Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

Photo from NIH

A study of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) suggests these individuals have an increased risk of developing hypertension as adults.

The CCSs studied had more than double the rate of hypertension observed in the matched general population.

Sex, age, race, and weight were all significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, but most treatment types were not.

The exception was nephrectomy, which was associated with an increased risk of hypertension.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“High blood pressure is an important modifiable risk factor that increases the risk of heart problems in everyone,” Dr Gibson said. “Research has shown that high blood pressure can have an even greater negative impact on survivors of childhood cancer who were treated with cardiotoxic therapies such as anthracyclines or chest radiation.”

To assess the prevalence of hypertension among CCSs, Dr Gibson and his colleagues examined 3016 adults who were 10-year survivors of childhood cancers. The subjects were enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, which provides ongoing medical assessments of CCSs to advance knowledge of their long-term health outcomes.

The subjects’ mean age at the initial study assessment was 32, and 52% were male. Most (83%) were non-Hispanic white, 14% were non-Hispanic black, 2% were Hispanic, and 1% were “other.”

Thirty-seven percent of subjects had leukemia, 12% had Hodgkin lymphoma, and 7% had non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Eighty-six percent of subjects had received chemotherapy, and 59% received radiation.

Results

Subjects were considered to have hypertension if their systolic blood pressure was 140 or greater, their diastolic blood pressure was 90 or greater, or if they had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and were taking antihypertensive medication.

The prevalence of hypertension was 2.6 times higher among CCSs than expected, based on age-, sex-, race- and body mass index-specific rates in the general population.

In addition, the incidence of hypertension increased for CCSs over time. Thirteen percent of CCSs had hypertension at age 30, 37% had it at age 40, and more than 70% had it at age 50.

Dr Gibson said rates of hypertension in CCSs matched rates in the general population of people about a decade older.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, including:

• Male sex (odd ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.67)
• Non-Hispanic black race (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28–2.16)
• Older age at assessment (OR per 1 year of age, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08–1.11)
• Being overweight (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.07)
• Obesity (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.34–3.88).

Exposure to any type of radiation or chemotherapy was not significantly associated with hypertension, but nephrectomy was (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.53).

Dr Gibson said the lack of an association between hypertension and radiation/chemotherapy was surprising. It suggests the connection between childhood cancer survival and adult hypertension is multifactorial and worthy of future research.

In the meantime, he said, clinicians should be mindful that CCSs are more likely than the general public to develop hypertension.

“The good news is that, unlike prior cancer therapy, high blood pressure is a modifiable risk factor,” Dr Gibson noted. “Research is needed to identify effective interventions to prevent hypertension in survivors, but our results emphasize the importance of blood pressure surveillance and management.”

Dr Gibson said a limitation of this study is that it was based on blood pressure measurements taken at a single study visit. A clinical diagnosis of hypertension typically requires measurements taken at multiple intervals.

In addition, the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort is a group of CCSs who undergo frequent clinical follow-up, so its participants may have benefited from being monitored and may therefore be in better health than CCSs who have less comprehensive follow-up.

Photo from NIH

A study of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) suggests these individuals have an increased risk of developing hypertension as adults.

The CCSs studied had more than double the rate of hypertension observed in the matched general population.

Sex, age, race, and weight were all significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, but most treatment types were not.

The exception was nephrectomy, which was associated with an increased risk of hypertension.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“High blood pressure is an important modifiable risk factor that increases the risk of heart problems in everyone,” Dr Gibson said. “Research has shown that high blood pressure can have an even greater negative impact on survivors of childhood cancer who were treated with cardiotoxic therapies such as anthracyclines or chest radiation.”

To assess the prevalence of hypertension among CCSs, Dr Gibson and his colleagues examined 3016 adults who were 10-year survivors of childhood cancers. The subjects were enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, which provides ongoing medical assessments of CCSs to advance knowledge of their long-term health outcomes.

The subjects’ mean age at the initial study assessment was 32, and 52% were male. Most (83%) were non-Hispanic white, 14% were non-Hispanic black, 2% were Hispanic, and 1% were “other.”

Thirty-seven percent of subjects had leukemia, 12% had Hodgkin lymphoma, and 7% had non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Eighty-six percent of subjects had received chemotherapy, and 59% received radiation.

Results

Subjects were considered to have hypertension if their systolic blood pressure was 140 or greater, their diastolic blood pressure was 90 or greater, or if they had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and were taking antihypertensive medication.

The prevalence of hypertension was 2.6 times higher among CCSs than expected, based on age-, sex-, race- and body mass index-specific rates in the general population.

In addition, the incidence of hypertension increased for CCSs over time. Thirteen percent of CCSs had hypertension at age 30, 37% had it at age 40, and more than 70% had it at age 50.

Dr Gibson said rates of hypertension in CCSs matched rates in the general population of people about a decade older.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, including:

• Male sex (odd ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.67)
• Non-Hispanic black race (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28–2.16)
• Older age at assessment (OR per 1 year of age, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08–1.11)
• Being overweight (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.07)
• Obesity (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.34–3.88).

Exposure to any type of radiation or chemotherapy was not significantly associated with hypertension, but nephrectomy was (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.53).

Dr Gibson said the lack of an association between hypertension and radiation/chemotherapy was surprising. It suggests the connection between childhood cancer survival and adult hypertension is multifactorial and worthy of future research.

In the meantime, he said, clinicians should be mindful that CCSs are more likely than the general public to develop hypertension.

“The good news is that, unlike prior cancer therapy, high blood pressure is a modifiable risk factor,” Dr Gibson noted. “Research is needed to identify effective interventions to prevent hypertension in survivors, but our results emphasize the importance of blood pressure surveillance and management.”

Dr Gibson said a limitation of this study is that it was based on blood pressure measurements taken at a single study visit. A clinical diagnosis of hypertension typically requires measurements taken at multiple intervals.

In addition, the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort is a group of CCSs who undergo frequent clinical follow-up, so its participants may have benefited from being monitored and may therefore be in better health than CCSs who have less comprehensive follow-up.

Photo from NIH

A study of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) suggests these individuals have an increased risk of developing hypertension as adults.

The CCSs studied had more than double the rate of hypertension observed in the matched general population.

Sex, age, race, and weight were all significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, but most treatment types were not.

The exception was nephrectomy, which was associated with an increased risk of hypertension.

Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

“High blood pressure is an important modifiable risk factor that increases the risk of heart problems in everyone,” Dr Gibson said. “Research has shown that high blood pressure can have an even greater negative impact on survivors of childhood cancer who were treated with cardiotoxic therapies such as anthracyclines or chest radiation.”

To assess the prevalence of hypertension among CCSs, Dr Gibson and his colleagues examined 3016 adults who were 10-year survivors of childhood cancers. The subjects were enrolled in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study, which provides ongoing medical assessments of CCSs to advance knowledge of their long-term health outcomes.

The subjects’ mean age at the initial study assessment was 32, and 52% were male. Most (83%) were non-Hispanic white, 14% were non-Hispanic black, 2% were Hispanic, and 1% were “other.”

Thirty-seven percent of subjects had leukemia, 12% had Hodgkin lymphoma, and 7% had non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Eighty-six percent of subjects had received chemotherapy, and 59% received radiation.

Results

Subjects were considered to have hypertension if their systolic blood pressure was 140 or greater, their diastolic blood pressure was 90 or greater, or if they had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and were taking antihypertensive medication.

The prevalence of hypertension was 2.6 times higher among CCSs than expected, based on age-, sex-, race- and body mass index-specific rates in the general population.

In addition, the incidence of hypertension increased for CCSs over time. Thirteen percent of CCSs had hypertension at age 30, 37% had it at age 40, and more than 70% had it at age 50.

Dr Gibson said rates of hypertension in CCSs matched rates in the general population of people about a decade older.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with hypertension among CCSs, including:

• Male sex (odd ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.67)
• Non-Hispanic black race (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28–2.16)
• Older age at assessment (OR per 1 year of age, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08–1.11)
• Being overweight (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.07)
• Obesity (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.34–3.88).

Exposure to any type of radiation or chemotherapy was not significantly associated with hypertension, but nephrectomy was (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.53).

Dr Gibson said the lack of an association between hypertension and radiation/chemotherapy was surprising. It suggests the connection between childhood cancer survival and adult hypertension is multifactorial and worthy of future research.

In the meantime, he said, clinicians should be mindful that CCSs are more likely than the general public to develop hypertension.

“The good news is that, unlike prior cancer therapy, high blood pressure is a modifiable risk factor,” Dr Gibson noted. “Research is needed to identify effective interventions to prevent hypertension in survivors, but our results emphasize the importance of blood pressure surveillance and management.”

Dr Gibson said a limitation of this study is that it was based on blood pressure measurements taken at a single study visit. A clinical diagnosis of hypertension typically requires measurements taken at multiple intervals.

In addition, the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort is a group of CCSs who undergo frequent clinical follow-up, so its participants may have benefited from being monitored and may therefore be in better health than CCSs who have less comprehensive follow-up.

Advances in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), multiple myeloma, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura will headline the late-breaking trials session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology in Atlanta.

In a preplanned interim analysis of data from 389 patients in the randomized phase III Murano trial, venetoclax and rituximab therapy proved “superior to the standard of care and well tolerated, and a major advance in the management of [relapsed/refractory] CLL,” ASH President Kenneth C. Anderson, MD said during a premeeting preview session for the media.

In Murano, venetoclax plus rituximab bettered bendamustine plus rituximab in progression-free survival, overall survival, overall and complete response rates, and number of patients achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, said Dr. Anderson, who is also director of the Lebow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

The results were consistent in all risk subsets, including patients who had high-risk disease by virtue of chromosome 17p deletion, according Dr. Anderson.

In another late-breaking randomized phase III study, known as ALCYONE, adding the CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody daratumumab to standard therapy with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) resulted in a “doubling” of progression-free survival in patients who had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and were ineligible for transplantation, he reported.

In the trial of more than 700 patients, daratumumab plus VMP as initial treatment for nontransplant patients was well tolerated and improved outcomes, including overall response rate and the percent of patients who achieved MRD negative status.

“As we saw in CLL, so it’s true in this abstract in myeloma: this is a very major advance,” Dr. Anderson said.

Also during the preview session, ASH Secretary Robert A. Brodsky, MD, discussed the randomized, phase III HERCULES study results, which showed that patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) may benefit when caplacizumab is added to standard therapy. Caplacizumab targets the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor, which inhibits interaction between ultra-large von Willebrand factor and platelets.

In the trial, 145 patients were randomized to receive either plasma exchange alone or plasma exchange and caplacizumab.

Preliminary results suggest “this was a very positive trial” with a primary endpoint of time to platelet response that “greatly favored the caplacizumab arm,” said Dr. Brodsky, professor of medicine and oncology and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “Even the secondary composite endpoint of death, recurrence, and/or major thromboembolic events was much improved with caplacizumab, so this is a very positive trial and potentially a game-changing drug for the management of TTP, which can be very challenging.”

Dr. Brodsky also discussed the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study, a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessment trial that showed the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

With more than 1,000 patients enrolled in 114 centers, the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study had a primary outcome of the composite of the first recurrent VTE or major bleeding event during follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 12.8% of patients in the edoxaban group, compared with 13.5% of patients in the dalteparin group (P = .0056 for noninferiority), according to the preliminary published results.

The key question addressed by the trial is whether a newer oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, can substitute for the older, subcutaneously administered low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin. The results “confirmed that a newer oral anticoagulant is at least as good and as safe as the low molecular weight heparin,” allowing patients the convenience of an oral therapy, Dr. Brodsky noted.

This year’s late-breaking abstracts at ASH are:

LBA-1 Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Hercules Study of Caplacizumab in Patients with Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

LBA-2 Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Is Superior to Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia - Results from Pre-Planned Interim Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Murano Study.

LBA-3 Mutations in SRP54 Gene Cause Severe Primary Neutropenia As Well As Shwachman-Diamond-like Syndrome.

LBA-4 Phase III Randomized Study of Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients (Pts) Ineligible for Transplant (ALCYONE).

LBA-5 Prospective Molecular MRD Detection By NGS: A Powerful Independent Predictor for Relapse and Survival in Adults with Newly Diagnosed AML.

LBA-6 A Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded Outcome Assessment Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of LMWH/Edoxaban Versus Dalteparin for Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer: Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study

Advances in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), multiple myeloma, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura will headline the late-breaking trials session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology in Atlanta.

In a preplanned interim analysis of data from 389 patients in the randomized phase III Murano trial, venetoclax and rituximab therapy proved “superior to the standard of care and well tolerated, and a major advance in the management of [relapsed/refractory] CLL,” ASH President Kenneth C. Anderson, MD said during a premeeting preview session for the media.

In Murano, venetoclax plus rituximab bettered bendamustine plus rituximab in progression-free survival, overall survival, overall and complete response rates, and number of patients achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, said Dr. Anderson, who is also director of the Lebow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

The results were consistent in all risk subsets, including patients who had high-risk disease by virtue of chromosome 17p deletion, according Dr. Anderson.

In another late-breaking randomized phase III study, known as ALCYONE, adding the CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody daratumumab to standard therapy with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) resulted in a “doubling” of progression-free survival in patients who had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and were ineligible for transplantation, he reported.

In the trial of more than 700 patients, daratumumab plus VMP as initial treatment for nontransplant patients was well tolerated and improved outcomes, including overall response rate and the percent of patients who achieved MRD negative status.

“As we saw in CLL, so it’s true in this abstract in myeloma: this is a very major advance,” Dr. Anderson said.

Also during the preview session, ASH Secretary Robert A. Brodsky, MD, discussed the randomized, phase III HERCULES study results, which showed that patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) may benefit when caplacizumab is added to standard therapy. Caplacizumab targets the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor, which inhibits interaction between ultra-large von Willebrand factor and platelets.

In the trial, 145 patients were randomized to receive either plasma exchange alone or plasma exchange and caplacizumab.

Preliminary results suggest “this was a very positive trial” with a primary endpoint of time to platelet response that “greatly favored the caplacizumab arm,” said Dr. Brodsky, professor of medicine and oncology and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “Even the secondary composite endpoint of death, recurrence, and/or major thromboembolic events was much improved with caplacizumab, so this is a very positive trial and potentially a game-changing drug for the management of TTP, which can be very challenging.”

Dr. Brodsky also discussed the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study, a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessment trial that showed the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

With more than 1,000 patients enrolled in 114 centers, the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study had a primary outcome of the composite of the first recurrent VTE or major bleeding event during follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 12.8% of patients in the edoxaban group, compared with 13.5% of patients in the dalteparin group (P = .0056 for noninferiority), according to the preliminary published results.

The key question addressed by the trial is whether a newer oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, can substitute for the older, subcutaneously administered low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin. The results “confirmed that a newer oral anticoagulant is at least as good and as safe as the low molecular weight heparin,” allowing patients the convenience of an oral therapy, Dr. Brodsky noted.

This year’s late-breaking abstracts at ASH are:

LBA-1 Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Hercules Study of Caplacizumab in Patients with Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

LBA-2 Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Is Superior to Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia - Results from Pre-Planned Interim Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Murano Study.

LBA-3 Mutations in SRP54 Gene Cause Severe Primary Neutropenia As Well As Shwachman-Diamond-like Syndrome.

LBA-4 Phase III Randomized Study of Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients (Pts) Ineligible for Transplant (ALCYONE).

LBA-5 Prospective Molecular MRD Detection By NGS: A Powerful Independent Predictor for Relapse and Survival in Adults with Newly Diagnosed AML.

LBA-6 A Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded Outcome Assessment Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of LMWH/Edoxaban Versus Dalteparin for Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer: Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study

Advances in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), multiple myeloma, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura will headline the late-breaking trials session at this year’s annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology in Atlanta.

In a preplanned interim analysis of data from 389 patients in the randomized phase III Murano trial, venetoclax and rituximab therapy proved “superior to the standard of care and well tolerated, and a major advance in the management of [relapsed/refractory] CLL,” ASH President Kenneth C. Anderson, MD said during a premeeting preview session for the media.

In Murano, venetoclax plus rituximab bettered bendamustine plus rituximab in progression-free survival, overall survival, overall and complete response rates, and number of patients achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, said Dr. Anderson, who is also director of the Lebow Institute for Myeloma Therapeutics and Jerome Lipper Myeloma Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.

The results were consistent in all risk subsets, including patients who had high-risk disease by virtue of chromosome 17p deletion, according Dr. Anderson.

In another late-breaking randomized phase III study, known as ALCYONE, adding the CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody daratumumab to standard therapy with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) resulted in a “doubling” of progression-free survival in patients who had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and were ineligible for transplantation, he reported.

In the trial of more than 700 patients, daratumumab plus VMP as initial treatment for nontransplant patients was well tolerated and improved outcomes, including overall response rate and the percent of patients who achieved MRD negative status.

“As we saw in CLL, so it’s true in this abstract in myeloma: this is a very major advance,” Dr. Anderson said.

Also during the preview session, ASH Secretary Robert A. Brodsky, MD, discussed the randomized, phase III HERCULES study results, which showed that patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) may benefit when caplacizumab is added to standard therapy. Caplacizumab targets the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor, which inhibits interaction between ultra-large von Willebrand factor and platelets.

In the trial, 145 patients were randomized to receive either plasma exchange alone or plasma exchange and caplacizumab.

Preliminary results suggest “this was a very positive trial” with a primary endpoint of time to platelet response that “greatly favored the caplacizumab arm,” said Dr. Brodsky, professor of medicine and oncology and director of the division of hematology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “Even the secondary composite endpoint of death, recurrence, and/or major thromboembolic events was much improved with caplacizumab, so this is a very positive trial and potentially a game-changing drug for the management of TTP, which can be very challenging.”

Dr. Brodsky also discussed the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study, a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessment trial that showed the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

With more than 1,000 patients enrolled in 114 centers, the Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study had a primary outcome of the composite of the first recurrent VTE or major bleeding event during follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 12.8% of patients in the edoxaban group, compared with 13.5% of patients in the dalteparin group (P = .0056 for noninferiority), according to the preliminary published results.

The key question addressed by the trial is whether a newer oral anticoagulant, edoxaban, can substitute for the older, subcutaneously administered low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin. The results “confirmed that a newer oral anticoagulant is at least as good and as safe as the low molecular weight heparin,” allowing patients the convenience of an oral therapy, Dr. Brodsky noted.

This year’s late-breaking abstracts at ASH are:

LBA-1 Results of the Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Hercules Study of Caplacizumab in Patients with Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

LBA-2 Venetoclax Plus Rituximab Is Superior to Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia - Results from Pre-Planned Interim Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Murano Study.

LBA-3 Mutations in SRP54 Gene Cause Severe Primary Neutropenia As Well As Shwachman-Diamond-like Syndrome.

LBA-4 Phase III Randomized Study of Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (D-VMP) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients (Pts) Ineligible for Transplant (ALCYONE).

LBA-5 Prospective Molecular MRD Detection By NGS: A Powerful Independent Predictor for Relapse and Survival in Adults with Newly Diagnosed AML.

LBA-6 A Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded Outcome Assessment Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of LMWH/Edoxaban Versus Dalteparin for Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Cancer: Hokusai VTE-Cancer Study

Wolfgang Däuble

An ex vivo drug screening method can reveal optimal therapies for patients with hematologic malignancies, according to research published in The Lancet Haematology.

Researchers used a method called pharmacoscopy to measure single-cell responses to possible treatments in samples from patients with leukemias and lymphomas.

The team then used these results to guide treatment decisions and found that pharmacoscopy-guided treatment greatly improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS).

“Having a robust, fast, and reliable predictive test at our disposal during the patient treatment process, especially at the time of relapse where a new intervention must be selected quickly, will change how medical doctors prioritize drugs to use for late-stage patients,” said study author Philipp Staber, MD, of Medical University of Vienna in Austria.

With pharmacoscopy, hundreds of drug options can be pre-tested ex vivo in small liquid biopsy samples collected from individual patients. The effects of each drug on the individual cells are quantified using high-throughput and high-content automated confocal microscopy.

In combination with specially developed analysis methods, machine learning, and other algorithms, pharmacoscopy allows quantification of never-before visualized phenotypes. The method was first described last April in Nature Chemical Biology.

Now, Dr Staber and his colleagues have reported, in The Lancet Haematology, an interim analysis of the first clinical trial testing pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

There were 17 evaluable patients, all of whom had aggressive hematologic malignancies. This included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=6), acute myeloid leukemia (n=3), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=2), precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (n=1), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (n=1), T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), follicular lymphoma (n=1), and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The researchers compared outcomes with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment to outcomes with the most recent regimen on which the patient had progressed.

The overall response rate was 88% with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 24% with the patients’ most recent previous treatment regimen (odds ratio=24.38; 95%, CI 3.99–125.4; P=0.0013).

None of the patients had progressive disease as their best overall response when they received pharmacoscopy-guided treatment. However, 7 patients had progressive disease in response to their most recent prior regimen.

At the time of analysis, 8 patients (47%) still had ongoing responses after pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

In addition, pharmacoscopy-guided treatment significantly improved PFS. The median PFS was 22.6 weeks with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 5.7 weeks with the most recent prior regimen (hazard ratio=3.14; 95%, CI 1.37–7.22; P=0.0075).

“Evidence that the pharmacoscopy approach is helpful for clinical evaluation of therapy is wonderful,” said study author Giulio Superti-Furga, PhD, of CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine in Vienna, Austria.

“Single-cell functional analysis of primary material gives unprecedented resolution and precision that we are sure to further develop in the future to address yet more diseases.”

Wolfgang Däuble

An ex vivo drug screening method can reveal optimal therapies for patients with hematologic malignancies, according to research published in The Lancet Haematology.

Researchers used a method called pharmacoscopy to measure single-cell responses to possible treatments in samples from patients with leukemias and lymphomas.

The team then used these results to guide treatment decisions and found that pharmacoscopy-guided treatment greatly improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS).

“Having a robust, fast, and reliable predictive test at our disposal during the patient treatment process, especially at the time of relapse where a new intervention must be selected quickly, will change how medical doctors prioritize drugs to use for late-stage patients,” said study author Philipp Staber, MD, of Medical University of Vienna in Austria.

With pharmacoscopy, hundreds of drug options can be pre-tested ex vivo in small liquid biopsy samples collected from individual patients. The effects of each drug on the individual cells are quantified using high-throughput and high-content automated confocal microscopy.

In combination with specially developed analysis methods, machine learning, and other algorithms, pharmacoscopy allows quantification of never-before visualized phenotypes. The method was first described last April in Nature Chemical Biology.

Now, Dr Staber and his colleagues have reported, in The Lancet Haematology, an interim analysis of the first clinical trial testing pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

There were 17 evaluable patients, all of whom had aggressive hematologic malignancies. This included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=6), acute myeloid leukemia (n=3), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=2), precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (n=1), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (n=1), T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), follicular lymphoma (n=1), and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The researchers compared outcomes with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment to outcomes with the most recent regimen on which the patient had progressed.

The overall response rate was 88% with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 24% with the patients’ most recent previous treatment regimen (odds ratio=24.38; 95%, CI 3.99–125.4; P=0.0013).

None of the patients had progressive disease as their best overall response when they received pharmacoscopy-guided treatment. However, 7 patients had progressive disease in response to their most recent prior regimen.

At the time of analysis, 8 patients (47%) still had ongoing responses after pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

In addition, pharmacoscopy-guided treatment significantly improved PFS. The median PFS was 22.6 weeks with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 5.7 weeks with the most recent prior regimen (hazard ratio=3.14; 95%, CI 1.37–7.22; P=0.0075).

“Evidence that the pharmacoscopy approach is helpful for clinical evaluation of therapy is wonderful,” said study author Giulio Superti-Furga, PhD, of CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine in Vienna, Austria.

“Single-cell functional analysis of primary material gives unprecedented resolution and precision that we are sure to further develop in the future to address yet more diseases.”

Wolfgang Däuble

An ex vivo drug screening method can reveal optimal therapies for patients with hematologic malignancies, according to research published in The Lancet Haematology.

Researchers used a method called pharmacoscopy to measure single-cell responses to possible treatments in samples from patients with leukemias and lymphomas.

The team then used these results to guide treatment decisions and found that pharmacoscopy-guided treatment greatly improved response rates and progression-free survival (PFS).

“Having a robust, fast, and reliable predictive test at our disposal during the patient treatment process, especially at the time of relapse where a new intervention must be selected quickly, will change how medical doctors prioritize drugs to use for late-stage patients,” said study author Philipp Staber, MD, of Medical University of Vienna in Austria.

With pharmacoscopy, hundreds of drug options can be pre-tested ex vivo in small liquid biopsy samples collected from individual patients. The effects of each drug on the individual cells are quantified using high-throughput and high-content automated confocal microscopy.

In combination with specially developed analysis methods, machine learning, and other algorithms, pharmacoscopy allows quantification of never-before visualized phenotypes. The method was first described last April in Nature Chemical Biology.

Now, Dr Staber and his colleagues have reported, in The Lancet Haematology, an interim analysis of the first clinical trial testing pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

There were 17 evaluable patients, all of whom had aggressive hematologic malignancies. This included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=6), acute myeloid leukemia (n=3), B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=2), precursor B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (n=1), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (n=1), T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (n=1), follicular lymphoma (n=1), and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (n=1).

The researchers compared outcomes with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment to outcomes with the most recent regimen on which the patient had progressed.

The overall response rate was 88% with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 24% with the patients’ most recent previous treatment regimen (odds ratio=24.38; 95%, CI 3.99–125.4; P=0.0013).

None of the patients had progressive disease as their best overall response when they received pharmacoscopy-guided treatment. However, 7 patients had progressive disease in response to their most recent prior regimen.

At the time of analysis, 8 patients (47%) still had ongoing responses after pharmacoscopy-guided treatment.

In addition, pharmacoscopy-guided treatment significantly improved PFS. The median PFS was 22.6 weeks with pharmacoscopy-guided treatment and 5.7 weeks with the most recent prior regimen (hazard ratio=3.14; 95%, CI 1.37–7.22; P=0.0075).

“Evidence that the pharmacoscopy approach is helpful for clinical evaluation of therapy is wonderful,” said study author Giulio Superti-Furga, PhD, of CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine in Vienna, Austria.

“Single-cell functional analysis of primary material gives unprecedented resolution and precision that we are sure to further develop in the future to address yet more diseases.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Cancer patients may experience lasting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to a study published in the journal Cancer.

Approximately one-fifth of patients involved in the study experienced PTSD several months after their cancer diagnosis, and roughly a third of these patients continued to live with PTSD 4 years later.

Researchers say these findings highlight the need for early identification, careful monitoring, and treatment of PTSD in cancer survivors.

Caryn Mei Hsien Chan, PhD, of the National University of Malaysia in Kuala Lumpur, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The study included 469 adults with various cancers who were within 1 month of cancer diagnosis at enrollment.

Patients who had significant psychological distress (defined as a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total cutoff score of 16 or higher) underwent

testing for PTSD at 6 months of follow-up. All patients were tested for PTSD at 4 years of follow-up (regardless of their Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score).

The incidence of PTSD was 21.7% at 6 months and 6.1% at 4 years. Although overall rates of PTSD decreased with time, roughly one-third of patients initially diagnosed with PTSD were found to have persistent or worsening symptoms 4 years later.

“Many cancer patients believe they need to adopt a ‘warrior mentality’ and remain positive and optimistic from diagnosis through treatment to stand a better chance of beating their cancer,” Dr Chan said.

“To these patients, seeking help for the emotional issues they face is akin to admitting weakness. There needs to be greater awareness that there is nothing wrong with getting help to manage the emotional upheaval—particularly depression, anxiety, and PTSD—post-cancer.”

Dr Chan also stressed that many patients live in fear that their cancer may come back, and they may think the cancer has returned with every lump or bump, pain or ache, fatigue or fever.

In addition, cancer survivors might skip visits to their oncologists or other physicians to avoid triggering memories of their past cancer experience. This can lead to delays in seeking help for new symptoms or even refusal of treatment for unrelated conditions.

“We need psychological evaluation and support services for patients with cancer at an initial stage and at continued follows-up because psychological well-being and mental health—and by extension, quality of life—are just as important as physical health,” Dr Chan noted.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Cancer patients may experience lasting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to a study published in the journal Cancer.

Approximately one-fifth of patients involved in the study experienced PTSD several months after their cancer diagnosis, and roughly a third of these patients continued to live with PTSD 4 years later.

Researchers say these findings highlight the need for early identification, careful monitoring, and treatment of PTSD in cancer survivors.

Caryn Mei Hsien Chan, PhD, of the National University of Malaysia in Kuala Lumpur, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The study included 469 adults with various cancers who were within 1 month of cancer diagnosis at enrollment.

Patients who had significant psychological distress (defined as a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total cutoff score of 16 or higher) underwent

testing for PTSD at 6 months of follow-up. All patients were tested for PTSD at 4 years of follow-up (regardless of their Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score).

The incidence of PTSD was 21.7% at 6 months and 6.1% at 4 years. Although overall rates of PTSD decreased with time, roughly one-third of patients initially diagnosed with PTSD were found to have persistent or worsening symptoms 4 years later.

“Many cancer patients believe they need to adopt a ‘warrior mentality’ and remain positive and optimistic from diagnosis through treatment to stand a better chance of beating their cancer,” Dr Chan said.

“To these patients, seeking help for the emotional issues they face is akin to admitting weakness. There needs to be greater awareness that there is nothing wrong with getting help to manage the emotional upheaval—particularly depression, anxiety, and PTSD—post-cancer.”

Dr Chan also stressed that many patients live in fear that their cancer may come back, and they may think the cancer has returned with every lump or bump, pain or ache, fatigue or fever.

In addition, cancer survivors might skip visits to their oncologists or other physicians to avoid triggering memories of their past cancer experience. This can lead to delays in seeking help for new symptoms or even refusal of treatment for unrelated conditions.

“We need psychological evaluation and support services for patients with cancer at an initial stage and at continued follows-up because psychological well-being and mental health—and by extension, quality of life—are just as important as physical health,” Dr Chan noted.

Photo by Rhoda Baer

Cancer patients may experience lasting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), according to a study published in the journal Cancer.

Approximately one-fifth of patients involved in the study experienced PTSD several months after their cancer diagnosis, and roughly a third of these patients continued to live with PTSD 4 years later.

Researchers say these findings highlight the need for early identification, careful monitoring, and treatment of PTSD in cancer survivors.

Caryn Mei Hsien Chan, PhD, of the National University of Malaysia in Kuala Lumpur, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The study included 469 adults with various cancers who were within 1 month of cancer diagnosis at enrollment.

Patients who had significant psychological distress (defined as a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total cutoff score of 16 or higher) underwent

testing for PTSD at 6 months of follow-up. All patients were tested for PTSD at 4 years of follow-up (regardless of their Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score).

The incidence of PTSD was 21.7% at 6 months and 6.1% at 4 years. Although overall rates of PTSD decreased with time, roughly one-third of patients initially diagnosed with PTSD were found to have persistent or worsening symptoms 4 years later.

“Many cancer patients believe they need to adopt a ‘warrior mentality’ and remain positive and optimistic from diagnosis through treatment to stand a better chance of beating their cancer,” Dr Chan said.

“To these patients, seeking help for the emotional issues they face is akin to admitting weakness. There needs to be greater awareness that there is nothing wrong with getting help to manage the emotional upheaval—particularly depression, anxiety, and PTSD—post-cancer.”

Dr Chan also stressed that many patients live in fear that their cancer may come back, and they may think the cancer has returned with every lump or bump, pain or ache, fatigue or fever.

In addition, cancer survivors might skip visits to their oncologists or other physicians to avoid triggering memories of their past cancer experience. This can lead to delays in seeking help for new symptoms or even refusal of treatment for unrelated conditions.

“We need psychological evaluation and support services for patients with cancer at an initial stage and at continued follows-up because psychological well-being and mental health—and by extension, quality of life—are just as important as physical health,” Dr Chan noted.

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission has approved nilotinib (Tasigna®) for the treatment of pediatric patients.

The drug is now approved to treat children age 2 and older with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+), chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

Nilotinib is the only second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently approved in the European Union (EU) for the treatment of Ph+ CP-CML in children. The approval applies to all EU member states.

According to Novartis, the expanded indication for nilotinib is based on 2 prospective studies of the drug in children with Ph+ CP-CML, which were part of a formal “pediatric investigation plan” agreed upon with the European Medicines Agency.

The company said 69 patients received nilotinib in these studies. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 18. They had either newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

In the newly diagnosed patients, the major molecular response (MMR) rate was 60.0% (95% CI: 38.7, 78.9) at 12 cycles, with 15 patients achieving MMR.

In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the MMR rate was 40.9% (95% CI: 26.3, 56.8) at 12 cycles, with 18 patients being in MMR.

In newly diagnosed patients, the cumulative MMR rate was 64.0% by cycle 12. In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the cumulative MMR rate was 47.7% by cycle 12.

Adverse events were generally consistent with those observed in adults, with the exception of hyperbilirubinemia and transaminase elevation, which were reported at a higher frequency than in adults.

The rate of grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia was 13.0%, the rate of grade 3/4 AST elevation was 1.4%, and the rate of grade 3/4 ALT elevation was 8.7%.

There were no deaths on treatment or after treatment discontinuation.

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission has approved nilotinib (Tasigna®) for the treatment of pediatric patients.

The drug is now approved to treat children age 2 and older with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+), chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

Nilotinib is the only second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently approved in the European Union (EU) for the treatment of Ph+ CP-CML in children. The approval applies to all EU member states.

According to Novartis, the expanded indication for nilotinib is based on 2 prospective studies of the drug in children with Ph+ CP-CML, which were part of a formal “pediatric investigation plan” agreed upon with the European Medicines Agency.

The company said 69 patients received nilotinib in these studies. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 18. They had either newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

In the newly diagnosed patients, the major molecular response (MMR) rate was 60.0% (95% CI: 38.7, 78.9) at 12 cycles, with 15 patients achieving MMR.

In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the MMR rate was 40.9% (95% CI: 26.3, 56.8) at 12 cycles, with 18 patients being in MMR.

In newly diagnosed patients, the cumulative MMR rate was 64.0% by cycle 12. In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the cumulative MMR rate was 47.7% by cycle 12.

Adverse events were generally consistent with those observed in adults, with the exception of hyperbilirubinemia and transaminase elevation, which were reported at a higher frequency than in adults.

The rate of grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia was 13.0%, the rate of grade 3/4 AST elevation was 1.4%, and the rate of grade 3/4 ALT elevation was 8.7%.

There were no deaths on treatment or after treatment discontinuation.

Photo from Novartis

The European Commission has approved nilotinib (Tasigna®) for the treatment of pediatric patients.

The drug is now approved to treat children age 2 and older with newly diagnosed, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+), chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

Nilotinib is the only second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor currently approved in the European Union (EU) for the treatment of Ph+ CP-CML in children. The approval applies to all EU member states.

According to Novartis, the expanded indication for nilotinib is based on 2 prospective studies of the drug in children with Ph+ CP-CML, which were part of a formal “pediatric investigation plan” agreed upon with the European Medicines Agency.

The company said 69 patients received nilotinib in these studies. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 18. They had either newly diagnosed Ph+ CP-CML or Ph+ CP-CML with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, including imatinib.

In the newly diagnosed patients, the major molecular response (MMR) rate was 60.0% (95% CI: 38.7, 78.9) at 12 cycles, with 15 patients achieving MMR.

In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the MMR rate was 40.9% (95% CI: 26.3, 56.8) at 12 cycles, with 18 patients being in MMR.

In newly diagnosed patients, the cumulative MMR rate was 64.0% by cycle 12. In patients with resistance or intolerance to prior therapy, the cumulative MMR rate was 47.7% by cycle 12.

Adverse events were generally consistent with those observed in adults, with the exception of hyperbilirubinemia and transaminase elevation, which were reported at a higher frequency than in adults.

The rate of grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia was 13.0%, the rate of grade 3/4 AST elevation was 1.4%, and the rate of grade 3/4 ALT elevation was 8.7%.

There were no deaths on treatment or after treatment discontinuation.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

When evaluating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia for treatment, start with their fitness levels.

ML is a disease of older adults, and with increasing age comes higher treatment-related mortality, lower complete remission rates, higher relapse risk, and shorter overall survival. So it may not be surprising that fewer than half of U.S. patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia over age 65 receive any chemotherapy at all, wrote Li-Wen Huang, MD, and Rebecca L. Olin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco.

[email protected]

When evaluating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia for treatment, start with their fitness levels.

ML is a disease of older adults, and with increasing age comes higher treatment-related mortality, lower complete remission rates, higher relapse risk, and shorter overall survival. So it may not be surprising that fewer than half of U.S. patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia over age 65 receive any chemotherapy at all, wrote Li-Wen Huang, MD, and Rebecca L. Olin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco.

[email protected]

When evaluating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia for treatment, start with their fitness levels.

ML is a disease of older adults, and with increasing age comes higher treatment-related mortality, lower complete remission rates, higher relapse risk, and shorter overall survival. So it may not be surprising that fewer than half of U.S. patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia over age 65 receive any chemotherapy at all, wrote Li-Wen Huang, MD, and Rebecca L. Olin, MD, of the University of California, San Francisco.

[email protected]

Reporting AT LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA 2017

NEW YORK – Clinical trials are needed to determine the best follow-on therapies when patients discontinue the ibrutinib due to adverse events or disease progression, according to a leading expert on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Anthony Mato, MD, MSCE, from the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, discussed how real-world experience with the use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) can fill the gaps in knowledge left by clinical trials and point to the need for further study.
“Regulatory bodies around the world are more and more interested in what’s going on in the clinic, and there is a question about whether or not the experiences for patients that we take care of might actually answer some important questions that aren’t easily answered in the context of clinical research,” he said at the annual Lymphoma & Myeloma International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies here.

“Are the experiences in practice with novel agents similar to experiences from clinical trials? I think that’s very important,” he added.
Other important questions that real-world experience may help to answer include whether it’s possible to refine adverse event profiles and reasons for ibrutinib discontinuation, what therapies should be prescribed after ibrutinib, and what is the optimal sequencing of therapies for CLL.
For example, in the RESONATE-2 trial, an open-label, international phase 3 study comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients 65 and older, ibrutinib was found to be superior to chlorambucil in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and improvements in hematologic variables.

However, this trial excluded patients with the deleterious chromosome 17p deletion (del17p) and included only patients 65 and older, a population that does not necessarily reflect clinical experience.
To get a better sense of how ibrutinib is used to treat CLL in the front-line setting Dr. Mato and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study of 391 patients treated in 19 US and international academic and community centers.

The median age of the sample was 68 years, but 41% of the patients were younger than 65. In all, 62% were male, and 80% had Rai stage 2 or greater disease. Genetic analyses showed that 30% of the patients were positive for del17p, and 17% had both del17p and the 11q deletion (del11q). Mutations in TP53 were seen in 20% of patients, 23% had a complex karyotype, and 67% had an unmutated immuglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). Only 57 patients (14.5%) were classified as genetically low risk.

Additionally, only 79 of the 391 patients had complete data for CLL International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) scoring, “which goes, I think, to show how often this is actually being tested and utilized in clinical practice,” Dr. Mato said.

Off-label use of ibrutinib in combination therapy was given to 16% of patients, most commonly with an anti-CD20 inhibitor such as rituximab.
In all, 17% of patients required permanent dose reductions; and 42% had a dose interruption, with a median hiatus of 12 days.
Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were uncommon, but more than 20% of patients experienced arthralgias or myalgias of any kind, about 19% reported fatigue, 18% had dermatologic toxicities, 18% reported bruising, 17% had diarrhea or colitis and 15% had infections.
The toxicities seen in RESONATE-2 were somewhat similar, but generally occurred in higher frequencies in the trial than in real-world practice.
Dr. Mato and colleagues found that at a median of 12 months of follow-up, 24% of patients had discontinued ibrutinib. In contrast, in RESONATE-2, after 18 months of follow-up, 13% of patients had discontinued the drug.

The most common reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice were for toxicities (59.5% of 94 discontinuations) including atrial fibrillation in 20% of the patients who discontinued, arthralgias/myalgias and skin toxicities in 14.5% each, and bleeding in 9.1%.
Other reasons for discontinuation included Richter’s transformation in 9.6%, doctor or patient preference in 7.4%, and deaths that were not secondary to CLL progression in 3.2%.

“We also tried to get a sense of whether or not cost was a factor for patients, and in this series and the relapsed refractory setting, 1% or less of patients discontinued due to financial issues,” Dr. Mato said.

Outcomes in the real word were quite good, he noted, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 81.7%, which included 17.4% complete responses (CR), Neither median PFS nor OS have been reached and the respective PFS and OS at 12 months were 92% and 95%. The respective PFS and OS rates for patients with del17p were 87% and 89%. An analysis of predictors of survival showed that only the presence of del17p was associated with inferior PFS (odds ratio 1.91, P = .035)

Dr. Mato noted that there was no clear standard treatment approach for patients who discontinued ibrutinib or for whom ibrutinib did not work. The top three second-line approaches used included an anti-CD20 agent combined with chlorambucil, venetoclax (Venclexta), or a different kinase inhibitor. Chemoimmunotherapy with either fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab or bendamustine and rituximab was given to only 5 patients as a second line therapy.

Dr. Mato disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen/Pharmacyclics, and TG Therapeutics.

Reporting AT LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA 2017

NEW YORK – Clinical trials are needed to determine the best follow-on therapies when patients discontinue the ibrutinib due to adverse events or disease progression, according to a leading expert on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Anthony Mato, MD, MSCE, from the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, discussed how real-world experience with the use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) can fill the gaps in knowledge left by clinical trials and point to the need for further study.
“Regulatory bodies around the world are more and more interested in what’s going on in the clinic, and there is a question about whether or not the experiences for patients that we take care of might actually answer some important questions that aren’t easily answered in the context of clinical research,” he said at the annual Lymphoma & Myeloma International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies here.

“Are the experiences in practice with novel agents similar to experiences from clinical trials? I think that’s very important,” he added.
Other important questions that real-world experience may help to answer include whether it’s possible to refine adverse event profiles and reasons for ibrutinib discontinuation, what therapies should be prescribed after ibrutinib, and what is the optimal sequencing of therapies for CLL.
For example, in the RESONATE-2 trial, an open-label, international phase 3 study comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients 65 and older, ibrutinib was found to be superior to chlorambucil in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and improvements in hematologic variables.

However, this trial excluded patients with the deleterious chromosome 17p deletion (del17p) and included only patients 65 and older, a population that does not necessarily reflect clinical experience.
To get a better sense of how ibrutinib is used to treat CLL in the front-line setting Dr. Mato and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study of 391 patients treated in 19 US and international academic and community centers.

The median age of the sample was 68 years, but 41% of the patients were younger than 65. In all, 62% were male, and 80% had Rai stage 2 or greater disease. Genetic analyses showed that 30% of the patients were positive for del17p, and 17% had both del17p and the 11q deletion (del11q). Mutations in TP53 were seen in 20% of patients, 23% had a complex karyotype, and 67% had an unmutated immuglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). Only 57 patients (14.5%) were classified as genetically low risk.

Additionally, only 79 of the 391 patients had complete data for CLL International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) scoring, “which goes, I think, to show how often this is actually being tested and utilized in clinical practice,” Dr. Mato said.

Off-label use of ibrutinib in combination therapy was given to 16% of patients, most commonly with an anti-CD20 inhibitor such as rituximab.
In all, 17% of patients required permanent dose reductions; and 42% had a dose interruption, with a median hiatus of 12 days.
Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were uncommon, but more than 20% of patients experienced arthralgias or myalgias of any kind, about 19% reported fatigue, 18% had dermatologic toxicities, 18% reported bruising, 17% had diarrhea or colitis and 15% had infections.
The toxicities seen in RESONATE-2 were somewhat similar, but generally occurred in higher frequencies in the trial than in real-world practice.
Dr. Mato and colleagues found that at a median of 12 months of follow-up, 24% of patients had discontinued ibrutinib. In contrast, in RESONATE-2, after 18 months of follow-up, 13% of patients had discontinued the drug.

The most common reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice were for toxicities (59.5% of 94 discontinuations) including atrial fibrillation in 20% of the patients who discontinued, arthralgias/myalgias and skin toxicities in 14.5% each, and bleeding in 9.1%.
Other reasons for discontinuation included Richter’s transformation in 9.6%, doctor or patient preference in 7.4%, and deaths that were not secondary to CLL progression in 3.2%.

“We also tried to get a sense of whether or not cost was a factor for patients, and in this series and the relapsed refractory setting, 1% or less of patients discontinued due to financial issues,” Dr. Mato said.

Outcomes in the real word were quite good, he noted, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 81.7%, which included 17.4% complete responses (CR), Neither median PFS nor OS have been reached and the respective PFS and OS at 12 months were 92% and 95%. The respective PFS and OS rates for patients with del17p were 87% and 89%. An analysis of predictors of survival showed that only the presence of del17p was associated with inferior PFS (odds ratio 1.91, P = .035)

Dr. Mato noted that there was no clear standard treatment approach for patients who discontinued ibrutinib or for whom ibrutinib did not work. The top three second-line approaches used included an anti-CD20 agent combined with chlorambucil, venetoclax (Venclexta), or a different kinase inhibitor. Chemoimmunotherapy with either fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab or bendamustine and rituximab was given to only 5 patients as a second line therapy.

Dr. Mato disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen/Pharmacyclics, and TG Therapeutics.

Reporting AT LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA 2017

NEW YORK – Clinical trials are needed to determine the best follow-on therapies when patients discontinue the ibrutinib due to adverse events or disease progression, according to a leading expert on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Anthony Mato, MD, MSCE, from the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, discussed how real-world experience with the use of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) can fill the gaps in knowledge left by clinical trials and point to the need for further study.
“Regulatory bodies around the world are more and more interested in what’s going on in the clinic, and there is a question about whether or not the experiences for patients that we take care of might actually answer some important questions that aren’t easily answered in the context of clinical research,” he said at the annual Lymphoma & Myeloma International Congress on Hematologic Malignancies here.

“Are the experiences in practice with novel agents similar to experiences from clinical trials? I think that’s very important,” he added.
Other important questions that real-world experience may help to answer include whether it’s possible to refine adverse event profiles and reasons for ibrutinib discontinuation, what therapies should be prescribed after ibrutinib, and what is the optimal sequencing of therapies for CLL.
For example, in the RESONATE-2 trial, an open-label, international phase 3 study comparing ibrutinib with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients 65 and older, ibrutinib was found to be superior to chlorambucil in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate, and improvements in hematologic variables.

However, this trial excluded patients with the deleterious chromosome 17p deletion (del17p) and included only patients 65 and older, a population that does not necessarily reflect clinical experience.
To get a better sense of how ibrutinib is used to treat CLL in the front-line setting Dr. Mato and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study of 391 patients treated in 19 US and international academic and community centers.

The median age of the sample was 68 years, but 41% of the patients were younger than 65. In all, 62% were male, and 80% had Rai stage 2 or greater disease. Genetic analyses showed that 30% of the patients were positive for del17p, and 17% had both del17p and the 11q deletion (del11q). Mutations in TP53 were seen in 20% of patients, 23% had a complex karyotype, and 67% had an unmutated immuglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). Only 57 patients (14.5%) were classified as genetically low risk.

Additionally, only 79 of the 391 patients had complete data for CLL International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) scoring, “which goes, I think, to show how often this is actually being tested and utilized in clinical practice,” Dr. Mato said.

Off-label use of ibrutinib in combination therapy was given to 16% of patients, most commonly with an anti-CD20 inhibitor such as rituximab.
In all, 17% of patients required permanent dose reductions; and 42% had a dose interruption, with a median hiatus of 12 days.
Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were uncommon, but more than 20% of patients experienced arthralgias or myalgias of any kind, about 19% reported fatigue, 18% had dermatologic toxicities, 18% reported bruising, 17% had diarrhea or colitis and 15% had infections.
The toxicities seen in RESONATE-2 were somewhat similar, but generally occurred in higher frequencies in the trial than in real-world practice.
Dr. Mato and colleagues found that at a median of 12 months of follow-up, 24% of patients had discontinued ibrutinib. In contrast, in RESONATE-2, after 18 months of follow-up, 13% of patients had discontinued the drug.

The most common reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice were for toxicities (59.5% of 94 discontinuations) including atrial fibrillation in 20% of the patients who discontinued, arthralgias/myalgias and skin toxicities in 14.5% each, and bleeding in 9.1%.
Other reasons for discontinuation included Richter’s transformation in 9.6%, doctor or patient preference in 7.4%, and deaths that were not secondary to CLL progression in 3.2%.

“We also tried to get a sense of whether or not cost was a factor for patients, and in this series and the relapsed refractory setting, 1% or less of patients discontinued due to financial issues,” Dr. Mato said.

Outcomes in the real word were quite good, he noted, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 81.7%, which included 17.4% complete responses (CR), Neither median PFS nor OS have been reached and the respective PFS and OS at 12 months were 92% and 95%. The respective PFS and OS rates for patients with del17p were 87% and 89%. An analysis of predictors of survival showed that only the presence of del17p was associated with inferior PFS (odds ratio 1.91, P = .035)

Dr. Mato noted that there was no clear standard treatment approach for patients who discontinued ibrutinib or for whom ibrutinib did not work. The top three second-line approaches used included an anti-CD20 agent combined with chlorambucil, venetoclax (Venclexta), or a different kinase inhibitor. Chemoimmunotherapy with either fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab or bendamustine and rituximab was given to only 5 patients as a second line therapy.

Dr. Mato disclosed serving as a consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen/Pharmacyclics, and TG Therapeutics.

Children’s Research Hospital

Researchers say they have uncovered a target to overcome drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team discovered how a linkage between 2 proteins enables AML cells to resist chemotherapy and showed that disrupting the linkage could render the cells vulnerable to treatment.

The researchers believe their discovery could lead to drugs to enhance chemotherapy in patients with AML and other cancers.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described this research in Nature Communications.

The team launched their experiments based on previous findings that a protein called ABCC4 was greatly elevated in aggressive cases of AML.

Dr Schuetz and his colleagues searched for other proteins that might interact with ABCC4 and enable its function. The team’s screening of candidate proteins yielded one, MPP1, which was also greatly increased in AML.

The researchers found the 2 proteins are connected, and the connection enables cells to assume the characteristics of highly proliferative leukemia cells.

These experiments involved genetically altering hematopoietic progenitor cells to have high MPP1 and ABCC4 levels. The cells were grown in culture and then replated to see if they would continue to grow, as such self-renewal is a hallmark of leukemia cells.

The researchers found that serial regrowth depended on the cells having high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1.

“Typically, if you take normal progenitors and you replate, you could do that one time, maybe twice,” Dr Schuetz said. “But our big surprise was that overexpressing MPP1—analogous to what you would see in leukemia—allows those progenitors to self-renew, to be replated over and over, to form new colonies.”

The experiments also revealed that MPP1 and ABCC4 functioned at the cell membrane, where they could play a role in the machinery that would rid the leukemia cells of chemotherapy drugs.

“When we disrupted their interaction, ABCC4 moved off the membrane and the cells became more sensitive to drugs used in AML—drugs that are pumped out of the cell by ABCC4,” Dr Schuetz said.

By screening thousands of compounds, the researchers identified some that could disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 connection. One, called Antimycin-A, reversed drug resistance in AML cell lines and in cells from AML patients.

Antimycin-A is too toxic to be used in chemotherapy, but the researchers believe identification of the compound should aid the search for other, less-toxic drugs to disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 interaction.

The team’s findings could also enable clinicians to identify AML patients with high levels of ABCC4 and MPP1. In such patients, drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1 might enhance the effectiveness of standard chemotherapy, Dr Schuetz said.

He also noted that other cancers, including breast and colon cancer and medulloblastoma, show high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1. Chemotherapy for those cancers might also be enhanced by drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1.

Children’s Research Hospital

Researchers say they have uncovered a target to overcome drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team discovered how a linkage between 2 proteins enables AML cells to resist chemotherapy and showed that disrupting the linkage could render the cells vulnerable to treatment.

The researchers believe their discovery could lead to drugs to enhance chemotherapy in patients with AML and other cancers.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described this research in Nature Communications.

The team launched their experiments based on previous findings that a protein called ABCC4 was greatly elevated in aggressive cases of AML.

Dr Schuetz and his colleagues searched for other proteins that might interact with ABCC4 and enable its function. The team’s screening of candidate proteins yielded one, MPP1, which was also greatly increased in AML.

The researchers found the 2 proteins are connected, and the connection enables cells to assume the characteristics of highly proliferative leukemia cells.

These experiments involved genetically altering hematopoietic progenitor cells to have high MPP1 and ABCC4 levels. The cells were grown in culture and then replated to see if they would continue to grow, as such self-renewal is a hallmark of leukemia cells.

The researchers found that serial regrowth depended on the cells having high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1.

“Typically, if you take normal progenitors and you replate, you could do that one time, maybe twice,” Dr Schuetz said. “But our big surprise was that overexpressing MPP1—analogous to what you would see in leukemia—allows those progenitors to self-renew, to be replated over and over, to form new colonies.”

The experiments also revealed that MPP1 and ABCC4 functioned at the cell membrane, where they could play a role in the machinery that would rid the leukemia cells of chemotherapy drugs.

“When we disrupted their interaction, ABCC4 moved off the membrane and the cells became more sensitive to drugs used in AML—drugs that are pumped out of the cell by ABCC4,” Dr Schuetz said.

By screening thousands of compounds, the researchers identified some that could disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 connection. One, called Antimycin-A, reversed drug resistance in AML cell lines and in cells from AML patients.

Antimycin-A is too toxic to be used in chemotherapy, but the researchers believe identification of the compound should aid the search for other, less-toxic drugs to disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 interaction.

The team’s findings could also enable clinicians to identify AML patients with high levels of ABCC4 and MPP1. In such patients, drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1 might enhance the effectiveness of standard chemotherapy, Dr Schuetz said.

He also noted that other cancers, including breast and colon cancer and medulloblastoma, show high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1. Chemotherapy for those cancers might also be enhanced by drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1.

Children’s Research Hospital

Researchers say they have uncovered a target to overcome drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The team discovered how a linkage between 2 proteins enables AML cells to resist chemotherapy and showed that disrupting the linkage could render the cells vulnerable to treatment.

The researchers believe their discovery could lead to drugs to enhance chemotherapy in patients with AML and other cancers.

John Schuetz, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described this research in Nature Communications.

The team launched their experiments based on previous findings that a protein called ABCC4 was greatly elevated in aggressive cases of AML.

Dr Schuetz and his colleagues searched for other proteins that might interact with ABCC4 and enable its function. The team’s screening of candidate proteins yielded one, MPP1, which was also greatly increased in AML.

The researchers found the 2 proteins are connected, and the connection enables cells to assume the characteristics of highly proliferative leukemia cells.

These experiments involved genetically altering hematopoietic progenitor cells to have high MPP1 and ABCC4 levels. The cells were grown in culture and then replated to see if they would continue to grow, as such self-renewal is a hallmark of leukemia cells.

The researchers found that serial regrowth depended on the cells having high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1.

“Typically, if you take normal progenitors and you replate, you could do that one time, maybe twice,” Dr Schuetz said. “But our big surprise was that overexpressing MPP1—analogous to what you would see in leukemia—allows those progenitors to self-renew, to be replated over and over, to form new colonies.”

The experiments also revealed that MPP1 and ABCC4 functioned at the cell membrane, where they could play a role in the machinery that would rid the leukemia cells of chemotherapy drugs.

“When we disrupted their interaction, ABCC4 moved off the membrane and the cells became more sensitive to drugs used in AML—drugs that are pumped out of the cell by ABCC4,” Dr Schuetz said.

By screening thousands of compounds, the researchers identified some that could disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 connection. One, called Antimycin-A, reversed drug resistance in AML cell lines and in cells from AML patients.

Antimycin-A is too toxic to be used in chemotherapy, but the researchers believe identification of the compound should aid the search for other, less-toxic drugs to disrupt the ABCC4-MPP1 interaction.

The team’s findings could also enable clinicians to identify AML patients with high levels of ABCC4 and MPP1. In such patients, drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1 might enhance the effectiveness of standard chemotherapy, Dr Schuetz said.

He also noted that other cancers, including breast and colon cancer and medulloblastoma, show high levels of both ABCC4 and MPP1. Chemotherapy for those cancers might also be enhanced by drugs that disrupt ABCC4-MPP1.