Residents/Training

A transition is coming. My fourth and final year of residency starts soon – meaning that from July 1, 2018, I’ll never again be on call overnight as a psychiatry resident. July 1 marks the end of 2 years as a PGY2 and PGY3, during which I’ve worked 60 overnight shifts.

In our residency program, the on-call shift is a continuation of daytime duties, and the experience is a formative physician-in-training/quasi-hazing process of care provision for 24 hours straight. Previously, I’ve recounted experiences from my overnight on-call shifts and reflected on the intensity of working with emotionally distressed individuals in the emergency department. I never thought I’d say it, but I will miss working in the middle of the night, particularly in the ED. In the small hours of the morning, the strange aura of hospital existence, and desperation of sickness isn’t washed out by daylight and the inhibitions of business hours.

Thomas Northcut/Thinkstock

• 0: There is no such thing as 0 emotional pain when asked to stay overnight in the hospital.

• 1: This is a full night of sleep on the uncomfortable bunk beds in the GWU call room. On occasion, I’ve had a night with one consult. Only once in 2 years did I have a night in which not a single consult was called from the ED and all the patients on the psychiatric unit slept as soundly as I did.
• 4: There’s a man I’ve seen in the ED seven times over the last 2 years. That’s more than 10% of my nights on call, so we’re well acquainted – though he has trouble remembering me. He’s an alcoholic, though I know the official diagnosis is alcohol use disorder–severe. His addiction is, indeed, severe; I’ve never seen him sober. Every time, he tells me how his wife is cheating on him, and he’s been depressed since his eldest son was killed in a shooting 10 years ago. He sits under a bridge and drinks liquor until he either goes home or to an ED. I feel for him. Several times, other residents and I have transferred him to a local detoxification unit with discharge to a 30-day drug rehab program. It doesn’t stick. The last time I evaluated him, I sent him home to his wife with a cab voucher. My emotional pain is equal parts pity and frustration over my ineffectual impact on his life. He, and others like him, used to cause me more emotional pain. Eventually, the pain is dulled.

  

• 5: The mean pain scale score of a GWU resident on call is 5.13. Analysis of the survey data showed the emotional pain score is correlated with the specific resident on call, and my personal average is 5.04. From the way residents talk about being on call, I expected the mean pain scale to be higher. There is no vignette for the mean score; I think of it as all the unremarkable calls blurred together.
• 8: Emotional pain rises with a fraught clinical scenario. One weeknight, I had to involuntarily commit a young lawyer who was psychotic yet adept at hiding it. The lawyer was brought into the ED by police after his brother in Chicago called them to his apartment. The patient had called the brother while standing on his 10th-floor balcony talking nonsensically about conspiracy theories and why he needed to end his life to save the world. In the ED, the patient denied every single part of the story. When I called the brother for collateral, his distress moved me as a both sibling and psychiatrist. The lawyer denied the story up and down, called his brother a liar and the favorite child, and refused to sign into the psychiatric hospital voluntarily. I felt I had no choice but to place him in an involuntary hold. It was a long and busy night, and every time I walked past his ED bay, he’d yell, “Is this the face of a crazy man? I know the law!” I tried to put myself in his position and that of his brother who had called the police. Eight is the emotional pain of involuntarily committing someone whose story isn’t black and white. Eight is the pain of exercising authority and beneficence over patient autonomy.

• 10: I was consulted to evaluate a woman for suicidal ideation whose mother had coded and died in the ED an hour before. When the woman was told of her mother’s death, she crumpled to floor, screaming she wanted to die to join her mother. In the tumult, ED staff thought she was running out of the hospital to jump into traffic. She was held in the ED involuntarily until she could be evaluated for safety by psychiatry – me. When I entered her hospital room, she was quietly weeping, whispering: “I want my mom. I want my mom.” I wanted to cry, too. I sat with her in silence for a few minutes and offered my condolences. Yet, as the consultant, I had a job to do: I needed to complete a risk assessment. My voice caught as I explained that I was here to assess her for suicidal thoughts and plans. She looked at me like I was crazy. I felt crazy. I acknowledged the risk of suicide and her expressed desire to join her mother in death. I asked the questions quickly and gently. She shook her head to all my questions and told me she just wanted to go home. I met her daughters in the waiting room who were caught up in grief over the combination of their grandmother’s death and their mother’s reaction. They seemed certain that their mother had not wanted to die, and we agreed it was a situation of the wrong reaction in the wrong place. The daughters agreed to take her home and watch her all night. This is the only 10 I’ve experienced on the emotional pain scale. I felt shame and confusion as I struggled to reconcile my obligation as a psychiatrist, and my true desire to give that woman a hug and send her home without a battery of questions at perhaps her most vulnerable moment.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at GWU. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

A transition is coming. My fourth and final year of residency starts soon – meaning that from July 1, 2018, I’ll never again be on call overnight as a psychiatry resident. July 1 marks the end of 2 years as a PGY2 and PGY3, during which I’ve worked 60 overnight shifts.

In our residency program, the on-call shift is a continuation of daytime duties, and the experience is a formative physician-in-training/quasi-hazing process of care provision for 24 hours straight. Previously, I’ve recounted experiences from my overnight on-call shifts and reflected on the intensity of working with emotionally distressed individuals in the emergency department. I never thought I’d say it, but I will miss working in the middle of the night, particularly in the ED. In the small hours of the morning, the strange aura of hospital existence, and desperation of sickness isn’t washed out by daylight and the inhibitions of business hours.

Thomas Northcut/Thinkstock

• 0: There is no such thing as 0 emotional pain when asked to stay overnight in the hospital.

• 1: This is a full night of sleep on the uncomfortable bunk beds in the GWU call room. On occasion, I’ve had a night with one consult. Only once in 2 years did I have a night in which not a single consult was called from the ED and all the patients on the psychiatric unit slept as soundly as I did.
• 4: There’s a man I’ve seen in the ED seven times over the last 2 years. That’s more than 10% of my nights on call, so we’re well acquainted – though he has trouble remembering me. He’s an alcoholic, though I know the official diagnosis is alcohol use disorder–severe. His addiction is, indeed, severe; I’ve never seen him sober. Every time, he tells me how his wife is cheating on him, and he’s been depressed since his eldest son was killed in a shooting 10 years ago. He sits under a bridge and drinks liquor until he either goes home or to an ED. I feel for him. Several times, other residents and I have transferred him to a local detoxification unit with discharge to a 30-day drug rehab program. It doesn’t stick. The last time I evaluated him, I sent him home to his wife with a cab voucher. My emotional pain is equal parts pity and frustration over my ineffectual impact on his life. He, and others like him, used to cause me more emotional pain. Eventually, the pain is dulled.

  

• 5: The mean pain scale score of a GWU resident on call is 5.13. Analysis of the survey data showed the emotional pain score is correlated with the specific resident on call, and my personal average is 5.04. From the way residents talk about being on call, I expected the mean pain scale to be higher. There is no vignette for the mean score; I think of it as all the unremarkable calls blurred together.
• 8: Emotional pain rises with a fraught clinical scenario. One weeknight, I had to involuntarily commit a young lawyer who was psychotic yet adept at hiding it. The lawyer was brought into the ED by police after his brother in Chicago called them to his apartment. The patient had called the brother while standing on his 10th-floor balcony talking nonsensically about conspiracy theories and why he needed to end his life to save the world. In the ED, the patient denied every single part of the story. When I called the brother for collateral, his distress moved me as a both sibling and psychiatrist. The lawyer denied the story up and down, called his brother a liar and the favorite child, and refused to sign into the psychiatric hospital voluntarily. I felt I had no choice but to place him in an involuntary hold. It was a long and busy night, and every time I walked past his ED bay, he’d yell, “Is this the face of a crazy man? I know the law!” I tried to put myself in his position and that of his brother who had called the police. Eight is the emotional pain of involuntarily committing someone whose story isn’t black and white. Eight is the pain of exercising authority and beneficence over patient autonomy.

• 10: I was consulted to evaluate a woman for suicidal ideation whose mother had coded and died in the ED an hour before. When the woman was told of her mother’s death, she crumpled to floor, screaming she wanted to die to join her mother. In the tumult, ED staff thought she was running out of the hospital to jump into traffic. She was held in the ED involuntarily until she could be evaluated for safety by psychiatry – me. When I entered her hospital room, she was quietly weeping, whispering: “I want my mom. I want my mom.” I wanted to cry, too. I sat with her in silence for a few minutes and offered my condolences. Yet, as the consultant, I had a job to do: I needed to complete a risk assessment. My voice caught as I explained that I was here to assess her for suicidal thoughts and plans. She looked at me like I was crazy. I felt crazy. I acknowledged the risk of suicide and her expressed desire to join her mother in death. I asked the questions quickly and gently. She shook her head to all my questions and told me she just wanted to go home. I met her daughters in the waiting room who were caught up in grief over the combination of their grandmother’s death and their mother’s reaction. They seemed certain that their mother had not wanted to die, and we agreed it was a situation of the wrong reaction in the wrong place. The daughters agreed to take her home and watch her all night. This is the only 10 I’ve experienced on the emotional pain scale. I felt shame and confusion as I struggled to reconcile my obligation as a psychiatrist, and my true desire to give that woman a hug and send her home without a battery of questions at perhaps her most vulnerable moment.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at GWU. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

A transition is coming. My fourth and final year of residency starts soon – meaning that from July 1, 2018, I’ll never again be on call overnight as a psychiatry resident. July 1 marks the end of 2 years as a PGY2 and PGY3, during which I’ve worked 60 overnight shifts.

In our residency program, the on-call shift is a continuation of daytime duties, and the experience is a formative physician-in-training/quasi-hazing process of care provision for 24 hours straight. Previously, I’ve recounted experiences from my overnight on-call shifts and reflected on the intensity of working with emotionally distressed individuals in the emergency department. I never thought I’d say it, but I will miss working in the middle of the night, particularly in the ED. In the small hours of the morning, the strange aura of hospital existence, and desperation of sickness isn’t washed out by daylight and the inhibitions of business hours.

Thomas Northcut/Thinkstock

• 0: There is no such thing as 0 emotional pain when asked to stay overnight in the hospital.

• 1: This is a full night of sleep on the uncomfortable bunk beds in the GWU call room. On occasion, I’ve had a night with one consult. Only once in 2 years did I have a night in which not a single consult was called from the ED and all the patients on the psychiatric unit slept as soundly as I did.
• 4: There’s a man I’ve seen in the ED seven times over the last 2 years. That’s more than 10% of my nights on call, so we’re well acquainted – though he has trouble remembering me. He’s an alcoholic, though I know the official diagnosis is alcohol use disorder–severe. His addiction is, indeed, severe; I’ve never seen him sober. Every time, he tells me how his wife is cheating on him, and he’s been depressed since his eldest son was killed in a shooting 10 years ago. He sits under a bridge and drinks liquor until he either goes home or to an ED. I feel for him. Several times, other residents and I have transferred him to a local detoxification unit with discharge to a 30-day drug rehab program. It doesn’t stick. The last time I evaluated him, I sent him home to his wife with a cab voucher. My emotional pain is equal parts pity and frustration over my ineffectual impact on his life. He, and others like him, used to cause me more emotional pain. Eventually, the pain is dulled.

  

• 5: The mean pain scale score of a GWU resident on call is 5.13. Analysis of the survey data showed the emotional pain score is correlated with the specific resident on call, and my personal average is 5.04. From the way residents talk about being on call, I expected the mean pain scale to be higher. There is no vignette for the mean score; I think of it as all the unremarkable calls blurred together.
• 8: Emotional pain rises with a fraught clinical scenario. One weeknight, I had to involuntarily commit a young lawyer who was psychotic yet adept at hiding it. The lawyer was brought into the ED by police after his brother in Chicago called them to his apartment. The patient had called the brother while standing on his 10th-floor balcony talking nonsensically about conspiracy theories and why he needed to end his life to save the world. In the ED, the patient denied every single part of the story. When I called the brother for collateral, his distress moved me as a both sibling and psychiatrist. The lawyer denied the story up and down, called his brother a liar and the favorite child, and refused to sign into the psychiatric hospital voluntarily. I felt I had no choice but to place him in an involuntary hold. It was a long and busy night, and every time I walked past his ED bay, he’d yell, “Is this the face of a crazy man? I know the law!” I tried to put myself in his position and that of his brother who had called the police. Eight is the emotional pain of involuntarily committing someone whose story isn’t black and white. Eight is the pain of exercising authority and beneficence over patient autonomy.

• 10: I was consulted to evaluate a woman for suicidal ideation whose mother had coded and died in the ED an hour before. When the woman was told of her mother’s death, she crumpled to floor, screaming she wanted to die to join her mother. In the tumult, ED staff thought she was running out of the hospital to jump into traffic. She was held in the ED involuntarily until she could be evaluated for safety by psychiatry – me. When I entered her hospital room, she was quietly weeping, whispering: “I want my mom. I want my mom.” I wanted to cry, too. I sat with her in silence for a few minutes and offered my condolences. Yet, as the consultant, I had a job to do: I needed to complete a risk assessment. My voice caught as I explained that I was here to assess her for suicidal thoughts and plans. She looked at me like I was crazy. I felt crazy. I acknowledged the risk of suicide and her expressed desire to join her mother in death. I asked the questions quickly and gently. She shook her head to all my questions and told me she just wanted to go home. I met her daughters in the waiting room who were caught up in grief over the combination of their grandmother’s death and their mother’s reaction. They seemed certain that their mother had not wanted to die, and we agreed it was a situation of the wrong reaction in the wrong place. The daughters agreed to take her home and watch her all night. This is the only 10 I’ve experienced on the emotional pain scale. I felt shame and confusion as I struggled to reconcile my obligation as a psychiatrist, and my true desire to give that woman a hug and send her home without a battery of questions at perhaps her most vulnerable moment.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at GWU. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

Editor’s note : Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he or she has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Mufida Wadhwania, MD. Dr. Wadhwania is an adult psychiatrist practicing in an urban/public setting in metro Atlanta, Georgia, at DeKalb Community Service Board. She manages a variety of uninsured and underinsured patients in an outpatient setting.

Dr. Stanciu: What attracted you to practice community mental health in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A high portion of the population here has no health insurance, and hence there is a great need in the community. The psychopathology severity is high, so one can see a wide range of disorders. One can also build on the skill to pull together resources, such as linking patients to community resources and patient assistance programs, finding food banks, and finding ways to secure stable housing. There is continuity of care, and when a staff member leaves the agency, patients are linked to the next provider in an adequate time frame so that the patient’s quality of care is not compromised. The new provider is also given notification so that he or she is aware of the transfer of the patient and is able to review the chart in advance.

Along with medication management, we also provide psychotherapy. We utilize a single electronic health record (EHR) throughout the agency and we are able to contribute to changes in the EHR to make it more user-friendly. We have monthly journal club meetings and meetings with other staff members to review and discuss the progress of our organization. There are also numerous online resources through which we can keep ourselves updated with current research and earn CME. Some of the providers at our agency have academic affiliations, and hence there are opportunities to teach medical students and residents who rotate at some of our sites.

Dr. Stanciu: What are some of the more prevalent disorders you encounter?

Dr. Wadhwania: We see a wide range of disorders, such as affective disorders, schizophrenia, and comorbid disorders, specifically comorbid substance use disorders. So we encounter a high number of chronic mental illnesses.

Continue to: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Stanciu: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Wadhwania: Based on the high volume of patients we encounter, the resources available in the community are limited. But this challenges us to be creative and maximize what we have available to create new resources, such as having on-site case managers rather than just in the community, and building psychosocial rehabilitation programs near our various clinics for the patients to bring them the best care possible. Other challenges include a lack of education on and awareness of mental illness; there is still a lot of stigma surrounding mental illness in the community.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe your experience working in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: It’s a very rewarding experience, as you get to be creative, and patients appreciate your efforts. We use a patient-centered approach, and we work as a team. Each team member brings in a unique set of skills, and we bounce ideas off each other. There is a sense of satisfaction when you help people who don’t have easy access to health care. Finally, in a setting like this, young psychiatrists are able to gain more opportunities earlier than they would while working in other settings.

Continue to: How did you career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: While at East Carolina University, teamwork and getting the best treatment for the patient was the goal. We treated an underserved population that did not have easy access to resources, and dealt with the same wide range of psychopathology. So my residency prepared me well to work in my current position.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a psychiatric physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A perfect fit would be someone who is able to harness and build resources for the patients in the community and in the practice and wants to continue to build that skill. This individual is someone who is a team player, is flexible, and has a high professional frustration tolerance. The physician’s main aim would be to serve, and his or her mission would not be monetarily driven.

Continue to: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: Approximately 40% of the patients we treat have no health insurance, and approximately 60% have Medicaid or managed Medicaid or Medicare. There is no burden of health insurance. Full-time employees are salaried, and part-time employees are compensated on an hourly model. There is also an incentive bonus system based on quality and productivity.

Dr. Stanciu: What model does your clinic use to overcome the shortage of services?

Dr. Wadhwania: There are approximately 37 medical staff members in the agency, most of whom are MDs, but this group also includes nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists, so there is no shortage within our agency. We do contract for telepsychiatry services, but because our agency’s clinics are located throughout the county, most of our patients have easy access to any one of our clinics. We have a number of social workers, therapists, nurses, case managers, and pharmacists. We have a crisis center where unstable patients who require admission to an inpatient unit can be admitted; we also are able to refer patients directly to other inpatient psychiatric units. Our agency also has an addiction clinic and a residential substance abuse program catering specifically to patients with substance use disorders. We have educational, therapeutic, and behavioral support services, including residential services, for patients who have developmental disabilities. Our agency also has residential services for patients who are homeless or have a lower income and would benefit from support in a residential setting.

Our therapists are able to refer patients to state-contracted Assertive Community Treatment teams that serve our county. We are also able to set up intensive case management for patients in the community, as well as other community support services, peer support programs, and psychosocial rehabilitation programs.

Continue to: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: First of all, realize that there are many misconceptions about serving in the public sector, such as there is no access to new medications, etc. It is important to establish whether public sector service is “in your heart.” You need to learn the organization’s philosophy, mission, and vision, and figure out whether these views align with yours. Getting to know the leadership and how they value psychiatrists and other staff members is also very important. Also, make sure that there are opportunities for you to become a leader in the organization, that there is room for growth, and that it’s a stable organization.

Editor’s note : Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he or she has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Mufida Wadhwania, MD. Dr. Wadhwania is an adult psychiatrist practicing in an urban/public setting in metro Atlanta, Georgia, at DeKalb Community Service Board. She manages a variety of uninsured and underinsured patients in an outpatient setting.

Dr. Stanciu: What attracted you to practice community mental health in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A high portion of the population here has no health insurance, and hence there is a great need in the community. The psychopathology severity is high, so one can see a wide range of disorders. One can also build on the skill to pull together resources, such as linking patients to community resources and patient assistance programs, finding food banks, and finding ways to secure stable housing. There is continuity of care, and when a staff member leaves the agency, patients are linked to the next provider in an adequate time frame so that the patient’s quality of care is not compromised. The new provider is also given notification so that he or she is aware of the transfer of the patient and is able to review the chart in advance.

Along with medication management, we also provide psychotherapy. We utilize a single electronic health record (EHR) throughout the agency and we are able to contribute to changes in the EHR to make it more user-friendly. We have monthly journal club meetings and meetings with other staff members to review and discuss the progress of our organization. There are also numerous online resources through which we can keep ourselves updated with current research and earn CME. Some of the providers at our agency have academic affiliations, and hence there are opportunities to teach medical students and residents who rotate at some of our sites.

Dr. Stanciu: What are some of the more prevalent disorders you encounter?

Dr. Wadhwania: We see a wide range of disorders, such as affective disorders, schizophrenia, and comorbid disorders, specifically comorbid substance use disorders. So we encounter a high number of chronic mental illnesses.

Continue to: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Stanciu: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Wadhwania: Based on the high volume of patients we encounter, the resources available in the community are limited. But this challenges us to be creative and maximize what we have available to create new resources, such as having on-site case managers rather than just in the community, and building psychosocial rehabilitation programs near our various clinics for the patients to bring them the best care possible. Other challenges include a lack of education on and awareness of mental illness; there is still a lot of stigma surrounding mental illness in the community.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe your experience working in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: It’s a very rewarding experience, as you get to be creative, and patients appreciate your efforts. We use a patient-centered approach, and we work as a team. Each team member brings in a unique set of skills, and we bounce ideas off each other. There is a sense of satisfaction when you help people who don’t have easy access to health care. Finally, in a setting like this, young psychiatrists are able to gain more opportunities earlier than they would while working in other settings.

Continue to: How did you career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: While at East Carolina University, teamwork and getting the best treatment for the patient was the goal. We treated an underserved population that did not have easy access to resources, and dealt with the same wide range of psychopathology. So my residency prepared me well to work in my current position.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a psychiatric physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A perfect fit would be someone who is able to harness and build resources for the patients in the community and in the practice and wants to continue to build that skill. This individual is someone who is a team player, is flexible, and has a high professional frustration tolerance. The physician’s main aim would be to serve, and his or her mission would not be monetarily driven.

Continue to: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: Approximately 40% of the patients we treat have no health insurance, and approximately 60% have Medicaid or managed Medicaid or Medicare. There is no burden of health insurance. Full-time employees are salaried, and part-time employees are compensated on an hourly model. There is also an incentive bonus system based on quality and productivity.

Dr. Stanciu: What model does your clinic use to overcome the shortage of services?

Dr. Wadhwania: There are approximately 37 medical staff members in the agency, most of whom are MDs, but this group also includes nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists, so there is no shortage within our agency. We do contract for telepsychiatry services, but because our agency’s clinics are located throughout the county, most of our patients have easy access to any one of our clinics. We have a number of social workers, therapists, nurses, case managers, and pharmacists. We have a crisis center where unstable patients who require admission to an inpatient unit can be admitted; we also are able to refer patients directly to other inpatient psychiatric units. Our agency also has an addiction clinic and a residential substance abuse program catering specifically to patients with substance use disorders. We have educational, therapeutic, and behavioral support services, including residential services, for patients who have developmental disabilities. Our agency also has residential services for patients who are homeless or have a lower income and would benefit from support in a residential setting.

Our therapists are able to refer patients to state-contracted Assertive Community Treatment teams that serve our county. We are also able to set up intensive case management for patients in the community, as well as other community support services, peer support programs, and psychosocial rehabilitation programs.

Continue to: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: First of all, realize that there are many misconceptions about serving in the public sector, such as there is no access to new medications, etc. It is important to establish whether public sector service is “in your heart.” You need to learn the organization’s philosophy, mission, and vision, and figure out whether these views align with yours. Getting to know the leadership and how they value psychiatrists and other staff members is also very important. Also, make sure that there are opportunities for you to become a leader in the organization, that there is room for growth, and that it’s a stable organization.

Editor’s note : Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he or she has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Mufida Wadhwania, MD. Dr. Wadhwania is an adult psychiatrist practicing in an urban/public setting in metro Atlanta, Georgia, at DeKalb Community Service Board. She manages a variety of uninsured and underinsured patients in an outpatient setting.

Dr. Stanciu: What attracted you to practice community mental health in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A high portion of the population here has no health insurance, and hence there is a great need in the community. The psychopathology severity is high, so one can see a wide range of disorders. One can also build on the skill to pull together resources, such as linking patients to community resources and patient assistance programs, finding food banks, and finding ways to secure stable housing. There is continuity of care, and when a staff member leaves the agency, patients are linked to the next provider in an adequate time frame so that the patient’s quality of care is not compromised. The new provider is also given notification so that he or she is aware of the transfer of the patient and is able to review the chart in advance.

Along with medication management, we also provide psychotherapy. We utilize a single electronic health record (EHR) throughout the agency and we are able to contribute to changes in the EHR to make it more user-friendly. We have monthly journal club meetings and meetings with other staff members to review and discuss the progress of our organization. There are also numerous online resources through which we can keep ourselves updated with current research and earn CME. Some of the providers at our agency have academic affiliations, and hence there are opportunities to teach medical students and residents who rotate at some of our sites.

Dr. Stanciu: What are some of the more prevalent disorders you encounter?

Dr. Wadhwania: We see a wide range of disorders, such as affective disorders, schizophrenia, and comorbid disorders, specifically comorbid substance use disorders. So we encounter a high number of chronic mental illnesses.

Continue to: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Stanciu: What are some challenges in working with this population?

Dr. Wadhwania: Based on the high volume of patients we encounter, the resources available in the community are limited. But this challenges us to be creative and maximize what we have available to create new resources, such as having on-site case managers rather than just in the community, and building psychosocial rehabilitation programs near our various clinics for the patients to bring them the best care possible. Other challenges include a lack of education on and awareness of mental illness; there is still a lot of stigma surrounding mental illness in the community.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe your experience working in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: It’s a very rewarding experience, as you get to be creative, and patients appreciate your efforts. We use a patient-centered approach, and we work as a team. Each team member brings in a unique set of skills, and we bounce ideas off each other. There is a sense of satisfaction when you help people who don’t have easy access to health care. Finally, in a setting like this, young psychiatrists are able to gain more opportunities earlier than they would while working in other settings.

Continue to: How did you career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to work in such a challenging setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: While at East Carolina University, teamwork and getting the best treatment for the patient was the goal. We treated an underserved population that did not have easy access to resources, and dealt with the same wide range of psychopathology. So my residency prepared me well to work in my current position.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a psychiatric physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: A perfect fit would be someone who is able to harness and build resources for the patients in the community and in the practice and wants to continue to build that skill. This individual is someone who is a team player, is flexible, and has a high professional frustration tolerance. The physician’s main aim would be to serve, and his or her mission would not be monetarily driven.

Continue to: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for your practice, and do you run into difficulties with health insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: Approximately 40% of the patients we treat have no health insurance, and approximately 60% have Medicaid or managed Medicaid or Medicare. There is no burden of health insurance. Full-time employees are salaried, and part-time employees are compensated on an hourly model. There is also an incentive bonus system based on quality and productivity.

Dr. Stanciu: What model does your clinic use to overcome the shortage of services?

Dr. Wadhwania: There are approximately 37 medical staff members in the agency, most of whom are MDs, but this group also includes nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists, so there is no shortage within our agency. We do contract for telepsychiatry services, but because our agency’s clinics are located throughout the county, most of our patients have easy access to any one of our clinics. We have a number of social workers, therapists, nurses, case managers, and pharmacists. We have a crisis center where unstable patients who require admission to an inpatient unit can be admitted; we also are able to refer patients directly to other inpatient psychiatric units. Our agency also has an addiction clinic and a residential substance abuse program catering specifically to patients with substance use disorders. We have educational, therapeutic, and behavioral support services, including residential services, for patients who have developmental disabilities. Our agency also has residential services for patients who are homeless or have a lower income and would benefit from support in a residential setting.

Our therapists are able to refer patients to state-contracted Assertive Community Treatment teams that serve our county. We are also able to set up intensive case management for patients in the community, as well as other community support services, peer support programs, and psychosocial rehabilitation programs.

Continue to: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating working in an urban-public setting?

Dr. Wadhwania: First of all, realize that there are many misconceptions about serving in the public sector, such as there is no access to new medications, etc. It is important to establish whether public sector service is “in your heart.” You need to learn the organization’s philosophy, mission, and vision, and figure out whether these views align with yours. Getting to know the leadership and how they value psychiatrists and other staff members is also very important. Also, make sure that there are opportunities for you to become a leader in the organization, that there is room for growth, and that it’s a stable organization.

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

When I came to this country, even before my current residency, I launched my addiction psychiatry career by researching nicotine addiction in schizophrenia patients. Those early experiences gave me a greater understanding of the health concerns and life experiences of people with addictions – and those more likely to develop them.

So imagine my excitement when I first became acquainted with the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP). I first learned about the AAAP, its mission, and activities at the 2017 American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego.

Getting in and involved

After returning to New York, I took those next steps and joined up, which opened the AAAP gates so I could receive its newsletters and submission calls, gain access to resources such as The American Journal on Addictions, survey the various joinable task forces, as well as discover who might be available to me as a mentor as part of the AAAP’s mentor-mentee program.

Sometime during my third-year residency training, I received a member-email advertising the AAAP 28th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, and soon after that, received another email calling for research submissions to be presented there, as well as an invitation to apply for a trainee travel scholarship that would defray the cost for and allow its fellows to attend the meeting in San Diego. That alone was enticing enough to apply. But even more enticing was the opportunity to showcase the addiction work I had been doing during my residency, as well as to meet other members at various levels of the AAAP to determine whether I wanted to become more involved.
 

Pursuing experiences

I did not think twice about applying for the poster presentation and the travel scholarship. The AAAP’s online application forms for both were easy to understand and very well structured, which greatly helped me with filling out and formatting my applications. Taking the initiative toward even these first AAAP offerings brought more positive echoes. I was thrilled when the poster I proposed was accepted, mostly because it would give me the chance to present my recent addiction psych work from a higher platform. A few weeks later, I was thrilled again when I received an AAAP email congratulating me on being awarded the San Diego 28th annual meeting travel scholarship, which would waive the annual membership and conference registration fees, in addition to defraying my travel costs. Pacific breezes, here I come. And there I went. (Thanks to my extremely supportive training director, who first nominated me for the award.)

On the ground at 2017 AAAP

The 28th AAAP annual meeting opened on a balmy December Thursday, and that’s the day I arrived. I attended many addiction workshops and symposiums, which featured premier figures in addiction psychiatry. Of the numerous trainee-specific events I attended, the most informative was the “Fellowship Forum: Exploring the Field of Addiction Psychiatry.” At this forum, I learned the true benefits of doing an addiction psychiatry fellowship, while meeting many of the fellowship program directors of top institutions. Having them all under one “roof” made it easy to compare and contrast the specific training they offered.

Then came what were, for me, major highlights of the AAAP 2017. After I delivered my poster presentation and shared my research, I was able to receive very close, constructive feedback from the field’s most experienced professionals. And, finally, I met my AAAP mentors face to face: Dr. Amy Yule of Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dr. Thomas Penders, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C.; and Dr. Cornel Stanciu of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
 

One AAAP trainee’s takeaways

All AAAP trainees, fellows, presenters leave the meeting with their own conclusions, but my biggest takeaways were:

• Regarding barriers to buprenorphine, emerging research supports similar efficacy for long-acting injectable naltrexone.
• Various protocols for rapid implementation of naltrexone are being used, and these allow for smoother transition and shorter “washout” periods.
• We should not overlook the effects of tobacco use in our patient population – and should address it aggressively, regardless of psychiatric comorbidities.
• The cannabinoid CBD receptors that exist on the dopamine pathway strengthen and complicate their relationship with psychosis.
• Telehealth should be seen as a potential solution for the incredible demand for addiction specialists, especially in rural and remote settings. The body of evidence supporting its efficacy is expanding.
• Synthetic cannabinoids are prevalent, and toxidromes exist – yet, trainees are not current on these.

The challenges facing those of us dedicated to fighting addiction have never been greater. I would urge more trainees and psychiatrists to join the AAAP in light of the opioid crisis and the potential fallout tied to marijuana legalization. I am grateful to have the opportunity to join my colleagues in this fight. Becoming part of the AAAP has led to a highly rewarding, career-enriching experience.
 

This article was updated 1/17/17.

Dr. Ahmed is a third-year resident in the department of psychiatry at Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York. Besides addiction psychiatry, his interests include public social psychiatry, health care policy, health disparities, and mental health stigma. Dr. Ahmed is a member of the American Psychiatric Association, the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, and the American Association for Social Psychiatry.

When I came to this country, even before my current residency, I launched my addiction psychiatry career by researching nicotine addiction in schizophrenia patients. Those early experiences gave me a greater understanding of the health concerns and life experiences of people with addictions – and those more likely to develop them.

So imagine my excitement when I first became acquainted with the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP). I first learned about the AAAP, its mission, and activities at the 2017 American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego.

Getting in and involved

After returning to New York, I took those next steps and joined up, which opened the AAAP gates so I could receive its newsletters and submission calls, gain access to resources such as The American Journal on Addictions, survey the various joinable task forces, as well as discover who might be available to me as a mentor as part of the AAAP’s mentor-mentee program.

Sometime during my third-year residency training, I received a member-email advertising the AAAP 28th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, and soon after that, received another email calling for research submissions to be presented there, as well as an invitation to apply for a trainee travel scholarship that would defray the cost for and allow its fellows to attend the meeting in San Diego. That alone was enticing enough to apply. But even more enticing was the opportunity to showcase the addiction work I had been doing during my residency, as well as to meet other members at various levels of the AAAP to determine whether I wanted to become more involved.
 

Pursuing experiences

I did not think twice about applying for the poster presentation and the travel scholarship. The AAAP’s online application forms for both were easy to understand and very well structured, which greatly helped me with filling out and formatting my applications. Taking the initiative toward even these first AAAP offerings brought more positive echoes. I was thrilled when the poster I proposed was accepted, mostly because it would give me the chance to present my recent addiction psych work from a higher platform. A few weeks later, I was thrilled again when I received an AAAP email congratulating me on being awarded the San Diego 28th annual meeting travel scholarship, which would waive the annual membership and conference registration fees, in addition to defraying my travel costs. Pacific breezes, here I come. And there I went. (Thanks to my extremely supportive training director, who first nominated me for the award.)

On the ground at 2017 AAAP

The 28th AAAP annual meeting opened on a balmy December Thursday, and that’s the day I arrived. I attended many addiction workshops and symposiums, which featured premier figures in addiction psychiatry. Of the numerous trainee-specific events I attended, the most informative was the “Fellowship Forum: Exploring the Field of Addiction Psychiatry.” At this forum, I learned the true benefits of doing an addiction psychiatry fellowship, while meeting many of the fellowship program directors of top institutions. Having them all under one “roof” made it easy to compare and contrast the specific training they offered.

Then came what were, for me, major highlights of the AAAP 2017. After I delivered my poster presentation and shared my research, I was able to receive very close, constructive feedback from the field’s most experienced professionals. And, finally, I met my AAAP mentors face to face: Dr. Amy Yule of Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dr. Thomas Penders, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C.; and Dr. Cornel Stanciu of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
 

One AAAP trainee’s takeaways

All AAAP trainees, fellows, presenters leave the meeting with their own conclusions, but my biggest takeaways were:

• Regarding barriers to buprenorphine, emerging research supports similar efficacy for long-acting injectable naltrexone.
• Various protocols for rapid implementation of naltrexone are being used, and these allow for smoother transition and shorter “washout” periods.
• We should not overlook the effects of tobacco use in our patient population – and should address it aggressively, regardless of psychiatric comorbidities.
• The cannabinoid CBD receptors that exist on the dopamine pathway strengthen and complicate their relationship with psychosis.
• Telehealth should be seen as a potential solution for the incredible demand for addiction specialists, especially in rural and remote settings. The body of evidence supporting its efficacy is expanding.
• Synthetic cannabinoids are prevalent, and toxidromes exist – yet, trainees are not current on these.

The challenges facing those of us dedicated to fighting addiction have never been greater. I would urge more trainees and psychiatrists to join the AAAP in light of the opioid crisis and the potential fallout tied to marijuana legalization. I am grateful to have the opportunity to join my colleagues in this fight. Becoming part of the AAAP has led to a highly rewarding, career-enriching experience.
 

This article was updated 1/17/17.

Dr. Ahmed is a third-year resident in the department of psychiatry at Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York. Besides addiction psychiatry, his interests include public social psychiatry, health care policy, health disparities, and mental health stigma. Dr. Ahmed is a member of the American Psychiatric Association, the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, and the American Association for Social Psychiatry.

When I came to this country, even before my current residency, I launched my addiction psychiatry career by researching nicotine addiction in schizophrenia patients. Those early experiences gave me a greater understanding of the health concerns and life experiences of people with addictions – and those more likely to develop them.

So imagine my excitement when I first became acquainted with the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP). I first learned about the AAAP, its mission, and activities at the 2017 American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting in San Diego.

Getting in and involved

After returning to New York, I took those next steps and joined up, which opened the AAAP gates so I could receive its newsletters and submission calls, gain access to resources such as The American Journal on Addictions, survey the various joinable task forces, as well as discover who might be available to me as a mentor as part of the AAAP’s mentor-mentee program.

Sometime during my third-year residency training, I received a member-email advertising the AAAP 28th Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium, and soon after that, received another email calling for research submissions to be presented there, as well as an invitation to apply for a trainee travel scholarship that would defray the cost for and allow its fellows to attend the meeting in San Diego. That alone was enticing enough to apply. But even more enticing was the opportunity to showcase the addiction work I had been doing during my residency, as well as to meet other members at various levels of the AAAP to determine whether I wanted to become more involved.
 

Pursuing experiences

I did not think twice about applying for the poster presentation and the travel scholarship. The AAAP’s online application forms for both were easy to understand and very well structured, which greatly helped me with filling out and formatting my applications. Taking the initiative toward even these first AAAP offerings brought more positive echoes. I was thrilled when the poster I proposed was accepted, mostly because it would give me the chance to present my recent addiction psych work from a higher platform. A few weeks later, I was thrilled again when I received an AAAP email congratulating me on being awarded the San Diego 28th annual meeting travel scholarship, which would waive the annual membership and conference registration fees, in addition to defraying my travel costs. Pacific breezes, here I come. And there I went. (Thanks to my extremely supportive training director, who first nominated me for the award.)

On the ground at 2017 AAAP

The 28th AAAP annual meeting opened on a balmy December Thursday, and that’s the day I arrived. I attended many addiction workshops and symposiums, which featured premier figures in addiction psychiatry. Of the numerous trainee-specific events I attended, the most informative was the “Fellowship Forum: Exploring the Field of Addiction Psychiatry.” At this forum, I learned the true benefits of doing an addiction psychiatry fellowship, while meeting many of the fellowship program directors of top institutions. Having them all under one “roof” made it easy to compare and contrast the specific training they offered.

Then came what were, for me, major highlights of the AAAP 2017. After I delivered my poster presentation and shared my research, I was able to receive very close, constructive feedback from the field’s most experienced professionals. And, finally, I met my AAAP mentors face to face: Dr. Amy Yule of Harvard Medical School, Boston; Dr. Thomas Penders, of East Carolina University, Greenville, N.C.; and Dr. Cornel Stanciu of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H.
 

One AAAP trainee’s takeaways

All AAAP trainees, fellows, presenters leave the meeting with their own conclusions, but my biggest takeaways were:

• Regarding barriers to buprenorphine, emerging research supports similar efficacy for long-acting injectable naltrexone.
• Various protocols for rapid implementation of naltrexone are being used, and these allow for smoother transition and shorter “washout” periods.
• We should not overlook the effects of tobacco use in our patient population – and should address it aggressively, regardless of psychiatric comorbidities.
• The cannabinoid CBD receptors that exist on the dopamine pathway strengthen and complicate their relationship with psychosis.
• Telehealth should be seen as a potential solution for the incredible demand for addiction specialists, especially in rural and remote settings. The body of evidence supporting its efficacy is expanding.
• Synthetic cannabinoids are prevalent, and toxidromes exist – yet, trainees are not current on these.

The challenges facing those of us dedicated to fighting addiction have never been greater. I would urge more trainees and psychiatrists to join the AAAP in light of the opioid crisis and the potential fallout tied to marijuana legalization. I am grateful to have the opportunity to join my colleagues in this fight. Becoming part of the AAAP has led to a highly rewarding, career-enriching experience.
 

This article was updated 1/17/17.

Dr. Ahmed is a third-year resident in the department of psychiatry at Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York. Besides addiction psychiatry, his interests include public social psychiatry, health care policy, health disparities, and mental health stigma. Dr. Ahmed is a member of the American Psychiatric Association, the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, and the American Association for Social Psychiatry.

Editor’s note: Career Choices is a new feature of Residents’ Voices. It features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths. Future installments will feature interviews with psychiatrists who have focused their careers on consultation-liaison psychiatry, academic psychiatry, rural psychiatry, and other career paths.

In this first Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Samantha Gnanasegaram, MD, a state hospital psychiatrist at New Hampshire Hospital, where she treats severe and chronic mental illness and testifies in various court proceedings.

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started thinking about career options after residency, I knew I wanted to start my career in a facility where I could be challenged, remain up-to-date with the most current evidence-based literature, and have the support and mentorship of seasoned psychiatrists in the field. The opportunity to work under the auspices of a great academic institution with the “bread and butter” of psychiatry reminds me every day why I chose the field in the first place. The often chronic and sometimes refractory cases I encounter daily are extremely thought-provoking, and they motivate me to think and pursue more complex management options. [This setting] also enables me to work closely as [part of] an interdisciplinary team with nursing, social work, and recreational and occupational therapy in ensuring these individuals get the best care and aftercare plans.

We often forget that psychosis often takes weeks to respond [to treatment]. Unfortunately, often in private hospitals, the longer stays that are necessary for patient care are not always possible, leading to premature psychotropic changes and discharge. In this setting, I am able to practice medicine based on what is best for the patient from an evidence-based standpoint. Additionally, being in the state system also allows me to learn first-hand and work closely with the legal system in this state and to testify in various settings to ensure my patients get the best possible care.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: During my residency, I had exposure to the affiliated state psychiatric hospital and spent some time on various units, each geared toward different patient populations. I also became very familiar with a wide range of psychotropics, ranging from first-line to second- and third-tier medications, as well as off-label. The ECT exposure as well as Crisis Prevention Institute training in how to deal with violent and aggressive individuals certainly added extra layers to my proficiency.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This setting is great for someone who likes to be challenged and stay current with literature. Furthermore, this is a great setting for those who are comfortable with the use of medications such as [clozapine] and long-acting injectables, and procedures such as ECT. Additionally, an ideal candidate is someone who understands the chronicity and complexity of mental illness, and has the patience to follow the course and does not rush to make drastic changes or panics at the first sign of a patient taking a step back.

A good candidate also should be comfortable with medical comorbidities, because severe mental illness often leads to poor self-care, diabetes, hypertension, etc., and should be able to work effectively in a team setting and interact with other specialties. State hospital physicians need to be cognizant of outpatient resources available to prevent decompensation in the community and not only focus on acute stabilization. Additionally, this is a great setting for those who enjoy working in an interdisciplinary team and learning from the expertise of different members of a treatment team.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started, the biggest challenge was learning about the differences in practice and legislature in a different state, because all states vary in their involuntary commitment laws, process, and ability to institute forced medications. Learning this as well as how they apply to my practice occurred quicker than I anticipated. As I started practicing, I became more proficient in being able to incorporate the resources I have available.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This is a subjective question. Some physicians may desire a rapid turnaround of patients, which is not always the case in state psychiatric hospitals. Even at discharge, some patients may have low-functioning baselines, requiring guardianship and/or placement in a more supervised setting to ensure they receive the care they need. It is also important to realize these are primarily not voluntary patients, but rather patients committed here involuntarily for treatment due to impaired insight and judgment. At times, the acuity can be high, but the potential for violence is mitigated through comprehensive risk assessments, staff training, and prevention strategies to help ensure patient and staff safety.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a state hospital career?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: I would recommend seeking exposure to working in a state psychiatric hospital early in your training so you can see the daily routine and protocol. It would help to obtain mentorship from a state hospital psychiatrist in the state where you intend to work. Ask as many questions as needed and seek their insight into the challenges and benefits of working there. During training, it’s important to familiarize yourself with managing difficult and refractory cases, and don’t shy away from challenging patients. The next step would be to apply for a position of interest to interview and learn more about the facility and the staff that you will be working with.

Dr. Stanciu: How important is the academic affiliation?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: Very important. Especially during the early phase of your career, it is important to have at your fingertips senior mentors and to be involved in the conferences and CME activities offered. This ensures good quality measures in patient care. The academic affiliation helps keep you up-to-date with advancements and maintains an atmosphere that fosters ongoing learning and the best possible care for your patients. Working with trainees at various levels, such as medical students, residents, and fellows, allows you to maintain an evidence-based practice approach as well as share your knowledge and experience with those in training. Being in this academic setting, you also have the opportunity for involvement in research activities and publications.

Editor’s note: Career Choices is a new feature of Residents’ Voices. It features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths. Future installments will feature interviews with psychiatrists who have focused their careers on consultation-liaison psychiatry, academic psychiatry, rural psychiatry, and other career paths.

In this first Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Samantha Gnanasegaram, MD, a state hospital psychiatrist at New Hampshire Hospital, where she treats severe and chronic mental illness and testifies in various court proceedings.

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started thinking about career options after residency, I knew I wanted to start my career in a facility where I could be challenged, remain up-to-date with the most current evidence-based literature, and have the support and mentorship of seasoned psychiatrists in the field. The opportunity to work under the auspices of a great academic institution with the “bread and butter” of psychiatry reminds me every day why I chose the field in the first place. The often chronic and sometimes refractory cases I encounter daily are extremely thought-provoking, and they motivate me to think and pursue more complex management options. [This setting] also enables me to work closely as [part of] an interdisciplinary team with nursing, social work, and recreational and occupational therapy in ensuring these individuals get the best care and aftercare plans.

We often forget that psychosis often takes weeks to respond [to treatment]. Unfortunately, often in private hospitals, the longer stays that are necessary for patient care are not always possible, leading to premature psychotropic changes and discharge. In this setting, I am able to practice medicine based on what is best for the patient from an evidence-based standpoint. Additionally, being in the state system also allows me to learn first-hand and work closely with the legal system in this state and to testify in various settings to ensure my patients get the best possible care.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: During my residency, I had exposure to the affiliated state psychiatric hospital and spent some time on various units, each geared toward different patient populations. I also became very familiar with a wide range of psychotropics, ranging from first-line to second- and third-tier medications, as well as off-label. The ECT exposure as well as Crisis Prevention Institute training in how to deal with violent and aggressive individuals certainly added extra layers to my proficiency.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This setting is great for someone who likes to be challenged and stay current with literature. Furthermore, this is a great setting for those who are comfortable with the use of medications such as [clozapine] and long-acting injectables, and procedures such as ECT. Additionally, an ideal candidate is someone who understands the chronicity and complexity of mental illness, and has the patience to follow the course and does not rush to make drastic changes or panics at the first sign of a patient taking a step back.

A good candidate also should be comfortable with medical comorbidities, because severe mental illness often leads to poor self-care, diabetes, hypertension, etc., and should be able to work effectively in a team setting and interact with other specialties. State hospital physicians need to be cognizant of outpatient resources available to prevent decompensation in the community and not only focus on acute stabilization. Additionally, this is a great setting for those who enjoy working in an interdisciplinary team and learning from the expertise of different members of a treatment team.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started, the biggest challenge was learning about the differences in practice and legislature in a different state, because all states vary in their involuntary commitment laws, process, and ability to institute forced medications. Learning this as well as how they apply to my practice occurred quicker than I anticipated. As I started practicing, I became more proficient in being able to incorporate the resources I have available.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This is a subjective question. Some physicians may desire a rapid turnaround of patients, which is not always the case in state psychiatric hospitals. Even at discharge, some patients may have low-functioning baselines, requiring guardianship and/or placement in a more supervised setting to ensure they receive the care they need. It is also important to realize these are primarily not voluntary patients, but rather patients committed here involuntarily for treatment due to impaired insight and judgment. At times, the acuity can be high, but the potential for violence is mitigated through comprehensive risk assessments, staff training, and prevention strategies to help ensure patient and staff safety.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a state hospital career?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: I would recommend seeking exposure to working in a state psychiatric hospital early in your training so you can see the daily routine and protocol. It would help to obtain mentorship from a state hospital psychiatrist in the state where you intend to work. Ask as many questions as needed and seek their insight into the challenges and benefits of working there. During training, it’s important to familiarize yourself with managing difficult and refractory cases, and don’t shy away from challenging patients. The next step would be to apply for a position of interest to interview and learn more about the facility and the staff that you will be working with.

Dr. Stanciu: How important is the academic affiliation?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: Very important. Especially during the early phase of your career, it is important to have at your fingertips senior mentors and to be involved in the conferences and CME activities offered. This ensures good quality measures in patient care. The academic affiliation helps keep you up-to-date with advancements and maintains an atmosphere that fosters ongoing learning and the best possible care for your patients. Working with trainees at various levels, such as medical students, residents, and fellows, allows you to maintain an evidence-based practice approach as well as share your knowledge and experience with those in training. Being in this academic setting, you also have the opportunity for involvement in research activities and publications.

Editor’s note: Career Choices is a new feature of Residents’ Voices. It features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths. Future installments will feature interviews with psychiatrists who have focused their careers on consultation-liaison psychiatry, academic psychiatry, rural psychiatry, and other career paths.

In this first Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Samantha Gnanasegaram, MD, a state hospital psychiatrist at New Hampshire Hospital, where she treats severe and chronic mental illness and testifies in various court proceedings.

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started thinking about career options after residency, I knew I wanted to start my career in a facility where I could be challenged, remain up-to-date with the most current evidence-based literature, and have the support and mentorship of seasoned psychiatrists in the field. The opportunity to work under the auspices of a great academic institution with the “bread and butter” of psychiatry reminds me every day why I chose the field in the first place. The often chronic and sometimes refractory cases I encounter daily are extremely thought-provoking, and they motivate me to think and pursue more complex management options. [This setting] also enables me to work closely as [part of] an interdisciplinary team with nursing, social work, and recreational and occupational therapy in ensuring these individuals get the best care and aftercare plans.

We often forget that psychosis often takes weeks to respond [to treatment]. Unfortunately, often in private hospitals, the longer stays that are necessary for patient care are not always possible, leading to premature psychotropic changes and discharge. In this setting, I am able to practice medicine based on what is best for the patient from an evidence-based standpoint. Additionally, being in the state system also allows me to learn first-hand and work closely with the legal system in this state and to testify in various settings to ensure my patients get the best possible care.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a state hospital psychiatrist?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: During my residency, I had exposure to the affiliated state psychiatric hospital and spent some time on various units, each geared toward different patient populations. I also became very familiar with a wide range of psychotropics, ranging from first-line to second- and third-tier medications, as well as off-label. The ECT exposure as well as Crisis Prevention Institute training in how to deal with violent and aggressive individuals certainly added extra layers to my proficiency.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This setting is great for someone who likes to be challenged and stay current with literature. Furthermore, this is a great setting for those who are comfortable with the use of medications such as [clozapine] and long-acting injectables, and procedures such as ECT. Additionally, an ideal candidate is someone who understands the chronicity and complexity of mental illness, and has the patience to follow the course and does not rush to make drastic changes or panics at the first sign of a patient taking a step back.

A good candidate also should be comfortable with medical comorbidities, because severe mental illness often leads to poor self-care, diabetes, hypertension, etc., and should be able to work effectively in a team setting and interact with other specialties. State hospital physicians need to be cognizant of outpatient resources available to prevent decompensation in the community and not only focus on acute stabilization. Additionally, this is a great setting for those who enjoy working in an interdisciplinary team and learning from the expertise of different members of a treatment team.

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: When I started, the biggest challenge was learning about the differences in practice and legislature in a different state, because all states vary in their involuntary commitment laws, process, and ability to institute forced medications. Learning this as well as how they apply to my practice occurred quicker than I anticipated. As I started practicing, I became more proficient in being able to incorporate the resources I have available.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: This is a subjective question. Some physicians may desire a rapid turnaround of patients, which is not always the case in state psychiatric hospitals. Even at discharge, some patients may have low-functioning baselines, requiring guardianship and/or placement in a more supervised setting to ensure they receive the care they need. It is also important to realize these are primarily not voluntary patients, but rather patients committed here involuntarily for treatment due to impaired insight and judgment. At times, the acuity can be high, but the potential for violence is mitigated through comprehensive risk assessments, staff training, and prevention strategies to help ensure patient and staff safety.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a state hospital career?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: I would recommend seeking exposure to working in a state psychiatric hospital early in your training so you can see the daily routine and protocol. It would help to obtain mentorship from a state hospital psychiatrist in the state where you intend to work. Ask as many questions as needed and seek their insight into the challenges and benefits of working there. During training, it’s important to familiarize yourself with managing difficult and refractory cases, and don’t shy away from challenging patients. The next step would be to apply for a position of interest to interview and learn more about the facility and the staff that you will be working with.

Dr. Stanciu: How important is the academic affiliation?

Dr. Gnanasegaram: Very important. Especially during the early phase of your career, it is important to have at your fingertips senior mentors and to be involved in the conferences and CME activities offered. This ensures good quality measures in patient care. The academic affiliation helps keep you up-to-date with advancements and maintains an atmosphere that fosters ongoing learning and the best possible care for your patients. Working with trainees at various levels, such as medical students, residents, and fellows, allows you to maintain an evidence-based practice approach as well as share your knowledge and experience with those in training. Being in this academic setting, you also have the opportunity for involvement in research activities and publications.

As physicians, we are cognizant of the importance of patient-centered care, active listening, empathy, and patience—the so-called “hidden curriculum of medicine.”¹ However, our attempts to centralize these concepts may be overshadowed by the deeply rooted drive to treat and fix. At times, we are simply treating uncertainty, whether it be diagnostic uncertainty or the uncertainty arising from clinical responses and outcomes that are far from binary. Definitive actions, such as adding medications or altering dosages, may appear to both patients and physicians to be a step closer to a “cure.” However, watchful waiting, re-evaluation, and accepting uncertainty are the true skills of effective care.

Be savvy about psychopharmacology

Psychotropics can take weeks to months to reach their full potential, and have varying responses and adverse effects. Beware of changing regimens prematurely, and keep in mind basic, yet crucial, pharma­cokinetic concepts (eg, 4 to 5 half-lives to reach steady state, variations in metabolism). Receptor binding and dosing heuristics are notably common in psychiatry. Although such concepts are important to grasp, there is no one-size-fits-all rule. The brain simply does not possess the heart’s machine-like, linear functioning. Therefore, targeting individual parts (ie, receptors) will not equate to fixing the whole organ systematically or predictably.

Is the patient truly treatment-resistant?

Even the best treatment regimen has no clinical benefit if the patient cannot afford the prescription or does not take the medication. If cost is an impediment, switch from brand name drugs to generic formulations or to older medications in the same class. Before declaring the patient “treatment-resistant” and making medication changes, assess for compliance. This may require assistance from collateral informants. Ask family members to count the number of pills remaining in the bottle, and call the pharmacy to find out the last refill dates. If the patient exhibits a partial response to what should be a therapeutic dose, consider obtaining drug plasma levels to rule out rapid metabolism before deeming the medication trial a failure.²

Medications as liabilities

Overreliance on medications can result in the medications becoming liabilities. The polypharmacy problem is not unique to psychiatry.³ However, psychiatric patients may be more likely to inadvertently use medications in a maladaptive manner and disrupt the fundamental goals of long-term care. Avoid making medication adjustments in response to a patient’s life stressors and normative situational reactions. Doing so is a disservice to patients, because we are robbing them of chances to develop necessary coping skills and defenses. This can be overtly damaging in certain patient populations, such as those with borderline personality disorder, who may use medication adjustments as a crutch during crises.⁴

Treat the patient, not yourself

We physicians mean well in prescribing evidence-based treatments; however, if the symptoms or adverse effects are not bother­some or cause functional impairment, we risk losing sight of the patient’s goals in treatment and imposing our own instead. Displacing the treatment focus can alienate the patient, harm the therapeutic alliance, and result in “pill fatigue.” For example, we may be tempted to treat antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia, even if the patient is not concerned about abnormal movements. Although we see this adverse effect as a secondary problem that necessitates treatment, from the patient’s perspective, taking additional medication may be a far greater burden. The patient’s perception of direct beneficial effects from medications is crucial not only for patient-oriented care but also for adherence.⁵

Change does not happen overnight

Picking a treatment option out of a lineup of choices, à la UWorld questions, does not always translate into patients agreeing with the suggested treatment, let alone the idea of receiving treatment at all. Motivational interviewing is our chance to shine in such situations and the reason why we are physicians, rather than answer-picking bots. Patients cannot change if they are not ready. However, we should be ready to roll with resistance while looking for signs of readiness to change. We must accept that it may take a week, a month, a year, or even longer for patients to align with our plan of action. The only futile decision is deeming our efforts as futile while discounting the benefits of incremental care.

As physicians, we are cognizant of the importance of patient-centered care, active listening, empathy, and patience—the so-called “hidden curriculum of medicine.”¹ However, our attempts to centralize these concepts may be overshadowed by the deeply rooted drive to treat and fix. At times, we are simply treating uncertainty, whether it be diagnostic uncertainty or the uncertainty arising from clinical responses and outcomes that are far from binary. Definitive actions, such as adding medications or altering dosages, may appear to both patients and physicians to be a step closer to a “cure.” However, watchful waiting, re-evaluation, and accepting uncertainty are the true skills of effective care.

Be savvy about psychopharmacology

Psychotropics can take weeks to months to reach their full potential, and have varying responses and adverse effects. Beware of changing regimens prematurely, and keep in mind basic, yet crucial, pharma­cokinetic concepts (eg, 4 to 5 half-lives to reach steady state, variations in metabolism). Receptor binding and dosing heuristics are notably common in psychiatry. Although such concepts are important to grasp, there is no one-size-fits-all rule. The brain simply does not possess the heart’s machine-like, linear functioning. Therefore, targeting individual parts (ie, receptors) will not equate to fixing the whole organ systematically or predictably.

Is the patient truly treatment-resistant?

Even the best treatment regimen has no clinical benefit if the patient cannot afford the prescription or does not take the medication. If cost is an impediment, switch from brand name drugs to generic formulations or to older medications in the same class. Before declaring the patient “treatment-resistant” and making medication changes, assess for compliance. This may require assistance from collateral informants. Ask family members to count the number of pills remaining in the bottle, and call the pharmacy to find out the last refill dates. If the patient exhibits a partial response to what should be a therapeutic dose, consider obtaining drug plasma levels to rule out rapid metabolism before deeming the medication trial a failure.²

Medications as liabilities

Overreliance on medications can result in the medications becoming liabilities. The polypharmacy problem is not unique to psychiatry.³ However, psychiatric patients may be more likely to inadvertently use medications in a maladaptive manner and disrupt the fundamental goals of long-term care. Avoid making medication adjustments in response to a patient’s life stressors and normative situational reactions. Doing so is a disservice to patients, because we are robbing them of chances to develop necessary coping skills and defenses. This can be overtly damaging in certain patient populations, such as those with borderline personality disorder, who may use medication adjustments as a crutch during crises.⁴

Treat the patient, not yourself

We physicians mean well in prescribing evidence-based treatments; however, if the symptoms or adverse effects are not bother­some or cause functional impairment, we risk losing sight of the patient’s goals in treatment and imposing our own instead. Displacing the treatment focus can alienate the patient, harm the therapeutic alliance, and result in “pill fatigue.” For example, we may be tempted to treat antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia, even if the patient is not concerned about abnormal movements. Although we see this adverse effect as a secondary problem that necessitates treatment, from the patient’s perspective, taking additional medication may be a far greater burden. The patient’s perception of direct beneficial effects from medications is crucial not only for patient-oriented care but also for adherence.⁵

Change does not happen overnight

Picking a treatment option out of a lineup of choices, à la UWorld questions, does not always translate into patients agreeing with the suggested treatment, let alone the idea of receiving treatment at all. Motivational interviewing is our chance to shine in such situations and the reason why we are physicians, rather than answer-picking bots. Patients cannot change if they are not ready. However, we should be ready to roll with resistance while looking for signs of readiness to change. We must accept that it may take a week, a month, a year, or even longer for patients to align with our plan of action. The only futile decision is deeming our efforts as futile while discounting the benefits of incremental care.

As physicians, we are cognizant of the importance of patient-centered care, active listening, empathy, and patience—the so-called “hidden curriculum of medicine.”¹ However, our attempts to centralize these concepts may be overshadowed by the deeply rooted drive to treat and fix. At times, we are simply treating uncertainty, whether it be diagnostic uncertainty or the uncertainty arising from clinical responses and outcomes that are far from binary. Definitive actions, such as adding medications or altering dosages, may appear to both patients and physicians to be a step closer to a “cure.” However, watchful waiting, re-evaluation, and accepting uncertainty are the true skills of effective care.

Be savvy about psychopharmacology

Psychotropics can take weeks to months to reach their full potential, and have varying responses and adverse effects. Beware of changing regimens prematurely, and keep in mind basic, yet crucial, pharma­cokinetic concepts (eg, 4 to 5 half-lives to reach steady state, variations in metabolism). Receptor binding and dosing heuristics are notably common in psychiatry. Although such concepts are important to grasp, there is no one-size-fits-all rule. The brain simply does not possess the heart’s machine-like, linear functioning. Therefore, targeting individual parts (ie, receptors) will not equate to fixing the whole organ systematically or predictably.

Is the patient truly treatment-resistant?

Even the best treatment regimen has no clinical benefit if the patient cannot afford the prescription or does not take the medication. If cost is an impediment, switch from brand name drugs to generic formulations or to older medications in the same class. Before declaring the patient “treatment-resistant” and making medication changes, assess for compliance. This may require assistance from collateral informants. Ask family members to count the number of pills remaining in the bottle, and call the pharmacy to find out the last refill dates. If the patient exhibits a partial response to what should be a therapeutic dose, consider obtaining drug plasma levels to rule out rapid metabolism before deeming the medication trial a failure.²

Medications as liabilities

Overreliance on medications can result in the medications becoming liabilities. The polypharmacy problem is not unique to psychiatry.³ However, psychiatric patients may be more likely to inadvertently use medications in a maladaptive manner and disrupt the fundamental goals of long-term care. Avoid making medication adjustments in response to a patient’s life stressors and normative situational reactions. Doing so is a disservice to patients, because we are robbing them of chances to develop necessary coping skills and defenses. This can be overtly damaging in certain patient populations, such as those with borderline personality disorder, who may use medication adjustments as a crutch during crises.⁴

Treat the patient, not yourself

We physicians mean well in prescribing evidence-based treatments; however, if the symptoms or adverse effects are not bother­some or cause functional impairment, we risk losing sight of the patient’s goals in treatment and imposing our own instead. Displacing the treatment focus can alienate the patient, harm the therapeutic alliance, and result in “pill fatigue.” For example, we may be tempted to treat antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia, even if the patient is not concerned about abnormal movements. Although we see this adverse effect as a secondary problem that necessitates treatment, from the patient’s perspective, taking additional medication may be a far greater burden. The patient’s perception of direct beneficial effects from medications is crucial not only for patient-oriented care but also for adherence.⁵

Change does not happen overnight

Picking a treatment option out of a lineup of choices, à la UWorld questions, does not always translate into patients agreeing with the suggested treatment, let alone the idea of receiving treatment at all. Motivational interviewing is our chance to shine in such situations and the reason why we are physicians, rather than answer-picking bots. Patients cannot change if they are not ready. However, we should be ready to roll with resistance while looking for signs of readiness to change. We must accept that it may take a week, a month, a year, or even longer for patients to align with our plan of action. The only futile decision is deeming our efforts as futile while discounting the benefits of incremental care.

Cognitive reappraisal is a top-down emotional regulation skill associated with resilience – the capacity to adaptively overcome adversity.

A person with this ability, also known as cognitive flexibility or reframing, monitors negative thoughts or situations and intentionally changes the way he or she views them. This reframing can involve retaining a positive outlook, trying to create meaning from a difficult situation, or finding ways to exert control over specific circumstances (Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Feb 15;7:10). Some individuals cope with their mental illness by creating their own models of their illness (Achieving Cultural Competency: A Case-Based Approach to Training Health Professionals, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2009).

Creating a model of illness is a type of reframing to help explain what’s happening to an individual by placing the locus of control either inside our ourselves, adjacent, or far away and uncontrollable. Depending on the model, there might be choice that results in action taken to face the mental illness. Sometimes, there is surrender, either to the illness or the treatment.

I asked my friend from home and my brother for their permission and sent them this piece to make sure they approved. I changed certain details about Ricardo’s story to protect his identity. With my brother, there was no way to change his identity, but he was touched and happy to be included. I also changed key facts about the patient I called Laura.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at George Washington University. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

Cognitive reappraisal is a top-down emotional regulation skill associated with resilience – the capacity to adaptively overcome adversity.

A person with this ability, also known as cognitive flexibility or reframing, monitors negative thoughts or situations and intentionally changes the way he or she views them. This reframing can involve retaining a positive outlook, trying to create meaning from a difficult situation, or finding ways to exert control over specific circumstances (Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Feb 15;7:10). Some individuals cope with their mental illness by creating their own models of their illness (Achieving Cultural Competency: A Case-Based Approach to Training Health Professionals, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2009).

Creating a model of illness is a type of reframing to help explain what’s happening to an individual by placing the locus of control either inside our ourselves, adjacent, or far away and uncontrollable. Depending on the model, there might be choice that results in action taken to face the mental illness. Sometimes, there is surrender, either to the illness or the treatment.

I asked my friend from home and my brother for their permission and sent them this piece to make sure they approved. I changed certain details about Ricardo’s story to protect his identity. With my brother, there was no way to change his identity, but he was touched and happy to be included. I also changed key facts about the patient I called Laura.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at George Washington University. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

Cognitive reappraisal is a top-down emotional regulation skill associated with resilience – the capacity to adaptively overcome adversity.

A person with this ability, also known as cognitive flexibility or reframing, monitors negative thoughts or situations and intentionally changes the way he or she views them. This reframing can involve retaining a positive outlook, trying to create meaning from a difficult situation, or finding ways to exert control over specific circumstances (Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Feb 15;7:10). Some individuals cope with their mental illness by creating their own models of their illness (Achieving Cultural Competency: A Case-Based Approach to Training Health Professionals, Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 2009).

Creating a model of illness is a type of reframing to help explain what’s happening to an individual by placing the locus of control either inside our ourselves, adjacent, or far away and uncontrollable. Depending on the model, there might be choice that results in action taken to face the mental illness. Sometimes, there is surrender, either to the illness or the treatment.

I asked my friend from home and my brother for their permission and sent them this piece to make sure they approved. I changed certain details about Ricardo’s story to protect his identity. With my brother, there was no way to change his identity, but he was touched and happy to be included. I also changed key facts about the patient I called Laura.

Dr. Posada is a third-year resident in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department at George Washington University, Washington. She completed a bachelor’s degree at George Washington University. For 2 years after her undergraduate education, she worked at the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases studying HIV pathogenesis. Dr. Posada completed her medical degree at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. Her interests include public psychiatry, health care policy, and health disparities, and she plans to pursue a fellowship in consult liaison psychiatry.

As psychiatrists, we do not often encounter situations in which we need to inform patients and their families that they have a life-threatening diagnosis. Nonetheless, on the rare occasions when we work with such patients, new psychiatrists may find their clinical skills challenged. Breaking bad news remains an aspect of clinical training that is often overlooked by medical schools.

Here I present a case that illustrates the challenges residents and medical students face when they need to deliver bad news and review the current literature on how to present patients with this type of information.

Case
Bizarre behavior, difficult diagnosis

Mr. C, age 59, with a 1-year history of major depressive disorder, was brought to the emergency department by his wife for worsening depression and disorganized behavior over the course of 3 weeks. Mr. C had obsessive thoughts about arranging things in symmetrical patterns, difficulty sleeping, loss of appetite, and anhedonia. His wife reported that his bizarre, disorganized behavior further intensified in the previous week; he was urinating on the rug, rubbing his genitals against the bathroom counter, staring into space without moving for prolonged periods of time, and arranging his food in symmetrical patterns. Mr. C has no reported substance use or suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Strategies for delivering bad news

Initially, I struggled when I realized I would have to deliver the news of this potentially life-threatening diagnosis to the patient and his wife because I had not received any training on how to do so. However, I took time to look into the literature and used the skills that we as psychiatrists have, including empathy, listening, and validation. My experience with Mr. C and his family made me realize that delivering bad news with empathy and being involved in the struggle that follows can make a significant difference to their suffering.

There are various models and techniques for breaking bad news to patients. Two of the most commonly used models in the oncology setting are the SPIKES (Set up, Perception, Interview, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategize and Summarize) model (Table 1²) and Kaye’s model (Table 2³).

• Choose a setting with adequate privacy, use simple language that distills medical facts into appreciable pieces of information, and give the recipients ample space and time to process the implications. Doing so will foster better understanding and facilitate their acceptance of the bad news.
• Although physicians can rarely appreciate the patient’s feelings at a personal level, make every effort to validate their thoughts and offer emotional support. In such situations, it is often appropriate to move closer to the recipient and make brief physical gestures, such as laying a hand on the shoulder, which might comfort them.
• In the aftermath of such encounters, it is important to remain active in the patient’s emotional journey and available for further clarification, which can mitigate uncertainties and facilitate the difficult process of coming to terms with new realities.^4,5

As psychiatrists, we do not often encounter situations in which we need to inform patients and their families that they have a life-threatening diagnosis. Nonetheless, on the rare occasions when we work with such patients, new psychiatrists may find their clinical skills challenged. Breaking bad news remains an aspect of clinical training that is often overlooked by medical schools.

Here I present a case that illustrates the challenges residents and medical students face when they need to deliver bad news and review the current literature on how to present patients with this type of information.

Case
Bizarre behavior, difficult diagnosis

Mr. C, age 59, with a 1-year history of major depressive disorder, was brought to the emergency department by his wife for worsening depression and disorganized behavior over the course of 3 weeks. Mr. C had obsessive thoughts about arranging things in symmetrical patterns, difficulty sleeping, loss of appetite, and anhedonia. His wife reported that his bizarre, disorganized behavior further intensified in the previous week; he was urinating on the rug, rubbing his genitals against the bathroom counter, staring into space without moving for prolonged periods of time, and arranging his food in symmetrical patterns. Mr. C has no reported substance use or suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Strategies for delivering bad news

Initially, I struggled when I realized I would have to deliver the news of this potentially life-threatening diagnosis to the patient and his wife because I had not received any training on how to do so. However, I took time to look into the literature and used the skills that we as psychiatrists have, including empathy, listening, and validation. My experience with Mr. C and his family made me realize that delivering bad news with empathy and being involved in the struggle that follows can make a significant difference to their suffering.

There are various models and techniques for breaking bad news to patients. Two of the most commonly used models in the oncology setting are the SPIKES (Set up, Perception, Interview, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategize and Summarize) model (Table 1²) and Kaye’s model (Table 2³).

• Choose a setting with adequate privacy, use simple language that distills medical facts into appreciable pieces of information, and give the recipients ample space and time to process the implications. Doing so will foster better understanding and facilitate their acceptance of the bad news.
• Although physicians can rarely appreciate the patient’s feelings at a personal level, make every effort to validate their thoughts and offer emotional support. In such situations, it is often appropriate to move closer to the recipient and make brief physical gestures, such as laying a hand on the shoulder, which might comfort them.
• In the aftermath of such encounters, it is important to remain active in the patient’s emotional journey and available for further clarification, which can mitigate uncertainties and facilitate the difficult process of coming to terms with new realities.^4,5

As psychiatrists, we do not often encounter situations in which we need to inform patients and their families that they have a life-threatening diagnosis. Nonetheless, on the rare occasions when we work with such patients, new psychiatrists may find their clinical skills challenged. Breaking bad news remains an aspect of clinical training that is often overlooked by medical schools.

Here I present a case that illustrates the challenges residents and medical students face when they need to deliver bad news and review the current literature on how to present patients with this type of information.

Case
Bizarre behavior, difficult diagnosis

Mr. C, age 59, with a 1-year history of major depressive disorder, was brought to the emergency department by his wife for worsening depression and disorganized behavior over the course of 3 weeks. Mr. C had obsessive thoughts about arranging things in symmetrical patterns, difficulty sleeping, loss of appetite, and anhedonia. His wife reported that his bizarre, disorganized behavior further intensified in the previous week; he was urinating on the rug, rubbing his genitals against the bathroom counter, staring into space without moving for prolonged periods of time, and arranging his food in symmetrical patterns. Mr. C has no reported substance use or suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Strategies for delivering bad news

Initially, I struggled when I realized I would have to deliver the news of this potentially life-threatening diagnosis to the patient and his wife because I had not received any training on how to do so. However, I took time to look into the literature and used the skills that we as psychiatrists have, including empathy, listening, and validation. My experience with Mr. C and his family made me realize that delivering bad news with empathy and being involved in the struggle that follows can make a significant difference to their suffering.

There are various models and techniques for breaking bad news to patients. Two of the most commonly used models in the oncology setting are the SPIKES (Set up, Perception, Interview, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategize and Summarize) model (Table 1²) and Kaye’s model (Table 2³).

• Choose a setting with adequate privacy, use simple language that distills medical facts into appreciable pieces of information, and give the recipients ample space and time to process the implications. Doing so will foster better understanding and facilitate their acceptance of the bad news.
• Although physicians can rarely appreciate the patient’s feelings at a personal level, make every effort to validate their thoughts and offer emotional support. In such situations, it is often appropriate to move closer to the recipient and make brief physical gestures, such as laying a hand on the shoulder, which might comfort them.
• In the aftermath of such encounters, it is important to remain active in the patient’s emotional journey and available for further clarification, which can mitigate uncertainties and facilitate the difficult process of coming to terms with new realities.^4,5