Atopic Dermatitis

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) does not have a significant association with the development of photodermatoses, including photosensitivity, photoallergy, and contact allergy.

Major finding: Of the phototested patients, 23 had a history of AD, of whom 52.2% were photosensitive and 34.8% were photopatch test-positive. Phototested patients with and without AD showed no significant differences in terms of the development of photosensitivity (P = .61), photoallergy (P = .25), or contact allergy (P = .74).

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 101 patients with or without a history of AD who were tested for sensitivity to UV-A, UV-B, and visible light, followed by photopatch or contact patch testing if photoallergy or simple contact dermatitis was suspected.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Afvari S and Zippin JH. Photodermatoses in patients with atopic dermatitis: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Feb 18). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.032 Source

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) does not have a significant association with the development of photodermatoses, including photosensitivity, photoallergy, and contact allergy.

Major finding: Of the phototested patients, 23 had a history of AD, of whom 52.2% were photosensitive and 34.8% were photopatch test-positive. Phototested patients with and without AD showed no significant differences in terms of the development of photosensitivity (P = .61), photoallergy (P = .25), or contact allergy (P = .74).

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 101 patients with or without a history of AD who were tested for sensitivity to UV-A, UV-B, and visible light, followed by photopatch or contact patch testing if photoallergy or simple contact dermatitis was suspected.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Afvari S and Zippin JH. Photodermatoses in patients with atopic dermatitis: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Feb 18). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.032 Source

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) does not have a significant association with the development of photodermatoses, including photosensitivity, photoallergy, and contact allergy.

Major finding: Of the phototested patients, 23 had a history of AD, of whom 52.2% were photosensitive and 34.8% were photopatch test-positive. Phototested patients with and without AD showed no significant differences in terms of the development of photosensitivity (P = .61), photoallergy (P = .25), or contact allergy (P = .74).

Study details: Findings are from a 10-year retrospective cohort study including 101 patients with or without a history of AD who were tested for sensitivity to UV-A, UV-B, and visible light, followed by photopatch or contact patch testing if photoallergy or simple contact dermatitis was suspected.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Afvari S and Zippin JH. Photodermatoses in patients with atopic dermatitis: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Feb 18). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.032 Source

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to rapid and significant improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms in children, including those who failed to attain clear or almost clear skin according to Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA).

Major finding: At week 16, the composite endpoint, including ≥50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores, was achieved by significantly more children receiving dupilumab vs placebo in the overall group (77.7% vs 24.6%; P < .0001) and the subgroup with an IGA score > 1 (68.9% vs 21.5%; P < .0001). Significant improvements were observed as early as week 2.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (Part B) included 162 children age 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo and low-potency topical corticosteroids, of whom 136 had an IGA score > 1.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Three authors reported being employees of or owning stocks or stock options in Sanofi or Regeneron. The remaining authors reported receiving grants from or having other ties with Sanofi, Regeneron, or others.

Source: Cork MJ, Lockshin B, Pinter A, et al. Clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab among children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin according to the investigator's global assessment: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 12). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.13467 Source

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to rapid and significant improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms in children, including those who failed to attain clear or almost clear skin according to Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA).

Major finding: At week 16, the composite endpoint, including ≥50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores, was achieved by significantly more children receiving dupilumab vs placebo in the overall group (77.7% vs 24.6%; P < .0001) and the subgroup with an IGA score > 1 (68.9% vs 21.5%; P < .0001). Significant improvements were observed as early as week 2.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (Part B) included 162 children age 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo and low-potency topical corticosteroids, of whom 136 had an IGA score > 1.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Three authors reported being employees of or owning stocks or stock options in Sanofi or Regeneron. The remaining authors reported receiving grants from or having other ties with Sanofi, Regeneron, or others.

Source: Cork MJ, Lockshin B, Pinter A, et al. Clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab among children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin according to the investigator's global assessment: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 12). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.13467 Source

Key clinical point: Dupilumab led to rapid and significant improvements in atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms in children, including those who failed to attain clear or almost clear skin according to Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA).

Major finding: At week 16, the composite endpoint, including ≥50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index scores, was achieved by significantly more children receiving dupilumab vs placebo in the overall group (77.7% vs 24.6%; P < .0001) and the subgroup with an IGA score > 1 (68.9% vs 21.5%; P < .0001). Significant improvements were observed as early as week 2.

Study details: This post hoc analysis of LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL (Part B) included 162 children age 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo and low-potency topical corticosteroids, of whom 136 had an IGA score > 1.

Disclosures: This study was sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. Three authors reported being employees of or owning stocks or stock options in Sanofi or Regeneron. The remaining authors reported receiving grants from or having other ties with Sanofi, Regeneron, or others.

Source: Cork MJ, Lockshin B, Pinter A, et al. Clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab among children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis who did not achieve clear or almost clear skin according to the investigator's global assessment: A post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 (Feb 12). doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.13467 Source

Key clinical point: Both the age of onset and persistence of atopic dermatitis (AD) are differentially associated with the expression and progression of other atopic diseases during childhood.

Major finding: Children who developed AD at 1 year of age (persistent AD) showed significantly higher rates of food allergy (P = .004), asthma (P < .001), and self-reported rhinitis (P < .001) during childhood compared with children without AD at age 1 year (none/intermittent AD [never had AD or had an intermittent course] or late-onset AD [onset from 4-6 years of age]).

Study details: This study included 285 children from the Childhood Origins of ASThma cohort with a history of physician-diagnosed asthma or respiratory allergies who were followed up to 18 years of age and categorized based on AD phenotypes into none/intermittent (n = 180), late-onset (n = 38), or persistent (n = 67) AD groups.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Two authors declared receiving funding from or having other ties with various sources, including NIH.

Source: Taki MH, Lee KE, Gangnon R, et al. Atopic dermatitis phenotypes impact expression of atopic diseases despite similar mononuclear cell cytokine responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 2). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.015 Source

Key clinical point: Both the age of onset and persistence of atopic dermatitis (AD) are differentially associated with the expression and progression of other atopic diseases during childhood.

Major finding: Children who developed AD at 1 year of age (persistent AD) showed significantly higher rates of food allergy (P = .004), asthma (P < .001), and self-reported rhinitis (P < .001) during childhood compared with children without AD at age 1 year (none/intermittent AD [never had AD or had an intermittent course] or late-onset AD [onset from 4-6 years of age]).

Study details: This study included 285 children from the Childhood Origins of ASThma cohort with a history of physician-diagnosed asthma or respiratory allergies who were followed up to 18 years of age and categorized based on AD phenotypes into none/intermittent (n = 180), late-onset (n = 38), or persistent (n = 67) AD groups.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Two authors declared receiving funding from or having other ties with various sources, including NIH.

Source: Taki MH, Lee KE, Gangnon R, et al. Atopic dermatitis phenotypes impact expression of atopic diseases despite similar mononuclear cell cytokine responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 2). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.015 Source

Key clinical point: Both the age of onset and persistence of atopic dermatitis (AD) are differentially associated with the expression and progression of other atopic diseases during childhood.

Major finding: Children who developed AD at 1 year of age (persistent AD) showed significantly higher rates of food allergy (P = .004), asthma (P < .001), and self-reported rhinitis (P < .001) during childhood compared with children without AD at age 1 year (none/intermittent AD [never had AD or had an intermittent course] or late-onset AD [onset from 4-6 years of age]).

Study details: This study included 285 children from the Childhood Origins of ASThma cohort with a history of physician-diagnosed asthma or respiratory allergies who were followed up to 18 years of age and categorized based on AD phenotypes into none/intermittent (n = 180), late-onset (n = 38), or persistent (n = 67) AD groups.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Two authors declared receiving funding from or having other ties with various sources, including NIH.

Source: Taki MH, Lee KE, Gangnon R, et al. Atopic dermatitis phenotypes impact expression of atopic diseases despite similar mononuclear cell cytokine responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 (Mar 2). doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.015 Source

Key clinical point: Children who later developed atopic dermatitis (AD) had a delayed maturation of the skin microbiome and increased levels of proinflammatory stratum corneum biomarkers before AD onset.

Major finding: Children who did vs did not develop AD later had significantly increased levels of stratum corneum biomarkers (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, interleukin-18, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin-22, etc.; all P ≤ .01) and greater variance over time in the most abundant 14 core amplicon sequence variants (P = .04), indicating delayed establishment of a stable skin microbiome.

Study details: This study longitudinally analyzed the epidermal biomarker levels and microbiome profiles of 50 children who were at a high risk for AD from a previous randomized study, of whom 26% of children developed AD up to month 24.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the BIOMAP project, LA ROCHE-POSAY Laboratoire Pharmaceutique, France, and others. Four authors declared receiving institutional research grants, honoraria for consulting, etc., from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Fonfara M, Hartmann J, Stölzl D, et al. Stratum corneum and microbial biomarkers precede and characterize childhood atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19932 Source

Key clinical point: Children who later developed atopic dermatitis (AD) had a delayed maturation of the skin microbiome and increased levels of proinflammatory stratum corneum biomarkers before AD onset.

Major finding: Children who did vs did not develop AD later had significantly increased levels of stratum corneum biomarkers (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, interleukin-18, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin-22, etc.; all P ≤ .01) and greater variance over time in the most abundant 14 core amplicon sequence variants (P = .04), indicating delayed establishment of a stable skin microbiome.

Study details: This study longitudinally analyzed the epidermal biomarker levels and microbiome profiles of 50 children who were at a high risk for AD from a previous randomized study, of whom 26% of children developed AD up to month 24.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the BIOMAP project, LA ROCHE-POSAY Laboratoire Pharmaceutique, France, and others. Four authors declared receiving institutional research grants, honoraria for consulting, etc., from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Fonfara M, Hartmann J, Stölzl D, et al. Stratum corneum and microbial biomarkers precede and characterize childhood atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19932 Source

Key clinical point: Children who later developed atopic dermatitis (AD) had a delayed maturation of the skin microbiome and increased levels of proinflammatory stratum corneum biomarkers before AD onset.

Major finding: Children who did vs did not develop AD later had significantly increased levels of stratum corneum biomarkers (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, interleukin-18, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interleukin-22, etc.; all P ≤ .01) and greater variance over time in the most abundant 14 core amplicon sequence variants (P = .04), indicating delayed establishment of a stable skin microbiome.

Study details: This study longitudinally analyzed the epidermal biomarker levels and microbiome profiles of 50 children who were at a high risk for AD from a previous randomized study, of whom 26% of children developed AD up to month 24.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the BIOMAP project, LA ROCHE-POSAY Laboratoire Pharmaceutique, France, and others. Four authors declared receiving institutional research grants, honoraria for consulting, etc., from or having other ties with various sources.

Source: Fonfara M, Hartmann J, Stölzl D, et al. Stratum corneum and microbial biomarkers precede and characterize childhood atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Feb 29). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19932 Source

Key clinical point: The presence of atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms in children during early life is associated with increased likelihood of pain at 10 years of age, suggesting a prospective influence of AD on pain experiences in children.

Major finding: Children with AD-like symptoms at 6 and 15 months of age had a significantly higher risk of reporting any pain (relative risk [RR] 1.75; 95% CI 1.15-2.66) and multisite pain (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.37), respectively, at age 10 years.

Study details: This prospective study analyzed the data of 1302 and 874 children from the Generation XXI birth cohort for AD-like symptoms at ages 6 months and 15 months, respectively, by interviewing parents; data on pain history in the last 3 months at age 10 years was collected using structured questionnaires for parents and children.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund, through COMPETE 2020 Operational Programme 'Competitiveness and Internationalization,' projects at the Univeridade do Porto, Portugal, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gorito V, Brandão M, Azevedo I, et al. Atopic dermatitis in early life and pain at 10 years of age: An exploratory study. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05439-0 Source

Key clinical point: The presence of atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms in children during early life is associated with increased likelihood of pain at 10 years of age, suggesting a prospective influence of AD on pain experiences in children.

Major finding: Children with AD-like symptoms at 6 and 15 months of age had a significantly higher risk of reporting any pain (relative risk [RR] 1.75; 95% CI 1.15-2.66) and multisite pain (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.37), respectively, at age 10 years.

Study details: This prospective study analyzed the data of 1302 and 874 children from the Generation XXI birth cohort for AD-like symptoms at ages 6 months and 15 months, respectively, by interviewing parents; data on pain history in the last 3 months at age 10 years was collected using structured questionnaires for parents and children.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund, through COMPETE 2020 Operational Programme 'Competitiveness and Internationalization,' projects at the Univeridade do Porto, Portugal, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gorito V, Brandão M, Azevedo I, et al. Atopic dermatitis in early life and pain at 10 years of age: An exploratory study. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05439-0 Source

Key clinical point: The presence of atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms in children during early life is associated with increased likelihood of pain at 10 years of age, suggesting a prospective influence of AD on pain experiences in children.

Major finding: Children with AD-like symptoms at 6 and 15 months of age had a significantly higher risk of reporting any pain (relative risk [RR] 1.75; 95% CI 1.15-2.66) and multisite pain (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.37), respectively, at age 10 years.

Study details: This prospective study analyzed the data of 1302 and 874 children from the Generation XXI birth cohort for AD-like symptoms at ages 6 months and 15 months, respectively, by interviewing parents; data on pain history in the last 3 months at age 10 years was collected using structured questionnaires for parents and children.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund, through COMPETE 2020 Operational Programme 'Competitiveness and Internationalization,' projects at the Univeridade do Porto, Portugal, and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Gorito V, Brandão M, Azevedo I, et al. Atopic dermatitis in early life and pain at 10 years of age: An exploratory study. Eur J Pediatr. 2024 (Feb 24). doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05439-0 Source

Key clinical point: Topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient (strain CX) demonstrated superior efficacy in improving disease activity outcomes and a tolerable safety profile in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 8, a higher percentage of patients in the topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient vs placebo group (41.5% vs 12.1%; P = .005) achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 and a reduction of ≥1 point from baseline. No significant safety issues were identified during the study.

Study details: Findings are from a proof-of-concept trial including 98 patients with mild-to-moderate AD (age 12-70 years) who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daily topical 1.0% Strain CX postbiotic emollient (n = 65) or placebo (n = 33) for 8 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government and Cosmax BTI. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim MS, Kim HJ, Kang SM, Heo YM, Kang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Allergy. 2024 (Mar 4). doi: 10.1111/all.16077 Source

Key clinical point: Topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient (strain CX) demonstrated superior efficacy in improving disease activity outcomes and a tolerable safety profile in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 8, a higher percentage of patients in the topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient vs placebo group (41.5% vs 12.1%; P = .005) achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 and a reduction of ≥1 point from baseline. No significant safety issues were identified during the study.

Study details: Findings are from a proof-of-concept trial including 98 patients with mild-to-moderate AD (age 12-70 years) who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daily topical 1.0% Strain CX postbiotic emollient (n = 65) or placebo (n = 33) for 8 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government and Cosmax BTI. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim MS, Kim HJ, Kang SM, Heo YM, Kang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Allergy. 2024 (Mar 4). doi: 10.1111/all.16077 Source

Key clinical point: Topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient (strain CX) demonstrated superior efficacy in improving disease activity outcomes and a tolerable safety profile in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD).

Major finding: At week 8, a higher percentage of patients in the topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient vs placebo group (41.5% vs 12.1%; P = .005) achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 and a reduction of ≥1 point from baseline. No significant safety issues were identified during the study.

Study details: Findings are from a proof-of-concept trial including 98 patients with mild-to-moderate AD (age 12-70 years) who were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive daily topical 1.0% Strain CX postbiotic emollient (n = 65) or placebo (n = 33) for 8 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government and Cosmax BTI. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kim MS, Kim HJ, Kang SM, Heo YM, Kang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical Streptococcus postbiotic emollient in adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial. Allergy. 2024 (Mar 4). doi: 10.1111/all.16077 Source

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive impairment symptoms involving difficulties in learning or memory, especially in children with neurodevelopmental comorbidities, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or learning disability.

Major finding: A significantly greater number of children with vs without AD experienced difficulties with learning (10.8% vs 5.9%) and memory (11.1% vs 5.8%; both P < .001). However, this association was observed only in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (adjusted odds ratio 2.26; 95% CI 1.43-3.57) including ADHD or learning disabilities.

Study details: This cross-sectional study analyzed the data of 7957 children, representing a weighted total of 69,732,807 children without intellectual disabilities from the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey who did (n = 9,223,013) or did not (n = 60,509,794) have AD. The survey randomly selects 1 child per surveyed household for whom a parent or adult caregiver provides information.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a grant to Joy Wan from the US National Institutes of Health. Joy Wan also declared receiving a grant and personal fees from various pharmaceutical companies. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma EZ, Chang HR, Radtke S, Wan J. Symptoms of cognitive impairment among children with atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 (Mar 6). doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0015 Source

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive impairment symptoms involving difficulties in learning or memory, especially in children with neurodevelopmental comorbidities, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or learning disability.

Major finding: A significantly greater number of children with vs without AD experienced difficulties with learning (10.8% vs 5.9%) and memory (11.1% vs 5.8%; both P < .001). However, this association was observed only in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (adjusted odds ratio 2.26; 95% CI 1.43-3.57) including ADHD or learning disabilities.

Study details: This cross-sectional study analyzed the data of 7957 children, representing a weighted total of 69,732,807 children without intellectual disabilities from the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey who did (n = 9,223,013) or did not (n = 60,509,794) have AD. The survey randomly selects 1 child per surveyed household for whom a parent or adult caregiver provides information.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a grant to Joy Wan from the US National Institutes of Health. Joy Wan also declared receiving a grant and personal fees from various pharmaceutical companies. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma EZ, Chang HR, Radtke S, Wan J. Symptoms of cognitive impairment among children with atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 (Mar 6). doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0015 Source

Key clinical point: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive impairment symptoms involving difficulties in learning or memory, especially in children with neurodevelopmental comorbidities, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or learning disability.

Major finding: A significantly greater number of children with vs without AD experienced difficulties with learning (10.8% vs 5.9%) and memory (11.1% vs 5.8%; both P < .001). However, this association was observed only in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (adjusted odds ratio 2.26; 95% CI 1.43-3.57) including ADHD or learning disabilities.

Study details: This cross-sectional study analyzed the data of 7957 children, representing a weighted total of 69,732,807 children without intellectual disabilities from the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey who did (n = 9,223,013) or did not (n = 60,509,794) have AD. The survey randomly selects 1 child per surveyed household for whom a parent or adult caregiver provides information.

Disclosures: This study was supported by a grant to Joy Wan from the US National Institutes of Health. Joy Wan also declared receiving a grant and personal fees from various pharmaceutical companies. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Ma EZ, Chang HR, Radtke S, Wan J. Symptoms of cognitive impairment among children with atopic dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 (Mar 6). doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.0015 Source

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is as safe and effective for high-risk older children and adolescents as oral immunotherapy (OIT) is for infants and preschoolers, according to new research.

Preliminary data from a study of more than 180 pediatric patients with multiple food allergies showed that while most patients had mild symptoms, none experienced a severe grade 4 reaction during the buildup and maintenance phase of SLIT.

In addition, 70% of those tested at the end of the treatment protocol were able to tolerate 300 mg of their allergen, a success rate nearly as high as that for OIT.

The study was published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.

SLIT has been used successfully in the treatment of environmental allergens such as grass and tree pollen and dust mites. In this study, researchers decided to test SLIT’s effectiveness and safety in the treatment of food allergies in older children.

“We knew that OIT is very effective and safe in infants and toddlers, but there was literature illustrating that for older, school-age kids and adolescents, OIT is not safe enough, as those older age groups tend to have higher risk of severe reaction during treatment,” senior author Edmond Chan, MD, clinical professor of allergy at the University of British Columbia and pediatric allergist at BC Children’s Hospital, both in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, told this news organization. “With that knowledge, we decided to explore SLIT as another first-phase therapy for the older kids.”

The investigators recruited 188 high-risk older children aged 4-18 years for multifood SLIT. Most (61.7%) participants had multiple food allergies. Approximately 68% were male, and the population’s median age was 11.3 years.

Nearly half (48.4%) of participants had atopic dermatitis, 45.2% had asthma, 58.0% had allergic rhinitis, and 2.66% had preexisting eosinophilic esophagitis.

Most (75.0%) of the children were classified as higher risk, and 23 had a history of a grade 3 or 4 reaction before beginning SLIT.

Of the 188 children who were initially enrolled in the study, 173 (92.0%) finished their SLIT buildup phase.

Because the study started when COVID-19 pandemic restrictions were in place, the SLIT protocol mandated that patients be seen virtually. The patients’ caregivers learned how to mix and administer the required doses at home using recipes specially developed by the research team that used products bought at the grocery store.

A wide variety of food allergens were treated, including peanut, other legumes, tree nuts, sesame, other seeds, egg, cow’s milk, fish, wheat, shrimp, and other allergens.

The children built up to 2-mg protein SLIT maintenance over the course of three to five visits under nurse supervision.

After 1-2 years of daily SLIT maintenance, patients were offered a low-dose oral food challenge (OFC; cumulative dose: 300 mg of protein) with the goal of bypassing OIT buildup.

Nearly all patients (93.1%) had symptoms during SLIT buildup, but most were mild grade 1 (52.1%) or 2 (40.4%) reactions. Only one patient had a grade 3 reaction. None of the patients experienced a severe grade 4 reaction.

The most common grade 1 reaction was oral itch, an expected symptom of SLIT, which occurred in 82.7% of the patients.

Four patients (2.10%) received epinephrine during buildup and went to the emergency department. All these patients returned to continue SLIT without further need for epinephrine.

To test the effectiveness of SLIT, the researchers performed 50 low-dose OFCs in 20 patients. Of these food challenges, 35 (70%) were successful, and patients were asked to start daily 300-mg OIT maintenance, thus bypassing OIT buildup.

An additional nine OFCs that were unsuccessful were counseled to self-escalate from 80 mg or higher to 300 mg at home with medical guidance as needed.

“Our preliminary data of 20 patients and 50 low-dose oral food challenges suggest that an initial phase of 1-2 years of 2-mg daily SLIT therapy may be a safe and effective way to bypass the OIT buildup phase without the need for dozens of in-person visits with an allergist,” said Dr. Chan.

“So now we have the best of both worlds. We harness the safety of SLIT for the first 1-2 years, with the effectiveness of OIT for the remainder of the treatment period,” he said.
 

Adds to Evidence

Commenting on the study for this news organization, Julia Upton, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, said, “This study adds to the evidence that consistent, low exposure to food drives meaningful desensitization far above the daily dose.” Upton did not participate in the research.

“Prior prospective studies in SLIT demonstrated that small single-digit-milligram doses and time greatly increased the threshold of reaction. This real-world report suggests that a way to utilize that threshold increase is by switching to a commonly used maintenance dose of OIT,” said Dr. Upton.

“Although few patients have been assessed for the 300-mg challenge, this study is notable for the age group of 4-18 years, and that many of the patients had reacted to low doses in the past. It also shows that many families are capable of diluting and mixing their own immunotherapy solutions with store-bought foods under the guidance of an experienced allergy clinic,” she added.

“Overall, evidence is building that by various routes, initial small amounts with minimal updoses, plus the tincture of time, may be preferred to multiple frequent updosing from multiple perspectives, including safety, feasibility, cost, and medical resources. It will also be important to understand the preferences and goals of the patient and family as various regimens become more available,” Dr. Upton concluded.

The study was funded by BC Children’s Hospital Foundation. Dr. Chan reported receiving research support from DVB Technologies; has been a member of advisory boards for Pfizer, Miravo, Medexus, Leo Pharma, Kaleo, DBV, AllerGenis, Sanofi, Genzyme, Bausch Health, Avir Pharma, AstraZeneca, ALK, and Alladapt; and was a colead of the CSACI OIT guidelines. Dr. Upton reported research support/grants from Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, ALK Abello, DBV Technologies, CIHR, and SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program and fees from Pfizer, ALK Abello, Bausch Health, Astra Zeneca, and Pharming. She serves as an associate editor for Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology and is on the Board of Directors of Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Healthcare Advisory Board of Food Allergy Canada.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com .

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is as safe and effective for high-risk older children and adolescents as oral immunotherapy (OIT) is for infants and preschoolers, according to new research.

Preliminary data from a study of more than 180 pediatric patients with multiple food allergies showed that while most patients had mild symptoms, none experienced a severe grade 4 reaction during the buildup and maintenance phase of SLIT.

In addition, 70% of those tested at the end of the treatment protocol were able to tolerate 300 mg of their allergen, a success rate nearly as high as that for OIT.

The study was published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.

SLIT has been used successfully in the treatment of environmental allergens such as grass and tree pollen and dust mites. In this study, researchers decided to test SLIT’s effectiveness and safety in the treatment of food allergies in older children.

“We knew that OIT is very effective and safe in infants and toddlers, but there was literature illustrating that for older, school-age kids and adolescents, OIT is not safe enough, as those older age groups tend to have higher risk of severe reaction during treatment,” senior author Edmond Chan, MD, clinical professor of allergy at the University of British Columbia and pediatric allergist at BC Children’s Hospital, both in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, told this news organization. “With that knowledge, we decided to explore SLIT as another first-phase therapy for the older kids.”

The investigators recruited 188 high-risk older children aged 4-18 years for multifood SLIT. Most (61.7%) participants had multiple food allergies. Approximately 68% were male, and the population’s median age was 11.3 years.

Nearly half (48.4%) of participants had atopic dermatitis, 45.2% had asthma, 58.0% had allergic rhinitis, and 2.66% had preexisting eosinophilic esophagitis.

Most (75.0%) of the children were classified as higher risk, and 23 had a history of a grade 3 or 4 reaction before beginning SLIT.

Of the 188 children who were initially enrolled in the study, 173 (92.0%) finished their SLIT buildup phase.

Because the study started when COVID-19 pandemic restrictions were in place, the SLIT protocol mandated that patients be seen virtually. The patients’ caregivers learned how to mix and administer the required doses at home using recipes specially developed by the research team that used products bought at the grocery store.

A wide variety of food allergens were treated, including peanut, other legumes, tree nuts, sesame, other seeds, egg, cow’s milk, fish, wheat, shrimp, and other allergens.

The children built up to 2-mg protein SLIT maintenance over the course of three to five visits under nurse supervision.

After 1-2 years of daily SLIT maintenance, patients were offered a low-dose oral food challenge (OFC; cumulative dose: 300 mg of protein) with the goal of bypassing OIT buildup.

Nearly all patients (93.1%) had symptoms during SLIT buildup, but most were mild grade 1 (52.1%) or 2 (40.4%) reactions. Only one patient had a grade 3 reaction. None of the patients experienced a severe grade 4 reaction.

The most common grade 1 reaction was oral itch, an expected symptom of SLIT, which occurred in 82.7% of the patients.

Four patients (2.10%) received epinephrine during buildup and went to the emergency department. All these patients returned to continue SLIT without further need for epinephrine.

To test the effectiveness of SLIT, the researchers performed 50 low-dose OFCs in 20 patients. Of these food challenges, 35 (70%) were successful, and patients were asked to start daily 300-mg OIT maintenance, thus bypassing OIT buildup.

An additional nine OFCs that were unsuccessful were counseled to self-escalate from 80 mg or higher to 300 mg at home with medical guidance as needed.

“Our preliminary data of 20 patients and 50 low-dose oral food challenges suggest that an initial phase of 1-2 years of 2-mg daily SLIT therapy may be a safe and effective way to bypass the OIT buildup phase without the need for dozens of in-person visits with an allergist,” said Dr. Chan.

“So now we have the best of both worlds. We harness the safety of SLIT for the first 1-2 years, with the effectiveness of OIT for the remainder of the treatment period,” he said.
 

Adds to Evidence

Commenting on the study for this news organization, Julia Upton, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, said, “This study adds to the evidence that consistent, low exposure to food drives meaningful desensitization far above the daily dose.” Upton did not participate in the research.

“Prior prospective studies in SLIT demonstrated that small single-digit-milligram doses and time greatly increased the threshold of reaction. This real-world report suggests that a way to utilize that threshold increase is by switching to a commonly used maintenance dose of OIT,” said Dr. Upton.

“Although few patients have been assessed for the 300-mg challenge, this study is notable for the age group of 4-18 years, and that many of the patients had reacted to low doses in the past. It also shows that many families are capable of diluting and mixing their own immunotherapy solutions with store-bought foods under the guidance of an experienced allergy clinic,” she added.

“Overall, evidence is building that by various routes, initial small amounts with minimal updoses, plus the tincture of time, may be preferred to multiple frequent updosing from multiple perspectives, including safety, feasibility, cost, and medical resources. It will also be important to understand the preferences and goals of the patient and family as various regimens become more available,” Dr. Upton concluded.

The study was funded by BC Children’s Hospital Foundation. Dr. Chan reported receiving research support from DVB Technologies; has been a member of advisory boards for Pfizer, Miravo, Medexus, Leo Pharma, Kaleo, DBV, AllerGenis, Sanofi, Genzyme, Bausch Health, Avir Pharma, AstraZeneca, ALK, and Alladapt; and was a colead of the CSACI OIT guidelines. Dr. Upton reported research support/grants from Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, ALK Abello, DBV Technologies, CIHR, and SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program and fees from Pfizer, ALK Abello, Bausch Health, Astra Zeneca, and Pharming. She serves as an associate editor for Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology and is on the Board of Directors of Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Healthcare Advisory Board of Food Allergy Canada.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com .

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is as safe and effective for high-risk older children and adolescents as oral immunotherapy (OIT) is for infants and preschoolers, according to new research.

Preliminary data from a study of more than 180 pediatric patients with multiple food allergies showed that while most patients had mild symptoms, none experienced a severe grade 4 reaction during the buildup and maintenance phase of SLIT.

In addition, 70% of those tested at the end of the treatment protocol were able to tolerate 300 mg of their allergen, a success rate nearly as high as that for OIT.

The study was published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice.

SLIT has been used successfully in the treatment of environmental allergens such as grass and tree pollen and dust mites. In this study, researchers decided to test SLIT’s effectiveness and safety in the treatment of food allergies in older children.

“We knew that OIT is very effective and safe in infants and toddlers, but there was literature illustrating that for older, school-age kids and adolescents, OIT is not safe enough, as those older age groups tend to have higher risk of severe reaction during treatment,” senior author Edmond Chan, MD, clinical professor of allergy at the University of British Columbia and pediatric allergist at BC Children’s Hospital, both in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, told this news organization. “With that knowledge, we decided to explore SLIT as another first-phase therapy for the older kids.”

The investigators recruited 188 high-risk older children aged 4-18 years for multifood SLIT. Most (61.7%) participants had multiple food allergies. Approximately 68% were male, and the population’s median age was 11.3 years.

Nearly half (48.4%) of participants had atopic dermatitis, 45.2% had asthma, 58.0% had allergic rhinitis, and 2.66% had preexisting eosinophilic esophagitis.

Most (75.0%) of the children were classified as higher risk, and 23 had a history of a grade 3 or 4 reaction before beginning SLIT.

Of the 188 children who were initially enrolled in the study, 173 (92.0%) finished their SLIT buildup phase.

Because the study started when COVID-19 pandemic restrictions were in place, the SLIT protocol mandated that patients be seen virtually. The patients’ caregivers learned how to mix and administer the required doses at home using recipes specially developed by the research team that used products bought at the grocery store.

A wide variety of food allergens were treated, including peanut, other legumes, tree nuts, sesame, other seeds, egg, cow’s milk, fish, wheat, shrimp, and other allergens.

The children built up to 2-mg protein SLIT maintenance over the course of three to five visits under nurse supervision.

After 1-2 years of daily SLIT maintenance, patients were offered a low-dose oral food challenge (OFC; cumulative dose: 300 mg of protein) with the goal of bypassing OIT buildup.

Nearly all patients (93.1%) had symptoms during SLIT buildup, but most were mild grade 1 (52.1%) or 2 (40.4%) reactions. Only one patient had a grade 3 reaction. None of the patients experienced a severe grade 4 reaction.

The most common grade 1 reaction was oral itch, an expected symptom of SLIT, which occurred in 82.7% of the patients.

Four patients (2.10%) received epinephrine during buildup and went to the emergency department. All these patients returned to continue SLIT without further need for epinephrine.

To test the effectiveness of SLIT, the researchers performed 50 low-dose OFCs in 20 patients. Of these food challenges, 35 (70%) were successful, and patients were asked to start daily 300-mg OIT maintenance, thus bypassing OIT buildup.

An additional nine OFCs that were unsuccessful were counseled to self-escalate from 80 mg or higher to 300 mg at home with medical guidance as needed.

“Our preliminary data of 20 patients and 50 low-dose oral food challenges suggest that an initial phase of 1-2 years of 2-mg daily SLIT therapy may be a safe and effective way to bypass the OIT buildup phase without the need for dozens of in-person visits with an allergist,” said Dr. Chan.

“So now we have the best of both worlds. We harness the safety of SLIT for the first 1-2 years, with the effectiveness of OIT for the remainder of the treatment period,” he said.
 

Adds to Evidence

Commenting on the study for this news organization, Julia Upton, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, said, “This study adds to the evidence that consistent, low exposure to food drives meaningful desensitization far above the daily dose.” Upton did not participate in the research.

“Prior prospective studies in SLIT demonstrated that small single-digit-milligram doses and time greatly increased the threshold of reaction. This real-world report suggests that a way to utilize that threshold increase is by switching to a commonly used maintenance dose of OIT,” said Dr. Upton.

“Although few patients have been assessed for the 300-mg challenge, this study is notable for the age group of 4-18 years, and that many of the patients had reacted to low doses in the past. It also shows that many families are capable of diluting and mixing their own immunotherapy solutions with store-bought foods under the guidance of an experienced allergy clinic,” she added.

“Overall, evidence is building that by various routes, initial small amounts with minimal updoses, plus the tincture of time, may be preferred to multiple frequent updosing from multiple perspectives, including safety, feasibility, cost, and medical resources. It will also be important to understand the preferences and goals of the patient and family as various regimens become more available,” Dr. Upton concluded.

The study was funded by BC Children’s Hospital Foundation. Dr. Chan reported receiving research support from DVB Technologies; has been a member of advisory boards for Pfizer, Miravo, Medexus, Leo Pharma, Kaleo, DBV, AllerGenis, Sanofi, Genzyme, Bausch Health, Avir Pharma, AstraZeneca, ALK, and Alladapt; and was a colead of the CSACI OIT guidelines. Dr. Upton reported research support/grants from Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, ALK Abello, DBV Technologies, CIHR, and SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program and fees from Pfizer, ALK Abello, Bausch Health, Astra Zeneca, and Pharming. She serves as an associate editor for Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology and is on the Board of Directors of Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the Healthcare Advisory Board of Food Allergy Canada.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com .

TOPLINE:

The odds of having cognitive impairment may be increased among children with atopic dermatitis, primarily among those with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or a learning disability.

METHODOLOGY:

It remains unknown whether subpopulations of children with atopic dermatitis face a greater risk for cognitive impairment or not.

To determine the association, researchers drew from a weighted sample of 69,732,807 children with atopic dermatitis in the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey.

Main outcomes of interest were difficulty in learning or memory (cognitive impairment symptoms) as reported by the child’s caregiver.

The researchers performed logistic regression to compare the odds of learning or memory difficulties between 60,509,794 children without atopic dermatitis and 9,223,013 children with atopic dermatitis.

TAKEAWAY:

Children with versus without atopic dermatitis were more likely to experience difficulties with learning (10.8% [95% CI, 7.8%-15.8%] vs 5.9% [95% CI, 5.1%-6.9%]; P < .001) and difficulties with memory (11.1% [95% CI, 8.0%-15.9%] vs 5.8% [95% CI, 4.9%-6.9%]; P < .001).

On multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic factors, asthma, food allergies, and seasonal allergies or hay fever, researchers found that having atopic dermatitis was associated with increased odds of difficulties in learning (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.45) and memory (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.41). 

When stratified by neurodevelopmental comorbidities, having atopic dermatitis was associated with a 2- to 3-fold greater odds of memory difficulties among children with any neurodevelopmental disorder (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.43-3.57), which included ADHD (aOR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.60-5.24) or learning disabilities (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-4.00).

Having atopic dermatitis was not associated with learning or memory difficulties among children without neurodevelopmental conditions. 

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings may improve the risk stratification of children with atopic dermatitis for cognitive impairment and suggest that evaluation for cognitive impairment should be prioritized among children with atopic dermatitis and comorbid ADHD or learning disability,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

Corresponding author Joy Wan, MD, of the department of dermatology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and colleagues conducted the research, which was published on March 6, 2024, in JAMA Dermatology.

LIMITATIONS:

The study’s limitations were its cross-sectional design, reliance on caregiver reports, and the fact that National Health Interview Survey data do not include information on factors such as atopic dermatitis severity, age at atopic dermatitis diagnosis, and sleep. 

DISCLOSURES:

The study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wan reported receiving a grant from Pfizer and personal fees from Sun Pharmaceutical Industries and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. No other study authors had disclosures to report. 

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

TOPLINE:

The odds of having cognitive impairment may be increased among children with atopic dermatitis, primarily among those with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or a learning disability.

METHODOLOGY:

It remains unknown whether subpopulations of children with atopic dermatitis face a greater risk for cognitive impairment or not.

To determine the association, researchers drew from a weighted sample of 69,732,807 children with atopic dermatitis in the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey.

Main outcomes of interest were difficulty in learning or memory (cognitive impairment symptoms) as reported by the child’s caregiver.

The researchers performed logistic regression to compare the odds of learning or memory difficulties between 60,509,794 children without atopic dermatitis and 9,223,013 children with atopic dermatitis.

TAKEAWAY:

Children with versus without atopic dermatitis were more likely to experience difficulties with learning (10.8% [95% CI, 7.8%-15.8%] vs 5.9% [95% CI, 5.1%-6.9%]; P < .001) and difficulties with memory (11.1% [95% CI, 8.0%-15.9%] vs 5.8% [95% CI, 4.9%-6.9%]; P < .001).

On multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic factors, asthma, food allergies, and seasonal allergies or hay fever, researchers found that having atopic dermatitis was associated with increased odds of difficulties in learning (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.45) and memory (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.41). 

When stratified by neurodevelopmental comorbidities, having atopic dermatitis was associated with a 2- to 3-fold greater odds of memory difficulties among children with any neurodevelopmental disorder (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.43-3.57), which included ADHD (aOR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.60-5.24) or learning disabilities (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-4.00).

Having atopic dermatitis was not associated with learning or memory difficulties among children without neurodevelopmental conditions. 

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings may improve the risk stratification of children with atopic dermatitis for cognitive impairment and suggest that evaluation for cognitive impairment should be prioritized among children with atopic dermatitis and comorbid ADHD or learning disability,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

Corresponding author Joy Wan, MD, of the department of dermatology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and colleagues conducted the research, which was published on March 6, 2024, in JAMA Dermatology.

LIMITATIONS:

The study’s limitations were its cross-sectional design, reliance on caregiver reports, and the fact that National Health Interview Survey data do not include information on factors such as atopic dermatitis severity, age at atopic dermatitis diagnosis, and sleep. 

DISCLOSURES:

The study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wan reported receiving a grant from Pfizer and personal fees from Sun Pharmaceutical Industries and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. No other study authors had disclosures to report. 

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

TOPLINE:

The odds of having cognitive impairment may be increased among children with atopic dermatitis, primarily among those with neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or a learning disability.

METHODOLOGY:

It remains unknown whether subpopulations of children with atopic dermatitis face a greater risk for cognitive impairment or not.

To determine the association, researchers drew from a weighted sample of 69,732,807 children with atopic dermatitis in the 2021 US National Health Interview Survey.

Main outcomes of interest were difficulty in learning or memory (cognitive impairment symptoms) as reported by the child’s caregiver.

The researchers performed logistic regression to compare the odds of learning or memory difficulties between 60,509,794 children without atopic dermatitis and 9,223,013 children with atopic dermatitis.

TAKEAWAY:

Children with versus without atopic dermatitis were more likely to experience difficulties with learning (10.8% [95% CI, 7.8%-15.8%] vs 5.9% [95% CI, 5.1%-6.9%]; P < .001) and difficulties with memory (11.1% [95% CI, 8.0%-15.9%] vs 5.8% [95% CI, 4.9%-6.9%]; P < .001).

On multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic factors, asthma, food allergies, and seasonal allergies or hay fever, researchers found that having atopic dermatitis was associated with increased odds of difficulties in learning (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.28-2.45) and memory (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.41). 

When stratified by neurodevelopmental comorbidities, having atopic dermatitis was associated with a 2- to 3-fold greater odds of memory difficulties among children with any neurodevelopmental disorder (aOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.43-3.57), which included ADHD (aOR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.60-5.24) or learning disabilities (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-4.00).

Having atopic dermatitis was not associated with learning or memory difficulties among children without neurodevelopmental conditions. 

IN PRACTICE:

“These findings may improve the risk stratification of children with atopic dermatitis for cognitive impairment and suggest that evaluation for cognitive impairment should be prioritized among children with atopic dermatitis and comorbid ADHD or learning disability,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

Corresponding author Joy Wan, MD, of the department of dermatology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and colleagues conducted the research, which was published on March 6, 2024, in JAMA Dermatology.

LIMITATIONS:

The study’s limitations were its cross-sectional design, reliance on caregiver reports, and the fact that National Health Interview Survey data do not include information on factors such as atopic dermatitis severity, age at atopic dermatitis diagnosis, and sleep. 

DISCLOSURES:

The study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wan reported receiving a grant from Pfizer and personal fees from Sun Pharmaceutical Industries and Janssen Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. No other study authors had disclosures to report. 

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Sandra Hong, MD, chair of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center of Excellence at Cleveland Clinic, in Ohio, sees firsthand how situations that feel ordinary to most people strike fear in the hearts of her patients with food allergies. 

Not only do some experience reactions to milk when they eat a cheese pizza — they can’t be in the same room with someone enjoying a slice nearby. “That would be terrifying,” Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab (Xolair), recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as monotherapy for the treatment of food allergies, may now bring peace of mind to these patients and their families by reducing their risk of dangerous allergic reactions to accidental exposure.

While the drug does not cure food allergies, a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial found that after 16 weeks of treatment, two thirds of participants were able to tolerate at least 600 mg of peanut protein — equal to about 2.5 peanuts — without experiencing moderate to severe reactions. 

An open-label extension trial also found the monoclonal antibody reduced the likelihood of serious reactions to eggs by 67%, milk by 66%, and cashews by 42%. The results of the study were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The treatment is approved for children as young as the age of 1 year and is the only treatment approved for multiple food allergies. It does not treat anaphylaxis or other emergency situations.

Patient Selection Key

While 8% of children and 10% of adults in the United States have a true food allergy, Brian Vickery, MD, chief of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, noted that a significantly higher proportion of the population restricts their diet based on perceived food intolerances.

“Most important for family doctors prior to prescribing the medication will be to be sure that the diagnosis is correct,” Kim said. “We know that allergy blood and skin testing is good but not perfect, and false positive results can occur,” said Edwin Kim, MD, chief of the Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and director of the University of North Carolina Food Allergy Initiative at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, who was a coauthor on the study in the New England Journal of Medicine. “ An allergist can conduct food challenges to confirm the diagnosis if results are unclear.”

Even for patients with confirmed IgE-mediated allergies, Dr. Hong said selecting patients who are good candidates for the therapy has “nuances.” 

Patients must be willing and able to commit to injections every 2-4 weeks. Dosing depends on body weight and the total IgE levels of each patient. Patients with IgE levels > 1850 UI/mL likely will be disqualified from treatment since the clinical trial did not enroll patients with total IgE above this level and the appropriate dose in those patients is unknown.

“My recommendation for family physicians who are counseling food-allergic patients interested in omalizumab treatment is to partner with an allergist-immunologist, if at all possible,” Dr. Vickery said. He added that patients should have a comprehensive workup before beginning treatment because starting omalizumab would reduce reactivity and alter the outcome a diagnostic oral food challenge.

Two populations Dr. Hong thinks might particularly benefit from the therapy are college students and preschoolers, who may be unable to completely avoid allergens because of poor impulse control and food sharing in group settings.

“The concerns we have about this age group are whether or not there might be other factors involved that may impede their ability to make good decisions.”

Less control of the environment in dorms or other group living situations also could increase the risk of accidental exposure to a food allergen.

For the right patients, the treatment regimen has significant advantages over oral immunotherapy treatment (OIT), including the fact that it’s not a daily medication and it has the potential to treat allergic asthma at the same time.

“The biggest pro for omalizumab is that it can treat all of your food allergies, whether you have one or many, and do it all in one medication,” Dr. Kim said. 

Managing Potential Harms

Omalizumab carries risks both primary care providers and patients must consider. First among them is that the drug carries a “black box” warning for an increased risk of anaphylaxis, Dr. Hong said. 

Although patients with multiple food allergies typically already have prescriptions for epinephrine, primary care physicians (PCPs) considering offering omalizumab must be comfortable treating severe systemic reactions and their offices capable of post-dose monitoring, Dr. Hong said. 

Anaphylaxis “can occur after the first dose or it can be delayed,” she said. “Typically, allergists will give these in our offices and we’ll actually have people wait for delayed amounts of time, for hours.”

The drug has been available since 2003 as a treatment for allergic asthma and urticaria. In addition to the warning for anaphylaxis, common reactions include joint pain and injection-site reactions. It also increases the risk for parasitic infection, and some studies show an increase in the risk for cancer.

Still, Dr. Kim said omalizumab’s safety profile is reassuring and noted it has advantages over OIT. “Since the patient is not exposing themselves to the food they are allergic to like in OIT, the safety is expected to be far better,” he said.

Lifelong Treatment 

Dr. Vickery, Dr. Hong, and Dr. Kim all cautioned that patients should understand that, while omalizumab offers protection against accidental exposure and can meaningfully improve quality of life, it won’t allow them to loosen their allergen-avoidant diets.

Further, maintaining protection requires receiving injections every 2-4 weeks for life. For those without insurance, or whose insurance does not cover the treatment, costs could reach thousands of dollars each month, Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab “has been well covered by insurance for asthma and chronic hives, but we will have to see what it looks like for food allergy. The range of plans and out-of-pocket deductibles available to patients will also play a big role,” Dr. Kim said. 

Other novel approaches to food allergies are currently in clinical trials, and both Dr. Hong and Dr. Vickery are optimistic about potential options in the pipeline.

“We’re just on the brink of really exciting therapies coming forward in the future,” Dr. Hong said.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, both part of the National Institutes of Health; the Claudia and Steve Stange Family Fund; Genentech; and Novartis. Dr. Hong, Dr. Kim, and Dr. Vickery reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Sandra Hong, MD, chair of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center of Excellence at Cleveland Clinic, in Ohio, sees firsthand how situations that feel ordinary to most people strike fear in the hearts of her patients with food allergies. 

Not only do some experience reactions to milk when they eat a cheese pizza — they can’t be in the same room with someone enjoying a slice nearby. “That would be terrifying,” Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab (Xolair), recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as monotherapy for the treatment of food allergies, may now bring peace of mind to these patients and their families by reducing their risk of dangerous allergic reactions to accidental exposure.

While the drug does not cure food allergies, a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial found that after 16 weeks of treatment, two thirds of participants were able to tolerate at least 600 mg of peanut protein — equal to about 2.5 peanuts — without experiencing moderate to severe reactions. 

An open-label extension trial also found the monoclonal antibody reduced the likelihood of serious reactions to eggs by 67%, milk by 66%, and cashews by 42%. The results of the study were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The treatment is approved for children as young as the age of 1 year and is the only treatment approved for multiple food allergies. It does not treat anaphylaxis or other emergency situations.

Patient Selection Key

While 8% of children and 10% of adults in the United States have a true food allergy, Brian Vickery, MD, chief of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, noted that a significantly higher proportion of the population restricts their diet based on perceived food intolerances.

“Most important for family doctors prior to prescribing the medication will be to be sure that the diagnosis is correct,” Kim said. “We know that allergy blood and skin testing is good but not perfect, and false positive results can occur,” said Edwin Kim, MD, chief of the Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and director of the University of North Carolina Food Allergy Initiative at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, who was a coauthor on the study in the New England Journal of Medicine. “ An allergist can conduct food challenges to confirm the diagnosis if results are unclear.”

Even for patients with confirmed IgE-mediated allergies, Dr. Hong said selecting patients who are good candidates for the therapy has “nuances.” 

Patients must be willing and able to commit to injections every 2-4 weeks. Dosing depends on body weight and the total IgE levels of each patient. Patients with IgE levels > 1850 UI/mL likely will be disqualified from treatment since the clinical trial did not enroll patients with total IgE above this level and the appropriate dose in those patients is unknown.

“My recommendation for family physicians who are counseling food-allergic patients interested in omalizumab treatment is to partner with an allergist-immunologist, if at all possible,” Dr. Vickery said. He added that patients should have a comprehensive workup before beginning treatment because starting omalizumab would reduce reactivity and alter the outcome a diagnostic oral food challenge.

Two populations Dr. Hong thinks might particularly benefit from the therapy are college students and preschoolers, who may be unable to completely avoid allergens because of poor impulse control and food sharing in group settings.

“The concerns we have about this age group are whether or not there might be other factors involved that may impede their ability to make good decisions.”

Less control of the environment in dorms or other group living situations also could increase the risk of accidental exposure to a food allergen.

For the right patients, the treatment regimen has significant advantages over oral immunotherapy treatment (OIT), including the fact that it’s not a daily medication and it has the potential to treat allergic asthma at the same time.

“The biggest pro for omalizumab is that it can treat all of your food allergies, whether you have one or many, and do it all in one medication,” Dr. Kim said. 

Managing Potential Harms

Omalizumab carries risks both primary care providers and patients must consider. First among them is that the drug carries a “black box” warning for an increased risk of anaphylaxis, Dr. Hong said. 

Although patients with multiple food allergies typically already have prescriptions for epinephrine, primary care physicians (PCPs) considering offering omalizumab must be comfortable treating severe systemic reactions and their offices capable of post-dose monitoring, Dr. Hong said. 

Anaphylaxis “can occur after the first dose or it can be delayed,” she said. “Typically, allergists will give these in our offices and we’ll actually have people wait for delayed amounts of time, for hours.”

The drug has been available since 2003 as a treatment for allergic asthma and urticaria. In addition to the warning for anaphylaxis, common reactions include joint pain and injection-site reactions. It also increases the risk for parasitic infection, and some studies show an increase in the risk for cancer.

Still, Dr. Kim said omalizumab’s safety profile is reassuring and noted it has advantages over OIT. “Since the patient is not exposing themselves to the food they are allergic to like in OIT, the safety is expected to be far better,” he said.

Lifelong Treatment 

Dr. Vickery, Dr. Hong, and Dr. Kim all cautioned that patients should understand that, while omalizumab offers protection against accidental exposure and can meaningfully improve quality of life, it won’t allow them to loosen their allergen-avoidant diets.

Further, maintaining protection requires receiving injections every 2-4 weeks for life. For those without insurance, or whose insurance does not cover the treatment, costs could reach thousands of dollars each month, Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab “has been well covered by insurance for asthma and chronic hives, but we will have to see what it looks like for food allergy. The range of plans and out-of-pocket deductibles available to patients will also play a big role,” Dr. Kim said. 

Other novel approaches to food allergies are currently in clinical trials, and both Dr. Hong and Dr. Vickery are optimistic about potential options in the pipeline.

“We’re just on the brink of really exciting therapies coming forward in the future,” Dr. Hong said.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, both part of the National Institutes of Health; the Claudia and Steve Stange Family Fund; Genentech; and Novartis. Dr. Hong, Dr. Kim, and Dr. Vickery reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Sandra Hong, MD, chair of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center of Excellence at Cleveland Clinic, in Ohio, sees firsthand how situations that feel ordinary to most people strike fear in the hearts of her patients with food allergies. 

Not only do some experience reactions to milk when they eat a cheese pizza — they can’t be in the same room with someone enjoying a slice nearby. “That would be terrifying,” Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab (Xolair), recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as monotherapy for the treatment of food allergies, may now bring peace of mind to these patients and their families by reducing their risk of dangerous allergic reactions to accidental exposure.

While the drug does not cure food allergies, a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial found that after 16 weeks of treatment, two thirds of participants were able to tolerate at least 600 mg of peanut protein — equal to about 2.5 peanuts — without experiencing moderate to severe reactions. 

An open-label extension trial also found the monoclonal antibody reduced the likelihood of serious reactions to eggs by 67%, milk by 66%, and cashews by 42%. The results of the study were published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The treatment is approved for children as young as the age of 1 year and is the only treatment approved for multiple food allergies. It does not treat anaphylaxis or other emergency situations.

Patient Selection Key

While 8% of children and 10% of adults in the United States have a true food allergy, Brian Vickery, MD, chief of allergy and immunology and director of the Food Allergy Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, noted that a significantly higher proportion of the population restricts their diet based on perceived food intolerances.

“Most important for family doctors prior to prescribing the medication will be to be sure that the diagnosis is correct,” Kim said. “We know that allergy blood and skin testing is good but not perfect, and false positive results can occur,” said Edwin Kim, MD, chief of the Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and director of the University of North Carolina Food Allergy Initiative at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, who was a coauthor on the study in the New England Journal of Medicine. “ An allergist can conduct food challenges to confirm the diagnosis if results are unclear.”

Even for patients with confirmed IgE-mediated allergies, Dr. Hong said selecting patients who are good candidates for the therapy has “nuances.” 

Patients must be willing and able to commit to injections every 2-4 weeks. Dosing depends on body weight and the total IgE levels of each patient. Patients with IgE levels > 1850 UI/mL likely will be disqualified from treatment since the clinical trial did not enroll patients with total IgE above this level and the appropriate dose in those patients is unknown.

“My recommendation for family physicians who are counseling food-allergic patients interested in omalizumab treatment is to partner with an allergist-immunologist, if at all possible,” Dr. Vickery said. He added that patients should have a comprehensive workup before beginning treatment because starting omalizumab would reduce reactivity and alter the outcome a diagnostic oral food challenge.

Two populations Dr. Hong thinks might particularly benefit from the therapy are college students and preschoolers, who may be unable to completely avoid allergens because of poor impulse control and food sharing in group settings.

“The concerns we have about this age group are whether or not there might be other factors involved that may impede their ability to make good decisions.”

Less control of the environment in dorms or other group living situations also could increase the risk of accidental exposure to a food allergen.

For the right patients, the treatment regimen has significant advantages over oral immunotherapy treatment (OIT), including the fact that it’s not a daily medication and it has the potential to treat allergic asthma at the same time.

“The biggest pro for omalizumab is that it can treat all of your food allergies, whether you have one or many, and do it all in one medication,” Dr. Kim said. 

Managing Potential Harms

Omalizumab carries risks both primary care providers and patients must consider. First among them is that the drug carries a “black box” warning for an increased risk of anaphylaxis, Dr. Hong said. 

Although patients with multiple food allergies typically already have prescriptions for epinephrine, primary care physicians (PCPs) considering offering omalizumab must be comfortable treating severe systemic reactions and their offices capable of post-dose monitoring, Dr. Hong said. 

Anaphylaxis “can occur after the first dose or it can be delayed,” she said. “Typically, allergists will give these in our offices and we’ll actually have people wait for delayed amounts of time, for hours.”

The drug has been available since 2003 as a treatment for allergic asthma and urticaria. In addition to the warning for anaphylaxis, common reactions include joint pain and injection-site reactions. It also increases the risk for parasitic infection, and some studies show an increase in the risk for cancer.

Still, Dr. Kim said omalizumab’s safety profile is reassuring and noted it has advantages over OIT. “Since the patient is not exposing themselves to the food they are allergic to like in OIT, the safety is expected to be far better,” he said.

Lifelong Treatment 

Dr. Vickery, Dr. Hong, and Dr. Kim all cautioned that patients should understand that, while omalizumab offers protection against accidental exposure and can meaningfully improve quality of life, it won’t allow them to loosen their allergen-avoidant diets.

Further, maintaining protection requires receiving injections every 2-4 weeks for life. For those without insurance, or whose insurance does not cover the treatment, costs could reach thousands of dollars each month, Dr. Hong said.

Omalizumab “has been well covered by insurance for asthma and chronic hives, but we will have to see what it looks like for food allergy. The range of plans and out-of-pocket deductibles available to patients will also play a big role,” Dr. Kim said. 

Other novel approaches to food allergies are currently in clinical trials, and both Dr. Hong and Dr. Vickery are optimistic about potential options in the pipeline.

“We’re just on the brink of really exciting therapies coming forward in the future,” Dr. Hong said.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, both part of the National Institutes of Health; the Claudia and Steve Stange Family Fund; Genentech; and Novartis. Dr. Hong, Dr. Kim, and Dr. Vickery reported no relevant financial relationships.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.