Allowed Publications
LayerRx Mapping ID
178
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Medscape Lead Concept
6005128

Revision technique treats graft dysfunction after esophageal reconstruction

Revision surgery after caustic injury
Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:44

 

Ingestion of caustic substances like alkali, acid, and bleaches that call for esophageal surgery is relatively rare, and the study of dealing with postsurgery complications even rarer, but a team of surgeons from a large public referral hospital in Paris has collected enough cases over the first years of this century to report that a form of revision surgery in these cases can yield good outcomes with acceptable morbidity, according to a study in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1378-85).

Thibault Voron, MD, and coauthors at Hôpitaux Saint-Louis and the University of Paris performed revision cervicosternolaparotomy (CSLap) on 55 patients from 1999 to 2015. Two patients (4%) died and the severe morbidity rate was 27%, but the long-term functional success rate was 85%. “Of note, these figures compare favorably with results of primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries in the literature,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said. Overall the study authors performed revision surgery on 100 patients, with the remaining 45 undergoing repair through a limited approach. There were no significant differences in characteristics between the two groups.

Primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries can usually be done at referral centers with good results, but up to half of these patients can have late complications, consisting mostly of strictures and redundancy that can cause loss of function, Dr. Voron and coauthors said. Published series have reported revision surgery in 15%-38% of patients (Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:E1-5; Dis Esophagus. 1999;12:7-9), but revision surgery itself is difficult to accomplish.

CSLap involves a large operative field from the jaw to the pubis. It starts with a comprehensive neck exploration through the previous cervical incision or with a median laparotomy to rule out a limited-approach repair. CSLap was undertaken when the graft was too short for a tension-free anastomosis. After the upper part of the graft was dissected from the thoracic inlet, the abdomen was opened for dissection of the abdominal part of the transplant. All scar tissues and strictures were excised after the transplant release, and a new anastomosis was constructed in healthy tissues. In cases involving life-threatening complications, patient survival prevailed over graft preservation and reconstruction of digestive continuity. The operations took up to 10 hours, with 8 hours, 20 minutes the median.

Dr. Voron and coauthors identified two distinct indications for CSLap: graft strictures in 43 (78%) of patients to rescue the primary conduit and reconstruct the cervical anastomosis and a need to access the retrosternal space to treat graft-related complications. “Graft lengthening was definitely not the issue in this situation,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said of the latter indication.

Four patients had emergency revision CSLap for spontaneous graft perforation and complications related to caustic reingestion. None died and one patient had preservation of the primary conduit. “Retrosternal grafts can be quickly removed by blunt dissection in life-threatening circumstances; however, if reasonable chances to recover the transplant exist, CSLap exploration can be justified,” Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

CSLap offers a few advantages in these situations: Transplant release provides significant lengthening of the graft that enables preservation of the primary conduit and redo of the cervical anastomosis in most patients, and it allows direct access to the retrosternal space if needed, Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

Dr. Voron and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Body

 

This series by Dr. Voron and coauthors was “truly remarkable,” given the rarity of esophageal caustic injuries and even rarer occasion of revision surgery, Victor A. Ferraris, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1386-7). He attributed the series size to the authors’ clinical setting in a trauma entry point for Europe’s largest hospital system – the same hospital that received victims of the terrorist attack at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris in November 2015.

“Voron and coauthors clearly have the benefit of a large referral population and vast medical infrastructure in the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,” Dr. Ferraris said. That volume certainly factors into their ability to achieve “very good outcomes,” he said.

“This seems to be an argument in favor of localization of resources to a single center,” Dr. Ferraris said. “Dr. Voron and coauthors have translated their experience into knowledge that can help other surgeons deal with this difficult problem.”

Dr. Ferraris had no financial relationships to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

This series by Dr. Voron and coauthors was “truly remarkable,” given the rarity of esophageal caustic injuries and even rarer occasion of revision surgery, Victor A. Ferraris, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1386-7). He attributed the series size to the authors’ clinical setting in a trauma entry point for Europe’s largest hospital system – the same hospital that received victims of the terrorist attack at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris in November 2015.

“Voron and coauthors clearly have the benefit of a large referral population and vast medical infrastructure in the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,” Dr. Ferraris said. That volume certainly factors into their ability to achieve “very good outcomes,” he said.

“This seems to be an argument in favor of localization of resources to a single center,” Dr. Ferraris said. “Dr. Voron and coauthors have translated their experience into knowledge that can help other surgeons deal with this difficult problem.”

Dr. Ferraris had no financial relationships to disclose.

Body

 

This series by Dr. Voron and coauthors was “truly remarkable,” given the rarity of esophageal caustic injuries and even rarer occasion of revision surgery, Victor A. Ferraris, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington, said in his invited commentary (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:1386-7). He attributed the series size to the authors’ clinical setting in a trauma entry point for Europe’s largest hospital system – the same hospital that received victims of the terrorist attack at the Bataclan concert hall in Paris in November 2015.

“Voron and coauthors clearly have the benefit of a large referral population and vast medical infrastructure in the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,” Dr. Ferraris said. That volume certainly factors into their ability to achieve “very good outcomes,” he said.

“This seems to be an argument in favor of localization of resources to a single center,” Dr. Ferraris said. “Dr. Voron and coauthors have translated their experience into knowledge that can help other surgeons deal with this difficult problem.”

Dr. Ferraris had no financial relationships to disclose.

Title
Revision surgery after caustic injury
Revision surgery after caustic injury

 

Ingestion of caustic substances like alkali, acid, and bleaches that call for esophageal surgery is relatively rare, and the study of dealing with postsurgery complications even rarer, but a team of surgeons from a large public referral hospital in Paris has collected enough cases over the first years of this century to report that a form of revision surgery in these cases can yield good outcomes with acceptable morbidity, according to a study in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1378-85).

Thibault Voron, MD, and coauthors at Hôpitaux Saint-Louis and the University of Paris performed revision cervicosternolaparotomy (CSLap) on 55 patients from 1999 to 2015. Two patients (4%) died and the severe morbidity rate was 27%, but the long-term functional success rate was 85%. “Of note, these figures compare favorably with results of primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries in the literature,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said. Overall the study authors performed revision surgery on 100 patients, with the remaining 45 undergoing repair through a limited approach. There were no significant differences in characteristics between the two groups.

Primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries can usually be done at referral centers with good results, but up to half of these patients can have late complications, consisting mostly of strictures and redundancy that can cause loss of function, Dr. Voron and coauthors said. Published series have reported revision surgery in 15%-38% of patients (Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:E1-5; Dis Esophagus. 1999;12:7-9), but revision surgery itself is difficult to accomplish.

CSLap involves a large operative field from the jaw to the pubis. It starts with a comprehensive neck exploration through the previous cervical incision or with a median laparotomy to rule out a limited-approach repair. CSLap was undertaken when the graft was too short for a tension-free anastomosis. After the upper part of the graft was dissected from the thoracic inlet, the abdomen was opened for dissection of the abdominal part of the transplant. All scar tissues and strictures were excised after the transplant release, and a new anastomosis was constructed in healthy tissues. In cases involving life-threatening complications, patient survival prevailed over graft preservation and reconstruction of digestive continuity. The operations took up to 10 hours, with 8 hours, 20 minutes the median.

Dr. Voron and coauthors identified two distinct indications for CSLap: graft strictures in 43 (78%) of patients to rescue the primary conduit and reconstruct the cervical anastomosis and a need to access the retrosternal space to treat graft-related complications. “Graft lengthening was definitely not the issue in this situation,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said of the latter indication.

Four patients had emergency revision CSLap for spontaneous graft perforation and complications related to caustic reingestion. None died and one patient had preservation of the primary conduit. “Retrosternal grafts can be quickly removed by blunt dissection in life-threatening circumstances; however, if reasonable chances to recover the transplant exist, CSLap exploration can be justified,” Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

CSLap offers a few advantages in these situations: Transplant release provides significant lengthening of the graft that enables preservation of the primary conduit and redo of the cervical anastomosis in most patients, and it allows direct access to the retrosternal space if needed, Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

Dr. Voron and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

 

Ingestion of caustic substances like alkali, acid, and bleaches that call for esophageal surgery is relatively rare, and the study of dealing with postsurgery complications even rarer, but a team of surgeons from a large public referral hospital in Paris has collected enough cases over the first years of this century to report that a form of revision surgery in these cases can yield good outcomes with acceptable morbidity, according to a study in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152:1378-85).

Thibault Voron, MD, and coauthors at Hôpitaux Saint-Louis and the University of Paris performed revision cervicosternolaparotomy (CSLap) on 55 patients from 1999 to 2015. Two patients (4%) died and the severe morbidity rate was 27%, but the long-term functional success rate was 85%. “Of note, these figures compare favorably with results of primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries in the literature,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said. Overall the study authors performed revision surgery on 100 patients, with the remaining 45 undergoing repair through a limited approach. There were no significant differences in characteristics between the two groups.

Primary esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries can usually be done at referral centers with good results, but up to half of these patients can have late complications, consisting mostly of strictures and redundancy that can cause loss of function, Dr. Voron and coauthors said. Published series have reported revision surgery in 15%-38% of patients (Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:E1-5; Dis Esophagus. 1999;12:7-9), but revision surgery itself is difficult to accomplish.

CSLap involves a large operative field from the jaw to the pubis. It starts with a comprehensive neck exploration through the previous cervical incision or with a median laparotomy to rule out a limited-approach repair. CSLap was undertaken when the graft was too short for a tension-free anastomosis. After the upper part of the graft was dissected from the thoracic inlet, the abdomen was opened for dissection of the abdominal part of the transplant. All scar tissues and strictures were excised after the transplant release, and a new anastomosis was constructed in healthy tissues. In cases involving life-threatening complications, patient survival prevailed over graft preservation and reconstruction of digestive continuity. The operations took up to 10 hours, with 8 hours, 20 minutes the median.

Dr. Voron and coauthors identified two distinct indications for CSLap: graft strictures in 43 (78%) of patients to rescue the primary conduit and reconstruct the cervical anastomosis and a need to access the retrosternal space to treat graft-related complications. “Graft lengthening was definitely not the issue in this situation,” Dr. Voron and colleagues said of the latter indication.

Four patients had emergency revision CSLap for spontaneous graft perforation and complications related to caustic reingestion. None died and one patient had preservation of the primary conduit. “Retrosternal grafts can be quickly removed by blunt dissection in life-threatening circumstances; however, if reasonable chances to recover the transplant exist, CSLap exploration can be justified,” Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

CSLap offers a few advantages in these situations: Transplant release provides significant lengthening of the graft that enables preservation of the primary conduit and redo of the cervical anastomosis in most patients, and it allows direct access to the retrosternal space if needed, Dr. Voron and coauthors said.

Dr. Voron and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Eligible
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Cervicosternolaparotomy revision surgery for graft dysfunction after esophageal reconstruction for caustic injuries can achieve good results with acceptable morbidity.

Major finding: Functional success rate after revision CSLap was 85% after a mean follow-up of 4.4 years.

Data source: 55 patients who underwent CSLap revision surgery between 1999 and 2015 at a single center.

Disclosures: Dr. Voron and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

VIDEO: HeartMate 3 LVAD solves pump thrombosis

Some big issues remain for HeartMate 3
Article Type
Changed
Tue, 07/21/2020 - 14:18

– HeartMate 3, the latest left ventricular assist device in the HeartMate line, appears to have solved the problem of pump thrombosis, a complication that has dogged ventricular pumps since the issue leapt into medical awareness about 3 years ago (New Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370:33-40).

During 6 months of follow-up, none of 152 heart failure patients assigned to receive a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis, compared with 14 patients (10%) having pump thrombosis out of 138 recipients of the prior-generation HeartMate II LVAD who served as the control group for the study.

Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
This sharp cut in pump thrombosis episodes directly drove a similar, clear drop in reoperations for pump malfunction (1% in the HeartMate 3 group and 8% with HeartMate II) that in turn drove the study’s primary, 6- month endpoint, a composite of survival without a disabling stroke or need for additional surgery to remove or replace the pump, Mandeep R. Mehra, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“Three years ago, when the issue of pump thrombosis was first revealed, there was a lot of consternation and some drop in LVAD use, especially as destination therapy. We think that seeing no pump thrombosis whatsoever will give people renewed confidence in this technology,” said Dr. Mehra, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical director of the Heart and Vascular Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

Pump thrombosis has also been a problem for the patients who have received a competitor LVAD, the HeartWare HVAD device (Circulation. 2015 Nov 10;132[suppl 3]:A19675), approved for U.S. use as bridge to transplant. HeartMate II is approved for both bridge to transplant and for destination therapy.

In addition to apparently eliminating pump thrombosis, HeartMate 3’s size and potential implantation approach should make its placement during routine use as quick and minimally invasive as the HeartWare device, features that should further help broader use of HeartMate 3, commented Mark Slaughter, MD, professor and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). But Dr. Slaughter and others were also quick to highlight the shortcomings that remain with both devices that will continue to hamper a broader role for LVAD treatment of patients with advanced heart failure.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Nancy K. Sweitzer
“The rates of stroke, infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding were not changed” with HeartMate 3 compared with HeartMate II, complications that “account for more events than pump thrombosis,” commented Nancy K. Sweitzer, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and director of the Sarver Heart Center of the University of Arizona, Tucson. “Pump thrombosis is a horrible complication,” so eliminating it is a step forward, “but we must also deal with these other complications before LVADs are widely accepted as an alternative” to heart transplantation, she said in an interview. Dr. Sweitzer especially cited the persistently high stroke rate, with a disabling stroke rate of 6% in patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 4% in those who received a HeartMate II during 6-month follow-up in the trial, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“We thought that if there was less pump thrombosis we’d see less stroke, but that is not what the data suggest. It’s the big puzzle we need to figure out before we see widespread acceptance of this treatment,” Dr. Sweitzer said.

“This will not shift LVAD use substantially,” commented Christopher B. Granger, MD, a professor of medicine and a heart failure specialist at Duke University, Durham, N.C. “Reducing the need for reoperation is good for the field, and is an incremental advance, but it is not transformational,” he said in an interview.

The MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3) trial randomized 294 patients at 69 U.S. centers. The study’s primary endpoint of 6-month survival free from disabling stroke or reoperation to repair or replace the LVAD occurred in 86% of 152 patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 77% of 142 patients randomized to HeartMate II, a statistical difference that met the prespecified criteria for both noninferiority and superiority. Concurrently with Dr. Mehra’s report at the meeting, a journal article appeared online (New Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426). He stated that as far as he understood, St. Jude would submit the 6-month data he reported to the Food and Drug Administration in an application for marketing approval for HeartMate 3.

“I agree that there are still morbid evens [with HeartMate 3] that need to be surmounted, but this is a confidence-building step in the right direction,” Dr. Mehra said.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Body

By eliminating all episodes of pump thrombosis during 6-month follow-up, the HeartMate 3 appeared to resolve one of the major issues that has stood in the way of patients and physicians feeling comfortable with left ventricular assist devices. The smaller size of the HeartMate 3 pump and its ability to be placed with minimally invasive and fairly rapid surgery is another big advance, putting this device on par with the rival pump, the HeartWare HVAD.

But the performance of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in MOMENTUM 3 also highlighted the shortcomings that still remain for these devices: the unchanged rates of stroke, gastrointestinal bleeds, and infections with HeartMate 3, compared with HeartMate II in this trial, and similar 6-month survival rates in the two arms of the study.
The HeartMate 3 can be implanted without sternotomy, using an 8 cm incision on the lateral chest wall, resulting in a shorter postoperative stay and fewer perisurgical adverse events. Despite the less invasive surgery and absence of pump thrombosis, some patients and physicians will remain hesitant to use an LVAD unless it is unavoidable because of concern about strokes. Until further design and procedural refinements change the rate of serious strokes and other adverse events, LVADs will not be fully competitive with heart transplantation.

The competition between HeartMate and the HeartWare devices will help drive this field forward, leading to further improvements in outcomes and expanded LVAD use.

Mark Slaughter, MD, is professor of surgery and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). He was an investigator in MOMENTUM 3, he has been a consultant to EvaHeart and Oregon Heart, and he has received research support from Carmat and HeartWare. He made these comments as designated discussant for the report and in a video interview.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Body

By eliminating all episodes of pump thrombosis during 6-month follow-up, the HeartMate 3 appeared to resolve one of the major issues that has stood in the way of patients and physicians feeling comfortable with left ventricular assist devices. The smaller size of the HeartMate 3 pump and its ability to be placed with minimally invasive and fairly rapid surgery is another big advance, putting this device on par with the rival pump, the HeartWare HVAD.

But the performance of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in MOMENTUM 3 also highlighted the shortcomings that still remain for these devices: the unchanged rates of stroke, gastrointestinal bleeds, and infections with HeartMate 3, compared with HeartMate II in this trial, and similar 6-month survival rates in the two arms of the study.
The HeartMate 3 can be implanted without sternotomy, using an 8 cm incision on the lateral chest wall, resulting in a shorter postoperative stay and fewer perisurgical adverse events. Despite the less invasive surgery and absence of pump thrombosis, some patients and physicians will remain hesitant to use an LVAD unless it is unavoidable because of concern about strokes. Until further design and procedural refinements change the rate of serious strokes and other adverse events, LVADs will not be fully competitive with heart transplantation.

The competition between HeartMate and the HeartWare devices will help drive this field forward, leading to further improvements in outcomes and expanded LVAD use.

Mark Slaughter, MD, is professor of surgery and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). He was an investigator in MOMENTUM 3, he has been a consultant to EvaHeart and Oregon Heart, and he has received research support from Carmat and HeartWare. He made these comments as designated discussant for the report and in a video interview.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Body

By eliminating all episodes of pump thrombosis during 6-month follow-up, the HeartMate 3 appeared to resolve one of the major issues that has stood in the way of patients and physicians feeling comfortable with left ventricular assist devices. The smaller size of the HeartMate 3 pump and its ability to be placed with minimally invasive and fairly rapid surgery is another big advance, putting this device on par with the rival pump, the HeartWare HVAD.

But the performance of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in MOMENTUM 3 also highlighted the shortcomings that still remain for these devices: the unchanged rates of stroke, gastrointestinal bleeds, and infections with HeartMate 3, compared with HeartMate II in this trial, and similar 6-month survival rates in the two arms of the study.
The HeartMate 3 can be implanted without sternotomy, using an 8 cm incision on the lateral chest wall, resulting in a shorter postoperative stay and fewer perisurgical adverse events. Despite the less invasive surgery and absence of pump thrombosis, some patients and physicians will remain hesitant to use an LVAD unless it is unavoidable because of concern about strokes. Until further design and procedural refinements change the rate of serious strokes and other adverse events, LVADs will not be fully competitive with heart transplantation.

The competition between HeartMate and the HeartWare devices will help drive this field forward, leading to further improvements in outcomes and expanded LVAD use.

Mark Slaughter, MD, is professor of surgery and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). He was an investigator in MOMENTUM 3, he has been a consultant to EvaHeart and Oregon Heart, and he has received research support from Carmat and HeartWare. He made these comments as designated discussant for the report and in a video interview.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Title
Some big issues remain for HeartMate 3
Some big issues remain for HeartMate 3

– HeartMate 3, the latest left ventricular assist device in the HeartMate line, appears to have solved the problem of pump thrombosis, a complication that has dogged ventricular pumps since the issue leapt into medical awareness about 3 years ago (New Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370:33-40).

During 6 months of follow-up, none of 152 heart failure patients assigned to receive a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis, compared with 14 patients (10%) having pump thrombosis out of 138 recipients of the prior-generation HeartMate II LVAD who served as the control group for the study.

Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
This sharp cut in pump thrombosis episodes directly drove a similar, clear drop in reoperations for pump malfunction (1% in the HeartMate 3 group and 8% with HeartMate II) that in turn drove the study’s primary, 6- month endpoint, a composite of survival without a disabling stroke or need for additional surgery to remove or replace the pump, Mandeep R. Mehra, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“Three years ago, when the issue of pump thrombosis was first revealed, there was a lot of consternation and some drop in LVAD use, especially as destination therapy. We think that seeing no pump thrombosis whatsoever will give people renewed confidence in this technology,” said Dr. Mehra, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical director of the Heart and Vascular Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

Pump thrombosis has also been a problem for the patients who have received a competitor LVAD, the HeartWare HVAD device (Circulation. 2015 Nov 10;132[suppl 3]:A19675), approved for U.S. use as bridge to transplant. HeartMate II is approved for both bridge to transplant and for destination therapy.

In addition to apparently eliminating pump thrombosis, HeartMate 3’s size and potential implantation approach should make its placement during routine use as quick and minimally invasive as the HeartWare device, features that should further help broader use of HeartMate 3, commented Mark Slaughter, MD, professor and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). But Dr. Slaughter and others were also quick to highlight the shortcomings that remain with both devices that will continue to hamper a broader role for LVAD treatment of patients with advanced heart failure.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Nancy K. Sweitzer
“The rates of stroke, infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding were not changed” with HeartMate 3 compared with HeartMate II, complications that “account for more events than pump thrombosis,” commented Nancy K. Sweitzer, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and director of the Sarver Heart Center of the University of Arizona, Tucson. “Pump thrombosis is a horrible complication,” so eliminating it is a step forward, “but we must also deal with these other complications before LVADs are widely accepted as an alternative” to heart transplantation, she said in an interview. Dr. Sweitzer especially cited the persistently high stroke rate, with a disabling stroke rate of 6% in patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 4% in those who received a HeartMate II during 6-month follow-up in the trial, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“We thought that if there was less pump thrombosis we’d see less stroke, but that is not what the data suggest. It’s the big puzzle we need to figure out before we see widespread acceptance of this treatment,” Dr. Sweitzer said.

“This will not shift LVAD use substantially,” commented Christopher B. Granger, MD, a professor of medicine and a heart failure specialist at Duke University, Durham, N.C. “Reducing the need for reoperation is good for the field, and is an incremental advance, but it is not transformational,” he said in an interview.

The MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3) trial randomized 294 patients at 69 U.S. centers. The study’s primary endpoint of 6-month survival free from disabling stroke or reoperation to repair or replace the LVAD occurred in 86% of 152 patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 77% of 142 patients randomized to HeartMate II, a statistical difference that met the prespecified criteria for both noninferiority and superiority. Concurrently with Dr. Mehra’s report at the meeting, a journal article appeared online (New Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426). He stated that as far as he understood, St. Jude would submit the 6-month data he reported to the Food and Drug Administration in an application for marketing approval for HeartMate 3.

“I agree that there are still morbid evens [with HeartMate 3] that need to be surmounted, but this is a confidence-building step in the right direction,” Dr. Mehra said.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

– HeartMate 3, the latest left ventricular assist device in the HeartMate line, appears to have solved the problem of pump thrombosis, a complication that has dogged ventricular pumps since the issue leapt into medical awareness about 3 years ago (New Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370:33-40).

During 6 months of follow-up, none of 152 heart failure patients assigned to receive a HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis, compared with 14 patients (10%) having pump thrombosis out of 138 recipients of the prior-generation HeartMate II LVAD who served as the control group for the study.

Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Mandeep R. Mehra
This sharp cut in pump thrombosis episodes directly drove a similar, clear drop in reoperations for pump malfunction (1% in the HeartMate 3 group and 8% with HeartMate II) that in turn drove the study’s primary, 6- month endpoint, a composite of survival without a disabling stroke or need for additional surgery to remove or replace the pump, Mandeep R. Mehra, MD, said at the American Heart Association scientific sessions.

“Three years ago, when the issue of pump thrombosis was first revealed, there was a lot of consternation and some drop in LVAD use, especially as destination therapy. We think that seeing no pump thrombosis whatsoever will give people renewed confidence in this technology,” said Dr. Mehra, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical director of the Heart and Vascular Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston.

Pump thrombosis has also been a problem for the patients who have received a competitor LVAD, the HeartWare HVAD device (Circulation. 2015 Nov 10;132[suppl 3]:A19675), approved for U.S. use as bridge to transplant. HeartMate II is approved for both bridge to transplant and for destination therapy.

In addition to apparently eliminating pump thrombosis, HeartMate 3’s size and potential implantation approach should make its placement during routine use as quick and minimally invasive as the HeartWare device, features that should further help broader use of HeartMate 3, commented Mark Slaughter, MD, professor and chairman of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery at the University of Louisville (Ky.). But Dr. Slaughter and others were also quick to highlight the shortcomings that remain with both devices that will continue to hamper a broader role for LVAD treatment of patients with advanced heart failure.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Nancy K. Sweitzer
“The rates of stroke, infection, and gastrointestinal bleeding were not changed” with HeartMate 3 compared with HeartMate II, complications that “account for more events than pump thrombosis,” commented Nancy K. Sweitzer, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and director of the Sarver Heart Center of the University of Arizona, Tucson. “Pump thrombosis is a horrible complication,” so eliminating it is a step forward, “but we must also deal with these other complications before LVADs are widely accepted as an alternative” to heart transplantation, she said in an interview. Dr. Sweitzer especially cited the persistently high stroke rate, with a disabling stroke rate of 6% in patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 4% in those who received a HeartMate II during 6-month follow-up in the trial, a difference that was not statistically significant.

“We thought that if there was less pump thrombosis we’d see less stroke, but that is not what the data suggest. It’s the big puzzle we need to figure out before we see widespread acceptance of this treatment,” Dr. Sweitzer said.

“This will not shift LVAD use substantially,” commented Christopher B. Granger, MD, a professor of medicine and a heart failure specialist at Duke University, Durham, N.C. “Reducing the need for reoperation is good for the field, and is an incremental advance, but it is not transformational,” he said in an interview.

The MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3) trial randomized 294 patients at 69 U.S. centers. The study’s primary endpoint of 6-month survival free from disabling stroke or reoperation to repair or replace the LVAD occurred in 86% of 152 patients who received a HeartMate 3 and 77% of 142 patients randomized to HeartMate II, a statistical difference that met the prespecified criteria for both noninferiority and superiority. Concurrently with Dr. Mehra’s report at the meeting, a journal article appeared online (New Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610426). He stated that as far as he understood, St. Jude would submit the 6-month data he reported to the Food and Drug Administration in an application for marketing approval for HeartMate 3.

“I agree that there are still morbid evens [with HeartMate 3] that need to be surmounted, but this is a confidence-building step in the right direction,” Dr. Mehra said.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE AHA SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

Disallow All Ads
Vitals

Key clinical point: During 6-month follow-up, none of 152 patients assigned to receive the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device developed suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis.

Major finding: During 6 months, suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis occurred in no HeartMate 3 patients and in 10% of HeartMate II recipients.

Data source: The MOMENTUM 3 trial, which randomized 294 patients at 69 U.S. centers.

Disclosures: MOMENTUM 3 was sponsored by St. Jude, the company developing the HeartMate 3 LVAD. Dr. Mehra has received travel reimbursements from St. Jude and has been a consultant to Medtronic, Stealth, and Teva. Dr. Sweitzer was an investigator in MOMENTUM 3 and has been a consultant to Acorda and Medtronic and received research support from Bayer, Corvia, and Novartis. Dr. Granger has been a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research support from Medtronic and several other drug and device companies. Dr. Slaughter was an investigator in MOMENTUM 3, has been a consultant to EvaHeart and Oregon Heart, and has received research support from Carmat and HeartWare.

REBOA may be a safe alternative to RTACC in the acute care setting

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:44

 

– Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could be an acceptable alternative to thoracotomy in traumatic arrest patients who are hemorrhaging below the diaphragm, according to the results of a small pilot study which were presented by William Teeter, MD, at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons.

Furthermore, virtual simulation training sufficiently prepares surgeons to safely use the REBOA technique in the acute care setting, a separate study found. Importantly, this training has the potential to allow REBOA to become a widespread tool for surgeons regardless of their endovascular surgical experience.

XiXinXing/ThinkStock
REBOA is an emerging and less invasive method of aortic occlusion during traumatic arrest. “Recent evidence published in the Journal of Trauma suggests that REBOA has similar outcomes to resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamping or RTACC,” said Dr. Teeter, who is currently an emergency medicine resident at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, but conducted this research during a fellowship at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore.

Dr. Teeter presented the preliminary results of a pilot study involving 19 patients who received RTACC between 2008 and 2013 and 17 patients who received REBOA between 2013 and 2015. All study participants were trauma patients who arrived at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in arrest or arrested shortly after arrival.

Age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale, and injury severity score were the same or similar between the two groups, Dr. Teeter reported. Mean systolic blood pressure at admission was 14 mmHg for the REBOA group and 28 mmHg for the RTACC group; however, the majority of patients (82% of REBOA patients and 73% of RTACC patients) arrived with a blood pressure of 0, reported Dr. Teeter.

Importantly, patients in the RTACC group who had penetrating chest injury were excluded for this analysis, Dr. Teeter noted, adding that there was a slightly higher incidence of blunt trauma within the REBOA group likely due to “a change in practice at the trauma center during this time.”

All resuscitations were captured with real-time videography. Continuous vitals were also collected and analyzed.

While more RTACC patients survived to the operating room (53% vs. 68%), among the REBOA group there were more patients who experienced return of spontaneous circulation (53% vs. 37%). However, neither of these results was statistically significant.

Following occlusion of the aorta, the blood pressure measures, taken from continuous vital signs and averaged over a 15-minute period, were 80 mmHg for the REBOA group and 46 mmHg for the RTACC group. Again, this result was statistically insignificant but trended toward favoring REBOA.

Overall, patient survival was dismal. Only one patient who received REBOA survived.

Following Dr. Teeter’s presentation, the study’s assigned discussant, Nicole A. Stassen, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center, N.Y., noted that while post-occlusion blood pressure was higher for the REBOA group it seemed not to matter as the majority of patients did not survive. Dr. Stassen also asked if these preliminary results were sufficient to inform or change clinical practice.

In response, Dr. Teeter explained that the pilot study was conducted at a time when the literature was unclear about how patients would respond to open versus endovascular occlusion, and this data helped guide further research and resuscitation efforts.

“At our center there has been a marked change in practice regarding which patients receive resuscitative thoracotomy and which get REBOA,” he added and concluded that “these and previous data suggest that the time performing thoracotomy for resuscitation purposes may be better spent performing CPR with REBOA.”

At the very least, this pilot study demonstrated that “REBOA may be an acceptable alternative to RTACC.” Further analysis of larger study populations will be published soon and will show that REBOA may be preferred over RTACC, according to Dr. Teeter.

Dr. David Hampton
In a subsequent presentation, David Hampton, MD, a surgical critical care fellow at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, confirmed that many recent studies have demonstrated that REBOA is a comparable alternative to emergency thoracotomies. In fact, REBOA is commonly used throughout Japan, the United Kingdom, and in northern Europe; however, in the United States, REBOA is currently only used at a few Level 1 trauma centers and in the military, according to Dr. Hampton.

A major hindrance to wider-spread REBOA use in the United States is the lack of endovascular training for surgeons during residency which has resulted in a limited number of surgeons who can perform the REBOA technique and a limited number of surgeons who can teach the procedure to others, said Dr. Hampton.

In lieu of experience, formalized 1- or 2-day endovascular simulation courses, such as BEST, were created to prepare surgeons to use techniques such as REBOA. Prior validation studies, including those conducted by researchers at the University of Maryland, demonstrated that surgeons who participated in these courses improved surgical technique and increased their surgical knowledge base, Dr. Hampton reported.

To further elucidate the benefits of these training courses on the successful use of REBOA in the acute care setting, Dr. Hampton and his associates selected nine acute care surgeons with varying endovascular surgical experience to complete the 1-day BEST course and then compared surgeons’ performances of the REBOA technique after successful course completion.

During the study, a total of 28 REBOA procedures were performed, 17 by the surgeons with no endovascular experience, and the remaining 11 by surgeons with endovascular surgical experience.

Overall, there was no difference in wire placements, sheath insertion, position or localization of balloons, or balloon inflation. In addition, there was no difference in mortality among patients, and there were no known REBOA complications during this study.

In conclusion, endovascular experience during residency is not a prerequisite for safe REBOA placement, Dr. Hampton commented.

Taken together, these two research studies are really helping to break ground on REBOA use in the acute care setting, commented an audience member.

The Department of Defense funded Dr. Teeter’s study. Dr. Teeter and Dr. Hampton both reported having no disclosures.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could be an acceptable alternative to thoracotomy in traumatic arrest patients who are hemorrhaging below the diaphragm, according to the results of a small pilot study which were presented by William Teeter, MD, at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons.

Furthermore, virtual simulation training sufficiently prepares surgeons to safely use the REBOA technique in the acute care setting, a separate study found. Importantly, this training has the potential to allow REBOA to become a widespread tool for surgeons regardless of their endovascular surgical experience.

XiXinXing/ThinkStock
REBOA is an emerging and less invasive method of aortic occlusion during traumatic arrest. “Recent evidence published in the Journal of Trauma suggests that REBOA has similar outcomes to resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamping or RTACC,” said Dr. Teeter, who is currently an emergency medicine resident at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, but conducted this research during a fellowship at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore.

Dr. Teeter presented the preliminary results of a pilot study involving 19 patients who received RTACC between 2008 and 2013 and 17 patients who received REBOA between 2013 and 2015. All study participants were trauma patients who arrived at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in arrest or arrested shortly after arrival.

Age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale, and injury severity score were the same or similar between the two groups, Dr. Teeter reported. Mean systolic blood pressure at admission was 14 mmHg for the REBOA group and 28 mmHg for the RTACC group; however, the majority of patients (82% of REBOA patients and 73% of RTACC patients) arrived with a blood pressure of 0, reported Dr. Teeter.

Importantly, patients in the RTACC group who had penetrating chest injury were excluded for this analysis, Dr. Teeter noted, adding that there was a slightly higher incidence of blunt trauma within the REBOA group likely due to “a change in practice at the trauma center during this time.”

All resuscitations were captured with real-time videography. Continuous vitals were also collected and analyzed.

While more RTACC patients survived to the operating room (53% vs. 68%), among the REBOA group there were more patients who experienced return of spontaneous circulation (53% vs. 37%). However, neither of these results was statistically significant.

Following occlusion of the aorta, the blood pressure measures, taken from continuous vital signs and averaged over a 15-minute period, were 80 mmHg for the REBOA group and 46 mmHg for the RTACC group. Again, this result was statistically insignificant but trended toward favoring REBOA.

Overall, patient survival was dismal. Only one patient who received REBOA survived.

Following Dr. Teeter’s presentation, the study’s assigned discussant, Nicole A. Stassen, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center, N.Y., noted that while post-occlusion blood pressure was higher for the REBOA group it seemed not to matter as the majority of patients did not survive. Dr. Stassen also asked if these preliminary results were sufficient to inform or change clinical practice.

In response, Dr. Teeter explained that the pilot study was conducted at a time when the literature was unclear about how patients would respond to open versus endovascular occlusion, and this data helped guide further research and resuscitation efforts.

“At our center there has been a marked change in practice regarding which patients receive resuscitative thoracotomy and which get REBOA,” he added and concluded that “these and previous data suggest that the time performing thoracotomy for resuscitation purposes may be better spent performing CPR with REBOA.”

At the very least, this pilot study demonstrated that “REBOA may be an acceptable alternative to RTACC.” Further analysis of larger study populations will be published soon and will show that REBOA may be preferred over RTACC, according to Dr. Teeter.

Dr. David Hampton
In a subsequent presentation, David Hampton, MD, a surgical critical care fellow at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, confirmed that many recent studies have demonstrated that REBOA is a comparable alternative to emergency thoracotomies. In fact, REBOA is commonly used throughout Japan, the United Kingdom, and in northern Europe; however, in the United States, REBOA is currently only used at a few Level 1 trauma centers and in the military, according to Dr. Hampton.

A major hindrance to wider-spread REBOA use in the United States is the lack of endovascular training for surgeons during residency which has resulted in a limited number of surgeons who can perform the REBOA technique and a limited number of surgeons who can teach the procedure to others, said Dr. Hampton.

In lieu of experience, formalized 1- or 2-day endovascular simulation courses, such as BEST, were created to prepare surgeons to use techniques such as REBOA. Prior validation studies, including those conducted by researchers at the University of Maryland, demonstrated that surgeons who participated in these courses improved surgical technique and increased their surgical knowledge base, Dr. Hampton reported.

To further elucidate the benefits of these training courses on the successful use of REBOA in the acute care setting, Dr. Hampton and his associates selected nine acute care surgeons with varying endovascular surgical experience to complete the 1-day BEST course and then compared surgeons’ performances of the REBOA technique after successful course completion.

During the study, a total of 28 REBOA procedures were performed, 17 by the surgeons with no endovascular experience, and the remaining 11 by surgeons with endovascular surgical experience.

Overall, there was no difference in wire placements, sheath insertion, position or localization of balloons, or balloon inflation. In addition, there was no difference in mortality among patients, and there were no known REBOA complications during this study.

In conclusion, endovascular experience during residency is not a prerequisite for safe REBOA placement, Dr. Hampton commented.

Taken together, these two research studies are really helping to break ground on REBOA use in the acute care setting, commented an audience member.

The Department of Defense funded Dr. Teeter’s study. Dr. Teeter and Dr. Hampton both reported having no disclosures.

 

 

 

– Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could be an acceptable alternative to thoracotomy in traumatic arrest patients who are hemorrhaging below the diaphragm, according to the results of a small pilot study which were presented by William Teeter, MD, at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons.

Furthermore, virtual simulation training sufficiently prepares surgeons to safely use the REBOA technique in the acute care setting, a separate study found. Importantly, this training has the potential to allow REBOA to become a widespread tool for surgeons regardless of their endovascular surgical experience.

XiXinXing/ThinkStock
REBOA is an emerging and less invasive method of aortic occlusion during traumatic arrest. “Recent evidence published in the Journal of Trauma suggests that REBOA has similar outcomes to resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic cross-clamping or RTACC,” said Dr. Teeter, who is currently an emergency medicine resident at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, but conducted this research during a fellowship at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore.

Dr. Teeter presented the preliminary results of a pilot study involving 19 patients who received RTACC between 2008 and 2013 and 17 patients who received REBOA between 2013 and 2015. All study participants were trauma patients who arrived at the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center in arrest or arrested shortly after arrival.

Age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale, and injury severity score were the same or similar between the two groups, Dr. Teeter reported. Mean systolic blood pressure at admission was 14 mmHg for the REBOA group and 28 mmHg for the RTACC group; however, the majority of patients (82% of REBOA patients and 73% of RTACC patients) arrived with a blood pressure of 0, reported Dr. Teeter.

Importantly, patients in the RTACC group who had penetrating chest injury were excluded for this analysis, Dr. Teeter noted, adding that there was a slightly higher incidence of blunt trauma within the REBOA group likely due to “a change in practice at the trauma center during this time.”

All resuscitations were captured with real-time videography. Continuous vitals were also collected and analyzed.

While more RTACC patients survived to the operating room (53% vs. 68%), among the REBOA group there were more patients who experienced return of spontaneous circulation (53% vs. 37%). However, neither of these results was statistically significant.

Following occlusion of the aorta, the blood pressure measures, taken from continuous vital signs and averaged over a 15-minute period, were 80 mmHg for the REBOA group and 46 mmHg for the RTACC group. Again, this result was statistically insignificant but trended toward favoring REBOA.

Overall, patient survival was dismal. Only one patient who received REBOA survived.

Following Dr. Teeter’s presentation, the study’s assigned discussant, Nicole A. Stassen, MD, of the University of Rochester Medical Center, N.Y., noted that while post-occlusion blood pressure was higher for the REBOA group it seemed not to matter as the majority of patients did not survive. Dr. Stassen also asked if these preliminary results were sufficient to inform or change clinical practice.

In response, Dr. Teeter explained that the pilot study was conducted at a time when the literature was unclear about how patients would respond to open versus endovascular occlusion, and this data helped guide further research and resuscitation efforts.

“At our center there has been a marked change in practice regarding which patients receive resuscitative thoracotomy and which get REBOA,” he added and concluded that “these and previous data suggest that the time performing thoracotomy for resuscitation purposes may be better spent performing CPR with REBOA.”

At the very least, this pilot study demonstrated that “REBOA may be an acceptable alternative to RTACC.” Further analysis of larger study populations will be published soon and will show that REBOA may be preferred over RTACC, according to Dr. Teeter.

Dr. David Hampton
In a subsequent presentation, David Hampton, MD, a surgical critical care fellow at the University of Maryland Medical Center’s R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, confirmed that many recent studies have demonstrated that REBOA is a comparable alternative to emergency thoracotomies. In fact, REBOA is commonly used throughout Japan, the United Kingdom, and in northern Europe; however, in the United States, REBOA is currently only used at a few Level 1 trauma centers and in the military, according to Dr. Hampton.

A major hindrance to wider-spread REBOA use in the United States is the lack of endovascular training for surgeons during residency which has resulted in a limited number of surgeons who can perform the REBOA technique and a limited number of surgeons who can teach the procedure to others, said Dr. Hampton.

In lieu of experience, formalized 1- or 2-day endovascular simulation courses, such as BEST, were created to prepare surgeons to use techniques such as REBOA. Prior validation studies, including those conducted by researchers at the University of Maryland, demonstrated that surgeons who participated in these courses improved surgical technique and increased their surgical knowledge base, Dr. Hampton reported.

To further elucidate the benefits of these training courses on the successful use of REBOA in the acute care setting, Dr. Hampton and his associates selected nine acute care surgeons with varying endovascular surgical experience to complete the 1-day BEST course and then compared surgeons’ performances of the REBOA technique after successful course completion.

During the study, a total of 28 REBOA procedures were performed, 17 by the surgeons with no endovascular experience, and the remaining 11 by surgeons with endovascular surgical experience.

Overall, there was no difference in wire placements, sheath insertion, position or localization of balloons, or balloon inflation. In addition, there was no difference in mortality among patients, and there were no known REBOA complications during this study.

In conclusion, endovascular experience during residency is not a prerequisite for safe REBOA placement, Dr. Hampton commented.

Taken together, these two research studies are really helping to break ground on REBOA use in the acute care setting, commented an audience member.

The Department of Defense funded Dr. Teeter’s study. Dr. Teeter and Dr. Hampton both reported having no disclosures.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ACS CLINICAL CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: REBOA and RTACC had similar outcomes in a small pilot study.

Major finding: More RTACC patients survived to the operating room (53% vs. 68%), but more REBOA patients experienced return of spontaneous circulation (53% vs. 37%).

Data source: Pilot study involving 36 trauma patients who received either RTACC or REBOA.

Disclosures: The Department of Defense funded Dr. Teeter’s study. Dr. Teeter and Dr. Hampton both reported having no disclosures.

VIDEO: For CABG, double arterial grafts found no better than single

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:43

 

– Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery do not see any 5-year survival advantage when their surgeon uses both internal mammary (thoracic) arteries for grafting rather than just one of them along with a vein, finds an interim analysis from the randomized Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART).

Overall, about 8.5% of the 3,102 patients randomized had died 5 years after surgery, with no significant difference between the bilateral graft and single graft groups, according to data reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions and simultaneously published (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021). The former had roughly triple the rate of sternal reconstruction, mainly driven by complications in insulin-dependent diabetes patients having high body mass index.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
The lack of any survival edge of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting was somewhat surprising even to the investigators, acknowledged David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, a professor of Cardiac Surgery at the University of Oxford (England).

There is strong angiographic evidence that vein grafts have a high rate of failure over time because of atherosclerosis, but internal mammary artery grafts retain excellent patency, he elaborated. “People have speculated that this superior patency of internal mammary arteries will translate into a clinical survival benefit,” and observational data indeed suggest that the bilateral artery strategy reduces mortality by about one-fifth relative to the single artery strategy.

Yet uptake of the bilateral procedure has been low. It is used in fewer than 5% of patients undergoing CABG in the United States and fewer than 10% of those in Europe, reflecting concerns about its greater technical complexity, potentially increased mortality and morbidity, and – until now – lack of evidence from randomized trials.

“What I think we can conclude today is that there are excellent 5-year outcomes of CABG in both groups. This study confirms that it’s at least safe to use bilateral grafts over the medium term,” Dr. Taggart commented. He discussed the results in a video interview conducted at the meeting.

These interim ART data probably won’t sway practice one way or the other, he said. “People who believe in arterial grafts will continue to do them, and those who are not enthusiastic about the prospect of a slightly technically more difficult operation [can now] remain comfortable as to why they are not using both internal mammary arteries.”

Pointed questions

Dr. Frank W. Sellke
“I’m very surprised at the results of this study. The conventional wisdom is that multiple arterial grafts, including bilateral internal mammary arteries, provide significant benefit,” commented invited discussant Frank W. Sellke, MD, professor and chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Brown University, Providence, R.I. “Why was there no improvement in 5-year outcomes with bilateral internal mammary artery versus single internal mammary artery?”

The lack of difference was possibly due to a very high level of guideline-based medical therapy in the trial (which may have especially protected the vein grafts) or to the fact that the annual failure rate of vein grafts is modest and steady up to 5 years but accelerates thereafter, Dr. Taggart proposed. The trial’s primary outcome of 10-year survival, expected in 2018, will likely differ, speculated Dr. Sellke, who is also program chair for the AHA scientific sessions.

“Do you think multiple arterial grafting is superior to single internal mammary artery grafting considering the lack of improvement in survival and other outcomes in the study, with the increase in sternal wound infections?” he asked.

“I personally, if I needed the operation, would insist on having bilateral internal mammary artery grafts done by an experienced operator because it is totally counterintuitive to believe that having more patent grafts in your heart at 10 to 20 years of follow-up is of no benefit,” Dr. Taggart maintained.

When data meet clinical practice

Dr. Timothy J. Gardner
“I think there is a growing conviction, especially for younger patients, that bilateral mammary grafts ought to be considered. We are seeing a slight uptick in the States,” commented Dr. Timothy J. Gardner, medical director of the Center for Heart & Vascular Health and interim director of the Value Institute, Heart & Vascular Administration, Christian Hospital, in Newark, Del. “This [study] may indeed curtail that enthusiasm a little bit, but I believe that the evidence of improved long-term patency of arterial grafts is so well established that a few more patients will be getting bilateral grafts.”

It may require time for the benefit of the bilateral artery graft to emerge, he agreed. “I’m undeterred from my belief that ... in patients who are getting CABG done in their 40s or 50s or early 60s, betting on a graft that’s going to outperform vein grafts is the better strategy.”

Until the trial’s 10-year results become available, physicians may wish to put these interim results in the context when counseling patients, according to Dr. Gardner.

“We have indisputable evidence that arterial grafts have better long-term patency than vein grafts,” he elaborated. “If we had a very sophisticated patient, we might tell them that we were a little surprised that this head-to-head trial of single versus double didn’t show any survival benefit at 5 years, but we still are persuaded by the data that shows the better patency, and we think in the situation that the patient’s in, that we would still recommend a double mammary, assuming that the patient doesn’t have comorbidities that would make that more dangerous.”

 

 

Trial details

ART enrolled patients from 28 cardiac surgical centers in seven countries. The patients, all of whom had multivessel coronary disease and were scheduled to undergo CABG, were randomized evenly to single or bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.

The interim results showed differences in nonadherence to the randomized operation: 2.4% of patients in the single graft group ultimately underwent got bilateral grafts, whereas 14% of patients in the bilateral graft group ultimately got a single graft.

“This raises questions about how experienced some surgeons were with the use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts,” Dr. Taggart commented.

At 5 years of follow-up, 8.7% of patients in the bilateral graft group and 8.4% of patients in the single graft group had died, a nonsignificant difference. “Those mortalities are similar to what has been observed in other contemporary trials of CABG,” he noted. There was no difference between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with respect to this outcome.

The rate of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 12.2% in the bilateral graft group and 12.7% in the single graft group, also a nonsignificant difference.

On the other hand, patients in the bilateral graft group had higher rates of sternal wound complications (3.5% vs. 1.9%; P = .005) and sternal reconstruction (1.9% vs. 0.6%; P = .002).

The groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to rates of mortality, major bleeding, or need for repeat revascularization, as well as angina status and quality of life measures, according to Dr. Taggart, who disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery do not see any 5-year survival advantage when their surgeon uses both internal mammary (thoracic) arteries for grafting rather than just one of them along with a vein, finds an interim analysis from the randomized Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART).

Overall, about 8.5% of the 3,102 patients randomized had died 5 years after surgery, with no significant difference between the bilateral graft and single graft groups, according to data reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions and simultaneously published (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021). The former had roughly triple the rate of sternal reconstruction, mainly driven by complications in insulin-dependent diabetes patients having high body mass index.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
The lack of any survival edge of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting was somewhat surprising even to the investigators, acknowledged David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, a professor of Cardiac Surgery at the University of Oxford (England).

There is strong angiographic evidence that vein grafts have a high rate of failure over time because of atherosclerosis, but internal mammary artery grafts retain excellent patency, he elaborated. “People have speculated that this superior patency of internal mammary arteries will translate into a clinical survival benefit,” and observational data indeed suggest that the bilateral artery strategy reduces mortality by about one-fifth relative to the single artery strategy.

Yet uptake of the bilateral procedure has been low. It is used in fewer than 5% of patients undergoing CABG in the United States and fewer than 10% of those in Europe, reflecting concerns about its greater technical complexity, potentially increased mortality and morbidity, and – until now – lack of evidence from randomized trials.

“What I think we can conclude today is that there are excellent 5-year outcomes of CABG in both groups. This study confirms that it’s at least safe to use bilateral grafts over the medium term,” Dr. Taggart commented. He discussed the results in a video interview conducted at the meeting.

These interim ART data probably won’t sway practice one way or the other, he said. “People who believe in arterial grafts will continue to do them, and those who are not enthusiastic about the prospect of a slightly technically more difficult operation [can now] remain comfortable as to why they are not using both internal mammary arteries.”

Pointed questions

Dr. Frank W. Sellke
“I’m very surprised at the results of this study. The conventional wisdom is that multiple arterial grafts, including bilateral internal mammary arteries, provide significant benefit,” commented invited discussant Frank W. Sellke, MD, professor and chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Brown University, Providence, R.I. “Why was there no improvement in 5-year outcomes with bilateral internal mammary artery versus single internal mammary artery?”

The lack of difference was possibly due to a very high level of guideline-based medical therapy in the trial (which may have especially protected the vein grafts) or to the fact that the annual failure rate of vein grafts is modest and steady up to 5 years but accelerates thereafter, Dr. Taggart proposed. The trial’s primary outcome of 10-year survival, expected in 2018, will likely differ, speculated Dr. Sellke, who is also program chair for the AHA scientific sessions.

“Do you think multiple arterial grafting is superior to single internal mammary artery grafting considering the lack of improvement in survival and other outcomes in the study, with the increase in sternal wound infections?” he asked.

“I personally, if I needed the operation, would insist on having bilateral internal mammary artery grafts done by an experienced operator because it is totally counterintuitive to believe that having more patent grafts in your heart at 10 to 20 years of follow-up is of no benefit,” Dr. Taggart maintained.

When data meet clinical practice

Dr. Timothy J. Gardner
“I think there is a growing conviction, especially for younger patients, that bilateral mammary grafts ought to be considered. We are seeing a slight uptick in the States,” commented Dr. Timothy J. Gardner, medical director of the Center for Heart & Vascular Health and interim director of the Value Institute, Heart & Vascular Administration, Christian Hospital, in Newark, Del. “This [study] may indeed curtail that enthusiasm a little bit, but I believe that the evidence of improved long-term patency of arterial grafts is so well established that a few more patients will be getting bilateral grafts.”

It may require time for the benefit of the bilateral artery graft to emerge, he agreed. “I’m undeterred from my belief that ... in patients who are getting CABG done in their 40s or 50s or early 60s, betting on a graft that’s going to outperform vein grafts is the better strategy.”

Until the trial’s 10-year results become available, physicians may wish to put these interim results in the context when counseling patients, according to Dr. Gardner.

“We have indisputable evidence that arterial grafts have better long-term patency than vein grafts,” he elaborated. “If we had a very sophisticated patient, we might tell them that we were a little surprised that this head-to-head trial of single versus double didn’t show any survival benefit at 5 years, but we still are persuaded by the data that shows the better patency, and we think in the situation that the patient’s in, that we would still recommend a double mammary, assuming that the patient doesn’t have comorbidities that would make that more dangerous.”

 

 

Trial details

ART enrolled patients from 28 cardiac surgical centers in seven countries. The patients, all of whom had multivessel coronary disease and were scheduled to undergo CABG, were randomized evenly to single or bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.

The interim results showed differences in nonadherence to the randomized operation: 2.4% of patients in the single graft group ultimately underwent got bilateral grafts, whereas 14% of patients in the bilateral graft group ultimately got a single graft.

“This raises questions about how experienced some surgeons were with the use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts,” Dr. Taggart commented.

At 5 years of follow-up, 8.7% of patients in the bilateral graft group and 8.4% of patients in the single graft group had died, a nonsignificant difference. “Those mortalities are similar to what has been observed in other contemporary trials of CABG,” he noted. There was no difference between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with respect to this outcome.

The rate of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 12.2% in the bilateral graft group and 12.7% in the single graft group, also a nonsignificant difference.

On the other hand, patients in the bilateral graft group had higher rates of sternal wound complications (3.5% vs. 1.9%; P = .005) and sternal reconstruction (1.9% vs. 0.6%; P = .002).

The groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to rates of mortality, major bleeding, or need for repeat revascularization, as well as angina status and quality of life measures, according to Dr. Taggart, who disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

 

– Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery do not see any 5-year survival advantage when their surgeon uses both internal mammary (thoracic) arteries for grafting rather than just one of them along with a vein, finds an interim analysis from the randomized Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART).

Overall, about 8.5% of the 3,102 patients randomized had died 5 years after surgery, with no significant difference between the bilateral graft and single graft groups, according to data reported at the American Heart Association scientific sessions and simultaneously published (N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610021). The former had roughly triple the rate of sternal reconstruction, mainly driven by complications in insulin-dependent diabetes patients having high body mass index.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
The lack of any survival edge of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting was somewhat surprising even to the investigators, acknowledged David P. Taggart, MD, PhD, a professor of Cardiac Surgery at the University of Oxford (England).

There is strong angiographic evidence that vein grafts have a high rate of failure over time because of atherosclerosis, but internal mammary artery grafts retain excellent patency, he elaborated. “People have speculated that this superior patency of internal mammary arteries will translate into a clinical survival benefit,” and observational data indeed suggest that the bilateral artery strategy reduces mortality by about one-fifth relative to the single artery strategy.

Yet uptake of the bilateral procedure has been low. It is used in fewer than 5% of patients undergoing CABG in the United States and fewer than 10% of those in Europe, reflecting concerns about its greater technical complexity, potentially increased mortality and morbidity, and – until now – lack of evidence from randomized trials.

“What I think we can conclude today is that there are excellent 5-year outcomes of CABG in both groups. This study confirms that it’s at least safe to use bilateral grafts over the medium term,” Dr. Taggart commented. He discussed the results in a video interview conducted at the meeting.

These interim ART data probably won’t sway practice one way or the other, he said. “People who believe in arterial grafts will continue to do them, and those who are not enthusiastic about the prospect of a slightly technically more difficult operation [can now] remain comfortable as to why they are not using both internal mammary arteries.”

Pointed questions

Dr. Frank W. Sellke
“I’m very surprised at the results of this study. The conventional wisdom is that multiple arterial grafts, including bilateral internal mammary arteries, provide significant benefit,” commented invited discussant Frank W. Sellke, MD, professor and chief of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Brown University, Providence, R.I. “Why was there no improvement in 5-year outcomes with bilateral internal mammary artery versus single internal mammary artery?”

The lack of difference was possibly due to a very high level of guideline-based medical therapy in the trial (which may have especially protected the vein grafts) or to the fact that the annual failure rate of vein grafts is modest and steady up to 5 years but accelerates thereafter, Dr. Taggart proposed. The trial’s primary outcome of 10-year survival, expected in 2018, will likely differ, speculated Dr. Sellke, who is also program chair for the AHA scientific sessions.

“Do you think multiple arterial grafting is superior to single internal mammary artery grafting considering the lack of improvement in survival and other outcomes in the study, with the increase in sternal wound infections?” he asked.

“I personally, if I needed the operation, would insist on having bilateral internal mammary artery grafts done by an experienced operator because it is totally counterintuitive to believe that having more patent grafts in your heart at 10 to 20 years of follow-up is of no benefit,” Dr. Taggart maintained.

When data meet clinical practice

Dr. Timothy J. Gardner
“I think there is a growing conviction, especially for younger patients, that bilateral mammary grafts ought to be considered. We are seeing a slight uptick in the States,” commented Dr. Timothy J. Gardner, medical director of the Center for Heart & Vascular Health and interim director of the Value Institute, Heart & Vascular Administration, Christian Hospital, in Newark, Del. “This [study] may indeed curtail that enthusiasm a little bit, but I believe that the evidence of improved long-term patency of arterial grafts is so well established that a few more patients will be getting bilateral grafts.”

It may require time for the benefit of the bilateral artery graft to emerge, he agreed. “I’m undeterred from my belief that ... in patients who are getting CABG done in their 40s or 50s or early 60s, betting on a graft that’s going to outperform vein grafts is the better strategy.”

Until the trial’s 10-year results become available, physicians may wish to put these interim results in the context when counseling patients, according to Dr. Gardner.

“We have indisputable evidence that arterial grafts have better long-term patency than vein grafts,” he elaborated. “If we had a very sophisticated patient, we might tell them that we were a little surprised that this head-to-head trial of single versus double didn’t show any survival benefit at 5 years, but we still are persuaded by the data that shows the better patency, and we think in the situation that the patient’s in, that we would still recommend a double mammary, assuming that the patient doesn’t have comorbidities that would make that more dangerous.”

 

 

Trial details

ART enrolled patients from 28 cardiac surgical centers in seven countries. The patients, all of whom had multivessel coronary disease and were scheduled to undergo CABG, were randomized evenly to single or bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.

The interim results showed differences in nonadherence to the randomized operation: 2.4% of patients in the single graft group ultimately underwent got bilateral grafts, whereas 14% of patients in the bilateral graft group ultimately got a single graft.

“This raises questions about how experienced some surgeons were with the use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts,” Dr. Taggart commented.

At 5 years of follow-up, 8.7% of patients in the bilateral graft group and 8.4% of patients in the single graft group had died, a nonsignificant difference. “Those mortalities are similar to what has been observed in other contemporary trials of CABG,” he noted. There was no difference between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with respect to this outcome.

The rate of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 12.2% in the bilateral graft group and 12.7% in the single graft group, also a nonsignificant difference.

On the other hand, patients in the bilateral graft group had higher rates of sternal wound complications (3.5% vs. 1.9%; P = .005) and sternal reconstruction (1.9% vs. 0.6%; P = .002).

The groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to rates of mortality, major bleeding, or need for repeat revascularization, as well as angina status and quality of life measures, according to Dr. Taggart, who disclosed that he had no relevant conflicts of interest.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE AHA SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

Disallow All Ads
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Compared with use of a single internal mammary artery graft for CABG, use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts yielded similar mortality and greater morbidity.

Major finding: At 5 years, the rate of all-cause mortality was 8.7% in the bilateral graft group and 8.4% in the single graft group, a nonsignificant difference.

Data source: ART, a randomized trial among 3,102 patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing CABG.

Disclosures: Dr. Taggart had no relevant conflicts of interest. The trial was funded by the U.K. Medical Research Council, the British Heart Foundation, and the U.K. National Institute of Health Research Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation.

Absorb’s problems will revise coronary scaffold standards

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 07/21/2020 - 14:18

One-year outcome results of the first bioresorbable coronary scaffold on the U.S. and world markets, Absorb, failed to show longer-term problems with the device that only became apparent with 3-year follow-up.

The failure of Absorb to show benefits after 3 years in the ABSORB II trial will probably not dampen enthusiasm for the concept of a bioresorbable coronary scaffold (BRS). The idea of treating coronary stenoses with a stent that disappears after a few years once it has done its job is a powerfully attractive idea, and reports from several early-stage clinical tests of new BRSs during TCT 2016 showed that many next-generation versions of these devices are in very active development.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. David J. Cohen
But the regulatory hurdles these new BRSs will need to clear to prove their safety suddenly grew taller when the 3-year ABSORB II outcomes went public in a report at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual meeting and in a simultaneously published report Oct. 30.

The surprising ABSORB II results showed more than just a failure of the Absorb BRS to produce 3 years after placement the improved coronary artery vasomotion and reduced late lumen loss that were the two primary efficacy endpoints of the trial.

The results also showed troubling signs of harm from the BRS, including significantly worse late lumen loss, compared with a contemporary drug-eluting metallic stent. In addition, there was a shocking 1%/year rate of late stent thrombosis during both the second and third years following Absorb placement in coronary arteries, the period when the Absorb BRS was in the process of disappearing, and which did not occur in the study’s control patients who received a conventional, metallic drug-eluting stent.

Patrick W. Serruys, MD, lead investigator of ABSORB II, attributed these adverse outcomes to the “highly thrombogenic” proteoglycan material that formed as the Absorb BRS resorbed, and a “structural discontinuity” of the BRS as it resorbed in some patients, resulting in parts of the scaffold remnant sticking out from the coronary artery wall toward the center of the vessel.

These late flaws in the bioresorption process will now need closer scrutiny during future studies of next-generation BRSs, and will surely mean longer follow-up of pivotal trials and a shift from the 1-year follow-up data used by the Food and Drug Administration when it approved the Absorb BRS last July.

“The challenge for the field [of BRS development] is the late results, as we saw in ABSORB II,” commented David J. Cohen, MD, an interventional cardiologist at Saint Luke’s Health System in Kansas City, Mo. The ABSORB II results “will lead to reexamination of the trial design and endpoints for the next generation of BRSs,” Dr. Cohen predicted at the meeting, sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Dean J. Kereiakes
The ABSORB II experience will also mean a reassessment of how long dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is needed for BRS recipients. In this trial, average DAPT duration was 1.5 years; and at 3 years, about 30% of patients in both arms of the study remained on DAPT.

“It’s not clear that BRS reduces the duration for DAPT,” Dr. Cohen noted, at least for the Absorb device, which is not full resorbed until it’s been in patients for about 3 years.

A striking property of the next-generation BRSs reported at the meeting was their use of thinner struts and faster resorption times. “These iterations hold immense promise for improving late outcomes,” commented Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, an interventional cardiologist at the Christ Hospital in Cincinnati who helped lead the large U.S. clinical trial of the Absorb BRS, ABSORB III.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

One-year outcome results of the first bioresorbable coronary scaffold on the U.S. and world markets, Absorb, failed to show longer-term problems with the device that only became apparent with 3-year follow-up.

The failure of Absorb to show benefits after 3 years in the ABSORB II trial will probably not dampen enthusiasm for the concept of a bioresorbable coronary scaffold (BRS). The idea of treating coronary stenoses with a stent that disappears after a few years once it has done its job is a powerfully attractive idea, and reports from several early-stage clinical tests of new BRSs during TCT 2016 showed that many next-generation versions of these devices are in very active development.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. David J. Cohen
But the regulatory hurdles these new BRSs will need to clear to prove their safety suddenly grew taller when the 3-year ABSORB II outcomes went public in a report at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual meeting and in a simultaneously published report Oct. 30.

The surprising ABSORB II results showed more than just a failure of the Absorb BRS to produce 3 years after placement the improved coronary artery vasomotion and reduced late lumen loss that were the two primary efficacy endpoints of the trial.

The results also showed troubling signs of harm from the BRS, including significantly worse late lumen loss, compared with a contemporary drug-eluting metallic stent. In addition, there was a shocking 1%/year rate of late stent thrombosis during both the second and third years following Absorb placement in coronary arteries, the period when the Absorb BRS was in the process of disappearing, and which did not occur in the study’s control patients who received a conventional, metallic drug-eluting stent.

Patrick W. Serruys, MD, lead investigator of ABSORB II, attributed these adverse outcomes to the “highly thrombogenic” proteoglycan material that formed as the Absorb BRS resorbed, and a “structural discontinuity” of the BRS as it resorbed in some patients, resulting in parts of the scaffold remnant sticking out from the coronary artery wall toward the center of the vessel.

These late flaws in the bioresorption process will now need closer scrutiny during future studies of next-generation BRSs, and will surely mean longer follow-up of pivotal trials and a shift from the 1-year follow-up data used by the Food and Drug Administration when it approved the Absorb BRS last July.

“The challenge for the field [of BRS development] is the late results, as we saw in ABSORB II,” commented David J. Cohen, MD, an interventional cardiologist at Saint Luke’s Health System in Kansas City, Mo. The ABSORB II results “will lead to reexamination of the trial design and endpoints for the next generation of BRSs,” Dr. Cohen predicted at the meeting, sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Dean J. Kereiakes
The ABSORB II experience will also mean a reassessment of how long dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is needed for BRS recipients. In this trial, average DAPT duration was 1.5 years; and at 3 years, about 30% of patients in both arms of the study remained on DAPT.

“It’s not clear that BRS reduces the duration for DAPT,” Dr. Cohen noted, at least for the Absorb device, which is not full resorbed until it’s been in patients for about 3 years.

A striking property of the next-generation BRSs reported at the meeting was their use of thinner struts and faster resorption times. “These iterations hold immense promise for improving late outcomes,” commented Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, an interventional cardiologist at the Christ Hospital in Cincinnati who helped lead the large U.S. clinical trial of the Absorb BRS, ABSORB III.

One-year outcome results of the first bioresorbable coronary scaffold on the U.S. and world markets, Absorb, failed to show longer-term problems with the device that only became apparent with 3-year follow-up.

The failure of Absorb to show benefits after 3 years in the ABSORB II trial will probably not dampen enthusiasm for the concept of a bioresorbable coronary scaffold (BRS). The idea of treating coronary stenoses with a stent that disappears after a few years once it has done its job is a powerfully attractive idea, and reports from several early-stage clinical tests of new BRSs during TCT 2016 showed that many next-generation versions of these devices are in very active development.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. David J. Cohen
But the regulatory hurdles these new BRSs will need to clear to prove their safety suddenly grew taller when the 3-year ABSORB II outcomes went public in a report at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual meeting and in a simultaneously published report Oct. 30.

The surprising ABSORB II results showed more than just a failure of the Absorb BRS to produce 3 years after placement the improved coronary artery vasomotion and reduced late lumen loss that were the two primary efficacy endpoints of the trial.

The results also showed troubling signs of harm from the BRS, including significantly worse late lumen loss, compared with a contemporary drug-eluting metallic stent. In addition, there was a shocking 1%/year rate of late stent thrombosis during both the second and third years following Absorb placement in coronary arteries, the period when the Absorb BRS was in the process of disappearing, and which did not occur in the study’s control patients who received a conventional, metallic drug-eluting stent.

Patrick W. Serruys, MD, lead investigator of ABSORB II, attributed these adverse outcomes to the “highly thrombogenic” proteoglycan material that formed as the Absorb BRS resorbed, and a “structural discontinuity” of the BRS as it resorbed in some patients, resulting in parts of the scaffold remnant sticking out from the coronary artery wall toward the center of the vessel.

These late flaws in the bioresorption process will now need closer scrutiny during future studies of next-generation BRSs, and will surely mean longer follow-up of pivotal trials and a shift from the 1-year follow-up data used by the Food and Drug Administration when it approved the Absorb BRS last July.

“The challenge for the field [of BRS development] is the late results, as we saw in ABSORB II,” commented David J. Cohen, MD, an interventional cardiologist at Saint Luke’s Health System in Kansas City, Mo. The ABSORB II results “will lead to reexamination of the trial design and endpoints for the next generation of BRSs,” Dr. Cohen predicted at the meeting, sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Dean J. Kereiakes
The ABSORB II experience will also mean a reassessment of how long dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is needed for BRS recipients. In this trial, average DAPT duration was 1.5 years; and at 3 years, about 30% of patients in both arms of the study remained on DAPT.

“It’s not clear that BRS reduces the duration for DAPT,” Dr. Cohen noted, at least for the Absorb device, which is not full resorbed until it’s been in patients for about 3 years.

A striking property of the next-generation BRSs reported at the meeting was their use of thinner struts and faster resorption times. “These iterations hold immense promise for improving late outcomes,” commented Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, an interventional cardiologist at the Christ Hospital in Cincinnati who helped lead the large U.S. clinical trial of the Absorb BRS, ABSORB III.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads

Most infective endocarditis calls for early surgery

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:43

 

CHICAGO- Turning to surgery earlier in infective endocarditis may hold the key to a cure for some patients. Upcoming guidelines for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis lend evidence-based support to early surgical intervention in this high-mortality condition.

“Infective endocarditis is the most severe and potentially devastating complication for heart valve disease,” said Joseph Coselli, MD, in a presentation that reviewed current trends in incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) and laid out a rationale and strategy for early surgical intervention in some patients.

Dr. Joseph S. Coselli
The bottom line? “Operate sooner rather than later,” said Dr. Coselli. “Once there’s an indication for surgery, operate. Leaky valves won’t become competent; disintegrated tissue will not regrow.” This requires something of a shift in mindset, he said. “Infective endocarditis is not a reason to postpone an operation otherwise indicated, but the opposite.”

“Untreated infective endocarditis is universally fatal,” said Dr. Coselli. Even with current treatments, however, overall mortality for infective endocarditis is 20%-25%, he said.

Speaking at the joint AATS-ACC Heart Valve Summit, Dr. Coselli, chief of the division of cardiothoracic surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, reviewed the key points in the upcoming guideline and the evidence that backs up the guidelines.

Dr. Coselli served on the writing committee for the 2016 AATS consensus guidelines for the surgical treatment of infective endocarditis; the guidelines are currently in press.

The guidelines propose that “at the time of surgery, the patient should be on an effective antimicrobial regimen to which the causative agent is sensitive,” he said. This is a level I recommendation, as is the recommendation that the surgeon should understand the pathology as well as possible before the procedure. Usually, say the guidelines, this is obtained by means of a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), assigning level I status to this recommendation as well.

According to the guidelines, patients with IE who may be surgical candidates during their hospitalization, regardless of whether their antimicrobial course is complete, include those who present with valve dysfunction that results in symptoms of heart failure. Surgery should also be considered in patients with left-sided IE with S. aureus, fungi, or other highly resistant organisms as the causative pathogen. If heart block, an aortic or annular abscess, or destructive penetrating lesions are present, surgery is also indicated. Finally, the guidelines recommend considering surgery if patients have persistent bacteremia or fevers at 5 to 7 days after initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. All of these are class I indications in the upcoming guidelines, he said.

The patient who has relapsing infection, defined by the guidelines as recurrent bacteremia “after a complete course of appropriate antibiotics and subsequently negative blood culture,” who has no other identifiable source of infection, may also be a candidate.

Given the dearth of randomized trials in the area, no recommendation for intervention is backed by a level of evidence greater than B, said Dr. Coselli. And knowledge gaps persist in many areas, such as the appropriate timing of surgery in IE when there are neurological complications. Also, he said, “embolism risk needs to be better understood.” Imaging improvements would help guide decision-making, as would better data about contemporary rates of IE relapse and recurrence, said Dr. Coselli.

Though these surgeries should be done at centers that can field a complete team, and by experience valve surgeons, early intervention may be a key to success: “Operate before a devastating complication occurs,” said Dr. Coselli. “Understand what you see; don’t be afraid of radical debridement, and master alternative options to reconstruction” depending on the heart’s appearance in the OR, he said.

Surgeons can run into trouble in IE cases if they wait too long. “A patient who’s already had an embolic stroke may be too sick,” said Dr. Coselli. Insensitive organisms and ineffective antimicrobial therapy set the patient up for recurrent IE or treatment failure as well.

Having guidance for surgical intervention is important because cardiologists and surgeons will be seeing more infective endocarditis patients as heroin and other illicit intravenous drug use continues to rise, said Dr. Coselli. IE in intravenous drug users now accounts for up to 30% of all patients who seek treatment for IE, he said, citing a study that tracked characteristics of endocarditis patients undergoing surgery at a single institution from 2002-2014 (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;152:832-41). Incidence in intravenous drug users can range to 2,000 cases per 100,000 patient-years, he said.

The study, conducted by Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD, and his colleagues at Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s hospitals, both in Boston, followed 436 patients with IE, 78 of whom were intravenous drug users (IVDUs) at the time of diagnosis. Overall, the IVDUs were younger (mean age, 36 plus or minus 10 years) when compared with the non-IVDU group (mean age, 58 plus or minus 14 years; P less than 0.001). The non-IVDU cohort were also significantly more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, but less likely to smoke. However, IVDUs were more likely to have embolic events, and to have right-sided valve involvement.

Though early mortality was better in the IVDU group post-surgically, late complications, including reinfection and reoperation, were significantly more likely to occur in the IVDUs, with reinfection more than four times as frequent in IVDUs (aggregate valve-related complications, 41% in IVDUs vs. 10% in non-IVDUs; P = 0.001).

Despite the additional morbidity seen in IVDU-associated endocarditis, the 10-year survival rate was virtually identical between the two groups.

For many IE patients, said Dr. Coselli, “the arguments against surgery have lost strength.” Active systemic infections are treatable, sicker patients can be operated on earlier, and surgeons will gain experience with this sometimes technically challenging surgery, he said. Finally, Dr. Coselli said, even though the best available data support early surgical intervention in select IE patients, “final cure of IE is always the result of antimicrobial treatment and the patient’s own defense.”
 

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

CHICAGO- Turning to surgery earlier in infective endocarditis may hold the key to a cure for some patients. Upcoming guidelines for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis lend evidence-based support to early surgical intervention in this high-mortality condition.

“Infective endocarditis is the most severe and potentially devastating complication for heart valve disease,” said Joseph Coselli, MD, in a presentation that reviewed current trends in incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) and laid out a rationale and strategy for early surgical intervention in some patients.

Dr. Joseph S. Coselli
The bottom line? “Operate sooner rather than later,” said Dr. Coselli. “Once there’s an indication for surgery, operate. Leaky valves won’t become competent; disintegrated tissue will not regrow.” This requires something of a shift in mindset, he said. “Infective endocarditis is not a reason to postpone an operation otherwise indicated, but the opposite.”

“Untreated infective endocarditis is universally fatal,” said Dr. Coselli. Even with current treatments, however, overall mortality for infective endocarditis is 20%-25%, he said.

Speaking at the joint AATS-ACC Heart Valve Summit, Dr. Coselli, chief of the division of cardiothoracic surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, reviewed the key points in the upcoming guideline and the evidence that backs up the guidelines.

Dr. Coselli served on the writing committee for the 2016 AATS consensus guidelines for the surgical treatment of infective endocarditis; the guidelines are currently in press.

The guidelines propose that “at the time of surgery, the patient should be on an effective antimicrobial regimen to which the causative agent is sensitive,” he said. This is a level I recommendation, as is the recommendation that the surgeon should understand the pathology as well as possible before the procedure. Usually, say the guidelines, this is obtained by means of a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), assigning level I status to this recommendation as well.

According to the guidelines, patients with IE who may be surgical candidates during their hospitalization, regardless of whether their antimicrobial course is complete, include those who present with valve dysfunction that results in symptoms of heart failure. Surgery should also be considered in patients with left-sided IE with S. aureus, fungi, or other highly resistant organisms as the causative pathogen. If heart block, an aortic or annular abscess, or destructive penetrating lesions are present, surgery is also indicated. Finally, the guidelines recommend considering surgery if patients have persistent bacteremia or fevers at 5 to 7 days after initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. All of these are class I indications in the upcoming guidelines, he said.

The patient who has relapsing infection, defined by the guidelines as recurrent bacteremia “after a complete course of appropriate antibiotics and subsequently negative blood culture,” who has no other identifiable source of infection, may also be a candidate.

Given the dearth of randomized trials in the area, no recommendation for intervention is backed by a level of evidence greater than B, said Dr. Coselli. And knowledge gaps persist in many areas, such as the appropriate timing of surgery in IE when there are neurological complications. Also, he said, “embolism risk needs to be better understood.” Imaging improvements would help guide decision-making, as would better data about contemporary rates of IE relapse and recurrence, said Dr. Coselli.

Though these surgeries should be done at centers that can field a complete team, and by experience valve surgeons, early intervention may be a key to success: “Operate before a devastating complication occurs,” said Dr. Coselli. “Understand what you see; don’t be afraid of radical debridement, and master alternative options to reconstruction” depending on the heart’s appearance in the OR, he said.

Surgeons can run into trouble in IE cases if they wait too long. “A patient who’s already had an embolic stroke may be too sick,” said Dr. Coselli. Insensitive organisms and ineffective antimicrobial therapy set the patient up for recurrent IE or treatment failure as well.

Having guidance for surgical intervention is important because cardiologists and surgeons will be seeing more infective endocarditis patients as heroin and other illicit intravenous drug use continues to rise, said Dr. Coselli. IE in intravenous drug users now accounts for up to 30% of all patients who seek treatment for IE, he said, citing a study that tracked characteristics of endocarditis patients undergoing surgery at a single institution from 2002-2014 (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;152:832-41). Incidence in intravenous drug users can range to 2,000 cases per 100,000 patient-years, he said.

The study, conducted by Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD, and his colleagues at Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s hospitals, both in Boston, followed 436 patients with IE, 78 of whom were intravenous drug users (IVDUs) at the time of diagnosis. Overall, the IVDUs were younger (mean age, 36 plus or minus 10 years) when compared with the non-IVDU group (mean age, 58 plus or minus 14 years; P less than 0.001). The non-IVDU cohort were also significantly more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, but less likely to smoke. However, IVDUs were more likely to have embolic events, and to have right-sided valve involvement.

Though early mortality was better in the IVDU group post-surgically, late complications, including reinfection and reoperation, were significantly more likely to occur in the IVDUs, with reinfection more than four times as frequent in IVDUs (aggregate valve-related complications, 41% in IVDUs vs. 10% in non-IVDUs; P = 0.001).

Despite the additional morbidity seen in IVDU-associated endocarditis, the 10-year survival rate was virtually identical between the two groups.

For many IE patients, said Dr. Coselli, “the arguments against surgery have lost strength.” Active systemic infections are treatable, sicker patients can be operated on earlier, and surgeons will gain experience with this sometimes technically challenging surgery, he said. Finally, Dr. Coselli said, even though the best available data support early surgical intervention in select IE patients, “final cure of IE is always the result of antimicrobial treatment and the patient’s own defense.”
 

 

 

 

CHICAGO- Turning to surgery earlier in infective endocarditis may hold the key to a cure for some patients. Upcoming guidelines for surgical treatment of infective endocarditis lend evidence-based support to early surgical intervention in this high-mortality condition.

“Infective endocarditis is the most severe and potentially devastating complication for heart valve disease,” said Joseph Coselli, MD, in a presentation that reviewed current trends in incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) and laid out a rationale and strategy for early surgical intervention in some patients.

Dr. Joseph S. Coselli
The bottom line? “Operate sooner rather than later,” said Dr. Coselli. “Once there’s an indication for surgery, operate. Leaky valves won’t become competent; disintegrated tissue will not regrow.” This requires something of a shift in mindset, he said. “Infective endocarditis is not a reason to postpone an operation otherwise indicated, but the opposite.”

“Untreated infective endocarditis is universally fatal,” said Dr. Coselli. Even with current treatments, however, overall mortality for infective endocarditis is 20%-25%, he said.

Speaking at the joint AATS-ACC Heart Valve Summit, Dr. Coselli, chief of the division of cardiothoracic surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, reviewed the key points in the upcoming guideline and the evidence that backs up the guidelines.

Dr. Coselli served on the writing committee for the 2016 AATS consensus guidelines for the surgical treatment of infective endocarditis; the guidelines are currently in press.

The guidelines propose that “at the time of surgery, the patient should be on an effective antimicrobial regimen to which the causative agent is sensitive,” he said. This is a level I recommendation, as is the recommendation that the surgeon should understand the pathology as well as possible before the procedure. Usually, say the guidelines, this is obtained by means of a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), assigning level I status to this recommendation as well.

According to the guidelines, patients with IE who may be surgical candidates during their hospitalization, regardless of whether their antimicrobial course is complete, include those who present with valve dysfunction that results in symptoms of heart failure. Surgery should also be considered in patients with left-sided IE with S. aureus, fungi, or other highly resistant organisms as the causative pathogen. If heart block, an aortic or annular abscess, or destructive penetrating lesions are present, surgery is also indicated. Finally, the guidelines recommend considering surgery if patients have persistent bacteremia or fevers at 5 to 7 days after initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. All of these are class I indications in the upcoming guidelines, he said.

The patient who has relapsing infection, defined by the guidelines as recurrent bacteremia “after a complete course of appropriate antibiotics and subsequently negative blood culture,” who has no other identifiable source of infection, may also be a candidate.

Given the dearth of randomized trials in the area, no recommendation for intervention is backed by a level of evidence greater than B, said Dr. Coselli. And knowledge gaps persist in many areas, such as the appropriate timing of surgery in IE when there are neurological complications. Also, he said, “embolism risk needs to be better understood.” Imaging improvements would help guide decision-making, as would better data about contemporary rates of IE relapse and recurrence, said Dr. Coselli.

Though these surgeries should be done at centers that can field a complete team, and by experience valve surgeons, early intervention may be a key to success: “Operate before a devastating complication occurs,” said Dr. Coselli. “Understand what you see; don’t be afraid of radical debridement, and master alternative options to reconstruction” depending on the heart’s appearance in the OR, he said.

Surgeons can run into trouble in IE cases if they wait too long. “A patient who’s already had an embolic stroke may be too sick,” said Dr. Coselli. Insensitive organisms and ineffective antimicrobial therapy set the patient up for recurrent IE or treatment failure as well.

Having guidance for surgical intervention is important because cardiologists and surgeons will be seeing more infective endocarditis patients as heroin and other illicit intravenous drug use continues to rise, said Dr. Coselli. IE in intravenous drug users now accounts for up to 30% of all patients who seek treatment for IE, he said, citing a study that tracked characteristics of endocarditis patients undergoing surgery at a single institution from 2002-2014 (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;152:832-41). Incidence in intravenous drug users can range to 2,000 cases per 100,000 patient-years, he said.

The study, conducted by Joon Bum Kim, MD, PhD, and his colleagues at Massachusetts General and Brigham and Women’s hospitals, both in Boston, followed 436 patients with IE, 78 of whom were intravenous drug users (IVDUs) at the time of diagnosis. Overall, the IVDUs were younger (mean age, 36 plus or minus 10 years) when compared with the non-IVDU group (mean age, 58 plus or minus 14 years; P less than 0.001). The non-IVDU cohort were also significantly more likely to have hypertension and diabetes, but less likely to smoke. However, IVDUs were more likely to have embolic events, and to have right-sided valve involvement.

Though early mortality was better in the IVDU group post-surgically, late complications, including reinfection and reoperation, were significantly more likely to occur in the IVDUs, with reinfection more than four times as frequent in IVDUs (aggregate valve-related complications, 41% in IVDUs vs. 10% in non-IVDUs; P = 0.001).

Despite the additional morbidity seen in IVDU-associated endocarditis, the 10-year survival rate was virtually identical between the two groups.

For many IE patients, said Dr. Coselli, “the arguments against surgery have lost strength.” Active systemic infections are treatable, sicker patients can be operated on earlier, and surgeons will gain experience with this sometimes technically challenging surgery, he said. Finally, Dr. Coselli said, even though the best available data support early surgical intervention in select IE patients, “final cure of IE is always the result of antimicrobial treatment and the patient’s own defense.”
 

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE HEART VALVE SUMMIT 2016

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Using CHIMPS for type A dissection in a high-risk patient

Gutter leaks, durability are challenges in CHIMPS method
Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:42

 

Traditional open repair for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome and a previous cardiovascular surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, but a team of surgeons from China have reported on a hybrid technique that combines open and endovascular approaches to repair type A dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.

Body

 

In their invited commentary, Lars Svensson, MD, PhD, Matthew Eagleton, MD, and Eric Roselli, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said the approach Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on is one of the “novel” endovascular CHIMPS methods for aortic arch repair – CHIMPS meaning chimneys, periscopes, snorkels, and sandwiches (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:958-9). But they noted that one of the ongoing challenges with these types of parallel grafts is the gutter leaks that occur between the sandwich grafts.

The commentators noted that CHIMPS procedures are easier alternatives to using spiral branch graft stents for the thoracoabdominal aorta or direct-connecting branch stems from an aortic stent in the arch, but they added, “An important caveat is that the blood supply maintenance and long-term durability may not be adequate.”

The patient Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on “is young and will need a durable operation,” Dr. Svensson, Dr. Eagleton, and Dr. Roselli said. “Unfortunately, in our experience over time we have observed that these CHIMPS procedures tend to break down and leak into the arch, including the arch actually rupturing,” they said. These patients will need “intensive” monitoring. What’s more, patients with Marfan syndrome are prone to aneurysm formation “and are not good candidates for stenting,” the commentators said.

“Nevertheless, further engineering iterations of CHIMPS may address the problem with gutter leaks and become an alternative to the elephant trunk procedure for those patients who are at particularly high risk,” the commentators said.

Dr. Svensson disclosed he holds a patent with potential royalties for an aortic valve and aortic root stent graft with connecting branch grafts to the coronary ostia. Dr. Roselli is a consultant and investigator for Bolton, Gore, and Medtronic. Dr. Eagleton has no relationships to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

In their invited commentary, Lars Svensson, MD, PhD, Matthew Eagleton, MD, and Eric Roselli, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said the approach Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on is one of the “novel” endovascular CHIMPS methods for aortic arch repair – CHIMPS meaning chimneys, periscopes, snorkels, and sandwiches (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:958-9). But they noted that one of the ongoing challenges with these types of parallel grafts is the gutter leaks that occur between the sandwich grafts.

The commentators noted that CHIMPS procedures are easier alternatives to using spiral branch graft stents for the thoracoabdominal aorta or direct-connecting branch stems from an aortic stent in the arch, but they added, “An important caveat is that the blood supply maintenance and long-term durability may not be adequate.”

The patient Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on “is young and will need a durable operation,” Dr. Svensson, Dr. Eagleton, and Dr. Roselli said. “Unfortunately, in our experience over time we have observed that these CHIMPS procedures tend to break down and leak into the arch, including the arch actually rupturing,” they said. These patients will need “intensive” monitoring. What’s more, patients with Marfan syndrome are prone to aneurysm formation “and are not good candidates for stenting,” the commentators said.

“Nevertheless, further engineering iterations of CHIMPS may address the problem with gutter leaks and become an alternative to the elephant trunk procedure for those patients who are at particularly high risk,” the commentators said.

Dr. Svensson disclosed he holds a patent with potential royalties for an aortic valve and aortic root stent graft with connecting branch grafts to the coronary ostia. Dr. Roselli is a consultant and investigator for Bolton, Gore, and Medtronic. Dr. Eagleton has no relationships to disclose.

Body

 

In their invited commentary, Lars Svensson, MD, PhD, Matthew Eagleton, MD, and Eric Roselli, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic, said the approach Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on is one of the “novel” endovascular CHIMPS methods for aortic arch repair – CHIMPS meaning chimneys, periscopes, snorkels, and sandwiches (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:958-9). But they noted that one of the ongoing challenges with these types of parallel grafts is the gutter leaks that occur between the sandwich grafts.

The commentators noted that CHIMPS procedures are easier alternatives to using spiral branch graft stents for the thoracoabdominal aorta or direct-connecting branch stems from an aortic stent in the arch, but they added, “An important caveat is that the blood supply maintenance and long-term durability may not be adequate.”

The patient Dr. Zhang and colleagues reported on “is young and will need a durable operation,” Dr. Svensson, Dr. Eagleton, and Dr. Roselli said. “Unfortunately, in our experience over time we have observed that these CHIMPS procedures tend to break down and leak into the arch, including the arch actually rupturing,” they said. These patients will need “intensive” monitoring. What’s more, patients with Marfan syndrome are prone to aneurysm formation “and are not good candidates for stenting,” the commentators said.

“Nevertheless, further engineering iterations of CHIMPS may address the problem with gutter leaks and become an alternative to the elephant trunk procedure for those patients who are at particularly high risk,” the commentators said.

Dr. Svensson disclosed he holds a patent with potential royalties for an aortic valve and aortic root stent graft with connecting branch grafts to the coronary ostia. Dr. Roselli is a consultant and investigator for Bolton, Gore, and Medtronic. Dr. Eagleton has no relationships to disclose.

Title
Gutter leaks, durability are challenges in CHIMPS method
Gutter leaks, durability are challenges in CHIMPS method

 

Traditional open repair for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome and a previous cardiovascular surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, but a team of surgeons from China have reported on a hybrid technique that combines open and endovascular approaches to repair type A dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.

 

Traditional open repair for type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome and a previous cardiovascular surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, but a team of surgeons from China have reported on a hybrid technique that combines open and endovascular approaches to repair type A dissection in a patient with Marfan syndrome.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Chimney and sandwich grafts facilitate hybrid repair of type A aortic dissection for a Marfan syndrome patient after Bentall surgery.

Major finding: A 33-year-old male with Marfan syndrome and a history of cardiac surgery was asymptomatic 30 days after hybrid repair for type A aortic dissection.

Data source: Case report of single patient at an academic medical center.

Disclosures: Dr. Zhang and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.

Lung cryobiopsies could reduce need for surgical biopsy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:41

 

LONDON – The vast majority of surgical lung biopsies currently used to diagnose interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) could be avoided, suggests research presented at the annual congress of the European Respiratory Society.

During an oral presentation, Benjamin Bondue, MD, of Hopital Erasme, Brussels, presented the preliminary results of a Belgian prospective study evaluating the role of transbronchial lung cryobiopsies in 24 patients with undefined ILD treated at three participating centers.

Cryobiopsies were found to have a diagnostic yield of 79%, meaning that patients might be able to avoid undergoing a more invasive surgical removal of tissue in many cases. Compared with surgical biopsy, cryobiopsies offered the potential advantage of lower morbidity and shorter hospitalization time, Dr. Bondue said. He reported that patients needed to stay in hospital just 1.2 days after the procedure in the study.

“Our data also show that there is some benefit of surgical lung biopsy after cryobiopsy if we identify an NSIP [nonspecific interstitial pneumonia] pattern or idiopathic conditions, or if we cannot obtain a clear pathological diagnosis,” he reported. Acknowledging the study was small and conducted in a single center, he said the use of cryobiopsies following surgical biopsy might be worth further study.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is a relatively new technique that uses a cryoprobe inserted down through a bronchoscope about 1-2 cm from the thoracic wall. Once in place, the probe is cooled for between 3 and 6 seconds, lung tissue freezes to the probe, and the probe and bronchoscope are removed together. This method allows for larger samples of tissue to be taken than does traditional transbronchial biopsy, which involves using large forceps to obtain tissue samples (Respirology. 2014;19:645-54).

In the Belgian study, Dr. Bondue noted that a Fogarty balloon was used to control any bleeding and that four transbronchial lung cryobiopsies were obtained from two different segments of the same lobe of a patient’s lungs. All biopsies were then analyzed by an expert pathologist in ILDs, and reviewed by two other expert pathologists when needed. The mean sample size obtained was 16 mm2.

The patients included in the study had undergone chest X-ray and had inconclusive findings in the majority (84%) of cases. They then had the option to undergo cryobiopsy or surgical lung biopsy, with the latter performed following discussion among a multidisciplinary team’s members.

Following cryobiopsy, 16 of the 24 patients – who were a mean age of 62 years, and over half of whom were past (56%) or current (12%) smokers – were diagnosed with a specific pattern of ILD not due to NSIP. Of the 16 cases, 6 were due to hypersensitive pneumonitis, 4 were due to interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, and 2 were due to sarcoidosis. The other four cases included patients with one of the following conditions: adenocarcinoma, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia, and amyloidosis.

Six of the 24 cases were defined as NSIP, with 2 reclassified as definite and 1 as probable hypersensitive pneumonitis, after discussion within the multidisciplinary team.

Five patients – three who had been diagnosed with NSIP and two who had been given no pathological diagnosis after cryobiopsy – underwent surgical lung biopsy. Of these, following the surgical biopsies, only one patient was considered to have NSIP and the other four were eventually diagnosed with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis.

In terms of safety, five patients experienced pneumothorax, two patients required chest drainage, two needed simple aspiration and one underwent observation. In the majority of cases, patients experienced mild bleeding, with only one patient having experienced severe bleeding. During this study, none of the participants experienced significant chest pain, acute exacerbations, or infections, and none of them died.

Dr. Bondue has received research grants and fees for consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

LONDON – The vast majority of surgical lung biopsies currently used to diagnose interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) could be avoided, suggests research presented at the annual congress of the European Respiratory Society.

During an oral presentation, Benjamin Bondue, MD, of Hopital Erasme, Brussels, presented the preliminary results of a Belgian prospective study evaluating the role of transbronchial lung cryobiopsies in 24 patients with undefined ILD treated at three participating centers.

Cryobiopsies were found to have a diagnostic yield of 79%, meaning that patients might be able to avoid undergoing a more invasive surgical removal of tissue in many cases. Compared with surgical biopsy, cryobiopsies offered the potential advantage of lower morbidity and shorter hospitalization time, Dr. Bondue said. He reported that patients needed to stay in hospital just 1.2 days after the procedure in the study.

“Our data also show that there is some benefit of surgical lung biopsy after cryobiopsy if we identify an NSIP [nonspecific interstitial pneumonia] pattern or idiopathic conditions, or if we cannot obtain a clear pathological diagnosis,” he reported. Acknowledging the study was small and conducted in a single center, he said the use of cryobiopsies following surgical biopsy might be worth further study.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is a relatively new technique that uses a cryoprobe inserted down through a bronchoscope about 1-2 cm from the thoracic wall. Once in place, the probe is cooled for between 3 and 6 seconds, lung tissue freezes to the probe, and the probe and bronchoscope are removed together. This method allows for larger samples of tissue to be taken than does traditional transbronchial biopsy, which involves using large forceps to obtain tissue samples (Respirology. 2014;19:645-54).

In the Belgian study, Dr. Bondue noted that a Fogarty balloon was used to control any bleeding and that four transbronchial lung cryobiopsies were obtained from two different segments of the same lobe of a patient’s lungs. All biopsies were then analyzed by an expert pathologist in ILDs, and reviewed by two other expert pathologists when needed. The mean sample size obtained was 16 mm2.

The patients included in the study had undergone chest X-ray and had inconclusive findings in the majority (84%) of cases. They then had the option to undergo cryobiopsy or surgical lung biopsy, with the latter performed following discussion among a multidisciplinary team’s members.

Following cryobiopsy, 16 of the 24 patients – who were a mean age of 62 years, and over half of whom were past (56%) or current (12%) smokers – were diagnosed with a specific pattern of ILD not due to NSIP. Of the 16 cases, 6 were due to hypersensitive pneumonitis, 4 were due to interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, and 2 were due to sarcoidosis. The other four cases included patients with one of the following conditions: adenocarcinoma, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia, and amyloidosis.

Six of the 24 cases were defined as NSIP, with 2 reclassified as definite and 1 as probable hypersensitive pneumonitis, after discussion within the multidisciplinary team.

Five patients – three who had been diagnosed with NSIP and two who had been given no pathological diagnosis after cryobiopsy – underwent surgical lung biopsy. Of these, following the surgical biopsies, only one patient was considered to have NSIP and the other four were eventually diagnosed with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis.

In terms of safety, five patients experienced pneumothorax, two patients required chest drainage, two needed simple aspiration and one underwent observation. In the majority of cases, patients experienced mild bleeding, with only one patient having experienced severe bleeding. During this study, none of the participants experienced significant chest pain, acute exacerbations, or infections, and none of them died.

Dr. Bondue has received research grants and fees for consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

 

LONDON – The vast majority of surgical lung biopsies currently used to diagnose interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) could be avoided, suggests research presented at the annual congress of the European Respiratory Society.

During an oral presentation, Benjamin Bondue, MD, of Hopital Erasme, Brussels, presented the preliminary results of a Belgian prospective study evaluating the role of transbronchial lung cryobiopsies in 24 patients with undefined ILD treated at three participating centers.

Cryobiopsies were found to have a diagnostic yield of 79%, meaning that patients might be able to avoid undergoing a more invasive surgical removal of tissue in many cases. Compared with surgical biopsy, cryobiopsies offered the potential advantage of lower morbidity and shorter hospitalization time, Dr. Bondue said. He reported that patients needed to stay in hospital just 1.2 days after the procedure in the study.

“Our data also show that there is some benefit of surgical lung biopsy after cryobiopsy if we identify an NSIP [nonspecific interstitial pneumonia] pattern or idiopathic conditions, or if we cannot obtain a clear pathological diagnosis,” he reported. Acknowledging the study was small and conducted in a single center, he said the use of cryobiopsies following surgical biopsy might be worth further study.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy is a relatively new technique that uses a cryoprobe inserted down through a bronchoscope about 1-2 cm from the thoracic wall. Once in place, the probe is cooled for between 3 and 6 seconds, lung tissue freezes to the probe, and the probe and bronchoscope are removed together. This method allows for larger samples of tissue to be taken than does traditional transbronchial biopsy, which involves using large forceps to obtain tissue samples (Respirology. 2014;19:645-54).

In the Belgian study, Dr. Bondue noted that a Fogarty balloon was used to control any bleeding and that four transbronchial lung cryobiopsies were obtained from two different segments of the same lobe of a patient’s lungs. All biopsies were then analyzed by an expert pathologist in ILDs, and reviewed by two other expert pathologists when needed. The mean sample size obtained was 16 mm2.

The patients included in the study had undergone chest X-ray and had inconclusive findings in the majority (84%) of cases. They then had the option to undergo cryobiopsy or surgical lung biopsy, with the latter performed following discussion among a multidisciplinary team’s members.

Following cryobiopsy, 16 of the 24 patients – who were a mean age of 62 years, and over half of whom were past (56%) or current (12%) smokers – were diagnosed with a specific pattern of ILD not due to NSIP. Of the 16 cases, 6 were due to hypersensitive pneumonitis, 4 were due to interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, and 2 were due to sarcoidosis. The other four cases included patients with one of the following conditions: adenocarcinoma, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia, and amyloidosis.

Six of the 24 cases were defined as NSIP, with 2 reclassified as definite and 1 as probable hypersensitive pneumonitis, after discussion within the multidisciplinary team.

Five patients – three who had been diagnosed with NSIP and two who had been given no pathological diagnosis after cryobiopsy – underwent surgical lung biopsy. Of these, following the surgical biopsies, only one patient was considered to have NSIP and the other four were eventually diagnosed with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis.

In terms of safety, five patients experienced pneumothorax, two patients required chest drainage, two needed simple aspiration and one underwent observation. In the majority of cases, patients experienced mild bleeding, with only one patient having experienced severe bleeding. During this study, none of the participants experienced significant chest pain, acute exacerbations, or infections, and none of them died.

Dr. Bondue has received research grants and fees for consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ERS CONGRESS 2016 LONDON

Disallow All Ads
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsies are useful for the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases and could help avoid surgical lung biopsies.

Major finding: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy had a diagnostic yield of 79%.

Data source: Single-center study of 24 patients with interstitial lung diseases who underwent transbronchial lung cryobiopsies, surgical lung biopsies, or both.

Disclosures: Dr. Bondue has received research grants and fees for consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche.

Has mystery of exercise-intolerant chronic thromboembolic disease been solved?

The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance
Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 11:17
Display Headline
Has mystery of exercise-intolerant chronic thromboembolic disease been solved?

The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) and mechanism of improvement after pulmonary endarterectomy have not been well understood, but researchers in the Netherlands have identified those key clinical characteristics of exercise intolerance as well as the mechanisms to response of treatment.

This is the first study to identify the pathophysiology of the exercise intolerance—abnormal pulmonary vascular response—and the underlying mechanism for the pulmonary improvement, Coen van Kan, MD, of Our Lady’s Hospital in Amsterdam and colleagues at the University of Amsterdam reported in the September issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152[3]:763-71).

“Our observations point to a hampered pulmonary vascular response and decreased ventilatory efficiency as underlying pathophysiological mechanisms to explain the exercise limitation observed in patients with CTED,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues wrote. “The clinically significant symptomatic improvement after surgery was shown to be related to significant improvements in both circulatory and ventilatory responses indicative for an improved right ventricle stroke volume during exercise and ventilatory efficiency.”

The researchers studied 14 patients with symptomatic CTED but with normal pulmonary pressures at rest. The patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during right heart catheterization and then had noninvasive CPET 1 year later. During exercise the study subjects showed four features of abnormal pulmonary vascular responses:

• Steep mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (2.7 mm Hg/min per L).

• Low pulmonary vascular compliance (2.8 mL/mm Hg).

• Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output slope correlated with dead space ventilation (r = 0.586; P = .028).

• Ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope (r = 0.580; P = .030).

After screening for exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, nine patients went on to have pulmonary endarterectomy (three patients had mPAP within normal limits during exercise and hence were not candidates, while two others declined surgery). All nine patients who had surgery survived, and a year afterward, their New York Heart Association functional class scores had improved from class II or II to class I in all patients. “Also, mean peak workload and mean oxygen consumption peak had increased, and the improvements observed tended to reach statistical significance,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues said.

After catheterization, improvement in exercise capacity was related to restoration of right ventricle stroke volume response, as measured by oxygen pulse improvement from 11.7 to 13.3 (P = .027) and heart rate response from 80.9 to 72 (P = .003); and a decrease in ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope from 38.2 to 32.8 (P = .014).

Dr. van Kan and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Body

By studying subjects with symptomatic chronic thromboembolic disease and normal pulmonary pressures, Dr. van Kan and colleagues “cleverly opted to study an interesting group,” Robert B. Cameron, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, said in his invited commentary.

 

Dr. Robert B. Cameron

“Logically, this patient group, representing potentially early pathophysiologic CTED, could reveal more pathophysiologic information about mechanisms active during the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension than would be seen in patients with more end-stage disease,” Dr. Cameron said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152[3]:771-2).

The early physiologic changes in patients with CTED that Dr. van Kan and colleagues reported on may make it possible to detect chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and intervene before advance disease sets in, Dr. Cameron said. “Surgical mortality may decrease to very-low levels simply from early surgical intervention,” he said.

Although the retrospective design is a limitation of the study, “these data improve our understanding of CTED and motivate all surgeons to promote prospective trials evaluating these findings and early intervention in a disease that is notoriously difficult to understand and treat,” Dr. Cameron said.

Dr. Cameron had no financial relationships to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

By studying subjects with symptomatic chronic thromboembolic disease and normal pulmonary pressures, Dr. van Kan and colleagues “cleverly opted to study an interesting group,” Robert B. Cameron, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, said in his invited commentary.

 

Dr. Robert B. Cameron

“Logically, this patient group, representing potentially early pathophysiologic CTED, could reveal more pathophysiologic information about mechanisms active during the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension than would be seen in patients with more end-stage disease,” Dr. Cameron said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152[3]:771-2).

The early physiologic changes in patients with CTED that Dr. van Kan and colleagues reported on may make it possible to detect chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and intervene before advance disease sets in, Dr. Cameron said. “Surgical mortality may decrease to very-low levels simply from early surgical intervention,” he said.

Although the retrospective design is a limitation of the study, “these data improve our understanding of CTED and motivate all surgeons to promote prospective trials evaluating these findings and early intervention in a disease that is notoriously difficult to understand and treat,” Dr. Cameron said.

Dr. Cameron had no financial relationships to disclose.

Body

By studying subjects with symptomatic chronic thromboembolic disease and normal pulmonary pressures, Dr. van Kan and colleagues “cleverly opted to study an interesting group,” Robert B. Cameron, MD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, said in his invited commentary.

 

Dr. Robert B. Cameron

“Logically, this patient group, representing potentially early pathophysiologic CTED, could reveal more pathophysiologic information about mechanisms active during the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension than would be seen in patients with more end-stage disease,” Dr. Cameron said (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152[3]:771-2).

The early physiologic changes in patients with CTED that Dr. van Kan and colleagues reported on may make it possible to detect chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and intervene before advance disease sets in, Dr. Cameron said. “Surgical mortality may decrease to very-low levels simply from early surgical intervention,” he said.

Although the retrospective design is a limitation of the study, “these data improve our understanding of CTED and motivate all surgeons to promote prospective trials evaluating these findings and early intervention in a disease that is notoriously difficult to understand and treat,” Dr. Cameron said.

Dr. Cameron had no financial relationships to disclose.

Title
The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance
The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance

The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) and mechanism of improvement after pulmonary endarterectomy have not been well understood, but researchers in the Netherlands have identified those key clinical characteristics of exercise intolerance as well as the mechanisms to response of treatment.

This is the first study to identify the pathophysiology of the exercise intolerance—abnormal pulmonary vascular response—and the underlying mechanism for the pulmonary improvement, Coen van Kan, MD, of Our Lady’s Hospital in Amsterdam and colleagues at the University of Amsterdam reported in the September issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152[3]:763-71).

“Our observations point to a hampered pulmonary vascular response and decreased ventilatory efficiency as underlying pathophysiological mechanisms to explain the exercise limitation observed in patients with CTED,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues wrote. “The clinically significant symptomatic improvement after surgery was shown to be related to significant improvements in both circulatory and ventilatory responses indicative for an improved right ventricle stroke volume during exercise and ventilatory efficiency.”

The researchers studied 14 patients with symptomatic CTED but with normal pulmonary pressures at rest. The patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during right heart catheterization and then had noninvasive CPET 1 year later. During exercise the study subjects showed four features of abnormal pulmonary vascular responses:

• Steep mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (2.7 mm Hg/min per L).

• Low pulmonary vascular compliance (2.8 mL/mm Hg).

• Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output slope correlated with dead space ventilation (r = 0.586; P = .028).

• Ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope (r = 0.580; P = .030).

After screening for exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, nine patients went on to have pulmonary endarterectomy (three patients had mPAP within normal limits during exercise and hence were not candidates, while two others declined surgery). All nine patients who had surgery survived, and a year afterward, their New York Heart Association functional class scores had improved from class II or II to class I in all patients. “Also, mean peak workload and mean oxygen consumption peak had increased, and the improvements observed tended to reach statistical significance,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues said.

After catheterization, improvement in exercise capacity was related to restoration of right ventricle stroke volume response, as measured by oxygen pulse improvement from 11.7 to 13.3 (P = .027) and heart rate response from 80.9 to 72 (P = .003); and a decrease in ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope from 38.2 to 32.8 (P = .014).

Dr. van Kan and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

The pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) and mechanism of improvement after pulmonary endarterectomy have not been well understood, but researchers in the Netherlands have identified those key clinical characteristics of exercise intolerance as well as the mechanisms to response of treatment.

This is the first study to identify the pathophysiology of the exercise intolerance—abnormal pulmonary vascular response—and the underlying mechanism for the pulmonary improvement, Coen van Kan, MD, of Our Lady’s Hospital in Amsterdam and colleagues at the University of Amsterdam reported in the September issue of the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (2016;152[3]:763-71).

“Our observations point to a hampered pulmonary vascular response and decreased ventilatory efficiency as underlying pathophysiological mechanisms to explain the exercise limitation observed in patients with CTED,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues wrote. “The clinically significant symptomatic improvement after surgery was shown to be related to significant improvements in both circulatory and ventilatory responses indicative for an improved right ventricle stroke volume during exercise and ventilatory efficiency.”

The researchers studied 14 patients with symptomatic CTED but with normal pulmonary pressures at rest. The patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during right heart catheterization and then had noninvasive CPET 1 year later. During exercise the study subjects showed four features of abnormal pulmonary vascular responses:

• Steep mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (2.7 mm Hg/min per L).

• Low pulmonary vascular compliance (2.8 mL/mm Hg).

• Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)/cardiac output slope correlated with dead space ventilation (r = 0.586; P = .028).

• Ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope (r = 0.580; P = .030).

After screening for exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension, nine patients went on to have pulmonary endarterectomy (three patients had mPAP within normal limits during exercise and hence were not candidates, while two others declined surgery). All nine patients who had surgery survived, and a year afterward, their New York Heart Association functional class scores had improved from class II or II to class I in all patients. “Also, mean peak workload and mean oxygen consumption peak had increased, and the improvements observed tended to reach statistical significance,” Dr. van Kan and colleagues said.

After catheterization, improvement in exercise capacity was related to restoration of right ventricle stroke volume response, as measured by oxygen pulse improvement from 11.7 to 13.3 (P = .027) and heart rate response from 80.9 to 72 (P = .003); and a decrease in ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide slope from 38.2 to 32.8 (P = .014).

Dr. van Kan and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Has mystery of exercise-intolerant chronic thromboembolic disease been solved?
Display Headline
Has mystery of exercise-intolerant chronic thromboembolic disease been solved?
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Vitals

Key clinical point: This study identifies key clinical features of the pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED) as well and the mechanisms of responses to treatment that have not been well understood .

Major finding: Exercise intolerance may result from an abnormal pulmonary vascular response and decreased ventilatory efficiency, while pulmonary endarterectomy restores right ventricle stroke volume response and ventilatory efficiency.

Data source: Fourteen subjects with exercise-intolerant CTED but normal pulmonary pressure underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during right heart catheterization and noninvasive CPET 1 year later.

Disclosures: Dr. van Kan and coauthors had no financial relationships to disclose.

Four factors raise risk of post-TAVR endocarditis

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:11
Display Headline
Four factors raise risk of post-TAVR endocarditis

Four factors – younger patient age, male sex, diabetes, and moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation – are associated with a significantly increased risk of infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, according to a report published online Sept. 13 in JAMA.

Until now, data pertaining to endocarditis following TAVR “have been limited to case reports and relatively small series with limited follow-up,” said Ander Regueiro, MD, of Laval University, Quebec City, and his associates.

They performed a retrospective analysis of data in a large international registry of TAVR cases to better characterize post-TAVR endocarditis.

Dr. Regueiro and his colleagues focused on 20,006 TAVR procedures done at 47 medical centers in Europe, North America, and South America during a 10-year period. The median time to symptom onset was 5.3 months after the procedure.

Infective endocarditis was definitively diagnosed in 250 of these cases. This incidence is similar to that reported for endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement, indicating that TAVR is no less predisposing to endocarditis despite being a less invasive approach.

The mean age of patients who developed post-TAVR endocarditis was 78.9 years, compared with 81.8 years for those who did not (HR, 0.97). The reason for this association is unclear, but it is possible that younger patients chosen for TAVR because of their prohibitive surgical risk carry a higher burden of comorbidity than do older patients. Similarly, 62% of endocarditis cases arose in men (HR, 1.69), and sex differences in comorbid conditions may explain the higher risk among men.

More patients who developed endocarditis had diabetes (41.7%), compared with those who did not develop endocarditis (30%), for an HR of 1.52. And patients who had moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation after TAVR also were at much higher risk for endocarditis than were those who did not (HR, 2.05), the investigators noted (JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316[10]:1083-92).

In contrast, factors that were not associated with endocarditis risk included chronic pulmonary disease, type of valve (self-expandable or balloon-expandable), and setting of the procedure (catheterization lab vs. operating room).

The bacteria that most commonly caused infective endocarditis were Enterococci species (24.6% of cases), Staphylococcus aureus (23.8%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.8%). This should be taken into consideration when selecting antibiotics for prophylaxis before TAVR and when choosing empirical antibiotics for treatment while waiting for blood culture results, wrote Dr. Regueiro and his associates.

“This information may help clinicians identify patients at higher risk [for endocarditis] and aid in implementing appropriate preventive measures,” they noted.

This study was supported by a grant from the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. Dr. Regueiro reported having no relevant financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Four factors – younger patient age, male sex, diabetes, and moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation – are associated with a significantly increased risk of infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, according to a report published online Sept. 13 in JAMA.

Until now, data pertaining to endocarditis following TAVR “have been limited to case reports and relatively small series with limited follow-up,” said Ander Regueiro, MD, of Laval University, Quebec City, and his associates.

They performed a retrospective analysis of data in a large international registry of TAVR cases to better characterize post-TAVR endocarditis.

Dr. Regueiro and his colleagues focused on 20,006 TAVR procedures done at 47 medical centers in Europe, North America, and South America during a 10-year period. The median time to symptom onset was 5.3 months after the procedure.

Infective endocarditis was definitively diagnosed in 250 of these cases. This incidence is similar to that reported for endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement, indicating that TAVR is no less predisposing to endocarditis despite being a less invasive approach.

The mean age of patients who developed post-TAVR endocarditis was 78.9 years, compared with 81.8 years for those who did not (HR, 0.97). The reason for this association is unclear, but it is possible that younger patients chosen for TAVR because of their prohibitive surgical risk carry a higher burden of comorbidity than do older patients. Similarly, 62% of endocarditis cases arose in men (HR, 1.69), and sex differences in comorbid conditions may explain the higher risk among men.

More patients who developed endocarditis had diabetes (41.7%), compared with those who did not develop endocarditis (30%), for an HR of 1.52. And patients who had moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation after TAVR also were at much higher risk for endocarditis than were those who did not (HR, 2.05), the investigators noted (JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316[10]:1083-92).

In contrast, factors that were not associated with endocarditis risk included chronic pulmonary disease, type of valve (self-expandable or balloon-expandable), and setting of the procedure (catheterization lab vs. operating room).

The bacteria that most commonly caused infective endocarditis were Enterococci species (24.6% of cases), Staphylococcus aureus (23.8%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.8%). This should be taken into consideration when selecting antibiotics for prophylaxis before TAVR and when choosing empirical antibiotics for treatment while waiting for blood culture results, wrote Dr. Regueiro and his associates.

“This information may help clinicians identify patients at higher risk [for endocarditis] and aid in implementing appropriate preventive measures,” they noted.

This study was supported by a grant from the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. Dr. Regueiro reported having no relevant financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Four factors – younger patient age, male sex, diabetes, and moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation – are associated with a significantly increased risk of infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, according to a report published online Sept. 13 in JAMA.

Until now, data pertaining to endocarditis following TAVR “have been limited to case reports and relatively small series with limited follow-up,” said Ander Regueiro, MD, of Laval University, Quebec City, and his associates.

They performed a retrospective analysis of data in a large international registry of TAVR cases to better characterize post-TAVR endocarditis.

Dr. Regueiro and his colleagues focused on 20,006 TAVR procedures done at 47 medical centers in Europe, North America, and South America during a 10-year period. The median time to symptom onset was 5.3 months after the procedure.

Infective endocarditis was definitively diagnosed in 250 of these cases. This incidence is similar to that reported for endocarditis following surgical aortic valve replacement, indicating that TAVR is no less predisposing to endocarditis despite being a less invasive approach.

The mean age of patients who developed post-TAVR endocarditis was 78.9 years, compared with 81.8 years for those who did not (HR, 0.97). The reason for this association is unclear, but it is possible that younger patients chosen for TAVR because of their prohibitive surgical risk carry a higher burden of comorbidity than do older patients. Similarly, 62% of endocarditis cases arose in men (HR, 1.69), and sex differences in comorbid conditions may explain the higher risk among men.

More patients who developed endocarditis had diabetes (41.7%), compared with those who did not develop endocarditis (30%), for an HR of 1.52. And patients who had moderate to severe residual aortic regurgitation after TAVR also were at much higher risk for endocarditis than were those who did not (HR, 2.05), the investigators noted (JAMA. 2016 Sep 13;316[10]:1083-92).

In contrast, factors that were not associated with endocarditis risk included chronic pulmonary disease, type of valve (self-expandable or balloon-expandable), and setting of the procedure (catheterization lab vs. operating room).

The bacteria that most commonly caused infective endocarditis were Enterococci species (24.6% of cases), Staphylococcus aureus (23.8%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.8%). This should be taken into consideration when selecting antibiotics for prophylaxis before TAVR and when choosing empirical antibiotics for treatment while waiting for blood culture results, wrote Dr. Regueiro and his associates.

“This information may help clinicians identify patients at higher risk [for endocarditis] and aid in implementing appropriate preventive measures,” they noted.

This study was supported by a grant from the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. Dr. Regueiro reported having no relevant financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Four factors raise risk of post-TAVR endocarditis
Display Headline
Four factors raise risk of post-TAVR endocarditis
Article Source

FROM JAMA

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Disallow All Ads
Vitals

Key clinical point: Four factors raise the risk that patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement will develop infective endocarditis.

Major finding: The mean age of patients who developed post-TAVR endocarditis was 78.9 years, compared with 81.8 years for those who didn’t (HR, 0.97).

Data source: A retrospective analysis of data in an international registry involving 20,006 patients who underwent TAVR at 47 medical centers during a 10-year period.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a grant from the Alfonso Martin Escudero Foundation. Dr. Regueiro reported having no relevant financial disclosures; his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.