Severe Refractory Hailey-Hailey Disease Treated With Electron Beam Radiotherapy and Low-Level Laser Therapy

To the Editor:

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD), or familial benign chronic pemphigus, is a genetic disorder caused by an autosomal-dominant mutation in ATPase secretory pathway Ca²⁺ transporting 1 gene, ATP2C1, which disrupts intracellular calcium signaling and blocks synthesis of junctional proteins required for cell-cell adhesion.^1,2 As a result, patients develop acantholysis of the suprabasilar epidermis resulting in chronic flaccid blisters and erosions, particularly in intertriginous areas.³ Patients often report associated itching, pain, and burning, and they frequently present with secondary polymicrobial infections.⁴ Although HHD is genetic, patients may present without a family history due to variable expressivity and sporadic germline mutations.⁵ Therapeutic options are numerous, and patients may attempt many treatments before a benefit is observed.⁴ Local disease improvement was noted in a case series of 3 patients treated with electron beam radiotherapy with no disease recurrence in treated sites at 38, 33, and 9 months’ follow-up.⁶ Herein, we present a case of HHD refractory to numerous prior therapies that was successfully treated with electron beam radiotherapy, highlighting the potential role for palliative radiotherapy in select refractory cases of HHD.

A 35-year-old woman with a 7-year of history of HHD presented with severe recalcitrant disease including extensive erosive patches and plaques in the intertriginous areas of the bilateral axillae, groin, and inframammary folds (Figure 1). The skin eruptions first appeared at 28 years of age after her last pregnancy and continued as painful blistering that worsened with each menstrual cycle. Initially the affected desquamated skin would heal between menstrual cycles, but large areas of desquamation remained unhealed in the groin and inframammary regions throughout her full menstrual cycles by the time of referral. Family history included 4 family members with HHD: 2 aunts, an uncle, and a cousin on the paternal side of her family. Over a 7-year period, treatment with clobetasol cream, clindamycin gel, tacrolimus ointment, doxycycline, dapsone, cyclosporine, methotrexate, etanercept, isotretinoin, and prednisone (15 mg every other day) all failed. Most recently, axillary abobotulinumtoxinA injections were attempted but failed. She had been prednisone dependent for more than 1 year. Due to the ongoing refractory disease, she was referred to radiation oncology to discuss radiotherapy treatment options.

At the time of presentation to the radiation oncology clinic, she continued to have extensive involvement of the intertriginous areas as well as involvement of the right neck at sites of skin chafing from clothing. Consistent with the limited available evidence, a dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions was first prescribed to the axillae to assess response in the event of radiosensitivity, resulting in brisk desquamation. The conventional fractionation of 2 Gy per fraction allowed for assessment of response/tolerance and the opportunity to stop the treatment in the unlikely event of a severe skin reaction. Her skin tolerated treatment well with slight dryness and mild irritation that was less severe than the typical HHD flares. Concurrently with the axillary radiotherapy, we delivered a trial of low-level laser therapy to areas of severe disease in both inguinal regions in the hope that it could be used instead of radiotherapy to avoid any associated risks of radiation. Low-level laser therapy was administered with a light-emitting diode cluster probe at 2.5 Hz for 1 minute to 2 sites in each inguinal area daily for a total of 10 treatments. Unfortunately, this therapy temporarily exacerbated exudation present in the skin before it resolved to its pretreatment state with no improvement.

