Video

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often has a suboptimal response to conventional chemotherapy, because of adverse biological features that can accumulate in cells.

The combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab has been associated with about 60% overall responses rates, median progression-free survival of approximately 15 months, and overall survival of nearly 3 years in patients with CLL, and there is now evidence that substituting venetoclax (Venclexta) for bendamustine could improve outcomes even further.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, John F. Seymour, MBBS, PhD, discussed results from a planned interim analysis of the phase 3 MURANO study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab with venetoclax plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

Venetoclax/rituximab was superior to bendamustine/rituximab for prolonging progression-free survival, with effects consistent across subgroups, regardless of mutation status, and for having a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival.

The MURANO trial was funded by AbbVie. Dr. Seymour reported honoraria, research funding, and advisory committee and speakers bureau participation for AbbVie and other companies.

ATLANTA – Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often has a suboptimal response to conventional chemotherapy, because of adverse biological features that can accumulate in cells.

The combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab has been associated with about 60% overall responses rates, median progression-free survival of approximately 15 months, and overall survival of nearly 3 years in patients with CLL, and there is now evidence that substituting venetoclax (Venclexta) for bendamustine could improve outcomes even further.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, John F. Seymour, MBBS, PhD, discussed results from a planned interim analysis of the phase 3 MURANO study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab with venetoclax plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

Venetoclax/rituximab was superior to bendamustine/rituximab for prolonging progression-free survival, with effects consistent across subgroups, regardless of mutation status, and for having a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival.

The MURANO trial was funded by AbbVie. Dr. Seymour reported honoraria, research funding, and advisory committee and speakers bureau participation for AbbVie and other companies.

ATLANTA – Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often has a suboptimal response to conventional chemotherapy, because of adverse biological features that can accumulate in cells.

The combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab has been associated with about 60% overall responses rates, median progression-free survival of approximately 15 months, and overall survival of nearly 3 years in patients with CLL, and there is now evidence that substituting venetoclax (Venclexta) for bendamustine could improve outcomes even further.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, John F. Seymour, MBBS, PhD, discussed results from a planned interim analysis of the phase 3 MURANO study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab with venetoclax plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.

Venetoclax/rituximab was superior to bendamustine/rituximab for prolonging progression-free survival, with effects consistent across subgroups, regardless of mutation status, and for having a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival.

The MURANO trial was funded by AbbVie. Dr. Seymour reported honoraria, research funding, and advisory committee and speakers bureau participation for AbbVie and other companies.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:

Measure #128: Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index Screening and Follow-Up Plan

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who have had their body mass index (BMI) calculated and documented in the last 6 months and a follow-up plan developed if the BMI was too high or too low.

What you need to do: Assess the patient’s BMI during the visit or document that it was done in the last 6 months. Patient-reported height and weight values cannot be used. If the BMI is outside of normal parameters (18.5 kg/m^{2 to} 25 kg/m²), develop a follow-up plan or document that one was made in the last 6 months.

Eligible cases include patients who were aged 18 years or older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97802, 97803, 98960, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, D7140, D7210, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0271, G0402, G0438, G0439, G0447 without telehealth modifiers GQ or GT.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8420 indicates that BMI has been documented within normal parameters and no follow-up plan is required, while G8417 and G8418 indicate BMI above and below normal parameters, respectively, with a documented follow-up plan.

Use exclusion code G8938 if the BMI has been documented as being outside of normal limits, but a follow-up plan is not documented because the patient is not eligible. For example, patients are considered not eligible if they are 65 years or older and weight reduction or gain would complicate an underlying health condition.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:

Measure #128: Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index Screening and Follow-Up Plan

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who have had their body mass index (BMI) calculated and documented in the last 6 months and a follow-up plan developed if the BMI was too high or too low.

