User login
Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir looks good in HBV coinfected patients
For patients or death in a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study.
“Although we observed increases in HBV DNA in most patients, these increases were [usually] not associated with ALT [alanine amino transferase] flares or clinical complications,” reported Chun-Jen Liu, MD, of National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, and his associates. Although nearly two-thirds of patients developed HBV reactivation, less than 5% developed alanine aminotransferase rises at least twice the upper limit of normal, and only one patient had symptomatic HBV reactivation, which entecavir therapy resolved. This study was the first to prospectively evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation during HCV treatment, the researchers wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
Because chronic hepatitis C virus infection tends to suppress HBV replication, peginterferon/ribavirin or direct-acting anti-HCV treatment can reactivate HBV infection, especially in patients who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Left untreated, reactivated HBV can lead to fulminant hepatitis, liver failure, and death, as noted on recently mandated boxed warnings.
Accordingly, guidelines recommend testing patients for HBV infection before starting HCV treatment. The study enrolled 111 coinfected patients; about two-thirds were female, and 16% had compensated cirrhosis. All tested positive for HBsAg at screening, and all but one also tested positive at baseline. Mean baseline HBV DNA levels were 2.1 log10 IU/mL. Patients received 90 mg ledipasvir plus 400 mg sofosbuvir for 12 weeks, and levels of HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBsAg were tested at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, posttreatment week 4, and then every 12 weeks until posttreatment week 108.
In all, 70 (63%) patients developed HBV reactivation, including 84% of the 37 patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline. During treatment, none of these patients had ALT rise more than twice the upper limit of normal. By 48 weeks post treatment, however, 77% still had quantifiable HBV DNA, and two had marked ALT rises. Furthermore, by posttreatment week 53, one of these patients developed bilirubinemia and symptomatic HBV infection (malaise, anorexia, sclera jaundice, and nausea), which resolved after treatment with entecavir.
A total of 74 patients had quantifiable baseline HBV DNA (at least 20 IU/mL). Three received entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate based on confirmed HBV reactivation with a concomitant ALT rise of at least twice the upper limit of normal. All were asymptomatic. There were no cases of liver failure or death.
“Regardless of HBV DNA and/or ALT elevations, no patient had signs of liver failure,” the researchers wrote. “Our results support the recommendations put forth in clinical treatment guidelines: HCV-infected patients should be evaluated for HBV infection prior to HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals. Those who are HBsAg positive should be monitored during and after treatment for HBV reactivation, and treatment should be initiated in accordance with existing guidelines.”
Gilead funded the study. Dr. Liu and 12 coinvestigators reported having no conflicts of interest. Nine coinvestigators reported being employees and shareholders of Gilead, and one coinvestigator reporting consulting for Gilead. The senior author disclosed ties to Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, MSD, and Taiha.
SOURCE: Lui C-J et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 21. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.011.
For patients or death in a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study.
“Although we observed increases in HBV DNA in most patients, these increases were [usually] not associated with ALT [alanine amino transferase] flares or clinical complications,” reported Chun-Jen Liu, MD, of National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, and his associates. Although nearly two-thirds of patients developed HBV reactivation, less than 5% developed alanine aminotransferase rises at least twice the upper limit of normal, and only one patient had symptomatic HBV reactivation, which entecavir therapy resolved. This study was the first to prospectively evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation during HCV treatment, the researchers wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
Because chronic hepatitis C virus infection tends to suppress HBV replication, peginterferon/ribavirin or direct-acting anti-HCV treatment can reactivate HBV infection, especially in patients who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Left untreated, reactivated HBV can lead to fulminant hepatitis, liver failure, and death, as noted on recently mandated boxed warnings.
Accordingly, guidelines recommend testing patients for HBV infection before starting HCV treatment. The study enrolled 111 coinfected patients; about two-thirds were female, and 16% had compensated cirrhosis. All tested positive for HBsAg at screening, and all but one also tested positive at baseline. Mean baseline HBV DNA levels were 2.1 log10 IU/mL. Patients received 90 mg ledipasvir plus 400 mg sofosbuvir for 12 weeks, and levels of HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBsAg were tested at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, posttreatment week 4, and then every 12 weeks until posttreatment week 108.
In all, 70 (63%) patients developed HBV reactivation, including 84% of the 37 patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline. During treatment, none of these patients had ALT rise more than twice the upper limit of normal. By 48 weeks post treatment, however, 77% still had quantifiable HBV DNA, and two had marked ALT rises. Furthermore, by posttreatment week 53, one of these patients developed bilirubinemia and symptomatic HBV infection (malaise, anorexia, sclera jaundice, and nausea), which resolved after treatment with entecavir.
A total of 74 patients had quantifiable baseline HBV DNA (at least 20 IU/mL). Three received entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate based on confirmed HBV reactivation with a concomitant ALT rise of at least twice the upper limit of normal. All were asymptomatic. There were no cases of liver failure or death.
“Regardless of HBV DNA and/or ALT elevations, no patient had signs of liver failure,” the researchers wrote. “Our results support the recommendations put forth in clinical treatment guidelines: HCV-infected patients should be evaluated for HBV infection prior to HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals. Those who are HBsAg positive should be monitored during and after treatment for HBV reactivation, and treatment should be initiated in accordance with existing guidelines.”
Gilead funded the study. Dr. Liu and 12 coinvestigators reported having no conflicts of interest. Nine coinvestigators reported being employees and shareholders of Gilead, and one coinvestigator reporting consulting for Gilead. The senior author disclosed ties to Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, MSD, and Taiha.
SOURCE: Lui C-J et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 21. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.011.
For patients or death in a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study.
“Although we observed increases in HBV DNA in most patients, these increases were [usually] not associated with ALT [alanine amino transferase] flares or clinical complications,” reported Chun-Jen Liu, MD, of National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei, and his associates. Although nearly two-thirds of patients developed HBV reactivation, less than 5% developed alanine aminotransferase rises at least twice the upper limit of normal, and only one patient had symptomatic HBV reactivation, which entecavir therapy resolved. This study was the first to prospectively evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation during HCV treatment, the researchers wrote in the March issue of Gastroenterology.
Because chronic hepatitis C virus infection tends to suppress HBV replication, peginterferon/ribavirin or direct-acting anti-HCV treatment can reactivate HBV infection, especially in patients who test positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Left untreated, reactivated HBV can lead to fulminant hepatitis, liver failure, and death, as noted on recently mandated boxed warnings.
Accordingly, guidelines recommend testing patients for HBV infection before starting HCV treatment. The study enrolled 111 coinfected patients; about two-thirds were female, and 16% had compensated cirrhosis. All tested positive for HBsAg at screening, and all but one also tested positive at baseline. Mean baseline HBV DNA levels were 2.1 log10 IU/mL. Patients received 90 mg ledipasvir plus 400 mg sofosbuvir for 12 weeks, and levels of HCV RNA, HBV DNA, and HBsAg were tested at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, posttreatment week 4, and then every 12 weeks until posttreatment week 108.
In all, 70 (63%) patients developed HBV reactivation, including 84% of the 37 patients with undetectable HBV DNA at baseline. During treatment, none of these patients had ALT rise more than twice the upper limit of normal. By 48 weeks post treatment, however, 77% still had quantifiable HBV DNA, and two had marked ALT rises. Furthermore, by posttreatment week 53, one of these patients developed bilirubinemia and symptomatic HBV infection (malaise, anorexia, sclera jaundice, and nausea), which resolved after treatment with entecavir.
A total of 74 patients had quantifiable baseline HBV DNA (at least 20 IU/mL). Three received entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate based on confirmed HBV reactivation with a concomitant ALT rise of at least twice the upper limit of normal. All were asymptomatic. There were no cases of liver failure or death.
“Regardless of HBV DNA and/or ALT elevations, no patient had signs of liver failure,” the researchers wrote. “Our results support the recommendations put forth in clinical treatment guidelines: HCV-infected patients should be evaluated for HBV infection prior to HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals. Those who are HBsAg positive should be monitored during and after treatment for HBV reactivation, and treatment should be initiated in accordance with existing guidelines.”
Gilead funded the study. Dr. Liu and 12 coinvestigators reported having no conflicts of interest. Nine coinvestigators reported being employees and shareholders of Gilead, and one coinvestigator reporting consulting for Gilead. The senior author disclosed ties to Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, MSD, and Taiha.
SOURCE: Lui C-J et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 21. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.011.
FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY
Key clinical point: Combination therapy with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir effectively treated chronic hepatitis C infection in hepatitis B coinfected patients.
Major finding: The rate of sustained viral response was 100% at 12 weeks. Most (63%) of patients had an increase in hepatitis B viral DNA, but only 5% of patients had a concomitant increase in alanine aminotransferase. There were no cases of liver failure or death.
Data source: A phase 3b, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study of 111 coinfected patients.
Disclosures: Gilead funded the study. Dr. Liu and 12 coinvestigators reported having no conflicts of interest. Nine coinvestigators reported being employees and shareholders of Gilead, and one coinvestigator reporting consulting for Gilead. The senior author disclosed ties to Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer, MSD, and Taiha.
Source: Lui C-J et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov 21. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.011.
