Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, Transplantation

Photo from Business Wire

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi^®, is now available in the US.

Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).

In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.

The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.

Photo from Business Wire

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi^®, is now available in the US.

Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).

In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.

The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.

Photo from Business Wire

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi^®, is now available in the US.

Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.

Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).

In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.

The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.

Image by Spencer Phillips

New research has revealed a link between rare gene variants and survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Researchers performed exome sequencing in nearly 2500 HSCT recipients and their matched, unrelated donors.

The sequencing revealed several gene variants—in both donors and recipients—that were significantly associated with overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and disease-related mortality (DRM) after HSCT.

Qianqian Zhu, PhD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center in Buffalo, New York, and her colleagues described these findings in Blood.

The team performed exome sequencing—using the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip—in patients who participated in the DISCOVeRY-BMT study.

This included 2473 HSCT recipients who had acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. It also included 2221 donors who were a 10/10 human leukocyte antigen match for each recipient.

The researchers looked at genetic variants in donors and recipients and assessed the variants’ associations with OS, TRM, and DRM.

Variants in recipients

Analyses revealed an increased risk of TRM when there was a mismatch between donors and recipients for a variant in TEX38—rs200092801. The increased risk was even more pronounced when either the recipient or the donor was female.

Among the recipients mismatched with their donors at rs200092801, every female recipient and every recipient with a female donor died from TRM. In comparison, 44% of the male recipients with male donors died from TRM.

The researchers said the rs200092801 variant may prompt the production of a mutant peptide that can be presented by MHC-I molecules to immune cells to trigger downstream immune response and TRM.

Dr Zhu and her colleagues also identified variants that appeared to have a positive impact on TRM and OS.

Recipients who had any of 6 variants in the gene OR51D1 had a decreased risk of TRM and improved OS.

The variants (rs138224979, rs148606808, rs141786655, rs61745314, rs200394876, and rs149135276) were not associated with DRM, so the researchers concluded that the improvement in OS was driven by protection against TRM.

Donor variants linked to OS

Donors had variants in 4 genes—ALPP, EMID1, SLC44A5, and LRP1—that were associated with OS but not TRM or DRM.

The 3 variants identified in ALPP (rs144454460, rs140078460, and rs142493383) were associated with improved OS.

And the 2 variants in SLC44A5 (rs143004355 and rs149696907) were associated with worse OS.

There were 2 variants in EMID1. One was associated with improved OS (rs34772704), and the other was associated with decreased OS (rs139996840).

And there were 27 variants in LRP1. Some had a positive association with OS, and others had a negative association.

Donor variants linked to TRM and DRM

Six variants in the HHAT gene were associated with TRM. Five of the variants appeared to have a protective effect against TRM (rs145455128, rs146916002, rs61744143, rs149597734, and rs145943928). For the other variant (rs141591165), the apparent effect was inconsistent between patient cohorts.

There were 3 variants in LYZL4 associated with DRM. Two were associated with an increased risk of DRM (rs147770623 and rs76947105), and 1 appeared to have a protective effect (rs181886204).

Six variants in NT5E appeared to have a protective effect against DRM (rs200250022, rs200369370, rs41271617, rs200648774, rs144719925, and rs145505137).

The researchers said the variants in NT5E probably reduce the enzyme activity of the gene. This supports preclinical findings showing that targeted blockade of NT5E can slow tumor growth.

“We have just started to uncover the biological relevance of these new and unexpected genes to a patient’s survival after [HSCT],” Dr Zhu said.

“Our findings shed light on new areas that were not considered before, but we need to further replicate and test our findings. We’re hoping that additional studies of this type will continue to discover novel genes leading to improved outcomes for patients.”

Image by Spencer Phillips

New research has revealed a link between rare gene variants and survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Researchers performed exome sequencing in nearly 2500 HSCT recipients and their matched, unrelated donors.

The sequencing revealed several gene variants—in both donors and recipients—that were significantly associated with overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and disease-related mortality (DRM) after HSCT.

Qianqian Zhu, PhD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center in Buffalo, New York, and her colleagues described these findings in Blood.

The team performed exome sequencing—using the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip—in patients who participated in the DISCOVeRY-BMT study.

This included 2473 HSCT recipients who had acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. It also included 2221 donors who were a 10/10 human leukocyte antigen match for each recipient.

The researchers looked at genetic variants in donors and recipients and assessed the variants’ associations with OS, TRM, and DRM.

Variants in recipients

Analyses revealed an increased risk of TRM when there was a mismatch between donors and recipients for a variant in TEX38—rs200092801. The increased risk was even more pronounced when either the recipient or the donor was female.

Among the recipients mismatched with their donors at rs200092801, every female recipient and every recipient with a female donor died from TRM. In comparison, 44% of the male recipients with male donors died from TRM.

The researchers said the rs200092801 variant may prompt the production of a mutant peptide that can be presented by MHC-I molecules to immune cells to trigger downstream immune response and TRM.

Dr Zhu and her colleagues also identified variants that appeared to have a positive impact on TRM and OS.

Recipients who had any of 6 variants in the gene OR51D1 had a decreased risk of TRM and improved OS.

The variants (rs138224979, rs148606808, rs141786655, rs61745314, rs200394876, and rs149135276) were not associated with DRM, so the researchers concluded that the improvement in OS was driven by protection against TRM.

Donor variants linked to OS

Donors had variants in 4 genes—ALPP, EMID1, SLC44A5, and LRP1—that were associated with OS but not TRM or DRM.

The 3 variants identified in ALPP (rs144454460, rs140078460, and rs142493383) were associated with improved OS.

And the 2 variants in SLC44A5 (rs143004355 and rs149696907) were associated with worse OS.

There were 2 variants in EMID1. One was associated with improved OS (rs34772704), and the other was associated with decreased OS (rs139996840).

And there were 27 variants in LRP1. Some had a positive association with OS, and others had a negative association.

Donor variants linked to TRM and DRM

Six variants in the HHAT gene were associated with TRM. Five of the variants appeared to have a protective effect against TRM (rs145455128, rs146916002, rs61744143, rs149597734, and rs145943928). For the other variant (rs141591165), the apparent effect was inconsistent between patient cohorts.

There were 3 variants in LYZL4 associated with DRM. Two were associated with an increased risk of DRM (rs147770623 and rs76947105), and 1 appeared to have a protective effect (rs181886204).

Six variants in NT5E appeared to have a protective effect against DRM (rs200250022, rs200369370, rs41271617, rs200648774, rs144719925, and rs145505137).

The researchers said the variants in NT5E probably reduce the enzyme activity of the gene. This supports preclinical findings showing that targeted blockade of NT5E can slow tumor growth.

“We have just started to uncover the biological relevance of these new and unexpected genes to a patient’s survival after [HSCT],” Dr Zhu said.

“Our findings shed light on new areas that were not considered before, but we need to further replicate and test our findings. We’re hoping that additional studies of this type will continue to discover novel genes leading to improved outcomes for patients.”

Image by Spencer Phillips

New research has revealed a link between rare gene variants and survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Researchers performed exome sequencing in nearly 2500 HSCT recipients and their matched, unrelated donors.

The sequencing revealed several gene variants—in both donors and recipients—that were significantly associated with overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), and disease-related mortality (DRM) after HSCT.

Qianqian Zhu, PhD, of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center in Buffalo, New York, and her colleagues described these findings in Blood.

The team performed exome sequencing—using the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip—in patients who participated in the DISCOVeRY-BMT study.

This included 2473 HSCT recipients who had acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. It also included 2221 donors who were a 10/10 human leukocyte antigen match for each recipient.

The researchers looked at genetic variants in donors and recipients and assessed the variants’ associations with OS, TRM, and DRM.

Variants in recipients

Analyses revealed an increased risk of TRM when there was a mismatch between donors and recipients for a variant in TEX38—rs200092801. The increased risk was even more pronounced when either the recipient or the donor was female.

Among the recipients mismatched with their donors at rs200092801, every female recipient and every recipient with a female donor died from TRM. In comparison, 44% of the male recipients with male donors died from TRM.

The researchers said the rs200092801 variant may prompt the production of a mutant peptide that can be presented by MHC-I molecules to immune cells to trigger downstream immune response and TRM.

Dr Zhu and her colleagues also identified variants that appeared to have a positive impact on TRM and OS.

Recipients who had any of 6 variants in the gene OR51D1 had a decreased risk of TRM and improved OS.

The variants (rs138224979, rs148606808, rs141786655, rs61745314, rs200394876, and rs149135276) were not associated with DRM, so the researchers concluded that the improvement in OS was driven by protection against TRM.

Donor variants linked to OS

Donors had variants in 4 genes—ALPP, EMID1, SLC44A5, and LRP1—that were associated with OS but not TRM or DRM.

The 3 variants identified in ALPP (rs144454460, rs140078460, and rs142493383) were associated with improved OS.

And the 2 variants in SLC44A5 (rs143004355 and rs149696907) were associated with worse OS.

There were 2 variants in EMID1. One was associated with improved OS (rs34772704), and the other was associated with decreased OS (rs139996840).

And there were 27 variants in LRP1. Some had a positive association with OS, and others had a negative association.

Donor variants linked to TRM and DRM

Six variants in the HHAT gene were associated with TRM. Five of the variants appeared to have a protective effect against TRM (rs145455128, rs146916002, rs61744143, rs149597734, and rs145943928). For the other variant (rs141591165), the apparent effect was inconsistent between patient cohorts.

There were 3 variants in LYZL4 associated with DRM. Two were associated with an increased risk of DRM (rs147770623 and rs76947105), and 1 appeared to have a protective effect (rs181886204).

Six variants in NT5E appeared to have a protective effect against DRM (rs200250022, rs200369370, rs41271617, rs200648774, rs144719925, and rs145505137).

The researchers said the variants in NT5E probably reduce the enzyme activity of the gene. This supports preclinical findings showing that targeted blockade of NT5E can slow tumor growth.

“We have just started to uncover the biological relevance of these new and unexpected genes to a patient’s survival after [HSCT],” Dr Zhu said.

“Our findings shed light on new areas that were not considered before, but we need to further replicate and test our findings. We’re hoping that additional studies of this type will continue to discover novel genes leading to improved outcomes for patients.”

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa™) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive, B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is the first and only CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for this indication.

The product consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

Health Canada’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is based on results from the phase 3 INO-VATE trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL.

Patients received inotuzumab ozogamicin or 1 of 3 chemotherapy regimens—high-dose cytarabine; cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab, and 2 were deemed related to chemotherapy.

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa™) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive, B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is the first and only CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for this indication.

The product consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

Health Canada’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is based on results from the phase 3 INO-VATE trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL.

Patients received inotuzumab ozogamicin or 1 of 3 chemotherapy regimens—high-dose cytarabine; cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab, and 2 were deemed related to chemotherapy.

Micrograph showing ALL

Health Canada has approved inotuzumab ozogamicin (Besponsa™) as monotherapy for adults with relapsed or refractory, CD22-positive, B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Inotuzumab ozogamicin is the first and only CD22-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for this indication.

The product consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 and a cytotoxic agent known as calicheamicin.

Health Canada’s approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin is based on results from the phase 3 INO-VATE trial, which were published in NEJM in June 2016.

The trial enrolled 326 adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor ALL.

Patients received inotuzumab ozogamicin or 1 of 3 chemotherapy regimens—high-dose cytarabine; cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

The rate of complete remission, including incomplete hematologic recovery, was 80.7% in the inotuzumab arm and 29.4% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The median duration of remission was 4.6 months and 3.1 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Forty-one percent of patients treated with inotuzumab and 11% of those who received chemotherapy proceeded to stem cell transplant directly after treatment (P<0.001).

The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months in the inotuzumab arm and 1.8 months in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001).

The median overall survival was 7.7 months and 6.7 months, respectively (P=0.04). This did not meet the prespecified boundary of significance (P=0.0208).

Liver-related adverse events were more common in the inotuzumab arm than the chemotherapy arm. The most frequent of these were increased aspartate aminotransferase level (20% vs 10%), hyperbilirubinemia (15% vs 10%), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (14% vs 11%).

Veno-occlusive liver disease occurred in 11% of patients in the inotuzumab arm and 1% in the chemotherapy arm.

There were 17 deaths during treatment in the inotuzumab arm and 11 in the chemotherapy arm. Four deaths were considered related to inotuzumab, and 2 were deemed related to chemotherapy.

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the new drug application (NDA) for duvelisib, a dual PI3K delta/gamma inhibitor.

With this NDA, Verastem, Inc., is seeking full approval of duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval of the drug for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the NDA by October 5, 2018.

The FDA aims to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The agency grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The application for duvelisib is supported by data from DUO™, a randomized, phase 3 study of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL, and DYNAMO™, a phase 2 study of patients with refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Phase 3 DUO trial

Results from DUO were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting in December.

This study included 319 CLL/SLL patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either duvelisib (25 mg orally twice daily) or ofatumumab (initial infusion of 300 mg followed by 7 weekly infusions and 4 monthly infusions of 2000 mg).

The study’s primary endpoint was met, as duvelisib conferred a significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) over ofatumumab.

Per an independent review committee, the median PFS was 13.3 months with duvelisib and 9.9 months with ofatumumab (hazard ratio=0.52; P<0.0001). Duvelisib maintained a PFS advantage in all patient subgroups analyzed.

The overall response rate was 73.8% with duvelisib and 45.3% with ofatumumab (P<0.0001). The complete response rate was 0.6% in both arms.

Overall survival (OS) was similar in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms (hazard ratio=0.99; P=0.4807). The median OS was not reached in either arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs)—in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms, respectively—were neutropenia (30% vs 17%), anemia (13% vs 5%), diarrhea (15% vs 1%), pneumonia (14% vs 1%), and colitis (12% vs 1%).

Thirty-five percent of patients discontinued duvelisib due to an AE.

Severe opportunistic infections occurred in 6% of duvelisib recipients—bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (n=4), fungal infection (n=2), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (n=2), and cytomegalovirus colitis (n=1).

There were 4 deaths related to duvelisib—staphylococcal pneumonia (n=2), general physical health deterioration (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

Phase 2 DYNAMO trial

Results from DYNAMO were presented at the 22nd EHA Congress (abstract S777) in June 2017.

This trial enrolled patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose disease was refractory to both rituximab and chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy.

There were 83 patients with FL. They had a median of 3 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1-10).

The patients received duvelisib at 25 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The overall response rate, per an independent review committee, was 43%. One patient achieved a complete response, and 35 had a partial response. The median duration of response was 7.9 months.

The median PFS was 8.3 months, and the median OS was 27.8 months.

The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), diarrhea (16%), lipase increase (10%), and thrombocytopenia (9%).

There were 2 serious opportunistic infections—Pneumocystis pneumonia and fungal pneumonia.

There were 3 deaths attributed to duvelisib—toxic epidermal necrolysis/sepsis syndrome (n=1), drug reaction/eosinophilia/systemic symptoms (n=1), and pneumonitis/pneumonia (n=1).

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the new drug application (NDA) for duvelisib, a dual PI3K delta/gamma inhibitor.

With this NDA, Verastem, Inc., is seeking full approval of duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval of the drug for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the NDA by October 5, 2018.

The FDA aims to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The agency grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The application for duvelisib is supported by data from DUO™, a randomized, phase 3 study of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL, and DYNAMO™, a phase 2 study of patients with refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Phase 3 DUO trial

Results from DUO were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting in December.

This study included 319 CLL/SLL patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either duvelisib (25 mg orally twice daily) or ofatumumab (initial infusion of 300 mg followed by 7 weekly infusions and 4 monthly infusions of 2000 mg).

The study’s primary endpoint was met, as duvelisib conferred a significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) over ofatumumab.

Per an independent review committee, the median PFS was 13.3 months with duvelisib and 9.9 months with ofatumumab (hazard ratio=0.52; P<0.0001). Duvelisib maintained a PFS advantage in all patient subgroups analyzed.

The overall response rate was 73.8% with duvelisib and 45.3% with ofatumumab (P<0.0001). The complete response rate was 0.6% in both arms.

Overall survival (OS) was similar in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms (hazard ratio=0.99; P=0.4807). The median OS was not reached in either arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs)—in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms, respectively—were neutropenia (30% vs 17%), anemia (13% vs 5%), diarrhea (15% vs 1%), pneumonia (14% vs 1%), and colitis (12% vs 1%).

Thirty-five percent of patients discontinued duvelisib due to an AE.

Severe opportunistic infections occurred in 6% of duvelisib recipients—bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (n=4), fungal infection (n=2), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (n=2), and cytomegalovirus colitis (n=1).

There were 4 deaths related to duvelisib—staphylococcal pneumonia (n=2), general physical health deterioration (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

Phase 2 DYNAMO trial

Results from DYNAMO were presented at the 22nd EHA Congress (abstract S777) in June 2017.

This trial enrolled patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose disease was refractory to both rituximab and chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy.

There were 83 patients with FL. They had a median of 3 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1-10).

The patients received duvelisib at 25 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The overall response rate, per an independent review committee, was 43%. One patient achieved a complete response, and 35 had a partial response. The median duration of response was 7.9 months.

The median PFS was 8.3 months, and the median OS was 27.8 months.

The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), diarrhea (16%), lipase increase (10%), and thrombocytopenia (9%).

There were 2 serious opportunistic infections—Pneumocystis pneumonia and fungal pneumonia.

There were 3 deaths attributed to duvelisib—toxic epidermal necrolysis/sepsis syndrome (n=1), drug reaction/eosinophilia/systemic symptoms (n=1), and pneumonitis/pneumonia (n=1).

follicular lymphoma

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the new drug application (NDA) for duvelisib, a dual PI3K delta/gamma inhibitor.

With this NDA, Verastem, Inc., is seeking full approval of duvelisib for the treatment of relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and accelerated approval of the drug for the treatment of relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (FL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the NDA by October 5, 2018.

The FDA aims to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The agency grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The application for duvelisib is supported by data from DUO™, a randomized, phase 3 study of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL, and DYNAMO™, a phase 2 study of patients with refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Phase 3 DUO trial

Results from DUO were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting in December.

This study included 319 CLL/SLL patients who were randomized 1:1 to receive either duvelisib (25 mg orally twice daily) or ofatumumab (initial infusion of 300 mg followed by 7 weekly infusions and 4 monthly infusions of 2000 mg).

The study’s primary endpoint was met, as duvelisib conferred a significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) over ofatumumab.

Per an independent review committee, the median PFS was 13.3 months with duvelisib and 9.9 months with ofatumumab (hazard ratio=0.52; P<0.0001). Duvelisib maintained a PFS advantage in all patient subgroups analyzed.

The overall response rate was 73.8% with duvelisib and 45.3% with ofatumumab (P<0.0001). The complete response rate was 0.6% in both arms.

Overall survival (OS) was similar in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms (hazard ratio=0.99; P=0.4807). The median OS was not reached in either arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs)—in the duvelisib and ofatumumab arms, respectively—were neutropenia (30% vs 17%), anemia (13% vs 5%), diarrhea (15% vs 1%), pneumonia (14% vs 1%), and colitis (12% vs 1%).

Thirty-five percent of patients discontinued duvelisib due to an AE.

Severe opportunistic infections occurred in 6% of duvelisib recipients—bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (n=4), fungal infection (n=2), Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (n=2), and cytomegalovirus colitis (n=1).

There were 4 deaths related to duvelisib—staphylococcal pneumonia (n=2), general physical health deterioration (n=1), and sepsis (n=1).

Phase 2 DYNAMO trial

Results from DYNAMO were presented at the 22nd EHA Congress (abstract S777) in June 2017.

This trial enrolled patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma whose disease was refractory to both rituximab and chemotherapy or radioimmunotherapy.

There were 83 patients with FL. They had a median of 3 prior anticancer regimens (range, 1-10).

The patients received duvelisib at 25 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The overall response rate, per an independent review committee, was 43%. One patient achieved a complete response, and 35 had a partial response. The median duration of response was 7.9 months.

The median PFS was 8.3 months, and the median OS was 27.8 months.

The most common grade 3 or higher AEs were neutropenia (22%), anemia (13%), diarrhea (16%), lipase increase (10%), and thrombocytopenia (9%).

There were 2 serious opportunistic infections—Pneumocystis pneumonia and fungal pneumonia.

There were 3 deaths attributed to duvelisib—toxic epidermal necrolysis/sepsis syndrome (n=1), drug reaction/eosinophilia/systemic symptoms (n=1), and pneumonitis/pneumonia (n=1).

Physicians receiving general payments from the company marketing a targeted cancer therapy were more likely to prescribe it in three out of six drugs evaluated, researchers reported.

Prescribing of sunitinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib was increased for physicians receiving such payments versus not receiving them, while prescribing of imatinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib were not, according to the analysis by Aaron P. Mitchell, MD, of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and his coauthors.

In previous studies, pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians have been associated with “higher-cost, brand-name pharmaceutical prescribing,” Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues wrote. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“Whether industry payments are associated with physician treatment choice in oncology is uncertain,” they said.

To evaluate the association between payments to oncologists and drug selection, Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues linked Open Payments data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to data from Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File for the years 2013-2014.

The primary variable in the study was payments received during 2013, according to investigators, and the primary outcome of the analysis was prescriptions filled during 2014.

Open Payments reported in 2013 had a total dollar value of $4.08 billion, including $1.20 billion paid to physicians, according to CMS data.

The researchers focused on targeted therapies for two therapeutic areas: metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib; and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

They limited their analysis to physicians listed as oncologists who filled at least 20 prescriptions for each of the three drugs in metastatic RCC (n = 354) or in CML (n = 2,225).

Receiving payments categorized as “general,” such as gifts, speaker fees, meals, and travel, increased the odds of prescribing drugs for both metastatic RCC (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.14; P = .001) and for CML (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47; P less than .001).

By contrast, research payments did not increase the odds of prescribing those drugs, the investigators reported.

Looking at specific drugs, they found that receipt of general payments from a drug’s manufacturer was associated with increased prescribing of sunitinib (50.5% versus 34.4%, P = .01), dasatinib (13.8% versus 11.4%, P = .02), and nilotinib (15.4% vs 12.5%, P = .01).

However, no such association was found for sorafenib or pazopanib.

For imatinib, by contrast, investigators said industry payments were associated with a prescribing decrease.

“This may reflect a strategy by the manufacturer of imatinib, which also produces nilotinib, to promote switching to nilotinib before the patent expiration of imatinib in 2015,” the researchers wrote.

Dr. Mitchell and his coauthors reported no conflict of interest disclosures related to the study.

SOURCE: Mitchell AP, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 9. doi: 0.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0776.

Physicians receiving general payments from the company marketing a targeted cancer therapy were more likely to prescribe it in three out of six drugs evaluated, researchers reported.

Prescribing of sunitinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib was increased for physicians receiving such payments versus not receiving them, while prescribing of imatinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib were not, according to the analysis by Aaron P. Mitchell, MD, of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and his coauthors.

In previous studies, pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians have been associated with “higher-cost, brand-name pharmaceutical prescribing,” Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues wrote. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“Whether industry payments are associated with physician treatment choice in oncology is uncertain,” they said.

To evaluate the association between payments to oncologists and drug selection, Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues linked Open Payments data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to data from Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File for the years 2013-2014.

The primary variable in the study was payments received during 2013, according to investigators, and the primary outcome of the analysis was prescriptions filled during 2014.

Open Payments reported in 2013 had a total dollar value of $4.08 billion, including $1.20 billion paid to physicians, according to CMS data.

The researchers focused on targeted therapies for two therapeutic areas: metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib; and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

They limited their analysis to physicians listed as oncologists who filled at least 20 prescriptions for each of the three drugs in metastatic RCC (n = 354) or in CML (n = 2,225).

Receiving payments categorized as “general,” such as gifts, speaker fees, meals, and travel, increased the odds of prescribing drugs for both metastatic RCC (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.14; P = .001) and for CML (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47; P less than .001).

By contrast, research payments did not increase the odds of prescribing those drugs, the investigators reported.

Looking at specific drugs, they found that receipt of general payments from a drug’s manufacturer was associated with increased prescribing of sunitinib (50.5% versus 34.4%, P = .01), dasatinib (13.8% versus 11.4%, P = .02), and nilotinib (15.4% vs 12.5%, P = .01).

However, no such association was found for sorafenib or pazopanib.

For imatinib, by contrast, investigators said industry payments were associated with a prescribing decrease.

“This may reflect a strategy by the manufacturer of imatinib, which also produces nilotinib, to promote switching to nilotinib before the patent expiration of imatinib in 2015,” the researchers wrote.

Dr. Mitchell and his coauthors reported no conflict of interest disclosures related to the study.

SOURCE: Mitchell AP, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 9. doi: 0.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0776.

Physicians receiving general payments from the company marketing a targeted cancer therapy were more likely to prescribe it in three out of six drugs evaluated, researchers reported.

Prescribing of sunitinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib was increased for physicians receiving such payments versus not receiving them, while prescribing of imatinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib were not, according to the analysis by Aaron P. Mitchell, MD, of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and his coauthors.

In previous studies, pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians have been associated with “higher-cost, brand-name pharmaceutical prescribing,” Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues wrote. The report was published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“Whether industry payments are associated with physician treatment choice in oncology is uncertain,” they said.

To evaluate the association between payments to oncologists and drug selection, Dr. Mitchell and his colleagues linked Open Payments data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to data from Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File for the years 2013-2014.

The primary variable in the study was payments received during 2013, according to investigators, and the primary outcome of the analysis was prescriptions filled during 2014.

Open Payments reported in 2013 had a total dollar value of $4.08 billion, including $1.20 billion paid to physicians, according to CMS data.

The researchers focused on targeted therapies for two therapeutic areas: metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), including sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib; and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib.

They limited their analysis to physicians listed as oncologists who filled at least 20 prescriptions for each of the three drugs in metastatic RCC (n = 354) or in CML (n = 2,225).

Receiving payments categorized as “general,” such as gifts, speaker fees, meals, and travel, increased the odds of prescribing drugs for both metastatic RCC (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.14; P = .001) and for CML (odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47; P less than .001).

By contrast, research payments did not increase the odds of prescribing those drugs, the investigators reported.

Looking at specific drugs, they found that receipt of general payments from a drug’s manufacturer was associated with increased prescribing of sunitinib (50.5% versus 34.4%, P = .01), dasatinib (13.8% versus 11.4%, P = .02), and nilotinib (15.4% vs 12.5%, P = .01).

However, no such association was found for sorafenib or pazopanib.

For imatinib, by contrast, investigators said industry payments were associated with a prescribing decrease.

“This may reflect a strategy by the manufacturer of imatinib, which also produces nilotinib, to promote switching to nilotinib before the patent expiration of imatinib in 2015,” the researchers wrote.

Dr. Mitchell and his coauthors reported no conflict of interest disclosures related to the study.

SOURCE: Mitchell AP, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 9. doi: 0.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0776.

Cancer Research Center

Single-cell analysis has revealed key genetic events in a type of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), according to researchers.

The team tracked the branching pattern of evolution in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL and identified mutations that may trigger development of the disease.

The researchers believe their findings could be used in minimal residual disease assessments as well as for the development of new targeted drugs.

Caroline Furness, MD, of Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and her colleagues described this research in Leukemia.

To determine the sequence of mutational events in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, the researchers examined individual leukemia cells from 19 children and young adults with the disease, as well as 1 cell line with the STIL-TAL1 rearrangement (RPMI 8402).

The team found the STIL-TAL1 gene fusion and inactivation of the CDKN2A gene occurred very early in leukemia development.

The researchers said it was difficult to tell whether STIL-TAL1 fusion or CDKN2A loss are initiating events in this disease, and it isn’t clear which mutational event occurs first.

However, the team believes the STIL-TAL1 fusion is likely a founder or truncal event for this type of leukemia, so targeting the TAL1 regulatory complex could be an effective way to treat the disease.

The researchers also identified mutations in NOTCH1 and PTEN as secondary subclonal events.

Half of the samples examined had errors affecting PTEN, which suggests these events are key to maintaining leukemia growth and survival in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, according to the researchers.

“We need to understand how cancers evolve and unpick which mutations are key to triggering cancer development and which are important for driving its growth and spread,” Dr Furness said.

“Our study uncovered these crucial mutations in a type of leukemia that accounts for around a quarter of cases of T-cell leukemia in children and young adults. This will help us to develop more effective treatments, especially in those children who relapse, and kinder treatments that won’t cause life-long side effects.”

Cancer Research Center

Single-cell analysis has revealed key genetic events in a type of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), according to researchers.

The team tracked the branching pattern of evolution in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL and identified mutations that may trigger development of the disease.

The researchers believe their findings could be used in minimal residual disease assessments as well as for the development of new targeted drugs.

Caroline Furness, MD, of Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and her colleagues described this research in Leukemia.

To determine the sequence of mutational events in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, the researchers examined individual leukemia cells from 19 children and young adults with the disease, as well as 1 cell line with the STIL-TAL1 rearrangement (RPMI 8402).

The team found the STIL-TAL1 gene fusion and inactivation of the CDKN2A gene occurred very early in leukemia development.

The researchers said it was difficult to tell whether STIL-TAL1 fusion or CDKN2A loss are initiating events in this disease, and it isn’t clear which mutational event occurs first.

However, the team believes the STIL-TAL1 fusion is likely a founder or truncal event for this type of leukemia, so targeting the TAL1 regulatory complex could be an effective way to treat the disease.

The researchers also identified mutations in NOTCH1 and PTEN as secondary subclonal events.

Half of the samples examined had errors affecting PTEN, which suggests these events are key to maintaining leukemia growth and survival in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, according to the researchers.

“We need to understand how cancers evolve and unpick which mutations are key to triggering cancer development and which are important for driving its growth and spread,” Dr Furness said.

“Our study uncovered these crucial mutations in a type of leukemia that accounts for around a quarter of cases of T-cell leukemia in children and young adults. This will help us to develop more effective treatments, especially in those children who relapse, and kinder treatments that won’t cause life-long side effects.”

Cancer Research Center

Single-cell analysis has revealed key genetic events in a type of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), according to researchers.

The team tracked the branching pattern of evolution in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL and identified mutations that may trigger development of the disease.

The researchers believe their findings could be used in minimal residual disease assessments as well as for the development of new targeted drugs.

Caroline Furness, MD, of Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK, and her colleagues described this research in Leukemia.

To determine the sequence of mutational events in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, the researchers examined individual leukemia cells from 19 children and young adults with the disease, as well as 1 cell line with the STIL-TAL1 rearrangement (RPMI 8402).

The team found the STIL-TAL1 gene fusion and inactivation of the CDKN2A gene occurred very early in leukemia development.

The researchers said it was difficult to tell whether STIL-TAL1 fusion or CDKN2A loss are initiating events in this disease, and it isn’t clear which mutational event occurs first.

However, the team believes the STIL-TAL1 fusion is likely a founder or truncal event for this type of leukemia, so targeting the TAL1 regulatory complex could be an effective way to treat the disease.

The researchers also identified mutations in NOTCH1 and PTEN as secondary subclonal events.

Half of the samples examined had errors affecting PTEN, which suggests these events are key to maintaining leukemia growth and survival in STIL-TAL1-positive T-ALL, according to the researchers.

“We need to understand how cancers evolve and unpick which mutations are key to triggering cancer development and which are important for driving its growth and spread,” Dr Furness said.

“Our study uncovered these crucial mutations in a type of leukemia that accounts for around a quarter of cases of T-cell leukemia in children and young adults. This will help us to develop more effective treatments, especially in those children who relapse, and kinder treatments that won’t cause life-long side effects.”

Every generation aspires to be better than its predecessors, and for the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib (Iclusig), that might just be true, investigators claim.

A retrospective analysis comparing clinical trial outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL) suggests that first-line ponatinib offers modestly better complete molecular response (CMR) rates and 3-year overall survival (OS) than either first-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec) or second-generation agents such as dasatinib (Sprycel) and nilotinib (Tasigna).

“Although only 1 relevant study of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy in Ph+ALL has been reported and our ability to adjust for baseline patient characteristics was limited, the results suggest that ponatinib combined with chemotherapy might represent a more effective front-line treatment option than chemotherapy combined with an earlier generation TKI for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who cannot or choose not to undergo [stem cell transplant],” wrote Elias Jabbour, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues.

They based their conclusions on a meta-regression analysis of 25 studies looking at first- or second-generation TKIs and one study of ponatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ALL. They described their results in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The investigators created pooled estimates of outcomes from studies of earlier-generation TKIs plus combination chemotherapy using a random-effects meta-analysis method. For the sole ponatinib study – a single-arm trial of combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib – they used a binomial distribution method to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). The method essentially estimates the probability of success or failure of a repeated experiment.

They found that 79% of patients in the ponatinib trial achieved a CMR, compared with 34% of patients treated with earlier generation TKIs plus chemotherapy. This translates into an odds ratio (OR) for CMR with ponatinib of 6.09 (P = .034).

Two-year OS rates were 83% with ponatinib versus 58% for all patients treated with other TKIs. Although the OR (3.70) seemed to run in favor of ponatinib, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .062).

For 3-year OS, however, ponatinib was superior to the pooled data for the other TKIs, at 79% versus 50%, translating into an OR of 4.49 (P = .050).

The authors acknowledged that the study was limited by differences in treatment regimens and centers, and a limited ability to adjust for patient characteristics, due to the study’s reliance on only those covariates published across different studies. Head-to-head comparison trials are needed to confirm their results, they noted.

Nonetheless, “[w]e believe that the improved efficacy of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ALL might prevent the need for allogeneic SCT,” they wrote.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals funded the study. Dr. Jabbour and three coauthors reported research funding from the company; other study authors reported employment or other financial relationships with Ariad or its parent company Takeda.

SOURCE: Jabbour E et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 18(4):257-65.

Every generation aspires to be better than its predecessors, and for the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib (Iclusig), that might just be true, investigators claim.

A retrospective analysis comparing clinical trial outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL) suggests that first-line ponatinib offers modestly better complete molecular response (CMR) rates and 3-year overall survival (OS) than either first-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec) or second-generation agents such as dasatinib (Sprycel) and nilotinib (Tasigna).

“Although only 1 relevant study of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy in Ph+ALL has been reported and our ability to adjust for baseline patient characteristics was limited, the results suggest that ponatinib combined with chemotherapy might represent a more effective front-line treatment option than chemotherapy combined with an earlier generation TKI for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who cannot or choose not to undergo [stem cell transplant],” wrote Elias Jabbour, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues.

They based their conclusions on a meta-regression analysis of 25 studies looking at first- or second-generation TKIs and one study of ponatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ALL. They described their results in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The investigators created pooled estimates of outcomes from studies of earlier-generation TKIs plus combination chemotherapy using a random-effects meta-analysis method. For the sole ponatinib study – a single-arm trial of combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib – they used a binomial distribution method to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). The method essentially estimates the probability of success or failure of a repeated experiment.

They found that 79% of patients in the ponatinib trial achieved a CMR, compared with 34% of patients treated with earlier generation TKIs plus chemotherapy. This translates into an odds ratio (OR) for CMR with ponatinib of 6.09 (P = .034).

Two-year OS rates were 83% with ponatinib versus 58% for all patients treated with other TKIs. Although the OR (3.70) seemed to run in favor of ponatinib, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .062).

For 3-year OS, however, ponatinib was superior to the pooled data for the other TKIs, at 79% versus 50%, translating into an OR of 4.49 (P = .050).

The authors acknowledged that the study was limited by differences in treatment regimens and centers, and a limited ability to adjust for patient characteristics, due to the study’s reliance on only those covariates published across different studies. Head-to-head comparison trials are needed to confirm their results, they noted.

Nonetheless, “[w]e believe that the improved efficacy of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ALL might prevent the need for allogeneic SCT,” they wrote.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals funded the study. Dr. Jabbour and three coauthors reported research funding from the company; other study authors reported employment or other financial relationships with Ariad or its parent company Takeda.

SOURCE: Jabbour E et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 18(4):257-65.

Every generation aspires to be better than its predecessors, and for the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib (Iclusig), that might just be true, investigators claim.

A retrospective analysis comparing clinical trial outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia positive for the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+ALL) suggests that first-line ponatinib offers modestly better complete molecular response (CMR) rates and 3-year overall survival (OS) than either first-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec) or second-generation agents such as dasatinib (Sprycel) and nilotinib (Tasigna).

“Although only 1 relevant study of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy in Ph+ALL has been reported and our ability to adjust for baseline patient characteristics was limited, the results suggest that ponatinib combined with chemotherapy might represent a more effective front-line treatment option than chemotherapy combined with an earlier generation TKI for patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, including those who cannot or choose not to undergo [stem cell transplant],” wrote Elias Jabbour, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues.

They based their conclusions on a meta-regression analysis of 25 studies looking at first- or second-generation TKIs and one study of ponatinib as frontline therapy for patients with Ph+ALL. They described their results in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The investigators created pooled estimates of outcomes from studies of earlier-generation TKIs plus combination chemotherapy using a random-effects meta-analysis method. For the sole ponatinib study – a single-arm trial of combination chemotherapy plus ponatinib – they used a binomial distribution method to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). The method essentially estimates the probability of success or failure of a repeated experiment.

They found that 79% of patients in the ponatinib trial achieved a CMR, compared with 34% of patients treated with earlier generation TKIs plus chemotherapy. This translates into an odds ratio (OR) for CMR with ponatinib of 6.09 (P = .034).

Two-year OS rates were 83% with ponatinib versus 58% for all patients treated with other TKIs. Although the OR (3.70) seemed to run in favor of ponatinib, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .062).

For 3-year OS, however, ponatinib was superior to the pooled data for the other TKIs, at 79% versus 50%, translating into an OR of 4.49 (P = .050).

The authors acknowledged that the study was limited by differences in treatment regimens and centers, and a limited ability to adjust for patient characteristics, due to the study’s reliance on only those covariates published across different studies. Head-to-head comparison trials are needed to confirm their results, they noted.

Nonetheless, “[w]e believe that the improved efficacy of ponatinib combined with chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ALL might prevent the need for allogeneic SCT,” they wrote.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals funded the study. Dr. Jabbour and three coauthors reported research funding from the company; other study authors reported employment or other financial relationships with Ariad or its parent company Takeda.

SOURCE: Jabbour E et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 18(4):257-65.

Older patients, African Americans, and individuals of low socioeconomic status may be less likely to receive systemic treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, results of a recent study suggest.

Comorbidities and poor performance indicators also reduced the likelihood of receiving first-line treatment, according to results of the retrospective cohort study published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The findings highlight the need for a “multifaceted approach” to address outcome disparities in multiple myeloma, according to researcher Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH, of the division of oncology at Washington University, St. Louis, and her coinvestigators.

“Particular attention to aging-related issues is essential to ensure older patients will benefit from the advances achieved in the field, similar to young patients,” the investigators wrote.

Racial and socioeconomic barriers should also be addressed, they added.

The retrospective cohort analysis included data on 3,814 patients with active multiple myeloma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database from 2007 to 2011. Investigators found that overall, 1,445 patients (38%) had no insurance claims confirming that they had received systemic treatment.

Older age increased the odds of not receiving treatment, with the likelihood increasing by 7% for each year of advancing age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.08). Likewise, African American patients were 26% more likely to have had no treatment (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54), and patients who were enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare – a proxy for lower income – had a 21% increased odds of no treatment (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42).

Similarly increased odds of no treatment were reported for patients with comorbidities and poor performance status indicators.

“In a subset of older and frail patients, the risks of treatments approved for [multiple myeloma] might outweigh the benefits or might not be in line with the individual’s goals of care,” the investigators wrote.

The study did not track supportive-care treatments that patients may have received instead of active disease treatment, such as bisphosphonates for skeletal lesions or plasmapheresis for hyperviscosity syndrome.

Lack of treatment was associated with poorer survival in the study. Median overall survival was just 9.6 months for individuals with no record of treatment, compared with 32.3 months for patients who had received treatment.

Dr. Fakhri and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures related to the study, which was supported by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Fakhri B et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Mar;18(3):219-24.

Older patients, African Americans, and individuals of low socioeconomic status may be less likely to receive systemic treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, results of a recent study suggest.

Comorbidities and poor performance indicators also reduced the likelihood of receiving first-line treatment, according to results of the retrospective cohort study published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The findings highlight the need for a “multifaceted approach” to address outcome disparities in multiple myeloma, according to researcher Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH, of the division of oncology at Washington University, St. Louis, and her coinvestigators.

“Particular attention to aging-related issues is essential to ensure older patients will benefit from the advances achieved in the field, similar to young patients,” the investigators wrote.

Racial and socioeconomic barriers should also be addressed, they added.

The retrospective cohort analysis included data on 3,814 patients with active multiple myeloma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database from 2007 to 2011. Investigators found that overall, 1,445 patients (38%) had no insurance claims confirming that they had received systemic treatment.

Older age increased the odds of not receiving treatment, with the likelihood increasing by 7% for each year of advancing age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.08). Likewise, African American patients were 26% more likely to have had no treatment (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54), and patients who were enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare – a proxy for lower income – had a 21% increased odds of no treatment (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42).

Similarly increased odds of no treatment were reported for patients with comorbidities and poor performance status indicators.

“In a subset of older and frail patients, the risks of treatments approved for [multiple myeloma] might outweigh the benefits or might not be in line with the individual’s goals of care,” the investigators wrote.

The study did not track supportive-care treatments that patients may have received instead of active disease treatment, such as bisphosphonates for skeletal lesions or plasmapheresis for hyperviscosity syndrome.

Lack of treatment was associated with poorer survival in the study. Median overall survival was just 9.6 months for individuals with no record of treatment, compared with 32.3 months for patients who had received treatment.

Dr. Fakhri and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures related to the study, which was supported by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Fakhri B et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Mar;18(3):219-24.

Older patients, African Americans, and individuals of low socioeconomic status may be less likely to receive systemic treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, results of a recent study suggest.

Comorbidities and poor performance indicators also reduced the likelihood of receiving first-line treatment, according to results of the retrospective cohort study published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia.

The findings highlight the need for a “multifaceted approach” to address outcome disparities in multiple myeloma, according to researcher Bita Fakhri, MD, MPH, of the division of oncology at Washington University, St. Louis, and her coinvestigators.

“Particular attention to aging-related issues is essential to ensure older patients will benefit from the advances achieved in the field, similar to young patients,” the investigators wrote.

Racial and socioeconomic barriers should also be addressed, they added.

The retrospective cohort analysis included data on 3,814 patients with active multiple myeloma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database from 2007 to 2011. Investigators found that overall, 1,445 patients (38%) had no insurance claims confirming that they had received systemic treatment.

Older age increased the odds of not receiving treatment, with the likelihood increasing by 7% for each year of advancing age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.08). Likewise, African American patients were 26% more likely to have had no treatment (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54), and patients who were enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare – a proxy for lower income – had a 21% increased odds of no treatment (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.42).

Similarly increased odds of no treatment were reported for patients with comorbidities and poor performance status indicators.

“In a subset of older and frail patients, the risks of treatments approved for [multiple myeloma] might outweigh the benefits or might not be in line with the individual’s goals of care,” the investigators wrote.

The study did not track supportive-care treatments that patients may have received instead of active disease treatment, such as bisphosphonates for skeletal lesions or plasmapheresis for hyperviscosity syndrome.

Lack of treatment was associated with poorer survival in the study. Median overall survival was just 9.6 months for individuals with no record of treatment, compared with 32.3 months for patients who had received treatment.

Dr. Fakhri and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures related to the study, which was supported by the National Cancer Institute.

SOURCE: Fakhri B et al. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Mar;18(3):219-24.

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

Updated clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include new and revised recommendations based on major advances in genomics, targeted therapies, and biomarkers that have occurred since the last iteration in 2008.

The guidelines are an update from a consensus document issued a decade ago by the International Workshop on CLL, focusing on the conduct of clinical trials in patients with CLL. The new guidelines are published in Blood.

Major changes or additions include:

Molecular genetics: The updated guidelines recognize the clinical importance of specific genomic alterations/mutations on response to standard chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, including the 17p deletion and mutations in TP53.

“Therefore, the assessment of both del(17p) and TP53 mutation has prognostic and predictive value and should guide therapeutic decisions in routine practice. For clinical trials, it is recommended that molecular genetics be performed prior to treating a patient on protocol,” the guidelines state.

IGHV mutational status: The mutational status of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain (IGHV) genes has been demonstrated to offer important prognostic information, according to the guidelines authors led by Michael Hallek, MD of the University of Cologne, Germany.

Specifically, leukemia with IGHV genes without somatic mutations are associated with worse clinical outcomes, compared with leukemia with IGHV mutations. Patients with mutated IGHV and other prognostic factors such as favorable cytogenetics or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity generally have excellent outcomes with a chemoimmunotherapy regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, the authors noted.

Image from Darryl Leja, NHGRI

Through extensive analyses of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), researchers have produced a new resource known as the Pan-Cancer Atlas.

Multiple research groups analyzed data on more than 10,000 tumors spanning 33 types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The work revealed new insights regarding cells of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways.

These insights make up the Pan-Cancer Atlas and are described in 27 papers published in Cell Press journals. The entire collection of papers is available through a portal on cell.com.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is the final output of TCGA, a joint effort of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) to “collect, select, and analyze human tissues for genomic alterations on a very large scale.”

“This project is the culmination of more than a decade of ground-breaking work,” said Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, director of the National Institutes of Health.

“This analysis provides cancer researchers with unprecedented understanding of how, where, and why tumors arise in humans, enabling better informed clinical trials and future treatments.”

The project focused on genome sequencing as well as other analyses, such as investigating gene and protein expression profiles and associating them with clinical and imaging data.

“The Pan-Cancer Atlas effort complements the over 30 tumor-specific papers that have been published by TCGA in the last decade and expands upon earlier pan-cancer work that was published in 2013,” said Jean Claude Zenklusen, PhD, director of the TCGA Program Office at NCI.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is divided into 3 main categories—cell of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways—each anchored by a summary paper that recaps the core findings for the topic. Companion papers report in-depth explorations of individual topics within these categories.

Cell of origin

In the first Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper, the authors review the findings from analyses using a technique called molecular clustering, which groups tumors by parameters such as genes being expressed, abnormality of chromosome numbers in tumor cells, and DNA modifications.

The analyses suggest that tumor types cluster by their possible cells of origin, a finding that has implications for the classification and treatment of various cancers.

“Rather than the organ of origin, we can now use molecular features to identify the cancer’s cell of origin,” said Li Ding, PhD, of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri.

“We are looking at what genes are turned on in the tumor, and that brings us to a particular cell type. For example, squamous cell cancers can arise in the lung, bladder, cervix, and some tumors of the head and neck. We traditionally have treated cancers in these areas as completely different diseases, but, [by] studying their molecular features, we now know such cancers are closely related.”

“This new molecular-based classification system should greatly help in the clinic, where it is already explaining some of the similar clinical behavior of what we thought were different tumor types,” said Charles Perou, PhD, of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

“These findings also provide many new therapeutic opportunities, which can and will be tested in the next phase of human clinical trials.”

Oncogenic processes

The second Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper presents a broad view of the TCGA findings on the processes that lead to cancer development and progression.

The research revealed insights into 3 critical oncogenic processes—germline and somatic mutations, the influence of the tumor’s underlying genome and epigenome on gene and protein expression, and the interplay of tumor and immune cells.

“For the 10,000 tumors we analyzed, we now know—in detail—the inherited mutations driving cancer and the genetic errors that accumulate as people age, increasing the risk of cancer,” Dr Ding said. “This is the first definitive summary of the genetics behind 33 major types of cancer.”

“TCGA has created a catalogue of alterations that occur in a variety of cancer types,” said Katherine Hoadley, PhD, of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“Having this catalogue of alterations is really important for us to look, in future studies, at why these alterations are there and to predict outcomes for patients.”

Signaling pathways

The final Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper details TCGA research on the genomic alterations in the signaling pathways that control cell-cycle progression, cell death, and cell growth. The work highlights the similarities and differences in these processes across a range of cancers.

The researchers believe these studies have revealed new patterns of potential vulnerabilities that might aid the development of targeted and combination therapies.

Image from Darryl Leja, NHGRI

Through extensive analyses of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), researchers have produced a new resource known as the Pan-Cancer Atlas.

Multiple research groups analyzed data on more than 10,000 tumors spanning 33 types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The work revealed new insights regarding cells of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways.

These insights make up the Pan-Cancer Atlas and are described in 27 papers published in Cell Press journals. The entire collection of papers is available through a portal on cell.com.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is the final output of TCGA, a joint effort of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) to “collect, select, and analyze human tissues for genomic alterations on a very large scale.”

“This project is the culmination of more than a decade of ground-breaking work,” said Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, director of the National Institutes of Health.

“This analysis provides cancer researchers with unprecedented understanding of how, where, and why tumors arise in humans, enabling better informed clinical trials and future treatments.”

The project focused on genome sequencing as well as other analyses, such as investigating gene and protein expression profiles and associating them with clinical and imaging data.

“The Pan-Cancer Atlas effort complements the over 30 tumor-specific papers that have been published by TCGA in the last decade and expands upon earlier pan-cancer work that was published in 2013,” said Jean Claude Zenklusen, PhD, director of the TCGA Program Office at NCI.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is divided into 3 main categories—cell of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways—each anchored by a summary paper that recaps the core findings for the topic. Companion papers report in-depth explorations of individual topics within these categories.

Cell of origin

In the first Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper, the authors review the findings from analyses using a technique called molecular clustering, which groups tumors by parameters such as genes being expressed, abnormality of chromosome numbers in tumor cells, and DNA modifications.

The analyses suggest that tumor types cluster by their possible cells of origin, a finding that has implications for the classification and treatment of various cancers.

“Rather than the organ of origin, we can now use molecular features to identify the cancer’s cell of origin,” said Li Ding, PhD, of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri.

“We are looking at what genes are turned on in the tumor, and that brings us to a particular cell type. For example, squamous cell cancers can arise in the lung, bladder, cervix, and some tumors of the head and neck. We traditionally have treated cancers in these areas as completely different diseases, but, [by] studying their molecular features, we now know such cancers are closely related.”

“This new molecular-based classification system should greatly help in the clinic, where it is already explaining some of the similar clinical behavior of what we thought were different tumor types,” said Charles Perou, PhD, of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

“These findings also provide many new therapeutic opportunities, which can and will be tested in the next phase of human clinical trials.”

Oncogenic processes

The second Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper presents a broad view of the TCGA findings on the processes that lead to cancer development and progression.

The research revealed insights into 3 critical oncogenic processes—germline and somatic mutations, the influence of the tumor’s underlying genome and epigenome on gene and protein expression, and the interplay of tumor and immune cells.

“For the 10,000 tumors we analyzed, we now know—in detail—the inherited mutations driving cancer and the genetic errors that accumulate as people age, increasing the risk of cancer,” Dr Ding said. “This is the first definitive summary of the genetics behind 33 major types of cancer.”

“TCGA has created a catalogue of alterations that occur in a variety of cancer types,” said Katherine Hoadley, PhD, of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“Having this catalogue of alterations is really important for us to look, in future studies, at why these alterations are there and to predict outcomes for patients.”

Signaling pathways

The final Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper details TCGA research on the genomic alterations in the signaling pathways that control cell-cycle progression, cell death, and cell growth. The work highlights the similarities and differences in these processes across a range of cancers.

The researchers believe these studies have revealed new patterns of potential vulnerabilities that might aid the development of targeted and combination therapies.

Image from Darryl Leja, NHGRI

Through extensive analyses of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), researchers have produced a new resource known as the Pan-Cancer Atlas.

Multiple research groups analyzed data on more than 10,000 tumors spanning 33 types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The work revealed new insights regarding cells of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways.

These insights make up the Pan-Cancer Atlas and are described in 27 papers published in Cell Press journals. The entire collection of papers is available through a portal on cell.com.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is the final output of TCGA, a joint effort of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) to “collect, select, and analyze human tissues for genomic alterations on a very large scale.”

“This project is the culmination of more than a decade of ground-breaking work,” said Francis S. Collins, MD, PhD, director of the National Institutes of Health.

“This analysis provides cancer researchers with unprecedented understanding of how, where, and why tumors arise in humans, enabling better informed clinical trials and future treatments.”

The project focused on genome sequencing as well as other analyses, such as investigating gene and protein expression profiles and associating them with clinical and imaging data.

“The Pan-Cancer Atlas effort complements the over 30 tumor-specific papers that have been published by TCGA in the last decade and expands upon earlier pan-cancer work that was published in 2013,” said Jean Claude Zenklusen, PhD, director of the TCGA Program Office at NCI.

The Pan-Cancer Atlas is divided into 3 main categories—cell of origin, oncogenic processes, and signaling pathways—each anchored by a summary paper that recaps the core findings for the topic. Companion papers report in-depth explorations of individual topics within these categories.

Cell of origin

In the first Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper, the authors review the findings from analyses using a technique called molecular clustering, which groups tumors by parameters such as genes being expressed, abnormality of chromosome numbers in tumor cells, and DNA modifications.

The analyses suggest that tumor types cluster by their possible cells of origin, a finding that has implications for the classification and treatment of various cancers.

“Rather than the organ of origin, we can now use molecular features to identify the cancer’s cell of origin,” said Li Ding, PhD, of Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri.

“We are looking at what genes are turned on in the tumor, and that brings us to a particular cell type. For example, squamous cell cancers can arise in the lung, bladder, cervix, and some tumors of the head and neck. We traditionally have treated cancers in these areas as completely different diseases, but, [by] studying their molecular features, we now know such cancers are closely related.”

“This new molecular-based classification system should greatly help in the clinic, where it is already explaining some of the similar clinical behavior of what we thought were different tumor types,” said Charles Perou, PhD, of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

“These findings also provide many new therapeutic opportunities, which can and will be tested in the next phase of human clinical trials.”

Oncogenic processes

The second Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper presents a broad view of the TCGA findings on the processes that lead to cancer development and progression.

The research revealed insights into 3 critical oncogenic processes—germline and somatic mutations, the influence of the tumor’s underlying genome and epigenome on gene and protein expression, and the interplay of tumor and immune cells.

“For the 10,000 tumors we analyzed, we now know—in detail—the inherited mutations driving cancer and the genetic errors that accumulate as people age, increasing the risk of cancer,” Dr Ding said. “This is the first definitive summary of the genetics behind 33 major types of cancer.”

“TCGA has created a catalogue of alterations that occur in a variety of cancer types,” said Katherine Hoadley, PhD, of University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“Having this catalogue of alterations is really important for us to look, in future studies, at why these alterations are there and to predict outcomes for patients.”

Signaling pathways

The final Pan-Cancer Atlas summary paper details TCGA research on the genomic alterations in the signaling pathways that control cell-cycle progression, cell death, and cell growth. The work highlights the similarities and differences in these processes across a range of cancers.

The researchers believe these studies have revealed new patterns of potential vulnerabilities that might aid the development of targeted and combination therapies.