The Hospitalist

The healthcare industry is not yet at zero when it comes to healthcare-associated infections—and that’s a problem. Hand hygiene compliance remains a major cause.

The Joint Commission addresses that problem with the Hand Hygiene Targeted Solutions Tool (TST), an online application that guides the user through collecting and analyzing data, with suggested solutions based on the root causes revealed. “It’s based on robust process improvement, what we refer to as RPI, that brings in Lean, Six Sigma, and change management,” says Erin DuPree, MD, chief medical officer and vice president, The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.

The tool was tested in a pilot program summarized in an article in the January 2016 issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, “Hand Hygiene Tool Linked to Decrease in Health Care-Associated Infections at Memorial Hermann Health System,” by M. Michael Shabot, MD, of Memorial Hermann Health System, Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH, of The Joint Commission, and their co-authors. In more than 31,600 observations, the organization’s average hand hygiene compliance improved from 58.1% to 95.6%. Rates of central line–associated bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult ICUs decreased by 49% and 45%, respectively.

Dr. DuPree encourages hospitalists to champion hand hygiene at their own organizations. “The more physicians lead and participate, the higher performing the organization is.”

The healthcare industry is not yet at zero when it comes to healthcare-associated infections—and that’s a problem. Hand hygiene compliance remains a major cause.

The Joint Commission addresses that problem with the Hand Hygiene Targeted Solutions Tool (TST), an online application that guides the user through collecting and analyzing data, with suggested solutions based on the root causes revealed. “It’s based on robust process improvement, what we refer to as RPI, that brings in Lean, Six Sigma, and change management,” says Erin DuPree, MD, chief medical officer and vice president, The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.

The tool was tested in a pilot program summarized in an article in the January 2016 issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, “Hand Hygiene Tool Linked to Decrease in Health Care-Associated Infections at Memorial Hermann Health System,” by M. Michael Shabot, MD, of Memorial Hermann Health System, Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH, of The Joint Commission, and their co-authors. In more than 31,600 observations, the organization’s average hand hygiene compliance improved from 58.1% to 95.6%. Rates of central line–associated bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult ICUs decreased by 49% and 45%, respectively.

Dr. DuPree encourages hospitalists to champion hand hygiene at their own organizations. “The more physicians lead and participate, the higher performing the organization is.”

The healthcare industry is not yet at zero when it comes to healthcare-associated infections—and that’s a problem. Hand hygiene compliance remains a major cause.

The Joint Commission addresses that problem with the Hand Hygiene Targeted Solutions Tool (TST), an online application that guides the user through collecting and analyzing data, with suggested solutions based on the root causes revealed. “It’s based on robust process improvement, what we refer to as RPI, that brings in Lean, Six Sigma, and change management,” says Erin DuPree, MD, chief medical officer and vice president, The Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare.

The tool was tested in a pilot program summarized in an article in the January 2016 issue of The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, “Hand Hygiene Tool Linked to Decrease in Health Care-Associated Infections at Memorial Hermann Health System,” by M. Michael Shabot, MD, of Memorial Hermann Health System, Mark R. Chassin, MD, MPP, MPH, of The Joint Commission, and their co-authors. In more than 31,600 observations, the organization’s average hand hygiene compliance improved from 58.1% to 95.6%. Rates of central line–associated bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult ICUs decreased by 49% and 45%, respectively.

Dr. DuPree encourages hospitalists to champion hand hygiene at their own organizations. “The more physicians lead and participate, the higher performing the organization is.”

“We are missing an important opportunity to learn from what is going on in health systems every day that could tell us how to make healthcare better and cheaper,” says Dr. Fisher, lead author of a January 2016 JAMA “Viewpoint” called “Implementation Science: A Potential Catalyst for Delivery System Reform.” “That’s the argument for the the field of implementation science.”

Implementation science studies ways to promote the integration of research findings and evidence into the healthcare system. Dr. Fisher says that integration is influenced by multiple factors: the characteristic of the innovation itself, the organizational setting, and the policy or community environment within which that organization is working. Context matters.

“We tend to think about adopting innovations like a new blood pressure medication or a new device,” Dr. Fisher says. “Those decisions rest almost entirely on the shoulders of physicians, so adoption requires thinking about the attributes of biomedical innovations and how physicians think.”

With care delivery innovations—for example, how to provide optimal care for people with heart failure across home, hospital, and nursing home—those are often developed with clinical input but by people who are fundamentally managers.

“It’s a more complex set of actors,” he says, “so you have to think about those decision makers if you’re going to get the best evidence-based practice into their setting.”

A third category of innovation focuses on individual behavior change, where the decision makers are the clinician and the patient and family. “You’ve got to persuade the patient the innovation is worth doing, so different factors may influence the successful adoptions of those interventions,” Dr. Fisher says.

Reference

1. Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA. 2016;315(4):339-340. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.17949.

“We are missing an important opportunity to learn from what is going on in health systems every day that could tell us how to make healthcare better and cheaper,” says Dr. Fisher, lead author of a January 2016 JAMA “Viewpoint” called “Implementation Science: A Potential Catalyst for Delivery System Reform.” “That’s the argument for the the field of implementation science.”

Implementation science studies ways to promote the integration of research findings and evidence into the healthcare system. Dr. Fisher says that integration is influenced by multiple factors: the characteristic of the innovation itself, the organizational setting, and the policy or community environment within which that organization is working. Context matters.

“We tend to think about adopting innovations like a new blood pressure medication or a new device,” Dr. Fisher says. “Those decisions rest almost entirely on the shoulders of physicians, so adoption requires thinking about the attributes of biomedical innovations and how physicians think.”

With care delivery innovations—for example, how to provide optimal care for people with heart failure across home, hospital, and nursing home—those are often developed with clinical input but by people who are fundamentally managers.

“It’s a more complex set of actors,” he says, “so you have to think about those decision makers if you’re going to get the best evidence-based practice into their setting.”

A third category of innovation focuses on individual behavior change, where the decision makers are the clinician and the patient and family. “You’ve got to persuade the patient the innovation is worth doing, so different factors may influence the successful adoptions of those interventions,” Dr. Fisher says.

Reference

1. Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA. 2016;315(4):339-340. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.17949.

“We are missing an important opportunity to learn from what is going on in health systems every day that could tell us how to make healthcare better and cheaper,” says Dr. Fisher, lead author of a January 2016 JAMA “Viewpoint” called “Implementation Science: A Potential Catalyst for Delivery System Reform.” “That’s the argument for the the field of implementation science.”

Implementation science studies ways to promote the integration of research findings and evidence into the healthcare system. Dr. Fisher says that integration is influenced by multiple factors: the characteristic of the innovation itself, the organizational setting, and the policy or community environment within which that organization is working. Context matters.

“We tend to think about adopting innovations like a new blood pressure medication or a new device,” Dr. Fisher says. “Those decisions rest almost entirely on the shoulders of physicians, so adoption requires thinking about the attributes of biomedical innovations and how physicians think.”

With care delivery innovations—for example, how to provide optimal care for people with heart failure across home, hospital, and nursing home—those are often developed with clinical input but by people who are fundamentally managers.

“It’s a more complex set of actors,” he says, “so you have to think about those decision makers if you’re going to get the best evidence-based practice into their setting.”

A third category of innovation focuses on individual behavior change, where the decision makers are the clinician and the patient and family. “You’ve got to persuade the patient the innovation is worth doing, so different factors may influence the successful adoptions of those interventions,” Dr. Fisher says.

Reference

1. Fisher ES, Shortell SM, Savitz LA. Implementation science: a potential catalyst for delivery system reform. JAMA. 2016;315(4):339-340. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.17949.

Clinical question: How frequent is contamination of skin and clothing during personal protective equipment (PPE) removal, and can it be prevented?

Background: PPE reduces transmission of pathogens to healthcare personnel and patients. However, improper removal can lead to contamination of the skin and clothing. Little information exists describing the frequency and sites of contamination after the removal of gloves or gowns.

Study design: Point prevalence study and quasi-experimental intervention.

Setting: Four northeast Ohio hospitals (university, community, county, and VA); intervention performed at VA hospital.

Synopsis: This study began with 435 glove and gown removal simulations performed at four northeast Ohio hospitals. Skin or clothing contamination occurred in 200 (46%) simulations, with similar frequencies across the four hospitals (42.5%–50.3%). Contamination occurred more frequently in the glove removal versus gown removal (52.9% versus 37.8%, P=0.002). Most common causes of contamination were gloves not covering the wrists, removing the gown over the head, donning gloves before the gown, and touching contaminated gloves.

The intervention, performed at the VA hospital, consisted of educational sessions, videos, demonstrations, and practice donning and doffing PPE, which resulted in reduced skin and clothing contamination (60% before versus 18.9% after, P<0.001) that was sustained at one and three months.

Given that the intervention was quasi-experimental and not randomized, it is difficult to attribute

causality to the intervention, and results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: During the removal of gloves and gowns, skin and clothing contamination is frequent, and a simple educational intervention with visual feedback may reduce rates of contamination.

Citation: Tomas ME, Kundrapu S, Thota P, et al. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1904-1910.

Clinical question: How frequent is contamination of skin and clothing during personal protective equipment (PPE) removal, and can it be prevented?

Background: PPE reduces transmission of pathogens to healthcare personnel and patients. However, improper removal can lead to contamination of the skin and clothing. Little information exists describing the frequency and sites of contamination after the removal of gloves or gowns.

Study design: Point prevalence study and quasi-experimental intervention.

Setting: Four northeast Ohio hospitals (university, community, county, and VA); intervention performed at VA hospital.

Synopsis: This study began with 435 glove and gown removal simulations performed at four northeast Ohio hospitals. Skin or clothing contamination occurred in 200 (46%) simulations, with similar frequencies across the four hospitals (42.5%–50.3%). Contamination occurred more frequently in the glove removal versus gown removal (52.9% versus 37.8%, P=0.002). Most common causes of contamination were gloves not covering the wrists, removing the gown over the head, donning gloves before the gown, and touching contaminated gloves.

The intervention, performed at the VA hospital, consisted of educational sessions, videos, demonstrations, and practice donning and doffing PPE, which resulted in reduced skin and clothing contamination (60% before versus 18.9% after, P<0.001) that was sustained at one and three months.

Given that the intervention was quasi-experimental and not randomized, it is difficult to attribute

causality to the intervention, and results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: During the removal of gloves and gowns, skin and clothing contamination is frequent, and a simple educational intervention with visual feedback may reduce rates of contamination.

Citation: Tomas ME, Kundrapu S, Thota P, et al. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1904-1910.

Clinical question: How frequent is contamination of skin and clothing during personal protective equipment (PPE) removal, and can it be prevented?

Background: PPE reduces transmission of pathogens to healthcare personnel and patients. However, improper removal can lead to contamination of the skin and clothing. Little information exists describing the frequency and sites of contamination after the removal of gloves or gowns.

Study design: Point prevalence study and quasi-experimental intervention.

Setting: Four northeast Ohio hospitals (university, community, county, and VA); intervention performed at VA hospital.

Synopsis: This study began with 435 glove and gown removal simulations performed at four northeast Ohio hospitals. Skin or clothing contamination occurred in 200 (46%) simulations, with similar frequencies across the four hospitals (42.5%–50.3%). Contamination occurred more frequently in the glove removal versus gown removal (52.9% versus 37.8%, P=0.002). Most common causes of contamination were gloves not covering the wrists, removing the gown over the head, donning gloves before the gown, and touching contaminated gloves.

The intervention, performed at the VA hospital, consisted of educational sessions, videos, demonstrations, and practice donning and doffing PPE, which resulted in reduced skin and clothing contamination (60% before versus 18.9% after, P<0.001) that was sustained at one and three months.

Given that the intervention was quasi-experimental and not randomized, it is difficult to attribute

causality to the intervention, and results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: During the removal of gloves and gowns, skin and clothing contamination is frequent, and a simple educational intervention with visual feedback may reduce rates of contamination.

Citation: Tomas ME, Kundrapu S, Thota P, et al. Contamination of health care personnel during removal of personal protective equipment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(12):1904-1910.

Clinical question: Can procalcitonin testing be used to determine whether antibiotics should be started and stopped?

Background: Procalcitonin naturally occurs in the body but increases with bacterial infection, with normal levels

Study design: Systematic review.

Setting: ICUs and EDs in Europe, China, and Brazil.

Synopsis: A systematic review of eight RCTs in the ICU showed that, in adults, procalcitonin testing decreased antibiotic duration (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.2 days; 95% CI, -5.44 to -0.95), decreased hospital length of stay (WMD -3.85 days; 95% CI, -6.78 to -0.92), and trended toward decreased ICU length of stay (WMD -2.03 days; 95% CI, -4.19 to 0.13).

Further review of eight different trials looking at procalcitonin testing in the ED showed that, in adults with suspected bacterial infection, procalcitonin testing reduced proportion of adults receiving antibiotics (relative risk 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68–0.87) and a trend toward reduction in hospital stays. No strong conclusions could be made about the effect on duration of antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin testing was demonstrated to be cost-effective in the study population, saving £3,268 in adults with sepsis in the ICU.

Most studies were of unclear quality and unclear risk of bias secondary to insufficient reporting; therefore, results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: Procalcitonin testing may be a cost-saving measure for adults with sepsis in the ICU and adults with possible bacterial infections in the ED.

Citation: Westwood M, Raemaekers B, Whiting P, et al. Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(96):1-236.

Short Take

Adjuvant Flu Vaccine Approved for Prevention of Seasonal Influenza

The FDA approved Fluad, an adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients >65 years of age based on studies showing comparable safety and immunogenicity to Agriflu, a FDA-approved unadjuvanted trivalent vaccine.

Citation: FDA approves first seasonal influenza vaccine containing an adjuvant [news release]. Washington, DC: FDA; November 24, 2015

Clinical question: Can procalcitonin testing be used to determine whether antibiotics should be started and stopped?

Background: Procalcitonin naturally occurs in the body but increases with bacterial infection, with normal levels

Study design: Systematic review.

Setting: ICUs and EDs in Europe, China, and Brazil.

Synopsis: A systematic review of eight RCTs in the ICU showed that, in adults, procalcitonin testing decreased antibiotic duration (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.2 days; 95% CI, -5.44 to -0.95), decreased hospital length of stay (WMD -3.85 days; 95% CI, -6.78 to -0.92), and trended toward decreased ICU length of stay (WMD -2.03 days; 95% CI, -4.19 to 0.13).

Further review of eight different trials looking at procalcitonin testing in the ED showed that, in adults with suspected bacterial infection, procalcitonin testing reduced proportion of adults receiving antibiotics (relative risk 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68–0.87) and a trend toward reduction in hospital stays. No strong conclusions could be made about the effect on duration of antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin testing was demonstrated to be cost-effective in the study population, saving £3,268 in adults with sepsis in the ICU.

Most studies were of unclear quality and unclear risk of bias secondary to insufficient reporting; therefore, results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: Procalcitonin testing may be a cost-saving measure for adults with sepsis in the ICU and adults with possible bacterial infections in the ED.

Citation: Westwood M, Raemaekers B, Whiting P, et al. Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(96):1-236.

Short Take

Adjuvant Flu Vaccine Approved for Prevention of Seasonal Influenza

The FDA approved Fluad, an adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients >65 years of age based on studies showing comparable safety and immunogenicity to Agriflu, a FDA-approved unadjuvanted trivalent vaccine.

Citation: FDA approves first seasonal influenza vaccine containing an adjuvant [news release]. Washington, DC: FDA; November 24, 2015

Clinical question: Can procalcitonin testing be used to determine whether antibiotics should be started and stopped?

Background: Procalcitonin naturally occurs in the body but increases with bacterial infection, with normal levels

Study design: Systematic review.

Setting: ICUs and EDs in Europe, China, and Brazil.

Synopsis: A systematic review of eight RCTs in the ICU showed that, in adults, procalcitonin testing decreased antibiotic duration (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.2 days; 95% CI, -5.44 to -0.95), decreased hospital length of stay (WMD -3.85 days; 95% CI, -6.78 to -0.92), and trended toward decreased ICU length of stay (WMD -2.03 days; 95% CI, -4.19 to 0.13).

Further review of eight different trials looking at procalcitonin testing in the ED showed that, in adults with suspected bacterial infection, procalcitonin testing reduced proportion of adults receiving antibiotics (relative risk 0.77; 95% CI, 0.68–0.87) and a trend toward reduction in hospital stays. No strong conclusions could be made about the effect on duration of antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin testing was demonstrated to be cost-effective in the study population, saving £3,268 in adults with sepsis in the ICU.

Most studies were of unclear quality and unclear risk of bias secondary to insufficient reporting; therefore, results must be interpreted with caution.

Bottom line: Procalcitonin testing may be a cost-saving measure for adults with sepsis in the ICU and adults with possible bacterial infections in the ED.

Citation: Westwood M, Raemaekers B, Whiting P, et al. Procalcitonin testing to guide antibiotic therapy for the treatment of sepsis in intensive care settings and for suspected bacterial infection in emergency department settings: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(96):1-236.

Short Take

Adjuvant Flu Vaccine Approved for Prevention of Seasonal Influenza

The FDA approved Fluad, an adjuvanted trivalent vaccine, for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients >65 years of age based on studies showing comparable safety and immunogenicity to Agriflu, a FDA-approved unadjuvanted trivalent vaccine.

Citation: FDA approves first seasonal influenza vaccine containing an adjuvant [news release]. Washington, DC: FDA; November 24, 2015

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Low-income adults in the U.S. likely benefited if their states expanded Medicaid in 2014 under the Affordable Care Act, suggests a new study.

Researchers found increased rates of insurance coverage, healthcare use, and chronic disease diagnoses among low-income adults in states that expanded access to the government-funded health insurance program.

"It looks like there is better medical care for these adults," said lead author Dr. Laura Wherry, of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

A key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), sometimes referred to as Obamacare, was to force states to expand their Medicaid programs by 2014. But with a Supreme Court decision allowing states to opt out of the expansion, only 26 states actually expanded their Medicaid programs.

For the new study, the researchers analyzed 2010-2014 survey data collected from low-income U.S. adults ages 19 to 64.

In the pre-expansion era, from 2010-2013, about 33% had no insurance in states that ultimately expanded Medicaid, compared to about 42% in states that opted out of expansion, according to an article online April 18 in Annals of Internal Medicine.

In 2014, those rates fell to about 18% in states that expanded Medicaid andabout 34% in states that didn't.

Overall, the uninsured rate fell by about 7 percentage points more in states that expanded Medicaid than in those that didn't.

States with expanded Medicaid coverage also had a larger increase in the proportion of people who thought their insurance coverage improved over the previous year.

Additionally, there was evidence that people in states with expanded Medicaid programs were using their coverage, because they had larger increases in interactions with general physicians and overnight hospital stays.

There were also more diagnoses of diabetes and high cholesterol in states with expanded Medicaid programs.

Gaining insurance likely leads to more screening for these conditions, and more diagnoses may lead to early treatment and important downstream health effects, Dr. Jeffrey Kullgren wrote in an editorial.

The new study shows what's happening in states that expand Medicaid and "what is foregone by states that reject the ACA's opportunity to expand Medicaid," write Kullgren, of the University of Michigan Medical School and the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System.

While the new study did not show that people felt healthier in expanded-Medicaid states, Dr. Wherry said it may be too early to see changes in that measure.

"I think long-term follow up will be very important," she said. The results help confirm the value of the ACA for people who obtain this coverage, said Dr. John McDonough, who worked on the ACA but was not involved with the new study.

He said the new findings likely won't convince reluctant states to expand their Medicaid programs, however.

"It's not about evidence at this point," said Dr. McDonough, who is a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. "It's about a political fear over Obamacare that at this point is not influenceable by meaningful evidence."

The authors reported no funding or disclosures.

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Low-income adults in the U.S. likely benefited if their states expanded Medicaid in 2014 under the Affordable Care Act, suggests a new study.

Researchers found increased rates of insurance coverage, healthcare use, and chronic disease diagnoses among low-income adults in states that expanded access to the government-funded health insurance program.

"It looks like there is better medical care for these adults," said lead author Dr. Laura Wherry, of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

A key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), sometimes referred to as Obamacare, was to force states to expand their Medicaid programs by 2014. But with a Supreme Court decision allowing states to opt out of the expansion, only 26 states actually expanded their Medicaid programs.

For the new study, the researchers analyzed 2010-2014 survey data collected from low-income U.S. adults ages 19 to 64.

In the pre-expansion era, from 2010-2013, about 33% had no insurance in states that ultimately expanded Medicaid, compared to about 42% in states that opted out of expansion, according to an article online April 18 in Annals of Internal Medicine.

In 2014, those rates fell to about 18% in states that expanded Medicaid andabout 34% in states that didn't.

Overall, the uninsured rate fell by about 7 percentage points more in states that expanded Medicaid than in those that didn't.

States with expanded Medicaid coverage also had a larger increase in the proportion of people who thought their insurance coverage improved over the previous year.

Additionally, there was evidence that people in states with expanded Medicaid programs were using their coverage, because they had larger increases in interactions with general physicians and overnight hospital stays.

There were also more diagnoses of diabetes and high cholesterol in states with expanded Medicaid programs.

Gaining insurance likely leads to more screening for these conditions, and more diagnoses may lead to early treatment and important downstream health effects, Dr. Jeffrey Kullgren wrote in an editorial.

The new study shows what's happening in states that expand Medicaid and "what is foregone by states that reject the ACA's opportunity to expand Medicaid," write Kullgren, of the University of Michigan Medical School and the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System.

While the new study did not show that people felt healthier in expanded-Medicaid states, Dr. Wherry said it may be too early to see changes in that measure.

"I think long-term follow up will be very important," she said. The results help confirm the value of the ACA for people who obtain this coverage, said Dr. John McDonough, who worked on the ACA but was not involved with the new study.

He said the new findings likely won't convince reluctant states to expand their Medicaid programs, however.

"It's not about evidence at this point," said Dr. McDonough, who is a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. "It's about a political fear over Obamacare that at this point is not influenceable by meaningful evidence."

The authors reported no funding or disclosures.

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Low-income adults in the U.S. likely benefited if their states expanded Medicaid in 2014 under the Affordable Care Act, suggests a new study.

Researchers found increased rates of insurance coverage, healthcare use, and chronic disease diagnoses among low-income adults in states that expanded access to the government-funded health insurance program.

"It looks like there is better medical care for these adults," said lead author Dr. Laura Wherry, of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

A key provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), sometimes referred to as Obamacare, was to force states to expand their Medicaid programs by 2014. But with a Supreme Court decision allowing states to opt out of the expansion, only 26 states actually expanded their Medicaid programs.

For the new study, the researchers analyzed 2010-2014 survey data collected from low-income U.S. adults ages 19 to 64.

In the pre-expansion era, from 2010-2013, about 33% had no insurance in states that ultimately expanded Medicaid, compared to about 42% in states that opted out of expansion, according to an article online April 18 in Annals of Internal Medicine.

In 2014, those rates fell to about 18% in states that expanded Medicaid andabout 34% in states that didn't.

Overall, the uninsured rate fell by about 7 percentage points more in states that expanded Medicaid than in those that didn't.

States with expanded Medicaid coverage also had a larger increase in the proportion of people who thought their insurance coverage improved over the previous year.

Additionally, there was evidence that people in states with expanded Medicaid programs were using their coverage, because they had larger increases in interactions with general physicians and overnight hospital stays.

There were also more diagnoses of diabetes and high cholesterol in states with expanded Medicaid programs.

Gaining insurance likely leads to more screening for these conditions, and more diagnoses may lead to early treatment and important downstream health effects, Dr. Jeffrey Kullgren wrote in an editorial.

The new study shows what's happening in states that expand Medicaid and "what is foregone by states that reject the ACA's opportunity to expand Medicaid," write Kullgren, of the University of Michigan Medical School and the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System.

While the new study did not show that people felt healthier in expanded-Medicaid states, Dr. Wherry said it may be too early to see changes in that measure.

"I think long-term follow up will be very important," she said. The results help confirm the value of the ACA for people who obtain this coverage, said Dr. John McDonough, who worked on the ACA but was not involved with the new study.

He said the new findings likely won't convince reluctant states to expand their Medicaid programs, however.

"It's not about evidence at this point," said Dr. McDonough, who is a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. "It's about a political fear over Obamacare that at this point is not influenceable by meaningful evidence."

The authors reported no funding or disclosures.

You asked, we listened: Introducing the enhanced SHM Learning Portal!

The SHM Learning Portal, the online learning home for hospitalists with all eLearning initiatives in one place, just launched a brand-new responsive design in March 2016. Feedback gathered by the Learning Portal team in the summer and fall of 2015 was used to develop a more user-friendly design aimed at reducing the time it takes to discover and access a growing catalog of educational content.

Mobile enhancements now allow for easy access and navigation on the go. Check out the new design for yourself at www.shmlearningportal.org.

You asked, we listened: Introducing the enhanced SHM Learning Portal!

The SHM Learning Portal, the online learning home for hospitalists with all eLearning initiatives in one place, just launched a brand-new responsive design in March 2016. Feedback gathered by the Learning Portal team in the summer and fall of 2015 was used to develop a more user-friendly design aimed at reducing the time it takes to discover and access a growing catalog of educational content.

Mobile enhancements now allow for easy access and navigation on the go. Check out the new design for yourself at www.shmlearningportal.org.

You asked, we listened: Introducing the enhanced SHM Learning Portal!

The SHM Learning Portal, the online learning home for hospitalists with all eLearning initiatives in one place, just launched a brand-new responsive design in March 2016. Feedback gathered by the Learning Portal team in the summer and fall of 2015 was used to develop a more user-friendly design aimed at reducing the time it takes to discover and access a growing catalog of educational content.

Mobile enhancements now allow for easy access and navigation on the go. Check out the new design for yourself at www.shmlearningportal.org.

Engaged hospitalists drive quality care, and SHM has the tools to help you assess the level of engagement of hospitalists in your hospital medicine group. SHM offered a Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service in 2015 and analyzed engagement of approximately 1,500 hospitalists. The survey can help open conversations about everything from relationships with the C-suite to sustaining teamwork.

Help ensure hospitalists are engaged in your hospital medicine group by registering now for the next cohort of the Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service at www.hospitalmedicine.org/engage.

Engaged hospitalists drive quality care, and SHM has the tools to help you assess the level of engagement of hospitalists in your hospital medicine group. SHM offered a Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service in 2015 and analyzed engagement of approximately 1,500 hospitalists. The survey can help open conversations about everything from relationships with the C-suite to sustaining teamwork.

Help ensure hospitalists are engaged in your hospital medicine group by registering now for the next cohort of the Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service at www.hospitalmedicine.org/engage.

Engaged hospitalists drive quality care, and SHM has the tools to help you assess the level of engagement of hospitalists in your hospital medicine group. SHM offered a Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service in 2015 and analyzed engagement of approximately 1,500 hospitalists. The survey can help open conversations about everything from relationships with the C-suite to sustaining teamwork.

Help ensure hospitalists are engaged in your hospital medicine group by registering now for the next cohort of the Hospitalist Engagement Benchmarking Service at www.hospitalmedicine.org/engage.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. health insurers that provide Medicare Advantage plans to elderly and disabled Americans will receive government payments in 2017 that are 0.85 percent higher on average than in 2016, reflecting small anticipated growth in medical costs, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said on Monday.

Health and Human Services' final plan to raise payments is a bit lower than the 1.35 percent increase the agency had proposed in February. It said the lower figure reflects revisions to medical services cost calculations.

In addition, the agency said it planned to introduce a two-year transition period to implement reductions in payments to insurers that offer employer-sponsored prescription drug plans for retirees. After it proposed the cuts to 2017 payments in February, insurers and other lobbying groups said the agency was too aggressive.

Insurers including UnitedHealth Group Inc, Aetna Inc and Anthem Inc manage health benefits for more than 17 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

The other more than 30 million people eligible for Medicare coverage are part of the government-run fee-for-service program.

Each year the government sets out how it will reimburse insurers for the healthcare services their members use. Payments vary by region, the quality rating earned by the plan, and the relative health of the members.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. health insurers that provide Medicare Advantage plans to elderly and disabled Americans will receive government payments in 2017 that are 0.85 percent higher on average than in 2016, reflecting small anticipated growth in medical costs, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said on Monday.

Health and Human Services' final plan to raise payments is a bit lower than the 1.35 percent increase the agency had proposed in February. It said the lower figure reflects revisions to medical services cost calculations.

In addition, the agency said it planned to introduce a two-year transition period to implement reductions in payments to insurers that offer employer-sponsored prescription drug plans for retirees. After it proposed the cuts to 2017 payments in February, insurers and other lobbying groups said the agency was too aggressive.

Insurers including UnitedHealth Group Inc, Aetna Inc and Anthem Inc manage health benefits for more than 17 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

The other more than 30 million people eligible for Medicare coverage are part of the government-run fee-for-service program.

Each year the government sets out how it will reimburse insurers for the healthcare services their members use. Payments vary by region, the quality rating earned by the plan, and the relative health of the members.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. health insurers that provide Medicare Advantage plans to elderly and disabled Americans will receive government payments in 2017 that are 0.85 percent higher on average than in 2016, reflecting small anticipated growth in medical costs, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said on Monday.

Health and Human Services' final plan to raise payments is a bit lower than the 1.35 percent increase the agency had proposed in February. It said the lower figure reflects revisions to medical services cost calculations.

In addition, the agency said it planned to introduce a two-year transition period to implement reductions in payments to insurers that offer employer-sponsored prescription drug plans for retirees. After it proposed the cuts to 2017 payments in February, insurers and other lobbying groups said the agency was too aggressive.

Insurers including UnitedHealth Group Inc, Aetna Inc and Anthem Inc manage health benefits for more than 17 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

The other more than 30 million people eligible for Medicare coverage are part of the government-run fee-for-service program.

Each year the government sets out how it will reimburse insurers for the healthcare services their members use. Payments vary by region, the quality rating earned by the plan, and the relative health of the members.

Hopefully, many of you were able to attend the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meeting this year in San Diego. (I know at least 4,000 of you made it!) Each year, the annual meeting is a time of catching up with hospitalists from around the country (many of whom I only see once a year) and catching up on what is going on in the medical industry.

This year was not particularly unique in that many sessions focused on the myriad challenges we should expect to see in the medical industry in the coming years. There was much discussion about future payment models; although there is ongoing ambiguity about exactly how these models are going to be operationalized, there is certainly no ambiguity that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is hard driving the amount of payments that will be tied to some form of alternative payment model (50% by 2018).

We also heard about ongoing challenges in quality and safety, where a stunning number of patients continue to suffer preventable harm on a daily basis within our hospital walls. And we heard much about the ongoing and mounting opiate abuse epidemic. All of these are monumentally difficult challenges that remain unsolved and without a clear path forward to resolution.

Contrast that with the message from the U.S. Surgeon General during the opening plenary of the annual meeting. Vivek Murthy, MD, was named Surgeon General at a time in the U.S. when all of the above challenges are being added to the abounding issues of chronic disease, mental illness, and extraordinary healthcare costs. He is the highest leader in the nation ordained with trying to improve the health of all Americans at a time when we have never been unhealthier. But despite these monumental challenges, his message was not about the average American body mass index (BMI), smoking status, or heroin addiction. Much different, his message was chock full of amazing stories of community engagement and resilience, focused on innovation and fresh thinking, and about creative problem-solving despite lean and unforgiving budgets.

What Dr. Murthy offered were endless stories of hope and goodness, which he was able to find in each and every city he has visited in his short time as the nation’s “top doc.”

During his tenure, he has visited innumerable communities and engaged with locals in listening sessions. His takeaway from these sessions is “you wouldn’t believe how much good is out there.” One of his many stories was of a hospital and a YMCA that joined forces to improve the health and well-being of the hospital patients, employees, and entire community. This was at a time when both were struggling with lean budgets and stagnant progress in healthy living.

This pragmatic optimism reminds me a bit of one of my life mentors, my Aunt Karen. She is extremely realistic and grounded and knows in great detail the trials and tribulations of being alive for 66 years (including being a 10-year survivor of recurrent ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma). What Aunt Karen does that is so uniquely different than anyone else I know is that she creates goodness. I did not fully understand this until a few years ago, but I noticed that she goes out of her way to create extreme goodness out of extreme ordinariness. I have often joked that she purposely befriends pregnant women just to have an excuse to host a baby shower. She goes overboard to make any and every excuse to celebrate relatively ordinary life milestones (anniversaries, Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day). In her words, “you have to have a buffer for the funerals.”

Flip Your Switch

And so while Dr. Murthy and Aunt Karen have little else in common, they do share the priceless ability to help others see the goodness in everything around them even when surrounded by remarkable challenges and uncertainty. What a unique gift they have.

But are there simple ways we can all incorporate such goodness into our lives and start to routinely build in these buffers?

In your own personal life and work life, what are your buffers? How could you routinely and repeatedly “find the good” in all things around you?

A few months ago, I started searching for what I call “inbox buffers” as I noticed my email inbox was routinely chock full of requests for time, advice, or resources (all of which can be limited). I found a daily email called “The Daily Good.” It comes into my inbox early each morning and typically covers a human-interest story that is short, interesting, and inspiring. I have found these help me reset my mindset and attitude toward one that is more resilient and forgiving; in other words, it helps me find the good even within the crevices of a cranky email inbox. I have many other buffers, but I cite this one as it is simple, easy, free, predictable, dependable, and routinely inspiring!

So in this time when hospitalists are facing monumental change, unpredictable conflict, and unending challenges, we all need to purposely and repeatedly build in buffers to keep us hopeful and motivated and to seamlessly and routinely find the good in all we do. TH

Hopefully, many of you were able to attend the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meeting this year in San Diego. (I know at least 4,000 of you made it!) Each year, the annual meeting is a time of catching up with hospitalists from around the country (many of whom I only see once a year) and catching up on what is going on in the medical industry.

This year was not particularly unique in that many sessions focused on the myriad challenges we should expect to see in the medical industry in the coming years. There was much discussion about future payment models; although there is ongoing ambiguity about exactly how these models are going to be operationalized, there is certainly no ambiguity that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is hard driving the amount of payments that will be tied to some form of alternative payment model (50% by 2018).

We also heard about ongoing challenges in quality and safety, where a stunning number of patients continue to suffer preventable harm on a daily basis within our hospital walls. And we heard much about the ongoing and mounting opiate abuse epidemic. All of these are monumentally difficult challenges that remain unsolved and without a clear path forward to resolution.

Contrast that with the message from the U.S. Surgeon General during the opening plenary of the annual meeting. Vivek Murthy, MD, was named Surgeon General at a time in the U.S. when all of the above challenges are being added to the abounding issues of chronic disease, mental illness, and extraordinary healthcare costs. He is the highest leader in the nation ordained with trying to improve the health of all Americans at a time when we have never been unhealthier. But despite these monumental challenges, his message was not about the average American body mass index (BMI), smoking status, or heroin addiction. Much different, his message was chock full of amazing stories of community engagement and resilience, focused on innovation and fresh thinking, and about creative problem-solving despite lean and unforgiving budgets.

What Dr. Murthy offered were endless stories of hope and goodness, which he was able to find in each and every city he has visited in his short time as the nation’s “top doc.”

During his tenure, he has visited innumerable communities and engaged with locals in listening sessions. His takeaway from these sessions is “you wouldn’t believe how much good is out there.” One of his many stories was of a hospital and a YMCA that joined forces to improve the health and well-being of the hospital patients, employees, and entire community. This was at a time when both were struggling with lean budgets and stagnant progress in healthy living.

This pragmatic optimism reminds me a bit of one of my life mentors, my Aunt Karen. She is extremely realistic and grounded and knows in great detail the trials and tribulations of being alive for 66 years (including being a 10-year survivor of recurrent ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma). What Aunt Karen does that is so uniquely different than anyone else I know is that she creates goodness. I did not fully understand this until a few years ago, but I noticed that she goes out of her way to create extreme goodness out of extreme ordinariness. I have often joked that she purposely befriends pregnant women just to have an excuse to host a baby shower. She goes overboard to make any and every excuse to celebrate relatively ordinary life milestones (anniversaries, Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day). In her words, “you have to have a buffer for the funerals.”

Flip Your Switch

And so while Dr. Murthy and Aunt Karen have little else in common, they do share the priceless ability to help others see the goodness in everything around them even when surrounded by remarkable challenges and uncertainty. What a unique gift they have.

But are there simple ways we can all incorporate such goodness into our lives and start to routinely build in these buffers?

In your own personal life and work life, what are your buffers? How could you routinely and repeatedly “find the good” in all things around you?

A few months ago, I started searching for what I call “inbox buffers” as I noticed my email inbox was routinely chock full of requests for time, advice, or resources (all of which can be limited). I found a daily email called “The Daily Good.” It comes into my inbox early each morning and typically covers a human-interest story that is short, interesting, and inspiring. I have found these help me reset my mindset and attitude toward one that is more resilient and forgiving; in other words, it helps me find the good even within the crevices of a cranky email inbox. I have many other buffers, but I cite this one as it is simple, easy, free, predictable, dependable, and routinely inspiring!

So in this time when hospitalists are facing monumental change, unpredictable conflict, and unending challenges, we all need to purposely and repeatedly build in buffers to keep us hopeful and motivated and to seamlessly and routinely find the good in all we do. TH

Hopefully, many of you were able to attend the Society of Hospital Medicine’s annual meeting this year in San Diego. (I know at least 4,000 of you made it!) Each year, the annual meeting is a time of catching up with hospitalists from around the country (many of whom I only see once a year) and catching up on what is going on in the medical industry.

This year was not particularly unique in that many sessions focused on the myriad challenges we should expect to see in the medical industry in the coming years. There was much discussion about future payment models; although there is ongoing ambiguity about exactly how these models are going to be operationalized, there is certainly no ambiguity that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is hard driving the amount of payments that will be tied to some form of alternative payment model (50% by 2018).

We also heard about ongoing challenges in quality and safety, where a stunning number of patients continue to suffer preventable harm on a daily basis within our hospital walls. And we heard much about the ongoing and mounting opiate abuse epidemic. All of these are monumentally difficult challenges that remain unsolved and without a clear path forward to resolution.

Contrast that with the message from the U.S. Surgeon General during the opening plenary of the annual meeting. Vivek Murthy, MD, was named Surgeon General at a time in the U.S. when all of the above challenges are being added to the abounding issues of chronic disease, mental illness, and extraordinary healthcare costs. He is the highest leader in the nation ordained with trying to improve the health of all Americans at a time when we have never been unhealthier. But despite these monumental challenges, his message was not about the average American body mass index (BMI), smoking status, or heroin addiction. Much different, his message was chock full of amazing stories of community engagement and resilience, focused on innovation and fresh thinking, and about creative problem-solving despite lean and unforgiving budgets.

What Dr. Murthy offered were endless stories of hope and goodness, which he was able to find in each and every city he has visited in his short time as the nation’s “top doc.”

During his tenure, he has visited innumerable communities and engaged with locals in listening sessions. His takeaway from these sessions is “you wouldn’t believe how much good is out there.” One of his many stories was of a hospital and a YMCA that joined forces to improve the health and well-being of the hospital patients, employees, and entire community. This was at a time when both were struggling with lean budgets and stagnant progress in healthy living.

This pragmatic optimism reminds me a bit of one of my life mentors, my Aunt Karen. She is extremely realistic and grounded and knows in great detail the trials and tribulations of being alive for 66 years (including being a 10-year survivor of recurrent ovarian rhabdomyosarcoma). What Aunt Karen does that is so uniquely different than anyone else I know is that she creates goodness. I did not fully understand this until a few years ago, but I noticed that she goes out of her way to create extreme goodness out of extreme ordinariness. I have often joked that she purposely befriends pregnant women just to have an excuse to host a baby shower. She goes overboard to make any and every excuse to celebrate relatively ordinary life milestones (anniversaries, Valentine’s Day, St. Patrick’s Day). In her words, “you have to have a buffer for the funerals.”

Flip Your Switch

And so while Dr. Murthy and Aunt Karen have little else in common, they do share the priceless ability to help others see the goodness in everything around them even when surrounded by remarkable challenges and uncertainty. What a unique gift they have.

But are there simple ways we can all incorporate such goodness into our lives and start to routinely build in these buffers?

In your own personal life and work life, what are your buffers? How could you routinely and repeatedly “find the good” in all things around you?

A few months ago, I started searching for what I call “inbox buffers” as I noticed my email inbox was routinely chock full of requests for time, advice, or resources (all of which can be limited). I found a daily email called “The Daily Good.” It comes into my inbox early each morning and typically covers a human-interest story that is short, interesting, and inspiring. I have found these help me reset my mindset and attitude toward one that is more resilient and forgiving; in other words, it helps me find the good even within the crevices of a cranky email inbox. I have many other buffers, but I cite this one as it is simple, easy, free, predictable, dependable, and routinely inspiring!

So in this time when hospitalists are facing monumental change, unpredictable conflict, and unending challenges, we all need to purposely and repeatedly build in buffers to keep us hopeful and motivated and to seamlessly and routinely find the good in all we do. TH

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Climate change can be expected to boost the number of annual premature U.S. deaths from heat waves in coming decades and to increase mental health problems from extreme weather like hurricanes and floods, a U.S. study said on Monday.

"I don't know that we've seen something like this before, where we have a force that has such a multitude of effects," Surgeon General Vivek Murthy told reporters at the White House about the study. "There's not one single source that we can target with climate change, there are multiple paths that we have to address."

Heat waves were estimated to cause 670 to 1,300 U.S. deaths annually in recent years. Premature U.S. deaths from heat waves can be expected to rise more than 27,000 per year by 2100, from a 1990 baseline, one scenario in the study said. The rise outpaced projected decreases in deaths from extreme cold.

Extreme heat can cause more forest fires and increase pollen counts and the resulting poor air quality threatens people with asthma and other lung conditions. The report said poor air quality will likely lead to hundreds of thousands of premature deaths, hospital visits, and acute respiratory illness each year by 2030.

Climate change also threatens mental health, the study found. Post traumatic stress disorder, depression, and general anxiety can all result in places that suffer extreme weather linked to climate change, such as hurricanes and floods. More study needs to be done on assessing the risks to mental health, it said.

The peer-reviewed study by eight federal agencies can be found at: https://health2016.globalchange.gov/

Cases of mosquito and tick-borne diseases can also be expected to increase, though the study, completed over three years, did not look at whether locally-transmitted Zika virus cases would be more likely to hit the U.S.

President Barack Obama's administration has taken steps to cut carbon emissions by speeding a switch from coal and oil to cleaner energy sources. In February, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the White House's climate ambitions by putting a hold on Obama's plan to cut emissions from power plants. Administration officials say the plan is on safe legal footing.John Holdren, Obama's senior science adviser, said steps the world agreed to in Paris last year to curb emissions through 2030 can help fight the risks to health.

"We will need a big encore after 2030 . . . in order to avoid the bulk of the worst impacts described in this report,"he said.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Climate change can be expected to boost the number of annual premature U.S. deaths from heat waves in coming decades and to increase mental health problems from extreme weather like hurricanes and floods, a U.S. study said on Monday.

"I don't know that we've seen something like this before, where we have a force that has such a multitude of effects," Surgeon General Vivek Murthy told reporters at the White House about the study. "There's not one single source that we can target with climate change, there are multiple paths that we have to address."

Heat waves were estimated to cause 670 to 1,300 U.S. deaths annually in recent years. Premature U.S. deaths from heat waves can be expected to rise more than 27,000 per year by 2100, from a 1990 baseline, one scenario in the study said. The rise outpaced projected decreases in deaths from extreme cold.

Extreme heat can cause more forest fires and increase pollen counts and the resulting poor air quality threatens people with asthma and other lung conditions. The report said poor air quality will likely lead to hundreds of thousands of premature deaths, hospital visits, and acute respiratory illness each year by 2030.

Climate change also threatens mental health, the study found. Post traumatic stress disorder, depression, and general anxiety can all result in places that suffer extreme weather linked to climate change, such as hurricanes and floods. More study needs to be done on assessing the risks to mental health, it said.

The peer-reviewed study by eight federal agencies can be found at: https://health2016.globalchange.gov/

Cases of mosquito and tick-borne diseases can also be expected to increase, though the study, completed over three years, did not look at whether locally-transmitted Zika virus cases would be more likely to hit the U.S.

President Barack Obama's administration has taken steps to cut carbon emissions by speeding a switch from coal and oil to cleaner energy sources. In February, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the White House's climate ambitions by putting a hold on Obama's plan to cut emissions from power plants. Administration officials say the plan is on safe legal footing.John Holdren, Obama's senior science adviser, said steps the world agreed to in Paris last year to curb emissions through 2030 can help fight the risks to health.

"We will need a big encore after 2030 . . . in order to avoid the bulk of the worst impacts described in this report,"he said.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Climate change can be expected to boost the number of annual premature U.S. deaths from heat waves in coming decades and to increase mental health problems from extreme weather like hurricanes and floods, a U.S. study said on Monday.

"I don't know that we've seen something like this before, where we have a force that has such a multitude of effects," Surgeon General Vivek Murthy told reporters at the White House about the study. "There's not one single source that we can target with climate change, there are multiple paths that we have to address."

Heat waves were estimated to cause 670 to 1,300 U.S. deaths annually in recent years. Premature U.S. deaths from heat waves can be expected to rise more than 27,000 per year by 2100, from a 1990 baseline, one scenario in the study said. The rise outpaced projected decreases in deaths from extreme cold.

Extreme heat can cause more forest fires and increase pollen counts and the resulting poor air quality threatens people with asthma and other lung conditions. The report said poor air quality will likely lead to hundreds of thousands of premature deaths, hospital visits, and acute respiratory illness each year by 2030.

Climate change also threatens mental health, the study found. Post traumatic stress disorder, depression, and general anxiety can all result in places that suffer extreme weather linked to climate change, such as hurricanes and floods. More study needs to be done on assessing the risks to mental health, it said.

The peer-reviewed study by eight federal agencies can be found at: https://health2016.globalchange.gov/

Cases of mosquito and tick-borne diseases can also be expected to increase, though the study, completed over three years, did not look at whether locally-transmitted Zika virus cases would be more likely to hit the U.S.

President Barack Obama's administration has taken steps to cut carbon emissions by speeding a switch from coal and oil to cleaner energy sources. In February, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the White House's climate ambitions by putting a hold on Obama's plan to cut emissions from power plants. Administration officials say the plan is on safe legal footing.John Holdren, Obama's senior science adviser, said steps the world agreed to in Paris last year to curb emissions through 2030 can help fight the risks to health.

"We will need a big encore after 2030 . . . in order to avoid the bulk of the worst impacts described in this report,"he said.