctly improves daytime sleepiness.19,20
Pressure is determined initially by titration during PSG, although a number of automated CPAP machines are available in which pressure is adjusted based on the machine’s response to airflow obstruction. Advantages of using PSG to titrate CPAP are direct observation to control mask leak and the ability to observe the effects of body position and sleep stage and clearly distinguish periods of sleep from wakefulness.
Regrettably, adherence to a nightly regimen of CPAP is less than ideal for several reasons, including claustrophobia, interface failure, and other motivational variables. Some patients who experience claustrophobia can use desensitization techniques; others are, ultimately, unable to use the mask.
Oral appliances. A patient who has mild or moderate OSA but who cannot use the CPAP mask might be a good candidate for an oral appliance. These appliances, which hold the mandible in an advanced position during the night, can be effective in such cases.
CPAP autotitration changes the treatment pressure based on feedback from such patient measures as airflow and airway resistance. Autotitrating devices might have a role in beginning treatment in patients with OSA by means of a portable sleep study, in which CPAP titration is not performed. In addition, autotitrating offers the possibility of changing pressure over time—such as with changes in position during the night or over the longer term in response to weight loss or gain.
Surgery. In patients who are unable to use CPAP, surgery might be indicated to relieve an anatomical obstruction, such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy or other type of mass lesion.
Sleep positioning. A patient who demonstrates OSA exclusively while sleeping supine might benefit from being trained to sleep on either side only or arranging pillows so that he can only sleep on his side.
In conclusion
OSA is common and easily treatable. It coexists with, and exacerbates, medical and psychiatric illness. Treating OSA concomitantly with comorbid medical and psychiatric illness is essential to achieve full symptom remission and prevent associated long-term consequences of both medical and psychiatric illness.
BOTTOM LINE
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and psychiatric illness, especially depression, often co-exist. Screen depressed patients—especially those with risk factors for OSA, such as obesity, smoking, and an upper-airway abnormality—for a sleep disorder. This is especially important if a patient complains of daytime somnolence, fatigue, cognitive problems, poor concentration, or weight gain. For optimal results, treat comorbid psychiatric illness and OSA concurrently; the same is true for other sleep disorders.
Related Resources
- Babson KA, Del Re AC, Bonn-Miller MO, et al. The comorbidity of sleep apnea and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders among obese military veterans within the Veterans Health Administration. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013; 9(12):1253-1258.
- Karkoulias K, Lykouras D, Sampsonas F, et al. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome severity on physical performance and mental health. The use of SF-36 questionnaire in sleep apnea. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(4):531-536.
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Muhammad Awais Aftab, psychiatry resident at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, and Umair Amin, final year MBBS student at King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan, assisted with development of the manuscript of this article.
Estimates are that 50 to 70 million Americans suffer from a chronic disorder of sleep and wakefulness, hindering daily functioning and affecting health.1 Psychiatric illness is common among people who have a sleep disorder. The relationship between psychiatric illness and sleep disorders is bidirectional: People with mental illness often have sleep complaints, and a primary sleep disorder often results in neuropsychiatric complications.
What is obstructive sleep apnea?
The most common type of sleep-disordered breathing, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by frequent cessations of breathing during sleep because of an obstruction of the upper airway. The obstruction occurs secondary to inadequate motor tone of the tongue or airway dilator muscles, or both.1 In addition, many people with OSA have central apneic episodes, in which breathing stops temporarily without airway blockage or respiratory effort.2
The prevalence of OSA is growing as obesity in the United States increases. Risk factors for OSA include obesity, a craniofacial abnormality, an upper-airway abnormality, heredity, smoking, and nasal congestion. OSA plays a role in causing and exacerbating medical illness in people with severe and persistent mental illness, contributing to a significantly shortened life span. Attending to the general health of people who suffer from severe mental illness—including effective treatment of illnesses such as OSA—is crucial.3
Clinical features of OSA
OSA is characterized by hypopnea (a decrease in breathing during sleep) or apnea (an actual pause in breathing). Pauses in breathing during sleep of at least 10 seconds, with obstruction of oronasal airflow despite continuous chest and abdominal movements, are referred to as obstructive apneas. These pauses are associated with a decrease in oxygen saturation or arousal from sleep, or both.1
Primary features of OSA include sleep fragmentation accompanied by nocturnal hypoxemia and hypercapnia, with resulting excessive daytime sleepiness, mood problems, and poor neurocognitive performance (Table 1). OSA often causes potentially serious organ system dysfunction, including adverse cardiovascular and metabolic effects. Studies have suggested that executive dysfunction can be a feature of OSA, which is thought to be related to prefrontal lobe dysfunction caused by intermittent hypoxia. All of these conditions can contribute significantly to decreased quality of life.1
The prevalence of OSA in the general population is approximately 20% when the condition is defined as an apnea-hypopnea index >5 events an hour. The index is the number of apnea and hypopnea episodes that occur during 1 hour of sleep.4
OSA and psychiatric illness
Psychiatric disorders often are comorbid with OSA. These include depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder, and substance use disorder.