What you need to do: Assess the patient’s BMI during the visit or document that it was done in the last 6 months. Patient-reported height and weight values cannot be used. If the BMI is outside of normal parameters (18.5 kg/m^{2 to} 25 kg/m²), develop a follow-up plan or document that one was made in the last 6 months.

Eligible cases include patients who were aged 18 years or older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97802, 97803, 98960, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, D7140, D7210, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0271, G0402, G0438, G0439, G0447 without telehealth modifiers GQ or GT.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8420 indicates that BMI has been documented within normal parameters and no follow-up plan is required, while G8417 and G8418 indicate BMI above and below normal parameters, respectively, with a documented follow-up plan.

Use exclusion code G8938 if the BMI has been documented as being outside of normal limits, but a follow-up plan is not documented because the patient is not eligible. For example, patients are considered not eligible if they are 65 years or older and weight reduction or gain would complicate an underlying health condition.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:

Measure #128: Preventive Care and Screening: Body Mass Index Screening and Follow-Up Plan

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who have had their body mass index (BMI) calculated and documented in the last 6 months and a follow-up plan developed if the BMI was too high or too low.

What you need to do: Assess the patient’s BMI during the visit or document that it was done in the last 6 months. Patient-reported height and weight values cannot be used. If the BMI is outside of normal parameters (18.5 kg/m^{2 to} 25 kg/m²), develop a follow-up plan or document that one was made in the last 6 months.

Eligible cases include patients who were aged 18 years or older on the date of the encounter and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT or HCPCS): 90791, 90792, 90832, 90834, 90837, 96150, 96151, 96152, 97161, 97162, 97163, 97165, 97166, 97167, 97802, 97803, 98960, 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215, D7140, D7210, G0101, G0108, G0270, G0271, G0402, G0438, G0439, G0447 without telehealth modifiers GQ or GT.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, G8420 indicates that BMI has been documented within normal parameters and no follow-up plan is required, while G8417 and G8418 indicate BMI above and below normal parameters, respectively, with a documented follow-up plan.

Use exclusion code G8938 if the BMI has been documented as being outside of normal limits, but a follow-up plan is not documented because the patient is not eligible. For example, patients are considered not eligible if they are 65 years or older and weight reduction or gain would complicate an underlying health condition.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:


 

Measure #109: Osteoarthritis Function and Pain Assessment

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of visits that included an assessment of function and pain for patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) who are aged 21 years or older.

What you need to do: Perform an assessment of symptoms and functional status for patients with OA and document it in the medical record. Validated scales and questionnaires may be used but are not required.

Eligible cases include patients aged 21 years and older with a diagnosis of OA and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT): 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, CPT II 1006F indicates that OA symptoms and functional status were assessed. Add the 8P modifier to CPT II 1006F if the assessment was not performed and the reason is not otherwise specified.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:


 

Measure #109: Osteoarthritis Function and Pain Assessment

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of visits that included an assessment of function and pain for patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) who are aged 21 years or older.

What you need to do: Perform an assessment of symptoms and functional status for patients with OA and document it in the medical record. Validated scales and questionnaires may be used but are not required.

Eligible cases include patients aged 21 years and older with a diagnosis of OA and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT): 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, CPT II 1006F indicates that OA symptoms and functional status were assessed. Add the 8P modifier to CPT II 1006F if the assessment was not performed and the reason is not otherwise specified.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

If you haven’t started reporting quality data for the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), there’s still time to avoid a 4% cut to your Medicare payments.

Under the Pick Your Pace approach being offered this year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services allows clinicians to test the system by reporting on one quality measure for one patient through paper-based claims. Be sure to append a Quality Data Code (QDC) to the claim form for care provided up to Dec. 31, 2017, in order to avoid a penalty in payment year 2019.

Consider this measure:


 

Measure #109: Osteoarthritis Function and Pain Assessment

This measure is aimed at capturing the percentage of visits that included an assessment of function and pain for patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) who are aged 21 years or older.

