Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

Ibrutinib, the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Yet for patients with high-risk molecular features, such as 11q deletion, 17p deletion, or TP53 mutation, relapse remains problematic.

Investigators evaluated whether the addition of ublituximab to ibrutinib would improve the outcome of patients with genetically high-risk CLL in the GENUINE (UTX-IB-301) phase 3 study.

Jeff P. Sharman, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center in Springfield, Oregon, reported the results at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7504).*

Ublituximab is a glycoengineered, anti-CD20 type 1 monoclonal antibody that maintains complement-dependent cytotoxicity and enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In a phase 2 study in combination with ibrutinib, it achieved an ORR of approximately 88%.

Protocol design

Originally, the study had co-primary endpoints of overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). To adequately power for both endpoints, the target enrollment was 330 patients.

Dr Sharman explained that after 22 months of open enrollment, the trial sponsor determined that the original enrollment goal could not be met in a timely manner and elected to redesign the protocol.

In the modified protocol, ORR became the primary response rate and PFS a secondary endpoint. This allowed for a reduced target enrollment of 120. However, the study was no longer powered to detect a change in PFS.

Investigators stratified the patients by lines of prior therapy and then randomized them to receive ibrutinib or ublituximab plus ibrutinib.

The ibrutinib dose was 420 mg daily in both arms. Ublituximab dose was 900 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2 through 6 and every third cycle thereafter.

The primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by Independent Central Review (IRC) using the iwCLL 2008 criteria.

Secondary endpoints included PFS, the complete response (CR) rate and depth of response (minimal residual disease [MRD] negativity), and safety.

The investigators assessed patients for response on weeks 8, 16, 24, and every 12 weeks thereafter.

The primary endpoint was evaluated when all enrolled patients had at least 2 efficacy evaluations.

The median follow-up was 11.4 months.

 Patient characteristics

 Patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk CLL had their disease centrally confirmed for the presence of deletion 17p, deletion 11q, and/or TP53 mutation.

They had measurable disease, ECOG performance status of 2 or less, no history of transformation of CLL, and no prior BTK inhibitor therapy.

 The investigators randomized 126 patients, and 117 received any dose of therapy.

“The dropout was because in part ibrutinib was via commercial supply and not every patient could get access,” Dr Sharman noted.

Fifty-nine patients were treated in the combination arm and 58 in the monotherapy arm.

All patients had at least one of the specified mutations, which were relatively balanced between the 2 arms.

Patients were a mean age of 67 (range, 43 – 87), had a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1 – 8), and more than 70% were male.

Patient characteristics were similar in each arm except for bulky disease, with 45% in the combination arm having bulky disease of 5 cm or more at baseline, compared with 26% in the monotherapy arm.

Twenty percent of the patients were considered refractory to rituximab.

Safety

Infusion reactions occurred in 54% of patients in the combination arm and 5% had grade 3/4 reactions. None occurred in the ibrutinib arm, since the latter is an orally bioavailable drug.

 

Other adverse events of all grades occurring in 10% of patients or more for the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, were: diarrhea (42% and 40%), fatigue (27% and 33%), insomnia (24% and 10%), nausea (22% and 21%), headache (20% and 28%), arthralgia (19% and 17%), cough (19% and 24%), abdominal pain (15% and 9%), stomatitis (15% and 9%), upper respiratory infection (15% and 12%), dizziness (15% and 22%), contusion (15% and 29%), anemia (14% and 17%), and peripheral edema (10% and 21%).

Neutropenia was higher in the experimental arm, 22% any grade, compared with 12% in the ibrutinib arm, although grade 3 or higher neutropenia was similar in the 2 arms. Other laboratory abnormalities were similar between the arms.

Efficacy

 The best ORR in the combination arm was 78%, with 7% achieving CR compared with 45% in the monotherapy arm with no CRs (P<0.001).

Nineteen percent of the combination arm achieved MRD negativity in peripheral blood compared with 2% of the monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

The reduction in lymph node size was similar between the arms.

In contrast, lymphocytosis was very different between the arms.

“As has been reported multiple times with targeted B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors,” Dr Sharman said, “patients treated with ibrutinib experienced rapid increase in their lymphocytes, returning approximately to baseline by 3 months and decreasing thereafter.”

“By contrast,” he continued, “those patients treated with the additional antibody had much more rapid resolution of their lymphocytosis. This was true whether patients were considered rituximab refractory or not.”

The investigators performed an additional analysis of ORR, this time including patients who achieved partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). These patients were not included in the primary endpoint because the iwCLL 2008 criteria had not yet been updated to include PR-L.

The best overall response including active PR-L patients was 83% in the experimental arm and 59% in the ibrutinib monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

PFS showed a trend toward improvement in the patients treated with the combination, with a hazard ratio of 0.559, which was not of statistical significance at the time of analysis.

The investigators concluded that the study met its primary endpoint, with a greater response rate and a greater depth of response than ibrutinib alone.

And the addition of ublituximab did not alter the safety profile of ibrutinib monotherapy.

TG Therapeutics, Inc, funded the study. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the meeting presentation.

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

Ibrutinib, the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Yet for patients with high-risk molecular features, such as 11q deletion, 17p deletion, or TP53 mutation, relapse remains problematic.

Investigators evaluated whether the addition of ublituximab to ibrutinib would improve the outcome of patients with genetically high-risk CLL in the GENUINE (UTX-IB-301) phase 3 study.

Jeff P. Sharman, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center in Springfield, Oregon, reported the results at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7504).*

Ublituximab is a glycoengineered, anti-CD20 type 1 monoclonal antibody that maintains complement-dependent cytotoxicity and enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In a phase 2 study in combination with ibrutinib, it achieved an ORR of approximately 88%.

Protocol design

Originally, the study had co-primary endpoints of overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). To adequately power for both endpoints, the target enrollment was 330 patients.

Dr Sharman explained that after 22 months of open enrollment, the trial sponsor determined that the original enrollment goal could not be met in a timely manner and elected to redesign the protocol.

In the modified protocol, ORR became the primary response rate and PFS a secondary endpoint. This allowed for a reduced target enrollment of 120. However, the study was no longer powered to detect a change in PFS.

Investigators stratified the patients by lines of prior therapy and then randomized them to receive ibrutinib or ublituximab plus ibrutinib.

The ibrutinib dose was 420 mg daily in both arms. Ublituximab dose was 900 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2 through 6 and every third cycle thereafter.

The primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by Independent Central Review (IRC) using the iwCLL 2008 criteria.

Secondary endpoints included PFS, the complete response (CR) rate and depth of response (minimal residual disease [MRD] negativity), and safety.

The investigators assessed patients for response on weeks 8, 16, 24, and every 12 weeks thereafter.

The primary endpoint was evaluated when all enrolled patients had at least 2 efficacy evaluations.

The median follow-up was 11.4 months.

 Patient characteristics

 Patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk CLL had their disease centrally confirmed for the presence of deletion 17p, deletion 11q, and/or TP53 mutation.

They had measurable disease, ECOG performance status of 2 or less, no history of transformation of CLL, and no prior BTK inhibitor therapy.

 The investigators randomized 126 patients, and 117 received any dose of therapy.

“The dropout was because in part ibrutinib was via commercial supply and not every patient could get access,” Dr Sharman noted.

Fifty-nine patients were treated in the combination arm and 58 in the monotherapy arm.

All patients had at least one of the specified mutations, which were relatively balanced between the 2 arms.

Patients were a mean age of 67 (range, 43 – 87), had a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1 – 8), and more than 70% were male.

Patient characteristics were similar in each arm except for bulky disease, with 45% in the combination arm having bulky disease of 5 cm or more at baseline, compared with 26% in the monotherapy arm.

Twenty percent of the patients were considered refractory to rituximab.

Safety

Infusion reactions occurred in 54% of patients in the combination arm and 5% had grade 3/4 reactions. None occurred in the ibrutinib arm, since the latter is an orally bioavailable drug.

