Hot Flashes in Younger Women May Signal Cardiac Risk

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/13/2016 - 12:08
Display Headline
Hot Flashes in Younger Women May Signal Cardiac Risk

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

Continue for the second trial >>

 

 

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Kari Oakes, Family Practice News Digital Network

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Author and Disclosure Information

Kari Oakes, Family Practice News Digital Network

Author and Disclosure Information

Kari Oakes, Family Practice News Digital Network

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

Continue for the second trial >>

 

 

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

Continue for the second trial >>

 

 

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Hot Flashes in Younger Women May Signal Cardiac Risk
Display Headline
Hot Flashes in Younger Women May Signal Cardiac Risk
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Article Source

FROM ACC 15

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Hot flashes in younger women may signal cardiac risk

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 14:34
Display Headline
Hot flashes in younger women may signal cardiac risk

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Dr. Rebecca Thurston

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Dr. Rebecca Thurston

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

For women in midlife, an earlier age of onset of vasomotor symptoms – hot flashes and night sweats – was linked to impaired endothelial function, a very early marker for cardiovascular disease.

In the first of two related studies, an earlier age of onset for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) was associated with increased endothelial dysfunction as measured by brachial artery ultrasound. Greater frequency of hot flashes was associated with endothelial dysfunction for younger but not older participants in the second study.

Dr. Rebecca Thurston

Though more than 70% of women experience VMS during perimenopause and menopause, these symptoms largely have been viewed as a quality of life issue. However, this emerging research might mean that early onset of of hot flashes might serve a potential marker for increased risk for cardiovascular disease, said Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., associate professor of psychiatry, psychology, and epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh. Her work was presented in a briefing in advance of the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Dr. Thurston and her colleagues drew from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study to evaluate 104 women at four study sites. Participants were postmenopausal and at least 50 years old, could not be on hormone replacement therapy, and had their ovaries. Women with any signs or symptoms of ischemia were excluded, and multiple potential confounders were assessed in the study’s extensive evaluation. Women were stratified by onset of VMS by self-report into three groups: those who never had VMS, those whose VMS began at age 42 or earlier, and those whose VMS began after the age of 42.

Women in the WISE study underwent brachial artery ultrasound to assess brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD), a known preclinical disease marker that has been linked to clinical outcomes. Lower FMD scores indicate poorer endothelial function. Women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial dysfunction. The effect persisted even after controlling for potentially confounding factors.

The second trial, the MSHeart Study, enrolled 189 women aged 40-60. All were nonsmokers with no history of CVD. All of the women had intact uteri and ovaries, and enrollees could not be using hormones or other medications that could affect vascular function (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, insulin, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). Participants again underwent extensive evaluation.

Women in the MSHeart Study received a full 24 hours of objective physiologic hot flash monitoring via an external monitoring system as well as FMD evaluation by brachial artery ultrasound. Women were stratified by age into three groups: younger than 53, 53-56, and greater than age 56.

For the youngest group of women in the second study, increased frequency of objectively verified hot flashes was associated with lower FMD and poorer endothelial dysfunction (P < 0.05). The association was not significant for either of the older two groups when taken separately; however, when pooled data for participants of all ages were considered, the interaction between age and hot flash frequency was associated with reduced FMD (P = 0.02). These associations held true after adjusting for the covariates of age, race, BMI, blood vessel diameter, menopausal stage, and any prior hormone use.

These two studies, said Dr. Thurston, “may point to subgroups of women that need targeted cardiovascular prevention” by identifying early VMS as a mechanistic pathway for endothelial dysfunction. Dr. Richard Chazal, ACC vice president and session moderator, noted that the MSHeart Study in particular succeeded in “leveraging physiologic symptoms and markers, as well as the flow mediated functional dilation that we all would expect.”

The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Hot flashes in younger women may signal cardiac risk
Display Headline
Hot flashes in younger women may signal cardiac risk
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Legacy Keywords
hot flashes, cardiac risk, CAD, ACC
Sections
Article Source

FROM ACC 15

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Early onset of hot flashes could be a marker for increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Major finding: Women who experience vasomotor symptoms earlier in midlife are more likely to have endothelial dysfunction. In one of the studies, women in the group with the earliest onset of VMS had significantly lower FMD values (P = 0.038), indicating poorer endothelial function.