Depression. Several studies have documented that OSA and depressive disorder often are comorbid. Many symptoms are common to both, including fatigue, daytime sleepiness, poor concentration, irritability, and weight gain (Figure), although some core symptoms of depression (eg, sadness, anhedonia, guilt, and agitation) are clearly distinguishable from symptoms of OSA. The current recommendation is that a mood disorder should be considered secondary to OSA, and treated accordingly.5
Anxiety. OSA also has been linked to anxiety and nocturnal panic attacks. Frequent awakening due to choking from breathing cessation might play a role in the development of anxiety in patients with OSA, although the association is unproven. Studies have shown a correlation between anxiety disorders and excessive daytime sleepiness, one of the core symptoms of OSA.6 OSA is highly prevalent among combat veterans who have PTSD and complain of being overly vigilant at night; experiencing nightmares and frequent awakening; and having non-restorative sleep.7 Anecdotal reports suggest an association between OSA and bipolar disorder: namely, that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment (see “How is OSA treated?,” below) might switch depressed patients to mania.8
Schizophrenia. A strong association exists between OSA and schizophrenia. In a study,9 an OSA diagnosis was made 6 times more often in patients with schizophrenia than in patients with other psychiatric illnesses. Obesity, male sex, and chronic antipsychotic administration were risk factors for OSA in patients with
schizophrenia.9 OSA might be underdiagnosed in patients with schizophrenia because excessive daytime sleepiness, the most common daytime symptom of OSA, can be misattributed as a negative symptom of the disease or a side effect of pharmacotherapy.
OSA and medical illness
OSA can be comorbid with several medical conditions (Table 2). Sleep research in the past 15 years has demonstrated that chronic sleep deprivation has multiple untoward health consequences apart from excessive daytime sleepiness.10 Recent research suggests that chronic sleep loss (<7 hours a night), including sleep loss secondary to OSA, has wide-ranging effects on the cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and nervous systems, including:
• obesity (adults and children)
• diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance
• cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Obesity is one of the primary and more modifiable risk factors for OSA (Box). Studies suggest that reducing the severity of obesity would likely benefit people with a sleep disorder, and that treating sleep deprivation and sleep disorders might benefit persons with obesity.12 Chronic sleep loss can have a deleterious influence on appetite regulation through effects on 2 hormones, leptin and ghrelin, that play a major role in appetite regulation. Chronic sleep loss causes and perpetuates obesity through its interplay with these, and other, hormones.12
Diabetes. The link between obesity and diabetes is well-established, as is the long-term morbidity and mortality of these 2 diseases.13 Evidence shows that OSA is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes.14
Cardiovascular disease. OSA has a strong association with cardiovascular disease, including systemic hypertension, possibly myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke.15 Institution of appropriate treatment for OSA including CPAP can minimize or reverse many of these effects.16
Making an OSA diagnosis
A diagnostic polysomnogram (PSG), or sleep study, is the standard test when OSA is suspected. It is performed most often at an attended sleep laboratory. Typically, a PSG measures several physiologic measures, including, but not limited to:
• airflow through mouth and nose
• stages of sleep (by means of electroencephalography channels)
• thoracic and abdominal movements (to assess effort of breathing)
• muscle activity of the chin
• oxyhemoglobin saturation (to monitor variability in oxygen saturation [SaO2] during OSA events).
