User login
Older Adults Face Higher Cancer Risk From Alcohol, Even at Low or Moderate Levels
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hello. I’m Maurie Markman, from City of Hope. I want to briefly discuss a very interesting paper that is probably a bit controversial, but nevertheless, I want to point out the data. The paper is “Alcohol Consumption Patterns and Mortality Among Older Adults With Health-Related or Socioeconomic Risk Factors,” published in JAMA Network Open.
This involved a little over 135,000 individual participants in a large, multiyear [research project] in the UK; it’s part of the UK Biobank. This is a population-based cohort that they were looking at here and is only a small part of this huge effort in the UK.
The particular participants that they were looking at here were 60 years or older and defined as current drinkers; that could be occasional all the way up to heavy. Again, that’s the 135,000 individuals I’m referring to.
The data were analyzed from September 2023 to May 2024. They divided the population into four groups, including what they call occasional drinkers, which I guess are social drinkers; it was not clear how they defined that. Then they defined three other categories, which were low risk, moderate risk, and high risk, which was much more clearly defined as it was stated in the paper the amount of alcohol consumption each individual had per day.
The question there was about the relationship between how much alcohol an individual stated they drank compared with the occasional drinker, and the risk for cancer in each group. The answer is that there was no protection from cancer by only being a low-risk or a low-level drinker.
All of the populations had a higher risk for cancer compared with the occasional drinkers. The low-risk group was not protected. The high-risk group had a hazard ratio of 1.39, which is a 39% increase. For the moderate-risk group, the hazard ratio was 1.15, and for the low-risk group, 1.11.
The risk was higher the more an individual drank. However, the point to be made is that if someone says, “Oh, I drink a certain amount each day, but there’s no impact on my risk for cancer,” these data do not support that conclusion.
There is much more to be discussed about this topic. It’s an interesting, large population-based, very carefully controlled analysis being done here, but an important point for future conversation.
Thank you for your attention.
Maurie Markman, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: GlaxoSmithKline; AstraZeneca.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hello. I’m Maurie Markman, from City of Hope. I want to briefly discuss a very interesting paper that is probably a bit controversial, but nevertheless, I want to point out the data. The paper is “Alcohol Consumption Patterns and Mortality Among Older Adults With Health-Related or Socioeconomic Risk Factors,” published in JAMA Network Open.
This involved a little over 135,000 individual participants in a large, multiyear [research project] in the UK; it’s part of the UK Biobank. This is a population-based cohort that they were looking at here and is only a small part of this huge effort in the UK.
The particular participants that they were looking at here were 60 years or older and defined as current drinkers; that could be occasional all the way up to heavy. Again, that’s the 135,000 individuals I’m referring to.
The data were analyzed from September 2023 to May 2024. They divided the population into four groups, including what they call occasional drinkers, which I guess are social drinkers; it was not clear how they defined that. Then they defined three other categories, which were low risk, moderate risk, and high risk, which was much more clearly defined as it was stated in the paper the amount of alcohol consumption each individual had per day.
The question there was about the relationship between how much alcohol an individual stated they drank compared with the occasional drinker, and the risk for cancer in each group. The answer is that there was no protection from cancer by only being a low-risk or a low-level drinker.
All of the populations had a higher risk for cancer compared with the occasional drinkers. The low-risk group was not protected. The high-risk group had a hazard ratio of 1.39, which is a 39% increase. For the moderate-risk group, the hazard ratio was 1.15, and for the low-risk group, 1.11.
The risk was higher the more an individual drank. However, the point to be made is that if someone says, “Oh, I drink a certain amount each day, but there’s no impact on my risk for cancer,” these data do not support that conclusion.
There is much more to be discussed about this topic. It’s an interesting, large population-based, very carefully controlled analysis being done here, but an important point for future conversation.
Thank you for your attention.
Maurie Markman, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: GlaxoSmithKline; AstraZeneca.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
This transcript has been edited for clarity.
Hello. I’m Maurie Markman, from City of Hope. I want to briefly discuss a very interesting paper that is probably a bit controversial, but nevertheless, I want to point out the data. The paper is “Alcohol Consumption Patterns and Mortality Among Older Adults With Health-Related or Socioeconomic Risk Factors,” published in JAMA Network Open.
This involved a little over 135,000 individual participants in a large, multiyear [research project] in the UK; it’s part of the UK Biobank. This is a population-based cohort that they were looking at here and is only a small part of this huge effort in the UK.
The particular participants that they were looking at here were 60 years or older and defined as current drinkers; that could be occasional all the way up to heavy. Again, that’s the 135,000 individuals I’m referring to.
The data were analyzed from September 2023 to May 2024. They divided the population into four groups, including what they call occasional drinkers, which I guess are social drinkers; it was not clear how they defined that. Then they defined three other categories, which were low risk, moderate risk, and high risk, which was much more clearly defined as it was stated in the paper the amount of alcohol consumption each individual had per day.
The question there was about the relationship between how much alcohol an individual stated they drank compared with the occasional drinker, and the risk for cancer in each group. The answer is that there was no protection from cancer by only being a low-risk or a low-level drinker.
All of the populations had a higher risk for cancer compared with the occasional drinkers. The low-risk group was not protected. The high-risk group had a hazard ratio of 1.39, which is a 39% increase. For the moderate-risk group, the hazard ratio was 1.15, and for the low-risk group, 1.11.
The risk was higher the more an individual drank. However, the point to be made is that if someone says, “Oh, I drink a certain amount each day, but there’s no impact on my risk for cancer,” these data do not support that conclusion.
There is much more to be discussed about this topic. It’s an interesting, large population-based, very carefully controlled analysis being done here, but an important point for future conversation.
Thank you for your attention.
Maurie Markman, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: GlaxoSmithKline; AstraZeneca.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Breast and Uterine Cancer: Screening Guidelines, Genetic Testing, and Mortality Trends
Breast and Uterine Cancer: Screening Guidelines, Genetic Testing, and Mortality Trends
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Shepherd-Banigan M, Zullig LL, Berkowitz TSZ, et al. Improving Cancer Care
for Women Seeking Services in the Veterans Health Administration Through the
Breast and Gynecological Oncology System of Excellence. Mil Med. 2024:usae447.
doi:10.1093/milmed/usae447 - US Preventive Services Task Force, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, et al. Screening
for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2024;331(22):1918-1930. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5534 - VA announces steps to increase life-saving screening, access to benefits for
Veterans with cancer. VA News. March 8, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://
news.va.gov/press-room/va-expands-health-care-benefits-veterans-cancer/ - Rezoug Z, Totten SP, Szlachtycz D, et al. Universal Genetic Testing for Newly
Diagnosed Invasive Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2431427.
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31427 - National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology,
and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer. Accessed January 14,
2025. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html - Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Hammer A, Wentzensen N. Racial and Ethnic Differences in
Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic
Subtype. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(6):895-903. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0009 - Moss HA, Rasmussen, KM, Patil, V, et al. Demographic Characteristics of Veterans
Diagnosed With Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: A Comparative Analysis With the
General Population. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the Association of
VA Hematology/Oncology (AVAHO); September 29–October 1, 2023; Chicago, IL.
Abstract 47. - Breland JY, Frayne SM, Saechao F, Gujral K, Vashi AA, Shaw JG, Gray KM, Illarmo SS,
Urech T, Grant N, Berg E, Offer C, Veldanda S, Schoemaker L, Dalton AL, Esmaeili
A, Phibbs CS, Hayes PM, Haskell S. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans
Health Administration. Volume 5: Longitudinal Trends in Sociodemographics and
Utilization, Including Type, Modality, and Source of Care. Women’s Health Evaluation
Initiative, Office of Women’s Health, Veterans Health Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Washington DC. June 2024. - NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer Screening and
Diagnosis. V2.2024 April 9, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.nccn.
org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf - ACS: American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis.
Revised December 19, 2023. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/
cancer/types/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancersociety-
recommendations-for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html - Somasegar S, Bashi A, Lang SM, et al. Trends in Uterine Cancer Mortality
in the United States: A 50-Year Population-Based Analysis. Obstet Gynecol.
2023;142(4):978-986. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005321
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Shepherd-Banigan M, Zullig LL, Berkowitz TSZ, et al. Improving Cancer Care
for Women Seeking Services in the Veterans Health Administration Through the
Breast and Gynecological Oncology System of Excellence. Mil Med. 2024:usae447.
doi:10.1093/milmed/usae447 - US Preventive Services Task Force, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, et al. Screening
for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2024;331(22):1918-1930. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5534 - VA announces steps to increase life-saving screening, access to benefits for
Veterans with cancer. VA News. March 8, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://
news.va.gov/press-room/va-expands-health-care-benefits-veterans-cancer/ - Rezoug Z, Totten SP, Szlachtycz D, et al. Universal Genetic Testing for Newly
Diagnosed Invasive Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2431427.
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31427 - National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology,
and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer. Accessed January 14,
2025. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html - Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Hammer A, Wentzensen N. Racial and Ethnic Differences in
Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic
Subtype. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(6):895-903. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0009 - Moss HA, Rasmussen, KM, Patil, V, et al. Demographic Characteristics of Veterans
Diagnosed With Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: A Comparative Analysis With the
General Population. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the Association of
VA Hematology/Oncology (AVAHO); September 29–October 1, 2023; Chicago, IL.
Abstract 47. - Breland JY, Frayne SM, Saechao F, Gujral K, Vashi AA, Shaw JG, Gray KM, Illarmo SS,
Urech T, Grant N, Berg E, Offer C, Veldanda S, Schoemaker L, Dalton AL, Esmaeili
A, Phibbs CS, Hayes PM, Haskell S. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans
Health Administration. Volume 5: Longitudinal Trends in Sociodemographics and
Utilization, Including Type, Modality, and Source of Care. Women’s Health Evaluation
Initiative, Office of Women’s Health, Veterans Health Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Washington DC. June 2024. - NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer Screening and
Diagnosis. V2.2024 April 9, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.nccn.
org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf - ACS: American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis.
Revised December 19, 2023. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/
cancer/types/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancersociety-
recommendations-for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html - Somasegar S, Bashi A, Lang SM, et al. Trends in Uterine Cancer Mortality
in the United States: A 50-Year Population-Based Analysis. Obstet Gynecol.
2023;142(4):978-986. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005321
- Shepherd-Banigan M, Zullig LL, Berkowitz TSZ, et al. Improving Cancer Care
for Women Seeking Services in the Veterans Health Administration Through the
Breast and Gynecological Oncology System of Excellence. Mil Med. 2024:usae447.
doi:10.1093/milmed/usae447 - US Preventive Services Task Force, Nicholson WK, Silverstein M, et al. Screening
for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2024;331(22):1918-1930. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.5534 - VA announces steps to increase life-saving screening, access to benefits for
Veterans with cancer. VA News. March 8, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://
news.va.gov/press-room/va-expands-health-care-benefits-veterans-cancer/ - Rezoug Z, Totten SP, Szlachtycz D, et al. Universal Genetic Testing for Newly
Diagnosed Invasive Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2431427.
doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31427 - National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology,
and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Uterine Cancer. Accessed January 14,
2025. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/corp.html - Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Hammer A, Wentzensen N. Racial and Ethnic Differences in
Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Mortality by Stage and Histologic
Subtype. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(6):895-903. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0009 - Moss HA, Rasmussen, KM, Patil, V, et al. Demographic Characteristics of Veterans
Diagnosed With Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: A Comparative Analysis With the
General Population. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the Association of
VA Hematology/Oncology (AVAHO); September 29–October 1, 2023; Chicago, IL.
Abstract 47. - Breland JY, Frayne SM, Saechao F, Gujral K, Vashi AA, Shaw JG, Gray KM, Illarmo SS,
Urech T, Grant N, Berg E, Offer C, Veldanda S, Schoemaker L, Dalton AL, Esmaeili
A, Phibbs CS, Hayes PM, Haskell S. Sourcebook: Women Veterans in the Veterans
Health Administration. Volume 5: Longitudinal Trends in Sociodemographics and
Utilization, Including Type, Modality, and Source of Care. Women’s Health Evaluation
Initiative, Office of Women’s Health, Veterans Health Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, Washington DC. June 2024. - NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer Screening and
Diagnosis. V2.2024 April 9, 2024. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.nccn.
org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf - ACS: American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis.
Revised December 19, 2023. Accessed January 14, 2025. https://www.cancer.org/
cancer/types/breast-cancer/screening-tests-and-early-detection/american-cancersociety-
recommendations-for-the-early-detection-of-breast-cancer.html - Somasegar S, Bashi A, Lang SM, et al. Trends in Uterine Cancer Mortality
in the United States: A 50-Year Population-Based Analysis. Obstet Gynecol.
2023;142(4):978-986. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005321
Breast and Uterine Cancer: Screening Guidelines, Genetic Testing, and Mortality Trends
Breast and Uterine Cancer: Screening Guidelines, Genetic Testing, and Mortality Trends
Brain Cancer: Epidemiology, TBI, and New Treatments
Brain Cancer: Epidemiology, TBI, and New Treatments
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Bihn JR, Cioffi G, Waite KA, et al. Brain tumors in United States military veterans.
Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(2):387-396. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad182 - Stewart IJ, Howard JT, Poltavsky E, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Subsequent
Risk of Brain Cancer in US Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. JAMA Netw
Open. 2024;7(2):e2354588. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54588 - DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository. December 15, 2023. Accessed December 11,
2024. https://researchbraininjury.org/ - Munch TN, Gørtz S, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. The long-term risk of malignant
astrocytic tumors after structural brain injury--a nationwide cohort study. Neuro
Oncol. 2015;17(5):718-724. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou312 - Strowd RE, Dunbar EM, Gan HK, et al. Practical guidance for telemedicine use in
neuro-oncology. Neurooncol Pract. 2022;9(2):91-104. doi:10.1093/nop/npac002 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Batool SM, Escobedo AK, Hsia T, et al. Clinical utility of a blood based assay for
the detection of IDH1.R132H-mutant gliomas. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7074.
doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51332-7 - Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, et al; INDIGO Trial Investigators.
Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med.
2023;389(7):589-601. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304194 - FDA. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves vorasidenib for Grade 2
astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with a susceptible IDH1 or IDH2 mutation.
Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesinformation-
approved-drugs/fda-approves-vorasidenib-grade-2-astrocytoma-oroligodendroglioma-
susceptible-idh1-or-idh2-mutation - NIH. National Cancer Institute. Tovorafenib Approved for Some Children with Low-
Grade Glioma. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/
cancer-currents-blog/2024/pediatric-low-grade-glioma-tovorafenib-braf - The Veteran Population. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.va.gov/vetdata/
docs/surveysandstudies/vetpop.pdf - Miller AM, Szalontay L, Bouvier N, et al. Next-generation sequencing of
cerebrospinal fluid for clinical molecular diagnostics in pediatric, adolescent
and young adult brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24(10):1763-1772.
doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac035
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Bihn JR, Cioffi G, Waite KA, et al. Brain tumors in United States military veterans.
Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(2):387-396. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad182 - Stewart IJ, Howard JT, Poltavsky E, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Subsequent
Risk of Brain Cancer in US Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. JAMA Netw
Open. 2024;7(2):e2354588. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54588 - DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository. December 15, 2023. Accessed December 11,
2024. https://researchbraininjury.org/ - Munch TN, Gørtz S, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. The long-term risk of malignant
astrocytic tumors after structural brain injury--a nationwide cohort study. Neuro
Oncol. 2015;17(5):718-724. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou312 - Strowd RE, Dunbar EM, Gan HK, et al. Practical guidance for telemedicine use in
neuro-oncology. Neurooncol Pract. 2022;9(2):91-104. doi:10.1093/nop/npac002 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Batool SM, Escobedo AK, Hsia T, et al. Clinical utility of a blood based assay for
the detection of IDH1.R132H-mutant gliomas. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7074.
doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51332-7 - Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, et al; INDIGO Trial Investigators.
Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med.
2023;389(7):589-601. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304194 - FDA. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves vorasidenib for Grade 2
astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with a susceptible IDH1 or IDH2 mutation.
Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesinformation-
approved-drugs/fda-approves-vorasidenib-grade-2-astrocytoma-oroligodendroglioma-
susceptible-idh1-or-idh2-mutation - NIH. National Cancer Institute. Tovorafenib Approved for Some Children with Low-
Grade Glioma. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/
cancer-currents-blog/2024/pediatric-low-grade-glioma-tovorafenib-braf - The Veteran Population. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.va.gov/vetdata/
docs/surveysandstudies/vetpop.pdf - Miller AM, Szalontay L, Bouvier N, et al. Next-generation sequencing of
cerebrospinal fluid for clinical molecular diagnostics in pediatric, adolescent
and young adult brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24(10):1763-1772.
doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac035
- Bihn JR, Cioffi G, Waite KA, et al. Brain tumors in United States military veterans.
Neuro Oncol. 2024;26(2):387-396. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad182 - Stewart IJ, Howard JT, Poltavsky E, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Subsequent
Risk of Brain Cancer in US Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. JAMA Netw
Open. 2024;7(2):e2354588. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54588 - DoD/USU Brain Tissue Repository. December 15, 2023. Accessed December 11,
2024. https://researchbraininjury.org/ - Munch TN, Gørtz S, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. The long-term risk of malignant
astrocytic tumors after structural brain injury--a nationwide cohort study. Neuro
Oncol. 2015;17(5):718-724. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou312 - Strowd RE, Dunbar EM, Gan HK, et al. Practical guidance for telemedicine use in
neuro-oncology. Neurooncol Pract. 2022;9(2):91-104. doi:10.1093/nop/npac002 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Batool SM, Escobedo AK, Hsia T, et al. Clinical utility of a blood based assay for
the detection of IDH1.R132H-mutant gliomas. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):7074.
doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51332-7 - Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, et al; INDIGO Trial Investigators.
Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med.
2023;389(7):589-601. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304194 - FDA. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves vorasidenib for Grade 2
astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma with a susceptible IDH1 or IDH2 mutation.
Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesinformation-
approved-drugs/fda-approves-vorasidenib-grade-2-astrocytoma-oroligodendroglioma-
susceptible-idh1-or-idh2-mutation - NIH. National Cancer Institute. Tovorafenib Approved for Some Children with Low-
Grade Glioma. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/
cancer-currents-blog/2024/pediatric-low-grade-glioma-tovorafenib-braf - The Veteran Population. Accessed December 11, 2024. https://www.va.gov/vetdata/
docs/surveysandstudies/vetpop.pdf - Miller AM, Szalontay L, Bouvier N, et al. Next-generation sequencing of
cerebrospinal fluid for clinical molecular diagnostics in pediatric, adolescent
and young adult brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol. 2022;24(10):1763-1772.
doi:10.1093/neuonc/noac035
Brain Cancer: Epidemiology, TBI, and New Treatments
Brain Cancer: Epidemiology, TBI, and New Treatments
AI-Based Risk Stratification for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas: AIROC
AI-Based Risk Stratification for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas: AIROC
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. Zevallos JP, Kramer JR, Sandulache VC, et al. National trends in oropharyngeal cancer incidence and survival within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Head Neck. 2021;43(1):108-115. doi:10.1002/hed.26465
2. Fakhry C, Blackford AL, Neuner G, et al. Association of oral human papillomavirus DNA persistence with cancer progression after primary treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):985-992. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0439
3. Fakhry C, Zhang Q, Gillison ML, et al. Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials. Cancer. 2019;125(12):2027-2038. doi:10.1002/cncr.32025
4. O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):440-451. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4
5. Koyuncu CF, Lu C, Bera K, et al. Computerized tumor multinucleation index (MuNI) is prognostic in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(8):e145488. doi:10.1172/JCI145488
6. Lu C, Lewis JS Jr, Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr, Janowczyk A, Madabhushi A. An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(12):1655-1665. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.98
7. Corredor G, Toro P, Koyuncu C, et al. An imaging biomarker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to risk-stratify patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(4):609-617. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab215
8. Cancer stat facts: oral cavity and pharynx cancer. National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/oralcav.html
9. Cancers associated with human papillomavirus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. September 18, 2024. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/united-states-cancer-statistics/publications/hpv-associated-cancers.html
10. Chidambaram S, Chang SH, Sandulache VC, Mazul AL, Zevallos JP. Human papillomavirus vaccination prevalence and disproportionate cancer burden among US veterans. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(5):712-714. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7944
11. Corredor G, Wang X, Zhou Y, et al. Spatial architecture and arrangement of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for predicting likelihood of recurrence in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(5):1526-1534. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2013
12. Alilou M, Orooji M, Beig N, et al. Quantitative vessel tortuosity: a potential CT imaging biomarker for distinguishing lung granulomas from adenocarcinomas. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15290. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33473-0
13. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99. doi:10.3322/caac.21388
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. Zevallos JP, Kramer JR, Sandulache VC, et al. National trends in oropharyngeal cancer incidence and survival within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Head Neck. 2021;43(1):108-115. doi:10.1002/hed.26465
2. Fakhry C, Blackford AL, Neuner G, et al. Association of oral human papillomavirus DNA persistence with cancer progression after primary treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):985-992. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0439
3. Fakhry C, Zhang Q, Gillison ML, et al. Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials. Cancer. 2019;125(12):2027-2038. doi:10.1002/cncr.32025
4. O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):440-451. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4
5. Koyuncu CF, Lu C, Bera K, et al. Computerized tumor multinucleation index (MuNI) is prognostic in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(8):e145488. doi:10.1172/JCI145488
6. Lu C, Lewis JS Jr, Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr, Janowczyk A, Madabhushi A. An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(12):1655-1665. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.98
7. Corredor G, Toro P, Koyuncu C, et al. An imaging biomarker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to risk-stratify patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(4):609-617. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab215
8. Cancer stat facts: oral cavity and pharynx cancer. National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/oralcav.html
9. Cancers associated with human papillomavirus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. September 18, 2024. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/united-states-cancer-statistics/publications/hpv-associated-cancers.html
10. Chidambaram S, Chang SH, Sandulache VC, Mazul AL, Zevallos JP. Human papillomavirus vaccination prevalence and disproportionate cancer burden among US veterans. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(5):712-714. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7944
11. Corredor G, Wang X, Zhou Y, et al. Spatial architecture and arrangement of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for predicting likelihood of recurrence in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(5):1526-1534. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2013
12. Alilou M, Orooji M, Beig N, et al. Quantitative vessel tortuosity: a potential CT imaging biomarker for distinguishing lung granulomas from adenocarcinomas. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15290. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33473-0
13. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99. doi:10.3322/caac.21388
1. Zevallos JP, Kramer JR, Sandulache VC, et al. National trends in oropharyngeal cancer incidence and survival within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Head Neck. 2021;43(1):108-115. doi:10.1002/hed.26465
2. Fakhry C, Blackford AL, Neuner G, et al. Association of oral human papillomavirus DNA persistence with cancer progression after primary treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):985-992. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0439
3. Fakhry C, Zhang Q, Gillison ML, et al. Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials. Cancer. 2019;125(12):2027-2038. doi:10.1002/cncr.32025
4. O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):440-451. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00560-4
5. Koyuncu CF, Lu C, Bera K, et al. Computerized tumor multinucleation index (MuNI) is prognostic in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(8):e145488. doi:10.1172/JCI145488
6. Lu C, Lewis JS Jr, Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr, Janowczyk A, Madabhushi A. An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(12):1655-1665. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.98
7. Corredor G, Toro P, Koyuncu C, et al. An imaging biomarker of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to risk-stratify patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114(4):609-617. doi:10.1093/jnci/djab215
8. Cancer stat facts: oral cavity and pharynx cancer. National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/oralcav.html
9. Cancers associated with human papillomavirus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. September 18, 2024. Accessed November 5, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/united-states-cancer-statistics/publications/hpv-associated-cancers.html
10. Chidambaram S, Chang SH, Sandulache VC, Mazul AL, Zevallos JP. Human papillomavirus vaccination prevalence and disproportionate cancer burden among US veterans. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(5):712-714. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7944
11. Corredor G, Wang X, Zhou Y, et al. Spatial architecture and arrangement of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for predicting likelihood of recurrence in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(5):1526-1534. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2013
12. Alilou M, Orooji M, Beig N, et al. Quantitative vessel tortuosity: a potential CT imaging biomarker for distinguishing lung granulomas from adenocarcinomas. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15290. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33473-0
13. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93-99. doi:10.3322/caac.21388
AI-Based Risk Stratification for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas: AIROC
AI-Based Risk Stratification for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas: AIROC
Rising Kidney Cancer Cases and Emerging Treatments for Veterans
Rising Kidney Cancer Cases and Emerging Treatments for Veterans
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. American Cancer Society website. Key Statistics About Kidney Cancer. Revised May 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/kidney-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
2. American Cancer Society website. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. 2024—First Year the US Expects More than 2M New Cases of Cancer. Published January 17, 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/facts-and-figures-2024.html
3.United States Department of Veterans Affairs factsheet. Pact Act & Gulf War, Post-911 Era Veterans. Published July 2023. Accessed December 18, 2024. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.va.gov/files/2023-08/PACT%20Act%20and%20Gulf%20War%2C%20Post-911%20Veterans%20NEW%20July%202023.pdf
4. Li M, Li L, Zheng J, Li Z, Li S, Wang K, Chen X. Liquid biopsy at the frontier in renal cell carcinoma: recent analysis of techniques and clinical application. Mol Cancer. 2023 Feb 21;22(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01745-7
5. Bellman NL. Incidental Finding of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Detected by a Thrombus in the Inferior Vena Cava. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2015;31(2):118-121. doi:10.1177/8756479314546691
6. Brown JT. Adjuvant Therapy for Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma—The Ascent Continues. JAMA Network Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425251. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25251
7. Siva S, Louie AV, Kotecha R, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS). Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jan;25(1):e18-e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00513-2.
8. Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al; for the KEYNOTE-564 Investigators. Overall Survival with Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1359-1371. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2312695
9. Bytnar JA, McGlynn KA, Kern SQ, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Incidence rates of bladder and kidney cancers among US military servicemen: comparison with the rates in the general US population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(6):505-511. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000886
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. American Cancer Society website. Key Statistics About Kidney Cancer. Revised May 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/kidney-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
2. American Cancer Society website. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. 2024—First Year the US Expects More than 2M New Cases of Cancer. Published January 17, 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/facts-and-figures-2024.html
3.United States Department of Veterans Affairs factsheet. Pact Act & Gulf War, Post-911 Era Veterans. Published July 2023. Accessed December 18, 2024. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.va.gov/files/2023-08/PACT%20Act%20and%20Gulf%20War%2C%20Post-911%20Veterans%20NEW%20July%202023.pdf
4. Li M, Li L, Zheng J, Li Z, Li S, Wang K, Chen X. Liquid biopsy at the frontier in renal cell carcinoma: recent analysis of techniques and clinical application. Mol Cancer. 2023 Feb 21;22(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01745-7
5. Bellman NL. Incidental Finding of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Detected by a Thrombus in the Inferior Vena Cava. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2015;31(2):118-121. doi:10.1177/8756479314546691
6. Brown JT. Adjuvant Therapy for Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma—The Ascent Continues. JAMA Network Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425251. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25251
7. Siva S, Louie AV, Kotecha R, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS). Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jan;25(1):e18-e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00513-2.
8. Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al; for the KEYNOTE-564 Investigators. Overall Survival with Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1359-1371. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2312695
9. Bytnar JA, McGlynn KA, Kern SQ, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Incidence rates of bladder and kidney cancers among US military servicemen: comparison with the rates in the general US population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(6):505-511. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000886
1. American Cancer Society website. Key Statistics About Kidney Cancer. Revised May 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/kidney-cancer/about/key-statistics.html
2. American Cancer Society website. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024. 2024—First Year the US Expects More than 2M New Cases of Cancer. Published January 17, 2024. Accessed December 18, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/facts-and-figures-2024.html
3.United States Department of Veterans Affairs factsheet. Pact Act & Gulf War, Post-911 Era Veterans. Published July 2023. Accessed December 18, 2024. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.va.gov/files/2023-08/PACT%20Act%20and%20Gulf%20War%2C%20Post-911%20Veterans%20NEW%20July%202023.pdf
4. Li M, Li L, Zheng J, Li Z, Li S, Wang K, Chen X. Liquid biopsy at the frontier in renal cell carcinoma: recent analysis of techniques and clinical application. Mol Cancer. 2023 Feb 21;22(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12943-023-01745-7
5. Bellman NL. Incidental Finding of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Detected by a Thrombus in the Inferior Vena Cava. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2015;31(2):118-121. doi:10.1177/8756479314546691
6. Brown JT. Adjuvant Therapy for Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma—The Ascent Continues. JAMA Network Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425251. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25251
7. Siva S, Louie AV, Kotecha R, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and practice guideline from the International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS). Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jan;25(1):e18-e28. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00513-2.
8. Choueiri TK, Tomczak P, Park SH, et al; for the KEYNOTE-564 Investigators. Overall Survival with Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1359-1371. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2312695
9. Bytnar JA, McGlynn KA, Kern SQ, Shriver CD, Zhu K. Incidence rates of bladder and kidney cancers among US military servicemen: comparison with the rates in the general US population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;33(6):505-511. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000886
Rising Kidney Cancer Cases and Emerging Treatments for Veterans
Rising Kidney Cancer Cases and Emerging Treatments for Veterans
Advances in Blood Cancer Care for Veterans
Advances in Blood Cancer Care for Veterans
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Li W, ed. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of
Hematolymphoid Tumors. In: Leukemia [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications;
October 16, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586208/ - Graf SA, Samples LS, Keating TM, Garcia JM. Clinical research in older adults with
hematologic malignancies: Opportunities for alignment in the Veterans Affairs. Semin
Oncol. 2020;47(1):94-101. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.010. - Tiu A, McKinnell Z, Liu S, et al. Risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms among
U.S. Veterans from Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. Am J Hematol.
2024;99(10):1969-1978. doi:10.1002/ajh.27438 - Ma H, Wan JY, Cortessis VK, Gupta P, Cozen W. Survival in Agent Orange
exposed and unexposed Vietnam-era veterans who were diagnosed with
lymphoid malignancies. Blood Adv. 2024;8(4):1037-1041. doi:10.1182/
bloodadvances.2023011999 - Friedman DR, Rodgers TD, Kovalick C, Yellapragada S, Szumita L, Weiss ES. Veterans
with blood cancers: Clinical trial navigation and the challenge of rurality. J Rural
Health. 2024;40(1):114-120. doi:10.1111/jrh.12773 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(3):e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Pulumati A, Pulumati A, Dwarakanath BS, Verma A, Papineni RVL. Technological
advancements in cancer diagnostics: Improvements and limitations. Cancer Rep
(Hoboken). 2023;6(2):e1764. doi:10.1002/cnr2.1764
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Li W, ed. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of
Hematolymphoid Tumors. In: Leukemia [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications;
October 16, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586208/ - Graf SA, Samples LS, Keating TM, Garcia JM. Clinical research in older adults with
hematologic malignancies: Opportunities for alignment in the Veterans Affairs. Semin
Oncol. 2020;47(1):94-101. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.010. - Tiu A, McKinnell Z, Liu S, et al. Risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms among
U.S. Veterans from Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. Am J Hematol.
2024;99(10):1969-1978. doi:10.1002/ajh.27438 - Ma H, Wan JY, Cortessis VK, Gupta P, Cozen W. Survival in Agent Orange
exposed and unexposed Vietnam-era veterans who were diagnosed with
lymphoid malignancies. Blood Adv. 2024;8(4):1037-1041. doi:10.1182/
bloodadvances.2023011999 - Friedman DR, Rodgers TD, Kovalick C, Yellapragada S, Szumita L, Weiss ES. Veterans
with blood cancers: Clinical trial navigation and the challenge of rurality. J Rural
Health. 2024;40(1):114-120. doi:10.1111/jrh.12773 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(3):e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Pulumati A, Pulumati A, Dwarakanath BS, Verma A, Papineni RVL. Technological
advancements in cancer diagnostics: Improvements and limitations. Cancer Rep
(Hoboken). 2023;6(2):e1764. doi:10.1002/cnr2.1764
- Li W, ed. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of
Hematolymphoid Tumors. In: Leukemia [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications;
October 16, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK586208/ - Graf SA, Samples LS, Keating TM, Garcia JM. Clinical research in older adults with
hematologic malignancies: Opportunities for alignment in the Veterans Affairs. Semin
Oncol. 2020;47(1):94-101. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.010. - Tiu A, McKinnell Z, Liu S, et al. Risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms among
U.S. Veterans from Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. Am J Hematol.
2024;99(10):1969-1978. doi:10.1002/ajh.27438 - Ma H, Wan JY, Cortessis VK, Gupta P, Cozen W. Survival in Agent Orange
exposed and unexposed Vietnam-era veterans who were diagnosed with
lymphoid malignancies. Blood Adv. 2024;8(4):1037-1041. doi:10.1182/
bloodadvances.2023011999 - Friedman DR, Rodgers TD, Kovalick C, Yellapragada S, Szumita L, Weiss ES. Veterans
with blood cancers: Clinical trial navigation and the challenge of rurality. J Rural
Health. 2024;40(1):114-120. doi:10.1111/jrh.12773 - Parikh DA, Rodgers TD, Passero VA, et al. Teleoncology in the Veterans Health
Administration: Models of Care and the Veteran Experience. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ
Book. 2024;44(3):e100042. doi:10.1200/EDBK_100042 - Pulumati A, Pulumati A, Dwarakanath BS, Verma A, Papineni RVL. Technological
advancements in cancer diagnostics: Improvements and limitations. Cancer Rep
(Hoboken). 2023;6(2):e1764. doi:10.1002/cnr2.1764
Advances in Blood Cancer Care for Veterans
Advances in Blood Cancer Care for Veterans
HCC Updates: Quality Care Framework and Risk Stratification Data
HCC Updates: Quality Care Framework and Risk Stratification Data
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. Rogal SS, Taddei TH, Monto A, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Management in 2021: A National Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Project. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):324-338. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.002
2. John BV, Dang Y, Kaplan DE, et al. Liver Stiffness Measurement and Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After HCV Eradication in Veterans With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;22(4):778-788.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.020
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click here to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
1. Rogal SS, Taddei TH, Monto A, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Management in 2021: A National Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Project. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):324-338. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.002
2. John BV, Dang Y, Kaplan DE, et al. Liver Stiffness Measurement and Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After HCV Eradication in Veterans With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;22(4):778-788.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.020
1. Rogal SS, Taddei TH, Monto A, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis and Management in 2021: A National Veterans Affairs Quality Improvement Project. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):324-338. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.002
2. John BV, Dang Y, Kaplan DE, et al. Liver Stiffness Measurement and Risk Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After HCV Eradication in Veterans With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr;22(4):778-788.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.020
HCC Updates: Quality Care Framework and Risk Stratification Data
HCC Updates: Quality Care Framework and Risk Stratification Data
Lung Cancer: Mortality Trends in Veterans and New Treatments
Lung Cancer: Mortality Trends in Veterans and New Treatments
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Tehzeeb J, Mahmood F, Gemoets D, Azem A, Mehdi SA. Epidemiology and survival
trends of lung carcinoids in the veteran population. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:e21049.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e21049 - Moghanaki D, Taylor J, Bryant AK, et al. Lung Cancer Survival Trends in the Veterans
Health Administration. Clin Lung Cancer. 2024;25(3):225-232. doi:10.1016/j.
cllc.2024.02.009 - Jalal SI, Guo A, Ahmed S, Kelley MJ. Analysis of actionable genetic alterations in
lung carcinoma from the VA National Precision Oncology Program. Semin Oncol.
2022;49(3-4):265-274. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.014 - Cascone T, Awad MM, Spicer JD, et al; for the CheckMate 77T Investigators.
Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med.
2024;390(19):1756-1769. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2311926 - Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al; for the KEYNOTE-671 Investigators.
Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(6):491-503. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302983 - Heymach JV, Harpole D, Mitsudomi T, et al; for the AEGEAN Investigators.
Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(18):1672-1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304875 - Duncan FC, Al Nasrallah N, Nephew L, et al. Racial disparities in staging, treatment,
and mortality in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024;13(1):76-
94. doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-407
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
Click to view more from Cancer Data Trends 2025.
- Tehzeeb J, Mahmood F, Gemoets D, Azem A, Mehdi SA. Epidemiology and survival
trends of lung carcinoids in the veteran population. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:e21049.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e21049 - Moghanaki D, Taylor J, Bryant AK, et al. Lung Cancer Survival Trends in the Veterans
Health Administration. Clin Lung Cancer. 2024;25(3):225-232. doi:10.1016/j.
cllc.2024.02.009 - Jalal SI, Guo A, Ahmed S, Kelley MJ. Analysis of actionable genetic alterations in
lung carcinoma from the VA National Precision Oncology Program. Semin Oncol.
2022;49(3-4):265-274. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.014 - Cascone T, Awad MM, Spicer JD, et al; for the CheckMate 77T Investigators.
Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med.
2024;390(19):1756-1769. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2311926 - Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al; for the KEYNOTE-671 Investigators.
Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(6):491-503. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302983 - Heymach JV, Harpole D, Mitsudomi T, et al; for the AEGEAN Investigators.
Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(18):1672-1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304875 - Duncan FC, Al Nasrallah N, Nephew L, et al. Racial disparities in staging, treatment,
and mortality in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024;13(1):76-
94. doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-407
- Tehzeeb J, Mahmood F, Gemoets D, Azem A, Mehdi SA. Epidemiology and survival
trends of lung carcinoids in the veteran population. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:e21049.
doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e21049 - Moghanaki D, Taylor J, Bryant AK, et al. Lung Cancer Survival Trends in the Veterans
Health Administration. Clin Lung Cancer. 2024;25(3):225-232. doi:10.1016/j.
cllc.2024.02.009 - Jalal SI, Guo A, Ahmed S, Kelley MJ. Analysis of actionable genetic alterations in
lung carcinoma from the VA National Precision Oncology Program. Semin Oncol.
2022;49(3-4):265-274. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.014 - Cascone T, Awad MM, Spicer JD, et al; for the CheckMate 77T Investigators.
Perioperative Nivolumab in Resectable Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med.
2024;390(19):1756-1769. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2311926 - Wakelee H, Liberman M, Kato T, et al; for the KEYNOTE-671 Investigators.
Perioperative Pembrolizumab for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(6):491-503. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2302983 - Heymach JV, Harpole D, Mitsudomi T, et al; for the AEGEAN Investigators.
Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J
Med. 2023;389(18):1672-1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2304875 - Duncan FC, Al Nasrallah N, Nephew L, et al. Racial disparities in staging, treatment,
and mortality in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024;13(1):76-
94. doi:10.21037/tlcr-23-407
Lung Cancer: Mortality Trends in Veterans and New Treatments
Lung Cancer: Mortality Trends in Veterans and New Treatments
FDA Approves Avastin Biosimilar Agent, Jobevne
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved bevacizumab-nwgd (Jobevne, Biocon Biologics Ltd), a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech), for intravenous use across multiple cancer types.
Approval was based on “a comprehensive package of comparative pharmacokinetic, safety, efficacy, nonclinical, structural, analytical and functional data, which confirmed the Jobevne is highly similar to Avastin,” according to a Biocon Biologics Ltd press release.
“The data demonstrated that there were no clinically meaningful differences between Jobevne and Avastin in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity,” the company stated.
The biosimilar agent is indicated as part of various combinations for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, certain types of non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer, recurrent glioblastoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, certain advanced cervical cancers, and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers, the company noted.
The agent is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, according to the press release, which includes detailed information about the indications, as well as a list of warnings and precautions.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved bevacizumab-nwgd (Jobevne, Biocon Biologics Ltd), a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech), for intravenous use across multiple cancer types.
Approval was based on “a comprehensive package of comparative pharmacokinetic, safety, efficacy, nonclinical, structural, analytical and functional data, which confirmed the Jobevne is highly similar to Avastin,” according to a Biocon Biologics Ltd press release.
“The data demonstrated that there were no clinically meaningful differences between Jobevne and Avastin in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity,” the company stated.
The biosimilar agent is indicated as part of various combinations for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, certain types of non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer, recurrent glioblastoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, certain advanced cervical cancers, and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers, the company noted.
The agent is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, according to the press release, which includes detailed information about the indications, as well as a list of warnings and precautions.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved bevacizumab-nwgd (Jobevne, Biocon Biologics Ltd), a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech), for intravenous use across multiple cancer types.
Approval was based on “a comprehensive package of comparative pharmacokinetic, safety, efficacy, nonclinical, structural, analytical and functional data, which confirmed the Jobevne is highly similar to Avastin,” according to a Biocon Biologics Ltd press release.
“The data demonstrated that there were no clinically meaningful differences between Jobevne and Avastin in terms of pharmacokinetics, safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity,” the company stated.
The biosimilar agent is indicated as part of various combinations for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, certain types of non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer, recurrent glioblastoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, certain advanced cervical cancers, and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancers, the company noted.
The agent is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, according to the press release, which includes detailed information about the indications, as well as a list of warnings and precautions.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Medical Centers Address Unique Needs of Young Adults With Cancer
Adam DuVall, MD, MPH, is a rare medical oncologist who trained in both adult and pediatric hematology/oncology.
This distinction, which DuVall said he shares with only a handful of oncologists in the world, matches his role at University of Chicago (UChicago) Medicine, Chicago. Since joining UChicago in 2020, DuVall has helped expand its Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology Program, which aims to provide comprehensive, one-stop care and support for patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years.
Started in 2012, the program is one of the oldest in a growing array of initiatives nationwide that seek to address the specific psychosocial and other support needs of patients with cancer who fall into the gap between young children and the older patients who more typically have cancer. Along with DuVall and other oncologists, UChicago’s AYA Program offers dedicated nurse practitioners, social workers, psychologists, a physical therapist, and a program administrator. A community health worker, who does home visits, helps patients coordinate travel, works with their insurance, and generally navigates the medical system, DuVall added.
The program receives about 1500-2000 visits a year, according to DuVall. What the young adult population with cancer has in common that distinguishes it from other age cohorts, he said, are its members’ particular psychosocial needs. “Going through adolescence and young adulthood without cancer, there’s plenty of things that are hard,” DuVall observed. “Put cancer on top of that, and it impacts every aspect of life.”
‘Millennials Have Higher Risk’
The proliferation of AYA programs comes as more and more studies have been published recently showing that young adults are increasingly getting cancer.
According to American Cancer Society research published in December in The Lancet Oncology, incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) among young adults aged 25-49 years rose in the decade through 2017 in more than half of the 50 countries and territories examined. For the past 5 years studied, the incidence rate of early-onset CRC was highest in Australia, Puerto Rico, New Zealand, the United States, and South Korea. At the same time, the study found, rates among older adults in all of those places except South Korea were stable or declining.
Hyuna Sung, PhD, the study’s lead author, said, “Research has shown that Gen X and millennials have higher risk of multiple types of cancer compared to the older generations.”
Some of the cancers found to be increasing among younger adults are linked to “excess body obesity,” Sung said, including not only CRC but also cancers of the uterine corpus, gallbladder, kidney, pancreas, breast, and stomach cardia, as well as myeloma. Early onset of cancers not linked to obesity, such as testicular cancer and small intestinal cancer, has also been shown to be on the rise, Sung noted.
As cancer rates among young adults have risen, nonprofits have stepped in to help medical institutions open programs geared to their needs. Teen Cancer America, founded by members of rock band The Who, has partnered with 64 hospitals in 36 cities to develop AYA-focused programs, funding 85 hospital positions, according to a spokesperson. The Los Angeles–based nonprofit has also provided free consultation to 130 hospitals without formally providing a grant, the spokesperson said.
A map on Teen Cancer America’s website illustrates the nationwide spread of AYA programs, from UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, with more in between.
‘Setting Them Up for a Life of Meaning’
Michael Roth, MD, co-director of the AYA Program at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, likes to say, “If you’ve seen one AYA Program, you’ve seen one AYA Program.”
In other words, offerings vary. “Most centers do not have comprehensive AYA programs,” Roth said, noting that at many sites the AYA Program might consist of oncofertility support. “That said, programs are doing the best they can, knowing that the AYA population is growing exponentially globally.”
Almost 90,000 AYA patients are diagnosed with cancer each year, and 85% will be at least 5-year survivors, Roth said. There are more than 2 million survivors of AYA cancer, he added, and if the median age of diagnosis is 30, they can live five decades beyond their cancer treatment. “Their life matters,” Roth said. “It matters during treatment. Their life after cancer matters.”
The AYA Program at MD Anderson began in 2017, and it sees more than 2000 AYAs diagnosed with cancer every year, according to Roth. The program is designed to complement the care that patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years or older may already be receiving from their primary treatment teams. New patients see a medical provider, a social worker, and a vocational counselor for discussions about their needs and concerns, and they have access to a nutritionist and genetic counselor.
The program offers psychosocial and supportive care for patients who may be facing challenges with school, work, relationships, having young children, and mental health, Roth said. Along with assessments and counseling around fertility risks and genetic predisposition, MD Anderson also provides patients in the program with a long-term survivorship plan.
“It’s not just increasing cures,” Roth observed. “We’re also setting them up for a life of meaning and happiness and productivity and health.”
Almost 40% of visits to the program are conducted virtually, according to Roth. “Our goal is to meet the patients where they are,” he said. “We want to be convenient, not be a burden.”
‘The Face of Cancer Has Changed’
Patients with AYA cancer diagnoses may be finishing up school or starting a job, developing their body image and sexual identity, or caring for young children or older parents.
“They feel incredibly isolated,” said Ann LaCasce, MD, MMSc, co-director of the Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. “They go into the cancer center or their community practice, and everyone is double, triple their age.”
Last year, Dana-Farber opened a Young Adult Lounge meant for patients aged 18 years or older to be able to relax and, if they wish, interact between appointments. “When you talk to these patients, they want to meet each other,” LaCasce said. “They want to share experiences.”
The Young Adults With Cancer Program at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee, opened its doors in 2019. It recently hired an interim nurse navigator, said Cathy Eng, MD, FACP, FASCO, director of the Program, which concentrates on patients aged 25-45 years.
“The face of cancer has changed,” Eng said.
She advises other oncologists to talk to their young adult patients as much as possible. “Really talk to them as an individual and see what other needs they have,” she said. “Even if they don’t tell you the first time, ask them the second time, ask them the third time.”
Christopher Cann, MD, executive director of the Young Adult Cancer Program at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, did his fellowship under Eng. He joined Fox Chase in 2023, and the Young Adult Cancer Program started accepting patients around the end of last year, zeroing in on patients aged 18-39 years.
Following the implementation of a new best practice advisory that pops up in the medical records system, he said, oncofertility referrals increased by 400% within 6 months.
“My hope is that if every institution throughout the country can have a young adult program, even something small like this can provide a large impact for patients,” Cann said.
The University of North Carolina (UNC) AYA Cancer Program, part of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, formed in 2015. It has expanded into a team of about 12 including a nurse practitioner, fertility counselor, and psychologist, said Jacob Stein, MD, MPH, the program’s AYA oncology liaison. UNC sees about 400 AYA patients with cancer annually, and the program interacts with slightly more than 100 of them, according to Stein.
“Our program has taken a very different approach, to target services, contact, and engagement with AYAs who we perceive to be at the highest need, either clinically or socially, for support,” he said.
Stein was the lead author on research presented last year at the ASCO Quality Care Symposium in San Francisco finding that patients engaged in the program were more likely to participate in clinical trials and received higher rates of fertility preservation and palliative care than AYA patients at UNC without program contact.
Andrew Smitherman, MD, MS, medical director of the UNC AYA Cancer Center Program, said the AYA field has grown impressively since a progress review group was started in 2005, which was backed by the National Cancer Institute and LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance. The group developed recommendations to address AYA oncology nationwide, in hopes of acting as a catalyst for future initiatives. Clearly, others caring for patients with cancer heard the message.
“If a colleague comes to me and says, ‘Where do I start, how do I make this change at my institution,’ I usually lead with changing the culture,” Smitherman said. “Educating hospital leadership about the importance of this population, educating colleagues, finding partners. And then start thinking about ways to make structural changes, like creating space. That’s worked really well for us.”
DuVall, Sung, Roth, LaCasce, Eng, Cann, Stein, and Smitherman declared no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Adam DuVall, MD, MPH, is a rare medical oncologist who trained in both adult and pediatric hematology/oncology.
This distinction, which DuVall said he shares with only a handful of oncologists in the world, matches his role at University of Chicago (UChicago) Medicine, Chicago. Since joining UChicago in 2020, DuVall has helped expand its Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology Program, which aims to provide comprehensive, one-stop care and support for patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years.
Started in 2012, the program is one of the oldest in a growing array of initiatives nationwide that seek to address the specific psychosocial and other support needs of patients with cancer who fall into the gap between young children and the older patients who more typically have cancer. Along with DuVall and other oncologists, UChicago’s AYA Program offers dedicated nurse practitioners, social workers, psychologists, a physical therapist, and a program administrator. A community health worker, who does home visits, helps patients coordinate travel, works with their insurance, and generally navigates the medical system, DuVall added.
The program receives about 1500-2000 visits a year, according to DuVall. What the young adult population with cancer has in common that distinguishes it from other age cohorts, he said, are its members’ particular psychosocial needs. “Going through adolescence and young adulthood without cancer, there’s plenty of things that are hard,” DuVall observed. “Put cancer on top of that, and it impacts every aspect of life.”
‘Millennials Have Higher Risk’
The proliferation of AYA programs comes as more and more studies have been published recently showing that young adults are increasingly getting cancer.
According to American Cancer Society research published in December in The Lancet Oncology, incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) among young adults aged 25-49 years rose in the decade through 2017 in more than half of the 50 countries and territories examined. For the past 5 years studied, the incidence rate of early-onset CRC was highest in Australia, Puerto Rico, New Zealand, the United States, and South Korea. At the same time, the study found, rates among older adults in all of those places except South Korea were stable or declining.
Hyuna Sung, PhD, the study’s lead author, said, “Research has shown that Gen X and millennials have higher risk of multiple types of cancer compared to the older generations.”
Some of the cancers found to be increasing among younger adults are linked to “excess body obesity,” Sung said, including not only CRC but also cancers of the uterine corpus, gallbladder, kidney, pancreas, breast, and stomach cardia, as well as myeloma. Early onset of cancers not linked to obesity, such as testicular cancer and small intestinal cancer, has also been shown to be on the rise, Sung noted.
As cancer rates among young adults have risen, nonprofits have stepped in to help medical institutions open programs geared to their needs. Teen Cancer America, founded by members of rock band The Who, has partnered with 64 hospitals in 36 cities to develop AYA-focused programs, funding 85 hospital positions, according to a spokesperson. The Los Angeles–based nonprofit has also provided free consultation to 130 hospitals without formally providing a grant, the spokesperson said.
A map on Teen Cancer America’s website illustrates the nationwide spread of AYA programs, from UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, with more in between.
‘Setting Them Up for a Life of Meaning’
Michael Roth, MD, co-director of the AYA Program at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, likes to say, “If you’ve seen one AYA Program, you’ve seen one AYA Program.”
In other words, offerings vary. “Most centers do not have comprehensive AYA programs,” Roth said, noting that at many sites the AYA Program might consist of oncofertility support. “That said, programs are doing the best they can, knowing that the AYA population is growing exponentially globally.”
Almost 90,000 AYA patients are diagnosed with cancer each year, and 85% will be at least 5-year survivors, Roth said. There are more than 2 million survivors of AYA cancer, he added, and if the median age of diagnosis is 30, they can live five decades beyond their cancer treatment. “Their life matters,” Roth said. “It matters during treatment. Their life after cancer matters.”
The AYA Program at MD Anderson began in 2017, and it sees more than 2000 AYAs diagnosed with cancer every year, according to Roth. The program is designed to complement the care that patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years or older may already be receiving from their primary treatment teams. New patients see a medical provider, a social worker, and a vocational counselor for discussions about their needs and concerns, and they have access to a nutritionist and genetic counselor.
The program offers psychosocial and supportive care for patients who may be facing challenges with school, work, relationships, having young children, and mental health, Roth said. Along with assessments and counseling around fertility risks and genetic predisposition, MD Anderson also provides patients in the program with a long-term survivorship plan.
“It’s not just increasing cures,” Roth observed. “We’re also setting them up for a life of meaning and happiness and productivity and health.”
Almost 40% of visits to the program are conducted virtually, according to Roth. “Our goal is to meet the patients where they are,” he said. “We want to be convenient, not be a burden.”
‘The Face of Cancer Has Changed’
Patients with AYA cancer diagnoses may be finishing up school or starting a job, developing their body image and sexual identity, or caring for young children or older parents.
“They feel incredibly isolated,” said Ann LaCasce, MD, MMSc, co-director of the Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. “They go into the cancer center or their community practice, and everyone is double, triple their age.”
Last year, Dana-Farber opened a Young Adult Lounge meant for patients aged 18 years or older to be able to relax and, if they wish, interact between appointments. “When you talk to these patients, they want to meet each other,” LaCasce said. “They want to share experiences.”
The Young Adults With Cancer Program at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee, opened its doors in 2019. It recently hired an interim nurse navigator, said Cathy Eng, MD, FACP, FASCO, director of the Program, which concentrates on patients aged 25-45 years.
“The face of cancer has changed,” Eng said.
She advises other oncologists to talk to their young adult patients as much as possible. “Really talk to them as an individual and see what other needs they have,” she said. “Even if they don’t tell you the first time, ask them the second time, ask them the third time.”
Christopher Cann, MD, executive director of the Young Adult Cancer Program at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, did his fellowship under Eng. He joined Fox Chase in 2023, and the Young Adult Cancer Program started accepting patients around the end of last year, zeroing in on patients aged 18-39 years.
Following the implementation of a new best practice advisory that pops up in the medical records system, he said, oncofertility referrals increased by 400% within 6 months.
“My hope is that if every institution throughout the country can have a young adult program, even something small like this can provide a large impact for patients,” Cann said.
The University of North Carolina (UNC) AYA Cancer Program, part of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, formed in 2015. It has expanded into a team of about 12 including a nurse practitioner, fertility counselor, and psychologist, said Jacob Stein, MD, MPH, the program’s AYA oncology liaison. UNC sees about 400 AYA patients with cancer annually, and the program interacts with slightly more than 100 of them, according to Stein.
“Our program has taken a very different approach, to target services, contact, and engagement with AYAs who we perceive to be at the highest need, either clinically or socially, for support,” he said.
Stein was the lead author on research presented last year at the ASCO Quality Care Symposium in San Francisco finding that patients engaged in the program were more likely to participate in clinical trials and received higher rates of fertility preservation and palliative care than AYA patients at UNC without program contact.
Andrew Smitherman, MD, MS, medical director of the UNC AYA Cancer Center Program, said the AYA field has grown impressively since a progress review group was started in 2005, which was backed by the National Cancer Institute and LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance. The group developed recommendations to address AYA oncology nationwide, in hopes of acting as a catalyst for future initiatives. Clearly, others caring for patients with cancer heard the message.
“If a colleague comes to me and says, ‘Where do I start, how do I make this change at my institution,’ I usually lead with changing the culture,” Smitherman said. “Educating hospital leadership about the importance of this population, educating colleagues, finding partners. And then start thinking about ways to make structural changes, like creating space. That’s worked really well for us.”
DuVall, Sung, Roth, LaCasce, Eng, Cann, Stein, and Smitherman declared no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Adam DuVall, MD, MPH, is a rare medical oncologist who trained in both adult and pediatric hematology/oncology.
This distinction, which DuVall said he shares with only a handful of oncologists in the world, matches his role at University of Chicago (UChicago) Medicine, Chicago. Since joining UChicago in 2020, DuVall has helped expand its Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology Program, which aims to provide comprehensive, one-stop care and support for patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years.
Started in 2012, the program is one of the oldest in a growing array of initiatives nationwide that seek to address the specific psychosocial and other support needs of patients with cancer who fall into the gap between young children and the older patients who more typically have cancer. Along with DuVall and other oncologists, UChicago’s AYA Program offers dedicated nurse practitioners, social workers, psychologists, a physical therapist, and a program administrator. A community health worker, who does home visits, helps patients coordinate travel, works with their insurance, and generally navigates the medical system, DuVall added.
The program receives about 1500-2000 visits a year, according to DuVall. What the young adult population with cancer has in common that distinguishes it from other age cohorts, he said, are its members’ particular psychosocial needs. “Going through adolescence and young adulthood without cancer, there’s plenty of things that are hard,” DuVall observed. “Put cancer on top of that, and it impacts every aspect of life.”
‘Millennials Have Higher Risk’
The proliferation of AYA programs comes as more and more studies have been published recently showing that young adults are increasingly getting cancer.
According to American Cancer Society research published in December in The Lancet Oncology, incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) among young adults aged 25-49 years rose in the decade through 2017 in more than half of the 50 countries and territories examined. For the past 5 years studied, the incidence rate of early-onset CRC was highest in Australia, Puerto Rico, New Zealand, the United States, and South Korea. At the same time, the study found, rates among older adults in all of those places except South Korea were stable or declining.
Hyuna Sung, PhD, the study’s lead author, said, “Research has shown that Gen X and millennials have higher risk of multiple types of cancer compared to the older generations.”
Some of the cancers found to be increasing among younger adults are linked to “excess body obesity,” Sung said, including not only CRC but also cancers of the uterine corpus, gallbladder, kidney, pancreas, breast, and stomach cardia, as well as myeloma. Early onset of cancers not linked to obesity, such as testicular cancer and small intestinal cancer, has also been shown to be on the rise, Sung noted.
As cancer rates among young adults have risen, nonprofits have stepped in to help medical institutions open programs geared to their needs. Teen Cancer America, founded by members of rock band The Who, has partnered with 64 hospitals in 36 cities to develop AYA-focused programs, funding 85 hospital positions, according to a spokesperson. The Los Angeles–based nonprofit has also provided free consultation to 130 hospitals without formally providing a grant, the spokesperson said.
A map on Teen Cancer America’s website illustrates the nationwide spread of AYA programs, from UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, with more in between.
‘Setting Them Up for a Life of Meaning’
Michael Roth, MD, co-director of the AYA Program at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, likes to say, “If you’ve seen one AYA Program, you’ve seen one AYA Program.”
In other words, offerings vary. “Most centers do not have comprehensive AYA programs,” Roth said, noting that at many sites the AYA Program might consist of oncofertility support. “That said, programs are doing the best they can, knowing that the AYA population is growing exponentially globally.”
Almost 90,000 AYA patients are diagnosed with cancer each year, and 85% will be at least 5-year survivors, Roth said. There are more than 2 million survivors of AYA cancer, he added, and if the median age of diagnosis is 30, they can live five decades beyond their cancer treatment. “Their life matters,” Roth said. “It matters during treatment. Their life after cancer matters.”
The AYA Program at MD Anderson began in 2017, and it sees more than 2000 AYAs diagnosed with cancer every year, according to Roth. The program is designed to complement the care that patients with cancer aged from 15 to 39 years or older may already be receiving from their primary treatment teams. New patients see a medical provider, a social worker, and a vocational counselor for discussions about their needs and concerns, and they have access to a nutritionist and genetic counselor.
The program offers psychosocial and supportive care for patients who may be facing challenges with school, work, relationships, having young children, and mental health, Roth said. Along with assessments and counseling around fertility risks and genetic predisposition, MD Anderson also provides patients in the program with a long-term survivorship plan.
“It’s not just increasing cures,” Roth observed. “We’re also setting them up for a life of meaning and happiness and productivity and health.”
Almost 40% of visits to the program are conducted virtually, according to Roth. “Our goal is to meet the patients where they are,” he said. “We want to be convenient, not be a burden.”
‘The Face of Cancer Has Changed’
Patients with AYA cancer diagnoses may be finishing up school or starting a job, developing their body image and sexual identity, or caring for young children or older parents.
“They feel incredibly isolated,” said Ann LaCasce, MD, MMSc, co-director of the Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. “They go into the cancer center or their community practice, and everyone is double, triple their age.”
Last year, Dana-Farber opened a Young Adult Lounge meant for patients aged 18 years or older to be able to relax and, if they wish, interact between appointments. “When you talk to these patients, they want to meet each other,” LaCasce said. “They want to share experiences.”
The Young Adults With Cancer Program at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee, opened its doors in 2019. It recently hired an interim nurse navigator, said Cathy Eng, MD, FACP, FASCO, director of the Program, which concentrates on patients aged 25-45 years.
“The face of cancer has changed,” Eng said.
She advises other oncologists to talk to their young adult patients as much as possible. “Really talk to them as an individual and see what other needs they have,” she said. “Even if they don’t tell you the first time, ask them the second time, ask them the third time.”
Christopher Cann, MD, executive director of the Young Adult Cancer Program at Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, did his fellowship under Eng. He joined Fox Chase in 2023, and the Young Adult Cancer Program started accepting patients around the end of last year, zeroing in on patients aged 18-39 years.
Following the implementation of a new best practice advisory that pops up in the medical records system, he said, oncofertility referrals increased by 400% within 6 months.
“My hope is that if every institution throughout the country can have a young adult program, even something small like this can provide a large impact for patients,” Cann said.
The University of North Carolina (UNC) AYA Cancer Program, part of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, formed in 2015. It has expanded into a team of about 12 including a nurse practitioner, fertility counselor, and psychologist, said Jacob Stein, MD, MPH, the program’s AYA oncology liaison. UNC sees about 400 AYA patients with cancer annually, and the program interacts with slightly more than 100 of them, according to Stein.
“Our program has taken a very different approach, to target services, contact, and engagement with AYAs who we perceive to be at the highest need, either clinically or socially, for support,” he said.
Stein was the lead author on research presented last year at the ASCO Quality Care Symposium in San Francisco finding that patients engaged in the program were more likely to participate in clinical trials and received higher rates of fertility preservation and palliative care than AYA patients at UNC without program contact.
Andrew Smitherman, MD, MS, medical director of the UNC AYA Cancer Center Program, said the AYA field has grown impressively since a progress review group was started in 2005, which was backed by the National Cancer Institute and LIVESTRONG Young Adult Alliance. The group developed recommendations to address AYA oncology nationwide, in hopes of acting as a catalyst for future initiatives. Clearly, others caring for patients with cancer heard the message.
“If a colleague comes to me and says, ‘Where do I start, how do I make this change at my institution,’ I usually lead with changing the culture,” Smitherman said. “Educating hospital leadership about the importance of this population, educating colleagues, finding partners. And then start thinking about ways to make structural changes, like creating space. That’s worked really well for us.”
DuVall, Sung, Roth, LaCasce, Eng, Cann, Stein, and Smitherman declared no conflicts of interest.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.