Two changes are made to resuscitation practice in delivery room

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:11

 

CHICAGOTwo changes have occurred in guidance related to resuscitation of newborns in the delivery room, according to Gary M. Weiner, MD, of the department of pediatrics and neonatal-perinatal medicine at the University of Michigan and C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor.

One is recommending an electronic cardiac (EC) monitor to assess heart rate during resuscitation instead of relying on pulse oximetry, and the other is no longer recommending routine tracheal suction in nonvigorous babies with meconium-stained fluid, he told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting.

Dr. Gary M. Weiner
He began his discussion of newborn delivery practices with an emphasis on risk factors, using tools such as checklists, and simply being prepared for resuscitation because delay isn’t an option.

About two-thirds of all births have a risk factor for needing resuscitation, and about 10%-20% of babies with a risk factor will need positive pressure ventilation (PPV). But risk factors do not identify all newborns who will need it. The risk is greatest for newborns less than 36 weeks’ or greater than 40 weeks’ gestational age, but 7% of term newborns will need PPV despite having no risk factors.

Situations in which there is the highest risk for advanced resuscitation include the following:

  • Fetal bradycardia: 24-fold greater odds.
  • Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): 20-fold greater odds.
  • Clinical chorioamnionitis: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Forceps or vacuum: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF): 17-fold greater odds.
  • Gestational diabetes: 16-fold greater odds.
  • Abruption: 12-fold greater odds.
  • General anesthesia: 11-fold greater odds.

These risks were determined in a prospective multicenter, case-control study of 61,593 births (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102[1]:F44-F50).
 

Assembling a team and using checklists

Teamwork and communication are key in delivery room emergencies, and teams should debrief afterward, ideally having videotaped the resuscitation, if possible, Dr. Weiner said.

He discussed preparation for a very-low-birth-weight birth, a “routine emergency” requiring many tasks in a short period of time: 130 tasks in the first hour and 40 in the first 3 minutes.

“Decisions made during the first hour have long-term implications, so you need multiple caregivers and a high-performance team,” Dr. Weiner said. In addition to a thorough understanding of the clinical situation, a high-performance team should have both effective leadership, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each member. Clinicians on the team need highly developed technical skills that they reliably and consistently execute with precision. “Practice, refine, practice, refine,” he emphasized.

It’s also important to make use of preset protocols, scripts, and checklists, Dr. Weiner said. These tools assure consistency, facilitate communication among team members, and improve outcomes. Research has shown that use of protocols, scripts, and checklists leads to improved stroke and trauma care, decreased complications during intubation, fewer central-line complications, and decreased perioperative mortality and complications.

He also recommended implementing a standardized equipment check and team briefing “time-out,” similar to a surgical time-out. This time-out gives teams an opportunity to identify a team leader, define member roles and responsibilities, check all equipment and supplies, discuss risk factors and possible scenarios, talk with the obstetrician and, if possible, introduce the leader or another team member to the parents.

In a study from University of California, San Diego, Medical Center, using checklists as part of resuscitation of potentially high-risk infants reduced the occurrence of communication problems from 24% to 4% of resuscitations (P less than 0.001) over a 3-year period (Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84[11]:1552-7).

stockce/Thinkstock
Similarly, in a study at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, clinicians implemented evidence-based guidelines to improve a specific set of outcomes among very low birth weight infants requiring resuscitation, including routine use of a checklist and frequent feedback to clinicians. The intervention led to less hypothermia among infants, less oxygen exposure in the first 10 minutes of birth, and reduced median durations of invasive ventilation and hospitalization (Pediatrics 2013;132:e1018–e1025).
 

Delayed cord clamping

Dr. Weiner also discussed the benefits of placental transfusion. The fetal-placental unit includes approximately 110 mL/kg of blood, and about one-third of its volume remains in the placenta immediately after birth. Immediate cord clamping means a loss of 10-20 mL/kg of “potential” newborn blood volume, and could contribute to unstable pulmonary blood flow or a carotid artery pressure spike (Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016. doi: 10.1186/s40748-016-0032-y).

 

 

“Umbilical blood flow is complex,” he said. Blood flows toward the baby via the umbilical vein during inhalation, but stops or reverses during crying. The umbilical artery primarily carries blood to the placenta, and flow stops after about 4 minutes in more than half of infants. Gravity’s role in blood flow is controversial (Lancet. 2014 Jul 19;384[9939]:235-40).

The two options for placental transfusion are delayed cord clamping and milking the umbilical cord (also called “stripping”). In vaginal births, delayed clamping allows 20 mL/kg blood to transfer to the baby by 3 minutes after birth, with 90% of that reaching the baby in the first minute (Lancet. 1969 Oct 25;294[7626]:871-3).

Blood transfer is less efficient in cesarean births, so milking may be more efficient than simply delaying clamping, according to a small randomized controlled trial of preterm infants around 28 weeks’ gestational age. No difference between the methods was seen in vaginal births. To milk the cord, pinch it near the placenta and squeeze it toward the newborn for 2 seconds; then release, refill and repeat.

The biggest benefits in delayed cord clamping or milking occur among preterm infants: decreased mortality, higher mean arterial pressure on day 1, and a lower risk of blood transfusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, and a Bayley Motor score below 85 at 18-22 months. Term babies also get benefits, though: increased hemoglobin at birth (approximately 2 g/dL), a 0.5- to 5-point average increase in boys’ Ages & Stages fine motor and social domain scores at age 4 years, and among high-risk infants, a lower risk of iron deficiency anemia at age 1 year (JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171[3]:264-70).

According to current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, “delayed cord clamping longer than 30 seconds is reasonable for both term and preterm infants who do not require resuscitation at birth,” but “there is insufficient evidence to recommend an approach to cord clamping for infants who require resuscitation.” They also recommend against routine milking for newborns less than 29 weeks’ gestation (Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136 Suppl 2:S196-218).
 

Meconium-related complications

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is common, occurring in about 8% of deliveries and increasing with gestational age, but meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is less common, occurring in about 2% of all MSAF cases (Int J Pediatr. 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/321545).

Risk factors for severe MAS include thick meconium and an abnormal fetal heart rate. But about two-thirds of MAS cases are mild, not requiring ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), Dr. Weiner said. Practice should be driven by evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

“Nonrandomized observational studies can be misleading, and rational conjecture has led to many mistakes in medicine,” he said. “Be willing to challenge conventional wisdom.” 
For example, the standard of care in the 1970s, based on two nonrandomized retrospective reviews of 175 babies, included orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction by the obstetrician and endotracheal tube (ETT) suction by the pediatrician. In the 2000s, however, an RCT of 2,500 infants found no benefit from orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction, even with thick MSAF, (Lancet. 2004 Aug 14-20;364[9434]:597-602) and another RCT with 2,100 infants found no benefit from ETT suction (Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105[1 Pt 1]:1-7).

More recent, smaller studies have confirmed those conclusions and found similar lack of benefit from ETT in non-vigorous infants, contributing to the new recommendation (Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84; Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;83[10]:1125-30).

“Routine tracheal suction is no longer recommended for nonvigorous babies with meconium stained fluid,” Dr. Weiner said. Since MSAF is risk factor for resuscitation, though, at least two clinicians with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training should be present, as well as a full team if resuscitation is expected.
 

Heart rate assessment and tracking

“The baby’s heart rate needs to be monitored during PPV [positive pressure ventilation] because a prompt increase in the baby’s heart rate is the most important indicator of effective PPV,” Dr. Weiner said in an interview. “Half of errors made during NRP [Neonatal Resuscitation Program] simulations are the result of incorrect heart rate assessment.”

Recent evidence comparing pulse oximetry to an EC monitor favored the latter for tracking heart rate, leading to the other new recommendation.

“The baby’s heart rate can be monitored using the pulse oximeter,” Dr. Weiner said. “However, health providers should consider using an electronic cardiac monitor in addition to pulse oximetry because studies show that it achieves a reliable signal faster.” He cited a study of 20 newborns that showed an EC monitor determined the heart rate in a median 34 seconds, compared with 122 seconds with the pulse oximeter (Pediatr Int. 2012 Apr;54[2]:205-7).

Pulse oximetry takes 90-120 seconds to attain a reliable signal and may not work if there’s poor perfusion, but an EC monitor provides continuous heart rate monitoring even with poor perfusion. So an initial heart rate assessment by auscultation is fine, but if PPV begins, EC monitoring may be better and is the preferred method with anticipated resuscitation or chest compressions.

However, pulse oximetry is still recommended “whenever positive pressure ventilation is started or oxygen is administered in order to guide the appropriate amount of oxygen supplementation,” Dr. Weiner noted.

He added that “preliminary studies suggest that handheld Doppler fetal heart monitors correlate well with ECG, provide a rapid audible heart rate and may be a promising alternative in the future” (Pediatr Int. 2017 Oct;59[10]:1069-73).
 

 

 

Correct ventilation techniques

“Ventilation of the lungs is the single most important and most effective step in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the compromised newborn,” Dr. Weiner said. “If the heart rate is not rapidly increasing, ask if the chest is moving.”

He emphasized that no compressions should occur until after at least 30 seconds of PPV that moves the chest. He provided a “MR. SOPA” acronym: Mask adjustment, Reposition airway, Suction, Open mouth, Pressure increase, Alternative airway.

You also should be aware of possible leaking or obstruction around the mask, which is common, he said, so monitor pressure instead of volume.

“We are not good at identifying leak, obstruction, or adequate tidal volume,” Dr. Weiner said. “A colorimetric CO2 detector attached to the mask is a simple indicator of gas exchange” (Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85[11]:1568-72).

He also strongly recommended inserting an alternative airway before starting chest compressions with either intubation or a laryngeal mask.

Dr. Weiner concluded with the following list of clinical practice changes you may consider:

  • Use a standardized equipment checklist.
  • Develop and practice standardized scripts.
  • Debrief after all resuscitations; use videotape if you can.
  • Delay cord clamping for most term and preterm babies.
  • Do not routinely intubate/suction nonvigorous newborns with MSAF. Initiate resuscitation.
  • Use an electronic cardiac monitor if resuscitation is required.
  • Use a colorimetric CO2 detector with PPV.
  • Intubate or place a laryngeal mask before starting compressions.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

CHICAGOTwo changes have occurred in guidance related to resuscitation of newborns in the delivery room, according to Gary M. Weiner, MD, of the department of pediatrics and neonatal-perinatal medicine at the University of Michigan and C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor.

One is recommending an electronic cardiac (EC) monitor to assess heart rate during resuscitation instead of relying on pulse oximetry, and the other is no longer recommending routine tracheal suction in nonvigorous babies with meconium-stained fluid, he told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting.

Dr. Gary M. Weiner
He began his discussion of newborn delivery practices with an emphasis on risk factors, using tools such as checklists, and simply being prepared for resuscitation because delay isn’t an option.

About two-thirds of all births have a risk factor for needing resuscitation, and about 10%-20% of babies with a risk factor will need positive pressure ventilation (PPV). But risk factors do not identify all newborns who will need it. The risk is greatest for newborns less than 36 weeks’ or greater than 40 weeks’ gestational age, but 7% of term newborns will need PPV despite having no risk factors.

Situations in which there is the highest risk for advanced resuscitation include the following:

  • Fetal bradycardia: 24-fold greater odds.
  • Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): 20-fold greater odds.
  • Clinical chorioamnionitis: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Forceps or vacuum: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF): 17-fold greater odds.
  • Gestational diabetes: 16-fold greater odds.
  • Abruption: 12-fold greater odds.
  • General anesthesia: 11-fold greater odds.

These risks were determined in a prospective multicenter, case-control study of 61,593 births (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102[1]:F44-F50).
 

Assembling a team and using checklists

Teamwork and communication are key in delivery room emergencies, and teams should debrief afterward, ideally having videotaped the resuscitation, if possible, Dr. Weiner said.

He discussed preparation for a very-low-birth-weight birth, a “routine emergency” requiring many tasks in a short period of time: 130 tasks in the first hour and 40 in the first 3 minutes.

“Decisions made during the first hour have long-term implications, so you need multiple caregivers and a high-performance team,” Dr. Weiner said. In addition to a thorough understanding of the clinical situation, a high-performance team should have both effective leadership, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each member. Clinicians on the team need highly developed technical skills that they reliably and consistently execute with precision. “Practice, refine, practice, refine,” he emphasized.

It’s also important to make use of preset protocols, scripts, and checklists, Dr. Weiner said. These tools assure consistency, facilitate communication among team members, and improve outcomes. Research has shown that use of protocols, scripts, and checklists leads to improved stroke and trauma care, decreased complications during intubation, fewer central-line complications, and decreased perioperative mortality and complications.

He also recommended implementing a standardized equipment check and team briefing “time-out,” similar to a surgical time-out. This time-out gives teams an opportunity to identify a team leader, define member roles and responsibilities, check all equipment and supplies, discuss risk factors and possible scenarios, talk with the obstetrician and, if possible, introduce the leader or another team member to the parents.

In a study from University of California, San Diego, Medical Center, using checklists as part of resuscitation of potentially high-risk infants reduced the occurrence of communication problems from 24% to 4% of resuscitations (P less than 0.001) over a 3-year period (Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84[11]:1552-7).

stockce/Thinkstock
Similarly, in a study at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, clinicians implemented evidence-based guidelines to improve a specific set of outcomes among very low birth weight infants requiring resuscitation, including routine use of a checklist and frequent feedback to clinicians. The intervention led to less hypothermia among infants, less oxygen exposure in the first 10 minutes of birth, and reduced median durations of invasive ventilation and hospitalization (Pediatrics 2013;132:e1018–e1025).
 

Delayed cord clamping

Dr. Weiner also discussed the benefits of placental transfusion. The fetal-placental unit includes approximately 110 mL/kg of blood, and about one-third of its volume remains in the placenta immediately after birth. Immediate cord clamping means a loss of 10-20 mL/kg of “potential” newborn blood volume, and could contribute to unstable pulmonary blood flow or a carotid artery pressure spike (Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016. doi: 10.1186/s40748-016-0032-y).

 

 

“Umbilical blood flow is complex,” he said. Blood flows toward the baby via the umbilical vein during inhalation, but stops or reverses during crying. The umbilical artery primarily carries blood to the placenta, and flow stops after about 4 minutes in more than half of infants. Gravity’s role in blood flow is controversial (Lancet. 2014 Jul 19;384[9939]:235-40).

The two options for placental transfusion are delayed cord clamping and milking the umbilical cord (also called “stripping”). In vaginal births, delayed clamping allows 20 mL/kg blood to transfer to the baby by 3 minutes after birth, with 90% of that reaching the baby in the first minute (Lancet. 1969 Oct 25;294[7626]:871-3).

Blood transfer is less efficient in cesarean births, so milking may be more efficient than simply delaying clamping, according to a small randomized controlled trial of preterm infants around 28 weeks’ gestational age. No difference between the methods was seen in vaginal births. To milk the cord, pinch it near the placenta and squeeze it toward the newborn for 2 seconds; then release, refill and repeat.

The biggest benefits in delayed cord clamping or milking occur among preterm infants: decreased mortality, higher mean arterial pressure on day 1, and a lower risk of blood transfusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, and a Bayley Motor score below 85 at 18-22 months. Term babies also get benefits, though: increased hemoglobin at birth (approximately 2 g/dL), a 0.5- to 5-point average increase in boys’ Ages & Stages fine motor and social domain scores at age 4 years, and among high-risk infants, a lower risk of iron deficiency anemia at age 1 year (JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171[3]:264-70).

According to current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, “delayed cord clamping longer than 30 seconds is reasonable for both term and preterm infants who do not require resuscitation at birth,” but “there is insufficient evidence to recommend an approach to cord clamping for infants who require resuscitation.” They also recommend against routine milking for newborns less than 29 weeks’ gestation (Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136 Suppl 2:S196-218).
 

Meconium-related complications

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is common, occurring in about 8% of deliveries and increasing with gestational age, but meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is less common, occurring in about 2% of all MSAF cases (Int J Pediatr. 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/321545).

Risk factors for severe MAS include thick meconium and an abnormal fetal heart rate. But about two-thirds of MAS cases are mild, not requiring ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), Dr. Weiner said. Practice should be driven by evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

“Nonrandomized observational studies can be misleading, and rational conjecture has led to many mistakes in medicine,” he said. “Be willing to challenge conventional wisdom.” 
For example, the standard of care in the 1970s, based on two nonrandomized retrospective reviews of 175 babies, included orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction by the obstetrician and endotracheal tube (ETT) suction by the pediatrician. In the 2000s, however, an RCT of 2,500 infants found no benefit from orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction, even with thick MSAF, (Lancet. 2004 Aug 14-20;364[9434]:597-602) and another RCT with 2,100 infants found no benefit from ETT suction (Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105[1 Pt 1]:1-7).

More recent, smaller studies have confirmed those conclusions and found similar lack of benefit from ETT in non-vigorous infants, contributing to the new recommendation (Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84; Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;83[10]:1125-30).

“Routine tracheal suction is no longer recommended for nonvigorous babies with meconium stained fluid,” Dr. Weiner said. Since MSAF is risk factor for resuscitation, though, at least two clinicians with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training should be present, as well as a full team if resuscitation is expected.
 

Heart rate assessment and tracking

“The baby’s heart rate needs to be monitored during PPV [positive pressure ventilation] because a prompt increase in the baby’s heart rate is the most important indicator of effective PPV,” Dr. Weiner said in an interview. “Half of errors made during NRP [Neonatal Resuscitation Program] simulations are the result of incorrect heart rate assessment.”

Recent evidence comparing pulse oximetry to an EC monitor favored the latter for tracking heart rate, leading to the other new recommendation.

“The baby’s heart rate can be monitored using the pulse oximeter,” Dr. Weiner said. “However, health providers should consider using an electronic cardiac monitor in addition to pulse oximetry because studies show that it achieves a reliable signal faster.” He cited a study of 20 newborns that showed an EC monitor determined the heart rate in a median 34 seconds, compared with 122 seconds with the pulse oximeter (Pediatr Int. 2012 Apr;54[2]:205-7).

Pulse oximetry takes 90-120 seconds to attain a reliable signal and may not work if there’s poor perfusion, but an EC monitor provides continuous heart rate monitoring even with poor perfusion. So an initial heart rate assessment by auscultation is fine, but if PPV begins, EC monitoring may be better and is the preferred method with anticipated resuscitation or chest compressions.

However, pulse oximetry is still recommended “whenever positive pressure ventilation is started or oxygen is administered in order to guide the appropriate amount of oxygen supplementation,” Dr. Weiner noted.

He added that “preliminary studies suggest that handheld Doppler fetal heart monitors correlate well with ECG, provide a rapid audible heart rate and may be a promising alternative in the future” (Pediatr Int. 2017 Oct;59[10]:1069-73).
 

 

 

Correct ventilation techniques

“Ventilation of the lungs is the single most important and most effective step in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the compromised newborn,” Dr. Weiner said. “If the heart rate is not rapidly increasing, ask if the chest is moving.”

He emphasized that no compressions should occur until after at least 30 seconds of PPV that moves the chest. He provided a “MR. SOPA” acronym: Mask adjustment, Reposition airway, Suction, Open mouth, Pressure increase, Alternative airway.

You also should be aware of possible leaking or obstruction around the mask, which is common, he said, so monitor pressure instead of volume.

“We are not good at identifying leak, obstruction, or adequate tidal volume,” Dr. Weiner said. “A colorimetric CO2 detector attached to the mask is a simple indicator of gas exchange” (Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85[11]:1568-72).

He also strongly recommended inserting an alternative airway before starting chest compressions with either intubation or a laryngeal mask.

Dr. Weiner concluded with the following list of clinical practice changes you may consider:

  • Use a standardized equipment checklist.
  • Develop and practice standardized scripts.
  • Debrief after all resuscitations; use videotape if you can.
  • Delay cord clamping for most term and preterm babies.
  • Do not routinely intubate/suction nonvigorous newborns with MSAF. Initiate resuscitation.
  • Use an electronic cardiac monitor if resuscitation is required.
  • Use a colorimetric CO2 detector with PPV.
  • Intubate or place a laryngeal mask before starting compressions.

 

CHICAGOTwo changes have occurred in guidance related to resuscitation of newborns in the delivery room, according to Gary M. Weiner, MD, of the department of pediatrics and neonatal-perinatal medicine at the University of Michigan and C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor.

One is recommending an electronic cardiac (EC) monitor to assess heart rate during resuscitation instead of relying on pulse oximetry, and the other is no longer recommending routine tracheal suction in nonvigorous babies with meconium-stained fluid, he told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting.

Dr. Gary M. Weiner
He began his discussion of newborn delivery practices with an emphasis on risk factors, using tools such as checklists, and simply being prepared for resuscitation because delay isn’t an option.

About two-thirds of all births have a risk factor for needing resuscitation, and about 10%-20% of babies with a risk factor will need positive pressure ventilation (PPV). But risk factors do not identify all newborns who will need it. The risk is greatest for newborns less than 36 weeks’ or greater than 40 weeks’ gestational age, but 7% of term newborns will need PPV despite having no risk factors.

Situations in which there is the highest risk for advanced resuscitation include the following:

  • Fetal bradycardia: 24-fold greater odds.
  • Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): 20-fold greater odds.
  • Clinical chorioamnionitis: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Forceps or vacuum: 17-fold greater odds.
  • Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF): 17-fold greater odds.
  • Gestational diabetes: 16-fold greater odds.
  • Abruption: 12-fold greater odds.
  • General anesthesia: 11-fold greater odds.

These risks were determined in a prospective multicenter, case-control study of 61,593 births (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102[1]:F44-F50).
 

Assembling a team and using checklists

Teamwork and communication are key in delivery room emergencies, and teams should debrief afterward, ideally having videotaped the resuscitation, if possible, Dr. Weiner said.

He discussed preparation for a very-low-birth-weight birth, a “routine emergency” requiring many tasks in a short period of time: 130 tasks in the first hour and 40 in the first 3 minutes.

“Decisions made during the first hour have long-term implications, so you need multiple caregivers and a high-performance team,” Dr. Weiner said. In addition to a thorough understanding of the clinical situation, a high-performance team should have both effective leadership, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities for each member. Clinicians on the team need highly developed technical skills that they reliably and consistently execute with precision. “Practice, refine, practice, refine,” he emphasized.

It’s also important to make use of preset protocols, scripts, and checklists, Dr. Weiner said. These tools assure consistency, facilitate communication among team members, and improve outcomes. Research has shown that use of protocols, scripts, and checklists leads to improved stroke and trauma care, decreased complications during intubation, fewer central-line complications, and decreased perioperative mortality and complications.

He also recommended implementing a standardized equipment check and team briefing “time-out,” similar to a surgical time-out. This time-out gives teams an opportunity to identify a team leader, define member roles and responsibilities, check all equipment and supplies, discuss risk factors and possible scenarios, talk with the obstetrician and, if possible, introduce the leader or another team member to the parents.

In a study from University of California, San Diego, Medical Center, using checklists as part of resuscitation of potentially high-risk infants reduced the occurrence of communication problems from 24% to 4% of resuscitations (P less than 0.001) over a 3-year period (Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84[11]:1552-7).

stockce/Thinkstock
Similarly, in a study at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, clinicians implemented evidence-based guidelines to improve a specific set of outcomes among very low birth weight infants requiring resuscitation, including routine use of a checklist and frequent feedback to clinicians. The intervention led to less hypothermia among infants, less oxygen exposure in the first 10 minutes of birth, and reduced median durations of invasive ventilation and hospitalization (Pediatrics 2013;132:e1018–e1025).
 

Delayed cord clamping

Dr. Weiner also discussed the benefits of placental transfusion. The fetal-placental unit includes approximately 110 mL/kg of blood, and about one-third of its volume remains in the placenta immediately after birth. Immediate cord clamping means a loss of 10-20 mL/kg of “potential” newborn blood volume, and could contribute to unstable pulmonary blood flow or a carotid artery pressure spike (Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2016. doi: 10.1186/s40748-016-0032-y).

 

 

“Umbilical blood flow is complex,” he said. Blood flows toward the baby via the umbilical vein during inhalation, but stops or reverses during crying. The umbilical artery primarily carries blood to the placenta, and flow stops after about 4 minutes in more than half of infants. Gravity’s role in blood flow is controversial (Lancet. 2014 Jul 19;384[9939]:235-40).

The two options for placental transfusion are delayed cord clamping and milking the umbilical cord (also called “stripping”). In vaginal births, delayed clamping allows 20 mL/kg blood to transfer to the baby by 3 minutes after birth, with 90% of that reaching the baby in the first minute (Lancet. 1969 Oct 25;294[7626]:871-3).

Blood transfer is less efficient in cesarean births, so milking may be more efficient than simply delaying clamping, according to a small randomized controlled trial of preterm infants around 28 weeks’ gestational age. No difference between the methods was seen in vaginal births. To milk the cord, pinch it near the placenta and squeeze it toward the newborn for 2 seconds; then release, refill and repeat.

The biggest benefits in delayed cord clamping or milking occur among preterm infants: decreased mortality, higher mean arterial pressure on day 1, and a lower risk of blood transfusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, and a Bayley Motor score below 85 at 18-22 months. Term babies also get benefits, though: increased hemoglobin at birth (approximately 2 g/dL), a 0.5- to 5-point average increase in boys’ Ages & Stages fine motor and social domain scores at age 4 years, and among high-risk infants, a lower risk of iron deficiency anemia at age 1 year (JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171[3]:264-70).

According to current guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics, “delayed cord clamping longer than 30 seconds is reasonable for both term and preterm infants who do not require resuscitation at birth,” but “there is insufficient evidence to recommend an approach to cord clamping for infants who require resuscitation.” They also recommend against routine milking for newborns less than 29 weeks’ gestation (Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136 Suppl 2:S196-218).
 

Meconium-related complications

Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is common, occurring in about 8% of deliveries and increasing with gestational age, but meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is less common, occurring in about 2% of all MSAF cases (Int J Pediatr. 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/321545).

Risk factors for severe MAS include thick meconium and an abnormal fetal heart rate. But about two-thirds of MAS cases are mild, not requiring ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), Dr. Weiner said. Practice should be driven by evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

“Nonrandomized observational studies can be misleading, and rational conjecture has led to many mistakes in medicine,” he said. “Be willing to challenge conventional wisdom.” 
For example, the standard of care in the 1970s, based on two nonrandomized retrospective reviews of 175 babies, included orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction by the obstetrician and endotracheal tube (ETT) suction by the pediatrician. In the 2000s, however, an RCT of 2,500 infants found no benefit from orapharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suction, even with thick MSAF, (Lancet. 2004 Aug 14-20;364[9434]:597-602) and another RCT with 2,100 infants found no benefit from ETT suction (Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105[1 Pt 1]:1-7).

More recent, smaller studies have confirmed those conclusions and found similar lack of benefit from ETT in non-vigorous infants, contributing to the new recommendation (Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84; Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;83[10]:1125-30).

“Routine tracheal suction is no longer recommended for nonvigorous babies with meconium stained fluid,” Dr. Weiner said. Since MSAF is risk factor for resuscitation, though, at least two clinicians with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training should be present, as well as a full team if resuscitation is expected.
 

Heart rate assessment and tracking

“The baby’s heart rate needs to be monitored during PPV [positive pressure ventilation] because a prompt increase in the baby’s heart rate is the most important indicator of effective PPV,” Dr. Weiner said in an interview. “Half of errors made during NRP [Neonatal Resuscitation Program] simulations are the result of incorrect heart rate assessment.”

Recent evidence comparing pulse oximetry to an EC monitor favored the latter for tracking heart rate, leading to the other new recommendation.

“The baby’s heart rate can be monitored using the pulse oximeter,” Dr. Weiner said. “However, health providers should consider using an electronic cardiac monitor in addition to pulse oximetry because studies show that it achieves a reliable signal faster.” He cited a study of 20 newborns that showed an EC monitor determined the heart rate in a median 34 seconds, compared with 122 seconds with the pulse oximeter (Pediatr Int. 2012 Apr;54[2]:205-7).

Pulse oximetry takes 90-120 seconds to attain a reliable signal and may not work if there’s poor perfusion, but an EC monitor provides continuous heart rate monitoring even with poor perfusion. So an initial heart rate assessment by auscultation is fine, but if PPV begins, EC monitoring may be better and is the preferred method with anticipated resuscitation or chest compressions.

However, pulse oximetry is still recommended “whenever positive pressure ventilation is started or oxygen is administered in order to guide the appropriate amount of oxygen supplementation,” Dr. Weiner noted.

He added that “preliminary studies suggest that handheld Doppler fetal heart monitors correlate well with ECG, provide a rapid audible heart rate and may be a promising alternative in the future” (Pediatr Int. 2017 Oct;59[10]:1069-73).
 

 

 

Correct ventilation techniques

“Ventilation of the lungs is the single most important and most effective step in cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the compromised newborn,” Dr. Weiner said. “If the heart rate is not rapidly increasing, ask if the chest is moving.”

He emphasized that no compressions should occur until after at least 30 seconds of PPV that moves the chest. He provided a “MR. SOPA” acronym: Mask adjustment, Reposition airway, Suction, Open mouth, Pressure increase, Alternative airway.

You also should be aware of possible leaking or obstruction around the mask, which is common, he said, so monitor pressure instead of volume.

“We are not good at identifying leak, obstruction, or adequate tidal volume,” Dr. Weiner said. “A colorimetric CO2 detector attached to the mask is a simple indicator of gas exchange” (Resuscitation. 2014 Nov;85[11]:1568-72).

He also strongly recommended inserting an alternative airway before starting chest compressions with either intubation or a laryngeal mask.

Dr. Weiner concluded with the following list of clinical practice changes you may consider:

  • Use a standardized equipment checklist.
  • Develop and practice standardized scripts.
  • Debrief after all resuscitations; use videotape if you can.
  • Delay cord clamping for most term and preterm babies.
  • Do not routinely intubate/suction nonvigorous newborns with MSAF. Initiate resuscitation.
  • Use an electronic cardiac monitor if resuscitation is required.
  • Use a colorimetric CO2 detector with PPV.
  • Intubate or place a laryngeal mask before starting compressions.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Herbal supplements offer value with cautions, caveats

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:21

 

CHICAGO – Nearly one in five people who take prescription medications also take herbal or mineral supplements, so it’s essential to make herbs, vitamins, and other supplements part of every patient medication history, emphasized Cora Breuner, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In chronically ill children, almost 80% to 90% of kids are using supplements, so it’s really almost imperative that this be asked when you’re taking your histories, not in the social history, but when you’re asking about medications,” Dr. Breuner told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “Remember to ask it, and remember to ask it every time because it makes the patient actually realize it’s something like a medication, and so you can get the drug-herb interactions.”

Providers also should be familiar with the evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). According to the 2012 U.S. National Health Interview Survey, which included 10,218 youths, 11.6% of those aged 4-17 years had taken or used some type of complementary health product within the previous year. Fish oil/omega-3 fatty acid supplements, melatonin, probiotics/prebiotics, and echinacea topped the list.

“For children, complementary approaches were most often used for back or neck pain, other musculoskeletal conditions, head or chest colds, anxiety or stress, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and insomnia or trouble sleeping,” Dr. Breuner said.
 

Regulation of herbal and other supplements

Dietary supplements, including vitamins, minerals, and herbal remedies, are regulated under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) – not the Food and Drug Administration. Not only can products enter the market without any testing for efficacy, but companies only have to provide “reasonable assurance” of a product’s safety, not proof.

“Supplements do not have to be manufactured according to any standards,” Dr. Breuner said, although reputable manufacturers support standards. “It’s basically up to the company that manufactures it to make sure the product is not contaminated and that the product is basically consistent. There’s no need whatsoever for the company to make sure it works.”

Yet many patients and parents don’t realize that, she said.

“It’s important for people to be aware that this is not a regulated industry per se by the federal government,” she said. “Patients really do think that it is.”

One voluntary quality indicator is the United States Pharmacopeia Dietary Supplement Verification Program, identified by a USP “dietary supplement verified” logo. ConsumerLab.com also provides an “approved quality” logo, tests samples voluntarily sent by manufacturers, and rates the quality of different brands.

“Supplements may not claim to cure or prevent a disease, but they can say how it affects the body’s structure and function,” she said, and companies do not need FDA approval for packaging or marketing claims. In this low regulatory environment, substantial variations exist in the quality and quantity of biological ingredients in marketed supplements.
 

Risks from herbal supplements

Dr. Breuner cited a 2011 study finding that 75% of 68 products tested had no key safety messages, including all 12 ginkgo products and all but 1 of the 21 garlic and seven Asian ginseng products tested. Most of the 13 echinacea products also lacked safety messages, but two-thirds of the 12 St John’s wort products did have safety information.

Risks can include contamination, inadequate packaging information, and unknown toxicities and interactions. Adverse reactions should be reported to the Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch at 800-FDA-1088 (fax: 800-FDA-0178) and to Poison Control at 800-222-1222.

Two popular herbal remedies that are unsafe for children include licorice and ephedra. Although it is used for peptic ulcers, licorice lacks much evidence backing it and also shouldn’t be used (or eaten) during pregnancy. Ephedra (ma huang), an appetite suppressant and decongestant, can cause heart palpitations, heart attacks, and death.

“You can still get ephedra over the Internet, but it’s very, very dangerous,” Dr. Breuner said.

Dr. Breuner listed other herbal products available online but deemed unsafe for children: aconite (also known as bushi), species from the genus Aristolochia, belladonna, blue cohosh, borage, broom, calamus, chaparral, coltsfoot, comfrey, germander, life root, lobelia, pennyroyal, poke root, sassafras, skullcap, tansy ragwort, and wormwood.

Another set of herbs can be dangerous prior to surgery, she said, noting that an estimated 26% of patients scheduled for surgery use herbal products.

“Many, many of the herbs cause platelet aggregation issues,” Dr. Breuner said, so it’s very important to ask about different herbs before surgeries. Patients should discontinue echinacea, ephedra, garlic, ginkgo, ginseng, kava, St. John’s wort, and valerian before surgery. Risks include cardiovascular instability, prolonged sedation, bleeding, electrolyte disturbances, and immunosuppression. Additionally, four supplements also adversely interact with warfarin: garlic, ginger, and feverfew have additive effects (although small dietary amounts of ginger and garlic are fine), and St. John’s wort can decrease warfarin’s effects.

Dr. Breuner urged attendees to use resources like PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset to find out more about supplements; this subset limits results of a PubMed search of citations and abstracts to just those related to dietary supplements. It was created through a partnership between the Office of Dietary Supplements and the National Library of Medicine, both parts of the National Institutes of Health.
 

 

 

Information on specific herbs

 Ginkgo. Although commonly used to boost memory and concentration, only limited studies in adults shows some potential benefit from ginkgo at 40 mg three times a day. “There isn’t any evidence to show any reason to use it in children,” Dr. Breuner said. Adverse effects can include gastrointestinal irritation, headache, bleeding, and contact dermatitis.

 Echinacea. Although people use echinacea to treat or prevent the common cold or upper respiratory infections, the evidence does not show significant reductions of incidence, duration, or severity of upper respiratory infections and common colds. Anyone immunocompromised with an allergy or autoimmune disease should not take it.

 Zinc. Some evidence from a pediatric Cochrane Review, albeit with heterogeneous studies, supports using 75 mg of zinc a day to reduce duration of common cold and sore throat symptoms in healthy people. Adverse effects include a bad taste, nausea, and anosmia.

 Valerian. Children can take 400 mg nightly of valerian to help with sleep, although there are some caveats.

“The problem with Valerian is that it takes 2-6 weeks before it has any effect,” Breuner said. “It tastes terrible, and it’s only in a capsule form. It isn’t dosed for age at all, so you have to be careful about this, and it’s not like Ambien,” she added. It does not work instantaneously, and stopping it abruptly can cause withdrawal symptoms, although she would recommend it over melatonin. Despite its use for sleep, it can have adverse effects, such as anxiety, restlessness, and heart palpitations, and it can interfere with barbiturates.

 St. John’s wort. No one is quite sure how it works, but research has shown St. John’s wort extracts can treat mild to moderate depression about as well as standard antidepressants. However, the dose is 300 mg three times a day. “There’s no St. John’s XL,” Dr. Breuner joked. It can also interfere with a wide range of prescribed medications, including oral contraception.

 Butterbur. Those taking pyrrolizidine alkaloids should avoid butterbur, but it otherwise can help prevent migraine when dosed at 50-75 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 8-9 years and 100-150 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 10-17 years. “Most of the neurologists at my institution are recommending butterbur,” Dr. Breuner said. “It’s not an abortive, but it’s a preventive, with decreased intensity and severity in childhood migraine 6 weeks after using it. This is absolutely something to consider in your patients with chronic headaches.” Adverse effects include diarrhea, stomach upset, belching, and dermal and allergic symptoms, such as itchy eyes, asthma, and rash.

 Magnesium. Also recommended by pediatric neurologists at her institution, 300-500 mg daily of magnesium can reduce migraine incidence, but doses should be titrated up at first. “Don’t start with the higher doses,” she said. “You have to be careful about starting at too high of a dose because of diarrhea,” which is its primary adverse effect. Magnesium also can interfere with bisphosphonates, antibiotics, and diuretics; proton pump inhibitors may reduce magnesium levels.

 Melatonin. Unlike most supplements that are herbal or mineral, melatonin is a synthetic hormone, but Dr. Breuner said many patients don’t realize that. “Because it’s a hormone, I’m very, very careful about it,” she said, never recommending more than 0.5 to 5 mg a night for help falling asleep. “I’m really not a fan of melatonin,” she said. “You develop a tolerance to it, and this is not something parents or children should be taking chronically because we do not know long-term outcomes at all. It’s not benign even though you can just toss it into your grocery basket.”

She briefly wrapped up with mentions of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid); most of the evidence for these supplements comes from adults with psychiatric disorders. However, one study showed reduced tics in children with Tourette’s – if they can stand the fishy taste. It also can cause belching, nosebleeds, nausea, loose stools, and, at higher doses, decreased blood coagulation.

Peppermint can be used to reduce nausea, coughs, anxiety, and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, but it needs to be taken as 1-2 enteric capsules, not as tea or another form.

“Chamomile is very helpful for generalized colic and also for those with chronic anxiety,” Dr. Breuner said, and arnica can be used topically for bruising. Ginger also can be used to reduce nausea but can cause heartburn. A combination of peppermint, chamomile, arnica, and ginger may be appropriate to address various chemotherapy symptoms in a child, she said.

Several articles are useful for looking up interactions between herbs and drugs, including Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2720C; J Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):267-71; and Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Feb;13(1):7-12.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Breuner reported having no disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

CHICAGO – Nearly one in five people who take prescription medications also take herbal or mineral supplements, so it’s essential to make herbs, vitamins, and other supplements part of every patient medication history, emphasized Cora Breuner, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In chronically ill children, almost 80% to 90% of kids are using supplements, so it’s really almost imperative that this be asked when you’re taking your histories, not in the social history, but when you’re asking about medications,” Dr. Breuner told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “Remember to ask it, and remember to ask it every time because it makes the patient actually realize it’s something like a medication, and so you can get the drug-herb interactions.”

Providers also should be familiar with the evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). According to the 2012 U.S. National Health Interview Survey, which included 10,218 youths, 11.6% of those aged 4-17 years had taken or used some type of complementary health product within the previous year. Fish oil/omega-3 fatty acid supplements, melatonin, probiotics/prebiotics, and echinacea topped the list.

“For children, complementary approaches were most often used for back or neck pain, other musculoskeletal conditions, head or chest colds, anxiety or stress, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and insomnia or trouble sleeping,” Dr. Breuner said.
 

Regulation of herbal and other supplements

Dietary supplements, including vitamins, minerals, and herbal remedies, are regulated under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) – not the Food and Drug Administration. Not only can products enter the market without any testing for efficacy, but companies only have to provide “reasonable assurance” of a product’s safety, not proof.

“Supplements do not have to be manufactured according to any standards,” Dr. Breuner said, although reputable manufacturers support standards. “It’s basically up to the company that manufactures it to make sure the product is not contaminated and that the product is basically consistent. There’s no need whatsoever for the company to make sure it works.”

Yet many patients and parents don’t realize that, she said.

“It’s important for people to be aware that this is not a regulated industry per se by the federal government,” she said. “Patients really do think that it is.”

One voluntary quality indicator is the United States Pharmacopeia Dietary Supplement Verification Program, identified by a USP “dietary supplement verified” logo. ConsumerLab.com also provides an “approved quality” logo, tests samples voluntarily sent by manufacturers, and rates the quality of different brands.

“Supplements may not claim to cure or prevent a disease, but they can say how it affects the body’s structure and function,” she said, and companies do not need FDA approval for packaging or marketing claims. In this low regulatory environment, substantial variations exist in the quality and quantity of biological ingredients in marketed supplements.
 

Risks from herbal supplements

Dr. Breuner cited a 2011 study finding that 75% of 68 products tested had no key safety messages, including all 12 ginkgo products and all but 1 of the 21 garlic and seven Asian ginseng products tested. Most of the 13 echinacea products also lacked safety messages, but two-thirds of the 12 St John’s wort products did have safety information.

Risks can include contamination, inadequate packaging information, and unknown toxicities and interactions. Adverse reactions should be reported to the Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch at 800-FDA-1088 (fax: 800-FDA-0178) and to Poison Control at 800-222-1222.

Two popular herbal remedies that are unsafe for children include licorice and ephedra. Although it is used for peptic ulcers, licorice lacks much evidence backing it and also shouldn’t be used (or eaten) during pregnancy. Ephedra (ma huang), an appetite suppressant and decongestant, can cause heart palpitations, heart attacks, and death.

“You can still get ephedra over the Internet, but it’s very, very dangerous,” Dr. Breuner said.

Dr. Breuner listed other herbal products available online but deemed unsafe for children: aconite (also known as bushi), species from the genus Aristolochia, belladonna, blue cohosh, borage, broom, calamus, chaparral, coltsfoot, comfrey, germander, life root, lobelia, pennyroyal, poke root, sassafras, skullcap, tansy ragwort, and wormwood.

Another set of herbs can be dangerous prior to surgery, she said, noting that an estimated 26% of patients scheduled for surgery use herbal products.

“Many, many of the herbs cause platelet aggregation issues,” Dr. Breuner said, so it’s very important to ask about different herbs before surgeries. Patients should discontinue echinacea, ephedra, garlic, ginkgo, ginseng, kava, St. John’s wort, and valerian before surgery. Risks include cardiovascular instability, prolonged sedation, bleeding, electrolyte disturbances, and immunosuppression. Additionally, four supplements also adversely interact with warfarin: garlic, ginger, and feverfew have additive effects (although small dietary amounts of ginger and garlic are fine), and St. John’s wort can decrease warfarin’s effects.

Dr. Breuner urged attendees to use resources like PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset to find out more about supplements; this subset limits results of a PubMed search of citations and abstracts to just those related to dietary supplements. It was created through a partnership between the Office of Dietary Supplements and the National Library of Medicine, both parts of the National Institutes of Health.
 

 

 

Information on specific herbs

 Ginkgo. Although commonly used to boost memory and concentration, only limited studies in adults shows some potential benefit from ginkgo at 40 mg three times a day. “There isn’t any evidence to show any reason to use it in children,” Dr. Breuner said. Adverse effects can include gastrointestinal irritation, headache, bleeding, and contact dermatitis.

 Echinacea. Although people use echinacea to treat or prevent the common cold or upper respiratory infections, the evidence does not show significant reductions of incidence, duration, or severity of upper respiratory infections and common colds. Anyone immunocompromised with an allergy or autoimmune disease should not take it.

 Zinc. Some evidence from a pediatric Cochrane Review, albeit with heterogeneous studies, supports using 75 mg of zinc a day to reduce duration of common cold and sore throat symptoms in healthy people. Adverse effects include a bad taste, nausea, and anosmia.

 Valerian. Children can take 400 mg nightly of valerian to help with sleep, although there are some caveats.

“The problem with Valerian is that it takes 2-6 weeks before it has any effect,” Breuner said. “It tastes terrible, and it’s only in a capsule form. It isn’t dosed for age at all, so you have to be careful about this, and it’s not like Ambien,” she added. It does not work instantaneously, and stopping it abruptly can cause withdrawal symptoms, although she would recommend it over melatonin. Despite its use for sleep, it can have adverse effects, such as anxiety, restlessness, and heart palpitations, and it can interfere with barbiturates.

 St. John’s wort. No one is quite sure how it works, but research has shown St. John’s wort extracts can treat mild to moderate depression about as well as standard antidepressants. However, the dose is 300 mg three times a day. “There’s no St. John’s XL,” Dr. Breuner joked. It can also interfere with a wide range of prescribed medications, including oral contraception.

 Butterbur. Those taking pyrrolizidine alkaloids should avoid butterbur, but it otherwise can help prevent migraine when dosed at 50-75 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 8-9 years and 100-150 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 10-17 years. “Most of the neurologists at my institution are recommending butterbur,” Dr. Breuner said. “It’s not an abortive, but it’s a preventive, with decreased intensity and severity in childhood migraine 6 weeks after using it. This is absolutely something to consider in your patients with chronic headaches.” Adverse effects include diarrhea, stomach upset, belching, and dermal and allergic symptoms, such as itchy eyes, asthma, and rash.

 Magnesium. Also recommended by pediatric neurologists at her institution, 300-500 mg daily of magnesium can reduce migraine incidence, but doses should be titrated up at first. “Don’t start with the higher doses,” she said. “You have to be careful about starting at too high of a dose because of diarrhea,” which is its primary adverse effect. Magnesium also can interfere with bisphosphonates, antibiotics, and diuretics; proton pump inhibitors may reduce magnesium levels.

 Melatonin. Unlike most supplements that are herbal or mineral, melatonin is a synthetic hormone, but Dr. Breuner said many patients don’t realize that. “Because it’s a hormone, I’m very, very careful about it,” she said, never recommending more than 0.5 to 5 mg a night for help falling asleep. “I’m really not a fan of melatonin,” she said. “You develop a tolerance to it, and this is not something parents or children should be taking chronically because we do not know long-term outcomes at all. It’s not benign even though you can just toss it into your grocery basket.”

She briefly wrapped up with mentions of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid); most of the evidence for these supplements comes from adults with psychiatric disorders. However, one study showed reduced tics in children with Tourette’s – if they can stand the fishy taste. It also can cause belching, nosebleeds, nausea, loose stools, and, at higher doses, decreased blood coagulation.

Peppermint can be used to reduce nausea, coughs, anxiety, and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, but it needs to be taken as 1-2 enteric capsules, not as tea or another form.

“Chamomile is very helpful for generalized colic and also for those with chronic anxiety,” Dr. Breuner said, and arnica can be used topically for bruising. Ginger also can be used to reduce nausea but can cause heartburn. A combination of peppermint, chamomile, arnica, and ginger may be appropriate to address various chemotherapy symptoms in a child, she said.

Several articles are useful for looking up interactions between herbs and drugs, including Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2720C; J Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):267-71; and Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Feb;13(1):7-12.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Breuner reported having no disclosures.

 

CHICAGO – Nearly one in five people who take prescription medications also take herbal or mineral supplements, so it’s essential to make herbs, vitamins, and other supplements part of every patient medication history, emphasized Cora Breuner, MD, MPH, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington in Seattle.

“In chronically ill children, almost 80% to 90% of kids are using supplements, so it’s really almost imperative that this be asked when you’re taking your histories, not in the social history, but when you’re asking about medications,” Dr. Breuner told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “Remember to ask it, and remember to ask it every time because it makes the patient actually realize it’s something like a medication, and so you can get the drug-herb interactions.”

Providers also should be familiar with the evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). According to the 2012 U.S. National Health Interview Survey, which included 10,218 youths, 11.6% of those aged 4-17 years had taken or used some type of complementary health product within the previous year. Fish oil/omega-3 fatty acid supplements, melatonin, probiotics/prebiotics, and echinacea topped the list.

“For children, complementary approaches were most often used for back or neck pain, other musculoskeletal conditions, head or chest colds, anxiety or stress, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and insomnia or trouble sleeping,” Dr. Breuner said.
 

Regulation of herbal and other supplements

Dietary supplements, including vitamins, minerals, and herbal remedies, are regulated under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA) – not the Food and Drug Administration. Not only can products enter the market without any testing for efficacy, but companies only have to provide “reasonable assurance” of a product’s safety, not proof.

“Supplements do not have to be manufactured according to any standards,” Dr. Breuner said, although reputable manufacturers support standards. “It’s basically up to the company that manufactures it to make sure the product is not contaminated and that the product is basically consistent. There’s no need whatsoever for the company to make sure it works.”

Yet many patients and parents don’t realize that, she said.

“It’s important for people to be aware that this is not a regulated industry per se by the federal government,” she said. “Patients really do think that it is.”

One voluntary quality indicator is the United States Pharmacopeia Dietary Supplement Verification Program, identified by a USP “dietary supplement verified” logo. ConsumerLab.com also provides an “approved quality” logo, tests samples voluntarily sent by manufacturers, and rates the quality of different brands.

“Supplements may not claim to cure or prevent a disease, but they can say how it affects the body’s structure and function,” she said, and companies do not need FDA approval for packaging or marketing claims. In this low regulatory environment, substantial variations exist in the quality and quantity of biological ingredients in marketed supplements.
 

Risks from herbal supplements

Dr. Breuner cited a 2011 study finding that 75% of 68 products tested had no key safety messages, including all 12 ginkgo products and all but 1 of the 21 garlic and seven Asian ginseng products tested. Most of the 13 echinacea products also lacked safety messages, but two-thirds of the 12 St John’s wort products did have safety information.

Risks can include contamination, inadequate packaging information, and unknown toxicities and interactions. Adverse reactions should be reported to the Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch at 800-FDA-1088 (fax: 800-FDA-0178) and to Poison Control at 800-222-1222.

Two popular herbal remedies that are unsafe for children include licorice and ephedra. Although it is used for peptic ulcers, licorice lacks much evidence backing it and also shouldn’t be used (or eaten) during pregnancy. Ephedra (ma huang), an appetite suppressant and decongestant, can cause heart palpitations, heart attacks, and death.

“You can still get ephedra over the Internet, but it’s very, very dangerous,” Dr. Breuner said.

Dr. Breuner listed other herbal products available online but deemed unsafe for children: aconite (also known as bushi), species from the genus Aristolochia, belladonna, blue cohosh, borage, broom, calamus, chaparral, coltsfoot, comfrey, germander, life root, lobelia, pennyroyal, poke root, sassafras, skullcap, tansy ragwort, and wormwood.

Another set of herbs can be dangerous prior to surgery, she said, noting that an estimated 26% of patients scheduled for surgery use herbal products.

“Many, many of the herbs cause platelet aggregation issues,” Dr. Breuner said, so it’s very important to ask about different herbs before surgeries. Patients should discontinue echinacea, ephedra, garlic, ginkgo, ginseng, kava, St. John’s wort, and valerian before surgery. Risks include cardiovascular instability, prolonged sedation, bleeding, electrolyte disturbances, and immunosuppression. Additionally, four supplements also adversely interact with warfarin: garlic, ginger, and feverfew have additive effects (although small dietary amounts of ginger and garlic are fine), and St. John’s wort can decrease warfarin’s effects.

Dr. Breuner urged attendees to use resources like PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset to find out more about supplements; this subset limits results of a PubMed search of citations and abstracts to just those related to dietary supplements. It was created through a partnership between the Office of Dietary Supplements and the National Library of Medicine, both parts of the National Institutes of Health.
 

 

 

Information on specific herbs

 Ginkgo. Although commonly used to boost memory and concentration, only limited studies in adults shows some potential benefit from ginkgo at 40 mg three times a day. “There isn’t any evidence to show any reason to use it in children,” Dr. Breuner said. Adverse effects can include gastrointestinal irritation, headache, bleeding, and contact dermatitis.

 Echinacea. Although people use echinacea to treat or prevent the common cold or upper respiratory infections, the evidence does not show significant reductions of incidence, duration, or severity of upper respiratory infections and common colds. Anyone immunocompromised with an allergy or autoimmune disease should not take it.

 Zinc. Some evidence from a pediatric Cochrane Review, albeit with heterogeneous studies, supports using 75 mg of zinc a day to reduce duration of common cold and sore throat symptoms in healthy people. Adverse effects include a bad taste, nausea, and anosmia.

 Valerian. Children can take 400 mg nightly of valerian to help with sleep, although there are some caveats.

“The problem with Valerian is that it takes 2-6 weeks before it has any effect,” Breuner said. “It tastes terrible, and it’s only in a capsule form. It isn’t dosed for age at all, so you have to be careful about this, and it’s not like Ambien,” she added. It does not work instantaneously, and stopping it abruptly can cause withdrawal symptoms, although she would recommend it over melatonin. Despite its use for sleep, it can have adverse effects, such as anxiety, restlessness, and heart palpitations, and it can interfere with barbiturates.

 St. John’s wort. No one is quite sure how it works, but research has shown St. John’s wort extracts can treat mild to moderate depression about as well as standard antidepressants. However, the dose is 300 mg three times a day. “There’s no St. John’s XL,” Dr. Breuner joked. It can also interfere with a wide range of prescribed medications, including oral contraception.

 Butterbur. Those taking pyrrolizidine alkaloids should avoid butterbur, but it otherwise can help prevent migraine when dosed at 50-75 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 8-9 years and 100-150 mg daily divided up into 2-3 for ages 10-17 years. “Most of the neurologists at my institution are recommending butterbur,” Dr. Breuner said. “It’s not an abortive, but it’s a preventive, with decreased intensity and severity in childhood migraine 6 weeks after using it. This is absolutely something to consider in your patients with chronic headaches.” Adverse effects include diarrhea, stomach upset, belching, and dermal and allergic symptoms, such as itchy eyes, asthma, and rash.

 Magnesium. Also recommended by pediatric neurologists at her institution, 300-500 mg daily of magnesium can reduce migraine incidence, but doses should be titrated up at first. “Don’t start with the higher doses,” she said. “You have to be careful about starting at too high of a dose because of diarrhea,” which is its primary adverse effect. Magnesium also can interfere with bisphosphonates, antibiotics, and diuretics; proton pump inhibitors may reduce magnesium levels.

 Melatonin. Unlike most supplements that are herbal or mineral, melatonin is a synthetic hormone, but Dr. Breuner said many patients don’t realize that. “Because it’s a hormone, I’m very, very careful about it,” she said, never recommending more than 0.5 to 5 mg a night for help falling asleep. “I’m really not a fan of melatonin,” she said. “You develop a tolerance to it, and this is not something parents or children should be taking chronically because we do not know long-term outcomes at all. It’s not benign even though you can just toss it into your grocery basket.”

She briefly wrapped up with mentions of omega-3 fatty acid supplements (docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid); most of the evidence for these supplements comes from adults with psychiatric disorders. However, one study showed reduced tics in children with Tourette’s – if they can stand the fishy taste. It also can cause belching, nosebleeds, nausea, loose stools, and, at higher doses, decreased blood coagulation.

Peppermint can be used to reduce nausea, coughs, anxiety, and irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, but it needs to be taken as 1-2 enteric capsules, not as tea or another form.

“Chamomile is very helpful for generalized colic and also for those with chronic anxiety,” Dr. Breuner said, and arnica can be used topically for bruising. Ginger also can be used to reduce nausea but can cause heartburn. A combination of peppermint, chamomile, arnica, and ginger may be appropriate to address various chemotherapy symptoms in a child, she said.

Several articles are useful for looking up interactions between herbs and drugs, including Pediatrics. 2017. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2720C; J Emerg Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):267-71; and Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Feb;13(1):7-12.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Breuner reported having no disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Teach your adolescent patients about normal menses, so they know when it’s abnormal

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:09

 

Not only do you need to know the normal features of adolescent menstruation to identify what’s abnormal, but you also need to teach your patients what’s typical, according to S. Paige Hertweck, MD, chief of gynecology at Norton Children’s Hospital in Louisville, Ky.

“Remember to use the menstrual cycle as a vital sign,” Dr. Hertweck told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Even within the first year of menarche, most girls have a period at least every 90 days, so work up those who don’t.”

The median age of menarche is 12.4 years, typically beginning within 2-3 years of breast budding at Tanner Stage 4 breast development, she said. By 15 years of age, 98% of girls have begun menstruation.

Girls’ cycles typically last 21-45 days, an average of 32.2 days during their first year of menstruation, with flow for 7 days or less, requiring an average of 3-6 pads and/or tampons per day. Dr. Hertweck recommends you write down these features of normal menstruation so that your patients can tell you when their cycle is abnormal or menses doesn’t return.

“Cycle length is more variable for teens versus women 20-40 years old,” she said. However, “it’s not true that ‘anything goes’ for cycle length” in teens, she added. “Cycles that are consistently outside the range of 21-45 days are statistically uncommon.” Hence the need to evaluate causes of amenorrhea in girls whose cycles exceed 90 days.

Possible causes of amenorrhea include pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid abnormalities, hyperprolactinemia, primary ovarian insufficiency, or hypogonadal amenorrhea, typically stimulated by the first instance of anorexia, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, or a gluten intolerance.
 

Primary amenorrhea

Dr. Hertweck listed five benchmarks that indicate primary amenorrhea requiring evaluation. Those indicators include girls who have no menarche by age 15 years or within 3 years of breast budding, no breast development by age 13 years, or no menses by age 14 years with hirsutism or with a history of excessive exercise or of an eating disorder.

You can start by examining what normal menstruation relies on: an intact central nervous system with a functioning pituitary, an ovarian response, and a normal uterus, cervix, and vagina. You should check the patient’s follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and prolactin levels to assess CNS functioning, and estradiol levels to assess ovarian response. A genital exam with a pelvic ultrasound can reveal any possible defects in the uterus, cervix, or vagina.

The presence of breasts without a uterus indicates normal estrogen production, so the missing uterus could be a congenital defect or result from androgen insensitivity, Dr. Hertweck explained. In those without breasts, gonadal dysgenesis or gonadal enzymatic deficiency may explain no estrogen production. If the patient has both breasts and a uterus, you should rule out pregnancy first and then track CNS changes via FSH, TSH, and prolactin levels.
 

Premature ovarian insufficiency

Approximately 1% of females experience premature ovarian insufficiency, which can be diagnosed as early as age 14 years and should be suspected in a patient with a uterus but without breasts who has low estradiol levels, CNS failure identified by a high FSH level, and gonadal failure.

Formal diagnosis requires two separate instances of FSH elevation, and chromosomal testing should be done to rule out gonadal dysgenesis. You also should test the serum anti-Müllerian hormone biomarker (readings above 8 are concerning) and look for two possible causes. The FMR1 (Fragile X) premutation carrier status could be a cause, or presence of 21-hydroxylase and/or adrenal antibodies indicate autoimmune polyglandular syndrome.

Catching premature ovarian insufficiency early enough may allow patients to preserve some fertility if they still have oocytes present. Aside from this, girls will need hormone replacement therapy to fulfill developmental emotional and physical needs, such as bone growth and overall health. Despite a history of treating teens with premature ovarian insufficiency like adults, you should follow the practice guidelines specific to adolescents by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion statement (Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:193-7).
 

Menorrhagia: heavy menstrual bleeding

Even though average blood loss is estimated at 30 mL per period, that number means little in clinical practice because patients cannot measure the actual amount of menses. Better indicators of abnormally greater flow include flow lasting longer than 7 days, finding clots larger than a quarter, changing menstrual products every 1-2 hours, leaking onto clothing such that patients need to take extra clothes to school, and any heavy periods that occur with easy bruising or with a family history of bleeding disorders.

First-line treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in teens is hormonal contraception, either combination oral contraceptive pills, the transdermal patch, or the intravaginal ring, which can be combined with other therapies.

An alternative for those under age 18 (per Food and Drug Administration labeling) is oral tranexamic acid, found in a crossover trial with an oral contraceptive pill to be just as effective at reducing average blood loss and improving quality of life, but with fewer side effects and better compliance. Before prescribing anything for heavy menstrual bleeding, however, you must consider possible causes and rule some out that require different management.

Aside from pregnancy, one potential cause of menorrhagia is infection such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, which should be considered even in those with a negative sexual history, Dr. Hertweck said. Other possible causes include an immature hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, polycystic ovary syndrome (even with low hemoglobin), malignancy with a hormone-producing tumor, hypothalamic dysfunction (often stimulated by eating disorders, obesity, rapid weight loss, or gluten intolerance), or coagulopathy.

“Teens with menorrhagia may need to be screened for a bleeding disorder,” Dr. Hertweck said. At a minimum, she recommends checking complete blood count, ferritin, and TSH. “The most common bleeding disorders associated with heavy menstrual bleeding include platelet function disorders and von Willebrand.”

Up to half of teen girls with menorrhagia who visit a hematologist or multidisciplinary clinic receive a diagnosis of a bleeding disorder, Dr. Hertweck said. And up to half of those with menorrhagia at menarche may have von Willebrand, as do one in six adolescents who go to the emergency department because of heavy menstrual bleeding.
 

 

 

Von Willebrand syndrome

Von Willebrand syndrome is a deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a protein with binding sites for platelets, collagen, and factor VIII that “serves as a bridge between platelets and injury sites in vessel walls” and “protects factor VIII from rapid proteolytic degradation,” Dr. Hertweck said. Von Willebrand syndrome is the most common inherited congenital bleeding disorder. Although acquired von Willebrand syndrome is rare, it has grown in incidence among those with complex cardiovascular, hematologic, or immunologic disorders.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Not only do you need to know the normal features of adolescent menstruation to identify what’s abnormal, but you also need to teach your patients what’s typical, according to S. Paige Hertweck, MD, chief of gynecology at Norton Children’s Hospital in Louisville, Ky.

“Remember to use the menstrual cycle as a vital sign,” Dr. Hertweck told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Even within the first year of menarche, most girls have a period at least every 90 days, so work up those who don’t.”

The median age of menarche is 12.4 years, typically beginning within 2-3 years of breast budding at Tanner Stage 4 breast development, she said. By 15 years of age, 98% of girls have begun menstruation.

Girls’ cycles typically last 21-45 days, an average of 32.2 days during their first year of menstruation, with flow for 7 days or less, requiring an average of 3-6 pads and/or tampons per day. Dr. Hertweck recommends you write down these features of normal menstruation so that your patients can tell you when their cycle is abnormal or menses doesn’t return.

“Cycle length is more variable for teens versus women 20-40 years old,” she said. However, “it’s not true that ‘anything goes’ for cycle length” in teens, she added. “Cycles that are consistently outside the range of 21-45 days are statistically uncommon.” Hence the need to evaluate causes of amenorrhea in girls whose cycles exceed 90 days.

Possible causes of amenorrhea include pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid abnormalities, hyperprolactinemia, primary ovarian insufficiency, or hypogonadal amenorrhea, typically stimulated by the first instance of anorexia, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, or a gluten intolerance.
 

Primary amenorrhea

Dr. Hertweck listed five benchmarks that indicate primary amenorrhea requiring evaluation. Those indicators include girls who have no menarche by age 15 years or within 3 years of breast budding, no breast development by age 13 years, or no menses by age 14 years with hirsutism or with a history of excessive exercise or of an eating disorder.

You can start by examining what normal menstruation relies on: an intact central nervous system with a functioning pituitary, an ovarian response, and a normal uterus, cervix, and vagina. You should check the patient’s follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and prolactin levels to assess CNS functioning, and estradiol levels to assess ovarian response. A genital exam with a pelvic ultrasound can reveal any possible defects in the uterus, cervix, or vagina.

The presence of breasts without a uterus indicates normal estrogen production, so the missing uterus could be a congenital defect or result from androgen insensitivity, Dr. Hertweck explained. In those without breasts, gonadal dysgenesis or gonadal enzymatic deficiency may explain no estrogen production. If the patient has both breasts and a uterus, you should rule out pregnancy first and then track CNS changes via FSH, TSH, and prolactin levels.
 

Premature ovarian insufficiency

Approximately 1% of females experience premature ovarian insufficiency, which can be diagnosed as early as age 14 years and should be suspected in a patient with a uterus but without breasts who has low estradiol levels, CNS failure identified by a high FSH level, and gonadal failure.

Formal diagnosis requires two separate instances of FSH elevation, and chromosomal testing should be done to rule out gonadal dysgenesis. You also should test the serum anti-Müllerian hormone biomarker (readings above 8 are concerning) and look for two possible causes. The FMR1 (Fragile X) premutation carrier status could be a cause, or presence of 21-hydroxylase and/or adrenal antibodies indicate autoimmune polyglandular syndrome.

Catching premature ovarian insufficiency early enough may allow patients to preserve some fertility if they still have oocytes present. Aside from this, girls will need hormone replacement therapy to fulfill developmental emotional and physical needs, such as bone growth and overall health. Despite a history of treating teens with premature ovarian insufficiency like adults, you should follow the practice guidelines specific to adolescents by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion statement (Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:193-7).
 

Menorrhagia: heavy menstrual bleeding

Even though average blood loss is estimated at 30 mL per period, that number means little in clinical practice because patients cannot measure the actual amount of menses. Better indicators of abnormally greater flow include flow lasting longer than 7 days, finding clots larger than a quarter, changing menstrual products every 1-2 hours, leaking onto clothing such that patients need to take extra clothes to school, and any heavy periods that occur with easy bruising or with a family history of bleeding disorders.

First-line treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in teens is hormonal contraception, either combination oral contraceptive pills, the transdermal patch, or the intravaginal ring, which can be combined with other therapies.

An alternative for those under age 18 (per Food and Drug Administration labeling) is oral tranexamic acid, found in a crossover trial with an oral contraceptive pill to be just as effective at reducing average blood loss and improving quality of life, but with fewer side effects and better compliance. Before prescribing anything for heavy menstrual bleeding, however, you must consider possible causes and rule some out that require different management.

Aside from pregnancy, one potential cause of menorrhagia is infection such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, which should be considered even in those with a negative sexual history, Dr. Hertweck said. Other possible causes include an immature hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, polycystic ovary syndrome (even with low hemoglobin), malignancy with a hormone-producing tumor, hypothalamic dysfunction (often stimulated by eating disorders, obesity, rapid weight loss, or gluten intolerance), or coagulopathy.

“Teens with menorrhagia may need to be screened for a bleeding disorder,” Dr. Hertweck said. At a minimum, she recommends checking complete blood count, ferritin, and TSH. “The most common bleeding disorders associated with heavy menstrual bleeding include platelet function disorders and von Willebrand.”

Up to half of teen girls with menorrhagia who visit a hematologist or multidisciplinary clinic receive a diagnosis of a bleeding disorder, Dr. Hertweck said. And up to half of those with menorrhagia at menarche may have von Willebrand, as do one in six adolescents who go to the emergency department because of heavy menstrual bleeding.
 

 

 

Von Willebrand syndrome

Von Willebrand syndrome is a deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a protein with binding sites for platelets, collagen, and factor VIII that “serves as a bridge between platelets and injury sites in vessel walls” and “protects factor VIII from rapid proteolytic degradation,” Dr. Hertweck said. Von Willebrand syndrome is the most common inherited congenital bleeding disorder. Although acquired von Willebrand syndrome is rare, it has grown in incidence among those with complex cardiovascular, hematologic, or immunologic disorders.

 

Not only do you need to know the normal features of adolescent menstruation to identify what’s abnormal, but you also need to teach your patients what’s typical, according to S. Paige Hertweck, MD, chief of gynecology at Norton Children’s Hospital in Louisville, Ky.

“Remember to use the menstrual cycle as a vital sign,” Dr. Hertweck told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Even within the first year of menarche, most girls have a period at least every 90 days, so work up those who don’t.”

The median age of menarche is 12.4 years, typically beginning within 2-3 years of breast budding at Tanner Stage 4 breast development, she said. By 15 years of age, 98% of girls have begun menstruation.

Girls’ cycles typically last 21-45 days, an average of 32.2 days during their first year of menstruation, with flow for 7 days or less, requiring an average of 3-6 pads and/or tampons per day. Dr. Hertweck recommends you write down these features of normal menstruation so that your patients can tell you when their cycle is abnormal or menses doesn’t return.

“Cycle length is more variable for teens versus women 20-40 years old,” she said. However, “it’s not true that ‘anything goes’ for cycle length” in teens, she added. “Cycles that are consistently outside the range of 21-45 days are statistically uncommon.” Hence the need to evaluate causes of amenorrhea in girls whose cycles exceed 90 days.

Possible causes of amenorrhea include pregnancy, polycystic ovary syndrome, thyroid abnormalities, hyperprolactinemia, primary ovarian insufficiency, or hypogonadal amenorrhea, typically stimulated by the first instance of anorexia, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease, or a gluten intolerance.
 

Primary amenorrhea

Dr. Hertweck listed five benchmarks that indicate primary amenorrhea requiring evaluation. Those indicators include girls who have no menarche by age 15 years or within 3 years of breast budding, no breast development by age 13 years, or no menses by age 14 years with hirsutism or with a history of excessive exercise or of an eating disorder.

You can start by examining what normal menstruation relies on: an intact central nervous system with a functioning pituitary, an ovarian response, and a normal uterus, cervix, and vagina. You should check the patient’s follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and prolactin levels to assess CNS functioning, and estradiol levels to assess ovarian response. A genital exam with a pelvic ultrasound can reveal any possible defects in the uterus, cervix, or vagina.

The presence of breasts without a uterus indicates normal estrogen production, so the missing uterus could be a congenital defect or result from androgen insensitivity, Dr. Hertweck explained. In those without breasts, gonadal dysgenesis or gonadal enzymatic deficiency may explain no estrogen production. If the patient has both breasts and a uterus, you should rule out pregnancy first and then track CNS changes via FSH, TSH, and prolactin levels.
 

Premature ovarian insufficiency

Approximately 1% of females experience premature ovarian insufficiency, which can be diagnosed as early as age 14 years and should be suspected in a patient with a uterus but without breasts who has low estradiol levels, CNS failure identified by a high FSH level, and gonadal failure.

Formal diagnosis requires two separate instances of FSH elevation, and chromosomal testing should be done to rule out gonadal dysgenesis. You also should test the serum anti-Müllerian hormone biomarker (readings above 8 are concerning) and look for two possible causes. The FMR1 (Fragile X) premutation carrier status could be a cause, or presence of 21-hydroxylase and/or adrenal antibodies indicate autoimmune polyglandular syndrome.

Catching premature ovarian insufficiency early enough may allow patients to preserve some fertility if they still have oocytes present. Aside from this, girls will need hormone replacement therapy to fulfill developmental emotional and physical needs, such as bone growth and overall health. Despite a history of treating teens with premature ovarian insufficiency like adults, you should follow the practice guidelines specific to adolescents by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists committee opinion statement (Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:193-7).
 

Menorrhagia: heavy menstrual bleeding

Even though average blood loss is estimated at 30 mL per period, that number means little in clinical practice because patients cannot measure the actual amount of menses. Better indicators of abnormally greater flow include flow lasting longer than 7 days, finding clots larger than a quarter, changing menstrual products every 1-2 hours, leaking onto clothing such that patients need to take extra clothes to school, and any heavy periods that occur with easy bruising or with a family history of bleeding disorders.

First-line treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding in teens is hormonal contraception, either combination oral contraceptive pills, the transdermal patch, or the intravaginal ring, which can be combined with other therapies.

An alternative for those under age 18 (per Food and Drug Administration labeling) is oral tranexamic acid, found in a crossover trial with an oral contraceptive pill to be just as effective at reducing average blood loss and improving quality of life, but with fewer side effects and better compliance. Before prescribing anything for heavy menstrual bleeding, however, you must consider possible causes and rule some out that require different management.

Aside from pregnancy, one potential cause of menorrhagia is infection such as chlamydia or gonorrhea, which should be considered even in those with a negative sexual history, Dr. Hertweck said. Other possible causes include an immature hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, polycystic ovary syndrome (even with low hemoglobin), malignancy with a hormone-producing tumor, hypothalamic dysfunction (often stimulated by eating disorders, obesity, rapid weight loss, or gluten intolerance), or coagulopathy.

“Teens with menorrhagia may need to be screened for a bleeding disorder,” Dr. Hertweck said. At a minimum, she recommends checking complete blood count, ferritin, and TSH. “The most common bleeding disorders associated with heavy menstrual bleeding include platelet function disorders and von Willebrand.”

Up to half of teen girls with menorrhagia who visit a hematologist or multidisciplinary clinic receive a diagnosis of a bleeding disorder, Dr. Hertweck said. And up to half of those with menorrhagia at menarche may have von Willebrand, as do one in six adolescents who go to the emergency department because of heavy menstrual bleeding.
 

 

 

Von Willebrand syndrome

Von Willebrand syndrome is a deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a protein with binding sites for platelets, collagen, and factor VIII that “serves as a bridge between platelets and injury sites in vessel walls” and “protects factor VIII from rapid proteolytic degradation,” Dr. Hertweck said. Von Willebrand syndrome is the most common inherited congenital bleeding disorder. Although acquired von Willebrand syndrome is rare, it has grown in incidence among those with complex cardiovascular, hematologic, or immunologic disorders.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

LARCs remain best contraception for teens

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:08

 

CHICAGO – The steady drop in teen pregnancy rates over the past 25 years – more than a 75% decline – is directly attributed to more effective use of contraception, but it only will continue if teens use the most effective forms of contraception, explained Rachael Phelps, MD, medical director of Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York.

Teen birth rates in the United States already remain much higher than those in other high-income countries. In fact, the 2015 U.S. rate of 22 births per 1,000 teens ages 15-19 years is barely below that of India and Rwanda – and more than triple the rates in France, Germany, Italy, and other Western European countries.

Dr. Rachael Phelps
It is therefore the responsibility of pediatricians to know and recommend the most effective forms of contraception to their teen patients, Dr. Phelps told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Of the approximately half of all pregnancies that are unintended in the United States, the largest proportion occur among women in their early 20s, followed by women in their late 20s, and then by teens.

“A lot of what you’re doing for adolescents in primary care is transitioning them from being a child to being an adult,” Dr. Phelps said. “Once they’re in their 20s, they may not see a primary care doctor, so you have the opportunity to give them the skills and the knowledge they need with contraception to protect themselves not only through their teens, but through their 20s.”

Contraceptive methods’ effectiveness

The most effective forms of birth control, with a less than 1% chance of pregnancy, are long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the implant (Nexplanon) and an intrauterine device (IUD), such as Skyla, Mirena, Liletta, and Kyleena, and the hormone-free Paragard. Sterilization also is highly effective, but is permanent and rarely an ideal option for the average teen.

Other hormonal options are second best, with 94%-99% effectiveness, but require more frequent replacement. Whereas the implant lasts 3 years and the IUDs last anywhere from 3 to 12 years depending on the type, the pill must be taken daily. The patch is replaced each week, the ring is replaced each month, and Depo-Provera shots are required every 3 months.

The least effective methods of birth control include withdrawal, natural family planning (fertility planning), and barrier methods such as condoms and diaphragms. Depending on the method, 12-24 women out of 100 will get pregnant each year using these methods, although that’s better than the 90% or more of women who get pregnant each year when using no contraception.

flocu/ThinkStock
Most teens (69%) use less effective short-acting contraception. Despite the superior effectiveness of LARC methods, only 4% of teens ages 15-19 years are using them. “If we could increase that number, we could make some real strides in [reducing] our teen pregnancy rates,” Dr. Phelps said, highlighting the problem with starting on the pill.

“The problem is, if you try pills first and see how that goes, the way you’re going to find out it didn’t go so well is she’s going to be pregnant,” Dr. Phelps said. “When you think about an IUD or an implant being invasive, you need to think about the alternative, which is pregnancy.”

Just over half of teens using contraception use oral contraceptives (54%), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, yet research shows only a third of women remember to take their pill every day in their first month. By their third month, just one in five women have remembered the pill every day, and more than half (51%) have forgotten three or more pills (Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28[4]:154-8).

“When we talk about risk, we often think about the risk of the method versus not using the method,” Dr. Phelps said. “But what we should be thinking about is the risk of the method versus the risk of pregnancy. That’s the true comparison because they’re not going to stop having sex.”

After oral contraception, condoms are most popular (23%), followed by 9% using Depo-Provera, and the remaining 10% split across withdrawal, the ring, and the patch, she said.

LARCs preferred by teens and organizations

The AAP, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) all recommend LARCs as first-line contraceptive choices.

Teens also prefer LARCs to the short-term, less effective methods as well, found the Contraceptive Choice Project study. Given a choice of any birth control method without cost or other access barriers, 72% of teens would choose a LARC, compared with 28% of teens who would choose a short-acting method, Dr. Phelps said.

Satisfaction rates with LARCs, ranging from 78% with the implant to 86% with a hormonal IUD, also far exceeded satisfaction with other hormonal contraception, ranging from 42% for the patch to 54% for Depo-Provera and oral contraceptives, the study found. And LARCs are among the safest contraceptive choices because they contain no estrogen and have few contraindications.

 

 

Understanding LARC and hormonal options

The two types of IUDs are an levonorgestrel IUD and a copper-T IUD. The levonorgestrel IUD contains progestin only, released at 20 mcg per day, and is effective up to 3-7 years. Most patients have light spotting initially, lasting 6 months in about 25% of patients and up to a year in 10%. By 6 months, 44% don’t have periods, which increases to 50% by 1 year (“Contraceptive Technology,” 19ed. [London: Ardent Media, 2007]).

The copper-T IUD contains copper ions but no hormones and is effective up to 12 years, starting immediately. Women have regular periods, but they may be heavier, longer, or with more cramps for the first 6 months.

Both IUDs and implants are safe in nulliparous, postpartum, and breastfeeding teens as well as those with obesity, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, diabetes, HIV, depression, stroke/myocardial infarction/deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, pelvic inflammatory disease, and sexually transmitted infections.

Dr. Phelps reviewed insertion for both IUDs and the implant, but also said providers can refer teens for LARCs using http://larc.arhp.org to find someone. She also recommended the Managing Contraception pocket-sized book, available at www.managingcontraception.com and free for medical students and residents. Further, the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria provides all necessary information on contraindications and is available as a mobile app.

All the hormonal options, including the levonorgestrel IUD, become effective 1 week after starting. The implant, costing $300-$600, contains only progesterone, is effective up to 4 years and works by inhibiting ovulation. Just over one in five girls (22%) have no period, 34% have infrequent light bleeding, and 11% discontinue it because of frequent bleeding.

Depo-Provera contains progestin only and involves an injection every 12-14 weeks; irregular bleeding is initially common, after which most patients experience amenorrhea.

Patients using the patch, containing both estrogen and progestin, should change it once a week for 3 weeks and then take 1 week off for their period. Providers should advise teens to stick the patch directly on clean, dry skin of the arm, torso, buttocks, or stomach, but not to their breasts.

The ring similarly contains estrogen and progestin and has 1 off week after 3 weeks of use, but it is changed out monthly. Patients pinch the ring and place it into the vagina in any location, going deeper if it is uncomfortable.

Emergency contraception

Of the two emergency contraception options, ulipristal acetate – prescription only as 30 mg used up to 120 hours after unprotected sex – is always more effective than levonorgestrel – over-the-counter as 1.5 mg used up to 72 hours after unprotected sex. Both, however, are less effective in those with obesity (ulipristal acetate if BMI great than 30 and levonorgestrel if BMI greater than 25), Dr. Phelps said. If the patient had unprotected sex 3-5 days earlier and/or has a higher BMI, ulipristal acetate is preferred. Ideally, teens should be provided emergency contraception ahead of time, thereby increasing earlier use and use overall when it’s needed without increasing risk-taking behavior.

Common misconceptions

Dr. Phelps also reviewed some of the key myths that providers and teens often believe about LARCs and other contraceptive methods.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

CHICAGO – The steady drop in teen pregnancy rates over the past 25 years – more than a 75% decline – is directly attributed to more effective use of contraception, but it only will continue if teens use the most effective forms of contraception, explained Rachael Phelps, MD, medical director of Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York.

Teen birth rates in the United States already remain much higher than those in other high-income countries. In fact, the 2015 U.S. rate of 22 births per 1,000 teens ages 15-19 years is barely below that of India and Rwanda – and more than triple the rates in France, Germany, Italy, and other Western European countries.

Dr. Rachael Phelps
It is therefore the responsibility of pediatricians to know and recommend the most effective forms of contraception to their teen patients, Dr. Phelps told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Of the approximately half of all pregnancies that are unintended in the United States, the largest proportion occur among women in their early 20s, followed by women in their late 20s, and then by teens.

“A lot of what you’re doing for adolescents in primary care is transitioning them from being a child to being an adult,” Dr. Phelps said. “Once they’re in their 20s, they may not see a primary care doctor, so you have the opportunity to give them the skills and the knowledge they need with contraception to protect themselves not only through their teens, but through their 20s.”

Contraceptive methods’ effectiveness

The most effective forms of birth control, with a less than 1% chance of pregnancy, are long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the implant (Nexplanon) and an intrauterine device (IUD), such as Skyla, Mirena, Liletta, and Kyleena, and the hormone-free Paragard. Sterilization also is highly effective, but is permanent and rarely an ideal option for the average teen.

Other hormonal options are second best, with 94%-99% effectiveness, but require more frequent replacement. Whereas the implant lasts 3 years and the IUDs last anywhere from 3 to 12 years depending on the type, the pill must be taken daily. The patch is replaced each week, the ring is replaced each month, and Depo-Provera shots are required every 3 months.

The least effective methods of birth control include withdrawal, natural family planning (fertility planning), and barrier methods such as condoms and diaphragms. Depending on the method, 12-24 women out of 100 will get pregnant each year using these methods, although that’s better than the 90% or more of women who get pregnant each year when using no contraception.

flocu/ThinkStock
Most teens (69%) use less effective short-acting contraception. Despite the superior effectiveness of LARC methods, only 4% of teens ages 15-19 years are using them. “If we could increase that number, we could make some real strides in [reducing] our teen pregnancy rates,” Dr. Phelps said, highlighting the problem with starting on the pill.

“The problem is, if you try pills first and see how that goes, the way you’re going to find out it didn’t go so well is she’s going to be pregnant,” Dr. Phelps said. “When you think about an IUD or an implant being invasive, you need to think about the alternative, which is pregnancy.”

Just over half of teens using contraception use oral contraceptives (54%), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, yet research shows only a third of women remember to take their pill every day in their first month. By their third month, just one in five women have remembered the pill every day, and more than half (51%) have forgotten three or more pills (Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28[4]:154-8).

“When we talk about risk, we often think about the risk of the method versus not using the method,” Dr. Phelps said. “But what we should be thinking about is the risk of the method versus the risk of pregnancy. That’s the true comparison because they’re not going to stop having sex.”

After oral contraception, condoms are most popular (23%), followed by 9% using Depo-Provera, and the remaining 10% split across withdrawal, the ring, and the patch, she said.

LARCs preferred by teens and organizations

The AAP, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) all recommend LARCs as first-line contraceptive choices.

Teens also prefer LARCs to the short-term, less effective methods as well, found the Contraceptive Choice Project study. Given a choice of any birth control method without cost or other access barriers, 72% of teens would choose a LARC, compared with 28% of teens who would choose a short-acting method, Dr. Phelps said.

Satisfaction rates with LARCs, ranging from 78% with the implant to 86% with a hormonal IUD, also far exceeded satisfaction with other hormonal contraception, ranging from 42% for the patch to 54% for Depo-Provera and oral contraceptives, the study found. And LARCs are among the safest contraceptive choices because they contain no estrogen and have few contraindications.

 

 

Understanding LARC and hormonal options

The two types of IUDs are an levonorgestrel IUD and a copper-T IUD. The levonorgestrel IUD contains progestin only, released at 20 mcg per day, and is effective up to 3-7 years. Most patients have light spotting initially, lasting 6 months in about 25% of patients and up to a year in 10%. By 6 months, 44% don’t have periods, which increases to 50% by 1 year (“Contraceptive Technology,” 19ed. [London: Ardent Media, 2007]).

The copper-T IUD contains copper ions but no hormones and is effective up to 12 years, starting immediately. Women have regular periods, but they may be heavier, longer, or with more cramps for the first 6 months.

Both IUDs and implants are safe in nulliparous, postpartum, and breastfeeding teens as well as those with obesity, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, diabetes, HIV, depression, stroke/myocardial infarction/deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, pelvic inflammatory disease, and sexually transmitted infections.

Dr. Phelps reviewed insertion for both IUDs and the implant, but also said providers can refer teens for LARCs using http://larc.arhp.org to find someone. She also recommended the Managing Contraception pocket-sized book, available at www.managingcontraception.com and free for medical students and residents. Further, the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria provides all necessary information on contraindications and is available as a mobile app.

All the hormonal options, including the levonorgestrel IUD, become effective 1 week after starting. The implant, costing $300-$600, contains only progesterone, is effective up to 4 years and works by inhibiting ovulation. Just over one in five girls (22%) have no period, 34% have infrequent light bleeding, and 11% discontinue it because of frequent bleeding.

Depo-Provera contains progestin only and involves an injection every 12-14 weeks; irregular bleeding is initially common, after which most patients experience amenorrhea.

Patients using the patch, containing both estrogen and progestin, should change it once a week for 3 weeks and then take 1 week off for their period. Providers should advise teens to stick the patch directly on clean, dry skin of the arm, torso, buttocks, or stomach, but not to their breasts.

The ring similarly contains estrogen and progestin and has 1 off week after 3 weeks of use, but it is changed out monthly. Patients pinch the ring and place it into the vagina in any location, going deeper if it is uncomfortable.

Emergency contraception

Of the two emergency contraception options, ulipristal acetate – prescription only as 30 mg used up to 120 hours after unprotected sex – is always more effective than levonorgestrel – over-the-counter as 1.5 mg used up to 72 hours after unprotected sex. Both, however, are less effective in those with obesity (ulipristal acetate if BMI great than 30 and levonorgestrel if BMI greater than 25), Dr. Phelps said. If the patient had unprotected sex 3-5 days earlier and/or has a higher BMI, ulipristal acetate is preferred. Ideally, teens should be provided emergency contraception ahead of time, thereby increasing earlier use and use overall when it’s needed without increasing risk-taking behavior.

Common misconceptions

Dr. Phelps also reviewed some of the key myths that providers and teens often believe about LARCs and other contraceptive methods.

 

CHICAGO – The steady drop in teen pregnancy rates over the past 25 years – more than a 75% decline – is directly attributed to more effective use of contraception, but it only will continue if teens use the most effective forms of contraception, explained Rachael Phelps, MD, medical director of Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York.

Teen birth rates in the United States already remain much higher than those in other high-income countries. In fact, the 2015 U.S. rate of 22 births per 1,000 teens ages 15-19 years is barely below that of India and Rwanda – and more than triple the rates in France, Germany, Italy, and other Western European countries.

Dr. Rachael Phelps
It is therefore the responsibility of pediatricians to know and recommend the most effective forms of contraception to their teen patients, Dr. Phelps told attendees at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Of the approximately half of all pregnancies that are unintended in the United States, the largest proportion occur among women in their early 20s, followed by women in their late 20s, and then by teens.

“A lot of what you’re doing for adolescents in primary care is transitioning them from being a child to being an adult,” Dr. Phelps said. “Once they’re in their 20s, they may not see a primary care doctor, so you have the opportunity to give them the skills and the knowledge they need with contraception to protect themselves not only through their teens, but through their 20s.”

Contraceptive methods’ effectiveness

The most effective forms of birth control, with a less than 1% chance of pregnancy, are long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the implant (Nexplanon) and an intrauterine device (IUD), such as Skyla, Mirena, Liletta, and Kyleena, and the hormone-free Paragard. Sterilization also is highly effective, but is permanent and rarely an ideal option for the average teen.

Other hormonal options are second best, with 94%-99% effectiveness, but require more frequent replacement. Whereas the implant lasts 3 years and the IUDs last anywhere from 3 to 12 years depending on the type, the pill must be taken daily. The patch is replaced each week, the ring is replaced each month, and Depo-Provera shots are required every 3 months.

The least effective methods of birth control include withdrawal, natural family planning (fertility planning), and barrier methods such as condoms and diaphragms. Depending on the method, 12-24 women out of 100 will get pregnant each year using these methods, although that’s better than the 90% or more of women who get pregnant each year when using no contraception.

flocu/ThinkStock
Most teens (69%) use less effective short-acting contraception. Despite the superior effectiveness of LARC methods, only 4% of teens ages 15-19 years are using them. “If we could increase that number, we could make some real strides in [reducing] our teen pregnancy rates,” Dr. Phelps said, highlighting the problem with starting on the pill.

“The problem is, if you try pills first and see how that goes, the way you’re going to find out it didn’t go so well is she’s going to be pregnant,” Dr. Phelps said. “When you think about an IUD or an implant being invasive, you need to think about the alternative, which is pregnancy.”

Just over half of teens using contraception use oral contraceptives (54%), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, yet research shows only a third of women remember to take their pill every day in their first month. By their third month, just one in five women have remembered the pill every day, and more than half (51%) have forgotten three or more pills (Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28[4]:154-8).

“When we talk about risk, we often think about the risk of the method versus not using the method,” Dr. Phelps said. “But what we should be thinking about is the risk of the method versus the risk of pregnancy. That’s the true comparison because they’re not going to stop having sex.”

After oral contraception, condoms are most popular (23%), followed by 9% using Depo-Provera, and the remaining 10% split across withdrawal, the ring, and the patch, she said.

LARCs preferred by teens and organizations

The AAP, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) all recommend LARCs as first-line contraceptive choices.

Teens also prefer LARCs to the short-term, less effective methods as well, found the Contraceptive Choice Project study. Given a choice of any birth control method without cost or other access barriers, 72% of teens would choose a LARC, compared with 28% of teens who would choose a short-acting method, Dr. Phelps said.

Satisfaction rates with LARCs, ranging from 78% with the implant to 86% with a hormonal IUD, also far exceeded satisfaction with other hormonal contraception, ranging from 42% for the patch to 54% for Depo-Provera and oral contraceptives, the study found. And LARCs are among the safest contraceptive choices because they contain no estrogen and have few contraindications.

 

 

Understanding LARC and hormonal options

The two types of IUDs are an levonorgestrel IUD and a copper-T IUD. The levonorgestrel IUD contains progestin only, released at 20 mcg per day, and is effective up to 3-7 years. Most patients have light spotting initially, lasting 6 months in about 25% of patients and up to a year in 10%. By 6 months, 44% don’t have periods, which increases to 50% by 1 year (“Contraceptive Technology,” 19ed. [London: Ardent Media, 2007]).

The copper-T IUD contains copper ions but no hormones and is effective up to 12 years, starting immediately. Women have regular periods, but they may be heavier, longer, or with more cramps for the first 6 months.

Both IUDs and implants are safe in nulliparous, postpartum, and breastfeeding teens as well as those with obesity, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, diabetes, HIV, depression, stroke/myocardial infarction/deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, pelvic inflammatory disease, and sexually transmitted infections.

Dr. Phelps reviewed insertion for both IUDs and the implant, but also said providers can refer teens for LARCs using http://larc.arhp.org to find someone. She also recommended the Managing Contraception pocket-sized book, available at www.managingcontraception.com and free for medical students and residents. Further, the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria provides all necessary information on contraindications and is available as a mobile app.

All the hormonal options, including the levonorgestrel IUD, become effective 1 week after starting. The implant, costing $300-$600, contains only progesterone, is effective up to 4 years and works by inhibiting ovulation. Just over one in five girls (22%) have no period, 34% have infrequent light bleeding, and 11% discontinue it because of frequent bleeding.

Depo-Provera contains progestin only and involves an injection every 12-14 weeks; irregular bleeding is initially common, after which most patients experience amenorrhea.

Patients using the patch, containing both estrogen and progestin, should change it once a week for 3 weeks and then take 1 week off for their period. Providers should advise teens to stick the patch directly on clean, dry skin of the arm, torso, buttocks, or stomach, but not to their breasts.

The ring similarly contains estrogen and progestin and has 1 off week after 3 weeks of use, but it is changed out monthly. Patients pinch the ring and place it into the vagina in any location, going deeper if it is uncomfortable.

Emergency contraception

Of the two emergency contraception options, ulipristal acetate – prescription only as 30 mg used up to 120 hours after unprotected sex – is always more effective than levonorgestrel – over-the-counter as 1.5 mg used up to 72 hours after unprotected sex. Both, however, are less effective in those with obesity (ulipristal acetate if BMI great than 30 and levonorgestrel if BMI greater than 25), Dr. Phelps said. If the patient had unprotected sex 3-5 days earlier and/or has a higher BMI, ulipristal acetate is preferred. Ideally, teens should be provided emergency contraception ahead of time, thereby increasing earlier use and use overall when it’s needed without increasing risk-taking behavior.

Common misconceptions

Dr. Phelps also reviewed some of the key myths that providers and teens often believe about LARCs and other contraceptive methods.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Localized wheezing differs from asthmatic, viral wheezing

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:07

 

CHICAGO – Nearly half of all children have wheezing in their first year of life, and one in five have recurrent wheezing episodes, but that doesn’t mean they have asthma, explained Erik Hysinger, MD, MS, of the division of pulmonary medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

Localized wheezing is not consistent with asthmatic or viral wheezing, which is typically diffuse and polyphonic, Dr. Hysinger emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“Localized wheezing is less common than diffuse wheezing and typically has a homophonous sound,” Dr. Hysinger said. It also usually arises from a central airway pathology. “High flow rates create loud amplitude sounds.”

iStock/Thinkstock
He discussed different presentations of localized wheezing and reviewed the three categories of differential diagnosis for nonasthmatic, nonviral wheezing: airway occlusion, airway narrowing, or airway compression.

Dr. Hysinger also covered management strategies for focal wheezing, starting with an initial trial of bronchodilators. Any wheezing resulting from a central airway problem, however, isn’t likely to respond to bronchodilators. Standard work-up for any of these causes is usually a chest x-ray, often paired with a bronchoscopy. Persistent wheezing likely needs a chest CT, and many of these conditions will require referral to a subspecialist.

Airway occlusion diagnoses

Four potential causes of an airway blockage are a foreign body, a bronchial cast, mucous plugs, or airway tumors.

A foreign body typically occurs with a cough, wheezing, stridor, and respiratory distress. It is most common in children under age 4 years, usually in those without a history of aspiration, yet providers initially misdiagnose more than 20% of patients with a foreign body. The foreign object – often coins, food, or batteries – frequently ends up in the right main bronchus and may go undetected up to a month, potentially leading to pneumonia, abscess, atelectasis, bronchiectasis, or airway erosion.

Dr. Erik Hysinger
The recommended initial evaluation, a bilateral decubitus chest x-ray, nevertheless cannot rule out a foreign body on its own because the objects may not show up on the films and only two-thirds of cases show an asymmetric hyperinflation. Physicians who suspect that a foreign body may be causing the wheeze should conduct a bronchoscopy. Obviously, the treatment is to remove the object, but providers also should expect to treat possible comorbidities if it took a while to identify and extract the object.

An endobronchial cast is rarer than a foreign body, but can be large enough to completely fill a lung with branching mucin, fibrin, and inflammatory cells. The wheezing sounds homophonous, with a barky or brassy cough accompanied by atelectasis. Dr. Hysinger recommended ordering chest x-ray, echocardiogram, and bronchoscopy. Although often idiopathic, these casts also can result from asthma or another disease: neutrophilic inflammation typically indicates a heart condition whereas asthma or influenza leads to eosinophilic inflammation.

Treatment should involve clearing the airway, followed by hypertonic saline, an inhaled tissue plasminogen activator, and a bronchoscopy for extraction.

Although distinct from endobronchial casts, a mucus plug also presents with wheezing, a cough, and atelectasis, and potentially respiratory distress or failure, and hypoxemia. Mucus plugs are diagnosed with a chest x-ray and flexible bronchoscopy, and then treated by removing the plug and clearing the airway, hypertonic saline, and mucolytics.

The rarest cause of an airway blockage is an airway tumor, often mistaken for asthma. Benign causes include papillomatosis, hemangioma, and hamartomas, while potentially malignant causes include a carcinoid, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, inflammatory myofibromas, and granular cell tumors.

In addition to a chest x-ray and bronchoscopy, a chest CT scan plus a biopsy and resection are necessary to diagnose airway tumors. Treatment will depend on the specific type of tumor identified.

“Overall survival is excellent,” Dr. Hysinger said of children with airway tumors.

Airway narrowing diagnoses

Two possible diagnoses for an intrinsic airway narrowing include bronchomalacia, occurring in only 1 of 2,100 children, and bronchial stenosis.

In bronchomalacia – diagnosed primarily with bronchoscopy – the airway collapses from weakening of the cartilage and posterior membrane. Bronchomalacia sounds like homophonous wheezing with a barky or brassy cough, and it’s frequently accompanied by recurrent bronchitis and/or pneumonia. Intervention is rarely necessary when occurring on its own, but severe cases may require endobronchial stents. Dr. Hysinger also recommended considering ipratroprium instead of albuterol.

Bronchial stenosis involves a fixed narrowing of the bronchi and can be congenital – typically occurring with heart disease – or acquired after an intubation and suction trauma or bronchiolitis obliterans (“popcorn lung”). A chest x-ray and bronchoscopy again are standard, but MRI may be necessary as well. Aside from helping the patient clear the airway, bronchial stenosis typically needs limited management unless the patient is symptomatic. In that case, options include balloon dilation, endobronchial stents, or a slide bronchoplasty.

 

 

Airway compression diagnoses

An extrinsic airway compression could have a vascular cause or could result from pressure by an extrinsic mass or the axial skeleton.

Vascular compression usually occurs due to abnormal vasculature development, particularly with vascular stents, Dr. Hysinger said. The wheezing presents with stridor, feeding intolerance, recurrent infections, and cyanotic episodes. The work-up should include a chest x-ray, bronchoscopy, and a chest CT and/or MRI. A variety of interventions may be necessary to treat it, including an aortopexy, pulmonary artery trunk–pexy, arterioplasty, vessel implantation, or endobronchial stent. Residual malacia may remain after treatment, however.

The most common reasons for airway compression by some kind of mass is a reactive lymphadenopathy, a tumor, or an infection, including tuberculosis or histoplasmosis. Severe narrowing of the airway can lead to respiratory failure, but because the compression can develop slowly, the wheezing can be mistaken for asthma. In addition to a chest CT and bronchoscopy, a patient will need other work-ups depending on the cause. Possibilities include a biopsy, a gastric aspirate (for tuberculosis), a bronchoalveolar lavage, or antibody titers.

Similarly, because therapeutic intervention requires treating the underlying infection, specific treatments will vary. Tumors typically will need resection, chemotherapy, and/or radiation – and, until the airway is fully cleared, the patient may need chronic mechanical ventilation.

Children with severe scoliosis or kyphosis are those most likely to experience airway compression resulting from pressure by the axial skeleton, in which the spine’s curvature directly presses on the airway. In addition to the wheeze, these patients may have respiratory distress or recurrent focal pneumonia, Dr. Hysinger said. The standard work-up involves a chest x-ray, chest CT, spinal MRI, and bronchoscopy.

Consider using spinal rods, but they can both help the condition or potentially exacerbate the compression, Dr. Hysinger said. Either way, children also will need help with airway clearance and coughing.

Dr. Hysinger concluded by reviewing what you may consider changing in your current practice, including the initial trial of bronchodilators, a chest x-ray, and a subspecialist referral.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Hysinger reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

CHICAGO – Nearly half of all children have wheezing in their first year of life, and one in five have recurrent wheezing episodes, but that doesn’t mean they have asthma, explained Erik Hysinger, MD, MS, of the division of pulmonary medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

Localized wheezing is not consistent with asthmatic or viral wheezing, which is typically diffuse and polyphonic, Dr. Hysinger emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“Localized wheezing is less common than diffuse wheezing and typically has a homophonous sound,” Dr. Hysinger said. It also usually arises from a central airway pathology. “High flow rates create loud amplitude sounds.”

iStock/Thinkstock
He discussed different presentations of localized wheezing and reviewed the three categories of differential diagnosis for nonasthmatic, nonviral wheezing: airway occlusion, airway narrowing, or airway compression.

Dr. Hysinger also covered management strategies for focal wheezing, starting with an initial trial of bronchodilators. Any wheezing resulting from a central airway problem, however, isn’t likely to respond to bronchodilators. Standard work-up for any of these causes is usually a chest x-ray, often paired with a bronchoscopy. Persistent wheezing likely needs a chest CT, and many of these conditions will require referral to a subspecialist.

Airway occlusion diagnoses

Four potential causes of an airway blockage are a foreign body, a bronchial cast, mucous plugs, or airway tumors.

A foreign body typically occurs with a cough, wheezing, stridor, and respiratory distress. It is most common in children under age 4 years, usually in those without a history of aspiration, yet providers initially misdiagnose more than 20% of patients with a foreign body. The foreign object – often coins, food, or batteries – frequently ends up in the right main bronchus and may go undetected up to a month, potentially leading to pneumonia, abscess, atelectasis, bronchiectasis, or airway erosion.

Dr. Erik Hysinger
The recommended initial evaluation, a bilateral decubitus chest x-ray, nevertheless cannot rule out a foreign body on its own because the objects may not show up on the films and only two-thirds of cases show an asymmetric hyperinflation. Physicians who suspect that a foreign body may be causing the wheeze should conduct a bronchoscopy. Obviously, the treatment is to remove the object, but providers also should expect to treat possible comorbidities if it took a while to identify and extract the object.

An endobronchial cast is rarer than a foreign body, but can be large enough to completely fill a lung with branching mucin, fibrin, and inflammatory cells. The wheezing sounds homophonous, with a barky or brassy cough accompanied by atelectasis. Dr. Hysinger recommended ordering chest x-ray, echocardiogram, and bronchoscopy. Although often idiopathic, these casts also can result from asthma or another disease: neutrophilic inflammation typically indicates a heart condition whereas asthma or influenza leads to eosinophilic inflammation.

Treatment should involve clearing the airway, followed by hypertonic saline, an inhaled tissue plasminogen activator, and a bronchoscopy for extraction.

Although distinct from endobronchial casts, a mucus plug also presents with wheezing, a cough, and atelectasis, and potentially respiratory distress or failure, and hypoxemia. Mucus plugs are diagnosed with a chest x-ray and flexible bronchoscopy, and then treated by removing the plug and clearing the airway, hypertonic saline, and mucolytics.

The rarest cause of an airway blockage is an airway tumor, often mistaken for asthma. Benign causes include papillomatosis, hemangioma, and hamartomas, while potentially malignant causes include a carcinoid, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, inflammatory myofibromas, and granular cell tumors.

In addition to a chest x-ray and bronchoscopy, a chest CT scan plus a biopsy and resection are necessary to diagnose airway tumors. Treatment will depend on the specific type of tumor identified.

“Overall survival is excellent,” Dr. Hysinger said of children with airway tumors.

Airway narrowing diagnoses

Two possible diagnoses for an intrinsic airway narrowing include bronchomalacia, occurring in only 1 of 2,100 children, and bronchial stenosis.

In bronchomalacia – diagnosed primarily with bronchoscopy – the airway collapses from weakening of the cartilage and posterior membrane. Bronchomalacia sounds like homophonous wheezing with a barky or brassy cough, and it’s frequently accompanied by recurrent bronchitis and/or pneumonia. Intervention is rarely necessary when occurring on its own, but severe cases may require endobronchial stents. Dr. Hysinger also recommended considering ipratroprium instead of albuterol.

Bronchial stenosis involves a fixed narrowing of the bronchi and can be congenital – typically occurring with heart disease – or acquired after an intubation and suction trauma or bronchiolitis obliterans (“popcorn lung”). A chest x-ray and bronchoscopy again are standard, but MRI may be necessary as well. Aside from helping the patient clear the airway, bronchial stenosis typically needs limited management unless the patient is symptomatic. In that case, options include balloon dilation, endobronchial stents, or a slide bronchoplasty.

 

 

Airway compression diagnoses

An extrinsic airway compression could have a vascular cause or could result from pressure by an extrinsic mass or the axial skeleton.

Vascular compression usually occurs due to abnormal vasculature development, particularly with vascular stents, Dr. Hysinger said. The wheezing presents with stridor, feeding intolerance, recurrent infections, and cyanotic episodes. The work-up should include a chest x-ray, bronchoscopy, and a chest CT and/or MRI. A variety of interventions may be necessary to treat it, including an aortopexy, pulmonary artery trunk–pexy, arterioplasty, vessel implantation, or endobronchial stent. Residual malacia may remain after treatment, however.

The most common reasons for airway compression by some kind of mass is a reactive lymphadenopathy, a tumor, or an infection, including tuberculosis or histoplasmosis. Severe narrowing of the airway can lead to respiratory failure, but because the compression can develop slowly, the wheezing can be mistaken for asthma. In addition to a chest CT and bronchoscopy, a patient will need other work-ups depending on the cause. Possibilities include a biopsy, a gastric aspirate (for tuberculosis), a bronchoalveolar lavage, or antibody titers.

Similarly, because therapeutic intervention requires treating the underlying infection, specific treatments will vary. Tumors typically will need resection, chemotherapy, and/or radiation – and, until the airway is fully cleared, the patient may need chronic mechanical ventilation.

Children with severe scoliosis or kyphosis are those most likely to experience airway compression resulting from pressure by the axial skeleton, in which the spine’s curvature directly presses on the airway. In addition to the wheeze, these patients may have respiratory distress or recurrent focal pneumonia, Dr. Hysinger said. The standard work-up involves a chest x-ray, chest CT, spinal MRI, and bronchoscopy.

Consider using spinal rods, but they can both help the condition or potentially exacerbate the compression, Dr. Hysinger said. Either way, children also will need help with airway clearance and coughing.

Dr. Hysinger concluded by reviewing what you may consider changing in your current practice, including the initial trial of bronchodilators, a chest x-ray, and a subspecialist referral.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Hysinger reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

 

CHICAGO – Nearly half of all children have wheezing in their first year of life, and one in five have recurrent wheezing episodes, but that doesn’t mean they have asthma, explained Erik Hysinger, MD, MS, of the division of pulmonary medicine at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital.

Localized wheezing is not consistent with asthmatic or viral wheezing, which is typically diffuse and polyphonic, Dr. Hysinger emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

“Localized wheezing is less common than diffuse wheezing and typically has a homophonous sound,” Dr. Hysinger said. It also usually arises from a central airway pathology. “High flow rates create loud amplitude sounds.”

iStock/Thinkstock
He discussed different presentations of localized wheezing and reviewed the three categories of differential diagnosis for nonasthmatic, nonviral wheezing: airway occlusion, airway narrowing, or airway compression.

Dr. Hysinger also covered management strategies for focal wheezing, starting with an initial trial of bronchodilators. Any wheezing resulting from a central airway problem, however, isn’t likely to respond to bronchodilators. Standard work-up for any of these causes is usually a chest x-ray, often paired with a bronchoscopy. Persistent wheezing likely needs a chest CT, and many of these conditions will require referral to a subspecialist.

Airway occlusion diagnoses

Four potential causes of an airway blockage are a foreign body, a bronchial cast, mucous plugs, or airway tumors.

A foreign body typically occurs with a cough, wheezing, stridor, and respiratory distress. It is most common in children under age 4 years, usually in those without a history of aspiration, yet providers initially misdiagnose more than 20% of patients with a foreign body. The foreign object – often coins, food, or batteries – frequently ends up in the right main bronchus and may go undetected up to a month, potentially leading to pneumonia, abscess, atelectasis, bronchiectasis, or airway erosion.

Dr. Erik Hysinger
The recommended initial evaluation, a bilateral decubitus chest x-ray, nevertheless cannot rule out a foreign body on its own because the objects may not show up on the films and only two-thirds of cases show an asymmetric hyperinflation. Physicians who suspect that a foreign body may be causing the wheeze should conduct a bronchoscopy. Obviously, the treatment is to remove the object, but providers also should expect to treat possible comorbidities if it took a while to identify and extract the object.

An endobronchial cast is rarer than a foreign body, but can be large enough to completely fill a lung with branching mucin, fibrin, and inflammatory cells. The wheezing sounds homophonous, with a barky or brassy cough accompanied by atelectasis. Dr. Hysinger recommended ordering chest x-ray, echocardiogram, and bronchoscopy. Although often idiopathic, these casts also can result from asthma or another disease: neutrophilic inflammation typically indicates a heart condition whereas asthma or influenza leads to eosinophilic inflammation.

Treatment should involve clearing the airway, followed by hypertonic saline, an inhaled tissue plasminogen activator, and a bronchoscopy for extraction.

Although distinct from endobronchial casts, a mucus plug also presents with wheezing, a cough, and atelectasis, and potentially respiratory distress or failure, and hypoxemia. Mucus plugs are diagnosed with a chest x-ray and flexible bronchoscopy, and then treated by removing the plug and clearing the airway, hypertonic saline, and mucolytics.

The rarest cause of an airway blockage is an airway tumor, often mistaken for asthma. Benign causes include papillomatosis, hemangioma, and hamartomas, while potentially malignant causes include a carcinoid, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, inflammatory myofibromas, and granular cell tumors.

In addition to a chest x-ray and bronchoscopy, a chest CT scan plus a biopsy and resection are necessary to diagnose airway tumors. Treatment will depend on the specific type of tumor identified.

“Overall survival is excellent,” Dr. Hysinger said of children with airway tumors.

Airway narrowing diagnoses

Two possible diagnoses for an intrinsic airway narrowing include bronchomalacia, occurring in only 1 of 2,100 children, and bronchial stenosis.

In bronchomalacia – diagnosed primarily with bronchoscopy – the airway collapses from weakening of the cartilage and posterior membrane. Bronchomalacia sounds like homophonous wheezing with a barky or brassy cough, and it’s frequently accompanied by recurrent bronchitis and/or pneumonia. Intervention is rarely necessary when occurring on its own, but severe cases may require endobronchial stents. Dr. Hysinger also recommended considering ipratroprium instead of albuterol.

Bronchial stenosis involves a fixed narrowing of the bronchi and can be congenital – typically occurring with heart disease – or acquired after an intubation and suction trauma or bronchiolitis obliterans (“popcorn lung”). A chest x-ray and bronchoscopy again are standard, but MRI may be necessary as well. Aside from helping the patient clear the airway, bronchial stenosis typically needs limited management unless the patient is symptomatic. In that case, options include balloon dilation, endobronchial stents, or a slide bronchoplasty.

 

 

Airway compression diagnoses

An extrinsic airway compression could have a vascular cause or could result from pressure by an extrinsic mass or the axial skeleton.

Vascular compression usually occurs due to abnormal vasculature development, particularly with vascular stents, Dr. Hysinger said. The wheezing presents with stridor, feeding intolerance, recurrent infections, and cyanotic episodes. The work-up should include a chest x-ray, bronchoscopy, and a chest CT and/or MRI. A variety of interventions may be necessary to treat it, including an aortopexy, pulmonary artery trunk–pexy, arterioplasty, vessel implantation, or endobronchial stent. Residual malacia may remain after treatment, however.

The most common reasons for airway compression by some kind of mass is a reactive lymphadenopathy, a tumor, or an infection, including tuberculosis or histoplasmosis. Severe narrowing of the airway can lead to respiratory failure, but because the compression can develop slowly, the wheezing can be mistaken for asthma. In addition to a chest CT and bronchoscopy, a patient will need other work-ups depending on the cause. Possibilities include a biopsy, a gastric aspirate (for tuberculosis), a bronchoalveolar lavage, or antibody titers.

Similarly, because therapeutic intervention requires treating the underlying infection, specific treatments will vary. Tumors typically will need resection, chemotherapy, and/or radiation – and, until the airway is fully cleared, the patient may need chronic mechanical ventilation.

Children with severe scoliosis or kyphosis are those most likely to experience airway compression resulting from pressure by the axial skeleton, in which the spine’s curvature directly presses on the airway. In addition to the wheeze, these patients may have respiratory distress or recurrent focal pneumonia, Dr. Hysinger said. The standard work-up involves a chest x-ray, chest CT, spinal MRI, and bronchoscopy.

Consider using spinal rods, but they can both help the condition or potentially exacerbate the compression, Dr. Hysinger said. Either way, children also will need help with airway clearance and coughing.

Dr. Hysinger concluded by reviewing what you may consider changing in your current practice, including the initial trial of bronchodilators, a chest x-ray, and a subspecialist referral.

No funding was used for this presentation, and Dr. Hysinger reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Healthy youth sports participation excludes early specialization

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:04

– When a boy receives five college football scholarship offers and a girl commits to playing soccer for a university before either of them starts ninth grade, it’s time to take several steps back in youth sports.

The culture of early specialization in sports poses more risks than benefits for young athletes, including the risk of potentially discouraging a lifetime of healthy athletic participation, according to Joel S. Brenner, MD, MPH, a sports medicine expert at the Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, both in Norfolk.

“This paradigm should be discouraged by society,” Dr. Brenner told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Sports specialization refers to focusing on one sport to the exclusion of all others, often playing that single sport year-round. Dr. Brenner authored the AAP’s 2016 clinical report on sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes.

Dr. Brenner emphasized the benefits of delaying sports specialization until after puberty, the risks of specializing sooner, and the importance of rest to prevent burnout and injuries.

This is not a new problem, he noted, showing the attendees two Time Magazine covers, from 1999 and 2017, that featured the concern of “Sports Crazed Kids.” But it is so far-reaching that it will requires more than just physicians to change.

“This is not just an athlete problem, a parent problem, a coach problem, or even a physician problem,” Dr. Brenner said. “It’s a societal problem, a youth sports culture problem, and one that all of us as stakeholders need to attack and try to change the culture.”

Youth sports offer a broad range of benefits, such as developing physical activity, and leadership skills, and promoting self-esteem, socialization, and teamwork, Dr. Brenner said.

“But one benefit that often gets forgotten by people, including the coaches, the parents, and the athletes, is that sports is supposed to be about having fun,” he said.

The old model of kids’ sports was loosely organized fun, with kids playing multiple sports throughout the year and less direct involvement from adults, such as street hockey games and pick-up basketball. But those bygone days, Dr. Brenner noted wistfully, have been replaced with a different paradigm today: Children specialize in a single sport very early, and parents and coaches are the driving forces behind their involvement.

Today’s culture of very early sports specialization and college recruitment increases pressure on parents and young athletes to play year-round on multiple teams to stay on the radar of scouts and colleges. And this specialization has expanded to younger and younger ages, with 7-year-olds participating in travel leagues and national rankings of children in their sport as early as sixth grade.

“We should not be ranking kids in middle school or even in early high school,” Dr. Brenner said to wide applause. “We should allow kids to develop in a low-pressure, healthy system before we do that.”

The effects of high pressure have potentially lifelong ramifications. By the time children are 13 years old, 70% have dropped out of organized sports, Dr. Brenner said, and injuries from overuse account for more than half of all sports-related injuries in youth.

Yet the alternative – early diversification and late specialization – can really benefit kids, he said. The early specialization paradigm of playing just one sport focuses on deliberate practice and performance from the start. By contrast, early diversification with multiple sports focuses on deliberate play, during which children develop foundational athletic skills. Children who play a variety of sports are more likely to participate for more years – and it meets youth’s more realistic, long-term needs for lifelong physical activity through “fun, variety, and play,” he said.

Dr. Brenner said that just 1% of high school athletes receive any athletic scholarships, and only 3%-11% of high school athletes compete at the college level. The numbers for high school athletes that go on to play at the professional level is, of course, even smaller: 0.03% to 0.5%, depending on the sport.

And the irony is that the goal of early specialization – producing such elite level athletes – is actually better accomplished through playing multiple sports, Dr. Brenner said. Most Division 1 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes and 90% of National Football League (NFL) first-round picks played multiple sports in high school. So the benefits of waiting until late adolescence to specialize are twofold: a greater likelihood of athletic success, even at elite levels, and minimizing the risks of injury.
 

Overuse injuries pose serious risks

More than half of sports injuries are from overuse, and a number of factors contribute to those injuries, such as muscle imbalance, playing surfaces, and training errors, Dr. Brenner said. But the biggest contributors are early specialization, playing year-round sports, and playing on multiple teams.

 

 

“This is a problem we see daily,” Dr. Brenner said. “We can see the young dancer, who’s dancing 6-7 days a week, who develops back pain and continues to dance, and develops a stress fracture in her lumbar spine known spondylosis.

“Or we see the young soccer player who plays on multiple teams and develops heel pain, who starts limping with activities of daily living, continues to play soccer despite limping, and develops calcaneal apophysitis, known as Sever’s disease. Or the young baseball pitcher, who pitches for two teams, who develops arm pain and weakness, who has a stress fracture through the proximal humeral epiphysis, known as Little League shoulder.”

Ablestock.com/Thinkstock


Two broad pieces of guidance can help reduce the risk of injuries, particularly from overuse. First, young athletes should take off at least 1 month from a specific sport at least three times a year to give them adequate time for physical and psychological recovery. Second, ensuring young athletes take at least 1 or 2 days off of practice each week further reduces the likelihood of injury.

In addition to the physical problems these young athletes may develop, they also risk anxiety, depression, burnout, early retirement, and social isolation from peers who don’t play their sport, Dr. Brenner said. Family members also may experience greater stress, he added. And then there’s the risk of missing out on learning other sports they may excel in that offer a lifetime of enjoyment, such as tennis or swimming.

It is not clear where the threshold of involvement is for reducing overuse injury, burnout, and attrition, but Dr. Brenner provided some guidelines as a starting place. High school athletes should not train more 16 hours a week, and organized sports should not exceed free play time by a greater ratio than 2:1. Another guideline is not to exceed more hours per week in organized sports than a child’s age in years.

The primary focus of sports should be learning lifelong physical activity skills and having fun, Dr. Brenner said. Pediatricians should encourage patients to play in a wide variety of sports at least until puberty, thereby decreasing the chance of injuries, stress, and burnout, he said. That can include sports that are not necessarily an official part of school or club competition. Waiting until later to specialize may lead to a higher likelihood of athletic success.

Dr. Brenner said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– When a boy receives five college football scholarship offers and a girl commits to playing soccer for a university before either of them starts ninth grade, it’s time to take several steps back in youth sports.

The culture of early specialization in sports poses more risks than benefits for young athletes, including the risk of potentially discouraging a lifetime of healthy athletic participation, according to Joel S. Brenner, MD, MPH, a sports medicine expert at the Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, both in Norfolk.

“This paradigm should be discouraged by society,” Dr. Brenner told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Sports specialization refers to focusing on one sport to the exclusion of all others, often playing that single sport year-round. Dr. Brenner authored the AAP’s 2016 clinical report on sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes.

Dr. Brenner emphasized the benefits of delaying sports specialization until after puberty, the risks of specializing sooner, and the importance of rest to prevent burnout and injuries.

This is not a new problem, he noted, showing the attendees two Time Magazine covers, from 1999 and 2017, that featured the concern of “Sports Crazed Kids.” But it is so far-reaching that it will requires more than just physicians to change.

“This is not just an athlete problem, a parent problem, a coach problem, or even a physician problem,” Dr. Brenner said. “It’s a societal problem, a youth sports culture problem, and one that all of us as stakeholders need to attack and try to change the culture.”

Youth sports offer a broad range of benefits, such as developing physical activity, and leadership skills, and promoting self-esteem, socialization, and teamwork, Dr. Brenner said.

“But one benefit that often gets forgotten by people, including the coaches, the parents, and the athletes, is that sports is supposed to be about having fun,” he said.

The old model of kids’ sports was loosely organized fun, with kids playing multiple sports throughout the year and less direct involvement from adults, such as street hockey games and pick-up basketball. But those bygone days, Dr. Brenner noted wistfully, have been replaced with a different paradigm today: Children specialize in a single sport very early, and parents and coaches are the driving forces behind their involvement.

Today’s culture of very early sports specialization and college recruitment increases pressure on parents and young athletes to play year-round on multiple teams to stay on the radar of scouts and colleges. And this specialization has expanded to younger and younger ages, with 7-year-olds participating in travel leagues and national rankings of children in their sport as early as sixth grade.

“We should not be ranking kids in middle school or even in early high school,” Dr. Brenner said to wide applause. “We should allow kids to develop in a low-pressure, healthy system before we do that.”

The effects of high pressure have potentially lifelong ramifications. By the time children are 13 years old, 70% have dropped out of organized sports, Dr. Brenner said, and injuries from overuse account for more than half of all sports-related injuries in youth.

Yet the alternative – early diversification and late specialization – can really benefit kids, he said. The early specialization paradigm of playing just one sport focuses on deliberate practice and performance from the start. By contrast, early diversification with multiple sports focuses on deliberate play, during which children develop foundational athletic skills. Children who play a variety of sports are more likely to participate for more years – and it meets youth’s more realistic, long-term needs for lifelong physical activity through “fun, variety, and play,” he said.

Dr. Brenner said that just 1% of high school athletes receive any athletic scholarships, and only 3%-11% of high school athletes compete at the college level. The numbers for high school athletes that go on to play at the professional level is, of course, even smaller: 0.03% to 0.5%, depending on the sport.

And the irony is that the goal of early specialization – producing such elite level athletes – is actually better accomplished through playing multiple sports, Dr. Brenner said. Most Division 1 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes and 90% of National Football League (NFL) first-round picks played multiple sports in high school. So the benefits of waiting until late adolescence to specialize are twofold: a greater likelihood of athletic success, even at elite levels, and minimizing the risks of injury.
 

Overuse injuries pose serious risks

More than half of sports injuries are from overuse, and a number of factors contribute to those injuries, such as muscle imbalance, playing surfaces, and training errors, Dr. Brenner said. But the biggest contributors are early specialization, playing year-round sports, and playing on multiple teams.

 

 

“This is a problem we see daily,” Dr. Brenner said. “We can see the young dancer, who’s dancing 6-7 days a week, who develops back pain and continues to dance, and develops a stress fracture in her lumbar spine known spondylosis.

“Or we see the young soccer player who plays on multiple teams and develops heel pain, who starts limping with activities of daily living, continues to play soccer despite limping, and develops calcaneal apophysitis, known as Sever’s disease. Or the young baseball pitcher, who pitches for two teams, who develops arm pain and weakness, who has a stress fracture through the proximal humeral epiphysis, known as Little League shoulder.”

Ablestock.com/Thinkstock


Two broad pieces of guidance can help reduce the risk of injuries, particularly from overuse. First, young athletes should take off at least 1 month from a specific sport at least three times a year to give them adequate time for physical and psychological recovery. Second, ensuring young athletes take at least 1 or 2 days off of practice each week further reduces the likelihood of injury.

In addition to the physical problems these young athletes may develop, they also risk anxiety, depression, burnout, early retirement, and social isolation from peers who don’t play their sport, Dr. Brenner said. Family members also may experience greater stress, he added. And then there’s the risk of missing out on learning other sports they may excel in that offer a lifetime of enjoyment, such as tennis or swimming.

It is not clear where the threshold of involvement is for reducing overuse injury, burnout, and attrition, but Dr. Brenner provided some guidelines as a starting place. High school athletes should not train more 16 hours a week, and organized sports should not exceed free play time by a greater ratio than 2:1. Another guideline is not to exceed more hours per week in organized sports than a child’s age in years.

The primary focus of sports should be learning lifelong physical activity skills and having fun, Dr. Brenner said. Pediatricians should encourage patients to play in a wide variety of sports at least until puberty, thereby decreasing the chance of injuries, stress, and burnout, he said. That can include sports that are not necessarily an official part of school or club competition. Waiting until later to specialize may lead to a higher likelihood of athletic success.

Dr. Brenner said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

– When a boy receives five college football scholarship offers and a girl commits to playing soccer for a university before either of them starts ninth grade, it’s time to take several steps back in youth sports.

The culture of early specialization in sports poses more risks than benefits for young athletes, including the risk of potentially discouraging a lifetime of healthy athletic participation, according to Joel S. Brenner, MD, MPH, a sports medicine expert at the Children’s Hospital of The King’s Daughters and Eastern Virginia Medical School, both in Norfolk.

“This paradigm should be discouraged by society,” Dr. Brenner told attendees at the American Academy of Pediatrics annual meeting. “Sports specialization refers to focusing on one sport to the exclusion of all others, often playing that single sport year-round. Dr. Brenner authored the AAP’s 2016 clinical report on sports specialization and intensive training in young athletes.

Dr. Brenner emphasized the benefits of delaying sports specialization until after puberty, the risks of specializing sooner, and the importance of rest to prevent burnout and injuries.

This is not a new problem, he noted, showing the attendees two Time Magazine covers, from 1999 and 2017, that featured the concern of “Sports Crazed Kids.” But it is so far-reaching that it will requires more than just physicians to change.

“This is not just an athlete problem, a parent problem, a coach problem, or even a physician problem,” Dr. Brenner said. “It’s a societal problem, a youth sports culture problem, and one that all of us as stakeholders need to attack and try to change the culture.”

Youth sports offer a broad range of benefits, such as developing physical activity, and leadership skills, and promoting self-esteem, socialization, and teamwork, Dr. Brenner said.

“But one benefit that often gets forgotten by people, including the coaches, the parents, and the athletes, is that sports is supposed to be about having fun,” he said.

The old model of kids’ sports was loosely organized fun, with kids playing multiple sports throughout the year and less direct involvement from adults, such as street hockey games and pick-up basketball. But those bygone days, Dr. Brenner noted wistfully, have been replaced with a different paradigm today: Children specialize in a single sport very early, and parents and coaches are the driving forces behind their involvement.

Today’s culture of very early sports specialization and college recruitment increases pressure on parents and young athletes to play year-round on multiple teams to stay on the radar of scouts and colleges. And this specialization has expanded to younger and younger ages, with 7-year-olds participating in travel leagues and national rankings of children in their sport as early as sixth grade.

“We should not be ranking kids in middle school or even in early high school,” Dr. Brenner said to wide applause. “We should allow kids to develop in a low-pressure, healthy system before we do that.”

The effects of high pressure have potentially lifelong ramifications. By the time children are 13 years old, 70% have dropped out of organized sports, Dr. Brenner said, and injuries from overuse account for more than half of all sports-related injuries in youth.

Yet the alternative – early diversification and late specialization – can really benefit kids, he said. The early specialization paradigm of playing just one sport focuses on deliberate practice and performance from the start. By contrast, early diversification with multiple sports focuses on deliberate play, during which children develop foundational athletic skills. Children who play a variety of sports are more likely to participate for more years – and it meets youth’s more realistic, long-term needs for lifelong physical activity through “fun, variety, and play,” he said.

Dr. Brenner said that just 1% of high school athletes receive any athletic scholarships, and only 3%-11% of high school athletes compete at the college level. The numbers for high school athletes that go on to play at the professional level is, of course, even smaller: 0.03% to 0.5%, depending on the sport.

And the irony is that the goal of early specialization – producing such elite level athletes – is actually better accomplished through playing multiple sports, Dr. Brenner said. Most Division 1 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes and 90% of National Football League (NFL) first-round picks played multiple sports in high school. So the benefits of waiting until late adolescence to specialize are twofold: a greater likelihood of athletic success, even at elite levels, and minimizing the risks of injury.
 

Overuse injuries pose serious risks

More than half of sports injuries are from overuse, and a number of factors contribute to those injuries, such as muscle imbalance, playing surfaces, and training errors, Dr. Brenner said. But the biggest contributors are early specialization, playing year-round sports, and playing on multiple teams.

 

 

“This is a problem we see daily,” Dr. Brenner said. “We can see the young dancer, who’s dancing 6-7 days a week, who develops back pain and continues to dance, and develops a stress fracture in her lumbar spine known spondylosis.

“Or we see the young soccer player who plays on multiple teams and develops heel pain, who starts limping with activities of daily living, continues to play soccer despite limping, and develops calcaneal apophysitis, known as Sever’s disease. Or the young baseball pitcher, who pitches for two teams, who develops arm pain and weakness, who has a stress fracture through the proximal humeral epiphysis, known as Little League shoulder.”

Ablestock.com/Thinkstock


Two broad pieces of guidance can help reduce the risk of injuries, particularly from overuse. First, young athletes should take off at least 1 month from a specific sport at least three times a year to give them adequate time for physical and psychological recovery. Second, ensuring young athletes take at least 1 or 2 days off of practice each week further reduces the likelihood of injury.

In addition to the physical problems these young athletes may develop, they also risk anxiety, depression, burnout, early retirement, and social isolation from peers who don’t play their sport, Dr. Brenner said. Family members also may experience greater stress, he added. And then there’s the risk of missing out on learning other sports they may excel in that offer a lifetime of enjoyment, such as tennis or swimming.

It is not clear where the threshold of involvement is for reducing overuse injury, burnout, and attrition, but Dr. Brenner provided some guidelines as a starting place. High school athletes should not train more 16 hours a week, and organized sports should not exceed free play time by a greater ratio than 2:1. Another guideline is not to exceed more hours per week in organized sports than a child’s age in years.

The primary focus of sports should be learning lifelong physical activity skills and having fun, Dr. Brenner said. Pediatricians should encourage patients to play in a wide variety of sports at least until puberty, thereby decreasing the chance of injuries, stress, and burnout, he said. That can include sports that are not necessarily an official part of school or club competition. Waiting until later to specialize may lead to a higher likelihood of athletic success.

Dr. Brenner said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Make teen suicide screenings a part of everyday practice

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:02

Screenings for preteen and adolescent suicide are essential to incorporate into daily clinical practice, Paula Cody, MD, MPH, emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

An estimated 2 million teenagers, aged 15-19 years, have attempted suicide within the past year, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC’s 1991-2015 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey data, nearly a third of students (30%) have felt so sad or helpless nearly daily for at least 2 weeks that they stopped doing their normal activities, and 18% had seriously considered suicide within the past year. One in seven (15%) had made a plan for attempting suicide, 9% had attempted suicide at least once, and 3% attempted suicide that required medical treatment. About twice as many females as males had considered, planned, and/or attempted suicide.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock
A doctor taking notes with a young male patient
Screening first involves identifying risk factors, said Dr. Cody, the medical director of adolescent medicine at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The teens at highest risk were those who had made prior suicide attempts, followed by those with psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and eating disorders. The LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning) population and those with a family history of psychiatric illness and suicide also have a higher risk.

“The offspring of suicide attempters have a sixfold higher risk of suicide than their peers whose parents have not attempted suicide,” Dr. Cody said. Other major risk factors include a history of being bullied, a history of abuse, and a history of substance abuse, particularly alcohol and opioids.

Once you identify a patient at risk for suicide, Dr. Cody advised that you should follow a suicide assessment management protocol, such as the one developed by Angela Stanley, PsyD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin and the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, both in Milwaukee. Doctors should identify the teen’s intensity of suicidal ideation, ask how far they are in their plans, ascertain their access to means, create a safety plan, refer the patient for mental health care, and follow up frequently.

Dr. Cody emphasized that “suicide contracts” and “safety plans” are different things. Suicide pacts are agreements not to hurt oneself, whereas safety plans include concrete, collaborative, proactive steps a person will take if experiencing suicidal thoughts.

“There is no evidence that contracts prevent suicide, but a lot of research shows that safety or crisis plans are much more effective at preventing a person from committing suicide,” Dr. Cody stated.

The first step of screening is asking a patient directly whether they have ever wished they were dead or had thoughts about killing themselves.

“Some pediatricians are afraid to ask the questions because they’re afraid they’re going to put the idea of suicide in the child’s head, but there is no evidence that screening puts kids at risk,” Dr. Cody said. The other reason you may feel uneasy asking about self-harm is not knowing what to do if a teen says that she is feeling suicidal. That’s where an assessment protocol helps.

If a patient has considered suicide more than a month prior, it shouldn’t be ignored, although the situation may require less urgency but further follow-up. For those with more recent suicidal ideation but without a plan or intent, Dr. Cody recommends following up within 2 weeks because the adolescent’s situation may change.

For those with suicidal ideation and a plan, you should ask three questions:

  • What ways of killing yourself have you thought about?
  • How likely is it you will follow through on your plan?
  • When you think about killing yourself, what stops you?

These questions can help you determine risk acuity: The more specific, realistic, available, and lethal a plan is, the more acute the risk. You then should ask questions to try to determine how likely the teen is to follow through, such as asking about his future plans, his connectedness with others, and his religious beliefs.

Asking about a plan helps determine how much access the patient has to a lethal, realistic means. Firearms are responsible for 52% of teen suicides, followed by hanging/suffocation (25%) and poisoning (16%).

“This is why it’s a really important part of social history to screen for guns in the house,” Dr. Cody told attendees. “I know it’s been really controversial, but it’s something that’s really important, especially if you have an adolescent in the house that’s having suicidal ideation.”

Teens with suicidal ideation and a plan but no intent require a safety plan along with follow-up within 1 week. Those with a plan and intent, or those with no intent but an unwillingness agree to a safety plan, should be immediately hospitalized, Dr. Cody said.

These suicide screenings should occur at annual well-child visits, Dr. Cody said, but they also should be done at acute visits; basically, any time you see your preteen and adolescent patients. Ideally, these should take place during alone time, without any parents present.

You also should share resources with your patients, including the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 and the Crisis TextLine at 741741.

Dr. Cody reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Screenings for preteen and adolescent suicide are essential to incorporate into daily clinical practice, Paula Cody, MD, MPH, emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

An estimated 2 million teenagers, aged 15-19 years, have attempted suicide within the past year, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC’s 1991-2015 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey data, nearly a third of students (30%) have felt so sad or helpless nearly daily for at least 2 weeks that they stopped doing their normal activities, and 18% had seriously considered suicide within the past year. One in seven (15%) had made a plan for attempting suicide, 9% had attempted suicide at least once, and 3% attempted suicide that required medical treatment. About twice as many females as males had considered, planned, and/or attempted suicide.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock
A doctor taking notes with a young male patient
Screening first involves identifying risk factors, said Dr. Cody, the medical director of adolescent medicine at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The teens at highest risk were those who had made prior suicide attempts, followed by those with psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and eating disorders. The LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning) population and those with a family history of psychiatric illness and suicide also have a higher risk.

“The offspring of suicide attempters have a sixfold higher risk of suicide than their peers whose parents have not attempted suicide,” Dr. Cody said. Other major risk factors include a history of being bullied, a history of abuse, and a history of substance abuse, particularly alcohol and opioids.

Once you identify a patient at risk for suicide, Dr. Cody advised that you should follow a suicide assessment management protocol, such as the one developed by Angela Stanley, PsyD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin and the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, both in Milwaukee. Doctors should identify the teen’s intensity of suicidal ideation, ask how far they are in their plans, ascertain their access to means, create a safety plan, refer the patient for mental health care, and follow up frequently.

Dr. Cody emphasized that “suicide contracts” and “safety plans” are different things. Suicide pacts are agreements not to hurt oneself, whereas safety plans include concrete, collaborative, proactive steps a person will take if experiencing suicidal thoughts.

“There is no evidence that contracts prevent suicide, but a lot of research shows that safety or crisis plans are much more effective at preventing a person from committing suicide,” Dr. Cody stated.

The first step of screening is asking a patient directly whether they have ever wished they were dead or had thoughts about killing themselves.

“Some pediatricians are afraid to ask the questions because they’re afraid they’re going to put the idea of suicide in the child’s head, but there is no evidence that screening puts kids at risk,” Dr. Cody said. The other reason you may feel uneasy asking about self-harm is not knowing what to do if a teen says that she is feeling suicidal. That’s where an assessment protocol helps.

If a patient has considered suicide more than a month prior, it shouldn’t be ignored, although the situation may require less urgency but further follow-up. For those with more recent suicidal ideation but without a plan or intent, Dr. Cody recommends following up within 2 weeks because the adolescent’s situation may change.

For those with suicidal ideation and a plan, you should ask three questions:

  • What ways of killing yourself have you thought about?
  • How likely is it you will follow through on your plan?
  • When you think about killing yourself, what stops you?

These questions can help you determine risk acuity: The more specific, realistic, available, and lethal a plan is, the more acute the risk. You then should ask questions to try to determine how likely the teen is to follow through, such as asking about his future plans, his connectedness with others, and his religious beliefs.

Asking about a plan helps determine how much access the patient has to a lethal, realistic means. Firearms are responsible for 52% of teen suicides, followed by hanging/suffocation (25%) and poisoning (16%).

“This is why it’s a really important part of social history to screen for guns in the house,” Dr. Cody told attendees. “I know it’s been really controversial, but it’s something that’s really important, especially if you have an adolescent in the house that’s having suicidal ideation.”

Teens with suicidal ideation and a plan but no intent require a safety plan along with follow-up within 1 week. Those with a plan and intent, or those with no intent but an unwillingness agree to a safety plan, should be immediately hospitalized, Dr. Cody said.

These suicide screenings should occur at annual well-child visits, Dr. Cody said, but they also should be done at acute visits; basically, any time you see your preteen and adolescent patients. Ideally, these should take place during alone time, without any parents present.

You also should share resources with your patients, including the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 and the Crisis TextLine at 741741.

Dr. Cody reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

 

 

Screenings for preteen and adolescent suicide are essential to incorporate into daily clinical practice, Paula Cody, MD, MPH, emphasized at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

An estimated 2 million teenagers, aged 15-19 years, have attempted suicide within the past year, based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to the CDC’s 1991-2015 High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey data, nearly a third of students (30%) have felt so sad or helpless nearly daily for at least 2 weeks that they stopped doing their normal activities, and 18% had seriously considered suicide within the past year. One in seven (15%) had made a plan for attempting suicide, 9% had attempted suicide at least once, and 3% attempted suicide that required medical treatment. About twice as many females as males had considered, planned, and/or attempted suicide.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock
A doctor taking notes with a young male patient
Screening first involves identifying risk factors, said Dr. Cody, the medical director of adolescent medicine at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The teens at highest risk were those who had made prior suicide attempts, followed by those with psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and eating disorders. The LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning) population and those with a family history of psychiatric illness and suicide also have a higher risk.

“The offspring of suicide attempters have a sixfold higher risk of suicide than their peers whose parents have not attempted suicide,” Dr. Cody said. Other major risk factors include a history of being bullied, a history of abuse, and a history of substance abuse, particularly alcohol and opioids.

Once you identify a patient at risk for suicide, Dr. Cody advised that you should follow a suicide assessment management protocol, such as the one developed by Angela Stanley, PsyD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin and the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, both in Milwaukee. Doctors should identify the teen’s intensity of suicidal ideation, ask how far they are in their plans, ascertain their access to means, create a safety plan, refer the patient for mental health care, and follow up frequently.

Dr. Cody emphasized that “suicide contracts” and “safety plans” are different things. Suicide pacts are agreements not to hurt oneself, whereas safety plans include concrete, collaborative, proactive steps a person will take if experiencing suicidal thoughts.

“There is no evidence that contracts prevent suicide, but a lot of research shows that safety or crisis plans are much more effective at preventing a person from committing suicide,” Dr. Cody stated.

The first step of screening is asking a patient directly whether they have ever wished they were dead or had thoughts about killing themselves.

“Some pediatricians are afraid to ask the questions because they’re afraid they’re going to put the idea of suicide in the child’s head, but there is no evidence that screening puts kids at risk,” Dr. Cody said. The other reason you may feel uneasy asking about self-harm is not knowing what to do if a teen says that she is feeling suicidal. That’s where an assessment protocol helps.

If a patient has considered suicide more than a month prior, it shouldn’t be ignored, although the situation may require less urgency but further follow-up. For those with more recent suicidal ideation but without a plan or intent, Dr. Cody recommends following up within 2 weeks because the adolescent’s situation may change.

For those with suicidal ideation and a plan, you should ask three questions:

  • What ways of killing yourself have you thought about?
  • How likely is it you will follow through on your plan?
  • When you think about killing yourself, what stops you?

These questions can help you determine risk acuity: The more specific, realistic, available, and lethal a plan is, the more acute the risk. You then should ask questions to try to determine how likely the teen is to follow through, such as asking about his future plans, his connectedness with others, and his religious beliefs.

Asking about a plan helps determine how much access the patient has to a lethal, realistic means. Firearms are responsible for 52% of teen suicides, followed by hanging/suffocation (25%) and poisoning (16%).

“This is why it’s a really important part of social history to screen for guns in the house,” Dr. Cody told attendees. “I know it’s been really controversial, but it’s something that’s really important, especially if you have an adolescent in the house that’s having suicidal ideation.”

Teens with suicidal ideation and a plan but no intent require a safety plan along with follow-up within 1 week. Those with a plan and intent, or those with no intent but an unwillingness agree to a safety plan, should be immediately hospitalized, Dr. Cody said.

These suicide screenings should occur at annual well-child visits, Dr. Cody said, but they also should be done at acute visits; basically, any time you see your preteen and adolescent patients. Ideally, these should take place during alone time, without any parents present.

You also should share resources with your patients, including the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 and the Crisis TextLine at 741741.

Dr. Cody reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Teens smoking more pot than cigarettes

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:02

CHICAGO – The challenge of addressing marijuana use by children and teens is increasing with its wider availability; 29 states have now legalized cannabis for medical use, and 8 of them plus the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana use.

“Past-month marijuana use is now higher than past-month use of cigarettes” based on teens’ responses to surveys from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Karen M. Wilson, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Karen M. Wilson
An estimated 22.5% of high school seniors, 14% of sophomores, and 5.4% of 8th graders reported using marijuana within the past month, in NIDA’s Monitoring the Future Survey. Even though 68.5% of high school seniors said they didn’t approve of regular marijuana use, 68.9% replied they don’t consider it to be harmful.

Dr. Wilson emphasized the importance of discussing drug use and attitudes about drug use with young teens, as well as educating them about risks.

Recent research suggests the brain does not fully mature until the mid-20s, and marijuana has been shown to impair working memory, cognitive flexibility, learning, attention, and verbal functions. Marijuana may alter the developing brain in ways that cannot be repaired in those who halt use at an older age, said Dr. Wilson, division chief of general pediatrics and vice-chair for clinical and translational research at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. Marijuana use becomes an addictive behavior in 9% of users, and this addictive behavior is more likely to persist in those who begin to use marijuana at a young age.

“Whether it’s alcohol or marijuana or tobacco, even if they’re only using it on the weekends,” the behavior can progress to addictive behavior, she said. Discussions should determine how much cannabis is used, how often, and why it is used.

“Kids may be self-medicating if they have depression, anxiety, or chronic pain,” Dr. Wilson said. “That could be something you could provide a more appropriate pharmacological intervention for.”

Motivational interviewing – a collaborative, person-centered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change – can be the impetus for discussion about whether young patients can try quitting for a short time to show they can do it.

One challenge of discouraging and reducing teens’ marijuana use is the increasing diversity of products and consumption methods. From candy and baked goods to electronic “vaping” products and dissolvable strips similar to breath mints, it’s difficult to keep up. Dr. Wilson showed an image of a new product that looks exactly like a medical inhaler.

Couse of marijuana with tobacco also presents challenges since researchers have little data on how dual use may affect the ability to quit using either drug. “Joints,” rolled in paper, contain only marijuana, but a “blunt” is marijuana rolled in a tobacco leaf, and “spliffs” contain both marijuana and tobacco. Both blunts and spliffs, therefore, include nicotine which is addictive.

Other inhaled substances that can potentially damage the lungs include “lung juice,” a herbal product marketed to “clean out” the lungs. “We should encourage teens to get clean lungs by not inhaling things that aren’t good for you.”

Dr. Wilson reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

CHICAGO – The challenge of addressing marijuana use by children and teens is increasing with its wider availability; 29 states have now legalized cannabis for medical use, and 8 of them plus the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana use.

“Past-month marijuana use is now higher than past-month use of cigarettes” based on teens’ responses to surveys from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Karen M. Wilson, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Karen M. Wilson
An estimated 22.5% of high school seniors, 14% of sophomores, and 5.4% of 8th graders reported using marijuana within the past month, in NIDA’s Monitoring the Future Survey. Even though 68.5% of high school seniors said they didn’t approve of regular marijuana use, 68.9% replied they don’t consider it to be harmful.

Dr. Wilson emphasized the importance of discussing drug use and attitudes about drug use with young teens, as well as educating them about risks.

Recent research suggests the brain does not fully mature until the mid-20s, and marijuana has been shown to impair working memory, cognitive flexibility, learning, attention, and verbal functions. Marijuana may alter the developing brain in ways that cannot be repaired in those who halt use at an older age, said Dr. Wilson, division chief of general pediatrics and vice-chair for clinical and translational research at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. Marijuana use becomes an addictive behavior in 9% of users, and this addictive behavior is more likely to persist in those who begin to use marijuana at a young age.

“Whether it’s alcohol or marijuana or tobacco, even if they’re only using it on the weekends,” the behavior can progress to addictive behavior, she said. Discussions should determine how much cannabis is used, how often, and why it is used.

“Kids may be self-medicating if they have depression, anxiety, or chronic pain,” Dr. Wilson said. “That could be something you could provide a more appropriate pharmacological intervention for.”

Motivational interviewing – a collaborative, person-centered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change – can be the impetus for discussion about whether young patients can try quitting for a short time to show they can do it.

One challenge of discouraging and reducing teens’ marijuana use is the increasing diversity of products and consumption methods. From candy and baked goods to electronic “vaping” products and dissolvable strips similar to breath mints, it’s difficult to keep up. Dr. Wilson showed an image of a new product that looks exactly like a medical inhaler.

Couse of marijuana with tobacco also presents challenges since researchers have little data on how dual use may affect the ability to quit using either drug. “Joints,” rolled in paper, contain only marijuana, but a “blunt” is marijuana rolled in a tobacco leaf, and “spliffs” contain both marijuana and tobacco. Both blunts and spliffs, therefore, include nicotine which is addictive.

Other inhaled substances that can potentially damage the lungs include “lung juice,” a herbal product marketed to “clean out” the lungs. “We should encourage teens to get clean lungs by not inhaling things that aren’t good for you.”

Dr. Wilson reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

CHICAGO – The challenge of addressing marijuana use by children and teens is increasing with its wider availability; 29 states have now legalized cannabis for medical use, and 8 of them plus the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana use.

“Past-month marijuana use is now higher than past-month use of cigarettes” based on teens’ responses to surveys from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Karen M. Wilson, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Karen M. Wilson
An estimated 22.5% of high school seniors, 14% of sophomores, and 5.4% of 8th graders reported using marijuana within the past month, in NIDA’s Monitoring the Future Survey. Even though 68.5% of high school seniors said they didn’t approve of regular marijuana use, 68.9% replied they don’t consider it to be harmful.

Dr. Wilson emphasized the importance of discussing drug use and attitudes about drug use with young teens, as well as educating them about risks.

Recent research suggests the brain does not fully mature until the mid-20s, and marijuana has been shown to impair working memory, cognitive flexibility, learning, attention, and verbal functions. Marijuana may alter the developing brain in ways that cannot be repaired in those who halt use at an older age, said Dr. Wilson, division chief of general pediatrics and vice-chair for clinical and translational research at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. Marijuana use becomes an addictive behavior in 9% of users, and this addictive behavior is more likely to persist in those who begin to use marijuana at a young age.

“Whether it’s alcohol or marijuana or tobacco, even if they’re only using it on the weekends,” the behavior can progress to addictive behavior, she said. Discussions should determine how much cannabis is used, how often, and why it is used.

“Kids may be self-medicating if they have depression, anxiety, or chronic pain,” Dr. Wilson said. “That could be something you could provide a more appropriate pharmacological intervention for.”

Motivational interviewing – a collaborative, person-centered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change – can be the impetus for discussion about whether young patients can try quitting for a short time to show they can do it.

One challenge of discouraging and reducing teens’ marijuana use is the increasing diversity of products and consumption methods. From candy and baked goods to electronic “vaping” products and dissolvable strips similar to breath mints, it’s difficult to keep up. Dr. Wilson showed an image of a new product that looks exactly like a medical inhaler.

Couse of marijuana with tobacco also presents challenges since researchers have little data on how dual use may affect the ability to quit using either drug. “Joints,” rolled in paper, contain only marijuana, but a “blunt” is marijuana rolled in a tobacco leaf, and “spliffs” contain both marijuana and tobacco. Both blunts and spliffs, therefore, include nicotine which is addictive.

Other inhaled substances that can potentially damage the lungs include “lung juice,” a herbal product marketed to “clean out” the lungs. “We should encourage teens to get clean lungs by not inhaling things that aren’t good for you.”

Dr. Wilson reported having no disclosures, and no external funding was used for the presentation.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

AAP recommends hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth for all infants

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:59

 

All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).

A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.

CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer
This digitally colorized transmission electron micrograph reveals the presence of hepatitis B virions. The large round virions are known as Dane particles.
“The birth dose also provides protection to infants at risk from household exposure after the perinatal period,” the statement indicated. “Because the consequences of perinatally acquired hepatitis B are enduring and potentially fatal, the safety net of the birth dose is critically important.”

Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.

The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).

There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.

Specific recommendations

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).

A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.

CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer
This digitally colorized transmission electron micrograph reveals the presence of hepatitis B virions. The large round virions are known as Dane particles.
“The birth dose also provides protection to infants at risk from household exposure after the perinatal period,” the statement indicated. “Because the consequences of perinatally acquired hepatitis B are enduring and potentially fatal, the safety net of the birth dose is critically important.”

Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.

The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).

There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.

Specific recommendations

 

All newborns with a birth weight of at least 2,000 grams (4.4 pounds) should receive the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, according to a new policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that brings its recommendations in line with those of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The birth dose can prevent infection of infants born to infected mothers in situations in which the mother’s results are never obtained, are misinterpreted, are falsely negative, are transcribed or reported to the infant care team inaccurately, or simply not communicated to the nursery,” announced the new statement from the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases and the Committee on Fetus and Newborn (Pediatrics. 2017 Aug 28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1870).

A dose of the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth is 75%-95% effective at preventing perinatal hepatitis B transmission. “When postexposure prophylaxis with both hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is given, is timed appropriately, and is followed by completion of the infant hepatitis B immunization series, perinatal infection rates range from 0.7% to 1.1%,” according to the statement.

CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer
This digitally colorized transmission electron micrograph reveals the presence of hepatitis B virions. The large round virions are known as Dane particles.
“The birth dose also provides protection to infants at risk from household exposure after the perinatal period,” the statement indicated. “Because the consequences of perinatally acquired hepatitis B are enduring and potentially fatal, the safety net of the birth dose is critically important.”

Approximately 1,000 newborns still contract perinatal hepatitis B infections every year. Of these, 90% will develop chronic hepatitis B infections, and a quarter of those who don’t receive treatment will die from liver cirrhosis or cancer. There has been an increase in the incidence of new hepatitis B infections in some states because of opioid epidemic in the United States, according to MMWR reports.

The cost effectiveness of preventing hepatitis B with the vaccine and, when necessary, HBIG, is estimated at $2,600 per quality-adjusted year of life. The most common side effects reported after hepatitis B administration are pain (3%-29%), erythema (3%), swelling (3%), fever (1%-6%) and headache (3%).

There has been extensive analysis of the safety of hepatitis B vaccines, the policy statement indicated. Analysis of Vaccine Safety Datalink data has found no causal link between administration of the hepatitis B vaccine and the following: neonatal sepsis or death, rheumatoid arthritis, Bell’s palsy, autoimmune thyroid disease, hemolytic anemia in children, anaphylaxis, optic neuritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss, or other chronic illnesses.

Specific recommendations

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: All infants should receive hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.

Major finding: Hepatitis B vaccine prevents 75%-95% of perinatal hepatitis B infections.

Data source: A literature review of data on hepatitis B epidemiology in the United States.

Disclosures: The statement did not receive external funding, and the authors stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Disqus Comments
Default

Latest U.S. alcohol use data critiqued

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:59

The findings of a recent study in JAMA Psychiatry suggest dramatic increases – approaching 50% – in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders in the United States. But the study’s methodology has come under scrutiny: The data sets that the researchers used might be too different for reliable comparison.

The JAMA Psychiatry research, led by Bridget F. Grant, PhD, of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, analyzed data from two waves of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a cross-sectional, federal survey administered during 2001-2002, known as Wave 1, and during 2012-2013, known as Wave 3 (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161). The findings were stark: In addition to a sharp increase in the rate of 12-month alcohol use and high-risk drinking, Dr. Grant and her associates found that the rate of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder climbed from 8.5% of the population during the first wave to 12.7% of the population during the third.

But Richard A. Grucza, PhD, an addiction-medicine researcher who has studied and written about these trends extensively (Addiction. 2007 April;102[4]:623-9), told vox.com that he doesn’t buy the new findings.

“I would urge caution in drawing conclusions based on only two time points,” Dr. Grucza said. Comparing those two waves of data is inherently problematic, he explained.

“The NESARC made important changes between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 – and several of these changes could be expected to lead to higher rates of disclosure,” said Dr. Grucza, a professor of psychiatry at Washington University in St. Louis. “This would lead to apparent increases in a variety of things – for example, they saw a 100% increase in prevalence of marijuana use among adults. So, the problem isn’t with the 2012-2013 NESARC, per se, but in the comparison between the 2012-2013 NESARC and the 2001-2002 NESARC.”

The changes include differences in the way each wave of the data was collected. The 2001-2002 survey was conducted using U.S. Census Bureau employees and didn’t offer participants incentives for survey completion. The 2012-2013 NESARC, however, was conducted through a private contractor; in addition, participants provided biological samples and received modest cash incentives for completing the survey.

“We can only speculate, but [the collection of DNA through samples of saliva] might make the participants think that their drug use would be known – and that they might therefore disclose it, anyway,” Dr. Grucza said. “I would guess that they would have been assured that this wasn’t the case during the informed consent process, but that process tends to be long, and people don’t pay attention to the whole informed consent document.”

The NESARC findings differed substantially from those found by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a federal survey of people aged 12 or older released annually by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The NSDUH gathers data first in a screening phase and then in an interview phase; data are gathered in the interview phase through computer-assisted, self-administered interviews. Dr. Grucza said countless studies “suggest people respond more faithfully when disclosing to a computer as opposed to a live interviewer.”

According to the NSDUH, the rate of past-month use of alcohol fell slightly in 2015 from the previous year’s rate and was comparable to the estimates in 2005-2013.

However, Dr. Grant pointed out that substantial changes made to the questions on the 2015 NSDUH also make comparisons to previous years problematic. As a result, she said, the “NSDUH is not able to estimate the trends during the time period analyzed in the NESARC,” Dr. Grant said. “We stand by the reliability and validity of our survey data.”

For his part, Robert L. DuPont, MD, said it’s important to look at the data broadly. “The bigger picture is that alcohol is the most commonly used addictive substance by Americans, and there is evidence of increased problems resulting from drinking. For example, alcohol liver disease and cirrhosis of the liver are rising in adults and have been described as one of a group of ‘diseases of despair,’ along with suicide and drug overdose deaths,” said Dr. DuPont, the first director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the president of the Institute for Behavior and Health in Rockville, Md. “The fundamental message is that alcohol (and drug use) patterns show complexity that has significant public health importance. Alcohol use and related problems are more complex than a bumper sticker stating that they are either ‘up’ or ‘down.’ ”

Dr. Grucza, Dr. Grant, and Dr. DuPont had no conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

The findings of a recent study in JAMA Psychiatry suggest dramatic increases – approaching 50% – in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders in the United States. But the study’s methodology has come under scrutiny: The data sets that the researchers used might be too different for reliable comparison.

The JAMA Psychiatry research, led by Bridget F. Grant, PhD, of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, analyzed data from two waves of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a cross-sectional, federal survey administered during 2001-2002, known as Wave 1, and during 2012-2013, known as Wave 3 (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161). The findings were stark: In addition to a sharp increase in the rate of 12-month alcohol use and high-risk drinking, Dr. Grant and her associates found that the rate of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder climbed from 8.5% of the population during the first wave to 12.7% of the population during the third.

But Richard A. Grucza, PhD, an addiction-medicine researcher who has studied and written about these trends extensively (Addiction. 2007 April;102[4]:623-9), told vox.com that he doesn’t buy the new findings.

“I would urge caution in drawing conclusions based on only two time points,” Dr. Grucza said. Comparing those two waves of data is inherently problematic, he explained.

“The NESARC made important changes between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 – and several of these changes could be expected to lead to higher rates of disclosure,” said Dr. Grucza, a professor of psychiatry at Washington University in St. Louis. “This would lead to apparent increases in a variety of things – for example, they saw a 100% increase in prevalence of marijuana use among adults. So, the problem isn’t with the 2012-2013 NESARC, per se, but in the comparison between the 2012-2013 NESARC and the 2001-2002 NESARC.”

The changes include differences in the way each wave of the data was collected. The 2001-2002 survey was conducted using U.S. Census Bureau employees and didn’t offer participants incentives for survey completion. The 2012-2013 NESARC, however, was conducted through a private contractor; in addition, participants provided biological samples and received modest cash incentives for completing the survey.

“We can only speculate, but [the collection of DNA through samples of saliva] might make the participants think that their drug use would be known – and that they might therefore disclose it, anyway,” Dr. Grucza said. “I would guess that they would have been assured that this wasn’t the case during the informed consent process, but that process tends to be long, and people don’t pay attention to the whole informed consent document.”

The NESARC findings differed substantially from those found by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a federal survey of people aged 12 or older released annually by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The NSDUH gathers data first in a screening phase and then in an interview phase; data are gathered in the interview phase through computer-assisted, self-administered interviews. Dr. Grucza said countless studies “suggest people respond more faithfully when disclosing to a computer as opposed to a live interviewer.”

According to the NSDUH, the rate of past-month use of alcohol fell slightly in 2015 from the previous year’s rate and was comparable to the estimates in 2005-2013.

However, Dr. Grant pointed out that substantial changes made to the questions on the 2015 NSDUH also make comparisons to previous years problematic. As a result, she said, the “NSDUH is not able to estimate the trends during the time period analyzed in the NESARC,” Dr. Grant said. “We stand by the reliability and validity of our survey data.”

For his part, Robert L. DuPont, MD, said it’s important to look at the data broadly. “The bigger picture is that alcohol is the most commonly used addictive substance by Americans, and there is evidence of increased problems resulting from drinking. For example, alcohol liver disease and cirrhosis of the liver are rising in adults and have been described as one of a group of ‘diseases of despair,’ along with suicide and drug overdose deaths,” said Dr. DuPont, the first director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the president of the Institute for Behavior and Health in Rockville, Md. “The fundamental message is that alcohol (and drug use) patterns show complexity that has significant public health importance. Alcohol use and related problems are more complex than a bumper sticker stating that they are either ‘up’ or ‘down.’ ”

Dr. Grucza, Dr. Grant, and Dr. DuPont had no conflicts to disclose.

The findings of a recent study in JAMA Psychiatry suggest dramatic increases – approaching 50% – in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders in the United States. But the study’s methodology has come under scrutiny: The data sets that the researchers used might be too different for reliable comparison.

The JAMA Psychiatry research, led by Bridget F. Grant, PhD, of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, analyzed data from two waves of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a cross-sectional, federal survey administered during 2001-2002, known as Wave 1, and during 2012-2013, known as Wave 3 (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161). The findings were stark: In addition to a sharp increase in the rate of 12-month alcohol use and high-risk drinking, Dr. Grant and her associates found that the rate of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder climbed from 8.5% of the population during the first wave to 12.7% of the population during the third.

But Richard A. Grucza, PhD, an addiction-medicine researcher who has studied and written about these trends extensively (Addiction. 2007 April;102[4]:623-9), told vox.com that he doesn’t buy the new findings.

“I would urge caution in drawing conclusions based on only two time points,” Dr. Grucza said. Comparing those two waves of data is inherently problematic, he explained.

“The NESARC made important changes between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013 – and several of these changes could be expected to lead to higher rates of disclosure,” said Dr. Grucza, a professor of psychiatry at Washington University in St. Louis. “This would lead to apparent increases in a variety of things – for example, they saw a 100% increase in prevalence of marijuana use among adults. So, the problem isn’t with the 2012-2013 NESARC, per se, but in the comparison between the 2012-2013 NESARC and the 2001-2002 NESARC.”

The changes include differences in the way each wave of the data was collected. The 2001-2002 survey was conducted using U.S. Census Bureau employees and didn’t offer participants incentives for survey completion. The 2012-2013 NESARC, however, was conducted through a private contractor; in addition, participants provided biological samples and received modest cash incentives for completing the survey.

“We can only speculate, but [the collection of DNA through samples of saliva] might make the participants think that their drug use would be known – and that they might therefore disclose it, anyway,” Dr. Grucza said. “I would guess that they would have been assured that this wasn’t the case during the informed consent process, but that process tends to be long, and people don’t pay attention to the whole informed consent document.”

The NESARC findings differed substantially from those found by the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), a federal survey of people aged 12 or older released annually by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The NSDUH gathers data first in a screening phase and then in an interview phase; data are gathered in the interview phase through computer-assisted, self-administered interviews. Dr. Grucza said countless studies “suggest people respond more faithfully when disclosing to a computer as opposed to a live interviewer.”

According to the NSDUH, the rate of past-month use of alcohol fell slightly in 2015 from the previous year’s rate and was comparable to the estimates in 2005-2013.

However, Dr. Grant pointed out that substantial changes made to the questions on the 2015 NSDUH also make comparisons to previous years problematic. As a result, she said, the “NSDUH is not able to estimate the trends during the time period analyzed in the NESARC,” Dr. Grant said. “We stand by the reliability and validity of our survey data.”

For his part, Robert L. DuPont, MD, said it’s important to look at the data broadly. “The bigger picture is that alcohol is the most commonly used addictive substance by Americans, and there is evidence of increased problems resulting from drinking. For example, alcohol liver disease and cirrhosis of the liver are rising in adults and have been described as one of a group of ‘diseases of despair,’ along with suicide and drug overdose deaths,” said Dr. DuPont, the first director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the president of the Institute for Behavior and Health in Rockville, Md. “The fundamental message is that alcohol (and drug use) patterns show complexity that has significant public health importance. Alcohol use and related problems are more complex than a bumper sticker stating that they are either ‘up’ or ‘down.’ ”

Dr. Grucza, Dr. Grant, and Dr. DuPont had no conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default