Safety of Nivolumab: A Medication Use Evaluation

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:03

Background: Nivolumab (Opdivo) was initially FDAapproved at a dose of 3mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks. In September 2016, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was changed from 3mg/kg to a 240mg flat dose. In January 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was updated to reflect a decreased infusion time of 30 minutes. In March 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was again modified from 240mg every 2 weeks to 480mg every 4 weeks. The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS) adopted the 480mg every 4 weeks regimen in March 2018. The increased nivolumab dose and shortened infusion time raised some concern regarding immune-mediated toxicities which was the rationale behind this medication use evaluation (MUE).

Methods: This retrospective chart review was completed to compare the incidence of toxicity between the every 2 week and the every 4 week dosing schedules and evaluate the adoption of every 4 week dosing regimen by VANEOHS prescribers. Patients newly initiated on nivolumab between 10/1/17 and 9/30/18 were reviewed for the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within the first 3 months of treatment.

Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the MUE, with 21 (46%) initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks and 25 (54%) initiated on 480mg every 4 weeks. All patients initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks were either converted to 480mg every 4 weeks, or nivolumab therapy was discontinued prior to VANEOHS adoption of the 4 week dosing regimen. Immune-mediated AEs potentially related to nivolumab therapy were documented in 8 (32%) patients receiving 480mg, and 4 (36%) patients receiving 240mg. Of patients who switched from nivolumab 240mg to 480mg, 3 (30%) experienced an AE while receiving 240mg, and 1 (10%) while receiving 480mg.

Conclusion: The nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen was readily adopted by oncology providers at VANEOHS and the rate of patients experiencing AEs with nivolumab 480mg every 4 weeks compared to 240mg every 2 weeks, was similar between treatment groups. The results of this MUE support continued prescribing of the nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen with close monitoring for adverse reactions.

Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Emily Weigand ([email protected])

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Emily Weigand ([email protected])

Author and Disclosure Information

Correspondence: Emily Weigand ([email protected])

Background: Nivolumab (Opdivo) was initially FDAapproved at a dose of 3mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks. In September 2016, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was changed from 3mg/kg to a 240mg flat dose. In January 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was updated to reflect a decreased infusion time of 30 minutes. In March 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was again modified from 240mg every 2 weeks to 480mg every 4 weeks. The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS) adopted the 480mg every 4 weeks regimen in March 2018. The increased nivolumab dose and shortened infusion time raised some concern regarding immune-mediated toxicities which was the rationale behind this medication use evaluation (MUE).

Methods: This retrospective chart review was completed to compare the incidence of toxicity between the every 2 week and the every 4 week dosing schedules and evaluate the adoption of every 4 week dosing regimen by VANEOHS prescribers. Patients newly initiated on nivolumab between 10/1/17 and 9/30/18 were reviewed for the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within the first 3 months of treatment.

Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the MUE, with 21 (46%) initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks and 25 (54%) initiated on 480mg every 4 weeks. All patients initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks were either converted to 480mg every 4 weeks, or nivolumab therapy was discontinued prior to VANEOHS adoption of the 4 week dosing regimen. Immune-mediated AEs potentially related to nivolumab therapy were documented in 8 (32%) patients receiving 480mg, and 4 (36%) patients receiving 240mg. Of patients who switched from nivolumab 240mg to 480mg, 3 (30%) experienced an AE while receiving 240mg, and 1 (10%) while receiving 480mg.

Conclusion: The nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen was readily adopted by oncology providers at VANEOHS and the rate of patients experiencing AEs with nivolumab 480mg every 4 weeks compared to 240mg every 2 weeks, was similar between treatment groups. The results of this MUE support continued prescribing of the nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen with close monitoring for adverse reactions.

Background: Nivolumab (Opdivo) was initially FDAapproved at a dose of 3mg/kg by intravenous infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks. In September 2016, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was changed from 3mg/kg to a 240mg flat dose. In January 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was updated to reflect a decreased infusion time of 30 minutes. In March 2018, nivolumab’s FDA approved dosing was again modified from 240mg every 2 weeks to 480mg every 4 weeks. The VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System (VANEOHS) adopted the 480mg every 4 weeks regimen in March 2018. The increased nivolumab dose and shortened infusion time raised some concern regarding immune-mediated toxicities which was the rationale behind this medication use evaluation (MUE).

Methods: This retrospective chart review was completed to compare the incidence of toxicity between the every 2 week and the every 4 week dosing schedules and evaluate the adoption of every 4 week dosing regimen by VANEOHS prescribers. Patients newly initiated on nivolumab between 10/1/17 and 9/30/18 were reviewed for the occurrence of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within the first 3 months of treatment.

Results: Sixty-five patients were included in the MUE, with 21 (46%) initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks and 25 (54%) initiated on 480mg every 4 weeks. All patients initiated on 240mg every 2 weeks were either converted to 480mg every 4 weeks, or nivolumab therapy was discontinued prior to VANEOHS adoption of the 4 week dosing regimen. Immune-mediated AEs potentially related to nivolumab therapy were documented in 8 (32%) patients receiving 480mg, and 4 (36%) patients receiving 240mg. Of patients who switched from nivolumab 240mg to 480mg, 3 (30%) experienced an AE while receiving 240mg, and 1 (10%) while receiving 480mg.

Conclusion: The nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen was readily adopted by oncology providers at VANEOHS and the rate of patients experiencing AEs with nivolumab 480mg every 4 weeks compared to 240mg every 2 weeks, was similar between treatment groups. The results of this MUE support continued prescribing of the nivolumab 480mg every 4 week dosing regimen with close monitoring for adverse reactions.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Citation Override
Abstract Presented at the 2019 Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Annual Meeting
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Fri, 09/06/2019 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Improving Lipid Outcomes for VA Patients Taking Nonformulary Statins

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Improving Lipid Outcomes for VA Patients Taking Nonformulary Statins
The Role of Pharmacist-Managed Clinics

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Corey A. Wirth, PharmD, Jon E. Folstad, PharmD, BCPS, and Mary Beth Low, PharmD

At the time of this study, Dr. Wirth was a pharmacy practice resident and Dr. Folstad was the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services, both at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (LSCVAMC), Cleveland, OH. Dr. Wirth is now a clinical pharmacist specializing in internal medicine at Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH and Dr. Folstad is now the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services at the W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC. Dr. Low is a clinical pharmacy specialist in pharmacoeconomics at the LSCVAMC.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 26(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
20
Legacy Keywords
lipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacistlipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacist
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Corey A. Wirth, PharmD, Jon E. Folstad, PharmD, BCPS, and Mary Beth Low, PharmD

At the time of this study, Dr. Wirth was a pharmacy practice resident and Dr. Folstad was the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services, both at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (LSCVAMC), Cleveland, OH. Dr. Wirth is now a clinical pharmacist specializing in internal medicine at Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH and Dr. Folstad is now the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services at the W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC. Dr. Low is a clinical pharmacy specialist in pharmacoeconomics at the LSCVAMC.

Author and Disclosure Information

Corey A. Wirth, PharmD, Jon E. Folstad, PharmD, BCPS, and Mary Beth Low, PharmD

At the time of this study, Dr. Wirth was a pharmacy practice resident and Dr. Folstad was the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services, both at the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (LSCVAMC), Cleveland, OH. Dr. Wirth is now a clinical pharmacist specializing in internal medicine at Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH and Dr. Folstad is now the clinical coordinator of pharmacy services at the W.G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC. Dr. Low is a clinical pharmacy specialist in pharmacoeconomics at the LSCVAMC.

Article PDF
Article PDF
The Role of Pharmacist-Managed Clinics
The Role of Pharmacist-Managed Clinics

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 26(2)
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 26(2)
Page Number
20
Page Number
20
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Improving Lipid Outcomes for VA Patients Taking Nonformulary Statins
Display Headline
Improving Lipid Outcomes for VA Patients Taking Nonformulary Statins
Legacy Keywords
lipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacistlipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacist
Legacy Keywords
lipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacistlipids, VA, Veterans Affairs, nonformulary, statins, dyslipidemia, antilipemics, cardiovascular diseases, CVD, pharmacist-driven clinics, coronary heart diseases, CHD, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C, quality improvements, nonpharmacist practitioners, non-pharmacist
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media