Portable diagnostic instruments can provide reliable information when a patient cannot be studied in a laboratory. Assessments available on portable instruments include cardiopulmonary monitoring of respiration only; PSG; and peripheral arterial tonometry, which measures autonomic manifestations of respiratory obstructive events.17,18
The severity of OSA is established by the apnea/hypopnea index, which measures the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep.
How is OSA treated?
CPAP is still the gold standard for treating OSA. CPAP provides a pneumatic splint for the upper airway by administering positive pressure through a nasal or oronasal mask. CPAP distinctly improves daytime sleepiness.19,20
Pressure is determined initially by titration during PSG, although a number of automated CPAP machines are available in which pressure is adjusted based on the machine’s response to airflow obstruction. Advantages of using PSG to titrate CPAP are direct observation to control mask leak and the ability to observe the effects of body position and sleep stage and clearly distinguish periods of sleep from wakefulness.
Regrettably, adherence to a nightly regimen of CPAP is less than ideal for several reasons, including claustrophobia, interface failure, and other motivational variables. Some patients who experience claustrophobia can use desensitization techniques; others are, ultimately, unable to use the mask.
Oral appliances. A patient who has mild or moderate OSA but who cannot use the CPAP mask might be a good candidate for an oral appliance. These appliances, which hold the mandible in an advanced position during the night, can be effective in such cases.
CPAP autotitration changes the treatment pressure based on feedback from such patient measures as airflow and airway resistance. Autotitrating devices might have a role in beginning treatment in patients with OSA by means of a portable sleep study, in which CPAP titration is not performed. In addition, autotitrating offers the possibility of changing pressure over time—such as with changes in position during the night or over the longer term in response to weight loss or gain.
Surgery. In patients who are unable to use CPAP, surgery might be indicated to relieve an anatomical obstruction, such as adenotonsillar hypertrophy or other type of mass lesion.
Sleep positioning. A patient who demonstrates OSA exclusively while sleeping supine might benefit from being trained to sleep on either side only or arranging pillows so that he can only sleep on his side.
In conclusion
OSA is common and easily treatable. It coexists with, and exacerbates, medical and psychiatric illness. Treating OSA concomitantly with comorbid medical and psychiatric illness is essential to achieve full symptom remission and prevent associated long-term consequences of both medical and psychiatric illness.
BOTTOM LINE
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and psychiatric illness, especially depression, often co-exist. Screen depressed patients—especially those with risk factors for OSA, such as obesity, smoking, and an upper-airway abnormality—for a sleep disorder. This is especially important if a patient complains of daytime somnolence, fatigue, cognitive problems, poor concentration, or weight gain. For optimal results, treat comorbid psychiatric illness and OSA concurrently; the same is true for other sleep disorders.
Related Resources
- Babson KA, Del Re AC, Bonn-Miller MO, et al. The comorbidity of sleep apnea and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders among obese military veterans within the Veterans Health Administration. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013; 9(12):1253-1258.
- Karkoulias K, Lykouras D, Sampsonas F, et al. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome severity on physical performance and mental health. The use of SF-36 questionnaire in sleep apnea. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17(4):531-536.
Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.
Acknowledgment
Dr. Muhammad Awais Aftab, psychiatry resident at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, and Umair Amin, final year MBBS student at King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan, assisted with development of the manuscript of this article.
1. Institute of Medicine. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: an unmet public health problem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006:20.
2. Badr MS. Central sleep apnea. Prim Care. 2005;32(2):361-374.
3. Freedland KE, Carney RM, Hayano J, et al. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72(4):276-281.
4. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):136-143.
5. El-Sherbini AM, Bediwy AS, El-Mitwalli A. Association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and depression and the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:715-721.
6. Hasler G, Buysse DJ, Gamma A, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in young adults: a 20-year prospective community study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):521-529.
7. Yesavage JA, Kinoshita LM, Kimball T, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(3):199-204.
8. Plante D, Winkelman J. Sleep disturbance in bipolar disorder: therapeutic implications. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165(7):830-843.
9. Winkelman J. Schizophrenia, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(1):8-11.
10. Partinen M, Hublin C. Epidemiology of sleep disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
11. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, et al. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):357-363.