Data source: Analysis of subgroups of the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) and MSHeart studies.

Disclosures: The studies were sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Digoxin linked to higher mortality in AF

Look for alternative digoxin for AF
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 14:34
Display Headline
Digoxin linked to higher mortality in AF

SAN DIEGO – Digoxin increases the risk of death by 27% in patients with atrial fibrillation, a meta-analysis of 19 studies showed.

Patients with AF and kidney failure faced a 60% to 70 % increase in mortality compared to their counterparts not taking digoxin, according to a press release on the study.

A weaker association between digoxin and death was observed in AF patients who also had heart failure, a finding the authors suggest warrants further investigation.

“Until further research can be done, I would suggest physicians use caution when prescribing digoxin for patients with atrial fibrillation, especially given that there are alternative drugs available that might be safer,” lead author Dr. Waqas Qureshi said in a statement.

The results were released in advance of their March 15 presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

About 5.6 million Americans have atrial fibrillation (AF) and roughly 1 in 5 are prescribed digoxin for heart rate control.

Current guidelines recommend digoxin as first-line therapy in patients who aren’t physically active and as a second-line drug for more active patients.

“Based on consistent results coming out of many studies, our results suggest digoxin should be downgraded from its position as a front-line agent for certain patients with atrial fibrillation,” Dr. Qureshi, a clinical and research cardiology fellow at Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., recommended.

The authors reviewed 19 studies including five cohort and randomized controlled trials involving 501,681 patients. Of these, 458,311 patients had AF and 111,978 were prescribed digoxin.

In a random effects model, digoxin was associated with an increased risk of mortality, with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.36; P value < .001).

Several studies in the meta-analysis suggest that higher blood levels of digoxin increase the risk of death. The mechanism behind the increased mortality is not known, although previous studies have suggested digoxin increases the risk of thromboembolism.

The meta-analysis accounted for risk factors and co-morbidities reported in the various studies, but it’s possible that some confounding factors may not have been accounted for, the authors acknowledge.

“The study points to the need for a well-structured, targeted trial to investigate digoxin’s safety,” Dr. Qureshi stated.

[email protected]

References

Body

Digoxin remains a commonly used agent for control of ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF) and is accepted as a valid therapy. Despite endorsement of digoxin in clinical practice guidelines for rate control in atrial fibrillation, there are only limited, conflicting, and mostly older observational data on the safety of digoxin in AF. There have been no appropriately designed clinical trials to assess the safety of digoxin in any patient population. In heart failure cohorts, the effectiveness and safety of digoxin has been shown to vary by serum digoxin concentrations, indicating possible moderation by kidney function.

The meta-analysis of five cohort studies and randomized controlled trials by Dr. Qureshi and colleagues concludes that digoxin is associated with a 27% increased risk of mortality in patients with AF. These results confirm another recently published analysis with similar conclusions, TREAT-AF (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64:660-8).

The TREAT-AF study was a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed AF. In this study, treatment with digoxin was independently associated with mortality, regardless of age, sex, kidney function, heart failure status, concomitant therapies, or drug adherence. Sensitivity analyses to assess the possible impact of unmeasured confounders make it highly unlikely that any influenced the result of the TREAT-AF Study.

Prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of these observational reports and to explore the mechanisms responsible for the increased risk of mortality in patients with AF treated with digoxin. In the meantime, physicians should consider alternatives to digoxin in managing patients with AF.

N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, is professor of medicine at Tufts University, Boston. He has no relevant disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Digoxin, atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disease, ACC
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Body

Digoxin remains a commonly used agent for control of ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF) and is accepted as a valid therapy. Despite endorsement of digoxin in clinical practice guidelines for rate control in atrial fibrillation, there are only limited, conflicting, and mostly older observational data on the safety of digoxin in AF. There have been no appropriately designed clinical trials to assess the safety of digoxin in any patient population. In heart failure cohorts, the effectiveness and safety of digoxin has been shown to vary by serum digoxin concentrations, indicating possible moderation by kidney function.

The meta-analysis of five cohort studies and randomized controlled trials by Dr. Qureshi and colleagues concludes that digoxin is associated with a 27% increased risk of mortality in patients with AF. These results confirm another recently published analysis with similar conclusions, TREAT-AF (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64:660-8).

The TREAT-AF study was a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed AF. In this study, treatment with digoxin was independently associated with mortality, regardless of age, sex, kidney function, heart failure status, concomitant therapies, or drug adherence. Sensitivity analyses to assess the possible impact of unmeasured confounders make it highly unlikely that any influenced the result of the TREAT-AF Study.

Prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of these observational reports and to explore the mechanisms responsible for the increased risk of mortality in patients with AF treated with digoxin. In the meantime, physicians should consider alternatives to digoxin in managing patients with AF.

N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, is professor of medicine at Tufts University, Boston. He has no relevant disclosures.

Body

Digoxin remains a commonly used agent for control of ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF) and is accepted as a valid therapy. Despite endorsement of digoxin in clinical practice guidelines for rate control in atrial fibrillation, there are only limited, conflicting, and mostly older observational data on the safety of digoxin in AF. There have been no appropriately designed clinical trials to assess the safety of digoxin in any patient population. In heart failure cohorts, the effectiveness and safety of digoxin has been shown to vary by serum digoxin concentrations, indicating possible moderation by kidney function.

The meta-analysis of five cohort studies and randomized controlled trials by Dr. Qureshi and colleagues concludes that digoxin is associated with a 27% increased risk of mortality in patients with AF. These results confirm another recently published analysis with similar conclusions, TREAT-AF (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64:660-8).

The TREAT-AF study was a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed AF. In this study, treatment with digoxin was independently associated with mortality, regardless of age, sex, kidney function, heart failure status, concomitant therapies, or drug adherence. Sensitivity analyses to assess the possible impact of unmeasured confounders make it highly unlikely that any influenced the result of the TREAT-AF Study.

Prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of these observational reports and to explore the mechanisms responsible for the increased risk of mortality in patients with AF treated with digoxin. In the meantime, physicians should consider alternatives to digoxin in managing patients with AF.

N.A. Mark Estes III, MD, is professor of medicine at Tufts University, Boston. He has no relevant disclosures.

Title
Look for alternative digoxin for AF
Look for alternative digoxin for AF

SAN DIEGO – Digoxin increases the risk of death by 27% in patients with atrial fibrillation, a meta-analysis of 19 studies showed.

Patients with AF and kidney failure faced a 60% to 70 % increase in mortality compared to their counterparts not taking digoxin, according to a press release on the study.

A weaker association between digoxin and death was observed in AF patients who also had heart failure, a finding the authors suggest warrants further investigation.

“Until further research can be done, I would suggest physicians use caution when prescribing digoxin for patients with atrial fibrillation, especially given that there are alternative drugs available that might be safer,” lead author Dr. Waqas Qureshi said in a statement.

The results were released in advance of their March 15 presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

About 5.6 million Americans have atrial fibrillation (AF) and roughly 1 in 5 are prescribed digoxin for heart rate control.

Current guidelines recommend digoxin as first-line therapy in patients who aren’t physically active and as a second-line drug for more active patients.

“Based on consistent results coming out of many studies, our results suggest digoxin should be downgraded from its position as a front-line agent for certain patients with atrial fibrillation,” Dr. Qureshi, a clinical and research cardiology fellow at Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., recommended.

The authors reviewed 19 studies including five cohort and randomized controlled trials involving 501,681 patients. Of these, 458,311 patients had AF and 111,978 were prescribed digoxin.

In a random effects model, digoxin was associated with an increased risk of mortality, with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.36; P value < .001).

Several studies in the meta-analysis suggest that higher blood levels of digoxin increase the risk of death. The mechanism behind the increased mortality is not known, although previous studies have suggested digoxin increases the risk of thromboembolism.

The meta-analysis accounted for risk factors and co-morbidities reported in the various studies, but it’s possible that some confounding factors may not have been accounted for, the authors acknowledge.

“The study points to the need for a well-structured, targeted trial to investigate digoxin’s safety,” Dr. Qureshi stated.

[email protected]

SAN DIEGO – Digoxin increases the risk of death by 27% in patients with atrial fibrillation, a meta-analysis of 19 studies showed.

Patients with AF and kidney failure faced a 60% to 70 % increase in mortality compared to their counterparts not taking digoxin, according to a press release on the study.

A weaker association between digoxin and death was observed in AF patients who also had heart failure, a finding the authors suggest warrants further investigation.

“Until further research can be done, I would suggest physicians use caution when prescribing digoxin for patients with atrial fibrillation, especially given that there are alternative drugs available that might be safer,” lead author Dr. Waqas Qureshi said in a statement.

The results were released in advance of their March 15 presentation at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

About 5.6 million Americans have atrial fibrillation (AF) and roughly 1 in 5 are prescribed digoxin for heart rate control.

Current guidelines recommend digoxin as first-line therapy in patients who aren’t physically active and as a second-line drug for more active patients.

“Based on consistent results coming out of many studies, our results suggest digoxin should be downgraded from its position as a front-line agent for certain patients with atrial fibrillation,” Dr. Qureshi, a clinical and research cardiology fellow at Wake Forest School of Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., recommended.

The authors reviewed 19 studies including five cohort and randomized controlled trials involving 501,681 patients. Of these, 458,311 patients had AF and 111,978 were prescribed digoxin.

In a random effects model, digoxin was associated with an increased risk of mortality, with a pooled hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.36; P value < .001).

Several studies in the meta-analysis suggest that higher blood levels of digoxin increase the risk of death. The mechanism behind the increased mortality is not known, although previous studies have suggested digoxin increases the risk of thromboembolism.

The meta-analysis accounted for risk factors and co-morbidities reported in the various studies, but it’s possible that some confounding factors may not have been accounted for, the authors acknowledge.

“The study points to the need for a well-structured, targeted trial to investigate digoxin’s safety,” Dr. Qureshi stated.

[email protected]

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Digoxin linked to higher mortality in AF
Display Headline
Digoxin linked to higher mortality in AF
Legacy Keywords
Digoxin, atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disease, ACC
Legacy Keywords
Digoxin, atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disease, ACC
Sections
Article Source

FROM ACC 2015

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Alternatives to digoxin should be considered when prescribing for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Major finding:
Digoxin was associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with AF (Hazard ratio, 1.27; P < 001).

Data source: Pooled analysis of 19 studies involving 501,681 patients, 458,311 with atrial fibrillation.

Disclosures: Dr. Qureshi and his co-authors reported having no financial disclosures.

More coronary artery calcification seen with sedentary behavior

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:41
Display Headline
More coronary artery calcification seen with sedentary behavior

Sedentary individuals have a significant increase in a marker of subclinical heart disease, according to a recent study. Each additional hour spent seated per day was associated with a 14% increase in the amount of coronary artery calcification seen on CT imaging.

Even for those who exercise vigorously but also spend many hours sitting, prolonged sedentary activity was independently associated with greater CAC. The effect held true even after adjustment for other known cardiac risk factors, according to Dr. Jacquelyn Kulinski of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and colleagues at Dallas’ University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. The results were released in advance of their presentation on March 15 at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Purestock/Thinkstock.com
Prolonged sedentary activity was linked with increased CAC, according to data from the Dallas Heart Study.

Using data from wrist accelerometers in the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic, population-based sample of adults residing in Dallas, Tex., Dr. Kulinski and colleagues assessed the activity of 2,031 participants without known cardiovascular disease. The median age was 50, about 62% were female, and about half of the participants were black.

The accelerometer, worn on the nondominant hand, captured 7 consecutive days of minute-by-minute activity, and could differentiate between sedentary behavior (sitting or reclining during waking hours), nonexercise activity (such as light movement around the house or a workplace), and more vigorous, purposeful exercise. CAC was assessed via two cardiac CT scans and a standardized scoring system.

Overall, participants had an average 5 hours of sedentary time per day, with a range of 2-12 hours. Higher amounts of sedentary time were associated with being older, having a higher body mass index, and having diabetes or hypertension.

The multivariate analysis included adjustments for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and the amount to which participants participated in moderate to vigorous physical activity. The researchers found that each additional hour of sedentary time during the day was associated with a statistically significant, 14% increase in CAC. Somewhat surprisingly, Dr. Kulinski noted, there was no association between the amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity and the amount of CAC detected.

Sedentary behavior, sometimes called “sitting disease,” has previously been identified as an independent risk factor for heart disease. These findings, she said, further bolster the concept that “lack of exercise and too much sitting are independent risk factors for CAD and death.”

Dr. Kulinski noted that although fitness is one of the strongest predictors of cardiac health and longevity, there has not been a clear demonstration that increased amounts of exercise are associated with less CAC. This has been true although CAC is an established marker of early formation of the plaque that can lead to coronary artery blockage. The present study suggests that sedentary behaviors, rather than lack of vigorous exercise, may contribute more to the development of CAC than had previously been known.

ACC Vice President Richard Chazal of Lee Memorial Health System, Fort Myers, Fla., remarked in a press briefing before the meeting that this information should be reassuring to patients. “Sometimes just moving around some, even short of a vigorous exercise program, is important,” said Dr. Chazal. “Regular exercise further reduces risk, and it may do so by a mechanism distinct from coronary artery calcification.”

“On a positive note,” Dr. Kulinski said, “reducing daily sitting time by even 1-2 hours could have a significant and positive impact on future cardiovascular health, and this should really be investigated in future studies.”

Dr. James de Lemos disclosed ties with Amgen, DiaDexus, Novo Nordisk, St. Jude Medical, Abbott Diagnostics, and Siemen’s Diagnostics. Dr. Jarrett Berry reports ties with Nihon and Merck. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Sedentary individuals have a significant increase in a marker of subclinical heart disease, according to a recent study. Each additional hour spent seated per day was associated with a 14% increase in the amount of coronary artery calcification seen on CT imaging.

Even for those who exercise vigorously but also spend many hours sitting, prolonged sedentary activity was independently associated with greater CAC. The effect held true even after adjustment for other known cardiac risk factors, according to Dr. Jacquelyn Kulinski of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and colleagues at Dallas’ University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. The results were released in advance of their presentation on March 15 at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Purestock/Thinkstock.com
Prolonged sedentary activity was linked with increased CAC, according to data from the Dallas Heart Study.

Using data from wrist accelerometers in the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic, population-based sample of adults residing in Dallas, Tex., Dr. Kulinski and colleagues assessed the activity of 2,031 participants without known cardiovascular disease. The median age was 50, about 62% were female, and about half of the participants were black.

The accelerometer, worn on the nondominant hand, captured 7 consecutive days of minute-by-minute activity, and could differentiate between sedentary behavior (sitting or reclining during waking hours), nonexercise activity (such as light movement around the house or a workplace), and more vigorous, purposeful exercise. CAC was assessed via two cardiac CT scans and a standardized scoring system.

Overall, participants had an average 5 hours of sedentary time per day, with a range of 2-12 hours. Higher amounts of sedentary time were associated with being older, having a higher body mass index, and having diabetes or hypertension.

The multivariate analysis included adjustments for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and the amount to which participants participated in moderate to vigorous physical activity. The researchers found that each additional hour of sedentary time during the day was associated with a statistically significant, 14% increase in CAC. Somewhat surprisingly, Dr. Kulinski noted, there was no association between the amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity and the amount of CAC detected.

Sedentary behavior, sometimes called “sitting disease,” has previously been identified as an independent risk factor for heart disease. These findings, she said, further bolster the concept that “lack of exercise and too much sitting are independent risk factors for CAD and death.”

Dr. Kulinski noted that although fitness is one of the strongest predictors of cardiac health and longevity, there has not been a clear demonstration that increased amounts of exercise are associated with less CAC. This has been true although CAC is an established marker of early formation of the plaque that can lead to coronary artery blockage. The present study suggests that sedentary behaviors, rather than lack of vigorous exercise, may contribute more to the development of CAC than had previously been known.

ACC Vice President Richard Chazal of Lee Memorial Health System, Fort Myers, Fla., remarked in a press briefing before the meeting that this information should be reassuring to patients. “Sometimes just moving around some, even short of a vigorous exercise program, is important,” said Dr. Chazal. “Regular exercise further reduces risk, and it may do so by a mechanism distinct from coronary artery calcification.”

“On a positive note,” Dr. Kulinski said, “reducing daily sitting time by even 1-2 hours could have a significant and positive impact on future cardiovascular health, and this should really be investigated in future studies.”

Dr. James de Lemos disclosed ties with Amgen, DiaDexus, Novo Nordisk, St. Jude Medical, Abbott Diagnostics, and Siemen’s Diagnostics. Dr. Jarrett Berry reports ties with Nihon and Merck. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

Sedentary individuals have a significant increase in a marker of subclinical heart disease, according to a recent study. Each additional hour spent seated per day was associated with a 14% increase in the amount of coronary artery calcification seen on CT imaging.

Even for those who exercise vigorously but also spend many hours sitting, prolonged sedentary activity was independently associated with greater CAC. The effect held true even after adjustment for other known cardiac risk factors, according to Dr. Jacquelyn Kulinski of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and colleagues at Dallas’ University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. The results were released in advance of their presentation on March 15 at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego.

Purestock/Thinkstock.com
Prolonged sedentary activity was linked with increased CAC, according to data from the Dallas Heart Study.

Using data from wrist accelerometers in the Dallas Heart Study, a multi-ethnic, population-based sample of adults residing in Dallas, Tex., Dr. Kulinski and colleagues assessed the activity of 2,031 participants without known cardiovascular disease. The median age was 50, about 62% were female, and about half of the participants were black.

The accelerometer, worn on the nondominant hand, captured 7 consecutive days of minute-by-minute activity, and could differentiate between sedentary behavior (sitting or reclining during waking hours), nonexercise activity (such as light movement around the house or a workplace), and more vigorous, purposeful exercise. CAC was assessed via two cardiac CT scans and a standardized scoring system.

Overall, participants had an average 5 hours of sedentary time per day, with a range of 2-12 hours. Higher amounts of sedentary time were associated with being older, having a higher body mass index, and having diabetes or hypertension.

The multivariate analysis included adjustments for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and the amount to which participants participated in moderate to vigorous physical activity. The researchers found that each additional hour of sedentary time during the day was associated with a statistically significant, 14% increase in CAC. Somewhat surprisingly, Dr. Kulinski noted, there was no association between the amount of moderate to vigorous physical activity and the amount of CAC detected.

Sedentary behavior, sometimes called “sitting disease,” has previously been identified as an independent risk factor for heart disease. These findings, she said, further bolster the concept that “lack of exercise and too much sitting are independent risk factors for CAD and death.”

Dr. Kulinski noted that although fitness is one of the strongest predictors of cardiac health and longevity, there has not been a clear demonstration that increased amounts of exercise are associated with less CAC. This has been true although CAC is an established marker of early formation of the plaque that can lead to coronary artery blockage. The present study suggests that sedentary behaviors, rather than lack of vigorous exercise, may contribute more to the development of CAC than had previously been known.

ACC Vice President Richard Chazal of Lee Memorial Health System, Fort Myers, Fla., remarked in a press briefing before the meeting that this information should be reassuring to patients. “Sometimes just moving around some, even short of a vigorous exercise program, is important,” said Dr. Chazal. “Regular exercise further reduces risk, and it may do so by a mechanism distinct from coronary artery calcification.”

“On a positive note,” Dr. Kulinski said, “reducing daily sitting time by even 1-2 hours could have a significant and positive impact on future cardiovascular health, and this should really be investigated in future studies.”

Dr. James de Lemos disclosed ties with Amgen, DiaDexus, Novo Nordisk, St. Jude Medical, Abbott Diagnostics, and Siemen’s Diagnostics. Dr. Jarrett Berry reports ties with Nihon and Merck. The remaining authors have no disclosures.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
More coronary artery calcification seen with sedentary behavior
Display Headline
More coronary artery calcification seen with sedentary behavior
Sections
Article Source

FROM ACC 15

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Increased sedentary time was independently associated with increased coronary artery calcification.

Major findings: In a multivariate analysis, each increased hour of sitting time was associated with a 14% increase in CAC.

Data source: Examination via logistic regression and multivariate analysis of activity data from 2,031 participants in the multi-ethnic, population-based Dallas Heart Study.

Disclosures: Dr. James de Lemos disclosed ties with Amgen, DiaDexus, Novo Nordisk, St. Jude Medical, Abbott Diagnostics, and Siemen’s Diagnostics. Dr. Jarrett Berry reports ties with Nihon and Merck. The remaining authors have no disclosures.