What you need to do: Perform an assessment of symptoms and functional status for patients with OA and document it in the medical record. Validated scales and questionnaires may be used but are not required.

Eligible cases include patients aged 21 years and older with a diagnosis of OA and a patient encounter during the performance period. Applicable codes include (CPT): 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, 99205, 99212, 99213, 99214, 99215.

To get credit under MIPS, be sure to include a QDC that shows that you successfully performed the measure or had a good reason for not doing so. For instance, CPT II 1006F indicates that OA symptoms and functional status were assessed. Add the 8P modifier to CPT II 1006F if the assessment was not performed and the reason is not otherwise specified.

CMS has a full list measures available for claims-based reporting at qpp.cms.gov. The American Medical Association has also created a step-by-step guide for reporting on one quality measure.

Certain clinicians are exempt from reporting and do not face a penalty under MIPS:

• Those who enrolled in Medicare for the first time during a performance period.
• Those who have Medicare Part B allowed charges of $30,000 or less.
• Those who have 100 or fewer Medicare Part B patients.
• Those who are significantly participating in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (APM).

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Targeting the anti-inflammatory drug canakinumab to cardiovascular disease patients with a robust response to a single dose may be an effective way to enhance the cost benefit of this novel treatment that is effective but also expensive.

A post hoc analysis of data collected in the ground-breaking CANTOS trial showed that among patients with a robust anti-inflammatory response to their first dose of canakinumab, the 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events fell by 25% compared with patients who received placebo, a much higher relative risk reduction compared with all canakinumab recipients in the study. In this responsive subgroup, which constituted 55% of all patients assessed after their first dose, canakinumab also cut both cardiovascular death and all-cause death by 31% each relative to placebo, statistically significant reductions that had not been seen in the trial’s primary analysis that included all drug recipients, Paul M. Ridker, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The current analysis suggests that the magnitude of hsCRP [high sensitivity C-reactive protein] reduction following a single dose of canakinumab may provide a simple clinical method to identify individuals most likely to accrue the largest cardiovascular and cancer benefits from continued treatment.” The findings have importance “for patient selection, cost-effectiveness, and personalized medicine” as researchers and clinicians begin using anti-inflammatory drugs such as canakinumab to treat cardiovascular disease patients, said Dr. Ridker, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

“The magnitude of the hsCRP reduction” after the first dose “is telling us who benefits most,” Dr. Ridker said in a video interview.

The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS) enrolled patients with a history of a MI and a “residual” inflammatory risk based on having an hsCRP level above 2 mg/L at baseline despite receiving optimized standard treatments and having a median LDL cholesterol level of 82 mg/dL. Dr. Ridker and his associates reported the study’s primary outcome results in August at the European Society of Cardiology meeting and in a simultaneously-published article (N Engl J Med. 2017 Sept 21; 377[12]:1119-31).

For the current analyses they defined a robust anti-inflammatory response as CANTOS patients who maintained an hsCRP level below 2 mg/L when measured 3 months after their first canakinumab dose. When the researchers divided all canakinumab recipients into tertiles based on their achieved hsCRP level after one dose, those with the lowest level, less than 1.2 mg/L, also had the best outcome, with a 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events that was 29% lower than the placebo patients. Patients in the middle tertile of achieved hsCRP, from 1.2 up to but not including 2.6 mg/L, showed a smaller but still statistically significant relative 17% reduction in events, while patients with the tertile with the highest hsCRP levels following one canakinumab dose had essentially no difference in their outcomes compared with placebo-treated control patients.

These findings suggest that for hsCRP, “lower is better,” Dr. Ridker noted. “It’s similar to where we were in 1994” when trial results showed how LDL levels related to cardiovascular disease events and the potential that statin treatment held had for reducing event rates.

The new analyses included three additional notable findings:

• The main serious adverse effect from canakinumab treatment, fatal infections, which occurred at a small but significantly higher rate than in control patients, had a similar incidence of about one episode/300 patient years regardless of whether the achieved hsCRP level fell below 2 mg/L or remained above that level. The placebo rate of fatal infections was about one for every 500 patient years.

• The substantially reduced incidence of lung cancer seen in the primary CANTOS results also tracked with achieved hsCRP. Patients with an achieved hsCRP that was below the median for all treated patients had a 71% cut in new-onset lung cancer compared with controls, while patients with hsCRP levels that fell above the median showed no significant difference compared with control patients.

• All three doses of canakinumab tested in CANTOS – 50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection once every 3 months – produced a drop in hsCRP to below 2 mg/L in some patients, but the rate at which patients reached this level differed depending on dose: 44% among patients who received the lowest dose, 55% of those who received a 150-mg dose, and 65% among those on the highest dose.

But this “responder analysis” of patients who received canakinumab received a strong cautionary caveat from Robert M. Califf, MD, professor of medicine and vice chancellor for health data sciences at Duke University in Durham, N.C.

“Beware of responder analyses,” Dr. Califf said during a talk at the meeting in which he commented on the new CANTOS findings. “There is a long history in cardiology of being misled” by responder analyses, he said.

Dr. Ridker added that the mechanism that determines whether patients have a robust or modest response to canakinumab remains unclear, although it likely depends on genetic factors. He also noted that research being done by himself and others is investigating the efficacy of other anti-inflammatory drugs that could potentially cut cardiovascular disease rates, including methotrexate and colchicine.

Canakinumab (Ilaris) had Food and Drug Administration marketing approval to treat systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pediatric fever syndromes. Concurrently with the meeting report, the results appeared in an article online (Lancet 2017 Nov 13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[17]32814-3).

CANTOS was sponsored by Novartis, the company that markets canakinumab. Dr. Ridker has been a consultant to Novartis and was lead investigator of CANTOS. He also holds patents on using hsCRP to assess cardiovascular disease risk. Dr. Califf is an adviser to Verily Health Sciences.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Targeting the anti-inflammatory drug canakinumab to cardiovascular disease patients with a robust response to a single dose may be an effective way to enhance the cost benefit of this novel treatment that is effective but also expensive.

A post hoc analysis of data collected in the ground-breaking CANTOS trial showed that among patients with a robust anti-inflammatory response to their first dose of canakinumab, the 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events fell by 25% compared with patients who received placebo, a much higher relative risk reduction compared with all canakinumab recipients in the study. In this responsive subgroup, which constituted 55% of all patients assessed after their first dose, canakinumab also cut both cardiovascular death and all-cause death by 31% each relative to placebo, statistically significant reductions that had not been seen in the trial’s primary analysis that included all drug recipients, Paul M. Ridker, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The current analysis suggests that the magnitude of hsCRP [high sensitivity C-reactive protein] reduction following a single dose of canakinumab may provide a simple clinical method to identify individuals most likely to accrue the largest cardiovascular and cancer benefits from continued treatment.” The findings have importance “for patient selection, cost-effectiveness, and personalized medicine” as researchers and clinicians begin using anti-inflammatory drugs such as canakinumab to treat cardiovascular disease patients, said Dr. Ridker, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

“The magnitude of the hsCRP reduction” after the first dose “is telling us who benefits most,” Dr. Ridker said in a video interview.

The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS) enrolled patients with a history of a MI and a “residual” inflammatory risk based on having an hsCRP level above 2 mg/L at baseline despite receiving optimized standard treatments and having a median LDL cholesterol level of 82 mg/dL. Dr. Ridker and his associates reported the study’s primary outcome results in August at the European Society of Cardiology meeting and in a simultaneously-published article (N Engl J Med. 2017 Sept 21; 377[12]:1119-31).

