Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Photo courtesy of the CDC

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has issued recommendations addressing the needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations with cancer.

The recommendations are designed to focus attention on the challenges facing the SGM community—including discrimination and greater risk of anxiety and depression, resulting in disparate care—and concrete steps that can help minimize health disparities among SGM individuals.

The recommendations were published in a policy statement in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Sexual and gender minorities face unique challenges related to cancer risk, discrimination, and other psychosocial issues,” said ASCO President Daniel F. Hayes, MD.

“Compounding these challenges is the fact that providers may have a lack of knowledge and sensitivity about the health risks and health needs facing their SGM patients.”

SGMs include individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (also referred to as those with differences in sex development).

ASCO’s policy statement notes that SGM populations bear a disproportionate cancer burden stemming from several factors, including:

• Lower rates of cancer screening, in part due to lower rates of insurance coverage, exclusion from traditional screening campaigns, and previous experience of discrimination in the healthcare system
• A hesitancy on the part of SGM patients to disclose their sexual orientation to providers due to a fear of stigmatization, which can create additional barriers to care.

ASCO’s statement calls for a coordinated effort to address health disparities among SGM populations, including:

• Increased patient access to culturally competent support services
• Expanded cancer prevention education for SGM individuals
• Robust policies prohibiting discrimination
• Adequate insurance coverage to meet the needs of SGM individuals affected by cancer
• Inclusion of SGM status as a required data element in cancer registries and clinical trials
• Increased focus on SGM populations in cancer research.

“Our objective was to raise awareness among oncology providers, patients, policy makers, and other stakeholders about the cancer care needs of SGM populations and the barriers that SGM individuals face in getting the highest-quality care,” said Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, lead author of the policy statement and a professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

“To address these barriers, a coordinated effort is needed to enhance education for patients and providers, to improve outreach and support, and to encourage productive policy and legislative action.”

Photo courtesy of the CDC

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has issued recommendations addressing the needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations with cancer.

The recommendations are designed to focus attention on the challenges facing the SGM community—including discrimination and greater risk of anxiety and depression, resulting in disparate care—and concrete steps that can help minimize health disparities among SGM individuals.

The recommendations were published in a policy statement in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Sexual and gender minorities face unique challenges related to cancer risk, discrimination, and other psychosocial issues,” said ASCO President Daniel F. Hayes, MD.

“Compounding these challenges is the fact that providers may have a lack of knowledge and sensitivity about the health risks and health needs facing their SGM patients.”

SGMs include individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (also referred to as those with differences in sex development).

ASCO’s policy statement notes that SGM populations bear a disproportionate cancer burden stemming from several factors, including:

• Lower rates of cancer screening, in part due to lower rates of insurance coverage, exclusion from traditional screening campaigns, and previous experience of discrimination in the healthcare system
• A hesitancy on the part of SGM patients to disclose their sexual orientation to providers due to a fear of stigmatization, which can create additional barriers to care.

ASCO’s statement calls for a coordinated effort to address health disparities among SGM populations, including:

• Increased patient access to culturally competent support services
• Expanded cancer prevention education for SGM individuals
• Robust policies prohibiting discrimination
• Adequate insurance coverage to meet the needs of SGM individuals affected by cancer
• Inclusion of SGM status as a required data element in cancer registries and clinical trials
• Increased focus on SGM populations in cancer research.

“Our objective was to raise awareness among oncology providers, patients, policy makers, and other stakeholders about the cancer care needs of SGM populations and the barriers that SGM individuals face in getting the highest-quality care,” said Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, lead author of the policy statement and a professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

“To address these barriers, a coordinated effort is needed to enhance education for patients and providers, to improve outreach and support, and to encourage productive policy and legislative action.”

Photo courtesy of the CDC

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has issued recommendations addressing the needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations with cancer.

The recommendations are designed to focus attention on the challenges facing the SGM community—including discrimination and greater risk of anxiety and depression, resulting in disparate care—and concrete steps that can help minimize health disparities among SGM individuals.

The recommendations were published in a policy statement in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Sexual and gender minorities face unique challenges related to cancer risk, discrimination, and other psychosocial issues,” said ASCO President Daniel F. Hayes, MD.

“Compounding these challenges is the fact that providers may have a lack of knowledge and sensitivity about the health risks and health needs facing their SGM patients.”

SGMs include individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (also referred to as those with differences in sex development).

ASCO’s policy statement notes that SGM populations bear a disproportionate cancer burden stemming from several factors, including:

• Lower rates of cancer screening, in part due to lower rates of insurance coverage, exclusion from traditional screening campaigns, and previous experience of discrimination in the healthcare system
• A hesitancy on the part of SGM patients to disclose their sexual orientation to providers due to a fear of stigmatization, which can create additional barriers to care.

ASCO’s statement calls for a coordinated effort to address health disparities among SGM populations, including:

• Increased patient access to culturally competent support services
• Expanded cancer prevention education for SGM individuals
• Robust policies prohibiting discrimination
• Adequate insurance coverage to meet the needs of SGM individuals affected by cancer
• Inclusion of SGM status as a required data element in cancer registries and clinical trials
• Increased focus on SGM populations in cancer research.

“Our objective was to raise awareness among oncology providers, patients, policy makers, and other stakeholders about the cancer care needs of SGM populations and the barriers that SGM individuals face in getting the highest-quality care,” said Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, lead author of the policy statement and a professor at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

“To address these barriers, a coordinated effort is needed to enhance education for patients and providers, to improve outreach and support, and to encourage productive policy and legislative action.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A report on cancer in the US suggests the incidence of leukemia and myeloma has been on the rise in recent years, but the incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has been on the decline.

Meanwhile, annual death rates for leukemia and NHL have decreased, and annual death rates for myeloma have decreased in men but not in women.

Furthermore, patients with leukemia, NHL, and myeloma have seen a substantial improvement in 5-year survival rates in recent years relative to patients in the late 1970s.

These findings are part of the Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2014, which has been published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

This report is released each year, but the current edition includes a special section focused on survival.

“While trends in death rates are the most commonly used measure to assess progress against cancer, survival trends are also an important measure to evaluate progress in improvement of cancer outcomes,” said Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, of the American Cancer Society.

“We last included a special section on cancer survival in 2004, and, as we found then, survival improved over time for almost all cancers at every stage of diagnosis.”

For the current report, researchers calculated the 5-year average annual percent changes (AAPCs) for 2009 to 2013 for cancer incidence and for 2010 to 2014 for cancer mortality.

Cancer incidence (2009-2013)

In women, the AAPC increased 1.5% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.5% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 2.2% for myeloma (P<0.05).

In men, the AAPC increased 1.7% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.2% for NHL, and increased 2.8% for myeloma (P<0.05).

Cancer mortality (2010-2014)

In women, the AAPC decreased 1.2% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.2% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 0.5% for myeloma.

In men, the AAPC decreased 1.0% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.0% for NHL (P<0.05), and decreased 0.9% for myeloma (P<0.05).

5-year survival

The researchers compared 5-year relative survival for cancers diagnosed from 1975 to 1977 and those diagnosed from 2006 to 2012.

The absolute percentage change over time (for both sexes combined) was 26.1% for NHL, 25.7% for myeloma, and 28.5% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 1975-1977 was 46.5% for NHL, 24.6% for myeloma, and 34.2% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 2006-2012 was 72.6% for NHL, 50.2% for myeloma, and 62.7% for leukemia.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A report on cancer in the US suggests the incidence of leukemia and myeloma has been on the rise in recent years, but the incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has been on the decline.

Meanwhile, annual death rates for leukemia and NHL have decreased, and annual death rates for myeloma have decreased in men but not in women.

Furthermore, patients with leukemia, NHL, and myeloma have seen a substantial improvement in 5-year survival rates in recent years relative to patients in the late 1970s.

These findings are part of the Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2014, which has been published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

This report is released each year, but the current edition includes a special section focused on survival.

“While trends in death rates are the most commonly used measure to assess progress against cancer, survival trends are also an important measure to evaluate progress in improvement of cancer outcomes,” said Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, of the American Cancer Society.

“We last included a special section on cancer survival in 2004, and, as we found then, survival improved over time for almost all cancers at every stage of diagnosis.”

For the current report, researchers calculated the 5-year average annual percent changes (AAPCs) for 2009 to 2013 for cancer incidence and for 2010 to 2014 for cancer mortality.

Cancer incidence (2009-2013)

In women, the AAPC increased 1.5% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.5% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 2.2% for myeloma (P<0.05).

In men, the AAPC increased 1.7% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.2% for NHL, and increased 2.8% for myeloma (P<0.05).

Cancer mortality (2010-2014)

In women, the AAPC decreased 1.2% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.2% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 0.5% for myeloma.

In men, the AAPC decreased 1.0% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.0% for NHL (P<0.05), and decreased 0.9% for myeloma (P<0.05).

5-year survival

The researchers compared 5-year relative survival for cancers diagnosed from 1975 to 1977 and those diagnosed from 2006 to 2012.

The absolute percentage change over time (for both sexes combined) was 26.1% for NHL, 25.7% for myeloma, and 28.5% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 1975-1977 was 46.5% for NHL, 24.6% for myeloma, and 34.2% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 2006-2012 was 72.6% for NHL, 50.2% for myeloma, and 62.7% for leukemia.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A report on cancer in the US suggests the incidence of leukemia and myeloma has been on the rise in recent years, but the incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has been on the decline.

Meanwhile, annual death rates for leukemia and NHL have decreased, and annual death rates for myeloma have decreased in men but not in women.

Furthermore, patients with leukemia, NHL, and myeloma have seen a substantial improvement in 5-year survival rates in recent years relative to patients in the late 1970s.

These findings are part of the Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2014, which has been published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

This report is released each year, but the current edition includes a special section focused on survival.

“While trends in death rates are the most commonly used measure to assess progress against cancer, survival trends are also an important measure to evaluate progress in improvement of cancer outcomes,” said Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, of the American Cancer Society.

“We last included a special section on cancer survival in 2004, and, as we found then, survival improved over time for almost all cancers at every stage of diagnosis.”

For the current report, researchers calculated the 5-year average annual percent changes (AAPCs) for 2009 to 2013 for cancer incidence and for 2010 to 2014 for cancer mortality.

Cancer incidence (2009-2013)

In women, the AAPC increased 1.5% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.5% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 2.2% for myeloma (P<0.05).

In men, the AAPC increased 1.7% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 0.2% for NHL, and increased 2.8% for myeloma (P<0.05).

Cancer mortality (2010-2014)

In women, the AAPC decreased 1.2% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.2% for NHL (P<0.05), and increased 0.5% for myeloma.

In men, the AAPC decreased 1.0% for leukemia (P<0.05), decreased 2.0% for NHL (P<0.05), and decreased 0.9% for myeloma (P<0.05).

5-year survival

The researchers compared 5-year relative survival for cancers diagnosed from 1975 to 1977 and those diagnosed from 2006 to 2012.

The absolute percentage change over time (for both sexes combined) was 26.1% for NHL, 25.7% for myeloma, and 28.5% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 1975-1977 was 46.5% for NHL, 24.6% for myeloma, and 34.2% for leukemia.

Five-year survival for patients diagnosed in 2006-2012 was 72.6% for NHL, 50.2% for myeloma, and 62.7% for leukemia.

B-cell precursor ALL

Blinatumomab has demonstrated activity in high-risk patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

This phase 2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Blinatumomab produced a complete response (CR) in 31% of these patients, the median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, and the median overall survival was 7.1 months.

The most common adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia, neurologic events, febrile neutropenia, and headache.

“Patients with Ph+ relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL typically have lower remission rates, poor long-term prognosis, and shorter duration of remission than patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative disease, and are especially in need of new treatment options beyond TKIs,” said study author Anthony Stein, MD, of City of Hope in Duarte, California.

“Results from this phase 2 study showed blinatumomab induced complete remission in these high-risk patients, regardless of prior TKI therapy or mutational status . . . .”

This study was supported by Amgen, the company developing and marketing blinatumomab.

The trial enrolled 45 patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL. Fifty-nine percent of patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Forty-six percent had ABL1 kinase domain mutations, and 27% had the T315I mutation.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 23-78), and 55% were male. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage was 80% (range, 6% to 98%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received at least 2 prior TKIs. All patients were refractory to (56%), had relapsed on (33%), or progressed after (11%) TKI therapy. Forty-four percent of patients had undergone an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).

The patients received blinatumomab in 28-day cycles by continuous intravenous infusion. The median number of cycles received was 2 (range, 1-5).

Efficacy

Thirty-six percent of patients (n=16) had a CR or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first 2 cycles of treatment. For 31% of patients (n=14), their best response was a CR.

Eighty-eight percent of patients who achieved a CR/CRh (n=14) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.

Forty percent of patients with a T315I mutation had a CR/CRh (4/10), and all of these responders were MRD negative.

Seven responders (44%) went on to allo-HSCT, 6 of whom were transplant-naïve.

Eight of the 16 responders (50%) ultimately relapsed. Their median time to relapse was 6.7 months. Three patients relapsed during treatment, 2 relapsed without undergoing allo-HSCT, and 3 relapsed after allo-HSCT.

Seven responders (44%) were still alive and had not relapsed at last follow-up. The remaining responder died in CR after allo-HSCT.

The median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT. And the median overall survival was 7.1 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT.

Safety

The most common AEs were pyrexia (58%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Nearly half of patients (47%) had neurologic events.

Eighty-two percent of patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs. The most common were febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and anemia (16%).

Forty-four percent of patients had grade 3 or higher AEs that were considered possibly related to blinatumomab. The most common were febrile neutropenia and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (11% each).

Five patients had fatal AEs—multiorgan failure, sepsis, septic shock, cerebral hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. The case of septic shock was considered related to treatment with blinatumomab.

Three patients developed cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), but none of them had their treatment interrupted or discontinued as a result.

 

Three patients had grade 3 neurologic events, and 1 of these events (aphasia) required temporary treatment interruption. There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

B-cell precursor ALL

Blinatumomab has demonstrated activity in high-risk patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

This phase 2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Blinatumomab produced a complete response (CR) in 31% of these patients, the median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, and the median overall survival was 7.1 months.

The most common adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia, neurologic events, febrile neutropenia, and headache.

“Patients with Ph+ relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL typically have lower remission rates, poor long-term prognosis, and shorter duration of remission than patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative disease, and are especially in need of new treatment options beyond TKIs,” said study author Anthony Stein, MD, of City of Hope in Duarte, California.

“Results from this phase 2 study showed blinatumomab induced complete remission in these high-risk patients, regardless of prior TKI therapy or mutational status . . . .”

This study was supported by Amgen, the company developing and marketing blinatumomab.

The trial enrolled 45 patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL. Fifty-nine percent of patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Forty-six percent had ABL1 kinase domain mutations, and 27% had the T315I mutation.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 23-78), and 55% were male. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage was 80% (range, 6% to 98%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received at least 2 prior TKIs. All patients were refractory to (56%), had relapsed on (33%), or progressed after (11%) TKI therapy. Forty-four percent of patients had undergone an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).

The patients received blinatumomab in 28-day cycles by continuous intravenous infusion. The median number of cycles received was 2 (range, 1-5).

Efficacy

Thirty-six percent of patients (n=16) had a CR or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first 2 cycles of treatment. For 31% of patients (n=14), their best response was a CR.

Eighty-eight percent of patients who achieved a CR/CRh (n=14) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.

Forty percent of patients with a T315I mutation had a CR/CRh (4/10), and all of these responders were MRD negative.

Seven responders (44%) went on to allo-HSCT, 6 of whom were transplant-naïve.

Eight of the 16 responders (50%) ultimately relapsed. Their median time to relapse was 6.7 months. Three patients relapsed during treatment, 2 relapsed without undergoing allo-HSCT, and 3 relapsed after allo-HSCT.

Seven responders (44%) were still alive and had not relapsed at last follow-up. The remaining responder died in CR after allo-HSCT.

The median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT. And the median overall survival was 7.1 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT.

Safety

The most common AEs were pyrexia (58%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Nearly half of patients (47%) had neurologic events.

Eighty-two percent of patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs. The most common were febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and anemia (16%).

Forty-four percent of patients had grade 3 or higher AEs that were considered possibly related to blinatumomab. The most common were febrile neutropenia and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (11% each).

Five patients had fatal AEs—multiorgan failure, sepsis, septic shock, cerebral hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. The case of septic shock was considered related to treatment with blinatumomab.

Three patients developed cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), but none of them had their treatment interrupted or discontinued as a result.