One month after treatment she had total resolution of the erosive patches and plaques with mild residual hyperpigmentation in the axillae, establishing that radiation therapy was reasonably effective. To lower the total radiation dose and decrease the risk of radiation-induced malignancy, we treated the bilateral groin and the inframammary region with a treatment schedule of 8 Gy in 2 fractions at a higher dose of 4 Gy per fraction instead of 2 Gy. At 12 days posttreatment, she had a dramatic response in the groin and a mixed response in the inframammary region, with a focus that had not yet regressed. Given the dramatic response in the treated sites, the patient requested treatment to the right side of the neck. Thus, we treated this area with a similar 8 Gy in 2 fractions, and an additional 6 Gy in 2 fractions boost was added to the slow responding focus in the inframammary fold for a total of 14 Gy in 4 fractions. The patient tolerated all treatments well with mild grade 1 skin irritation that was unlike the blistering of the typical HHD flares. Two months following completion of the first course of radiotherapy to the axillae and 2 weeks from the most recent course, she tapered off her prednisone regimen (15 mg every other day) but had a relapse of disease with her subsequent menstrual cycles that presented as a blistering skin reaction in the inframammary region, which healed in response to restarting steroids. This flare was less severe than those prior to radiotherapy. At 10 months posttreatment, the patient was free of disease in the neck and axillae (Figure 2). She continued to have relapses in the inframammary region with menstrual cycles and noted new disease in the popliteal regions; however, the relapses were less severe, and her skin had improved more with radiation than any of the prior therapies.

Our experience with low-level laser therapy indicated that it should be completely avoided in HHD. Our patient’s treatment with radiotherapy demonstrated excellent short-term responses in areas of pemphigus but later proved to be a mixed response with further follow-up including a mild posttreatment flare of the inframammary region that responded to steroids and new popliteal region involvement. As summarized in the Table, earlier reports of radiotherapy for the treatment of HHD have yielded varied results.^6-8 The mixed response seen in our patient suggests that response to radiotherapy may be site specific, related to underlying inflammation from microbial overgrowth, or a function of the disease severity.

Although the number of reports on radiotherapy in HHD is small, there have been several reports of Darier disease, another acantholytic autosomal-dominant genodermatosis affecting the ATP2A2 gene, successfully treated incidentally with radiation.^9,10 Total skin electron beam therapy also has been employed in the treatment of Darier disease; this patient experienced a severe flare after a relatively low treatment dose that required intensive care monitoring, possibly highlighting the potential radiosensitivity of patients with underlying genodermatoses and cautioning against radiotherapy dose escalation.¹¹ In light of the mixed responses seen, radiation therapy should be used sparingly for severe relapsing cases that have failed a plethora of prior treatments. The risk of second cancer induction is especially of concern when using radiotherapy in a benign disease.¹² We observed excellent initial responses in our patient, both with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and hypofractionation. The risk of second malignancy induction is a linear function of radiotherapy dose.¹² Thus, utilization of hypofractionated regimens such as 4 Gy times 2 fractions seems most prudent. It remains unclear if further dose de-escalation may yield a similar response, as seen in studies utilizing radiotherapy for other benign disease.^13,14 Overall, given our mixed results with short follow-up, we conclude that the consideration of radiotherapy should be limited to patients with severe recalcitrant HHD.

To the Editor:

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD), or familial benign chronic pemphigus, is a genetic disorder caused by an autosomal-dominant mutation in ATPase secretory pathway Ca²⁺ transporting 1 gene, ATP2C1, which disrupts intracellular calcium signaling and blocks synthesis of junctional proteins required for cell-cell adhesion.^1,2 As a result, patients develop acantholysis of the suprabasilar epidermis resulting in chronic flaccid blisters and erosions, particularly in intertriginous areas.³ Patients often report associated itching, pain, and burning, and they frequently present with secondary polymicrobial infections.⁴ Although HHD is genetic, patients may present without a family history due to variable expressivity and sporadic germline mutations.⁵ Therapeutic options are numerous, and patients may attempt many treatments before a benefit is observed.⁴ Local disease improvement was noted in a case series of 3 patients treated with electron beam radiotherapy with no disease recurrence in treated sites at 38, 33, and 9 months’ follow-up.⁶ Herein, we present a case of HHD refractory to numerous prior therapies that was successfully treated with electron beam radiotherapy, highlighting the potential role for palliative radiotherapy in select refractory cases of HHD.

