User login
VIDEO: Grading tools help set alopecia treatment expectations and monitor progress
ORLANDO – Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.
The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.
He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.
Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.
The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.
He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.
Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Two hair loss clinical grading tools can help physicians and their female androgenetic alopecia patients set medical treatment expectations, and make tracking progress both easier and more accurate, according to the dermatologist who developed the scales.
The five-point clinical grading scale helps physicians with diagnosing female pattern hair loss and grading the severity, Rodney Sinclair, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “And you can use that clinical grading scale to monitor the response to treatment” and show patients what to expect with treatment, added Dr. Sinclair, professor and chairman, department of dermatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne.
He also discussed a validated hair shedding scale, “a really simple and easy test to use,” with six photographs to help patients determine how much hair they are shedding on a daily basis. “Most women don’t know what’s a normal amount of hair to shed,” he said. In the interview, Dr. Sinclair explains more about the two scales, and how they can be used to obtain clinically relevant information to help guide treatment – and shares his tips for how to work with women who are anxious about their hair loss improvement.
Dr. Sinclair owns the copyrights for the Sinclair Severity Scale. He has no other relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
AT AAD 17
Physicians need to take hyperhidrosis in teens seriously
ORLANDO – Not quite a fifth of teens experience excessive, uncontrollable sweating, according to the results of an online survey presented during this year’s annual American Academy of Dermatology.
Because nearly 70% of teens who reported the condition said it interferes with their activities of daily living, late-breaking research presenter, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, chief of pediatric dermatology at the University of Texas, Houston, said it was time medical schools paid more attention to it.
For the study, Dr. Hebert and her colleagues online-surveyed 1,000 adolescents between 12 and 17 years who meet the accepted diagnostic criteria for primary focal hyperhidrosis. An analysis of the 981 surveys that were complete showed that 17.1% of respondents experienced excessive, uncontrollable sweating and that 68.6% of these reported the sweating was moderate or major, impairing their normal functioning.
The average age of onset for the condition was 11 years, although more than a quarter of respondents said their sweating began at age 10 years. Nearly all those surveyed said they sweat from at least two focal areas, with five areas being the average number of focal areas.
Adolescence is when hyperhidrosis begins for many adults with the condition, yet few if any data exist regarding the condition in this age group, according to Dr. Hebert. “We have to figure out what is going on so maybe we can make a difference later.”
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Not quite a fifth of teens experience excessive, uncontrollable sweating, according to the results of an online survey presented during this year’s annual American Academy of Dermatology.
Because nearly 70% of teens who reported the condition said it interferes with their activities of daily living, late-breaking research presenter, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, chief of pediatric dermatology at the University of Texas, Houston, said it was time medical schools paid more attention to it.
For the study, Dr. Hebert and her colleagues online-surveyed 1,000 adolescents between 12 and 17 years who meet the accepted diagnostic criteria for primary focal hyperhidrosis. An analysis of the 981 surveys that were complete showed that 17.1% of respondents experienced excessive, uncontrollable sweating and that 68.6% of these reported the sweating was moderate or major, impairing their normal functioning.
The average age of onset for the condition was 11 years, although more than a quarter of respondents said their sweating began at age 10 years. Nearly all those surveyed said they sweat from at least two focal areas, with five areas being the average number of focal areas.
Adolescence is when hyperhidrosis begins for many adults with the condition, yet few if any data exist regarding the condition in this age group, according to Dr. Hebert. “We have to figure out what is going on so maybe we can make a difference later.”
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Not quite a fifth of teens experience excessive, uncontrollable sweating, according to the results of an online survey presented during this year’s annual American Academy of Dermatology.
Because nearly 70% of teens who reported the condition said it interferes with their activities of daily living, late-breaking research presenter, Adelaide A. Hebert, MD, chief of pediatric dermatology at the University of Texas, Houston, said it was time medical schools paid more attention to it.
For the study, Dr. Hebert and her colleagues online-surveyed 1,000 adolescents between 12 and 17 years who meet the accepted diagnostic criteria for primary focal hyperhidrosis. An analysis of the 981 surveys that were complete showed that 17.1% of respondents experienced excessive, uncontrollable sweating and that 68.6% of these reported the sweating was moderate or major, impairing their normal functioning.
The average age of onset for the condition was 11 years, although more than a quarter of respondents said their sweating began at age 10 years. Nearly all those surveyed said they sweat from at least two focal areas, with five areas being the average number of focal areas.
Adolescence is when hyperhidrosis begins for many adults with the condition, yet few if any data exist regarding the condition in this age group, according to Dr. Hebert. “We have to figure out what is going on so maybe we can make a difference later.”
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
AT AAD 17
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Hyperhidrosis is common in 17% of teens surveyed; 69% of these reported hyperhidrosis interferes with activities of daily living.
Data source: Online survey of 1,000 U.S. teens between 12 and 17 years who reported excessive, uncontrollable sweating.
Disclosures: Dr. Hebert received a grant from GlaxoSmithKline for this study. She is also a board member of the International Hyperhidrosis Society.
Teletriage app reduced skin specialty care wait times
ORLANDO – A teletriage app significantly reduced the time between triage and evaluation by a dermatologist, helping a volunteer-staffed clinic for the uninsured see more patients and improve rates of accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Peter Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, presented the data on a study of the app during a late-breaking research session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
The teletriage app AccessDerm, which is free to all AAD members, uses a photo of the dermatological condition, along with basic clinical and demographic information. The investigators found that with the app, the mean time from referral to teledermatology response was 1.4 days vs. 13.4 days for waiting to be seen in the next dermatology clinic (P less than .0001). Additionally, because the app requires the referring physicians to enter a differential diagnosis and a suggested treatment plan, it was established that diagnoses improved with teledermatology. Compared with self-reported primary care provider plans, the app led to an altered course of treatment in 95% of cases.
In all, 70% of cases were triaged via teledermatology without the need for an in-person evaluation, resulting in an average of 1.4 out of 8 appointments being saved monthly. This allowed the clinic to treat 18% more patients who needed in-person care, according to Mr. Chansky.
“Teletriage can be easily implemented in an underserved clinical setting, and provides an opportunity for dermatologists to make a significant and meaningful impact on the health care and outcomes of underserved populations,” Mr. Chansky said.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – A teletriage app significantly reduced the time between triage and evaluation by a dermatologist, helping a volunteer-staffed clinic for the uninsured see more patients and improve rates of accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Peter Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, presented the data on a study of the app during a late-breaking research session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
The teletriage app AccessDerm, which is free to all AAD members, uses a photo of the dermatological condition, along with basic clinical and demographic information. The investigators found that with the app, the mean time from referral to teledermatology response was 1.4 days vs. 13.4 days for waiting to be seen in the next dermatology clinic (P less than .0001). Additionally, because the app requires the referring physicians to enter a differential diagnosis and a suggested treatment plan, it was established that diagnoses improved with teledermatology. Compared with self-reported primary care provider plans, the app led to an altered course of treatment in 95% of cases.
In all, 70% of cases were triaged via teledermatology without the need for an in-person evaluation, resulting in an average of 1.4 out of 8 appointments being saved monthly. This allowed the clinic to treat 18% more patients who needed in-person care, according to Mr. Chansky.
“Teletriage can be easily implemented in an underserved clinical setting, and provides an opportunity for dermatologists to make a significant and meaningful impact on the health care and outcomes of underserved populations,” Mr. Chansky said.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – A teletriage app significantly reduced the time between triage and evaluation by a dermatologist, helping a volunteer-staffed clinic for the uninsured see more patients and improve rates of accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Peter Chansky, a medical student at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, presented the data on a study of the app during a late-breaking research session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
The teletriage app AccessDerm, which is free to all AAD members, uses a photo of the dermatological condition, along with basic clinical and demographic information. The investigators found that with the app, the mean time from referral to teledermatology response was 1.4 days vs. 13.4 days for waiting to be seen in the next dermatology clinic (P less than .0001). Additionally, because the app requires the referring physicians to enter a differential diagnosis and a suggested treatment plan, it was established that diagnoses improved with teledermatology. Compared with self-reported primary care provider plans, the app led to an altered course of treatment in 95% of cases.
In all, 70% of cases were triaged via teledermatology without the need for an in-person evaluation, resulting in an average of 1.4 out of 8 appointments being saved monthly. This allowed the clinic to treat 18% more patients who needed in-person care, according to Mr. Chansky.
“Teletriage can be easily implemented in an underserved clinical setting, and provides an opportunity for dermatologists to make a significant and meaningful impact on the health care and outcomes of underserved populations,” Mr. Chansky said.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
AT AAD 17
VIDEO: Don’t overlook psychosocial concerns of vitiligo patients
ORLANDO – There are ways to assess the psychosocial needs of your patients with vitiligo, even if you don’t believe you have the necessary skills to do a complete mental health work-up, according to Seemal R. Desai, MD.
In an interview recorded at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Desai, an assistant clinical professor of dermatology at the University of Texas, Dallas, shares his ideas for how to have casual conversations with patients that can help reveal important clues to psychosocial stress patients with this serious medical skin condition might be facing.
“There are subtle clues to look for to know that these patients are uncomfortable with others seeing their skin,” says Dr. Desai.
In the video interview, he also covers taking a multidisciplinary approach to caring for these patients, what treatments are available to those who are suffering psychosocial stress after having failed several interventions, and how patients from many Asian and African counties are especially at risk for ostracization.
“It’s important to let your patients know that you understand this is really affecting them psychosocially, and that you care,” says Dr. Desai.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – There are ways to assess the psychosocial needs of your patients with vitiligo, even if you don’t believe you have the necessary skills to do a complete mental health work-up, according to Seemal R. Desai, MD.
In an interview recorded at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Desai, an assistant clinical professor of dermatology at the University of Texas, Dallas, shares his ideas for how to have casual conversations with patients that can help reveal important clues to psychosocial stress patients with this serious medical skin condition might be facing.
“There are subtle clues to look for to know that these patients are uncomfortable with others seeing their skin,” says Dr. Desai.
In the video interview, he also covers taking a multidisciplinary approach to caring for these patients, what treatments are available to those who are suffering psychosocial stress after having failed several interventions, and how patients from many Asian and African counties are especially at risk for ostracization.
“It’s important to let your patients know that you understand this is really affecting them psychosocially, and that you care,” says Dr. Desai.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – There are ways to assess the psychosocial needs of your patients with vitiligo, even if you don’t believe you have the necessary skills to do a complete mental health work-up, according to Seemal R. Desai, MD.
In an interview recorded at this year’s annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Desai, an assistant clinical professor of dermatology at the University of Texas, Dallas, shares his ideas for how to have casual conversations with patients that can help reveal important clues to psychosocial stress patients with this serious medical skin condition might be facing.
“There are subtle clues to look for to know that these patients are uncomfortable with others seeing their skin,” says Dr. Desai.
In the video interview, he also covers taking a multidisciplinary approach to caring for these patients, what treatments are available to those who are suffering psychosocial stress after having failed several interventions, and how patients from many Asian and African counties are especially at risk for ostracization.
“It’s important to let your patients know that you understand this is really affecting them psychosocially, and that you care,” says Dr. Desai.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAD 17
CIMPASI-1 and -2 show certolizumab pegol benefits patients with severe plaque psoriasis
ORLANDO – Results from two phase III trials indicated the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor certolizumab pegol led to significant improvements in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, compared with placebo, according to an oral presentation at this year’s annual Academy of Dermatology Meeting.
Across the CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials, at 16 weeks, both certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg and 200 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks in groups of patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and on the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores, when compared with placebo. The data were presented by Alice B. Gottlieb, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology at New York Medical College, Valhalla. Certolizumab pegol currently is approved in the United States for use in psoriatic arthritis, but not for psoriasis.
In CIMPASI-1, 234 mostly white male patients in their mid-40s who had moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 88 participants in the arm given 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4; 95 given 200 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 4; and 51 given placebo. At week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 75 was 75.8% in the first group, 66.5% in the second, and 6.5% for placebo. A PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 57.9% for group 1, 47.0% for the second group, and 4.2% for placebo.
Also at week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 90 was 43.6% in the 400 mg dose group, 35.8% in the 200 mg dose group, and 0.4% in the placebo group.
In CIMPASI-2, 227 mostly white patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, most of whom were in their mid-40s, evenly distributed across the sexes, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 87 participants in the 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 group; 91 in the 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 arm, and 49 in the placebo group. At week 16, 82.6% of patients in the first group and 81.4% in the second group had a PASI 75, compared with 11.6% of the placebo group. Also at 16 weeks, a PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 71.6% for group 1, 66.8% for the second group, and 2.0% for placebo. At week 16, 55.4% of patients receiving the 400 mg dose had a PASI 90, as did 52.6% of patients receiving the 200 mg dose every 2 weeks, compared with only 4.5% of the placebo group.
Additionally, Dr. Gottlieb said that at week 16, patients in the 400-mg and 200-mg groups showed significant improvements over baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) average scores, compared with placebo: a 10.2 decrease in the 400-mg group and a 9.3 decrease in the 200-mg group, compared with a 3.3 decrease in the placebo arm (P less than .001) in the CIMPASI-1 study. In the CIMPASI-2 study at week 16, there was a drop of 10.0 DLQI in average scores in the 400-mg group, 10.4 in the 200-mg group, and an average drop of only 3.8 in controls (P less than .001).
Dr. Gottlieb, who disclosed that her mother suffers from severe plaque psoriasis, told the audience that the patient improvements were on par with those seen with infliximab, which she said was “the best anti–TNF alpha in the pack to date, and that’s an intravenous drug. These are impressive drops in the DLQI.”
Adverse events were, said Dr. Gottlieb, “a whole lot of nothing. There’s nothing that stands out.” She said there were no cases of tuberculosis, one case of vulvovaginal candidiasis, and equal distribution of herpes zoster across the study.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Results from two phase III trials indicated the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor certolizumab pegol led to significant improvements in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, compared with placebo, according to an oral presentation at this year’s annual Academy of Dermatology Meeting.
Across the CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials, at 16 weeks, both certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg and 200 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks in groups of patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and on the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores, when compared with placebo. The data were presented by Alice B. Gottlieb, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology at New York Medical College, Valhalla. Certolizumab pegol currently is approved in the United States for use in psoriatic arthritis, but not for psoriasis.
In CIMPASI-1, 234 mostly white male patients in their mid-40s who had moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 88 participants in the arm given 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4; 95 given 200 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 4; and 51 given placebo. At week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 75 was 75.8% in the first group, 66.5% in the second, and 6.5% for placebo. A PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 57.9% for group 1, 47.0% for the second group, and 4.2% for placebo.
Also at week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 90 was 43.6% in the 400 mg dose group, 35.8% in the 200 mg dose group, and 0.4% in the placebo group.
In CIMPASI-2, 227 mostly white patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, most of whom were in their mid-40s, evenly distributed across the sexes, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 87 participants in the 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 group; 91 in the 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 arm, and 49 in the placebo group. At week 16, 82.6% of patients in the first group and 81.4% in the second group had a PASI 75, compared with 11.6% of the placebo group. Also at 16 weeks, a PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 71.6% for group 1, 66.8% for the second group, and 2.0% for placebo. At week 16, 55.4% of patients receiving the 400 mg dose had a PASI 90, as did 52.6% of patients receiving the 200 mg dose every 2 weeks, compared with only 4.5% of the placebo group.
Additionally, Dr. Gottlieb said that at week 16, patients in the 400-mg and 200-mg groups showed significant improvements over baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) average scores, compared with placebo: a 10.2 decrease in the 400-mg group and a 9.3 decrease in the 200-mg group, compared with a 3.3 decrease in the placebo arm (P less than .001) in the CIMPASI-1 study. In the CIMPASI-2 study at week 16, there was a drop of 10.0 DLQI in average scores in the 400-mg group, 10.4 in the 200-mg group, and an average drop of only 3.8 in controls (P less than .001).
Dr. Gottlieb, who disclosed that her mother suffers from severe plaque psoriasis, told the audience that the patient improvements were on par with those seen with infliximab, which she said was “the best anti–TNF alpha in the pack to date, and that’s an intravenous drug. These are impressive drops in the DLQI.”
Adverse events were, said Dr. Gottlieb, “a whole lot of nothing. There’s nothing that stands out.” She said there were no cases of tuberculosis, one case of vulvovaginal candidiasis, and equal distribution of herpes zoster across the study.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
ORLANDO – Results from two phase III trials indicated the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor certolizumab pegol led to significant improvements in moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, compared with placebo, according to an oral presentation at this year’s annual Academy of Dermatology Meeting.
Across the CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials, at 16 weeks, both certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) 400 mg and 200 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks in groups of patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores, and on the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores, when compared with placebo. The data were presented by Alice B. Gottlieb, MD, PhD, professor of dermatology at New York Medical College, Valhalla. Certolizumab pegol currently is approved in the United States for use in psoriatic arthritis, but not for psoriasis.
In CIMPASI-1, 234 mostly white male patients in their mid-40s who had moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 88 participants in the arm given 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4; 95 given 200 mg at weeks 0, 2, and 4; and 51 given placebo. At week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 75 was 75.8% in the first group, 66.5% in the second, and 6.5% for placebo. A PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 57.9% for group 1, 47.0% for the second group, and 4.2% for placebo.