12. Romero-Corral A, Caples SM, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Interactions between obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: implications for treatment. Chest. 2010;137(3):711-719.
13. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, et al. Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, The Obesity Society. Obes Res. 2005;13(11):1849-1863.
14. Pamidi S, Aronsohn RS, Tasali E. Obstructive sleep apnea: role in the risk and severity of diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(5):703-715.
15. Malhotra A, Loscalzo J. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: an overview. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;51(4):279-284.
16. Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):82-93.
17. Chesson A, Berry R, Pack A. Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2003; 26(7):907-913.
18. Pittman S, Ayas N, MacDonald M, et al. Using a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea: in-laboratory and ambulatory validation. Sleep. 2004;27(1):923-933.
19. Ballester E, Badia J, Hernandez L, et al. Evidence of the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:495-501.
20. Jenkinson D, Davies J, Mullins R, et al. Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999;353:2100-2105.
1. Institute of Medicine. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: an unmet public health problem. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006:20.
2. Badr MS. Central sleep apnea. Prim Care. 2005;32(2):361-374.
3. Freedland KE, Carney RM, Hayano J, et al. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on response to cognitive behavior therapy for depression after an acute myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72(4):276-281.
4. Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):136-143.
5. El-Sherbini AM, Bediwy AS, El-Mitwalli A. Association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and depression and the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:715-721.
6. Hasler G, Buysse DJ, Gamma A, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness in young adults: a 20-year prospective community study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(4):521-529.
7. Yesavage JA, Kinoshita LM, Kimball T, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing in Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012;20(3):199-204.
8. Plante D, Winkelman J. Sleep disturbance in bipolar disorder: therapeutic implications. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165(7):830-843.
9. Winkelman J. Schizophrenia, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(1):8-11.
10. Partinen M, Hublin C. Epidemiology of sleep disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
11. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, et al. Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):357-363.
12. Romero-Corral A, Caples SM, Lopez-Jimenez F, et al. Interactions between obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: implications for treatment. Chest. 2010;137(3):711-719.
13. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, et al. Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, The Obesity Society. Obes Res. 2005;13(11):1849-1863.
14. Pamidi S, Aronsohn RS, Tasali E. Obstructive sleep apnea: role in the risk and severity of diabetes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(5):703-715.
15. Malhotra A, Loscalzo J. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: an overview. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;51(4):279-284.
16. Bradley TD, Floras JS. Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences. Lancet. 2009;373(9657):82-93.
17. Chesson A, Berry R, Pack A. Practice parameters for the use of portable monitoring devices in the investigation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in adults. Sleep. 2003; 26(7):907-913.
18. Pittman S, Ayas N, MacDonald M, et al. Using a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea: in-laboratory and ambulatory validation. Sleep. 2004;27(1):923-933.
19. Ballester E, Badia J, Hernandez L, et al. Evidence of the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:495-501.
20. Jenkinson D, Davies J, Mullins R, et al. Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999;353:2100-2105.
Sleep hygiene helps patients catch some ZZZs
Proper sleep hygiene can help your patients fall and stay asleep consistently. Patients with insomnia are at a higher risk of developing or experiencing a recurrence of a mood disorder, and poor sleep can worsen psychiatric symptoms such as depression or mania.1 Data about combining behavioral approaches and hypnotic medications to treat insomnia are inconclusive;2 however, using the 2 together may help patients who do not respond to a single approach.
First rule out other causes of insomnia, such as sleep apnea, other medical conditions, or medications. Patients may improve after these factors are addressed.
Teaching sleep hygiene principles (Box) does not mean patients will adopt these habits, but employing the following suggestions could improve adherence:
Obtain a detailed sleep history to identify specific behaviors to be changed. For example, a patient might only have to stop watching television in bed to get a good night’s sleep, although some may find a brief exposure to television or radio facilitates relaxation.
Explain the rationale for changing a behavior. For example, when telling patients to limit caffeine or alcohol at night, list these substances’ negative effects on sleep. Similarly, when instructing patients to avoid watching television in bed, tell them that using the bedroom only for sleep or sex will help condition them for sleep at bedtime.
- Establish a regular sleep-wake schedule
- Limit caffeine and alcohol consumption
- Avoid naps
- Eliminate noise and light from the sleep environment
- Use the bed only for sleep or sex
- Avoid looking at a clock when trying to sleep
Discuss sleep regularly. A patient might not disclose poor sleeping habits during the first session.
Give your patient handouts on sleep hygiene principles and highlight the most pertinent information. Ask the patient to place the handout where he or she will see it regularly.
Involve the family to help identify a patient’s poor sleep habits and find ways to implement sleep hygiene principles.
Encourage patients to keep a sleep diary. Ask the patient to note how many hours and at what time he or she slept for at least 2 weeks, then bring this information to the next appointment. This record allows you to examine patients’ sleep patterns and recommend appropriate changes.
Ask patients for creative ideas to improve their sleep. This dialogue will facilitate the therapeutic alliance and encourage positive changes in patients’ lives.
1. Peterson MJ, Benca RM. Sleep in mood disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006;29:1009-32.
2. Mendelson WB. Combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for insomnia. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(suppl 5):19-23.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Hurwitz is a psychiatrist and sleep medicine physician, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Ebrahim is an endocrinologist, Minnesota Center for Obesity, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Eagan, MN.
Proper sleep hygiene can help your patients fall and stay asleep consistently. Patients with insomnia are at a higher risk of developing or experiencing a recurrence of a mood disorder, and poor sleep can worsen psychiatric symptoms such as depression or mania.1 Data about combining behavioral approaches and hypnotic medications to treat insomnia are inconclusive;2 however, using the 2 together may help patients who do not respond to a single approach.
First rule out other causes of insomnia, such as sleep apnea, other medical conditions, or medications. Patients may improve after these factors are addressed.
Teaching sleep hygiene principles (Box) does not mean patients will adopt these habits, but employing the following suggestions could improve adherence:
Obtain a detailed sleep history to identify specific behaviors to be changed. For example, a patient might only have to stop watching television in bed to get a good night’s sleep, although some may find a brief exposure to television or radio facilitates relaxation.
Explain the rationale for changing a behavior. For example, when telling patients to limit caffeine or alcohol at night, list these substances’ negative effects on sleep. Similarly, when instructing patients to avoid watching television in bed, tell them that using the bedroom only for sleep or sex will help condition them for sleep at bedtime.
- Establish a regular sleep-wake schedule
- Limit caffeine and alcohol consumption
- Avoid naps
- Eliminate noise and light from the sleep environment
- Use the bed only for sleep or sex
- Avoid looking at a clock when trying to sleep
Discuss sleep regularly. A patient might not disclose poor sleeping habits during the first session.
Give your patient handouts on sleep hygiene principles and highlight the most pertinent information. Ask the patient to place the handout where he or she will see it regularly.
Involve the family to help identify a patient’s poor sleep habits and find ways to implement sleep hygiene principles.
Encourage patients to keep a sleep diary. Ask the patient to note how many hours and at what time he or she slept for at least 2 weeks, then bring this information to the next appointment. This record allows you to examine patients’ sleep patterns and recommend appropriate changes.
Ask patients for creative ideas to improve their sleep. This dialogue will facilitate the therapeutic alliance and encourage positive changes in patients’ lives.
Proper sleep hygiene can help your patients fall and stay asleep consistently. Patients with insomnia are at a higher risk of developing or experiencing a recurrence of a mood disorder, and poor sleep can worsen psychiatric symptoms such as depression or mania.1 Data about combining behavioral approaches and hypnotic medications to treat insomnia are inconclusive;2 however, using the 2 together may help patients who do not respond to a single approach.
First rule out other causes of insomnia, such as sleep apnea, other medical conditions, or medications. Patients may improve after these factors are addressed.
Teaching sleep hygiene principles (Box) does not mean patients will adopt these habits, but employing the following suggestions could improve adherence:
Obtain a detailed sleep history to identify specific behaviors to be changed. For example, a patient might only have to stop watching television in bed to get a good night’s sleep, although some may find a brief exposure to television or radio facilitates relaxation.
Explain the rationale for changing a behavior. For example, when telling patients to limit caffeine or alcohol at night, list these substances’ negative effects on sleep. Similarly, when instructing patients to avoid watching television in bed, tell them that using the bedroom only for sleep or sex will help condition them for sleep at bedtime.
- Establish a regular sleep-wake schedule
- Limit caffeine and alcohol consumption
- Avoid naps
- Eliminate noise and light from the sleep environment
- Use the bed only for sleep or sex
- Avoid looking at a clock when trying to sleep
Discuss sleep regularly. A patient might not disclose poor sleeping habits during the first session.
Give your patient handouts on sleep hygiene principles and highlight the most pertinent information. Ask the patient to place the handout where he or she will see it regularly.
Involve the family to help identify a patient’s poor sleep habits and find ways to implement sleep hygiene principles.
Encourage patients to keep a sleep diary. Ask the patient to note how many hours and at what time he or she slept for at least 2 weeks, then bring this information to the next appointment. This record allows you to examine patients’ sleep patterns and recommend appropriate changes.
Ask patients for creative ideas to improve their sleep. This dialogue will facilitate the therapeutic alliance and encourage positive changes in patients’ lives.
1. Peterson MJ, Benca RM. Sleep in mood disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006;29:1009-32.
2. Mendelson WB. Combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for insomnia. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(suppl 5):19-23.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Hurwitz is a psychiatrist and sleep medicine physician, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Ebrahim is an endocrinologist, Minnesota Center for Obesity, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Eagan, MN.
1. Peterson MJ, Benca RM. Sleep in mood disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006;29:1009-32.
2. Mendelson WB. Combining pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for insomnia. J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(suppl 5):19-23.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Hurwitz is a psychiatrist and sleep medicine physician, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; Dr. Ebrahim is an endocrinologist, Minnesota Center for Obesity, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Eagan, MN.
Oral board jitters? Try these rehearsal tips
Many candidates become anxious before and during the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) part II oral exam, especially if they failed before. As many as 50% of candidates fail the part II oral exam on the first try, and those who fail a second time risk failing several times.1
Studying more and worrying less can improve your chance of passing, whether it’s your first time taking the test or after an initial failure. You may also perform better if you begin the certification process promptly after residency training.2 By fitting rehearsal opportunities into a busy schedule, you—or residents you supervise—can prepare for the exam’s oral portion and reduce test-taking anxiety.
Form a study group. Take turns performing oral board-type interviews with other candidates. Give and receive informal feedback while you practice.
Conduct many mock board interviews. Mock interviews with volunteer patients who have given written or verbal consent are the most-thorough form of exam preparation, especially when supervised by psychiatrists who have been examiners. Try to do as many as your schedule permits.
Practice on your patients. When you see a new patient, keep the board process in mind and try to do a 30-minute interview. Imagine you are in front of the examiners.
Dictate evaluations as if presenting to examiners. Tape-recording dictations allows you to review your presentation later and critique yourself.
Practice for the exam’s video portion. Because this part is commonly overlooked, many candidates pass the live interview but fail the video portion.
For the video portion, you are asked to watch a short video of a patient interview and present a case based on information from the video. You can purchase sample videos from commercial test preparation organizations, which often advertise in American Psychiatric Association newsletters.
Videotape yourself interviewing and presenting the case. Reviewing the videos can help you identify and correct body language problems so that you convey warmth, empathy, and confidence. You can videotape an interview after obtaining written consent from the patient. If no patients agree, videotape yourself giving the case presentation only.
Practice in inpatient, outpatient, and office settings. This gives you a chance to practice interviewing patients with a variety of psychiatric conditions.
These tips can help you make the 30-minute interview and presentation second nature, reduce exam anxiety, and increase your chance of passing.
1. Moran M. Project helps candidate succeed on ABPN exam. Psychiatr News 2005;40(17):22.-
2. Juul D, Scully JH, Jr, Scheiber SC. Achieving board certification in psychiatry: a cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(3):563-5.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, and has recently been appointed assistant professor, department of psychiatry, University of Minnesota.
