Key clinical point: Compared with the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine, an emollient plus balm combination significantly improved pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) receiving systemic treatment.

Major finding: Patients treated with an emollient plus balm combination after pre-cleaning with a syndet (emollient “plus” group) vs the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine (control group) had a significantly greater mean decrease in current pruritus after 70 days (P  =  .0277) and worse pruritus over the last 24 hours after 42 days (P  =  .025) of treatment.

Study details: This randomized controlled multicenter study included 57 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD using systemic treatment who were randomly assigned 1:1 to the emollient “plus” group or the control group.

Disclosures: This study was funded by La Roche-Posay (LRP). Two authors declared being employees of LRP, and some authors declared serving on advisory boards or as speakers, consultants, or investigators in the presented trial or other clinical trials sponsored by various sources, including LRP.

Source: Magnolo N et al. Comparison of different skin care regimens in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis receiving systemic treatment: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 (Apr 24). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18949

Key clinical point: Compared with the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine, an emollient plus balm combination significantly improved pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) receiving systemic treatment.

Major finding: Patients treated with an emollient plus balm combination after pre-cleaning with a syndet (emollient “plus” group) vs the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine (control group) had a significantly greater mean decrease in current pruritus after 70 days (P  =  .0277) and worse pruritus over the last 24 hours after 42 days (P  =  .025) of treatment.

Study details: This randomized controlled multicenter study included 57 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD using systemic treatment who were randomly assigned 1:1 to the emollient “plus” group or the control group.

Disclosures: This study was funded by La Roche-Posay (LRP). Two authors declared being employees of LRP, and some authors declared serving on advisory boards or as speakers, consultants, or investigators in the presented trial or other clinical trials sponsored by various sources, including LRP.

Source: Magnolo N et al. Comparison of different skin care regimens in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis receiving systemic treatment: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 (Apr 24). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18949

Key clinical point: Compared with the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine, an emollient plus balm combination significantly improved pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) receiving systemic treatment.

Major finding: Patients treated with an emollient plus balm combination after pre-cleaning with a syndet (emollient “plus” group) vs the usual emollient and cleanser skincare routine (control group) had a significantly greater mean decrease in current pruritus after 70 days (P  =  .0277) and worse pruritus over the last 24 hours after 42 days (P  =  .025) of treatment.

Study details: This randomized controlled multicenter study included 57 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD using systemic treatment who were randomly assigned 1:1 to the emollient “plus” group or the control group.

Disclosures: This study was funded by La Roche-Posay (LRP). Two authors declared being employees of LRP, and some authors declared serving on advisory boards or as speakers, consultants, or investigators in the presented trial or other clinical trials sponsored by various sources, including LRP.

Source: Magnolo N et al. Comparison of different skin care regimens in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis receiving systemic treatment: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 (Apr 24). Doi: 10.1111/jdv.18949

Key clinical point: Dupilumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis (AD), including those aged 2 to <6 years.

Major finding: At week 16, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score decreased significantly from 29.0 to 5.1 (P < .0001) and 73.3% and 53.3% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in EASI and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis scores, respectively. The change in clinical scores was similar among the 2 to <6-year, 6 to <12-year, and 12 to <18-year subgroups. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were observed.

Study details: This single-center real-world retrospective study included 39 patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled AD who received dupilumab therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang Y et al. Dupilumab improves clinical scores in pediatric patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis: A single-center, real-world study. Dermatol Ther. 2023;5626410 (Apr 17). Doi: 10.1155/2023/5626410

Key clinical point: Dupilumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis (AD), including those aged 2 to <6 years.

Major finding: At week 16, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score decreased significantly from 29.0 to 5.1 (P < .0001) and 73.3% and 53.3% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in EASI and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis scores, respectively. The change in clinical scores was similar among the 2 to <6-year, 6 to <12-year, and 12 to <18-year subgroups. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were observed.

Study details: This single-center real-world retrospective study included 39 patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled AD who received dupilumab therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang Y et al. Dupilumab improves clinical scores in pediatric patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis: A single-center, real-world study. Dermatol Ther. 2023;5626410 (Apr 17). Doi: 10.1155/2023/5626410

Key clinical point: Dupilumab is efficacious and safe in pediatric patients with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis (AD), including those aged 2 to <6 years.

Major finding: At week 16, the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score decreased significantly from 29.0 to 5.1 (P < .0001) and 73.3% and 53.3% of patients achieved ≥75% improvement in EASI and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis scores, respectively. The change in clinical scores was similar among the 2 to <6-year, 6 to <12-year, and 12 to <18-year subgroups. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were observed.

Study details: This single-center real-world retrospective study included 39 patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled AD who received dupilumab therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wang Y et al. Dupilumab improves clinical scores in pediatric patients aged 2 to <18 years with uncontrolled atopic dermatitis: A single-center, real-world study. Dermatol Ther. 2023;5626410 (Apr 17). Doi: 10.1155/2023/5626410

Key Clinical Point: Crisaborole induces proteomic changes and modulates the lesional skin phenotype toward normal skin in mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At days 8 and 15, a markedly greater number of biomarkers were down-regulated with crisaborole vs vehicle (123 vs 9 and 162 vs 22, respectively), with a significantly higher rate of improvement in the overall lesional (45.9% vs 12.6% and 57.0% vs 28.3%, respectively; both P < .001) and nonlesional (53.0% vs 15.5% and 62.6% vs 36.8%, respectively; both P < .001) proteomes relative to a normal skin proteome.

Study details: This phase 2a study conducted a proteomic analysis in 20 control individuals and 40 adult patients with mild-to-moderate AD after double-blind, 1:1 random assignment of two target lesions in each patient with AD to crisaborole (2% ointment) or vehicle twice daily for 14 days.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Pfizer, New York. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Pfizer. One author declared being an employee of and holding shares in Pfizer.

Source: Kim M et al. Crisaborole reverses dysregulation of the mild to moderate atopic dermatitis proteome towards nonlesional and normal skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 10). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.064

Key Clinical Point: Crisaborole induces proteomic changes and modulates the lesional skin phenotype toward normal skin in mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At days 8 and 15, a markedly greater number of biomarkers were down-regulated with crisaborole vs vehicle (123 vs 9 and 162 vs 22, respectively), with a significantly higher rate of improvement in the overall lesional (45.9% vs 12.6% and 57.0% vs 28.3%, respectively; both P < .001) and nonlesional (53.0% vs 15.5% and 62.6% vs 36.8%, respectively; both P < .001) proteomes relative to a normal skin proteome.

Study details: This phase 2a study conducted a proteomic analysis in 20 control individuals and 40 adult patients with mild-to-moderate AD after double-blind, 1:1 random assignment of two target lesions in each patient with AD to crisaborole (2% ointment) or vehicle twice daily for 14 days.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Pfizer, New York. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Pfizer. One author declared being an employee of and holding shares in Pfizer.

Source: Kim M et al. Crisaborole reverses dysregulation of the mild to moderate atopic dermatitis proteome towards nonlesional and normal skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 10). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.064

Key Clinical Point: Crisaborole induces proteomic changes and modulates the lesional skin phenotype toward normal skin in mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At days 8 and 15, a markedly greater number of biomarkers were down-regulated with crisaborole vs vehicle (123 vs 9 and 162 vs 22, respectively), with a significantly higher rate of improvement in the overall lesional (45.9% vs 12.6% and 57.0% vs 28.3%, respectively; both P < .001) and nonlesional (53.0% vs 15.5% and 62.6% vs 36.8%, respectively; both P < .001) proteomes relative to a normal skin proteome.

Study details: This phase 2a study conducted a proteomic analysis in 20 control individuals and 40 adult patients with mild-to-moderate AD after double-blind, 1:1 random assignment of two target lesions in each patient with AD to crisaborole (2% ointment) or vehicle twice daily for 14 days.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Pfizer, New York. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Pfizer. One author declared being an employee of and holding shares in Pfizer.

Source: Kim M et al. Crisaborole reverses dysregulation of the mild to moderate atopic dermatitis proteome towards nonlesional and normal skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 10). Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.064

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated specific targeting of interleukin-13 is effective and safe in treating adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 150 mg or 300 mg tralokinumab vs placebo achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (21.4% and 17.5% vs 4.3%; P < .001 and P  =  .002, respectively) and ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score (28.6% and 27.8% vs 6.4%, respectively; both P < .001) without rescue medication. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 ECZTRA 6 trial including 289 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg tralokinumab (n = 98), 300 mg tralokinumab (n = 97), or placebo (n = 94).

Disclosures: This study was funded by LEO Pharma. Some authors reported ties with various organizations including LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of or holding shares in LEO Pharma.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: The phase 3 ECZTRA 6 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0627

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated specific targeting of interleukin-13 is effective and safe in treating adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 150 mg or 300 mg tralokinumab vs placebo achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (21.4% and 17.5% vs 4.3%; P < .001 and P  =  .002, respectively) and ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score (28.6% and 27.8% vs 6.4%, respectively; both P < .001) without rescue medication. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 ECZTRA 6 trial including 289 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg tralokinumab (n = 98), 300 mg tralokinumab (n = 97), or placebo (n = 94).

Disclosures: This study was funded by LEO Pharma. Some authors reported ties with various organizations including LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of or holding shares in LEO Pharma.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: The phase 3 ECZTRA 6 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0627

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated specific targeting of interleukin-13 is effective and safe in treating adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 150 mg or 300 mg tralokinumab vs placebo achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (21.4% and 17.5% vs 4.3%; P < .001 and P  =  .002, respectively) and ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score (28.6% and 27.8% vs 6.4%, respectively; both P < .001) without rescue medication. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 3 ECZTRA 6 trial including 289 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 150 mg tralokinumab (n = 98), 300 mg tralokinumab (n = 97), or placebo (n = 94).

Disclosures: This study was funded by LEO Pharma. Some authors reported ties with various organizations including LEO Pharma. Five authors declared being employees of or holding shares in LEO Pharma.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: The phase 3 ECZTRA 6 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 19). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0627

Key clinical point: Upadacitinib is as effective and safe in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) as in adults with AD.

Major finding: At week 16, in Measure Up 1 and 2 and AD Up, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 15/30 mg upadacitinib vs placebo achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (73%/78%, 69%/73%, and 63%/84% vs 12%, 13%, and 30%, respectively; all P < .001) and Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 (45%/64%, 45%/59%, and 38%/67% vs 7%, 5%, and 11%, respectively; all P < .001). The safety profile was consistent in adolescents and adults.

Study details: This interim analysis of 3 phase 3 trials included 552 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg upadacitinib, 30 mg upadacitinib, or placebo alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up).

Disclosures: This study was funded by AbbVie Inc. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including AbbVie. Nine authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in AbbVie.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 12). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391

Key clinical point: Upadacitinib is as effective and safe in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) as in adults with AD.

Major finding: At week 16, in Measure Up 1 and 2 and AD Up, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 15/30 mg upadacitinib vs placebo achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (73%/78%, 69%/73%, and 63%/84% vs 12%, 13%, and 30%, respectively; all P < .001) and Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 (45%/64%, 45%/59%, and 38%/67% vs 7%, 5%, and 11%, respectively; all P < .001). The safety profile was consistent in adolescents and adults.

Study details: This interim analysis of 3 phase 3 trials included 552 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg upadacitinib, 30 mg upadacitinib, or placebo alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up).

Disclosures: This study was funded by AbbVie Inc. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including AbbVie. Nine authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in AbbVie.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 12). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391

Key clinical point: Upadacitinib is as effective and safe in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) as in adults with AD.

Major finding: At week 16, in Measure Up 1 and 2 and AD Up, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving 15/30 mg upadacitinib vs placebo achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (73%/78%, 69%/73%, and 63%/84% vs 12%, 13%, and 30%, respectively; all P < .001) and Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 (45%/64%, 45%/59%, and 38%/67% vs 7%, 5%, and 11%, respectively; all P < .001). The safety profile was consistent in adolescents and adults.

Study details: This interim analysis of 3 phase 3 trials included 552 adolescents (12-17 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg upadacitinib, 30 mg upadacitinib, or placebo alone (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) or with topical corticosteroids (AD Up).

Disclosures: This study was funded by AbbVie Inc. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including AbbVie. Nine authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in AbbVie.

Source: Paller AS et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib treatment in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 (Apr 12). Doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391

Key clinical point: A referral tool based on five independent risk factors for concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among patients with psoriasis may help dermatologists to identify patients with psoriasis who could benefit from a rheumatologist referral.

Major finding: The predictive variables for concomitant PsA among patients with psoriasis that were included in the referral tool were treatment history with conventional systemics (P  =  .04) and biologics/small molecule inhibitors (P  =  .01), patient-reported history of joint pain without trauma (P  =  .02), swollen joints (P < .001), and sausage-like swollen digits (P  =  .01). The referral tool had an area under curve of 0.82.

Study details: This study analyzed the data of 303 patients with psoriasis from the prospective observational DAPPER study who had visited the dermatology outpatient clinic.

Disclosures: This study was funded by a PhD grant from Radboud University Medical Center/Sint Maartenskliniek, Netherlands, and local structural research funding of the Sint Maartenskliniek. Several authors reported financial and non-financial ties with various sources.

Source: van Hal TW et al. Development of a new referral tool to identify psoriasis patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis: Results of the prospective DAPPER cohort. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 (Apr 27). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.5269

Key clinical point: A referral tool based on five independent risk factors for concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among patients with psoriasis may help dermatologists to identify patients with psoriasis who could benefit from a rheumatologist referral.

Major finding: The predictive variables for concomitant PsA among patients with psoriasis that were included in the referral tool were treatment history with conventional systemics (P  =  .04) and biologics/small molecule inhibitors (P  =  .01), patient-reported history of joint pain without trauma (P  =  .02), swollen joints (P < .001), and sausage-like swollen digits (P  =  .01). The referral tool had an area under curve of 0.82.

Study details: This study analyzed the data of 303 patients with psoriasis from the prospective observational DAPPER study who had visited the dermatology outpatient clinic.

Disclosures: This study was funded by a PhD grant from Radboud University Medical Center/Sint Maartenskliniek, Netherlands, and local structural research funding of the Sint Maartenskliniek. Several authors reported financial and non-financial ties with various sources.

Source: van Hal TW et al. Development of a new referral tool to identify psoriasis patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis: Results of the prospective DAPPER cohort. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 (Apr 27). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.5269

Key clinical point: A referral tool based on five independent risk factors for concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA) among patients with psoriasis may help dermatologists to identify patients with psoriasis who could benefit from a rheumatologist referral.

Major finding: The predictive variables for concomitant PsA among patients with psoriasis that were included in the referral tool were treatment history with conventional systemics (P  =  .04) and biologics/small molecule inhibitors (P  =  .01), patient-reported history of joint pain without trauma (P  =  .02), swollen joints (P < .001), and sausage-like swollen digits (P  =  .01). The referral tool had an area under curve of 0.82.

Study details: This study analyzed the data of 303 patients with psoriasis from the prospective observational DAPPER study who had visited the dermatology outpatient clinic.

Disclosures: This study was funded by a PhD grant from Radboud University Medical Center/Sint Maartenskliniek, Netherlands, and local structural research funding of the Sint Maartenskliniek. Several authors reported financial and non-financial ties with various sources.

Source: van Hal TW et al. Development of a new referral tool to identify psoriasis patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis: Results of the prospective DAPPER cohort. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023 (Apr 27). Doi: 10.2340/actadv.v103.5269

Key clinical point: The occurrence of radiographic spinal damage was overall low among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis; however, severe spinal damage and the extent of syndesmophytes led spinal damage were more observed in spondyloarthritis vs PsA.

Major finding: Proportion of patients with PsA vs spondyloarthritis experiencing spinal damage was comparable (10.6% vs 7.9%; P  =  .320). However, patients with spondyloarthritis and spinal damage vs PsA had higher modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Scores, indicating severe spinal damage (P < .05). Syndesmophytes were significantly higher in the total spine of patients with spondyloarthritis vs PsA (P < .05).

Study details: This study evaluated patients with PsA (n = 312) and spondyloarthritis (n = 213) who had undergone radiographic imaging assessment in the Belgian Epidemiological Psoriatic Arthritis Study (BEPAS) and observational Ghent and Belgian Inflammatory Arthritis and Spondylitis (Be-GIANT) study, respectively.

Disclosures: The BEPAS and Be-GIANT studies were funded by Merck Sharp Dohme Belgium and AbbVie, respectively. Several authors reported ties with various companies, including AbbVie or Merck Sharp Dohme.

Source: de Hooge M et al. Extent of axial damage in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Comparative data from the BEPAS and (Be-)GIANT multicentre cohorts. RMD Open. 2023;9(2):e002994 (May 3). Doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002994

Key clinical point: The occurrence of radiographic spinal damage was overall low among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis; however, severe spinal damage and the extent of syndesmophytes led spinal damage were more observed in spondyloarthritis vs PsA.

Major finding: Proportion of patients with PsA vs spondyloarthritis experiencing spinal damage was comparable (10.6% vs 7.9%; P  =  .320). However, patients with spondyloarthritis and spinal damage vs PsA had higher modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Scores, indicating severe spinal damage (P < .05). Syndesmophytes were significantly higher in the total spine of patients with spondyloarthritis vs PsA (P < .05).

Study details: This study evaluated patients with PsA (n = 312) and spondyloarthritis (n = 213) who had undergone radiographic imaging assessment in the Belgian Epidemiological Psoriatic Arthritis Study (BEPAS) and observational Ghent and Belgian Inflammatory Arthritis and Spondylitis (Be-GIANT) study, respectively.

Disclosures: The BEPAS and Be-GIANT studies were funded by Merck Sharp Dohme Belgium and AbbVie, respectively. Several authors reported ties with various companies, including AbbVie or Merck Sharp Dohme.

Source: de Hooge M et al. Extent of axial damage in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Comparative data from the BEPAS and (Be-)GIANT multicentre cohorts. RMD Open. 2023;9(2):e002994 (May 3). Doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002994

Key clinical point: The occurrence of radiographic spinal damage was overall low among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis; however, severe spinal damage and the extent of syndesmophytes led spinal damage were more observed in spondyloarthritis vs PsA.

Major finding: Proportion of patients with PsA vs spondyloarthritis experiencing spinal damage was comparable (10.6% vs 7.9%; P  =  .320). However, patients with spondyloarthritis and spinal damage vs PsA had higher modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Scores, indicating severe spinal damage (P < .05). Syndesmophytes were significantly higher in the total spine of patients with spondyloarthritis vs PsA (P < .05).

Study details: This study evaluated patients with PsA (n = 312) and spondyloarthritis (n = 213) who had undergone radiographic imaging assessment in the Belgian Epidemiological Psoriatic Arthritis Study (BEPAS) and observational Ghent and Belgian Inflammatory Arthritis and Spondylitis (Be-GIANT) study, respectively.

Disclosures: The BEPAS and Be-GIANT studies were funded by Merck Sharp Dohme Belgium and AbbVie, respectively. Several authors reported ties with various companies, including AbbVie or Merck Sharp Dohme.

Source: de Hooge M et al. Extent of axial damage in psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Comparative data from the BEPAS and (Be-)GIANT multicentre cohorts. RMD Open. 2023;9(2):e002994 (May 3). Doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002994

Key clinical point: Secukinumab reduced disease activity at week 12, which sustained or improved by week 52, and demonstrated a consistent safety profile in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 12, 50% improvement in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA50) was achieved by a higher proportion of patients treated with 300 mg or 150 mg secukinumab vs placebo-treated patients (65.2% and 44.4% vs 30.0%, respectively). DAPSA50 responses further improved with 300 mg and 150 mg secukinumab at week 52 (74.2% and 71.8%; respectively). The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that reported in the original trials.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the phase 3/3b FUTURE 2-5 and MAXIMISE trials included 84 patients with oligoarticular PsA who were randomly assigned to receive 150 or 300 mg secukinumab or placebo until week 12 and 150 or 300 mg `secukinumab from week 12 to 52.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Some authors declared being employees and holding stocks or shares or having other ties with Novartis or others.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Inhibition of interleukin-17 in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 (May 6). Doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00548-y

Key clinical point: Secukinumab reduced disease activity at week 12, which sustained or improved by week 52, and demonstrated a consistent safety profile in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 12, 50% improvement in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA50) was achieved by a higher proportion of patients treated with 300 mg or 150 mg secukinumab vs placebo-treated patients (65.2% and 44.4% vs 30.0%, respectively). DAPSA50 responses further improved with 300 mg and 150 mg secukinumab at week 52 (74.2% and 71.8%; respectively). The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that reported in the original trials.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the phase 3/3b FUTURE 2-5 and MAXIMISE trials included 84 patients with oligoarticular PsA who were randomly assigned to receive 150 or 300 mg secukinumab or placebo until week 12 and 150 or 300 mg `secukinumab from week 12 to 52.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Some authors declared being employees and holding stocks or shares or having other ties with Novartis or others.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Inhibition of interleukin-17 in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 (May 6). Doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00548-y

Key clinical point: Secukinumab reduced disease activity at week 12, which sustained or improved by week 52, and demonstrated a consistent safety profile in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: At week 12, 50% improvement in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA50) was achieved by a higher proportion of patients treated with 300 mg or 150 mg secukinumab vs placebo-treated patients (65.2% and 44.4% vs 30.0%, respectively). DAPSA50 responses further improved with 300 mg and 150 mg secukinumab at week 52 (74.2% and 71.8%; respectively). The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with that reported in the original trials.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the phase 3/3b FUTURE 2-5 and MAXIMISE trials included 84 patients with oligoarticular PsA who were randomly assigned to receive 150 or 300 mg secukinumab or placebo until week 12 and 150 or 300 mg `secukinumab from week 12 to 52.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Some authors declared being employees and holding stocks or shares or having other ties with Novartis or others.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Inhibition of interleukin-17 in patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 (May 6). Doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00548-y

Key clinical point: Patients with higher platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were more likely to be diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) than psoriasis vulgaris (PsV), with patients having higher pretreatment systemic inflammatory marker scores showing lower treatment persistence with conventional therapies.

Major finding: PLR (odds ratio [OR] 7.027; P  =  .040) or CRP levels (OR 3.179; P  =  .022) at the time of initial presentation were associated with a higher probability of PsA vs PsV diagnosis, with patients having higher pretreatment platelet or neutrophil counts, PLR, and systemic immune/inflammation index scores exhibiting lower treatment continuation rates for conventional systemic agents (all P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis including patients with PsA (n = 47) and PsV (n = 117) and control individuals with no history of allergy or skin diseases (n = 50).

Disclosures: This study did not receive any external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Sugimoto E, Matsuda H, et al. Impact of pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers on treatment persistence with biologics and conventional systemic therapy: A retrospective study of patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):3046 (Apr 21). Doi: 10.3390/jcm12083046

Key clinical point: Patients with higher platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were more likely to be diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) than psoriasis vulgaris (PsV), with patients having higher pretreatment systemic inflammatory marker scores showing lower treatment persistence with conventional therapies.

Major finding: PLR (odds ratio [OR] 7.027; P  =  .040) or CRP levels (OR 3.179; P  =  .022) at the time of initial presentation were associated with a higher probability of PsA vs PsV diagnosis, with patients having higher pretreatment platelet or neutrophil counts, PLR, and systemic immune/inflammation index scores exhibiting lower treatment continuation rates for conventional systemic agents (all P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis including patients with PsA (n = 47) and PsV (n = 117) and control individuals with no history of allergy or skin diseases (n = 50).

Disclosures: This study did not receive any external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Sugimoto E, Matsuda H, et al. Impact of pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers on treatment persistence with biologics and conventional systemic therapy: A retrospective study of patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):3046 (Apr 21). Doi: 10.3390/jcm12083046

Key clinical point: Patients with higher platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were more likely to be diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) than psoriasis vulgaris (PsV), with patients having higher pretreatment systemic inflammatory marker scores showing lower treatment persistence with conventional therapies.

Major finding: PLR (odds ratio [OR] 7.027; P  =  .040) or CRP levels (OR 3.179; P  =  .022) at the time of initial presentation were associated with a higher probability of PsA vs PsV diagnosis, with patients having higher pretreatment platelet or neutrophil counts, PLR, and systemic immune/inflammation index scores exhibiting lower treatment continuation rates for conventional systemic agents (all P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective analysis including patients with PsA (n = 47) and PsV (n = 117) and control individuals with no history of allergy or skin diseases (n = 50).

Disclosures: This study did not receive any external funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Sugimoto E, Matsuda H, et al. Impact of pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers on treatment persistence with biologics and conventional systemic therapy: A retrospective study of patients with psoriasis vulgaris and psoriatic arthritis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(8):3046 (Apr 21). Doi: 10.3390/jcm12083046

Key clinical point: Concomitant methotrexate had no effect on ustekimumab immunogenicity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with the formation of antidrug antibody (ADA) not being associated with reductions in ustekinumab safety or efficacy.

Major finding: The prevalence of ADA at week 52 was not significantly different between the ustekinumab+methotrexate and ustekinumab+placebo groups, with disease activity, treatment response, dropout rates, effect of pretreatment with methotrexate, and safety outcomes not being significantly different in patients with vs without ADA (all P > .05).

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the MUST trial included 112 patients with active PsA who were naive to ustekimumab and were randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab with concomitant methotrexate or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, which received support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and others. F Behrens, M Koehm, and H Burkhardt declared receiving research grants from Janssen Cilag. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Source: Poor SM et al. The role of antidrug antibodies in ustekinumab therapy and the impact of methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 (Apr 20). Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead177

Key clinical point: Concomitant methotrexate had no effect on ustekimumab immunogenicity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with the formation of antidrug antibody (ADA) not being associated with reductions in ustekinumab safety or efficacy.

Major finding: The prevalence of ADA at week 52 was not significantly different between the ustekinumab+methotrexate and ustekinumab+placebo groups, with disease activity, treatment response, dropout rates, effect of pretreatment with methotrexate, and safety outcomes not being significantly different in patients with vs without ADA (all P > .05).

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the MUST trial included 112 patients with active PsA who were naive to ustekimumab and were randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab with concomitant methotrexate or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, which received support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and others. F Behrens, M Koehm, and H Burkhardt declared receiving research grants from Janssen Cilag. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Source: Poor SM et al. The role of antidrug antibodies in ustekinumab therapy and the impact of methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 (Apr 20). Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead177

Key clinical point: Concomitant methotrexate had no effect on ustekimumab immunogenicity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with the formation of antidrug antibody (ADA) not being associated with reductions in ustekinumab safety or efficacy.

Major finding: The prevalence of ADA at week 52 was not significantly different between the ustekinumab+methotrexate and ustekinumab+placebo groups, with disease activity, treatment response, dropout rates, effect of pretreatment with methotrexate, and safety outcomes not being significantly different in patients with vs without ADA (all P > .05).

Study details: This post hoc analysis of the MUST trial included 112 patients with active PsA who were naive to ustekimumab and were randomly assigned to receive ustekinumab with concomitant methotrexate or placebo.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking, which received support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and others. F Behrens, M Koehm, and H Burkhardt declared receiving research grants from Janssen Cilag. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Source: Poor SM et al. The role of antidrug antibodies in ustekinumab therapy and the impact of methotrexate. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 (Apr 20). Doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead177