Kari Oakes

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – For a select subset of pediatric dermatology patients, home phototherapy may represent a safe, effective, and even affordable alternative to office visits. Some families whose children are in treatment for vitiligo, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis may find that the expense and learning curve of administering treatment at home are worthwhile, but dermatologists must select those families carefully.

Leslie Castelo-Soccio, MD, PhD, professor of pediatric dermatology at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, gave an overview of medical phototherapy for childhood skin diseases at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

For vitiligo, narrow-band UVB’s (NBUVB) effectiveness is maximized if treatment is begun relatively early, and if results are going to happen, they’ll show up fairly quickly. “If there’s no response after six months, stop the therapy,” Dr. Castelo-Soccio said.

Although the literature shows NBUVB to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis, Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that most pediatric atopic dermatitis studies have been small and retrospective and conducted in a population with severe disease.

Regarding psoriasis in children, the literature shows “higher numbers of patients with near-complete or complete response,” she said.

The experience of NBUVB for pediatric dermatologic conditions at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia supports the idea that “the best responses are seen after at least 40 treatments,” and that 6 months is enough time to see whether a patient will respond. The best responders at her institution are children with facial vitiligo. “Of course, you get a better response with compliance,” she noted.

The experience of her patients falls in line with the data about side effects, in which the most common adverse events are reactivation of HSV and burning.

Families ask about cancer risk, but “there are no published data on the risk of skin cancer in long-term phototherapy in children,” she said. At this point, the best pediatric dermatologists can do is to extrapolate risk from data on phototherapy for neonatal jaundice, but even those data are inconclusive, she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that it’s pretty common for families to request home treatment: “When you start talking to patients about phototherapy, the thing I always get questions about is, ‘Why can’t I do it at home?’ ” She prefers to initiate treatment in the clinic and then assess suitability for home therapy after a relationship has been established.

The ideal patient, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio, is one whose family has been diligent about coming to appointments and who otherwise demonstrates excellent compliance.

At first blush, the cost of acquiring a home device – often in the $2,000 range – might seem prohibitive for many families. The upfront cost may be worth it for some, since office visits involve copayments and lost time from school and work for multiple treatments weekly over a period of months. A big commute to the doctor’s office for treatment may further tip the scales toward home treatment. “I wouldn’t hesitate to offer this option to the right family,” she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she’s had some limited success getting insurance reimbursement for home phototherapy, especially if success has already been seen with office-based treatment.

NBUVB therapy has limitations, though. Some that have particular relevance for the pediatric population involve the challenges of safe delivery, including using appropriate eye wear and ensuring lack of movement. Each of these problems can be even more of a challenge at home, reinforcing the need to select appropriate patients for home phototherapy, she added.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she provides information about all of the various phototherapy devices to her patients and their parents, letting them make the choice. “All of the companies are really good about helping with paperwork” to apply for insurance reimbursement, she said. Options range from the bulkiest and most expensive – a full phototherapy box – to three-panel arrays, single panels, hand-foot devices, and even hand-held devices. The latter can be had for less than $1,000 and may be best suited for targeting smaller areas.

Features to look for in home phototherapy devices include a dosimeter accuracy sensor, which adjusts the treatment time to deliver the same dose, even if dust or aging lamps reduce output. User-friendly timers also are helpful for families, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio. A safety lock-out will allow only a certain number of treatments before the unit must be reset by the physician and is a reassuring feature. Each activation counts as a treatment, however, so families and physicians must be aware that if a hand-held unit is used to treat multiple small lesions in different body areas, a single treatment session will involve many device activations, each of which will be registered as a treatment.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – For a select subset of pediatric dermatology patients, home phototherapy may represent a safe, effective, and even affordable alternative to office visits. Some families whose children are in treatment for vitiligo, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis may find that the expense and learning curve of administering treatment at home are worthwhile, but dermatologists must select those families carefully.

Leslie Castelo-Soccio, MD, PhD, professor of pediatric dermatology at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, gave an overview of medical phototherapy for childhood skin diseases at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

For vitiligo, narrow-band UVB’s (NBUVB) effectiveness is maximized if treatment is begun relatively early, and if results are going to happen, they’ll show up fairly quickly. “If there’s no response after six months, stop the therapy,” Dr. Castelo-Soccio said.

Although the literature shows NBUVB to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis, Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that most pediatric atopic dermatitis studies have been small and retrospective and conducted in a population with severe disease.

Regarding psoriasis in children, the literature shows “higher numbers of patients with near-complete or complete response,” she said.

The experience of NBUVB for pediatric dermatologic conditions at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia supports the idea that “the best responses are seen after at least 40 treatments,” and that 6 months is enough time to see whether a patient will respond. The best responders at her institution are children with facial vitiligo. “Of course, you get a better response with compliance,” she noted.

The experience of her patients falls in line with the data about side effects, in which the most common adverse events are reactivation of HSV and burning.

Families ask about cancer risk, but “there are no published data on the risk of skin cancer in long-term phototherapy in children,” she said. At this point, the best pediatric dermatologists can do is to extrapolate risk from data on phototherapy for neonatal jaundice, but even those data are inconclusive, she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that it’s pretty common for families to request home treatment: “When you start talking to patients about phototherapy, the thing I always get questions about is, ‘Why can’t I do it at home?’ ” She prefers to initiate treatment in the clinic and then assess suitability for home therapy after a relationship has been established.

The ideal patient, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio, is one whose family has been diligent about coming to appointments and who otherwise demonstrates excellent compliance.

At first blush, the cost of acquiring a home device – often in the $2,000 range – might seem prohibitive for many families. The upfront cost may be worth it for some, since office visits involve copayments and lost time from school and work for multiple treatments weekly over a period of months. A big commute to the doctor’s office for treatment may further tip the scales toward home treatment. “I wouldn’t hesitate to offer this option to the right family,” she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she’s had some limited success getting insurance reimbursement for home phototherapy, especially if success has already been seen with office-based treatment.

NBUVB therapy has limitations, though. Some that have particular relevance for the pediatric population involve the challenges of safe delivery, including using appropriate eye wear and ensuring lack of movement. Each of these problems can be even more of a challenge at home, reinforcing the need to select appropriate patients for home phototherapy, she added.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she provides information about all of the various phototherapy devices to her patients and their parents, letting them make the choice. “All of the companies are really good about helping with paperwork” to apply for insurance reimbursement, she said. Options range from the bulkiest and most expensive – a full phototherapy box – to three-panel arrays, single panels, hand-foot devices, and even hand-held devices. The latter can be had for less than $1,000 and may be best suited for targeting smaller areas.

Features to look for in home phototherapy devices include a dosimeter accuracy sensor, which adjusts the treatment time to deliver the same dose, even if dust or aging lamps reduce output. User-friendly timers also are helpful for families, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio. A safety lock-out will allow only a certain number of treatments before the unit must be reset by the physician and is a reassuring feature. Each activation counts as a treatment, however, so families and physicians must be aware that if a hand-held unit is used to treat multiple small lesions in different body areas, a single treatment session will involve many device activations, each of which will be registered as a treatment.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. – For a select subset of pediatric dermatology patients, home phototherapy may represent a safe, effective, and even affordable alternative to office visits. Some families whose children are in treatment for vitiligo, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis may find that the expense and learning curve of administering treatment at home are worthwhile, but dermatologists must select those families carefully.

Leslie Castelo-Soccio, MD, PhD, professor of pediatric dermatology at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, gave an overview of medical phototherapy for childhood skin diseases at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

For vitiligo, narrow-band UVB’s (NBUVB) effectiveness is maximized if treatment is begun relatively early, and if results are going to happen, they’ll show up fairly quickly. “If there’s no response after six months, stop the therapy,” Dr. Castelo-Soccio said.

Although the literature shows NBUVB to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis, Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that most pediatric atopic dermatitis studies have been small and retrospective and conducted in a population with severe disease.

Regarding psoriasis in children, the literature shows “higher numbers of patients with near-complete or complete response,” she said.

The experience of NBUVB for pediatric dermatologic conditions at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia supports the idea that “the best responses are seen after at least 40 treatments,” and that 6 months is enough time to see whether a patient will respond. The best responders at her institution are children with facial vitiligo. “Of course, you get a better response with compliance,” she noted.

The experience of her patients falls in line with the data about side effects, in which the most common adverse events are reactivation of HSV and burning.

Families ask about cancer risk, but “there are no published data on the risk of skin cancer in long-term phototherapy in children,” she said. At this point, the best pediatric dermatologists can do is to extrapolate risk from data on phototherapy for neonatal jaundice, but even those data are inconclusive, she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio noted that it’s pretty common for families to request home treatment: “When you start talking to patients about phototherapy, the thing I always get questions about is, ‘Why can’t I do it at home?’ ” She prefers to initiate treatment in the clinic and then assess suitability for home therapy after a relationship has been established.

The ideal patient, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio, is one whose family has been diligent about coming to appointments and who otherwise demonstrates excellent compliance.

At first blush, the cost of acquiring a home device – often in the $2,000 range – might seem prohibitive for many families. The upfront cost may be worth it for some, since office visits involve copayments and lost time from school and work for multiple treatments weekly over a period of months. A big commute to the doctor’s office for treatment may further tip the scales toward home treatment. “I wouldn’t hesitate to offer this option to the right family,” she said.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she’s had some limited success getting insurance reimbursement for home phototherapy, especially if success has already been seen with office-based treatment.

NBUVB therapy has limitations, though. Some that have particular relevance for the pediatric population involve the challenges of safe delivery, including using appropriate eye wear and ensuring lack of movement. Each of these problems can be even more of a challenge at home, reinforcing the need to select appropriate patients for home phototherapy, she added.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio said she provides information about all of the various phototherapy devices to her patients and their parents, letting them make the choice. “All of the companies are really good about helping with paperwork” to apply for insurance reimbursement, she said. Options range from the bulkiest and most expensive – a full phototherapy box – to three-panel arrays, single panels, hand-foot devices, and even hand-held devices. The latter can be had for less than $1,000 and may be best suited for targeting smaller areas.

Features to look for in home phototherapy devices include a dosimeter accuracy sensor, which adjusts the treatment time to deliver the same dose, even if dust or aging lamps reduce output. User-friendly timers also are helpful for families, said Dr. Castelo-Soccio. A safety lock-out will allow only a certain number of treatments before the unit must be reset by the physician and is a reassuring feature. Each activation counts as a treatment, however, so families and physicians must be aware that if a hand-held unit is used to treat multiple small lesions in different body areas, a single treatment session will involve many device activations, each of which will be registered as a treatment.

Dr. Castelo-Soccio had no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BALTIMORE – Cervical spine injuries may be more prevalent than previously thought among young children who sustain abusive head trauma, results of a 4-year, multicenter, retrospective study presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies have shown.

Of children with abusive head trauma (AHT) who received cervical CT or MRI scans, 31% had abnormal findings. The most common cervical spine injuries were hemorrhagic (23.7%), with ligamentous abnormalities less common (8.7%).

This study helps fill a gap in the existing literature on the risk for cervical spine injuries for children who have suffered abusive head trauma, said Kate Henry, MD, in presenting the results of the study, conducted with her colleagues at the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Previous research in the area has concentrated on older children and on motor vehicle crashes, but “young children are different. They are preverbal, and the physical exam can be difficult. Also, the developing spine has a unique anatomy” that can change injury patterns and make imaging interpretation challenging, said Dr. Henry. Motor vehicle crashes make up less than 15% of the cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in young children, with falls being responsible for about half, and AHT accounting for 19%-25%, she said.

The study included patients younger than 2 years with an ICD-9 code for TBI associated with a hospital admission or emergency department visit. For final inclusion, patients also had to have MRI or CT confirmation of an intracranial injury. Patients who sustained a motor vehicle collision, were readmitted for complications of a prior injury, or were hospitalized following birth were excluded.

The retrospective chart review of records from four urban children’s hospitals found 3,170 patients who met all criteria except positive intracranial imaging findings; a stratified random sampling reduced the number to 664 charts eligible for review. The final TBI cohort included 329 patients who met the imaging criteria and were not excluded for other reasons.

For these 329 records, Dr. Henry and her colleagues collected physical exam findings, radiology reports of abnormal imaging findings, and the care team’s documentation of their assessment of the etiology of the injury.

The medical team’s assessment, together with the assessment of the child protection team (if it was engaged) were used to classify patients as having either “AHT” or “accidental TBI.”

The trauma-related cervical spine injuries considered as positive findings included ligamentous or soft tissue injury, spinal cord injury, vertebral dislocation or fracture, and extra-axial hemorrhage. “We had a high threshold for inclusion,” said Dr. Henry, explaining that only cervical, not high thoracic, findings were included. Additionally, she and her colleagues excluded radiologist interpretation of injuries as “nonspecific soft tissue findings” or a “possible” injury.

Overall, vertebral fractures or dislocations were seen in just 1.1% of patients with imaged AHT. Cord injuries were slightly more common, at 5.5%. Soft tissue or muscular findings were seen in 0.6% of patients. Some patients had multiple findings, so the overall 31.3% of patients with image-confirmed cervical injuries includes the 23.7% of patients with extra-axial bleed and the 8.7% with ligamentous injury.

Dr. Henry noted that the study was predicated on a certain “circularity of reasoning,” in that the results of spinal imaging could have an influence on the clinician assessment of etiology. The percentage of children diagnosed with AHT who received imaging of any kind was higher than for the all-cause TBI group, as well as for the subgroups of those with accidental TBI or indeterminate etiology. And Dr. Henry said there’s an inherent selection bias in including only those cases where imaging was performed: “The decision to image is unlikely to be random,” she said. However, if all AHT patients who did not receive imaging within the study period were considered to have normal findings, then 9.7% of AHT cases, or about 1 in 10, would still have abnormal findings.

These findings are important because currently, “There are no guidelines for use of cervical CT or MRI” for children with abusive head trauma, said Dr. Henry, and previous research in this area was based on a single-center study. Next steps should go beyond retrospective chart reviews, she said. “Prospective studies are needed to inform cervical imaging recommendations.”

Dr. Henry reported no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BALTIMORE – Cervical spine injuries may be more prevalent than previously thought among young children who sustain abusive head trauma, results of a 4-year, multicenter, retrospective study presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies have shown.

Of children with abusive head trauma (AHT) who received cervical CT or MRI scans, 31% had abnormal findings. The most common cervical spine injuries were hemorrhagic (23.7%), with ligamentous abnormalities less common (8.7%).

This study helps fill a gap in the existing literature on the risk for cervical spine injuries for children who have suffered abusive head trauma, said Kate Henry, MD, in presenting the results of the study, conducted with her colleagues at the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Previous research in the area has concentrated on older children and on motor vehicle crashes, but “young children are different. They are preverbal, and the physical exam can be difficult. Also, the developing spine has a unique anatomy” that can change injury patterns and make imaging interpretation challenging, said Dr. Henry. Motor vehicle crashes make up less than 15% of the cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in young children, with falls being responsible for about half, and AHT accounting for 19%-25%, she said.

The study included patients younger than 2 years with an ICD-9 code for TBI associated with a hospital admission or emergency department visit. For final inclusion, patients also had to have MRI or CT confirmation of an intracranial injury. Patients who sustained a motor vehicle collision, were readmitted for complications of a prior injury, or were hospitalized following birth were excluded.

The retrospective chart review of records from four urban children’s hospitals found 3,170 patients who met all criteria except positive intracranial imaging findings; a stratified random sampling reduced the number to 664 charts eligible for review. The final TBI cohort included 329 patients who met the imaging criteria and were not excluded for other reasons.

For these 329 records, Dr. Henry and her colleagues collected physical exam findings, radiology reports of abnormal imaging findings, and the care team’s documentation of their assessment of the etiology of the injury.

The medical team’s assessment, together with the assessment of the child protection team (if it was engaged) were used to classify patients as having either “AHT” or “accidental TBI.”

The trauma-related cervical spine injuries considered as positive findings included ligamentous or soft tissue injury, spinal cord injury, vertebral dislocation or fracture, and extra-axial hemorrhage. “We had a high threshold for inclusion,” said Dr. Henry, explaining that only cervical, not high thoracic, findings were included. Additionally, she and her colleagues excluded radiologist interpretation of injuries as “nonspecific soft tissue findings” or a “possible” injury.

Overall, vertebral fractures or dislocations were seen in just 1.1% of patients with imaged AHT. Cord injuries were slightly more common, at 5.5%. Soft tissue or muscular findings were seen in 0.6% of patients. Some patients had multiple findings, so the overall 31.3% of patients with image-confirmed cervical injuries includes the 23.7% of patients with extra-axial bleed and the 8.7% with ligamentous injury.

Dr. Henry noted that the study was predicated on a certain “circularity of reasoning,” in that the results of spinal imaging could have an influence on the clinician assessment of etiology. The percentage of children diagnosed with AHT who received imaging of any kind was higher than for the all-cause TBI group, as well as for the subgroups of those with accidental TBI or indeterminate etiology. And Dr. Henry said there’s an inherent selection bias in including only those cases where imaging was performed: “The decision to image is unlikely to be random,” she said. However, if all AHT patients who did not receive imaging within the study period were considered to have normal findings, then 9.7% of AHT cases, or about 1 in 10, would still have abnormal findings.

These findings are important because currently, “There are no guidelines for use of cervical CT or MRI” for children with abusive head trauma, said Dr. Henry, and previous research in this area was based on a single-center study. Next steps should go beyond retrospective chart reviews, she said. “Prospective studies are needed to inform cervical imaging recommendations.”

Dr. Henry reported no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BALTIMORE – Cervical spine injuries may be more prevalent than previously thought among young children who sustain abusive head trauma, results of a 4-year, multicenter, retrospective study presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies have shown.

Of children with abusive head trauma (AHT) who received cervical CT or MRI scans, 31% had abnormal findings. The most common cervical spine injuries were hemorrhagic (23.7%), with ligamentous abnormalities less common (8.7%).

This study helps fill a gap in the existing literature on the risk for cervical spine injuries for children who have suffered abusive head trauma, said Kate Henry, MD, in presenting the results of the study, conducted with her colleagues at the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Previous research in the area has concentrated on older children and on motor vehicle crashes, but “young children are different. They are preverbal, and the physical exam can be difficult. Also, the developing spine has a unique anatomy” that can change injury patterns and make imaging interpretation challenging, said Dr. Henry. Motor vehicle crashes make up less than 15% of the cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in young children, with falls being responsible for about half, and AHT accounting for 19%-25%, she said.