Many candidates become anxious before and during the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) part II oral exam, especially if they failed before. As many as 50% of candidates fail the part II oral exam on the first try, and those who fail a second time risk failing several times.1
Studying more and worrying less can improve your chance of passing, whether it’s your first time taking the test or after an initial failure. You may also perform better if you begin the certification process promptly after residency training.2 By fitting rehearsal opportunities into a busy schedule, you—or residents you supervise—can prepare for the exam’s oral portion and reduce test-taking anxiety.
Form a study group. Take turns performing oral board-type interviews with other candidates. Give and receive informal feedback while you practice.
Conduct many mock board interviews. Mock interviews with volunteer patients who have given written or verbal consent are the most-thorough form of exam preparation, especially when supervised by psychiatrists who have been examiners. Try to do as many as your schedule permits.
Practice on your patients. When you see a new patient, keep the board process in mind and try to do a 30-minute interview. Imagine you are in front of the examiners.
Dictate evaluations as if presenting to examiners. Tape-recording dictations allows you to review your presentation later and critique yourself.
Practice for the exam’s video portion. Because this part is commonly overlooked, many candidates pass the live interview but fail the video portion.
For the video portion, you are asked to watch a short video of a patient interview and present a case based on information from the video. You can purchase sample videos from commercial test preparation organizations, which often advertise in American Psychiatric Association newsletters.
Videotape yourself interviewing and presenting the case. Reviewing the videos can help you identify and correct body language problems so that you convey warmth, empathy, and confidence. You can videotape an interview after obtaining written consent from the patient. If no patients agree, videotape yourself giving the case presentation only.
Practice in inpatient, outpatient, and office settings. This gives you a chance to practice interviewing patients with a variety of psychiatric conditions.
These tips can help you make the 30-minute interview and presentation second nature, reduce exam anxiety, and increase your chance of passing.
Many candidates become anxious before and during the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) part II oral exam, especially if they failed before. As many as 50% of candidates fail the part II oral exam on the first try, and those who fail a second time risk failing several times.1
Studying more and worrying less can improve your chance of passing, whether it’s your first time taking the test or after an initial failure. You may also perform better if you begin the certification process promptly after residency training.2 By fitting rehearsal opportunities into a busy schedule, you—or residents you supervise—can prepare for the exam’s oral portion and reduce test-taking anxiety.
Form a study group. Take turns performing oral board-type interviews with other candidates. Give and receive informal feedback while you practice.
Conduct many mock board interviews. Mock interviews with volunteer patients who have given written or verbal consent are the most-thorough form of exam preparation, especially when supervised by psychiatrists who have been examiners. Try to do as many as your schedule permits.
Practice on your patients. When you see a new patient, keep the board process in mind and try to do a 30-minute interview. Imagine you are in front of the examiners.
Dictate evaluations as if presenting to examiners. Tape-recording dictations allows you to review your presentation later and critique yourself.
Practice for the exam’s video portion. Because this part is commonly overlooked, many candidates pass the live interview but fail the video portion.
For the video portion, you are asked to watch a short video of a patient interview and present a case based on information from the video. You can purchase sample videos from commercial test preparation organizations, which often advertise in American Psychiatric Association newsletters.
Videotape yourself interviewing and presenting the case. Reviewing the videos can help you identify and correct body language problems so that you convey warmth, empathy, and confidence. You can videotape an interview after obtaining written consent from the patient. If no patients agree, videotape yourself giving the case presentation only.
Practice in inpatient, outpatient, and office settings. This gives you a chance to practice interviewing patients with a variety of psychiatric conditions.
These tips can help you make the 30-minute interview and presentation second nature, reduce exam anxiety, and increase your chance of passing.
1. Moran M. Project helps candidate succeed on ABPN exam. Psychiatr News 2005;40(17):22.-
2. Juul D, Scully JH, Jr, Scheiber SC. Achieving board certification in psychiatry: a cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(3):563-5.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, and has recently been appointed assistant professor, department of psychiatry, University of Minnesota.
1. Moran M. Project helps candidate succeed on ABPN exam. Psychiatr News 2005;40(17):22.-
2. Juul D, Scully JH, Jr, Scheiber SC. Achieving board certification in psychiatry: a cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160(3):563-5.
Dr. Khawaja is staff psychiatrist, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, and has recently been appointed assistant professor, department of psychiatry, University of Minnesota.