Nodule on the Second Toe in an Infant

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:22
Display Headline
Nodule on the Second Toe in an Infant

The Diagnosis: Infantile Digital Fibromatosis

On examination, the patient appeared well developed, well nourished, and had a 1×0.5-cm, flesh-colored, firm, nontender nodule on the dorsolateral aspect of the left second toe. After excision by a pediatric surgeon, the specimen was submitted for histopathologic examination. Dense bands of collagen with spindled myofibroblasts containing characteristic eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusion bodies staining with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin confirmed the diagnosis of infantile digital fibromatosis (Figure). Postoperatively the patient did well with normal healing and no complications. After 4 months, a recurrence was noted and the parents were considering reexcision.

Histopathology revealed a dense spindled cell proliferation in the dermis with low power (A)(H&E, original magnification ×4). High-power examination showed myofibroblasts with characteristic round and ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Inclusion bodies stained purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain (C)(original magnification ×40).

Infantile digital fibromatosis is a rare, benign, often spontaneously regressing, fibrous tissue tumor of infancy and childhood.1 The prevalence of this tumor is unknown. It can be present at birth or more commonly appears in the first year of life. The lesions present as 1- to 2-cm, firm, flesh-colored nodules that initially grow slowly but have the potential for rapid growth in subsequent months. They occur preferentially on the extensor aspects of the digits, typically sparing the thumb and great toe.1 The clinical differential diagnosis includes keloids or hypertrophic scars, granuloma annulare, sarcoidosis, acral fibrokeratomas, periungual fibromas, supernumerary digits, pachydermodactyly, juvenile aponeurotic fibroma, and terminal osseous dysplasia and pigmentary defects.2

The histology of infantile digital fibromatosis is distinctive. Spindled myofibroblasts that contain round or ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies composed of an accumulation of actin and vimentin filaments are characteristic.1 Inclusions are typically juxtanuclear and may indent the adjacent nucleus. The inclusion bodies stain red with Masson trichrome stain and purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain.1 The histopathologic differential diagnosis includes scar, angiofibroma, dermatofibroma, neurofibroma, and angiofibromatous verruca vulgaris.

Although many treatments exist for infantile digital fibromatosis, optimal therapy is not standardized. Most lesions spontaneously regress, but func-tional disability with deforming contractures can occur if untreated. Topical therapy with imiquimod cream 5% and diflucortolone valerate cream have been reported to produce no effect on tumor size.3 Intralesional 5-fluorouracil was successful in treating a patient after 5 monthly injections.4 Intralesional triamcinolone 10 mg/cc injections were shown to be a well-tolerated and successful treatment in a case series of 7 patients.5 The most utilized intervention appears to be standard surgery, with a few patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.6,7

Treatment with surgical excision often results in recurrence, with studies showing a 50% to 75% recurrence rate.8,9 Our case is not atypical and illustrates this phenomenon. Other reported complications of surgical management include hypertrophic scarring and reduced distal interphalangeal joint mobility.5 Unless infantile digital fibromatosis causes mobility dysfunction or related disabilities, observation with regular follow-up should be considered, as lesions can spontaneously regress.

References

1. Heymann WR. Infantile digital fibromatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:122-123.

2. Niamba P, Léauté-Labrèze C, Boralevi F, et al. Further documentation of spontaneous regression of infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:280-284.

3. Failla V, Wauters O, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, et al. Congenital infantile digital fibromatosis: a case report and review of the literature. Rare Tumors. 2009;1:e47.

4. Oh CK, Son HS, Kwon YW, et al. Intralesional fluorouracil injection in infantile digital fibromatosis. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:549-550

5. Holmes WJ, Mishra A, McArthur P. Intra-lesional steroid for the management of symptomatic infantile digital fibromatosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:632-637.

6. Campbell LB, Petrick MG. Mohs micrographic surgery for a problematic infantile digital fibroma. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:385-387.

7. Albertini JG, Welsch MJ, Conger LA, et al. Infantile digital fibroma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:959-961.

8. Kang SK, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. A case of congenital infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19:462-463.

9. Rimareix F, Bardot J, Andrac L, et al. Infantile digital fibromareport on eleven cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;7:345-348.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Katherine Gordon, MD; Michael Marchetti, MD; Mark Russell, MD

Dr. Gordon is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. Dr. Marchetti is from the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Dr. Russell is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Katherine Gordon, MD, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9069 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 95(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E4-E6
Legacy Keywords
nodule, infantile digital fibromatosis, infant, toe
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Katherine Gordon, MD; Michael Marchetti, MD; Mark Russell, MD

Dr. Gordon is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. Dr. Marchetti is from the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Dr. Russell is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Katherine Gordon, MD, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9069 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Katherine Gordon, MD; Michael Marchetti, MD; Mark Russell, MD

Dr. Gordon is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. Dr. Marchetti is from the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Dr. Russell is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Katherine Gordon, MD, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9069 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF

The Diagnosis: Infantile Digital Fibromatosis

On examination, the patient appeared well developed, well nourished, and had a 1×0.5-cm, flesh-colored, firm, nontender nodule on the dorsolateral aspect of the left second toe. After excision by a pediatric surgeon, the specimen was submitted for histopathologic examination. Dense bands of collagen with spindled myofibroblasts containing characteristic eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusion bodies staining with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin confirmed the diagnosis of infantile digital fibromatosis (Figure). Postoperatively the patient did well with normal healing and no complications. After 4 months, a recurrence was noted and the parents were considering reexcision.

Histopathology revealed a dense spindled cell proliferation in the dermis with low power (A)(H&E, original magnification ×4). High-power examination showed myofibroblasts with characteristic round and ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Inclusion bodies stained purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain (C)(original magnification ×40).

Infantile digital fibromatosis is a rare, benign, often spontaneously regressing, fibrous tissue tumor of infancy and childhood.1 The prevalence of this tumor is unknown. It can be present at birth or more commonly appears in the first year of life. The lesions present as 1- to 2-cm, firm, flesh-colored nodules that initially grow slowly but have the potential for rapid growth in subsequent months. They occur preferentially on the extensor aspects of the digits, typically sparing the thumb and great toe.1 The clinical differential diagnosis includes keloids or hypertrophic scars, granuloma annulare, sarcoidosis, acral fibrokeratomas, periungual fibromas, supernumerary digits, pachydermodactyly, juvenile aponeurotic fibroma, and terminal osseous dysplasia and pigmentary defects.2

The histology of infantile digital fibromatosis is distinctive. Spindled myofibroblasts that contain round or ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies composed of an accumulation of actin and vimentin filaments are characteristic.1 Inclusions are typically juxtanuclear and may indent the adjacent nucleus. The inclusion bodies stain red with Masson trichrome stain and purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain.1 The histopathologic differential diagnosis includes scar, angiofibroma, dermatofibroma, neurofibroma, and angiofibromatous verruca vulgaris.

Although many treatments exist for infantile digital fibromatosis, optimal therapy is not standardized. Most lesions spontaneously regress, but func-tional disability with deforming contractures can occur if untreated. Topical therapy with imiquimod cream 5% and diflucortolone valerate cream have been reported to produce no effect on tumor size.3 Intralesional 5-fluorouracil was successful in treating a patient after 5 monthly injections.4 Intralesional triamcinolone 10 mg/cc injections were shown to be a well-tolerated and successful treatment in a case series of 7 patients.5 The most utilized intervention appears to be standard surgery, with a few patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.6,7

Treatment with surgical excision often results in recurrence, with studies showing a 50% to 75% recurrence rate.8,9 Our case is not atypical and illustrates this phenomenon. Other reported complications of surgical management include hypertrophic scarring and reduced distal interphalangeal joint mobility.5 Unless infantile digital fibromatosis causes mobility dysfunction or related disabilities, observation with regular follow-up should be considered, as lesions can spontaneously regress.

The Diagnosis: Infantile Digital Fibromatosis

On examination, the patient appeared well developed, well nourished, and had a 1×0.5-cm, flesh-colored, firm, nontender nodule on the dorsolateral aspect of the left second toe. After excision by a pediatric surgeon, the specimen was submitted for histopathologic examination. Dense bands of collagen with spindled myofibroblasts containing characteristic eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusion bodies staining with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin confirmed the diagnosis of infantile digital fibromatosis (Figure). Postoperatively the patient did well with normal healing and no complications. After 4 months, a recurrence was noted and the parents were considering reexcision.

Histopathology revealed a dense spindled cell proliferation in the dermis with low power (A)(H&E, original magnification ×4). High-power examination showed myofibroblasts with characteristic round and ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Inclusion bodies stained purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain (C)(original magnification ×40).

Infantile digital fibromatosis is a rare, benign, often spontaneously regressing, fibrous tissue tumor of infancy and childhood.1 The prevalence of this tumor is unknown. It can be present at birth or more commonly appears in the first year of life. The lesions present as 1- to 2-cm, firm, flesh-colored nodules that initially grow slowly but have the potential for rapid growth in subsequent months. They occur preferentially on the extensor aspects of the digits, typically sparing the thumb and great toe.1 The clinical differential diagnosis includes keloids or hypertrophic scars, granuloma annulare, sarcoidosis, acral fibrokeratomas, periungual fibromas, supernumerary digits, pachydermodactyly, juvenile aponeurotic fibroma, and terminal osseous dysplasia and pigmentary defects.2

The histology of infantile digital fibromatosis is distinctive. Spindled myofibroblasts that contain round or ovoid, eosinophilic, cytoplasmic inclusion bodies composed of an accumulation of actin and vimentin filaments are characteristic.1 Inclusions are typically juxtanuclear and may indent the adjacent nucleus. The inclusion bodies stain red with Masson trichrome stain and purple with phosphotungstic acid hematoxylin stain.1 The histopathologic differential diagnosis includes scar, angiofibroma, dermatofibroma, neurofibroma, and angiofibromatous verruca vulgaris.

Although many treatments exist for infantile digital fibromatosis, optimal therapy is not standardized. Most lesions spontaneously regress, but func-tional disability with deforming contractures can occur if untreated. Topical therapy with imiquimod cream 5% and diflucortolone valerate cream have been reported to produce no effect on tumor size.3 Intralesional 5-fluorouracil was successful in treating a patient after 5 monthly injections.4 Intralesional triamcinolone 10 mg/cc injections were shown to be a well-tolerated and successful treatment in a case series of 7 patients.5 The most utilized intervention appears to be standard surgery, with a few patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.6,7

Treatment with surgical excision often results in recurrence, with studies showing a 50% to 75% recurrence rate.8,9 Our case is not atypical and illustrates this phenomenon. Other reported complications of surgical management include hypertrophic scarring and reduced distal interphalangeal joint mobility.5 Unless infantile digital fibromatosis causes mobility dysfunction or related disabilities, observation with regular follow-up should be considered, as lesions can spontaneously regress.

References

1. Heymann WR. Infantile digital fibromatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:122-123.

2. Niamba P, Léauté-Labrèze C, Boralevi F, et al. Further documentation of spontaneous regression of infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:280-284.

3. Failla V, Wauters O, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, et al. Congenital infantile digital fibromatosis: a case report and review of the literature. Rare Tumors. 2009;1:e47.

4. Oh CK, Son HS, Kwon YW, et al. Intralesional fluorouracil injection in infantile digital fibromatosis. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:549-550

5. Holmes WJ, Mishra A, McArthur P. Intra-lesional steroid for the management of symptomatic infantile digital fibromatosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:632-637.

6. Campbell LB, Petrick MG. Mohs micrographic surgery for a problematic infantile digital fibroma. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:385-387.

7. Albertini JG, Welsch MJ, Conger LA, et al. Infantile digital fibroma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:959-961.

8. Kang SK, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. A case of congenital infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19:462-463.

9. Rimareix F, Bardot J, Andrac L, et al. Infantile digital fibromareport on eleven cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;7:345-348.

References

1. Heymann WR. Infantile digital fibromatosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59:122-123.

2. Niamba P, Léauté-Labrèze C, Boralevi F, et al. Further documentation of spontaneous regression of infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:280-284.

3. Failla V, Wauters O, Nikkels-Tassoudji N, et al. Congenital infantile digital fibromatosis: a case report and review of the literature. Rare Tumors. 2009;1:e47.

4. Oh CK, Son HS, Kwon YW, et al. Intralesional fluorouracil injection in infantile digital fibromatosis. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141:549-550

5. Holmes WJ, Mishra A, McArthur P. Intra-lesional steroid for the management of symptomatic infantile digital fibromatosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:632-637.

6. Campbell LB, Petrick MG. Mohs micrographic surgery for a problematic infantile digital fibroma. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:385-387.

7. Albertini JG, Welsch MJ, Conger LA, et al. Infantile digital fibroma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:959-961.

8. Kang SK, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. A case of congenital infantile digital fibromatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19:462-463.

9. Rimareix F, Bardot J, Andrac L, et al. Infantile digital fibromareport on eleven cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997;7:345-348.

Issue
Cutis - 95(4)
Issue
Cutis - 95(4)
Page Number
E4-E6
Page Number
E4-E6
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Nodule on the Second Toe in an Infant
Display Headline
Nodule on the Second Toe in an Infant
Legacy Keywords
nodule, infantile digital fibromatosis, infant, toe
Legacy Keywords
nodule, infantile digital fibromatosis, infant, toe
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 6-month-old male infant presented with a 1×0.5-cm, flesh-colored nodule on the dorsolateral aspect of the left second toe. The persistent, slowly enlarging, painless lesion was first noticed at 3 months of age and did not cause functional impairment. There was no preceding trauma and the patient’s medical history was otherwise noncontributory.
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media