Also at week 16, the percentage of patients who achieved a PASI 90 was 43.6% in the 400 mg dose group, 35.8% in the 200 mg dose group, and 0.4% in the placebo group.
In CIMPASI-2, 227 mostly white patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, most of whom were in their mid-40s, evenly distributed across the sexes, were randomly assigned to one of three groups. There were 87 participants in the 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 group; 91 in the 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0, 2, and 4 arm, and 49 in the placebo group. At week 16, 82.6% of patients in the first group and 81.4% in the second group had a PASI 75, compared with 11.6% of the placebo group. Also at 16 weeks, a PGA scale improvement of at least two points over baseline toward a final score of clear or almost clear skin at week 16 was 71.6% for group 1, 66.8% for the second group, and 2.0% for placebo. At week 16, 55.4% of patients receiving the 400 mg dose had a PASI 90, as did 52.6% of patients receiving the 200 mg dose every 2 weeks, compared with only 4.5% of the placebo group.
Additionally, Dr. Gottlieb said that at week 16, patients in the 400-mg and 200-mg groups showed significant improvements over baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) average scores, compared with placebo: a 10.2 decrease in the 400-mg group and a 9.3 decrease in the 200-mg group, compared with a 3.3 decrease in the placebo arm (P less than .001) in the CIMPASI-1 study. In the CIMPASI-2 study at week 16, there was a drop of 10.0 DLQI in average scores in the 400-mg group, 10.4 in the 200-mg group, and an average drop of only 3.8 in controls (P less than .001).
Dr. Gottlieb, who disclosed that her mother suffers from severe plaque psoriasis, told the audience that the patient improvements were on par with those seen with infliximab, which she said was “the best anti–TNF alpha in the pack to date, and that’s an intravenous drug. These are impressive drops in the DLQI.”
Adverse events were, said Dr. Gottlieb, “a whole lot of nothing. There’s nothing that stands out.” She said there were no cases of tuberculosis, one case of vulvovaginal candidiasis, and equal distribution of herpes zoster across the study.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
AT AAD 17
Key clinical point:
Major finding: In CIMPASI-1, at week 16, the response rate for patients who achieved a PASI 75 was 75.8% in the 400-mg group, 66.5% in the 200-mg group, and 6.5% in the placebo group.
Data source: 461 adults with moderate to severe plaque arthritis randomly assigned to either 400 mg certolizumab pegol, 200 mg of the treatment, or placebo every other week at weeks 0, 2, and 4.
Disclosures: Dr. Gottlieb had relevant disclosures, including with Dermira and UCB, the sponsors of this trial.
Data collection urged on patients treated with talk therapy
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Most psychiatrists are familiar with many of the basic tenets of psychoanalysis, but they probably aren’t relying on its therapeutic powers in practice as much as they are pharmacotherapy, according to an expert.
“There’s a great deal of discussion about whether psychoanalysis has an adequate evidence base. That’s a popular concept. It’s not so much about whether practitioners want to use it, but whether or not they can defend using it in their dialogs with insurance companies, government agencies, and other sources of support,” Robert Michels, MD, a Walsh McDermott University Professor of Medicine, and professor of psychiatry, at Cornell University, New York, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists. “My summary is that it has less adequate data supporting it [than pharmacologic interventions]. … There is, however, convincing evidence that all of these treatments, ranging from cognitive-behavioral therapy to [dialectical behavior therapy], to dynamic psychoanalysis, to mentalization-based treatment, do have an effect.”
“The SSRI probably did more to change psychotherapy than any other evolutionary change in the theory of psychotherapy,” Dr. Michels said. “In the beginning, [pharmacologic treatments] were not terribly useful to the patients of psychoanalysis, because they were too toxic or too psychologically disturbing to use in people without major psychiatric problems. Now, [there is] intense competition from biologic treatments.”
Whereas the goal of pharmacotherapy is cure, the point of psychoanalysis is to derive meaning from neurosis, and ultimately, from life. A sea change in thought about how psychoanalysis should be conducted was well underway before the advent of fluoxetine, however. With the death in 1939 of Sigmund Freud, MD, the founder of psychoanalysis, a wave of theories began to wash over the field. Most of those theories do not see memories as the enemy, or detachment from the patient as appropriate, according to Dr. Michels.
And while the form might vary across the different approaches, the function is the same. “The goal is no longer to recover the lost memory of the childhood trauma. More important is the journey in attempting to discover it,” Dr. Michels said.
Freud avoided seeing his patients as having personality disorders, while the next generations of psychotherapists largely embraced and conceptualized diagnoses, going beyond symptoms and instead focusing on the person’s predisposition to symptom formation. Psychotherapy today sees pathology not as something to be cured but as a reaction to problems tied to everyday living. It assumes that a more effective reaction to those problems can be learned.
Rather than shun what were once considered obstacles – resistance, enactment, transference, countertransference, and working through interpretations – the psychotherapist uses those to establish a relationship with the patient; emotions stirred by the therapist become important markers of patterns that have persisted in the person’s life that prevent forming smooth relationships, and vice versa. “In the new model, the therapist is an actively engaged participant whose core skill is to stay fully involved and interconnected while also being able to step back and say, ‘What is happening here?’ ” Dr. Michels said. “Transference and countertransference are essential tools to the therapeutic process. Hopefully, we change the patient’s attitude to his own mental life and toward others around him. We have a much more open, broader, wider way of dealing with patients, and we are much more humble about what we know before the treatment starts.”
In an interview, Dr. Michels said this has been especially helpful in treating people with borderline personality disorder, for whom the neutral face of a therapist can often be a trigger. “You end up being a better player through collaboration. If you carry the argument to its extreme, we’d say it doesn’t make any difference if you discover the flaw.”
Also in the interview, Dr. Michels said that, while many therapists are aware that psychotherapy has evolved and that it is effective, it is still not commonly taught in medical schools beyond a basic level because of the “finite nature of the amount of time to learn what students are required to learn in order to be a skilled psychotherapist, regardless of whether they have the raw talent for it.” Outcomes of pharmacologic therapies are easier to measure, and that is another reason psychotherapy is “troublesome,” he said. Most psychotherapists prefer not having to justify its use to third-party payers.
The tension between the therapist and insurers should not automatically be a deterrent to expanding access to talk therapy according to the meeting’s program chair, Scott T. Aaronson, MD, director of clinical research at the Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore. “I don’t think that psychoanalysis has ever been a great friend of insurance. I think we need to educate insurance companies on what psychotherapy means. Instead, we just sort of allow them to make rules. It’s been a one-way street that needs to change,” Dr. Aaronson said in an interview.
He and Dr. Michels said data collection on patient outcomes would help. Collecting the hospitalization rates, morbidity and mortality, and medical care costs of people who have received psychotherapy may be worthwhile and would be fairly straightforward to do, according to Dr. Aaronson. “I would worry [about factoring in] those who have been getting psychiatric care off the grid skewing statistics, but if your patient population is of a moderate-income group, very few of those people could afford private care.”
Even if clinicians do not include newer psychoanalytic techniques in practice, Dr. Aaronson said, they “should keep up to date on the trends, and be aware that for many patients, modalities such as mentalization have been exquisitely helpful.”
Neither Dr. Michels nor Dr. Aaronson had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Most psychiatrists are familiar with many of the basic tenets of psychoanalysis, but they probably aren’t relying on its therapeutic powers in practice as much as they are pharmacotherapy, according to an expert.
“There’s a great deal of discussion about whether psychoanalysis has an adequate evidence base. That’s a popular concept. It’s not so much about whether practitioners want to use it, but whether or not they can defend using it in their dialogs with insurance companies, government agencies, and other sources of support,” Robert Michels, MD, a Walsh McDermott University Professor of Medicine, and professor of psychiatry, at Cornell University, New York, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists. “My summary is that it has less adequate data supporting it [than pharmacologic interventions]. … There is, however, convincing evidence that all of these treatments, ranging from cognitive-behavioral therapy to [dialectical behavior therapy], to dynamic psychoanalysis, to mentalization-based treatment, do have an effect.”
“The SSRI probably did more to change psychotherapy than any other evolutionary change in the theory of psychotherapy,” Dr. Michels said. “In the beginning, [pharmacologic treatments] were not terribly useful to the patients of psychoanalysis, because they were too toxic or too psychologically disturbing to use in people without major psychiatric problems. Now, [there is] intense competition from biologic treatments.”
Whereas the goal of pharmacotherapy is cure, the point of psychoanalysis is to derive meaning from neurosis, and ultimately, from life. A sea change in thought about how psychoanalysis should be conducted was well underway before the advent of fluoxetine, however. With the death in 1939 of Sigmund Freud, MD, the founder of psychoanalysis, a wave of theories began to wash over the field. Most of those theories do not see memories as the enemy, or detachment from the patient as appropriate, according to Dr. Michels.
