Article Type
Changed
Wed, 09/16/2020 - 09:33

 

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread across all 7 continents, including 185 countries, and infected more than 21.9 million individuals worldwide as of August 18, 2020, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. It has strained our health care system and affected all specialties, including dermatology. Dermatologists have taken important safety measures by canceling/deferring elective and nonemergency procedures and diagnosing/treating patients via telemedicine. Many residents and attending dermatologists have volunteered to care for COVID-19 inpatients and donated personal protective equipment (PPE) to hospitals reporting shortages.1 As we prepare to treat increasing numbers of in-office patients, there will be a critical need for PPE. We highlight the use of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing technologies as it applies to the dermatology outpatient setting.

N95 masks are necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic because they effectively filter at least 95% of 0.3-μm airborne particles and provide adequate face seals.1 3-Dimensional imaging integrated with 3D printers can be used to scan precise facial parameters (eg, jawline, nose) and account for facial hair density and length to produce comfortable tailored N95 masks and face seals.1,2 3-Dimensional printing utilizes robotics and computer-aided design systems to layer and deposit biomaterials, thereby creating cost-effective, customizable, mechanically stable, and biocompatible constructs.1,3 An ideal 3D-printed N95 mask would be printed via fused deposition modeling, consisting of a combination of lightweight and fatigue-resistant biomaterials, including electrostatic nonwoven polypropylene and styrene-(ethylene-butylene)-styrene.1,4 The resulting masks, made from industrial-grade raw materials, are practical alternatives for dermatology practices with insufficient supplies.

Face shields offer an additional layer of safety for the face and mucosae and also may provide longevity for N95 masks. Using synthetic polymers such as polycarbonate and polyethylene, 3D printers can be used to construct face shields via fused deposition modeling.1 These face shields may be worn over N95 masks and then can be sanitized and reused.

Mohs surgeons and staff may be at particularly high risk for COVID-19 infection due to their close proximity to the face during surgery, use of cautery, and prolonged time spent with patients while taking layers and suturing. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography is a noninvasive imaging tool that can map skin tumors via optical contrast with accuracy comparable to histologic measurements.5 3-Dimensional facial imaging and printing can be used to calculate tumor surface area for customized masks, leaving sufficient skin for excision and reconstruction. Patient face coverings would cover the nose and mouth, only expose relevant areas near the excision site, and include adjustable/removable ear loops for tumors localized to the ears. A schematic of how 3D technologies can be applied for Mohs micrographic surgery is provided in the Figure.

3-Dimensional (3D) imaging technologies and a 3D-printed face covering prototype that can potentially be used on patients during Mohs micrographic surgery. The biomaterials in this diagram have been well tested in the literature and are the same materials that are used in N95 masks.


As dermatologists reopen and ramp up practice volume, there will be increased PPE requirements. Using 3D technology and imaging to produce N95 masks, face shields, and face coverings, we can offer effective diagnosis and treatment while optimizing safety for dermatologists, staff, and patients.

References
  1. Ishack S, Lipner SR. Applications of 3D printing technology to address COVID-19-related supply shortages [published online April 21, 2020]. Am J Med. 2020;133:771-773.
  2. Cai M, Li H, Shen S, et al. Customized design and 3D printing of face seal for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;3:226-234.
  3. Ishack S, Lipner SR. A review of 3-dimensional skin bioprinting techniques: applications, approaches, and trends [published online March 17, 2020]. Dermatol Surg. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002378.
  4. Banerjee SS, Burbine S, Shivaprakash NK, et al. 3D-printable PP/SEBS thermoplastic elastomeric blends: preparation and properties [published online February 17, 2019]. Polymers (Basel). doi:10.3390/polym11020347.
  5. Chuah SY, Attia ABE, Long V. Structural and functional 3D mapping of skin tumours with non-invasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography [published online November 2, 2016]. Skin Res Technol. 2017;23:221-226.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Ishack is from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 106(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
140-141
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Ishack is from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Ishack is from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Dr. Lipner is from the Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Shari R. Lipner, MD, PhD, 1305 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

 

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread across all 7 continents, including 185 countries, and infected more than 21.9 million individuals worldwide as of August 18, 2020, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. It has strained our health care system and affected all specialties, including dermatology. Dermatologists have taken important safety measures by canceling/deferring elective and nonemergency procedures and diagnosing/treating patients via telemedicine. Many residents and attending dermatologists have volunteered to care for COVID-19 inpatients and donated personal protective equipment (PPE) to hospitals reporting shortages.1 As we prepare to treat increasing numbers of in-office patients, there will be a critical need for PPE. We highlight the use of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing technologies as it applies to the dermatology outpatient setting.

N95 masks are necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic because they effectively filter at least 95% of 0.3-μm airborne particles and provide adequate face seals.1 3-Dimensional imaging integrated with 3D printers can be used to scan precise facial parameters (eg, jawline, nose) and account for facial hair density and length to produce comfortable tailored N95 masks and face seals.1,2 3-Dimensional printing utilizes robotics and computer-aided design systems to layer and deposit biomaterials, thereby creating cost-effective, customizable, mechanically stable, and biocompatible constructs.1,3 An ideal 3D-printed N95 mask would be printed via fused deposition modeling, consisting of a combination of lightweight and fatigue-resistant biomaterials, including electrostatic nonwoven polypropylene and styrene-(ethylene-butylene)-styrene.1,4 The resulting masks, made from industrial-grade raw materials, are practical alternatives for dermatology practices with insufficient supplies.

Face shields offer an additional layer of safety for the face and mucosae and also may provide longevity for N95 masks. Using synthetic polymers such as polycarbonate and polyethylene, 3D printers can be used to construct face shields via fused deposition modeling.1 These face shields may be worn over N95 masks and then can be sanitized and reused.

Mohs surgeons and staff may be at particularly high risk for COVID-19 infection due to their close proximity to the face during surgery, use of cautery, and prolonged time spent with patients while taking layers and suturing. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography is a noninvasive imaging tool that can map skin tumors via optical contrast with accuracy comparable to histologic measurements.5 3-Dimensional facial imaging and printing can be used to calculate tumor surface area for customized masks, leaving sufficient skin for excision and reconstruction. Patient face coverings would cover the nose and mouth, only expose relevant areas near the excision site, and include adjustable/removable ear loops for tumors localized to the ears. A schematic of how 3D technologies can be applied for Mohs micrographic surgery is provided in the Figure.

3-Dimensional (3D) imaging technologies and a 3D-printed face covering prototype that can potentially be used on patients during Mohs micrographic surgery. The biomaterials in this diagram have been well tested in the literature and are the same materials that are used in N95 masks.


As dermatologists reopen and ramp up practice volume, there will be increased PPE requirements. Using 3D technology and imaging to produce N95 masks, face shields, and face coverings, we can offer effective diagnosis and treatment while optimizing safety for dermatologists, staff, and patients.

 

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread across all 7 continents, including 185 countries, and infected more than 21.9 million individuals worldwide as of August 18, 2020, according to the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center. It has strained our health care system and affected all specialties, including dermatology. Dermatologists have taken important safety measures by canceling/deferring elective and nonemergency procedures and diagnosing/treating patients via telemedicine. Many residents and attending dermatologists have volunteered to care for COVID-19 inpatients and donated personal protective equipment (PPE) to hospitals reporting shortages.1 As we prepare to treat increasing numbers of in-office patients, there will be a critical need for PPE. We highlight the use of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging and printing technologies as it applies to the dermatology outpatient setting.

N95 masks are necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic because they effectively filter at least 95% of 0.3-μm airborne particles and provide adequate face seals.1 3-Dimensional imaging integrated with 3D printers can be used to scan precise facial parameters (eg, jawline, nose) and account for facial hair density and length to produce comfortable tailored N95 masks and face seals.1,2 3-Dimensional printing utilizes robotics and computer-aided design systems to layer and deposit biomaterials, thereby creating cost-effective, customizable, mechanically stable, and biocompatible constructs.1,3 An ideal 3D-printed N95 mask would be printed via fused deposition modeling, consisting of a combination of lightweight and fatigue-resistant biomaterials, including electrostatic nonwoven polypropylene and styrene-(ethylene-butylene)-styrene.1,4 The resulting masks, made from industrial-grade raw materials, are practical alternatives for dermatology practices with insufficient supplies.

Face shields offer an additional layer of safety for the face and mucosae and also may provide longevity for N95 masks. Using synthetic polymers such as polycarbonate and polyethylene, 3D printers can be used to construct face shields via fused deposition modeling.1 These face shields may be worn over N95 masks and then can be sanitized and reused.

Mohs surgeons and staff may be at particularly high risk for COVID-19 infection due to their close proximity to the face during surgery, use of cautery, and prolonged time spent with patients while taking layers and suturing. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography is a noninvasive imaging tool that can map skin tumors via optical contrast with accuracy comparable to histologic measurements.5 3-Dimensional facial imaging and printing can be used to calculate tumor surface area for customized masks, leaving sufficient skin for excision and reconstruction. Patient face coverings would cover the nose and mouth, only expose relevant areas near the excision site, and include adjustable/removable ear loops for tumors localized to the ears. A schematic of how 3D technologies can be applied for Mohs micrographic surgery is provided in the Figure.

3-Dimensional (3D) imaging technologies and a 3D-printed face covering prototype that can potentially be used on patients during Mohs micrographic surgery. The biomaterials in this diagram have been well tested in the literature and are the same materials that are used in N95 masks.


As dermatologists reopen and ramp up practice volume, there will be increased PPE requirements. Using 3D technology and imaging to produce N95 masks, face shields, and face coverings, we can offer effective diagnosis and treatment while optimizing safety for dermatologists, staff, and patients.

References
  1. Ishack S, Lipner SR. Applications of 3D printing technology to address COVID-19-related supply shortages [published online April 21, 2020]. Am J Med. 2020;133:771-773.
  2. Cai M, Li H, Shen S, et al. Customized design and 3D printing of face seal for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;3:226-234.
  3. Ishack S, Lipner SR. A review of 3-dimensional skin bioprinting techniques: applications, approaches, and trends [published online March 17, 2020]. Dermatol Surg. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002378.
  4. Banerjee SS, Burbine S, Shivaprakash NK, et al. 3D-printable PP/SEBS thermoplastic elastomeric blends: preparation and properties [published online February 17, 2019]. Polymers (Basel). doi:10.3390/polym11020347.
  5. Chuah SY, Attia ABE, Long V. Structural and functional 3D mapping of skin tumours with non-invasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography [published online November 2, 2016]. Skin Res Technol. 2017;23:221-226.
References
  1. Ishack S, Lipner SR. Applications of 3D printing technology to address COVID-19-related supply shortages [published online April 21, 2020]. Am J Med. 2020;133:771-773.
  2. Cai M, Li H, Shen S, et al. Customized design and 3D printing of face seal for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018;3:226-234.
  3. Ishack S, Lipner SR. A review of 3-dimensional skin bioprinting techniques: applications, approaches, and trends [published online March 17, 2020]. Dermatol Surg. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002378.
  4. Banerjee SS, Burbine S, Shivaprakash NK, et al. 3D-printable PP/SEBS thermoplastic elastomeric blends: preparation and properties [published online February 17, 2019]. Polymers (Basel). doi:10.3390/polym11020347.
  5. Chuah SY, Attia ABE, Long V. Structural and functional 3D mapping of skin tumours with non-invasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography [published online November 2, 2016]. Skin Res Technol. 2017;23:221-226.
Issue
Cutis - 106(3)
Issue
Cutis - 106(3)
Page Number
140-141
Page Number
140-141
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Coronavirus disease 19 has overwhelmed our health care system and affected all specialties, including dermatology.
  • There are concerns about shortages of personal protective equipment to safely care for patients.
  • 3-Dimensional imaging and printing technologies can be harnessed to create face coverings and face shields for the dermatology outpatient setting.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Article PDF Media