 

Other adverse events of all grades occurring in 10% of patients or more for the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, were: diarrhea (42% and 40%), fatigue (27% and 33%), insomnia (24% and 10%), nausea (22% and 21%), headache (20% and 28%), arthralgia (19% and 17%), cough (19% and 24%), abdominal pain (15% and 9%), stomatitis (15% and 9%), upper respiratory infection (15% and 12%), dizziness (15% and 22%), contusion (15% and 29%), anemia (14% and 17%), and peripheral edema (10% and 21%).

Neutropenia was higher in the experimental arm, 22% any grade, compared with 12% in the ibrutinib arm, although grade 3 or higher neutropenia was similar in the 2 arms. Other laboratory abnormalities were similar between the arms.

Efficacy

 The best ORR in the combination arm was 78%, with 7% achieving CR compared with 45% in the monotherapy arm with no CRs (P<0.001).

Nineteen percent of the combination arm achieved MRD negativity in peripheral blood compared with 2% of the monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

The reduction in lymph node size was similar between the arms.

In contrast, lymphocytosis was very different between the arms.

“As has been reported multiple times with targeted B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors,” Dr Sharman said, “patients treated with ibrutinib experienced rapid increase in their lymphocytes, returning approximately to baseline by 3 months and decreasing thereafter.”

“By contrast,” he continued, “those patients treated with the additional antibody had much more rapid resolution of their lymphocytosis. This was true whether patients were considered rituximab refractory or not.”

The investigators performed an additional analysis of ORR, this time including patients who achieved partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). These patients were not included in the primary endpoint because the iwCLL 2008 criteria had not yet been updated to include PR-L.

The best overall response including active PR-L patients was 83% in the experimental arm and 59% in the ibrutinib monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

PFS showed a trend toward improvement in the patients treated with the combination, with a hazard ratio of 0.559, which was not of statistical significance at the time of analysis.

The investigators concluded that the study met its primary endpoint, with a greater response rate and a greater depth of response than ibrutinib alone.

And the addition of ublituximab did not alter the safety profile of ibrutinib monotherapy.

TG Therapeutics, Inc, funded the study. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the meeting presentation.

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

Ibrutinib, the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, has transformed the treatment landscape for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Yet for patients with high-risk molecular features, such as 11q deletion, 17p deletion, or TP53 mutation, relapse remains problematic.

Investigators evaluated whether the addition of ublituximab to ibrutinib would improve the outcome of patients with genetically high-risk CLL in the GENUINE (UTX-IB-301) phase 3 study.

Jeff P. Sharman, MD, of Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center in Springfield, Oregon, reported the results at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting (abstract 7504).*

Ublituximab is a glycoengineered, anti-CD20 type 1 monoclonal antibody that maintains complement-dependent cytotoxicity and enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In a phase 2 study in combination with ibrutinib, it achieved an ORR of approximately 88%.

Protocol design

Originally, the study had co-primary endpoints of overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). To adequately power for both endpoints, the target enrollment was 330 patients.

Dr Sharman explained that after 22 months of open enrollment, the trial sponsor determined that the original enrollment goal could not be met in a timely manner and elected to redesign the protocol.

In the modified protocol, ORR became the primary response rate and PFS a secondary endpoint. This allowed for a reduced target enrollment of 120. However, the study was no longer powered to detect a change in PFS.

Investigators stratified the patients by lines of prior therapy and then randomized them to receive ibrutinib or ublituximab plus ibrutinib.

The ibrutinib dose was 420 mg daily in both arms. Ublituximab dose was 900 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2 through 6 and every third cycle thereafter.

The primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by Independent Central Review (IRC) using the iwCLL 2008 criteria.

Secondary endpoints included PFS, the complete response (CR) rate and depth of response (minimal residual disease [MRD] negativity), and safety.

The investigators assessed patients for response on weeks 8, 16, 24, and every 12 weeks thereafter.

The primary endpoint was evaluated when all enrolled patients had at least 2 efficacy evaluations.

The median follow-up was 11.4 months.

 Patient characteristics

 Patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk CLL had their disease centrally confirmed for the presence of deletion 17p, deletion 11q, and/or TP53 mutation.

They had measurable disease, ECOG performance status of 2 or less, no history of transformation of CLL, and no prior BTK inhibitor therapy.

 The investigators randomized 126 patients, and 117 received any dose of therapy.

“The dropout was because in part ibrutinib was via commercial supply and not every patient could get access,” Dr Sharman noted.

Fifty-nine patients were treated in the combination arm and 58 in the monotherapy arm.

All patients had at least one of the specified mutations, which were relatively balanced between the 2 arms.

Patients were a mean age of 67 (range, 43 – 87), had a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1 – 8), and more than 70% were male.

Patient characteristics were similar in each arm except for bulky disease, with 45% in the combination arm having bulky disease of 5 cm or more at baseline, compared with 26% in the monotherapy arm.

Twenty percent of the patients were considered refractory to rituximab.

Safety

Infusion reactions occurred in 54% of patients in the combination arm and 5% had grade 3/4 reactions. None occurred in the ibrutinib arm, since the latter is an orally bioavailable drug.

 

Other adverse events of all grades occurring in 10% of patients or more for the combination and monotherapy arms, respectively, were: diarrhea (42% and 40%), fatigue (27% and 33%), insomnia (24% and 10%), nausea (22% and 21%), headache (20% and 28%), arthralgia (19% and 17%), cough (19% and 24%), abdominal pain (15% and 9%), stomatitis (15% and 9%), upper respiratory infection (15% and 12%), dizziness (15% and 22%), contusion (15% and 29%), anemia (14% and 17%), and peripheral edema (10% and 21%).

Neutropenia was higher in the experimental arm, 22% any grade, compared with 12% in the ibrutinib arm, although grade 3 or higher neutropenia was similar in the 2 arms. Other laboratory abnormalities were similar between the arms.

Efficacy

 The best ORR in the combination arm was 78%, with 7% achieving CR compared with 45% in the monotherapy arm with no CRs (P<0.001).

Nineteen percent of the combination arm achieved MRD negativity in peripheral blood compared with 2% of the monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

The reduction in lymph node size was similar between the arms.

In contrast, lymphocytosis was very different between the arms.

“As has been reported multiple times with targeted B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors,” Dr Sharman said, “patients treated with ibrutinib experienced rapid increase in their lymphocytes, returning approximately to baseline by 3 months and decreasing thereafter.”

“By contrast,” he continued, “those patients treated with the additional antibody had much more rapid resolution of their lymphocytosis. This was true whether patients were considered rituximab refractory or not.”

The investigators performed an additional analysis of ORR, this time including patients who achieved partial response with lymphocytosis (PR-L). These patients were not included in the primary endpoint because the iwCLL 2008 criteria had not yet been updated to include PR-L.

The best overall response including active PR-L patients was 83% in the experimental arm and 59% in the ibrutinib monotherapy arm (P<0.01).

PFS showed a trend toward improvement in the patients treated with the combination, with a hazard ratio of 0.559, which was not of statistical significance at the time of analysis.

The investigators concluded that the study met its primary endpoint, with a greater response rate and a greater depth of response than ibrutinib alone.

And the addition of ublituximab did not alter the safety profile of ibrutinib monotherapy.

TG Therapeutics, Inc, funded the study. 

*Data in the abstract differ from the meeting presentation.

Photo from Penn Medicine

CHICAGO—Outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are dismal, with the probability of event-free survival ranging from 15% to 70% after a first relapse to 15% to 20% after a second relapse.

“So novel therapies are obviously urgently needed,” Mala Kiran Talekar, MD, of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, affirmed. “And herein comes the role of CAR T cells as a breakthrough therapy for relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL.”

She presented the outcome of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in pediatric patients with non-CNS extramedullary (EM) relapse at the ASCO 2017 Annual meeting as abstract 10507.

The investigators had drawn the patient population for this analysis from 2 CAR studies, CTL019 and CTL119.

CTL019, which had already been completed, employed a murine CAR, and CTL119 is ongoing and uses a humanized CAR.

Of the 60 patients enrolled in CTL019, 56 (93%) achieved a complete response (CR) at day 28, and 100% had a CNS remission. Their 12-month overall survival (OS) was 79%.

“[K]eep in mind, when the study first started,” Dr Talekar said, “the patient population that had been referred to us was patients who had suffered a second or greater relapse or had been refractory to forms of treatment available to them, and the majority had been refractory to multiple therapies.”

The humanized CAR study, CTL119, is divided into 2 cohorts—one with CAR-naïve patients (n=22) and the other a CAR-retreatment arm (n=15) with patients who had received previous CAR therapy and relapsed.

Dr Talekar explained that the humanized CAR was made with the intention of decreasing rejection or loss of persistence of the T cells related to murine antigenicity.

Nine patients (60%) in the CAR-retreatment arm achieved a CR at day 28, and at 6 months, 78% experienced relapse-free survival (RFS) with a median follow-up of 12 months.

All of the CAR-naïve patients achieved CR at day 28, with 86% achieving RFS at 6 months, with a median follow-up of 10 months.

ALL with EM involvement

The investigators identified 10 pediatric patients treated in the murine (n=6) or humanized (n=4) trials who had received CAR therapy for isolated extramedullary disease or for combined bone marrow extramedullary (BM/EM) relapse of ALL.

They defined EM relapse as involvement of a non-CNS site confirmed by imaging with or without pathology within 12 months of CAR T-cell infusion. After infusion, patients had diagnostic imaging performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Of the 10 patients, 5 had active EM involvement at the time of infusion, 2 had isolated EM relapse—1 with parotid and multifocal bony lesions and 1 with testis and sinus lesions—and 5 had multiple sites of EM relapse.

The patients had 2 to 4 prior ALL relapses, 2 had prior local radiation to the EM site, and all 10 had received prior bone marrow transplants.

Three patients had an MLL rearrangement, 1 had hypodiploid ALL, and 1 had trisomy 21.

Nine of the 10 patients achieved MRD-negative CR at day 28.

One patient was not evaluable because his disease progressed within 2 weeks of CAR therapy in both the bone marrow and EM site. He died 6 weeks after the infusion.

Five patients evaluated by serial imaging had objective responses. Two had no evidence of EM disease by day 28, 2 had resolution by 3 months, and 1 had continued decrease in the size of her uterine mass at 3 and 6 months. She underwent hysterectomy at 8 months with no evidence of disease on pathology.

 

Four patients with a prior history of skin or testicular involvement had no evidence of disease by exam at day 28.

Three of the 9 patients relapsed with CD19+ disease. One had skin/medullary involvement and died at 38 months after CAR T-cell infusion. And 2 had medullary disease: 1 died at 17 months and 1 is alive at 28 months.

The remaining 6 patients are alive and well at a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 3 – 16 months) without recurrence of disease.

The investigators therefore concluded that single agent CAR T-cell immunotherapy can induce potent and durable response in patients with EM relapse of their ALL. 

Photo from Penn Medicine

CHICAGO—Outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are dismal, with the probability of event-free survival ranging from 15% to 70% after a first relapse to 15% to 20% after a second relapse.

“So novel therapies are obviously urgently needed,” Mala Kiran Talekar, MD, of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, affirmed. “And herein comes the role of CAR T cells as a breakthrough therapy for relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL.”

She presented the outcome of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in pediatric patients with non-CNS extramedullary (EM) relapse at the ASCO 2017 Annual meeting as abstract 10507.

The investigators had drawn the patient population for this analysis from 2 CAR studies, CTL019 and CTL119.

CTL019, which had already been completed, employed a murine CAR, and CTL119 is ongoing and uses a humanized CAR.

Of the 60 patients enrolled in CTL019, 56 (93%) achieved a complete response (CR) at day 28, and 100% had a CNS remission. Their 12-month overall survival (OS) was 79%.

“[K]eep in mind, when the study first started,” Dr Talekar said, “the patient population that had been referred to us was patients who had suffered a second or greater relapse or had been refractory to forms of treatment available to them, and the majority had been refractory to multiple therapies.”

The humanized CAR study, CTL119, is divided into 2 cohorts—one with CAR-naïve patients (n=22) and the other a CAR-retreatment arm (n=15) with patients who had received previous CAR therapy and relapsed.

Dr Talekar explained that the humanized CAR was made with the intention of decreasing rejection or loss of persistence of the T cells related to murine antigenicity.

Nine patients (60%) in the CAR-retreatment arm achieved a CR at day 28, and at 6 months, 78% experienced relapse-free survival (RFS) with a median follow-up of 12 months.

All of the CAR-naïve patients achieved CR at day 28, with 86% achieving RFS at 6 months, with a median follow-up of 10 months.

ALL with EM involvement

The investigators identified 10 pediatric patients treated in the murine (n=6) or humanized (n=4) trials who had received CAR therapy for isolated extramedullary disease or for combined bone marrow extramedullary (BM/EM) relapse of ALL.

They defined EM relapse as involvement of a non-CNS site confirmed by imaging with or without pathology within 12 months of CAR T-cell infusion. After infusion, patients had diagnostic imaging performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Of the 10 patients, 5 had active EM involvement at the time of infusion, 2 had isolated EM relapse—1 with parotid and multifocal bony lesions and 1 with testis and sinus lesions—and 5 had multiple sites of EM relapse.

The patients had 2 to 4 prior ALL relapses, 2 had prior local radiation to the EM site, and all 10 had received prior bone marrow transplants.

Three patients had an MLL rearrangement, 1 had hypodiploid ALL, and 1 had trisomy 21.

Nine of the 10 patients achieved MRD-negative CR at day 28.

One patient was not evaluable because his disease progressed within 2 weeks of CAR therapy in both the bone marrow and EM site. He died 6 weeks after the infusion.

Five patients evaluated by serial imaging had objective responses. Two had no evidence of EM disease by day 28, 2 had resolution by 3 months, and 1 had continued decrease in the size of her uterine mass at 3 and 6 months. She underwent hysterectomy at 8 months with no evidence of disease on pathology.

 

Four patients with a prior history of skin or testicular involvement had no evidence of disease by exam at day 28.

Three of the 9 patients relapsed with CD19+ disease. One had skin/medullary involvement and died at 38 months after CAR T-cell infusion. And 2 had medullary disease: 1 died at 17 months and 1 is alive at 28 months.

The remaining 6 patients are alive and well at a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 3 – 16 months) without recurrence of disease.

The investigators therefore concluded that single agent CAR T-cell immunotherapy can induce potent and durable response in patients with EM relapse of their ALL. 

Photo from Penn Medicine

CHICAGO—Outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are dismal, with the probability of event-free survival ranging from 15% to 70% after a first relapse to 15% to 20% after a second relapse.

“So novel therapies are obviously urgently needed,” Mala Kiran Talekar, MD, of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, affirmed. “And herein comes the role of CAR T cells as a breakthrough therapy for relapsed/refractory pediatric ALL.”

She presented the outcome of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in pediatric patients with non-CNS extramedullary (EM) relapse at the ASCO 2017 Annual meeting as abstract 10507.

The investigators had drawn the patient population for this analysis from 2 CAR studies, CTL019 and CTL119.

CTL019, which had already been completed, employed a murine CAR, and CTL119 is ongoing and uses a humanized CAR.

Of the 60 patients enrolled in CTL019, 56 (93%) achieved a complete response (CR) at day 28, and 100% had a CNS remission. Their 12-month overall survival (OS) was 79%.

“[K]eep in mind, when the study first started,” Dr Talekar said, “the patient population that had been referred to us was patients who had suffered a second or greater relapse or had been refractory to forms of treatment available to them, and the majority had been refractory to multiple therapies.”

The humanized CAR study, CTL119, is divided into 2 cohorts—one with CAR-naïve patients (n=22) and the other a CAR-retreatment arm (n=15) with patients who had received previous CAR therapy and relapsed.

Dr Talekar explained that the humanized CAR was made with the intention of decreasing rejection or loss of persistence of the T cells related to murine antigenicity.

Nine patients (60%) in the CAR-retreatment arm achieved a CR at day 28, and at 6 months, 78% experienced relapse-free survival (RFS) with a median follow-up of 12 months.

All of the CAR-naïve patients achieved CR at day 28, with 86% achieving RFS at 6 months, with a median follow-up of 10 months.

ALL with EM involvement

The investigators identified 10 pediatric patients treated in the murine (n=6) or humanized (n=4) trials who had received CAR therapy for isolated extramedullary disease or for combined bone marrow extramedullary (BM/EM) relapse of ALL.

They defined EM relapse as involvement of a non-CNS site confirmed by imaging with or without pathology within 12 months of CAR T-cell infusion. After infusion, patients had diagnostic imaging performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Of the 10 patients, 5 had active EM involvement at the time of infusion, 2 had isolated EM relapse—1 with parotid and multifocal bony lesions and 1 with testis and sinus lesions—and 5 had multiple sites of EM relapse.

The patients had 2 to 4 prior ALL relapses, 2 had prior local radiation to the EM site, and all 10 had received prior bone marrow transplants.

Three patients had an MLL rearrangement, 1 had hypodiploid ALL, and 1 had trisomy 21.

Nine of the 10 patients achieved MRD-negative CR at day 28.

One patient was not evaluable because his disease progressed within 2 weeks of CAR therapy in both the bone marrow and EM site. He died 6 weeks after the infusion.

Five patients evaluated by serial imaging had objective responses. Two had no evidence of EM disease by day 28, 2 had resolution by 3 months, and 1 had continued decrease in the size of her uterine mass at 3 and 6 months. She underwent hysterectomy at 8 months with no evidence of disease on pathology.

 

Four patients with a prior history of skin or testicular involvement had no evidence of disease by exam at day 28.

Three of the 9 patients relapsed with CD19+ disease. One had skin/medullary involvement and died at 38 months after CAR T-cell infusion. And 2 had medullary disease: 1 died at 17 months and 1 is alive at 28 months.

The remaining 6 patients are alive and well at a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 3 – 16 months) without recurrence of disease.

The investigators therefore concluded that single agent CAR T-cell immunotherapy can induce potent and durable response in patients with EM relapse of their ALL. 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Micrograph showing MDS

A 3-arm phase 2 study of azacitidine alone or in combination with lenalidomide or vorinostat in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) has shown the combination therapies to have similar overall response rates (ORR) to azacitidine monotherapy. Based on these findings, investigators did not choose either combination arm for phase 3 testing of overall survival.

However, patients with CMML treated with the azacitidine-lenalidomide combination had twice the ORR compared with azacitidine monotherapy, they reported.

And patients with certain mutations, such as DNMT3A, BCOR, and NRAS, had higher overall response rates, although only those with the DNMT3A mutation were significant.

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and colleagues reported these findings in the Journal of Clinical Oncology on behalf of the North American Intergroup Study SWOG S117.

Doses of azacitidine were the same for monotherapy and combination arms: 75 mg/m²/day intravenously or subcutaneously on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle.

Patients in the lenalidomide arm received 10 mg/day orally of that drug on days 1 to 21, and patients in the vorinostat arm received 300 mg twice daily orally on days 3 to 9.

Patient characteristics

Patients had MDS of IPSS Intermediate-2 or higher or bone marrow blasts 5% or greater. Patients with CMML had fewer than 20% blasts.

The investigators randomized 277 patients to receive either azacitidine alone (n=92), azacitidine plus lenalidomide (n=93), or azacitidine plus vorinostat (n=92).

 Patients were a median age of 70 years (range, 28 to 93). Eighty-five patients (31%) were female, 53 (19%) had CMML, and 18 (6%) had treatment-related MDS. More than half the patients were transfusion-dependent at baseline.

Baseline characteristics were similar across the 3 arms. The investigators noted that the baseline characteristics were also similar across the 90 centers participating in the study, whether they were an MDS Center of Excellence or a high-volume center.

Adverse events

 For the most part, therapy-related adverse events were similar across the arms.

Rates of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia and infection and infestations were similar for all 3 cohorts: 89% for azaciditine monotherapy, 91% for the lenalidomide combination, and 91% for the vorinostat combination.

However, the vorinostat arm had more grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities (14 patients, 15%) compared with the monotherapy arm (4 patients, 4%), P=0.02.

And patients receiving lenalidomide experienced more grade 3 or higher rash (14 patients, 16%) compared with patients receiving monotherapy (3 patients, 3%), P=0.005.

Patients in the combination arms stopped therapy at significantly higher rates than the monotherapy arm. Eight percent of patients receiving monotherapy stopped treatment compared with 20% in the lenalidomide arm and 21% in the vorinostat arm.

Patients in the combination arms also had more dose modifications not specified in the protocol than those in the monotherapy arm. Twenty-four percent receiving azacitidine monotherapy had non-protocol defined dose modifications, compared with 43% in the lenalidomide arm and 42% in the vorinostat arm.

Responses

The ORR for the entire study population was 38%.

Patients in the monotherapy arm had an ORR of 38%, those in the lenalidomide arm, 49%, and those in the vorinostate arm, 27%. Neither arm achieved significance compared with the monotherapy arm.

Patients who were treatment-naïve in the lenalidomide arm had a somewhat improved ORR compared with monotherapy, P=0.08.

The median duration of response for all cohorts was 15 months: 10 months for monotherapy, 14 months for lenalidomide, and 18 months for vorinostat.

Patients who were able to remain on therapy for 6 months or more in the lenalidomide arm achieved a higher ORR of 87% compared with monotherapy (62%, P=0.01). However, there was no difference in response duration with longer therapy.

 

The median overall survival (OS) was 17 months for all patients, 15 months for patients in the monotherapy group, 19 months for those in the lenalidomide arm, and 17 months for those in the vorinostat group.

CMML patients had similar OS across treatment arms, with the median not yet reached for patients in the monotherapy arm.

Subgroup responses

Patients with CMML in the lenalidomide arm had a significantly higher ORR than CMML patients in the monotherapy arm, 68% and 28%, respectively (P=0.02).

Median duration of response for CMML patients was 19 months, with no differences between the arms.

The investigators observed no differences in ORR for therapy-related MDS, IPSS subgroups, transfusion-dependent patients, or allogeneic transplant rates.

However, they noted ORR was better for patients with chromosome 5 abnormality regardless of treatment arm than for those without the abnormality (odds ratio, 2.17, P=0.008).

One hundred thirteen patients had mutational data available. They had a median number of 2 mutations (range, 0 to 7), with the most common being ASXL1 (n = 31), TET2 (n = 26), SRSF2 (n = 23), TP53 (n = 22), RUNX1 (n = 21), and U2AF1 (n = 19).

Patients with DNMT3A mutation had a significantly higher ORR than for patients without mutations, 67% and 34%, respectively P=0.025).

Patients with BCOR and NRAS mutations had numerically higher, but non-significant, ORR than non-mutated patients. Patients with BCOR mutation had a 57% ORR compared with 34% for non-mutated patients (P=0.23).  Patients with NRAS mutation had a 60% ORR compared with 36% for non-mutated patients (P=0.28).

Patients with mutations in TET2 (P = .046) and TP53 (P = .003) had a worse response duration than those without mutations.

Response duration was significantly better with fewer mutations. For 2 or more mutations, the hazard ration was 6.86 versus no mutations (P=0.01).

The investigators believed under-dosing may have compromised response and survival in the combination arms. They suggested that studies focused on the subgroups that seemed to benefit from the combinations should be conducted. 

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

CHICAGO—The 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions for survivors of childhood cancer has decreased over the past 30 years, from 12.7% for those diagnosed in the 1970s to 10.1% and 8.9% for those diagnosed in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. And the decreases were greatest for patients with Wilms’ tumor and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), followed by patients with astrocytoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Investigators of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) undertook a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 0 – 14 years diagnosed with cancer between 1970 and 1999. Their goal was to determine whether cancer therapy modifications have maintained cure rates while decreasing the risk of late effects of therapy.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, presented the findings at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) as abstract LBA10500.

Researchers analyzed data from 23,600 childhood cancer survivors in the CCSS who were alive 5 years after diagnosis. The patients had leukemia, lymphoma, CNS malignancies, Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, or soft-tissue/bone sarcoma.

Dr Gibson noted that while 83% of children with a malignancy achieve a 5-year survival, more than half develop at least one severe, disabling, life-threatening health condition by age 50.

The survivors were a median age at last follow-up of 28 years (range, 5-63) and the median time since diagnosis was 21 years (range, 5-43).

The investigators found significant decreases in severe health conditions in 6 diagnostic groups:

• Wilms tumor, decreased from 13% to 5% (P<0.0001)
• HL, decreased from 18% to 11% (P<0.0001)
• Astrocytoma, decreased from 15% to 9% (P=0.004)
• NHL, decreased from 10% to 6% (P=0.04)
• ALL, decreased from 9% to 7% (P=0.002)
• Ewings sarcoma, decreased from 19% to 10% (P=0.01)

They found no reductions in subsequent severe health conditions among survivors of neuroblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), soft tissue sarcoma, or osteosarcoma.

The investigators believe the decreases were driven mainly by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions, subsequent malignant neoplasms, gastrointestinal and neurological conditions, but not cardiac or pulmonary conditions.

They also analyzed the reduction in treatment intensities by decade for different diseases and found they correlated with the reduced incidence of serious chronic health conditions by 15 years after diagnosis.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study.

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

CHICAGO—The 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions for survivors of childhood cancer has decreased over the past 30 years, from 12.7% for those diagnosed in the 1970s to 10.1% and 8.9% for those diagnosed in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. And the decreases were greatest for patients with Wilms’ tumor and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), followed by patients with astrocytoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Investigators of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) undertook a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 0 – 14 years diagnosed with cancer between 1970 and 1999. Their goal was to determine whether cancer therapy modifications have maintained cure rates while decreasing the risk of late effects of therapy.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, presented the findings at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) as abstract LBA10500.

Researchers analyzed data from 23,600 childhood cancer survivors in the CCSS who were alive 5 years after diagnosis. The patients had leukemia, lymphoma, CNS malignancies, Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, or soft-tissue/bone sarcoma.

Dr Gibson noted that while 83% of children with a malignancy achieve a 5-year survival, more than half develop at least one severe, disabling, life-threatening health condition by age 50.

The survivors were a median age at last follow-up of 28 years (range, 5-63) and the median time since diagnosis was 21 years (range, 5-43).

The investigators found significant decreases in severe health conditions in 6 diagnostic groups:

• Wilms tumor, decreased from 13% to 5% (P<0.0001)
• HL, decreased from 18% to 11% (P<0.0001)
• Astrocytoma, decreased from 15% to 9% (P=0.004)
• NHL, decreased from 10% to 6% (P=0.04)
• ALL, decreased from 9% to 7% (P=0.002)
• Ewings sarcoma, decreased from 19% to 10% (P=0.01)

They found no reductions in subsequent severe health conditions among survivors of neuroblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), soft tissue sarcoma, or osteosarcoma.

The investigators believe the decreases were driven mainly by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions, subsequent malignant neoplasms, gastrointestinal and neurological conditions, but not cardiac or pulmonary conditions.

They also analyzed the reduction in treatment intensities by decade for different diseases and found they correlated with the reduced incidence of serious chronic health conditions by 15 years after diagnosis.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study.

Photo © ASCO/Danny Morton 2017

CHICAGO—The 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions for survivors of childhood cancer has decreased over the past 30 years, from 12.7% for those diagnosed in the 1970s to 10.1% and 8.9% for those diagnosed in the 1980s and 1990s, respectively. And the decreases were greatest for patients with Wilms’ tumor and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), followed by patients with astrocytoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Investigators of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) undertook a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 0 – 14 years diagnosed with cancer between 1970 and 1999. Their goal was to determine whether cancer therapy modifications have maintained cure rates while decreasing the risk of late effects of therapy.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, presented the findings at the 2017 annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) as abstract LBA10500.

Researchers analyzed data from 23,600 childhood cancer survivors in the CCSS who were alive 5 years after diagnosis. The patients had leukemia, lymphoma, CNS malignancies, Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, or soft-tissue/bone sarcoma.

Dr Gibson noted that while 83% of children with a malignancy achieve a 5-year survival, more than half develop at least one severe, disabling, life-threatening health condition by age 50.

The survivors were a median age at last follow-up of 28 years (range, 5-63) and the median time since diagnosis was 21 years (range, 5-43).

The investigators found significant decreases in severe health conditions in 6 diagnostic groups:

• Wilms tumor, decreased from 13% to 5% (P<0.0001)
• HL, decreased from 18% to 11% (P<0.0001)
• Astrocytoma, decreased from 15% to 9% (P=0.004)
• NHL, decreased from 10% to 6% (P=0.04)
• ALL, decreased from 9% to 7% (P=0.002)
• Ewings sarcoma, decreased from 19% to 10% (P=0.01)

They found no reductions in subsequent severe health conditions among survivors of neuroblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), soft tissue sarcoma, or osteosarcoma.

The investigators believe the decreases were driven mainly by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions, subsequent malignant neoplasms, gastrointestinal and neurological conditions, but not cardiac or pulmonary conditions.

They also analyzed the reduction in treatment intensities by decade for different diseases and found they correlated with the reduced incidence of serious chronic health conditions by 15 years after diagnosis.

The National Institutes of Health funded the study.

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4^th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.

The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.

For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.

In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4^th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.

The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.

The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients.  GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.

The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.

Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.

The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.

The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4^th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.

The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.

For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.

In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4^th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.

The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.

The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients.  GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.

The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.

Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.

The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.

The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

Photo courtesy of the CDC

A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4^th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.

The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.

For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.

In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4^th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.

The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.

The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients.  GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.

The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.

Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.

The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.

The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

Winship Cancer Institute

Physician, researcher, and educator H. Jean Khoury, MD, recently passed away.

He died on Monday, May 22, at the age of 50, after a year-long battle with esophageal cancer.

Dr Khoury led the division of hematology at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

He was considered an authority on hematologic malignancies, particularly chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Dr Khoury joined Winship Cancer Institute in 2004 as director of the Leukemia Service and associate professor in the Emory School of Medicine.

In 2009, he was promoted to professor and director of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, and he was later named to the R. Randall Rollins Chair in Oncology.

“We are all deeply grieving the loss of this remarkable man who gave so much to Winship,” said Walter J. Curran, Jr, MD, Winship Cancer Institute’s executive director.

“His enthusiasm and love for his patients and his commitment to lessening the burden of cancer for all has been unwavering throughout his life.”

A native of Beirut, Lebanon, Dr Khoury came to the Winship Cancer Institute from Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, where he served on the faculty after completing a fellowship in hematology-oncology.

He earned his medical degree from the Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium, and completed a residency in internal medicine at Memorial Medical Center in Savannah, Georgia.

Dr Khoury was recruited to Winship Cancer Institute by Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, former deputy director of the institute and now president of the American University of Beirut. What he first saw in Dr Khoury was someone who was “in the best sense, a disruptive presence.”

“What you always want in a leader is someone who’s not afraid to be wrong, to take risks,” Dr Khuri said. “Being wrong disrupts the pattern, and Jean was very brave. He didn’t like business as usual, and that showed in the way he took about redeveloping the hematology division, the leukemia program, and his interactions with the transplant division, with faculty, and all across Winship.”

According to his colleagues, Dr Khoury’s guiding principle was how to improve his patients’ lives, whether through research discoveries or through compassionate care.

Even after being diagnosed with cancer himself, Dr Khoury continued to see patients and carry on his work in the clinic and his research.

Dr Khoury pioneered the development of personalized treatment for CML patients and better approaches to improve quality of life for survivors. His research focused on drug development in leukemia and MDS, genomic abnormalities in leukemia, development of cost-effective practice models, and outcome analysis of bone marrow transplant.

He conducted several leukemia and transplant clinical trials, including trials that led to the approval of drugs such as imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

Dr Khoury received the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholarship, which allowed for establishment of the Hematological Disorders Tissue Bank at Emory, which now contains annotated germline and somatic samples from more than 800 patients with various hematologic disorders.

Dr Khoury died at home with his family by his side. He is survived by his wife, Angela, and 3 children, Mikhail, Iman, and Alya.

In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to a new fund at Winship Cancer Institute that will memorialize the life and work of Dr Khoury by supporting a fellowship program that was so meaningful to him.

Contributions, marked in Memory of Dr H. Jean Khoury, can be sent to Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Office of Gift Records, Emory University, 1762 Clifton Rd. NE, Suite 1400, Atlanta, GA 30322. Gifts can also be made online.

 

There will be a memorial service for Dr Khoury on Wednesday, May 31, at 4:30 pm at Glenn Memorial Church, 1652 North Decatur Road in Atlanta, Georgia. 

 

NEW YORK – Three courses of treatment with the novel combination of ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) was well tolerated and associated with a high rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative remission in the bone marrow of favorable-risk, treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, based on early results from an ongoing investigator-initiated phase II trial.

Of 29 patients, 24 had completed treatment and been followed for a median of 8.3 months. All 24 had an overall response rate (42% complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and 58% partial response), and 83% of patients achieved MRD negativity (100% with complete response and 71% with partial response), Nitin Jain, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

“It appears that the MRD-negativity rate continues to improve over time,” Dr. Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported. The MRD-negativity rate increased to 89% at 6 months, and 100% at 9 and 12 months.

All nine patients who reached the 12-month time point are off therapy and are being monitored, he said.

Patients with IGHV mutations generally have favorable long-term outcomes with 10-year progression-free survival rates greater than 60% after receiving standard first-line therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). However, ibrutinib is approved for patients with CLL, and obinutuzumab, a glycoengineered type II CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in the CLL11 trial, Dr. Jain said.

Further, data from the HELIOS trial indicated that combining targeted therapies with chemoimmunotherapy is safe and effective.

iFCG was developed with the intent to limit fludarabine and cyclophosphamide to three courses, potentially reducing short- and long-term toxicity, while maintaining efficacy through the addition of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab, he explained.

Of note, higher pretreatment levels of beta-2 microglobulin were associated with a lower MRD-negativity rate after 3 cycles of iFCG, he said.

In six patients with beta-2 microglobulin of 4 mg/dL or greater, the rate was 50%, compared with 94% in 18 patients with beta-2 microglobulin less than 4 mg/dL.

The patients in the current analysis had a median age of 60 years and adequate organ function. All had IGHV mutation and did not have del(17p) or TP53 mutation. They received three courses of iFCG, including ibrutinib at 420 mg once daily continuously starting at day 1 of course 1 (C1D1); obinutuzumab at 100 mg C1D1, 900 mg C1D2, 1000 mg C1D8, 1000 mg C1D15, 1000 mg C2D1, and 1000 mg C3D1; fludarabine at 25 mg/m² daily for 3 days each course; and cyclophosphamide at 250mg/m² daily for 3 days each course.

Per study protocol, all patients receive ibrutinib with obinutuzumab for courses 4-6. Patients meeting the primary endpoint of complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and bone marrow MRD negativity received ibrutinib monotherapy for courses 7-12. Those who did not achieve the primary endpoint received six more courses of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab. All patients who are MRD negative at 1 year stop all therapy, including ibrutinib, while those who are MRD positive at 1 year may continue ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression.

The target bone marrow MRD-negative rate after 3 cycles of iFCG is 45%. The historic C3 bone marrow MRD-negative rate with standard FCR therapy in patients with IGHV mutation is 26%, Dr. Jain said, noting that the rate in the current analysis compared favorably with both.

The treatment thus far has been generally well tolerated. Toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 9 and 12 patients, respectively), thrombocytopenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 12 and 1 patients, respectively), ALT/AST (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 3 and 1 patients respectively), atrial fibrillation (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), arthralgia (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), and infusion-related reaction (grade 2 and 3 occurring in 9 patients and 1 patient, respectively).

Infections included herpes zoster, acute cholecystitis, pulmonary mycobacterium avium complex infection, and pneumocystis pneumonia, which occurred in 1 patient each, and neutropenic fever, which occurred in 4 patients.

“Notably, no patient has progressed or died in the study so far,” Dr. Jain said.

The trial continues to enroll patients, with plans for enrolling a total of 45.

Dr. Jain has received research support from and/or served on an advisory board for Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Abbvie, Prizer, Incyte, BMS, Infinity, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Servier, Novartis Novimmune, and Adaptive Biotechnologies.

[email protected]

 

NEW YORK – Three courses of treatment with the novel combination of ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) was well tolerated and associated with a high rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative remission in the bone marrow of favorable-risk, treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, based on early results from an ongoing investigator-initiated phase II trial.

Of 29 patients, 24 had completed treatment and been followed for a median of 8.3 months. All 24 had an overall response rate (42% complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and 58% partial response), and 83% of patients achieved MRD negativity (100% with complete response and 71% with partial response), Nitin Jain, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

“It appears that the MRD-negativity rate continues to improve over time,” Dr. Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported. The MRD-negativity rate increased to 89% at 6 months, and 100% at 9 and 12 months.

All nine patients who reached the 12-month time point are off therapy and are being monitored, he said.

Patients with IGHV mutations generally have favorable long-term outcomes with 10-year progression-free survival rates greater than 60% after receiving standard first-line therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). However, ibrutinib is approved for patients with CLL, and obinutuzumab, a glycoengineered type II CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in the CLL11 trial, Dr. Jain said.

Further, data from the HELIOS trial indicated that combining targeted therapies with chemoimmunotherapy is safe and effective.

iFCG was developed with the intent to limit fludarabine and cyclophosphamide to three courses, potentially reducing short- and long-term toxicity, while maintaining efficacy through the addition of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab, he explained.

Of note, higher pretreatment levels of beta-2 microglobulin were associated with a lower MRD-negativity rate after 3 cycles of iFCG, he said.

In six patients with beta-2 microglobulin of 4 mg/dL or greater, the rate was 50%, compared with 94% in 18 patients with beta-2 microglobulin less than 4 mg/dL.

The patients in the current analysis had a median age of 60 years and adequate organ function. All had IGHV mutation and did not have del(17p) or TP53 mutation. They received three courses of iFCG, including ibrutinib at 420 mg once daily continuously starting at day 1 of course 1 (C1D1); obinutuzumab at 100 mg C1D1, 900 mg C1D2, 1000 mg C1D8, 1000 mg C1D15, 1000 mg C2D1, and 1000 mg C3D1; fludarabine at 25 mg/m² daily for 3 days each course; and cyclophosphamide at 250mg/m² daily for 3 days each course.

Per study protocol, all patients receive ibrutinib with obinutuzumab for courses 4-6. Patients meeting the primary endpoint of complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and bone marrow MRD negativity received ibrutinib monotherapy for courses 7-12. Those who did not achieve the primary endpoint received six more courses of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab. All patients who are MRD negative at 1 year stop all therapy, including ibrutinib, while those who are MRD positive at 1 year may continue ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression.

The target bone marrow MRD-negative rate after 3 cycles of iFCG is 45%. The historic C3 bone marrow MRD-negative rate with standard FCR therapy in patients with IGHV mutation is 26%, Dr. Jain said, noting that the rate in the current analysis compared favorably with both.

The treatment thus far has been generally well tolerated. Toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 9 and 12 patients, respectively), thrombocytopenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 12 and 1 patients, respectively), ALT/AST (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 3 and 1 patients respectively), atrial fibrillation (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), arthralgia (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), and infusion-related reaction (grade 2 and 3 occurring in 9 patients and 1 patient, respectively).

Infections included herpes zoster, acute cholecystitis, pulmonary mycobacterium avium complex infection, and pneumocystis pneumonia, which occurred in 1 patient each, and neutropenic fever, which occurred in 4 patients.

“Notably, no patient has progressed or died in the study so far,” Dr. Jain said.

The trial continues to enroll patients, with plans for enrolling a total of 45.

Dr. Jain has received research support from and/or served on an advisory board for Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Abbvie, Prizer, Incyte, BMS, Infinity, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Servier, Novartis Novimmune, and Adaptive Biotechnologies.

[email protected]

 

NEW YORK – Three courses of treatment with the novel combination of ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) was well tolerated and associated with a high rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative remission in the bone marrow of favorable-risk, treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, based on early results from an ongoing investigator-initiated phase II trial.

Of 29 patients, 24 had completed treatment and been followed for a median of 8.3 months. All 24 had an overall response rate (42% complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and 58% partial response), and 83% of patients achieved MRD negativity (100% with complete response and 71% with partial response), Nitin Jain, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

“It appears that the MRD-negativity rate continues to improve over time,” Dr. Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, reported. The MRD-negativity rate increased to 89% at 6 months, and 100% at 9 and 12 months.

All nine patients who reached the 12-month time point are off therapy and are being monitored, he said.

Patients with IGHV mutations generally have favorable long-term outcomes with 10-year progression-free survival rates greater than 60% after receiving standard first-line therapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). However, ibrutinib is approved for patients with CLL, and obinutuzumab, a glycoengineered type II CD20 monoclonal antibody, was superior to rituximab in the CLL11 trial, Dr. Jain said.

Further, data from the HELIOS trial indicated that combining targeted therapies with chemoimmunotherapy is safe and effective.

iFCG was developed with the intent to limit fludarabine and cyclophosphamide to three courses, potentially reducing short- and long-term toxicity, while maintaining efficacy through the addition of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab, he explained.

Of note, higher pretreatment levels of beta-2 microglobulin were associated with a lower MRD-negativity rate after 3 cycles of iFCG, he said.

In six patients with beta-2 microglobulin of 4 mg/dL or greater, the rate was 50%, compared with 94% in 18 patients with beta-2 microglobulin less than 4 mg/dL.

The patients in the current analysis had a median age of 60 years and adequate organ function. All had IGHV mutation and did not have del(17p) or TP53 mutation. They received three courses of iFCG, including ibrutinib at 420 mg once daily continuously starting at day 1 of course 1 (C1D1); obinutuzumab at 100 mg C1D1, 900 mg C1D2, 1000 mg C1D8, 1000 mg C1D15, 1000 mg C2D1, and 1000 mg C3D1; fludarabine at 25 mg/m² daily for 3 days each course; and cyclophosphamide at 250mg/m² daily for 3 days each course.

Per study protocol, all patients receive ibrutinib with obinutuzumab for courses 4-6. Patients meeting the primary endpoint of complete response/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and bone marrow MRD negativity received ibrutinib monotherapy for courses 7-12. Those who did not achieve the primary endpoint received six more courses of ibrutinib and obinutuzumab. All patients who are MRD negative at 1 year stop all therapy, including ibrutinib, while those who are MRD positive at 1 year may continue ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression.

The target bone marrow MRD-negative rate after 3 cycles of iFCG is 45%. The historic C3 bone marrow MRD-negative rate with standard FCR therapy in patients with IGHV mutation is 26%, Dr. Jain said, noting that the rate in the current analysis compared favorably with both.

The treatment thus far has been generally well tolerated. Toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 9 and 12 patients, respectively), thrombocytopenia (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 12 and 1 patients, respectively), ALT/AST (grade 3 and 4 occurring in 3 and 1 patients respectively), atrial fibrillation (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), arthralgia (grade 3 occurring in 1 patient), and infusion-related reaction (grade 2 and 3 occurring in 9 patients and 1 patient, respectively).

Infections included herpes zoster, acute cholecystitis, pulmonary mycobacterium avium complex infection, and pneumocystis pneumonia, which occurred in 1 patient each, and neutropenic fever, which occurred in 4 patients.

“Notably, no patient has progressed or died in the study so far,” Dr. Jain said.

The trial continues to enroll patients, with plans for enrolling a total of 45.

Dr. Jain has received research support from and/or served on an advisory board for Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Abbvie, Prizer, Incyte, BMS, Infinity, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Servier, Novartis Novimmune, and Adaptive Biotechnologies.

[email protected]

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Commission (EC) has granted orphan designation to GMI-1271 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

GMI-1271 is an E-selectin antagonist being developed by GlycoMimetics, Inc.

The product also has orphan designation, fast track designation, and breakthrough therapy designation in the US.

GMI-1271 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial of patients with relapsed or refractory AML and patients age 60 and older with newly diagnosed AML.

The patients are receiving GM-1271 in combination with chemotherapy. The relapsed/refractory group is receiving mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine. The newly diagnosed patients are receiving cytarabine and idarubicin (7+3).

GlycoMimetics plans to present data from this trial at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting as abstracts 2520 and 2560.

The company also plans to present the research at the 22nd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstracts P547 and P203.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The European Medicines Agency adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the EC for a final decision. The EC typically makes a decision within 30 days of that submission. 

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Commission (EC) has granted orphan designation to GMI-1271 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

GMI-1271 is an E-selectin antagonist being developed by GlycoMimetics, Inc.

The product also has orphan designation, fast track designation, and breakthrough therapy designation in the US.

GMI-1271 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial of patients with relapsed or refractory AML and patients age 60 and older with newly diagnosed AML.

The patients are receiving GM-1271 in combination with chemotherapy. The relapsed/refractory group is receiving mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine. The newly diagnosed patients are receiving cytarabine and idarubicin (7+3).

GlycoMimetics plans to present data from this trial at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting as abstracts 2520 and 2560.

The company also plans to present the research at the 22nd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstracts P547 and P203.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The European Medicines Agency adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the EC for a final decision. The EC typically makes a decision within 30 days of that submission. 

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Commission (EC) has granted orphan designation to GMI-1271 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

GMI-1271 is an E-selectin antagonist being developed by GlycoMimetics, Inc.

The product also has orphan designation, fast track designation, and breakthrough therapy designation in the US.

GMI-1271 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial of patients with relapsed or refractory AML and patients age 60 and older with newly diagnosed AML.

The patients are receiving GM-1271 in combination with chemotherapy. The relapsed/refractory group is receiving mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine. The newly diagnosed patients are receiving cytarabine and idarubicin (7+3).

GlycoMimetics plans to present data from this trial at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting as abstracts 2520 and 2560.

The company also plans to present the research at the 22nd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA) as abstracts P547 and P203.

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval.

The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The European Medicines Agency adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the EC for a final decision. The EC typically makes a decision within 30 days of that submission. 

AML cells

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended orphan designation for Actimab-A, a product intended to treat patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are over the age of 60 and are ineligible for standard induction therapy.

Actimab-A targets CD33, a protein expressed on the surface of AML cells, via the monoclonal antibody, HuM195, which carries the cytotoxic radioisotope actinium-225 to the AML cells.

Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing Actimab-A, is testing the drug in a phase 2 trial.

Results from a phase 1 trial of the drug were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, researchers reported results in 18 patients who had been newly diagnosed with AML and were age 60 and older. Their median age was 77 (range, 68-87).

The patients received Actimab-A in combination with low-dose cytarabine. Actimab-A was given at 0.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), 1 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6), 1.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), or 2 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6).

Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Both had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks after therapy. One patient was in the 1 µCi/kg/fraction cohort, and the other was in the 2 µCi/kg/fraction cohort.

The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, but 2 µCi/kg/fraction was chosen as the phase 2 dose.

Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=9), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=5), other infections (n=3), atrial fibrillation/syncope (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), generalized fatigue (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), mucositis (n=1), and rectal hemorrhage (n=1).

Twenty-eight percent of patients (5/18) had objective responses to treatment. Two patients achieved a complete response (CR), 1 had a CR with incomplete platelet recovery, and 2 had a CR with incomplete marrow recovery.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 4.1-16.9).

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days. 

AML cells

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended orphan designation for Actimab-A, a product intended to treat patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are over the age of 60 and are ineligible for standard induction therapy.

Actimab-A targets CD33, a protein expressed on the surface of AML cells, via the monoclonal antibody, HuM195, which carries the cytotoxic radioisotope actinium-225 to the AML cells.

Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing Actimab-A, is testing the drug in a phase 2 trial.

Results from a phase 1 trial of the drug were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, researchers reported results in 18 patients who had been newly diagnosed with AML and were age 60 and older. Their median age was 77 (range, 68-87).

The patients received Actimab-A in combination with low-dose cytarabine. Actimab-A was given at 0.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), 1 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6), 1.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), or 2 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6).

Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Both had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks after therapy. One patient was in the 1 µCi/kg/fraction cohort, and the other was in the 2 µCi/kg/fraction cohort.

The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, but 2 µCi/kg/fraction was chosen as the phase 2 dose.

Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=9), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=5), other infections (n=3), atrial fibrillation/syncope (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), generalized fatigue (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), mucositis (n=1), and rectal hemorrhage (n=1).

Twenty-eight percent of patients (5/18) had objective responses to treatment. Two patients achieved a complete response (CR), 1 had a CR with incomplete platelet recovery, and 2 had a CR with incomplete marrow recovery.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 4.1-16.9).

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days. 

AML cells

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended orphan designation for Actimab-A, a product intended to treat patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are over the age of 60 and are ineligible for standard induction therapy.

Actimab-A targets CD33, a protein expressed on the surface of AML cells, via the monoclonal antibody, HuM195, which carries the cytotoxic radioisotope actinium-225 to the AML cells.

Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing Actimab-A, is testing the drug in a phase 2 trial.

Results from a phase 1 trial of the drug were presented at the 2016 ASH Annual Meeting.

At that time, researchers reported results in 18 patients who had been newly diagnosed with AML and were age 60 and older. Their median age was 77 (range, 68-87).

The patients received Actimab-A in combination with low-dose cytarabine. Actimab-A was given at 0.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), 1 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6), 1.5 μCi/kg/fraction (n=3), or 2 μCi/kg/fraction (n=6).

Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Both had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks after therapy. One patient was in the 1 µCi/kg/fraction cohort, and the other was in the 2 µCi/kg/fraction cohort.

The maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, but 2 µCi/kg/fraction was chosen as the phase 2 dose.

Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=9), febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=5), other infections (n=3), atrial fibrillation/syncope (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), generalized fatigue (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), mucositis (n=1), and rectal hemorrhage (n=1).

Twenty-eight percent of patients (5/18) had objective responses to treatment. Two patients achieved a complete response (CR), 1 had a CR with incomplete platelet recovery, and 2 had a CR with incomplete marrow recovery.

The median duration of response was 9.1 months (range, 4.1-16.9).

About orphan designation

Orphan designation provides regulatory and financial incentives for companies to develop and market therapies that treat life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union, and where no satisfactory treatment is available.

Orphan designation provides a 10-year period of marketing exclusivity if the drug receives regulatory approval. The designation also provides incentives for companies seeking protocol assistance from the EMA during the product development phase and direct access to the centralized authorization procedure.

The EMA adopts an opinion on the granting of orphan drug designation, and that opinion is submitted to the European Commission for a final decision. The European Commission typically makes a decision within 30 days. 

Photo courtesy of the CDC

New research provides an explanation for the fact that US patients with hematologic malignancies are less likely to enroll in hospice care than patients with solid tumor malignancies.

Results of a national survey suggest that concerns about the adequacy of hospice may prevent hematologic oncologists from referring their patients.

Researchers say this finding, published in Cancer, points to potential means of improving end-of-life care for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Oreofe Odejide, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and her colleagues carried out this study.

The team conducted a survey of a national sample of hematologic oncologists listed in the publicly available clinical directory of the American Society of Hematology.

More than 57% of physicians who were contacted provided responses, for a total of 349 respondents.

The survey included questions about views regarding the helpfulness and adequacy of home hospice services for patients with hematologic malignancies, as well as factors that would impact oncologists’ likelihood of referring patients to hospice.

More than 68% of hematologic oncologists strongly agreed that hospice care is “helpful” for patients with hematologic malignancies.

However, 46% of the oncologists felt that home hospice is “inadequate” for the needs of patients with hematologic malignancies, when compared to inpatient hospice.

Still, most of the respondents who believed home hospice is inadequate said they would be more likely to refer patients if platelet and red blood cell transfusions were readily available.

“Our findings are important as they shed light on factors that are potential barriers to hospice referrals,” Dr Odejide said. “These findings can be employed to develop targeted interventions to address hospice underuse for patients with blood cancers.” 

Photo courtesy of the CDC

New research provides an explanation for the fact that US patients with hematologic malignancies are less likely to enroll in hospice care than patients with solid tumor malignancies.

Results of a national survey suggest that concerns about the adequacy of hospice may prevent hematologic oncologists from referring their patients.

Researchers say this finding, published in Cancer, points to potential means of improving end-of-life care for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Oreofe Odejide, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and her colleagues carried out this study.

The team conducted a survey of a national sample of hematologic oncologists listed in the publicly available clinical directory of the American Society of Hematology.

More than 57% of physicians who were contacted provided responses, for a total of 349 respondents.

The survey included questions about views regarding the helpfulness and adequacy of home hospice services for patients with hematologic malignancies, as well as factors that would impact oncologists’ likelihood of referring patients to hospice.

More than 68% of hematologic oncologists strongly agreed that hospice care is “helpful” for patients with hematologic malignancies.

However, 46% of the oncologists felt that home hospice is “inadequate” for the needs of patients with hematologic malignancies, when compared to inpatient hospice.

Still, most of the respondents who believed home hospice is inadequate said they would be more likely to refer patients if platelet and red blood cell transfusions were readily available.

“Our findings are important as they shed light on factors that are potential barriers to hospice referrals,” Dr Odejide said. “These findings can be employed to develop targeted interventions to address hospice underuse for patients with blood cancers.” 

Photo courtesy of the CDC

New research provides an explanation for the fact that US patients with hematologic malignancies are less likely to enroll in hospice care than patients with solid tumor malignancies.

Results of a national survey suggest that concerns about the adequacy of hospice may prevent hematologic oncologists from referring their patients.

Researchers say this finding, published in Cancer, points to potential means of improving end-of-life care for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Oreofe Odejide, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, and her colleagues carried out this study.

The team conducted a survey of a national sample of hematologic oncologists listed in the publicly available clinical directory of the American Society of Hematology.

More than 57% of physicians who were contacted provided responses, for a total of 349 respondents.

The survey included questions about views regarding the helpfulness and adequacy of home hospice services for patients with hematologic malignancies, as well as factors that would impact oncologists’ likelihood of referring patients to hospice.

More than 68% of hematologic oncologists strongly agreed that hospice care is “helpful” for patients with hematologic malignancies.

However, 46% of the oncologists felt that home hospice is “inadequate” for the needs of patients with hematologic malignancies, when compared to inpatient hospice.

Still, most of the respondents who believed home hospice is inadequate said they would be more likely to refer patients if platelet and red blood cell transfusions were readily available.

“Our findings are important as they shed light on factors that are potential barriers to hospice referrals,” Dr Odejide said. “These findings can be employed to develop targeted interventions to address hospice underuse for patients with blood cancers.”