User login
Doug Brunk is a San Diego-based award-winning reporter who began covering health care in 1991. Before joining the company, he wrote for the health sciences division of Columbia University and was an associate editor at Contemporary Long Term Care magazine when it won a Jesse H. Neal Award. His work has been syndicated by the Los Angeles Times and he is the author of two books related to the University of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball program. Doug has a master’s degree in magazine journalism from the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Follow him on Twitter @dougbrunk.
Laser-Assisted Liposuction 'Still Finding Its Place'
DANA POINT, CALIF. – In the opinion of Dr. Gordon Sasaki, laser-assisted liposuction is still "finding its place" as a treatment option for invasive body shaping.
"We have to keep in mind that gold standard still is traditional liposuction," Dr. Sasaki said at the Summit in Aesthetic Medicine, sponsored by Skin Disease Education Foundation (SDEF). "Any other types of devices that come on the market have to be measured against that."
While there are currently six devices cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for laser-assisted liposuction, Dr. Sasaki discussed the one he has the most experience with: Cynosure's Smartlipo, which contains a laser that fires at three wavelengths: 1,064 nm, 1,320 nm, and 1,440 nm.
"I believe that the primary effect of laser lipolysis is collagen for tissue contraction, more than skin accommodation, redistribution, or retraction," said Dr. Sasaki, clinical professor of plastic surgery at Loma Linda (Calif.) University. "I think the secondary effect is lipolysis."
Since June 2008, Dr. Sasaki has treated 252 patients with Smartlipo. Their average age was 48 years, 91% were female, and their average body mass index was 24.9 kg/m2. Per case, the average total infiltrate was about 2,500 cc, the average total aspirate was about 2,400 cc, and the average total amount of fat removed was about 2,000 cc.
"That means the average fat/aspirate ratio is 87%, which is comparable to other liposuction methods," said Dr. Sasaki, who has a private aesthetic plastic surgery practice in Pasadena, Calif.
Preoperative medications include 5-10 mg of diazepam or Norco 10/325 as needed. After making 5-by-5-cm preoperative markings in the skin, he delivers 50-100 cc per 5-by-5-cm2 of tumescent anesthesia to the treatment area. Next, he delivers deep laser energy to the skin. For example, his protocol for the 1440-nm laser is to deliver 1,000-1,500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the body area and 200-500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the face.
The next step involves liposuction, which enables "a better clinical assessment of the contouring," he explained. "You remove all of that debris, so when you bring in the heating for the subdermis of the skin the process goes much faster because you don’t have to heat up the materials that you have already destroyed."
This is followed by shallow laser-assisted liposuction "where the skin is heated in a controlled fashion to 38-42 C," Dr. Sasaki said. "At this time, I use either the 1,440-nm laser or a combination of the 1,064-nm and 1,320-nm, depending upon its usages either for the skin of the facial area or to other parts of the body."
For postoperative management, he uses quarter-inch Penrose drains, which are removed the day after the procedure.
"I use compression garments as long as the patients can tolerate them, usually for 1 or 2 weeks," he said. He also uses external ultrasound treatment to smooth out the areas of lymphatic drainage and light-emitting diode skin rejuvenation sessions for inflammation.
Dr. Sasaki said that off-label uses of laser-assisted liposuction "are beginning to be investigated to expand its potential therapies in other areas, especially cellulite."
Dr. Sasaki disclosed that he has been a paid consultant for many laser and device companies, including Cynosure.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by Elsevier.
DANA POINT, CALIF. – In the opinion of Dr. Gordon Sasaki, laser-assisted liposuction is still "finding its place" as a treatment option for invasive body shaping.
"We have to keep in mind that gold standard still is traditional liposuction," Dr. Sasaki said at the Summit in Aesthetic Medicine, sponsored by Skin Disease Education Foundation (SDEF). "Any other types of devices that come on the market have to be measured against that."
While there are currently six devices cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for laser-assisted liposuction, Dr. Sasaki discussed the one he has the most experience with: Cynosure's Smartlipo, which contains a laser that fires at three wavelengths: 1,064 nm, 1,320 nm, and 1,440 nm.
"I believe that the primary effect of laser lipolysis is collagen for tissue contraction, more than skin accommodation, redistribution, or retraction," said Dr. Sasaki, clinical professor of plastic surgery at Loma Linda (Calif.) University. "I think the secondary effect is lipolysis."
Since June 2008, Dr. Sasaki has treated 252 patients with Smartlipo. Their average age was 48 years, 91% were female, and their average body mass index was 24.9 kg/m2. Per case, the average total infiltrate was about 2,500 cc, the average total aspirate was about 2,400 cc, and the average total amount of fat removed was about 2,000 cc.
"That means the average fat/aspirate ratio is 87%, which is comparable to other liposuction methods," said Dr. Sasaki, who has a private aesthetic plastic surgery practice in Pasadena, Calif.
Preoperative medications include 5-10 mg of diazepam or Norco 10/325 as needed. After making 5-by-5-cm preoperative markings in the skin, he delivers 50-100 cc per 5-by-5-cm2 of tumescent anesthesia to the treatment area. Next, he delivers deep laser energy to the skin. For example, his protocol for the 1440-nm laser is to deliver 1,000-1,500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the body area and 200-500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the face.
The next step involves liposuction, which enables "a better clinical assessment of the contouring," he explained. "You remove all of that debris, so when you bring in the heating for the subdermis of the skin the process goes much faster because you don’t have to heat up the materials that you have already destroyed."
This is followed by shallow laser-assisted liposuction "where the skin is heated in a controlled fashion to 38-42 C," Dr. Sasaki said. "At this time, I use either the 1,440-nm laser or a combination of the 1,064-nm and 1,320-nm, depending upon its usages either for the skin of the facial area or to other parts of the body."
For postoperative management, he uses quarter-inch Penrose drains, which are removed the day after the procedure.
"I use compression garments as long as the patients can tolerate them, usually for 1 or 2 weeks," he said. He also uses external ultrasound treatment to smooth out the areas of lymphatic drainage and light-emitting diode skin rejuvenation sessions for inflammation.
Dr. Sasaki said that off-label uses of laser-assisted liposuction "are beginning to be investigated to expand its potential therapies in other areas, especially cellulite."
Dr. Sasaki disclosed that he has been a paid consultant for many laser and device companies, including Cynosure.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by Elsevier.
DANA POINT, CALIF. – In the opinion of Dr. Gordon Sasaki, laser-assisted liposuction is still "finding its place" as a treatment option for invasive body shaping.
"We have to keep in mind that gold standard still is traditional liposuction," Dr. Sasaki said at the Summit in Aesthetic Medicine, sponsored by Skin Disease Education Foundation (SDEF). "Any other types of devices that come on the market have to be measured against that."
While there are currently six devices cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for laser-assisted liposuction, Dr. Sasaki discussed the one he has the most experience with: Cynosure's Smartlipo, which contains a laser that fires at three wavelengths: 1,064 nm, 1,320 nm, and 1,440 nm.
"I believe that the primary effect of laser lipolysis is collagen for tissue contraction, more than skin accommodation, redistribution, or retraction," said Dr. Sasaki, clinical professor of plastic surgery at Loma Linda (Calif.) University. "I think the secondary effect is lipolysis."
Since June 2008, Dr. Sasaki has treated 252 patients with Smartlipo. Their average age was 48 years, 91% were female, and their average body mass index was 24.9 kg/m2. Per case, the average total infiltrate was about 2,500 cc, the average total aspirate was about 2,400 cc, and the average total amount of fat removed was about 2,000 cc.
"That means the average fat/aspirate ratio is 87%, which is comparable to other liposuction methods," said Dr. Sasaki, who has a private aesthetic plastic surgery practice in Pasadena, Calif.
Preoperative medications include 5-10 mg of diazepam or Norco 10/325 as needed. After making 5-by-5-cm preoperative markings in the skin, he delivers 50-100 cc per 5-by-5-cm2 of tumescent anesthesia to the treatment area. Next, he delivers deep laser energy to the skin. For example, his protocol for the 1440-nm laser is to deliver 1,000-1,500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the body area and 200-500 J per 5-by-5-cm2 to the face.
The next step involves liposuction, which enables "a better clinical assessment of the contouring," he explained. "You remove all of that debris, so when you bring in the heating for the subdermis of the skin the process goes much faster because you don’t have to heat up the materials that you have already destroyed."
This is followed by shallow laser-assisted liposuction "where the skin is heated in a controlled fashion to 38-42 C," Dr. Sasaki said. "At this time, I use either the 1,440-nm laser or a combination of the 1,064-nm and 1,320-nm, depending upon its usages either for the skin of the facial area or to other parts of the body."
For postoperative management, he uses quarter-inch Penrose drains, which are removed the day after the procedure.
"I use compression garments as long as the patients can tolerate them, usually for 1 or 2 weeks," he said. He also uses external ultrasound treatment to smooth out the areas of lymphatic drainage and light-emitting diode skin rejuvenation sessions for inflammation.
Dr. Sasaki said that off-label uses of laser-assisted liposuction "are beginning to be investigated to expand its potential therapies in other areas, especially cellulite."
Dr. Sasaki disclosed that he has been a paid consultant for many laser and device companies, including Cynosure.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by Elsevier.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE SDEF SUMMIT IN AESTHETIC MEDICINE
Trends in Use of Nitric Oxide for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studied
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION
Trends in Use of Nitric Oxide for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studied
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
PALM DESERT, CALIF. – Nitric oxide use in neonates with diaphragmatic hernia remains widespread even though its efficacy remains to be proven, results from a large national analysis demonstrated.
"Nitric oxide has been studied extensively in newborns with hypoxemic respiratory failure," Dr. Brendan T. Campbell said at the annual meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association. "There have been 14 randomized, controlled trials done in term newborns with respiratory failure, and two of these studies enrolled significant numbers of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Both studies demonstrated conclusively that treatment with nitric oxide does not improve outcomes in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
The first of these studies, he said, found that patients treated with nitric oxide were actually 30% more likely to require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than were those who did not receive nitric oxide (Pediatrics 1997;99:838-45).
In an effort to describe national trends, interhospital variability in use, and costs associated with nitric oxide use in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a health services research team led by Dr. Campbell analyzed records in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. For the years 2003-2010, they identified all patients with a diagnostic code of CDH and a procedural code for CDH repair at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the PHIS. Patients with congenital cardiac anomalies and inaccurate nitric oxide discharge data were excluded from analysis, said Dr. Campbell, a pediatric surgeon at Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, who is also with the departments of surgery and pediatrics at the University of Connecticut, Storrs.
A total of 3,651 infants with CDH were identified in the analysis, and 514 with cardiac anomalies and missing or inaccurate data were excluded. The overall mortality rate was 15%, but the mortality rate for the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide was 47%, compared with roughly 5% for the 2,376 patients who were not treated with nitric oxide.
Patients treated with nitric oxide had a significantly longer median length of stay, compared with their counterparts (a median of 31 days vs. 6 days, respectively), and significantly higher median total charges billed (a median of $456,473 vs. $36,270).
Dr. Campbell estimated that the 761 patients treated with nitric oxide generated nearly $34 million in unnecessary hospital charges. "Reducing nitric oxide use in these patients would significantly lower costs without adversely affecting outcomes," he said.
Wide variation in the use of nitric oxide in neonates with CDH existed among the 40 PHIS hospitals. At one hospital, for example, more than 50% were treated with nitric oxide, while the rate was 10% or less at two other PHIS hospitals.
Limitations of the study included its retrospective design and the potential for coding errors and missing data.
Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
The meeting was supported by a grant from Elsevier, which owns this news organization.
FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: Newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia who were treated with nitric oxide had a 47% mortality rate, compared with roughly 5% for patients not treated with nitric oxide.
Data Source: An analysis of 3,137 patients at 40 children’s hospitals that contribute data to the Pediatric Health Information System database.
Disclosures: Dr. Campbell said that he had no relevant financial disclosures to make.
HbA1c Control in Type 1 Curbs Heart Failure Risk
Major Finding: The incidence of heart failure among patients with type 1 diabetes increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with HbA1c below 6.5% to 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years in those in with HbA1c of at least 10.5%.
Data Source: An analysis of 20,985 patients from the Swedish national diabetes registry who were aged 18 years or older, had type 1 disease, no known heart failure, and were registered during 1998-2003 and followed through 2009.
Disclosures: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, according to the results from a large, long-term study.
In fact, patients who had very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts who had optimal glycemic control, the researchers said.
“Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage,” lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the meeting and simultaneously published online.
“Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile,” he noted.
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003.
The researchers followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients' characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m
“For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting.
“This may be the first time that it's been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population,” Dr. Kirkman added.
She called the study “hypothesis-generating,” and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings.
“It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes,” she said.
Dr. Lind and his coinvestigators acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, “so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated.”
They added: “Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured.”
Major Finding: The incidence of heart failure among patients with type 1 diabetes increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with HbA1c below 6.5% to 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years in those in with HbA1c of at least 10.5%.
Data Source: An analysis of 20,985 patients from the Swedish national diabetes registry who were aged 18 years or older, had type 1 disease, no known heart failure, and were registered during 1998-2003 and followed through 2009.
Disclosures: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, according to the results from a large, long-term study.
In fact, patients who had very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts who had optimal glycemic control, the researchers said.
“Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage,” lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the meeting and simultaneously published online.
“Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile,” he noted.
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003.
The researchers followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients' characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m
“For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting.
“This may be the first time that it's been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population,” Dr. Kirkman added.
She called the study “hypothesis-generating,” and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings.
“It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes,” she said.
Dr. Lind and his coinvestigators acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, “so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated.”
They added: “Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured.”
Major Finding: The incidence of heart failure among patients with type 1 diabetes increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with HbA1c below 6.5% to 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years in those in with HbA1c of at least 10.5%.
Data Source: An analysis of 20,985 patients from the Swedish national diabetes registry who were aged 18 years or older, had type 1 disease, no known heart failure, and were registered during 1998-2003 and followed through 2009.
Disclosures: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, according to the results from a large, long-term study.
In fact, patients who had very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts who had optimal glycemic control, the researchers said.
“Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage,” lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the meeting and simultaneously published online.
“Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile,” he noted.
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003.
The researchers followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients' characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m
“For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality,” Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting.
“This may be the first time that it's been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population,” Dr. Kirkman added.
She called the study “hypothesis-generating,” and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings.
“It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes,” she said.
Dr. Lind and his coinvestigators acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, “so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated.”
They added: “Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured.”
From the Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association
CVD Risk Factors Greater in Girls with Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: Compared with boys who have type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased average hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), body mass index z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and C-reactive protein (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL).
Data Source: A study of gender differences and cardiovascular disease risk factors among 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 100 adolescents without the disease.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center. Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
CVD Risk Factors Greater in Girls with Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Girls with type 1 diabetes had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c levels, body mass index, LDL cholesterol, and C-reactive protein, compared with boys who have the disease, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
The finding suggests that adolescence "may be a critical period for CVD prevention in girls with type 1 diabetes," Talia L. Brown said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association. "Future studies should investigate factors contributing to these gender differences."
Adults with type 1 diabetes are known to have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease compared with nondiabetic adults, said Ms. Brown, a graduate student who is a research assistant at the Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colo.
"There is a greater relative increase in women, where women with type 1 diabetes have four times the CVD risk as nondiabetic women," Ms. Brown said. "Meanwhile, men with type 1 diabetes have two times greater CVD risk than nondiabetic men. It is uncertain when these gender differences begin."
To find out, she and her associates compared the CVD risk profile of 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes with 100 nondiabetic adolescents and evaluated gender differences between the groups. The adolescents’ mean age was 15 years. Tanner stage was assessed by a physician or self report at the visit. Measures included fasting lipids, assays for HbA1c and C-reactive protein, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and body mass index z score. The researchers used questionnaires to assess physical activity and average insulin dose, and multivariate linear regression to examine each CVD risk factor.
Ms. Brown reported that physical activity was equivalent among the study participants (a mean of about 2 hours per day), and insulin dose was similar between boys and girls (a mean of 1.1 vs. 1.2 units/kg, respectively).
Compared with boys with type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased mean hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), BMI z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and CRP (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL). Boys with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with girls with the disease – 115 mm Hg vs. 111 mm Hg, respectively. But girls with type 1 had higher levels of systolic blood pressure, compared with nondiabetic girls (111 mm Hg vs. 106 mm Hg, respectively).
"Girls with diabetes had higher LDL levels than both boys with type 1 diabetes and girls without diabetes," Ms. Brown added. "CRP was ninefold higher in girls with type 1 diabetes than in both girls without diabetes and boys with type 1 diabetes."
After adjustment for HbA1c and BMI z score, a significant increase in CRP and LDL in girls with type 1 diabetes remained. The researchers also found a significant interaction between gender and diabetes, "causing type 1 diabetes to have a more detrimental effect in girls than in boys with regard to LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure," Ms. Brown said.
Increased HbA1c and body mass index "are likely to contribute to the increased blood pressure, inflammation, and cholesterol that we observed in girls with type 1 diabetes," she said. "These findings are somewhat unexpected, because generally there can be an inverse relationship between glycemic control and weight. Increased HbA1c and obesity are likely to translate into worse CVD outcomes for females, and raises concern for the long-term effects in CVD health."
When asked to speculate why HbA1c and body mass index were increased in girls with type 1, Ms. Brown said that girls generally "have a hard time controlling both [factors], so it’s hard to know what’s contributing to this."
Prevention efforts such as maintaining a healthy diet, getting adequate physical exercise, and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels "may improve this problem," she said.
The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center.
Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: Compared with boys who have type 1 diabetes, girls with the disease had significantly increased average hemoglobin A1c (9.1% vs. 8.7%, respectively), body mass index z score (0.72 vs. 0.49), LDL cholesterol (95 mg/dL vs. 82 mg/dL), and C-reactive protein (0.86 mg/dL vs. 0.15 mg/dL).
Data Source: A study of gender differences and cardiovascular disease risk factors among 302 adolescents with type 1 diabetes and 100 adolescents without the disease.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and Children’s Hospital Colorado Clinical Translational Research Center. Ms. Brown said that she had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
Big Shift Seen in Prescribing Patterns for Type 2 Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
Data Source: A study of 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes at the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, who had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents from 2001-2010.
Disclosures: Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
Big Shift Seen in Prescribing Patterns for Type 2 Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
SAN DIEGO – Since the mid-2000s clinicians dramatically shifted away from prescribing rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in favor of other novel type 2 diabetes medications, results from a large, single-center suggest.
At the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Sanjeev N. Mehta presented findings from a study of electronic medical records at Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, that evaluated 10-year prescribing patterns for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, as well as uptake of novel drug classes (categorized as "other") approved between 2001 and 2010. The "other" group consisted of amylin analogs, GLP-1 analogs, DPP-IV inhibitors, and bile acid sequestrants. Insulin use was not studied, nor were medications introduced prior to 2001.
The analysis aimed to measure provider response to the 2007 FDA black box warning for rosiglitazone, which was implemented due to the drug’s association with adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
"Given the availability of these new drugs, there’s a need to better understand provider patterns reading the use of new and established medications, [including] responsiveness to FDA indications and safety warnings," said Dr. Mehta, a staff physician at Joslin Diabetes Center.
Electronic health records with integrated prescribing functionality "may best describe provider behaviors, as their content is not limited top patient claims," he added. "Further, the detailed clinical information may provide the information necessary to validate both patient conditions and health outcomes."
Eligible patients had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes based on an algorithm that used ICD-9 codes and a field that specified diabetes type. If a medication was used and later resumed, he and his associates used the earliest start date. For validation they conducted a manual review of 60 random electronic medical records.
Over the 10-year study period, 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents. After 2007, the number of new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone declined dramatically.
By 2010, new prescriptions for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were at 7% and 47%, respectively, of peak levels. The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
"Prescribing patterns may be described using EHR-based clinical data," Dr. Mehta concluded. "The data suggest provider responsiveness to an FDA warning for an established medication, as well as rapid adoption of new drugs and drug classes during this period. However, the explanation for provider behaviors cannot be fully determined in the present analysis, but merit further investigation."
Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: The relative proportion of prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other medications was 44%, 50%, and 6% in 2005 and 2%, 18%, and 80% in 2010.
Data Source: A study of 7,846 patients with type 2 diabetes at the Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, who had 9,178 new prescriptions for rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and other agents from 2001-2010.
Disclosures: Dr. Mehta said that he had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
Glycemic Control Protects Against Heart Failure in Type 1 Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: The incidence of heart failure among patients with type 1 diabetes increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with HbA1c below 6.5% to 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years in those in with HbA1c of at least 10.5%.
Data Source: An analysis of 20,985 patients from the Swedish national diabetes registry who were aged 18 years or older, had type 1 disease, no known heart failure, and who were registered during 1998-2003, and followed through 2009.
Disclosures: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
Glycemic Control Protects Against Heart Failure in Type 1 Diabetes
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
How tightly should glycemia be controlled in diabetes? The clear message from Dr. Lind’s and his colleagues’ paper is that tight control of glycemia in type 1 diabetes is essential, especially now that they have shown that such control can prevent heart failure, besides other aspects of cardiovascular disease. In the future, even established type 1 diabetes cardiomyopathy might be rescued by gene-activated prosurvival paths, as shown in a mouse model. Only in developing countries, where tight control is often not feasible, could less-strict control be acceptable for type 1 diabetes.
Lionel H. Opie, M.D., is director of the Hatter Cardiovascular Research Institute at the University of Cape Town (South Africa). This was adapted from an accompanying commentary published online (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)6078703]). He reported no conflicts of interest.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
SAN DIEGO – Tight control of hemoglobin A1c levels significantly reduces the risk of heart failure in patients with type 1 diabetes, results from a large, long-term study show.
In fact, patients with very poor glycemic control were four times as likely to experience heart failure, compared with their counterparts with optimal glycemic control.
"Because treatment for heart failure improves survival and quality of life, clinicians should be observant of signs of heart failure in management of patients with type 1 diabetes, starting at an early stage," lead author Dr. Marcus Lind wrote in the study, which was presented at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association and simultaneously published online in the Lancet on June 25. "Echocardiography might be warranted, especially in the presence of poor glycemic control, long duration of diabetes, or an adverse risk factor profile."
Dr. Lind of the department of medicine at Uddevalla (Sweden) Hospital and his associates used the Swedish national diabetes registry to identify 20,985 patients aged 18 years or older with type 1 disease who had no known heart failure and who were registered between January 1998 and December 2003. They followed the cohort until hospital admission for heart failure, death, or end of follow-up on Dec. 31, 2009 (Lancet 2011 June 25 [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60471-6]).
The incidence of heart failure was determined by dividing the number of patient-years of follow-up in a particular HbA1c category, reported as events per 1,000 years of follow-up. The six HbA1c categories were less than 6.5%, from 6.5% to less than 7.5%, from 7.5% to less than 8.5%, from 8.5% to less than 9.5%, from 9.5% to less than 10.5%, and 10.5% or greater. Cox regression analysis was used to study possible associations between heart failure and patients’ characteristics.
The mean age of patients was 39 years, and 45% were female; they had had diabetes for a mean of 14 years, and their mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2. During a median follow-up of 9 years, 635 patients (3%) were admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure, for an incidence of 3.38 per 1,000 patient-years. The incidence of heart failure increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from an incidence of 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years among patients in the below-6.5% category of HbA1c to an incidence of 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years among those in the 10.5% or higher category of HbA1c.
After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, acute myocardial infarction, and other comorbidities, a Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with an HbA1c level of 10.5% or higher were four times more likely to develop heart failure than were those who had an HbA1c level of less than 6.5%.
Other independent predictors of heart failure included age (hazard ratio, 1.64 per 10-year increase); duration of diabetes (HR, 1.34 per 10-year increase); BMI (HR, 1.05 per 1 kg/m2 increase); systolic blood pressure (HR, 1.15 per 10 mm Hg increase); smoking (HR, 1.11-1.90, according to reported frequency); valve surgery (HR, 2.32); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.89); myocardial infarction (HR, 6.42), and ischemic heart disease (HR, 2.9).
"For many years there have observations that poor glycemic control is linked to heart attack and cardiovascular mortality," Dr. Sue Kirkman, senior vice president of medical affairs and community information for the American Diabetes Association, said in an interview at the meeting. "This may be the first time that it’s been shown to be linked to heart failure in a type 1 population."
She called the study "hypothesis-generating," and noted that a long-term randomized trial will be needed to confirm the findings. "It is interesting, because it seems that in type 1 diabetes there may be a stronger link between glucose lowering and cardiac outcomes than in type 2 diabetes," she said.
The researchers acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its observational design and the fact that only data on hospital admission for heart failure were available from the Swedish national diabetes registry, "so the true incidence of heart failure could be underestimated," they wrote. "Patients with early signs of heart failure, or asymptomatic heart failure detectable by echocardiography, will not have been captured."
The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.
FROM THE ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS OF THE AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION
Major Finding: The incidence of heart failure among patients with type 1 diabetes increased in a stepwise fashion as HbA1c levels increased, from 1.42 per 1,000 patient-years in patients with HbA1c below 6.5% to 5.20 per 1,000 patient-years in those in with HbA1c of at least 10.5%.
Data Source: An analysis of 20,985 patients from the Swedish national diabetes registry who were aged 18 years or older, had type 1 disease, no known heart failure, and who were registered during 1998-2003, and followed through 2009.
Disclosures: The study was supported by an unrestricted grant from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Research Council. Dr. Lind disclosed that he has received honoraria or served as consultant for Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk Scandinavia, Medtronic Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has been a member of an advisory board for Novo Nordisk Scandinavia.