A 35-year-old woman with a 7-year of history of HHD presented with severe recalcitrant disease including extensive erosive patches and plaques in the intertriginous areas of the bilateral axillae, groin, and inframammary folds (Figure 1). The skin eruptions first appeared at 28 years of age after her last pregnancy and continued as painful blistering that worsened with each menstrual cycle. Initially the affected desquamated skin would heal between menstrual cycles, but large areas of desquamation remained unhealed in the groin and inframammary regions throughout her full menstrual cycles by the time of referral. Family history included 4 family members with HHD: 2 aunts, an uncle, and a cousin on the paternal side of her family. Over a 7-year period, treatment with clobetasol cream, clindamycin gel, tacrolimus ointment, doxycycline, dapsone, cyclosporine, methotrexate, etanercept, isotretinoin, and prednisone (15 mg every other day) all failed. Most recently, axillary abobotulinumtoxinA injections were attempted but failed. She had been prednisone dependent for more than 1 year. Due to the ongoing refractory disease, she was referred to radiation oncology to discuss radiotherapy treatment options.

At the time of presentation to the radiation oncology clinic, she continued to have extensive involvement of the intertriginous areas as well as involvement of the right neck at sites of skin chafing from clothing. Consistent with the limited available evidence, a dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions was first prescribed to the axillae to assess response in the event of radiosensitivity, resulting in brisk desquamation. The conventional fractionation of 2 Gy per fraction allowed for assessment of response/tolerance and the opportunity to stop the treatment in the unlikely event of a severe skin reaction. Her skin tolerated treatment well with slight dryness and mild irritation that was less severe than the typical HHD flares. Concurrently with the axillary radiotherapy, we delivered a trial of low-level laser therapy to areas of severe disease in both inguinal regions in the hope that it could be used instead of radiotherapy to avoid any associated risks of radiation. Low-level laser therapy was administered with a light-emitting diode cluster probe at 2.5 Hz for 1 minute to 2 sites in each inguinal area daily for a total of 10 treatments. Unfortunately, this therapy temporarily exacerbated exudation present in the skin before it resolved to its pretreatment state with no improvement.

One month after treatment she had total resolution of the erosive patches and plaques with mild residual hyperpigmentation in the axillae, establishing that radiation therapy was reasonably effective. To lower the total radiation dose and decrease the risk of radiation-induced malignancy, we treated the bilateral groin and the inframammary region with a treatment schedule of 8 Gy in 2 fractions at a higher dose of 4 Gy per fraction instead of 2 Gy. At 12 days posttreatment, she had a dramatic response in the groin and a mixed response in the inframammary region, with a focus that had not yet regressed. Given the dramatic response in the treated sites, the patient requested treatment to the right side of the neck. Thus, we treated this area with a similar 8 Gy in 2 fractions, and an additional 6 Gy in 2 fractions boost was added to the slow responding focus in the inframammary fold for a total of 14 Gy in 4 fractions. The patient tolerated all treatments well with mild grade 1 skin irritation that was unlike the blistering of the typical HHD flares. Two months following completion of the first course of radiotherapy to the axillae and 2 weeks from the most recent course, she tapered off her prednisone regimen (15 mg every other day) but had a relapse of disease with her subsequent menstrual cycles that presented as a blistering skin reaction in the inframammary region, which healed in response to restarting steroids. This flare was less severe than those prior to radiotherapy. At 10 months posttreatment, the patient was free of disease in the neck and axillae (Figure 2). She continued to have relapses in the inframammary region with menstrual cycles and noted new disease in the popliteal regions; however, the relapses were less severe, and her skin had improved more with radiation than any of the prior therapies.

Our experience with low-level laser therapy indicated that it should be completely avoided in HHD. Our patient’s treatment with radiotherapy demonstrated excellent short-term responses in areas of pemphigus but later proved to be a mixed response with further follow-up including a mild posttreatment flare of the inframammary region that responded to steroids and new popliteal region involvement. As summarized in the Table, earlier reports of radiotherapy for the treatment of HHD have yielded varied results.^6-8 The mixed response seen in our patient suggests that response to radiotherapy may be site specific, related to underlying inflammation from microbial overgrowth, or a function of the disease severity.

Although the number of reports on radiotherapy in HHD is small, there have been several reports of Darier disease, another acantholytic autosomal-dominant genodermatosis affecting the ATP2A2 gene, successfully treated incidentally with radiation.^9,10 Total skin electron beam therapy also has been employed in the treatment of Darier disease; this patient experienced a severe flare after a relatively low treatment dose that required intensive care monitoring, possibly highlighting the potential radiosensitivity of patients with underlying genodermatoses and cautioning against radiotherapy dose escalation.¹¹ In light of the mixed responses seen, radiation therapy should be used sparingly for severe relapsing cases that have failed a plethora of prior treatments. The risk of second cancer induction is especially of concern when using radiotherapy in a benign disease.¹² We observed excellent initial responses in our patient, both with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and hypofractionation. The risk of second malignancy induction is a linear function of radiotherapy dose.¹² Thus, utilization of hypofractionated regimens such as 4 Gy times 2 fractions seems most prudent. It remains unclear if further dose de-escalation may yield a similar response, as seen in studies utilizing radiotherapy for other benign disease.^13,14 Overall, given our mixed results with short follow-up, we conclude that the consideration of radiotherapy should be limited to patients with severe recalcitrant HHD.

To the Editor:

Hailey-Hailey disease (HHD), or familial benign chronic pemphigus, is a genetic disorder caused by an autosomal-dominant mutation in ATPase secretory pathway Ca²⁺ transporting 1 gene, ATP2C1, which disrupts intracellular calcium signaling and blocks synthesis of junctional proteins required for cell-cell adhesion.^1,2 As a result, patients develop acantholysis of the suprabasilar epidermis resulting in chronic flaccid blisters and erosions, particularly in intertriginous areas.³ Patients often report associated itching, pain, and burning, and they frequently present with secondary polymicrobial infections.⁴ Although HHD is genetic, patients may present without a family history due to variable expressivity and sporadic germline mutations.⁵ Therapeutic options are numerous, and patients may attempt many treatments before a benefit is observed.⁴ Local disease improvement was noted in a case series of 3 patients treated with electron beam radiotherapy with no disease recurrence in treated sites at 38, 33, and 9 months’ follow-up.⁶ Herein, we present a case of HHD refractory to numerous prior therapies that was successfully treated with electron beam radiotherapy, highlighting the potential role for palliative radiotherapy in select refractory cases of HHD.

A 35-year-old woman with a 7-year of history of HHD presented with severe recalcitrant disease including extensive erosive patches and plaques in the intertriginous areas of the bilateral axillae, groin, and inframammary folds (Figure 1). The skin eruptions first appeared at 28 years of age after her last pregnancy and continued as painful blistering that worsened with each menstrual cycle. Initially the affected desquamated skin would heal between menstrual cycles, but large areas of desquamation remained unhealed in the groin and inframammary regions throughout her full menstrual cycles by the time of referral. Family history included 4 family members with HHD: 2 aunts, an uncle, and a cousin on the paternal side of her family. Over a 7-year period, treatment with clobetasol cream, clindamycin gel, tacrolimus ointment, doxycycline, dapsone, cyclosporine, methotrexate, etanercept, isotretinoin, and prednisone (15 mg every other day) all failed. Most recently, axillary abobotulinumtoxinA injections were attempted but failed. She had been prednisone dependent for more than 1 year. Due to the ongoing refractory disease, she was referred to radiation oncology to discuss radiotherapy treatment options.