 

Three patients had grade 3 neurologic events, and 1 of these events (aphasia) required temporary treatment interruption. There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

B-cell precursor ALL

Blinatumomab has demonstrated activity in high-risk patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), according to research published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

This phase 2 trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Blinatumomab produced a complete response (CR) in 31% of these patients, the median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, and the median overall survival was 7.1 months.

The most common adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia, neurologic events, febrile neutropenia, and headache.

“Patients with Ph+ relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL typically have lower remission rates, poor long-term prognosis, and shorter duration of remission than patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative disease, and are especially in need of new treatment options beyond TKIs,” said study author Anthony Stein, MD, of City of Hope in Duarte, California.

“Results from this phase 2 study showed blinatumomab induced complete remission in these high-risk patients, regardless of prior TKI therapy or mutational status . . . .”

This study was supported by Amgen, the company developing and marketing blinatumomab.

The trial enrolled 45 patients with relapsed or refractory Ph+ BCP-ALL. Fifty-nine percent of patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Forty-six percent had ABL1 kinase domain mutations, and 27% had the T315I mutation.

The patients’ median age was 55 (range, 23-78), and 55% were male. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage was 80% (range, 6% to 98%).

Eighty-four percent of patients had received at least 2 prior TKIs. All patients were refractory to (56%), had relapsed on (33%), or progressed after (11%) TKI therapy. Forty-four percent of patients had undergone an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT).

The patients received blinatumomab in 28-day cycles by continuous intravenous infusion. The median number of cycles received was 2 (range, 1-5).

Efficacy

Thirty-six percent of patients (n=16) had a CR or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first 2 cycles of treatment. For 31% of patients (n=14), their best response was a CR.

Eighty-eight percent of patients who achieved a CR/CRh (n=14) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.

Forty percent of patients with a T315I mutation had a CR/CRh (4/10), and all of these responders were MRD negative.

Seven responders (44%) went on to allo-HSCT, 6 of whom were transplant-naïve.

Eight of the 16 responders (50%) ultimately relapsed. Their median time to relapse was 6.7 months. Three patients relapsed during treatment, 2 relapsed without undergoing allo-HSCT, and 3 relapsed after allo-HSCT.

Seven responders (44%) were still alive and had not relapsed at last follow-up. The remaining responder died in CR after allo-HSCT.

The median relapse-free survival was 6.7 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT. And the median overall survival was 7.1 months, with or without censoring for allo-HSCT.

Safety

The most common AEs were pyrexia (58%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Nearly half of patients (47%) had neurologic events.

Eighty-two percent of patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs. The most common were febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and anemia (16%).

Forty-four percent of patients had grade 3 or higher AEs that were considered possibly related to blinatumomab. The most common were febrile neutropenia and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (11% each).

Five patients had fatal AEs—multiorgan failure, sepsis, septic shock, cerebral hemorrhage, and respiratory failure. The case of septic shock was considered related to treatment with blinatumomab.

Three patients developed cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2), but none of them had their treatment interrupted or discontinued as a result.

 

Three patients had grade 3 neurologic events, and 1 of these events (aphasia) required temporary treatment interruption. There were no grade 4 or 5 neurologic events.

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on trials of selinexor (KPT-330) in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The partial hold, which was announced on March 10, was placed on all trials of the drug, including those in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

The hold meant that no new patients could be enrolled in selinexor trials.

Patients who were already enrolled and had stable disease or better could remain on selinexor therapy.

Now, the FDA has lifted the hold on trials of patients with hematologic malignancies, so new patients can be enrolled in these trials and begin receiving selinexor.

The FDA had placed the hold due to a lack of information in the investigator’s brochure, including an incomplete list of serious adverse events associated with selinexor.

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., the company developing selinexor, noted that the hold was not the result of patient deaths or any new information regarding the safety profile of selinexor.

In response to the hold, Karyopharm amended the investigator’s brochure, updated informed consent documents, and submitted the documents to the FDA.

“The Karyopharm team worked diligently to update and submit the required documents to the FDA, which allowed the hematology division to expeditiously remove the partial clinical hold,” said Michael G. Kauffman, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Karyopharm.

“We anticipate that the solid tumor divisions will follow suit shortly. Patient enrollment is again underway in our hematologic oncology studies. Our previously disclosed enrollment rates and timelines for both ongoing and planned trials are not expected to be materially impacted.”

About selinexor

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound. The drug functions by inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1 (also called CRM1).

This leads to the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the cell nucleus, which subsequently reinitiates and amplifies their tumor suppressor function. This is thought to prompt apoptosis in cancer cells while largely sparing normal cells.

To date, more than 1900 patients have been treated with selinexor.

The drug is currently being evaluated in clinical trials across multiple cancer indications, including in acute myeloid leukemia (SOPRA), in multiple myeloma in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (STORM) and backbone therapies (STOMP), as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL). 

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on trials of selinexor (KPT-330) in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The partial hold, which was announced on March 10, was placed on all trials of the drug, including those in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

The hold meant that no new patients could be enrolled in selinexor trials.

Patients who were already enrolled and had stable disease or better could remain on selinexor therapy.

Now, the FDA has lifted the hold on trials of patients with hematologic malignancies, so new patients can be enrolled in these trials and begin receiving selinexor.

The FDA had placed the hold due to a lack of information in the investigator’s brochure, including an incomplete list of serious adverse events associated with selinexor.

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., the company developing selinexor, noted that the hold was not the result of patient deaths or any new information regarding the safety profile of selinexor.

In response to the hold, Karyopharm amended the investigator’s brochure, updated informed consent documents, and submitted the documents to the FDA.

“The Karyopharm team worked diligently to update and submit the required documents to the FDA, which allowed the hematology division to expeditiously remove the partial clinical hold,” said Michael G. Kauffman, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Karyopharm.

“We anticipate that the solid tumor divisions will follow suit shortly. Patient enrollment is again underway in our hematologic oncology studies. Our previously disclosed enrollment rates and timelines for both ongoing and planned trials are not expected to be materially impacted.”

About selinexor

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound. The drug functions by inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1 (also called CRM1).

This leads to the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the cell nucleus, which subsequently reinitiates and amplifies their tumor suppressor function. This is thought to prompt apoptosis in cancer cells while largely sparing normal cells.

To date, more than 1900 patients have been treated with selinexor.

The drug is currently being evaluated in clinical trials across multiple cancer indications, including in acute myeloid leukemia (SOPRA), in multiple myeloma in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (STORM) and backbone therapies (STOMP), as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL). 

Photo by Esther Dyson

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lifted the partial clinical hold on trials of selinexor (KPT-330) in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The partial hold, which was announced on March 10, was placed on all trials of the drug, including those in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

The hold meant that no new patients could be enrolled in selinexor trials.

Patients who were already enrolled and had stable disease or better could remain on selinexor therapy.

Now, the FDA has lifted the hold on trials of patients with hematologic malignancies, so new patients can be enrolled in these trials and begin receiving selinexor.

The FDA had placed the hold due to a lack of information in the investigator’s brochure, including an incomplete list of serious adverse events associated with selinexor.

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., the company developing selinexor, noted that the hold was not the result of patient deaths or any new information regarding the safety profile of selinexor.

In response to the hold, Karyopharm amended the investigator’s brochure, updated informed consent documents, and submitted the documents to the FDA.

“The Karyopharm team worked diligently to update and submit the required documents to the FDA, which allowed the hematology division to expeditiously remove the partial clinical hold,” said Michael G. Kauffman, MD, PhD, chief executive officer of Karyopharm.

“We anticipate that the solid tumor divisions will follow suit shortly. Patient enrollment is again underway in our hematologic oncology studies. Our previously disclosed enrollment rates and timelines for both ongoing and planned trials are not expected to be materially impacted.”

About selinexor

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound. The drug functions by inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1 (also called CRM1).

This leads to the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the cell nucleus, which subsequently reinitiates and amplifies their tumor suppressor function. This is thought to prompt apoptosis in cancer cells while largely sparing normal cells.

To date, more than 1900 patients have been treated with selinexor.

The drug is currently being evaluated in clinical trials across multiple cancer indications, including in acute myeloid leukemia (SOPRA), in multiple myeloma in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (STORM) and backbone therapies (STOMP), as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL). 

Photo courtesy of Amgen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for blinatumomab (Blincyto®).

The aim of this application is to expand the indication for blinatumomab to include all patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) and to convert blinatumomab’s current accelerated approval to a full approval.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The Prescription Drug User Fee Act target action date for the blinatumomab sBLA is August 14, 2017.

About blinatumomab

Blinatumomab is a bispecific, CD19-directed, CD3 T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that binds specifically to CD19 expressed on the surface of cells of B-lineage origin and CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells.

Blinatumomab currently has accelerated approval in the US as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL.

The FDA-approved prescribing information for blinatumomab includes a boxed warning detailing the risk of cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities.

Blinatumomab is also under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program in the US intended to inform healthcare providers about these risks.

Blinatumomab is being developed and marketed by Amgen.

About the sBLA

With this sBLA, Amgen is seeking to make blinatumomab available as a treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL (as well as Ph-).

To this end, the application includes data from the ALCANTARA study, which were just published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In this trial, researchers evaluated blinatumomab in adults with Ph+ relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Thirty-six percent of patients achieved a complete response or complete response with partial hematologic recovery within the first 2 cycles of blinatumomab treatment. Of these patients, 88% were minimal residual disease negative.

The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in this trial were pyrexia (58%), neurologic events (47%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Three patients had grade 1/2 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 patients had grade 3 neurologic AEs.

The sBLA also includes overall survival (OS) data from the phase 3 TOWER trial, which is intended to support the conversion of blinatumomab’s accelerated approval to a full approval.

Results from the TOWER trial were recently published in NEJM.

In this study, researchers compared blinatumomab to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy (4 different regimens) in adults with Ph- relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL.

Blinatumomab produced higher response rates and nearly doubled OS compared to SOC. The median OS was 7.7 months in the blinatumomab arm and 4 months in the SOC arm. The hazard ratio for death was 0.71 (P=0.012).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was higher in the SOC arm, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

Photo courtesy of Amgen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for blinatumomab (Blincyto®).

The aim of this application is to expand the indication for blinatumomab to include all patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) and to convert blinatumomab’s current accelerated approval to a full approval.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The Prescription Drug User Fee Act target action date for the blinatumomab sBLA is August 14, 2017.

About blinatumomab

Blinatumomab is a bispecific, CD19-directed, CD3 T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that binds specifically to CD19 expressed on the surface of cells of B-lineage origin and CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells.

Blinatumomab currently has accelerated approval in the US as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL.

The FDA-approved prescribing information for blinatumomab includes a boxed warning detailing the risk of cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities.

Blinatumomab is also under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program in the US intended to inform healthcare providers about these risks.

Blinatumomab is being developed and marketed by Amgen.

About the sBLA

With this sBLA, Amgen is seeking to make blinatumomab available as a treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL (as well as Ph-).

To this end, the application includes data from the ALCANTARA study, which were just published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In this trial, researchers evaluated blinatumomab in adults with Ph+ relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Thirty-six percent of patients achieved a complete response or complete response with partial hematologic recovery within the first 2 cycles of blinatumomab treatment. Of these patients, 88% were minimal residual disease negative.

The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in this trial were pyrexia (58%), neurologic events (47%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Three patients had grade 1/2 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 patients had grade 3 neurologic AEs.

The sBLA also includes overall survival (OS) data from the phase 3 TOWER trial, which is intended to support the conversion of blinatumomab’s accelerated approval to a full approval.

Results from the TOWER trial were recently published in NEJM.

In this study, researchers compared blinatumomab to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy (4 different regimens) in adults with Ph- relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL.

Blinatumomab produced higher response rates and nearly doubled OS compared to SOC. The median OS was 7.7 months in the blinatumomab arm and 4 months in the SOC arm. The hazard ratio for death was 0.71 (P=0.012).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was higher in the SOC arm, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

Photo courtesy of Amgen

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for blinatumomab (Blincyto®).

The aim of this application is to expand the indication for blinatumomab to include all patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) and to convert blinatumomab’s current accelerated approval to a full approval.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The Prescription Drug User Fee Act target action date for the blinatumomab sBLA is August 14, 2017.

About blinatumomab

Blinatumomab is a bispecific, CD19-directed, CD3 T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct that binds specifically to CD19 expressed on the surface of cells of B-lineage origin and CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells.

Blinatumomab currently has accelerated approval in the US as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed or refractory BCP-ALL.

The FDA-approved prescribing information for blinatumomab includes a boxed warning detailing the risk of cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities.

Blinatumomab is also under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program in the US intended to inform healthcare providers about these risks.

Blinatumomab is being developed and marketed by Amgen.

About the sBLA

With this sBLA, Amgen is seeking to make blinatumomab available as a treatment for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL (as well as Ph-).

To this end, the application includes data from the ALCANTARA study, which were just published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In this trial, researchers evaluated blinatumomab in adults with Ph+ relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL who had failed treatment with at least 1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Thirty-six percent of patients achieved a complete response or complete response with partial hematologic recovery within the first 2 cycles of blinatumomab treatment. Of these patients, 88% were minimal residual disease negative.

The most frequent adverse events (AEs) in this trial were pyrexia (58%), neurologic events (47%), febrile neutropenia (40%), and headache (31%). Three patients had grade 1/2 cytokine release syndrome, and 3 patients had grade 3 neurologic AEs.

The sBLA also includes overall survival (OS) data from the phase 3 TOWER trial, which is intended to support the conversion of blinatumomab’s accelerated approval to a full approval.

Results from the TOWER trial were recently published in NEJM.

In this study, researchers compared blinatumomab to standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy (4 different regimens) in adults with Ph- relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL.

Blinatumomab produced higher response rates and nearly doubled OS compared to SOC. The median OS was 7.7 months in the blinatumomab arm and 4 months in the SOC arm. The hazard ratio for death was 0.71 (P=0.012).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was higher in the SOC arm, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

Photo from Penn Medicine

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for a biologics license application (BLA) for CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T), an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

The BLA is for CTL019 as a treatment for pediatric patients and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA accepted the BLA for CTL019 yesterday, according to Novartis.

About CTL019

CTL019 consists of autologous T cells expressing a CD19-specific CAR. The therapy was first developed by the University of Pennsylvania.

In 2012, the university and Novartis entered into a global collaboration to further research, develop, and commercialize CAR-T cell therapies, including CTL019. Novartis holds the worldwide rights to CARs developed through the collaboration.

CTL019 already has breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of adults and children with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Novartis said it is planning additional filings for CTL019 in the US and European Union later this year, including a BLA with the FDA for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and applications for marketing authorization with the European Medicines Agency in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Trials of CTL019 in ALL

The priority review designation for CTL019 is based on results from the Novartis-sponsored ELIANA study (NCT02435849). Results from this international, phase 2 trial were presented at ASH 2016.

The trial enrolled patients who had CD19-positive B-ALL with morphologic marrow tumor involvement at registration (>5% blasts) and were primary refractory, were chemo-refractory after first relapse, had relapsed after second-line therapy, or were ineligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Most patients received fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by a single dose of CTL019.

Three months post-infusion, 82% of patients (41/50) had achieved a complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery.

Nearly half of the patients in the trial (48%) experienced grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), though there were no deaths due to CRS. Fifteen percent of patients experienced grade 3 neurological and psychiatric events, including confusion, delirium, encephalopathy, agitation, and seizure.

The BLA for CTL019 is also supported by results from the phase 2 ENSIGN trial, which were presented at ASH 2016, and results of a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL, which were presented at ASH 2015.

Photo from Penn Medicine

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for a biologics license application (BLA) for CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T), an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

The BLA is for CTL019 as a treatment for pediatric patients and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA accepted the BLA for CTL019 yesterday, according to Novartis.

About CTL019

CTL019 consists of autologous T cells expressing a CD19-specific CAR. The therapy was first developed by the University of Pennsylvania.

In 2012, the university and Novartis entered into a global collaboration to further research, develop, and commercialize CAR-T cell therapies, including CTL019. Novartis holds the worldwide rights to CARs developed through the collaboration.

CTL019 already has breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of adults and children with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Novartis said it is planning additional filings for CTL019 in the US and European Union later this year, including a BLA with the FDA for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and applications for marketing authorization with the European Medicines Agency in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Trials of CTL019 in ALL

The priority review designation for CTL019 is based on results from the Novartis-sponsored ELIANA study (NCT02435849). Results from this international, phase 2 trial were presented at ASH 2016.

The trial enrolled patients who had CD19-positive B-ALL with morphologic marrow tumor involvement at registration (>5% blasts) and were primary refractory, were chemo-refractory after first relapse, had relapsed after second-line therapy, or were ineligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Most patients received fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by a single dose of CTL019.

Three months post-infusion, 82% of patients (41/50) had achieved a complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery.

Nearly half of the patients in the trial (48%) experienced grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), though there were no deaths due to CRS. Fifteen percent of patients experienced grade 3 neurological and psychiatric events, including confusion, delirium, encephalopathy, agitation, and seizure.

The BLA for CTL019 is also supported by results from the phase 2 ENSIGN trial, which were presented at ASH 2016, and results of a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL, which were presented at ASH 2015.

Photo from Penn Medicine

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted priority review for a biologics license application (BLA) for CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel-T), an investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy.

The BLA is for CTL019 as a treatment for pediatric patients and young adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA accepted the BLA for CTL019 yesterday, according to Novartis.

About CTL019

CTL019 consists of autologous T cells expressing a CD19-specific CAR. The therapy was first developed by the University of Pennsylvania.

In 2012, the university and Novartis entered into a global collaboration to further research, develop, and commercialize CAR-T cell therapies, including CTL019. Novartis holds the worldwide rights to CARs developed through the collaboration.

CTL019 already has breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of adults and children with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Novartis said it is planning additional filings for CTL019 in the US and European Union later this year, including a BLA with the FDA for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and applications for marketing authorization with the European Medicines Agency in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Trials of CTL019 in ALL

The priority review designation for CTL019 is based on results from the Novartis-sponsored ELIANA study (NCT02435849). Results from this international, phase 2 trial were presented at ASH 2016.

The trial enrolled patients who had CD19-positive B-ALL with morphologic marrow tumor involvement at registration (>5% blasts) and were primary refractory, were chemo-refractory after first relapse, had relapsed after second-line therapy, or were ineligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Most patients received fludarabine/cyclophosphamide lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by a single dose of CTL019.

Three months post-infusion, 82% of patients (41/50) had achieved a complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery.

Nearly half of the patients in the trial (48%) experienced grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), though there were no deaths due to CRS. Fifteen percent of patients experienced grade 3 neurological and psychiatric events, including confusion, delirium, encephalopathy, agitation, and seizure.

The BLA for CTL019 is also supported by results from the phase 2 ENSIGN trial, which were presented at ASH 2016, and results of a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory ALL, which were presented at ASH 2015.

 

ORLANDO – In patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the results with venetoclax continue to be encouraging, and recent findings from a multicenter phase Ib study hint that venetoclax may also provide durable responses – even with treatment discontinuation.

Venetoclax is an orally bioavailable selective BCL2 inhibitor that is typically given in an open-ended fashion. Toxicity – including tumor lysis syndrome – is always a concern, however, and the issue of whether open-ended administration is necessary is an important question, Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

In one phase II multicenter study of venetoclax monotherapy in 107 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL with del(17p) at 31 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe, the overall response rate was 79.4% based on an independent review committee assessment, (Lancet Oncol. 2016[17]:768-78).

Treatment included once-daily venetoclax beginning with a dose of 20 mg that was ramped up to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg over 4-5 weeks, followed by daily 400 mg continuous dosing until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason.

Notably, 18 of 85 patients from the study who achieved an objective response were minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative in peripheral blood samples – an outcome that has not been seen with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, noted Dr. Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The durability of venetoclax’s activity in the study was 84.7% at 12 months in all responders; 100% in those who achieved complete response, complete response with incomplete recovery of blood counts, or nodular partial remission; and 94.4% in the MRD-negative patients.

The authors concluded that venetoclax monotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and that given the distinct mechanism of action of this new therapeutic option for these very poor-prognosis patients, it deserves further investigation as part of a combination or as part of sequential treatment with other novel targeted agents.

The finding that patients on venetoclax can achieve MRD negativity also raised the question of whether treatment can be stopped, Dr. Zelenetz said.

“Because who wants to be on a drug forever? Nobody,” he added.

This question was explored in a study published in February by Seymour et al., which provided early evidence that stopping treatment may indeed be feasible in some patients (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18[2]:230-40).

Venetoclax in this study was given in a dose-escalating fashion to target doses of 200-600 mg daily, in 49 patients with relapsed or refractory “moderately heavily pretreated” CLL. Rituximab was added at a dose of 375 mg/m² in month 1 and 500 mg/m² in months 2-6.

Patients had the option of stopping treatment if they achieved a complete response.

The overall response rate was 86%, including a complete response in 51% of patients. Two-year estimates for progression-free survival and ongoing response were 82% and 89% respectively.

MRD negativity was attained in 80% of complete responders and 57% of patients overall. Thirteen responders discontinued all treatment, and at the time of publication, 11 MRD-negative responders who discontinued therapy remained progression free off therapy. Two MRD-positive patients who achieved complete response and discontinued therapy progressed after 2 years, but were able to recapture response once they restarted the drug.

“So it’s really quite interesting. We might have durable responses after discontinuation of this drug in an MRD-negative state,” Dr. Zelenetz said.

Of note, the latest update to the NCCN guidelines for the treatment of CLL/SLL (small lymphocytic lymphoma) included the addition of “+/– rituximab” as part of the “suggested treatment regimen” of venetoclax in the relapsed/refractory disease setting. This recommendation is category 2A, meaning it is based on lower level evidence with uniform NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate.

Venetoclax: adverse events of special interest

In these studies, venetoclax was considered well tolerated, but attention to adverse events and their prevention and management – particularly with respect to tumor lysis syndrome – is essential, Dr. Zelenetz said.

In the phase II study by Stilgenbauer et al., adverse events of special interest included grade 3/4 neutropenia, which occurred in 40% of patients. This was manageable with dose interruptions (five patients) or reductions (four patients), or with granulocyte–colony stimulating factor and antibiotics (six patients, including one who received only antibiotics). None of the patients permanently discontinued treatment.

Infections occurred in 72% of patients, and grade 3 or greater infections occurred in 20% of patients. The most common overall were upper respiratory infections (15%), nasopharyngitis (14%), and urinary tract infections (9%).

Serious infections occurring in two or more patients were pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infection, and upper respiratory tract infection. One patient died from septic shock, 10 had infections leading to venetoclax interruption, and 2 had infections leading to dose reduction.

No mandated infection prophylaxis was used in this study.

Serious adverse events occurred in 59 patients (55%). The most common, occurring in at least 5% of patients, were pyrexia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, pneumonia, and febrile neutropenia. Thirteen had adverse events leading to dose reductions, most commonly due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia.

Laboratory-confirmed tumor lysis syndrome was reported in five patients during the ramp-up period, including four who developed the syndrome within the first 2 days of treatment. All cases resolved without clinical sequelae. Treatment was continued without interruption in three patients with tumor lysis syndrome, who received only electrolyte management, and two patients had a 1-day treatment interruption. Both resumed dosing the next day.

In the phase Ib study by Seymour et al., common grade 1-2 toxicities included upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, and nausea occurring in 57%, 55%, and 53% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 76% of 49 patients, and most often included neutropenia (12% of patients), thrombocytopenia (16%), anemia (14%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and leukopenia (12%). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (12%), febrile neutropenia (10%), lower respiratory tract infection (6%), and pneumonia (6%). Clinical tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients who initiated venetoclax at 50 mg, one of whom died as a result.

After enhancement of tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis measures and reduction of the starting dose of venetoclax to 20 mg, no additional cases occurred, the authors reported.

 

Mitigating tumor lysis syndrome risk

General measures for mitigating the risk of tumor lysis syndrome include identification of patients at increased risk, initiation of prophylaxis with hydration and a uric acid reducing agent, and initiation of venetoclax at a 20 mg dose for 1 week, with gradual step-wise ramp-up over 5 weeks to the target dose, Dr. Zelenetz noted.

As reported by Stilgenbauer, et al., patients with a nodal mass less than 5 cm and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 25,000 or less are considered at low risk for tumor lysis syndrome, those with a nodal mass of 5 cm to less than 10 cm or ALC greater than 25,000 are at medium risk, and those with a nodal mass of 10 cm or greater or nodal mass of 5 cm or greater and ALC of greater than 25,000 are considered to be at high risk.

High-risk patients in the study received inpatient venetoclax dosing and monitoring at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours with 20 mg and 50 mg dosing, as well as outpatient intravenous hydration at 100 mg if there was no indication to hospitalize, and post-dose 8-24 hour laboratory monitoring at 100 mg and above.

Medium-risk patients received IV hydration at 20 and 50 mg dosing, inpatient care if creatinine clearance was less than 80 mL/min or if there was a high tumor burden, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose escalations. Low-risk patients received outpatient dosing at all dose levels in the absence of an indication to hospitalize, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose increases.

“Unfortunately, the dose-limiting toxicity of venetoclax is fatal tumor lysis,” Dr. Zelenetz said, adding that by increasing the dose slowly over time according to current treatment recommendations – from 20 mg, to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg at weekly intervals, this complication can be avoided.

Dr. Zelenetz reported receiving consulting fees, honoraria, and/or grant/research support from Genentech, the maker of venetoclax (Venclexta), and a wide variety of other drug companies.

[email protected]

 

ORLANDO – In patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the results with venetoclax continue to be encouraging, and recent findings from a multicenter phase Ib study hint that venetoclax may also provide durable responses – even with treatment discontinuation.

Venetoclax is an orally bioavailable selective BCL2 inhibitor that is typically given in an open-ended fashion. Toxicity – including tumor lysis syndrome – is always a concern, however, and the issue of whether open-ended administration is necessary is an important question, Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

In one phase II multicenter study of venetoclax monotherapy in 107 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL with del(17p) at 31 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe, the overall response rate was 79.4% based on an independent review committee assessment, (Lancet Oncol. 2016[17]:768-78).

Treatment included once-daily venetoclax beginning with a dose of 20 mg that was ramped up to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg over 4-5 weeks, followed by daily 400 mg continuous dosing until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason.

Notably, 18 of 85 patients from the study who achieved an objective response were minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative in peripheral blood samples – an outcome that has not been seen with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, noted Dr. Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The durability of venetoclax’s activity in the study was 84.7% at 12 months in all responders; 100% in those who achieved complete response, complete response with incomplete recovery of blood counts, or nodular partial remission; and 94.4% in the MRD-negative patients.

The authors concluded that venetoclax monotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and that given the distinct mechanism of action of this new therapeutic option for these very poor-prognosis patients, it deserves further investigation as part of a combination or as part of sequential treatment with other novel targeted agents.

The finding that patients on venetoclax can achieve MRD negativity also raised the question of whether treatment can be stopped, Dr. Zelenetz said.

“Because who wants to be on a drug forever? Nobody,” he added.

This question was explored in a study published in February by Seymour et al., which provided early evidence that stopping treatment may indeed be feasible in some patients (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18[2]:230-40).

Venetoclax in this study was given in a dose-escalating fashion to target doses of 200-600 mg daily, in 49 patients with relapsed or refractory “moderately heavily pretreated” CLL. Rituximab was added at a dose of 375 mg/m² in month 1 and 500 mg/m² in months 2-6.

Patients had the option of stopping treatment if they achieved a complete response.

The overall response rate was 86%, including a complete response in 51% of patients. Two-year estimates for progression-free survival and ongoing response were 82% and 89% respectively.

MRD negativity was attained in 80% of complete responders and 57% of patients overall. Thirteen responders discontinued all treatment, and at the time of publication, 11 MRD-negative responders who discontinued therapy remained progression free off therapy. Two MRD-positive patients who achieved complete response and discontinued therapy progressed after 2 years, but were able to recapture response once they restarted the drug.

“So it’s really quite interesting. We might have durable responses after discontinuation of this drug in an MRD-negative state,” Dr. Zelenetz said.

Of note, the latest update to the NCCN guidelines for the treatment of CLL/SLL (small lymphocytic lymphoma) included the addition of “+/– rituximab” as part of the “suggested treatment regimen” of venetoclax in the relapsed/refractory disease setting. This recommendation is category 2A, meaning it is based on lower level evidence with uniform NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate.

Venetoclax: adverse events of special interest

In these studies, venetoclax was considered well tolerated, but attention to adverse events and their prevention and management – particularly with respect to tumor lysis syndrome – is essential, Dr. Zelenetz said.

In the phase II study by Stilgenbauer et al., adverse events of special interest included grade 3/4 neutropenia, which occurred in 40% of patients. This was manageable with dose interruptions (five patients) or reductions (four patients), or with granulocyte–colony stimulating factor and antibiotics (six patients, including one who received only antibiotics). None of the patients permanently discontinued treatment.

Infections occurred in 72% of patients, and grade 3 or greater infections occurred in 20% of patients. The most common overall were upper respiratory infections (15%), nasopharyngitis (14%), and urinary tract infections (9%).

Serious infections occurring in two or more patients were pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infection, and upper respiratory tract infection. One patient died from septic shock, 10 had infections leading to venetoclax interruption, and 2 had infections leading to dose reduction.

No mandated infection prophylaxis was used in this study.

Serious adverse events occurred in 59 patients (55%). The most common, occurring in at least 5% of patients, were pyrexia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, pneumonia, and febrile neutropenia. Thirteen had adverse events leading to dose reductions, most commonly due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia.

Laboratory-confirmed tumor lysis syndrome was reported in five patients during the ramp-up period, including four who developed the syndrome within the first 2 days of treatment. All cases resolved without clinical sequelae. Treatment was continued without interruption in three patients with tumor lysis syndrome, who received only electrolyte management, and two patients had a 1-day treatment interruption. Both resumed dosing the next day.

In the phase Ib study by Seymour et al., common grade 1-2 toxicities included upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, and nausea occurring in 57%, 55%, and 53% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 76% of 49 patients, and most often included neutropenia (12% of patients), thrombocytopenia (16%), anemia (14%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and leukopenia (12%). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (12%), febrile neutropenia (10%), lower respiratory tract infection (6%), and pneumonia (6%). Clinical tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients who initiated venetoclax at 50 mg, one of whom died as a result.

After enhancement of tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis measures and reduction of the starting dose of venetoclax to 20 mg, no additional cases occurred, the authors reported.

 

Mitigating tumor lysis syndrome risk

General measures for mitigating the risk of tumor lysis syndrome include identification of patients at increased risk, initiation of prophylaxis with hydration and a uric acid reducing agent, and initiation of venetoclax at a 20 mg dose for 1 week, with gradual step-wise ramp-up over 5 weeks to the target dose, Dr. Zelenetz noted.

As reported by Stilgenbauer, et al., patients with a nodal mass less than 5 cm and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 25,000 or less are considered at low risk for tumor lysis syndrome, those with a nodal mass of 5 cm to less than 10 cm or ALC greater than 25,000 are at medium risk, and those with a nodal mass of 10 cm or greater or nodal mass of 5 cm or greater and ALC of greater than 25,000 are considered to be at high risk.

High-risk patients in the study received inpatient venetoclax dosing and monitoring at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours with 20 mg and 50 mg dosing, as well as outpatient intravenous hydration at 100 mg if there was no indication to hospitalize, and post-dose 8-24 hour laboratory monitoring at 100 mg and above.

Medium-risk patients received IV hydration at 20 and 50 mg dosing, inpatient care if creatinine clearance was less than 80 mL/min or if there was a high tumor burden, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose escalations. Low-risk patients received outpatient dosing at all dose levels in the absence of an indication to hospitalize, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose increases.

“Unfortunately, the dose-limiting toxicity of venetoclax is fatal tumor lysis,” Dr. Zelenetz said, adding that by increasing the dose slowly over time according to current treatment recommendations – from 20 mg, to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg at weekly intervals, this complication can be avoided.

Dr. Zelenetz reported receiving consulting fees, honoraria, and/or grant/research support from Genentech, the maker of venetoclax (Venclexta), and a wide variety of other drug companies.

[email protected]

 

ORLANDO – In patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the results with venetoclax continue to be encouraging, and recent findings from a multicenter phase Ib study hint that venetoclax may also provide durable responses – even with treatment discontinuation.

Venetoclax is an orally bioavailable selective BCL2 inhibitor that is typically given in an open-ended fashion. Toxicity – including tumor lysis syndrome – is always a concern, however, and the issue of whether open-ended administration is necessary is an important question, Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD, said at the annual conference of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

In one phase II multicenter study of venetoclax monotherapy in 107 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL with del(17p) at 31 centers in the United States, Canada, and Europe, the overall response rate was 79.4% based on an independent review committee assessment, (Lancet Oncol. 2016[17]:768-78).

Treatment included once-daily venetoclax beginning with a dose of 20 mg that was ramped up to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg over 4-5 weeks, followed by daily 400 mg continuous dosing until disease progression or discontinuation for another reason.

Notably, 18 of 85 patients from the study who achieved an objective response were minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative in peripheral blood samples – an outcome that has not been seen with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, noted Dr. Zelenetz of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

The durability of venetoclax’s activity in the study was 84.7% at 12 months in all responders; 100% in those who achieved complete response, complete response with incomplete recovery of blood counts, or nodular partial remission; and 94.4% in the MRD-negative patients.

The authors concluded that venetoclax monotherapy is active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory del(17p) chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and that given the distinct mechanism of action of this new therapeutic option for these very poor-prognosis patients, it deserves further investigation as part of a combination or as part of sequential treatment with other novel targeted agents.

The finding that patients on venetoclax can achieve MRD negativity also raised the question of whether treatment can be stopped, Dr. Zelenetz said.

“Because who wants to be on a drug forever? Nobody,” he added.

This question was explored in a study published in February by Seymour et al., which provided early evidence that stopping treatment may indeed be feasible in some patients (Lancet Oncol. 2017;18[2]:230-40).

Venetoclax in this study was given in a dose-escalating fashion to target doses of 200-600 mg daily, in 49 patients with relapsed or refractory “moderately heavily pretreated” CLL. Rituximab was added at a dose of 375 mg/m² in month 1 and 500 mg/m² in months 2-6.

Patients had the option of stopping treatment if they achieved a complete response.

The overall response rate was 86%, including a complete response in 51% of patients. Two-year estimates for progression-free survival and ongoing response were 82% and 89% respectively.

MRD negativity was attained in 80% of complete responders and 57% of patients overall. Thirteen responders discontinued all treatment, and at the time of publication, 11 MRD-negative responders who discontinued therapy remained progression free off therapy. Two MRD-positive patients who achieved complete response and discontinued therapy progressed after 2 years, but were able to recapture response once they restarted the drug.

“So it’s really quite interesting. We might have durable responses after discontinuation of this drug in an MRD-negative state,” Dr. Zelenetz said.

Of note, the latest update to the NCCN guidelines for the treatment of CLL/SLL (small lymphocytic lymphoma) included the addition of “+/– rituximab” as part of the “suggested treatment regimen” of venetoclax in the relapsed/refractory disease setting. This recommendation is category 2A, meaning it is based on lower level evidence with uniform NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate.

Venetoclax: adverse events of special interest

In these studies, venetoclax was considered well tolerated, but attention to adverse events and their prevention and management – particularly with respect to tumor lysis syndrome – is essential, Dr. Zelenetz said.

In the phase II study by Stilgenbauer et al., adverse events of special interest included grade 3/4 neutropenia, which occurred in 40% of patients. This was manageable with dose interruptions (five patients) or reductions (four patients), or with granulocyte–colony stimulating factor and antibiotics (six patients, including one who received only antibiotics). None of the patients permanently discontinued treatment.

Infections occurred in 72% of patients, and grade 3 or greater infections occurred in 20% of patients. The most common overall were upper respiratory infections (15%), nasopharyngitis (14%), and urinary tract infections (9%).

Serious infections occurring in two or more patients were pneumonia, lower respiratory tract infection, and upper respiratory tract infection. One patient died from septic shock, 10 had infections leading to venetoclax interruption, and 2 had infections leading to dose reduction.

No mandated infection prophylaxis was used in this study.

Serious adverse events occurred in 59 patients (55%). The most common, occurring in at least 5% of patients, were pyrexia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, pneumonia, and febrile neutropenia. Thirteen had adverse events leading to dose reductions, most commonly due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia.

Laboratory-confirmed tumor lysis syndrome was reported in five patients during the ramp-up period, including four who developed the syndrome within the first 2 days of treatment. All cases resolved without clinical sequelae. Treatment was continued without interruption in three patients with tumor lysis syndrome, who received only electrolyte management, and two patients had a 1-day treatment interruption. Both resumed dosing the next day.

In the phase Ib study by Seymour et al., common grade 1-2 toxicities included upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, and nausea occurring in 57%, 55%, and 53% of patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 76% of 49 patients, and most often included neutropenia (12% of patients), thrombocytopenia (16%), anemia (14%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and leukopenia (12%). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (12%), febrile neutropenia (10%), lower respiratory tract infection (6%), and pneumonia (6%). Clinical tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients who initiated venetoclax at 50 mg, one of whom died as a result.

After enhancement of tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis measures and reduction of the starting dose of venetoclax to 20 mg, no additional cases occurred, the authors reported.

 

Mitigating tumor lysis syndrome risk

General measures for mitigating the risk of tumor lysis syndrome include identification of patients at increased risk, initiation of prophylaxis with hydration and a uric acid reducing agent, and initiation of venetoclax at a 20 mg dose for 1 week, with gradual step-wise ramp-up over 5 weeks to the target dose, Dr. Zelenetz noted.

As reported by Stilgenbauer, et al., patients with a nodal mass less than 5 cm and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 25,000 or less are considered at low risk for tumor lysis syndrome, those with a nodal mass of 5 cm to less than 10 cm or ALC greater than 25,000 are at medium risk, and those with a nodal mass of 10 cm or greater or nodal mass of 5 cm or greater and ALC of greater than 25,000 are considered to be at high risk.

High-risk patients in the study received inpatient venetoclax dosing and monitoring at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours with 20 mg and 50 mg dosing, as well as outpatient intravenous hydration at 100 mg if there was no indication to hospitalize, and post-dose 8-24 hour laboratory monitoring at 100 mg and above.

Medium-risk patients received IV hydration at 20 and 50 mg dosing, inpatient care if creatinine clearance was less than 80 mL/min or if there was a high tumor burden, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose escalations. Low-risk patients received outpatient dosing at all dose levels in the absence of an indication to hospitalize, and postdose 8- and 24-hour laboratory monitoring after the initial dose and at dose increases.

“Unfortunately, the dose-limiting toxicity of venetoclax is fatal tumor lysis,” Dr. Zelenetz said, adding that by increasing the dose slowly over time according to current treatment recommendations – from 20 mg, to 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg at weekly intervals, this complication can be avoided.

Dr. Zelenetz reported receiving consulting fees, honoraria, and/or grant/research support from Genentech, the maker of venetoclax (Venclexta), and a wide variety of other drug companies.

[email protected]

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recently launched the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, which provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy.

The compendium provides guidance on all radiation therapy modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated radiation therapy, intra-operative radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiotherapy/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

“As a single source for all radiation therapy recommendations within the NCCN guidelines, the compendium benefits patients with cancer by assisting providers and payers in making evidence-based treatment and coverage decisions,” said Robert W. Carlson, MD, chief executive officer of NCCN.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™ includes recommendations for the following 24 cancer types:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

NCCN said additional cancer types will be published on a rolling basis over the coming months.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recently launched the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, which provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy.

The compendium provides guidance on all radiation therapy modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated radiation therapy, intra-operative radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiotherapy/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

“As a single source for all radiation therapy recommendations within the NCCN guidelines, the compendium benefits patients with cancer by assisting providers and payers in making evidence-based treatment and coverage decisions,” said Robert W. Carlson, MD, chief executive officer of NCCN.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™ includes recommendations for the following 24 cancer types:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

NCCN said additional cancer types will be published on a rolling basis over the coming months.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recently launched the NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™, which provides a single access point for NCCN recommendations pertaining to radiation therapy.

The compendium provides guidance on all radiation therapy modalities recommended within NCCN guidelines, including intensity modulated radiation therapy, intra-operative radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiotherapy/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, low dose-rate brachytherapy/high dose-rate brachytherapy, radioisotope, and particle therapy.

“As a single source for all radiation therapy recommendations within the NCCN guidelines, the compendium benefits patients with cancer by assisting providers and payers in making evidence-based treatment and coverage decisions,” said Robert W. Carlson, MD, chief executive officer of NCCN.