For the current analyses they defined a robust anti-inflammatory response as CANTOS patients who maintained an hsCRP level below 2 mg/L when measured 3 months after their first canakinumab dose. When the researchers divided all canakinumab recipients into tertiles based on their achieved hsCRP level after one dose, those with the lowest level, less than 1.2 mg/L, also had the best outcome, with a 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events that was 29% lower than the placebo patients. Patients in the middle tertile of achieved hsCRP, from 1.2 up to but not including 2.6 mg/L, showed a smaller but still statistically significant relative 17% reduction in events, while patients with the tertile with the highest hsCRP levels following one canakinumab dose had essentially no difference in their outcomes compared with placebo-treated control patients.

These findings suggest that for hsCRP, “lower is better,” Dr. Ridker noted. “It’s similar to where we were in 1994” when trial results showed how LDL levels related to cardiovascular disease events and the potential that statin treatment held had for reducing event rates.

The new analyses included three additional notable findings:

• The main serious adverse effect from canakinumab treatment, fatal infections, which occurred at a small but significantly higher rate than in control patients, had a similar incidence of about one episode/300 patient years regardless of whether the achieved hsCRP level fell below 2 mg/L or remained above that level. The placebo rate of fatal infections was about one for every 500 patient years.

• The substantially reduced incidence of lung cancer seen in the primary CANTOS results also tracked with achieved hsCRP. Patients with an achieved hsCRP that was below the median for all treated patients had a 71% cut in new-onset lung cancer compared with controls, while patients with hsCRP levels that fell above the median showed no significant difference compared with control patients.

• All three doses of canakinumab tested in CANTOS – 50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection once every 3 months – produced a drop in hsCRP to below 2 mg/L in some patients, but the rate at which patients reached this level differed depending on dose: 44% among patients who received the lowest dose, 55% of those who received a 150-mg dose, and 65% among those on the highest dose.

But this “responder analysis” of patients who received canakinumab received a strong cautionary caveat from Robert M. Califf, MD, professor of medicine and vice chancellor for health data sciences at Duke University in Durham, N.C.

“Beware of responder analyses,” Dr. Califf said during a talk at the meeting in which he commented on the new CANTOS findings. “There is a long history in cardiology of being misled” by responder analyses, he said.

Dr. Ridker added that the mechanism that determines whether patients have a robust or modest response to canakinumab remains unclear, although it likely depends on genetic factors. He also noted that research being done by himself and others is investigating the efficacy of other anti-inflammatory drugs that could potentially cut cardiovascular disease rates, including methotrexate and colchicine.

Canakinumab (Ilaris) had Food and Drug Administration marketing approval to treat systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pediatric fever syndromes. Concurrently with the meeting report, the results appeared in an article online (Lancet 2017 Nov 13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[17]32814-3).

CANTOS was sponsored by Novartis, the company that markets canakinumab. Dr. Ridker has been a consultant to Novartis and was lead investigator of CANTOS. He also holds patents on using hsCRP to assess cardiovascular disease risk. Dr. Califf is an adviser to Verily Health Sciences.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

ANAHEIM, CALIF. – Targeting the anti-inflammatory drug canakinumab to cardiovascular disease patients with a robust response to a single dose may be an effective way to enhance the cost benefit of this novel treatment that is effective but also expensive.

A post hoc analysis of data collected in the ground-breaking CANTOS trial showed that among patients with a robust anti-inflammatory response to their first dose of canakinumab, the 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events fell by 25% compared with patients who received placebo, a much higher relative risk reduction compared with all canakinumab recipients in the study. In this responsive subgroup, which constituted 55% of all patients assessed after their first dose, canakinumab also cut both cardiovascular death and all-cause death by 31% each relative to placebo, statistically significant reductions that had not been seen in the trial’s primary analysis that included all drug recipients, Paul M. Ridker, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“The current analysis suggests that the magnitude of hsCRP [high sensitivity C-reactive protein] reduction following a single dose of canakinumab may provide a simple clinical method to identify individuals most likely to accrue the largest cardiovascular and cancer benefits from continued treatment.” The findings have importance “for patient selection, cost-effectiveness, and personalized medicine” as researchers and clinicians begin using anti-inflammatory drugs such as canakinumab to treat cardiovascular disease patients, said Dr. Ridker, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and director of the Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

“The magnitude of the hsCRP reduction” after the first dose “is telling us who benefits most,” Dr. Ridker said in a video interview.

The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study (CANTOS) enrolled patients with a history of a MI and a “residual” inflammatory risk based on having an hsCRP level above 2 mg/L at baseline despite receiving optimized standard treatments and having a median LDL cholesterol level of 82 mg/dL. Dr. Ridker and his associates reported the study’s primary outcome results in August at the European Society of Cardiology meeting and in a simultaneously-published article (N Engl J Med. 2017 Sept 21; 377[12]:1119-31).

For the current analyses they defined a robust anti-inflammatory response as CANTOS patients who maintained an hsCRP level below 2 mg/L when measured 3 months after their first canakinumab dose. When the researchers divided all canakinumab recipients into tertiles based on their achieved hsCRP level after one dose, those with the lowest level, less than 1.2 mg/L, also had the best outcome, with a 4-year rate of major adverse cardiovascular events that was 29% lower than the placebo patients. Patients in the middle tertile of achieved hsCRP, from 1.2 up to but not including 2.6 mg/L, showed a smaller but still statistically significant relative 17% reduction in events, while patients with the tertile with the highest hsCRP levels following one canakinumab dose had essentially no difference in their outcomes compared with placebo-treated control patients.

These findings suggest that for hsCRP, “lower is better,” Dr. Ridker noted. “It’s similar to where we were in 1994” when trial results showed how LDL levels related to cardiovascular disease events and the potential that statin treatment held had for reducing event rates.

The new analyses included three additional notable findings:

• The main serious adverse effect from canakinumab treatment, fatal infections, which occurred at a small but significantly higher rate than in control patients, had a similar incidence of about one episode/300 patient years regardless of whether the achieved hsCRP level fell below 2 mg/L or remained above that level. The placebo rate of fatal infections was about one for every 500 patient years.

• The substantially reduced incidence of lung cancer seen in the primary CANTOS results also tracked with achieved hsCRP. Patients with an achieved hsCRP that was below the median for all treated patients had a 71% cut in new-onset lung cancer compared with controls, while patients with hsCRP levels that fell above the median showed no significant difference compared with control patients.

• All three doses of canakinumab tested in CANTOS – 50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg administered by subcutaneous injection once every 3 months – produced a drop in hsCRP to below 2 mg/L in some patients, but the rate at which patients reached this level differed depending on dose: 44% among patients who received the lowest dose, 55% of those who received a 150-mg dose, and 65% among those on the highest dose.

But this “responder analysis” of patients who received canakinumab received a strong cautionary caveat from Robert M. Califf, MD, professor of medicine and vice chancellor for health data sciences at Duke University in Durham, N.C.

“Beware of responder analyses,” Dr. Califf said during a talk at the meeting in which he commented on the new CANTOS findings. “There is a long history in cardiology of being misled” by responder analyses, he said.

Dr. Ridker added that the mechanism that determines whether patients have a robust or modest response to canakinumab remains unclear, although it likely depends on genetic factors. He also noted that research being done by himself and others is investigating the efficacy of other anti-inflammatory drugs that could potentially cut cardiovascular disease rates, including methotrexate and colchicine.

Canakinumab (Ilaris) had Food and Drug Administration marketing approval to treat systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pediatric fever syndromes. Concurrently with the meeting report, the results appeared in an article online (Lancet 2017 Nov 13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736[17]32814-3).

CANTOS was sponsored by Novartis, the company that markets canakinumab. Dr. Ridker has been a consultant to Novartis and was lead investigator of CANTOS. He also holds patents on using hsCRP to assess cardiovascular disease risk. Dr. Califf is an adviser to Verily Health Sciences.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler