User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
R-CHOP looks viable as first line in follicular lymphoma
A decade of follow-up data suggest that patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma may derive long-term benefit from first-line therapy with the R-CHOP regimen, according to investigators in Japan.
Among patients with untreated follicular and other indolent B-cell lymphomas enrolled in a randomized phase 2/3 trial, the 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-21 (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 3 weeks) was 33%, and the 10-year PFS rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-14 (R-CHOP every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] support] was 39%, and these PFS rates did not differ between the treatment arms, Takashi Watanabe, MD, PhD, from Mie University in Tsu, Japan, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology.
They also found that, compared with therapeutic regimens prior to the introduction of rituximab, R-CHOP was associated with a reduced likelihood of histological transformation of follicular lymphoma into a poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no apparent increase in risk of secondary malignancies.
“The gold-standard, first-line treatment in patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma remains undetermined. However, because of the reduction in incidence of transformation without an increase in either secondary malignancies or fatal infectious events, the R-CHOP regimen should be a candidate for standard treatment, particularly from the viewpoint of long-term follow-up,” the investigators wrote
The JCOG0203 trial, which began enrollment in September 2002, included patients with stage III or IV indolent B-cell lymphomas, including grades 1-3 follicular lymphoma, from 44 Japanese hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either R-CHOP-14 plus G-CSF or R-CHOP-21 administered once daily for 6 days beginning on day 8 of every cycle). Patients did not receive rituximab maintenance in either group.
In the primary analysis of the trial, published in 2011, the investigators reported that in 299 patients there were no significant differences in either PFS or 6-year overall survival (OS).
In the current analysis, the investigators reported that, for 248 patients with grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, the 8-year PFS rate was 39% and the 10-year PFS rate was 36%.
The cumulative incidence of histological transformation was 3.2% at 5 years, 8.5% at 8 years, and 9.3% 10 years after the last patient was enrolled.
“In our study, survival after histological transformation was still poor; therefore, reducing histological transformation remains a crucial issue for patients with follicular lymphoma,” the investigators wrote.
The cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 8.1%, and the cumulative incidence of hematological secondary malignancies was 2.9%.
The investigators noted that the actual incidence of secondary solid tumors or hematologic malignancies apart from the setting of autologous stem cell transplants is not known and emphasized that patients should be followed beyond 10 years to ensure that the risk of secondary malignancies is not underestimated.
“Clinicians choosing a first-line treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma should be cautious of secondary malignancies caused by immunochemotherapy and severe complications of infectious diseases in the long-term follow-up – both of which could lead to death,” they advised.
The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund of Japan. Dr. Watanabe has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Taisho Toyama, Celgene, Nippon Shinyaku, and Novartis and funding resources from TakaraBio and United Immunity to support the Department of Immuno-Gene Therapy at Mie University. Multiple coauthors reported similar relationships.
SOURCE: Watanabe T et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-31.
A decade of follow-up data suggest that patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma may derive long-term benefit from first-line therapy with the R-CHOP regimen, according to investigators in Japan.
Among patients with untreated follicular and other indolent B-cell lymphomas enrolled in a randomized phase 2/3 trial, the 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-21 (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 3 weeks) was 33%, and the 10-year PFS rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-14 (R-CHOP every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] support] was 39%, and these PFS rates did not differ between the treatment arms, Takashi Watanabe, MD, PhD, from Mie University in Tsu, Japan, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology.
They also found that, compared with therapeutic regimens prior to the introduction of rituximab, R-CHOP was associated with a reduced likelihood of histological transformation of follicular lymphoma into a poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no apparent increase in risk of secondary malignancies.
“The gold-standard, first-line treatment in patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma remains undetermined. However, because of the reduction in incidence of transformation without an increase in either secondary malignancies or fatal infectious events, the R-CHOP regimen should be a candidate for standard treatment, particularly from the viewpoint of long-term follow-up,” the investigators wrote
The JCOG0203 trial, which began enrollment in September 2002, included patients with stage III or IV indolent B-cell lymphomas, including grades 1-3 follicular lymphoma, from 44 Japanese hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either R-CHOP-14 plus G-CSF or R-CHOP-21 administered once daily for 6 days beginning on day 8 of every cycle). Patients did not receive rituximab maintenance in either group.
In the primary analysis of the trial, published in 2011, the investigators reported that in 299 patients there were no significant differences in either PFS or 6-year overall survival (OS).
In the current analysis, the investigators reported that, for 248 patients with grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, the 8-year PFS rate was 39% and the 10-year PFS rate was 36%.
The cumulative incidence of histological transformation was 3.2% at 5 years, 8.5% at 8 years, and 9.3% 10 years after the last patient was enrolled.
“In our study, survival after histological transformation was still poor; therefore, reducing histological transformation remains a crucial issue for patients with follicular lymphoma,” the investigators wrote.
The cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 8.1%, and the cumulative incidence of hematological secondary malignancies was 2.9%.
The investigators noted that the actual incidence of secondary solid tumors or hematologic malignancies apart from the setting of autologous stem cell transplants is not known and emphasized that patients should be followed beyond 10 years to ensure that the risk of secondary malignancies is not underestimated.
“Clinicians choosing a first-line treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma should be cautious of secondary malignancies caused by immunochemotherapy and severe complications of infectious diseases in the long-term follow-up – both of which could lead to death,” they advised.
The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund of Japan. Dr. Watanabe has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Taisho Toyama, Celgene, Nippon Shinyaku, and Novartis and funding resources from TakaraBio and United Immunity to support the Department of Immuno-Gene Therapy at Mie University. Multiple coauthors reported similar relationships.
SOURCE: Watanabe T et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-31.
A decade of follow-up data suggest that patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma may derive long-term benefit from first-line therapy with the R-CHOP regimen, according to investigators in Japan.
Among patients with untreated follicular and other indolent B-cell lymphomas enrolled in a randomized phase 2/3 trial, the 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-21 (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone every 3 weeks) was 33%, and the 10-year PFS rate for patients assigned to R-CHOP-14 (R-CHOP every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] support] was 39%, and these PFS rates did not differ between the treatment arms, Takashi Watanabe, MD, PhD, from Mie University in Tsu, Japan, and his colleagues reported in the Lancet Haematology.
They also found that, compared with therapeutic regimens prior to the introduction of rituximab, R-CHOP was associated with a reduced likelihood of histological transformation of follicular lymphoma into a poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no apparent increase in risk of secondary malignancies.
“The gold-standard, first-line treatment in patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma remains undetermined. However, because of the reduction in incidence of transformation without an increase in either secondary malignancies or fatal infectious events, the R-CHOP regimen should be a candidate for standard treatment, particularly from the viewpoint of long-term follow-up,” the investigators wrote
The JCOG0203 trial, which began enrollment in September 2002, included patients with stage III or IV indolent B-cell lymphomas, including grades 1-3 follicular lymphoma, from 44 Japanese hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either R-CHOP-14 plus G-CSF or R-CHOP-21 administered once daily for 6 days beginning on day 8 of every cycle). Patients did not receive rituximab maintenance in either group.
In the primary analysis of the trial, published in 2011, the investigators reported that in 299 patients there were no significant differences in either PFS or 6-year overall survival (OS).
In the current analysis, the investigators reported that, for 248 patients with grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma, the 8-year PFS rate was 39% and the 10-year PFS rate was 36%.
The cumulative incidence of histological transformation was 3.2% at 5 years, 8.5% at 8 years, and 9.3% 10 years after the last patient was enrolled.
“In our study, survival after histological transformation was still poor; therefore, reducing histological transformation remains a crucial issue for patients with follicular lymphoma,” the investigators wrote.
The cumulative incidence of secondary malignancies at 10 years was 8.1%, and the cumulative incidence of hematological secondary malignancies was 2.9%.
The investigators noted that the actual incidence of secondary solid tumors or hematologic malignancies apart from the setting of autologous stem cell transplants is not known and emphasized that patients should be followed beyond 10 years to ensure that the risk of secondary malignancies is not underestimated.
“Clinicians choosing a first-line treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma should be cautious of secondary malignancies caused by immunochemotherapy and severe complications of infectious diseases in the long-term follow-up – both of which could lead to death,” they advised.
The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund of Japan. Dr. Watanabe has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Taisho Toyama, Celgene, Nippon Shinyaku, and Novartis and funding resources from TakaraBio and United Immunity to support the Department of Immuno-Gene Therapy at Mie University. Multiple coauthors reported similar relationships.
SOURCE: Watanabe T et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-31.
FROM LANCET HAEMATOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Approximately one-third of patients treated with R-CHOP-14 plus G-CSF or R-CHOP-21 had no disease progression after 10 years of follow-up.
Study details: Long-term analysis of a randomized phase 2/3 trial in 299 patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma.
Disclosures: The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan and by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund of Japan. Dr. Wantanabe has received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Taisho Toyama, Celgene, Nippon Shinyaku, and Novartis and funding resources from TakaraBio and United Immunity to support the Department of Immuno-Gene Therapy in Mie University. Multiple coauthors reported similar relationships.
Source: Wantanabe T et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e520-31.
Bortezomib may unlock resistance in WM with mutations
The use of bortezomib may help overcome treatment resistance in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) with CXCR4 mutations, according to new research.
Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and his colleagues compared the effects of treatment with bortezomib/rituximab in patients with WM based on their CXCR4 mutation status. They found no significant difference in progression-free survival (Log-rank, P = .994) or overall survival (Log-rank, P = .407) when comparing patients who have CXCR4 mutations with those who have CXCR4 wild type.
“We report for the first time that a bortezomib-based combination is impervious to the impact of CXCR4 mutations in a cohort of patients with WM,” the researchers wrote in Blood. “Previously, we had shown this to be true in WM cell lines, whereby genetically engineering BCWM.1 and MWCL-1 to overexpress CXCR4 had no impact on bortezomib resistance.”
The researchers noted, however, that the mechanism at work may be different than that seen with bortezomib in other cancers.
“Different experiments have linked CXCR4 expression and bortezomib in a variety of ways in other hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma. However, despite the complicated association in those cancer types, in WM there seems to be a consistently neutral effect of CXCR4 mutations on bortezomib resistance in both cell line and patient data,” they wrote.
The researchers recommended that the theory be tested in a prospective trial of bortezomib-based therapy in WM patients with CXCR4 mutations. Another question to be investigated, they pointed out, is the role of rituximab in the survival results seen in the current analysis.
The study included 63 patients with WM who were treated with bortezomib/rituximab either as upfront treatment or in the relapsed/refractory setting as part of a phase 2 trial.
Bortezomib was given by IV weekly at 1.6 mg/m2 for six cycles and rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 during cycles one and four. Patients were taken off therapy after two cycles if they had progressive disease.
The researchers excluded 20 patients from the study because of a lack of material for genotyping. However, they noted that their clinical characteristics were not different from those patients who were included.
Out of 43 patients who were genotyped for CXCR4, 17 patients had a mutation. All patients who carried a CXCR4 mutation also had MYD88 L265P. Ten patients had frameshift mutations, one patient had a nonsense mutation, and six patients had missense mutations. The median follow-up of the analysis was 90.7 months.
The researchers repeated the analysis after excluding six patients with missense mutations and accounting for different treatment settings and found that survival remained unchanged.
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and the International Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Foundation. One of the authors reported consulting and research funding from Takeda, which markets bortezomib, and other companies.
SOURCE: Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R et al. Blood. 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863241.
The use of bortezomib may help overcome treatment resistance in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) with CXCR4 mutations, according to new research.
Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and his colleagues compared the effects of treatment with bortezomib/rituximab in patients with WM based on their CXCR4 mutation status. They found no significant difference in progression-free survival (Log-rank, P = .994) or overall survival (Log-rank, P = .407) when comparing patients who have CXCR4 mutations with those who have CXCR4 wild type.
“We report for the first time that a bortezomib-based combination is impervious to the impact of CXCR4 mutations in a cohort of patients with WM,” the researchers wrote in Blood. “Previously, we had shown this to be true in WM cell lines, whereby genetically engineering BCWM.1 and MWCL-1 to overexpress CXCR4 had no impact on bortezomib resistance.”
The researchers noted, however, that the mechanism at work may be different than that seen with bortezomib in other cancers.
“Different experiments have linked CXCR4 expression and bortezomib in a variety of ways in other hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma. However, despite the complicated association in those cancer types, in WM there seems to be a consistently neutral effect of CXCR4 mutations on bortezomib resistance in both cell line and patient data,” they wrote.
The researchers recommended that the theory be tested in a prospective trial of bortezomib-based therapy in WM patients with CXCR4 mutations. Another question to be investigated, they pointed out, is the role of rituximab in the survival results seen in the current analysis.
The study included 63 patients with WM who were treated with bortezomib/rituximab either as upfront treatment or in the relapsed/refractory setting as part of a phase 2 trial.
Bortezomib was given by IV weekly at 1.6 mg/m2 for six cycles and rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 during cycles one and four. Patients were taken off therapy after two cycles if they had progressive disease.
The researchers excluded 20 patients from the study because of a lack of material for genotyping. However, they noted that their clinical characteristics were not different from those patients who were included.
Out of 43 patients who were genotyped for CXCR4, 17 patients had a mutation. All patients who carried a CXCR4 mutation also had MYD88 L265P. Ten patients had frameshift mutations, one patient had a nonsense mutation, and six patients had missense mutations. The median follow-up of the analysis was 90.7 months.
The researchers repeated the analysis after excluding six patients with missense mutations and accounting for different treatment settings and found that survival remained unchanged.
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and the International Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Foundation. One of the authors reported consulting and research funding from Takeda, which markets bortezomib, and other companies.
SOURCE: Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R et al. Blood. 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863241.
The use of bortezomib may help overcome treatment resistance in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) with CXCR4 mutations, according to new research.
Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, and his colleagues compared the effects of treatment with bortezomib/rituximab in patients with WM based on their CXCR4 mutation status. They found no significant difference in progression-free survival (Log-rank, P = .994) or overall survival (Log-rank, P = .407) when comparing patients who have CXCR4 mutations with those who have CXCR4 wild type.
“We report for the first time that a bortezomib-based combination is impervious to the impact of CXCR4 mutations in a cohort of patients with WM,” the researchers wrote in Blood. “Previously, we had shown this to be true in WM cell lines, whereby genetically engineering BCWM.1 and MWCL-1 to overexpress CXCR4 had no impact on bortezomib resistance.”
The researchers noted, however, that the mechanism at work may be different than that seen with bortezomib in other cancers.
“Different experiments have linked CXCR4 expression and bortezomib in a variety of ways in other hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma. However, despite the complicated association in those cancer types, in WM there seems to be a consistently neutral effect of CXCR4 mutations on bortezomib resistance in both cell line and patient data,” they wrote.
The researchers recommended that the theory be tested in a prospective trial of bortezomib-based therapy in WM patients with CXCR4 mutations. Another question to be investigated, they pointed out, is the role of rituximab in the survival results seen in the current analysis.
The study included 63 patients with WM who were treated with bortezomib/rituximab either as upfront treatment or in the relapsed/refractory setting as part of a phase 2 trial.
Bortezomib was given by IV weekly at 1.6 mg/m2 for six cycles and rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 during cycles one and four. Patients were taken off therapy after two cycles if they had progressive disease.
The researchers excluded 20 patients from the study because of a lack of material for genotyping. However, they noted that their clinical characteristics were not different from those patients who were included.
Out of 43 patients who were genotyped for CXCR4, 17 patients had a mutation. All patients who carried a CXCR4 mutation also had MYD88 L265P. Ten patients had frameshift mutations, one patient had a nonsense mutation, and six patients had missense mutations. The median follow-up of the analysis was 90.7 months.
The researchers repeated the analysis after excluding six patients with missense mutations and accounting for different treatment settings and found that survival remained unchanged.
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and the International Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Foundation. One of the authors reported consulting and research funding from Takeda, which markets bortezomib, and other companies.
SOURCE: Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R et al. Blood. 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863241.
FROM BLOOD
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Progression-free and overall survival were not significantly different between WM patients with CXCR4 mutations and those with CXCR4 wild type (log-rank, P = .994 and P = .407, respectively).
Study details: An analysis of 43 WM patients treated with bortezomib/rituximab and genotyped to determine CXCR4 mutation status.
Disclosures: The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and the International Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Foundation. One of the authors reported consulting and research funding from Takeda, which markets bortezomib, and other companies.
Source: Sklavenitis-Pistofidis R et al. Blood. 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863241.
Relapsed MCL: Options for treatment
CHICAGO – according to Kristie A. Blum, MD.
Venetoclax and lenalidomide can also be considered in the relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) setting, Dr. Blum, a professor in the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University in Atlanta, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
“I tend to favor BTK inhibitors as my first line of therapy,” she said, later qualifying that this applies when clinical trial enrollment is unavailable.
Ibrutinib
The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is well established as a treatment for MCL and for use in the relapsed setting, she said, noting that pooled data from the phase 2 CYC-1104 trial, the phase 2 MCL 2001 (SPARK) trial, and the phase 3 MCL3001 (RAY) trial showed an overall response (OR) rate of 66% in 370 patients and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%.
The median duration of response (DOR) was 18.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (Br J Haematol. 2017 Nov;179[3]:430-8).
Adding rituximab to ibrutinib (R-ibrutinib) improved outcomes, at least in one single center phase 2 trial of 50 relapsed patients with a median of three prior therapies, she said. The OR rate in that study was 88%, and the CR rate was 58% (Br J Haematol. 2018 May;182[3]:404-11).
“What was really impressive to me was that the median duration of response was about 46 months. PFS was 43 months, and patients were on [treatment] as long as 56 cycles,” she said.
Acalabrutinib
The newer BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib also shows benefit in the relapsed MCL setting, Dr. Blum said.
In a recent multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of 124 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median of two prior therapies, acalabrutinib at a dose of 100 mg twice daily was associated with an OR rate of 81% and a CR rate of 40% (Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391:659-67).
“Seems a little better than what you’d expect with single agent ibrutinib,” she said, noting that median DOR and PFS have not been reached in that study.
The main toxicities have been “headache and some diarrhea,” but follow-up is currently only about 15 months, she added.
Venetoclax
Another option in this setting is the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax, which was shown in a recent phase 1 study of patients with various lymphoma subtypes to have activity in relapsed MCL, Dr. Blum said.
The OR rate in 28 relapsed MCL patients in that study was 75%, and the median PFS was 14 months (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35:826-33).
Additionally, an “intriguing combination study of venetoclax and ibrutinib” was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, she noted.
That study included only 23 patients with relapsed MCL, but they were a “pretty high-risk” group with a median age of 68 years, about half having a TP53 abnormality, and 30% having a prior transplant.
The OR and CR rates at 16 weeks by positron emission tomography were 71% and 62%, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378:1211-23).
“Actually, about 40% achieved [minimal residual disease] negativity, but this was only checked in about half the patients,” she said. “So this is an intriguing combination and hopefully something we’ll see more of in the upcoming years.”
Lenalidomide
In the randomized phase 2 SPRINT study, patients received either single-agent lenolidamine or the investigator’s choice of single-agent rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine.
The expected OR rate in 170 patients treated with lenalidomide was 40% versus 11% in 84 patients treated with investigator’s choice of treatment, and the respective CR rates were 5% and 0% (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):319-31).
Median DOR was 16 months versus 10.4 months, PFS was 8.7 versus 5.2 months, and median OS was 27.9 versus 21.1 months in the groups, respectively.
Other options
Combination regimens, such as R-CHOP and R-bendamustine, are also options for the treatment of relapsed MCL patients who haven’t received combination therapy in the past, Dr. Blum said. Transplant is another option in some patients.
“I will consider transplants for younger patients if they come to me and they actually hadn’t had one in [their] first CR,” she said.
Dr. Blum is a consultant for Acerta, AstraZeneca, and Molecular Templates and has received research funding from Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Cephalon, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Millennium, Molecular Templates, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics.
CHICAGO – according to Kristie A. Blum, MD.
Venetoclax and lenalidomide can also be considered in the relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) setting, Dr. Blum, a professor in the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University in Atlanta, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
“I tend to favor BTK inhibitors as my first line of therapy,” she said, later qualifying that this applies when clinical trial enrollment is unavailable.
Ibrutinib
The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is well established as a treatment for MCL and for use in the relapsed setting, she said, noting that pooled data from the phase 2 CYC-1104 trial, the phase 2 MCL 2001 (SPARK) trial, and the phase 3 MCL3001 (RAY) trial showed an overall response (OR) rate of 66% in 370 patients and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%.
The median duration of response (DOR) was 18.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (Br J Haematol. 2017 Nov;179[3]:430-8).
Adding rituximab to ibrutinib (R-ibrutinib) improved outcomes, at least in one single center phase 2 trial of 50 relapsed patients with a median of three prior therapies, she said. The OR rate in that study was 88%, and the CR rate was 58% (Br J Haematol. 2018 May;182[3]:404-11).
“What was really impressive to me was that the median duration of response was about 46 months. PFS was 43 months, and patients were on [treatment] as long as 56 cycles,” she said.
Acalabrutinib
The newer BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib also shows benefit in the relapsed MCL setting, Dr. Blum said.
In a recent multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of 124 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median of two prior therapies, acalabrutinib at a dose of 100 mg twice daily was associated with an OR rate of 81% and a CR rate of 40% (Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391:659-67).
“Seems a little better than what you’d expect with single agent ibrutinib,” she said, noting that median DOR and PFS have not been reached in that study.
The main toxicities have been “headache and some diarrhea,” but follow-up is currently only about 15 months, she added.
Venetoclax
Another option in this setting is the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax, which was shown in a recent phase 1 study of patients with various lymphoma subtypes to have activity in relapsed MCL, Dr. Blum said.
The OR rate in 28 relapsed MCL patients in that study was 75%, and the median PFS was 14 months (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35:826-33).
Additionally, an “intriguing combination study of venetoclax and ibrutinib” was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, she noted.
That study included only 23 patients with relapsed MCL, but they were a “pretty high-risk” group with a median age of 68 years, about half having a TP53 abnormality, and 30% having a prior transplant.
The OR and CR rates at 16 weeks by positron emission tomography were 71% and 62%, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378:1211-23).
“Actually, about 40% achieved [minimal residual disease] negativity, but this was only checked in about half the patients,” she said. “So this is an intriguing combination and hopefully something we’ll see more of in the upcoming years.”
Lenalidomide
In the randomized phase 2 SPRINT study, patients received either single-agent lenolidamine or the investigator’s choice of single-agent rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine.
The expected OR rate in 170 patients treated with lenalidomide was 40% versus 11% in 84 patients treated with investigator’s choice of treatment, and the respective CR rates were 5% and 0% (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):319-31).
Median DOR was 16 months versus 10.4 months, PFS was 8.7 versus 5.2 months, and median OS was 27.9 versus 21.1 months in the groups, respectively.
Other options
Combination regimens, such as R-CHOP and R-bendamustine, are also options for the treatment of relapsed MCL patients who haven’t received combination therapy in the past, Dr. Blum said. Transplant is another option in some patients.
“I will consider transplants for younger patients if they come to me and they actually hadn’t had one in [their] first CR,” she said.
Dr. Blum is a consultant for Acerta, AstraZeneca, and Molecular Templates and has received research funding from Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Cephalon, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Millennium, Molecular Templates, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics.
CHICAGO – according to Kristie A. Blum, MD.
Venetoclax and lenalidomide can also be considered in the relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) setting, Dr. Blum, a professor in the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University in Atlanta, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
“I tend to favor BTK inhibitors as my first line of therapy,” she said, later qualifying that this applies when clinical trial enrollment is unavailable.
Ibrutinib
The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is well established as a treatment for MCL and for use in the relapsed setting, she said, noting that pooled data from the phase 2 CYC-1104 trial, the phase 2 MCL 2001 (SPARK) trial, and the phase 3 MCL3001 (RAY) trial showed an overall response (OR) rate of 66% in 370 patients and a complete response (CR) rate of 20%.
The median duration of response (DOR) was 18.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 25 months (Br J Haematol. 2017 Nov;179[3]:430-8).
Adding rituximab to ibrutinib (R-ibrutinib) improved outcomes, at least in one single center phase 2 trial of 50 relapsed patients with a median of three prior therapies, she said. The OR rate in that study was 88%, and the CR rate was 58% (Br J Haematol. 2018 May;182[3]:404-11).
“What was really impressive to me was that the median duration of response was about 46 months. PFS was 43 months, and patients were on [treatment] as long as 56 cycles,” she said.
Acalabrutinib
The newer BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib also shows benefit in the relapsed MCL setting, Dr. Blum said.
In a recent multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of 124 patients with a median age of 68 years and a median of two prior therapies, acalabrutinib at a dose of 100 mg twice daily was associated with an OR rate of 81% and a CR rate of 40% (Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391:659-67).
“Seems a little better than what you’d expect with single agent ibrutinib,” she said, noting that median DOR and PFS have not been reached in that study.
The main toxicities have been “headache and some diarrhea,” but follow-up is currently only about 15 months, she added.
Venetoclax
Another option in this setting is the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax, which was shown in a recent phase 1 study of patients with various lymphoma subtypes to have activity in relapsed MCL, Dr. Blum said.
The OR rate in 28 relapsed MCL patients in that study was 75%, and the median PFS was 14 months (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35:826-33).
Additionally, an “intriguing combination study of venetoclax and ibrutinib” was recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, she noted.
That study included only 23 patients with relapsed MCL, but they were a “pretty high-risk” group with a median age of 68 years, about half having a TP53 abnormality, and 30% having a prior transplant.
The OR and CR rates at 16 weeks by positron emission tomography were 71% and 62%, respectively (N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378:1211-23).
“Actually, about 40% achieved [minimal residual disease] negativity, but this was only checked in about half the patients,” she said. “So this is an intriguing combination and hopefully something we’ll see more of in the upcoming years.”
Lenalidomide
In the randomized phase 2 SPRINT study, patients received either single-agent lenolidamine or the investigator’s choice of single-agent rituximab, gemcitabine, fludarabine, chlorambucil, or cytarabine.
The expected OR rate in 170 patients treated with lenalidomide was 40% versus 11% in 84 patients treated with investigator’s choice of treatment, and the respective CR rates were 5% and 0% (Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):319-31).
Median DOR was 16 months versus 10.4 months, PFS was 8.7 versus 5.2 months, and median OS was 27.9 versus 21.1 months in the groups, respectively.
Other options
Combination regimens, such as R-CHOP and R-bendamustine, are also options for the treatment of relapsed MCL patients who haven’t received combination therapy in the past, Dr. Blum said. Transplant is another option in some patients.
“I will consider transplants for younger patients if they come to me and they actually hadn’t had one in [their] first CR,” she said.
Dr. Blum is a consultant for Acerta, AstraZeneca, and Molecular Templates and has received research funding from Acerta, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Cephalon, Immunomedics, Janssen, Merck, Millennium, Molecular Templates, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM MHM 2018
Consider treatment, testing when CLL symptoms emerge
CHICAGO – said Paul M. Barr, MD.
He described a patient who had been observed for 7 years when he began to complain of increasing fatigue and lost work time. A complete blood count (CBC) showed thrombocytopenia.
The recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines state that assessments before treatment in this type of patient should include history and physical, evaluation of infectious disease status, and routine laboratory testing – including CBC and differential, chemistry, serum immunoglobulin, and direct antiglobulin test.
“Bone marrow biopsies and [computed tomography] scans are listed as ‘not necessarily required,’ ” Dr. Barr, medical director of the Clinical Trials Office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
He added that he opts for CT scans prior to therapy “to understand the patient’s disease burden and potentially to compare to later” and that bone marrow biopsy is “still very reasonable” for understanding the source of a patient’s cytopenias.
“Is it marrow failure or [immune thrombocytopenia]? Could the patient have [myelodysplastic syndrome]? All important considerations,” he said.
Positron emission tomography (PET) scans, however, are only considered when there is concern about transformation, he noted.
Predictive tests that should be conducted before initiating therapy, and that could help in guiding therapy decisions, include TP53 mutation testing and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutational status testing (although this doesn’t need to be repeated if it was done at diagnosis because mutational status doesn’t change). Another helpful test is molecular cytogenetics using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for del(13q), del(17p), and trisomy 12 in peripheral blood lymphocytes. This should be repeated even it was done at diagnosis because patients can acquire additional molecular aberrations over time, Dr. Barr said.
Among the data that justify this advice for predictive testing are studies showing the curative potential of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) in mutated IGHV CLL, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of ibrutinib for patients with del(17p), and the activity of idelalisib in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, including those with TP53 dysfunction.
“The IGHV mutation status is useful to know what to expect from chemoimmunotherapy over time,” Dr. Barr said, explaining that several analyses demonstrate that patients with mutated IGHV genes (patients with low-risk disease) respond exceptionally well to chemoimmunotherapy, especially FCR.
In fact, studies, including a 2016 study by Philip A. Thompson and his colleagues and another by Kirsten Fischer and her colleagues, show that nearly 60% of patients with IGHV mutation remain in remission 10 years after FCR treatment, he said. However, the same is not necessarily true for bendamustine/rituximab (BR); the CLL10 study showed a significantly greater PFS with FCR, compared with that seen with BR.
Unmutated patients in that study had lower PFS, but the outcomes were still better with FCR than with BR, he said.
Studies of novel agents, including ibrutinib and idelalisib, suggest they may have particular benefit in higher-risk patients.
Ibrutinib was shown in a phase 2 study to be of benefit regardless of IGHV status, and this was replicated in the first-line RESONATE 2 study, which compared ibrutinib with chlorambucil and showed it had better PFS than that seen in unmutated patients treated with FCR in other studies, said Dr. Barr, the first author on that study.
“So you can see how the treatment paradigms are starting to evolve. It does look like ... comparing across trials, that ibrutinib leads to better remission durations, compared to chemoimmunotherapy, so far,” he said.
Ibrutinib has also been shown to be of benefit for patients with del(17p). A single-arm phase 2 study showed 79% PFS in relapsed, high-risk patients, which is much better than has been seen with chemoimmunotherapy, he noted.
“Venetoclax is also a very good option for this patient population in the relapse setting,” he said, adding that the PFS with venetoclax has been shown to be very similar to that with ibrutinib.
Similarly, idelalisib has been shown to provide comparable benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, with and without del(17p)/TP53 mutation, he said.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
CHICAGO – said Paul M. Barr, MD.
He described a patient who had been observed for 7 years when he began to complain of increasing fatigue and lost work time. A complete blood count (CBC) showed thrombocytopenia.
The recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines state that assessments before treatment in this type of patient should include history and physical, evaluation of infectious disease status, and routine laboratory testing – including CBC and differential, chemistry, serum immunoglobulin, and direct antiglobulin test.
“Bone marrow biopsies and [computed tomography] scans are listed as ‘not necessarily required,’ ” Dr. Barr, medical director of the Clinical Trials Office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
He added that he opts for CT scans prior to therapy “to understand the patient’s disease burden and potentially to compare to later” and that bone marrow biopsy is “still very reasonable” for understanding the source of a patient’s cytopenias.
“Is it marrow failure or [immune thrombocytopenia]? Could the patient have [myelodysplastic syndrome]? All important considerations,” he said.
Positron emission tomography (PET) scans, however, are only considered when there is concern about transformation, he noted.
Predictive tests that should be conducted before initiating therapy, and that could help in guiding therapy decisions, include TP53 mutation testing and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutational status testing (although this doesn’t need to be repeated if it was done at diagnosis because mutational status doesn’t change). Another helpful test is molecular cytogenetics using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for del(13q), del(17p), and trisomy 12 in peripheral blood lymphocytes. This should be repeated even it was done at diagnosis because patients can acquire additional molecular aberrations over time, Dr. Barr said.
Among the data that justify this advice for predictive testing are studies showing the curative potential of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) in mutated IGHV CLL, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of ibrutinib for patients with del(17p), and the activity of idelalisib in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, including those with TP53 dysfunction.
“The IGHV mutation status is useful to know what to expect from chemoimmunotherapy over time,” Dr. Barr said, explaining that several analyses demonstrate that patients with mutated IGHV genes (patients with low-risk disease) respond exceptionally well to chemoimmunotherapy, especially FCR.
In fact, studies, including a 2016 study by Philip A. Thompson and his colleagues and another by Kirsten Fischer and her colleagues, show that nearly 60% of patients with IGHV mutation remain in remission 10 years after FCR treatment, he said. However, the same is not necessarily true for bendamustine/rituximab (BR); the CLL10 study showed a significantly greater PFS with FCR, compared with that seen with BR.
Unmutated patients in that study had lower PFS, but the outcomes were still better with FCR than with BR, he said.
Studies of novel agents, including ibrutinib and idelalisib, suggest they may have particular benefit in higher-risk patients.
Ibrutinib was shown in a phase 2 study to be of benefit regardless of IGHV status, and this was replicated in the first-line RESONATE 2 study, which compared ibrutinib with chlorambucil and showed it had better PFS than that seen in unmutated patients treated with FCR in other studies, said Dr. Barr, the first author on that study.
“So you can see how the treatment paradigms are starting to evolve. It does look like ... comparing across trials, that ibrutinib leads to better remission durations, compared to chemoimmunotherapy, so far,” he said.
Ibrutinib has also been shown to be of benefit for patients with del(17p). A single-arm phase 2 study showed 79% PFS in relapsed, high-risk patients, which is much better than has been seen with chemoimmunotherapy, he noted.
“Venetoclax is also a very good option for this patient population in the relapse setting,” he said, adding that the PFS with venetoclax has been shown to be very similar to that with ibrutinib.
Similarly, idelalisib has been shown to provide comparable benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, with and without del(17p)/TP53 mutation, he said.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
CHICAGO – said Paul M. Barr, MD.
He described a patient who had been observed for 7 years when he began to complain of increasing fatigue and lost work time. A complete blood count (CBC) showed thrombocytopenia.
The recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines state that assessments before treatment in this type of patient should include history and physical, evaluation of infectious disease status, and routine laboratory testing – including CBC and differential, chemistry, serum immunoglobulin, and direct antiglobulin test.
“Bone marrow biopsies and [computed tomography] scans are listed as ‘not necessarily required,’ ” Dr. Barr, medical director of the Clinical Trials Office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
He added that he opts for CT scans prior to therapy “to understand the patient’s disease burden and potentially to compare to later” and that bone marrow biopsy is “still very reasonable” for understanding the source of a patient’s cytopenias.
“Is it marrow failure or [immune thrombocytopenia]? Could the patient have [myelodysplastic syndrome]? All important considerations,” he said.
Positron emission tomography (PET) scans, however, are only considered when there is concern about transformation, he noted.
Predictive tests that should be conducted before initiating therapy, and that could help in guiding therapy decisions, include TP53 mutation testing and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region gene (IGHV) mutational status testing (although this doesn’t need to be repeated if it was done at diagnosis because mutational status doesn’t change). Another helpful test is molecular cytogenetics using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for del(13q), del(17p), and trisomy 12 in peripheral blood lymphocytes. This should be repeated even it was done at diagnosis because patients can acquire additional molecular aberrations over time, Dr. Barr said.
Among the data that justify this advice for predictive testing are studies showing the curative potential of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) in mutated IGHV CLL, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefits of ibrutinib for patients with del(17p), and the activity of idelalisib in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, including those with TP53 dysfunction.
“The IGHV mutation status is useful to know what to expect from chemoimmunotherapy over time,” Dr. Barr said, explaining that several analyses demonstrate that patients with mutated IGHV genes (patients with low-risk disease) respond exceptionally well to chemoimmunotherapy, especially FCR.
In fact, studies, including a 2016 study by Philip A. Thompson and his colleagues and another by Kirsten Fischer and her colleagues, show that nearly 60% of patients with IGHV mutation remain in remission 10 years after FCR treatment, he said. However, the same is not necessarily true for bendamustine/rituximab (BR); the CLL10 study showed a significantly greater PFS with FCR, compared with that seen with BR.
Unmutated patients in that study had lower PFS, but the outcomes were still better with FCR than with BR, he said.
Studies of novel agents, including ibrutinib and idelalisib, suggest they may have particular benefit in higher-risk patients.
Ibrutinib was shown in a phase 2 study to be of benefit regardless of IGHV status, and this was replicated in the first-line RESONATE 2 study, which compared ibrutinib with chlorambucil and showed it had better PFS than that seen in unmutated patients treated with FCR in other studies, said Dr. Barr, the first author on that study.
“So you can see how the treatment paradigms are starting to evolve. It does look like ... comparing across trials, that ibrutinib leads to better remission durations, compared to chemoimmunotherapy, so far,” he said.
Ibrutinib has also been shown to be of benefit for patients with del(17p). A single-arm phase 2 study showed 79% PFS in relapsed, high-risk patients, which is much better than has been seen with chemoimmunotherapy, he noted.
“Venetoclax is also a very good option for this patient population in the relapse setting,” he said, adding that the PFS with venetoclax has been shown to be very similar to that with ibrutinib.
Similarly, idelalisib has been shown to provide comparable benefit in relapsed/refractory CLL patients, with and without del(17p)/TP53 mutation, he said.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM MHM 2018
CLL: The initial work-up
CHICAGO – A 50-year old otherwise healthy man was found on routine history and physical to have lymphocytosis and was referred for additional work-up. He denied recent infection, had no lymphadenopathy, organomegaly, or rash or other concerning skin lesions. A complete blood count showed a white cell count of 23 x 109/Land absolute lymphocyte count of 19 x 109/L and normal hemoglobin and platelets.
Based on recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines, additional work-up for this patient might include peripheral smear and flow cytometry, according to Paul Barr, MD.
“A peripheral smear is still useful in this day and age just to ensure that a patient has a typical look under the microscope. We expect to see small mature lymphocytes, smudge cells, and perhaps a smaller number of prolymphocytes. But to mark CLL based on flow cytometry we need to see greater than 5 x 109/L clonal B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood sustained over time,” Dr. Barr, medical director of the clinical trials office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
A nuance in the iwCLL guidelines is that CLL also can be defined by a cytopenia caused by a typical marrow infiltrate, regardless of the number of circulating B lymphocytes, he noted.
Immunophenotype
As for CLL immunophenotype, the cells are CD5- and CD23-positive, and additional B cell markers like CD20 are “often dim, and – understandably – the cells are light-chain restricted,” he said.
A subtle difference between the World Health Organization classification of CLL and the iwCLL guidelines is that, by the former, patients can have “a somewhat atypical immunophenotype.”
“So our pathologists, I like to think, use a commonsense approach where, if there are very minor differences, they will still call it CLL, but not if there are major differences in the immunophenotype,” Dr. Barr said.
Patients with lymphadenopathy, without the critical threshold of circulating B lymphocytes, are considered to have small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).
“In this day and age we treat CLL and SLL relatively similarly, however, monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) is the precursor lesion to CLL where we see less than 5 x 109/L of circulating B lymphocytes and an absence of adenopathy and disease-related cytopenias,” he noted.
Staging
It is still common practice to stage patients given the prognostic value of staging and given that treatment is provided in advanced disease, Dr. Barr said.
“This is simple, easy to apply, applicable worldwide, and only requires laboratory testing and a physical exam,” he said.
The stages include:
- Stage 0: Lymphocytosis, peripheral lymphocyte count greater than 15,000/mcL and greater than 40% lymphocytes in bone marrow (low-risk disease status).
- Stage I: Stage 0 disease plus enlarged lymph nodes (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage II: Stage 0-I disease with splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage III: Stage 0-II disease with hemoglobin less than 11g/dL or hematocrit less than 33% (high-risk disease status).
- Stage IV: Stage 0-III disease with platelet count less than 100,000/mcL (high-risk disease status).
Prognostic testing
Once a patient is diagnosed with CLL, as was the case with the 50-year-old patient Dr. Barr described, a number of tests can be considered to assess prognosis.
There’s no “perfect answer” when it comes to which tests are considered a reasonable standard of care, he noted.
“I would typically perform [immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene] mutation testing, a [fluorescence in situ hybridization] panel, and TP53 mutation testing,” he said.
Scoring systems such as CLL-IPI, which combine prognostic factors to divide patients into various risk categories, can be useful.
For example, such systems may identify high-risk patients who might be appropriate candidates for clinical trials, or low-risk patients who could be expected to do well over time despite having advanced stage disease, he explained.
“I do think it’s a useful process to go through to understand a patient’s risk over time,” he added.
However, treatment for CLL still is not based on molecular aberrations/prognostic features. In fact, the treatment indications according to the updated iwCLL guidelines remain exactly the same, he said.
Therefore, the case of the 50-year-old man described earlier would be observed as long as he remained asymptomatic.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
CHICAGO – A 50-year old otherwise healthy man was found on routine history and physical to have lymphocytosis and was referred for additional work-up. He denied recent infection, had no lymphadenopathy, organomegaly, or rash or other concerning skin lesions. A complete blood count showed a white cell count of 23 x 109/Land absolute lymphocyte count of 19 x 109/L and normal hemoglobin and platelets.
Based on recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines, additional work-up for this patient might include peripheral smear and flow cytometry, according to Paul Barr, MD.
“A peripheral smear is still useful in this day and age just to ensure that a patient has a typical look under the microscope. We expect to see small mature lymphocytes, smudge cells, and perhaps a smaller number of prolymphocytes. But to mark CLL based on flow cytometry we need to see greater than 5 x 109/L clonal B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood sustained over time,” Dr. Barr, medical director of the clinical trials office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
A nuance in the iwCLL guidelines is that CLL also can be defined by a cytopenia caused by a typical marrow infiltrate, regardless of the number of circulating B lymphocytes, he noted.
Immunophenotype
As for CLL immunophenotype, the cells are CD5- and CD23-positive, and additional B cell markers like CD20 are “often dim, and – understandably – the cells are light-chain restricted,” he said.
A subtle difference between the World Health Organization classification of CLL and the iwCLL guidelines is that, by the former, patients can have “a somewhat atypical immunophenotype.”
“So our pathologists, I like to think, use a commonsense approach where, if there are very minor differences, they will still call it CLL, but not if there are major differences in the immunophenotype,” Dr. Barr said.
Patients with lymphadenopathy, without the critical threshold of circulating B lymphocytes, are considered to have small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).
“In this day and age we treat CLL and SLL relatively similarly, however, monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) is the precursor lesion to CLL where we see less than 5 x 109/L of circulating B lymphocytes and an absence of adenopathy and disease-related cytopenias,” he noted.
Staging
It is still common practice to stage patients given the prognostic value of staging and given that treatment is provided in advanced disease, Dr. Barr said.
“This is simple, easy to apply, applicable worldwide, and only requires laboratory testing and a physical exam,” he said.
The stages include:
- Stage 0: Lymphocytosis, peripheral lymphocyte count greater than 15,000/mcL and greater than 40% lymphocytes in bone marrow (low-risk disease status).
- Stage I: Stage 0 disease plus enlarged lymph nodes (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage II: Stage 0-I disease with splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage III: Stage 0-II disease with hemoglobin less than 11g/dL or hematocrit less than 33% (high-risk disease status).
- Stage IV: Stage 0-III disease with platelet count less than 100,000/mcL (high-risk disease status).
Prognostic testing
Once a patient is diagnosed with CLL, as was the case with the 50-year-old patient Dr. Barr described, a number of tests can be considered to assess prognosis.
There’s no “perfect answer” when it comes to which tests are considered a reasonable standard of care, he noted.
“I would typically perform [immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene] mutation testing, a [fluorescence in situ hybridization] panel, and TP53 mutation testing,” he said.
Scoring systems such as CLL-IPI, which combine prognostic factors to divide patients into various risk categories, can be useful.
For example, such systems may identify high-risk patients who might be appropriate candidates for clinical trials, or low-risk patients who could be expected to do well over time despite having advanced stage disease, he explained.
“I do think it’s a useful process to go through to understand a patient’s risk over time,” he added.
However, treatment for CLL still is not based on molecular aberrations/prognostic features. In fact, the treatment indications according to the updated iwCLL guidelines remain exactly the same, he said.
Therefore, the case of the 50-year-old man described earlier would be observed as long as he remained asymptomatic.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
CHICAGO – A 50-year old otherwise healthy man was found on routine history and physical to have lymphocytosis and was referred for additional work-up. He denied recent infection, had no lymphadenopathy, organomegaly, or rash or other concerning skin lesions. A complete blood count showed a white cell count of 23 x 109/Land absolute lymphocyte count of 19 x 109/L and normal hemoglobin and platelets.
Based on recently updated International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) guidelines, additional work-up for this patient might include peripheral smear and flow cytometry, according to Paul Barr, MD.
“A peripheral smear is still useful in this day and age just to ensure that a patient has a typical look under the microscope. We expect to see small mature lymphocytes, smudge cells, and perhaps a smaller number of prolymphocytes. But to mark CLL based on flow cytometry we need to see greater than 5 x 109/L clonal B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood sustained over time,” Dr. Barr, medical director of the clinical trials office for Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), said during a presentation at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.
A nuance in the iwCLL guidelines is that CLL also can be defined by a cytopenia caused by a typical marrow infiltrate, regardless of the number of circulating B lymphocytes, he noted.
Immunophenotype
As for CLL immunophenotype, the cells are CD5- and CD23-positive, and additional B cell markers like CD20 are “often dim, and – understandably – the cells are light-chain restricted,” he said.
A subtle difference between the World Health Organization classification of CLL and the iwCLL guidelines is that, by the former, patients can have “a somewhat atypical immunophenotype.”
“So our pathologists, I like to think, use a commonsense approach where, if there are very minor differences, they will still call it CLL, but not if there are major differences in the immunophenotype,” Dr. Barr said.
Patients with lymphadenopathy, without the critical threshold of circulating B lymphocytes, are considered to have small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).
“In this day and age we treat CLL and SLL relatively similarly, however, monoclonal B lymphocytosis (MBL) is the precursor lesion to CLL where we see less than 5 x 109/L of circulating B lymphocytes and an absence of adenopathy and disease-related cytopenias,” he noted.
Staging
It is still common practice to stage patients given the prognostic value of staging and given that treatment is provided in advanced disease, Dr. Barr said.
“This is simple, easy to apply, applicable worldwide, and only requires laboratory testing and a physical exam,” he said.
The stages include:
- Stage 0: Lymphocytosis, peripheral lymphocyte count greater than 15,000/mcL and greater than 40% lymphocytes in bone marrow (low-risk disease status).
- Stage I: Stage 0 disease plus enlarged lymph nodes (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage II: Stage 0-I disease with splenomegaly and/or hepatomegaly (intermediate-risk disease status).
- Stage III: Stage 0-II disease with hemoglobin less than 11g/dL or hematocrit less than 33% (high-risk disease status).
- Stage IV: Stage 0-III disease with platelet count less than 100,000/mcL (high-risk disease status).
Prognostic testing
Once a patient is diagnosed with CLL, as was the case with the 50-year-old patient Dr. Barr described, a number of tests can be considered to assess prognosis.
There’s no “perfect answer” when it comes to which tests are considered a reasonable standard of care, he noted.
“I would typically perform [immunoglobulin variable heavy-chain gene] mutation testing, a [fluorescence in situ hybridization] panel, and TP53 mutation testing,” he said.
Scoring systems such as CLL-IPI, which combine prognostic factors to divide patients into various risk categories, can be useful.
For example, such systems may identify high-risk patients who might be appropriate candidates for clinical trials, or low-risk patients who could be expected to do well over time despite having advanced stage disease, he explained.
“I do think it’s a useful process to go through to understand a patient’s risk over time,” he added.
However, treatment for CLL still is not based on molecular aberrations/prognostic features. In fact, the treatment indications according to the updated iwCLL guidelines remain exactly the same, he said.
Therefore, the case of the 50-year-old man described earlier would be observed as long as he remained asymptomatic.
Dr. Barr is a consultant for Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Celgene, Gilead, Infinity, Novartis, and Seattle Genetics and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics and AbbVie.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM MHM 2018
FDA puts selinexor on fast track for DLBCL
The Food and Drug Administration has granted fast track designation to selinexor for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
The designation is for selinexor to treat DLBCL patients who have received at least two prior therapies and who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
Selinexor is being studied in the phase 2b SADAL trial (NCT02227251), which is enrolling patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who have received two to five prior therapies and are not eligible for stem cell transplant.
Top-line results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (Abstract 1677).
Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound being developed by Karyopharm Therapeutics.
The company previously received fast track designation for selinexor to treat patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy.
The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products that are intended to treat serious conditions and have the potential to address unmet medical needs. Fast track designation provides developers with greater access to the FDA as well as eligibility for accelerated approval, priority review, and rolling review.
“Pending positive results from the phase 2b SADAL study, we plan to submit a second NDA [new drug application] to the FDA in the first half of 2019, with a request for accelerated approval, for oral selinexor as a potential new treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” Sharon Shacham, PhD, founder, president, and chief scientific officer of Karyopharm, said in a statement.
In October, the FDA accepted an NDA for selinexor as a treatment for penta-refractory multiple myeloma. The agency granted the application priority review and set an action date of April 6, 2019.
The Food and Drug Administration has granted fast track designation to selinexor for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
The designation is for selinexor to treat DLBCL patients who have received at least two prior therapies and who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
Selinexor is being studied in the phase 2b SADAL trial (NCT02227251), which is enrolling patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who have received two to five prior therapies and are not eligible for stem cell transplant.
Top-line results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (Abstract 1677).
Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound being developed by Karyopharm Therapeutics.
The company previously received fast track designation for selinexor to treat patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy.
The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products that are intended to treat serious conditions and have the potential to address unmet medical needs. Fast track designation provides developers with greater access to the FDA as well as eligibility for accelerated approval, priority review, and rolling review.
“Pending positive results from the phase 2b SADAL study, we plan to submit a second NDA [new drug application] to the FDA in the first half of 2019, with a request for accelerated approval, for oral selinexor as a potential new treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” Sharon Shacham, PhD, founder, president, and chief scientific officer of Karyopharm, said in a statement.
In October, the FDA accepted an NDA for selinexor as a treatment for penta-refractory multiple myeloma. The agency granted the application priority review and set an action date of April 6, 2019.
The Food and Drug Administration has granted fast track designation to selinexor for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
The designation is for selinexor to treat DLBCL patients who have received at least two prior therapies and who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.
Selinexor is being studied in the phase 2b SADAL trial (NCT02227251), which is enrolling patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who have received two to five prior therapies and are not eligible for stem cell transplant.
Top-line results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting (Abstract 1677).
Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound being developed by Karyopharm Therapeutics.
The company previously received fast track designation for selinexor to treat patients with penta-refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least three prior lines of therapy.
The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products that are intended to treat serious conditions and have the potential to address unmet medical needs. Fast track designation provides developers with greater access to the FDA as well as eligibility for accelerated approval, priority review, and rolling review.
“Pending positive results from the phase 2b SADAL study, we plan to submit a second NDA [new drug application] to the FDA in the first half of 2019, with a request for accelerated approval, for oral selinexor as a potential new treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL,” Sharon Shacham, PhD, founder, president, and chief scientific officer of Karyopharm, said in a statement.
In October, the FDA accepted an NDA for selinexor as a treatment for penta-refractory multiple myeloma. The agency granted the application priority review and set an action date of April 6, 2019.
Zanubrutinib looks ‘robust’ in Waldenström macroglobulinemia
The BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib has demonstrated “robust activity” and “good tolerability” in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), according to an investigator.
In a phase 1 trial, zanubrutinib produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 92%, and the estimated 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%.
Most adverse events (AEs) in this trial were grade 1 or 2 in severity, although the incidence of serious AEs was 42%.
Constantine Tam, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center in Victoria, Australia, presented these results at the 10th International Workshop on Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene, the company developing zanubrutinib.
The trial (NCT02343120) includes patients with WM and other B-cell malignancies. As of July 24, 2018, 77 patients with treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory WM had been enrolled. Of those patients, 73 were evaluable for efficacy in this analysis, and the median follow-up time was 22.5 months.
At the time of the data cutoff, 62 patients remained on study treatment. Four patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression, and one patient remains on treatment after progression.
The median time to response was 85 days. The ORR was 92%, and the major response rate (MRR) was 82%. Of patients in the analysis, 41% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), defined as a greater than 90% reduction in baseline immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels and improvement of extramedullary disease by computed tomography.
The median IgM decreased from 32.7 g/L at baseline to 8.2 g/L. The median hemoglobin increased from 8.85 g/dL to 13.4 g/dL among 32 patients with hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL at baseline.
MYD88 genotype was known in 63 patients. In the subset known to have the MYD88L265P mutation (n = 54), the ORR was 94%, the MRR was 89%, and the VGPR rate was 46%. In the nine patients known to have wild-type MYD88 (a genotype that, historically, has had suboptimal response to BTK inhibition), the ORR was 89%, the MRR was 67%, and the VGPR rate was 22%.
The 12-month PFS was estimated to be 89%, and the median PFS had not been reached.
The most frequent AEs of any attribution were petechiae/purpura/contusion (43%), upper respiratory tract infection (42%), cough (17%), diarrhea (17%), constipation (16%), back pain (16%), and headache (16%). Grade 3-4 AEs of any attribution reported in three or more patients included neutropenia (9%), anemia (7%), hypertension (5%), basal cell carcinoma (5%), renal and urinary disorders (4%), and pneumonia (4%). Serious AEs were seen in 32 patients (42%). Events in five patients (7%) were considered possibly related to zanubrutinib treatment – febrile neutropenia, colitis, atrial fibrillation, hemothorax, and pneumonia. Atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in four patients (5%), and major hemorrhage was observed in two patients (3%).
“We are encouraged that additional data on zanubrutinib in patients with WM confirms the initially reported experience with consistent demonstration of robust activity and good tolerability,” Dr. Tam said in a statement.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported financial relationships with BeiGene and other companies.
The BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib has demonstrated “robust activity” and “good tolerability” in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), according to an investigator.
In a phase 1 trial, zanubrutinib produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 92%, and the estimated 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%.
Most adverse events (AEs) in this trial were grade 1 or 2 in severity, although the incidence of serious AEs was 42%.
Constantine Tam, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center in Victoria, Australia, presented these results at the 10th International Workshop on Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene, the company developing zanubrutinib.
The trial (NCT02343120) includes patients with WM and other B-cell malignancies. As of July 24, 2018, 77 patients with treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory WM had been enrolled. Of those patients, 73 were evaluable for efficacy in this analysis, and the median follow-up time was 22.5 months.
At the time of the data cutoff, 62 patients remained on study treatment. Four patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression, and one patient remains on treatment after progression.
The median time to response was 85 days. The ORR was 92%, and the major response rate (MRR) was 82%. Of patients in the analysis, 41% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), defined as a greater than 90% reduction in baseline immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels and improvement of extramedullary disease by computed tomography.
The median IgM decreased from 32.7 g/L at baseline to 8.2 g/L. The median hemoglobin increased from 8.85 g/dL to 13.4 g/dL among 32 patients with hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL at baseline.
MYD88 genotype was known in 63 patients. In the subset known to have the MYD88L265P mutation (n = 54), the ORR was 94%, the MRR was 89%, and the VGPR rate was 46%. In the nine patients known to have wild-type MYD88 (a genotype that, historically, has had suboptimal response to BTK inhibition), the ORR was 89%, the MRR was 67%, and the VGPR rate was 22%.
The 12-month PFS was estimated to be 89%, and the median PFS had not been reached.
The most frequent AEs of any attribution were petechiae/purpura/contusion (43%), upper respiratory tract infection (42%), cough (17%), diarrhea (17%), constipation (16%), back pain (16%), and headache (16%). Grade 3-4 AEs of any attribution reported in three or more patients included neutropenia (9%), anemia (7%), hypertension (5%), basal cell carcinoma (5%), renal and urinary disorders (4%), and pneumonia (4%). Serious AEs were seen in 32 patients (42%). Events in five patients (7%) were considered possibly related to zanubrutinib treatment – febrile neutropenia, colitis, atrial fibrillation, hemothorax, and pneumonia. Atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in four patients (5%), and major hemorrhage was observed in two patients (3%).
“We are encouraged that additional data on zanubrutinib in patients with WM confirms the initially reported experience with consistent demonstration of robust activity and good tolerability,” Dr. Tam said in a statement.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported financial relationships with BeiGene and other companies.
The BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib has demonstrated “robust activity” and “good tolerability” in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), according to an investigator.
In a phase 1 trial, zanubrutinib produced an overall response rate (ORR) of 92%, and the estimated 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%.
Most adverse events (AEs) in this trial were grade 1 or 2 in severity, although the incidence of serious AEs was 42%.
Constantine Tam, MD, of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center in Victoria, Australia, presented these results at the 10th International Workshop on Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene, the company developing zanubrutinib.
The trial (NCT02343120) includes patients with WM and other B-cell malignancies. As of July 24, 2018, 77 patients with treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory WM had been enrolled. Of those patients, 73 were evaluable for efficacy in this analysis, and the median follow-up time was 22.5 months.
At the time of the data cutoff, 62 patients remained on study treatment. Four patients (3%) discontinued treatment because of disease progression, and one patient remains on treatment after progression.
The median time to response was 85 days. The ORR was 92%, and the major response rate (MRR) was 82%. Of patients in the analysis, 41% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), defined as a greater than 90% reduction in baseline immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels and improvement of extramedullary disease by computed tomography.
The median IgM decreased from 32.7 g/L at baseline to 8.2 g/L. The median hemoglobin increased from 8.85 g/dL to 13.4 g/dL among 32 patients with hemoglobin less than 10 g/dL at baseline.
MYD88 genotype was known in 63 patients. In the subset known to have the MYD88L265P mutation (n = 54), the ORR was 94%, the MRR was 89%, and the VGPR rate was 46%. In the nine patients known to have wild-type MYD88 (a genotype that, historically, has had suboptimal response to BTK inhibition), the ORR was 89%, the MRR was 67%, and the VGPR rate was 22%.
The 12-month PFS was estimated to be 89%, and the median PFS had not been reached.
The most frequent AEs of any attribution were petechiae/purpura/contusion (43%), upper respiratory tract infection (42%), cough (17%), diarrhea (17%), constipation (16%), back pain (16%), and headache (16%). Grade 3-4 AEs of any attribution reported in three or more patients included neutropenia (9%), anemia (7%), hypertension (5%), basal cell carcinoma (5%), renal and urinary disorders (4%), and pneumonia (4%). Serious AEs were seen in 32 patients (42%). Events in five patients (7%) were considered possibly related to zanubrutinib treatment – febrile neutropenia, colitis, atrial fibrillation, hemothorax, and pneumonia. Atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred in four patients (5%), and major hemorrhage was observed in two patients (3%).
“We are encouraged that additional data on zanubrutinib in patients with WM confirms the initially reported experience with consistent demonstration of robust activity and good tolerability,” Dr. Tam said in a statement.
The trial is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported financial relationships with BeiGene and other companies.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Zanubrutinib had an overall response rate of 92%, and the estimated 12-month progression-free survival rate was 89%.
Study details: A phase 1 study with 73 patients evaluable for efficacy in this analysis.
Disclosures: The trial is sponsored by BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported financial relationships with BeiGene and other companies.
Variant not linked to CLL in Southeast Europe
DUBROVNIK, CROATIA – New research suggests there is no association between the PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or autoimmune hematologic disorders in patients from the Republic of Macedonia.
Past studies have shown an association between the PTPN22 R620W variant and both CLL and autoimmune diseases in patients from Northwest Europe. However, a new study of Macedonian patients suggests there is no association between the variant and CLL, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) for patients from Southeast Europe.
Irina Panovska-Stavridis, PhD, of Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, and her colleagues presented this finding at Leukemia and Lymphoma, a meeting jointly sponsored by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the School of Medicine at the University of Zagreb, Croatia.
“A lot of data from the literature suggests [the PTPN22 R620W variant ] has a role in developing multiple immune diseases, but it is validated just in patients from Northwest Europe,” Dr. Panovska-Stavridis noted.
She and her colleagues decided to assess the frequency of the PTPN22 R620W variant (C1858T, rs2476601) in individuals from Southeast Europe, particularly the Republic of Macedonia.
The researchers evaluated 320 patients – 168 with CLL, 66 with AIHA, and 86 with ITP – and 182 age- and sex-matched control subjects with no history of malignant or autoimmune disease.
The team found a similar frequency of the minor T allele and genotype distribution in control subjects and patients. For example, minor T allele was 0.107 in CLL, 0.067 in AIHA, 0.036 in ITP, and 0.05 in controls. Similarly, the frequency of the CC genotype was 0.809 in CLL, 0.166 in AIHA, 0.023 in ITP, and 0.901 in controls.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis said these results suggest the PTPN22 R620W variant is not a risk factor for the development of CLL, AIHA, or ITP in patients from Southeast Europe.
She also said the results suggest the influence of the variant on lymphocytic homeostasis is affected by certain genetic and environmental factors, and the development of CLL and autoimmune diseases is influenced by race/ethnicity-based variations in the germline composition of the IGHV locus in correlation with environmental factors.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis did not declare any conflicts of interest.
The Leukemia and Lymphoma meeting is organized by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the parent company of this news organization.
DUBROVNIK, CROATIA – New research suggests there is no association between the PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or autoimmune hematologic disorders in patients from the Republic of Macedonia.
Past studies have shown an association between the PTPN22 R620W variant and both CLL and autoimmune diseases in patients from Northwest Europe. However, a new study of Macedonian patients suggests there is no association between the variant and CLL, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) for patients from Southeast Europe.
Irina Panovska-Stavridis, PhD, of Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, and her colleagues presented this finding at Leukemia and Lymphoma, a meeting jointly sponsored by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the School of Medicine at the University of Zagreb, Croatia.
“A lot of data from the literature suggests [the PTPN22 R620W variant ] has a role in developing multiple immune diseases, but it is validated just in patients from Northwest Europe,” Dr. Panovska-Stavridis noted.
She and her colleagues decided to assess the frequency of the PTPN22 R620W variant (C1858T, rs2476601) in individuals from Southeast Europe, particularly the Republic of Macedonia.
The researchers evaluated 320 patients – 168 with CLL, 66 with AIHA, and 86 with ITP – and 182 age- and sex-matched control subjects with no history of malignant or autoimmune disease.
The team found a similar frequency of the minor T allele and genotype distribution in control subjects and patients. For example, minor T allele was 0.107 in CLL, 0.067 in AIHA, 0.036 in ITP, and 0.05 in controls. Similarly, the frequency of the CC genotype was 0.809 in CLL, 0.166 in AIHA, 0.023 in ITP, and 0.901 in controls.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis said these results suggest the PTPN22 R620W variant is not a risk factor for the development of CLL, AIHA, or ITP in patients from Southeast Europe.
She also said the results suggest the influence of the variant on lymphocytic homeostasis is affected by certain genetic and environmental factors, and the development of CLL and autoimmune diseases is influenced by race/ethnicity-based variations in the germline composition of the IGHV locus in correlation with environmental factors.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis did not declare any conflicts of interest.
The Leukemia and Lymphoma meeting is organized by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the parent company of this news organization.
DUBROVNIK, CROATIA – New research suggests there is no association between the PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or autoimmune hematologic disorders in patients from the Republic of Macedonia.
Past studies have shown an association between the PTPN22 R620W variant and both CLL and autoimmune diseases in patients from Northwest Europe. However, a new study of Macedonian patients suggests there is no association between the variant and CLL, autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) for patients from Southeast Europe.
Irina Panovska-Stavridis, PhD, of Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, and her colleagues presented this finding at Leukemia and Lymphoma, a meeting jointly sponsored by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the School of Medicine at the University of Zagreb, Croatia.
“A lot of data from the literature suggests [the PTPN22 R620W variant ] has a role in developing multiple immune diseases, but it is validated just in patients from Northwest Europe,” Dr. Panovska-Stavridis noted.
She and her colleagues decided to assess the frequency of the PTPN22 R620W variant (C1858T, rs2476601) in individuals from Southeast Europe, particularly the Republic of Macedonia.
The researchers evaluated 320 patients – 168 with CLL, 66 with AIHA, and 86 with ITP – and 182 age- and sex-matched control subjects with no history of malignant or autoimmune disease.
The team found a similar frequency of the minor T allele and genotype distribution in control subjects and patients. For example, minor T allele was 0.107 in CLL, 0.067 in AIHA, 0.036 in ITP, and 0.05 in controls. Similarly, the frequency of the CC genotype was 0.809 in CLL, 0.166 in AIHA, 0.023 in ITP, and 0.901 in controls.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis said these results suggest the PTPN22 R620W variant is not a risk factor for the development of CLL, AIHA, or ITP in patients from Southeast Europe.
She also said the results suggest the influence of the variant on lymphocytic homeostasis is affected by certain genetic and environmental factors, and the development of CLL and autoimmune diseases is influenced by race/ethnicity-based variations in the germline composition of the IGHV locus in correlation with environmental factors.
Dr. Panovska-Stavridis did not declare any conflicts of interest.
The Leukemia and Lymphoma meeting is organized by Jonathan Wood & Associates, which is owned by the parent company of this news organization.
REPORTING FROM LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA 2018
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The frequency of minor T allele was 0.107 in patients with CLL, 0.067 in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, 0.036 in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and 0.05 in controls.
Study details: An analysis of the frequency of the PTPN22 R620W variant in 320 individuals from the Republic of Macedonia.
Disclosures: Dr. Panovska-Stavridis did not declare any conflicts of interest.
Sandoz halts pursuit of U.S. approval for rituximab biosimilar
.
Sandoz, a division of Novartis, was seeking Food and Drug Administration approval of GP2013 for all the same indications as the reference product – B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, rheumatoid arthritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and pemphigus vulgaris.
GP2013 already is approved in the European Union and elsewhere.
The FDA had accepted the biologics license application (BLA) for GP2013 in September 2017. In May 2018, the agency issued a complete response letter saying it could not approve GP2013. The agency also requested additional information to complement the BLA submission.
At the time of the complete response letter, Sandoz said it was still committed to bringing GP2013 to the U.S. market.
“We appreciate the important conversations with the FDA, which have provided specific requirements for our potential U.S. biosimilar rituximab but believe the patient and marketplace needs in the U.S. will be satisfied before we can generate the data required,” Stefan Hendriks, global head of biopharmaceuticals at Sandoz, said in a statement.
“We are disappointed to have to make this decision and stand behind the safety, efficacy, and quality of our medicine, which met the stringent criteria for approval in the European Union, Switzerland, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia.”
The BLA for GP2013 was supported, in part, by results from the ASSIST-FL trial, in which researchers compared GP2013 with the reference product (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Aug;4[8]:e350-61).
The phase 3 trial included adults with previously untreated, advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Patients received eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone with either GP2013 or reference rituximab. Responders then received GP2013 or rituximab monotherapy as maintenance for up to 2 years.
At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, the overall response rate was 87% in the GP2013 arm and 88% in the rituximab arm.
.
Sandoz, a division of Novartis, was seeking Food and Drug Administration approval of GP2013 for all the same indications as the reference product – B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, rheumatoid arthritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and pemphigus vulgaris.
GP2013 already is approved in the European Union and elsewhere.
The FDA had accepted the biologics license application (BLA) for GP2013 in September 2017. In May 2018, the agency issued a complete response letter saying it could not approve GP2013. The agency also requested additional information to complement the BLA submission.
At the time of the complete response letter, Sandoz said it was still committed to bringing GP2013 to the U.S. market.
“We appreciate the important conversations with the FDA, which have provided specific requirements for our potential U.S. biosimilar rituximab but believe the patient and marketplace needs in the U.S. will be satisfied before we can generate the data required,” Stefan Hendriks, global head of biopharmaceuticals at Sandoz, said in a statement.
“We are disappointed to have to make this decision and stand behind the safety, efficacy, and quality of our medicine, which met the stringent criteria for approval in the European Union, Switzerland, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia.”
The BLA for GP2013 was supported, in part, by results from the ASSIST-FL trial, in which researchers compared GP2013 with the reference product (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Aug;4[8]:e350-61).
The phase 3 trial included adults with previously untreated, advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Patients received eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone with either GP2013 or reference rituximab. Responders then received GP2013 or rituximab monotherapy as maintenance for up to 2 years.
At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, the overall response rate was 87% in the GP2013 arm and 88% in the rituximab arm.
.
Sandoz, a division of Novartis, was seeking Food and Drug Administration approval of GP2013 for all the same indications as the reference product – B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, rheumatoid arthritis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, and pemphigus vulgaris.
GP2013 already is approved in the European Union and elsewhere.
The FDA had accepted the biologics license application (BLA) for GP2013 in September 2017. In May 2018, the agency issued a complete response letter saying it could not approve GP2013. The agency also requested additional information to complement the BLA submission.
At the time of the complete response letter, Sandoz said it was still committed to bringing GP2013 to the U.S. market.
“We appreciate the important conversations with the FDA, which have provided specific requirements for our potential U.S. biosimilar rituximab but believe the patient and marketplace needs in the U.S. will be satisfied before we can generate the data required,” Stefan Hendriks, global head of biopharmaceuticals at Sandoz, said in a statement.
“We are disappointed to have to make this decision and stand behind the safety, efficacy, and quality of our medicine, which met the stringent criteria for approval in the European Union, Switzerland, Japan, New Zealand, and Australia.”
The BLA for GP2013 was supported, in part, by results from the ASSIST-FL trial, in which researchers compared GP2013 with the reference product (Lancet Haematol. 2017 Aug;4[8]:e350-61).
The phase 3 trial included adults with previously untreated, advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Patients received eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone with either GP2013 or reference rituximab. Responders then received GP2013 or rituximab monotherapy as maintenance for up to 2 years.
At a median follow-up of 11.6 months, the overall response rate was 87% in the GP2013 arm and 88% in the rituximab arm.
Novel risk factors for febrile neutropenia in NHL, solid tumors
A retrospective study has revealed new potential risk factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Researchers found the timing and duration of corticosteroid use were both associated with febrile neutropenia. The team also observed “marginal” associations between febrile neutropenia and certain dermatologic and mucosal conditions, as well as the use of intravenous antibiotics before chemotherapy.
However, there was no association found between oral antibiotic use and febrile neutropenia or between radiation therapy and febrile neutropenia.
Chun Rebecca Chao, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
“Febrile neutropenia is life threatening and often requires hospitalization,” Dr. Chao said in a statement. “Furthermore, [febrile neutropenia] can lead to chemotherapy dose delay and dose reduction, which, in turn, negatively impacts antitumor efficacy. However, it can be prevented if high-risk individuals are identified and treated prophylactically.”
With this in mind, Dr. Chao and her colleagues set out to identify novel risk factors for febrile neutropenia by analyzing 15,971 patients who were treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 2000 and 2009.
Patients had been diagnosed with NHL (n = 1,617) or breast (n = 6,323), lung (n = 3,584), colorectal (n = 3,062), ovarian (n = 924), or gastric (n = 461) cancers. In all, 4.3% of patients developed febrile neutropenia during their first cycle of chemotherapy.
The researchers found that corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a propensity score–adjusted (PSA) model. The hazard ratio was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.98; P less than .01) for patients who received corticosteroids.
A longer duration of corticosteroid use was associated with a greater risk of febrile neutropenia. The adjusted HR, compared with no corticosteroid use, was 1.78 for corticosteroid treatment lasting less than 15 days and rose to 2.86 for treatment lasting 45-90 days.
“One way to reduce the incidence rate for [febrile neutropenia] could be to schedule prior corticosteroid use and subsequent chemotherapy with at least 2 weeks between them, given the magnitude of the risk increase and prevalence of this risk factor,” Dr. Chao said.
The researchers found a “marginally” increased risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with certain dermatologic conditions (dermatitis, psoriasis, pruritus) and mucosal conditions (gastritis, stomatitis, mucositis). In the PSA model, the HR was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98-1.93; P = 0.05) for patients with these conditions.
Intravenous antibiotic use was also found to be marginally associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a restricted analysis covering patients treated in 2008 and 2009. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.97-1.87; P = .08).
There was no association found between febrile neutropenia and oral antibiotic use in the restricted analysis. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.48; P = .70) for patients who received oral antibiotics.
Dr. Chao and her colleagues wrote that these results suggest intravenous antibiotics may have a more profound impact than oral antibiotics on the balance of bacterial flora and other immune functions. Another possible explanation is that patients who received intravenous antibiotics were generally sicker and more prone to severe infection than patients who received oral antibiotics.
The researchers also found no association between febrile neutropenia and prior surgery, prior radiation therapy, and concurrent radiation therapy in the PSA model.
The study was funded by Amgen. Three of the authors reported being employees and stockholders of Amgen.
[email protected]
SOURCE: Chao CR et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(10):1201-8.
A retrospective study has revealed new potential risk factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Researchers found the timing and duration of corticosteroid use were both associated with febrile neutropenia. The team also observed “marginal” associations between febrile neutropenia and certain dermatologic and mucosal conditions, as well as the use of intravenous antibiotics before chemotherapy.
However, there was no association found between oral antibiotic use and febrile neutropenia or between radiation therapy and febrile neutropenia.
Chun Rebecca Chao, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
“Febrile neutropenia is life threatening and often requires hospitalization,” Dr. Chao said in a statement. “Furthermore, [febrile neutropenia] can lead to chemotherapy dose delay and dose reduction, which, in turn, negatively impacts antitumor efficacy. However, it can be prevented if high-risk individuals are identified and treated prophylactically.”
With this in mind, Dr. Chao and her colleagues set out to identify novel risk factors for febrile neutropenia by analyzing 15,971 patients who were treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 2000 and 2009.
Patients had been diagnosed with NHL (n = 1,617) or breast (n = 6,323), lung (n = 3,584), colorectal (n = 3,062), ovarian (n = 924), or gastric (n = 461) cancers. In all, 4.3% of patients developed febrile neutropenia during their first cycle of chemotherapy.
The researchers found that corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a propensity score–adjusted (PSA) model. The hazard ratio was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.98; P less than .01) for patients who received corticosteroids.
A longer duration of corticosteroid use was associated with a greater risk of febrile neutropenia. The adjusted HR, compared with no corticosteroid use, was 1.78 for corticosteroid treatment lasting less than 15 days and rose to 2.86 for treatment lasting 45-90 days.
“One way to reduce the incidence rate for [febrile neutropenia] could be to schedule prior corticosteroid use and subsequent chemotherapy with at least 2 weeks between them, given the magnitude of the risk increase and prevalence of this risk factor,” Dr. Chao said.
The researchers found a “marginally” increased risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with certain dermatologic conditions (dermatitis, psoriasis, pruritus) and mucosal conditions (gastritis, stomatitis, mucositis). In the PSA model, the HR was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98-1.93; P = 0.05) for patients with these conditions.
Intravenous antibiotic use was also found to be marginally associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a restricted analysis covering patients treated in 2008 and 2009. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.97-1.87; P = .08).
There was no association found between febrile neutropenia and oral antibiotic use in the restricted analysis. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.48; P = .70) for patients who received oral antibiotics.
Dr. Chao and her colleagues wrote that these results suggest intravenous antibiotics may have a more profound impact than oral antibiotics on the balance of bacterial flora and other immune functions. Another possible explanation is that patients who received intravenous antibiotics were generally sicker and more prone to severe infection than patients who received oral antibiotics.
The researchers also found no association between febrile neutropenia and prior surgery, prior radiation therapy, and concurrent radiation therapy in the PSA model.
The study was funded by Amgen. Three of the authors reported being employees and stockholders of Amgen.
[email protected]
SOURCE: Chao CR et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(10):1201-8.
A retrospective study has revealed new potential risk factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).
Researchers found the timing and duration of corticosteroid use were both associated with febrile neutropenia. The team also observed “marginal” associations between febrile neutropenia and certain dermatologic and mucosal conditions, as well as the use of intravenous antibiotics before chemotherapy.
However, there was no association found between oral antibiotic use and febrile neutropenia or between radiation therapy and febrile neutropenia.
Chun Rebecca Chao, PhD, of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, and her colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
“Febrile neutropenia is life threatening and often requires hospitalization,” Dr. Chao said in a statement. “Furthermore, [febrile neutropenia] can lead to chemotherapy dose delay and dose reduction, which, in turn, negatively impacts antitumor efficacy. However, it can be prevented if high-risk individuals are identified and treated prophylactically.”
With this in mind, Dr. Chao and her colleagues set out to identify novel risk factors for febrile neutropenia by analyzing 15,971 patients who were treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between 2000 and 2009.
Patients had been diagnosed with NHL (n = 1,617) or breast (n = 6,323), lung (n = 3,584), colorectal (n = 3,062), ovarian (n = 924), or gastric (n = 461) cancers. In all, 4.3% of patients developed febrile neutropenia during their first cycle of chemotherapy.
The researchers found that corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a propensity score–adjusted (PSA) model. The hazard ratio was 1.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.98; P less than .01) for patients who received corticosteroids.
A longer duration of corticosteroid use was associated with a greater risk of febrile neutropenia. The adjusted HR, compared with no corticosteroid use, was 1.78 for corticosteroid treatment lasting less than 15 days and rose to 2.86 for treatment lasting 45-90 days.
“One way to reduce the incidence rate for [febrile neutropenia] could be to schedule prior corticosteroid use and subsequent chemotherapy with at least 2 weeks between them, given the magnitude of the risk increase and prevalence of this risk factor,” Dr. Chao said.
The researchers found a “marginally” increased risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with certain dermatologic conditions (dermatitis, psoriasis, pruritus) and mucosal conditions (gastritis, stomatitis, mucositis). In the PSA model, the HR was 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98-1.93; P = 0.05) for patients with these conditions.
Intravenous antibiotic use was also found to be marginally associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in a restricted analysis covering patients treated in 2008 and 2009. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.97-1.87; P = .08).
There was no association found between febrile neutropenia and oral antibiotic use in the restricted analysis. In the PSA model, the HR was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.77-1.48; P = .70) for patients who received oral antibiotics.
Dr. Chao and her colleagues wrote that these results suggest intravenous antibiotics may have a more profound impact than oral antibiotics on the balance of bacterial flora and other immune functions. Another possible explanation is that patients who received intravenous antibiotics were generally sicker and more prone to severe infection than patients who received oral antibiotics.
The researchers also found no association between febrile neutropenia and prior surgery, prior radiation therapy, and concurrent radiation therapy in the PSA model.
The study was funded by Amgen. Three of the authors reported being employees and stockholders of Amgen.
[email protected]
SOURCE: Chao CR et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(10):1201-8.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Corticosteroid use was associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia, compared with no corticosteroid use (hazard ratio, 1.53; P less than .01).
Study details: This retrospective study included 15,971 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or five solid tumors.
Disclosures: The study was funded by Amgen. Three of the authors reported being employers and stockholders of Amgen.
Source: Chao CR et al. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(10):1201-8.