Hodgkin Lymphoma

Photo by Nina Matthews

Women diagnosed with cancer during their childbearing years have an increased risk of preterm births, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

The study showed that cancer survivors were more likely than women who never had cancer to give birth prematurely, have underweight babies, and undergo cesarean section deliveries.

The researchers said women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy may be delivering early in order to start their cancer treatment, but that does not fully explain these findings.

The team also detected an increased risk of preterm delivery in women who had already received cancer treatment.

“We found that women were more likely to deliver preterm if they’ve been treated for cancer overall, with greater risks for women who had chemotherapy,” said study author Hazel B. Nichols, PhD, of University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill.

“While we believe these findings are something women should be aware of, we still have a lot of work to do to understand why this risk is becoming apparent and whether or not the children who are born preterm to these women go on to develop any health concerns.”

Dr Nichols and her colleagues analyzed data on 2598 births to female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (ages 15 to 39) and 12,990 births to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Among cancer survivors, there was a significantly increased prevalence of preterm birth (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.52), low birth weight (PR=1.59), and cesarean delivery (PR=1.08), compared to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Timing of diagnosis and cancer type

When the researchers broke the data down by cancer diagnosis, they found a higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight for women with lymphoma as well as breast and gynecologic cancers.

The PR for preterm birth was 1.59 for Hodgkin lymphoma, 1.98 for breast cancer, 2.11 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.58 for gynecologic cancer. The PR for low birth weight was 1.59 for breast cancer, 2.41 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.74 for gynecologic cancer.

The researchers found an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes among women who were diagnosed with cancer while pregnant and before pregnancy.

Among women diagnosed while pregnant, the PR was 2.97 for preterm birth, 2.82 for low birth weight, 1.21 for cesarean delivery, and 1.90 for low Apgar score. Among women diagnosed before pregnancy, the PR was 1.23 for preterm birth and 1.36 for low birth weight.

Role of treatment

Compared to women without a cancer diagnosis, cancer survivors who received chemotherapy but no radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.11), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.36), and cesarean deliveries (PR=1.16).

There was no significant increase in adverse birth outcomes among cancer survivors who received radiation but not chemotherapy.

Among the cancer survivors, women who received chemotherapy without radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.12), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.13), and infants who were small for their gestational age (PR=1.43) when compared to women treated with surgery only.

Dr Nichols said the role of treatment is an area of possible future research.

“We’d like to get better information about the types of chemotherapy women receive,” she said. “Chemotherapy is a very broad category, and the agents have very different effects on the body. In the future, we’d like to get more detailed information on the types of drugs that were involved in treatment.”

Photo by Nina Matthews

Women diagnosed with cancer during their childbearing years have an increased risk of preterm births, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

The study showed that cancer survivors were more likely than women who never had cancer to give birth prematurely, have underweight babies, and undergo cesarean section deliveries.

The researchers said women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy may be delivering early in order to start their cancer treatment, but that does not fully explain these findings.

The team also detected an increased risk of preterm delivery in women who had already received cancer treatment.

“We found that women were more likely to deliver preterm if they’ve been treated for cancer overall, with greater risks for women who had chemotherapy,” said study author Hazel B. Nichols, PhD, of University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill.

“While we believe these findings are something women should be aware of, we still have a lot of work to do to understand why this risk is becoming apparent and whether or not the children who are born preterm to these women go on to develop any health concerns.”

Dr Nichols and her colleagues analyzed data on 2598 births to female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (ages 15 to 39) and 12,990 births to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Among cancer survivors, there was a significantly increased prevalence of preterm birth (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.52), low birth weight (PR=1.59), and cesarean delivery (PR=1.08), compared to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Timing of diagnosis and cancer type

When the researchers broke the data down by cancer diagnosis, they found a higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight for women with lymphoma as well as breast and gynecologic cancers.

The PR for preterm birth was 1.59 for Hodgkin lymphoma, 1.98 for breast cancer, 2.11 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.58 for gynecologic cancer. The PR for low birth weight was 1.59 for breast cancer, 2.41 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.74 for gynecologic cancer.

The researchers found an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes among women who were diagnosed with cancer while pregnant and before pregnancy.

Among women diagnosed while pregnant, the PR was 2.97 for preterm birth, 2.82 for low birth weight, 1.21 for cesarean delivery, and 1.90 for low Apgar score. Among women diagnosed before pregnancy, the PR was 1.23 for preterm birth and 1.36 for low birth weight.

Role of treatment

Compared to women without a cancer diagnosis, cancer survivors who received chemotherapy but no radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.11), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.36), and cesarean deliveries (PR=1.16).

There was no significant increase in adverse birth outcomes among cancer survivors who received radiation but not chemotherapy.

Among the cancer survivors, women who received chemotherapy without radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.12), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.13), and infants who were small for their gestational age (PR=1.43) when compared to women treated with surgery only.

Dr Nichols said the role of treatment is an area of possible future research.

“We’d like to get better information about the types of chemotherapy women receive,” she said. “Chemotherapy is a very broad category, and the agents have very different effects on the body. In the future, we’d like to get more detailed information on the types of drugs that were involved in treatment.”

Photo by Nina Matthews

Women diagnosed with cancer during their childbearing years have an increased risk of preterm births, according to research published in JAMA Oncology.

The study showed that cancer survivors were more likely than women who never had cancer to give birth prematurely, have underweight babies, and undergo cesarean section deliveries.

The researchers said women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy may be delivering early in order to start their cancer treatment, but that does not fully explain these findings.

The team also detected an increased risk of preterm delivery in women who had already received cancer treatment.

“We found that women were more likely to deliver preterm if they’ve been treated for cancer overall, with greater risks for women who had chemotherapy,” said study author Hazel B. Nichols, PhD, of University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill.

“While we believe these findings are something women should be aware of, we still have a lot of work to do to understand why this risk is becoming apparent and whether or not the children who are born preterm to these women go on to develop any health concerns.”

Dr Nichols and her colleagues analyzed data on 2598 births to female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (ages 15 to 39) and 12,990 births to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Among cancer survivors, there was a significantly increased prevalence of preterm birth (prevalence ratio [PR]=1.52), low birth weight (PR=1.59), and cesarean delivery (PR=1.08), compared to women without a cancer diagnosis.

Timing of diagnosis and cancer type

When the researchers broke the data down by cancer diagnosis, they found a higher risk of preterm birth and low birth weight for women with lymphoma as well as breast and gynecologic cancers.

The PR for preterm birth was 1.59 for Hodgkin lymphoma, 1.98 for breast cancer, 2.11 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.58 for gynecologic cancer. The PR for low birth weight was 1.59 for breast cancer, 2.41 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2.74 for gynecologic cancer.

The researchers found an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes among women who were diagnosed with cancer while pregnant and before pregnancy.

Among women diagnosed while pregnant, the PR was 2.97 for preterm birth, 2.82 for low birth weight, 1.21 for cesarean delivery, and 1.90 for low Apgar score. Among women diagnosed before pregnancy, the PR was 1.23 for preterm birth and 1.36 for low birth weight.

Role of treatment

Compared to women without a cancer diagnosis, cancer survivors who received chemotherapy but no radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.11), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.36), and cesarean deliveries (PR=1.16).

There was no significant increase in adverse birth outcomes among cancer survivors who received radiation but not chemotherapy.

Among the cancer survivors, women who received chemotherapy without radiation were more likely to have preterm births (PR=2.12), infants with low birth weight (PR=2.13), and infants who were small for their gestational age (PR=1.43) when compared to women treated with surgery only.

Dr Nichols said the role of treatment is an area of possible future research.

“We’d like to get better information about the types of chemotherapy women receive,” she said. “Chemotherapy is a very broad category, and the agents have very different effects on the body. In the future, we’d like to get more detailed information on the types of drugs that were involved in treatment.”

 

Up to two-thirds of the mutations that drive human cancers may be due to DNA replication errors in normally dividing stem cells, not by inherited or environmentally induced mutations, according to a mathematical modeling study.

The proportion of replication error-driven mutations varied widely among 17 cancers analyzed, but the overall attributable risk of these errors was remarkably consistent among 69 countries included in the study, said Cristian Tomasetti, PhD, a coauthor of the paper and a biostatistician at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

The findings should be a game-changer in the cancer field, Dr. Tomasetti said during a press briefing sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Research dogma has long held that most cancers are related to lifestyle and environmental exposure, with a few primarily due to genetic factors.

“We have now determined that there is a third factor, and that it causes most of the mutations that drive cancer,” Dr. Tomasetti said. “We cannot ignore it and pretend it doesn’t exist. This is a complete paradigm shift in how we think of cancer and what causes it.”

The finding that 66% of cancer-driving mutations are based on unavoidable replication errors doesn’t challenge well-established epidemiology, said Dr. Tomasetti and his coauthor, Bert Vogelstein, MD. Rather, it fits perfectly with several key understandings of cancer: that about 40% of cases are preventable, that rapidly dividing tissues are more prone to develop cancers, and that cancer incidence rises exponentially as humans age.

“If we have as our starting point the assumption that 42% of cancers are preventable, we are completely consistent with that,” in finding that about 60% of cancers are unavoidable, Dr. Tomasetti said. “Those two numbers go perfectly together.”

The study also found that replication-error mutations (R) were most likely to drive cancers in tissues with rapid turnover, such as colorectal tissue. This makes intuitive sense, given that basal mutation rates hover at about three errors per cell replication cycle regardless of tissue type.

“The basal mutation rate in all cells is pretty even,” said Dr. Vogelstein, the Clayton Professor of Oncology and Pathology at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The difference is the number of stem cells. The more cells, the more divisions, and the more mistakes.”

R-mutations also contribute to age-related cancer incidence. As a person ages, more cell divisions accumulate, thus increasing the risk of a cancer-driving R-error. But these mutations also occur in children, who have rapid cell division in all their tissues. In fact, the colleagues suspect that R-errors are the main drivers of almost all pediatric cancers.

The new study bolsters the duo’s controversial 2015 work.

Courtesy Dr. Cristian Tomasetti and Dr. Bert Vogelstein

That paper was the first to suggest that random mutations arising during DNA replication in normal, noncancerous stem cells are an important driver of many cancers. In it, the authors conducted mathematical modeling of the lifetime risk of 32 cancers in a U.S. population and the number of stem cell divisions in each of the associated tissue types. The correlation between these two very different parameters – number of stem cell divisions and lifetime risk – was striking and highly positive. The research showed that 65% of the differences in cancer risk among different tissues could be explained by the total number of stem cell divisions in those tissues.

The theory sparked controversy among scholars and researchers. They challenged it on a number of technical fronts, from stem cell counts and division rates to charges that it didn’t adequately assess the interaction between R-mutations and environmental risks.

Some commentators, perceiving nihilism in the paper, expressed concern that clinicians and patients would get the idea that cancer prevention strategies were useless, since most cancers were simply a case of “bad luck.”

A pervading theme of these counter arguments was one familiar to any researcher: Correlation does not equal causation. The new study was an attempt to expand upon and strengthen the original findings, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“There are well-known environmental risk variations across the world, and there was a question of how our findings might change if we did this analysis in a different country. This paper is also the very first time that someone has ever looked at the proportions of mutations in each cancer type and assigned them to these factors.”

The new study employed a similar mathematical model, but comprised data from 423 cancer registries in 69 countries. The researchers examined the relationship between the lifetime risk of 17 cancers (including breast and prostate, which were not included in the 2015 study) and lifetime stem cell divisions for each tissue. The median correlation coefficient was 0.80; 89% of the countries examined had a correlation of greater than 0.70. This was “remarkably similar” to the correlation determined in the 2015 U.S.-only study.

The team’s next step was to determine what fraction of cancer-driving mutations arose from R-errors, from environmental factors (E), and from hereditary factors (H). They examined these proportions in 32 different cancers in which environmental, lifestyle, and genetic factors have been thoroughly studied. Overall, 29% of the driver mutations were due to environment, 5% to heredity, and 66% to R-errors.

The proportions of these drivers did vary widely between the cancer types, the team noted. For example, lung and esophageal cancers and melanoma were primarily driven by environmental factors (more than 60% each). However, they wrote, “even in lung adenocarcinomas, R contributes a third of the total mutations, with tobacco smoke [including secondhand smoke], diet, radiation, and occupational exposures contributing the remainder. In cancers that are less strongly associated with environmental factors, such as those of the pancreas, brain, bone, or prostate, the majority of the mutations are attributable to R.”

During the press briefing, Dr. Tomasetti and Dr. Vogelstein stressed that most of the inevitable R-errors don’t precipitate cancer – and that even if they do increase risk, that risk may not ever trip the disease process.

“Most of the time these replicative mutations do no harm,” Dr Vogelstein said. “They occur in junk DNA genes, or in areas that are unimportant with respect to cancer. That’s the good luck. Occasionally, they occur in a cancer driver gene, and that is bad luck.”

But even a dose of bad luck isn’t enough to cause cancer. Most cancers require multiple hits to develop – which makes primary prevention strategies more important than ever, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“In the case of lung cancer, for instance, three or more mutations are needed. We showed that these mutations are caused by a combination of environment and R-errors. In theory, then, all of these cancers are preventable because if we can prevent even one of the environmentally caused mutations, then that patient won’t develop cancer.”

However, he said, some cancers do appear to be entirely driven by E-errors and, thus, appear entirely unavoidable. This is an extremely difficult area for clinicians and patients to navigate, said Dr. Vogelstein, a former pediatrician.

“We hope that understanding this will offer some comfort to the literally millions of patients who develop cancer despite having lead a near-perfect life,” in terms of managing risk factors. “Cancer develops in people who haven’t smoked, who avoided the sun and wore sunscreen, who eat perfectly healthy diets and exercise regularly. This is a particularly important concept for parents of children who have cancer, who think ‘I either transmitted a bad gene or unknowingly exposed my child to an environmental agent that caused their cancer.’ They need to understand that these cancers would have occurred no matter what they did.”

Dr. Tomasetti had no disclosures. Dr. Vogelstein is on the scientific advisory boards of Morphotek, Exelixis GP, and Sysmex Inostics, and is a founder of PapGene and Personal Genome Diagnostics.

 

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_gal

 

Up to two-thirds of the mutations that drive human cancers may be due to DNA replication errors in normally dividing stem cells, not by inherited or environmentally induced mutations, according to a mathematical modeling study.

The proportion of replication error-driven mutations varied widely among 17 cancers analyzed, but the overall attributable risk of these errors was remarkably consistent among 69 countries included in the study, said Cristian Tomasetti, PhD, a coauthor of the paper and a biostatistician at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

The findings should be a game-changer in the cancer field, Dr. Tomasetti said during a press briefing sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Research dogma has long held that most cancers are related to lifestyle and environmental exposure, with a few primarily due to genetic factors.

“We have now determined that there is a third factor, and that it causes most of the mutations that drive cancer,” Dr. Tomasetti said. “We cannot ignore it and pretend it doesn’t exist. This is a complete paradigm shift in how we think of cancer and what causes it.”

The finding that 66% of cancer-driving mutations are based on unavoidable replication errors doesn’t challenge well-established epidemiology, said Dr. Tomasetti and his coauthor, Bert Vogelstein, MD. Rather, it fits perfectly with several key understandings of cancer: that about 40% of cases are preventable, that rapidly dividing tissues are more prone to develop cancers, and that cancer incidence rises exponentially as humans age.

“If we have as our starting point the assumption that 42% of cancers are preventable, we are completely consistent with that,” in finding that about 60% of cancers are unavoidable, Dr. Tomasetti said. “Those two numbers go perfectly together.”

The study also found that replication-error mutations (R) were most likely to drive cancers in tissues with rapid turnover, such as colorectal tissue. This makes intuitive sense, given that basal mutation rates hover at about three errors per cell replication cycle regardless of tissue type.

“The basal mutation rate in all cells is pretty even,” said Dr. Vogelstein, the Clayton Professor of Oncology and Pathology at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The difference is the number of stem cells. The more cells, the more divisions, and the more mistakes.”

R-mutations also contribute to age-related cancer incidence. As a person ages, more cell divisions accumulate, thus increasing the risk of a cancer-driving R-error. But these mutations also occur in children, who have rapid cell division in all their tissues. In fact, the colleagues suspect that R-errors are the main drivers of almost all pediatric cancers.

The new study bolsters the duo’s controversial 2015 work.

Courtesy Dr. Cristian Tomasetti and Dr. Bert Vogelstein

That paper was the first to suggest that random mutations arising during DNA replication in normal, noncancerous stem cells are an important driver of many cancers. In it, the authors conducted mathematical modeling of the lifetime risk of 32 cancers in a U.S. population and the number of stem cell divisions in each of the associated tissue types. The correlation between these two very different parameters – number of stem cell divisions and lifetime risk – was striking and highly positive. The research showed that 65% of the differences in cancer risk among different tissues could be explained by the total number of stem cell divisions in those tissues.

The theory sparked controversy among scholars and researchers. They challenged it on a number of technical fronts, from stem cell counts and division rates to charges that it didn’t adequately assess the interaction between R-mutations and environmental risks.

Some commentators, perceiving nihilism in the paper, expressed concern that clinicians and patients would get the idea that cancer prevention strategies were useless, since most cancers were simply a case of “bad luck.”

A pervading theme of these counter arguments was one familiar to any researcher: Correlation does not equal causation. The new study was an attempt to expand upon and strengthen the original findings, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“There are well-known environmental risk variations across the world, and there was a question of how our findings might change if we did this analysis in a different country. This paper is also the very first time that someone has ever looked at the proportions of mutations in each cancer type and assigned them to these factors.”

The new study employed a similar mathematical model, but comprised data from 423 cancer registries in 69 countries. The researchers examined the relationship between the lifetime risk of 17 cancers (including breast and prostate, which were not included in the 2015 study) and lifetime stem cell divisions for each tissue. The median correlation coefficient was 0.80; 89% of the countries examined had a correlation of greater than 0.70. This was “remarkably similar” to the correlation determined in the 2015 U.S.-only study.

The team’s next step was to determine what fraction of cancer-driving mutations arose from R-errors, from environmental factors (E), and from hereditary factors (H). They examined these proportions in 32 different cancers in which environmental, lifestyle, and genetic factors have been thoroughly studied. Overall, 29% of the driver mutations were due to environment, 5% to heredity, and 66% to R-errors.

The proportions of these drivers did vary widely between the cancer types, the team noted. For example, lung and esophageal cancers and melanoma were primarily driven by environmental factors (more than 60% each). However, they wrote, “even in lung adenocarcinomas, R contributes a third of the total mutations, with tobacco smoke [including secondhand smoke], diet, radiation, and occupational exposures contributing the remainder. In cancers that are less strongly associated with environmental factors, such as those of the pancreas, brain, bone, or prostate, the majority of the mutations are attributable to R.”

During the press briefing, Dr. Tomasetti and Dr. Vogelstein stressed that most of the inevitable R-errors don’t precipitate cancer – and that even if they do increase risk, that risk may not ever trip the disease process.

“Most of the time these replicative mutations do no harm,” Dr Vogelstein said. “They occur in junk DNA genes, or in areas that are unimportant with respect to cancer. That’s the good luck. Occasionally, they occur in a cancer driver gene, and that is bad luck.”

But even a dose of bad luck isn’t enough to cause cancer. Most cancers require multiple hits to develop – which makes primary prevention strategies more important than ever, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“In the case of lung cancer, for instance, three or more mutations are needed. We showed that these mutations are caused by a combination of environment and R-errors. In theory, then, all of these cancers are preventable because if we can prevent even one of the environmentally caused mutations, then that patient won’t develop cancer.”

However, he said, some cancers do appear to be entirely driven by E-errors and, thus, appear entirely unavoidable. This is an extremely difficult area for clinicians and patients to navigate, said Dr. Vogelstein, a former pediatrician.

“We hope that understanding this will offer some comfort to the literally millions of patients who develop cancer despite having lead a near-perfect life,” in terms of managing risk factors. “Cancer develops in people who haven’t smoked, who avoided the sun and wore sunscreen, who eat perfectly healthy diets and exercise regularly. This is a particularly important concept for parents of children who have cancer, who think ‘I either transmitted a bad gene or unknowingly exposed my child to an environmental agent that caused their cancer.’ They need to understand that these cancers would have occurred no matter what they did.”

Dr. Tomasetti had no disclosures. Dr. Vogelstein is on the scientific advisory boards of Morphotek, Exelixis GP, and Sysmex Inostics, and is a founder of PapGene and Personal Genome Diagnostics.

 

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_gal

 

Up to two-thirds of the mutations that drive human cancers may be due to DNA replication errors in normally dividing stem cells, not by inherited or environmentally induced mutations, according to a mathematical modeling study.

The proportion of replication error-driven mutations varied widely among 17 cancers analyzed, but the overall attributable risk of these errors was remarkably consistent among 69 countries included in the study, said Cristian Tomasetti, PhD, a coauthor of the paper and a biostatistician at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

The findings should be a game-changer in the cancer field, Dr. Tomasetti said during a press briefing sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Research dogma has long held that most cancers are related to lifestyle and environmental exposure, with a few primarily due to genetic factors.

“We have now determined that there is a third factor, and that it causes most of the mutations that drive cancer,” Dr. Tomasetti said. “We cannot ignore it and pretend it doesn’t exist. This is a complete paradigm shift in how we think of cancer and what causes it.”

The finding that 66% of cancer-driving mutations are based on unavoidable replication errors doesn’t challenge well-established epidemiology, said Dr. Tomasetti and his coauthor, Bert Vogelstein, MD. Rather, it fits perfectly with several key understandings of cancer: that about 40% of cases are preventable, that rapidly dividing tissues are more prone to develop cancers, and that cancer incidence rises exponentially as humans age.

“If we have as our starting point the assumption that 42% of cancers are preventable, we are completely consistent with that,” in finding that about 60% of cancers are unavoidable, Dr. Tomasetti said. “Those two numbers go perfectly together.”

The study also found that replication-error mutations (R) were most likely to drive cancers in tissues with rapid turnover, such as colorectal tissue. This makes intuitive sense, given that basal mutation rates hover at about three errors per cell replication cycle regardless of tissue type.

“The basal mutation rate in all cells is pretty even,” said Dr. Vogelstein, the Clayton Professor of Oncology and Pathology at John Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The difference is the number of stem cells. The more cells, the more divisions, and the more mistakes.”

R-mutations also contribute to age-related cancer incidence. As a person ages, more cell divisions accumulate, thus increasing the risk of a cancer-driving R-error. But these mutations also occur in children, who have rapid cell division in all their tissues. In fact, the colleagues suspect that R-errors are the main drivers of almost all pediatric cancers.

The new study bolsters the duo’s controversial 2015 work.

Courtesy Dr. Cristian Tomasetti and Dr. Bert Vogelstein

That paper was the first to suggest that random mutations arising during DNA replication in normal, noncancerous stem cells are an important driver of many cancers. In it, the authors conducted mathematical modeling of the lifetime risk of 32 cancers in a U.S. population and the number of stem cell divisions in each of the associated tissue types. The correlation between these two very different parameters – number of stem cell divisions and lifetime risk – was striking and highly positive. The research showed that 65% of the differences in cancer risk among different tissues could be explained by the total number of stem cell divisions in those tissues.

The theory sparked controversy among scholars and researchers. They challenged it on a number of technical fronts, from stem cell counts and division rates to charges that it didn’t adequately assess the interaction between R-mutations and environmental risks.

Some commentators, perceiving nihilism in the paper, expressed concern that clinicians and patients would get the idea that cancer prevention strategies were useless, since most cancers were simply a case of “bad luck.”

A pervading theme of these counter arguments was one familiar to any researcher: Correlation does not equal causation. The new study was an attempt to expand upon and strengthen the original findings, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“There are well-known environmental risk variations across the world, and there was a question of how our findings might change if we did this analysis in a different country. This paper is also the very first time that someone has ever looked at the proportions of mutations in each cancer type and assigned them to these factors.”

The new study employed a similar mathematical model, but comprised data from 423 cancer registries in 69 countries. The researchers examined the relationship between the lifetime risk of 17 cancers (including breast and prostate, which were not included in the 2015 study) and lifetime stem cell divisions for each tissue. The median correlation coefficient was 0.80; 89% of the countries examined had a correlation of greater than 0.70. This was “remarkably similar” to the correlation determined in the 2015 U.S.-only study.

The team’s next step was to determine what fraction of cancer-driving mutations arose from R-errors, from environmental factors (E), and from hereditary factors (H). They examined these proportions in 32 different cancers in which environmental, lifestyle, and genetic factors have been thoroughly studied. Overall, 29% of the driver mutations were due to environment, 5% to heredity, and 66% to R-errors.

The proportions of these drivers did vary widely between the cancer types, the team noted. For example, lung and esophageal cancers and melanoma were primarily driven by environmental factors (more than 60% each). However, they wrote, “even in lung adenocarcinomas, R contributes a third of the total mutations, with tobacco smoke [including secondhand smoke], diet, radiation, and occupational exposures contributing the remainder. In cancers that are less strongly associated with environmental factors, such as those of the pancreas, brain, bone, or prostate, the majority of the mutations are attributable to R.”

During the press briefing, Dr. Tomasetti and Dr. Vogelstein stressed that most of the inevitable R-errors don’t precipitate cancer – and that even if they do increase risk, that risk may not ever trip the disease process.

“Most of the time these replicative mutations do no harm,” Dr Vogelstein said. “They occur in junk DNA genes, or in areas that are unimportant with respect to cancer. That’s the good luck. Occasionally, they occur in a cancer driver gene, and that is bad luck.”

But even a dose of bad luck isn’t enough to cause cancer. Most cancers require multiple hits to develop – which makes primary prevention strategies more important than ever, Dr. Tomasetti said.

“In the case of lung cancer, for instance, three or more mutations are needed. We showed that these mutations are caused by a combination of environment and R-errors. In theory, then, all of these cancers are preventable because if we can prevent even one of the environmentally caused mutations, then that patient won’t develop cancer.”

However, he said, some cancers do appear to be entirely driven by E-errors and, thus, appear entirely unavoidable. This is an extremely difficult area for clinicians and patients to navigate, said Dr. Vogelstein, a former pediatrician.

“We hope that understanding this will offer some comfort to the literally millions of patients who develop cancer despite having lead a near-perfect life,” in terms of managing risk factors. “Cancer develops in people who haven’t smoked, who avoided the sun and wore sunscreen, who eat perfectly healthy diets and exercise regularly. This is a particularly important concept for parents of children who have cancer, who think ‘I either transmitted a bad gene or unknowingly exposed my child to an environmental agent that caused their cancer.’ They need to understand that these cancers would have occurred no matter what they did.”

Dr. Tomasetti had no disclosures. Dr. Vogelstein is on the scientific advisory boards of Morphotek, Exelixis GP, and Sysmex Inostics, and is a founder of PapGene and Personal Genome Diagnostics.

 

[email protected]

On Twitter @Alz_gal

Cpl Si Longworth RLC

People who have served in the Armed Forces do not have an increased risk of leukemia or lymphoma, according to research published in Cancer Epidemiology.

Researchers analyzed the long-term risks of developing leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in veterans living in Scotland.

At a mean 30 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the risk of the aforementioned malignancies between veterans and non-veterans in Scotland.

This retrospective study included 56,205 veterans and 172,741 non-veterans.

The veterans’ earliest date of entering service was January 1960, and the latest date of leaving service was December 2012.

At a mean follow-up of 29.3 years, 294 (0.52%) veterans and 974 (0.56%) non-veterans were diagnosed with leukemia, HL, or NHL.

There were 125 (0.22%) cases of leukemia in veterans and 365 (0.21%) in non-veterans. There were 59 (0.10%) cases of HL in veterans and 182 (0.11%) in non-veterans. And there were 144 (0.26%) cases of NHL in veterans and 538 (0.31%) in non-veterans.

There was no significant difference in the risk of all 3 cancer types between the veterans and non-veterans. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.96 (P=0.541).

There were no significant differences in an adjusted analysis either. (The analysis was adjusted for regional deprivation, which takes into account information on income, employment, health, education, housing, crime, and access to services.)

The adjusted HR was 1.03 (P=0.773) for leukemias, 1.19 (P=0.272) for HL, and 0.86 (P=0.110) for NHL.

“This is an important study which provides reassurance that military service in the last 50 years does not increase people’s risk of leukemia overall,” said study author Beverly Bergman, PhD, of the University of Glasgow in the UK.

“The Armed Forces comply with all relevant health and safety legislation and regulations, and we can now see that their risk is no different from the general population.”

Cpl Si Longworth RLC

People who have served in the Armed Forces do not have an increased risk of leukemia or lymphoma, according to research published in Cancer Epidemiology.

Researchers analyzed the long-term risks of developing leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in veterans living in Scotland.

At a mean 30 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the risk of the aforementioned malignancies between veterans and non-veterans in Scotland.

This retrospective study included 56,205 veterans and 172,741 non-veterans.

The veterans’ earliest date of entering service was January 1960, and the latest date of leaving service was December 2012.

At a mean follow-up of 29.3 years, 294 (0.52%) veterans and 974 (0.56%) non-veterans were diagnosed with leukemia, HL, or NHL.

There were 125 (0.22%) cases of leukemia in veterans and 365 (0.21%) in non-veterans. There were 59 (0.10%) cases of HL in veterans and 182 (0.11%) in non-veterans. And there were 144 (0.26%) cases of NHL in veterans and 538 (0.31%) in non-veterans.

There was no significant difference in the risk of all 3 cancer types between the veterans and non-veterans. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.96 (P=0.541).

There were no significant differences in an adjusted analysis either. (The analysis was adjusted for regional deprivation, which takes into account information on income, employment, health, education, housing, crime, and access to services.)

The adjusted HR was 1.03 (P=0.773) for leukemias, 1.19 (P=0.272) for HL, and 0.86 (P=0.110) for NHL.

“This is an important study which provides reassurance that military service in the last 50 years does not increase people’s risk of leukemia overall,” said study author Beverly Bergman, PhD, of the University of Glasgow in the UK.

“The Armed Forces comply with all relevant health and safety legislation and regulations, and we can now see that their risk is no different from the general population.”

Cpl Si Longworth RLC

People who have served in the Armed Forces do not have an increased risk of leukemia or lymphoma, according to research published in Cancer Epidemiology.

Researchers analyzed the long-term risks of developing leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in veterans living in Scotland.

At a mean 30 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the risk of the aforementioned malignancies between veterans and non-veterans in Scotland.

This retrospective study included 56,205 veterans and 172,741 non-veterans.

The veterans’ earliest date of entering service was January 1960, and the latest date of leaving service was December 2012.

At a mean follow-up of 29.3 years, 294 (0.52%) veterans and 974 (0.56%) non-veterans were diagnosed with leukemia, HL, or NHL.

There were 125 (0.22%) cases of leukemia in veterans and 365 (0.21%) in non-veterans. There were 59 (0.10%) cases of HL in veterans and 182 (0.11%) in non-veterans. And there were 144 (0.26%) cases of NHL in veterans and 538 (0.31%) in non-veterans.

There was no significant difference in the risk of all 3 cancer types between the veterans and non-veterans. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.96 (P=0.541).

There were no significant differences in an adjusted analysis either. (The analysis was adjusted for regional deprivation, which takes into account information on income, employment, health, education, housing, crime, and access to services.)

The adjusted HR was 1.03 (P=0.773) for leukemias, 1.19 (P=0.272) for HL, and 0.86 (P=0.110) for NHL.

“This is an important study which provides reassurance that military service in the last 50 years does not increase people’s risk of leukemia overall,” said study author Beverly Bergman, PhD, of the University of Glasgow in the UK.

“The Armed Forces comply with all relevant health and safety legislation and regulations, and we can now see that their risk is no different from the general population.”

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted accelerated approval for pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, releasing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including the antitumor immune response.

The drug, which is being developed by Merck, previously received FDA approval as a treatment for melanoma, lung cancer, and head and neck cancer.

Now, pembrolizumab has received accelerated approval to treat adult and pediatric patients with refractory cHL or those with cHL who have relapsed after 3 or more prior lines of therapy.

The accelerated approval was based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval of pembrolizumab for cHL patients may be contingent upon the verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

In adults with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

In pediatric patients with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 200 mg) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

Pembrolizumab trials

The FDA’s approval of pembrolizumab in adults with cHL is based on data from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 trial. (The following data were provided by Merck.)

The trial enrolled 210 patients who received pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or documented disease progression, or for up to 24 months in patients who did not progress.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy, including 35% with primary refractory disease and 14% whose disease was refractory to all prior regimens.

Sixty-one percent of patients had undergone prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, 83% had prior brentuximab use, and 36% had prior radiation therapy.

At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the overall response rate was 69%, and the complete response rate was 22%. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (range, 0.0+ to 11.1 months).

Five percent of patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to adverse events (AEs), and 26% had dose interruptions due to AEs. Fifteen percent of patients had an AE requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy.

The most common AEs (occurring in ≥20% of patients) were fatigue (26%), pyrexia (24%), cough (24%), musculoskeletal pain (21%), diarrhea (20%), and rash (20%).

Serious AEs occurred in 16% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥1%) were pneumonia, pneumonitis, pyrexia, dyspnea, graft-vs-host disease, and herpes zoster.

Two patients died from causes other than disease progression. One death was a result of graft-vs-host disease after subsequent allogeneic transplant, and the other was from septic shock.

There is limited experience with pembrolizumab in pediatric patients. The efficacy of the drug for pediatric patients was extrapolated from the results in the adult cHL population.

However, there is safety data on pembrolizumab in pediatric patients enrolled in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-051 trial. (These data were also provided by Merck.)

The trial included 40 pediatric patients with advanced melanoma or PD-L1–positive advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. Patients in this trial received pembrolizumab for a median of 43 days (range, 1-414 days).

The safety profile in these patients was similar to the profile in adults. Toxicities that occurred at a higher rate (≥15% difference) in pediatric patients than in adults under age 65 were fatigue (45%), vomiting (38%), abdominal pain (28%), hypertransaminasemia (28%), and hyponatremia (18%).

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted accelerated approval for pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, releasing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including the antitumor immune response.

The drug, which is being developed by Merck, previously received FDA approval as a treatment for melanoma, lung cancer, and head and neck cancer.

Now, pembrolizumab has received accelerated approval to treat adult and pediatric patients with refractory cHL or those with cHL who have relapsed after 3 or more prior lines of therapy.

The accelerated approval was based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval of pembrolizumab for cHL patients may be contingent upon the verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

In adults with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

In pediatric patients with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 200 mg) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

Pembrolizumab trials

The FDA’s approval of pembrolizumab in adults with cHL is based on data from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 trial. (The following data were provided by Merck.)

The trial enrolled 210 patients who received pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or documented disease progression, or for up to 24 months in patients who did not progress.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy, including 35% with primary refractory disease and 14% whose disease was refractory to all prior regimens.

Sixty-one percent of patients had undergone prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, 83% had prior brentuximab use, and 36% had prior radiation therapy.

At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the overall response rate was 69%, and the complete response rate was 22%. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (range, 0.0+ to 11.1 months).

Five percent of patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to adverse events (AEs), and 26% had dose interruptions due to AEs. Fifteen percent of patients had an AE requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy.

The most common AEs (occurring in ≥20% of patients) were fatigue (26%), pyrexia (24%), cough (24%), musculoskeletal pain (21%), diarrhea (20%), and rash (20%).

Serious AEs occurred in 16% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥1%) were pneumonia, pneumonitis, pyrexia, dyspnea, graft-vs-host disease, and herpes zoster.

Two patients died from causes other than disease progression. One death was a result of graft-vs-host disease after subsequent allogeneic transplant, and the other was from septic shock.

There is limited experience with pembrolizumab in pediatric patients. The efficacy of the drug for pediatric patients was extrapolated from the results in the adult cHL population.

However, there is safety data on pembrolizumab in pediatric patients enrolled in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-051 trial. (These data were also provided by Merck.)

The trial included 40 pediatric patients with advanced melanoma or PD-L1–positive advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. Patients in this trial received pembrolizumab for a median of 43 days (range, 1-414 days).

The safety profile in these patients was similar to the profile in adults. Toxicities that occurred at a higher rate (≥15% difference) in pediatric patients than in adults under age 65 were fatigue (45%), vomiting (38%), abdominal pain (28%), hypertransaminasemia (28%), and hyponatremia (18%).

Photo courtesy of Merck

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted accelerated approval for pembrolizumab (Keytruda) as a treatment for adult and pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, releasing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including the antitumor immune response.

The drug, which is being developed by Merck, previously received FDA approval as a treatment for melanoma, lung cancer, and head and neck cancer.

Now, pembrolizumab has received accelerated approval to treat adult and pediatric patients with refractory cHL or those with cHL who have relapsed after 3 or more prior lines of therapy.

The accelerated approval was based on tumor response rate and durability of response. Continued approval of pembrolizumab for cHL patients may be contingent upon the verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.

In adults with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

In pediatric patients with cHL, pembrolizumab is administered at a dose of 2 mg/kg (up to a maximum of 200 mg) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, or up to 24 months in patients without disease progression.

Pembrolizumab trials

The FDA’s approval of pembrolizumab in adults with cHL is based on data from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-087 trial. (The following data were provided by Merck.)

The trial enrolled 210 patients who received pembrolizumab at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or documented disease progression, or for up to 24 months in patients who did not progress.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were refractory to their last prior therapy, including 35% with primary refractory disease and 14% whose disease was refractory to all prior regimens.

Sixty-one percent of patients had undergone prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, 83% had prior brentuximab use, and 36% had prior radiation therapy.

At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the overall response rate was 69%, and the complete response rate was 22%. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (range, 0.0+ to 11.1 months).

Five percent of patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to adverse events (AEs), and 26% had dose interruptions due to AEs. Fifteen percent of patients had an AE requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy.

The most common AEs (occurring in ≥20% of patients) were fatigue (26%), pyrexia (24%), cough (24%), musculoskeletal pain (21%), diarrhea (20%), and rash (20%).

Serious AEs occurred in 16% of patients. The most frequent serious AEs (≥1%) were pneumonia, pneumonitis, pyrexia, dyspnea, graft-vs-host disease, and herpes zoster.

Two patients died from causes other than disease progression. One death was a result of graft-vs-host disease after subsequent allogeneic transplant, and the other was from septic shock.

There is limited experience with pembrolizumab in pediatric patients. The efficacy of the drug for pediatric patients was extrapolated from the results in the adult cHL population.

However, there is safety data on pembrolizumab in pediatric patients enrolled in the phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-051 trial. (These data were also provided by Merck.)

The trial included 40 pediatric patients with advanced melanoma or PD-L1–positive advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. Patients in this trial received pembrolizumab for a median of 43 days (range, 1-414 days).

The safety profile in these patients was similar to the profile in adults. Toxicities that occurred at a higher rate (≥15% difference) in pediatric patients than in adults under age 65 were fatigue (45%), vomiting (38%), abdominal pain (28%), hypertransaminasemia (28%), and hyponatremia (18%).

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have a high risk of developing a second malignancy, particularly if they have a family history of that malignancy.

The research showed that HL survivors in Sweden were roughly 2.4 times more likely than individuals in the country’s general population to develop a second cancer.

The risk for HL survivors remained high 30 years after treatment, and the risk was even greater in HL survivors who had a family history of specific cancers.

“The vast majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are cured with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” said study author Amit Sud, MBChB, of The Institute of Cancer Research, London in the UK.

“Our research has shown that these patients are at substantially increased risk of a second cancer later in life and particularly if they have a family history of cancer.”

Dr Sud and his colleagues described this research in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The team analyzed data from the Swedish Family-Cancer Project Database. They identified 9522 HL patients diagnosed between 1965 and 2013. During a median follow-up of 12.6 years, there were 1215 second cancers in 1121 HL patients (12%).

Compared to the general population, the HL patients had a significantly higher risk of all second malignancies, with a standardized incident ratio (SIR) of 2.39 and an absolute excess risk of 71.2 cases per 10,000 person-years.

Cancer types

HL patients had a significantly increased risk of several malignancies. The overall SIRs were as follows:

• NHL—7.99
• Leukemia—6.46
• Connective tissue cancer—5.73
• Thyroid cancer—5.13
• Squamous cell carcinoma—4.44
• Lung cancer—3.61
• Pharyngeal cancer—3.52
• Esophageal cancer—2.62
• Brain cancer—2.58
• Breast cancer—2.52
• Colon cancer—2.21
• Pancreatic cancer—2.09
• Melanoma—2.08
• Colorectal cancer—1.85
• Stomach cancer—1.78
• Bladder cancer—1.57
• Prostate cancer—1.21.

The researchers calculated SIRs over time and found the risk for many of the cancers remained high over 30 years following HL treatment.

Family history

The researchers identified 28,277 first-degree relatives of the HL survivors. Thirty percent of HL survivors (n=2785) had 1 or more first-degree relatives with a family history of cancer.

The SIR for cancers was 1.02 in the relatives. The SIR for second cancers was 2.83 for HL survivors who had first-degree relatives with cancer and 2.16 for HL survivors who did not have any first-degree relatives with cancer.

The researchers said the increased risk of second malignancy was correlated with the number of first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIR was 2.67 for HL patients who had a single first-degree relative with cancer and 3.40 for HL patients who had 2 or more first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIRs for different cancer types (for HL patients with at least 1 first-degree relative with cancer and no first-degree relatives with cancer, respectively) were as follows:

• NHL—14.43 vs 7.83
• Leukemia—14.31 vs 6.37
• Squamous cell carcinoma—10.85 vs 4.30
• Lung cancer—11.24 vs 3.39
• Breast cancer—4.36 vs 2.36
• Colorectal cancer—3.71 vs 1.76.

Sex and age

The researchers found significant differences in the SIRs for second cancers between HL patients diagnosed before the age of 35 and those diagnosed after age 35.

For men, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.26 for <35, 2.08 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—4.07 for < 35, 1.73 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—6.16 for < 35, 3.20 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—12.60 for < 35, 4.58 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—5.89 for < 35, 3.96 for ≥35
• NHL—15.9 for < 35, 6.93 for ≥35
• Leukemia—12.15 for < 35, 5.57 for ≥35.

For women, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.61 for <35, 1.73 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—1.31 for < 35, 1.65 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—8.84 for < 35, 2.50 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—6.00 for < 35, 1.14 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—6.37 for < 35, 4.87 for ≥35
• NHL—6.23 for < 35, 6.55 for ≥35
• Leukemia—10.36 for < 35, 4.51 for ≥35.

 

“Younger women who have been treated with radiotherapy to the chest for Hodgkin lymphoma are already screened for breast cancer, but our study suggests that we should be looking at ways of monitoring survivors for other forms of cancer too, and potentially offering preventative interventions,” Dr Sud said.

“After patients are cured, they no longer encounter oncologists, so it’s important that other healthcare providers are aware of the increased risk to Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to improve early diagnosis of second cancers.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have a high risk of developing a second malignancy, particularly if they have a family history of that malignancy.

The research showed that HL survivors in Sweden were roughly 2.4 times more likely than individuals in the country’s general population to develop a second cancer.

The risk for HL survivors remained high 30 years after treatment, and the risk was even greater in HL survivors who had a family history of specific cancers.

“The vast majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are cured with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” said study author Amit Sud, MBChB, of The Institute of Cancer Research, London in the UK.

“Our research has shown that these patients are at substantially increased risk of a second cancer later in life and particularly if they have a family history of cancer.”

Dr Sud and his colleagues described this research in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The team analyzed data from the Swedish Family-Cancer Project Database. They identified 9522 HL patients diagnosed between 1965 and 2013. During a median follow-up of 12.6 years, there were 1215 second cancers in 1121 HL patients (12%).

Compared to the general population, the HL patients had a significantly higher risk of all second malignancies, with a standardized incident ratio (SIR) of 2.39 and an absolute excess risk of 71.2 cases per 10,000 person-years.

Cancer types

HL patients had a significantly increased risk of several malignancies. The overall SIRs were as follows:

• NHL—7.99
• Leukemia—6.46
• Connective tissue cancer—5.73
• Thyroid cancer—5.13
• Squamous cell carcinoma—4.44
• Lung cancer—3.61
• Pharyngeal cancer—3.52
• Esophageal cancer—2.62
• Brain cancer—2.58
• Breast cancer—2.52
• Colon cancer—2.21
• Pancreatic cancer—2.09
• Melanoma—2.08
• Colorectal cancer—1.85
• Stomach cancer—1.78
• Bladder cancer—1.57
• Prostate cancer—1.21.

The researchers calculated SIRs over time and found the risk for many of the cancers remained high over 30 years following HL treatment.

Family history

The researchers identified 28,277 first-degree relatives of the HL survivors. Thirty percent of HL survivors (n=2785) had 1 or more first-degree relatives with a family history of cancer.

The SIR for cancers was 1.02 in the relatives. The SIR for second cancers was 2.83 for HL survivors who had first-degree relatives with cancer and 2.16 for HL survivors who did not have any first-degree relatives with cancer.

The researchers said the increased risk of second malignancy was correlated with the number of first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIR was 2.67 for HL patients who had a single first-degree relative with cancer and 3.40 for HL patients who had 2 or more first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIRs for different cancer types (for HL patients with at least 1 first-degree relative with cancer and no first-degree relatives with cancer, respectively) were as follows:

• NHL—14.43 vs 7.83
• Leukemia—14.31 vs 6.37
• Squamous cell carcinoma—10.85 vs 4.30
• Lung cancer—11.24 vs 3.39
• Breast cancer—4.36 vs 2.36
• Colorectal cancer—3.71 vs 1.76.

Sex and age

The researchers found significant differences in the SIRs for second cancers between HL patients diagnosed before the age of 35 and those diagnosed after age 35.

For men, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.26 for <35, 2.08 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—4.07 for < 35, 1.73 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—6.16 for < 35, 3.20 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—12.60 for < 35, 4.58 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—5.89 for < 35, 3.96 for ≥35
• NHL—15.9 for < 35, 6.93 for ≥35
• Leukemia—12.15 for < 35, 5.57 for ≥35.

For women, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.61 for <35, 1.73 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—1.31 for < 35, 1.65 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—8.84 for < 35, 2.50 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—6.00 for < 35, 1.14 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—6.37 for < 35, 4.87 for ≥35
• NHL—6.23 for < 35, 6.55 for ≥35
• Leukemia—10.36 for < 35, 4.51 for ≥35.

 

“Younger women who have been treated with radiotherapy to the chest for Hodgkin lymphoma are already screened for breast cancer, but our study suggests that we should be looking at ways of monitoring survivors for other forms of cancer too, and potentially offering preventative interventions,” Dr Sud said.

“After patients are cured, they no longer encounter oncologists, so it’s important that other healthcare providers are aware of the increased risk to Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to improve early diagnosis of second cancers.”

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors have a high risk of developing a second malignancy, particularly if they have a family history of that malignancy.

The research showed that HL survivors in Sweden were roughly 2.4 times more likely than individuals in the country’s general population to develop a second cancer.

The risk for HL survivors remained high 30 years after treatment, and the risk was even greater in HL survivors who had a family history of specific cancers.

“The vast majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are cured with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy,” said study author Amit Sud, MBChB, of The Institute of Cancer Research, London in the UK.

“Our research has shown that these patients are at substantially increased risk of a second cancer later in life and particularly if they have a family history of cancer.”

Dr Sud and his colleagues described this research in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The team analyzed data from the Swedish Family-Cancer Project Database. They identified 9522 HL patients diagnosed between 1965 and 2013. During a median follow-up of 12.6 years, there were 1215 second cancers in 1121 HL patients (12%).

Compared to the general population, the HL patients had a significantly higher risk of all second malignancies, with a standardized incident ratio (SIR) of 2.39 and an absolute excess risk of 71.2 cases per 10,000 person-years.

Cancer types

HL patients had a significantly increased risk of several malignancies. The overall SIRs were as follows:

• NHL—7.99
• Leukemia—6.46
• Connective tissue cancer—5.73
• Thyroid cancer—5.13
• Squamous cell carcinoma—4.44
• Lung cancer—3.61
• Pharyngeal cancer—3.52
• Esophageal cancer—2.62
• Brain cancer—2.58
• Breast cancer—2.52
• Colon cancer—2.21
• Pancreatic cancer—2.09
• Melanoma—2.08
• Colorectal cancer—1.85
• Stomach cancer—1.78
• Bladder cancer—1.57
• Prostate cancer—1.21.

The researchers calculated SIRs over time and found the risk for many of the cancers remained high over 30 years following HL treatment.

Family history

The researchers identified 28,277 first-degree relatives of the HL survivors. Thirty percent of HL survivors (n=2785) had 1 or more first-degree relatives with a family history of cancer.

The SIR for cancers was 1.02 in the relatives. The SIR for second cancers was 2.83 for HL survivors who had first-degree relatives with cancer and 2.16 for HL survivors who did not have any first-degree relatives with cancer.

The researchers said the increased risk of second malignancy was correlated with the number of first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIR was 2.67 for HL patients who had a single first-degree relative with cancer and 3.40 for HL patients who had 2 or more first-degree relatives with cancer.

The SIRs for different cancer types (for HL patients with at least 1 first-degree relative with cancer and no first-degree relatives with cancer, respectively) were as follows:

• NHL—14.43 vs 7.83
• Leukemia—14.31 vs 6.37
• Squamous cell carcinoma—10.85 vs 4.30
• Lung cancer—11.24 vs 3.39
• Breast cancer—4.36 vs 2.36
• Colorectal cancer—3.71 vs 1.76.

Sex and age

The researchers found significant differences in the SIRs for second cancers between HL patients diagnosed before the age of 35 and those diagnosed after age 35.

For men, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.26 for <35, 2.08 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—4.07 for < 35, 1.73 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—6.16 for < 35, 3.20 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—12.60 for < 35, 4.58 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—5.89 for < 35, 3.96 for ≥35
• NHL—15.9 for < 35, 6.93 for ≥35
• Leukemia—12.15 for < 35, 5.57 for ≥35.

For women, the SIRs were:

• All cancers—4.61 for <35, 1.73 for ≥ 35
• Colorectal cancer—1.31 for < 35, 1.65 for ≥35
• Lung cancer—8.84 for < 35, 2.50 for ≥35
• Breast cancer—6.00 for < 35, 1.14 for ≥35
• Squamous cell carcinoma—6.37 for < 35, 4.87 for ≥35
• NHL—6.23 for < 35, 6.55 for ≥35
• Leukemia—10.36 for < 35, 4.51 for ≥35.

 

“Younger women who have been treated with radiotherapy to the chest for Hodgkin lymphoma are already screened for breast cancer, but our study suggests that we should be looking at ways of monitoring survivors for other forms of cancer too, and potentially offering preventative interventions,” Dr Sud said.

“After patients are cured, they no longer encounter oncologists, so it’s important that other healthcare providers are aware of the increased risk to Hodgkin lymphoma survivors to improve early diagnosis of second cancers.”

Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to CMD-003 (baltaleucel-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

CMD-003 consists of patient-derived T cells that have been activated to kill malignant cells expressing antigens associated with EBV.

The T cells specifically target 4 EBV epitopes—LMP1, LMP2, EBNA, and BARF1.

CMD-003 is being developed by Cell Medica and the Baylor College of Medicine with funding provided, in part, by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

About fast track designation

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the FDA’s fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review. In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the biologic license application or new drug application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

CMD-003-related research

CMD-003 is currently under investigation in the phase 2 CITADEL trial for patients with extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma and the phase 2 CIVIC trial for patients with EBV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Researchers have not published results from any trials of CMD-003, but they have published results with EBV-specific T-cell products related to CMD-003.

In one study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2014, researchers administered cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in 50 patients with EBV-associated Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Twenty-nine of the patients were in remission when they received CTL infusions, but they were at a high risk of relapse. The remaining 21 patients had relapsed or refractory disease at the time of CTL infusion.

Twenty-seven of the patients who received CTLs as an adjuvant treatment remained in remission at 3.1 years after treatment.

Their 2-year event-free survival rate was 82%. None of the patients died of lymphoma, but 9 died from complications associated with the chemotherapy and radiation they had received.

Of the 21 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, 13 responded to CTL infusions, and 11 patients achieved a complete response. In this group, the 2-year event-free survival rate was about 50%.

The researchers said there were no toxicities that were definitively related to CTL infusion.

One patient had central nervous system deterioration 2 weeks after infusion. This was attributed to disease progression but could possibly have been treatment-related.

Another patient developed respiratory complications about 4 weeks after a second CTL infusion that may have been treatment-related. However, the researchers attributed it to an intercurrent infection, and the patient made a complete recovery.

Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to CMD-003 (baltaleucel-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

CMD-003 consists of patient-derived T cells that have been activated to kill malignant cells expressing antigens associated with EBV.

The T cells specifically target 4 EBV epitopes—LMP1, LMP2, EBNA, and BARF1.

CMD-003 is being developed by Cell Medica and the Baylor College of Medicine with funding provided, in part, by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

About fast track designation

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the FDA’s fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review. In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the biologic license application or new drug application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

CMD-003-related research

CMD-003 is currently under investigation in the phase 2 CITADEL trial for patients with extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma and the phase 2 CIVIC trial for patients with EBV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Researchers have not published results from any trials of CMD-003, but they have published results with EBV-specific T-cell products related to CMD-003.

In one study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2014, researchers administered cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in 50 patients with EBV-associated Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Twenty-nine of the patients were in remission when they received CTL infusions, but they were at a high risk of relapse. The remaining 21 patients had relapsed or refractory disease at the time of CTL infusion.

Twenty-seven of the patients who received CTLs as an adjuvant treatment remained in remission at 3.1 years after treatment.

Their 2-year event-free survival rate was 82%. None of the patients died of lymphoma, but 9 died from complications associated with the chemotherapy and radiation they had received.

Of the 21 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, 13 responded to CTL infusions, and 11 patients achieved a complete response. In this group, the 2-year event-free survival rate was about 50%.

The researchers said there were no toxicities that were definitively related to CTL infusion.

One patient had central nervous system deterioration 2 weeks after infusion. This was attributed to disease progression but could possibly have been treatment-related.

Another patient developed respiratory complications about 4 weeks after a second CTL infusion that may have been treatment-related. However, the researchers attributed it to an intercurrent infection, and the patient made a complete recovery.

Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast track designation to CMD-003 (baltaleucel-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).

CMD-003 consists of patient-derived T cells that have been activated to kill malignant cells expressing antigens associated with EBV.

The T cells specifically target 4 EBV epitopes—LMP1, LMP2, EBNA, and BARF1.

CMD-003 is being developed by Cell Medica and the Baylor College of Medicine with funding provided, in part, by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

About fast track designation

The FDA’s fast track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of products intended to treat or prevent serious or life-threatening conditions and address unmet medical need.

Through the FDA’s fast track program, a product may be eligible for priority review. In addition, the company developing the product may be allowed to submit sections of the biologic license application or new drug application on a rolling basis as data become available.

Fast track designation also provides the company with opportunities for more frequent meetings and written communications with the FDA.

CMD-003-related research

CMD-003 is currently under investigation in the phase 2 CITADEL trial for patients with extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma and the phase 2 CIVIC trial for patients with EBV-associated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

Researchers have not published results from any trials of CMD-003, but they have published results with EBV-specific T-cell products related to CMD-003.

In one study, published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2014, researchers administered cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in 50 patients with EBV-associated Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Twenty-nine of the patients were in remission when they received CTL infusions, but they were at a high risk of relapse. The remaining 21 patients had relapsed or refractory disease at the time of CTL infusion.

Twenty-seven of the patients who received CTLs as an adjuvant treatment remained in remission at 3.1 years after treatment.

Their 2-year event-free survival rate was 82%. None of the patients died of lymphoma, but 9 died from complications associated with the chemotherapy and radiation they had received.

Of the 21 patients with relapsed or refractory disease, 13 responded to CTL infusions, and 11 patients achieved a complete response. In this group, the 2-year event-free survival rate was about 50%.

The researchers said there were no toxicities that were definitively related to CTL infusion.

One patient had central nervous system deterioration 2 weeks after infusion. This was attributed to disease progression but could possibly have been treatment-related.

Another patient developed respiratory complications about 4 weeks after a second CTL infusion that may have been treatment-related. However, the researchers attributed it to an intercurrent infection, and the patient made a complete recovery.

Wind turbines in Styria, Austria. Styrene is used in the manufacture of wind turbines.

A new study links styrene—a chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, rubber, and resins—to certain cancers.

The research showed that, contrary to previous suggestions, employees who have worked with styrene do not have an increased incidence of esophageal, pancreatic, lung, kidney, or bladder cancer.

On the other hand, they may have an increased risk of nasal and paranasal cancer, as well as myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The research was published in Epidemiology.

“It is important to know for present and former workers exposed to styrene that they are unlikely to have become ill by doing their job if they have developed cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, lungs, kidneys, bladder, or a wide range of other types of cancer,” said study author Henrik A. Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Aarhus University in Denmark.

“This is also new and important knowledge in the USA, where styrene was added to the list of carcinogenic substances in 2011.”

In relation to the cancers for which the study shows a possible increased risk, Dr Kolstad emphasized that additional research is needed to determine if styrene is the actual cause of the employees’ disease.

For the current study, Dr Kolstad and his colleagues analyzed data on 72,292 employees who worked for 1 of 443 small and medium-sized companies in Denmark that used styrene for the production of wind turbines, pleasure boats, and other products from 1964 to 2007.

There were 8961 incident cases of cancer in this cohort from 1968 to 2012. The standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) for all cancers was 1.04. When the researchers included a 10-year lag period, the SIR for all cancers was still 1.04.

As for hematologic malignancies, the researchers said they observed increased rate ratios associated with increased duration of employment for HL and myeloid leukemia.

For HL, the SIRs were 1.21 with no lag and 1.22 with a 10-year lag. For myeloid leukemia, the SIRs were 1.06 and 1.13, respectively.

The SIRs for non-Hodgkin lymphoma were 0.97 with no lag and 0.94 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for multiple myeloma were 0.79 and 0.77, respectively.

For cancers of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue, the SIRs were 0.97 with no lag and 0.96 with a 10-year lag. For lymphatic leukemia, the SIR was 0.96 for both time points.

The SIRs for monocytic leukemia were 0.77 with no lag and 0.56 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for other and unspecified leukemias were 1.05 and 1.26, respectively.

The researchers noted that workers first employed in the 1960s had a higher risk of HL than workers first employed in subsequent years.

The SIRs were 2.12 for those first employed in 1964-1969, 0.82 for 1970-1979, 1.07 for 1980-1989, 1.52 for 1990-1999, and 1.10 for those first employed in 2000-2007.

There were no such associations for other cancer sites.

Wind turbines in Styria, Austria. Styrene is used in the manufacture of wind turbines.

A new study links styrene—a chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, rubber, and resins—to certain cancers.

The research showed that, contrary to previous suggestions, employees who have worked with styrene do not have an increased incidence of esophageal, pancreatic, lung, kidney, or bladder cancer.

On the other hand, they may have an increased risk of nasal and paranasal cancer, as well as myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The research was published in Epidemiology.

“It is important to know for present and former workers exposed to styrene that they are unlikely to have become ill by doing their job if they have developed cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, lungs, kidneys, bladder, or a wide range of other types of cancer,” said study author Henrik A. Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Aarhus University in Denmark.

“This is also new and important knowledge in the USA, where styrene was added to the list of carcinogenic substances in 2011.”

In relation to the cancers for which the study shows a possible increased risk, Dr Kolstad emphasized that additional research is needed to determine if styrene is the actual cause of the employees’ disease.

For the current study, Dr Kolstad and his colleagues analyzed data on 72,292 employees who worked for 1 of 443 small and medium-sized companies in Denmark that used styrene for the production of wind turbines, pleasure boats, and other products from 1964 to 2007.

There were 8961 incident cases of cancer in this cohort from 1968 to 2012. The standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) for all cancers was 1.04. When the researchers included a 10-year lag period, the SIR for all cancers was still 1.04.

As for hematologic malignancies, the researchers said they observed increased rate ratios associated with increased duration of employment for HL and myeloid leukemia.

For HL, the SIRs were 1.21 with no lag and 1.22 with a 10-year lag. For myeloid leukemia, the SIRs were 1.06 and 1.13, respectively.

The SIRs for non-Hodgkin lymphoma were 0.97 with no lag and 0.94 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for multiple myeloma were 0.79 and 0.77, respectively.

For cancers of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue, the SIRs were 0.97 with no lag and 0.96 with a 10-year lag. For lymphatic leukemia, the SIR was 0.96 for both time points.

The SIRs for monocytic leukemia were 0.77 with no lag and 0.56 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for other and unspecified leukemias were 1.05 and 1.26, respectively.

The researchers noted that workers first employed in the 1960s had a higher risk of HL than workers first employed in subsequent years.

The SIRs were 2.12 for those first employed in 1964-1969, 0.82 for 1970-1979, 1.07 for 1980-1989, 1.52 for 1990-1999, and 1.10 for those first employed in 2000-2007.

There were no such associations for other cancer sites.

Wind turbines in Styria, Austria. Styrene is used in the manufacture of wind turbines.

A new study links styrene—a chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, rubber, and resins—to certain cancers.

The research showed that, contrary to previous suggestions, employees who have worked with styrene do not have an increased incidence of esophageal, pancreatic, lung, kidney, or bladder cancer.

On the other hand, they may have an increased risk of nasal and paranasal cancer, as well as myeloid leukemia and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The research was published in Epidemiology.

“It is important to know for present and former workers exposed to styrene that they are unlikely to have become ill by doing their job if they have developed cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, lungs, kidneys, bladder, or a wide range of other types of cancer,” said study author Henrik A. Kolstad, MD, PhD, of Aarhus University in Denmark.

“This is also new and important knowledge in the USA, where styrene was added to the list of carcinogenic substances in 2011.”

In relation to the cancers for which the study shows a possible increased risk, Dr Kolstad emphasized that additional research is needed to determine if styrene is the actual cause of the employees’ disease.

For the current study, Dr Kolstad and his colleagues analyzed data on 72,292 employees who worked for 1 of 443 small and medium-sized companies in Denmark that used styrene for the production of wind turbines, pleasure boats, and other products from 1964 to 2007.

There were 8961 incident cases of cancer in this cohort from 1968 to 2012. The standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) for all cancers was 1.04. When the researchers included a 10-year lag period, the SIR for all cancers was still 1.04.

As for hematologic malignancies, the researchers said they observed increased rate ratios associated with increased duration of employment for HL and myeloid leukemia.

For HL, the SIRs were 1.21 with no lag and 1.22 with a 10-year lag. For myeloid leukemia, the SIRs were 1.06 and 1.13, respectively.

The SIRs for non-Hodgkin lymphoma were 0.97 with no lag and 0.94 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for multiple myeloma were 0.79 and 0.77, respectively.

For cancers of lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue, the SIRs were 0.97 with no lag and 0.96 with a 10-year lag. For lymphatic leukemia, the SIR was 0.96 for both time points.

The SIRs for monocytic leukemia were 0.77 with no lag and 0.56 with a 10-year lag. The SIRs for other and unspecified leukemias were 1.05 and 1.26, respectively.

The researchers noted that workers first employed in the 1960s had a higher risk of HL than workers first employed in subsequent years.

The SIRs were 2.12 for those first employed in 1964-1969, 0.82 for 1970-1979, 1.07 for 1980-1989, 1.52 for 1990-1999, and 1.10 for those first employed in 2000-2007.

There were no such associations for other cancer sites.

New research published in Nature Communications appears to explain how Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reprograms cells into cancer cells.

Investigators said they discovered a mechanism by which EBV particles induce chromosomal instability without establishing a chronic infection, thereby conferring a risk for the development of tumors that do not necessarily carry the viral genome.

“The contribution of the viral infection to cancer development in patients with a weakened immune system is well understood,” said study author Henri-Jacques Delecluse, MD, PhD, of the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) in Heidelberg.

“But in the majority of cases, it remains unclear how an EBV infection leads to cancer development.”

With their research, Dr Delecluse and his colleagues found that BNRF1, a protein component of EBV, promotes the development of cancer. They said BNRF1 induces centrosome amplification, which is associated with chromosomal instability.

When a dividing cell comes in contact with EBV, BNRF1 frequently prompts the formation of an excessive number of centrosomes. As a result, chromosomes are no longer divided equally and accurately between daughter cells—a known cancer risk factor.

In contrast, when the investigators studied EBV deficient of BNRF1, they found the virus did not interfere with chromosome distribution to daughter cells.

The team noted that EBV normally remains silent in a few infected cells, but, occasionally, it reactivates to produce viral offspring that infects nearby cells. As a consequence, these cells come in close contact with BNRF1, thus increasing their risk of transforming into cancer cells.

“The novelty of our work is that we have uncovered a component of the viral particle as a cancer driver,” Dr Delecluse said. “All human-tumors viruses that have been studied so far cause cancer in a completely different manner.”

“Usually, the genetic material of the viruses needs to be permanently present in the infected cell, thus causing the activation of one or several viral genes that cause cancer development. However, these gene products are not present in the infectious particle itself.”

Dr Delecluse and his colleagues therefore suspect that EBV could cause cancers other than those that have already been linked to EBV. Certain cancers might not have been linked to the virus because they do not carry the viral genetic material.

“We must push forward with the development of a vaccine against EBV infection,” Dr Delecluse said. “This would be the most direct strategy to prevent an infection with the virus.”

“Our latest results show that the first infection could already be a cancer risk, and this fits with earlier work that showed an increase in the incidence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in people who underwent an episode of infectious mononucleosis.”

New research published in Nature Communications appears to explain how Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reprograms cells into cancer cells.

Investigators said they discovered a mechanism by which EBV particles induce chromosomal instability without establishing a chronic infection, thereby conferring a risk for the development of tumors that do not necessarily carry the viral genome.

“The contribution of the viral infection to cancer development in patients with a weakened immune system is well understood,” said study author Henri-Jacques Delecluse, MD, PhD, of the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) in Heidelberg.

“But in the majority of cases, it remains unclear how an EBV infection leads to cancer development.”

With their research, Dr Delecluse and his colleagues found that BNRF1, a protein component of EBV, promotes the development of cancer. They said BNRF1 induces centrosome amplification, which is associated with chromosomal instability.

When a dividing cell comes in contact with EBV, BNRF1 frequently prompts the formation of an excessive number of centrosomes. As a result, chromosomes are no longer divided equally and accurately between daughter cells—a known cancer risk factor.

In contrast, when the investigators studied EBV deficient of BNRF1, they found the virus did not interfere with chromosome distribution to daughter cells.

The team noted that EBV normally remains silent in a few infected cells, but, occasionally, it reactivates to produce viral offspring that infects nearby cells. As a consequence, these cells come in close contact with BNRF1, thus increasing their risk of transforming into cancer cells.

“The novelty of our work is that we have uncovered a component of the viral particle as a cancer driver,” Dr Delecluse said. “All human-tumors viruses that have been studied so far cause cancer in a completely different manner.”

“Usually, the genetic material of the viruses needs to be permanently present in the infected cell, thus causing the activation of one or several viral genes that cause cancer development. However, these gene products are not present in the infectious particle itself.”

Dr Delecluse and his colleagues therefore suspect that EBV could cause cancers other than those that have already been linked to EBV. Certain cancers might not have been linked to the virus because they do not carry the viral genetic material.

“We must push forward with the development of a vaccine against EBV infection,” Dr Delecluse said. “This would be the most direct strategy to prevent an infection with the virus.”

“Our latest results show that the first infection could already be a cancer risk, and this fits with earlier work that showed an increase in the incidence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in people who underwent an episode of infectious mononucleosis.”

New research published in Nature Communications appears to explain how Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reprograms cells into cancer cells.

Investigators said they discovered a mechanism by which EBV particles induce chromosomal instability without establishing a chronic infection, thereby conferring a risk for the development of tumors that do not necessarily carry the viral genome.

“The contribution of the viral infection to cancer development in patients with a weakened immune system is well understood,” said study author Henri-Jacques Delecluse, MD, PhD, of the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ) in Heidelberg.

“But in the majority of cases, it remains unclear how an EBV infection leads to cancer development.”

With their research, Dr Delecluse and his colleagues found that BNRF1, a protein component of EBV, promotes the development of cancer. They said BNRF1 induces centrosome amplification, which is associated with chromosomal instability.

When a dividing cell comes in contact with EBV, BNRF1 frequently prompts the formation of an excessive number of centrosomes. As a result, chromosomes are no longer divided equally and accurately between daughter cells—a known cancer risk factor.

In contrast, when the investigators studied EBV deficient of BNRF1, they found the virus did not interfere with chromosome distribution to daughter cells.

The team noted that EBV normally remains silent in a few infected cells, but, occasionally, it reactivates to produce viral offspring that infects nearby cells. As a consequence, these cells come in close contact with BNRF1, thus increasing their risk of transforming into cancer cells.

“The novelty of our work is that we have uncovered a component of the viral particle as a cancer driver,” Dr Delecluse said. “All human-tumors viruses that have been studied so far cause cancer in a completely different manner.”

“Usually, the genetic material of the viruses needs to be permanently present in the infected cell, thus causing the activation of one or several viral genes that cause cancer development. However, these gene products are not present in the infectious particle itself.”

Dr Delecluse and his colleagues therefore suspect that EBV could cause cancers other than those that have already been linked to EBV. Certain cancers might not have been linked to the virus because they do not carry the viral genetic material.

“We must push forward with the development of a vaccine against EBV infection,” Dr Delecluse said. “This would be the most direct strategy to prevent an infection with the virus.”

“Our latest results show that the first infection could already be a cancer risk, and this fits with earlier work that showed an increase in the incidence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in people who underwent an episode of infectious mononucleosis.”

 

Five-year survival for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma has more than doubled since the early 1950s, according to Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates.

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program show that the 5-year relative survival rate for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States went from 33% in 1950-1954 to 71.2% in 2008-2013, an increase of 116%, Dr. Mokdad and his associates reported (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

Not all of that trend was mirrored by mortality, however, as the death rate “was essentially unchanged between 1980 (8.3 deaths per 100,000) and 2014 (8.3 deaths per 100,000),” they noted in another part of their study that used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

In 2014, mortality for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the 7th highest among the 29 cancers included in the study, and more than 487,000 years of life were lost, which put it 6th among the 29 cancers, said Dr. Mokdad and his associates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

[email protected]

 

Five-year survival for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma has more than doubled since the early 1950s, according to Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates.

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program show that the 5-year relative survival rate for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States went from 33% in 1950-1954 to 71.2% in 2008-2013, an increase of 116%, Dr. Mokdad and his associates reported (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

Not all of that trend was mirrored by mortality, however, as the death rate “was essentially unchanged between 1980 (8.3 deaths per 100,000) and 2014 (8.3 deaths per 100,000),” they noted in another part of their study that used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

In 2014, mortality for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the 7th highest among the 29 cancers included in the study, and more than 487,000 years of life were lost, which put it 6th among the 29 cancers, said Dr. Mokdad and his associates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

[email protected]

 

Five-year survival for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma has more than doubled since the early 1950s, according to Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates.

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program show that the 5-year relative survival rate for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States went from 33% in 1950-1954 to 71.2% in 2008-2013, an increase of 116%, Dr. Mokdad and his associates reported (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

Not all of that trend was mirrored by mortality, however, as the death rate “was essentially unchanged between 1980 (8.3 deaths per 100,000) and 2014 (8.3 deaths per 100,000),” they noted in another part of their study that used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

In 2014, mortality for non-Hodgkin lymphoma was the 7th highest among the 29 cancers included in the study, and more than 487,000 years of life were lost, which put it 6th among the 29 cancers, said Dr. Mokdad and his associates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

[email protected]

 

Five-year relative survival for Hodgkin lymphoma increased 189% over the approximately 60 years from the early 1950s to 2013, according to investigators looking at data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

During 1950-1954, the 5-year relative survival rate for Hodgkin lymphoma was 30%, compared with 86.6% in 2008-2013, said Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

Hodgkin lymphoma was 1 of only 6 of the 29 cancers included in the analysis that had a 5-year survival rate of above 85%. The other five were breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, testicular cancer, and thyroid cancer, the investigators noted (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

In 2014, mortality for Hodgkin lymphoma was 0.4 per 100,000 population, which put it 27th among the 29 included cancers, with about 36,000 years of life lost, which was 26th of the 29 cancers, Dr. Mokdad and his associates said. This part of their study used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

[email protected]

 

Five-year relative survival for Hodgkin lymphoma increased 189% over the approximately 60 years from the early 1950s to 2013, according to investigators looking at data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

During 1950-1954, the 5-year relative survival rate for Hodgkin lymphoma was 30%, compared with 86.6% in 2008-2013, said Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

Hodgkin lymphoma was 1 of only 6 of the 29 cancers included in the analysis that had a 5-year survival rate of above 85%. The other five were breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, testicular cancer, and thyroid cancer, the investigators noted (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

In 2014, mortality for Hodgkin lymphoma was 0.4 per 100,000 population, which put it 27th among the 29 included cancers, with about 36,000 years of life lost, which was 26th of the 29 cancers, Dr. Mokdad and his associates said. This part of their study used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

[email protected]

 

Five-year relative survival for Hodgkin lymphoma increased 189% over the approximately 60 years from the early 1950s to 2013, according to investigators looking at data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

During 1950-1954, the 5-year relative survival rate for Hodgkin lymphoma was 30%, compared with 86.6% in 2008-2013, said Ali H. Mokdad, PhD, and his associates at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, Seattle.

Hodgkin lymphoma was 1 of only 6 of the 29 cancers included in the analysis that had a 5-year survival rate of above 85%. The other five were breast cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer, testicular cancer, and thyroid cancer, the investigators noted (JAMA 2017;317[4]:388-406).

In 2014, mortality for Hodgkin lymphoma was 0.4 per 100,000 population, which put it 27th among the 29 included cancers, with about 36,000 years of life lost, which was 26th of the 29 cancers, Dr. Mokdad and his associates said. This part of their study used deidentified death records from the National Center for Health Statistics and population counts from the Census Bureau, the NCHS, and the Human Mortality Database.

[email protected]