NASH rapidly overtaking hepatitis C as cause of liver cancer
Researchers reported on their analysis of past prevalence of HCV, NASH, and alcoholic cirrhosis and prediction of future trends and their effect on hepatocellular carcinoma in the Feb. 24 online edition of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.
The analysis, based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, shows that the prevalence of HCV has been in steady decline since 2005 and that decline is forecast to continue. From a prevalence of 3.22 million cases in 2005, researchers have forecasted a decline to 1.06 million cases by 2025.
At the same time, even a conservative linear model for the changing prevalence of NASH forecast a rapid increase from 1.37 million cases in 2005 to 17.95 million in 2025. The exponential model suggested an increase from 2.41 million in 2005 to 42.34 million in 2025.
In terms of the effect on the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the modeling suggested cases of HCV-related liver cancer were predicted to peak at around 29,000 cases in 2015 then decline to fewer than 18,000 cases by 2025. In contrast, the prevalence of HCC from NASH is forecast to increase from between 5000 and 6000 cases in 2005 to 45,000 in 2025 by the conservative linear model or even as high as 106,000 cases according to the exponential model. It overtook HCV infection as a cause of liver cancer by around 2015.
“Despite the lack of existing data off of which to work, the general trends of our prediction models are consistent with the documented trends of liver transplant etiology, as well as 2010 insurance data indicating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH as the leading etiology associated with HCC,” wrote Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD, from the Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and his coauthors.
The study used liver transplant data as a proxy for the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma and also took into account the natural history of the disease. Between 5% and 20% of untreated HCV infections will go on to develop into cirrhosis, and of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, around 15% will develop HCC within 10 years. In the case of NASH, the authors cited research suggesting that around 35% of patients go on to develop progressive fibrosis, that progression to cirrhosis takes around 29 years, and that the risk of progression to HCC ranged from 2.4% over 7 years to 12.8% over 3 years.
“A higher proportion of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis, but of those who develop cirrhosis, the probability of developing HCC is higher in patients with HCV,” the authors wrote. “In contrast, HCV progression to HCC rarely occurs in noncirrhotic patients.”
The authors wrote that it was important to explore projected trends in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma to inform the development of screening, diagnostic, and treatment approaches, particularly given potential differences in the pathology, natural history, and treatment options for NASH-related and HCV-related liver cancer.
“Histologically, NASH shares characteristics with alcoholic liver disease, primarily proinflammatory fat accumulation in parenchymal cells, [and] key players in NASH progression to HCC are suggested to include genetic modifications, proinflammatory high-fat and/or high-fructose diets, and oxidative and endoplasmic cellular stresses,” they wrote. “In HCV progression to HCC, the presence of the HCV core protein may induce HCC without the prerequisite load of genetic errors normally required for cancer development, skipping or accelerating some of the classic steps of cancer induction.”
The authors did note that their model represented a base scenario that assumed the environmental and genetic factors driving NASH would continue along the path of current trends.
“Therefore, the possibility exists that our models underestimate the response of the medical community in addressing the rising nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH epidemic.”
No funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Ahmed O et al. J Clin Exp Hepatology. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.02.006.
Researchers reported on their analysis of past prevalence of HCV, NASH, and alcoholic cirrhosis and prediction of future trends and their effect on hepatocellular carcinoma in the Feb. 24 online edition of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.
The analysis, based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, shows that the prevalence of HCV has been in steady decline since 2005 and that decline is forecast to continue. From a prevalence of 3.22 million cases in 2005, researchers have forecasted a decline to 1.06 million cases by 2025.
At the same time, even a conservative linear model for the changing prevalence of NASH forecast a rapid increase from 1.37 million cases in 2005 to 17.95 million in 2025. The exponential model suggested an increase from 2.41 million in 2005 to 42.34 million in 2025.
In terms of the effect on the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the modeling suggested cases of HCV-related liver cancer were predicted to peak at around 29,000 cases in 2015 then decline to fewer than 18,000 cases by 2025. In contrast, the prevalence of HCC from NASH is forecast to increase from between 5000 and 6000 cases in 2005 to 45,000 in 2025 by the conservative linear model or even as high as 106,000 cases according to the exponential model. It overtook HCV infection as a cause of liver cancer by around 2015.
“Despite the lack of existing data off of which to work, the general trends of our prediction models are consistent with the documented trends of liver transplant etiology, as well as 2010 insurance data indicating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH as the leading etiology associated with HCC,” wrote Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD, from the Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and his coauthors.
The study used liver transplant data as a proxy for the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma and also took into account the natural history of the disease. Between 5% and 20% of untreated HCV infections will go on to develop into cirrhosis, and of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, around 15% will develop HCC within 10 years. In the case of NASH, the authors cited research suggesting that around 35% of patients go on to develop progressive fibrosis, that progression to cirrhosis takes around 29 years, and that the risk of progression to HCC ranged from 2.4% over 7 years to 12.8% over 3 years.
“A higher proportion of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis, but of those who develop cirrhosis, the probability of developing HCC is higher in patients with HCV,” the authors wrote. “In contrast, HCV progression to HCC rarely occurs in noncirrhotic patients.”
The authors wrote that it was important to explore projected trends in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma to inform the development of screening, diagnostic, and treatment approaches, particularly given potential differences in the pathology, natural history, and treatment options for NASH-related and HCV-related liver cancer.
“Histologically, NASH shares characteristics with alcoholic liver disease, primarily proinflammatory fat accumulation in parenchymal cells, [and] key players in NASH progression to HCC are suggested to include genetic modifications, proinflammatory high-fat and/or high-fructose diets, and oxidative and endoplasmic cellular stresses,” they wrote. “In HCV progression to HCC, the presence of the HCV core protein may induce HCC without the prerequisite load of genetic errors normally required for cancer development, skipping or accelerating some of the classic steps of cancer induction.”
The authors did note that their model represented a base scenario that assumed the environmental and genetic factors driving NASH would continue along the path of current trends.
“Therefore, the possibility exists that our models underestimate the response of the medical community in addressing the rising nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH epidemic.”
No funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Ahmed O et al. J Clin Exp Hepatology. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.02.006.
Researchers reported on their analysis of past prevalence of HCV, NASH, and alcoholic cirrhosis and prediction of future trends and their effect on hepatocellular carcinoma in the Feb. 24 online edition of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology.
The analysis, based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, shows that the prevalence of HCV has been in steady decline since 2005 and that decline is forecast to continue. From a prevalence of 3.22 million cases in 2005, researchers have forecasted a decline to 1.06 million cases by 2025.
At the same time, even a conservative linear model for the changing prevalence of NASH forecast a rapid increase from 1.37 million cases in 2005 to 17.95 million in 2025. The exponential model suggested an increase from 2.41 million in 2005 to 42.34 million in 2025.
In terms of the effect on the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the modeling suggested cases of HCV-related liver cancer were predicted to peak at around 29,000 cases in 2015 then decline to fewer than 18,000 cases by 2025. In contrast, the prevalence of HCC from NASH is forecast to increase from between 5000 and 6000 cases in 2005 to 45,000 in 2025 by the conservative linear model or even as high as 106,000 cases according to the exponential model. It overtook HCV infection as a cause of liver cancer by around 2015.
“Despite the lack of existing data off of which to work, the general trends of our prediction models are consistent with the documented trends of liver transplant etiology, as well as 2010 insurance data indicating nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH as the leading etiology associated with HCC,” wrote Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD, from the Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and his coauthors.
The study used liver transplant data as a proxy for the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma and also took into account the natural history of the disease. Between 5% and 20% of untreated HCV infections will go on to develop into cirrhosis, and of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, around 15% will develop HCC within 10 years. In the case of NASH, the authors cited research suggesting that around 35% of patients go on to develop progressive fibrosis, that progression to cirrhosis takes around 29 years, and that the risk of progression to HCC ranged from 2.4% over 7 years to 12.8% over 3 years.
“A higher proportion of patients with NASH develop cirrhosis, but of those who develop cirrhosis, the probability of developing HCC is higher in patients with HCV,” the authors wrote. “In contrast, HCV progression to HCC rarely occurs in noncirrhotic patients.”
The authors wrote that it was important to explore projected trends in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma to inform the development of screening, diagnostic, and treatment approaches, particularly given potential differences in the pathology, natural history, and treatment options for NASH-related and HCV-related liver cancer.
“Histologically, NASH shares characteristics with alcoholic liver disease, primarily proinflammatory fat accumulation in parenchymal cells, [and] key players in NASH progression to HCC are suggested to include genetic modifications, proinflammatory high-fat and/or high-fructose diets, and oxidative and endoplasmic cellular stresses,” they wrote. “In HCV progression to HCC, the presence of the HCV core protein may induce HCC without the prerequisite load of genetic errors normally required for cancer development, skipping or accelerating some of the classic steps of cancer induction.”
The authors did note that their model represented a base scenario that assumed the environmental and genetic factors driving NASH would continue along the path of current trends.
“Therefore, the possibility exists that our models underestimate the response of the medical community in addressing the rising nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/NASH epidemic.”
No funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Ahmed O et al. J Clin Exp Hepatology. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.02.006.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY
Key clinical point: NASH is rapidly eclipsing HCV infection as the leading contributor to liver cancer in the United States.
Major finding: The prevalence of HCV infection is forecast to decline to 1.06 million cases by 2025 while the prevalence of NASH is projected to increase to as many as 42.34 million cases by 2025.
Data source: Analysis based on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.
Disclosures: No funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared.
Source: Ahmed O et al. J Clin Exp Hepatology. 2018 Feb 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.02.006.
ACIP unanimously recommends HEPLISAV-B
At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.
“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.
According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.
Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).
HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).
Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”
While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.
At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.
“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.
According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.
Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).
HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).
Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”
While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.
At a meeting of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, members unanimously voted to include HEPLISAV-B on the ACIP list of recommended products to vaccinate adults against hepatitis B.
“I think this is a huge advance, and a step forward “ said David S. Stephens, MD, of Emory University, Atlanta, who is a voting member of ACIP.
According to Sarah Schillie, MD, of ACIP’s Hepatitis Work Group, the reduction from three doses to two also will improve vaccine series completion rates, providing more effective protection. This could be very important for health care professionals, with only about 60% of treated individuals fulfilling the three doses necessary for complete HBV protection.
Although fewer doses are needed with HEPLISAV-B, it displays similar immunogenicity to similar vaccines (90.0%-100% vs. 70.5%-90.2%). It is also more effective, compared with similar vaccines in those with type II diabetes (90.0% vs. 65.1%) and chronic kidney disease (89.9% vs. 81.1%).
HEPLISAV-B uses an adjuvant, but it appears to be safe and well tolerated. The rate of mild (45.6% vs. 45.7%) and serious (5.4% vs. 6.3%) reactions were similar among HEPLISAV-B and comparable vaccines, although cardiovascular events were more common with this vaccine than with others (0.27% vs. 0.14%).
Dr. Stephens, who supported the recommendation of HEPLISAV-B, voiced reservations about these findings. “I am concerned about the myocardial infarction signal and the use of this new adjuvant and certainly urge us to look at the postmarketing data carefully.”
While the reported incidence rate of acute HBV cases consistently fell during 2000-2015, it began to rise again at the end of 2015. This is linked with concomitant rise in injection drug use, which also is a risk factor in transmitting HBV. Over the same period, the incidence of HBV was highest in people aged 30-49 years. With these factors to consider, the vote by ACIP for HEPLISAV-B as a recommended vaccine is timely and may help reduce HBV infections in adults.
REPORTING FROM AN ACIP MEETING
Liver cancer deaths expected to increase again in 2018
Liver cancer mortality for 2018 is expected to be lowest in Utah and highest in Hawaii.
A total of 30,200 deaths from liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer are predicted for the year in the United States by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in its Cancer Facts & Figures 2018, based on analysis of 2001-2015 data from the National Center for Health Statistics. That’s up from the 28,920 predicted by the ACS for 2017.
Mortality from liver cancer has been rising since the early 1980s, and in the last 10 years for which data are available (2006-2015), it increased by 2.5% per year. Over almost the same period (2005-2014), incidence rose by approximately 3% a year, and 42,220 new cases are expected in 2018, the ACS noted.
Over the most recent 5 years with available data (2011-2015), racial and ethnic disparities put American Indian/Alaska Natives at the highest mortality risk – 14.8 per 100,000 for men and 7.0 for women – followed by Asian/Pacific Islanders at 14.0 and 6.0, respectively. Non-Hispanic whites had the lowest rates: 8.2 for men and 3.4 for women, according to the ACS report.
Read more about the ACS’s research and estimates here.
Liver cancer mortality for 2018 is expected to be lowest in Utah and highest in Hawaii.
A total of 30,200 deaths from liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer are predicted for the year in the United States by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in its Cancer Facts & Figures 2018, based on analysis of 2001-2015 data from the National Center for Health Statistics. That’s up from the 28,920 predicted by the ACS for 2017.
Mortality from liver cancer has been rising since the early 1980s, and in the last 10 years for which data are available (2006-2015), it increased by 2.5% per year. Over almost the same period (2005-2014), incidence rose by approximately 3% a year, and 42,220 new cases are expected in 2018, the ACS noted.
Over the most recent 5 years with available data (2011-2015), racial and ethnic disparities put American Indian/Alaska Natives at the highest mortality risk – 14.8 per 100,000 for men and 7.0 for women – followed by Asian/Pacific Islanders at 14.0 and 6.0, respectively. Non-Hispanic whites had the lowest rates: 8.2 for men and 3.4 for women, according to the ACS report.
Read more about the ACS’s research and estimates here.
Liver cancer mortality for 2018 is expected to be lowest in Utah and highest in Hawaii.
A total of 30,200 deaths from liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancer are predicted for the year in the United States by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in its Cancer Facts & Figures 2018, based on analysis of 2001-2015 data from the National Center for Health Statistics. That’s up from the 28,920 predicted by the ACS for 2017.
Mortality from liver cancer has been rising since the early 1980s, and in the last 10 years for which data are available (2006-2015), it increased by 2.5% per year. Over almost the same period (2005-2014), incidence rose by approximately 3% a year, and 42,220 new cases are expected in 2018, the ACS noted.
Over the most recent 5 years with available data (2011-2015), racial and ethnic disparities put American Indian/Alaska Natives at the highest mortality risk – 14.8 per 100,000 for men and 7.0 for women – followed by Asian/Pacific Islanders at 14.0 and 6.0, respectively. Non-Hispanic whites had the lowest rates: 8.2 for men and 3.4 for women, according to the ACS report.
Read more about the ACS’s research and estimates here.
Obesity affects the ability to diagnose liver fibrosis
Body mass index accounts for a 43.7% discordance in fibrosis findings between magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and transient elastography (TE), according to a study from the University of California, San Diego.
“This study demonstrates that BMI is a significant factor of discordancy between MRE and TE for the stage of significant fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1),” wrote Cyrielle Caussy, MD, and her colleagues (Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037). “Furthermore, this study showed that the grade of obesity is also a significant predictor of discordancy between MRE and TE because the discordance rate between MRE and TE increases with the increase in BMI.”
Dr. Caussy of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues had noted that MRE and TE had discordant findings in obese patients. To ascertain under what conditions TE and MRE produce the same readings, Dr. Caussy and her associates conducted a cross-sectional study of two cohorts with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who underwent contemporaneous MRE, TE, and liver biopsy. TE utilized both M and XL probes during imaging. The training cohort involved 119 adult patients undergoing NAFLD testing from October 2011 through January 2017. The validation cohort, consisting of 75 adults with NAFLD undergoing liver imaging from March 2010 through May 2013, was formed to validate the findings of the training cohort.
The study revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of the difference between MRE and TE results and made it difficult to assess the stage of liver fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1). After adjustment for age and sex, BMI accounted for a 5-unit increase of 1.694 (95% confidence interval, 1.145-2.507; P = .008). This was not a static relationship, and as BMI increased, so did the discordance between MRE and TE (P = .0309). Interestingly, the discordance rate was significantly higher in participants with BMIs greater than 35 kg/m2, compared with participants with BMIs below 35 (63.0% vs. 38.0%; P = .022), the investigators reported.
While the study revealed valuable information, it had both strengths and limitations. A strength of the study was the use of two cohorts, specifically the validation cohort. The use of the liver biopsy as a reference, which is the standard for assessing fibrosis, was also a strength of the study. A limitation was that the study was conducted at specialized, tertiary care centers using advanced imaging techniques that may not be available at other clinics. Additionally, the cohorts included a small number of patients with advanced fibrosis.
“The integration of the BMI in the screening strategy for the noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis in NAFLD should be considered, and this parameter would help to determine when MRE is not needed in future guidelines” wrote Dr. Caussy and her associates. “Further cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of MRE, TE, and/or liver biopsy to develop optimal screening strategies for diagnosing NAFLD-associated fibrosis.”
Jun Chen, MD, Meng Yin, MD, and Richard L. Ehman, MD, all have intellectual property rights and financial interests in elastography technology. Dr. Ehman also serves as an noncompensated CEO of Resoundant. Claude B. Sirlin, MD, has served as a consultant to Bayer and GE Healthcare. All other authors did not disclose any conflicts.
The AGA Obesity Practice Guide provides a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary process to personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.
SOURCE: Caussy C et al. Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037.
Body mass index accounts for a 43.7% discordance in fibrosis findings between magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and transient elastography (TE), according to a study from the University of California, San Diego.
“This study demonstrates that BMI is a significant factor of discordancy between MRE and TE for the stage of significant fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1),” wrote Cyrielle Caussy, MD, and her colleagues (Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037). “Furthermore, this study showed that the grade of obesity is also a significant predictor of discordancy between MRE and TE because the discordance rate between MRE and TE increases with the increase in BMI.”
Dr. Caussy of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues had noted that MRE and TE had discordant findings in obese patients. To ascertain under what conditions TE and MRE produce the same readings, Dr. Caussy and her associates conducted a cross-sectional study of two cohorts with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who underwent contemporaneous MRE, TE, and liver biopsy. TE utilized both M and XL probes during imaging. The training cohort involved 119 adult patients undergoing NAFLD testing from October 2011 through January 2017. The validation cohort, consisting of 75 adults with NAFLD undergoing liver imaging from March 2010 through May 2013, was formed to validate the findings of the training cohort.
The study revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of the difference between MRE and TE results and made it difficult to assess the stage of liver fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1). After adjustment for age and sex, BMI accounted for a 5-unit increase of 1.694 (95% confidence interval, 1.145-2.507; P = .008). This was not a static relationship, and as BMI increased, so did the discordance between MRE and TE (P = .0309). Interestingly, the discordance rate was significantly higher in participants with BMIs greater than 35 kg/m2, compared with participants with BMIs below 35 (63.0% vs. 38.0%; P = .022), the investigators reported.
While the study revealed valuable information, it had both strengths and limitations. A strength of the study was the use of two cohorts, specifically the validation cohort. The use of the liver biopsy as a reference, which is the standard for assessing fibrosis, was also a strength of the study. A limitation was that the study was conducted at specialized, tertiary care centers using advanced imaging techniques that may not be available at other clinics. Additionally, the cohorts included a small number of patients with advanced fibrosis.
“The integration of the BMI in the screening strategy for the noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis in NAFLD should be considered, and this parameter would help to determine when MRE is not needed in future guidelines” wrote Dr. Caussy and her associates. “Further cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of MRE, TE, and/or liver biopsy to develop optimal screening strategies for diagnosing NAFLD-associated fibrosis.”
Jun Chen, MD, Meng Yin, MD, and Richard L. Ehman, MD, all have intellectual property rights and financial interests in elastography technology. Dr. Ehman also serves as an noncompensated CEO of Resoundant. Claude B. Sirlin, MD, has served as a consultant to Bayer and GE Healthcare. All other authors did not disclose any conflicts.
The AGA Obesity Practice Guide provides a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary process to personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.
SOURCE: Caussy C et al. Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037.
Body mass index accounts for a 43.7% discordance in fibrosis findings between magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and transient elastography (TE), according to a study from the University of California, San Diego.
“This study demonstrates that BMI is a significant factor of discordancy between MRE and TE for the stage of significant fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1),” wrote Cyrielle Caussy, MD, and her colleagues (Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037). “Furthermore, this study showed that the grade of obesity is also a significant predictor of discordancy between MRE and TE because the discordance rate between MRE and TE increases with the increase in BMI.”
Dr. Caussy of the University of California, San Diego, and her colleagues had noted that MRE and TE had discordant findings in obese patients. To ascertain under what conditions TE and MRE produce the same readings, Dr. Caussy and her associates conducted a cross-sectional study of two cohorts with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who underwent contemporaneous MRE, TE, and liver biopsy. TE utilized both M and XL probes during imaging. The training cohort involved 119 adult patients undergoing NAFLD testing from October 2011 through January 2017. The validation cohort, consisting of 75 adults with NAFLD undergoing liver imaging from March 2010 through May 2013, was formed to validate the findings of the training cohort.
The study revealed that BMI was a significant predictor of the difference between MRE and TE results and made it difficult to assess the stage of liver fibrosis (2-4 vs. 0-1). After adjustment for age and sex, BMI accounted for a 5-unit increase of 1.694 (95% confidence interval, 1.145-2.507; P = .008). This was not a static relationship, and as BMI increased, so did the discordance between MRE and TE (P = .0309). Interestingly, the discordance rate was significantly higher in participants with BMIs greater than 35 kg/m2, compared with participants with BMIs below 35 (63.0% vs. 38.0%; P = .022), the investigators reported.
While the study revealed valuable information, it had both strengths and limitations. A strength of the study was the use of two cohorts, specifically the validation cohort. The use of the liver biopsy as a reference, which is the standard for assessing fibrosis, was also a strength of the study. A limitation was that the study was conducted at specialized, tertiary care centers using advanced imaging techniques that may not be available at other clinics. Additionally, the cohorts included a small number of patients with advanced fibrosis.
“The integration of the BMI in the screening strategy for the noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis in NAFLD should be considered, and this parameter would help to determine when MRE is not needed in future guidelines” wrote Dr. Caussy and her associates. “Further cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of MRE, TE, and/or liver biopsy to develop optimal screening strategies for diagnosing NAFLD-associated fibrosis.”
Jun Chen, MD, Meng Yin, MD, and Richard L. Ehman, MD, all have intellectual property rights and financial interests in elastography technology. Dr. Ehman also serves as an noncompensated CEO of Resoundant. Claude B. Sirlin, MD, has served as a consultant to Bayer and GE Healthcare. All other authors did not disclose any conflicts.
The AGA Obesity Practice Guide provides a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary process to personalize innovative obesity care for safe and effective weight management. Learn more at www.gastro.org/obesity.
SOURCE: Caussy C et al. Clin Gastrolenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan 15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.037.
Psychiatric issues common among hepatitis C inpatients
Adult inpatients with hepatitis C are much more likely to have mental health comorbidities, compared with those who do not have hepatitis C, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
All four comorbidities skewed younger, and the oldest patients (73 years and older) with hepatitis C presented with each condition at about the same rate as the non–hepatitis C population. The proportions of hepatitis C–related inpatient stays with alcohol abuse by age, for example, were 20.5% for 18-51 years, 23.3% for those aged 52-72, and 5.8% for the 73-and-older group, according to data from the National Inpatient Sample, which includes more than 95% of all discharges from community (short-term, nonfederal, nonrehabilitation) hospitals in the United States.
Adult inpatients with hepatitis C are much more likely to have mental health comorbidities, compared with those who do not have hepatitis C, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
All four comorbidities skewed younger, and the oldest patients (73 years and older) with hepatitis C presented with each condition at about the same rate as the non–hepatitis C population. The proportions of hepatitis C–related inpatient stays with alcohol abuse by age, for example, were 20.5% for 18-51 years, 23.3% for those aged 52-72, and 5.8% for the 73-and-older group, according to data from the National Inpatient Sample, which includes more than 95% of all discharges from community (short-term, nonfederal, nonrehabilitation) hospitals in the United States.
Adult inpatients with hepatitis C are much more likely to have mental health comorbidities, compared with those who do not have hepatitis C, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
All four comorbidities skewed younger, and the oldest patients (73 years and older) with hepatitis C presented with each condition at about the same rate as the non–hepatitis C population. The proportions of hepatitis C–related inpatient stays with alcohol abuse by age, for example, were 20.5% for 18-51 years, 23.3% for those aged 52-72, and 5.8% for the 73-and-older group, according to data from the National Inpatient Sample, which includes more than 95% of all discharges from community (short-term, nonfederal, nonrehabilitation) hospitals in the United States.
Baby boomers are the hepatitis C generation
Increases in hepatitis C–related inpatient stays for baby boomers from 2005 to 2014 far outpaced those of older adults, while younger adults saw their admissions drop over that period, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
For the baby boomers (adults aged 52-72 years), the rate of inpatient stays involving hepatitis C with or without hepatitis B, HIV, or alcoholic liver disease rose from 300.7 per 100,000 population in 2005 to 503.1 per 100,000 in 2014 – an increase of over 67%. For patients aged 73 years and older, that rate went from 104.4 in 2005 to 117.1 in 2014, which translates to a 12% increase, and for patients aged 18-51 years, it dropped 15%, from 182.5 to 155.4, the AHRQ said in a statistical brief.
Along with the increased hospitalizations, “acute hepatitis C cases nearly tripled from 2010 through 2015,” the report noted, which was “likely the result of increasing injection drug use due to the growing opioid epidemic.”
AGA offers tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards, and improve the process of care for your hepatitis C patients.
Increases in hepatitis C–related inpatient stays for baby boomers from 2005 to 2014 far outpaced those of older adults, while younger adults saw their admissions drop over that period, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
For the baby boomers (adults aged 52-72 years), the rate of inpatient stays involving hepatitis C with or without hepatitis B, HIV, or alcoholic liver disease rose from 300.7 per 100,000 population in 2005 to 503.1 per 100,000 in 2014 – an increase of over 67%. For patients aged 73 years and older, that rate went from 104.4 in 2005 to 117.1 in 2014, which translates to a 12% increase, and for patients aged 18-51 years, it dropped 15%, from 182.5 to 155.4, the AHRQ said in a statistical brief.
Along with the increased hospitalizations, “acute hepatitis C cases nearly tripled from 2010 through 2015,” the report noted, which was “likely the result of increasing injection drug use due to the growing opioid epidemic.”
AGA offers tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards, and improve the process of care for your hepatitis C patients.
Increases in hepatitis C–related inpatient stays for baby boomers from 2005 to 2014 far outpaced those of older adults, while younger adults saw their admissions drop over that period, according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
For the baby boomers (adults aged 52-72 years), the rate of inpatient stays involving hepatitis C with or without hepatitis B, HIV, or alcoholic liver disease rose from 300.7 per 100,000 population in 2005 to 503.1 per 100,000 in 2014 – an increase of over 67%. For patients aged 73 years and older, that rate went from 104.4 in 2005 to 117.1 in 2014, which translates to a 12% increase, and for patients aged 18-51 years, it dropped 15%, from 182.5 to 155.4, the AHRQ said in a statistical brief.
Along with the increased hospitalizations, “acute hepatitis C cases nearly tripled from 2010 through 2015,” the report noted, which was “likely the result of increasing injection drug use due to the growing opioid epidemic.”
AGA offers tools to help you become more efficient, understand quality standards, and improve the process of care for your hepatitis C patients.
FDA adds boxed warning to obeticholic acid label
The Food and Drug Administration is requiring a boxed warning on the label for obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) to highlight the correct weekly dosing regimen after incorrect daily dosing caused severe liver injury in patients with moderate to severe primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
“FDA is adding a new Boxed Warning, FDA’s most prominent warning, to highlight this information in the prescribing information of the drug label,” FDA officials said in a statement Feb. 1. “To ensure correct dosing and reduce the risk of liver problems, FDA is clarifying the current recommendations for screening, dosing, monitoring, and managing PBC patients with moderate to severe liver disease taking Ocaliva.”
FDA recommends that “health care professionals should follow the Ocaliva dosing regimen in the drug label. … Dosing higher than recommended in the drug label can increase the risk for liver decompensation, liver failure, and sometimes death. Routinely monitor all patients for biochemical response, tolerability, and PBC progression, and reevaluate Child-Pugh classification to determine if dosage adjustment is needed.”
Manufacturer Intercept Pharmaceuticals was required to continue studying obeticholic acid in patients with advanced PBC as a condition of its FDA approval. Results from these studies are expected in 2023, FDA noted.
To report adverse medication events and side effects to the FDA, access the MedWatch program.
The Food and Drug Administration is requiring a boxed warning on the label for obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) to highlight the correct weekly dosing regimen after incorrect daily dosing caused severe liver injury in patients with moderate to severe primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
“FDA is adding a new Boxed Warning, FDA’s most prominent warning, to highlight this information in the prescribing information of the drug label,” FDA officials said in a statement Feb. 1. “To ensure correct dosing and reduce the risk of liver problems, FDA is clarifying the current recommendations for screening, dosing, monitoring, and managing PBC patients with moderate to severe liver disease taking Ocaliva.”
FDA recommends that “health care professionals should follow the Ocaliva dosing regimen in the drug label. … Dosing higher than recommended in the drug label can increase the risk for liver decompensation, liver failure, and sometimes death. Routinely monitor all patients for biochemical response, tolerability, and PBC progression, and reevaluate Child-Pugh classification to determine if dosage adjustment is needed.”
Manufacturer Intercept Pharmaceuticals was required to continue studying obeticholic acid in patients with advanced PBC as a condition of its FDA approval. Results from these studies are expected in 2023, FDA noted.
To report adverse medication events and side effects to the FDA, access the MedWatch program.
The Food and Drug Administration is requiring a boxed warning on the label for obeticholic acid (Ocaliva) to highlight the correct weekly dosing regimen after incorrect daily dosing caused severe liver injury in patients with moderate to severe primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).
“FDA is adding a new Boxed Warning, FDA’s most prominent warning, to highlight this information in the prescribing information of the drug label,” FDA officials said in a statement Feb. 1. “To ensure correct dosing and reduce the risk of liver problems, FDA is clarifying the current recommendations for screening, dosing, monitoring, and managing PBC patients with moderate to severe liver disease taking Ocaliva.”
FDA recommends that “health care professionals should follow the Ocaliva dosing regimen in the drug label. … Dosing higher than recommended in the drug label can increase the risk for liver decompensation, liver failure, and sometimes death. Routinely monitor all patients for biochemical response, tolerability, and PBC progression, and reevaluate Child-Pugh classification to determine if dosage adjustment is needed.”
Manufacturer Intercept Pharmaceuticals was required to continue studying obeticholic acid in patients with advanced PBC as a condition of its FDA approval. Results from these studies are expected in 2023, FDA noted.
To report adverse medication events and side effects to the FDA, access the MedWatch program.
Three in 10 diabetic patients may have liver fibrosis
LOS ANGELES – For every 10 adult patients with type 2 diabetes, three are likely to have moderate to severe liver fibrosis, according to Kenneth Cusi, MD, FACP, FACE.
“The question is, How are we going to tackle this problem? My academic goal is that we incorporate screening for NASH [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis], or for fibrosis more specifically, in the same way we do for retinopathy or nephropathy [in diabetes], because we do have a way to treat it,” he said at the World Congress on Insulin Resistance, Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease.
Dr. Cusi, chief of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, predicted that obesity will become the No. 1 cause of liver transplantation. “It’s a real epidemic; you’re not seeing it because the inflexion of obesity happened just 2 decades ago,” he said. “Patients with diabetes face the greatest risk of fatty liver and of fibrosis. Untreated, it’s the equivalent of having macroalbuminuria. If you do nothing and they don’t die of cardiovascular disease, they’re going to have a good chance of getting fibrosis.”
As part of the large population-based Rotterdam study of individuals aged 45 years and older, researchers found that liver stiffness of 8 kPa or more by transient elastography was present in 5.6% of the study participants and was strongly associated with steatosis and diabetes (Hepatology. 2016;63:138-47). According to Dr. Cusi, individuals who have steatosis without diabetes face a 5%-10% risk of fibrosis, while those with steatosis and diabetes face a 15%-20% risk. “It’s well established in a number of studies that if you have fibrosis, you’re at high risk not only of cirrhosis, but also of hepatocellular carcinoma,” he said. “The key thing is not detecting fat, which is not really the target. The target is if there’s fibrosis or not.” Three ways to assess for fibrosis include MR elastography, transient elastography (which is the most commonly used), and fibrosis marker panels.
Liver fibrosis likely starts with adipose tissue dysfunction, said Dr. Cusi, who authored a review on the pathophysiology of interactions between adipose tissue and target organs in obesity and the resulting clinical implications for the management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Gastroenterology. 2012;142[4]:711-25.e6). “When you have insulin-resistant, sick adipose tissue, that leads to the accumulation of fat in the liver,” he said. “. Even if you get people who are matched for BMIs [body mass indexes] between 30 and 35 kg/m2, there is a spectrum in which some individuals have very insulin-resistant adipose tissue and others less so. I would say that 1 out of 10 are metabolically healthy, and we don’t understand exactly why.”
In a recent cross-sectional analysis of 352 healthy individuals, Dr. Cusi and his associates found that intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) accumulation is strongly associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance, supporting the current theory of lipotoxicity as a driver of IHTG accumulation (Hepatology. 2017;65[4]:1132-44). The researchers observed that once IHTG accumulation reaches about 6%, skeletal muscle insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol become fully established. “The next question is, How does this correlate with NASH?” Dr. Cusi said. “Our take is that there is a threshold effect. Once you have a critical amount of triglycerides in your liver, some individuals are going to activate pathways that are harmful. NASH is not something exclusive to individuals who are obese. Lean people can also develop NASH. The key feature is insulin resistance, not metabolic syndrome. Once you develop a fatty liver, your chances of NASH are comparable to that of an obese individual. The paradox is that lean individuals get a fatty liver, but when they get a fatty liver, they are at risk for NASH and for fibrosis.”
Why lean individuals develop NASH is not fully understood, but Dr. Cusi said he suspects that the problem develops at the mitochondrial level. Results from an unpublished animal model in which mice were fed a high–trans-fat diet for 24 weeks showed that the mice developed steatosis by week 8 and NASH by week 24. The mice had an increase in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, which is typical of the NASH period, as well as an increase in ceramides. “Perhaps a unifying hypothesis would be that the development of NASH is linked to inflammation and to insulin signaling,” Dr. Cusi said. “Not surprisingly, it had a number of effects on the mitochondria, and in this animal model it decreases the TCA.” He noted that the biology of fibrosis remains unknown in humans. “What we have been familiar with is the high-triglyceride, low-HDL pattern,” he said. “If you look at how that correlates with the amount of liver fat, it is basically a threshold effect. Once you have steatosis, you don’t see much worse dyslipidemia, which is typical of these patients.”
Recently published guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases on the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) suggests that patients require a weight loss of 3%-5% to improve steatosis, but a loss of 7%-10% to improve most histologic features of NASH, including fibrosis (Hepatology. 2018;67[1]:328-57). Exercise alone may prevent or reduce steatosis, but its ability to improve other aspects of liver histology remains unknown. Bariatric surgery can be considered in otherwise eligible obese individuals with NAFLD or NASH. The procedure’s impact on fibrosis is unknown.
The AASLD practice guideline notes that metformin is not recommended for treating NASH in adult patients, but pioglitazone improves liver histology in patients with and without type 2 diabetes with biopsy-proven NASH. “Pioglitazone has had the greatest benefit in terms of treatment effect, compared to placebo,” Dr. Cusi said. “It’s a generic drug; at the VA [Veterans Affairs], it costs 8 cents per tablet. I think that pioglitazone will be to NASH what metformin has been to type 2 diabetes. The most common side effect is weight gain, typically between 4 and 9 lb. Risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. It should not be used for NAFLD without biopsy-proven NASH.” The guideline goes on to say that it’s currently premature to consider GLP-1 (glucagonlike peptide–1) agonists for treating liver disease in patients with NAFLD or NASH. Meanwhile, vitamin E at 800 IU has been shown to improve liver histology in nondiabetic adults with NASH, but the risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. Vitamin E is not recommended for NASH in diabetic patients, NAFLD without a liver biopsy, NASH cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis.
The AASLD practice guideline also states that the best evidence for using SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter–2) inhibitors in NAFLD comes from animal studies, which report a reduction in steatosis with and without weight loss. Clinical studies reporting a reduction in steatosis are limited. There are positive observational studies with a reduction in alanine aminotransferase and some studies that have shown a reduction in liver fat. “For me, the best option is to tailor treatment to the pathophysiology of the disease,” Dr. Cusi said. “You reduce fat by weight loss in some way, or you change the biology of fat with a thiazolidinedione.”
Dr. Cusi reported that he has received grant support from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the National Institutes of Health.
LOS ANGELES – For every 10 adult patients with type 2 diabetes, three are likely to have moderate to severe liver fibrosis, according to Kenneth Cusi, MD, FACP, FACE.
“The question is, How are we going to tackle this problem? My academic goal is that we incorporate screening for NASH [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis], or for fibrosis more specifically, in the same way we do for retinopathy or nephropathy [in diabetes], because we do have a way to treat it,” he said at the World Congress on Insulin Resistance, Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease.
Dr. Cusi, chief of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, predicted that obesity will become the No. 1 cause of liver transplantation. “It’s a real epidemic; you’re not seeing it because the inflexion of obesity happened just 2 decades ago,” he said. “Patients with diabetes face the greatest risk of fatty liver and of fibrosis. Untreated, it’s the equivalent of having macroalbuminuria. If you do nothing and they don’t die of cardiovascular disease, they’re going to have a good chance of getting fibrosis.”
As part of the large population-based Rotterdam study of individuals aged 45 years and older, researchers found that liver stiffness of 8 kPa or more by transient elastography was present in 5.6% of the study participants and was strongly associated with steatosis and diabetes (Hepatology. 2016;63:138-47). According to Dr. Cusi, individuals who have steatosis without diabetes face a 5%-10% risk of fibrosis, while those with steatosis and diabetes face a 15%-20% risk. “It’s well established in a number of studies that if you have fibrosis, you’re at high risk not only of cirrhosis, but also of hepatocellular carcinoma,” he said. “The key thing is not detecting fat, which is not really the target. The target is if there’s fibrosis or not.” Three ways to assess for fibrosis include MR elastography, transient elastography (which is the most commonly used), and fibrosis marker panels.
Liver fibrosis likely starts with adipose tissue dysfunction, said Dr. Cusi, who authored a review on the pathophysiology of interactions between adipose tissue and target organs in obesity and the resulting clinical implications for the management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Gastroenterology. 2012;142[4]:711-25.e6). “When you have insulin-resistant, sick adipose tissue, that leads to the accumulation of fat in the liver,” he said. “. Even if you get people who are matched for BMIs [body mass indexes] between 30 and 35 kg/m2, there is a spectrum in which some individuals have very insulin-resistant adipose tissue and others less so. I would say that 1 out of 10 are metabolically healthy, and we don’t understand exactly why.”
In a recent cross-sectional analysis of 352 healthy individuals, Dr. Cusi and his associates found that intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) accumulation is strongly associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance, supporting the current theory of lipotoxicity as a driver of IHTG accumulation (Hepatology. 2017;65[4]:1132-44). The researchers observed that once IHTG accumulation reaches about 6%, skeletal muscle insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol become fully established. “The next question is, How does this correlate with NASH?” Dr. Cusi said. “Our take is that there is a threshold effect. Once you have a critical amount of triglycerides in your liver, some individuals are going to activate pathways that are harmful. NASH is not something exclusive to individuals who are obese. Lean people can also develop NASH. The key feature is insulin resistance, not metabolic syndrome. Once you develop a fatty liver, your chances of NASH are comparable to that of an obese individual. The paradox is that lean individuals get a fatty liver, but when they get a fatty liver, they are at risk for NASH and for fibrosis.”
Why lean individuals develop NASH is not fully understood, but Dr. Cusi said he suspects that the problem develops at the mitochondrial level. Results from an unpublished animal model in which mice were fed a high–trans-fat diet for 24 weeks showed that the mice developed steatosis by week 8 and NASH by week 24. The mice had an increase in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, which is typical of the NASH period, as well as an increase in ceramides. “Perhaps a unifying hypothesis would be that the development of NASH is linked to inflammation and to insulin signaling,” Dr. Cusi said. “Not surprisingly, it had a number of effects on the mitochondria, and in this animal model it decreases the TCA.” He noted that the biology of fibrosis remains unknown in humans. “What we have been familiar with is the high-triglyceride, low-HDL pattern,” he said. “If you look at how that correlates with the amount of liver fat, it is basically a threshold effect. Once you have steatosis, you don’t see much worse dyslipidemia, which is typical of these patients.”
Recently published guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases on the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) suggests that patients require a weight loss of 3%-5% to improve steatosis, but a loss of 7%-10% to improve most histologic features of NASH, including fibrosis (Hepatology. 2018;67[1]:328-57). Exercise alone may prevent or reduce steatosis, but its ability to improve other aspects of liver histology remains unknown. Bariatric surgery can be considered in otherwise eligible obese individuals with NAFLD or NASH. The procedure’s impact on fibrosis is unknown.
The AASLD practice guideline notes that metformin is not recommended for treating NASH in adult patients, but pioglitazone improves liver histology in patients with and without type 2 diabetes with biopsy-proven NASH. “Pioglitazone has had the greatest benefit in terms of treatment effect, compared to placebo,” Dr. Cusi said. “It’s a generic drug; at the VA [Veterans Affairs], it costs 8 cents per tablet. I think that pioglitazone will be to NASH what metformin has been to type 2 diabetes. The most common side effect is weight gain, typically between 4 and 9 lb. Risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. It should not be used for NAFLD without biopsy-proven NASH.” The guideline goes on to say that it’s currently premature to consider GLP-1 (glucagonlike peptide–1) agonists for treating liver disease in patients with NAFLD or NASH. Meanwhile, vitamin E at 800 IU has been shown to improve liver histology in nondiabetic adults with NASH, but the risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. Vitamin E is not recommended for NASH in diabetic patients, NAFLD without a liver biopsy, NASH cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis.
The AASLD practice guideline also states that the best evidence for using SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter–2) inhibitors in NAFLD comes from animal studies, which report a reduction in steatosis with and without weight loss. Clinical studies reporting a reduction in steatosis are limited. There are positive observational studies with a reduction in alanine aminotransferase and some studies that have shown a reduction in liver fat. “For me, the best option is to tailor treatment to the pathophysiology of the disease,” Dr. Cusi said. “You reduce fat by weight loss in some way, or you change the biology of fat with a thiazolidinedione.”
Dr. Cusi reported that he has received grant support from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the National Institutes of Health.
LOS ANGELES – For every 10 adult patients with type 2 diabetes, three are likely to have moderate to severe liver fibrosis, according to Kenneth Cusi, MD, FACP, FACE.
“The question is, How are we going to tackle this problem? My academic goal is that we incorporate screening for NASH [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis], or for fibrosis more specifically, in the same way we do for retinopathy or nephropathy [in diabetes], because we do have a way to treat it,” he said at the World Congress on Insulin Resistance, Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease.
Dr. Cusi, chief of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Florida, Gainesville, predicted that obesity will become the No. 1 cause of liver transplantation. “It’s a real epidemic; you’re not seeing it because the inflexion of obesity happened just 2 decades ago,” he said. “Patients with diabetes face the greatest risk of fatty liver and of fibrosis. Untreated, it’s the equivalent of having macroalbuminuria. If you do nothing and they don’t die of cardiovascular disease, they’re going to have a good chance of getting fibrosis.”
As part of the large population-based Rotterdam study of individuals aged 45 years and older, researchers found that liver stiffness of 8 kPa or more by transient elastography was present in 5.6% of the study participants and was strongly associated with steatosis and diabetes (Hepatology. 2016;63:138-47). According to Dr. Cusi, individuals who have steatosis without diabetes face a 5%-10% risk of fibrosis, while those with steatosis and diabetes face a 15%-20% risk. “It’s well established in a number of studies that if you have fibrosis, you’re at high risk not only of cirrhosis, but also of hepatocellular carcinoma,” he said. “The key thing is not detecting fat, which is not really the target. The target is if there’s fibrosis or not.” Three ways to assess for fibrosis include MR elastography, transient elastography (which is the most commonly used), and fibrosis marker panels.
Liver fibrosis likely starts with adipose tissue dysfunction, said Dr. Cusi, who authored a review on the pathophysiology of interactions between adipose tissue and target organs in obesity and the resulting clinical implications for the management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (Gastroenterology. 2012;142[4]:711-25.e6). “When you have insulin-resistant, sick adipose tissue, that leads to the accumulation of fat in the liver,” he said. “. Even if you get people who are matched for BMIs [body mass indexes] between 30 and 35 kg/m2, there is a spectrum in which some individuals have very insulin-resistant adipose tissue and others less so. I would say that 1 out of 10 are metabolically healthy, and we don’t understand exactly why.”
In a recent cross-sectional analysis of 352 healthy individuals, Dr. Cusi and his associates found that intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) accumulation is strongly associated with adipose tissue insulin resistance, supporting the current theory of lipotoxicity as a driver of IHTG accumulation (Hepatology. 2017;65[4]:1132-44). The researchers observed that once IHTG accumulation reaches about 6%, skeletal muscle insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol become fully established. “The next question is, How does this correlate with NASH?” Dr. Cusi said. “Our take is that there is a threshold effect. Once you have a critical amount of triglycerides in your liver, some individuals are going to activate pathways that are harmful. NASH is not something exclusive to individuals who are obese. Lean people can also develop NASH. The key feature is insulin resistance, not metabolic syndrome. Once you develop a fatty liver, your chances of NASH are comparable to that of an obese individual. The paradox is that lean individuals get a fatty liver, but when they get a fatty liver, they are at risk for NASH and for fibrosis.”
Why lean individuals develop NASH is not fully understood, but Dr. Cusi said he suspects that the problem develops at the mitochondrial level. Results from an unpublished animal model in which mice were fed a high–trans-fat diet for 24 weeks showed that the mice developed steatosis by week 8 and NASH by week 24. The mice had an increase in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, which is typical of the NASH period, as well as an increase in ceramides. “Perhaps a unifying hypothesis would be that the development of NASH is linked to inflammation and to insulin signaling,” Dr. Cusi said. “Not surprisingly, it had a number of effects on the mitochondria, and in this animal model it decreases the TCA.” He noted that the biology of fibrosis remains unknown in humans. “What we have been familiar with is the high-triglyceride, low-HDL pattern,” he said. “If you look at how that correlates with the amount of liver fat, it is basically a threshold effect. Once you have steatosis, you don’t see much worse dyslipidemia, which is typical of these patients.”
Recently published guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases on the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) suggests that patients require a weight loss of 3%-5% to improve steatosis, but a loss of 7%-10% to improve most histologic features of NASH, including fibrosis (Hepatology. 2018;67[1]:328-57). Exercise alone may prevent or reduce steatosis, but its ability to improve other aspects of liver histology remains unknown. Bariatric surgery can be considered in otherwise eligible obese individuals with NAFLD or NASH. The procedure’s impact on fibrosis is unknown.
The AASLD practice guideline notes that metformin is not recommended for treating NASH in adult patients, but pioglitazone improves liver histology in patients with and without type 2 diabetes with biopsy-proven NASH. “Pioglitazone has had the greatest benefit in terms of treatment effect, compared to placebo,” Dr. Cusi said. “It’s a generic drug; at the VA [Veterans Affairs], it costs 8 cents per tablet. I think that pioglitazone will be to NASH what metformin has been to type 2 diabetes. The most common side effect is weight gain, typically between 4 and 9 lb. Risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. It should not be used for NAFLD without biopsy-proven NASH.” The guideline goes on to say that it’s currently premature to consider GLP-1 (glucagonlike peptide–1) agonists for treating liver disease in patients with NAFLD or NASH. Meanwhile, vitamin E at 800 IU has been shown to improve liver histology in nondiabetic adults with NASH, but the risks and benefits should be discussed with each patient. Vitamin E is not recommended for NASH in diabetic patients, NAFLD without a liver biopsy, NASH cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis.
The AASLD practice guideline also states that the best evidence for using SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter–2) inhibitors in NAFLD comes from animal studies, which report a reduction in steatosis with and without weight loss. Clinical studies reporting a reduction in steatosis are limited. There are positive observational studies with a reduction in alanine aminotransferase and some studies that have shown a reduction in liver fat. “For me, the best option is to tailor treatment to the pathophysiology of the disease,” Dr. Cusi said. “You reduce fat by weight loss in some way, or you change the biology of fat with a thiazolidinedione.”
Dr. Cusi reported that he has received grant support from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the American Diabetes Association, and the National Institutes of Health.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM WCIRDC 2017
Isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation: An emerging disease
SNOWMASS, COLO. – that’s treatable, provided affected patients are referred for surgery before the clinical course progresses to intractable right heart disease with cirrhosis and liver failure, Rick A. Nishimura, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“This is an emerging disease that you’re all going to see in your practices this year. You’ve got to know what to do with these patients. Get to them early,” urged Dr. Nishimura, professor of cardiovascular sciences and hypertension at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
The medical textbooks don’t discuss isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (ISTR) or its etiology. ISTR is a disorder of progressive right ventricular dilation and dysfunction whose etiology involves either longstanding atrial fibrillation or valvular disruption due to interference from a crossing lead of a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
“This is something different. These patients have a normal left heart and left heart valves and normal pressures, with no pulmonary hypertension. So it doesn’t fit into any of the textbook categories of tricuspid regurgitation,” the cardiologist said. 
Moreover, the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on valvular heart disease don’t address ISTR, either. Physicians who attempt to apply the guidelines in deciding when to refer a patient with ISTR for surgery will oftentimes find they’ve waited too long and the patient has started to develop end-stage disease, according to Dr. Nishimura.
And he should know: He was lead author of the current ACC/AHA guidelines (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63[22]:2438-88).
Decades ago, Eugene Braunwald, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, famously called the tricuspid valve “the forgotten valve.” The history of the Snowmass winter cardiology conference bears that out. During 2007-2017, the conference featured an average of 5.4 sessions per year on aortic valve disease, 4.5 sessions per year on mitral valve disease, and not a single session on tricuspid valve disease. But the tricuspid valve is forgotten no longer, Dr. Nishimura emphasized.
How ISTR presents
The affected patient has a history of either longstanding atrial fibrillation or a permanent pacemaker or ICD.
“This is something that 4 or 5 years ago people said didn’t exist. Our pacemaker people told me, ‘Nah, you can never get tricuspid regurgitation from our leads.’ Now it’s one of the leading causes of tricuspid regurgitation going to operation,” said Dr. Nishimura.
The presenting symptoms of ISTR are typically ascites, edema, and shortness of breath.
“Why should patients with a right heart problem get dyspnea? It turns out that when the right ventricle dilates it pushes the septum in, so the effective operative compliance of the left ventricle decreases and you actually see the pulmonary artery wedge pressure go up,” he explained.
On physical examination, the patient will have elevated jugular venous pressure with large V waves.
“This is a clue that something is going on. The patient will have neck veins jumping up to her ear lobes. The ear lobes are going to wiggle with every heart beat – boom, boom, boom. If you see that, you start to figure out what’s going on. You need nothing else,” Dr. Nishimura said.
The patient will likely also have a pulsatile enlarged liver and, even though this is valve disease, a murmur that’s either soft or inaudible.
Echocardiographic diagnosis
Echocardiography will show a dilated right ventricle and right atrium, a dilated inferior vena cava, and a normal left ventricle with no pulmonary hypertension. The classic sign of ISTR on continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a dagger-shaped tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity signal of less than 2.5 meters/sec, which indicates the absence of pulmonary hypertension. This dagger shape occurs because the right atrial pressure equalizes the right ventricular pressure.
It’s also important to point the echo probe at the hepatic veins to spot another echocardiographic hallmark of ISTR: systolic reversal.
A thorough echo exam makes hemodynamic catheterization unnecessary in these patients, Dr. Nishimura added.
When to refer for tricuspid valve repair or replacement
The clinical course of ISTR is progressive, often rapidly so. It starts with elevated jugular venous pressure, then comes fatigue and shortness of breath, moving on to ascites and edema, then finally cirrhosis and renal failure. It’s a vicious cycle in which tricuspid regurgitation begets annular dilation, which causes chordal stretching and worsening tricuspid regurgitation, leading to further annular dilation.
Patients typically aren’t referred for surgery – and may not even present to a physician – until they’ve already developed end-stage disease. That’s probably why the outcomes of surgery for ISTR are so poor. Dr. Nishimura was senior investigator of a recent retrospective study of national trends and outcomes for ISTR surgery based on the National Inpatient Sample. The number of operations increased by 250% during a recent 10-year period, but the surgery is still rare: 290 operations in 2004, climbing to 780 nationwide in 2013.
In-hospital mortality remained steady over time at 8.8%, far higher than rates of in-hospital mortality for surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease, which today stand at 1%-2% or less. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with ISTR was 1.9-fold greater than for valve repair (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70[24]:2953-60).
“I think the reason the operative risk of valve surgery for ISTR is so high is that we’re waiting until patients have end-stage disease,” Dr. Nishimura said.
Indeed, he recommends referral for surgery as soon as the echocardiographic diagnosis of ISTR is made in a patient with huge neck veins.
“This will probably take the operative risk down by going to a time when the right ventricle can still recover,” he added.
In a patient with ISTR and pacemaker or defibrillator leads crossing the valve, tricuspid valve repair or replacement should be accompanied by exteriorization of the leads.
Dr. Nishimura reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
SNOWMASS, COLO. – that’s treatable, provided affected patients are referred for surgery before the clinical course progresses to intractable right heart disease with cirrhosis and liver failure, Rick A. Nishimura, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“This is an emerging disease that you’re all going to see in your practices this year. You’ve got to know what to do with these patients. Get to them early,” urged Dr. Nishimura, professor of cardiovascular sciences and hypertension at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
The medical textbooks don’t discuss isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (ISTR) or its etiology. ISTR is a disorder of progressive right ventricular dilation and dysfunction whose etiology involves either longstanding atrial fibrillation or valvular disruption due to interference from a crossing lead of a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
“This is something different. These patients have a normal left heart and left heart valves and normal pressures, with no pulmonary hypertension. So it doesn’t fit into any of the textbook categories of tricuspid regurgitation,” the cardiologist said.
Moreover, the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on valvular heart disease don’t address ISTR, either. Physicians who attempt to apply the guidelines in deciding when to refer a patient with ISTR for surgery will oftentimes find they’ve waited too long and the patient has started to develop end-stage disease, according to Dr. Nishimura.
And he should know: He was lead author of the current ACC/AHA guidelines (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63[22]:2438-88).
Decades ago, Eugene Braunwald, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, famously called the tricuspid valve “the forgotten valve.” The history of the Snowmass winter cardiology conference bears that out. During 2007-2017, the conference featured an average of 5.4 sessions per year on aortic valve disease, 4.5 sessions per year on mitral valve disease, and not a single session on tricuspid valve disease. But the tricuspid valve is forgotten no longer, Dr. Nishimura emphasized.
How ISTR presents
The affected patient has a history of either longstanding atrial fibrillation or a permanent pacemaker or ICD.
“This is something that 4 or 5 years ago people said didn’t exist. Our pacemaker people told me, ‘Nah, you can never get tricuspid regurgitation from our leads.’ Now it’s one of the leading causes of tricuspid regurgitation going to operation,” said Dr. Nishimura.
The presenting symptoms of ISTR are typically ascites, edema, and shortness of breath.
“Why should patients with a right heart problem get dyspnea? It turns out that when the right ventricle dilates it pushes the septum in, so the effective operative compliance of the left ventricle decreases and you actually see the pulmonary artery wedge pressure go up,” he explained.
On physical examination, the patient will have elevated jugular venous pressure with large V waves.
“This is a clue that something is going on. The patient will have neck veins jumping up to her ear lobes. The ear lobes are going to wiggle with every heart beat – boom, boom, boom. If you see that, you start to figure out what’s going on. You need nothing else,” Dr. Nishimura said.
The patient will likely also have a pulsatile enlarged liver and, even though this is valve disease, a murmur that’s either soft or inaudible.
Echocardiographic diagnosis
Echocardiography will show a dilated right ventricle and right atrium, a dilated inferior vena cava, and a normal left ventricle with no pulmonary hypertension. The classic sign of ISTR on continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a dagger-shaped tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity signal of less than 2.5 meters/sec, which indicates the absence of pulmonary hypertension. This dagger shape occurs because the right atrial pressure equalizes the right ventricular pressure.
It’s also important to point the echo probe at the hepatic veins to spot another echocardiographic hallmark of ISTR: systolic reversal.
A thorough echo exam makes hemodynamic catheterization unnecessary in these patients, Dr. Nishimura added.
When to refer for tricuspid valve repair or replacement
The clinical course of ISTR is progressive, often rapidly so. It starts with elevated jugular venous pressure, then comes fatigue and shortness of breath, moving on to ascites and edema, then finally cirrhosis and renal failure. It’s a vicious cycle in which tricuspid regurgitation begets annular dilation, which causes chordal stretching and worsening tricuspid regurgitation, leading to further annular dilation.
Patients typically aren’t referred for surgery – and may not even present to a physician – until they’ve already developed end-stage disease. That’s probably why the outcomes of surgery for ISTR are so poor. Dr. Nishimura was senior investigator of a recent retrospective study of national trends and outcomes for ISTR surgery based on the National Inpatient Sample. The number of operations increased by 250% during a recent 10-year period, but the surgery is still rare: 290 operations in 2004, climbing to 780 nationwide in 2013.
In-hospital mortality remained steady over time at 8.8%, far higher than rates of in-hospital mortality for surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease, which today stand at 1%-2% or less. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with ISTR was 1.9-fold greater than for valve repair (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70[24]:2953-60).
“I think the reason the operative risk of valve surgery for ISTR is so high is that we’re waiting until patients have end-stage disease,” Dr. Nishimura said.
Indeed, he recommends referral for surgery as soon as the echocardiographic diagnosis of ISTR is made in a patient with huge neck veins.
“This will probably take the operative risk down by going to a time when the right ventricle can still recover,” he added.
In a patient with ISTR and pacemaker or defibrillator leads crossing the valve, tricuspid valve repair or replacement should be accompanied by exteriorization of the leads.
Dr. Nishimura reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
SNOWMASS, COLO. – that’s treatable, provided affected patients are referred for surgery before the clinical course progresses to intractable right heart disease with cirrhosis and liver failure, Rick A. Nishimura, MD, said at the Annual Cardiovascular Conference at Snowmass.
“This is an emerging disease that you’re all going to see in your practices this year. You’ve got to know what to do with these patients. Get to them early,” urged Dr. Nishimura, professor of cardiovascular sciences and hypertension at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.
The medical textbooks don’t discuss isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (ISTR) or its etiology. ISTR is a disorder of progressive right ventricular dilation and dysfunction whose etiology involves either longstanding atrial fibrillation or valvular disruption due to interference from a crossing lead of a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
“This is something different. These patients have a normal left heart and left heart valves and normal pressures, with no pulmonary hypertension. So it doesn’t fit into any of the textbook categories of tricuspid regurgitation,” the cardiologist said.
Moreover, the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on valvular heart disease don’t address ISTR, either. Physicians who attempt to apply the guidelines in deciding when to refer a patient with ISTR for surgery will oftentimes find they’ve waited too long and the patient has started to develop end-stage disease, according to Dr. Nishimura.
And he should know: He was lead author of the current ACC/AHA guidelines (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63[22]:2438-88).
Decades ago, Eugene Braunwald, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, famously called the tricuspid valve “the forgotten valve.” The history of the Snowmass winter cardiology conference bears that out. During 2007-2017, the conference featured an average of 5.4 sessions per year on aortic valve disease, 4.5 sessions per year on mitral valve disease, and not a single session on tricuspid valve disease. But the tricuspid valve is forgotten no longer, Dr. Nishimura emphasized.
How ISTR presents
The affected patient has a history of either longstanding atrial fibrillation or a permanent pacemaker or ICD.
“This is something that 4 or 5 years ago people said didn’t exist. Our pacemaker people told me, ‘Nah, you can never get tricuspid regurgitation from our leads.’ Now it’s one of the leading causes of tricuspid regurgitation going to operation,” said Dr. Nishimura.
The presenting symptoms of ISTR are typically ascites, edema, and shortness of breath.
“Why should patients with a right heart problem get dyspnea? It turns out that when the right ventricle dilates it pushes the septum in, so the effective operative compliance of the left ventricle decreases and you actually see the pulmonary artery wedge pressure go up,” he explained.
On physical examination, the patient will have elevated jugular venous pressure with large V waves.
“This is a clue that something is going on. The patient will have neck veins jumping up to her ear lobes. The ear lobes are going to wiggle with every heart beat – boom, boom, boom. If you see that, you start to figure out what’s going on. You need nothing else,” Dr. Nishimura said.
The patient will likely also have a pulsatile enlarged liver and, even though this is valve disease, a murmur that’s either soft or inaudible.
Echocardiographic diagnosis
Echocardiography will show a dilated right ventricle and right atrium, a dilated inferior vena cava, and a normal left ventricle with no pulmonary hypertension. The classic sign of ISTR on continuous wave Doppler echocardiography is a dagger-shaped tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity signal of less than 2.5 meters/sec, which indicates the absence of pulmonary hypertension. This dagger shape occurs because the right atrial pressure equalizes the right ventricular pressure.
It’s also important to point the echo probe at the hepatic veins to spot another echocardiographic hallmark of ISTR: systolic reversal.
A thorough echo exam makes hemodynamic catheterization unnecessary in these patients, Dr. Nishimura added.
When to refer for tricuspid valve repair or replacement
The clinical course of ISTR is progressive, often rapidly so. It starts with elevated jugular venous pressure, then comes fatigue and shortness of breath, moving on to ascites and edema, then finally cirrhosis and renal failure. It’s a vicious cycle in which tricuspid regurgitation begets annular dilation, which causes chordal stretching and worsening tricuspid regurgitation, leading to further annular dilation.
Patients typically aren’t referred for surgery – and may not even present to a physician – until they’ve already developed end-stage disease. That’s probably why the outcomes of surgery for ISTR are so poor. Dr. Nishimura was senior investigator of a recent retrospective study of national trends and outcomes for ISTR surgery based on the National Inpatient Sample. The number of operations increased by 250% during a recent 10-year period, but the surgery is still rare: 290 operations in 2004, climbing to 780 nationwide in 2013.
In-hospital mortality remained steady over time at 8.8%, far higher than rates of in-hospital mortality for surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease, which today stand at 1%-2% or less. The adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with ISTR was 1.9-fold greater than for valve repair (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70[24]:2953-60).
“I think the reason the operative risk of valve surgery for ISTR is so high is that we’re waiting until patients have end-stage disease,” Dr. Nishimura said.
Indeed, he recommends referral for surgery as soon as the echocardiographic diagnosis of ISTR is made in a patient with huge neck veins.
“This will probably take the operative risk down by going to a time when the right ventricle can still recover,” he added.
In a patient with ISTR and pacemaker or defibrillator leads crossing the valve, tricuspid valve repair or replacement should be accompanied by exteriorization of the leads.
Dr. Nishimura reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding his presentation.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE CARDIOVASCULAR CONFERENCE AT SNOWMASS