The NCCN Radiation Therapy Compendium™ includes recommendations for the following 24 cancer types:

Acute myeloid leukemia

Anal cancer

B-cell lymphomas

Bladder cancer

Breast cancer

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphoblastic lymphoma

Colon cancer

Hepatobiliary cancers

Kidney cancer

Malignant pleural mesothelioma

Melanoma

Multiple myeloma

Neuroendocrine tumors

Non-small cell lung cancer

Occult primary cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Penile cancer

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Prostate cancer

Rectal cancer

Small cell lung cancer

Soft tissue sarcoma

T-cell lymphomas

Testicular cancer

NCCN said additional cancer types will be published on a rolling basis over the coming months.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted annamycin orphan designation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Annamycin is a liposomal anthracycline under development by Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

The company said it is working with the FDA on an investigative new drug application for a phase 1/2 trial of annamycin in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Annamycin has already been tested in 6 clinical trials, 3 of which focused on leukemia.

Results from one of these trials, in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, were published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia in 2013.

Annamycin has been under development by several other pharmaceutical companies. Moleculin Biotech, Inc. acquired rights and development assets relating to the drug in 2015.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent rare diseases/disorders affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation provides companies with certain incentives to develop products for rare diseases. This includes a 50% tax break on research and development, a fee waiver, access to federal grants, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted annamycin orphan designation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Annamycin is a liposomal anthracycline under development by Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

The company said it is working with the FDA on an investigative new drug application for a phase 1/2 trial of annamycin in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Annamycin has already been tested in 6 clinical trials, 3 of which focused on leukemia.

Results from one of these trials, in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, were published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia in 2013.

Annamycin has been under development by several other pharmaceutical companies. Moleculin Biotech, Inc. acquired rights and development assets relating to the drug in 2015.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent rare diseases/disorders affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation provides companies with certain incentives to develop products for rare diseases. This includes a 50% tax break on research and development, a fee waiver, access to federal grants, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

AML cells

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted annamycin orphan designation for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Annamycin is a liposomal anthracycline under development by Moleculin Biotech, Inc.

The company said it is working with the FDA on an investigative new drug application for a phase 1/2 trial of annamycin in patients with relapsed or refractory AML.

Annamycin has already been tested in 6 clinical trials, 3 of which focused on leukemia.

Results from one of these trials, in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia, were published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia in 2013.

Annamycin has been under development by several other pharmaceutical companies. Moleculin Biotech, Inc. acquired rights and development assets relating to the drug in 2015.

About orphan designation

The FDA grants orphan designation to drugs and biologics intended to treat, diagnose, or prevent rare diseases/disorders affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the US.

Orphan designation provides companies with certain incentives to develop products for rare diseases. This includes a 50% tax break on research and development, a fee waiver, access to federal grants, and 7 years of market exclusivity if the product is approved.

Micrograph showing MDS

The protein p300 may prevent the transformation from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to research published in Leukemia.

Researchers found that loss of p300 “markedly” increased leukemogenesis in a mouse model of MDS.

“The loss of p300 allows these defective [MDS] cells to grow and become leukemic,” said study author Stephen Nimer, MD, of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center in Miami, Florida.

“This work offers us a window into AML, which we are now going to try to exploit.”

Previous research suggested that p300 and CBP (both histone lysine acetyltransferases) may be tumor suppressors. The current study indicates that, in the context of MDS, that is only true for p300.

The researchers evaluated the effects of deleting both p300 and CBP in Nup98-HoxD13 (NHD13) transgenic mice, a model of human MDS.

The team found that p300 deletion, but not CBP deletion, accelerated leukemogenesis in the mice.

“When we eliminated p300, 100% of the mice developed leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “It indicated that, under this specific circumstance, p300 is a tumor suppressor, offering great insight into how MDS converts to leukemia. It was quite surprising that CBP plays no role at all.”

The researchers also found that deleting p300 restored the ability of NHD13-expressing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to self-renew, and p300 deletion decreased apoptosis.

“While investigating how p300 functions in MDS cells, we found that MDS cells do not grow well in the lab,” Dr Nimer said. “However, when you eliminate p300, suddenly, the cells continue to grow.”

On the other hand, deletion of p300 did not have a significant effect on wild-type hematopoiesis.

Finally, the researchers found that p300 deletion enhanced cytokine signaling in NHD13-expressing HSPCs. They observed enhanced activation of the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways in HSPCs isolated from NHD13 transgenic mice.

The team said more research is needed to understand exactly how p300 controls MDS cells, but these findings could ultimately help MDS patients avoid AML.

“Other than chemotherapy, right now, there’s no way to prevent MDS from developing into myeloid leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “However, drugs are being developed that can promote p300 function and possibly prevent MDS patients from developing leukemia.”

Micrograph showing MDS

The protein p300 may prevent the transformation from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to research published in Leukemia.

Researchers found that loss of p300 “markedly” increased leukemogenesis in a mouse model of MDS.

“The loss of p300 allows these defective [MDS] cells to grow and become leukemic,” said study author Stephen Nimer, MD, of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center in Miami, Florida.

“This work offers us a window into AML, which we are now going to try to exploit.”

Previous research suggested that p300 and CBP (both histone lysine acetyltransferases) may be tumor suppressors. The current study indicates that, in the context of MDS, that is only true for p300.

The researchers evaluated the effects of deleting both p300 and CBP in Nup98-HoxD13 (NHD13) transgenic mice, a model of human MDS.

The team found that p300 deletion, but not CBP deletion, accelerated leukemogenesis in the mice.

“When we eliminated p300, 100% of the mice developed leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “It indicated that, under this specific circumstance, p300 is a tumor suppressor, offering great insight into how MDS converts to leukemia. It was quite surprising that CBP plays no role at all.”

The researchers also found that deleting p300 restored the ability of NHD13-expressing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to self-renew, and p300 deletion decreased apoptosis.

“While investigating how p300 functions in MDS cells, we found that MDS cells do not grow well in the lab,” Dr Nimer said. “However, when you eliminate p300, suddenly, the cells continue to grow.”

On the other hand, deletion of p300 did not have a significant effect on wild-type hematopoiesis.

Finally, the researchers found that p300 deletion enhanced cytokine signaling in NHD13-expressing HSPCs. They observed enhanced activation of the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways in HSPCs isolated from NHD13 transgenic mice.

The team said more research is needed to understand exactly how p300 controls MDS cells, but these findings could ultimately help MDS patients avoid AML.

“Other than chemotherapy, right now, there’s no way to prevent MDS from developing into myeloid leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “However, drugs are being developed that can promote p300 function and possibly prevent MDS patients from developing leukemia.”

Micrograph showing MDS

The protein p300 may prevent the transformation from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to research published in Leukemia.

Researchers found that loss of p300 “markedly” increased leukemogenesis in a mouse model of MDS.

“The loss of p300 allows these defective [MDS] cells to grow and become leukemic,” said study author Stephen Nimer, MD, of Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center in Miami, Florida.

“This work offers us a window into AML, which we are now going to try to exploit.”

Previous research suggested that p300 and CBP (both histone lysine acetyltransferases) may be tumor suppressors. The current study indicates that, in the context of MDS, that is only true for p300.

The researchers evaluated the effects of deleting both p300 and CBP in Nup98-HoxD13 (NHD13) transgenic mice, a model of human MDS.

The team found that p300 deletion, but not CBP deletion, accelerated leukemogenesis in the mice.

“When we eliminated p300, 100% of the mice developed leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “It indicated that, under this specific circumstance, p300 is a tumor suppressor, offering great insight into how MDS converts to leukemia. It was quite surprising that CBP plays no role at all.”

The researchers also found that deleting p300 restored the ability of NHD13-expressing hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to self-renew, and p300 deletion decreased apoptosis.

“While investigating how p300 functions in MDS cells, we found that MDS cells do not grow well in the lab,” Dr Nimer said. “However, when you eliminate p300, suddenly, the cells continue to grow.”

On the other hand, deletion of p300 did not have a significant effect on wild-type hematopoiesis.

Finally, the researchers found that p300 deletion enhanced cytokine signaling in NHD13-expressing HSPCs. They observed enhanced activation of the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathways in HSPCs isolated from NHD13 transgenic mice.

The team said more research is needed to understand exactly how p300 controls MDS cells, but these findings could ultimately help MDS patients avoid AML.

“Other than chemotherapy, right now, there’s no way to prevent MDS from developing into myeloid leukemia,” Dr Nimer said. “However, drugs are being developed that can promote p300 function and possibly prevent MDS patients from developing leukemia.”