And while the form might vary across the different approaches, the function is the same. “The goal is no longer to recover the lost memory of the childhood trauma. More important is the journey in attempting to discover it,” Dr. Michels said.
Freud avoided seeing his patients as having personality disorders, while the next generations of psychotherapists largely embraced and conceptualized diagnoses, going beyond symptoms and instead focusing on the person’s predisposition to symptom formation. Psychotherapy today sees pathology not as something to be cured but as a reaction to problems tied to everyday living. It assumes that a more effective reaction to those problems can be learned.
Rather than shun what were once considered obstacles – resistance, enactment, transference, countertransference, and working through interpretations – the psychotherapist uses those to establish a relationship with the patient; emotions stirred by the therapist become important markers of patterns that have persisted in the person’s life that prevent forming smooth relationships, and vice versa. “In the new model, the therapist is an actively engaged participant whose core skill is to stay fully involved and interconnected while also being able to step back and say, ‘What is happening here?’ ” Dr. Michels said. “Transference and countertransference are essential tools to the therapeutic process. Hopefully, we change the patient’s attitude to his own mental life and toward others around him. We have a much more open, broader, wider way of dealing with patients, and we are much more humble about what we know before the treatment starts.”
In an interview, Dr. Michels said this has been especially helpful in treating people with borderline personality disorder, for whom the neutral face of a therapist can often be a trigger. “You end up being a better player through collaboration. If you carry the argument to its extreme, we’d say it doesn’t make any difference if you discover the flaw.”
Also in the interview, Dr. Michels said that, while many therapists are aware that psychotherapy has evolved and that it is effective, it is still not commonly taught in medical schools beyond a basic level because of the “finite nature of the amount of time to learn what students are required to learn in order to be a skilled psychotherapist, regardless of whether they have the raw talent for it.” Outcomes of pharmacologic therapies are easier to measure, and that is another reason psychotherapy is “troublesome,” he said. Most psychotherapists prefer not having to justify its use to third-party payers.
The tension between the therapist and insurers should not automatically be a deterrent to expanding access to talk therapy according to the meeting’s program chair, Scott T. Aaronson, MD, director of clinical research at the Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore. “I don’t think that psychoanalysis has ever been a great friend of insurance. I think we need to educate insurance companies on what psychotherapy means. Instead, we just sort of allow them to make rules. It’s been a one-way street that needs to change,” Dr. Aaronson said in an interview.
He and Dr. Michels said data collection on patient outcomes would help. Collecting the hospitalization rates, morbidity and mortality, and medical care costs of people who have received psychotherapy may be worthwhile and would be fairly straightforward to do, according to Dr. Aaronson. “I would worry [about factoring in] those who have been getting psychiatric care off the grid skewing statistics, but if your patient population is of a moderate-income group, very few of those people could afford private care.”
Even if clinicians do not include newer psychoanalytic techniques in practice, Dr. Aaronson said, they “should keep up to date on the trends, and be aware that for many patients, modalities such as mentalization have been exquisitely helpful.”
Neither Dr. Michels nor Dr. Aaronson had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Most psychiatrists are familiar with many of the basic tenets of psychoanalysis, but they probably aren’t relying on its therapeutic powers in practice as much as they are pharmacotherapy, according to an expert.
“There’s a great deal of discussion about whether psychoanalysis has an adequate evidence base. That’s a popular concept. It’s not so much about whether practitioners want to use it, but whether or not they can defend using it in their dialogs with insurance companies, government agencies, and other sources of support,” Robert Michels, MD, a Walsh McDermott University Professor of Medicine, and professor of psychiatry, at Cornell University, New York, said at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists. “My summary is that it has less adequate data supporting it [than pharmacologic interventions]. … There is, however, convincing evidence that all of these treatments, ranging from cognitive-behavioral therapy to [dialectical behavior therapy], to dynamic psychoanalysis, to mentalization-based treatment, do have an effect.”
“The SSRI probably did more to change psychotherapy than any other evolutionary change in the theory of psychotherapy,” Dr. Michels said. “In the beginning, [pharmacologic treatments] were not terribly useful to the patients of psychoanalysis, because they were too toxic or too psychologically disturbing to use in people without major psychiatric problems. Now, [there is] intense competition from biologic treatments.”
Whereas the goal of pharmacotherapy is cure, the point of psychoanalysis is to derive meaning from neurosis, and ultimately, from life. A sea change in thought about how psychoanalysis should be conducted was well underway before the advent of fluoxetine, however. With the death in 1939 of Sigmund Freud, MD, the founder of psychoanalysis, a wave of theories began to wash over the field. Most of those theories do not see memories as the enemy, or detachment from the patient as appropriate, according to Dr. Michels.
And while the form might vary across the different approaches, the function is the same. “The goal is no longer to recover the lost memory of the childhood trauma. More important is the journey in attempting to discover it,” Dr. Michels said.
Freud avoided seeing his patients as having personality disorders, while the next generations of psychotherapists largely embraced and conceptualized diagnoses, going beyond symptoms and instead focusing on the person’s predisposition to symptom formation. Psychotherapy today sees pathology not as something to be cured but as a reaction to problems tied to everyday living. It assumes that a more effective reaction to those problems can be learned.
Rather than shun what were once considered obstacles – resistance, enactment, transference, countertransference, and working through interpretations – the psychotherapist uses those to establish a relationship with the patient; emotions stirred by the therapist become important markers of patterns that have persisted in the person’s life that prevent forming smooth relationships, and vice versa. “In the new model, the therapist is an actively engaged participant whose core skill is to stay fully involved and interconnected while also being able to step back and say, ‘What is happening here?’ ” Dr. Michels said. “Transference and countertransference are essential tools to the therapeutic process. Hopefully, we change the patient’s attitude to his own mental life and toward others around him. We have a much more open, broader, wider way of dealing with patients, and we are much more humble about what we know before the treatment starts.”
In an interview, Dr. Michels said this has been especially helpful in treating people with borderline personality disorder, for whom the neutral face of a therapist can often be a trigger. “You end up being a better player through collaboration. If you carry the argument to its extreme, we’d say it doesn’t make any difference if you discover the flaw.”
Also in the interview, Dr. Michels said that, while many therapists are aware that psychotherapy has evolved and that it is effective, it is still not commonly taught in medical schools beyond a basic level because of the “finite nature of the amount of time to learn what students are required to learn in order to be a skilled psychotherapist, regardless of whether they have the raw talent for it.” Outcomes of pharmacologic therapies are easier to measure, and that is another reason psychotherapy is “troublesome,” he said. Most psychotherapists prefer not having to justify its use to third-party payers.
The tension between the therapist and insurers should not automatically be a deterrent to expanding access to talk therapy according to the meeting’s program chair, Scott T. Aaronson, MD, director of clinical research at the Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore. “I don’t think that psychoanalysis has ever been a great friend of insurance. I think we need to educate insurance companies on what psychotherapy means. Instead, we just sort of allow them to make rules. It’s been a one-way street that needs to change,” Dr. Aaronson said in an interview.
He and Dr. Michels said data collection on patient outcomes would help. Collecting the hospitalization rates, morbidity and mortality, and medical care costs of people who have received psychotherapy may be worthwhile and would be fairly straightforward to do, according to Dr. Aaronson. “I would worry [about factoring in] those who have been getting psychiatric care off the grid skewing statistics, but if your patient population is of a moderate-income group, very few of those people could afford private care.”
Even if clinicians do not include newer psychoanalytic techniques in practice, Dr. Aaronson said, they “should keep up to date on the trends, and be aware that for many patients, modalities such as mentalization have been exquisitely helpful.”
Neither Dr. Michels nor Dr. Aaronson had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS ANNUAL MEETING
Expert to psychiatrists: Collaborative care is here to stay
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Whether or not the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed, replaced, reviled, or revered should not deter psychiatrists and primary care physicians from seeking to work together, according to a leading expert on integrating mental health care in medical practice.
“Community-based psychiatrists should be focused on finding ways to help create integrated models of care, both in health systems and in other settings, to provide mental health specialty support for primary care providers, regardless of whatever else is going on [in Washington],” Paul Summergrad, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.
“If Medicaid expansion is replaced with block grants, that would lead to less care in general for Medicaid recipients,” Dr. Summergrad said in the interview. “It depends on how the states would view their costs of care, and how they would view the medical psychiatric issues.”
Since Medicaid is the largest payer of mental and behavioral health services in the country with reimbursable models of collaborative care, cutting funding for those services would sting. “There’s evidence that addressing mental and behavioral health issues keeps medical costs low,” said Dr. Summergrad, a past president of the American Psychiatric Association.
In his talk, Dr. Summergrad pointed to the now decade-old IMPACT study (Improving Mood: Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment) which showed that patients screened for depression when presenting with chronic medical issues had lower overall medical costs over time.
He also referred to a more recent study in a large Utah health system that showed overall cost savings, far-fewer emergency department admissions, and better patient outcomes across a wide range of medical issues, which were achieved when mental health services were integrated into routine care: in all, a $12 million investment resulted in $52 million in savings after 4 years (JAMA. 2016;316[8]:826-34). “Utah is not exactly a blue state, but it worked for them,” Dr. Summergrad said. The key was that physicians “embraced normalizing mental health care,” he said.
As for how any changes to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, which is predicated largely on team-based care for higher reimbursements, Dr. Summergrad said cash-only psychiatrists should be thinking about how to collaborate with primary care providers. “I think the important message at this point is that, however this works, we’ll have to think about integrated care.”
In an interview, Lee H. Beecher, MD, agreed. In fact, Dr. Beecher said that, in his state of Minnesota, engaging with patients on a cash-only basis is the only way a psychiatrist can have a private practice and provide valuable, essential communication with primary care physicians. “Direct-pay physicians are uniquely able to actively facilitate communication,” said Dr. Beecher, president of the nonprofit Minnesota Physician-Patient Alliance. “Most of this is done by phone, directly, with the primary care clinician – rather than inputting and sending an electronic health record.”
Dr. Summergrad had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Whether or not the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed, replaced, reviled, or revered should not deter psychiatrists and primary care physicians from seeking to work together, according to a leading expert on integrating mental health care in medical practice.
“Community-based psychiatrists should be focused on finding ways to help create integrated models of care, both in health systems and in other settings, to provide mental health specialty support for primary care providers, regardless of whatever else is going on [in Washington],” Paul Summergrad, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.
“If Medicaid expansion is replaced with block grants, that would lead to less care in general for Medicaid recipients,” Dr. Summergrad said in the interview. “It depends on how the states would view their costs of care, and how they would view the medical psychiatric issues.”
Since Medicaid is the largest payer of mental and behavioral health services in the country with reimbursable models of collaborative care, cutting funding for those services would sting. “There’s evidence that addressing mental and behavioral health issues keeps medical costs low,” said Dr. Summergrad, a past president of the American Psychiatric Association.
In his talk, Dr. Summergrad pointed to the now decade-old IMPACT study (Improving Mood: Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment) which showed that patients screened for depression when presenting with chronic medical issues had lower overall medical costs over time.
He also referred to a more recent study in a large Utah health system that showed overall cost savings, far-fewer emergency department admissions, and better patient outcomes across a wide range of medical issues, which were achieved when mental health services were integrated into routine care: in all, a $12 million investment resulted in $52 million in savings after 4 years (JAMA. 2016;316[8]:826-34). “Utah is not exactly a blue state, but it worked for them,” Dr. Summergrad said. The key was that physicians “embraced normalizing mental health care,” he said.
As for how any changes to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, which is predicated largely on team-based care for higher reimbursements, Dr. Summergrad said cash-only psychiatrists should be thinking about how to collaborate with primary care providers. “I think the important message at this point is that, however this works, we’ll have to think about integrated care.”
In an interview, Lee H. Beecher, MD, agreed. In fact, Dr. Beecher said that, in his state of Minnesota, engaging with patients on a cash-only basis is the only way a psychiatrist can have a private practice and provide valuable, essential communication with primary care physicians. “Direct-pay physicians are uniquely able to actively facilitate communication,” said Dr. Beecher, president of the nonprofit Minnesota Physician-Patient Alliance. “Most of this is done by phone, directly, with the primary care clinician – rather than inputting and sending an electronic health record.”
Dr. Summergrad had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZ. – Whether or not the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is repealed, replaced, reviled, or revered should not deter psychiatrists and primary care physicians from seeking to work together, according to a leading expert on integrating mental health care in medical practice.
“Community-based psychiatrists should be focused on finding ways to help create integrated models of care, both in health systems and in other settings, to provide mental health specialty support for primary care providers, regardless of whatever else is going on [in Washington],” Paul Summergrad, MD, said in an interview at the annual meeting of the American College of Psychiatrists.
“If Medicaid expansion is replaced with block grants, that would lead to less care in general for Medicaid recipients,” Dr. Summergrad said in the interview. “It depends on how the states would view their costs of care, and how they would view the medical psychiatric issues.”
Since Medicaid is the largest payer of mental and behavioral health services in the country with reimbursable models of collaborative care, cutting funding for those services would sting. “There’s evidence that addressing mental and behavioral health issues keeps medical costs low,” said Dr. Summergrad, a past president of the American Psychiatric Association.
In his talk, Dr. Summergrad pointed to the now decade-old IMPACT study (Improving Mood: Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment) which showed that patients screened for depression when presenting with chronic medical issues had lower overall medical costs over time.
He also referred to a more recent study in a large Utah health system that showed overall cost savings, far-fewer emergency department admissions, and better patient outcomes across a wide range of medical issues, which were achieved when mental health services were integrated into routine care: in all, a $12 million investment resulted in $52 million in savings after 4 years (JAMA. 2016;316[8]:826-34). “Utah is not exactly a blue state, but it worked for them,” Dr. Summergrad said. The key was that physicians “embraced normalizing mental health care,” he said.
As for how any changes to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, which is predicated largely on team-based care for higher reimbursements, Dr. Summergrad said cash-only psychiatrists should be thinking about how to collaborate with primary care providers. “I think the important message at this point is that, however this works, we’ll have to think about integrated care.”
In an interview, Lee H. Beecher, MD, agreed. In fact, Dr. Beecher said that, in his state of Minnesota, engaging with patients on a cash-only basis is the only way a psychiatrist can have a private practice and provide valuable, essential communication with primary care physicians. “Direct-pay physicians are uniquely able to actively facilitate communication,” said Dr. Beecher, president of the nonprofit Minnesota Physician-Patient Alliance. “Most of this is done by phone, directly, with the primary care clinician – rather than inputting and sending an electronic health record.”
Dr. Summergrad had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS ANNUAL MEETING
Sarcoidosis doubles hospitalized infection risk
Persons with sarcoidosis were found to have double the risk of hospitalization, compared with age-matched controls in a population-based cohort study that also linked glucocorticoid use with an increased risk of hospitalization in this group.
Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project record-linkage system, Patompong Ungprasert, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues identified 345 incident cases of sarcoidosis recorded between 1976 and 2013, confirmed by individual medical records (Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb 8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-750OC). Using random selection, each patient was age- and sex-matched with sarcoidosis-free controls taken from the same database. Medical records across the study were examined for community-acquired infections requiring hospitalization that occurred after the index date or the date of diagnosis.
Dr. Ungprasert and his coinvestigators found that those with sarcoidosis had double the risk of all forms of specific hospitalized infection when compared with controls – a 2.00 hazard ratio (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.84). The results were similar when adjusted for infection risk factors: 2.13 HR (95% CI, 1.35-3.34).
The risk of hospitalized infection in the sarcoidosis arm was higher than in controls regardless of disease stage: an HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.12-2.58, P = .013) in those with Stage I; an HR of 2.00 (95% CI, 1.22-3.29, P = .006) among those with stage II; and an HR of 2.63 (95% CI, 1.58-4.39, P less than .001) in those with Stage III and Stage IV disease.
Biopsies taken in 251 cases resulted in 229 positive results for noncaseating granuloma, and just over half of patients had stage I disease. Stage II disease was found in 29%, Stage III in 15%, and Stage IV in 2%.
Patients in the sarcoidosis group who had not been exposed to immunosuppressive treatment had significantly higher risk of hospitalization with an HR of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.16-2.60; P = .008) when compared with controls. The risk was even higher in study patients who had received immunosuppressive therapy: an HR of 2.41 (95% CI, 1.60-3.64; P less than .001), when compared with controls. Less than half of all sarcoidosis patients required immunosuppressive therapy at any point during follow-up: about 37% by year 30 after original diagnosis. Oral glucocorticoids were the most commonly prescribed medication, used in 113 cases.
A baseline diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was associated with an overall increased risk of hospitalized infection, with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (95% CI, 1.01-1.32). A baseline forced vital capacity was associated with an increased hospitalized pneumonia risk with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in forced vital capacity (95% CI, 1.01-1.32).
Although the use of immunosuppressive agents was not significantly associated with the risk of hospitalized infection (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.94-2.19), current use of oral glucocorticoids, whether alone or as adjunct to immunosuppressive therapy, significantly predicted risk of infection in patients with sarcoidosis, with an HR of 3.03 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) for oral glucocorticoids up to 10 mg per day, and an HR of 4.48 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) in patients taking oral glucocorticoids at more than 10 mg per day, when compared with controls.
In an interview, Dr. Ungprasert said the results were not surprising, but provided the following takeaways from this study for physicians caring for patients with sarcoidosis.
“These patients are at an increased risk of serious infection and should seek medical attention as soon as possible when they develop symptoms of infection, such as fever or chills,” he said in an interview. “Keeping current with vaccinations is also important for them.”
Dr. Ungprasert also said the study serves as a reminder to use oral glucocorticoids judiciously. “When considering their use, the physician should keep in mind that a large number of patients with sarcoidosis will have a spontaneous resolution of the disease.”
There were no relevant disclosures. The study was funded in part by the National Institute on Aging.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Persons with sarcoidosis were found to have double the risk of hospitalization, compared with age-matched controls in a population-based cohort study that also linked glucocorticoid use with an increased risk of hospitalization in this group.
Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project record-linkage system, Patompong Ungprasert, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues identified 345 incident cases of sarcoidosis recorded between 1976 and 2013, confirmed by individual medical records (Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb 8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-750OC). Using random selection, each patient was age- and sex-matched with sarcoidosis-free controls taken from the same database. Medical records across the study were examined for community-acquired infections requiring hospitalization that occurred after the index date or the date of diagnosis.
Dr. Ungprasert and his coinvestigators found that those with sarcoidosis had double the risk of all forms of specific hospitalized infection when compared with controls – a 2.00 hazard ratio (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.84). The results were similar when adjusted for infection risk factors: 2.13 HR (95% CI, 1.35-3.34).
The risk of hospitalized infection in the sarcoidosis arm was higher than in controls regardless of disease stage: an HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.12-2.58, P = .013) in those with Stage I; an HR of 2.00 (95% CI, 1.22-3.29, P = .006) among those with stage II; and an HR of 2.63 (95% CI, 1.58-4.39, P less than .001) in those with Stage III and Stage IV disease.
Biopsies taken in 251 cases resulted in 229 positive results for noncaseating granuloma, and just over half of patients had stage I disease. Stage II disease was found in 29%, Stage III in 15%, and Stage IV in 2%.
Patients in the sarcoidosis group who had not been exposed to immunosuppressive treatment had significantly higher risk of hospitalization with an HR of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.16-2.60; P = .008) when compared with controls. The risk was even higher in study patients who had received immunosuppressive therapy: an HR of 2.41 (95% CI, 1.60-3.64; P less than .001), when compared with controls. Less than half of all sarcoidosis patients required immunosuppressive therapy at any point during follow-up: about 37% by year 30 after original diagnosis. Oral glucocorticoids were the most commonly prescribed medication, used in 113 cases.
A baseline diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was associated with an overall increased risk of hospitalized infection, with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (95% CI, 1.01-1.32). A baseline forced vital capacity was associated with an increased hospitalized pneumonia risk with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in forced vital capacity (95% CI, 1.01-1.32).
Although the use of immunosuppressive agents was not significantly associated with the risk of hospitalized infection (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.94-2.19), current use of oral glucocorticoids, whether alone or as adjunct to immunosuppressive therapy, significantly predicted risk of infection in patients with sarcoidosis, with an HR of 3.03 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) for oral glucocorticoids up to 10 mg per day, and an HR of 4.48 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) in patients taking oral glucocorticoids at more than 10 mg per day, when compared with controls.
In an interview, Dr. Ungprasert said the results were not surprising, but provided the following takeaways from this study for physicians caring for patients with sarcoidosis.
“These patients are at an increased risk of serious infection and should seek medical attention as soon as possible when they develop symptoms of infection, such as fever or chills,” he said in an interview. “Keeping current with vaccinations is also important for them.”
Dr. Ungprasert also said the study serves as a reminder to use oral glucocorticoids judiciously. “When considering their use, the physician should keep in mind that a large number of patients with sarcoidosis will have a spontaneous resolution of the disease.”
There were no relevant disclosures. The study was funded in part by the National Institute on Aging.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Persons with sarcoidosis were found to have double the risk of hospitalization, compared with age-matched controls in a population-based cohort study that also linked glucocorticoid use with an increased risk of hospitalization in this group.
Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project record-linkage system, Patompong Ungprasert, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues identified 345 incident cases of sarcoidosis recorded between 1976 and 2013, confirmed by individual medical records (Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Feb 8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-750OC). Using random selection, each patient was age- and sex-matched with sarcoidosis-free controls taken from the same database. Medical records across the study were examined for community-acquired infections requiring hospitalization that occurred after the index date or the date of diagnosis.
Dr. Ungprasert and his coinvestigators found that those with sarcoidosis had double the risk of all forms of specific hospitalized infection when compared with controls – a 2.00 hazard ratio (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.84). The results were similar when adjusted for infection risk factors: 2.13 HR (95% CI, 1.35-3.34).
The risk of hospitalized infection in the sarcoidosis arm was higher than in controls regardless of disease stage: an HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.12-2.58, P = .013) in those with Stage I; an HR of 2.00 (95% CI, 1.22-3.29, P = .006) among those with stage II; and an HR of 2.63 (95% CI, 1.58-4.39, P less than .001) in those with Stage III and Stage IV disease.
Biopsies taken in 251 cases resulted in 229 positive results for noncaseating granuloma, and just over half of patients had stage I disease. Stage II disease was found in 29%, Stage III in 15%, and Stage IV in 2%.
Patients in the sarcoidosis group who had not been exposed to immunosuppressive treatment had significantly higher risk of hospitalization with an HR of 1.73 (95% CI, 1.16-2.60; P = .008) when compared with controls. The risk was even higher in study patients who had received immunosuppressive therapy: an HR of 2.41 (95% CI, 1.60-3.64; P less than .001), when compared with controls. Less than half of all sarcoidosis patients required immunosuppressive therapy at any point during follow-up: about 37% by year 30 after original diagnosis. Oral glucocorticoids were the most commonly prescribed medication, used in 113 cases.
A baseline diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was associated with an overall increased risk of hospitalized infection, with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (95% CI, 1.01-1.32). A baseline forced vital capacity was associated with an increased hospitalized pneumonia risk with an HR of 1.15 per decrease of 10% predicted in forced vital capacity (95% CI, 1.01-1.32).
Although the use of immunosuppressive agents was not significantly associated with the risk of hospitalized infection (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.94-2.19), current use of oral glucocorticoids, whether alone or as adjunct to immunosuppressive therapy, significantly predicted risk of infection in patients with sarcoidosis, with an HR of 3.03 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) for oral glucocorticoids up to 10 mg per day, and an HR of 4.48 (95% CI, 1.33-6.90) in patients taking oral glucocorticoids at more than 10 mg per day, when compared with controls.
In an interview, Dr. Ungprasert said the results were not surprising, but provided the following takeaways from this study for physicians caring for patients with sarcoidosis.
“These patients are at an increased risk of serious infection and should seek medical attention as soon as possible when they develop symptoms of infection, such as fever or chills,” he said in an interview. “Keeping current with vaccinations is also important for them.”
Dr. Ungprasert also said the study serves as a reminder to use oral glucocorticoids judiciously. “When considering their use, the physician should keep in mind that a large number of patients with sarcoidosis will have a spontaneous resolution of the disease.”
There were no relevant disclosures. The study was funded in part by the National Institute on Aging.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
FROM ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: 345 patients with sarcoidosis had a hazard ratio of 2.00 (95% CI, 1.41-2.84) for hospitalized infection, compared with controls.
Data source: Olmsted County, Minn. epidemiology records from 1976 to 2013.
Disclosures: There were no relevant disclosures. The study was funded in part by the National Institute on Aging.
Inactivated hepatitis A vaccine shows promise in 5-year study
, a study has shown.
In October 2008, a team of investigators in China led by Zhilun Zhang of the Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, randomly assigned 332 children aged 18-60 months with prevaccination anti-HAV antibody titers of less than 20 mIU/mL to receive either one dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine or one dose of live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccine. Both groups were followed through December 2013, with assessments of anti-HAV antibody concentrations at years 1, 2, and 5 post vaccination. In all, 182 successfully completed the study, meeting all requirements, including providing serum samples at each time point.
Titer levels were 76.3% mIU/mL and 66.8mIU/mL for the inactivated and live vaccines at 5 years, respectively. No clinical hepatitis A case was reported.
The study appears online in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1278329).
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
, a study has shown.
In October 2008, a team of investigators in China led by Zhilun Zhang of the Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, randomly assigned 332 children aged 18-60 months with prevaccination anti-HAV antibody titers of less than 20 mIU/mL to receive either one dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine or one dose of live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccine. Both groups were followed through December 2013, with assessments of anti-HAV antibody concentrations at years 1, 2, and 5 post vaccination. In all, 182 successfully completed the study, meeting all requirements, including providing serum samples at each time point.
Titer levels were 76.3% mIU/mL and 66.8mIU/mL for the inactivated and live vaccines at 5 years, respectively. No clinical hepatitis A case was reported.
The study appears online in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1278329).
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
, a study has shown.
In October 2008, a team of investigators in China led by Zhilun Zhang of the Tianjin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, randomly assigned 332 children aged 18-60 months with prevaccination anti-HAV antibody titers of less than 20 mIU/mL to receive either one dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine or one dose of live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccine. Both groups were followed through December 2013, with assessments of anti-HAV antibody concentrations at years 1, 2, and 5 post vaccination. In all, 182 successfully completed the study, meeting all requirements, including providing serum samples at each time point.
Titer levels were 76.3% mIU/mL and 66.8mIU/mL for the inactivated and live vaccines at 5 years, respectively. No clinical hepatitis A case was reported.
The study appears online in Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1278329).
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
FROM HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Watch and wait often better than resecting in ground-glass opacities
Three years of follow-up is adequate for partially solid ground-glass opacity lesions that do not progress, while pure ground-glass opacity lesions that show no progression may require further follow-up care, a study suggests.
The results of the study strengthen the argument for taking a “watch and wait” approach, and raise the question of whether patient outcomes can be improved without more precise diagnostic criteria, said study author Shigei Sawada, MD, PhD, a researcher at the Shikoku Cancer Center in Matsuyama, Japan, and his colleagues. They drew these conclusions from performing a long-term outcome investigation of 226 patients with pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesions shown by CT imaging to be 3 cm or less in diameter.
Once established that the disease has stabilized in a pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesion, “the frequency of CT examinations could probably be reduced or ... discontinued,” the investigators wrote. The study is published online in Chest (2017;151[2]:308-15).
Because ground-glass opacities often can remain unchanged for years, reflexively choosing resection can result in a patient’s being overtreated. Meanwhile, the use of increasingly accurate imaging technology likely means detection rates of such lesions will continue to increase, leaving clinicians to wonder about optimal management protocols, particularly since several guidance documents include differing recommendations on the timing of surveillance CTs for patients with stable disease.
The study includes 10-15 years of follow-up data on the 226 patients, registered between 2000 and 2005. Across the study, there were nearly twice as many women as men, all with an average age of 61 years. About a quarter had multiple ground-glass opacities; about a quarter also had partially consolidated lesions. Of the 124 patients who’d had resections, all but one was stage IA. The most prominent histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in situ in 63 patients, followed by 39 patients with minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, and 19 with lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas. Five patients had papillary-predominant adenocarcinomas.
Roughly one-quarter of the cohort did not receive follow-up examinations after 68 months, as their lesions either remained stable or were shown to have reduced in size. Another 45 continued to undergo follow-up examinations.
After initial detection of a pure ground-glass opacity, the CT examination schedule was every 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually. After detection of a mixed ground-glass opacity, a CT examination was given every 3 months for the first year, then reduced to every 6 months thereafter. In patients with stable disease, the individual clinicians determined whether to obtain additional CT follow-up imaging.
A ground-glass lesion was determined to have progressed if the diameter increased, as it did in about a third of patients; or, if there was new or increased consolidation, as there was in about two-thirds of patients. The table of consolidation/tumor ratios (CTR) used included CTR zero, also referred to as a pure ground-glass lesion; CTR 1-25; CTR 26-50; and CTR equal to or greater than 51. When there were multiple lesions, the largest one detected was the target.
All cases of patients with a CTR of more than zero were identified within 3 years, while 13.6% of patients with a CTR of zero required more than 3 years to identify tumor growth. Aggressive cancer was detected in 4% of patients with a CTR of zero and in 70% of those with a CTR greater than 25% (P less than .001). Aggressive cancer was seen in 46% of those with consolidation/tumor ratios that increased during follow-up and in 8% of those whose tumors increased in diameter (P less than .007). After about 10 years of follow-up after resection, 1.6% of cancers recurred.
There were two deaths from lung cancer among the study’s patients. The first, a 54-year-old man, had an acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma, 5 mm in diameter with a consolidation/tumor ratio of 0.75 that increased during follow-up. The recurrence developed in the mediastinal lymph nodes 51 months after resection surgery. The second patient had a papillary-predominant adenocarcinoma appearing as a pure ground-glass opacity 27 mm in diameter. The consolidation/tumor ratio also increased during follow-up, with recurrences in the bone and mediastinal lymph nodes at 30 months post resectioning.
Neither patient was re-biopsied, and both were diagnosed according to CT imaging alone. There were 13 other patient deaths from non–lung cancer related causes.
Given the 3-year timespan necessary to detect tumor growth in all but the CTR zero group, and the study’s size and long-term nature, the investigators concluded that a follow-up period of 3 years for patients with part-solid lesions “should be adequate.”
By contrast, CHEST recommends CT scans be done for at least 3 years in patients with pure ground-glass lesions and between 3 and 5 years in the other CTR groups with nodules measuring 8 mm or less. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline advises low-dose CT scanning until a patient is no longer eligible for definitive treatment.
Dr. Sawada and his colleagues did not use an exact criterion for tumor growth in their study, such as a precise ratio of increase in size or consolidation, in part because at the time of the study the most common form of CT evaluation was visual inspection; they reported that tumors exhibiting growth most commonly increased between 2 and 3 mm in either size or consolidation. “Evaluations based on visual inspections can be imprecise, and different physicians may arrive at different judgments,” the investigators wrote. “However, [the use of] computer-aided diagnosis systems are not yet commonly applied in clinical practice.”
Although imaging should have guided the decision to resect, according to Dr. Sawada and his coauthors, two-thirds of patients in the study were given the procedure even though their lesions were not shown by CT scans to have progressed. This was done either at the patient’s request, or per the clinical judgment of a physician.
Also becoming more specific about changing CTRs would be helpful in developing management protocols, according to Dr. Detterbeck. “In my opinion, we need to start factoring in the rate of change. A gradual 2 mm increase in size over a period of 5 years may not be an appropriate trigger for resection.”
Neither the investigators nor the editorial writer had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: This study provides further support that the biology of ground-glass and part-solid nodules is different than fully solid nodules – and we should not be in a rush to resect these lesions. While the recommendations are likely to evolve over time as more information becomes available, this conservative approach toward nonsolid nodules is currently adopted in the Lung-RADS guidelines.
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: This study provides further support that the biology of ground-glass and part-solid nodules is different than fully solid nodules – and we should not be in a rush to resect these lesions. While the recommendations are likely to evolve over time as more information becomes available, this conservative approach toward nonsolid nodules is currently adopted in the Lung-RADS guidelines.
Eric Gartman, MD, FCCP, comments: This study provides further support that the biology of ground-glass and part-solid nodules is different than fully solid nodules – and we should not be in a rush to resect these lesions. While the recommendations are likely to evolve over time as more information becomes available, this conservative approach toward nonsolid nodules is currently adopted in the Lung-RADS guidelines.
Three years of follow-up is adequate for partially solid ground-glass opacity lesions that do not progress, while pure ground-glass opacity lesions that show no progression may require further follow-up care, a study suggests.
The results of the study strengthen the argument for taking a “watch and wait” approach, and raise the question of whether patient outcomes can be improved without more precise diagnostic criteria, said study author Shigei Sawada, MD, PhD, a researcher at the Shikoku Cancer Center in Matsuyama, Japan, and his colleagues. They drew these conclusions from performing a long-term outcome investigation of 226 patients with pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesions shown by CT imaging to be 3 cm or less in diameter.
Once established that the disease has stabilized in a pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesion, “the frequency of CT examinations could probably be reduced or ... discontinued,” the investigators wrote. The study is published online in Chest (2017;151[2]:308-15).
Because ground-glass opacities often can remain unchanged for years, reflexively choosing resection can result in a patient’s being overtreated. Meanwhile, the use of increasingly accurate imaging technology likely means detection rates of such lesions will continue to increase, leaving clinicians to wonder about optimal management protocols, particularly since several guidance documents include differing recommendations on the timing of surveillance CTs for patients with stable disease.
The study includes 10-15 years of follow-up data on the 226 patients, registered between 2000 and 2005. Across the study, there were nearly twice as many women as men, all with an average age of 61 years. About a quarter had multiple ground-glass opacities; about a quarter also had partially consolidated lesions. Of the 124 patients who’d had resections, all but one was stage IA. The most prominent histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in situ in 63 patients, followed by 39 patients with minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, and 19 with lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas. Five patients had papillary-predominant adenocarcinomas.
Roughly one-quarter of the cohort did not receive follow-up examinations after 68 months, as their lesions either remained stable or were shown to have reduced in size. Another 45 continued to undergo follow-up examinations.
After initial detection of a pure ground-glass opacity, the CT examination schedule was every 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually. After detection of a mixed ground-glass opacity, a CT examination was given every 3 months for the first year, then reduced to every 6 months thereafter. In patients with stable disease, the individual clinicians determined whether to obtain additional CT follow-up imaging.
A ground-glass lesion was determined to have progressed if the diameter increased, as it did in about a third of patients; or, if there was new or increased consolidation, as there was in about two-thirds of patients. The table of consolidation/tumor ratios (CTR) used included CTR zero, also referred to as a pure ground-glass lesion; CTR 1-25; CTR 26-50; and CTR equal to or greater than 51. When there were multiple lesions, the largest one detected was the target.
All cases of patients with a CTR of more than zero were identified within 3 years, while 13.6% of patients with a CTR of zero required more than 3 years to identify tumor growth. Aggressive cancer was detected in 4% of patients with a CTR of zero and in 70% of those with a CTR greater than 25% (P less than .001). Aggressive cancer was seen in 46% of those with consolidation/tumor ratios that increased during follow-up and in 8% of those whose tumors increased in diameter (P less than .007). After about 10 years of follow-up after resection, 1.6% of cancers recurred.
There were two deaths from lung cancer among the study’s patients. The first, a 54-year-old man, had an acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma, 5 mm in diameter with a consolidation/tumor ratio of 0.75 that increased during follow-up. The recurrence developed in the mediastinal lymph nodes 51 months after resection surgery. The second patient had a papillary-predominant adenocarcinoma appearing as a pure ground-glass opacity 27 mm in diameter. The consolidation/tumor ratio also increased during follow-up, with recurrences in the bone and mediastinal lymph nodes at 30 months post resectioning.
Neither patient was re-biopsied, and both were diagnosed according to CT imaging alone. There were 13 other patient deaths from non–lung cancer related causes.
Given the 3-year timespan necessary to detect tumor growth in all but the CTR zero group, and the study’s size and long-term nature, the investigators concluded that a follow-up period of 3 years for patients with part-solid lesions “should be adequate.”
By contrast, CHEST recommends CT scans be done for at least 3 years in patients with pure ground-glass lesions and between 3 and 5 years in the other CTR groups with nodules measuring 8 mm or less. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline advises low-dose CT scanning until a patient is no longer eligible for definitive treatment.
Dr. Sawada and his colleagues did not use an exact criterion for tumor growth in their study, such as a precise ratio of increase in size or consolidation, in part because at the time of the study the most common form of CT evaluation was visual inspection; they reported that tumors exhibiting growth most commonly increased between 2 and 3 mm in either size or consolidation. “Evaluations based on visual inspections can be imprecise, and different physicians may arrive at different judgments,” the investigators wrote. “However, [the use of] computer-aided diagnosis systems are not yet commonly applied in clinical practice.”
Although imaging should have guided the decision to resect, according to Dr. Sawada and his coauthors, two-thirds of patients in the study were given the procedure even though their lesions were not shown by CT scans to have progressed. This was done either at the patient’s request, or per the clinical judgment of a physician.
Also becoming more specific about changing CTRs would be helpful in developing management protocols, according to Dr. Detterbeck. “In my opinion, we need to start factoring in the rate of change. A gradual 2 mm increase in size over a period of 5 years may not be an appropriate trigger for resection.”
Neither the investigators nor the editorial writer had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Three years of follow-up is adequate for partially solid ground-glass opacity lesions that do not progress, while pure ground-glass opacity lesions that show no progression may require further follow-up care, a study suggests.
The results of the study strengthen the argument for taking a “watch and wait” approach, and raise the question of whether patient outcomes can be improved without more precise diagnostic criteria, said study author Shigei Sawada, MD, PhD, a researcher at the Shikoku Cancer Center in Matsuyama, Japan, and his colleagues. They drew these conclusions from performing a long-term outcome investigation of 226 patients with pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesions shown by CT imaging to be 3 cm or less in diameter.
Once established that the disease has stabilized in a pure or mixed ground-glass opacity lesion, “the frequency of CT examinations could probably be reduced or ... discontinued,” the investigators wrote. The study is published online in Chest (2017;151[2]:308-15).
Because ground-glass opacities often can remain unchanged for years, reflexively choosing resection can result in a patient’s being overtreated. Meanwhile, the use of increasingly accurate imaging technology likely means detection rates of such lesions will continue to increase, leaving clinicians to wonder about optimal management protocols, particularly since several guidance documents include differing recommendations on the timing of surveillance CTs for patients with stable disease.
The study includes 10-15 years of follow-up data on the 226 patients, registered between 2000 and 2005. Across the study, there were nearly twice as many women as men, all with an average age of 61 years. About a quarter had multiple ground-glass opacities; about a quarter also had partially consolidated lesions. Of the 124 patients who’d had resections, all but one was stage IA. The most prominent histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in situ in 63 patients, followed by 39 patients with minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, and 19 with lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas. Five patients had papillary-predominant adenocarcinomas.
Roughly one-quarter of the cohort did not receive follow-up examinations after 68 months, as their lesions either remained stable or were shown to have reduced in size. Another 45 continued to undergo follow-up examinations.
After initial detection of a pure ground-glass opacity, the CT examination schedule was every 3, 6, and 12 months, and then annually. After detection of a mixed ground-glass opacity, a CT examination was given every 3 months for the first year, then reduced to every 6 months thereafter. In patients with stable disease, the individual clinicians determined whether to obtain additional CT follow-up imaging.
A ground-glass lesion was determined to have progressed if the diameter increased, as it did in about a third of patients; or, if there was new or increased consolidation, as there was in about two-thirds of patients. The table of consolidation/tumor ratios (CTR) used included CTR zero, also referred to as a pure ground-glass lesion; CTR 1-25; CTR 26-50; and CTR equal to or greater than 51. When there were multiple lesions, the largest one detected was the target.
All cases of patients with a CTR of more than zero were identified within 3 years, while 13.6% of patients with a CTR of zero required more than 3 years to identify tumor growth. Aggressive cancer was detected in 4% of patients with a CTR of zero and in 70% of those with a CTR greater than 25% (P less than .001). Aggressive cancer was seen in 46% of those with consolidation/tumor ratios that increased during follow-up and in 8% of those whose tumors increased in diameter (P less than .007). After about 10 years of follow-up after resection, 1.6% of cancers recurred.
There were two deaths from lung cancer among the study’s patients. The first, a 54-year-old man, had an acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma, 5 mm in diameter with a consolidation/tumor ratio of 0.75 that increased during follow-up. The recurrence developed in the mediastinal lymph nodes 51 months after resection surgery. The second patient had a papillary-predominant adenocarcinoma appearing as a pure ground-glass opacity 27 mm in diameter. The consolidation/tumor ratio also increased during follow-up, with recurrences in the bone and mediastinal lymph nodes at 30 months post resectioning.
Neither patient was re-biopsied, and both were diagnosed according to CT imaging alone. There were 13 other patient deaths from non–lung cancer related causes.
Given the 3-year timespan necessary to detect tumor growth in all but the CTR zero group, and the study’s size and long-term nature, the investigators concluded that a follow-up period of 3 years for patients with part-solid lesions “should be adequate.”
By contrast, CHEST recommends CT scans be done for at least 3 years in patients with pure ground-glass lesions and between 3 and 5 years in the other CTR groups with nodules measuring 8 mm or less. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline advises low-dose CT scanning until a patient is no longer eligible for definitive treatment.
Dr. Sawada and his colleagues did not use an exact criterion for tumor growth in their study, such as a precise ratio of increase in size or consolidation, in part because at the time of the study the most common form of CT evaluation was visual inspection; they reported that tumors exhibiting growth most commonly increased between 2 and 3 mm in either size or consolidation. “Evaluations based on visual inspections can be imprecise, and different physicians may arrive at different judgments,” the investigators wrote. “However, [the use of] computer-aided diagnosis systems are not yet commonly applied in clinical practice.”
Although imaging should have guided the decision to resect, according to Dr. Sawada and his coauthors, two-thirds of patients in the study were given the procedure even though their lesions were not shown by CT scans to have progressed. This was done either at the patient’s request, or per the clinical judgment of a physician.
Also becoming more specific about changing CTRs would be helpful in developing management protocols, according to Dr. Detterbeck. “In my opinion, we need to start factoring in the rate of change. A gradual 2 mm increase in size over a period of 5 years may not be an appropriate trigger for resection.”
Neither the investigators nor the editorial writer had any relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
FROM CHEST
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Of 226 patients with ground-glass opacity lesions 3 cm or less in size, 124 had resection, 57 required no further follow-up, and 45 continue to receive follow-up.
Data source: Long-term study of 226 patients with pure or mixed ground-glass opacities of 3 cm or less given regular CT imaging between 2000 and 2005.
Disclosures: Neither the investigators nor the editorial writer had any relevant disclosures.
