Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

First NCCN guideline on hematopoietic cell transplantation focuses on GVHD

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/05/2019 - 11:42

 

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are the central focus of the first National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline on hematopoietic cell transplantation.

The guideline presents detailed recommendations for the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, and an extensive section on the diagnosis and workup of GVHD, including information on staging and grading of acute GVHD, grading of chronic GVHD, treatment response criteria, and suggested systemic therapies for steroid-refractory disease.

“We wanted to both build on the commonly used approach to stage and treat graft-versus-host disease, and make sure that this information is readily available for physicians-in-training and young physicians who are learning about transplants,” said guideline committee chair Ayman Saad, MB BCh, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute in Columbus, Ohio.

In an interview, Dr. Saad emphasized that an important goal of the guidelines is to encourage general oncologists to recognize early signs of GVHD and refer potential candidates to transplant centers for further evaluation.

“We also urge oncologists who may be caring for patients after HCT to familiarize themselves with the varied manifestations of GVHD – a very common and significant posttransplant complication – and to consult with transplant providers to optimize their ongoing care. The guidelines explain how to diagnose and treat this condition in order to achieve the best possible outcomes,” guideline panel member Alison W. Loren, MD, director of blood and marrow transplantation at Abraham Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said in a statement.

The guideline includes links to other NCCN guidelines for diseases where HCT is a common therapeutic option, including leukemias, myeloid malignancies, lymphomas, central nervous system cancers, and testicular cancer.

The HCT guideline includes:

  • Pretransplant recipient evaluation with recommendations for clinical assessment and imaging.
  • Diagnosis and workup of GVHD, with separate algorithms for suspected acute or chronic GVHD.
  • Specific interventions for management of acute GVHD with corticosteroids or other systemic agents.
  • Chronic GVHD diagnosis by organ site and symptoms, with a severity scoring system.
  • Chronic GVHD steroid response definitions and criteria.
  • Suggested systemic agents for steroid-refractory GVHD.

One feature that is unusual for an NCCN guideline document is a page of photographs to assist clinicians in diagnosing range-of-motion abnormalities in the shoulder, elbow, hand, and ankle of patients with suspected or confirmed GVHD. Dr. Saad said that future iterations of the guideline will include additional photos to help clinicians develop a visual repertoire of potential GVHD signs.

Future versions will also include a discussion section and more comprehensive information on other common complications following HCT transplant, as well as management of posttransplant relapse.

Ideally, the guideline will help clinicians document and justify clinical decisions surrounding HCT and GVHD management in discussions with third-party payers, Dr. Saad said.

“Sometimes we struggle with payers when we want to use a certain modality to treat GVHD, and they respond ‘that’s not approved,’ or ‘that’s not a common indication,’ et cetera,” he said. “What we’re trying to put here are the commonly used therapies that most, but not all, experts agree on, and we can use this to negotiate with payers.”

He also emphasized that the guideline is meant to be instructive rather than prescriptive and is not meant to hinder innovations that may emerge from clinical trials.

“We would appreciate any feedback from non-NCCN centers as well as experts at NCCN centers, and we’ll be more than happy to address any concerns or criticisms they have,” he said.

Dr. Saad reported financial relationships with Actinium and Incysus Biomedical. Dr. Loren has previously reported having no disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are the central focus of the first National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline on hematopoietic cell transplantation.

The guideline presents detailed recommendations for the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, and an extensive section on the diagnosis and workup of GVHD, including information on staging and grading of acute GVHD, grading of chronic GVHD, treatment response criteria, and suggested systemic therapies for steroid-refractory disease.

“We wanted to both build on the commonly used approach to stage and treat graft-versus-host disease, and make sure that this information is readily available for physicians-in-training and young physicians who are learning about transplants,” said guideline committee chair Ayman Saad, MB BCh, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute in Columbus, Ohio.

In an interview, Dr. Saad emphasized that an important goal of the guidelines is to encourage general oncologists to recognize early signs of GVHD and refer potential candidates to transplant centers for further evaluation.

“We also urge oncologists who may be caring for patients after HCT to familiarize themselves with the varied manifestations of GVHD – a very common and significant posttransplant complication – and to consult with transplant providers to optimize their ongoing care. The guidelines explain how to diagnose and treat this condition in order to achieve the best possible outcomes,” guideline panel member Alison W. Loren, MD, director of blood and marrow transplantation at Abraham Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said in a statement.

The guideline includes links to other NCCN guidelines for diseases where HCT is a common therapeutic option, including leukemias, myeloid malignancies, lymphomas, central nervous system cancers, and testicular cancer.

The HCT guideline includes:

  • Pretransplant recipient evaluation with recommendations for clinical assessment and imaging.
  • Diagnosis and workup of GVHD, with separate algorithms for suspected acute or chronic GVHD.
  • Specific interventions for management of acute GVHD with corticosteroids or other systemic agents.
  • Chronic GVHD diagnosis by organ site and symptoms, with a severity scoring system.
  • Chronic GVHD steroid response definitions and criteria.
  • Suggested systemic agents for steroid-refractory GVHD.

One feature that is unusual for an NCCN guideline document is a page of photographs to assist clinicians in diagnosing range-of-motion abnormalities in the shoulder, elbow, hand, and ankle of patients with suspected or confirmed GVHD. Dr. Saad said that future iterations of the guideline will include additional photos to help clinicians develop a visual repertoire of potential GVHD signs.

Future versions will also include a discussion section and more comprehensive information on other common complications following HCT transplant, as well as management of posttransplant relapse.

Ideally, the guideline will help clinicians document and justify clinical decisions surrounding HCT and GVHD management in discussions with third-party payers, Dr. Saad said.

“Sometimes we struggle with payers when we want to use a certain modality to treat GVHD, and they respond ‘that’s not approved,’ or ‘that’s not a common indication,’ et cetera,” he said. “What we’re trying to put here are the commonly used therapies that most, but not all, experts agree on, and we can use this to negotiate with payers.”

He also emphasized that the guideline is meant to be instructive rather than prescriptive and is not meant to hinder innovations that may emerge from clinical trials.

“We would appreciate any feedback from non-NCCN centers as well as experts at NCCN centers, and we’ll be more than happy to address any concerns or criticisms they have,” he said.

Dr. Saad reported financial relationships with Actinium and Incysus Biomedical. Dr. Loren has previously reported having no disclosures.

 

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are the central focus of the first National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline on hematopoietic cell transplantation.

The guideline presents detailed recommendations for the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, and an extensive section on the diagnosis and workup of GVHD, including information on staging and grading of acute GVHD, grading of chronic GVHD, treatment response criteria, and suggested systemic therapies for steroid-refractory disease.

“We wanted to both build on the commonly used approach to stage and treat graft-versus-host disease, and make sure that this information is readily available for physicians-in-training and young physicians who are learning about transplants,” said guideline committee chair Ayman Saad, MB BCh, of The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute in Columbus, Ohio.

In an interview, Dr. Saad emphasized that an important goal of the guidelines is to encourage general oncologists to recognize early signs of GVHD and refer potential candidates to transplant centers for further evaluation.

“We also urge oncologists who may be caring for patients after HCT to familiarize themselves with the varied manifestations of GVHD – a very common and significant posttransplant complication – and to consult with transplant providers to optimize their ongoing care. The guidelines explain how to diagnose and treat this condition in order to achieve the best possible outcomes,” guideline panel member Alison W. Loren, MD, director of blood and marrow transplantation at Abraham Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, said in a statement.

The guideline includes links to other NCCN guidelines for diseases where HCT is a common therapeutic option, including leukemias, myeloid malignancies, lymphomas, central nervous system cancers, and testicular cancer.

The HCT guideline includes:

  • Pretransplant recipient evaluation with recommendations for clinical assessment and imaging.
  • Diagnosis and workup of GVHD, with separate algorithms for suspected acute or chronic GVHD.
  • Specific interventions for management of acute GVHD with corticosteroids or other systemic agents.
  • Chronic GVHD diagnosis by organ site and symptoms, with a severity scoring system.
  • Chronic GVHD steroid response definitions and criteria.
  • Suggested systemic agents for steroid-refractory GVHD.

One feature that is unusual for an NCCN guideline document is a page of photographs to assist clinicians in diagnosing range-of-motion abnormalities in the shoulder, elbow, hand, and ankle of patients with suspected or confirmed GVHD. Dr. Saad said that future iterations of the guideline will include additional photos to help clinicians develop a visual repertoire of potential GVHD signs.

Future versions will also include a discussion section and more comprehensive information on other common complications following HCT transplant, as well as management of posttransplant relapse.

Ideally, the guideline will help clinicians document and justify clinical decisions surrounding HCT and GVHD management in discussions with third-party payers, Dr. Saad said.

“Sometimes we struggle with payers when we want to use a certain modality to treat GVHD, and they respond ‘that’s not approved,’ or ‘that’s not a common indication,’ et cetera,” he said. “What we’re trying to put here are the commonly used therapies that most, but not all, experts agree on, and we can use this to negotiate with payers.”

He also emphasized that the guideline is meant to be instructive rather than prescriptive and is not meant to hinder innovations that may emerge from clinical trials.

“We would appreciate any feedback from non-NCCN centers as well as experts at NCCN centers, and we’ll be more than happy to address any concerns or criticisms they have,” he said.

Dr. Saad reported financial relationships with Actinium and Incysus Biomedical. Dr. Loren has previously reported having no disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Hematopoietic cell transplant offers realistic cure in secondary AML

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/05/2019 - 23:32

 

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a better option than consolidation chemotherapy in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia, yielding significantly better survival outcomes, according to findings from an observational study.

National Institutes of Health/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

Although secondary AML has been identified as an independent predictor of poor prognosis, it is not included in current risk classifications that provide the basis of deciding when to perform HCT.

Christer Nilsson, MD, of Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and colleagues, used two nationwide Swedish registries – the Swedish AML Registry and the Swedish Cancer Registry – to characterize how often HCT is performed in these patients and to evaluate its impact in a real-world setting. The registries include all patients with AML diagnosed between 1997 and 2013.

Their findings are in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

The analysis included 3,337 adult patients with AML who were intensively treated and did not have acute promyelocytic leukemia. More than three-quarters of the patients had de novo AML and the remainder had secondary AML that was either therapy related or developed after an antecedent myeloid disease. In total, 100 patients with secondary AML underwent HCT while in first complete remission.

In terms of crude survival at 5 years after diagnosis, patients with secondary AML who did not undergo HCT did very poorly. The survival rate was 0% in those with AML preceded by myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-AML), 2% in patients with AML preceded by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML), and 4% in patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML). In contrast, the 5-year overall survival in patients who underwent HCT at any time point or disease stage was 32% for patients with MPN-AML, 18% for patients with MDS-AML, and 25% for patients t-AML.

These crude survival figures suggest that “HCT is the sole realistic curable treatment option for [secondary] AML,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers also performed a propensity score matching analysis of HCT versus chemotherapy consolidation in patients with secondary AML who had been in first complete remission for more than 90 days. The model matched 45 patients who underwent HCT with 66 patients treated with chemotherapy consolidation. The projected 5-year overall survival was 48% in the HCT group, compared with 20% in the consolidation group (P = .01). Similarly, 5-year relapse-free survival was also higher in the HCT group, compared with the consolidation group (43% vs. 21%, P = .02).

“Ideally, the role of transplantation in [secondary] AML should be evaluated in a prospective randomized trial, minimizing the risk of any bias,” the researchers wrote. “However, such a trial is lacking and most likely will never be performed.”

The researchers concluded that HCT should be considered for all patients with secondary AML who are eligible and fit for transplantation.

The study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Stockholm County Council, Gothenberg Medical Society, and Assar Gabrielsson Foundation. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Nilson C et al. Biol Blood Marrow Tranplant. 2019;25:1770-8.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a better option than consolidation chemotherapy in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia, yielding significantly better survival outcomes, according to findings from an observational study.

National Institutes of Health/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

Although secondary AML has been identified as an independent predictor of poor prognosis, it is not included in current risk classifications that provide the basis of deciding when to perform HCT.

Christer Nilsson, MD, of Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and colleagues, used two nationwide Swedish registries – the Swedish AML Registry and the Swedish Cancer Registry – to characterize how often HCT is performed in these patients and to evaluate its impact in a real-world setting. The registries include all patients with AML diagnosed between 1997 and 2013.

Their findings are in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

The analysis included 3,337 adult patients with AML who were intensively treated and did not have acute promyelocytic leukemia. More than three-quarters of the patients had de novo AML and the remainder had secondary AML that was either therapy related or developed after an antecedent myeloid disease. In total, 100 patients with secondary AML underwent HCT while in first complete remission.

In terms of crude survival at 5 years after diagnosis, patients with secondary AML who did not undergo HCT did very poorly. The survival rate was 0% in those with AML preceded by myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-AML), 2% in patients with AML preceded by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML), and 4% in patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML). In contrast, the 5-year overall survival in patients who underwent HCT at any time point or disease stage was 32% for patients with MPN-AML, 18% for patients with MDS-AML, and 25% for patients t-AML.

These crude survival figures suggest that “HCT is the sole realistic curable treatment option for [secondary] AML,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers also performed a propensity score matching analysis of HCT versus chemotherapy consolidation in patients with secondary AML who had been in first complete remission for more than 90 days. The model matched 45 patients who underwent HCT with 66 patients treated with chemotherapy consolidation. The projected 5-year overall survival was 48% in the HCT group, compared with 20% in the consolidation group (P = .01). Similarly, 5-year relapse-free survival was also higher in the HCT group, compared with the consolidation group (43% vs. 21%, P = .02).

“Ideally, the role of transplantation in [secondary] AML should be evaluated in a prospective randomized trial, minimizing the risk of any bias,” the researchers wrote. “However, such a trial is lacking and most likely will never be performed.”

The researchers concluded that HCT should be considered for all patients with secondary AML who are eligible and fit for transplantation.

The study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Stockholm County Council, Gothenberg Medical Society, and Assar Gabrielsson Foundation. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Nilson C et al. Biol Blood Marrow Tranplant. 2019;25:1770-8.

 

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a better option than consolidation chemotherapy in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia, yielding significantly better survival outcomes, according to findings from an observational study.

National Institutes of Health/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain

Although secondary AML has been identified as an independent predictor of poor prognosis, it is not included in current risk classifications that provide the basis of deciding when to perform HCT.

Christer Nilsson, MD, of Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, and colleagues, used two nationwide Swedish registries – the Swedish AML Registry and the Swedish Cancer Registry – to characterize how often HCT is performed in these patients and to evaluate its impact in a real-world setting. The registries include all patients with AML diagnosed between 1997 and 2013.

Their findings are in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

The analysis included 3,337 adult patients with AML who were intensively treated and did not have acute promyelocytic leukemia. More than three-quarters of the patients had de novo AML and the remainder had secondary AML that was either therapy related or developed after an antecedent myeloid disease. In total, 100 patients with secondary AML underwent HCT while in first complete remission.

In terms of crude survival at 5 years after diagnosis, patients with secondary AML who did not undergo HCT did very poorly. The survival rate was 0% in those with AML preceded by myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-AML), 2% in patients with AML preceded by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML), and 4% in patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML). In contrast, the 5-year overall survival in patients who underwent HCT at any time point or disease stage was 32% for patients with MPN-AML, 18% for patients with MDS-AML, and 25% for patients t-AML.

These crude survival figures suggest that “HCT is the sole realistic curable treatment option for [secondary] AML,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers also performed a propensity score matching analysis of HCT versus chemotherapy consolidation in patients with secondary AML who had been in first complete remission for more than 90 days. The model matched 45 patients who underwent HCT with 66 patients treated with chemotherapy consolidation. The projected 5-year overall survival was 48% in the HCT group, compared with 20% in the consolidation group (P = .01). Similarly, 5-year relapse-free survival was also higher in the HCT group, compared with the consolidation group (43% vs. 21%, P = .02).

“Ideally, the role of transplantation in [secondary] AML should be evaluated in a prospective randomized trial, minimizing the risk of any bias,” the researchers wrote. “However, such a trial is lacking and most likely will never be performed.”

The researchers concluded that HCT should be considered for all patients with secondary AML who are eligible and fit for transplantation.

The study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Stockholm County Council, Gothenberg Medical Society, and Assar Gabrielsson Foundation. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Nilson C et al. Biol Blood Marrow Tranplant. 2019;25:1770-8.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

FROM BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
210685
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Ongoing research aims to improve transplant outcomes in sickle cell

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/26/2019 - 14:34

 

Researchers are leading several studies designed to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), experts at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reported during a recent webinar.

bubaone/DigitalVision Vectors

“HSCT offers a potential cure [for SCD], which may improve quantity and quality of life [for patients],” said Courtney D. Fitzhugh, MD, a Lasker Clinical Research Scholar in the Laboratory of Early Sickle Mortality Prevention at NHLBI.

Currently, HLA-matched sibling and matched unrelated donor sources provide the best outcomes for sickle cell patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, she explained. Alternative stem cell sources include umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors.

Over the past 2 years, the majority of novel transplant techniques have been primarily aimed at improving conditioning regimens and lowering rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
 

Recent evidence

A recent international survey found high survival rates in patients with SCD who underwent HLA-matched sibling HSCT during 1986-2013. At 5-years, overall- and event-free survival rates were 92.9% and 91.4%, respectively, with even higher rates (95% and 93%) seen in children aged younger than 16 years.

With respect to safety, the cumulative incidence rates of acute and chronic GVHD were 14.8% and 14.3%, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

Much of the success seen with HLA-matched sibling donors is attributable to recent data demonstrating that complete transformation of patient’s bone marrow is unnecessary to illicit a curative effect.

With donor myeloid chimerism levels of at least 20%, the sickle disease phenotype can be reversed, and there’s a reduced risk of GVHD, she said.

In mouse models, researchers have found that inclusion of sirolimus in HLA-matched pretransplant conditioning regimens leads to higher levels of donor cell engraftment. As a result, some conditioning regimens now administer sirolimus (target 10-15 ng/dL) one-day prior to transplantation.

In 55 patients transplanted using this technique, overall- and event-free survival rates of 93% and 87% have been reported, with no transplant-related mortality or evidence of GVHD. Other institutions have also begun to adopt this technique, and have reported similar findings, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

“When you [administer high-dose] chemotherapy, you don’t expect that patients are able to have children, but we are excited to report that 8 of our patients have had 13 healthy babies post transplant,” Dr. Fitzhugh said.

As a whole, several recent studies have emphasized the importance of the conditioning regimen in successful transplantation for patients with SCD.

With HLA-matched sibling donors, myeloablative regimens that include antithymocyte globulin have demonstrated greater efficacy, she said.

In patients receiving a transplant from a matched unrelated donor, early use of alemtuzumab is linked to higher rates of GVHD, while ongoing studies are exploring whether abatacept reduces the risk of GVHD, she further explained.

With respect to haploidentical and unrelated umbilical cord donors, T-cell depletion and higher-intensity conditioning have been shown to reduce graft rejection rates, she said.

Dr. Fitzhugh acknowledged that long-term efficacy and safety of these novel conditioning regimens is largely unknown. Thus, ongoing follow-up is essential to monitor for potential late effects.
 

NHLBI-funded trials

Nancy L. DiFronzo, PhD, program director at NHLBI, explained that the agency has funded specific clinical studies evaluating allogeneic HSCT in patients with severe SCD.

 

 

“[Surprisingly], this treatment modality is [actually] quite rare, with [only] approximately 9,000 allogeneic transplants occurring in the United States each year,” she said.

One of the primary barriers to HSCT for SCD is a lack of compatible donors. Currently, fewer than 20% of sickle cell patients have a matched unrelated donor or HLA-matched sibling donor, she reported.

Another common barrier are the risks associated with the procedure, including treatment-related toxicities and death. Active participation in a clinical trial is one strategy that can mitigate these risks, she said.

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) is a group of transplant centers that are recognized experts in HSCT. Dr. DiFronzo explained that the consortium is cosponsored by the National Cancer Institute and NHLBI, with the goal of improving outcomes for both pediatric and adult patients with SCD undergoing HSCT.

At present, the BMT CTN has directly funded three multicenter clinical studies for SCD, including the SCURT study, which has now been completed, as well as the STRIDE2 and Haploidentical HCT trials, both of which are currently enrolling patients.

“The goal of these new approaches [being studied in these 3 trials] is cure, where individuals can live longer with a better quality of life,” Dr. DiFronzo said. “We’ve [specifically] adjusted regimens with [this goal] in mind.”

Dr. Fitzhugh and Dr. DiFronzo did not provide information on financial disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Researchers are leading several studies designed to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), experts at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reported during a recent webinar.

bubaone/DigitalVision Vectors

“HSCT offers a potential cure [for SCD], which may improve quantity and quality of life [for patients],” said Courtney D. Fitzhugh, MD, a Lasker Clinical Research Scholar in the Laboratory of Early Sickle Mortality Prevention at NHLBI.

Currently, HLA-matched sibling and matched unrelated donor sources provide the best outcomes for sickle cell patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, she explained. Alternative stem cell sources include umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors.

Over the past 2 years, the majority of novel transplant techniques have been primarily aimed at improving conditioning regimens and lowering rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
 

Recent evidence

A recent international survey found high survival rates in patients with SCD who underwent HLA-matched sibling HSCT during 1986-2013. At 5-years, overall- and event-free survival rates were 92.9% and 91.4%, respectively, with even higher rates (95% and 93%) seen in children aged younger than 16 years.

With respect to safety, the cumulative incidence rates of acute and chronic GVHD were 14.8% and 14.3%, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

Much of the success seen with HLA-matched sibling donors is attributable to recent data demonstrating that complete transformation of patient’s bone marrow is unnecessary to illicit a curative effect.

With donor myeloid chimerism levels of at least 20%, the sickle disease phenotype can be reversed, and there’s a reduced risk of GVHD, she said.

In mouse models, researchers have found that inclusion of sirolimus in HLA-matched pretransplant conditioning regimens leads to higher levels of donor cell engraftment. As a result, some conditioning regimens now administer sirolimus (target 10-15 ng/dL) one-day prior to transplantation.

In 55 patients transplanted using this technique, overall- and event-free survival rates of 93% and 87% have been reported, with no transplant-related mortality or evidence of GVHD. Other institutions have also begun to adopt this technique, and have reported similar findings, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

“When you [administer high-dose] chemotherapy, you don’t expect that patients are able to have children, but we are excited to report that 8 of our patients have had 13 healthy babies post transplant,” Dr. Fitzhugh said.

As a whole, several recent studies have emphasized the importance of the conditioning regimen in successful transplantation for patients with SCD.

With HLA-matched sibling donors, myeloablative regimens that include antithymocyte globulin have demonstrated greater efficacy, she said.

In patients receiving a transplant from a matched unrelated donor, early use of alemtuzumab is linked to higher rates of GVHD, while ongoing studies are exploring whether abatacept reduces the risk of GVHD, she further explained.

With respect to haploidentical and unrelated umbilical cord donors, T-cell depletion and higher-intensity conditioning have been shown to reduce graft rejection rates, she said.

Dr. Fitzhugh acknowledged that long-term efficacy and safety of these novel conditioning regimens is largely unknown. Thus, ongoing follow-up is essential to monitor for potential late effects.
 

NHLBI-funded trials

Nancy L. DiFronzo, PhD, program director at NHLBI, explained that the agency has funded specific clinical studies evaluating allogeneic HSCT in patients with severe SCD.

 

 

“[Surprisingly], this treatment modality is [actually] quite rare, with [only] approximately 9,000 allogeneic transplants occurring in the United States each year,” she said.

One of the primary barriers to HSCT for SCD is a lack of compatible donors. Currently, fewer than 20% of sickle cell patients have a matched unrelated donor or HLA-matched sibling donor, she reported.

Another common barrier are the risks associated with the procedure, including treatment-related toxicities and death. Active participation in a clinical trial is one strategy that can mitigate these risks, she said.

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) is a group of transplant centers that are recognized experts in HSCT. Dr. DiFronzo explained that the consortium is cosponsored by the National Cancer Institute and NHLBI, with the goal of improving outcomes for both pediatric and adult patients with SCD undergoing HSCT.

At present, the BMT CTN has directly funded three multicenter clinical studies for SCD, including the SCURT study, which has now been completed, as well as the STRIDE2 and Haploidentical HCT trials, both of which are currently enrolling patients.

“The goal of these new approaches [being studied in these 3 trials] is cure, where individuals can live longer with a better quality of life,” Dr. DiFronzo said. “We’ve [specifically] adjusted regimens with [this goal] in mind.”

Dr. Fitzhugh and Dr. DiFronzo did not provide information on financial disclosures.

 

Researchers are leading several studies designed to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), experts at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute reported during a recent webinar.

bubaone/DigitalVision Vectors

“HSCT offers a potential cure [for SCD], which may improve quantity and quality of life [for patients],” said Courtney D. Fitzhugh, MD, a Lasker Clinical Research Scholar in the Laboratory of Early Sickle Mortality Prevention at NHLBI.

Currently, HLA-matched sibling and matched unrelated donor sources provide the best outcomes for sickle cell patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, she explained. Alternative stem cell sources include umbilical cord blood and haploidentical donors.

Over the past 2 years, the majority of novel transplant techniques have been primarily aimed at improving conditioning regimens and lowering rates of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
 

Recent evidence

A recent international survey found high survival rates in patients with SCD who underwent HLA-matched sibling HSCT during 1986-2013. At 5-years, overall- and event-free survival rates were 92.9% and 91.4%, respectively, with even higher rates (95% and 93%) seen in children aged younger than 16 years.

With respect to safety, the cumulative incidence rates of acute and chronic GVHD were 14.8% and 14.3%, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

Much of the success seen with HLA-matched sibling donors is attributable to recent data demonstrating that complete transformation of patient’s bone marrow is unnecessary to illicit a curative effect.

With donor myeloid chimerism levels of at least 20%, the sickle disease phenotype can be reversed, and there’s a reduced risk of GVHD, she said.

In mouse models, researchers have found that inclusion of sirolimus in HLA-matched pretransplant conditioning regimens leads to higher levels of donor cell engraftment. As a result, some conditioning regimens now administer sirolimus (target 10-15 ng/dL) one-day prior to transplantation.

In 55 patients transplanted using this technique, overall- and event-free survival rates of 93% and 87% have been reported, with no transplant-related mortality or evidence of GVHD. Other institutions have also begun to adopt this technique, and have reported similar findings, Dr. Fitzhugh reported.

“When you [administer high-dose] chemotherapy, you don’t expect that patients are able to have children, but we are excited to report that 8 of our patients have had 13 healthy babies post transplant,” Dr. Fitzhugh said.

As a whole, several recent studies have emphasized the importance of the conditioning regimen in successful transplantation for patients with SCD.

With HLA-matched sibling donors, myeloablative regimens that include antithymocyte globulin have demonstrated greater efficacy, she said.

In patients receiving a transplant from a matched unrelated donor, early use of alemtuzumab is linked to higher rates of GVHD, while ongoing studies are exploring whether abatacept reduces the risk of GVHD, she further explained.

With respect to haploidentical and unrelated umbilical cord donors, T-cell depletion and higher-intensity conditioning have been shown to reduce graft rejection rates, she said.

Dr. Fitzhugh acknowledged that long-term efficacy and safety of these novel conditioning regimens is largely unknown. Thus, ongoing follow-up is essential to monitor for potential late effects.
 

NHLBI-funded trials

Nancy L. DiFronzo, PhD, program director at NHLBI, explained that the agency has funded specific clinical studies evaluating allogeneic HSCT in patients with severe SCD.

 

 

“[Surprisingly], this treatment modality is [actually] quite rare, with [only] approximately 9,000 allogeneic transplants occurring in the United States each year,” she said.

One of the primary barriers to HSCT for SCD is a lack of compatible donors. Currently, fewer than 20% of sickle cell patients have a matched unrelated donor or HLA-matched sibling donor, she reported.

Another common barrier are the risks associated with the procedure, including treatment-related toxicities and death. Active participation in a clinical trial is one strategy that can mitigate these risks, she said.

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) is a group of transplant centers that are recognized experts in HSCT. Dr. DiFronzo explained that the consortium is cosponsored by the National Cancer Institute and NHLBI, with the goal of improving outcomes for both pediatric and adult patients with SCD undergoing HSCT.

At present, the BMT CTN has directly funded three multicenter clinical studies for SCD, including the SCURT study, which has now been completed, as well as the STRIDE2 and Haploidentical HCT trials, both of which are currently enrolling patients.

“The goal of these new approaches [being studied in these 3 trials] is cure, where individuals can live longer with a better quality of life,” Dr. DiFronzo said. “We’ve [specifically] adjusted regimens with [this goal] in mind.”

Dr. Fitzhugh and Dr. DiFronzo did not provide information on financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Several factors may affect immune suppression discontinuation after HCT

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 09/27/2019 - 00:03

 

New research suggests several factors are associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

Patients older than 50 years, those with advanced stage disease, patients with a mismatched unrelated donor, and those who received peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor were less likely to discontinue immune suppression successfully, Joseph Pidala, MD, PhD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla., and colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 827 patients in two national Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network studies (NCT00075816 and NCT00406393). These randomized, phase 3 trials enrolled patients with hematologic malignancies who received myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic HCT.

The patients’ median age at HCT was 44 years (range, less than 1 to 67 years), and 55.1% were male. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 11-124 months).

At 5 years, 20% of patients (n = 168) had successfully discontinued immune suppression and were still alive. A total of 342 patients (41.4%) were able to stop immune suppression, but 127 of them had to resume it after developing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There were an additional 47 patients who died or relapsed after stopping immune suppression.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with lower odds of discontinuing immune suppression and being free of GVHD, including:
 

  • Being older than 50 years versus younger than 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.50; P less than .001).
  • Having a mismatched unrelated donor versus having a matched sibling (aOR, 0.37; 99% CI, 0.14-0.97; P = .008).
  • Receiving peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow, from unrelated donors only (aOR, 0.46; 99% CI, 0.26-0.82; P less than .001).
  • Having advanced stage disease versus early disease (aOR, 0.45; 99%CI, 0.23-0.86; P = .002).

The researchers also found that discontinuing immune suppression was not significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.95 (99% CI, 0.88-4.31; P = .03).

There was no significant association between acute GVHD–related variables and discontinuation of immune suppression. However, there were a few factors significantly associated with a lower likelihood of discontinuation after chronic GVHD, including:
 

  • Current skin involvement (HR, 0.33; 99% CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .001).
  • Unrelated well-matched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.10-0.79; P = .001).
  • Unrelated mismatched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.17; 99% CI, 0.03-0.95; P = .008).

In total, 127 patients had to resume immune suppression because of GVHD. Such failed attempts at discontinuing immune suppression were associated with receiving peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor versus bone marrow from an unrelated donor, with an HR of 2.62 (99% CI, 1.30-5.29; P less than .001).

A history of acute or chronic GVHD was associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression, the researchers noted.

Lastly, the researchers developed dynamic prediction models for the probability of freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at 1, 3, and 5 years in the future. The team found that graft type, donor type, age, state history, and timing of immune suppression discontinuation were all associated with the likelihood of being free from immune suppression and GVHD at all three time points. Disease risk was only associated with freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at the 1-year mark.

The researchers said their findings must be validated in an independent cohort of patients and, after that, should be tested in a prospective trial.

The current study was funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Two of the researchers reported relationships with more than 30 pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Pidala J et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2974.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

New research suggests several factors are associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

Patients older than 50 years, those with advanced stage disease, patients with a mismatched unrelated donor, and those who received peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor were less likely to discontinue immune suppression successfully, Joseph Pidala, MD, PhD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla., and colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 827 patients in two national Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network studies (NCT00075816 and NCT00406393). These randomized, phase 3 trials enrolled patients with hematologic malignancies who received myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic HCT.

The patients’ median age at HCT was 44 years (range, less than 1 to 67 years), and 55.1% were male. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 11-124 months).

At 5 years, 20% of patients (n = 168) had successfully discontinued immune suppression and were still alive. A total of 342 patients (41.4%) were able to stop immune suppression, but 127 of them had to resume it after developing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There were an additional 47 patients who died or relapsed after stopping immune suppression.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with lower odds of discontinuing immune suppression and being free of GVHD, including:
 

  • Being older than 50 years versus younger than 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.50; P less than .001).
  • Having a mismatched unrelated donor versus having a matched sibling (aOR, 0.37; 99% CI, 0.14-0.97; P = .008).
  • Receiving peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow, from unrelated donors only (aOR, 0.46; 99% CI, 0.26-0.82; P less than .001).
  • Having advanced stage disease versus early disease (aOR, 0.45; 99%CI, 0.23-0.86; P = .002).

The researchers also found that discontinuing immune suppression was not significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.95 (99% CI, 0.88-4.31; P = .03).

There was no significant association between acute GVHD–related variables and discontinuation of immune suppression. However, there were a few factors significantly associated with a lower likelihood of discontinuation after chronic GVHD, including:
 

  • Current skin involvement (HR, 0.33; 99% CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .001).
  • Unrelated well-matched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.10-0.79; P = .001).
  • Unrelated mismatched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.17; 99% CI, 0.03-0.95; P = .008).

In total, 127 patients had to resume immune suppression because of GVHD. Such failed attempts at discontinuing immune suppression were associated with receiving peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor versus bone marrow from an unrelated donor, with an HR of 2.62 (99% CI, 1.30-5.29; P less than .001).

A history of acute or chronic GVHD was associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression, the researchers noted.

Lastly, the researchers developed dynamic prediction models for the probability of freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at 1, 3, and 5 years in the future. The team found that graft type, donor type, age, state history, and timing of immune suppression discontinuation were all associated with the likelihood of being free from immune suppression and GVHD at all three time points. Disease risk was only associated with freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at the 1-year mark.

The researchers said their findings must be validated in an independent cohort of patients and, after that, should be tested in a prospective trial.

The current study was funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Two of the researchers reported relationships with more than 30 pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Pidala J et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2974.

 

New research suggests several factors are associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).

Patients older than 50 years, those with advanced stage disease, patients with a mismatched unrelated donor, and those who received peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor were less likely to discontinue immune suppression successfully, Joseph Pidala, MD, PhD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla., and colleagues reported in JAMA Oncology.

The researchers analyzed data from 827 patients in two national Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trial Network studies (NCT00075816 and NCT00406393). These randomized, phase 3 trials enrolled patients with hematologic malignancies who received myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic HCT.

The patients’ median age at HCT was 44 years (range, less than 1 to 67 years), and 55.1% were male. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 11-124 months).

At 5 years, 20% of patients (n = 168) had successfully discontinued immune suppression and were still alive. A total of 342 patients (41.4%) were able to stop immune suppression, but 127 of them had to resume it after developing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There were an additional 47 patients who died or relapsed after stopping immune suppression.

The researchers identified several factors that were significantly associated with lower odds of discontinuing immune suppression and being free of GVHD, including:
 

  • Being older than 50 years versus younger than 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.50; P less than .001).
  • Having a mismatched unrelated donor versus having a matched sibling (aOR, 0.37; 99% CI, 0.14-0.97; P = .008).
  • Receiving peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow, from unrelated donors only (aOR, 0.46; 99% CI, 0.26-0.82; P less than .001).
  • Having advanced stage disease versus early disease (aOR, 0.45; 99%CI, 0.23-0.86; P = .002).

The researchers also found that discontinuing immune suppression was not significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.95 (99% CI, 0.88-4.31; P = .03).

There was no significant association between acute GVHD–related variables and discontinuation of immune suppression. However, there were a few factors significantly associated with a lower likelihood of discontinuation after chronic GVHD, including:
 

  • Current skin involvement (HR, 0.33; 99% CI, 0.14-0.80; P = .001).
  • Unrelated well-matched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.29; 99% CI, 0.10-0.79; P = .001).
  • Unrelated mismatched donor versus matched sibling donor (HR, 0.17; 99% CI, 0.03-0.95; P = .008).

In total, 127 patients had to resume immune suppression because of GVHD. Such failed attempts at discontinuing immune suppression were associated with receiving peripheral blood stem cells from an unrelated donor versus bone marrow from an unrelated donor, with an HR of 2.62 (99% CI, 1.30-5.29; P less than .001).

A history of acute or chronic GVHD was associated with failure to discontinue immune suppression, the researchers noted.

Lastly, the researchers developed dynamic prediction models for the probability of freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at 1, 3, and 5 years in the future. The team found that graft type, donor type, age, state history, and timing of immune suppression discontinuation were all associated with the likelihood of being free from immune suppression and GVHD at all three time points. Disease risk was only associated with freedom from immune suppression and GVHD at the 1-year mark.

The researchers said their findings must be validated in an independent cohort of patients and, after that, should be tested in a prospective trial.

The current study was funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Two of the researchers reported relationships with more than 30 pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Pidala J et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 26. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2974.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA ONCOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

ASCT may cure follicular lymphoma for some rituximab-naive patients

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 12/16/2022 - 12:17

 

Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.

The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.

“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.

Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.

Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.

Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.

Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).

Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.

Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.

The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.

The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.

“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.

Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.

Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.

Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.

Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).

Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.

Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.

The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.

 

Prompt autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is often curative in rituximab-naive patients with follicular lymphoma who have experienced early failure of first-line therapy and achieved a response to second-line therapy, suggest results from a registry-based study conducted by GELTAMO (the Spanish Lymphoma and Bone Marrow Transplant Group).

Patho/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

“Overall, our results suggest that, whereas some patients might benefit from more aggressive therapies, such as allogenic stem cell transplantations, or novel drugs, such as immunomodulatory agents, monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, or even the application of bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, there are a considerable number of patients in this high-risk [early therapy failure] subgroup that can be cured with ASCT, even in the absence of rituximab,” Ana Jiménez-Ubieto, MD, PhD, of the Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, and colleagues wrote.

The results are more favorable when ASCT is performed in patients experiencing early therapy failure, with less than 1 year from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT.

“Early ASCT could be a hopeful option in patients with difficult access to rituximab,” the researchers wrote in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy.

Patients with follicular lymphoma who experience relapse or progression during or soon after first-line therapy have poor overall survival, and there is no standard therapy for this population, according to the researchers. Previous research has shown that ASCT prolongs survival in those who have received rituximab before transplantation, but benefit in the absence of this agent is unknown.

Dr. Jiménez-Ubieto and colleagues conducted a multicenter registry-based retrospective cohort study of 134 patients with nontransformed follicular lymphoma who underwent ASCT during 1989-2007 while in second complete or partial response to rescue chemotherapy and had not received rituximab.

Overall, 65% of the patients had experienced early therapy failure (relapse or progression within 2 years of starting first-line chemotherapy). Within this group, 78% underwent ASCT within 1 year, and 67% underwent ASCT while in second complete response. Median posttransplantation follow-up for the entire study cohort was 13.4 years.

Study results showed that patients who had experienced early therapy failure versus who had not had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (43% vs. 57%; P = .048) but similar 5-year overall survival (69% vs. 77%; P = .4). However, those patients with early therapy failure who underwent ASCT within 1 year had a statistically indistinguishable 5-year progression-free survival relative to counterparts without early therapy failure (48% vs. 66%; P = .44).

Additionally, the 48% progression-free survival seen in this subset was almost identical to the 49% seen in a historical cohort of patients with early therapy failure who similarly underwent ASCT within 1 year of first relapse but received rituximab before transplantation (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36[5]:765-72). This suggests “that the possible synergistic effect of rituximab plus ASCT is not as relevant if ASCT is offered soon in the course of the disease,” the researchers wrote.

Patients who had experienced early therapy failure achieved better overall survival if they underwent ASCT while in second complete response, as opposed to second partial response. Notably, 56% of those who underwent ASCT while in second complete response were alive at 13.7 years of follow-up and remained so long term.

The study was funded by the Foundation Research Institute at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. The researchers reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Jiménez-Ubieto A et al. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Jul 9. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY AND STEM CELL THERAPY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Could home care replace inpatient HSCT?

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 12/16/2022 - 12:00

 

Can receiving all posttransplant care at home benefit patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)? Researchers are conducting phase 2 trials to find out.

Dr. Nelson Chao

Nelson Chao, MD, and colleagues at Duke University in Durham, N.C., completed a phase 1 trial that suggested post-HSCT care at home was feasible and safe (Blood. 2017;130:745).

Now, the team is conducting phase 2 trials – NCT01725022 and NCT02218151 – comparing patients who receive all posttransplant care at home with patients treated in the hospital or in the outpatient setting with daily visits to the clinic.

The main goal is to determine if allogeneic HSCT recipients treated at home can maintain their normal microbiome and, as a result, have a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The researchers are also looking at other outcomes such as quality of life, treatment-related morbidities and mortality, and the cost of care for both allogeneic and autologous transplant recipients.

To be eligible for home care after HSCT, a patient must live within a 90-minute driving distance of Duke and have a caregiver available at home. The patient’s home must pass an inspection, showing it to be free of sources for potential infection, such as mold or pets that sleep in the patient’s bed.

When the time comes for treatment, the patient receives conditioning at the hospital but can return home the day before or the day of transplant. After discharge, the patient is visited by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant each morning for a physical examination and blood draw.

In the afternoon, the patient is visited by a clinic nurse who brings any necessary supplies or treatments, such as blood products or intravenous antibiotics. The patient also has daily video calls with an attending physician and can be admitted to the hospital for any events that cannot be managed in the home setting.

Patients can have visitors and spend time away from home, but precautions are necessary. Friends or family who are sick should not be allowed to visit, and patients should avoid crowds when they go out.

Vidyard Video

Initial findings

The Duke team has treated 41 HSCT recipients at home so far. Dr. Chao said it’s still too early to draw any conclusions about differences in outcomes between home care and inpatient/outpatient HSCT.

However, a preliminary analysis of costs suggests home care is cheaper than inpatient HSCT. The researchers found that, for the first several transplants, at day 60, the cost of home care was roughly half that of inpatient HSCT.

In addition, patients seem to be happy with posttransplant care at home.

“The patients love being at home, in their own environment, with their families,” Dr. Chao said. “Almost every single patient [in the phase 1 trial] said that he or she liked it much better. There was one patient in the phase 1 that felt a little isolated, and I can see why because we say, ‘You can stay home, but don’t have a whole lot of people in.’ ”

 

 

One patient’s experience

Beth Vanderkin said it was “a blessing” to receive care at home after undergoing HSCT at Duke.

Beth Vanderkin

Ms. Vanderkin was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2014. After two chemotherapy regimens failed to shrink the tumor in her chest, she underwent radiotherapy and responded well. When a PET scan revealed the tumor had gone completely, she proceeded to transplant.

She received a haploidentical HSCT using cells donated by her eldest daughter, Hannah Eichhorst. Ms. Vanderkin received the transplant in the hospital, and for 2 weeks after that, she made daily visits to the transplant clinic.

After those 2 weeks, Ms. Vanderkin continued her treatment at home. Like other patients eligible for home care, Ms. Vanderkin lived close to Duke, had a caregiver available, and had passed a home inspection. The Duke team shipped the needed medical supplies to her house and arranged twice-daily visits from nurses and daily video calls with a doctor.

Ms. Vanderkin said receiving care at home was “a game changer.” She derived comfort from recovering in her own environment, could spend more time with her family, and didn’t have to miss special events. While receiving care at home, Ms. Vanderkin attended the homecoming event where her son, Josiah, was part of the court. Wearing a face mask and carrying a portable pump in her purse, Ms. Vanderkin joined other mothers in escorting their children onto the football field.

“I got to escort my son out onto the field, and he was crowned king that night,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “I didn’t do a lot of things [while receiving care at home], but there were things I didn’t have to miss because I was at home and not in the hospital.”

Ms. Vanderkin said home care was also beneficial for her husband, who was her caregiver. Thomas Vanderkin was able to work from home while caring for his wife, and the daily nurses’ visits allowed him to run errands without having to leave Ms. Vanderkin alone.

Since her experience with home care, Ms. Vanderkin has spent many more days in the hospital and clinic. She experienced a relapse after the transplant and went on to receive more chemotherapy as well as ipilimumab. She responded to that treatment and has now been cancer-free for 3 years.

The ipilimumab did cause side effects, including intestinal problems that resulted in the need for parenteral nutrition. This side effect was made more bearable, Ms. Vanderkin said, because she was able to receive the parenteral nutrition at home. She and her husband were comfortable with additional home care because of their positive experience with posttransplant care.

“I think we’re conditioned to think that, to receive the best care, we have to be sitting in a hospital room or a clinic, but I think there’s a lot of things we can probably do at home,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “And we might fare a lot better as patients if we’re in an environment that we feel comfortable in.”

 

 

Experience at other centers

The team at Duke is not the first to study HSCT care at home. In fact, researchers in Sweden have been studying posttransplant home care since 1998.

A pilot trial the group published in 2000 suggested that home care was safe and, in some ways, superior to inpatient HSCT (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Nov;26[10]:1057-60). Patients treated at home had a lower rate of bacteremia, fewer days of total parenteral nutrition, fewer erythrocyte transfusions, and fewer days on antibiotics and analgesics. Rates of fever, engraftment time, and acute GVHD were similar between the inpatient and home-care groups.

A study published by the same researchers in 2002 showed that patients who received home care had lower rates of grade 2-4 acute GVHD and transplant-related mortality compared to inpatients (Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100[13]:4317-24). Two-year overall survival was superior with home care as well.

On the other hand, a study the group published in 2013 showed no significant differences in 5-year survival, transplant-related mortality, relapse, or chronic GVHD between inpatients and those who received care at home (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.11.5189).

The phase 2 trials at Duke should provide more insight into patient outcomes, but results probably won’t be available for 2 more years, Dr. Chao said.

In the meantime, other U.S. researchers are studying home care as well. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is conducting a pilot study to determine if HSCT care at home is feasible (NCT02671448).

Dr. Chao said home care should be possible for other centers, particularly those that already perform outpatient HSCT.

“Having the outpatient infrastructure to support these patients is a big step,” he said. “And I think we were able to do that mainly because we do most of our transplants in the outpatient setting already. So that jump to the home is a little less compared to a center that does no outpatient transplants.”

He added, “There’s a certain amount of inertia to overcome and a certain amount of apprehension from the caregivers initially because [patients aren’t] sitting in your unit all the time, but I don’t see this as a huge barrier.”

In fact, Dr. Chao said, if results with home care are favorable, it could potentially replace inpatient HSCT for certain patients.

Dr. Chao’s research is supported by Duke University, and he reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Can receiving all posttransplant care at home benefit patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)? Researchers are conducting phase 2 trials to find out.

Dr. Nelson Chao

Nelson Chao, MD, and colleagues at Duke University in Durham, N.C., completed a phase 1 trial that suggested post-HSCT care at home was feasible and safe (Blood. 2017;130:745).

Now, the team is conducting phase 2 trials – NCT01725022 and NCT02218151 – comparing patients who receive all posttransplant care at home with patients treated in the hospital or in the outpatient setting with daily visits to the clinic.

The main goal is to determine if allogeneic HSCT recipients treated at home can maintain their normal microbiome and, as a result, have a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The researchers are also looking at other outcomes such as quality of life, treatment-related morbidities and mortality, and the cost of care for both allogeneic and autologous transplant recipients.

To be eligible for home care after HSCT, a patient must live within a 90-minute driving distance of Duke and have a caregiver available at home. The patient’s home must pass an inspection, showing it to be free of sources for potential infection, such as mold or pets that sleep in the patient’s bed.

When the time comes for treatment, the patient receives conditioning at the hospital but can return home the day before or the day of transplant. After discharge, the patient is visited by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant each morning for a physical examination and blood draw.

In the afternoon, the patient is visited by a clinic nurse who brings any necessary supplies or treatments, such as blood products or intravenous antibiotics. The patient also has daily video calls with an attending physician and can be admitted to the hospital for any events that cannot be managed in the home setting.

Patients can have visitors and spend time away from home, but precautions are necessary. Friends or family who are sick should not be allowed to visit, and patients should avoid crowds when they go out.

Vidyard Video

Initial findings

The Duke team has treated 41 HSCT recipients at home so far. Dr. Chao said it’s still too early to draw any conclusions about differences in outcomes between home care and inpatient/outpatient HSCT.

However, a preliminary analysis of costs suggests home care is cheaper than inpatient HSCT. The researchers found that, for the first several transplants, at day 60, the cost of home care was roughly half that of inpatient HSCT.

In addition, patients seem to be happy with posttransplant care at home.

“The patients love being at home, in their own environment, with their families,” Dr. Chao said. “Almost every single patient [in the phase 1 trial] said that he or she liked it much better. There was one patient in the phase 1 that felt a little isolated, and I can see why because we say, ‘You can stay home, but don’t have a whole lot of people in.’ ”

 

 

One patient’s experience

Beth Vanderkin said it was “a blessing” to receive care at home after undergoing HSCT at Duke.

Beth Vanderkin

Ms. Vanderkin was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2014. After two chemotherapy regimens failed to shrink the tumor in her chest, she underwent radiotherapy and responded well. When a PET scan revealed the tumor had gone completely, she proceeded to transplant.

She received a haploidentical HSCT using cells donated by her eldest daughter, Hannah Eichhorst. Ms. Vanderkin received the transplant in the hospital, and for 2 weeks after that, she made daily visits to the transplant clinic.

After those 2 weeks, Ms. Vanderkin continued her treatment at home. Like other patients eligible for home care, Ms. Vanderkin lived close to Duke, had a caregiver available, and had passed a home inspection. The Duke team shipped the needed medical supplies to her house and arranged twice-daily visits from nurses and daily video calls with a doctor.

Ms. Vanderkin said receiving care at home was “a game changer.” She derived comfort from recovering in her own environment, could spend more time with her family, and didn’t have to miss special events. While receiving care at home, Ms. Vanderkin attended the homecoming event where her son, Josiah, was part of the court. Wearing a face mask and carrying a portable pump in her purse, Ms. Vanderkin joined other mothers in escorting their children onto the football field.

“I got to escort my son out onto the field, and he was crowned king that night,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “I didn’t do a lot of things [while receiving care at home], but there were things I didn’t have to miss because I was at home and not in the hospital.”

Ms. Vanderkin said home care was also beneficial for her husband, who was her caregiver. Thomas Vanderkin was able to work from home while caring for his wife, and the daily nurses’ visits allowed him to run errands without having to leave Ms. Vanderkin alone.

Since her experience with home care, Ms. Vanderkin has spent many more days in the hospital and clinic. She experienced a relapse after the transplant and went on to receive more chemotherapy as well as ipilimumab. She responded to that treatment and has now been cancer-free for 3 years.

The ipilimumab did cause side effects, including intestinal problems that resulted in the need for parenteral nutrition. This side effect was made more bearable, Ms. Vanderkin said, because she was able to receive the parenteral nutrition at home. She and her husband were comfortable with additional home care because of their positive experience with posttransplant care.

“I think we’re conditioned to think that, to receive the best care, we have to be sitting in a hospital room or a clinic, but I think there’s a lot of things we can probably do at home,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “And we might fare a lot better as patients if we’re in an environment that we feel comfortable in.”

 

 

Experience at other centers

The team at Duke is not the first to study HSCT care at home. In fact, researchers in Sweden have been studying posttransplant home care since 1998.

A pilot trial the group published in 2000 suggested that home care was safe and, in some ways, superior to inpatient HSCT (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Nov;26[10]:1057-60). Patients treated at home had a lower rate of bacteremia, fewer days of total parenteral nutrition, fewer erythrocyte transfusions, and fewer days on antibiotics and analgesics. Rates of fever, engraftment time, and acute GVHD were similar between the inpatient and home-care groups.

A study published by the same researchers in 2002 showed that patients who received home care had lower rates of grade 2-4 acute GVHD and transplant-related mortality compared to inpatients (Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100[13]:4317-24). Two-year overall survival was superior with home care as well.

On the other hand, a study the group published in 2013 showed no significant differences in 5-year survival, transplant-related mortality, relapse, or chronic GVHD between inpatients and those who received care at home (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.11.5189).

The phase 2 trials at Duke should provide more insight into patient outcomes, but results probably won’t be available for 2 more years, Dr. Chao said.

In the meantime, other U.S. researchers are studying home care as well. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is conducting a pilot study to determine if HSCT care at home is feasible (NCT02671448).

Dr. Chao said home care should be possible for other centers, particularly those that already perform outpatient HSCT.

“Having the outpatient infrastructure to support these patients is a big step,” he said. “And I think we were able to do that mainly because we do most of our transplants in the outpatient setting already. So that jump to the home is a little less compared to a center that does no outpatient transplants.”

He added, “There’s a certain amount of inertia to overcome and a certain amount of apprehension from the caregivers initially because [patients aren’t] sitting in your unit all the time, but I don’t see this as a huge barrier.”

In fact, Dr. Chao said, if results with home care are favorable, it could potentially replace inpatient HSCT for certain patients.

Dr. Chao’s research is supported by Duke University, and he reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

Can receiving all posttransplant care at home benefit patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)? Researchers are conducting phase 2 trials to find out.

Dr. Nelson Chao

Nelson Chao, MD, and colleagues at Duke University in Durham, N.C., completed a phase 1 trial that suggested post-HSCT care at home was feasible and safe (Blood. 2017;130:745).

Now, the team is conducting phase 2 trials – NCT01725022 and NCT02218151 – comparing patients who receive all posttransplant care at home with patients treated in the hospital or in the outpatient setting with daily visits to the clinic.

The main goal is to determine if allogeneic HSCT recipients treated at home can maintain their normal microbiome and, as a result, have a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The researchers are also looking at other outcomes such as quality of life, treatment-related morbidities and mortality, and the cost of care for both allogeneic and autologous transplant recipients.

To be eligible for home care after HSCT, a patient must live within a 90-minute driving distance of Duke and have a caregiver available at home. The patient’s home must pass an inspection, showing it to be free of sources for potential infection, such as mold or pets that sleep in the patient’s bed.

When the time comes for treatment, the patient receives conditioning at the hospital but can return home the day before or the day of transplant. After discharge, the patient is visited by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant each morning for a physical examination and blood draw.

In the afternoon, the patient is visited by a clinic nurse who brings any necessary supplies or treatments, such as blood products or intravenous antibiotics. The patient also has daily video calls with an attending physician and can be admitted to the hospital for any events that cannot be managed in the home setting.

Patients can have visitors and spend time away from home, but precautions are necessary. Friends or family who are sick should not be allowed to visit, and patients should avoid crowds when they go out.

Vidyard Video

Initial findings

The Duke team has treated 41 HSCT recipients at home so far. Dr. Chao said it’s still too early to draw any conclusions about differences in outcomes between home care and inpatient/outpatient HSCT.

However, a preliminary analysis of costs suggests home care is cheaper than inpatient HSCT. The researchers found that, for the first several transplants, at day 60, the cost of home care was roughly half that of inpatient HSCT.

In addition, patients seem to be happy with posttransplant care at home.

“The patients love being at home, in their own environment, with their families,” Dr. Chao said. “Almost every single patient [in the phase 1 trial] said that he or she liked it much better. There was one patient in the phase 1 that felt a little isolated, and I can see why because we say, ‘You can stay home, but don’t have a whole lot of people in.’ ”

 

 

One patient’s experience

Beth Vanderkin said it was “a blessing” to receive care at home after undergoing HSCT at Duke.

Beth Vanderkin

Ms. Vanderkin was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2014. After two chemotherapy regimens failed to shrink the tumor in her chest, she underwent radiotherapy and responded well. When a PET scan revealed the tumor had gone completely, she proceeded to transplant.

She received a haploidentical HSCT using cells donated by her eldest daughter, Hannah Eichhorst. Ms. Vanderkin received the transplant in the hospital, and for 2 weeks after that, she made daily visits to the transplant clinic.

After those 2 weeks, Ms. Vanderkin continued her treatment at home. Like other patients eligible for home care, Ms. Vanderkin lived close to Duke, had a caregiver available, and had passed a home inspection. The Duke team shipped the needed medical supplies to her house and arranged twice-daily visits from nurses and daily video calls with a doctor.

Ms. Vanderkin said receiving care at home was “a game changer.” She derived comfort from recovering in her own environment, could spend more time with her family, and didn’t have to miss special events. While receiving care at home, Ms. Vanderkin attended the homecoming event where her son, Josiah, was part of the court. Wearing a face mask and carrying a portable pump in her purse, Ms. Vanderkin joined other mothers in escorting their children onto the football field.

“I got to escort my son out onto the field, and he was crowned king that night,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “I didn’t do a lot of things [while receiving care at home], but there were things I didn’t have to miss because I was at home and not in the hospital.”

Ms. Vanderkin said home care was also beneficial for her husband, who was her caregiver. Thomas Vanderkin was able to work from home while caring for his wife, and the daily nurses’ visits allowed him to run errands without having to leave Ms. Vanderkin alone.

Since her experience with home care, Ms. Vanderkin has spent many more days in the hospital and clinic. She experienced a relapse after the transplant and went on to receive more chemotherapy as well as ipilimumab. She responded to that treatment and has now been cancer-free for 3 years.

The ipilimumab did cause side effects, including intestinal problems that resulted in the need for parenteral nutrition. This side effect was made more bearable, Ms. Vanderkin said, because she was able to receive the parenteral nutrition at home. She and her husband were comfortable with additional home care because of their positive experience with posttransplant care.

“I think we’re conditioned to think that, to receive the best care, we have to be sitting in a hospital room or a clinic, but I think there’s a lot of things we can probably do at home,” Ms. Vanderkin said. “And we might fare a lot better as patients if we’re in an environment that we feel comfortable in.”

 

 

Experience at other centers

The team at Duke is not the first to study HSCT care at home. In fact, researchers in Sweden have been studying posttransplant home care since 1998.

A pilot trial the group published in 2000 suggested that home care was safe and, in some ways, superior to inpatient HSCT (Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Nov;26[10]:1057-60). Patients treated at home had a lower rate of bacteremia, fewer days of total parenteral nutrition, fewer erythrocyte transfusions, and fewer days on antibiotics and analgesics. Rates of fever, engraftment time, and acute GVHD were similar between the inpatient and home-care groups.

A study published by the same researchers in 2002 showed that patients who received home care had lower rates of grade 2-4 acute GVHD and transplant-related mortality compared to inpatients (Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100[13]:4317-24). Two-year overall survival was superior with home care as well.

On the other hand, a study the group published in 2013 showed no significant differences in 5-year survival, transplant-related mortality, relapse, or chronic GVHD between inpatients and those who received care at home (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.11.5189).

The phase 2 trials at Duke should provide more insight into patient outcomes, but results probably won’t be available for 2 more years, Dr. Chao said.

In the meantime, other U.S. researchers are studying home care as well. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is conducting a pilot study to determine if HSCT care at home is feasible (NCT02671448).

Dr. Chao said home care should be possible for other centers, particularly those that already perform outpatient HSCT.

“Having the outpatient infrastructure to support these patients is a big step,” he said. “And I think we were able to do that mainly because we do most of our transplants in the outpatient setting already. So that jump to the home is a little less compared to a center that does no outpatient transplants.”

He added, “There’s a certain amount of inertia to overcome and a certain amount of apprehension from the caregivers initially because [patients aren’t] sitting in your unit all the time, but I don’t see this as a huge barrier.”

In fact, Dr. Chao said, if results with home care are favorable, it could potentially replace inpatient HSCT for certain patients.

Dr. Chao’s research is supported by Duke University, and he reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

VRD pretransplant induction deepens responses in myeloma

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 09/17/2019 - 12:31

 

Pretransplant induction therapy with subcutaneous bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) deepened responses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to an interim analysis of a phase 3 study.

Overall, the regimen was well tolerated, with a minimal number of patients discontinuing treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events.

The ongoing, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study is designed to compare two transplant-conditioning regimens – intravenous busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan – in patients who received VRD induction and consolidation, wrote Laura Rosiñol, MD, PhD, of the August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute in Barcelona, and colleagues. The findings were published in Blood.

The PETHEMA/GEM2012 study included 458 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Study patients were previously untreated and aged younger than 65 years.

All patients received VRD induction, which consisted of subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle; lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 9-12 at 4-week intervals for six cycles. Posttransplant consolidation consisted of two cycles of VRD.

The researchers conducted a grouped-response analysis of three different treatment phases: induction, transplant, and consolidation.

After analysis, the researchers found that responses deepened over the duration of treatment. In patients who started the sixth induction cycle, the response rates were 55.6%, 63.8%, 68.3%, and 70.4% after cycles 3, 4, 5, and post induction, respectively.

After six cycles of induction, the complete response rate was 33.4%, with a rate of undetectable minimal residual disease of 28.8%, which further increased at transplant (42.1%), and consolidation (45.2%).

With respect to safety, the most frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (12.9%) and infection (9.2%). The rate of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy throughout induction was 17.0%, with lower rates of grade 3 (3.7%) and 4 (0.2%) toxicities.

“The regimen [used in the present study] has the highest lenalidomide and dexamethasone dose intensity per cycle and a lower bortezomib dose intensity per cycle than the 21-day regimens, which may offer high activity with low levels of toxicity, thereby enabling delivery of all planned induction cycles,” the researchers wrote, adding that “these results confirm that VRD is an effective pretransplant induction regimen and may be considered a new standard of care.”

The study was supported by Celgene, Janssen, Pierre Fabré, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The authors reported financial affiliations with Celgene, Janssen, and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rosiñol L et al. Blood. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000241.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Pretransplant induction therapy with subcutaneous bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) deepened responses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to an interim analysis of a phase 3 study.

Overall, the regimen was well tolerated, with a minimal number of patients discontinuing treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events.

The ongoing, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study is designed to compare two transplant-conditioning regimens – intravenous busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan – in patients who received VRD induction and consolidation, wrote Laura Rosiñol, MD, PhD, of the August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute in Barcelona, and colleagues. The findings were published in Blood.

The PETHEMA/GEM2012 study included 458 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Study patients were previously untreated and aged younger than 65 years.

All patients received VRD induction, which consisted of subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle; lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 9-12 at 4-week intervals for six cycles. Posttransplant consolidation consisted of two cycles of VRD.

The researchers conducted a grouped-response analysis of three different treatment phases: induction, transplant, and consolidation.

After analysis, the researchers found that responses deepened over the duration of treatment. In patients who started the sixth induction cycle, the response rates were 55.6%, 63.8%, 68.3%, and 70.4% after cycles 3, 4, 5, and post induction, respectively.

After six cycles of induction, the complete response rate was 33.4%, with a rate of undetectable minimal residual disease of 28.8%, which further increased at transplant (42.1%), and consolidation (45.2%).

With respect to safety, the most frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (12.9%) and infection (9.2%). The rate of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy throughout induction was 17.0%, with lower rates of grade 3 (3.7%) and 4 (0.2%) toxicities.

“The regimen [used in the present study] has the highest lenalidomide and dexamethasone dose intensity per cycle and a lower bortezomib dose intensity per cycle than the 21-day regimens, which may offer high activity with low levels of toxicity, thereby enabling delivery of all planned induction cycles,” the researchers wrote, adding that “these results confirm that VRD is an effective pretransplant induction regimen and may be considered a new standard of care.”

The study was supported by Celgene, Janssen, Pierre Fabré, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The authors reported financial affiliations with Celgene, Janssen, and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rosiñol L et al. Blood. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000241.

 

Pretransplant induction therapy with subcutaneous bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) deepened responses in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to an interim analysis of a phase 3 study.

Overall, the regimen was well tolerated, with a minimal number of patients discontinuing treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events.

The ongoing, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study is designed to compare two transplant-conditioning regimens – intravenous busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan – in patients who received VRD induction and consolidation, wrote Laura Rosiñol, MD, PhD, of the August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute in Barcelona, and colleagues. The findings were published in Blood.

The PETHEMA/GEM2012 study included 458 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Study patients were previously untreated and aged younger than 65 years.

All patients received VRD induction, which consisted of subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle; lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and 9-12 at 4-week intervals for six cycles. Posttransplant consolidation consisted of two cycles of VRD.

The researchers conducted a grouped-response analysis of three different treatment phases: induction, transplant, and consolidation.

After analysis, the researchers found that responses deepened over the duration of treatment. In patients who started the sixth induction cycle, the response rates were 55.6%, 63.8%, 68.3%, and 70.4% after cycles 3, 4, 5, and post induction, respectively.

After six cycles of induction, the complete response rate was 33.4%, with a rate of undetectable minimal residual disease of 28.8%, which further increased at transplant (42.1%), and consolidation (45.2%).

With respect to safety, the most frequently reported grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (12.9%) and infection (9.2%). The rate of grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy throughout induction was 17.0%, with lower rates of grade 3 (3.7%) and 4 (0.2%) toxicities.

“The regimen [used in the present study] has the highest lenalidomide and dexamethasone dose intensity per cycle and a lower bortezomib dose intensity per cycle than the 21-day regimens, which may offer high activity with low levels of toxicity, thereby enabling delivery of all planned induction cycles,” the researchers wrote, adding that “these results confirm that VRD is an effective pretransplant induction regimen and may be considered a new standard of care.”

The study was supported by Celgene, Janssen, Pierre Fabré, and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III. The authors reported financial affiliations with Celgene, Janssen, and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rosiñol L et al. Blood. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000241.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM BLOOD

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Stem cells gene edited to be HIV resistant treat ALL, but not HIV

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 09/12/2019 - 14:59

 

Gene editing of donor stem cells prior to transplantation into a patient with both HIV infection and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was safe and effectively treated the patient’s leukemia, but failed to resolve his HIV, investigators reported.

NIAID
This image shows a T cell infected by HIV particles.

The 27-year-old man received an HLA-matched transplant of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that had been genetically engineered to lack CCR5, a key gateway for HIV entry into cells.

Although the transplant resulted in complete remission of leukemia with full donor chimerism, only about 9% of the posttransplant lymphocytes showed disruption of CCR5, and during a brief trial of antiretroviral therapy interruption his HIV viral load rebounded, reported Hongkui Deng, PhD, and colleagues from Peking University in China.

Although the experiment did not meet its goal of a drug-free HIV remission, it serves as a proof of concept for the use of CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) gene editing to treat HIV infection, the authors contend.

“These results show the proof of principle that transplantation and long-term engraftment of CRISPR-edited allogeneic HSPCs can be achieved; however, the efficiency of the response was not adequate to achieve the target of cure of HIV-1 infection,” they wrote in a brief report published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

As previously reported, other research groups have investigated genetic editing to mimic a naturally occurring mutation that effectively disables the CCR5 HIV coreceptor, preventing the retrovirus from entering healthy cells. The mutation was first identified in a man named Timothy Brown who came to be known as “the Berlin patient” after he was apparently cured of HIV infection after a bone marrow transplant from a donor who had the mutation.

Dr. Deng and colleagues took advantage of HSPC transplantation, a standard therapy for ALL to see whether it could also have beneficial effects on concomitant HIV infection.

They treated donor HSPCs with CRISPR-Cas9 to ablate CCR5 and then delivered them to the patient along with additional CD34-depleted donor cells from mobilized peripheral blood.

The transplant was a success, with neutrophil engraftment on day 13 and platelet engraftment on day 27, and the leukemia was in morphologic complete remission at week 4 following transplantation. The patient remained in complete remission from leukemia throughout the 19-month follow-up period, with full donor chimerism .

However, when a planned interruption of antiretroviral therapy was carried out at 7 months post transplant, the serum viral load increased to 3 × 107 copies/ml at week 4 following interruption, and the patient was restarted on the drug. His viral levels gradually decreased to undetectable level during the subsequent months.

The investigators noted that 2 weeks after the drug interruption trial was started there was a small increase in the percentage of CCR5 insertion/deletions.

“The low efficiency of gene editing in the patient may be due to the competitive engraftment of the coinfused HSPCs in CD34-depleted cells and the persistence of donor T cells. To further clarify the anti-HIV effect of CCR5-ablated HSPCs, it will be essential to increase the gene-editing efficiency of our CRISPR-Cas9 system and improve the transplantation protocol,” they wrote.

The study was funded by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission and others (unspecified). All authors reported having nothing to disclose.

 

 

SOURCE: Xu L et al. N Engl J Med. 2019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817426.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Gene editing of donor stem cells prior to transplantation into a patient with both HIV infection and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was safe and effectively treated the patient’s leukemia, but failed to resolve his HIV, investigators reported.

NIAID
This image shows a T cell infected by HIV particles.

The 27-year-old man received an HLA-matched transplant of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that had been genetically engineered to lack CCR5, a key gateway for HIV entry into cells.

Although the transplant resulted in complete remission of leukemia with full donor chimerism, only about 9% of the posttransplant lymphocytes showed disruption of CCR5, and during a brief trial of antiretroviral therapy interruption his HIV viral load rebounded, reported Hongkui Deng, PhD, and colleagues from Peking University in China.

Although the experiment did not meet its goal of a drug-free HIV remission, it serves as a proof of concept for the use of CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) gene editing to treat HIV infection, the authors contend.

“These results show the proof of principle that transplantation and long-term engraftment of CRISPR-edited allogeneic HSPCs can be achieved; however, the efficiency of the response was not adequate to achieve the target of cure of HIV-1 infection,” they wrote in a brief report published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

As previously reported, other research groups have investigated genetic editing to mimic a naturally occurring mutation that effectively disables the CCR5 HIV coreceptor, preventing the retrovirus from entering healthy cells. The mutation was first identified in a man named Timothy Brown who came to be known as “the Berlin patient” after he was apparently cured of HIV infection after a bone marrow transplant from a donor who had the mutation.

Dr. Deng and colleagues took advantage of HSPC transplantation, a standard therapy for ALL to see whether it could also have beneficial effects on concomitant HIV infection.

They treated donor HSPCs with CRISPR-Cas9 to ablate CCR5 and then delivered them to the patient along with additional CD34-depleted donor cells from mobilized peripheral blood.

The transplant was a success, with neutrophil engraftment on day 13 and platelet engraftment on day 27, and the leukemia was in morphologic complete remission at week 4 following transplantation. The patient remained in complete remission from leukemia throughout the 19-month follow-up period, with full donor chimerism .

However, when a planned interruption of antiretroviral therapy was carried out at 7 months post transplant, the serum viral load increased to 3 × 107 copies/ml at week 4 following interruption, and the patient was restarted on the drug. His viral levels gradually decreased to undetectable level during the subsequent months.

The investigators noted that 2 weeks after the drug interruption trial was started there was a small increase in the percentage of CCR5 insertion/deletions.

“The low efficiency of gene editing in the patient may be due to the competitive engraftment of the coinfused HSPCs in CD34-depleted cells and the persistence of donor T cells. To further clarify the anti-HIV effect of CCR5-ablated HSPCs, it will be essential to increase the gene-editing efficiency of our CRISPR-Cas9 system and improve the transplantation protocol,” they wrote.

The study was funded by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission and others (unspecified). All authors reported having nothing to disclose.

 

 

SOURCE: Xu L et al. N Engl J Med. 2019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817426.

 

Gene editing of donor stem cells prior to transplantation into a patient with both HIV infection and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was safe and effectively treated the patient’s leukemia, but failed to resolve his HIV, investigators reported.

NIAID
This image shows a T cell infected by HIV particles.

The 27-year-old man received an HLA-matched transplant of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that had been genetically engineered to lack CCR5, a key gateway for HIV entry into cells.

Although the transplant resulted in complete remission of leukemia with full donor chimerism, only about 9% of the posttransplant lymphocytes showed disruption of CCR5, and during a brief trial of antiretroviral therapy interruption his HIV viral load rebounded, reported Hongkui Deng, PhD, and colleagues from Peking University in China.

Although the experiment did not meet its goal of a drug-free HIV remission, it serves as a proof of concept for the use of CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9) gene editing to treat HIV infection, the authors contend.

“These results show the proof of principle that transplantation and long-term engraftment of CRISPR-edited allogeneic HSPCs can be achieved; however, the efficiency of the response was not adequate to achieve the target of cure of HIV-1 infection,” they wrote in a brief report published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

As previously reported, other research groups have investigated genetic editing to mimic a naturally occurring mutation that effectively disables the CCR5 HIV coreceptor, preventing the retrovirus from entering healthy cells. The mutation was first identified in a man named Timothy Brown who came to be known as “the Berlin patient” after he was apparently cured of HIV infection after a bone marrow transplant from a donor who had the mutation.

Dr. Deng and colleagues took advantage of HSPC transplantation, a standard therapy for ALL to see whether it could also have beneficial effects on concomitant HIV infection.

They treated donor HSPCs with CRISPR-Cas9 to ablate CCR5 and then delivered them to the patient along with additional CD34-depleted donor cells from mobilized peripheral blood.

The transplant was a success, with neutrophil engraftment on day 13 and platelet engraftment on day 27, and the leukemia was in morphologic complete remission at week 4 following transplantation. The patient remained in complete remission from leukemia throughout the 19-month follow-up period, with full donor chimerism .

However, when a planned interruption of antiretroviral therapy was carried out at 7 months post transplant, the serum viral load increased to 3 × 107 copies/ml at week 4 following interruption, and the patient was restarted on the drug. His viral levels gradually decreased to undetectable level during the subsequent months.

The investigators noted that 2 weeks after the drug interruption trial was started there was a small increase in the percentage of CCR5 insertion/deletions.

“The low efficiency of gene editing in the patient may be due to the competitive engraftment of the coinfused HSPCs in CD34-depleted cells and the persistence of donor T cells. To further clarify the anti-HIV effect of CCR5-ablated HSPCs, it will be essential to increase the gene-editing efficiency of our CRISPR-Cas9 system and improve the transplantation protocol,” they wrote.

The study was funded by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission and others (unspecified). All authors reported having nothing to disclose.

 

 

SOURCE: Xu L et al. N Engl J Med. 2019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817426.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Donor cells depleted of the HIV coreceptor CCR5 effectively treated ALL, but not HIV.

Major finding: The patient had a sustained complete remission of ALL, but HIV persisted after transplantation.

Study details: Case report of a 27-year-old man with ALL and HIV.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission and others (unspecified). All authors reported having nothing to disclose.

Source: Xu L et al. N Engl J Med. 2019. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817426.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Nonmyeloablative conditioning carries lowers infection risk in patients with AML

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 09/24/2019 - 14:31

 

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) offers a lower risk of infection than myeloablative conditioning (MAC), based on a retrospective study involving more than 1,700 patients.

OlegMalyshev/Getty Images

Within 100 days of treatment, patients who underwent MAC were significantly more likely to develop a bacterial infection, and develop it at an earlier date, than patients who had undergone RIC/NMA, reported lead author Celalettin Ustun, MD, of Rush University in Chicago, and colleagues.

“The incidence of infections, a common and often severe complication of alloHCT, is expected to be lower after RIC/NMA compared with MAC and thus contribute to the decreased [nonrelapse mortality],” the investigators wrote in Blood Advances, noting that this hypothesis has previously lacked supporting data, prompting the present study.

The retrospective analysis involved 1,755 patients with AML who were in first complete remission. Data were drawn from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The primary end point was incidence of infection within 100 days after T-cell replete alloHCT in patients receiving MAC (n = 978) versus those who underwent RIC/NMA (n = 777). Secondary end points included comparisons of infection types and infection density.

Patients who received RIC/NMA were generally older and more likely to have myelodysplastic syndrome than patients in the MAC group; the groups were otherwise similar, based on comorbidities, cytogenetic risks, and Karnofsky performance scores.

The proportion of patients who developed at least one infection was comparable between groups: 61% of MAC patients versus 58% of RIC/NMA patients (P = .21), but further analysis showed that MAC was in fact associated with some relatively increased risks. For instance, patients in the MAC group tended to develop infections sooner than patients treated with RIC/NMA (21 vs. 15 days), and more patients treated with MAC had at least one bacterial infection by day 100 (46% vs. 37%).

Although the proportion of patients developing at least one viral infection was slightly lower in the MAC group than the RIC/NMA group (34% vs. 39%), overall infection density was higher, which takes into account multiple infections.

The increased bacterial infections after MAC were caused by gram-positive bacteria, while the increased viral infections with RIC/NMA were caused by cytomegalovirus, the investigators reported.

“RIC/NMA alloHCT is associated with a decreased risk of any infection and particularly early bacterial infections,” the investigators wrote. “The risk of viral and fungal infections per days at risk is similar.”

The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research is supported by grants from the U.S. government and several pharmaceutical companies. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ustun C et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Sep 10;3(17):2525-36.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) offers a lower risk of infection than myeloablative conditioning (MAC), based on a retrospective study involving more than 1,700 patients.

OlegMalyshev/Getty Images

Within 100 days of treatment, patients who underwent MAC were significantly more likely to develop a bacterial infection, and develop it at an earlier date, than patients who had undergone RIC/NMA, reported lead author Celalettin Ustun, MD, of Rush University in Chicago, and colleagues.

“The incidence of infections, a common and often severe complication of alloHCT, is expected to be lower after RIC/NMA compared with MAC and thus contribute to the decreased [nonrelapse mortality],” the investigators wrote in Blood Advances, noting that this hypothesis has previously lacked supporting data, prompting the present study.

The retrospective analysis involved 1,755 patients with AML who were in first complete remission. Data were drawn from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The primary end point was incidence of infection within 100 days after T-cell replete alloHCT in patients receiving MAC (n = 978) versus those who underwent RIC/NMA (n = 777). Secondary end points included comparisons of infection types and infection density.

Patients who received RIC/NMA were generally older and more likely to have myelodysplastic syndrome than patients in the MAC group; the groups were otherwise similar, based on comorbidities, cytogenetic risks, and Karnofsky performance scores.

The proportion of patients who developed at least one infection was comparable between groups: 61% of MAC patients versus 58% of RIC/NMA patients (P = .21), but further analysis showed that MAC was in fact associated with some relatively increased risks. For instance, patients in the MAC group tended to develop infections sooner than patients treated with RIC/NMA (21 vs. 15 days), and more patients treated with MAC had at least one bacterial infection by day 100 (46% vs. 37%).

Although the proportion of patients developing at least one viral infection was slightly lower in the MAC group than the RIC/NMA group (34% vs. 39%), overall infection density was higher, which takes into account multiple infections.

The increased bacterial infections after MAC were caused by gram-positive bacteria, while the increased viral infections with RIC/NMA were caused by cytomegalovirus, the investigators reported.

“RIC/NMA alloHCT is associated with a decreased risk of any infection and particularly early bacterial infections,” the investigators wrote. “The risk of viral and fungal infections per days at risk is similar.”

The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research is supported by grants from the U.S. government and several pharmaceutical companies. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ustun C et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Sep 10;3(17):2525-36.

 

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) offers a lower risk of infection than myeloablative conditioning (MAC), based on a retrospective study involving more than 1,700 patients.

OlegMalyshev/Getty Images

Within 100 days of treatment, patients who underwent MAC were significantly more likely to develop a bacterial infection, and develop it at an earlier date, than patients who had undergone RIC/NMA, reported lead author Celalettin Ustun, MD, of Rush University in Chicago, and colleagues.

“The incidence of infections, a common and often severe complication of alloHCT, is expected to be lower after RIC/NMA compared with MAC and thus contribute to the decreased [nonrelapse mortality],” the investigators wrote in Blood Advances, noting that this hypothesis has previously lacked supporting data, prompting the present study.

The retrospective analysis involved 1,755 patients with AML who were in first complete remission. Data were drawn from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The primary end point was incidence of infection within 100 days after T-cell replete alloHCT in patients receiving MAC (n = 978) versus those who underwent RIC/NMA (n = 777). Secondary end points included comparisons of infection types and infection density.

Patients who received RIC/NMA were generally older and more likely to have myelodysplastic syndrome than patients in the MAC group; the groups were otherwise similar, based on comorbidities, cytogenetic risks, and Karnofsky performance scores.

The proportion of patients who developed at least one infection was comparable between groups: 61% of MAC patients versus 58% of RIC/NMA patients (P = .21), but further analysis showed that MAC was in fact associated with some relatively increased risks. For instance, patients in the MAC group tended to develop infections sooner than patients treated with RIC/NMA (21 vs. 15 days), and more patients treated with MAC had at least one bacterial infection by day 100 (46% vs. 37%).

Although the proportion of patients developing at least one viral infection was slightly lower in the MAC group than the RIC/NMA group (34% vs. 39%), overall infection density was higher, which takes into account multiple infections.

The increased bacterial infections after MAC were caused by gram-positive bacteria, while the increased viral infections with RIC/NMA were caused by cytomegalovirus, the investigators reported.

“RIC/NMA alloHCT is associated with a decreased risk of any infection and particularly early bacterial infections,” the investigators wrote. “The risk of viral and fungal infections per days at risk is similar.”

The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research is supported by grants from the U.S. government and several pharmaceutical companies. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ustun C et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Sep 10;3(17):2525-36.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

FROM BLOOD ADVANCES

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
207878
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in need of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) offers a lower risk of infection than myeloablative conditioning (MAC).

Major finding: By day 100, 37% of patients who received RIC/NMA had at least one bacterial infection, compared with 46% of patients who underwent MAC (P = .0004).

Study details: A retrospective study involving 1,755 patients with AML in first complete remission.

Disclosures: The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research is supported by grants from the U.S. government and several pharmaceutical companies. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ustun C et al. Blood Adv. 2019 Sep 3(17):2525-36.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Pediatric HSCT recipients still risking sunburn

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 09/10/2019 - 12:30

 

Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.

Yuri Arcurs/Fotolia

In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.

“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.

The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.

There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).

However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.

“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”

The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.

The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.

Yuri Arcurs/Fotolia

In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.

“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.

The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.

There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).

However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.

“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”

The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.

The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.

 

Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.

Yuri Arcurs/Fotolia

In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.

“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.

The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.

There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).

However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.

“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”

The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.

The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.