The study included patients younger than 2 years with an ICD-9 code for TBI associated with a hospital admission or emergency department visit. For final inclusion, patients also had to have MRI or CT confirmation of an intracranial injury. Patients who sustained a motor vehicle collision, were readmitted for complications of a prior injury, or were hospitalized following birth were excluded.

The retrospective chart review of records from four urban children’s hospitals found 3,170 patients who met all criteria except positive intracranial imaging findings; a stratified random sampling reduced the number to 664 charts eligible for review. The final TBI cohort included 329 patients who met the imaging criteria and were not excluded for other reasons.

For these 329 records, Dr. Henry and her colleagues collected physical exam findings, radiology reports of abnormal imaging findings, and the care team’s documentation of their assessment of the etiology of the injury.

The medical team’s assessment, together with the assessment of the child protection team (if it was engaged) were used to classify patients as having either “AHT” or “accidental TBI.”

The trauma-related cervical spine injuries considered as positive findings included ligamentous or soft tissue injury, spinal cord injury, vertebral dislocation or fracture, and extra-axial hemorrhage. “We had a high threshold for inclusion,” said Dr. Henry, explaining that only cervical, not high thoracic, findings were included. Additionally, she and her colleagues excluded radiologist interpretation of injuries as “nonspecific soft tissue findings” or a “possible” injury.

Overall, vertebral fractures or dislocations were seen in just 1.1% of patients with imaged AHT. Cord injuries were slightly more common, at 5.5%. Soft tissue or muscular findings were seen in 0.6% of patients. Some patients had multiple findings, so the overall 31.3% of patients with image-confirmed cervical injuries includes the 23.7% of patients with extra-axial bleed and the 8.7% with ligamentous injury.

Dr. Henry noted that the study was predicated on a certain “circularity of reasoning,” in that the results of spinal imaging could have an influence on the clinician assessment of etiology. The percentage of children diagnosed with AHT who received imaging of any kind was higher than for the all-cause TBI group, as well as for the subgroups of those with accidental TBI or indeterminate etiology. And Dr. Henry said there’s an inherent selection bias in including only those cases where imaging was performed: “The decision to image is unlikely to be random,” she said. However, if all AHT patients who did not receive imaging within the study period were considered to have normal findings, then 9.7% of AHT cases, or about 1 in 10, would still have abnormal findings.

These findings are important because currently, “There are no guidelines for use of cervical CT or MRI” for children with abusive head trauma, said Dr. Henry, and previous research in this area was based on a single-center study. Next steps should go beyond retrospective chart reviews, she said. “Prospective studies are needed to inform cervical imaging recommendations.”

Dr. Henry reported no relevant disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

Hand-wringing stories about the opioid epidemic are flooding the popular press – and clincians are seeing the headlines reflected in their practices.

As clinics fill with more and more pregnant patients who have opioid use disorder, both ob.gyns. and family physicians who incorporate obstetrics are facing a steep learning curve in dealing with the medical and ethical challenges these patients bring to their clinic visits. Though there’s no panacea, collaboration with community and family stakeholders and a comprehensive care model incorporating best practices can optimize outcomes for these fragile patients.

On May 23, 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a statement affirming medically assisted treatment (MAT) as the recommended standard of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorders. In a statement, Hal Lawrence, MD, ACOG’s executive vice president and CEO, said, “Robust evidence has demonstrated that maintenance therapy during pregnancy can improve outcomes.”

Methadone has been the mainstay MAT medication, in part because its long time on the market means that favorable data are more robust than for buprenorphine. For patients in rural areas facing transportation challenges, however, or for those whose jobs or caregiving duties make a daily visit to a methadone clinic difficult, buprenorphine may be the better option. Additionally, especially in smaller communities, an oral self-administered medication avoids the obvious stigma of methadone clinic visits.

In making efforts to reduce maternal opioid dependence a 2016 legislative priority, ACOG voiced opposition to any legislation that might be punitive for women with opioid use disorder, as well as for babies born with neonatal abstinence syndrome; however, ACOG also supports public health efforts to reduce these conditions.

Wanda Filer, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, concurred in an interview. “We do not support criminalization or incarceration of pregnant women with substance use disorders,” stressed Dr. Filer, who noted that the AAFP does not have a formal policy statement at this point.

Courtesy AAFP News

Mishka Terplan, MD, an ob.gyn. who also is an addiction medicine specialist and has helped shape ACOG policy in this area, said in an interview that the maternal-fetal-placental unit has a “complicated and unique biology.” About targeted legislation – or reinterpretation of existing legislation – that incarcerates pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said, “These laws in effect cleave that unit. … To me, it’s unnatural, and not in the interests of the mom.”

Most laws that target women who are pregnant and have substance use disorder are on the state rather than the federal level, said Dr. Terplan, medical director of Behavioral Health System Baltimore.

Currently, three states allow involuntary commitment for treatment of pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said. Other states will classify substance use in pregnancy as child abuse, or use “chemical endangerment” statutes as a vehicle for incarceration or prosecution. Additionally, Medicaid provisions or limitations on access to MAT may vary by state, so physicians must be familiar with their local legal landscape in these cases, he said.

Community resources, critical to providing holistic care for this fragile population, are also region specific. In interviews, two physicians caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder talked about how their practices are tailored to their communities. Understanding which resources are available and what’s possible for their patients informs how they care for these challenging patients.

La Crosse, Wis., is situated along the eastern side of the Mississippi River, close to the Minnesota-Iowa border. Though the college town has about 100,000 people in its urban area, the surrounding area gets very rural, very quickly. Gundersen Health System, based in La Crosse, has over two dozen clinics and a handful of hospitals in three states and is the practice home for Charles Schauberger, MD, an ob.gyn. who specializes in caring for pregnant women with substance use disorder.

Dr. Schauberger sees a broad range of patients with a wide demographic and urban-rural mix. He estimates that about two-thirds of his patients have a history of previous treatment for substance use disorder, while the opioid use is a fairly new development in other one-third. And most of them face many other challenges. “Many of my patients have high concerns about housing insecurity. They do a lot of couchsurfing,” said Dr. Schauberger.

His patient panel’s high no-show rate reflects the chaotic lives and transportation challenges of many of his patients, and it’s not uncommon for Dr. Schauberger’s patients to come from jail to his office for prenatal care. “It’s about not putting up barriers” for these women, he said. “I might see one patient for just one prenatal visit. Another one, we might see 20 times. We take what we can get.” His staff and partners all realize that flexibility is key to maximizing the chance for a good outcome, he said.

Using a collaborative care model, Dr. Schauberger and his nonphysician colleagues will see patients together. “We’ll often have two or three staff members in the room – at least the social worker, the care coordinator, and myself,” he said. Recognizing that “the patient, not the doctor, is at the center of the care model” is critical for making things work, he said. “It’s important for everyone on the team to be aware of that.”

The collaborative model helps to address the many nonmedical challenges that can contribute to ongoing issues with substance use. Family dynamics and the presence – or absence – of a support system can make a big difference in adherence to a treatment plan during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. “The social, political, and legal issues are really what are important. … We try to get them into the system as soon as possible,” he said. His practice has a close connection with the addiction team at Gundersen Health, which dispenses methadone, as does a private addiction clinic in town, said Dr. Schauberger, who prescribes buprenorphine.

Wisconsin is one of the three states where pregnant women can be committed for coerced treatment, said Dr. Terplan. Dr. Schauberger has a good connection with his legal system locally, and he views any possibility of incarceration or commitment for substance use in pregnancy as “a serious problem that we need to avoid.”

Not all physicians practice in an environment where they have the luxury of specialization, and Dr. Schauberger said that the demand is too high in many places for primary care providers not to manage the care of pregnant women with substance use disorders. Though these women are high risk, “it is a type of high risk that a family medicine doctor should be able to take care of without problem. Primarily the risks are premature labor and intrauterine growth retardation, which are both problems that most family medicine doctors that do obstetrics should be able to identify and follow,” he said.

This fits with the mission of family practice, said Dr. Filer. As a specialty, “family practice is tied in to community resources,” she said. “Knowing your referral network is vital.” She also sees a growing trend of AAFP members who have completed addiction medicine fellowships. “This reflects a practice need – and a community need,” she said.

One family practice physician’s rural southeast Nebraska practice necessitates a creative and flexible approach to caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Robert Wergin, MD, the only physician in the small town of Milford, Neb., has a cradle-to-grave practice that includes obstetrics. When on call, he’s also the emergency physician at the 25-bed critical-access hospital that serves his area. The opioid epidemic touches his pregnant patients frequently.

Dr. Wergin is the current board chair of AAFP, as well as a past president of the organization. A Nebraska native, he draws his resources from the community, often tapping local pastors for help. He recently referred a pregnant woman to a church food pantry, since her food aid for the month had run out and she had another 10 days to face with an empty larder. “You’ve got to look at the comprehensive picture, and really know the patient to understand barriers to care, such as transportation problems and poverty.”

The area has no methadone clinic, and the few buprenorphine prescribers in the area usually have full practices and waiting lists. This means that optimal MAT may not be achievable. When he can, he sends patients to Lincoln, Neb., about 30 miles away, for treatment. If that’s not feasible, and the problem is identified early in the pregnancy, Dr. Wergin may help patients taper to eliminate or reduce opioid use.

An opinion reaffirmed in 2014 by ACOG recognized that MAT may not be accessible to all. ACOG’s Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, together with the American Society of Addiction Medicine, wrote, “If the alternative to medically supervised withdrawal is continued illicit drug use, then a medically supervised withdrawal in the first trimester is preferable to waiting until the second trimester.”

Dr. Wergin also works hard to incorporate family supports into his care of substance-using pregnant women. “Comprehensive care is really important,” he said. “Somehow, you have to get a buy-in from the patient,” and sometimes a supportive mother or partner can make a big difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes, he explained. Rapport and trust are critical, and his career-long presence in the community has helped build that trust with the families for whom he cares, he said.

Planning for delivery of an infant who’s likely to exhibit neonatal abstinence syndrome is a particular challenge for Dr. Wergin. His local hospital has a staff of generalist nurses, no NICU, and no ventilators appropriate for critically ill infants. Optimally, there’s time for transport to a tertiary care center in Lincoln before delivery. Inevitably, though, some deliveries can’t wait. “If you’ve got a withdrawing baby, the earlier they get to a higher level of care, the better,” said Dr. Wergin. “You have to prepare as best you can, and coordinate a transfer soon.”

Dr. Filer said that the real value proposition offered by family physicians in addressing the social and medical complexity of substance use in pregnancy is the wrap-around care the specialty offers. “We can leverage the family and support systems … to help these women find a way to become whole again – whole in their work, in their family, in parenting,” she said.

Hand-wringing stories about the opioid epidemic are flooding the popular press – and clincians are seeing the headlines reflected in their practices.

As clinics fill with more and more pregnant patients who have opioid use disorder, both ob.gyns. and family physicians who incorporate obstetrics are facing a steep learning curve in dealing with the medical and ethical challenges these patients bring to their clinic visits. Though there’s no panacea, collaboration with community and family stakeholders and a comprehensive care model incorporating best practices can optimize outcomes for these fragile patients.

On May 23, 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a statement affirming medically assisted treatment (MAT) as the recommended standard of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorders. In a statement, Hal Lawrence, MD, ACOG’s executive vice president and CEO, said, “Robust evidence has demonstrated that maintenance therapy during pregnancy can improve outcomes.”

Methadone has been the mainstay MAT medication, in part because its long time on the market means that favorable data are more robust than for buprenorphine. For patients in rural areas facing transportation challenges, however, or for those whose jobs or caregiving duties make a daily visit to a methadone clinic difficult, buprenorphine may be the better option. Additionally, especially in smaller communities, an oral self-administered medication avoids the obvious stigma of methadone clinic visits.

In making efforts to reduce maternal opioid dependence a 2016 legislative priority, ACOG voiced opposition to any legislation that might be punitive for women with opioid use disorder, as well as for babies born with neonatal abstinence syndrome; however, ACOG also supports public health efforts to reduce these conditions.

Wanda Filer, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, concurred in an interview. “We do not support criminalization or incarceration of pregnant women with substance use disorders,” stressed Dr. Filer, who noted that the AAFP does not have a formal policy statement at this point.

Courtesy AAFP News

Mishka Terplan, MD, an ob.gyn. who also is an addiction medicine specialist and has helped shape ACOG policy in this area, said in an interview that the maternal-fetal-placental unit has a “complicated and unique biology.” About targeted legislation – or reinterpretation of existing legislation – that incarcerates pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said, “These laws in effect cleave that unit. … To me, it’s unnatural, and not in the interests of the mom.”

Most laws that target women who are pregnant and have substance use disorder are on the state rather than the federal level, said Dr. Terplan, medical director of Behavioral Health System Baltimore.

Currently, three states allow involuntary commitment for treatment of pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said. Other states will classify substance use in pregnancy as child abuse, or use “chemical endangerment” statutes as a vehicle for incarceration or prosecution. Additionally, Medicaid provisions or limitations on access to MAT may vary by state, so physicians must be familiar with their local legal landscape in these cases, he said.

Community resources, critical to providing holistic care for this fragile population, are also region specific. In interviews, two physicians caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder talked about how their practices are tailored to their communities. Understanding which resources are available and what’s possible for their patients informs how they care for these challenging patients.

La Crosse, Wis., is situated along the eastern side of the Mississippi River, close to the Minnesota-Iowa border. Though the college town has about 100,000 people in its urban area, the surrounding area gets very rural, very quickly. Gundersen Health System, based in La Crosse, has over two dozen clinics and a handful of hospitals in three states and is the practice home for Charles Schauberger, MD, an ob.gyn. who specializes in caring for pregnant women with substance use disorder.

Dr. Schauberger sees a broad range of patients with a wide demographic and urban-rural mix. He estimates that about two-thirds of his patients have a history of previous treatment for substance use disorder, while the opioid use is a fairly new development in other one-third. And most of them face many other challenges. “Many of my patients have high concerns about housing insecurity. They do a lot of couchsurfing,” said Dr. Schauberger.

His patient panel’s high no-show rate reflects the chaotic lives and transportation challenges of many of his patients, and it’s not uncommon for Dr. Schauberger’s patients to come from jail to his office for prenatal care. “It’s about not putting up barriers” for these women, he said. “I might see one patient for just one prenatal visit. Another one, we might see 20 times. We take what we can get.” His staff and partners all realize that flexibility is key to maximizing the chance for a good outcome, he said.

Using a collaborative care model, Dr. Schauberger and his nonphysician colleagues will see patients together. “We’ll often have two or three staff members in the room – at least the social worker, the care coordinator, and myself,” he said. Recognizing that “the patient, not the doctor, is at the center of the care model” is critical for making things work, he said. “It’s important for everyone on the team to be aware of that.”

The collaborative model helps to address the many nonmedical challenges that can contribute to ongoing issues with substance use. Family dynamics and the presence – or absence – of a support system can make a big difference in adherence to a treatment plan during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. “The social, political, and legal issues are really what are important. … We try to get them into the system as soon as possible,” he said. His practice has a close connection with the addiction team at Gundersen Health, which dispenses methadone, as does a private addiction clinic in town, said Dr. Schauberger, who prescribes buprenorphine.

Wisconsin is one of the three states where pregnant women can be committed for coerced treatment, said Dr. Terplan. Dr. Schauberger has a good connection with his legal system locally, and he views any possibility of incarceration or commitment for substance use in pregnancy as “a serious problem that we need to avoid.”

Not all physicians practice in an environment where they have the luxury of specialization, and Dr. Schauberger said that the demand is too high in many places for primary care providers not to manage the care of pregnant women with substance use disorders. Though these women are high risk, “it is a type of high risk that a family medicine doctor should be able to take care of without problem. Primarily the risks are premature labor and intrauterine growth retardation, which are both problems that most family medicine doctors that do obstetrics should be able to identify and follow,” he said.

This fits with the mission of family practice, said Dr. Filer. As a specialty, “family practice is tied in to community resources,” she said. “Knowing your referral network is vital.” She also sees a growing trend of AAFP members who have completed addiction medicine fellowships. “This reflects a practice need – and a community need,” she said.

One family practice physician’s rural southeast Nebraska practice necessitates a creative and flexible approach to caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Robert Wergin, MD, the only physician in the small town of Milford, Neb., has a cradle-to-grave practice that includes obstetrics. When on call, he’s also the emergency physician at the 25-bed critical-access hospital that serves his area. The opioid epidemic touches his pregnant patients frequently.

Dr. Wergin is the current board chair of AAFP, as well as a past president of the organization. A Nebraska native, he draws his resources from the community, often tapping local pastors for help. He recently referred a pregnant woman to a church food pantry, since her food aid for the month had run out and she had another 10 days to face with an empty larder. “You’ve got to look at the comprehensive picture, and really know the patient to understand barriers to care, such as transportation problems and poverty.”

The area has no methadone clinic, and the few buprenorphine prescribers in the area usually have full practices and waiting lists. This means that optimal MAT may not be achievable. When he can, he sends patients to Lincoln, Neb., about 30 miles away, for treatment. If that’s not feasible, and the problem is identified early in the pregnancy, Dr. Wergin may help patients taper to eliminate or reduce opioid use.

An opinion reaffirmed in 2014 by ACOG recognized that MAT may not be accessible to all. ACOG’s Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, together with the American Society of Addiction Medicine, wrote, “If the alternative to medically supervised withdrawal is continued illicit drug use, then a medically supervised withdrawal in the first trimester is preferable to waiting until the second trimester.”

Dr. Wergin also works hard to incorporate family supports into his care of substance-using pregnant women. “Comprehensive care is really important,” he said. “Somehow, you have to get a buy-in from the patient,” and sometimes a supportive mother or partner can make a big difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes, he explained. Rapport and trust are critical, and his career-long presence in the community has helped build that trust with the families for whom he cares, he said.

Planning for delivery of an infant who’s likely to exhibit neonatal abstinence syndrome is a particular challenge for Dr. Wergin. His local hospital has a staff of generalist nurses, no NICU, and no ventilators appropriate for critically ill infants. Optimally, there’s time for transport to a tertiary care center in Lincoln before delivery. Inevitably, though, some deliveries can’t wait. “If you’ve got a withdrawing baby, the earlier they get to a higher level of care, the better,” said Dr. Wergin. “You have to prepare as best you can, and coordinate a transfer soon.”

Dr. Filer said that the real value proposition offered by family physicians in addressing the social and medical complexity of substance use in pregnancy is the wrap-around care the specialty offers. “We can leverage the family and support systems … to help these women find a way to become whole again – whole in their work, in their family, in parenting,” she said.

Hand-wringing stories about the opioid epidemic are flooding the popular press – and clincians are seeing the headlines reflected in their practices.

As clinics fill with more and more pregnant patients who have opioid use disorder, both ob.gyns. and family physicians who incorporate obstetrics are facing a steep learning curve in dealing with the medical and ethical challenges these patients bring to their clinic visits. Though there’s no panacea, collaboration with community and family stakeholders and a comprehensive care model incorporating best practices can optimize outcomes for these fragile patients.

On May 23, 2016, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a statement affirming medically assisted treatment (MAT) as the recommended standard of care for pregnant women with opioid use disorders. In a statement, Hal Lawrence, MD, ACOG’s executive vice president and CEO, said, “Robust evidence has demonstrated that maintenance therapy during pregnancy can improve outcomes.”

Methadone has been the mainstay MAT medication, in part because its long time on the market means that favorable data are more robust than for buprenorphine. For patients in rural areas facing transportation challenges, however, or for those whose jobs or caregiving duties make a daily visit to a methadone clinic difficult, buprenorphine may be the better option. Additionally, especially in smaller communities, an oral self-administered medication avoids the obvious stigma of methadone clinic visits.

In making efforts to reduce maternal opioid dependence a 2016 legislative priority, ACOG voiced opposition to any legislation that might be punitive for women with opioid use disorder, as well as for babies born with neonatal abstinence syndrome; however, ACOG also supports public health efforts to reduce these conditions.

Wanda Filer, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, concurred in an interview. “We do not support criminalization or incarceration of pregnant women with substance use disorders,” stressed Dr. Filer, who noted that the AAFP does not have a formal policy statement at this point.

Courtesy AAFP News

Mishka Terplan, MD, an ob.gyn. who also is an addiction medicine specialist and has helped shape ACOG policy in this area, said in an interview that the maternal-fetal-placental unit has a “complicated and unique biology.” About targeted legislation – or reinterpretation of existing legislation – that incarcerates pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said, “These laws in effect cleave that unit. … To me, it’s unnatural, and not in the interests of the mom.”

Most laws that target women who are pregnant and have substance use disorder are on the state rather than the federal level, said Dr. Terplan, medical director of Behavioral Health System Baltimore.

Currently, three states allow involuntary commitment for treatment of pregnant women with substance use disorder, he said. Other states will classify substance use in pregnancy as child abuse, or use “chemical endangerment” statutes as a vehicle for incarceration or prosecution. Additionally, Medicaid provisions or limitations on access to MAT may vary by state, so physicians must be familiar with their local legal landscape in these cases, he said.

Community resources, critical to providing holistic care for this fragile population, are also region specific. In interviews, two physicians caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder talked about how their practices are tailored to their communities. Understanding which resources are available and what’s possible for their patients informs how they care for these challenging patients.

La Crosse, Wis., is situated along the eastern side of the Mississippi River, close to the Minnesota-Iowa border. Though the college town has about 100,000 people in its urban area, the surrounding area gets very rural, very quickly. Gundersen Health System, based in La Crosse, has over two dozen clinics and a handful of hospitals in three states and is the practice home for Charles Schauberger, MD, an ob.gyn. who specializes in caring for pregnant women with substance use disorder.

Dr. Schauberger sees a broad range of patients with a wide demographic and urban-rural mix. He estimates that about two-thirds of his patients have a history of previous treatment for substance use disorder, while the opioid use is a fairly new development in other one-third. And most of them face many other challenges. “Many of my patients have high concerns about housing insecurity. They do a lot of couchsurfing,” said Dr. Schauberger.

His patient panel’s high no-show rate reflects the chaotic lives and transportation challenges of many of his patients, and it’s not uncommon for Dr. Schauberger’s patients to come from jail to his office for prenatal care. “It’s about not putting up barriers” for these women, he said. “I might see one patient for just one prenatal visit. Another one, we might see 20 times. We take what we can get.” His staff and partners all realize that flexibility is key to maximizing the chance for a good outcome, he said.

Using a collaborative care model, Dr. Schauberger and his nonphysician colleagues will see patients together. “We’ll often have two or three staff members in the room – at least the social worker, the care coordinator, and myself,” he said. Recognizing that “the patient, not the doctor, is at the center of the care model” is critical for making things work, he said. “It’s important for everyone on the team to be aware of that.”

The collaborative model helps to address the many nonmedical challenges that can contribute to ongoing issues with substance use. Family dynamics and the presence – or absence – of a support system can make a big difference in adherence to a treatment plan during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. “The social, political, and legal issues are really what are important. … We try to get them into the system as soon as possible,” he said. His practice has a close connection with the addiction team at Gundersen Health, which dispenses methadone, as does a private addiction clinic in town, said Dr. Schauberger, who prescribes buprenorphine.

Wisconsin is one of the three states where pregnant women can be committed for coerced treatment, said Dr. Terplan. Dr. Schauberger has a good connection with his legal system locally, and he views any possibility of incarceration or commitment for substance use in pregnancy as “a serious problem that we need to avoid.”

Not all physicians practice in an environment where they have the luxury of specialization, and Dr. Schauberger said that the demand is too high in many places for primary care providers not to manage the care of pregnant women with substance use disorders. Though these women are high risk, “it is a type of high risk that a family medicine doctor should be able to take care of without problem. Primarily the risks are premature labor and intrauterine growth retardation, which are both problems that most family medicine doctors that do obstetrics should be able to identify and follow,” he said.

This fits with the mission of family practice, said Dr. Filer. As a specialty, “family practice is tied in to community resources,” she said. “Knowing your referral network is vital.” She also sees a growing trend of AAFP members who have completed addiction medicine fellowships. “This reflects a practice need – and a community need,” she said.

One family practice physician’s rural southeast Nebraska practice necessitates a creative and flexible approach to caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder. Robert Wergin, MD, the only physician in the small town of Milford, Neb., has a cradle-to-grave practice that includes obstetrics. When on call, he’s also the emergency physician at the 25-bed critical-access hospital that serves his area. The opioid epidemic touches his pregnant patients frequently.

Dr. Wergin is the current board chair of AAFP, as well as a past president of the organization. A Nebraska native, he draws his resources from the community, often tapping local pastors for help. He recently referred a pregnant woman to a church food pantry, since her food aid for the month had run out and she had another 10 days to face with an empty larder. “You’ve got to look at the comprehensive picture, and really know the patient to understand barriers to care, such as transportation problems and poverty.”

The area has no methadone clinic, and the few buprenorphine prescribers in the area usually have full practices and waiting lists. This means that optimal MAT may not be achievable. When he can, he sends patients to Lincoln, Neb., about 30 miles away, for treatment. If that’s not feasible, and the problem is identified early in the pregnancy, Dr. Wergin may help patients taper to eliminate or reduce opioid use.

An opinion reaffirmed in 2014 by ACOG recognized that MAT may not be accessible to all. ACOG’s Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women, together with the American Society of Addiction Medicine, wrote, “If the alternative to medically supervised withdrawal is continued illicit drug use, then a medically supervised withdrawal in the first trimester is preferable to waiting until the second trimester.”

Dr. Wergin also works hard to incorporate family supports into his care of substance-using pregnant women. “Comprehensive care is really important,” he said. “Somehow, you have to get a buy-in from the patient,” and sometimes a supportive mother or partner can make a big difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes, he explained. Rapport and trust are critical, and his career-long presence in the community has helped build that trust with the families for whom he cares, he said.

Planning for delivery of an infant who’s likely to exhibit neonatal abstinence syndrome is a particular challenge for Dr. Wergin. His local hospital has a staff of generalist nurses, no NICU, and no ventilators appropriate for critically ill infants. Optimally, there’s time for transport to a tertiary care center in Lincoln before delivery. Inevitably, though, some deliveries can’t wait. “If you’ve got a withdrawing baby, the earlier they get to a higher level of care, the better,” said Dr. Wergin. “You have to prepare as best you can, and coordinate a transfer soon.”

Dr. Filer said that the real value proposition offered by family physicians in addressing the social and medical complexity of substance use in pregnancy is the wrap-around care the specialty offers. “We can leverage the family and support systems … to help these women find a way to become whole again – whole in their work, in their family, in parenting,” she said.

BOSTON – No winter spike in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates was seen among hospitalized patients after testing methodologies and frequency were accounted for, according to a large multinational study.

A total of 180 hospitals in five European countries had wide variation in CDI testing methods and testing density. However, among the hospitals that used a currently recommended toxin-detecting testing algorithm, there was no significant seasonal variation in cases, defined as mean cases per 10,000 patient bed-days per hospital per month (C/PBDs/H/M). The hospitals using toxin-detecting algorithms had summer C/PBDs/H/M rates of 9.6, compared to 8.0 in winter months (P = .27).

These results, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology by Kerrie Davies, clinical scientist at the University of Leeds (England), stand in contrast to some other studies that have shown a wintertime peak in CDI incidence. The data presented help in “understanding the context in which published reported rate data have been generated,” said Ms. Davies, enabling a better understanding both of how samples are tested, and who gets tested.

The study enrolled 180 hospitals – 38 each in France and Italy, 37 each in Germany and the United Kingdom, and 30 in Spain. Institutions reported patient demographics, as well as CDI testing data and patient bed-days for CDI cases, for 1 year.

cjc2nd/Wikimedia Commons/CC ASA-3.0

Current European and U.K. CDI testing algorithms, said Ms. Davies, begin either with testing for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and then proceed to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing for C. difficile toxins A and B.

Other algorithms, for example those that begin with toxin testing, are not recommended, said Ms. Davies. Some institutions may diagnose CDI only by toxin detection, GDH testing, or NAAT testing.

For data analysis, Ms. Davies and her collaborators compared CDI-related PBDs and testing density during June, July, and August to data collected in December, January, and February. Testing methods were dichotomized to toxin-detecting CDI testing algorithms (TCTA, using GDH/toxin or NAAT/toxin), or non-TCTA methods, which included all other algorithms or stand-alone testing methods.

Wide variation was seen between countries in testing methodologies. The United Kingdom had the highest rate of TCTA testing at 89%, while Germany had the lowest, at 8%, with 30 of 37 (81%) of participating German hospitals using non–toxin detection methods.

In addition, both testing density and case incidence rates varied between countries. Standardizing test density to mean number of tests per 10,000 PBDs per hospital per month (T/PBDs/H/M), the United Kingdom had the highest density, at 96.0 T/PBDs/H/M, while France had the lowest, at 34.4 T/PBDs/H/M. Overall per-nation case rates ranged from 2.55 C/PBDs/H/M in the United Kingdom to 6.9 C/PBDs/H/M in Spain.

Ms. Davies and her collaborators also analyzed data for all of the hospitals in any country according to testing method. That analysis saw no significant difference in seasonal variation testing rates for TCTA-using hospitals (mean T/PBDs/H/M in summer, 119.2 versus 102.4 in winter, P = .11), and no significant seasonal variation in CDI incidence. However, “the largest variation in CDI rates was seen in those hospitals using toxin-only diagnostic methods,” said Ms. Davies.

By contrast, for hospitals using non-TCTA methods, though testing rates did not change significantly, incidence was significantly higher in winter months, at a mean 13.5 wintertime versus 10.0 summertime C/PBDs/H/M (P = .49).

One country, Italy, stood out for having both higher overall wintertime testing (mean 57.2 summertime versus 78.8 wintertime T/PBDs/H/M, P = .041), and higher incidence (mean 6.6 summertime versus 10.1 wintertime C/PBDs/H/M, P = .017).

“Reported CDI rates only increase in winter if testing rates increase concurrently, or if hospitals use nonrecommended testing methods for diagnosis, especially non–toxin detection methods,” said Ms. Davies.

The study investigators reported receiving financial support from Sanofi Pasteur.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BOSTON – No winter spike in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates was seen among hospitalized patients after testing methodologies and frequency were accounted for, according to a large multinational study.

A total of 180 hospitals in five European countries had wide variation in CDI testing methods and testing density. However, among the hospitals that used a currently recommended toxin-detecting testing algorithm, there was no significant seasonal variation in cases, defined as mean cases per 10,000 patient bed-days per hospital per month (C/PBDs/H/M). The hospitals using toxin-detecting algorithms had summer C/PBDs/H/M rates of 9.6, compared to 8.0 in winter months (P = .27).

These results, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology by Kerrie Davies, clinical scientist at the University of Leeds (England), stand in contrast to some other studies that have shown a wintertime peak in CDI incidence. The data presented help in “understanding the context in which published reported rate data have been generated,” said Ms. Davies, enabling a better understanding both of how samples are tested, and who gets tested.

The study enrolled 180 hospitals – 38 each in France and Italy, 37 each in Germany and the United Kingdom, and 30 in Spain. Institutions reported patient demographics, as well as CDI testing data and patient bed-days for CDI cases, for 1 year.

cjc2nd/Wikimedia Commons/CC ASA-3.0

Current European and U.K. CDI testing algorithms, said Ms. Davies, begin either with testing for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and then proceed to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing for C. difficile toxins A and B.

Other algorithms, for example those that begin with toxin testing, are not recommended, said Ms. Davies. Some institutions may diagnose CDI only by toxin detection, GDH testing, or NAAT testing.

For data analysis, Ms. Davies and her collaborators compared CDI-related PBDs and testing density during June, July, and August to data collected in December, January, and February. Testing methods were dichotomized to toxin-detecting CDI testing algorithms (TCTA, using GDH/toxin or NAAT/toxin), or non-TCTA methods, which included all other algorithms or stand-alone testing methods.

Wide variation was seen between countries in testing methodologies. The United Kingdom had the highest rate of TCTA testing at 89%, while Germany had the lowest, at 8%, with 30 of 37 (81%) of participating German hospitals using non–toxin detection methods.

In addition, both testing density and case incidence rates varied between countries. Standardizing test density to mean number of tests per 10,000 PBDs per hospital per month (T/PBDs/H/M), the United Kingdom had the highest density, at 96.0 T/PBDs/H/M, while France had the lowest, at 34.4 T/PBDs/H/M. Overall per-nation case rates ranged from 2.55 C/PBDs/H/M in the United Kingdom to 6.9 C/PBDs/H/M in Spain.

Ms. Davies and her collaborators also analyzed data for all of the hospitals in any country according to testing method. That analysis saw no significant difference in seasonal variation testing rates for TCTA-using hospitals (mean T/PBDs/H/M in summer, 119.2 versus 102.4 in winter, P = .11), and no significant seasonal variation in CDI incidence. However, “the largest variation in CDI rates was seen in those hospitals using toxin-only diagnostic methods,” said Ms. Davies.

By contrast, for hospitals using non-TCTA methods, though testing rates did not change significantly, incidence was significantly higher in winter months, at a mean 13.5 wintertime versus 10.0 summertime C/PBDs/H/M (P = .49).

One country, Italy, stood out for having both higher overall wintertime testing (mean 57.2 summertime versus 78.8 wintertime T/PBDs/H/M, P = .041), and higher incidence (mean 6.6 summertime versus 10.1 wintertime C/PBDs/H/M, P = .017).

“Reported CDI rates only increase in winter if testing rates increase concurrently, or if hospitals use nonrecommended testing methods for diagnosis, especially non–toxin detection methods,” said Ms. Davies.

The study investigators reported receiving financial support from Sanofi Pasteur.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BOSTON – No winter spike in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates was seen among hospitalized patients after testing methodologies and frequency were accounted for, according to a large multinational study.

A total of 180 hospitals in five European countries had wide variation in CDI testing methods and testing density. However, among the hospitals that used a currently recommended toxin-detecting testing algorithm, there was no significant seasonal variation in cases, defined as mean cases per 10,000 patient bed-days per hospital per month (C/PBDs/H/M). The hospitals using toxin-detecting algorithms had summer C/PBDs/H/M rates of 9.6, compared to 8.0 in winter months (P = .27).

These results, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology by Kerrie Davies, clinical scientist at the University of Leeds (England), stand in contrast to some other studies that have shown a wintertime peak in CDI incidence. The data presented help in “understanding the context in which published reported rate data have been generated,” said Ms. Davies, enabling a better understanding both of how samples are tested, and who gets tested.

The study enrolled 180 hospitals – 38 each in France and Italy, 37 each in Germany and the United Kingdom, and 30 in Spain. Institutions reported patient demographics, as well as CDI testing data and patient bed-days for CDI cases, for 1 year.

cjc2nd/Wikimedia Commons/CC ASA-3.0

Current European and U.K. CDI testing algorithms, said Ms. Davies, begin either with testing for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), and then proceed to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing for C. difficile toxins A and B.

Other algorithms, for example those that begin with toxin testing, are not recommended, said Ms. Davies. Some institutions may diagnose CDI only by toxin detection, GDH testing, or NAAT testing.

For data analysis, Ms. Davies and her collaborators compared CDI-related PBDs and testing density during June, July, and August to data collected in December, January, and February. Testing methods were dichotomized to toxin-detecting CDI testing algorithms (TCTA, using GDH/toxin or NAAT/toxin), or non-TCTA methods, which included all other algorithms or stand-alone testing methods.

Wide variation was seen between countries in testing methodologies. The United Kingdom had the highest rate of TCTA testing at 89%, while Germany had the lowest, at 8%, with 30 of 37 (81%) of participating German hospitals using non–toxin detection methods.

In addition, both testing density and case incidence rates varied between countries. Standardizing test density to mean number of tests per 10,000 PBDs per hospital per month (T/PBDs/H/M), the United Kingdom had the highest density, at 96.0 T/PBDs/H/M, while France had the lowest, at 34.4 T/PBDs/H/M. Overall per-nation case rates ranged from 2.55 C/PBDs/H/M in the United Kingdom to 6.9 C/PBDs/H/M in Spain.

Ms. Davies and her collaborators also analyzed data for all of the hospitals in any country according to testing method. That analysis saw no significant difference in seasonal variation testing rates for TCTA-using hospitals (mean T/PBDs/H/M in summer, 119.2 versus 102.4 in winter, P = .11), and no significant seasonal variation in CDI incidence. However, “the largest variation in CDI rates was seen in those hospitals using toxin-only diagnostic methods,” said Ms. Davies.

By contrast, for hospitals using non-TCTA methods, though testing rates did not change significantly, incidence was significantly higher in winter months, at a mean 13.5 wintertime versus 10.0 summertime C/PBDs/H/M (P = .49).

One country, Italy, stood out for having both higher overall wintertime testing (mean 57.2 summertime versus 78.8 wintertime T/PBDs/H/M, P = .041), and higher incidence (mean 6.6 summertime versus 10.1 wintertime C/PBDs/H/M, P = .017).

“Reported CDI rates only increase in winter if testing rates increase concurrently, or if hospitals use nonrecommended testing methods for diagnosis, especially non–toxin detection methods,” said Ms. Davies.

The study investigators reported receiving financial support from Sanofi Pasteur.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BOSTON – An underappreciated cause of bacterial pharyngitis had a similar clinical presentation to group A Streptococcus (GAS), although prevalence was low in the population of 300 pediatric patients in a single-site study.

The 10 patients (3.3%) who had positive cultures for Fusobacterium necrophorum were about as likely as those with GAS to have fever, sore throat, exudate, and absence of cough. GAS cultures were positive in 57 (19%) of the patients.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

F. necrophorum is a common cause of serious bacterial pharyngitis, especially in adolescents and young adults. The gram-negative species, an obligate anaerobe, is a cause of Lemierre’s syndrome, and “has recently been identified to be an important pathogen of bacterial pharyngitis with higher prevalence than group A Streptococcus (GAS) in adolescents and young adults,” wrote Tam Van, Ph.D., and her colleagues in a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.

To examine the prevalence and disease characteristics of F. necrophorum in the emergency department patient population at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr Van, a medical microbiology fellow at the hospital, and her colleagues enrolled 300 patients with pharyngitis aged 1-20 years (mean, 7.8 years).

All patients’ throats were swabbed, and investigators conducted a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and cultured samples for Streptococcus on a blood agar plate, according to usual care; samples also were cultured anaerobically and tested via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for F. necrophorum.

A total of 67 patients had positive culture or PCR results for both species. Fifteen of the RADT tests were positive, while 57 cultures returned positive for GAS growth. Nine of the 10 positive F. necrophorum PCR tests correlated with positive culture results for that species.

Luckily, said Dr. Van, penicillin is an effective treatment for F. necrophorum, although it’s a gram-negative bacterium, so if a patient is coinfected with F. necrophorum and GAS, or treated for GAS empirically, then standard of care treatment should be effective, she said. However, since the species is associated with serious complications such as Lemierre’s disease, close follow-up and a low threshold for aggressive treatment are warranted if F. necrophorum is suspected or identified.

The relatively low positive culture rate of 3.3% for F. necrophorum in the study population was a bit surprising, Dr. Van said in an interview but was perhaps accounted for by the relatively young age of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles patients. “Previous reports looked at adolescents and young adults,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues, while two-thirds of the patients in their study were under the age of 10 years. “This may contribute to the difference in prevalence.”

“Although rare, recovery of F. necrophorum correlated with true signs and symptoms of bacterial pharyngitis,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues. Serious pharyngitis with a negative rapid test and culture for group A Streptococcus should prompt clinical suspicion for F. necrophorum, especially in older adolescents and young adults, said Dr. Tam.

Dr. Tam and her coauthors reported no outside sources of funding and reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BOSTON – An underappreciated cause of bacterial pharyngitis had a similar clinical presentation to group A Streptococcus (GAS), although prevalence was low in the population of 300 pediatric patients in a single-site study.

The 10 patients (3.3%) who had positive cultures for Fusobacterium necrophorum were about as likely as those with GAS to have fever, sore throat, exudate, and absence of cough. GAS cultures were positive in 57 (19%) of the patients.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

F. necrophorum is a common cause of serious bacterial pharyngitis, especially in adolescents and young adults. The gram-negative species, an obligate anaerobe, is a cause of Lemierre’s syndrome, and “has recently been identified to be an important pathogen of bacterial pharyngitis with higher prevalence than group A Streptococcus (GAS) in adolescents and young adults,” wrote Tam Van, Ph.D., and her colleagues in a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.

To examine the prevalence and disease characteristics of F. necrophorum in the emergency department patient population at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr Van, a medical microbiology fellow at the hospital, and her colleagues enrolled 300 patients with pharyngitis aged 1-20 years (mean, 7.8 years).

All patients’ throats were swabbed, and investigators conducted a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and cultured samples for Streptococcus on a blood agar plate, according to usual care; samples also were cultured anaerobically and tested via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for F. necrophorum.

A total of 67 patients had positive culture or PCR results for both species. Fifteen of the RADT tests were positive, while 57 cultures returned positive for GAS growth. Nine of the 10 positive F. necrophorum PCR tests correlated with positive culture results for that species.

Luckily, said Dr. Van, penicillin is an effective treatment for F. necrophorum, although it’s a gram-negative bacterium, so if a patient is coinfected with F. necrophorum and GAS, or treated for GAS empirically, then standard of care treatment should be effective, she said. However, since the species is associated with serious complications such as Lemierre’s disease, close follow-up and a low threshold for aggressive treatment are warranted if F. necrophorum is suspected or identified.

The relatively low positive culture rate of 3.3% for F. necrophorum in the study population was a bit surprising, Dr. Van said in an interview but was perhaps accounted for by the relatively young age of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles patients. “Previous reports looked at adolescents and young adults,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues, while two-thirds of the patients in their study were under the age of 10 years. “This may contribute to the difference in prevalence.”

“Although rare, recovery of F. necrophorum correlated with true signs and symptoms of bacterial pharyngitis,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues. Serious pharyngitis with a negative rapid test and culture for group A Streptococcus should prompt clinical suspicion for F. necrophorum, especially in older adolescents and young adults, said Dr. Tam.

Dr. Tam and her coauthors reported no outside sources of funding and reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

BOSTON – An underappreciated cause of bacterial pharyngitis had a similar clinical presentation to group A Streptococcus (GAS), although prevalence was low in the population of 300 pediatric patients in a single-site study.

The 10 patients (3.3%) who had positive cultures for Fusobacterium necrophorum were about as likely as those with GAS to have fever, sore throat, exudate, and absence of cough. GAS cultures were positive in 57 (19%) of the patients.

Kari Oakes/Frontline Medical News

F. necrophorum is a common cause of serious bacterial pharyngitis, especially in adolescents and young adults. The gram-negative species, an obligate anaerobe, is a cause of Lemierre’s syndrome, and “has recently been identified to be an important pathogen of bacterial pharyngitis with higher prevalence than group A Streptococcus (GAS) in adolescents and young adults,” wrote Tam Van, Ph.D., and her colleagues in a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology.

To examine the prevalence and disease characteristics of F. necrophorum in the emergency department patient population at Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Dr Van, a medical microbiology fellow at the hospital, and her colleagues enrolled 300 patients with pharyngitis aged 1-20 years (mean, 7.8 years).

All patients’ throats were swabbed, and investigators conducted a rapid antigen detection test (RADT) for group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and cultured samples for Streptococcus on a blood agar plate, according to usual care; samples also were cultured anaerobically and tested via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for F. necrophorum.

A total of 67 patients had positive culture or PCR results for both species. Fifteen of the RADT tests were positive, while 57 cultures returned positive for GAS growth. Nine of the 10 positive F. necrophorum PCR tests correlated with positive culture results for that species.

Luckily, said Dr. Van, penicillin is an effective treatment for F. necrophorum, although it’s a gram-negative bacterium, so if a patient is coinfected with F. necrophorum and GAS, or treated for GAS empirically, then standard of care treatment should be effective, she said. However, since the species is associated with serious complications such as Lemierre’s disease, close follow-up and a low threshold for aggressive treatment are warranted if F. necrophorum is suspected or identified.

The relatively low positive culture rate of 3.3% for F. necrophorum in the study population was a bit surprising, Dr. Van said in an interview but was perhaps accounted for by the relatively young age of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles patients. “Previous reports looked at adolescents and young adults,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues, while two-thirds of the patients in their study were under the age of 10 years. “This may contribute to the difference in prevalence.”

“Although rare, recovery of F. necrophorum correlated with true signs and symptoms of bacterial pharyngitis,” wrote Dr. Van and her colleagues. Serious pharyngitis with a negative rapid test and culture for group A Streptococcus should prompt clinical suspicion for F. necrophorum, especially in older adolescents and young adults, said Dr. Tam.

Dr. Tam and her coauthors reported no outside sources of funding and reported no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Simple, effective, nonpharmacologic therapies can significantly augment pharmacotherapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression, according to Dr. Mark Hyman Rapaport.

More complex complementary approaches are being explored and may hold promise as part of the future of precision medicine, but well-tested strategies can still help many patients, he said.

Speaking at a session focused on treatment-resistant depression at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Dr. Rapaport, chairman of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and Reunette W. Harris Professor at Emory University, Atlanta, began with the basics.

Citing a recent meta-analysis examining the way in which exercise works as a treatment for depression, Dr. Rapaport said, “looking at the world’s literature in a very thoughtful way, [the meta-analysis] did demonstrate a significant effect for aerobic exercise in decreasing signs and symptoms of depression.” The meta-analysis, he said, found that exercise provided the equivalent of a 5.07-point improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (P = .0007). “I think it is something we should encourage our patients to use,” he said.

Similarly, though the treatments “have fallen out of favor,” Dr. Rapaport said “meta-analyses clearly demonstrate” a significant effect of bright white light (BL) therapy in seasonal affective disorder, both as monotherapy and in combination with antidepressants. The light should be dosed at 5000 lux or more for 1 hour daily.

Further, said Dr. Rapaport, BL as monotherapy or used in combination with antidepressants, or with sleep deprivation can be moderately effective in treating major depressive disorder. “It’s something to consider. We do not use it; we should use it,” Dr. Rapaport said. For patients with bipolar disorder, BL therapy can effectively augment medication use as well.

Focused, intensive treatment with light and sleep adjustments can be effective in both bipolar depression and treatment-resistant depression, Dr. Rapaport said. This approach, termed “adjunctive triple chronotherapy,” begins with total sleep deprivation for a period of 33-36 hours. Then, the patient receives BL therapy at 5,000 lux for at least 1 hour for 3 consecutive nights. Finally, patients are asked to advance their sleep phase for 3 days so that they sleep from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. the 1st night, 8 p.m. to 3 a.m. the 2nd night, and 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. the 3rd night.

The triple chronotherapy approach, said Dr. Rapaport, results in a “rapid and sustained response, both in unipolar and bipolar depression, in the studies that have been done to date.”

Massage can effectively improve mood for individuals with depression as well. In a study of HIV-positive individuals with major depressive disorder and on stable medication, those who received weekly massage had a 33% decrease in HAM-D scores, compared with a 12% increase for those receiving light touch, and a 9% decrease for those on a wait list who received neither touch nor massage (P less than .05). The response rate of 40% for those receiving massage also was significantly higher than the 6.3% for those receiving light touch and the 14% for those on the wait list (P less than .05).

Recently completed unpublished work by Dr. Rapaport and his colleagues involving patients with generalized anxiety disorder also showed significantly greater improvement on a self-rating scale for anxiety for those receiving twice-weekly Swedish massage therapy, compared with those receiving light touch.

“Our patients – their symptoms aren’t just what we see on the monitors – they deal with quality of life, they deal with functioning,” said Dr. Rapaport, “so there are many things that we as clinicians need to look at,” he said at the meeting. “The key is this: There’s a slowly increasing but limited data set for [treatment-resistant depression]. We need to find the right treatments for the right subjects. “

The ASCP meeting was formerly known as the New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit meeting. Dr. Rapaport reported no relevant financial conflicts.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Simple, effective, nonpharmacologic therapies can significantly augment pharmacotherapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression, according to Dr. Mark Hyman Rapaport.

More complex complementary approaches are being explored and may hold promise as part of the future of precision medicine, but well-tested strategies can still help many patients, he said.

Speaking at a session focused on treatment-resistant depression at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Dr. Rapaport, chairman of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and Reunette W. Harris Professor at Emory University, Atlanta, began with the basics.

Citing a recent meta-analysis examining the way in which exercise works as a treatment for depression, Dr. Rapaport said, “looking at the world’s literature in a very thoughtful way, [the meta-analysis] did demonstrate a significant effect for aerobic exercise in decreasing signs and symptoms of depression.” The meta-analysis, he said, found that exercise provided the equivalent of a 5.07-point improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (P = .0007). “I think it is something we should encourage our patients to use,” he said.

Similarly, though the treatments “have fallen out of favor,” Dr. Rapaport said “meta-analyses clearly demonstrate” a significant effect of bright white light (BL) therapy in seasonal affective disorder, both as monotherapy and in combination with antidepressants. The light should be dosed at 5000 lux or more for 1 hour daily.

Further, said Dr. Rapaport, BL as monotherapy or used in combination with antidepressants, or with sleep deprivation can be moderately effective in treating major depressive disorder. “It’s something to consider. We do not use it; we should use it,” Dr. Rapaport said. For patients with bipolar disorder, BL therapy can effectively augment medication use as well.

Focused, intensive treatment with light and sleep adjustments can be effective in both bipolar depression and treatment-resistant depression, Dr. Rapaport said. This approach, termed “adjunctive triple chronotherapy,” begins with total sleep deprivation for a period of 33-36 hours. Then, the patient receives BL therapy at 5,000 lux for at least 1 hour for 3 consecutive nights. Finally, patients are asked to advance their sleep phase for 3 days so that they sleep from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. the 1st night, 8 p.m. to 3 a.m. the 2nd night, and 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. the 3rd night.

The triple chronotherapy approach, said Dr. Rapaport, results in a “rapid and sustained response, both in unipolar and bipolar depression, in the studies that have been done to date.”

Massage can effectively improve mood for individuals with depression as well. In a study of HIV-positive individuals with major depressive disorder and on stable medication, those who received weekly massage had a 33% decrease in HAM-D scores, compared with a 12% increase for those receiving light touch, and a 9% decrease for those on a wait list who received neither touch nor massage (P less than .05). The response rate of 40% for those receiving massage also was significantly higher than the 6.3% for those receiving light touch and the 14% for those on the wait list (P less than .05).

Recently completed unpublished work by Dr. Rapaport and his colleagues involving patients with generalized anxiety disorder also showed significantly greater improvement on a self-rating scale for anxiety for those receiving twice-weekly Swedish massage therapy, compared with those receiving light touch.

“Our patients – their symptoms aren’t just what we see on the monitors – they deal with quality of life, they deal with functioning,” said Dr. Rapaport, “so there are many things that we as clinicians need to look at,” he said at the meeting. “The key is this: There’s a slowly increasing but limited data set for [treatment-resistant depression]. We need to find the right treatments for the right subjects. “

The ASCP meeting was formerly known as the New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit meeting. Dr. Rapaport reported no relevant financial conflicts.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Simple, effective, nonpharmacologic therapies can significantly augment pharmacotherapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression, according to Dr. Mark Hyman Rapaport.

More complex complementary approaches are being explored and may hold promise as part of the future of precision medicine, but well-tested strategies can still help many patients, he said.

Speaking at a session focused on treatment-resistant depression at a meeting of the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Dr. Rapaport, chairman of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and Reunette W. Harris Professor at Emory University, Atlanta, began with the basics.

Citing a recent meta-analysis examining the way in which exercise works as a treatment for depression, Dr. Rapaport said, “looking at the world’s literature in a very thoughtful way, [the meta-analysis] did demonstrate a significant effect for aerobic exercise in decreasing signs and symptoms of depression.” The meta-analysis, he said, found that exercise provided the equivalent of a 5.07-point improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (P = .0007). “I think it is something we should encourage our patients to use,” he said.

Similarly, though the treatments “have fallen out of favor,” Dr. Rapaport said “meta-analyses clearly demonstrate” a significant effect of bright white light (BL) therapy in seasonal affective disorder, both as monotherapy and in combination with antidepressants. The light should be dosed at 5000 lux or more for 1 hour daily.

Further, said Dr. Rapaport, BL as monotherapy or used in combination with antidepressants, or with sleep deprivation can be moderately effective in treating major depressive disorder. “It’s something to consider. We do not use it; we should use it,” Dr. Rapaport said. For patients with bipolar disorder, BL therapy can effectively augment medication use as well.

Focused, intensive treatment with light and sleep adjustments can be effective in both bipolar depression and treatment-resistant depression, Dr. Rapaport said. This approach, termed “adjunctive triple chronotherapy,” begins with total sleep deprivation for a period of 33-36 hours. Then, the patient receives BL therapy at 5,000 lux for at least 1 hour for 3 consecutive nights. Finally, patients are asked to advance their sleep phase for 3 days so that they sleep from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. the 1st night, 8 p.m. to 3 a.m. the 2nd night, and 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. the 3rd night.

The triple chronotherapy approach, said Dr. Rapaport, results in a “rapid and sustained response, both in unipolar and bipolar depression, in the studies that have been done to date.”

Massage can effectively improve mood for individuals with depression as well. In a study of HIV-positive individuals with major depressive disorder and on stable medication, those who received weekly massage had a 33% decrease in HAM-D scores, compared with a 12% increase for those receiving light touch, and a 9% decrease for those on a wait list who received neither touch nor massage (P less than .05). The response rate of 40% for those receiving massage also was significantly higher than the 6.3% for those receiving light touch and the 14% for those on the wait list (P less than .05).

Recently completed unpublished work by Dr. Rapaport and his colleagues involving patients with generalized anxiety disorder also showed significantly greater improvement on a self-rating scale for anxiety for those receiving twice-weekly Swedish massage therapy, compared with those receiving light touch.

“Our patients – their symptoms aren’t just what we see on the monitors – they deal with quality of life, they deal with functioning,” said Dr. Rapaport, “so there are many things that we as clinicians need to look at,” he said at the meeting. “The key is this: There’s a slowly increasing but limited data set for [treatment-resistant depression]. We need to find the right treatments for the right subjects. “

The ASCP meeting was formerly known as the New Clinical Drug Evaluation Unit meeting. Dr. Rapaport reported no relevant financial conflicts.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes