CCJM delivers practical clinical articles relevant to internists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, and other specialists, all written by known experts.

Theme
medstat_ccjm
Top Sections
CME
Reviews
1-Minute Consult
The Clinical Picture
Smart Testing
Symptoms to Diagnosis
ccjm
Main menu
CCJM Main Menu
Explore menu
CCJM Explore Menu
Proclivity ID
18804001
Unpublish
Negative Keywords
gaming
gambling
compulsive behaviors
ammunition
assault rifle
black jack
Boko Haram
bondage
child abuse
cocaine
Daech
drug paraphernalia
explosion
gun
human trafficking
ISIL
ISIS
Islamic caliphate
Islamic state
mixed martial arts
MMA
molestation
national rifle association
NRA
nsfw
pedophile
pedophilia
poker
porn
pornography
psychedelic drug
recreational drug
sex slave rings
slot machine
terrorism
terrorist
Texas hold 'em
UFC
substance abuse
abuseed
abuseer
abusees
abuseing
abusely
abuses
aeolus
aeolused
aeoluser
aeoluses
aeolusing
aeolusly
aeoluss
ahole
aholeed
aholeer
aholees
aholeing
aholely
aholes
alcohol
alcoholed
alcoholer
alcoholes
alcoholing
alcoholly
alcohols
allman
allmaned
allmaner
allmanes
allmaning
allmanly
allmans
alted
altes
alting
altly
alts
analed
analer
anales
analing
anally
analprobe
analprobeed
analprobeer
analprobees
analprobeing
analprobely
analprobes
anals
anilingus
anilingused
anilinguser
anilinguses
anilingusing
anilingusly
anilinguss
anus
anused
anuser
anuses
anusing
anusly
anuss
areola
areolaed
areolaer
areolaes
areolaing
areolaly
areolas
areole
areoleed
areoleer
areolees
areoleing
areolely
areoles
arian
arianed
arianer
arianes
arianing
arianly
arians
aryan
aryaned
aryaner
aryanes
aryaning
aryanly
aryans
asiaed
asiaer
asiaes
asiaing
asialy
asias
ass
ass hole
ass lick
ass licked
ass licker
ass lickes
ass licking
ass lickly
ass licks
assbang
assbanged
assbangeded
assbangeder
assbangedes
assbangeding
assbangedly
assbangeds
assbanger
assbanges
assbanging
assbangly
assbangs
assbangsed
assbangser
assbangses
assbangsing
assbangsly
assbangss
assed
asser
asses
assesed
asseser
asseses
assesing
assesly
assess
assfuck
assfucked
assfucker
assfuckered
assfuckerer
assfuckeres
assfuckering
assfuckerly
assfuckers
assfuckes
assfucking
assfuckly
assfucks
asshat
asshated
asshater
asshates
asshating
asshatly
asshats
assholeed
assholeer
assholees
assholeing
assholely
assholes
assholesed
assholeser
assholeses
assholesing
assholesly
assholess
assing
assly
assmaster
assmastered
assmasterer
assmasteres
assmastering
assmasterly
assmasters
assmunch
assmunched
assmuncher
assmunches
assmunching
assmunchly
assmunchs
asss
asswipe
asswipeed
asswipeer
asswipees
asswipeing
asswipely
asswipes
asswipesed
asswipeser
asswipeses
asswipesing
asswipesly
asswipess
azz
azzed
azzer
azzes
azzing
azzly
azzs
babeed
babeer
babees
babeing
babely
babes
babesed
babeser
babeses
babesing
babesly
babess
ballsac
ballsaced
ballsacer
ballsaces
ballsacing
ballsack
ballsacked
ballsacker
ballsackes
ballsacking
ballsackly
ballsacks
ballsacly
ballsacs
ballsed
ballser
ballses
ballsing
ballsly
ballss
barf
barfed
barfer
barfes
barfing
barfly
barfs
bastard
bastarded
bastarder
bastardes
bastarding
bastardly
bastards
bastardsed
bastardser
bastardses
bastardsing
bastardsly
bastardss
bawdy
bawdyed
bawdyer
bawdyes
bawdying
bawdyly
bawdys
beaner
beanered
beanerer
beaneres
beanering
beanerly
beaners
beardedclam
beardedclamed
beardedclamer
beardedclames
beardedclaming
beardedclamly
beardedclams
beastiality
beastialityed
beastialityer
beastialityes
beastialitying
beastialityly
beastialitys
beatch
beatched
beatcher
beatches
beatching
beatchly
beatchs
beater
beatered
beaterer
beateres
beatering
beaterly
beaters
beered
beerer
beeres
beering
beerly
beeyotch
beeyotched
beeyotcher
beeyotches
beeyotching
beeyotchly
beeyotchs
beotch
beotched
beotcher
beotches
beotching
beotchly
beotchs
biatch
biatched
biatcher
biatches
biatching
biatchly
biatchs
big tits
big titsed
big titser
big titses
big titsing
big titsly
big titss
bigtits
bigtitsed
bigtitser
bigtitses
bigtitsing
bigtitsly
bigtitss
bimbo
bimboed
bimboer
bimboes
bimboing
bimboly
bimbos
bisexualed
bisexualer
bisexuales
bisexualing
bisexually
bisexuals
bitch
bitched
bitcheded
bitcheder
bitchedes
bitcheding
bitchedly
bitcheds
bitcher
bitches
bitchesed
bitcheser
bitcheses
bitchesing
bitchesly
bitchess
bitching
bitchly
bitchs
bitchy
bitchyed
bitchyer
bitchyes
bitchying
bitchyly
bitchys
bleached
bleacher
bleaches
bleaching
bleachly
bleachs
blow job
blow jobed
blow jober
blow jobes
blow jobing
blow jobly
blow jobs
blowed
blower
blowes
blowing
blowjob
blowjobed
blowjober
blowjobes
blowjobing
blowjobly
blowjobs
blowjobsed
blowjobser
blowjobses
blowjobsing
blowjobsly
blowjobss
blowly
blows
boink
boinked
boinker
boinkes
boinking
boinkly
boinks
bollock
bollocked
bollocker
bollockes
bollocking
bollockly
bollocks
bollocksed
bollockser
bollockses
bollocksing
bollocksly
bollockss
bollok
bolloked
bolloker
bollokes
bolloking
bollokly
bolloks
boner
bonered
bonerer
boneres
bonering
bonerly
boners
bonersed
bonerser
bonerses
bonersing
bonersly
bonerss
bong
bonged
bonger
bonges
bonging
bongly
bongs
boob
boobed
boober
boobes
boobies
boobiesed
boobieser
boobieses
boobiesing
boobiesly
boobiess
boobing
boobly
boobs
boobsed
boobser
boobses
boobsing
boobsly
boobss
booby
boobyed
boobyer
boobyes
boobying
boobyly
boobys
booger
boogered
boogerer
boogeres
boogering
boogerly
boogers
bookie
bookieed
bookieer
bookiees
bookieing
bookiely
bookies
bootee
booteeed
booteeer
booteees
booteeing
booteely
bootees
bootie
bootieed
bootieer
bootiees
bootieing
bootiely
booties
booty
bootyed
bootyer
bootyes
bootying
bootyly
bootys
boozeed
boozeer
boozees
boozeing
boozely
boozer
boozered
boozerer
boozeres
boozering
boozerly
boozers
boozes
boozy
boozyed
boozyer
boozyes
boozying
boozyly
boozys
bosomed
bosomer
bosomes
bosoming
bosomly
bosoms
bosomy
bosomyed
bosomyer
bosomyes
bosomying
bosomyly
bosomys
bugger
buggered
buggerer
buggeres
buggering
buggerly
buggers
bukkake
bukkakeed
bukkakeer
bukkakees
bukkakeing
bukkakely
bukkakes
bull shit
bull shited
bull shiter
bull shites
bull shiting
bull shitly
bull shits
bullshit
bullshited
bullshiter
bullshites
bullshiting
bullshitly
bullshits
bullshitsed
bullshitser
bullshitses
bullshitsing
bullshitsly
bullshitss
bullshitted
bullshitteded
bullshitteder
bullshittedes
bullshitteding
bullshittedly
bullshitteds
bullturds
bullturdsed
bullturdser
bullturdses
bullturdsing
bullturdsly
bullturdss
bung
bunged
bunger
bunges
bunging
bungly
bungs
busty
bustyed
bustyer
bustyes
bustying
bustyly
bustys
butt
butt fuck
butt fucked
butt fucker
butt fuckes
butt fucking
butt fuckly
butt fucks
butted
buttes
buttfuck
buttfucked
buttfucker
buttfuckered
buttfuckerer
buttfuckeres
buttfuckering
buttfuckerly
buttfuckers
buttfuckes
buttfucking
buttfuckly
buttfucks
butting
buttly
buttplug
buttpluged
buttpluger
buttpluges
buttpluging
buttplugly
buttplugs
butts
caca
cacaed
cacaer
cacaes
cacaing
cacaly
cacas
cahone
cahoneed
cahoneer
cahonees
cahoneing
cahonely
cahones
cameltoe
cameltoeed
cameltoeer
cameltoees
cameltoeing
cameltoely
cameltoes
carpetmuncher
carpetmunchered
carpetmuncherer
carpetmuncheres
carpetmunchering
carpetmuncherly
carpetmunchers
cawk
cawked
cawker
cawkes
cawking
cawkly
cawks
chinc
chinced
chincer
chinces
chincing
chincly
chincs
chincsed
chincser
chincses
chincsing
chincsly
chincss
chink
chinked
chinker
chinkes
chinking
chinkly
chinks
chode
chodeed
chodeer
chodees
chodeing
chodely
chodes
chodesed
chodeser
chodeses
chodesing
chodesly
chodess
clit
clited
cliter
clites
cliting
clitly
clitoris
clitorised
clitoriser
clitorises
clitorising
clitorisly
clitoriss
clitorus
clitorused
clitoruser
clitoruses
clitorusing
clitorusly
clitoruss
clits
clitsed
clitser
clitses
clitsing
clitsly
clitss
clitty
clittyed
clittyer
clittyes
clittying
clittyly
clittys
cocain
cocaine
cocained
cocaineed
cocaineer
cocainees
cocaineing
cocainely
cocainer
cocaines
cocaining
cocainly
cocains
cock
cock sucker
cock suckered
cock suckerer
cock suckeres
cock suckering
cock suckerly
cock suckers
cockblock
cockblocked
cockblocker
cockblockes
cockblocking
cockblockly
cockblocks
cocked
cocker
cockes
cockholster
cockholstered
cockholsterer
cockholsteres
cockholstering
cockholsterly
cockholsters
cocking
cockknocker
cockknockered
cockknockerer
cockknockeres
cockknockering
cockknockerly
cockknockers
cockly
cocks
cocksed
cockser
cockses
cocksing
cocksly
cocksmoker
cocksmokered
cocksmokerer
cocksmokeres
cocksmokering
cocksmokerly
cocksmokers
cockss
cocksucker
cocksuckered
cocksuckerer
cocksuckeres
cocksuckering
cocksuckerly
cocksuckers
coital
coitaled
coitaler
coitales
coitaling
coitally
coitals
commie
commieed
commieer
commiees
commieing
commiely
commies
condomed
condomer
condomes
condoming
condomly
condoms
coon
cooned
cooner
coones
cooning
coonly
coons
coonsed
coonser
coonses
coonsing
coonsly
coonss
corksucker
corksuckered
corksuckerer
corksuckeres
corksuckering
corksuckerly
corksuckers
cracked
crackwhore
crackwhoreed
crackwhoreer
crackwhorees
crackwhoreing
crackwhorely
crackwhores
crap
craped
craper
crapes
craping
craply
crappy
crappyed
crappyer
crappyes
crappying
crappyly
crappys
cum
cumed
cumer
cumes
cuming
cumly
cummin
cummined
cumminer
cummines
cumming
cumminged
cumminger
cumminges
cumminging
cummingly
cummings
cummining
cumminly
cummins
cums
cumshot
cumshoted
cumshoter
cumshotes
cumshoting
cumshotly
cumshots
cumshotsed
cumshotser
cumshotses
cumshotsing
cumshotsly
cumshotss
cumslut
cumsluted
cumsluter
cumslutes
cumsluting
cumslutly
cumsluts
cumstain
cumstained
cumstainer
cumstaines
cumstaining
cumstainly
cumstains
cunilingus
cunilingused
cunilinguser
cunilinguses
cunilingusing
cunilingusly
cunilinguss
cunnilingus
cunnilingused
cunnilinguser
cunnilinguses
cunnilingusing
cunnilingusly
cunnilinguss
cunny
cunnyed
cunnyer
cunnyes
cunnying
cunnyly
cunnys
cunt
cunted
cunter
cuntes
cuntface
cuntfaceed
cuntfaceer
cuntfacees
cuntfaceing
cuntfacely
cuntfaces
cunthunter
cunthuntered
cunthunterer
cunthunteres
cunthuntering
cunthunterly
cunthunters
cunting
cuntlick
cuntlicked
cuntlicker
cuntlickered
cuntlickerer
cuntlickeres
cuntlickering
cuntlickerly
cuntlickers
cuntlickes
cuntlicking
cuntlickly
cuntlicks
cuntly
cunts
cuntsed
cuntser
cuntses
cuntsing
cuntsly
cuntss
dago
dagoed
dagoer
dagoes
dagoing
dagoly
dagos
dagosed
dagoser
dagoses
dagosing
dagosly
dagoss
dammit
dammited
dammiter
dammites
dammiting
dammitly
dammits
damn
damned
damneded
damneder
damnedes
damneding
damnedly
damneds
damner
damnes
damning
damnit
damnited
damniter
damnites
damniting
damnitly
damnits
damnly
damns
dick
dickbag
dickbaged
dickbager
dickbages
dickbaging
dickbagly
dickbags
dickdipper
dickdippered
dickdipperer
dickdipperes
dickdippering
dickdipperly
dickdippers
dicked
dicker
dickes
dickface
dickfaceed
dickfaceer
dickfacees
dickfaceing
dickfacely
dickfaces
dickflipper
dickflippered
dickflipperer
dickflipperes
dickflippering
dickflipperly
dickflippers
dickhead
dickheaded
dickheader
dickheades
dickheading
dickheadly
dickheads
dickheadsed
dickheadser
dickheadses
dickheadsing
dickheadsly
dickheadss
dicking
dickish
dickished
dickisher
dickishes
dickishing
dickishly
dickishs
dickly
dickripper
dickrippered
dickripperer
dickripperes
dickrippering
dickripperly
dickrippers
dicks
dicksipper
dicksippered
dicksipperer
dicksipperes
dicksippering
dicksipperly
dicksippers
dickweed
dickweeded
dickweeder
dickweedes
dickweeding
dickweedly
dickweeds
dickwhipper
dickwhippered
dickwhipperer
dickwhipperes
dickwhippering
dickwhipperly
dickwhippers
dickzipper
dickzippered
dickzipperer
dickzipperes
dickzippering
dickzipperly
dickzippers
diddle
diddleed
diddleer
diddlees
diddleing
diddlely
diddles
dike
dikeed
dikeer
dikees
dikeing
dikely
dikes
dildo
dildoed
dildoer
dildoes
dildoing
dildoly
dildos
dildosed
dildoser
dildoses
dildosing
dildosly
dildoss
diligaf
diligafed
diligafer
diligafes
diligafing
diligafly
diligafs
dillweed
dillweeded
dillweeder
dillweedes
dillweeding
dillweedly
dillweeds
dimwit
dimwited
dimwiter
dimwites
dimwiting
dimwitly
dimwits
dingle
dingleed
dingleer
dinglees
dingleing
dinglely
dingles
dipship
dipshiped
dipshiper
dipshipes
dipshiping
dipshiply
dipships
dizzyed
dizzyer
dizzyes
dizzying
dizzyly
dizzys
doggiestyleed
doggiestyleer
doggiestylees
doggiestyleing
doggiestylely
doggiestyles
doggystyleed
doggystyleer
doggystylees
doggystyleing
doggystylely
doggystyles
dong
donged
donger
donges
donging
dongly
dongs
doofus
doofused
doofuser
doofuses
doofusing
doofusly
doofuss
doosh
dooshed
doosher
dooshes
dooshing
dooshly
dooshs
dopeyed
dopeyer
dopeyes
dopeying
dopeyly
dopeys
douchebag
douchebaged
douchebager
douchebages
douchebaging
douchebagly
douchebags
douchebagsed
douchebagser
douchebagses
douchebagsing
douchebagsly
douchebagss
doucheed
doucheer
douchees
doucheing
douchely
douches
douchey
doucheyed
doucheyer
doucheyes
doucheying
doucheyly
doucheys
drunk
drunked
drunker
drunkes
drunking
drunkly
drunks
dumass
dumassed
dumasser
dumasses
dumassing
dumassly
dumasss
dumbass
dumbassed
dumbasser
dumbasses
dumbassesed
dumbasseser
dumbasseses
dumbassesing
dumbassesly
dumbassess
dumbassing
dumbassly
dumbasss
dummy
dummyed
dummyer
dummyes
dummying
dummyly
dummys
dyke
dykeed
dykeer
dykees
dykeing
dykely
dykes
dykesed
dykeser
dykeses
dykesing
dykesly
dykess
erotic
eroticed
eroticer
erotices
eroticing
eroticly
erotics
extacy
extacyed
extacyer
extacyes
extacying
extacyly
extacys
extasy
extasyed
extasyer
extasyes
extasying
extasyly
extasys
fack
facked
facker
fackes
facking
fackly
facks
fag
faged
fager
fages
fagg
fagged
faggeded
faggeder
faggedes
faggeding
faggedly
faggeds
fagger
fagges
fagging
faggit
faggited
faggiter
faggites
faggiting
faggitly
faggits
faggly
faggot
faggoted
faggoter
faggotes
faggoting
faggotly
faggots
faggs
faging
fagly
fagot
fagoted
fagoter
fagotes
fagoting
fagotly
fagots
fags
fagsed
fagser
fagses
fagsing
fagsly
fagss
faig
faiged
faiger
faiges
faiging
faigly
faigs
faigt
faigted
faigter
faigtes
faigting
faigtly
faigts
fannybandit
fannybandited
fannybanditer
fannybandites
fannybanditing
fannybanditly
fannybandits
farted
farter
fartes
farting
fartknocker
fartknockered
fartknockerer
fartknockeres
fartknockering
fartknockerly
fartknockers
fartly
farts
felch
felched
felcher
felchered
felcherer
felcheres
felchering
felcherly
felchers
felches
felching
felchinged
felchinger
felchinges
felchinging
felchingly
felchings
felchly
felchs
fellate
fellateed
fellateer
fellatees
fellateing
fellately
fellates
fellatio
fellatioed
fellatioer
fellatioes
fellatioing
fellatioly
fellatios
feltch
feltched
feltcher
feltchered
feltcherer
feltcheres
feltchering
feltcherly
feltchers
feltches
feltching
feltchly
feltchs
feom
feomed
feomer
feomes
feoming
feomly
feoms
fisted
fisteded
fisteder
fistedes
fisteding
fistedly
fisteds
fisting
fistinged
fistinger
fistinges
fistinging
fistingly
fistings
fisty
fistyed
fistyer
fistyes
fistying
fistyly
fistys
floozy
floozyed
floozyer
floozyes
floozying
floozyly
floozys
foad
foaded
foader
foades
foading
foadly
foads
fondleed
fondleer
fondlees
fondleing
fondlely
fondles
foobar
foobared
foobarer
foobares
foobaring
foobarly
foobars
freex
freexed
freexer
freexes
freexing
freexly
freexs
frigg
frigga
friggaed
friggaer
friggaes
friggaing
friggaly
friggas
frigged
frigger
frigges
frigging
friggly
friggs
fubar
fubared
fubarer
fubares
fubaring
fubarly
fubars
fuck
fuckass
fuckassed
fuckasser
fuckasses
fuckassing
fuckassly
fuckasss
fucked
fuckeded
fuckeder
fuckedes
fuckeding
fuckedly
fuckeds
fucker
fuckered
fuckerer
fuckeres
fuckering
fuckerly
fuckers
fuckes
fuckface
fuckfaceed
fuckfaceer
fuckfacees
fuckfaceing
fuckfacely
fuckfaces
fuckin
fuckined
fuckiner
fuckines
fucking
fuckinged
fuckinger
fuckinges
fuckinging
fuckingly
fuckings
fuckining
fuckinly
fuckins
fuckly
fucknugget
fucknuggeted
fucknuggeter
fucknuggetes
fucknuggeting
fucknuggetly
fucknuggets
fucknut
fucknuted
fucknuter
fucknutes
fucknuting
fucknutly
fucknuts
fuckoff
fuckoffed
fuckoffer
fuckoffes
fuckoffing
fuckoffly
fuckoffs
fucks
fucksed
fuckser
fuckses
fucksing
fucksly
fuckss
fucktard
fucktarded
fucktarder
fucktardes
fucktarding
fucktardly
fucktards
fuckup
fuckuped
fuckuper
fuckupes
fuckuping
fuckuply
fuckups
fuckwad
fuckwaded
fuckwader
fuckwades
fuckwading
fuckwadly
fuckwads
fuckwit
fuckwited
fuckwiter
fuckwites
fuckwiting
fuckwitly
fuckwits
fudgepacker
fudgepackered
fudgepackerer
fudgepackeres
fudgepackering
fudgepackerly
fudgepackers
fuk
fuked
fuker
fukes
fuking
fukly
fuks
fvck
fvcked
fvcker
fvckes
fvcking
fvckly
fvcks
fxck
fxcked
fxcker
fxckes
fxcking
fxckly
fxcks
gae
gaeed
gaeer
gaees
gaeing
gaely
gaes
gai
gaied
gaier
gaies
gaiing
gaily
gais
ganja
ganjaed
ganjaer
ganjaes
ganjaing
ganjaly
ganjas
gayed
gayer
gayes
gaying
gayly
gays
gaysed
gayser
gayses
gaysing
gaysly
gayss
gey
geyed
geyer
geyes
geying
geyly
geys
gfc
gfced
gfcer
gfces
gfcing
gfcly
gfcs
gfy
gfyed
gfyer
gfyes
gfying
gfyly
gfys
ghay
ghayed
ghayer
ghayes
ghaying
ghayly
ghays
ghey
gheyed
gheyer
gheyes
gheying
gheyly
gheys
gigolo
gigoloed
gigoloer
gigoloes
gigoloing
gigololy
gigolos
goatse
goatseed
goatseer
goatsees
goatseing
goatsely
goatses
godamn
godamned
godamner
godamnes
godamning
godamnit
godamnited
godamniter
godamnites
godamniting
godamnitly
godamnits
godamnly
godamns
goddam
goddamed
goddamer
goddames
goddaming
goddamly
goddammit
goddammited
goddammiter
goddammites
goddammiting
goddammitly
goddammits
goddamn
goddamned
goddamner
goddamnes
goddamning
goddamnly
goddamns
goddams
goldenshower
goldenshowered
goldenshowerer
goldenshoweres
goldenshowering
goldenshowerly
goldenshowers
gonad
gonaded
gonader
gonades
gonading
gonadly
gonads
gonadsed
gonadser
gonadses
gonadsing
gonadsly
gonadss
gook
gooked
gooker
gookes
gooking
gookly
gooks
gooksed
gookser
gookses
gooksing
gooksly
gookss
gringo
gringoed
gringoer
gringoes
gringoing
gringoly
gringos
gspot
gspoted
gspoter
gspotes
gspoting
gspotly
gspots
gtfo
gtfoed
gtfoer
gtfoes
gtfoing
gtfoly
gtfos
guido
guidoed
guidoer
guidoes
guidoing
guidoly
guidos
handjob
handjobed
handjober
handjobes
handjobing
handjobly
handjobs
hard on
hard oned
hard oner
hard ones
hard oning
hard only
hard ons
hardknight
hardknighted
hardknighter
hardknightes
hardknighting
hardknightly
hardknights
hebe
hebeed
hebeer
hebees
hebeing
hebely
hebes
heeb
heebed
heeber
heebes
heebing
heebly
heebs
hell
helled
heller
helles
helling
hellly
hells
hemp
hemped
hemper
hempes
hemping
hemply
hemps
heroined
heroiner
heroines
heroining
heroinly
heroins
herp
herped
herper
herpes
herpesed
herpeser
herpeses
herpesing
herpesly
herpess
herping
herply
herps
herpy
herpyed
herpyer
herpyes
herpying
herpyly
herpys
hitler
hitlered
hitlerer
hitleres
hitlering
hitlerly
hitlers
hived
hiver
hives
hiving
hivly
hivs
hobag
hobaged
hobager
hobages
hobaging
hobagly
hobags
homey
homeyed
homeyer
homeyes
homeying
homeyly
homeys
homo
homoed
homoer
homoes
homoey
homoeyed
homoeyer
homoeyes
homoeying
homoeyly
homoeys
homoing
homoly
homos
honky
honkyed
honkyer
honkyes
honkying
honkyly
honkys
hooch
hooched
hoocher
hooches
hooching
hoochly
hoochs
hookah
hookahed
hookaher
hookahes
hookahing
hookahly
hookahs
hooker
hookered
hookerer
hookeres
hookering
hookerly
hookers
hoor
hoored
hoorer
hoores
hooring
hoorly
hoors
hootch
hootched
hootcher
hootches
hootching
hootchly
hootchs
hooter
hootered
hooterer
hooteres
hootering
hooterly
hooters
hootersed
hooterser
hooterses
hootersing
hootersly
hooterss
horny
hornyed
hornyer
hornyes
hornying
hornyly
hornys
houstoned
houstoner
houstones
houstoning
houstonly
houstons
hump
humped
humpeded
humpeder
humpedes
humpeding
humpedly
humpeds
humper
humpes
humping
humpinged
humpinger
humpinges
humpinging
humpingly
humpings
humply
humps
husbanded
husbander
husbandes
husbanding
husbandly
husbands
hussy
hussyed
hussyer
hussyes
hussying
hussyly
hussys
hymened
hymener
hymenes
hymening
hymenly
hymens
inbred
inbreded
inbreder
inbredes
inbreding
inbredly
inbreds
incest
incested
incester
incestes
incesting
incestly
incests
injun
injuned
injuner
injunes
injuning
injunly
injuns
jackass
jackassed
jackasser
jackasses
jackassing
jackassly
jackasss
jackhole
jackholeed
jackholeer
jackholees
jackholeing
jackholely
jackholes
jackoff
jackoffed
jackoffer
jackoffes
jackoffing
jackoffly
jackoffs
jap
japed
japer
japes
japing
japly
japs
japsed
japser
japses
japsing
japsly
japss
jerkoff
jerkoffed
jerkoffer
jerkoffes
jerkoffing
jerkoffly
jerkoffs
jerks
jism
jismed
jismer
jismes
jisming
jismly
jisms
jiz
jized
jizer
jizes
jizing
jizly
jizm
jizmed
jizmer
jizmes
jizming
jizmly
jizms
jizs
jizz
jizzed
jizzeded
jizzeder
jizzedes
jizzeding
jizzedly
jizzeds
jizzer
jizzes
jizzing
jizzly
jizzs
junkie
junkieed
junkieer
junkiees
junkieing
junkiely
junkies
junky
junkyed
junkyer
junkyes
junkying
junkyly
junkys
kike
kikeed
kikeer
kikees
kikeing
kikely
kikes
kikesed
kikeser
kikeses
kikesing
kikesly
kikess
killed
killer
killes
killing
killly
kills
kinky
kinkyed
kinkyer
kinkyes
kinkying
kinkyly
kinkys
kkk
kkked
kkker
kkkes
kkking
kkkly
kkks
klan
klaned
klaner
klanes
klaning
klanly
klans
knobend
knobended
knobender
knobendes
knobending
knobendly
knobends
kooch
kooched
koocher
kooches
koochesed
koocheser
koocheses
koochesing
koochesly
koochess
kooching
koochly
koochs
kootch
kootched
kootcher
kootches
kootching
kootchly
kootchs
kraut
krauted
krauter
krautes
krauting
krautly
krauts
kyke
kykeed
kykeer
kykees
kykeing
kykely
kykes
lech
leched
lecher
leches
leching
lechly
lechs
leper
lepered
leperer
leperes
lepering
leperly
lepers
lesbiansed
lesbianser
lesbianses
lesbiansing
lesbiansly
lesbianss
lesbo
lesboed
lesboer
lesboes
lesboing
lesboly
lesbos
lesbosed
lesboser
lesboses
lesbosing
lesbosly
lesboss
lez
lezbianed
lezbianer
lezbianes
lezbianing
lezbianly
lezbians
lezbiansed
lezbianser
lezbianses
lezbiansing
lezbiansly
lezbianss
lezbo
lezboed
lezboer
lezboes
lezboing
lezboly
lezbos
lezbosed
lezboser
lezboses
lezbosing
lezbosly
lezboss
lezed
lezer
lezes
lezing
lezly
lezs
lezzie
lezzieed
lezzieer
lezziees
lezzieing
lezziely
lezzies
lezziesed
lezzieser
lezzieses
lezziesing
lezziesly
lezziess
lezzy
lezzyed
lezzyer
lezzyes
lezzying
lezzyly
lezzys
lmaoed
lmaoer
lmaoes
lmaoing
lmaoly
lmaos
lmfao
lmfaoed
lmfaoer
lmfaoes
lmfaoing
lmfaoly
lmfaos
loined
loiner
loines
loining
loinly
loins
loinsed
loinser
loinses
loinsing
loinsly
loinss
lubeed
lubeer
lubees
lubeing
lubely
lubes
lusty
lustyed
lustyer
lustyes
lustying
lustyly
lustys
massa
massaed
massaer
massaes
massaing
massaly
massas
masterbate
masterbateed
masterbateer
masterbatees
masterbateing
masterbately
masterbates
masterbating
masterbatinged
masterbatinger
masterbatinges
masterbatinging
masterbatingly
masterbatings
masterbation
masterbationed
masterbationer
masterbationes
masterbationing
masterbationly
masterbations
masturbate
masturbateed
masturbateer
masturbatees
masturbateing
masturbately
masturbates
masturbating
masturbatinged
masturbatinger
masturbatinges
masturbatinging
masturbatingly
masturbatings
masturbation
masturbationed
masturbationer
masturbationes
masturbationing
masturbationly
masturbations
methed
mether
methes
mething
methly
meths
militaryed
militaryer
militaryes
militarying
militaryly
militarys
mofo
mofoed
mofoer
mofoes
mofoing
mofoly
mofos
molest
molested
molester
molestes
molesting
molestly
molests
moolie
moolieed
moolieer
mooliees
moolieing
mooliely
moolies
moron
moroned
moroner
morones
moroning
moronly
morons
motherfucka
motherfuckaed
motherfuckaer
motherfuckaes
motherfuckaing
motherfuckaly
motherfuckas
motherfucker
motherfuckered
motherfuckerer
motherfuckeres
motherfuckering
motherfuckerly
motherfuckers
motherfucking
motherfuckinged
motherfuckinger
motherfuckinges
motherfuckinging
motherfuckingly
motherfuckings
mtherfucker
mtherfuckered
mtherfuckerer
mtherfuckeres
mtherfuckering
mtherfuckerly
mtherfuckers
mthrfucker
mthrfuckered
mthrfuckerer
mthrfuckeres
mthrfuckering
mthrfuckerly
mthrfuckers
mthrfucking
mthrfuckinged
mthrfuckinger
mthrfuckinges
mthrfuckinging
mthrfuckingly
mthrfuckings
muff
muffdiver
muffdivered
muffdiverer
muffdiveres
muffdivering
muffdiverly
muffdivers
muffed
muffer
muffes
muffing
muffly
muffs
murdered
murderer
murderes
murdering
murderly
murders
muthafuckaz
muthafuckazed
muthafuckazer
muthafuckazes
muthafuckazing
muthafuckazly
muthafuckazs
muthafucker
muthafuckered
muthafuckerer
muthafuckeres
muthafuckering
muthafuckerly
muthafuckers
mutherfucker
mutherfuckered
mutherfuckerer
mutherfuckeres
mutherfuckering
mutherfuckerly
mutherfuckers
mutherfucking
mutherfuckinged
mutherfuckinger
mutherfuckinges
mutherfuckinging
mutherfuckingly
mutherfuckings
muthrfucking
muthrfuckinged
muthrfuckinger
muthrfuckinges
muthrfuckinging
muthrfuckingly
muthrfuckings
nad
naded
nader
nades
nading
nadly
nads
nadsed
nadser
nadses
nadsing
nadsly
nadss
nakeded
nakeder
nakedes
nakeding
nakedly
nakeds
napalm
napalmed
napalmer
napalmes
napalming
napalmly
napalms
nappy
nappyed
nappyer
nappyes
nappying
nappyly
nappys
nazi
nazied
nazier
nazies
naziing
nazily
nazis
nazism
nazismed
nazismer
nazismes
nazisming
nazismly
nazisms
negro
negroed
negroer
negroes
negroing
negroly
negros
nigga
niggaed
niggaer
niggaes
niggah
niggahed
niggaher
niggahes
niggahing
niggahly
niggahs
niggaing
niggaly
niggas
niggased
niggaser
niggases
niggasing
niggasly
niggass
niggaz
niggazed
niggazer
niggazes
niggazing
niggazly
niggazs
nigger
niggered
niggerer
niggeres
niggering
niggerly
niggers
niggersed
niggerser
niggerses
niggersing
niggersly
niggerss
niggle
niggleed
niggleer
nigglees
niggleing
nigglely
niggles
niglet
nigleted
nigleter
nigletes
nigleting
nigletly
niglets
nimrod
nimroded
nimroder
nimrodes
nimroding
nimrodly
nimrods
ninny
ninnyed
ninnyer
ninnyes
ninnying
ninnyly
ninnys
nooky
nookyed
nookyer
nookyes
nookying
nookyly
nookys
nuccitelli
nuccitellied
nuccitellier
nuccitellies
nuccitelliing
nuccitellily
nuccitellis
nympho
nymphoed
nymphoer
nymphoes
nymphoing
nympholy
nymphos
opium
opiumed
opiumer
opiumes
opiuming
opiumly
opiums
orgies
orgiesed
orgieser
orgieses
orgiesing
orgiesly
orgiess
orgy
orgyed
orgyer
orgyes
orgying
orgyly
orgys
paddy
paddyed
paddyer
paddyes
paddying
paddyly
paddys
paki
pakied
pakier
pakies
pakiing
pakily
pakis
pantie
pantieed
pantieer
pantiees
pantieing
pantiely
panties
pantiesed
pantieser
pantieses
pantiesing
pantiesly
pantiess
panty
pantyed
pantyer
pantyes
pantying
pantyly
pantys
pastie
pastieed
pastieer
pastiees
pastieing
pastiely
pasties
pasty
pastyed
pastyer
pastyes
pastying
pastyly
pastys
pecker
peckered
peckerer
peckeres
peckering
peckerly
peckers
pedo
pedoed
pedoer
pedoes
pedoing
pedoly
pedophile
pedophileed
pedophileer
pedophilees
pedophileing
pedophilely
pedophiles
pedophilia
pedophiliac
pedophiliaced
pedophiliacer
pedophiliaces
pedophiliacing
pedophiliacly
pedophiliacs
pedophiliaed
pedophiliaer
pedophiliaes
pedophiliaing
pedophilialy
pedophilias
pedos
penial
penialed
penialer
peniales
penialing
penially
penials
penile
penileed
penileer
penilees
penileing
penilely
peniles
penis
penised
peniser
penises
penising
penisly
peniss
perversion
perversioned
perversioner
perversiones
perversioning
perversionly
perversions
peyote
peyoteed
peyoteer
peyotees
peyoteing
peyotely
peyotes
phuck
phucked
phucker
phuckes
phucking
phuckly
phucks
pillowbiter
pillowbitered
pillowbiterer
pillowbiteres
pillowbitering
pillowbiterly
pillowbiters
pimp
pimped
pimper
pimpes
pimping
pimply
pimps
pinko
pinkoed
pinkoer
pinkoes
pinkoing
pinkoly
pinkos
pissed
pisseded
pisseder
pissedes
pisseding
pissedly
pisseds
pisser
pisses
pissing
pissly
pissoff
pissoffed
pissoffer
pissoffes
pissoffing
pissoffly
pissoffs
pisss
polack
polacked
polacker
polackes
polacking
polackly
polacks
pollock
pollocked
pollocker
pollockes
pollocking
pollockly
pollocks
poon
pooned
pooner
poones
pooning
poonly
poons
poontang
poontanged
poontanger
poontanges
poontanging
poontangly
poontangs
porn
porned
porner
pornes
porning
pornly
porno
pornoed
pornoer
pornoes
pornography
pornographyed
pornographyer
pornographyes
pornographying
pornographyly
pornographys
pornoing
pornoly
pornos
porns
prick
pricked
pricker
prickes
pricking
prickly
pricks
prig
priged
priger
priges
priging
prigly
prigs
prostitute
prostituteed
prostituteer
prostitutees
prostituteing
prostitutely
prostitutes
prude
prudeed
prudeer
prudees
prudeing
prudely
prudes
punkass
punkassed
punkasser
punkasses
punkassing
punkassly
punkasss
punky
punkyed
punkyer
punkyes
punkying
punkyly
punkys
puss
pussed
pusser
pusses
pussies
pussiesed
pussieser
pussieses
pussiesing
pussiesly
pussiess
pussing
pussly
pusss
pussy
pussyed
pussyer
pussyes
pussying
pussyly
pussypounder
pussypoundered
pussypounderer
pussypounderes
pussypoundering
pussypounderly
pussypounders
pussys
puto
putoed
putoer
putoes
putoing
putoly
putos
queaf
queafed
queafer
queafes
queafing
queafly
queafs
queef
queefed
queefer
queefes
queefing
queefly
queefs
queer
queered
queerer
queeres
queering
queerly
queero
queeroed
queeroer
queeroes
queeroing
queeroly
queeros
queers
queersed
queerser
queerses
queersing
queersly
queerss
quicky
quickyed
quickyer
quickyes
quickying
quickyly
quickys
quim
quimed
quimer
quimes
quiming
quimly
quims
racy
racyed
racyer
racyes
racying
racyly
racys
rape
raped
rapeded
rapeder
rapedes
rapeding
rapedly
rapeds
rapeed
rapeer
rapees
rapeing
rapely
raper
rapered
raperer
raperes
rapering
raperly
rapers
rapes
rapist
rapisted
rapister
rapistes
rapisting
rapistly
rapists
raunch
raunched
rauncher
raunches
raunching
raunchly
raunchs
rectus
rectused
rectuser
rectuses
rectusing
rectusly
rectuss
reefer
reefered
reeferer
reeferes
reefering
reeferly
reefers
reetard
reetarded
reetarder
reetardes
reetarding
reetardly
reetards
reich
reiched
reicher
reiches
reiching
reichly
reichs
retard
retarded
retardeded
retardeder
retardedes
retardeding
retardedly
retardeds
retarder
retardes
retarding
retardly
retards
rimjob
rimjobed
rimjober
rimjobes
rimjobing
rimjobly
rimjobs
ritard
ritarded
ritarder
ritardes
ritarding
ritardly
ritards
rtard
rtarded
rtarder
rtardes
rtarding
rtardly
rtards
rum
rumed
rumer
rumes
ruming
rumly
rump
rumped
rumper
rumpes
rumping
rumply
rumprammer
rumprammered
rumprammerer
rumprammeres
rumprammering
rumprammerly
rumprammers
rumps
rums
ruski
ruskied
ruskier
ruskies
ruskiing
ruskily
ruskis
sadism
sadismed
sadismer
sadismes
sadisming
sadismly
sadisms
sadist
sadisted
sadister
sadistes
sadisting
sadistly
sadists
scag
scaged
scager
scages
scaging
scagly
scags
scantily
scantilyed
scantilyer
scantilyes
scantilying
scantilyly
scantilys
schlong
schlonged
schlonger
schlonges
schlonging
schlongly
schlongs
scrog
scroged
scroger
scroges
scroging
scrogly
scrogs
scrot
scrote
scroted
scroteed
scroteer
scrotees
scroteing
scrotely
scroter
scrotes
scroting
scrotly
scrots
scrotum
scrotumed
scrotumer
scrotumes
scrotuming
scrotumly
scrotums
scrud
scruded
scruder
scrudes
scruding
scrudly
scruds
scum
scumed
scumer
scumes
scuming
scumly
scums
seaman
seamaned
seamaner
seamanes
seamaning
seamanly
seamans
seamen
seamened
seamener
seamenes
seamening
seamenly
seamens
seduceed
seduceer
seducees
seduceing
seducely
seduces
semen
semened
semener
semenes
semening
semenly
semens
shamedame
shamedameed
shamedameer
shamedamees
shamedameing
shamedamely
shamedames
shit
shite
shiteater
shiteatered
shiteaterer
shiteateres
shiteatering
shiteaterly
shiteaters
shited
shiteed
shiteer
shitees
shiteing
shitely
shiter
shites
shitface
shitfaceed
shitfaceer
shitfacees
shitfaceing
shitfacely
shitfaces
shithead
shitheaded
shitheader
shitheades
shitheading
shitheadly
shitheads
shithole
shitholeed
shitholeer
shitholees
shitholeing
shitholely
shitholes
shithouse
shithouseed
shithouseer
shithousees
shithouseing
shithousely
shithouses
shiting
shitly
shits
shitsed
shitser
shitses
shitsing
shitsly
shitss
shitt
shitted
shitteded
shitteder
shittedes
shitteding
shittedly
shitteds
shitter
shittered
shitterer
shitteres
shittering
shitterly
shitters
shittes
shitting
shittly
shitts
shitty
shittyed
shittyer
shittyes
shittying
shittyly
shittys
shiz
shized
shizer
shizes
shizing
shizly
shizs
shooted
shooter
shootes
shooting
shootly
shoots
sissy
sissyed
sissyer
sissyes
sissying
sissyly
sissys
skag
skaged
skager
skages
skaging
skagly
skags
skank
skanked
skanker
skankes
skanking
skankly
skanks
slave
slaveed
slaveer
slavees
slaveing
slavely
slaves
sleaze
sleazeed
sleazeer
sleazees
sleazeing
sleazely
sleazes
sleazy
sleazyed
sleazyer
sleazyes
sleazying
sleazyly
sleazys
slut
slutdumper
slutdumpered
slutdumperer
slutdumperes
slutdumpering
slutdumperly
slutdumpers
sluted
sluter
slutes
sluting
slutkiss
slutkissed
slutkisser
slutkisses
slutkissing
slutkissly
slutkisss
slutly
sluts
slutsed
slutser
slutses
slutsing
slutsly
slutss
smegma
smegmaed
smegmaer
smegmaes
smegmaing
smegmaly
smegmas
smut
smuted
smuter
smutes
smuting
smutly
smuts
smutty
smuttyed
smuttyer
smuttyes
smuttying
smuttyly
smuttys
snatch
snatched
snatcher
snatches
snatching
snatchly
snatchs
sniper
snipered
sniperer
sniperes
snipering
sniperly
snipers
snort
snorted
snorter
snortes
snorting
snortly
snorts
snuff
snuffed
snuffer
snuffes
snuffing
snuffly
snuffs
sodom
sodomed
sodomer
sodomes
sodoming
sodomly
sodoms
spic
spiced
spicer
spices
spicing
spick
spicked
spicker
spickes
spicking
spickly
spicks
spicly
spics
spik
spoof
spoofed
spoofer
spoofes
spoofing
spoofly
spoofs
spooge
spoogeed
spoogeer
spoogees
spoogeing
spoogely
spooges
spunk
spunked
spunker
spunkes
spunking
spunkly
spunks
steamyed
steamyer
steamyes
steamying
steamyly
steamys
stfu
stfued
stfuer
stfues
stfuing
stfuly
stfus
stiffy
stiffyed
stiffyer
stiffyes
stiffying
stiffyly
stiffys
stoneded
stoneder
stonedes
stoneding
stonedly
stoneds
stupided
stupider
stupides
stupiding
stupidly
stupids
suckeded
suckeder
suckedes
suckeding
suckedly
suckeds
sucker
suckes
sucking
suckinged
suckinger
suckinges
suckinging
suckingly
suckings
suckly
sucks
sumofabiatch
sumofabiatched
sumofabiatcher
sumofabiatches
sumofabiatching
sumofabiatchly
sumofabiatchs
tard
tarded
tarder
tardes
tarding
tardly
tards
tawdry
tawdryed
tawdryer
tawdryes
tawdrying
tawdryly
tawdrys
teabagging
teabagginged
teabagginger
teabagginges
teabagginging
teabaggingly
teabaggings
terd
terded
terder
terdes
terding
terdly
terds
teste
testee
testeed
testeeed
testeeer
testeees
testeeing
testeely
testeer
testees
testeing
testely
testes
testesed
testeser
testeses
testesing
testesly
testess
testicle
testicleed
testicleer
testiclees
testicleing
testiclely
testicles
testis
testised
testiser
testises
testising
testisly
testiss
thrusted
thruster
thrustes
thrusting
thrustly
thrusts
thug
thuged
thuger
thuges
thuging
thugly
thugs
tinkle
tinkleed
tinkleer
tinklees
tinkleing
tinklely
tinkles
tit
tited
titer
tites
titfuck
titfucked
titfucker
titfuckes
titfucking
titfuckly
titfucks
titi
titied
titier
tities
titiing
titily
titing
titis
titly
tits
titsed
titser
titses
titsing
titsly
titss
tittiefucker
tittiefuckered
tittiefuckerer
tittiefuckeres
tittiefuckering
tittiefuckerly
tittiefuckers
titties
tittiesed
tittieser
tittieses
tittiesing
tittiesly
tittiess
titty
tittyed
tittyer
tittyes
tittyfuck
tittyfucked
tittyfucker
tittyfuckered
tittyfuckerer
tittyfuckeres
tittyfuckering
tittyfuckerly
tittyfuckers
tittyfuckes
tittyfucking
tittyfuckly
tittyfucks
tittying
tittyly
tittys
toke
tokeed
tokeer
tokees
tokeing
tokely
tokes
toots
tootsed
tootser
tootses
tootsing
tootsly
tootss
tramp
tramped
tramper
trampes
tramping
tramply
tramps
transsexualed
transsexualer
transsexuales
transsexualing
transsexually
transsexuals
trashy
trashyed
trashyer
trashyes
trashying
trashyly
trashys
tubgirl
tubgirled
tubgirler
tubgirles
tubgirling
tubgirlly
tubgirls
turd
turded
turder
turdes
turding
turdly
turds
tush
tushed
tusher
tushes
tushing
tushly
tushs
twat
twated
twater
twates
twating
twatly
twats
twatsed
twatser
twatses
twatsing
twatsly
twatss
undies
undiesed
undieser
undieses
undiesing
undiesly
undiess
unweded
unweder
unwedes
unweding
unwedly
unweds
uzi
uzied
uzier
uzies
uziing
uzily
uzis
vag
vaged
vager
vages
vaging
vagly
vags
valium
valiumed
valiumer
valiumes
valiuming
valiumly
valiums
venous
virgined
virginer
virgines
virgining
virginly
virgins
vixen
vixened
vixener
vixenes
vixening
vixenly
vixens
vodkaed
vodkaer
vodkaes
vodkaing
vodkaly
vodkas
voyeur
voyeured
voyeurer
voyeures
voyeuring
voyeurly
voyeurs
vulgar
vulgared
vulgarer
vulgares
vulgaring
vulgarly
vulgars
wang
wanged
wanger
wanges
wanging
wangly
wangs
wank
wanked
wanker
wankered
wankerer
wankeres
wankering
wankerly
wankers
wankes
wanking
wankly
wanks
wazoo
wazooed
wazooer
wazooes
wazooing
wazooly
wazoos
wedgie
wedgieed
wedgieer
wedgiees
wedgieing
wedgiely
wedgies
weeded
weeder
weedes
weeding
weedly
weeds
weenie
weenieed
weenieer
weeniees
weenieing
weeniely
weenies
weewee
weeweeed
weeweeer
weeweees
weeweeing
weeweely
weewees
weiner
weinered
weinerer
weineres
weinering
weinerly
weiners
weirdo
weirdoed
weirdoer
weirdoes
weirdoing
weirdoly
weirdos
wench
wenched
wencher
wenches
wenching
wenchly
wenchs
wetback
wetbacked
wetbacker
wetbackes
wetbacking
wetbackly
wetbacks
whitey
whiteyed
whiteyer
whiteyes
whiteying
whiteyly
whiteys
whiz
whized
whizer
whizes
whizing
whizly
whizs
whoralicious
whoralicioused
whoraliciouser
whoraliciouses
whoraliciousing
whoraliciously
whoraliciouss
whore
whorealicious
whorealicioused
whorealiciouser
whorealiciouses
whorealiciousing
whorealiciously
whorealiciouss
whored
whoreded
whoreder
whoredes
whoreding
whoredly
whoreds
whoreed
whoreer
whorees
whoreface
whorefaceed
whorefaceer
whorefacees
whorefaceing
whorefacely
whorefaces
whorehopper
whorehoppered
whorehopperer
whorehopperes
whorehoppering
whorehopperly
whorehoppers
whorehouse
whorehouseed
whorehouseer
whorehousees
whorehouseing
whorehousely
whorehouses
whoreing
whorely
whores
whoresed
whoreser
whoreses
whoresing
whoresly
whoress
whoring
whoringed
whoringer
whoringes
whoringing
whoringly
whorings
wigger
wiggered
wiggerer
wiggeres
wiggering
wiggerly
wiggers
woody
woodyed
woodyer
woodyes
woodying
woodyly
woodys
wop
woped
woper
wopes
woping
woply
wops
wtf
wtfed
wtfer
wtfes
wtfing
wtfly
wtfs
xxx
xxxed
xxxer
xxxes
xxxing
xxxly
xxxs
yeasty
yeastyed
yeastyer
yeastyes
yeastying
yeastyly
yeastys
yobbo
yobboed
yobboer
yobboes
yobboing
yobboly
yobbos
zoophile
zoophileed
zoophileer
zoophilees
zoophileing
zoophilely
zoophiles
anal
ass
ass lick
balls
ballsac
bisexual
bleach
causas
cheap
cost of miracles
cunt
display network stats
fart
fda and death
fda AND warn
fda AND warning
fda AND warns
feom
fuck
gfc
humira AND expensive
illegal
madvocate
masturbation
nuccitelli
overdose
porn
shit
snort
texarkana
direct\-acting antivirals
assistance
ombitasvir
support path
harvoni
abbvie
direct-acting antivirals
paritaprevir
advocacy
ledipasvir
vpak
ritonavir with dasabuvir
program
gilead
greedy
financial
needy
fake-ovir
viekira pak
v pak
sofosbuvir
support
oasis
discount
dasabuvir
protest
ritonavir
Negative Keywords Excluded Elements
header[@id='header']
section[contains(@class, 'nav-hidden')]
footer[@id='footer']
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-article-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-home-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-topic-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'panel-panel-inner')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-node-field-article-topics')]
section[contains(@class, 'footer-nav-section-wrapper')]
Altmetric
DSM Affiliated
Display in offset block
Disqus Exclude
Best Practices
CE/CME
Education Center
Medical Education Library
Enable Disqus
Display Author and Disclosure Link
Publication Type
Society
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Disable Sticky Ads
Disable Ad Block Mitigation
Featured Buckets Admin
LayerRx MD-IQ Id
773
Show Ads on this Publication's Homepage
Consolidated Pub
Show Article Page Numbers on TOC
Use larger logo size
Off
publication_blueconic_enabled
Off
Show More Destinations Menu
Disable Adhesion on Publication
Off
Restore Menu Label on Mobile Navigation
Disable Facebook Pixel from Publication
Exclude this publication from publication selection on articles and quiz

Vaccination: An option not to be ignored

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/15/2018 - 07:40
Display Headline
Vaccination: An option not to be ignored

“Emerging” viral infections such as Ebola, Hantavirus, JC virus, and anthrax tend to attract attention. But reemerging infections once considered limited to children or virtually eradicated by vaccination programs also merit attention.

We have previously discussed in the Journal the recrudescence of pertussis in adults and the challenges to its diagnosis, which include the misperception that it is a rare disease. 1 Adult pertussis infection is usually due to the waning effect of childhood vaccination, and in adults it is more often an extreme annoyance than a life-threatening illness.

In this issue, Dr. Camille Sabella2 discusses measles, an infection thought to be all but eradicated in the United States by vaccination, predominantly using the live-attenuated measles virus contained in the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.

But measles outbreaks are seemingly on the rise, and because measles is extremely contagious, it poses a real risk to closed communities such as college dormitories, churches, and health care facilities. Measles infection can have significant adverse outcomes, particularly in immunosuppressed patients.

Although outbreaks have been attributed to virus imported from locations outside the United States, the spread of infection has been blamed on an increased number of unvaccinated children and adults. The reasons for decreased vaccination rates are many, and include parental fears that the vaccine will cause problems such as autism.

This autism link is a goblin that refuses to go away, despite strongly worded debunking by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Institute of Medicine,1 and many peer-reviewed publications. The very recent retraction by the Lancet4—based on ethical and nondisclosure concerns—of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al5 (which suggested a link in 12 children between MMR vaccine and chronic gastrointestinal problems and autism spectrum disorders) may further diffuse this concern. But I fear it will not.

So at present, we should reeducate ourselves on the clinical features, natural history, and potential complications of this eradicable disease, particularly if we treat patients who work in closed communities or have defects in cellular immunity.

References
  1. Sabella C. Pertussis: old foe, persistent problem. Cleve Clin J Med 2005; 72:601608.
  2. Sabella C. Measles: not just a childhood rash. Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77:207213.
  3. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Immunization safety review: vaccines and autism. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Immunization-Safety-Review-Vaccines-and-Autism.aspx. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  4. The Editors of The Lancet. Retraction—ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet (published online February 2, 2010) DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60175-4. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  5. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351:637641.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD
Editor in Chief

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
151
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD
Editor in Chief

Author and Disclosure Information

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD
Editor in Chief

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

“Emerging” viral infections such as Ebola, Hantavirus, JC virus, and anthrax tend to attract attention. But reemerging infections once considered limited to children or virtually eradicated by vaccination programs also merit attention.

We have previously discussed in the Journal the recrudescence of pertussis in adults and the challenges to its diagnosis, which include the misperception that it is a rare disease. 1 Adult pertussis infection is usually due to the waning effect of childhood vaccination, and in adults it is more often an extreme annoyance than a life-threatening illness.

In this issue, Dr. Camille Sabella2 discusses measles, an infection thought to be all but eradicated in the United States by vaccination, predominantly using the live-attenuated measles virus contained in the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.

But measles outbreaks are seemingly on the rise, and because measles is extremely contagious, it poses a real risk to closed communities such as college dormitories, churches, and health care facilities. Measles infection can have significant adverse outcomes, particularly in immunosuppressed patients.

Although outbreaks have been attributed to virus imported from locations outside the United States, the spread of infection has been blamed on an increased number of unvaccinated children and adults. The reasons for decreased vaccination rates are many, and include parental fears that the vaccine will cause problems such as autism.

This autism link is a goblin that refuses to go away, despite strongly worded debunking by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Institute of Medicine,1 and many peer-reviewed publications. The very recent retraction by the Lancet4—based on ethical and nondisclosure concerns—of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al5 (which suggested a link in 12 children between MMR vaccine and chronic gastrointestinal problems and autism spectrum disorders) may further diffuse this concern. But I fear it will not.

So at present, we should reeducate ourselves on the clinical features, natural history, and potential complications of this eradicable disease, particularly if we treat patients who work in closed communities or have defects in cellular immunity.

“Emerging” viral infections such as Ebola, Hantavirus, JC virus, and anthrax tend to attract attention. But reemerging infections once considered limited to children or virtually eradicated by vaccination programs also merit attention.

We have previously discussed in the Journal the recrudescence of pertussis in adults and the challenges to its diagnosis, which include the misperception that it is a rare disease. 1 Adult pertussis infection is usually due to the waning effect of childhood vaccination, and in adults it is more often an extreme annoyance than a life-threatening illness.

In this issue, Dr. Camille Sabella2 discusses measles, an infection thought to be all but eradicated in the United States by vaccination, predominantly using the live-attenuated measles virus contained in the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.

But measles outbreaks are seemingly on the rise, and because measles is extremely contagious, it poses a real risk to closed communities such as college dormitories, churches, and health care facilities. Measles infection can have significant adverse outcomes, particularly in immunosuppressed patients.

Although outbreaks have been attributed to virus imported from locations outside the United States, the spread of infection has been blamed on an increased number of unvaccinated children and adults. The reasons for decreased vaccination rates are many, and include parental fears that the vaccine will cause problems such as autism.

This autism link is a goblin that refuses to go away, despite strongly worded debunking by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Institute of Medicine,1 and many peer-reviewed publications. The very recent retraction by the Lancet4—based on ethical and nondisclosure concerns—of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al5 (which suggested a link in 12 children between MMR vaccine and chronic gastrointestinal problems and autism spectrum disorders) may further diffuse this concern. But I fear it will not.

So at present, we should reeducate ourselves on the clinical features, natural history, and potential complications of this eradicable disease, particularly if we treat patients who work in closed communities or have defects in cellular immunity.

References
  1. Sabella C. Pertussis: old foe, persistent problem. Cleve Clin J Med 2005; 72:601608.
  2. Sabella C. Measles: not just a childhood rash. Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77:207213.
  3. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Immunization safety review: vaccines and autism. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Immunization-Safety-Review-Vaccines-and-Autism.aspx. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  4. The Editors of The Lancet. Retraction—ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet (published online February 2, 2010) DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60175-4. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  5. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351:637641.
References
  1. Sabella C. Pertussis: old foe, persistent problem. Cleve Clin J Med 2005; 72:601608.
  2. Sabella C. Measles: not just a childhood rash. Cleve Clin J Med 2010; 77:207213.
  3. Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Immunization safety review: vaccines and autism. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Immunization-Safety-Review-Vaccines-and-Autism.aspx. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  4. The Editors of The Lancet. Retraction—ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet (published online February 2, 2010) DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60175-4. Accessed February 11, 2010.
  5. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351:637641.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Page Number
151
Page Number
151
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Vaccination: An option not to be ignored
Display Headline
Vaccination: An option not to be ignored
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Measles: Not just a childhood rash

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/15/2018 - 09:29
Display Headline
Measles: Not just a childhood rash

Although measles is generally considered a disease of children, it affects people of all ages. While the incidence of measles in the United States is significantly lower than in 1963, when an effective measles vaccine was first introduced, recent increases in the number of sporadic cases and community outbreaks in adults show that measles is still a significant health problem.

PATHOGENESIS OF MEASLES

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection, whose manifestations have been recognized since the 7th century. The measles virus is an RNA virus of the Paramyxoviridae family. It is very difficult to isolate from clinical specimens, requiring special cell lines for in vitro propagation.

After acquisition, the measles virus establishes localized infection of the respiratory epithelium and then spreads to the regional lymphatics. A primary viremia then occurs, in which the virus replicates at the site of inoculation and in the reticuloendothelial tissues. A secondary viremia follows, in which the virus infects and replicates in the skin, conjunctiva, respiratory tract, and other distant organs.

The measles rash is thought to be due to a hypersensitivity reaction.1 Cell-mediated responses are the main line of defense against measles, as evidenced by the fact that people with cell-mediated deficiencies develop severe measles infection.2 Immunity to wild-type measles is believed to be lifelong.3,4

MEASLES IS HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS

Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases, with a secondary attack rate of at least 90% in susceptible household contacts. 4 The fact that emergency departments and physicians’ offices have become sites of measles transmission in recent years underscores the transmissibility of the virus.5–7

Although the virus is very labile, it can remain infective in respiratory droplets from the air for many hours. Thus, measles virus spreads from person to person by direct contact with droplets from respiratory secretions of infected persons.

The period of maximal contagion is the late prodrome, ie, 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash. People who are generally in good health are contagious through 4 days after the onset of the rash, whereas people with compromised immunity can continue to shed the virus for the entire duration of the illness.

Airborne transmission precautions are required for 4 days after the onset of the rash in hospitalized, non-immunocompromised patients with measles, and for the duration of the illness for immunocompromised patients.

In the absence of widespread measles vaccination, measles infection peaks in late winter and early spring.

EPIDEMIOLOGIC TRENDS: CAUSE FOR CONCERN

Since an effective vaccine became available in 1963, the annual incidence of measles cases in the United States has decreased by more than 99%. A significant resurgence from 1989 to 1991 affected mainly unvaccinated preschoolers and resulted in more than 55,000 cases and 130 deaths.8 This resurgence prompted widespread, intensive immunization efforts and the recommendation that a second dose of measles vaccine be given to school-aged children. This led to the effective elimination of endemic transmission of measles in the United States.9

From the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Figure 1. Age distribution of reported measles cases, 1975–2005.
Since 1993, most reported cases of measles have been directly or indirectly linked to international travel, and many have been in adults (Figure 1). From 2000 to 2007, an average of 63 cases were reported each year to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with an all-time low of 34 cases reported in 2004. Since that time, however, the number of reported cases of measles has increased, and although most are linked to importation of the virus from other countries, incomplete vaccination rates have facilitated the spread of the virus once introduced into this country. This was well illustrated by the 131 cases of measles reported to the CDC from 15 states between January and July of 2008, which marked the largest number of reported cases in 1 year since 1996.10

Although 90% of these cases either were directly imported or were associated with importation from other countries,10 the reason for the large number of cases was clearly the greater transmission after importation of the virus into the United States. This transmission was the direct result of the fact that 91% of the cases occurred in unvaccinated people or people whose vaccination status was not known or was not documented. A high proportion— at least 61 (47%)—of the 131 measles cases in 2008 were in school-aged children whose parents chose not to have them vaccinated. Although no deaths were reported in these 131 patients, 15 required hospitalization.

Although most reported measles cases are still in young and school-aged children, recent cases and outbreaks have also occurred in isolated communities of adults. Approximately 25% of the cases reported in 2008 were in people age 20 and older. Most adults who contracted measles had unknown or undocumented vaccination status. Similarly, a small measles outbreak occurred in Indiana in 2005, when an adolescent US citizen traveling in Europe became infected in Romania and exposed 500 people at a church gathering upon her return. Thirty-four cases of measles were reported from this exposure, and many were in adults.11

The recent increase in the number of cases reported and the continued reports of outbreaks highlight the fact that measles outbreaks can occur in communities with a high number of unvaccinated people, and underscore the need for high overall measles vaccination coverage to limit the spread of this infection.12

 

 

CLINICAL FEATURES OF MEASLES

The first sign of measles is a distinct prodrome, which occurs after an incubation period of 10 to 12 days. The prodrome is characterized by fever, malaise, anorexia, conjunctivitis, coryza, and cough and may resemble an upper respiratory tract infection; it lasts 2 to 4 days.

Towards the end of the prodrome, the body temperature can rise to as high as 40°C, and Koplik spots, pathognomonic for measles, appear. Koplik spots, bluish-gray specks on an erythematous base, usually appear on the buccal mucosa opposite the second molars 1 to 2 days before the onset of the rash, and last for 1 to 2 days after the onset of the rash. Thus, it is not unusual for Koplik spots to have disappeared at the time the diagnosis of measles is entertained.

The classic measles rash is an erythematous maculopapular eruption that begins on the head and face and spreads to involve the entire body. It usually persists for 4 to 5 days and is most confluent on the face and upper body. The rash fades in order of appearance, and may desquamate. People with measles appear ill, especially 1 to 2 days after the rash appears.

The entire course of measles usually lasts 7 to 10 days in patients with a healthy immune system. The cough, a manifestation of tracheobronchitis, is usually the last symptom to resolve. Patients are contagious 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash, and remain so through 4 days after the onset of the rash.

COMPLICATIONS

Complications of measles most often occur in patients under age 5 and over age 20.13–16 Complications most commonly involve the respiratory tract and central nervous system (Table 1). The death rate associated with measles in developed countries is 1 to 3 deaths per 1,000 cases; in developing countries, the rate of complications and the death rate are both appreciably higher, with malnutrition contributing significantly to the higher rate of complications.

Respiratory complications

Pneumonia is responsible for 60% of deaths associated with measles.13 Although radiographic evidence of pneumonia is found in measles patients with no complications, symptomatic pneumonia occurs in 1% to 6% of patients. It is the result of either direct invasion by the virus or secondary bacterial infection,17 most often with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other respiratory complications include otitis media, sinusitis, and laryngotracheobronchitis.

Neurologic complications

Acute measles encephalitis is more common in adults than in children. Occuring in 1 in 1,000 to 2,000 patients,18 it is characterized by the resurgence of fever during the convalescent phase of the illness, along with headaches, seizures, and altered consciousness. These manifestations may be mild or severe, but they lead to permanent neurologic sequelae in a substantial proportion of affected patients. It is not clear whether acute measles encephalitis represents direct invasion of the virus or a postinfectious process from a hypersensitivity to the virus.19

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis is a rare, chronic, degenerative central nervous system disease that occurs secondary to persistent infection with a defective measles virus.20 The prevalence is estimated at 1 per 100,000 cases. Signs and symptoms appear an average of 7 years after the initial infection and include personality changes, myoclonic seizures, and motor disturbances. Often, coma and death follow.

This condition occurs particularly in those who had measles at a very young age, ie, before the age of 2 years, and it occurs despite a vigorous host-immune response to the virus. Patients have high titers of measles-specific antibody in the sera and cerebrospinal fluid.

Other complications

Diarrhea and stomatitis account for much of the sickness and death from measles in developing countries.

Subclinical hepatitis occurs in at least 30% of adult measles patients.

Less common complications include thrombocytopenia, appendicitis, ileocolitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, and hypocalcemia.

MEASLES DURING PREGNANCY

Measles during pregnancy may be severe, mainly due to primary measles pneumonia.21 Measles is associated with a risk of miscarriage and prematurity, but congenital anomalies of the fetus have not been described, as they have for rubella infection.22

 

 

MEASLES IN COMPROMISED IMMUNITY

Measles patients with deficiencies of cellmediated immunity have a prolonged, severe, and often fatal course.2,23,24 This includes patients with:

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Congenital immunodeficiencies
  • Disorders requiring chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive therapy.

These patients are particularly susceptible to acute progressive encephalitis and measles pneumonitis. Case-fatality rates of 70% in cancer patients and 40% in HIV-infected patients have been reported.24

The diagnosis of measles may be difficult in patients without cell-mediated immunity, as 25% to 40% of them do not develop the characteristic rash.2,23 The absence of rash supports the theory that the rash is a hypersensitivity reaction to the virus.

MODIFIED AND ATYPICAL MEASLES

Modified measles

A modified form of measles can occur in people with some degree of passive immunity to the virus, including those previously vaccinated. It occurs mostly in patients who recently received immunoglobulin products, or in young infants who have residual maternal antibody. A modified measles illness can also follow vaccination with live-virus vaccine (see later discussion).

The clinical manifestations vary, and the illness may not have the classic features of prodrome, rash, and Koplik spots.

Atypical measles

Atypical measles is an unusual form that can occur when a person previously vaccinated with a killed-virus measles vaccine (used from 1963 to 1967) is exposed to wild-type measles.25 Features include a shorter prodrome (1 to 2 days), followed by appearance of a rash that begins on the distal extremities and spreads centripetally, usually sparing the neck, face, and head. The rash may be petechial, maculopapular, urticarial, vesicular, or a combination. The rash is accompanied by high fever and edema of the extremities. Complications such as pneumonia and hepatitis may occur.

The course of atypical measles is more prolonged than with classic measles, but because these patients are thought to have partial protection against the virus, they do not transmit it and are not considered contagious.26

DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES

The classic clinical features are usually enough to distinguish measles from other febrile illnesses with similar clinical manifestions, such as rubella, dengue, parvovirus B19 infection, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and streptococcal scarlet fever. The distinctive measles prodrome, Koplik spots, the progression of the rash from the head and neck to the trunk and the extremities, and the severity of disease are distinctive features of measles.

Laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis are often used in areas where measles is rare, and laboratory confirmation is currently recommended in the United States. Because viral isolation is technically difficult and is not widely available, serologic testing is the method most commonly used. The measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody assay, the test used most often, is almost 100% sensitive when done 2 to 3 days after the onset of the rash.27,28 Measles IgM antibody peaks at 4 weeks after the infection and disappears by 6 to 8 weeks.

It is important to remember that false-positive measles IgM antibody may occur with other viral infections, such as parvovirus B19 and rubella. Because measles-specific IgG antibody is produced with the onset of infection and peaks at 4 weeks, a fourfold rise in the IgG titer is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Measles IgG antibody after infection is sustained for life.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing can also detect measles virus in the blood and urine when direct evidence of the virus is necessary, such as in immunocompromised patients.29

TREATMENT IS SUPPORTIVE

Treatment of measles mainly involves supportive measures, such as fluids and antipyretics. Antiviral agents such as ribavirin and interferon have in vitro activity against the measles virus and have been used to treat severe measles infection in immunocompromised patients. However, their clinical efficacy is unproven.30

Routine use of antibacterial agents to prevent secondary bacterial infection is not recommended.

CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION

Active immunization for measles has been available since 1963. Between 1963 and 1967, both killed-virus and live-virus vaccines were available. As atypical measles cases became recognized, the killed-virus vaccine was withdrawn.

The vaccine currently available in the United States is a live-attenuated strain prepared in chicken embryo cell culture and combined with mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) or mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV).

Two doses of live-virus measles vaccine are recommended for all healthy children before they begin school, with the first dose given at 12 to 15 months of age. A second dose is needed because the failure rate with one dose is 5%. More than 99% of people who receive two doses separated by 4 weeks develop serologic evidence of measles.

Waning immunity after vaccination occurs very rarely, with approximately 5% of children developing secondary vaccine failure 10 to 15 years after vaccination.3,31

Although rates of vaccination in the United States are high, cases of measles continue to occur in unvaccinated infants and in children who are either too young to be vaccinated or whose parents claimed exemption because of religious or personal beliefs.

Because of the occurrence of measles cases in adolescents, young adults, and adults, potentially susceptible people should be identified and vaccinated according to current guidelines. People should be considered susceptible unless they have documentation of at least two doses of measles vaccine given at least 28 days apart, physician-diagnosed measles, laboratory evidence of immunity to measles, or were born before 1957. All adults who are susceptible should receive at least one dose of measles vaccine.10 Adults at higher risk of contracting measles include:

  • Students in high school and college
  • International travelers
  • Health care personnel.

For these adults, two doses of measles vaccine, at least 28 days apart, are recommended.32

Postexposure prophylaxis

Measles vaccination given to susceptible contacts within 72 hours of exposure as postexposure prophylaxis may protect against infection and induces protection against subsequent exposures to measles.33,34 Vaccination is the intervention of choice for susceptible individuals older than 12 months of age who are exposed to measles and who do not have a contraindication to measles vaccination.35 Active rather than passive immunization is also the strategy of choice for controlling measles outbreaks.

Passive immunization with intramuscular immune globulin within 6 days of exposure can be used in selected circumstances to prevent transmission or to modify the clinical course of the infection.36 Immune globulin therapy is recommended for susceptible individuals who are exposed to measles and who are at high risk of developing severe or fatal measles. This includes individuals who are being treated with immunosuppressive agents, those with HIV infection, pregnant women, and infants less than 1 year of age. Immune globulin should not be used to control measles outbreaks.

 

 

ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MEASLES VACCINE

Live-virus measles vaccine has an excellent safety record. A transient fever, which may be accompanied by a measles-like rash, occurs in 5% to 15% of people 5 to 12 days after vaccination. The rash may be discrete or confluent and is self-limited.

Although measles vaccine is a live-attenuated vaccine, vaccinated people do not transmit the virus to susceptible contacts and are not considered contagious, even if they develop a vaccine-associated rash. Thus, the vaccine can be safely given to close contacts of immunocompromised and other susceptible people. Encephalitis is exceedingly rare following vaccination.

There is no scientific evidence that the risk of autism is higher in children who receive measles or MMR vaccine than in unvaccinated children.37 An Institute of Medicine report in 2001 rejected a causal relationship between MMR vaccine and autism spectrum disorders.38

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO MEASLES VACCINATION

Measles vaccine is contraindicated for:

  • People who have cell-mediated immune deficiencies (except patients wtih HIV infection—see discussion just below)
  • Pregnant women
  • Those who had a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component after a previous dose
  • Those with moderate or severe acute illness
  • Those who have recently received immune globulin products.

HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression should not receive the liveattenuated measles vaccine. However, because patients with HIV are at risk of severe measles, and because the vaccine has been shown to be safe in HIV patients who do not have severe immunosuppression, the vaccine is recommended for those with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HIV infection who do not have evidence of severe immunosuppression. 39

After receiving immune globulin

Anyone who has recently received immune globulin should not receive measles vaccine until sufficient time has passed, since passively acquired antibodies interfere with the immune response to live-virus vaccines. How long to wait depends on the type of immune globulin, the indication, the amount, and the route of administration. In general, the waiting period is:

  • At least 3 months after intramuscular immune globulin or tetanus, hepatitis A, or hepatitis B prophylaxis
  • At least 4 months after intramuscular immune globulin for rabies, or 6 months after intravenous immune globulin for cytomegalovirus (dose, 150 mg/kg)
  • At least 8 months after intravenous immune globulin as replacement or therapy for immune deficiencies (dose, 400 mg/kg), or after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (400 mg/kg)
  • At least 10 months after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic pupura at a dose of 1 g/kg.39

Egg allergy is not a contraindication

Although measles vaccine is produced in chick embryo cell culture, the vaccine has been shown to be safe in people with egg allergy, so they may be vaccinated without first being tested for egg allergy.39,40

References
  1. Lachmann PJ. Immunopathology of measles. Proc R Soc Med 1974; 67:11201122.
  2. Enders JF, McCarthy K, Mitus A, Cheatham WJ. Isolation of measles virus at autopsy in case of giant cell pneumonia without rash. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:875881.
  3. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Fine PE, Orenstein WA. Duration of live measles vaccine-induced immunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:101110.
  4. Stokes J, Reilly CM, Buynak EB, Hilleman MR. Immunologic studies of measles. Am J Hyg 1961; 74:293303.
  5. Farizo KM, Stehr-Green PA, Simpson DM, Markowitz LE. Pediatric emergency room visits: a risk factor for acquiring measles. Pediatrics 1991; 87:7479.
  6. Bloch AB, Orenstein W, Ewing WM, et al. Measles outbreak in a pediatric practice: airborne transmission in an office setting. Pediatrics 1985; 75:676683.
  7. Remington PL, Hall WN, Davis IH, et al. Airborne transmission of measles in a physician’s office. JAMA 1985; 253:15741577.
  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported vaccine-preventable diseases—United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR 1994; 43:5760.
  9. Orenstein WA, Papania MJ, Wharton ME. Measles elimination in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 189 (suppl 1):S1S3.
  10. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Measles—United States, January–July 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:893896.
  11. Parker AA, Staggs W, Dayan GH, et al. Implications of a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana for sustained elimination of measles in the United States. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:447455.
  12. Mulholland EK. Measles in the United States, 2006. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:440443.
  13. Barkin RM. Measles mortality. Analysis of the primary cause of death. Am J Dis Child 1975; 129:307309.
  14. Barkin RM. Measles mortality: a retrospective look at the vaccine era. Am J Epidemiol 1975; 102:341349.
  15. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public-sector vaccination efforts in response to the resurgence of measles among preschool-aged children—United States, 1989–1991. MMWR 1992; 41:522525.
  16. Gremillion DH, Crawford GE. Measles pneumonia in young adults. an analysis of 106 cases. Am J Med 1981; 71:539542.
  17. Quiambao BP, Gatchalian SR, Halonen P, et al. Coinfection is common in measles-associated pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:8993.
  18. Perry RT, Halsey NA. The clinical significance of measles: a review. J Infect Dis 2004; 189( suppl 1):S4S16.
  19. Johnson RT, Griffin DE, Hirsch RL, et al. Measles encephalomyelitis—clinical and immunologic studies. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:137141.
  20. Sever JL. Persistent measles infection of the central nervous system: subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Rev Infect Dis 1983; 5:467473.
  21. Atmar RL, Englund JA, Hammill H. Complications of measles during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14:217226.
  22. Gershon AA. Chickenpox, measles, and mumps. In:Remington J, Klein J, eds. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, 2006:693738.
  23. Mitus A, Enders JF, Craig JM, Holloway A. Persistence of measles virus and depression of antibody formation in patients with giant-cell pneumonia after measles. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:882889.
  24. Kaplan LJ, Daum RS, Smaron M, McCarthy CA. Severe measles in immunocompromised patients JAMA 1992; 267:12371241.
  25. Frey HM, Krugman S. Atypical measles syndrome: unusual hepatic, pulmonary, and immunologic aspects. Am J Med Sci 1981; 281:5155.
  26. Fulginiti VA, Eller JJ, Downie AW, Kempe CH. Altered reactivity to measles virus. Atypical measles in children previously immunized with inactivated measles virus vaccines. JAMA 1967; 202:10751080.
  27. Mayo DR, Brennan T, Cormier DP, Hadler J, Lamb P. Evaluation of a commercial measles virus immunoglobulin M enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:28652867.
  28. Bellini WJ, Helfand RF. The challenges and strategies for laboratory diagnosis of measles in an international setting. J Infect Dis 2003; 187( suppl 1):S283S290.
  29. Riddell MA, Chibo D, Kelly HA, Catton MG, Birch CJ. Investigation of optimal specimen type and sampling time for detection of measles virus RNA during a measles epidemic. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:375376.
  30. Forni Al, Schluger NW, Roberts RB. Severe measles pneumonitis in adults: evaluation of clinical characteristics and therapy with intravenous ribavirin. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19:454462.
  31. Anders JF, Jacobsen RM, Poland GA, Jacobsen SJ, Wollan PC. Secondary failure rates of measles vaccines: a metaanalysis of published studes. Pediar Infect Dis J 1996; 15:6266.
  32. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles—United States, January 1–April 25, 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:494498.
  33. Berkovitz S, Starr S. Use of live-measles-virus vaccine to abort an expected outbreak of measles within a closed population. N Engl J Med 1963; 269:7577.
  34. Ruuskanen O, Salmi TT, Halonen P. Measles vaccination after exposure to natural measles. J Pediatr 1978; 93:4346.
  35. Strebel PM, Papania MJ, Halsey NA. Measles vaccine. In:Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, eds. Vaccines. Saunders: New York, 2004:389440.
  36. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles, mumps and rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1998; 47( RR-8):157. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4708.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2009.
  37. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:14771482.
  38. Straton K, Gable A, Shetty P, McCormick M; for the Institute of Medicine. Immunization Safety Review: Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
  39. Pickerington LK, Baker CJ, Long SS, McMillan JA, editors. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009:444455.
  40. James JM, Burks AW, Roberson PK, Sampson HA. Safe administration of the measles vaccine to children allergic to eggs. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:12621266.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Camille Sabella, MD
Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital

Address: Camille Sabella, MD, Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, S25, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail [email protected]

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
207-213
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Camille Sabella, MD
Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital

Address: Camille Sabella, MD, Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, S25, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail [email protected]

Author and Disclosure Information

Camille Sabella, MD
Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital

Address: Camille Sabella, MD, Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, S25, Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail [email protected]

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Although measles is generally considered a disease of children, it affects people of all ages. While the incidence of measles in the United States is significantly lower than in 1963, when an effective measles vaccine was first introduced, recent increases in the number of sporadic cases and community outbreaks in adults show that measles is still a significant health problem.

PATHOGENESIS OF MEASLES

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection, whose manifestations have been recognized since the 7th century. The measles virus is an RNA virus of the Paramyxoviridae family. It is very difficult to isolate from clinical specimens, requiring special cell lines for in vitro propagation.

After acquisition, the measles virus establishes localized infection of the respiratory epithelium and then spreads to the regional lymphatics. A primary viremia then occurs, in which the virus replicates at the site of inoculation and in the reticuloendothelial tissues. A secondary viremia follows, in which the virus infects and replicates in the skin, conjunctiva, respiratory tract, and other distant organs.

The measles rash is thought to be due to a hypersensitivity reaction.1 Cell-mediated responses are the main line of defense against measles, as evidenced by the fact that people with cell-mediated deficiencies develop severe measles infection.2 Immunity to wild-type measles is believed to be lifelong.3,4

MEASLES IS HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS

Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases, with a secondary attack rate of at least 90% in susceptible household contacts. 4 The fact that emergency departments and physicians’ offices have become sites of measles transmission in recent years underscores the transmissibility of the virus.5–7

Although the virus is very labile, it can remain infective in respiratory droplets from the air for many hours. Thus, measles virus spreads from person to person by direct contact with droplets from respiratory secretions of infected persons.

The period of maximal contagion is the late prodrome, ie, 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash. People who are generally in good health are contagious through 4 days after the onset of the rash, whereas people with compromised immunity can continue to shed the virus for the entire duration of the illness.

Airborne transmission precautions are required for 4 days after the onset of the rash in hospitalized, non-immunocompromised patients with measles, and for the duration of the illness for immunocompromised patients.

In the absence of widespread measles vaccination, measles infection peaks in late winter and early spring.

EPIDEMIOLOGIC TRENDS: CAUSE FOR CONCERN

Since an effective vaccine became available in 1963, the annual incidence of measles cases in the United States has decreased by more than 99%. A significant resurgence from 1989 to 1991 affected mainly unvaccinated preschoolers and resulted in more than 55,000 cases and 130 deaths.8 This resurgence prompted widespread, intensive immunization efforts and the recommendation that a second dose of measles vaccine be given to school-aged children. This led to the effective elimination of endemic transmission of measles in the United States.9

From the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Figure 1. Age distribution of reported measles cases, 1975–2005.
Since 1993, most reported cases of measles have been directly or indirectly linked to international travel, and many have been in adults (Figure 1). From 2000 to 2007, an average of 63 cases were reported each year to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with an all-time low of 34 cases reported in 2004. Since that time, however, the number of reported cases of measles has increased, and although most are linked to importation of the virus from other countries, incomplete vaccination rates have facilitated the spread of the virus once introduced into this country. This was well illustrated by the 131 cases of measles reported to the CDC from 15 states between January and July of 2008, which marked the largest number of reported cases in 1 year since 1996.10

Although 90% of these cases either were directly imported or were associated with importation from other countries,10 the reason for the large number of cases was clearly the greater transmission after importation of the virus into the United States. This transmission was the direct result of the fact that 91% of the cases occurred in unvaccinated people or people whose vaccination status was not known or was not documented. A high proportion— at least 61 (47%)—of the 131 measles cases in 2008 were in school-aged children whose parents chose not to have them vaccinated. Although no deaths were reported in these 131 patients, 15 required hospitalization.

Although most reported measles cases are still in young and school-aged children, recent cases and outbreaks have also occurred in isolated communities of adults. Approximately 25% of the cases reported in 2008 were in people age 20 and older. Most adults who contracted measles had unknown or undocumented vaccination status. Similarly, a small measles outbreak occurred in Indiana in 2005, when an adolescent US citizen traveling in Europe became infected in Romania and exposed 500 people at a church gathering upon her return. Thirty-four cases of measles were reported from this exposure, and many were in adults.11

The recent increase in the number of cases reported and the continued reports of outbreaks highlight the fact that measles outbreaks can occur in communities with a high number of unvaccinated people, and underscore the need for high overall measles vaccination coverage to limit the spread of this infection.12

 

 

CLINICAL FEATURES OF MEASLES

The first sign of measles is a distinct prodrome, which occurs after an incubation period of 10 to 12 days. The prodrome is characterized by fever, malaise, anorexia, conjunctivitis, coryza, and cough and may resemble an upper respiratory tract infection; it lasts 2 to 4 days.

Towards the end of the prodrome, the body temperature can rise to as high as 40°C, and Koplik spots, pathognomonic for measles, appear. Koplik spots, bluish-gray specks on an erythematous base, usually appear on the buccal mucosa opposite the second molars 1 to 2 days before the onset of the rash, and last for 1 to 2 days after the onset of the rash. Thus, it is not unusual for Koplik spots to have disappeared at the time the diagnosis of measles is entertained.

The classic measles rash is an erythematous maculopapular eruption that begins on the head and face and spreads to involve the entire body. It usually persists for 4 to 5 days and is most confluent on the face and upper body. The rash fades in order of appearance, and may desquamate. People with measles appear ill, especially 1 to 2 days after the rash appears.

The entire course of measles usually lasts 7 to 10 days in patients with a healthy immune system. The cough, a manifestation of tracheobronchitis, is usually the last symptom to resolve. Patients are contagious 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash, and remain so through 4 days after the onset of the rash.

COMPLICATIONS

Complications of measles most often occur in patients under age 5 and over age 20.13–16 Complications most commonly involve the respiratory tract and central nervous system (Table 1). The death rate associated with measles in developed countries is 1 to 3 deaths per 1,000 cases; in developing countries, the rate of complications and the death rate are both appreciably higher, with malnutrition contributing significantly to the higher rate of complications.

Respiratory complications

Pneumonia is responsible for 60% of deaths associated with measles.13 Although radiographic evidence of pneumonia is found in measles patients with no complications, symptomatic pneumonia occurs in 1% to 6% of patients. It is the result of either direct invasion by the virus or secondary bacterial infection,17 most often with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other respiratory complications include otitis media, sinusitis, and laryngotracheobronchitis.

Neurologic complications

Acute measles encephalitis is more common in adults than in children. Occuring in 1 in 1,000 to 2,000 patients,18 it is characterized by the resurgence of fever during the convalescent phase of the illness, along with headaches, seizures, and altered consciousness. These manifestations may be mild or severe, but they lead to permanent neurologic sequelae in a substantial proportion of affected patients. It is not clear whether acute measles encephalitis represents direct invasion of the virus or a postinfectious process from a hypersensitivity to the virus.19

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis is a rare, chronic, degenerative central nervous system disease that occurs secondary to persistent infection with a defective measles virus.20 The prevalence is estimated at 1 per 100,000 cases. Signs and symptoms appear an average of 7 years after the initial infection and include personality changes, myoclonic seizures, and motor disturbances. Often, coma and death follow.

This condition occurs particularly in those who had measles at a very young age, ie, before the age of 2 years, and it occurs despite a vigorous host-immune response to the virus. Patients have high titers of measles-specific antibody in the sera and cerebrospinal fluid.

Other complications

Diarrhea and stomatitis account for much of the sickness and death from measles in developing countries.

Subclinical hepatitis occurs in at least 30% of adult measles patients.

Less common complications include thrombocytopenia, appendicitis, ileocolitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, and hypocalcemia.

MEASLES DURING PREGNANCY

Measles during pregnancy may be severe, mainly due to primary measles pneumonia.21 Measles is associated with a risk of miscarriage and prematurity, but congenital anomalies of the fetus have not been described, as they have for rubella infection.22

 

 

MEASLES IN COMPROMISED IMMUNITY

Measles patients with deficiencies of cellmediated immunity have a prolonged, severe, and often fatal course.2,23,24 This includes patients with:

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Congenital immunodeficiencies
  • Disorders requiring chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive therapy.

These patients are particularly susceptible to acute progressive encephalitis and measles pneumonitis. Case-fatality rates of 70% in cancer patients and 40% in HIV-infected patients have been reported.24

The diagnosis of measles may be difficult in patients without cell-mediated immunity, as 25% to 40% of them do not develop the characteristic rash.2,23 The absence of rash supports the theory that the rash is a hypersensitivity reaction to the virus.

MODIFIED AND ATYPICAL MEASLES

Modified measles

A modified form of measles can occur in people with some degree of passive immunity to the virus, including those previously vaccinated. It occurs mostly in patients who recently received immunoglobulin products, or in young infants who have residual maternal antibody. A modified measles illness can also follow vaccination with live-virus vaccine (see later discussion).

The clinical manifestations vary, and the illness may not have the classic features of prodrome, rash, and Koplik spots.

Atypical measles

Atypical measles is an unusual form that can occur when a person previously vaccinated with a killed-virus measles vaccine (used from 1963 to 1967) is exposed to wild-type measles.25 Features include a shorter prodrome (1 to 2 days), followed by appearance of a rash that begins on the distal extremities and spreads centripetally, usually sparing the neck, face, and head. The rash may be petechial, maculopapular, urticarial, vesicular, or a combination. The rash is accompanied by high fever and edema of the extremities. Complications such as pneumonia and hepatitis may occur.

The course of atypical measles is more prolonged than with classic measles, but because these patients are thought to have partial protection against the virus, they do not transmit it and are not considered contagious.26

DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES

The classic clinical features are usually enough to distinguish measles from other febrile illnesses with similar clinical manifestions, such as rubella, dengue, parvovirus B19 infection, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and streptococcal scarlet fever. The distinctive measles prodrome, Koplik spots, the progression of the rash from the head and neck to the trunk and the extremities, and the severity of disease are distinctive features of measles.

Laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis are often used in areas where measles is rare, and laboratory confirmation is currently recommended in the United States. Because viral isolation is technically difficult and is not widely available, serologic testing is the method most commonly used. The measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody assay, the test used most often, is almost 100% sensitive when done 2 to 3 days after the onset of the rash.27,28 Measles IgM antibody peaks at 4 weeks after the infection and disappears by 6 to 8 weeks.

It is important to remember that false-positive measles IgM antibody may occur with other viral infections, such as parvovirus B19 and rubella. Because measles-specific IgG antibody is produced with the onset of infection and peaks at 4 weeks, a fourfold rise in the IgG titer is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Measles IgG antibody after infection is sustained for life.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing can also detect measles virus in the blood and urine when direct evidence of the virus is necessary, such as in immunocompromised patients.29

TREATMENT IS SUPPORTIVE

Treatment of measles mainly involves supportive measures, such as fluids and antipyretics. Antiviral agents such as ribavirin and interferon have in vitro activity against the measles virus and have been used to treat severe measles infection in immunocompromised patients. However, their clinical efficacy is unproven.30

Routine use of antibacterial agents to prevent secondary bacterial infection is not recommended.

CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION

Active immunization for measles has been available since 1963. Between 1963 and 1967, both killed-virus and live-virus vaccines were available. As atypical measles cases became recognized, the killed-virus vaccine was withdrawn.

The vaccine currently available in the United States is a live-attenuated strain prepared in chicken embryo cell culture and combined with mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) or mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV).

Two doses of live-virus measles vaccine are recommended for all healthy children before they begin school, with the first dose given at 12 to 15 months of age. A second dose is needed because the failure rate with one dose is 5%. More than 99% of people who receive two doses separated by 4 weeks develop serologic evidence of measles.

Waning immunity after vaccination occurs very rarely, with approximately 5% of children developing secondary vaccine failure 10 to 15 years after vaccination.3,31

Although rates of vaccination in the United States are high, cases of measles continue to occur in unvaccinated infants and in children who are either too young to be vaccinated or whose parents claimed exemption because of religious or personal beliefs.

Because of the occurrence of measles cases in adolescents, young adults, and adults, potentially susceptible people should be identified and vaccinated according to current guidelines. People should be considered susceptible unless they have documentation of at least two doses of measles vaccine given at least 28 days apart, physician-diagnosed measles, laboratory evidence of immunity to measles, or were born before 1957. All adults who are susceptible should receive at least one dose of measles vaccine.10 Adults at higher risk of contracting measles include:

  • Students in high school and college
  • International travelers
  • Health care personnel.

For these adults, two doses of measles vaccine, at least 28 days apart, are recommended.32

Postexposure prophylaxis

Measles vaccination given to susceptible contacts within 72 hours of exposure as postexposure prophylaxis may protect against infection and induces protection against subsequent exposures to measles.33,34 Vaccination is the intervention of choice for susceptible individuals older than 12 months of age who are exposed to measles and who do not have a contraindication to measles vaccination.35 Active rather than passive immunization is also the strategy of choice for controlling measles outbreaks.

Passive immunization with intramuscular immune globulin within 6 days of exposure can be used in selected circumstances to prevent transmission or to modify the clinical course of the infection.36 Immune globulin therapy is recommended for susceptible individuals who are exposed to measles and who are at high risk of developing severe or fatal measles. This includes individuals who are being treated with immunosuppressive agents, those with HIV infection, pregnant women, and infants less than 1 year of age. Immune globulin should not be used to control measles outbreaks.

 

 

ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MEASLES VACCINE

Live-virus measles vaccine has an excellent safety record. A transient fever, which may be accompanied by a measles-like rash, occurs in 5% to 15% of people 5 to 12 days after vaccination. The rash may be discrete or confluent and is self-limited.

Although measles vaccine is a live-attenuated vaccine, vaccinated people do not transmit the virus to susceptible contacts and are not considered contagious, even if they develop a vaccine-associated rash. Thus, the vaccine can be safely given to close contacts of immunocompromised and other susceptible people. Encephalitis is exceedingly rare following vaccination.

There is no scientific evidence that the risk of autism is higher in children who receive measles or MMR vaccine than in unvaccinated children.37 An Institute of Medicine report in 2001 rejected a causal relationship between MMR vaccine and autism spectrum disorders.38

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO MEASLES VACCINATION

Measles vaccine is contraindicated for:

  • People who have cell-mediated immune deficiencies (except patients wtih HIV infection—see discussion just below)
  • Pregnant women
  • Those who had a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component after a previous dose
  • Those with moderate or severe acute illness
  • Those who have recently received immune globulin products.

HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression should not receive the liveattenuated measles vaccine. However, because patients with HIV are at risk of severe measles, and because the vaccine has been shown to be safe in HIV patients who do not have severe immunosuppression, the vaccine is recommended for those with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HIV infection who do not have evidence of severe immunosuppression. 39

After receiving immune globulin

Anyone who has recently received immune globulin should not receive measles vaccine until sufficient time has passed, since passively acquired antibodies interfere with the immune response to live-virus vaccines. How long to wait depends on the type of immune globulin, the indication, the amount, and the route of administration. In general, the waiting period is:

  • At least 3 months after intramuscular immune globulin or tetanus, hepatitis A, or hepatitis B prophylaxis
  • At least 4 months after intramuscular immune globulin for rabies, or 6 months after intravenous immune globulin for cytomegalovirus (dose, 150 mg/kg)
  • At least 8 months after intravenous immune globulin as replacement or therapy for immune deficiencies (dose, 400 mg/kg), or after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (400 mg/kg)
  • At least 10 months after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic pupura at a dose of 1 g/kg.39

Egg allergy is not a contraindication

Although measles vaccine is produced in chick embryo cell culture, the vaccine has been shown to be safe in people with egg allergy, so they may be vaccinated without first being tested for egg allergy.39,40

Although measles is generally considered a disease of children, it affects people of all ages. While the incidence of measles in the United States is significantly lower than in 1963, when an effective measles vaccine was first introduced, recent increases in the number of sporadic cases and community outbreaks in adults show that measles is still a significant health problem.

PATHOGENESIS OF MEASLES

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection, whose manifestations have been recognized since the 7th century. The measles virus is an RNA virus of the Paramyxoviridae family. It is very difficult to isolate from clinical specimens, requiring special cell lines for in vitro propagation.

After acquisition, the measles virus establishes localized infection of the respiratory epithelium and then spreads to the regional lymphatics. A primary viremia then occurs, in which the virus replicates at the site of inoculation and in the reticuloendothelial tissues. A secondary viremia follows, in which the virus infects and replicates in the skin, conjunctiva, respiratory tract, and other distant organs.

The measles rash is thought to be due to a hypersensitivity reaction.1 Cell-mediated responses are the main line of defense against measles, as evidenced by the fact that people with cell-mediated deficiencies develop severe measles infection.2 Immunity to wild-type measles is believed to be lifelong.3,4

MEASLES IS HIGHLY CONTAGIOUS

Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases, with a secondary attack rate of at least 90% in susceptible household contacts. 4 The fact that emergency departments and physicians’ offices have become sites of measles transmission in recent years underscores the transmissibility of the virus.5–7

Although the virus is very labile, it can remain infective in respiratory droplets from the air for many hours. Thus, measles virus spreads from person to person by direct contact with droplets from respiratory secretions of infected persons.

The period of maximal contagion is the late prodrome, ie, 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash. People who are generally in good health are contagious through 4 days after the onset of the rash, whereas people with compromised immunity can continue to shed the virus for the entire duration of the illness.

Airborne transmission precautions are required for 4 days after the onset of the rash in hospitalized, non-immunocompromised patients with measles, and for the duration of the illness for immunocompromised patients.

In the absence of widespread measles vaccination, measles infection peaks in late winter and early spring.

EPIDEMIOLOGIC TRENDS: CAUSE FOR CONCERN

Since an effective vaccine became available in 1963, the annual incidence of measles cases in the United States has decreased by more than 99%. A significant resurgence from 1989 to 1991 affected mainly unvaccinated preschoolers and resulted in more than 55,000 cases and 130 deaths.8 This resurgence prompted widespread, intensive immunization efforts and the recommendation that a second dose of measles vaccine be given to school-aged children. This led to the effective elimination of endemic transmission of measles in the United States.9

From the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Figure 1. Age distribution of reported measles cases, 1975–2005.
Since 1993, most reported cases of measles have been directly or indirectly linked to international travel, and many have been in adults (Figure 1). From 2000 to 2007, an average of 63 cases were reported each year to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with an all-time low of 34 cases reported in 2004. Since that time, however, the number of reported cases of measles has increased, and although most are linked to importation of the virus from other countries, incomplete vaccination rates have facilitated the spread of the virus once introduced into this country. This was well illustrated by the 131 cases of measles reported to the CDC from 15 states between January and July of 2008, which marked the largest number of reported cases in 1 year since 1996.10

Although 90% of these cases either were directly imported or were associated with importation from other countries,10 the reason for the large number of cases was clearly the greater transmission after importation of the virus into the United States. This transmission was the direct result of the fact that 91% of the cases occurred in unvaccinated people or people whose vaccination status was not known or was not documented. A high proportion— at least 61 (47%)—of the 131 measles cases in 2008 were in school-aged children whose parents chose not to have them vaccinated. Although no deaths were reported in these 131 patients, 15 required hospitalization.

Although most reported measles cases are still in young and school-aged children, recent cases and outbreaks have also occurred in isolated communities of adults. Approximately 25% of the cases reported in 2008 were in people age 20 and older. Most adults who contracted measles had unknown or undocumented vaccination status. Similarly, a small measles outbreak occurred in Indiana in 2005, when an adolescent US citizen traveling in Europe became infected in Romania and exposed 500 people at a church gathering upon her return. Thirty-four cases of measles were reported from this exposure, and many were in adults.11

The recent increase in the number of cases reported and the continued reports of outbreaks highlight the fact that measles outbreaks can occur in communities with a high number of unvaccinated people, and underscore the need for high overall measles vaccination coverage to limit the spread of this infection.12

 

 

CLINICAL FEATURES OF MEASLES

The first sign of measles is a distinct prodrome, which occurs after an incubation period of 10 to 12 days. The prodrome is characterized by fever, malaise, anorexia, conjunctivitis, coryza, and cough and may resemble an upper respiratory tract infection; it lasts 2 to 4 days.

Towards the end of the prodrome, the body temperature can rise to as high as 40°C, and Koplik spots, pathognomonic for measles, appear. Koplik spots, bluish-gray specks on an erythematous base, usually appear on the buccal mucosa opposite the second molars 1 to 2 days before the onset of the rash, and last for 1 to 2 days after the onset of the rash. Thus, it is not unusual for Koplik spots to have disappeared at the time the diagnosis of measles is entertained.

The classic measles rash is an erythematous maculopapular eruption that begins on the head and face and spreads to involve the entire body. It usually persists for 4 to 5 days and is most confluent on the face and upper body. The rash fades in order of appearance, and may desquamate. People with measles appear ill, especially 1 to 2 days after the rash appears.

The entire course of measles usually lasts 7 to 10 days in patients with a healthy immune system. The cough, a manifestation of tracheobronchitis, is usually the last symptom to resolve. Patients are contagious 2 to 4 days before the onset of the rash, and remain so through 4 days after the onset of the rash.

COMPLICATIONS

Complications of measles most often occur in patients under age 5 and over age 20.13–16 Complications most commonly involve the respiratory tract and central nervous system (Table 1). The death rate associated with measles in developed countries is 1 to 3 deaths per 1,000 cases; in developing countries, the rate of complications and the death rate are both appreciably higher, with malnutrition contributing significantly to the higher rate of complications.

Respiratory complications

Pneumonia is responsible for 60% of deaths associated with measles.13 Although radiographic evidence of pneumonia is found in measles patients with no complications, symptomatic pneumonia occurs in 1% to 6% of patients. It is the result of either direct invasion by the virus or secondary bacterial infection,17 most often with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other respiratory complications include otitis media, sinusitis, and laryngotracheobronchitis.

Neurologic complications

Acute measles encephalitis is more common in adults than in children. Occuring in 1 in 1,000 to 2,000 patients,18 it is characterized by the resurgence of fever during the convalescent phase of the illness, along with headaches, seizures, and altered consciousness. These manifestations may be mild or severe, but they lead to permanent neurologic sequelae in a substantial proportion of affected patients. It is not clear whether acute measles encephalitis represents direct invasion of the virus or a postinfectious process from a hypersensitivity to the virus.19

Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis is a rare, chronic, degenerative central nervous system disease that occurs secondary to persistent infection with a defective measles virus.20 The prevalence is estimated at 1 per 100,000 cases. Signs and symptoms appear an average of 7 years after the initial infection and include personality changes, myoclonic seizures, and motor disturbances. Often, coma and death follow.

This condition occurs particularly in those who had measles at a very young age, ie, before the age of 2 years, and it occurs despite a vigorous host-immune response to the virus. Patients have high titers of measles-specific antibody in the sera and cerebrospinal fluid.

Other complications

Diarrhea and stomatitis account for much of the sickness and death from measles in developing countries.

Subclinical hepatitis occurs in at least 30% of adult measles patients.

Less common complications include thrombocytopenia, appendicitis, ileocolitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, and hypocalcemia.

MEASLES DURING PREGNANCY

Measles during pregnancy may be severe, mainly due to primary measles pneumonia.21 Measles is associated with a risk of miscarriage and prematurity, but congenital anomalies of the fetus have not been described, as they have for rubella infection.22

 

 

MEASLES IN COMPROMISED IMMUNITY

Measles patients with deficiencies of cellmediated immunity have a prolonged, severe, and often fatal course.2,23,24 This includes patients with:

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Congenital immunodeficiencies
  • Disorders requiring chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive therapy.

These patients are particularly susceptible to acute progressive encephalitis and measles pneumonitis. Case-fatality rates of 70% in cancer patients and 40% in HIV-infected patients have been reported.24

The diagnosis of measles may be difficult in patients without cell-mediated immunity, as 25% to 40% of them do not develop the characteristic rash.2,23 The absence of rash supports the theory that the rash is a hypersensitivity reaction to the virus.

MODIFIED AND ATYPICAL MEASLES

Modified measles

A modified form of measles can occur in people with some degree of passive immunity to the virus, including those previously vaccinated. It occurs mostly in patients who recently received immunoglobulin products, or in young infants who have residual maternal antibody. A modified measles illness can also follow vaccination with live-virus vaccine (see later discussion).

The clinical manifestations vary, and the illness may not have the classic features of prodrome, rash, and Koplik spots.

Atypical measles

Atypical measles is an unusual form that can occur when a person previously vaccinated with a killed-virus measles vaccine (used from 1963 to 1967) is exposed to wild-type measles.25 Features include a shorter prodrome (1 to 2 days), followed by appearance of a rash that begins on the distal extremities and spreads centripetally, usually sparing the neck, face, and head. The rash may be petechial, maculopapular, urticarial, vesicular, or a combination. The rash is accompanied by high fever and edema of the extremities. Complications such as pneumonia and hepatitis may occur.

The course of atypical measles is more prolonged than with classic measles, but because these patients are thought to have partial protection against the virus, they do not transmit it and are not considered contagious.26

DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES

The classic clinical features are usually enough to distinguish measles from other febrile illnesses with similar clinical manifestions, such as rubella, dengue, parvovirus B19 infection, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and streptococcal scarlet fever. The distinctive measles prodrome, Koplik spots, the progression of the rash from the head and neck to the trunk and the extremities, and the severity of disease are distinctive features of measles.

Laboratory tests to confirm the diagnosis are often used in areas where measles is rare, and laboratory confirmation is currently recommended in the United States. Because viral isolation is technically difficult and is not widely available, serologic testing is the method most commonly used. The measles-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody assay, the test used most often, is almost 100% sensitive when done 2 to 3 days after the onset of the rash.27,28 Measles IgM antibody peaks at 4 weeks after the infection and disappears by 6 to 8 weeks.

It is important to remember that false-positive measles IgM antibody may occur with other viral infections, such as parvovirus B19 and rubella. Because measles-specific IgG antibody is produced with the onset of infection and peaks at 4 weeks, a fourfold rise in the IgG titer is useful in confirming the diagnosis. Measles IgG antibody after infection is sustained for life.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing can also detect measles virus in the blood and urine when direct evidence of the virus is necessary, such as in immunocompromised patients.29

TREATMENT IS SUPPORTIVE

Treatment of measles mainly involves supportive measures, such as fluids and antipyretics. Antiviral agents such as ribavirin and interferon have in vitro activity against the measles virus and have been used to treat severe measles infection in immunocompromised patients. However, their clinical efficacy is unproven.30

Routine use of antibacterial agents to prevent secondary bacterial infection is not recommended.

CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION

Active immunization for measles has been available since 1963. Between 1963 and 1967, both killed-virus and live-virus vaccines were available. As atypical measles cases became recognized, the killed-virus vaccine was withdrawn.

The vaccine currently available in the United States is a live-attenuated strain prepared in chicken embryo cell culture and combined with mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) or mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (MMRV).

Two doses of live-virus measles vaccine are recommended for all healthy children before they begin school, with the first dose given at 12 to 15 months of age. A second dose is needed because the failure rate with one dose is 5%. More than 99% of people who receive two doses separated by 4 weeks develop serologic evidence of measles.

Waning immunity after vaccination occurs very rarely, with approximately 5% of children developing secondary vaccine failure 10 to 15 years after vaccination.3,31

Although rates of vaccination in the United States are high, cases of measles continue to occur in unvaccinated infants and in children who are either too young to be vaccinated or whose parents claimed exemption because of religious or personal beliefs.

Because of the occurrence of measles cases in adolescents, young adults, and adults, potentially susceptible people should be identified and vaccinated according to current guidelines. People should be considered susceptible unless they have documentation of at least two doses of measles vaccine given at least 28 days apart, physician-diagnosed measles, laboratory evidence of immunity to measles, or were born before 1957. All adults who are susceptible should receive at least one dose of measles vaccine.10 Adults at higher risk of contracting measles include:

  • Students in high school and college
  • International travelers
  • Health care personnel.

For these adults, two doses of measles vaccine, at least 28 days apart, are recommended.32

Postexposure prophylaxis

Measles vaccination given to susceptible contacts within 72 hours of exposure as postexposure prophylaxis may protect against infection and induces protection against subsequent exposures to measles.33,34 Vaccination is the intervention of choice for susceptible individuals older than 12 months of age who are exposed to measles and who do not have a contraindication to measles vaccination.35 Active rather than passive immunization is also the strategy of choice for controlling measles outbreaks.

Passive immunization with intramuscular immune globulin within 6 days of exposure can be used in selected circumstances to prevent transmission or to modify the clinical course of the infection.36 Immune globulin therapy is recommended for susceptible individuals who are exposed to measles and who are at high risk of developing severe or fatal measles. This includes individuals who are being treated with immunosuppressive agents, those with HIV infection, pregnant women, and infants less than 1 year of age. Immune globulin should not be used to control measles outbreaks.

 

 

ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MEASLES VACCINE

Live-virus measles vaccine has an excellent safety record. A transient fever, which may be accompanied by a measles-like rash, occurs in 5% to 15% of people 5 to 12 days after vaccination. The rash may be discrete or confluent and is self-limited.

Although measles vaccine is a live-attenuated vaccine, vaccinated people do not transmit the virus to susceptible contacts and are not considered contagious, even if they develop a vaccine-associated rash. Thus, the vaccine can be safely given to close contacts of immunocompromised and other susceptible people. Encephalitis is exceedingly rare following vaccination.

There is no scientific evidence that the risk of autism is higher in children who receive measles or MMR vaccine than in unvaccinated children.37 An Institute of Medicine report in 2001 rejected a causal relationship between MMR vaccine and autism spectrum disorders.38

CONTRAINDICATIONS TO MEASLES VACCINATION

Measles vaccine is contraindicated for:

  • People who have cell-mediated immune deficiencies (except patients wtih HIV infection—see discussion just below)
  • Pregnant women
  • Those who had a severe allergic reaction to a vaccine component after a previous dose
  • Those with moderate or severe acute illness
  • Those who have recently received immune globulin products.

HIV-infected patients with severe immunosuppression should not receive the liveattenuated measles vaccine. However, because patients with HIV are at risk of severe measles, and because the vaccine has been shown to be safe in HIV patients who do not have severe immunosuppression, the vaccine is recommended for those with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic HIV infection who do not have evidence of severe immunosuppression. 39

After receiving immune globulin

Anyone who has recently received immune globulin should not receive measles vaccine until sufficient time has passed, since passively acquired antibodies interfere with the immune response to live-virus vaccines. How long to wait depends on the type of immune globulin, the indication, the amount, and the route of administration. In general, the waiting period is:

  • At least 3 months after intramuscular immune globulin or tetanus, hepatitis A, or hepatitis B prophylaxis
  • At least 4 months after intramuscular immune globulin for rabies, or 6 months after intravenous immune globulin for cytomegalovirus (dose, 150 mg/kg)
  • At least 8 months after intravenous immune globulin as replacement or therapy for immune deficiencies (dose, 400 mg/kg), or after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic purpura (400 mg/kg)
  • At least 10 months after intravenous immune globulin for immune thrombocytopenic pupura at a dose of 1 g/kg.39

Egg allergy is not a contraindication

Although measles vaccine is produced in chick embryo cell culture, the vaccine has been shown to be safe in people with egg allergy, so they may be vaccinated without first being tested for egg allergy.39,40

References
  1. Lachmann PJ. Immunopathology of measles. Proc R Soc Med 1974; 67:11201122.
  2. Enders JF, McCarthy K, Mitus A, Cheatham WJ. Isolation of measles virus at autopsy in case of giant cell pneumonia without rash. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:875881.
  3. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Fine PE, Orenstein WA. Duration of live measles vaccine-induced immunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:101110.
  4. Stokes J, Reilly CM, Buynak EB, Hilleman MR. Immunologic studies of measles. Am J Hyg 1961; 74:293303.
  5. Farizo KM, Stehr-Green PA, Simpson DM, Markowitz LE. Pediatric emergency room visits: a risk factor for acquiring measles. Pediatrics 1991; 87:7479.
  6. Bloch AB, Orenstein W, Ewing WM, et al. Measles outbreak in a pediatric practice: airborne transmission in an office setting. Pediatrics 1985; 75:676683.
  7. Remington PL, Hall WN, Davis IH, et al. Airborne transmission of measles in a physician’s office. JAMA 1985; 253:15741577.
  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported vaccine-preventable diseases—United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR 1994; 43:5760.
  9. Orenstein WA, Papania MJ, Wharton ME. Measles elimination in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 189 (suppl 1):S1S3.
  10. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Measles—United States, January–July 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:893896.
  11. Parker AA, Staggs W, Dayan GH, et al. Implications of a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana for sustained elimination of measles in the United States. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:447455.
  12. Mulholland EK. Measles in the United States, 2006. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:440443.
  13. Barkin RM. Measles mortality. Analysis of the primary cause of death. Am J Dis Child 1975; 129:307309.
  14. Barkin RM. Measles mortality: a retrospective look at the vaccine era. Am J Epidemiol 1975; 102:341349.
  15. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public-sector vaccination efforts in response to the resurgence of measles among preschool-aged children—United States, 1989–1991. MMWR 1992; 41:522525.
  16. Gremillion DH, Crawford GE. Measles pneumonia in young adults. an analysis of 106 cases. Am J Med 1981; 71:539542.
  17. Quiambao BP, Gatchalian SR, Halonen P, et al. Coinfection is common in measles-associated pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:8993.
  18. Perry RT, Halsey NA. The clinical significance of measles: a review. J Infect Dis 2004; 189( suppl 1):S4S16.
  19. Johnson RT, Griffin DE, Hirsch RL, et al. Measles encephalomyelitis—clinical and immunologic studies. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:137141.
  20. Sever JL. Persistent measles infection of the central nervous system: subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Rev Infect Dis 1983; 5:467473.
  21. Atmar RL, Englund JA, Hammill H. Complications of measles during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14:217226.
  22. Gershon AA. Chickenpox, measles, and mumps. In:Remington J, Klein J, eds. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, 2006:693738.
  23. Mitus A, Enders JF, Craig JM, Holloway A. Persistence of measles virus and depression of antibody formation in patients with giant-cell pneumonia after measles. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:882889.
  24. Kaplan LJ, Daum RS, Smaron M, McCarthy CA. Severe measles in immunocompromised patients JAMA 1992; 267:12371241.
  25. Frey HM, Krugman S. Atypical measles syndrome: unusual hepatic, pulmonary, and immunologic aspects. Am J Med Sci 1981; 281:5155.
  26. Fulginiti VA, Eller JJ, Downie AW, Kempe CH. Altered reactivity to measles virus. Atypical measles in children previously immunized with inactivated measles virus vaccines. JAMA 1967; 202:10751080.
  27. Mayo DR, Brennan T, Cormier DP, Hadler J, Lamb P. Evaluation of a commercial measles virus immunoglobulin M enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:28652867.
  28. Bellini WJ, Helfand RF. The challenges and strategies for laboratory diagnosis of measles in an international setting. J Infect Dis 2003; 187( suppl 1):S283S290.
  29. Riddell MA, Chibo D, Kelly HA, Catton MG, Birch CJ. Investigation of optimal specimen type and sampling time for detection of measles virus RNA during a measles epidemic. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:375376.
  30. Forni Al, Schluger NW, Roberts RB. Severe measles pneumonitis in adults: evaluation of clinical characteristics and therapy with intravenous ribavirin. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19:454462.
  31. Anders JF, Jacobsen RM, Poland GA, Jacobsen SJ, Wollan PC. Secondary failure rates of measles vaccines: a metaanalysis of published studes. Pediar Infect Dis J 1996; 15:6266.
  32. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles—United States, January 1–April 25, 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:494498.
  33. Berkovitz S, Starr S. Use of live-measles-virus vaccine to abort an expected outbreak of measles within a closed population. N Engl J Med 1963; 269:7577.
  34. Ruuskanen O, Salmi TT, Halonen P. Measles vaccination after exposure to natural measles. J Pediatr 1978; 93:4346.
  35. Strebel PM, Papania MJ, Halsey NA. Measles vaccine. In:Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, eds. Vaccines. Saunders: New York, 2004:389440.
  36. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles, mumps and rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1998; 47( RR-8):157. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4708.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2009.
  37. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:14771482.
  38. Straton K, Gable A, Shetty P, McCormick M; for the Institute of Medicine. Immunization Safety Review: Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
  39. Pickerington LK, Baker CJ, Long SS, McMillan JA, editors. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009:444455.
  40. James JM, Burks AW, Roberson PK, Sampson HA. Safe administration of the measles vaccine to children allergic to eggs. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:12621266.
References
  1. Lachmann PJ. Immunopathology of measles. Proc R Soc Med 1974; 67:11201122.
  2. Enders JF, McCarthy K, Mitus A, Cheatham WJ. Isolation of measles virus at autopsy in case of giant cell pneumonia without rash. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:875881.
  3. Markowitz LE, Preblud SR, Fine PE, Orenstein WA. Duration of live measles vaccine-induced immunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:101110.
  4. Stokes J, Reilly CM, Buynak EB, Hilleman MR. Immunologic studies of measles. Am J Hyg 1961; 74:293303.
  5. Farizo KM, Stehr-Green PA, Simpson DM, Markowitz LE. Pediatric emergency room visits: a risk factor for acquiring measles. Pediatrics 1991; 87:7479.
  6. Bloch AB, Orenstein W, Ewing WM, et al. Measles outbreak in a pediatric practice: airborne transmission in an office setting. Pediatrics 1985; 75:676683.
  7. Remington PL, Hall WN, Davis IH, et al. Airborne transmission of measles in a physician’s office. JAMA 1985; 253:15741577.
  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported vaccine-preventable diseases—United States, 1993, and the Childhood Immunization Initiative. MMWR 1994; 43:5760.
  9. Orenstein WA, Papania MJ, Wharton ME. Measles elimination in the United States. J Infect Dis 2004; 189 (suppl 1):S1S3.
  10. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Measles—United States, January–July 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:893896.
  11. Parker AA, Staggs W, Dayan GH, et al. Implications of a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana for sustained elimination of measles in the United States. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:447455.
  12. Mulholland EK. Measles in the United States, 2006. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:440443.
  13. Barkin RM. Measles mortality. Analysis of the primary cause of death. Am J Dis Child 1975; 129:307309.
  14. Barkin RM. Measles mortality: a retrospective look at the vaccine era. Am J Epidemiol 1975; 102:341349.
  15. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public-sector vaccination efforts in response to the resurgence of measles among preschool-aged children—United States, 1989–1991. MMWR 1992; 41:522525.
  16. Gremillion DH, Crawford GE. Measles pneumonia in young adults. an analysis of 106 cases. Am J Med 1981; 71:539542.
  17. Quiambao BP, Gatchalian SR, Halonen P, et al. Coinfection is common in measles-associated pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:8993.
  18. Perry RT, Halsey NA. The clinical significance of measles: a review. J Infect Dis 2004; 189( suppl 1):S4S16.
  19. Johnson RT, Griffin DE, Hirsch RL, et al. Measles encephalomyelitis—clinical and immunologic studies. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:137141.
  20. Sever JL. Persistent measles infection of the central nervous system: subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Rev Infect Dis 1983; 5:467473.
  21. Atmar RL, Englund JA, Hammill H. Complications of measles during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14:217226.
  22. Gershon AA. Chickenpox, measles, and mumps. In:Remington J, Klein J, eds. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. Elsevier Saunders: Philadelphia, 2006:693738.
  23. Mitus A, Enders JF, Craig JM, Holloway A. Persistence of measles virus and depression of antibody formation in patients with giant-cell pneumonia after measles. N Engl J Med 1959; 261:882889.
  24. Kaplan LJ, Daum RS, Smaron M, McCarthy CA. Severe measles in immunocompromised patients JAMA 1992; 267:12371241.
  25. Frey HM, Krugman S. Atypical measles syndrome: unusual hepatic, pulmonary, and immunologic aspects. Am J Med Sci 1981; 281:5155.
  26. Fulginiti VA, Eller JJ, Downie AW, Kempe CH. Altered reactivity to measles virus. Atypical measles in children previously immunized with inactivated measles virus vaccines. JAMA 1967; 202:10751080.
  27. Mayo DR, Brennan T, Cormier DP, Hadler J, Lamb P. Evaluation of a commercial measles virus immunoglobulin M enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:28652867.
  28. Bellini WJ, Helfand RF. The challenges and strategies for laboratory diagnosis of measles in an international setting. J Infect Dis 2003; 187( suppl 1):S283S290.
  29. Riddell MA, Chibo D, Kelly HA, Catton MG, Birch CJ. Investigation of optimal specimen type and sampling time for detection of measles virus RNA during a measles epidemic. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39:375376.
  30. Forni Al, Schluger NW, Roberts RB. Severe measles pneumonitis in adults: evaluation of clinical characteristics and therapy with intravenous ribavirin. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19:454462.
  31. Anders JF, Jacobsen RM, Poland GA, Jacobsen SJ, Wollan PC. Secondary failure rates of measles vaccines: a metaanalysis of published studes. Pediar Infect Dis J 1996; 15:6266.
  32. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles—United States, January 1–April 25, 2008. MMWR 2008; 57:494498.
  33. Berkovitz S, Starr S. Use of live-measles-virus vaccine to abort an expected outbreak of measles within a closed population. N Engl J Med 1963; 269:7577.
  34. Ruuskanen O, Salmi TT, Halonen P. Measles vaccination after exposure to natural measles. J Pediatr 1978; 93:4346.
  35. Strebel PM, Papania MJ, Halsey NA. Measles vaccine. In:Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, eds. Vaccines. Saunders: New York, 2004:389440.
  36. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measles, mumps and rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 1998; 47( RR-8):157. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4708.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2009.
  37. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, et al. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:14771482.
  38. Straton K, Gable A, Shetty P, McCormick M; for the Institute of Medicine. Immunization Safety Review: Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
  39. Pickerington LK, Baker CJ, Long SS, McMillan JA, editors. Red Book: 2009 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 28th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2009:444455.
  40. James JM, Burks AW, Roberson PK, Sampson HA. Safe administration of the measles vaccine to children allergic to eggs. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:12621266.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Page Number
207-213
Page Number
207-213
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Measles: Not just a childhood rash
Display Headline
Measles: Not just a childhood rash
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Measles is one of the most contagious infectious diseases, with a secondary attack rate of at least 90% in susceptible household contacts.
  • Since 1993, most reported cases of measles have been directly or indirectly linked to international travel, and many have occurred in adults.
  • Acute measles encephalitis, a neurologic complication of measles, is more common in adults than in children and is characterized by the resurgence of fever during the convalescent phase, along with headaches, seizures, and altered consciousness.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Correction: Renal stone interventions

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/15/2018 - 08:02
Display Headline
Correction: Renal stone interventions

A typographical error appeared in: Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598. On page 594, second column, fourth paragraph, the text should read, “Lithotripsy is more likely to fail if the skin-to-stone distance is more than 10 cm…”—not 10 mm.

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Publications
Page Number
160
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

A typographical error appeared in: Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598. On page 594, second column, fourth paragraph, the text should read, “Lithotripsy is more likely to fail if the skin-to-stone distance is more than 10 cm…”—not 10 mm.

A typographical error appeared in: Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598. On page 594, second column, fourth paragraph, the text should read, “Lithotripsy is more likely to fail if the skin-to-stone distance is more than 10 cm…”—not 10 mm.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Page Number
160
Page Number
160
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Renal stone interventions
Display Headline
Correction: Renal stone interventions
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Correction: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/15/2018 - 07:58
Display Headline
Correction: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage

An incorrect brand name was used for a formulation of methyprednisolone in: Ioachimescu OC, Stoller JK. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: Diagnosing it and finding the cause Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:258–280; doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.4.258. On page 275, in the section on treatment, the second paragraph should read:

“Most experts recommend intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) (up to 500 mg every 6 hours, although lower doses seem to have similar efficacy) for 4 or 5 days, followed by a gradual taper to maintenance doses of oral steroids.”

The online versions of this article have been corrected.

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Publications
Page Number
160
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

An incorrect brand name was used for a formulation of methyprednisolone in: Ioachimescu OC, Stoller JK. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: Diagnosing it and finding the cause Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:258–280; doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.4.258. On page 275, in the section on treatment, the second paragraph should read:

“Most experts recommend intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) (up to 500 mg every 6 hours, although lower doses seem to have similar efficacy) for 4 or 5 days, followed by a gradual taper to maintenance doses of oral steroids.”

The online versions of this article have been corrected.

An incorrect brand name was used for a formulation of methyprednisolone in: Ioachimescu OC, Stoller JK. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: Diagnosing it and finding the cause Cleve Clin J Med 2008; 75:258–280; doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.4.258. On page 275, in the section on treatment, the second paragraph should read:

“Most experts recommend intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol) (up to 500 mg every 6 hours, although lower doses seem to have similar efficacy) for 4 or 5 days, followed by a gradual taper to maintenance doses of oral steroids.”

The online versions of this article have been corrected.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(3)
Page Number
160
Page Number
160
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Correction: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
Display Headline
Correction: Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Kidney stones

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 06/05/2019 - 12:01
Display Headline
Kidney stones

To the Editor: Thanks for the excellent review articles on nephrolithiasis in your October 2009 issue.1,2

Dr. Hall1 cites studies in which patients given the alpha blocker tamsulosin (Flomax) or the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (Procardia) had improved rates of kidney stone passage compared with placebo. As a primary care physician, I am often confronted with the challenge of managing a patient who is waiting for a kidney stone to pass while taking tamsulosin. Is Dr. Hall aware of any clinical studies, or at least theoretical reasons, which would support adding nifedipine in such cases?

Secondly, Dr. Hall cites studies that demonstrated that a higher intake of dietary calcium is actually associated with fewer calcium stone events in both men and women. An unanswered question is whether patients taking calcium supplements for osteoporosis or osteopenia can safely continue to do so after a calcium stone event, or indeed, whether calcium supplementation might actually be helpful in preventing a recurrent calcum stone.

If there is an absence of randomized studies to answer these questions, Dr. Hall’s recommendations based on his expert experience would be most welcome.

References
  1. Hall PM. Nephrolithiasis: treatment, causes, and prevention. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:583–591.
  2. Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

David L. Keller, MD
Torrance, CA

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
74
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

David L. Keller, MD
Torrance, CA

Author and Disclosure Information

David L. Keller, MD
Torrance, CA

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor: Thanks for the excellent review articles on nephrolithiasis in your October 2009 issue.1,2

Dr. Hall1 cites studies in which patients given the alpha blocker tamsulosin (Flomax) or the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (Procardia) had improved rates of kidney stone passage compared with placebo. As a primary care physician, I am often confronted with the challenge of managing a patient who is waiting for a kidney stone to pass while taking tamsulosin. Is Dr. Hall aware of any clinical studies, or at least theoretical reasons, which would support adding nifedipine in such cases?

Secondly, Dr. Hall cites studies that demonstrated that a higher intake of dietary calcium is actually associated with fewer calcium stone events in both men and women. An unanswered question is whether patients taking calcium supplements for osteoporosis or osteopenia can safely continue to do so after a calcium stone event, or indeed, whether calcium supplementation might actually be helpful in preventing a recurrent calcum stone.

If there is an absence of randomized studies to answer these questions, Dr. Hall’s recommendations based on his expert experience would be most welcome.

To the Editor: Thanks for the excellent review articles on nephrolithiasis in your October 2009 issue.1,2

Dr. Hall1 cites studies in which patients given the alpha blocker tamsulosin (Flomax) or the calcium channel blocker nifedipine (Procardia) had improved rates of kidney stone passage compared with placebo. As a primary care physician, I am often confronted with the challenge of managing a patient who is waiting for a kidney stone to pass while taking tamsulosin. Is Dr. Hall aware of any clinical studies, or at least theoretical reasons, which would support adding nifedipine in such cases?

Secondly, Dr. Hall cites studies that demonstrated that a higher intake of dietary calcium is actually associated with fewer calcium stone events in both men and women. An unanswered question is whether patients taking calcium supplements for osteoporosis or osteopenia can safely continue to do so after a calcium stone event, or indeed, whether calcium supplementation might actually be helpful in preventing a recurrent calcum stone.

If there is an absence of randomized studies to answer these questions, Dr. Hall’s recommendations based on his expert experience would be most welcome.

References
  1. Hall PM. Nephrolithiasis: treatment, causes, and prevention. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:583–591.
  2. Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598.
References
  1. Hall PM. Nephrolithiasis: treatment, causes, and prevention. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:583–591.
  2. Samplaski MK, Irwin BH, Desai M. Less-invasive ways to remove stones from the kidneys and ureters. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:592–598.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
74
Page Number
74
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Kidney stones
Display Headline
Kidney stones
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

In reply: Kidney stones

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 06/05/2019 - 12:03
Display Headline
In reply: Kidney stones

In Reply: I thank Dr. Keller for his kind letter.

With respect to expulsive therapy, Dellabella et al1 randomly assigned 210 patients to receive nifedipine, tamsulosin, or phloroglucinol. All the patients also received a corticosteroid. The most effective therapy was tamsulosin, though this was not a placebo-controlled study. In a separate study, Borghi et al2 compared methylprednisolone plus nifedipine and methylprednisolone plus placebo. The nifedipine-methylpednisolone combination seemed to result in more prompt stone passage.

With respect to calcium supplements in calcium kidney stone disease, Curhan et al3 prospectively examined stone risk associated with dietary calcium as well as calcium supplements. This seemed to show that with calcium supplements there was no increased risk, and there may have even been some benefit. In another study by Borghi et al,4 normal dietary calcium intake was shown to be associated with lower stone risk than a low calcium intake. Further, the study by Curhan et al3 seemed to indicate the same.

References
  1. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 2005; 174:167–172.
  2. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone
    in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol 1994; 152:1095–1098.
  3. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:885–891.
  4. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:77–84.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
74
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Author and Disclosure Information

Phillip M. Hall, MD
Cleveland Clinic

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Reply: I thank Dr. Keller for his kind letter.

With respect to expulsive therapy, Dellabella et al1 randomly assigned 210 patients to receive nifedipine, tamsulosin, or phloroglucinol. All the patients also received a corticosteroid. The most effective therapy was tamsulosin, though this was not a placebo-controlled study. In a separate study, Borghi et al2 compared methylprednisolone plus nifedipine and methylprednisolone plus placebo. The nifedipine-methylpednisolone combination seemed to result in more prompt stone passage.

With respect to calcium supplements in calcium kidney stone disease, Curhan et al3 prospectively examined stone risk associated with dietary calcium as well as calcium supplements. This seemed to show that with calcium supplements there was no increased risk, and there may have even been some benefit. In another study by Borghi et al,4 normal dietary calcium intake was shown to be associated with lower stone risk than a low calcium intake. Further, the study by Curhan et al3 seemed to indicate the same.

In Reply: I thank Dr. Keller for his kind letter.

With respect to expulsive therapy, Dellabella et al1 randomly assigned 210 patients to receive nifedipine, tamsulosin, or phloroglucinol. All the patients also received a corticosteroid. The most effective therapy was tamsulosin, though this was not a placebo-controlled study. In a separate study, Borghi et al2 compared methylprednisolone plus nifedipine and methylprednisolone plus placebo. The nifedipine-methylpednisolone combination seemed to result in more prompt stone passage.

With respect to calcium supplements in calcium kidney stone disease, Curhan et al3 prospectively examined stone risk associated with dietary calcium as well as calcium supplements. This seemed to show that with calcium supplements there was no increased risk, and there may have even been some benefit. In another study by Borghi et al,4 normal dietary calcium intake was shown to be associated with lower stone risk than a low calcium intake. Further, the study by Curhan et al3 seemed to indicate the same.

References
  1. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 2005; 174:167–172.
  2. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone
    in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol 1994; 152:1095–1098.
  3. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:885–891.
  4. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:77–84.
References
  1. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Randomized trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin, nifedipine and phloroglucinol in medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral calculi. J Urol 2005; 174:167–172.
  2. Borghi L, Meschi T, Amato F, et al. Nifedipine and methylprednisolone
    in facilitating ureteral stone passage: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J Urol 1994; 152:1095–1098.
  3. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ. Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:885–891.
  4. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, et al. Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:77–84.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
74
Page Number
74
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In reply: Kidney stones
Display Headline
In reply: Kidney stones
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 06/05/2019 - 12:05
Display Headline
Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views

To the Editor: I was pleased to see my article on fragility fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine1 and your preamble Letter from the Editor.2

However, Dr. Coco’s accompanying editorial3 misquoted a particular point I cautiously and consistently make—not only in the CCJM article, but in other invited papers on the topic of fractures in CKD. I specifically state that bisphosphonates should only be considered in stage 4–5 CKD in fracturing patients, not just those with “low bone mineral density,” who have clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusion of other causes of fractures in this population. Hence, Dr. Coco’s statement that “… the author advocates the use of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease who have low bone mineral density” is inaccurate.

If one carefully reads the last four paragraphs of my paper on page 721, one will see that I emphasize this caution repeatedly and even specifically state: “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density and other risk factors seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.”

Thank you for your consideration.

References

1. Miller PD. Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: an opinion-based approach. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:715–723.

2. Mandell BF. Low bone density is not always bisphosphonate deficiency (From the Editor). Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:683.

3. Coco M. Treating the renal patient who has a fracture: opinion vs evidence. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:684–688.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Paul D. Miller, MD
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Denver, CO

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
75
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Paul D. Miller, MD
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Denver, CO

Author and Disclosure Information

Paul D. Miller, MD
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Denver, CO

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor: I was pleased to see my article on fragility fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine1 and your preamble Letter from the Editor.2

However, Dr. Coco’s accompanying editorial3 misquoted a particular point I cautiously and consistently make—not only in the CCJM article, but in other invited papers on the topic of fractures in CKD. I specifically state that bisphosphonates should only be considered in stage 4–5 CKD in fracturing patients, not just those with “low bone mineral density,” who have clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusion of other causes of fractures in this population. Hence, Dr. Coco’s statement that “… the author advocates the use of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease who have low bone mineral density” is inaccurate.

If one carefully reads the last four paragraphs of my paper on page 721, one will see that I emphasize this caution repeatedly and even specifically state: “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density and other risk factors seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.”

Thank you for your consideration.

To the Editor: I was pleased to see my article on fragility fractures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine1 and your preamble Letter from the Editor.2

However, Dr. Coco’s accompanying editorial3 misquoted a particular point I cautiously and consistently make—not only in the CCJM article, but in other invited papers on the topic of fractures in CKD. I specifically state that bisphosphonates should only be considered in stage 4–5 CKD in fracturing patients, not just those with “low bone mineral density,” who have clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusion of other causes of fractures in this population. Hence, Dr. Coco’s statement that “… the author advocates the use of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease who have low bone mineral density” is inaccurate.

If one carefully reads the last four paragraphs of my paper on page 721, one will see that I emphasize this caution repeatedly and even specifically state: “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density and other risk factors seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.”

Thank you for your consideration.

References

1. Miller PD. Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: an opinion-based approach. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:715–723.

2. Mandell BF. Low bone density is not always bisphosphonate deficiency (From the Editor). Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:683.

3. Coco M. Treating the renal patient who has a fracture: opinion vs evidence. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:684–688.

References

1. Miller PD. Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: an opinion-based approach. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:715–723.

2. Mandell BF. Low bone density is not always bisphosphonate deficiency (From the Editor). Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:683.

3. Coco M. Treating the renal patient who has a fracture: opinion vs evidence. Cleve Clin J Med 2009; 76:684–688.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
75
Page Number
75
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views
Display Headline
Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

In reply: Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 06/05/2019 - 12:06
Display Headline
In reply: Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views

In Reply: Bone disease in the patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in the presence of a fracture, is indeed a vexing problem. Clinically, it is very difficult to differentiate between low bone turnover—not uncommon in patients with CKD—and patients who have osteoporosis. Clinically, these patients present similarly: both can have abnormal bone density measurements (usually low bone mineral density with T scores less than −2.5 standard deviation), and both can have fractures. But both should not be treated the same without further evidence.

In Dr. Miller’s article, bisphosphonate and other therapies are named as possible treatments for “osteoporosis” in patients with CKD stages 1 through 3. “Treatment decisions are more difficult … in stage 4 and especially stage 5 chronic kidney disease with fragility fractures…."

Dr. Miller indeed states that “patients without fractures with stage 5 … should not be given bisphosphonates …” He also states, “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density … seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.” In Dr. Miller’s opinion, the latter group of patients may be treated with a bisphosphonate if there has been a fracture. However, many of these patients may have fractured because of low turnover bone disease; unfortunately, they cannot have “clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusions of other causes.” Bisphosphonate therapy may further suppress bone activity (if there is any activity left) and may predispose to extraosseous and cardiovascular calcifications and further non-bone pathology.

Dr. Miller does caution regarding unknown risks in these patients with advanced kidney disease.

Treating metabolic bone disease is certainly not straightforward, especially when present in the fracturing renal patient. We need more evidence before making treatment paradigms.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Maria Coco, MD
Montefiore Medical Center Bronx, NY

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
75
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Maria Coco, MD
Montefiore Medical Center Bronx, NY

Author and Disclosure Information

Maria Coco, MD
Montefiore Medical Center Bronx, NY

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Reply: Bone disease in the patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in the presence of a fracture, is indeed a vexing problem. Clinically, it is very difficult to differentiate between low bone turnover—not uncommon in patients with CKD—and patients who have osteoporosis. Clinically, these patients present similarly: both can have abnormal bone density measurements (usually low bone mineral density with T scores less than −2.5 standard deviation), and both can have fractures. But both should not be treated the same without further evidence.

In Dr. Miller’s article, bisphosphonate and other therapies are named as possible treatments for “osteoporosis” in patients with CKD stages 1 through 3. “Treatment decisions are more difficult … in stage 4 and especially stage 5 chronic kidney disease with fragility fractures…."

Dr. Miller indeed states that “patients without fractures with stage 5 … should not be given bisphosphonates …” He also states, “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density … seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.” In Dr. Miller’s opinion, the latter group of patients may be treated with a bisphosphonate if there has been a fracture. However, many of these patients may have fractured because of low turnover bone disease; unfortunately, they cannot have “clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusions of other causes.” Bisphosphonate therapy may further suppress bone activity (if there is any activity left) and may predispose to extraosseous and cardiovascular calcifications and further non-bone pathology.

Dr. Miller does caution regarding unknown risks in these patients with advanced kidney disease.

Treating metabolic bone disease is certainly not straightforward, especially when present in the fracturing renal patient. We need more evidence before making treatment paradigms.

In Reply: Bone disease in the patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in the presence of a fracture, is indeed a vexing problem. Clinically, it is very difficult to differentiate between low bone turnover—not uncommon in patients with CKD—and patients who have osteoporosis. Clinically, these patients present similarly: both can have abnormal bone density measurements (usually low bone mineral density with T scores less than −2.5 standard deviation), and both can have fractures. But both should not be treated the same without further evidence.

In Dr. Miller’s article, bisphosphonate and other therapies are named as possible treatments for “osteoporosis” in patients with CKD stages 1 through 3. “Treatment decisions are more difficult … in stage 4 and especially stage 5 chronic kidney disease with fragility fractures…."

Dr. Miller indeed states that “patients without fractures with stage 5 … should not be given bisphosphonates …” He also states, “Treating only on the basis of low bone mineral density … seems to be associated with greater risk than benefit.” In Dr. Miller’s opinion, the latter group of patients may be treated with a bisphosphonate if there has been a fracture. However, many of these patients may have fractured because of low turnover bone disease; unfortunately, they cannot have “clear-cut osteoporosis by exclusions of other causes.” Bisphosphonate therapy may further suppress bone activity (if there is any activity left) and may predispose to extraosseous and cardiovascular calcifications and further non-bone pathology.

Dr. Miller does caution regarding unknown risks in these patients with advanced kidney disease.

Treating metabolic bone disease is certainly not straightforward, especially when present in the fracturing renal patient. We need more evidence before making treatment paradigms.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
75
Page Number
75
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In reply: Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views
Display Headline
In reply: Fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease: A clarification of views
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Peer-reviewers for 2009

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/28/2019 - 16:37
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2009

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine for the year ending December 31, 2009. Reviewing papers for scientific journals is an arduous task and involves considerable time and effort. We are grateful to these reviewers for contributing their expertise this past year.

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

Article PDF
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Page Number
83
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine for the year ending December 31, 2009. Reviewing papers for scientific journals is an arduous task and involves considerable time and effort. We are grateful to these reviewers for contributing their expertise this past year.

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

We thank those who reviewed manuscripts submitted to the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine for the year ending December 31, 2009. Reviewing papers for scientific journals is an arduous task and involves considerable time and effort. We are grateful to these reviewers for contributing their expertise this past year.

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD, Editor in Chief

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
83
Page Number
83
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2009
Display Headline
Peer-reviewers for 2009
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Managing acute upper GI bleeding, preventing recurrences

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/12/2018 - 17:00
Display Headline
Managing acute upper GI bleeding, preventing recurrences

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common, costly, and potentially life-threatening. It must be managed promptly and appropriately to prevent adverse outcomes.

More people are admitted to the hospital for upper GI bleeding than for congestive heart failure or deep vein thrombosis. In the United States, the annual rate of hospitalization for upper GI bleeding is estimated to be 165 per 100,000—more than 300,000 hospitalizations per year, at a cost of $2.5 billion.1,2

Furthermore, despite advances in therapy, the case-fatality rate has remained unchanged at 7% to 10%.3 This may be because today’s patients are older and have more comorbidities than those in the past.4

CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEEDING

Peptic ulcers account for about 60% of severe cases of upper GI bleeding,5 and they are the focus of this paper. Fortunately, up to 80% of bleeding ulcers stop bleeding spontaneously without any intervention.6

Gastroduodenal erosions account for about 12%.3

Varices due to cirrhosis are less common but more dangerous. Variceal bleeding accounts for a relatively small percentage (6%) of upper GI bleeding, but the mortality rate from a single episode of variceal bleeding is 30%, and 60% to 70% of patients die within 1 year, mostly of underlying liver disease.

Less frequent causes include Mallory-Weiss tears, erosive duodenitis, Dieulafoy ulcer (a type of vascular malformation), other vascular lesions, neoplasms, aortoenteric fistula, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and prolapse gastropathy.5

HEMATEMESIS AND MELENA

The most common presenting signs of acute upper GI bleeding are hematemesis (vomiting of blood), “coffee grounds” emesis, and melena (tarry black stools). About 30% of patients with bleeding ulcers present with hematemesis, 20% with melena, and 50% with both.7

Hematochezia (red blood in the stool) usually suggests a lower GI source of bleeding, since blood from an upper source turns black and tarry as it passes through the gut, producing melena. However, up to 5% of patients with bleeding ulcers have hematochezia,7 and it indicates heavy bleeding: bleeding of approximately 1,000 mL into the upper GI tract is needed to cause hematochezia, whereas only 50 to 100 mL is needed to cause melena.8,9 Hematochezia with signs and symptoms of hemodynamic compromise such as syncope, postural hypotension, tachycardia, and shock should therefore direct one’s attention to an upper GI source of bleeding.

Nonspecific features include nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, vasovagal phenomena, and syncope.

WHAT IS THE PATIENT’S RISK?

An assessment of clinical severity is the first critical task, as it helps in planning treatment. Advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and hemodynamic instability call for aggressive treatment. Apart from this simple clinical rule, scoring systems have been developed.

The Rockall scoring system, the most widely used, gives estimates of the risks of recurrent bleeding and death. It is based on the three clinical factors mentioned above and on two endoscopic ones, awarding points for:

  • Age—0 points if less than 60; 1 point if 60 to 79; or 2 points if 80 years or older
  • Shock—1 point if the pulse is more than 100; 2 points if the systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mm Hg
  • Comorbid illness—2 points for ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or other major comorbidity; 3 points for renal failure, hepatic failure, or metastatic disease
  • Endoscopic diagnosis—0 points if no lesion found or a Mallory-Weiss tear; 1 point for peptic ulcer, esophagitis, or erosive disease; 2 points for GI malignancy
  • Endoscopic stigmata or recent hemorrhage—0 points for a clean-based ulcer or flat pigmented spot; 2 points for blood in the upper GI tract, active bleeding, a nonbleeding visible vessel, or adherent clot.

The Rockall score can thus range from 0 to 11 points, with an overall score of 0, 1, or 2 associated with an excellent prognosis.10

The Blatchford scoring system uses only clinical and laboratory factors and has no endoscopic component (Table 1). In contrast to the Rockall score, the main outcome it predicts is the need for clinical intervention (endoscopy, surgery, or blood transfusion). The Blatchford score ranges from 0 to 23; most patients with a score of 6 or higher need intervention.11

Other systems that are used less often include the Baylor severity scale and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score.

Does the patient have varices?

All variceal bleeding should be considered severe, since the 1-year death rate is so high (up to 70%). Clues pointing to variceal bleeding include previous variceal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, history of liver disease, and signs of liver disease on clinical examination.

All patients suspected of having bleeding varices should be admitted to the intensive care unit for close monitoring and should be given the highest priority, even if they are hemodynamically stable.

Is the patient hemodynamically stable?

Appropriate hemodynamic assessment includes monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and mental status. Tachycardia at rest, hypotension, and orthostatic changes in vital signs indicate a considerable loss of blood volume. Low urine output, dry mucous membranes, and sunken neck veins are also useful signs. (Tachycardia may be blunted if the patient is taking a beta-blocker.)

If these signs of hypovolemia are present, the initial management focuses on treating shock and on improving oxygen delivery to the vital organs. This involves repletion of the intravascular volume with intravenous infusions or blood transfusions. Supplemental oxygen also is useful, especially in elderly patients with heart disease.12

Inspection of nasogastric aspirate

In the initial assessment, it is useful to insert a nasogastric tube and inspect the aspirate. If it contains bright red blood, the patient needs an urgent endoscopic evaluation and an intensive level of care13,14; if it contains coffee-grounds material, the patient needs to be admitted to the hospital and to undergo endoscopic evaluation within 24 hours.

However, a normal aspirate does not rule out upper GI bleeding. Aljebreen et al15 found that 15% of patients with upper GI bleeding and normal nasogastric aspirate still had high-risk lesions (ie, visible bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels) on endoscopy.

 

 

ACID-SUPPRESSION HELPS ULCERS HEAL

Acid and pepsin interfere with the healing of ulcers and other nonvariceal upper GI lesions. Further, an acidic environment promotes platelet disaggregation and fibrinolysis and impairs clot formation.16 This suggests that inhibiting gastric acid secretion and raising the gastric pH to 6 or higher may stabilize clots. Moreover, pepsinogen in the stomach is converted to its active form (pepsin) if the pH is less than 4. Therefore, keeping the pH above 4 keeps pepsinogen in an inactive form.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists were the first drugs to inhibit acid secretion, reversibly blocking histamine-2 receptors on the basolateral membrane of parietal cells. However, these drugs did not prove very useful in managing upper GI bleeding in clinical trials.17,18 In their intravenous form, they often fail to keep the gastric pH at 6 or higher, due to tachyphylaxis.19 The use of this class of drugs has declined in favor of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors reduce both basal and stimulated acid secretion by inhibiting hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase, the proton pump of the parietal cell.

Multiple studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors raise the gastric pH and keep it high. For example, an infusion of omeprazole (Prilosec) can keep the gastric pH above 6 for 72 hours without inducing tachyphylaxis.20,21

Started after endoscopy. Randomized controlled trials have found proton pump inhibitors to be effective when given in high doses intravenously for 72 hours after successful endoscopic treatment of bleeding ulcers with high-risk endoscopic signs, such as active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels.22,23

A meta-analysis indicated that these drugs decrease the incidence of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, the need for blood transfusions, the need for surgery, and the duration of hospitalization, but not the mortality rate.24,25 These studies also illustrate the benefit of following up endoscopic treatment to stop the bleeding with an intravenous infusion of a proton pump inhibitor.

The recommended dose of omeprazole for patients with high-risk findings on endoscopy is an 80-mg bolus followed by an 8-mg/hour infusion for 72 hours. After the patient’s condition stabilizes, oral therapy can be substituted for intravenous therapy. In patients with low-risk endoscopic findings (a clean-based ulcer or flat spot), oral proton pump inhibitors in high doses are recommended.

In either case, after the initial bleeding is treated endoscopically and hemostasis is achieved, a proton pump inhibitor is recommended for 6 to 8 weeks, or longer if the patient is also positive for Helicobacter pylori or is on daily treatment with aspirin or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is not selective for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (see below).

Started before endoscopy, these drugs reduced the frequency of actively bleeding ulcers, the duration of hospitalization, and the need for endoscopic therapy in a randomized controlled trial.26 A meta-analysis found that significantly fewer patients had signs of recent bleeding on endoscopy if they received a proton pump inhibitor 24 to 48 hours before the procedure, but it did not find any significant difference in important clinical outcomes such as death, recurrent bleeding, or surgery.27 Nevertheless, we believe that intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy should be started before endoscopy in patients with upper GI bleeding.

Somatostatin analogues

Octreotide (Sandostatin), an analogue of the hormone somatostatin, decreases splanchnic blood flow, decreases secretion of gastric acid and pepsin, and stimulates mucus production. Although it is beneficial in treating upper GI bleeding due to varices, its benefit has not been confirmed in patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.

A meta-analysis revealed that outcomes were better with high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy than with octreotide when these drugs were started after endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding.28 Nevertheless, octreotide may be useful in patients with uncontrolled nonvariceal bleeding who are awaiting endoscopy, since it is relatively safe to use.

ALL PATIENTS NEED ENDOSCOPY

All patients with upper GI bleeding need an upper endoscopic examination to diagnose and assess the risk posed by the bleeding lesion and to treat the lesion, reducing the risk of recurrent bleeding.

How urgently does endoscopy need to be done?

Endoscopy within the first 24 hours of upper GI bleeding is considered the standard of care. Patients with uncontrolled or recurrent bleeding should undergo endoscopy on an urgent basis to control the bleeding and reduce the risk of death.

However, how urgently endoscopy needs to be done is often debated. A multicenter randomized controlled trial compared outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopy within 6 hours of coming to the emergency department vs within 24 hours after the initial evaluation. The study found no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups; however, the group that underwent endoscopy sooner needed fewer transfusions.29

For a better view of the stomach

Gastric lavage improves the view of the gastric fundus but has not been proven to improve outcome.30

Promotility agents such as erythromycin and metoclopramide (Reglan) are also used to empty the stomach for better visualization.31–35 Erythromycin has been shown to improve visualization, shorten the procedure time, and prevent the need for additional endoscopy attempts in two randomized controlled studies.33,34 Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness study confirmed that giving intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy for acute upper GI bleeding saved money and resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life-years.35

 

 

Endoscopy to diagnose bleeding and assess risk

Upper endoscopy is 90% to 95% diagnostic for acute upper GI bleeding.36

Figure 1. Endoscopic stigmata of bleeding peptic ulcer (arrows) and risk of recurrent bleeding and death.
Furthermore, some of the clinical scoring systems are based on endoscopic findings along with clinical factors on admission. These scoring systems are valuable for assessing patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, as they predict the risk of death, longer hospital stay, surgical intervention, and recurrent bleeding.37,38 Patients with endoscopic findings associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding and death (Figure 1) need aggressive management.

Certain factors, primarily clinical and endoscopic, predict that endoscopic treatment will fail to stop ulcer bleeding. Clinical factors include a history of peptic ulcer bleeding and hemodynamic compromise at presentation. Endoscopic factors include ulcers located high on the lesser curvature of the stomach, ulcers in the posterior or superior duodenal bulb, ulcers larger than 2 cm in diameter, and ulcers that are actively bleeding at the time of endoscopy.37 Other endoscopic findings that predict clinical outcome are summarized in Table 2.

Patients at high risk (ie, older than 60 years, with severe comorbidity, or hemodynamically compromised) who have active bleeding (ie, witnessed hematemesis, red blood per nasogastric tube, or fresh blood per rectum) or a nonbleeding visible vessel should be admitted to a monitored bed or intensive care unit. Observation in a regular medical ward is appropriate for high-risk patients found to have an adherent clot. Patients with low-risk findings (eg, a clean ulcer base) are at low risk of recurrent bleeding and may be considered for early hospital discharge with appropriate outpatient follow-up.

Endoscopy to treat bleeding

About 25% of endoscopic procedures performed for upper GI bleeding include some type of treatment,39 such as injections of epinephrine, normal saline, or sclerosants; thermal cautery; argon plasma coagulation; electrocautery; or application of clips or bands. They are all equally effective, and combinations of these therapies are more effective than when they are used individually. A recent meta-analysis found dual therapy to be superior to epinephrine monotherapy in preventing recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and death.40

Endoscopic therapy is recommended for patients found to have active bleeding or nonbleeding visible blood vessels, as outcomes are better with endoscopic hemostatic treatment than with drug therapy alone (Table 3).41–44

How to manage adherent clots is controversial, but recent studies have revealed a significant benefit from removing them and treating the underlying lesions compared with drug therapy alone.43,45

Flat, pigmented spots and nonbleeding ulcers with a clean base do not require endoscopic treatment because the risk of recurrent bleeding is low.

Endoscopic therapy stops the bleeding in more than 90% of patients, but bleeding recurs after endoscopic therapy in 10% to 25%.46 Reversal of any severe coagulopathy with transfusions of platelets or fresh frozen plasma is essential for endoscopic hemostasis. However, coagulopathy at the time of initial bleeding and endoscopy does not appear to be associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.47

Patients with refractory bleeding are candidates for angiography or surgery. However, even when endoscopic hemostasis fails, endoscopy is important before angiography or surgery to pinpoint the site of bleeding and diagnose the cause.

A second endoscopic procedure is generally not recommended within 24 hours after the initial procedure.48 However, it is appropriate in cases in which clinical signs indicate recurrent bleeding or if hemostasis during the initial procedure is questionable. A meta-analysis found that routinely repeating endoscopy reduces the rate of recurrent bleeding but not the need for surgery or the risk of death.49

ALL PATIENTS SHOULD BE ADMITTED

Figure 2. Algorithm for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
All patients with upper GI bleeding should be admitted to the hospital, with the level of care dictated by the severity of their clinical condition (Figure 2).

VARICEAL BLEEDING

Variceal bleeding, a severe outcome of portal hypertension secondary to cirrhosis, carries a 6-week mortality rate of 10% to 20%.50 In view of the risk, primary prevention is indicated in patients with high-risk varices.

The mainstays of primary and secondary prevention are the nonselective beta-blockers such as nadolol (Corgard) and propranolol (Inderal). Several randomized controlled trials have shown lower rates of recurrent bleeding and death with propranolol or nadolol than with placebo.51 In doses that decrease the heart rate by 25%, beta-blockers have been shown to delay and decrease variceal hemorrhage. However, most patients require prophylactic endoscopic variceal ligation because they cannot tolerate beta-blocker therapy.

In suspected acute variceal bleeding, a somatostatin analogue should be started to decrease the portal pressure, and antibiotics should be started to reduce the risks of infection and death. Vasoactive drugs, ie, somatostatin analogues, should be started before endoscopy and continued for 5 days to reduce the chances of recurrent bleeding.52,53

Terlipressin is the only drug proven to improve the odds of survival in acute variceal bleeding. Although widely used in Europe, it has not been approved for use in the United States.

Octreotide, another option, improves hemostasis to the same extent, although it does not increase the survival rate.54,55 The recommended dose of octreotide for patients with variceal bleeding is a 50-μg intravenous bolus, followed by a 50-μg/hour infusion for 5 days.

Combining endoscopic and drug therapy improves the chances of stopping the bleeding and reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding compared with endoscopic therapy alone.56

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is indicated in recurrent variceal hemorrhage or in those with initial bleeding that is refractory to standard medical and endoscopic therapy. It is not the primary therapy because it doubles the risk of encephalopathy and has a high stent occlusion rate (up to 60%, lower with covered stents).

 

 

GI BLEEDING CAN CAUSE ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The simultaneous presentation of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and GI hemorrhage is very serious and unfortunately common.

An acute MI occurring simultaneously with or after GI bleeding is usually precipitated by massive bleeding causing hypovolemia, hemodynamic compromise, and hypoperfusion. Conversely, the anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic drugs given to treat MI can precipitate GI bleeding (see below).

This distinction is important because the two scenarios have different clinical courses and prognoses. GI bleeding that precipitates an acute MI tends to be massive, whereas GI bleeding after treatment of acute MI tends to be self-limited and often resolves with reversal of underlying coagulopathy.57

Endoscopy carries a higher than average risk in patients with recent acute MI, with all-cause mortality rates as high as 1%.58 (The usual rate is 0.0004%.59) Nevertheless, endoscopy can be safely performed early on in patients with acute MI if it is done under strict monitoring in a coronary care unit.

Several studies have shown that MI patients who present with upper GI bleeding as the inciting event or patients with acute MI who are vomiting blood or who are hemodynamically unstable due to GI bleeding are significantly more likely to have a high-risk lesion and so have the greatest need for endoscopic therapy. Therefore, endoscopic intervention may be offered to MI patients at high risk who have been started on antiplatelet agents.

WARFARIN CAN PRECIPITATE BLEEDING

Acute upper GI bleeding can be a severe complication of long-term oral anticoagulation, not because the drugs cause ulcers, but rather because they exacerbate ulcers that are already present.60 Therefore, when starting warfarin (Coumadin), patients should be evaluated to determine if they have other risk factors for GI bleeding, such as ulcers.

The number of people presenting with upper GI bleeding while on warfarin therapy is increasing because of the expanding indications for long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as atrial fibrillation and deep venous thrombosis.

The risk of GI bleeding in patients who use oral anticoagulants is estimated to be 2.3 to 4.9 times higher than in nonusers.61

The goal international normalized ratio (INR) for patients on warfarin therapy is usually 2.0 to 3.0. Recent studies found that endoscopy can be safely performed in patients with acute GI bleeding whose INR is between 2.0 and 3.0.62,63 Some suggest that both the length of warfarin therapy and the INR affect the risk of bleeding.64,65

Managing patients with an INR higher than 3.0 who have an episode of GI bleeding is always a challenge. It is not uncommon to find pathologic lesions causing GI bleeding in patients who are on warfarin with a supratherapeutic INR, and thus, endoscopy is indicated. However, before endoscopy, reversal of anticoagulation should be considered.

BLEEDING IN PATIENTS ON ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Aspirin

Aspirin decreases production of prostaglandins in the GI tract, thereby decreasing the protective and restorative properties of the gastric and duodenal mucosa and predisposing to ulcers and bleeding.

The higher the aspirin dose, the higher the risk. Aspirin doubles the risk of upper GI bleeding at daily doses of 75 mg and quadruples it at doses of 300 mg.66 Even doses as low as 10 mg can decrease gastric mucosal prostaglandin production.67 Thus, it appears that there is no risk-free dose of aspirin, and enteric-coated or buffered formulations do not appear to reduce the risk.68–70

The most important risk factor for upper GI bleeding in patients taking aspirin is a history of peptic ulcer bleeding. Approximately 15% of aspirin users who have bleeding from ulcers have recurrent bleeding within 1 year.71

As aspirin-induced GI bleeding becomes more common, health care providers often feel caught between the GI risk and the cardiovascular benefit. When considering whether to discontinue antiplatelet therapy, a cardiologist should be consulted along with a gastroenterologist to weigh the risks of GI bleeding vs thrombosis. To date, there have been no clinical trials published to suggest when antiplatelet therapy should be stopped to optimize GI and cardiovascular outcomes. An alternative is to replace aspirin with another antiplatelet drug that does not induce ulcers.

Clopidogrel

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is recommended for hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome who cannot tolerate the GI side effects of aspirin, according to the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, with the highest level of evidence.72 This recommendation was largely based on the safety data from the CAPRIE (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trial, in which the incidence of major GI bleeding was lower in the clopidogrel group (0.52%) than in the aspirin group (0.72%; P < .05).73

Aspirin plus a proton pump inhibitor

Patients who have had an episode of upper GI bleeding and who need long-term aspirin therapy should also receive a proton pump inhibitor indefinitely to prevent ulcer recurrence.

In a recent double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients with a history of aspirin-induced bleeding, the combination of low-dose aspirin plus esomeprazole (Nexium) twice a day was superior to clopidogrel by itself in terms of the rate of recurrent bleeding (0.7% vs 8.6%; P < .05).74 A similar trial showed nearly identical results: 0% upper GI bleeding in the group receiving aspirin plus esomeprazole 20 mg daily, vs 13.6% in the clopidogrel group (P = .0019).75 These studies suggest that a once-daily proton pump inhibitor combined with aspirin is a safer alternative than clopidogrel alone.

Clopidogrel plus a proton pump inhibitor

Interestingly, recent studies have shown that omeprazole decreases the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, possibly by inhibiting the CYP2C19 enzyme.76 However, concomitant use of pantoprazole (Protonix), lansoprazole (Prevacid), and esomeprazole did not have this effect, suggesting that although all proton pump inhibitors are metabolized to a varying degree by CYP2C19, the interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel is not a class effect.77–79 Therefore, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole may be the appropriate proton pump inhibitors to use with clopidogrel in patients who have a clear indication for the medication, consistent with current guideline recommendations.

Helicobacter pylori infection in antiplatelet drug users

Before starting any long-term antiplatelet therapy, patients with a history of ulcers should be tested and treated for H pylori (Table 4).80 Confirmation of eradication is required after H pylori treatment in patients with upper GI bleeding. Some suggest that for patients with a history of bleeding ulcer who need aspirin, eradication of H pylori substantially reduces the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding.81

 

 

TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF NSAID-RELATED GI INJURY

About 1 in 20 users of NSAIDs develop GI complications and ulcers of varying degrees of severity, as do one in seven NSAID users over the age of 65. In fact, NSAID use accounts for 30% of hospitalizations for upper GI bleeding and deaths from this cause.82–85 In addition, approximately 15% to 30% of NSAID users have clinically silent but endoscopically evident peptic ulcers.86

NSAIDs contribute to ulcer development by depleting prostaglandins. Thus, misoprostol (Cytotec), a synthetic prostaglandin, has been used to reduce this side effect.

In a clinical trial, misoprostol reduced the incidence of NSAID-associated GI complications by 40%.87 Furthermore, it has been shown to be better than placebo in preventing recurrent gastric ulcers in patients with a history of gastric ulcer who were receiving low-dose aspirin.88

However, misoprostol is rarely used because it can cause diarrhea and abdominal cramping. Rather, the preferred drugs for preventing and treating NSAID- and aspirin-related GI lesions are proton pump inhibitors.

Numerous clinical trials using endoscopic end points showed that proton pump inhibitors in standard doses significantly reduce the incidence of ulcers associated with the use of NSAIDs.89 Proton pump inhibitor therapy has achieved a significant reduction in relative risk of upper GI bleeding in patients who received low-dose aspirin therapy, as confirmed by epidemiologic studies.90,91 The number of NSAID-related ulcers found on endoscopy could be reduced by an estimated 90% simply by using proton pump inhibitors.92

References
  1. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: relationship to sales of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:25402549.
  2. Viviane A, Alan BN. Estimates of costs of hospital stays for variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the United States. Value Health 2008; 11:13.
  3. Yavorski RT, Wong RK, Maydonovitch C, Battin LS, Furnia A, Amundson DE. Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:568573.
  4. Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al. Risk factors for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding among older persons. Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49:126133.
  5. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:206210.
  6. Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:717727.
  7. Wara P, Stodkilde H. Bleeding pattern before admission as guideline for emergency endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985; 20:7278.
  8. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology 1988; 95:15691574.
  9. Daniel WA, Egan S. The quantity of blood required to produce a tarry stool. J Am Med Assoc 1939; 113:2232.
  10. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38:316321.
  11. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356:13181321.
  12. Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:928937.
  13. Silverstein FE, Gilbert DA, Tedesco FJ, Buenger NK, Persing J. The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding II. Clinical prognostic factors. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27:8093.
  14. Corley DA, Stefan AM, Wolf M, Cook EF, Lee TH. Early indicators of prognosis in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:336340.
  15. Aljebreen AM, Fallone CA, Barkun AN. Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:172178.
  16. Barkun AN, Cockeram AW, Plourde V, Fedorak RN. Review article: acid suppression in non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13:15651584.
  17. Levine JE, Leontiadis JI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:11371142.
  18. Walt RP, Cottrell J, Mann SG, Freemantle NP, Langman MJ. Continuous intravenous famotidine for hemorrhage from peptic ulcer. Lancet 1992; 340:10581062.
  19. Labenz J, Peitz U, Leusing C, Tillenburg B, Blum AL, Börsch G. Efficacy of primed infusion with high dose ranitidine and omeprazole to maintain high intragastric pH in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled study. Gut 1997; 40:3641.
  20. Merki HS, Wilder-Smith CH. Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing? Gastroenterology 1994; 106:6064.
  21. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, et al. Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:351357.
  22. Lin HJ, Lo WC, Cheng YC, Perng CL. Role of intravenous omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection: a prospective randomized comparative trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:500505.
  23. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effects of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:310316.
  24. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD002094.
  25. Andriulli A, Annese V, Caruso N, et al. Proton-pump inhibitors and outcome of endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers: a series of meta-analyses. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:207219.
  26. Lau JY, Leung WK, Wu JC, et al. Omeprazole before endoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:16311640.
  27. Dorward S, Sreedharan A, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moayyedi P, Forman D. Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005415.
  28. Bardou M, Toubouti Y, Benhaberou-Brun D, Rahme E, Barkun AN. Meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21:677686.
  29. Bjorkman DJ, Zaman A, Fennerty MB, Lieberman D, Disario JA, Guest-Warnick G. Urgent vs elective endoscopy for acute non-variceal upper-GI bleeding: an effectiveness study. Gastointest Endosc 2004; 60:18.
  30. Lee SD, Kearney DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:861865.
  31. Tack J, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, et al. Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in controls and in diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:7279.
  32. Xynos E, Mantides A, Papageorgiou A, Fountos A, Pechlivanides G, Vassilakis JS. Erythromycin accelerates delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients after truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty. Eur J Surg 1992; 158:407411.
  33. Coffin B, Pocard M, Panis Y, et al; Groupe des endoscopistes de garde á l’AP-HP. Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:174179.
  34. Frossard JL, Spahr L, Queneau PE, et al. Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1723.
  35. Winstead NS, Wilcox CM. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:13711377.
  36. Chak A, Cooper GS, Lloyd LE, Kolz CS, Barnhart BA, Wong RC. Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with upper GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:613.
  37. Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, Lo KK, Yung MY, Li AK. The evolution of stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: a sequential endoscopic study. Endoscopy 1998; 30:513518.
  38. Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS, et al. Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Endoscopy 2001; 33:969975.
  39. Elta GH. Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2002; 5:147152.
  40. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:279289.
  41. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal, and colonic bleeding. Med Clin North Am 2002; 86:13191356.
  42. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2007; 10:143148.
  43. Jensen DM, Kovacs TO, Jutabha R, et al. Randomized trial of medical or endoscopic therapy to prevent recurrent ulcer hemorrhage in patients with adherent clots. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:407413.
  44. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer hemorrhage with injection, thermal, and combination methods. Techniques Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 7:124131.
  45. Bleau BL, Gostout CJ, Sherman KE, et al. Recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer associated with adherent clot: a randomized study comparing endoscopic treatment with medical therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:16.
  46. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lam YH, et al. Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:751756.
  47. Wolf AT, Wasan SK, Saltzman JR. Impact of anticoagulation on rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:290296.
  48. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK; Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:843857.
  49. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Piscopo R, Prisco A, Cipolletta L. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:6267.
  50. Dell’Era A, deFrancis R, Iannuzzi F. Acute variceal bleeding: pharmacological treatment and primary/secondary prophylaxis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22:279294.
  51. Jalan R, Hayes PC. UK guidelines on the management of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 2000; 46( suppl 3–4):III1III15.
  52. Bernard B, Lebrec D, Mathurin P, Opolon P, Poynard T. Beta-adrenergic antagonists in the prevention of gastrointestinal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 1997; 25:6370.
  53. De Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2005; 43:167176.
  54. Levacher S, Letoumelin P, Pateron D, Blaise M, Lapandry C, Pourriat JL. Early administration of terlipressin plus glyceryl trinitrate to control active upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Lancet 1995; 346:865868.
  55. Abraldes JG, Bosch J. Somatostatin and analogues in portal hypertension. Hepatology 2002; 35:13051312.
  56. Banares R, Albillos A, Rincon D, et al. Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacological treatment for acute variceal bleeding: a meta analysis. Hepatology 2002; 35:609615.
  57. Cappell M. Gastrointenstinal bleeding associated with myocardial infarction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2000; 29:423444.
  58. Lin S, Konstance R, Jollis J, Fisher DA. The utility of upper endoscopy in patients with concomitant upper gastrointestinal bleeding and acute myocardial infarction. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51:23772383.
  59. Silvis SE, Nebel O, Rogers G, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P. Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. JAMA 1976; 235:928930.
  60. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  61. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants places elderly persons at high risk for hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:16651670.
  62. Tabibian N. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients: a prospective evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84:1012.
  63. Choudari CP, Rajgopal C, Palmer KR. Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients: diagnoses and response to endoscopic treatment. Gut 1994; 35:464466.
  64. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Frequency of major complications of aspirin, warfarin, and intravenous heparin for secondary stroke prevention: a population-based study. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:1422.
  65. Landefeld CS, Rosenblatt MW, Goldman L. Bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: relation to the prothrombin time and important remediable lesions. Am J Med 1989; 87:153159.
  66. Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, et al. Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ 1995; 310:827830.
  67. Cryer B, Feldman M. Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:1725.
  68. De Abajo FJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with low-dose aspirin as plain and enteric-coated formulations. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2001; 1:1.
  69. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM, Sheehan J, Koff RS, Shapiro S. Risk of aspirin-associated major upper gastrointestinal bleeding with enteric coated or buffered product. Lancet 1996; 348:14131416.
  70. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S, De Abajo FJ. Association between aspirin and upper gastrointestinal complications: systematic review of epidemiological studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52:563571.
  71. Wilcox CM, Ladabaum U. A patient with high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:10901093.
  72. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:e1e157.
  73. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348:13291339.
  74. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:238244.
  75. Lai KC, Chu KM, Hui WM, et al. Esomeprazole with aspirin versus clopidogrel for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:860865.
  76. Ho MP, Maddox TM, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2009; 301:937944.
  77. Siller-Matula JM, Spiel AO, Lang IM, Kreiner G, Christ G, Jilma B. Effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. Am Heart J 2009; 157:148.e1e5.
  78. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, et al. Effects of proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48:475484.
  79. Ishizaki T, Horai Y. Review article: cytochrome P450 and the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors—emphasis on rabeprazole. Aliment Pharacol Ther 1999; 13 (suppl 3):2736.
  80. Lanas A, Fuentes J, Benito R, Serrano P, Bajador E, Sainz R. Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:779786.
  81. Chan FK. NSAID-Induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management. Drug Saf 2005; 28:287300.
  82. Bombardier V, Laine L, Reicin A, et al; VIGOR Study Group. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: VIGOR Study Group. N Eng J Med 2000; 343:15201528.
  83. Griffin MR, Ray WA, Schaffner W. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:359363.
  84. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, Snowden M, Ray WA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:257263.
  85. Smalley WE, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141:539545.
  86. Laine L. Approaches to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the high-risk patient. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:594606.
  87. Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, et al. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123:241249.
  88. Goldstein JL, Huang B, Amer F, Christopoulos NG. Ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus low dose aspirin: results of a post hoc subanalysis. Clin Ther 2004; 26:16371643.
  89. Berger JS, Stebbins A, Granger CB, et al. Initial aspirin dose and outcome among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Circulation 2008; 117:192199.
  90. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  91. Chin MW, Yong G, Bulsara MK, Rankin J, Forbes GM. Predictive and protective factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:24112416.
  92. Hunt RH, Bazzoli F. Should NSAID/low dose aspirin takers be tested routinely for H. Pylori infection and treated if positive? Implications for primary risk of ulcer and ulcer relapse after initial healing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19 (suppl 1):916.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Mazen Albeldawi, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic

Mohammed A. Qadeer, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

John J. Vargo, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Address: John J. Vargo, MD, MPH, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A30, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Vargo has disclosed that he has received consulting fees from Ethicon EndoSurgery and honoraria for teaching and speaking from Olympus America, Inc.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
131-142
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Mazen Albeldawi, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic

Mohammed A. Qadeer, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

John J. Vargo, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Address: John J. Vargo, MD, MPH, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A30, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Vargo has disclosed that he has received consulting fees from Ethicon EndoSurgery and honoraria for teaching and speaking from Olympus America, Inc.

Author and Disclosure Information

Mazen Albeldawi, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic

Mohammed A. Qadeer, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

John J. Vargo, MD, MPH
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Address: John J. Vargo, MD, MPH, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A30, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; e-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Vargo has disclosed that he has received consulting fees from Ethicon EndoSurgery and honoraria for teaching and speaking from Olympus America, Inc.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common, costly, and potentially life-threatening. It must be managed promptly and appropriately to prevent adverse outcomes.

More people are admitted to the hospital for upper GI bleeding than for congestive heart failure or deep vein thrombosis. In the United States, the annual rate of hospitalization for upper GI bleeding is estimated to be 165 per 100,000—more than 300,000 hospitalizations per year, at a cost of $2.5 billion.1,2

Furthermore, despite advances in therapy, the case-fatality rate has remained unchanged at 7% to 10%.3 This may be because today’s patients are older and have more comorbidities than those in the past.4

CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEEDING

Peptic ulcers account for about 60% of severe cases of upper GI bleeding,5 and they are the focus of this paper. Fortunately, up to 80% of bleeding ulcers stop bleeding spontaneously without any intervention.6

Gastroduodenal erosions account for about 12%.3

Varices due to cirrhosis are less common but more dangerous. Variceal bleeding accounts for a relatively small percentage (6%) of upper GI bleeding, but the mortality rate from a single episode of variceal bleeding is 30%, and 60% to 70% of patients die within 1 year, mostly of underlying liver disease.

Less frequent causes include Mallory-Weiss tears, erosive duodenitis, Dieulafoy ulcer (a type of vascular malformation), other vascular lesions, neoplasms, aortoenteric fistula, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and prolapse gastropathy.5

HEMATEMESIS AND MELENA

The most common presenting signs of acute upper GI bleeding are hematemesis (vomiting of blood), “coffee grounds” emesis, and melena (tarry black stools). About 30% of patients with bleeding ulcers present with hematemesis, 20% with melena, and 50% with both.7

Hematochezia (red blood in the stool) usually suggests a lower GI source of bleeding, since blood from an upper source turns black and tarry as it passes through the gut, producing melena. However, up to 5% of patients with bleeding ulcers have hematochezia,7 and it indicates heavy bleeding: bleeding of approximately 1,000 mL into the upper GI tract is needed to cause hematochezia, whereas only 50 to 100 mL is needed to cause melena.8,9 Hematochezia with signs and symptoms of hemodynamic compromise such as syncope, postural hypotension, tachycardia, and shock should therefore direct one’s attention to an upper GI source of bleeding.

Nonspecific features include nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, vasovagal phenomena, and syncope.

WHAT IS THE PATIENT’S RISK?

An assessment of clinical severity is the first critical task, as it helps in planning treatment. Advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and hemodynamic instability call for aggressive treatment. Apart from this simple clinical rule, scoring systems have been developed.

The Rockall scoring system, the most widely used, gives estimates of the risks of recurrent bleeding and death. It is based on the three clinical factors mentioned above and on two endoscopic ones, awarding points for:

  • Age—0 points if less than 60; 1 point if 60 to 79; or 2 points if 80 years or older
  • Shock—1 point if the pulse is more than 100; 2 points if the systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mm Hg
  • Comorbid illness—2 points for ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or other major comorbidity; 3 points for renal failure, hepatic failure, or metastatic disease
  • Endoscopic diagnosis—0 points if no lesion found or a Mallory-Weiss tear; 1 point for peptic ulcer, esophagitis, or erosive disease; 2 points for GI malignancy
  • Endoscopic stigmata or recent hemorrhage—0 points for a clean-based ulcer or flat pigmented spot; 2 points for blood in the upper GI tract, active bleeding, a nonbleeding visible vessel, or adherent clot.

The Rockall score can thus range from 0 to 11 points, with an overall score of 0, 1, or 2 associated with an excellent prognosis.10

The Blatchford scoring system uses only clinical and laboratory factors and has no endoscopic component (Table 1). In contrast to the Rockall score, the main outcome it predicts is the need for clinical intervention (endoscopy, surgery, or blood transfusion). The Blatchford score ranges from 0 to 23; most patients with a score of 6 or higher need intervention.11

Other systems that are used less often include the Baylor severity scale and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score.

Does the patient have varices?

All variceal bleeding should be considered severe, since the 1-year death rate is so high (up to 70%). Clues pointing to variceal bleeding include previous variceal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, history of liver disease, and signs of liver disease on clinical examination.

All patients suspected of having bleeding varices should be admitted to the intensive care unit for close monitoring and should be given the highest priority, even if they are hemodynamically stable.

Is the patient hemodynamically stable?

Appropriate hemodynamic assessment includes monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and mental status. Tachycardia at rest, hypotension, and orthostatic changes in vital signs indicate a considerable loss of blood volume. Low urine output, dry mucous membranes, and sunken neck veins are also useful signs. (Tachycardia may be blunted if the patient is taking a beta-blocker.)

If these signs of hypovolemia are present, the initial management focuses on treating shock and on improving oxygen delivery to the vital organs. This involves repletion of the intravascular volume with intravenous infusions or blood transfusions. Supplemental oxygen also is useful, especially in elderly patients with heart disease.12

Inspection of nasogastric aspirate

In the initial assessment, it is useful to insert a nasogastric tube and inspect the aspirate. If it contains bright red blood, the patient needs an urgent endoscopic evaluation and an intensive level of care13,14; if it contains coffee-grounds material, the patient needs to be admitted to the hospital and to undergo endoscopic evaluation within 24 hours.

However, a normal aspirate does not rule out upper GI bleeding. Aljebreen et al15 found that 15% of patients with upper GI bleeding and normal nasogastric aspirate still had high-risk lesions (ie, visible bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels) on endoscopy.

 

 

ACID-SUPPRESSION HELPS ULCERS HEAL

Acid and pepsin interfere with the healing of ulcers and other nonvariceal upper GI lesions. Further, an acidic environment promotes platelet disaggregation and fibrinolysis and impairs clot formation.16 This suggests that inhibiting gastric acid secretion and raising the gastric pH to 6 or higher may stabilize clots. Moreover, pepsinogen in the stomach is converted to its active form (pepsin) if the pH is less than 4. Therefore, keeping the pH above 4 keeps pepsinogen in an inactive form.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists were the first drugs to inhibit acid secretion, reversibly blocking histamine-2 receptors on the basolateral membrane of parietal cells. However, these drugs did not prove very useful in managing upper GI bleeding in clinical trials.17,18 In their intravenous form, they often fail to keep the gastric pH at 6 or higher, due to tachyphylaxis.19 The use of this class of drugs has declined in favor of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors reduce both basal and stimulated acid secretion by inhibiting hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase, the proton pump of the parietal cell.

Multiple studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors raise the gastric pH and keep it high. For example, an infusion of omeprazole (Prilosec) can keep the gastric pH above 6 for 72 hours without inducing tachyphylaxis.20,21

Started after endoscopy. Randomized controlled trials have found proton pump inhibitors to be effective when given in high doses intravenously for 72 hours after successful endoscopic treatment of bleeding ulcers with high-risk endoscopic signs, such as active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels.22,23

A meta-analysis indicated that these drugs decrease the incidence of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, the need for blood transfusions, the need for surgery, and the duration of hospitalization, but not the mortality rate.24,25 These studies also illustrate the benefit of following up endoscopic treatment to stop the bleeding with an intravenous infusion of a proton pump inhibitor.

The recommended dose of omeprazole for patients with high-risk findings on endoscopy is an 80-mg bolus followed by an 8-mg/hour infusion for 72 hours. After the patient’s condition stabilizes, oral therapy can be substituted for intravenous therapy. In patients with low-risk endoscopic findings (a clean-based ulcer or flat spot), oral proton pump inhibitors in high doses are recommended.

In either case, after the initial bleeding is treated endoscopically and hemostasis is achieved, a proton pump inhibitor is recommended for 6 to 8 weeks, or longer if the patient is also positive for Helicobacter pylori or is on daily treatment with aspirin or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is not selective for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (see below).

Started before endoscopy, these drugs reduced the frequency of actively bleeding ulcers, the duration of hospitalization, and the need for endoscopic therapy in a randomized controlled trial.26 A meta-analysis found that significantly fewer patients had signs of recent bleeding on endoscopy if they received a proton pump inhibitor 24 to 48 hours before the procedure, but it did not find any significant difference in important clinical outcomes such as death, recurrent bleeding, or surgery.27 Nevertheless, we believe that intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy should be started before endoscopy in patients with upper GI bleeding.

Somatostatin analogues

Octreotide (Sandostatin), an analogue of the hormone somatostatin, decreases splanchnic blood flow, decreases secretion of gastric acid and pepsin, and stimulates mucus production. Although it is beneficial in treating upper GI bleeding due to varices, its benefit has not been confirmed in patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.

A meta-analysis revealed that outcomes were better with high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy than with octreotide when these drugs were started after endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding.28 Nevertheless, octreotide may be useful in patients with uncontrolled nonvariceal bleeding who are awaiting endoscopy, since it is relatively safe to use.

ALL PATIENTS NEED ENDOSCOPY

All patients with upper GI bleeding need an upper endoscopic examination to diagnose and assess the risk posed by the bleeding lesion and to treat the lesion, reducing the risk of recurrent bleeding.

How urgently does endoscopy need to be done?

Endoscopy within the first 24 hours of upper GI bleeding is considered the standard of care. Patients with uncontrolled or recurrent bleeding should undergo endoscopy on an urgent basis to control the bleeding and reduce the risk of death.

However, how urgently endoscopy needs to be done is often debated. A multicenter randomized controlled trial compared outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopy within 6 hours of coming to the emergency department vs within 24 hours after the initial evaluation. The study found no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups; however, the group that underwent endoscopy sooner needed fewer transfusions.29

For a better view of the stomach

Gastric lavage improves the view of the gastric fundus but has not been proven to improve outcome.30

Promotility agents such as erythromycin and metoclopramide (Reglan) are also used to empty the stomach for better visualization.31–35 Erythromycin has been shown to improve visualization, shorten the procedure time, and prevent the need for additional endoscopy attempts in two randomized controlled studies.33,34 Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness study confirmed that giving intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy for acute upper GI bleeding saved money and resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life-years.35

 

 

Endoscopy to diagnose bleeding and assess risk

Upper endoscopy is 90% to 95% diagnostic for acute upper GI bleeding.36

Figure 1. Endoscopic stigmata of bleeding peptic ulcer (arrows) and risk of recurrent bleeding and death.
Furthermore, some of the clinical scoring systems are based on endoscopic findings along with clinical factors on admission. These scoring systems are valuable for assessing patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, as they predict the risk of death, longer hospital stay, surgical intervention, and recurrent bleeding.37,38 Patients with endoscopic findings associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding and death (Figure 1) need aggressive management.

Certain factors, primarily clinical and endoscopic, predict that endoscopic treatment will fail to stop ulcer bleeding. Clinical factors include a history of peptic ulcer bleeding and hemodynamic compromise at presentation. Endoscopic factors include ulcers located high on the lesser curvature of the stomach, ulcers in the posterior or superior duodenal bulb, ulcers larger than 2 cm in diameter, and ulcers that are actively bleeding at the time of endoscopy.37 Other endoscopic findings that predict clinical outcome are summarized in Table 2.

Patients at high risk (ie, older than 60 years, with severe comorbidity, or hemodynamically compromised) who have active bleeding (ie, witnessed hematemesis, red blood per nasogastric tube, or fresh blood per rectum) or a nonbleeding visible vessel should be admitted to a monitored bed or intensive care unit. Observation in a regular medical ward is appropriate for high-risk patients found to have an adherent clot. Patients with low-risk findings (eg, a clean ulcer base) are at low risk of recurrent bleeding and may be considered for early hospital discharge with appropriate outpatient follow-up.

Endoscopy to treat bleeding

About 25% of endoscopic procedures performed for upper GI bleeding include some type of treatment,39 such as injections of epinephrine, normal saline, or sclerosants; thermal cautery; argon plasma coagulation; electrocautery; or application of clips or bands. They are all equally effective, and combinations of these therapies are more effective than when they are used individually. A recent meta-analysis found dual therapy to be superior to epinephrine monotherapy in preventing recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and death.40

Endoscopic therapy is recommended for patients found to have active bleeding or nonbleeding visible blood vessels, as outcomes are better with endoscopic hemostatic treatment than with drug therapy alone (Table 3).41–44

How to manage adherent clots is controversial, but recent studies have revealed a significant benefit from removing them and treating the underlying lesions compared with drug therapy alone.43,45

Flat, pigmented spots and nonbleeding ulcers with a clean base do not require endoscopic treatment because the risk of recurrent bleeding is low.

Endoscopic therapy stops the bleeding in more than 90% of patients, but bleeding recurs after endoscopic therapy in 10% to 25%.46 Reversal of any severe coagulopathy with transfusions of platelets or fresh frozen plasma is essential for endoscopic hemostasis. However, coagulopathy at the time of initial bleeding and endoscopy does not appear to be associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.47

Patients with refractory bleeding are candidates for angiography or surgery. However, even when endoscopic hemostasis fails, endoscopy is important before angiography or surgery to pinpoint the site of bleeding and diagnose the cause.

A second endoscopic procedure is generally not recommended within 24 hours after the initial procedure.48 However, it is appropriate in cases in which clinical signs indicate recurrent bleeding or if hemostasis during the initial procedure is questionable. A meta-analysis found that routinely repeating endoscopy reduces the rate of recurrent bleeding but not the need for surgery or the risk of death.49

ALL PATIENTS SHOULD BE ADMITTED

Figure 2. Algorithm for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
All patients with upper GI bleeding should be admitted to the hospital, with the level of care dictated by the severity of their clinical condition (Figure 2).

VARICEAL BLEEDING

Variceal bleeding, a severe outcome of portal hypertension secondary to cirrhosis, carries a 6-week mortality rate of 10% to 20%.50 In view of the risk, primary prevention is indicated in patients with high-risk varices.

The mainstays of primary and secondary prevention are the nonselective beta-blockers such as nadolol (Corgard) and propranolol (Inderal). Several randomized controlled trials have shown lower rates of recurrent bleeding and death with propranolol or nadolol than with placebo.51 In doses that decrease the heart rate by 25%, beta-blockers have been shown to delay and decrease variceal hemorrhage. However, most patients require prophylactic endoscopic variceal ligation because they cannot tolerate beta-blocker therapy.

In suspected acute variceal bleeding, a somatostatin analogue should be started to decrease the portal pressure, and antibiotics should be started to reduce the risks of infection and death. Vasoactive drugs, ie, somatostatin analogues, should be started before endoscopy and continued for 5 days to reduce the chances of recurrent bleeding.52,53

Terlipressin is the only drug proven to improve the odds of survival in acute variceal bleeding. Although widely used in Europe, it has not been approved for use in the United States.

Octreotide, another option, improves hemostasis to the same extent, although it does not increase the survival rate.54,55 The recommended dose of octreotide for patients with variceal bleeding is a 50-μg intravenous bolus, followed by a 50-μg/hour infusion for 5 days.

Combining endoscopic and drug therapy improves the chances of stopping the bleeding and reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding compared with endoscopic therapy alone.56

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is indicated in recurrent variceal hemorrhage or in those with initial bleeding that is refractory to standard medical and endoscopic therapy. It is not the primary therapy because it doubles the risk of encephalopathy and has a high stent occlusion rate (up to 60%, lower with covered stents).

 

 

GI BLEEDING CAN CAUSE ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The simultaneous presentation of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and GI hemorrhage is very serious and unfortunately common.

An acute MI occurring simultaneously with or after GI bleeding is usually precipitated by massive bleeding causing hypovolemia, hemodynamic compromise, and hypoperfusion. Conversely, the anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic drugs given to treat MI can precipitate GI bleeding (see below).

This distinction is important because the two scenarios have different clinical courses and prognoses. GI bleeding that precipitates an acute MI tends to be massive, whereas GI bleeding after treatment of acute MI tends to be self-limited and often resolves with reversal of underlying coagulopathy.57

Endoscopy carries a higher than average risk in patients with recent acute MI, with all-cause mortality rates as high as 1%.58 (The usual rate is 0.0004%.59) Nevertheless, endoscopy can be safely performed early on in patients with acute MI if it is done under strict monitoring in a coronary care unit.

Several studies have shown that MI patients who present with upper GI bleeding as the inciting event or patients with acute MI who are vomiting blood or who are hemodynamically unstable due to GI bleeding are significantly more likely to have a high-risk lesion and so have the greatest need for endoscopic therapy. Therefore, endoscopic intervention may be offered to MI patients at high risk who have been started on antiplatelet agents.

WARFARIN CAN PRECIPITATE BLEEDING

Acute upper GI bleeding can be a severe complication of long-term oral anticoagulation, not because the drugs cause ulcers, but rather because they exacerbate ulcers that are already present.60 Therefore, when starting warfarin (Coumadin), patients should be evaluated to determine if they have other risk factors for GI bleeding, such as ulcers.

The number of people presenting with upper GI bleeding while on warfarin therapy is increasing because of the expanding indications for long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as atrial fibrillation and deep venous thrombosis.

The risk of GI bleeding in patients who use oral anticoagulants is estimated to be 2.3 to 4.9 times higher than in nonusers.61

The goal international normalized ratio (INR) for patients on warfarin therapy is usually 2.0 to 3.0. Recent studies found that endoscopy can be safely performed in patients with acute GI bleeding whose INR is between 2.0 and 3.0.62,63 Some suggest that both the length of warfarin therapy and the INR affect the risk of bleeding.64,65

Managing patients with an INR higher than 3.0 who have an episode of GI bleeding is always a challenge. It is not uncommon to find pathologic lesions causing GI bleeding in patients who are on warfarin with a supratherapeutic INR, and thus, endoscopy is indicated. However, before endoscopy, reversal of anticoagulation should be considered.

BLEEDING IN PATIENTS ON ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Aspirin

Aspirin decreases production of prostaglandins in the GI tract, thereby decreasing the protective and restorative properties of the gastric and duodenal mucosa and predisposing to ulcers and bleeding.

The higher the aspirin dose, the higher the risk. Aspirin doubles the risk of upper GI bleeding at daily doses of 75 mg and quadruples it at doses of 300 mg.66 Even doses as low as 10 mg can decrease gastric mucosal prostaglandin production.67 Thus, it appears that there is no risk-free dose of aspirin, and enteric-coated or buffered formulations do not appear to reduce the risk.68–70

The most important risk factor for upper GI bleeding in patients taking aspirin is a history of peptic ulcer bleeding. Approximately 15% of aspirin users who have bleeding from ulcers have recurrent bleeding within 1 year.71

As aspirin-induced GI bleeding becomes more common, health care providers often feel caught between the GI risk and the cardiovascular benefit. When considering whether to discontinue antiplatelet therapy, a cardiologist should be consulted along with a gastroenterologist to weigh the risks of GI bleeding vs thrombosis. To date, there have been no clinical trials published to suggest when antiplatelet therapy should be stopped to optimize GI and cardiovascular outcomes. An alternative is to replace aspirin with another antiplatelet drug that does not induce ulcers.

Clopidogrel

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is recommended for hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome who cannot tolerate the GI side effects of aspirin, according to the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, with the highest level of evidence.72 This recommendation was largely based on the safety data from the CAPRIE (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trial, in which the incidence of major GI bleeding was lower in the clopidogrel group (0.52%) than in the aspirin group (0.72%; P < .05).73

Aspirin plus a proton pump inhibitor

Patients who have had an episode of upper GI bleeding and who need long-term aspirin therapy should also receive a proton pump inhibitor indefinitely to prevent ulcer recurrence.

In a recent double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients with a history of aspirin-induced bleeding, the combination of low-dose aspirin plus esomeprazole (Nexium) twice a day was superior to clopidogrel by itself in terms of the rate of recurrent bleeding (0.7% vs 8.6%; P < .05).74 A similar trial showed nearly identical results: 0% upper GI bleeding in the group receiving aspirin plus esomeprazole 20 mg daily, vs 13.6% in the clopidogrel group (P = .0019).75 These studies suggest that a once-daily proton pump inhibitor combined with aspirin is a safer alternative than clopidogrel alone.

Clopidogrel plus a proton pump inhibitor

Interestingly, recent studies have shown that omeprazole decreases the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, possibly by inhibiting the CYP2C19 enzyme.76 However, concomitant use of pantoprazole (Protonix), lansoprazole (Prevacid), and esomeprazole did not have this effect, suggesting that although all proton pump inhibitors are metabolized to a varying degree by CYP2C19, the interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel is not a class effect.77–79 Therefore, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole may be the appropriate proton pump inhibitors to use with clopidogrel in patients who have a clear indication for the medication, consistent with current guideline recommendations.

Helicobacter pylori infection in antiplatelet drug users

Before starting any long-term antiplatelet therapy, patients with a history of ulcers should be tested and treated for H pylori (Table 4).80 Confirmation of eradication is required after H pylori treatment in patients with upper GI bleeding. Some suggest that for patients with a history of bleeding ulcer who need aspirin, eradication of H pylori substantially reduces the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding.81

 

 

TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF NSAID-RELATED GI INJURY

About 1 in 20 users of NSAIDs develop GI complications and ulcers of varying degrees of severity, as do one in seven NSAID users over the age of 65. In fact, NSAID use accounts for 30% of hospitalizations for upper GI bleeding and deaths from this cause.82–85 In addition, approximately 15% to 30% of NSAID users have clinically silent but endoscopically evident peptic ulcers.86

NSAIDs contribute to ulcer development by depleting prostaglandins. Thus, misoprostol (Cytotec), a synthetic prostaglandin, has been used to reduce this side effect.

In a clinical trial, misoprostol reduced the incidence of NSAID-associated GI complications by 40%.87 Furthermore, it has been shown to be better than placebo in preventing recurrent gastric ulcers in patients with a history of gastric ulcer who were receiving low-dose aspirin.88

However, misoprostol is rarely used because it can cause diarrhea and abdominal cramping. Rather, the preferred drugs for preventing and treating NSAID- and aspirin-related GI lesions are proton pump inhibitors.

Numerous clinical trials using endoscopic end points showed that proton pump inhibitors in standard doses significantly reduce the incidence of ulcers associated with the use of NSAIDs.89 Proton pump inhibitor therapy has achieved a significant reduction in relative risk of upper GI bleeding in patients who received low-dose aspirin therapy, as confirmed by epidemiologic studies.90,91 The number of NSAID-related ulcers found on endoscopy could be reduced by an estimated 90% simply by using proton pump inhibitors.92

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is common, costly, and potentially life-threatening. It must be managed promptly and appropriately to prevent adverse outcomes.

More people are admitted to the hospital for upper GI bleeding than for congestive heart failure or deep vein thrombosis. In the United States, the annual rate of hospitalization for upper GI bleeding is estimated to be 165 per 100,000—more than 300,000 hospitalizations per year, at a cost of $2.5 billion.1,2

Furthermore, despite advances in therapy, the case-fatality rate has remained unchanged at 7% to 10%.3 This may be because today’s patients are older and have more comorbidities than those in the past.4

CAUSES OF UPPER GI BLEEDING

Peptic ulcers account for about 60% of severe cases of upper GI bleeding,5 and they are the focus of this paper. Fortunately, up to 80% of bleeding ulcers stop bleeding spontaneously without any intervention.6

Gastroduodenal erosions account for about 12%.3

Varices due to cirrhosis are less common but more dangerous. Variceal bleeding accounts for a relatively small percentage (6%) of upper GI bleeding, but the mortality rate from a single episode of variceal bleeding is 30%, and 60% to 70% of patients die within 1 year, mostly of underlying liver disease.

Less frequent causes include Mallory-Weiss tears, erosive duodenitis, Dieulafoy ulcer (a type of vascular malformation), other vascular lesions, neoplasms, aortoenteric fistula, gastric antral vascular ectasia, and prolapse gastropathy.5

HEMATEMESIS AND MELENA

The most common presenting signs of acute upper GI bleeding are hematemesis (vomiting of blood), “coffee grounds” emesis, and melena (tarry black stools). About 30% of patients with bleeding ulcers present with hematemesis, 20% with melena, and 50% with both.7

Hematochezia (red blood in the stool) usually suggests a lower GI source of bleeding, since blood from an upper source turns black and tarry as it passes through the gut, producing melena. However, up to 5% of patients with bleeding ulcers have hematochezia,7 and it indicates heavy bleeding: bleeding of approximately 1,000 mL into the upper GI tract is needed to cause hematochezia, whereas only 50 to 100 mL is needed to cause melena.8,9 Hematochezia with signs and symptoms of hemodynamic compromise such as syncope, postural hypotension, tachycardia, and shock should therefore direct one’s attention to an upper GI source of bleeding.

Nonspecific features include nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, vasovagal phenomena, and syncope.

WHAT IS THE PATIENT’S RISK?

An assessment of clinical severity is the first critical task, as it helps in planning treatment. Advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and hemodynamic instability call for aggressive treatment. Apart from this simple clinical rule, scoring systems have been developed.

The Rockall scoring system, the most widely used, gives estimates of the risks of recurrent bleeding and death. It is based on the three clinical factors mentioned above and on two endoscopic ones, awarding points for:

  • Age—0 points if less than 60; 1 point if 60 to 79; or 2 points if 80 years or older
  • Shock—1 point if the pulse is more than 100; 2 points if the systolic blood pressure is less than 100 mm Hg
  • Comorbid illness—2 points for ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or other major comorbidity; 3 points for renal failure, hepatic failure, or metastatic disease
  • Endoscopic diagnosis—0 points if no lesion found or a Mallory-Weiss tear; 1 point for peptic ulcer, esophagitis, or erosive disease; 2 points for GI malignancy
  • Endoscopic stigmata or recent hemorrhage—0 points for a clean-based ulcer or flat pigmented spot; 2 points for blood in the upper GI tract, active bleeding, a nonbleeding visible vessel, or adherent clot.

The Rockall score can thus range from 0 to 11 points, with an overall score of 0, 1, or 2 associated with an excellent prognosis.10

The Blatchford scoring system uses only clinical and laboratory factors and has no endoscopic component (Table 1). In contrast to the Rockall score, the main outcome it predicts is the need for clinical intervention (endoscopy, surgery, or blood transfusion). The Blatchford score ranges from 0 to 23; most patients with a score of 6 or higher need intervention.11

Other systems that are used less often include the Baylor severity scale and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score.

Does the patient have varices?

All variceal bleeding should be considered severe, since the 1-year death rate is so high (up to 70%). Clues pointing to variceal bleeding include previous variceal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, history of liver disease, and signs of liver disease on clinical examination.

All patients suspected of having bleeding varices should be admitted to the intensive care unit for close monitoring and should be given the highest priority, even if they are hemodynamically stable.

Is the patient hemodynamically stable?

Appropriate hemodynamic assessment includes monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, and mental status. Tachycardia at rest, hypotension, and orthostatic changes in vital signs indicate a considerable loss of blood volume. Low urine output, dry mucous membranes, and sunken neck veins are also useful signs. (Tachycardia may be blunted if the patient is taking a beta-blocker.)

If these signs of hypovolemia are present, the initial management focuses on treating shock and on improving oxygen delivery to the vital organs. This involves repletion of the intravascular volume with intravenous infusions or blood transfusions. Supplemental oxygen also is useful, especially in elderly patients with heart disease.12

Inspection of nasogastric aspirate

In the initial assessment, it is useful to insert a nasogastric tube and inspect the aspirate. If it contains bright red blood, the patient needs an urgent endoscopic evaluation and an intensive level of care13,14; if it contains coffee-grounds material, the patient needs to be admitted to the hospital and to undergo endoscopic evaluation within 24 hours.

However, a normal aspirate does not rule out upper GI bleeding. Aljebreen et al15 found that 15% of patients with upper GI bleeding and normal nasogastric aspirate still had high-risk lesions (ie, visible bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels) on endoscopy.

 

 

ACID-SUPPRESSION HELPS ULCERS HEAL

Acid and pepsin interfere with the healing of ulcers and other nonvariceal upper GI lesions. Further, an acidic environment promotes platelet disaggregation and fibrinolysis and impairs clot formation.16 This suggests that inhibiting gastric acid secretion and raising the gastric pH to 6 or higher may stabilize clots. Moreover, pepsinogen in the stomach is converted to its active form (pepsin) if the pH is less than 4. Therefore, keeping the pH above 4 keeps pepsinogen in an inactive form.

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists

Histamine-2 receptor antagonists were the first drugs to inhibit acid secretion, reversibly blocking histamine-2 receptors on the basolateral membrane of parietal cells. However, these drugs did not prove very useful in managing upper GI bleeding in clinical trials.17,18 In their intravenous form, they often fail to keep the gastric pH at 6 or higher, due to tachyphylaxis.19 The use of this class of drugs has declined in favor of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors reduce both basal and stimulated acid secretion by inhibiting hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase, the proton pump of the parietal cell.

Multiple studies have shown that proton pump inhibitors raise the gastric pH and keep it high. For example, an infusion of omeprazole (Prilosec) can keep the gastric pH above 6 for 72 hours without inducing tachyphylaxis.20,21

Started after endoscopy. Randomized controlled trials have found proton pump inhibitors to be effective when given in high doses intravenously for 72 hours after successful endoscopic treatment of bleeding ulcers with high-risk endoscopic signs, such as active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels.22,23

A meta-analysis indicated that these drugs decrease the incidence of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, the need for blood transfusions, the need for surgery, and the duration of hospitalization, but not the mortality rate.24,25 These studies also illustrate the benefit of following up endoscopic treatment to stop the bleeding with an intravenous infusion of a proton pump inhibitor.

The recommended dose of omeprazole for patients with high-risk findings on endoscopy is an 80-mg bolus followed by an 8-mg/hour infusion for 72 hours. After the patient’s condition stabilizes, oral therapy can be substituted for intravenous therapy. In patients with low-risk endoscopic findings (a clean-based ulcer or flat spot), oral proton pump inhibitors in high doses are recommended.

In either case, after the initial bleeding is treated endoscopically and hemostasis is achieved, a proton pump inhibitor is recommended for 6 to 8 weeks, or longer if the patient is also positive for Helicobacter pylori or is on daily treatment with aspirin or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that is not selective for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (see below).

Started before endoscopy, these drugs reduced the frequency of actively bleeding ulcers, the duration of hospitalization, and the need for endoscopic therapy in a randomized controlled trial.26 A meta-analysis found that significantly fewer patients had signs of recent bleeding on endoscopy if they received a proton pump inhibitor 24 to 48 hours before the procedure, but it did not find any significant difference in important clinical outcomes such as death, recurrent bleeding, or surgery.27 Nevertheless, we believe that intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy should be started before endoscopy in patients with upper GI bleeding.

Somatostatin analogues

Octreotide (Sandostatin), an analogue of the hormone somatostatin, decreases splanchnic blood flow, decreases secretion of gastric acid and pepsin, and stimulates mucus production. Although it is beneficial in treating upper GI bleeding due to varices, its benefit has not been confirmed in patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.

A meta-analysis revealed that outcomes were better with high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitor therapy than with octreotide when these drugs were started after endoscopic treatment of acute peptic ulcer bleeding.28 Nevertheless, octreotide may be useful in patients with uncontrolled nonvariceal bleeding who are awaiting endoscopy, since it is relatively safe to use.

ALL PATIENTS NEED ENDOSCOPY

All patients with upper GI bleeding need an upper endoscopic examination to diagnose and assess the risk posed by the bleeding lesion and to treat the lesion, reducing the risk of recurrent bleeding.

How urgently does endoscopy need to be done?

Endoscopy within the first 24 hours of upper GI bleeding is considered the standard of care. Patients with uncontrolled or recurrent bleeding should undergo endoscopy on an urgent basis to control the bleeding and reduce the risk of death.

However, how urgently endoscopy needs to be done is often debated. A multicenter randomized controlled trial compared outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopy within 6 hours of coming to the emergency department vs within 24 hours after the initial evaluation. The study found no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups; however, the group that underwent endoscopy sooner needed fewer transfusions.29

For a better view of the stomach

Gastric lavage improves the view of the gastric fundus but has not been proven to improve outcome.30

Promotility agents such as erythromycin and metoclopramide (Reglan) are also used to empty the stomach for better visualization.31–35 Erythromycin has been shown to improve visualization, shorten the procedure time, and prevent the need for additional endoscopy attempts in two randomized controlled studies.33,34 Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness study confirmed that giving intravenous erythromycin before endoscopy for acute upper GI bleeding saved money and resulted in an increase in quality-adjusted life-years.35

 

 

Endoscopy to diagnose bleeding and assess risk

Upper endoscopy is 90% to 95% diagnostic for acute upper GI bleeding.36

Figure 1. Endoscopic stigmata of bleeding peptic ulcer (arrows) and risk of recurrent bleeding and death.
Furthermore, some of the clinical scoring systems are based on endoscopic findings along with clinical factors on admission. These scoring systems are valuable for assessing patients with nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, as they predict the risk of death, longer hospital stay, surgical intervention, and recurrent bleeding.37,38 Patients with endoscopic findings associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding and death (Figure 1) need aggressive management.

Certain factors, primarily clinical and endoscopic, predict that endoscopic treatment will fail to stop ulcer bleeding. Clinical factors include a history of peptic ulcer bleeding and hemodynamic compromise at presentation. Endoscopic factors include ulcers located high on the lesser curvature of the stomach, ulcers in the posterior or superior duodenal bulb, ulcers larger than 2 cm in diameter, and ulcers that are actively bleeding at the time of endoscopy.37 Other endoscopic findings that predict clinical outcome are summarized in Table 2.

Patients at high risk (ie, older than 60 years, with severe comorbidity, or hemodynamically compromised) who have active bleeding (ie, witnessed hematemesis, red blood per nasogastric tube, or fresh blood per rectum) or a nonbleeding visible vessel should be admitted to a monitored bed or intensive care unit. Observation in a regular medical ward is appropriate for high-risk patients found to have an adherent clot. Patients with low-risk findings (eg, a clean ulcer base) are at low risk of recurrent bleeding and may be considered for early hospital discharge with appropriate outpatient follow-up.

Endoscopy to treat bleeding

About 25% of endoscopic procedures performed for upper GI bleeding include some type of treatment,39 such as injections of epinephrine, normal saline, or sclerosants; thermal cautery; argon plasma coagulation; electrocautery; or application of clips or bands. They are all equally effective, and combinations of these therapies are more effective than when they are used individually. A recent meta-analysis found dual therapy to be superior to epinephrine monotherapy in preventing recurrent bleeding, need for surgery, and death.40

Endoscopic therapy is recommended for patients found to have active bleeding or nonbleeding visible blood vessels, as outcomes are better with endoscopic hemostatic treatment than with drug therapy alone (Table 3).41–44

How to manage adherent clots is controversial, but recent studies have revealed a significant benefit from removing them and treating the underlying lesions compared with drug therapy alone.43,45

Flat, pigmented spots and nonbleeding ulcers with a clean base do not require endoscopic treatment because the risk of recurrent bleeding is low.

Endoscopic therapy stops the bleeding in more than 90% of patients, but bleeding recurs after endoscopic therapy in 10% to 25%.46 Reversal of any severe coagulopathy with transfusions of platelets or fresh frozen plasma is essential for endoscopic hemostasis. However, coagulopathy at the time of initial bleeding and endoscopy does not appear to be associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.47

Patients with refractory bleeding are candidates for angiography or surgery. However, even when endoscopic hemostasis fails, endoscopy is important before angiography or surgery to pinpoint the site of bleeding and diagnose the cause.

A second endoscopic procedure is generally not recommended within 24 hours after the initial procedure.48 However, it is appropriate in cases in which clinical signs indicate recurrent bleeding or if hemostasis during the initial procedure is questionable. A meta-analysis found that routinely repeating endoscopy reduces the rate of recurrent bleeding but not the need for surgery or the risk of death.49

ALL PATIENTS SHOULD BE ADMITTED

Figure 2. Algorithm for patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
All patients with upper GI bleeding should be admitted to the hospital, with the level of care dictated by the severity of their clinical condition (Figure 2).

VARICEAL BLEEDING

Variceal bleeding, a severe outcome of portal hypertension secondary to cirrhosis, carries a 6-week mortality rate of 10% to 20%.50 In view of the risk, primary prevention is indicated in patients with high-risk varices.

The mainstays of primary and secondary prevention are the nonselective beta-blockers such as nadolol (Corgard) and propranolol (Inderal). Several randomized controlled trials have shown lower rates of recurrent bleeding and death with propranolol or nadolol than with placebo.51 In doses that decrease the heart rate by 25%, beta-blockers have been shown to delay and decrease variceal hemorrhage. However, most patients require prophylactic endoscopic variceal ligation because they cannot tolerate beta-blocker therapy.

In suspected acute variceal bleeding, a somatostatin analogue should be started to decrease the portal pressure, and antibiotics should be started to reduce the risks of infection and death. Vasoactive drugs, ie, somatostatin analogues, should be started before endoscopy and continued for 5 days to reduce the chances of recurrent bleeding.52,53

Terlipressin is the only drug proven to improve the odds of survival in acute variceal bleeding. Although widely used in Europe, it has not been approved for use in the United States.

Octreotide, another option, improves hemostasis to the same extent, although it does not increase the survival rate.54,55 The recommended dose of octreotide for patients with variceal bleeding is a 50-μg intravenous bolus, followed by a 50-μg/hour infusion for 5 days.

Combining endoscopic and drug therapy improves the chances of stopping the bleeding and reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding compared with endoscopic therapy alone.56

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting is indicated in recurrent variceal hemorrhage or in those with initial bleeding that is refractory to standard medical and endoscopic therapy. It is not the primary therapy because it doubles the risk of encephalopathy and has a high stent occlusion rate (up to 60%, lower with covered stents).

 

 

GI BLEEDING CAN CAUSE ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

The simultaneous presentation of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and GI hemorrhage is very serious and unfortunately common.

An acute MI occurring simultaneously with or after GI bleeding is usually precipitated by massive bleeding causing hypovolemia, hemodynamic compromise, and hypoperfusion. Conversely, the anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic drugs given to treat MI can precipitate GI bleeding (see below).

This distinction is important because the two scenarios have different clinical courses and prognoses. GI bleeding that precipitates an acute MI tends to be massive, whereas GI bleeding after treatment of acute MI tends to be self-limited and often resolves with reversal of underlying coagulopathy.57

Endoscopy carries a higher than average risk in patients with recent acute MI, with all-cause mortality rates as high as 1%.58 (The usual rate is 0.0004%.59) Nevertheless, endoscopy can be safely performed early on in patients with acute MI if it is done under strict monitoring in a coronary care unit.

Several studies have shown that MI patients who present with upper GI bleeding as the inciting event or patients with acute MI who are vomiting blood or who are hemodynamically unstable due to GI bleeding are significantly more likely to have a high-risk lesion and so have the greatest need for endoscopic therapy. Therefore, endoscopic intervention may be offered to MI patients at high risk who have been started on antiplatelet agents.

WARFARIN CAN PRECIPITATE BLEEDING

Acute upper GI bleeding can be a severe complication of long-term oral anticoagulation, not because the drugs cause ulcers, but rather because they exacerbate ulcers that are already present.60 Therefore, when starting warfarin (Coumadin), patients should be evaluated to determine if they have other risk factors for GI bleeding, such as ulcers.

The number of people presenting with upper GI bleeding while on warfarin therapy is increasing because of the expanding indications for long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as atrial fibrillation and deep venous thrombosis.

The risk of GI bleeding in patients who use oral anticoagulants is estimated to be 2.3 to 4.9 times higher than in nonusers.61

The goal international normalized ratio (INR) for patients on warfarin therapy is usually 2.0 to 3.0. Recent studies found that endoscopy can be safely performed in patients with acute GI bleeding whose INR is between 2.0 and 3.0.62,63 Some suggest that both the length of warfarin therapy and the INR affect the risk of bleeding.64,65

Managing patients with an INR higher than 3.0 who have an episode of GI bleeding is always a challenge. It is not uncommon to find pathologic lesions causing GI bleeding in patients who are on warfarin with a supratherapeutic INR, and thus, endoscopy is indicated. However, before endoscopy, reversal of anticoagulation should be considered.

BLEEDING IN PATIENTS ON ANTIPLATELET DRUGS

Aspirin

Aspirin decreases production of prostaglandins in the GI tract, thereby decreasing the protective and restorative properties of the gastric and duodenal mucosa and predisposing to ulcers and bleeding.

The higher the aspirin dose, the higher the risk. Aspirin doubles the risk of upper GI bleeding at daily doses of 75 mg and quadruples it at doses of 300 mg.66 Even doses as low as 10 mg can decrease gastric mucosal prostaglandin production.67 Thus, it appears that there is no risk-free dose of aspirin, and enteric-coated or buffered formulations do not appear to reduce the risk.68–70

The most important risk factor for upper GI bleeding in patients taking aspirin is a history of peptic ulcer bleeding. Approximately 15% of aspirin users who have bleeding from ulcers have recurrent bleeding within 1 year.71

As aspirin-induced GI bleeding becomes more common, health care providers often feel caught between the GI risk and the cardiovascular benefit. When considering whether to discontinue antiplatelet therapy, a cardiologist should be consulted along with a gastroenterologist to weigh the risks of GI bleeding vs thrombosis. To date, there have been no clinical trials published to suggest when antiplatelet therapy should be stopped to optimize GI and cardiovascular outcomes. An alternative is to replace aspirin with another antiplatelet drug that does not induce ulcers.

Clopidogrel

Clopidogrel (Plavix) is recommended for hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome who cannot tolerate the GI side effects of aspirin, according to the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, with the highest level of evidence.72 This recommendation was largely based on the safety data from the CAPRIE (Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) trial, in which the incidence of major GI bleeding was lower in the clopidogrel group (0.52%) than in the aspirin group (0.72%; P < .05).73

Aspirin plus a proton pump inhibitor

Patients who have had an episode of upper GI bleeding and who need long-term aspirin therapy should also receive a proton pump inhibitor indefinitely to prevent ulcer recurrence.

In a recent double-blind randomized controlled trial in patients with a history of aspirin-induced bleeding, the combination of low-dose aspirin plus esomeprazole (Nexium) twice a day was superior to clopidogrel by itself in terms of the rate of recurrent bleeding (0.7% vs 8.6%; P < .05).74 A similar trial showed nearly identical results: 0% upper GI bleeding in the group receiving aspirin plus esomeprazole 20 mg daily, vs 13.6% in the clopidogrel group (P = .0019).75 These studies suggest that a once-daily proton pump inhibitor combined with aspirin is a safer alternative than clopidogrel alone.

Clopidogrel plus a proton pump inhibitor

Interestingly, recent studies have shown that omeprazole decreases the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel, possibly by inhibiting the CYP2C19 enzyme.76 However, concomitant use of pantoprazole (Protonix), lansoprazole (Prevacid), and esomeprazole did not have this effect, suggesting that although all proton pump inhibitors are metabolized to a varying degree by CYP2C19, the interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel is not a class effect.77–79 Therefore, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole may be the appropriate proton pump inhibitors to use with clopidogrel in patients who have a clear indication for the medication, consistent with current guideline recommendations.

Helicobacter pylori infection in antiplatelet drug users

Before starting any long-term antiplatelet therapy, patients with a history of ulcers should be tested and treated for H pylori (Table 4).80 Confirmation of eradication is required after H pylori treatment in patients with upper GI bleeding. Some suggest that for patients with a history of bleeding ulcer who need aspirin, eradication of H pylori substantially reduces the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding.81

 

 

TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF NSAID-RELATED GI INJURY

About 1 in 20 users of NSAIDs develop GI complications and ulcers of varying degrees of severity, as do one in seven NSAID users over the age of 65. In fact, NSAID use accounts for 30% of hospitalizations for upper GI bleeding and deaths from this cause.82–85 In addition, approximately 15% to 30% of NSAID users have clinically silent but endoscopically evident peptic ulcers.86

NSAIDs contribute to ulcer development by depleting prostaglandins. Thus, misoprostol (Cytotec), a synthetic prostaglandin, has been used to reduce this side effect.

In a clinical trial, misoprostol reduced the incidence of NSAID-associated GI complications by 40%.87 Furthermore, it has been shown to be better than placebo in preventing recurrent gastric ulcers in patients with a history of gastric ulcer who were receiving low-dose aspirin.88

However, misoprostol is rarely used because it can cause diarrhea and abdominal cramping. Rather, the preferred drugs for preventing and treating NSAID- and aspirin-related GI lesions are proton pump inhibitors.

Numerous clinical trials using endoscopic end points showed that proton pump inhibitors in standard doses significantly reduce the incidence of ulcers associated with the use of NSAIDs.89 Proton pump inhibitor therapy has achieved a significant reduction in relative risk of upper GI bleeding in patients who received low-dose aspirin therapy, as confirmed by epidemiologic studies.90,91 The number of NSAID-related ulcers found on endoscopy could be reduced by an estimated 90% simply by using proton pump inhibitors.92

References
  1. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: relationship to sales of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:25402549.
  2. Viviane A, Alan BN. Estimates of costs of hospital stays for variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the United States. Value Health 2008; 11:13.
  3. Yavorski RT, Wong RK, Maydonovitch C, Battin LS, Furnia A, Amundson DE. Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:568573.
  4. Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al. Risk factors for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding among older persons. Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49:126133.
  5. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:206210.
  6. Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:717727.
  7. Wara P, Stodkilde H. Bleeding pattern before admission as guideline for emergency endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985; 20:7278.
  8. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology 1988; 95:15691574.
  9. Daniel WA, Egan S. The quantity of blood required to produce a tarry stool. J Am Med Assoc 1939; 113:2232.
  10. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38:316321.
  11. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356:13181321.
  12. Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:928937.
  13. Silverstein FE, Gilbert DA, Tedesco FJ, Buenger NK, Persing J. The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding II. Clinical prognostic factors. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27:8093.
  14. Corley DA, Stefan AM, Wolf M, Cook EF, Lee TH. Early indicators of prognosis in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:336340.
  15. Aljebreen AM, Fallone CA, Barkun AN. Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:172178.
  16. Barkun AN, Cockeram AW, Plourde V, Fedorak RN. Review article: acid suppression in non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13:15651584.
  17. Levine JE, Leontiadis JI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:11371142.
  18. Walt RP, Cottrell J, Mann SG, Freemantle NP, Langman MJ. Continuous intravenous famotidine for hemorrhage from peptic ulcer. Lancet 1992; 340:10581062.
  19. Labenz J, Peitz U, Leusing C, Tillenburg B, Blum AL, Börsch G. Efficacy of primed infusion with high dose ranitidine and omeprazole to maintain high intragastric pH in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled study. Gut 1997; 40:3641.
  20. Merki HS, Wilder-Smith CH. Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing? Gastroenterology 1994; 106:6064.
  21. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, et al. Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:351357.
  22. Lin HJ, Lo WC, Cheng YC, Perng CL. Role of intravenous omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection: a prospective randomized comparative trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:500505.
  23. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effects of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:310316.
  24. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD002094.
  25. Andriulli A, Annese V, Caruso N, et al. Proton-pump inhibitors and outcome of endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers: a series of meta-analyses. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:207219.
  26. Lau JY, Leung WK, Wu JC, et al. Omeprazole before endoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:16311640.
  27. Dorward S, Sreedharan A, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moayyedi P, Forman D. Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005415.
  28. Bardou M, Toubouti Y, Benhaberou-Brun D, Rahme E, Barkun AN. Meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21:677686.
  29. Bjorkman DJ, Zaman A, Fennerty MB, Lieberman D, Disario JA, Guest-Warnick G. Urgent vs elective endoscopy for acute non-variceal upper-GI bleeding: an effectiveness study. Gastointest Endosc 2004; 60:18.
  30. Lee SD, Kearney DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:861865.
  31. Tack J, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, et al. Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in controls and in diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:7279.
  32. Xynos E, Mantides A, Papageorgiou A, Fountos A, Pechlivanides G, Vassilakis JS. Erythromycin accelerates delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients after truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty. Eur J Surg 1992; 158:407411.
  33. Coffin B, Pocard M, Panis Y, et al; Groupe des endoscopistes de garde á l’AP-HP. Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:174179.
  34. Frossard JL, Spahr L, Queneau PE, et al. Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1723.
  35. Winstead NS, Wilcox CM. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:13711377.
  36. Chak A, Cooper GS, Lloyd LE, Kolz CS, Barnhart BA, Wong RC. Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with upper GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:613.
  37. Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, Lo KK, Yung MY, Li AK. The evolution of stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: a sequential endoscopic study. Endoscopy 1998; 30:513518.
  38. Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS, et al. Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Endoscopy 2001; 33:969975.
  39. Elta GH. Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2002; 5:147152.
  40. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:279289.
  41. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal, and colonic bleeding. Med Clin North Am 2002; 86:13191356.
  42. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2007; 10:143148.
  43. Jensen DM, Kovacs TO, Jutabha R, et al. Randomized trial of medical or endoscopic therapy to prevent recurrent ulcer hemorrhage in patients with adherent clots. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:407413.
  44. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer hemorrhage with injection, thermal, and combination methods. Techniques Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 7:124131.
  45. Bleau BL, Gostout CJ, Sherman KE, et al. Recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer associated with adherent clot: a randomized study comparing endoscopic treatment with medical therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:16.
  46. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lam YH, et al. Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:751756.
  47. Wolf AT, Wasan SK, Saltzman JR. Impact of anticoagulation on rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:290296.
  48. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK; Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:843857.
  49. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Piscopo R, Prisco A, Cipolletta L. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:6267.
  50. Dell’Era A, deFrancis R, Iannuzzi F. Acute variceal bleeding: pharmacological treatment and primary/secondary prophylaxis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22:279294.
  51. Jalan R, Hayes PC. UK guidelines on the management of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 2000; 46( suppl 3–4):III1III15.
  52. Bernard B, Lebrec D, Mathurin P, Opolon P, Poynard T. Beta-adrenergic antagonists in the prevention of gastrointestinal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 1997; 25:6370.
  53. De Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2005; 43:167176.
  54. Levacher S, Letoumelin P, Pateron D, Blaise M, Lapandry C, Pourriat JL. Early administration of terlipressin plus glyceryl trinitrate to control active upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Lancet 1995; 346:865868.
  55. Abraldes JG, Bosch J. Somatostatin and analogues in portal hypertension. Hepatology 2002; 35:13051312.
  56. Banares R, Albillos A, Rincon D, et al. Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacological treatment for acute variceal bleeding: a meta analysis. Hepatology 2002; 35:609615.
  57. Cappell M. Gastrointenstinal bleeding associated with myocardial infarction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2000; 29:423444.
  58. Lin S, Konstance R, Jollis J, Fisher DA. The utility of upper endoscopy in patients with concomitant upper gastrointestinal bleeding and acute myocardial infarction. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51:23772383.
  59. Silvis SE, Nebel O, Rogers G, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P. Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. JAMA 1976; 235:928930.
  60. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  61. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants places elderly persons at high risk for hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:16651670.
  62. Tabibian N. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients: a prospective evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84:1012.
  63. Choudari CP, Rajgopal C, Palmer KR. Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients: diagnoses and response to endoscopic treatment. Gut 1994; 35:464466.
  64. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Frequency of major complications of aspirin, warfarin, and intravenous heparin for secondary stroke prevention: a population-based study. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:1422.
  65. Landefeld CS, Rosenblatt MW, Goldman L. Bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: relation to the prothrombin time and important remediable lesions. Am J Med 1989; 87:153159.
  66. Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, et al. Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ 1995; 310:827830.
  67. Cryer B, Feldman M. Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:1725.
  68. De Abajo FJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with low-dose aspirin as plain and enteric-coated formulations. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2001; 1:1.
  69. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM, Sheehan J, Koff RS, Shapiro S. Risk of aspirin-associated major upper gastrointestinal bleeding with enteric coated or buffered product. Lancet 1996; 348:14131416.
  70. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S, De Abajo FJ. Association between aspirin and upper gastrointestinal complications: systematic review of epidemiological studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52:563571.
  71. Wilcox CM, Ladabaum U. A patient with high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:10901093.
  72. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:e1e157.
  73. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348:13291339.
  74. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:238244.
  75. Lai KC, Chu KM, Hui WM, et al. Esomeprazole with aspirin versus clopidogrel for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:860865.
  76. Ho MP, Maddox TM, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2009; 301:937944.
  77. Siller-Matula JM, Spiel AO, Lang IM, Kreiner G, Christ G, Jilma B. Effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. Am Heart J 2009; 157:148.e1e5.
  78. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, et al. Effects of proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48:475484.
  79. Ishizaki T, Horai Y. Review article: cytochrome P450 and the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors—emphasis on rabeprazole. Aliment Pharacol Ther 1999; 13 (suppl 3):2736.
  80. Lanas A, Fuentes J, Benito R, Serrano P, Bajador E, Sainz R. Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:779786.
  81. Chan FK. NSAID-Induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management. Drug Saf 2005; 28:287300.
  82. Bombardier V, Laine L, Reicin A, et al; VIGOR Study Group. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: VIGOR Study Group. N Eng J Med 2000; 343:15201528.
  83. Griffin MR, Ray WA, Schaffner W. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:359363.
  84. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, Snowden M, Ray WA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:257263.
  85. Smalley WE, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141:539545.
  86. Laine L. Approaches to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the high-risk patient. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:594606.
  87. Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, et al. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123:241249.
  88. Goldstein JL, Huang B, Amer F, Christopoulos NG. Ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus low dose aspirin: results of a post hoc subanalysis. Clin Ther 2004; 26:16371643.
  89. Berger JS, Stebbins A, Granger CB, et al. Initial aspirin dose and outcome among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Circulation 2008; 117:192199.
  90. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  91. Chin MW, Yong G, Bulsara MK, Rankin J, Forbes GM. Predictive and protective factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:24112416.
  92. Hunt RH, Bazzoli F. Should NSAID/low dose aspirin takers be tested routinely for H. Pylori infection and treated if positive? Implications for primary risk of ulcer and ulcer relapse after initial healing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19 (suppl 1):916.
References
  1. Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Hospitalization and mortality rates from peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding in the 1990s: relationship to sales of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acid suppression medications. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:25402549.
  2. Viviane A, Alan BN. Estimates of costs of hospital stays for variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the United States. Value Health 2008; 11:13.
  3. Yavorski RT, Wong RK, Maydonovitch C, Battin LS, Furnia A, Amundson DE. Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:568573.
  4. Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al. Risk factors for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding among older persons. Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49:126133.
  5. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90:206210.
  6. Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:717727.
  7. Wara P, Stodkilde H. Bleeding pattern before admission as guideline for emergency endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985; 20:7278.
  8. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology 1988; 95:15691574.
  9. Daniel WA, Egan S. The quantity of blood required to produce a tarry stool. J Am Med Assoc 1939; 113:2232.
  10. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38:316321.
  11. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356:13181321.
  12. Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:928937.
  13. Silverstein FE, Gilbert DA, Tedesco FJ, Buenger NK, Persing J. The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding II. Clinical prognostic factors. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27:8093.
  14. Corley DA, Stefan AM, Wolf M, Cook EF, Lee TH. Early indicators of prognosis in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93:336340.
  15. Aljebreen AM, Fallone CA, Barkun AN. Nasogastric aspirate predicts high-risk endoscopic lesions in patients with acute upper-GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59:172178.
  16. Barkun AN, Cockeram AW, Plourde V, Fedorak RN. Review article: acid suppression in non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13:15651584.
  17. Levine JE, Leontiadis JI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:11371142.
  18. Walt RP, Cottrell J, Mann SG, Freemantle NP, Langman MJ. Continuous intravenous famotidine for hemorrhage from peptic ulcer. Lancet 1992; 340:10581062.
  19. Labenz J, Peitz U, Leusing C, Tillenburg B, Blum AL, Börsch G. Efficacy of primed infusion with high dose ranitidine and omeprazole to maintain high intragastric pH in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomized controlled study. Gut 1997; 40:3641.
  20. Merki HS, Wilder-Smith CH. Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing? Gastroenterology 1994; 106:6064.
  21. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, et al. Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:351357.
  22. Lin HJ, Lo WC, Cheng YC, Perng CL. Role of intravenous omeprazole in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic epinephrine injection: a prospective randomized comparative trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101:500505.
  23. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effects of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:310316.
  24. Leontiadis GI, Sharma VK, Howden CW. Proton pump inhibitor treatment for acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD002094.
  25. Andriulli A, Annese V, Caruso N, et al. Proton-pump inhibitors and outcome of endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers: a series of meta-analyses. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:207219.
  26. Lau JY, Leung WK, Wu JC, et al. Omeprazole before endoscopy in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:16311640.
  27. Dorward S, Sreedharan A, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moayyedi P, Forman D. Proton pump inhibitor treatment initiated prior to endoscopic diagnosis in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;CD005415.
  28. Bardou M, Toubouti Y, Benhaberou-Brun D, Rahme E, Barkun AN. Meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21:677686.
  29. Bjorkman DJ, Zaman A, Fennerty MB, Lieberman D, Disario JA, Guest-Warnick G. Urgent vs elective endoscopy for acute non-variceal upper-GI bleeding: an effectiveness study. Gastointest Endosc 2004; 60:18.
  30. Lee SD, Kearney DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:861865.
  31. Tack J, Janssens J, Vantrappen G, et al. Effect of erythromycin on gastric motility in controls and in diabetic gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:7279.
  32. Xynos E, Mantides A, Papageorgiou A, Fountos A, Pechlivanides G, Vassilakis JS. Erythromycin accelerates delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients after truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty. Eur J Surg 1992; 158:407411.
  33. Coffin B, Pocard M, Panis Y, et al; Groupe des endoscopistes de garde á l’AP-HP. Erythromycin improves the quality of EGD in patients with acute upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:174179.
  34. Frossard JL, Spahr L, Queneau PE, et al. Erythromycin intravenous bolus infusion in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1723.
  35. Winstead NS, Wilcox CM. Erythromycin prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:13711377.
  36. Chak A, Cooper GS, Lloyd LE, Kolz CS, Barnhart BA, Wong RC. Effectiveness of endoscopy in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with upper GI hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53:613.
  37. Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW, Lo KK, Yung MY, Li AK. The evolution of stigmata of hemorrhage in bleeding peptic ulcers: a sequential endoscopic study. Endoscopy 1998; 30:513518.
  38. Chung IK, Kim EJ, Lee MS, et al. Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Endoscopy 2001; 33:969975.
  39. Elta GH. Acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2002; 5:147152.
  40. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:279289.
  41. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal, and colonic bleeding. Med Clin North Am 2002; 86:13191356.
  42. Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2007; 10:143148.
  43. Jensen DM, Kovacs TO, Jutabha R, et al. Randomized trial of medical or endoscopic therapy to prevent recurrent ulcer hemorrhage in patients with adherent clots. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:407413.
  44. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer hemorrhage with injection, thermal, and combination methods. Techniques Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 7:124131.
  45. Bleau BL, Gostout CJ, Sherman KE, et al. Recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer associated with adherent clot: a randomized study comparing endoscopic treatment with medical therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56:16.
  46. Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lam YH, et al. Endoscopic retreatment compared with surgery in patients with recurrent bleeding after initial endoscopic control of bleeding ulcers. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:751756.
  47. Wolf AT, Wasan SK, Saltzman JR. Impact of anticoagulation on rebleeding following endoscopic therapy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:290296.
  48. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK; Nonvariceal Upper GI Bleeding Consensus Conference Group. Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:843857.
  49. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Piscopo R, Prisco A, Cipolletta L. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57:6267.
  50. Dell’Era A, deFrancis R, Iannuzzi F. Acute variceal bleeding: pharmacological treatment and primary/secondary prophylaxis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22:279294.
  51. Jalan R, Hayes PC. UK guidelines on the management of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut 2000; 46( suppl 3–4):III1III15.
  52. Bernard B, Lebrec D, Mathurin P, Opolon P, Poynard T. Beta-adrenergic antagonists in the prevention of gastrointestinal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. Hepatology 1997; 25:6370.
  53. De Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2005; 43:167176.
  54. Levacher S, Letoumelin P, Pateron D, Blaise M, Lapandry C, Pourriat JL. Early administration of terlipressin plus glyceryl trinitrate to control active upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. Lancet 1995; 346:865868.
  55. Abraldes JG, Bosch J. Somatostatin and analogues in portal hypertension. Hepatology 2002; 35:13051312.
  56. Banares R, Albillos A, Rincon D, et al. Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacological treatment for acute variceal bleeding: a meta analysis. Hepatology 2002; 35:609615.
  57. Cappell M. Gastrointenstinal bleeding associated with myocardial infarction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2000; 29:423444.
  58. Lin S, Konstance R, Jollis J, Fisher DA. The utility of upper endoscopy in patients with concomitant upper gastrointestinal bleeding and acute myocardial infarction. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51:23772383.
  59. Silvis SE, Nebel O, Rogers G, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P. Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. JAMA 1976; 235:928930.
  60. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  61. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants places elderly persons at high risk for hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:16651670.
  62. Tabibian N. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients: a prospective evaluation. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84:1012.
  63. Choudari CP, Rajgopal C, Palmer KR. Acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage in anticoagulated patients: diagnoses and response to endoscopic treatment. Gut 1994; 35:464466.
  64. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Frequency of major complications of aspirin, warfarin, and intravenous heparin for secondary stroke prevention: a population-based study. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:1422.
  65. Landefeld CS, Rosenblatt MW, Goldman L. Bleeding in outpatients treated with warfarin: relation to the prothrombin time and important remediable lesions. Am J Med 1989; 87:153159.
  66. Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, et al. Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ 1995; 310:827830.
  67. Cryer B, Feldman M. Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:1725.
  68. De Abajo FJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with low-dose aspirin as plain and enteric-coated formulations. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2001; 1:1.
  69. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM, Sheehan J, Koff RS, Shapiro S. Risk of aspirin-associated major upper gastrointestinal bleeding with enteric coated or buffered product. Lancet 1996; 348:14131416.
  70. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S, De Abajo FJ. Association between aspirin and upper gastrointestinal complications: systematic review of epidemiological studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 52:563571.
  71. Wilcox CM, Ladabaum U. A patient with high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:10901093.
  72. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50:e1e157.
  73. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348:13291339.
  74. Chan FK, Ching JY, Hung LC, et al. Clopidogrel versus aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:238244.
  75. Lai KC, Chu KM, Hui WM, et al. Esomeprazole with aspirin versus clopidogrel for prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal ulcer complications. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:860865.
  76. Ho MP, Maddox TM, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome. JAMA 2009; 301:937944.
  77. Siller-Matula JM, Spiel AO, Lang IM, Kreiner G, Christ G, Jilma B. Effects of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. Am Heart J 2009; 157:148.e1e5.
  78. Small DS, Farid NA, Payne CD, et al. Effects of proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugel and clopidogrel. J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 48:475484.
  79. Ishizaki T, Horai Y. Review article: cytochrome P450 and the metabolism of proton pump inhibitors—emphasis on rabeprazole. Aliment Pharacol Ther 1999; 13 (suppl 3):2736.
  80. Lanas A, Fuentes J, Benito R, Serrano P, Bajador E, Sainz R. Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16:779786.
  81. Chan FK. NSAID-Induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management. Drug Saf 2005; 28:287300.
  82. Bombardier V, Laine L, Reicin A, et al; VIGOR Study Group. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: VIGOR Study Group. N Eng J Med 2000; 343:15201528.
  83. Griffin MR, Ray WA, Schaffner W. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:359363.
  84. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, Snowden M, Ray WA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:257263.
  85. Smalley WE, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141:539545.
  86. Laine L. Approaches to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in the high-risk patient. Gastroenterology 2001; 120:594606.
  87. Silverstein FE, Graham DY, Senior JR, et al. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123:241249.
  88. Goldstein JL, Huang B, Amer F, Christopoulos NG. Ulcer recurrence in high-risk patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus low dose aspirin: results of a post hoc subanalysis. Clin Ther 2004; 26:16371643.
  89. Berger JS, Stebbins A, Granger CB, et al. Initial aspirin dose and outcome among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Circulation 2008; 117:192199.
  90. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al; Investigators of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG). Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:507515.
  91. Chin MW, Yong G, Bulsara MK, Rankin J, Forbes GM. Predictive and protective factors associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:24112416.
  92. Hunt RH, Bazzoli F. Should NSAID/low dose aspirin takers be tested routinely for H. Pylori infection and treated if positive? Implications for primary risk of ulcer and ulcer relapse after initial healing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19 (suppl 1):916.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 77(2)
Page Number
131-142
Page Number
131-142
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Managing acute upper GI bleeding, preventing recurrences
Display Headline
Managing acute upper GI bleeding, preventing recurrences
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • The first priority is to ensure that the patient is hemodynamically stable, which often requires admission to the intensive care unit for monitoring and fluid resuscitation.
  • Peptic ulcers account for most cases of upper GI bleeding, but bleeding from varices has a much higher case-fatality rate and always demands aggressive treatment.
  • Patients with ulcer disease should be tested and treated for Helicobacter pylori infection.
  • Patients with a history of bleeding ulcers who need long-term treatment with aspirin or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug should also be prescribed a proton pump inhibitor.
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media