At the time of presentation to the radiation oncology clinic, she continued to have extensive involvement of the intertriginous areas as well as involvement of the right neck at sites of skin chafing from clothing. Consistent with the limited available evidence, a dose of 20 Gy in 10 fractions was first prescribed to the axillae to assess response in the event of radiosensitivity, resulting in brisk desquamation. The conventional fractionation of 2 Gy per fraction allowed for assessment of response/tolerance and the opportunity to stop the treatment in the unlikely event of a severe skin reaction. Her skin tolerated treatment well with slight dryness and mild irritation that was less severe than the typical HHD flares. Concurrently with the axillary radiotherapy, we delivered a trial of low-level laser therapy to areas of severe disease in both inguinal regions in the hope that it could be used instead of radiotherapy to avoid any associated risks of radiation. Low-level laser therapy was administered with a light-emitting diode cluster probe at 2.5 Hz for 1 minute to 2 sites in each inguinal area daily for a total of 10 treatments. Unfortunately, this therapy temporarily exacerbated exudation present in the skin before it resolved to its pretreatment state with no improvement.

One month after treatment she had total resolution of the erosive patches and plaques with mild residual hyperpigmentation in the axillae, establishing that radiation therapy was reasonably effective. To lower the total radiation dose and decrease the risk of radiation-induced malignancy, we treated the bilateral groin and the inframammary region with a treatment schedule of 8 Gy in 2 fractions at a higher dose of 4 Gy per fraction instead of 2 Gy. At 12 days posttreatment, she had a dramatic response in the groin and a mixed response in the inframammary region, with a focus that had not yet regressed. Given the dramatic response in the treated sites, the patient requested treatment to the right side of the neck. Thus, we treated this area with a similar 8 Gy in 2 fractions, and an additional 6 Gy in 2 fractions boost was added to the slow responding focus in the inframammary fold for a total of 14 Gy in 4 fractions. The patient tolerated all treatments well with mild grade 1 skin irritation that was unlike the blistering of the typical HHD flares. Two months following completion of the first course of radiotherapy to the axillae and 2 weeks from the most recent course, she tapered off her prednisone regimen (15 mg every other day) but had a relapse of disease with her subsequent menstrual cycles that presented as a blistering skin reaction in the inframammary region, which healed in response to restarting steroids. This flare was less severe than those prior to radiotherapy. At 10 months posttreatment, the patient was free of disease in the neck and axillae (Figure 2). She continued to have relapses in the inframammary region with menstrual cycles and noted new disease in the popliteal regions; however, the relapses were less severe, and her skin had improved more with radiation than any of the prior therapies.

Our experience with low-level laser therapy indicated that it should be completely avoided in HHD. Our patient’s treatment with radiotherapy demonstrated excellent short-term responses in areas of pemphigus but later proved to be a mixed response with further follow-up including a mild posttreatment flare of the inframammary region that responded to steroids and new popliteal region involvement. As summarized in the Table, earlier reports of radiotherapy for the treatment of HHD have yielded varied results.^6-8 The mixed response seen in our patient suggests that response to radiotherapy may be site specific, related to underlying inflammation from microbial overgrowth, or a function of the disease severity.

Although the number of reports on radiotherapy in HHD is small, there have been several reports of Darier disease, another acantholytic autosomal-dominant genodermatosis affecting the ATP2A2 gene, successfully treated incidentally with radiation.^9,10 Total skin electron beam therapy also has been employed in the treatment of Darier disease; this patient experienced a severe flare after a relatively low treatment dose that required intensive care monitoring, possibly highlighting the potential radiosensitivity of patients with underlying genodermatoses and cautioning against radiotherapy dose escalation.¹¹ In light of the mixed responses seen, radiation therapy should be used sparingly for severe relapsing cases that have failed a plethora of prior treatments. The risk of second cancer induction is especially of concern when using radiotherapy in a benign disease.¹² We observed excellent initial responses in our patient, both with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and hypofractionation. The risk of second malignancy induction is a linear function of radiotherapy dose.¹² Thus, utilization of hypofractionated regimens such as 4 Gy times 2 fractions seems most prudent. It remains unclear if further dose de-escalation may yield a similar response, as seen in studies utilizing radiotherapy for other benign disease.^13,14 Overall, given our mixed results with short follow-up, we conclude that the consideration of radiotherapy should be limited to patients with severe recalcitrant HHD.