Allowed Publications
LayerRx Mapping ID
440
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Baseline patient-reported physical function predicts SLE-related mortality

Article Type
Changed

The baseline physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) was an independent predictor of mortality for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to recent analysis of data from the University of California, San Francisco, (UCSF) Lupus Outcomes Study.

wildpixel/Thinkstock

Desiree R. Azizoddin, PsyD, of Stanford Health Care in Palo Alto, Calif., and her colleagues analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of 728 patients with SLE from the UCSF study, which included measures such as self-rated health, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD), and SF-36 mental and physical component scores between 2007 and 2015. Patients had a mean age of 50.6 years and consisted of mostly whites (68.5%) and women (92.2%), with a mean SLE disease duration of 16.7 years.

“As PROs can be measured easily, quickly, reliably in a systematic manner, without use of many resources (including cost) and experts, PROs can serve as an important tool in community settings that provide care for individuals with SLE,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research. “Implementation and integration of PROs may potentially help decrease mortality among patients with SLE in the long run.”

The researchers reported 71 deaths (9.8%) in the study. A univariate analysis showed that self-rated health as fair or poor and all SF-36 subscale scores, except for mental health and role emotional subscales, were predictors of mortality. After the investigators performed a multivariate analysis, they found that baseline SF-36 physical component scores alone were associated with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P less than .01), with a 3.5% lower risk for each point-rating increase in the score.

“Insight to predictors of mortality, above and beyond those that require physician resources such as assessments of renal involvement and traditional physician-completed measures of disease activity and damage in this complex disease, affords rheumatologists and SLE providers with additional tools to assess potential patient health trajectories,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in their study. “Identification of such predictors will expand opportunities for early interventions aimed at the reduction of such risk, including allocation of appropriate medical resources in areas with large numbers of patients with compromised health.”

The researchers noted that bias in self-reporting, a lack of prospective evaluations at each visit, and clinical applicability to only similar cohorts were limitations in the study.

This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research and individually was awarded grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

SOURCE: Azizoddin DR et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/acr.23734.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

The baseline physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) was an independent predictor of mortality for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to recent analysis of data from the University of California, San Francisco, (UCSF) Lupus Outcomes Study.

wildpixel/Thinkstock

Desiree R. Azizoddin, PsyD, of Stanford Health Care in Palo Alto, Calif., and her colleagues analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of 728 patients with SLE from the UCSF study, which included measures such as self-rated health, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD), and SF-36 mental and physical component scores between 2007 and 2015. Patients had a mean age of 50.6 years and consisted of mostly whites (68.5%) and women (92.2%), with a mean SLE disease duration of 16.7 years.

“As PROs can be measured easily, quickly, reliably in a systematic manner, without use of many resources (including cost) and experts, PROs can serve as an important tool in community settings that provide care for individuals with SLE,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research. “Implementation and integration of PROs may potentially help decrease mortality among patients with SLE in the long run.”

The researchers reported 71 deaths (9.8%) in the study. A univariate analysis showed that self-rated health as fair or poor and all SF-36 subscale scores, except for mental health and role emotional subscales, were predictors of mortality. After the investigators performed a multivariate analysis, they found that baseline SF-36 physical component scores alone were associated with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P less than .01), with a 3.5% lower risk for each point-rating increase in the score.

“Insight to predictors of mortality, above and beyond those that require physician resources such as assessments of renal involvement and traditional physician-completed measures of disease activity and damage in this complex disease, affords rheumatologists and SLE providers with additional tools to assess potential patient health trajectories,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in their study. “Identification of such predictors will expand opportunities for early interventions aimed at the reduction of such risk, including allocation of appropriate medical resources in areas with large numbers of patients with compromised health.”

The researchers noted that bias in self-reporting, a lack of prospective evaluations at each visit, and clinical applicability to only similar cohorts were limitations in the study.

This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research and individually was awarded grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

SOURCE: Azizoddin DR et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/acr.23734.

The baseline physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 (SF-36) was an independent predictor of mortality for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), according to recent analysis of data from the University of California, San Francisco, (UCSF) Lupus Outcomes Study.

wildpixel/Thinkstock

Desiree R. Azizoddin, PsyD, of Stanford Health Care in Palo Alto, Calif., and her colleagues analyzed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of 728 patients with SLE from the UCSF study, which included measures such as self-rated health, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD), and SF-36 mental and physical component scores between 2007 and 2015. Patients had a mean age of 50.6 years and consisted of mostly whites (68.5%) and women (92.2%), with a mean SLE disease duration of 16.7 years.

“As PROs can be measured easily, quickly, reliably in a systematic manner, without use of many resources (including cost) and experts, PROs can serve as an important tool in community settings that provide care for individuals with SLE,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in Arthritis Care & Research. “Implementation and integration of PROs may potentially help decrease mortality among patients with SLE in the long run.”

The researchers reported 71 deaths (9.8%) in the study. A univariate analysis showed that self-rated health as fair or poor and all SF-36 subscale scores, except for mental health and role emotional subscales, were predictors of mortality. After the investigators performed a multivariate analysis, they found that baseline SF-36 physical component scores alone were associated with an increased mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P less than .01), with a 3.5% lower risk for each point-rating increase in the score.

“Insight to predictors of mortality, above and beyond those that require physician resources such as assessments of renal involvement and traditional physician-completed measures of disease activity and damage in this complex disease, affords rheumatologists and SLE providers with additional tools to assess potential patient health trajectories,” Dr. Azizoddin and her colleagues wrote in their study. “Identification of such predictors will expand opportunities for early interventions aimed at the reduction of such risk, including allocation of appropriate medical resources in areas with large numbers of patients with compromised health.”

The researchers noted that bias in self-reporting, a lack of prospective evaluations at each visit, and clinical applicability to only similar cohorts were limitations in the study.

This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research and individually was awarded grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

SOURCE: Azizoddin DR et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/acr.23734.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The physical component of the SF-36 alone was a predictor of mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus after a multivariate analysis.

Major finding: There was a 3.5% lower risk of mortality per each increased point rating on the SF-36 physical component score.

Study details: An analysis of 728 patients with SLE from the University of California, San Francisco, Lupus Outcomes Study.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research and individually was awarded grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Source: Azizoddin DR et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 24. doi: 10.1002/acr.23734.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Childhood-onset SLE has major impact in adult life

Article Type
Changed

 

The majority of adults with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a longitudinal Dutch study developed significant damage at a young age, remain on corticosteroids in adulthood, and have an impaired health-related quality of life.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/doktorinternet/Creative Commons License

The findings in the study, dubbed Childhood-Onset SLE in the Netherlands (CHILL-NL), highlighted the need for preventive screening measures to be put in place before the age of 30 to facilitate a better outcome for patients, who still face high morbidity from childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) despite improved survival. Such information is helpful to “answer questions from children and parents regarding the future course of the disease,” wrote Noortje Groot, PhD, of the department of pediatric rheumatology at Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children’s Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and her colleagues. The report is in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The current study included all adult SLE patients treated in any Dutch public hospital during the period of November 2013 to April 2016 who were diagnosed with the autoimmune disease prior to their 18th birthday.

All 111 patients involved in the study were seen for a 1.5-hour visit at Erasmus University Medical Center or a local hospital of their choice. During the appointment, a medical history was taken, a physical examination was performed, and the patients completed questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

The average age of patients at the study visit was 33 years, 91% were female, and 72% were white. Median disease duration was 20 years and disease activity was low (median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2k] = 4). Low complement (32%), skin rashes (14%), and proteinuria (13%) were the most common SLEDAI items reported.

Overall, 68% of the cohort (n = 76) were taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), 29% of whom (n = 22) were taking it as monotherapy.

Furthermore, 68% of patients at the study visit were taking corticosteroids and/or non-HCQ disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and just over half (51%) of patients (n = 56) were taking corticosteroids either alone or with a non-HCQ DMARD.

“This [finding] is worrying as corticosteroids are associated with the development of damage. Patients are certainly eager to limit corticosteroid use, as almost all patients in the CHILL-NL cohort reported to have negative experiences with prednisone regarding their physical appearance and or mental well-being,” the study authors wrote.

Results also showed that 62% of the patients had damage, predominantly in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, and renal systems.

Most organ systems became involved within the first 2 years of diagnosis, but after 5 years of disease the nature of disease manifestations tended to shift to damage such as myocardial infarctions.

Notably, after 10-20 years, when cSLE patients were in their early 20s and 30s, significant damage had occurred in more than half of the patients, the authors noted.

“This shift to damage has also been observed in adult-onset SLE patients and urges for preventative screening measures of such (cardiovascular) damage and healthy lifestyle advice (healthy diet, regular exercise, abstinence from smoking),” they wrote.

Multivariate logistic regression showed that damage accrual was associated with disease duration (odds ratio, 1.15; P less than .001), antiphospholipid‐antibody positivity (OR, 3.56; P = .026), and hypertension (OR, 3.21; P = .043). On the other hand, current HCQ monotherapy was associated with an SLICC-Damage Index score of 0 (OR, 0.16; P = .009).

The HRQOL of the cohort, assessed via the Short Form–36, was also impaired compared with the general population, the researchers discovered. For example, the presence of damage reduced HRQOL in one domain, and high disease activity, defined as SLEDAI-2k of 8 or more, strongly reduced HRQOL in four of eight domains. Changes in physical appearance lowered HRQOL in seven of eight domains.

“HRQOL of adults with cSLE is impaired and affected by other factors than disease activity or damage alone. By identifying and addressing these factors, like physical appearance and potentially coping styles, HRQOL may be improved,” they advised.

The study was supported financially by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation and the Dutch national patient association for lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, scleroderma, and mixed connective tissue diseases.

SOURCE: Groot N et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 27. doi: 10.1002/art.40697

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

The majority of adults with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a longitudinal Dutch study developed significant damage at a young age, remain on corticosteroids in adulthood, and have an impaired health-related quality of life.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/doktorinternet/Creative Commons License

The findings in the study, dubbed Childhood-Onset SLE in the Netherlands (CHILL-NL), highlighted the need for preventive screening measures to be put in place before the age of 30 to facilitate a better outcome for patients, who still face high morbidity from childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) despite improved survival. Such information is helpful to “answer questions from children and parents regarding the future course of the disease,” wrote Noortje Groot, PhD, of the department of pediatric rheumatology at Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children’s Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and her colleagues. The report is in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The current study included all adult SLE patients treated in any Dutch public hospital during the period of November 2013 to April 2016 who were diagnosed with the autoimmune disease prior to their 18th birthday.

All 111 patients involved in the study were seen for a 1.5-hour visit at Erasmus University Medical Center or a local hospital of their choice. During the appointment, a medical history was taken, a physical examination was performed, and the patients completed questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

The average age of patients at the study visit was 33 years, 91% were female, and 72% were white. Median disease duration was 20 years and disease activity was low (median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2k] = 4). Low complement (32%), skin rashes (14%), and proteinuria (13%) were the most common SLEDAI items reported.

Overall, 68% of the cohort (n = 76) were taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), 29% of whom (n = 22) were taking it as monotherapy.

Furthermore, 68% of patients at the study visit were taking corticosteroids and/or non-HCQ disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and just over half (51%) of patients (n = 56) were taking corticosteroids either alone or with a non-HCQ DMARD.

“This [finding] is worrying as corticosteroids are associated with the development of damage. Patients are certainly eager to limit corticosteroid use, as almost all patients in the CHILL-NL cohort reported to have negative experiences with prednisone regarding their physical appearance and or mental well-being,” the study authors wrote.

Results also showed that 62% of the patients had damage, predominantly in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, and renal systems.

Most organ systems became involved within the first 2 years of diagnosis, but after 5 years of disease the nature of disease manifestations tended to shift to damage such as myocardial infarctions.

Notably, after 10-20 years, when cSLE patients were in their early 20s and 30s, significant damage had occurred in more than half of the patients, the authors noted.

“This shift to damage has also been observed in adult-onset SLE patients and urges for preventative screening measures of such (cardiovascular) damage and healthy lifestyle advice (healthy diet, regular exercise, abstinence from smoking),” they wrote.

Multivariate logistic regression showed that damage accrual was associated with disease duration (odds ratio, 1.15; P less than .001), antiphospholipid‐antibody positivity (OR, 3.56; P = .026), and hypertension (OR, 3.21; P = .043). On the other hand, current HCQ monotherapy was associated with an SLICC-Damage Index score of 0 (OR, 0.16; P = .009).

The HRQOL of the cohort, assessed via the Short Form–36, was also impaired compared with the general population, the researchers discovered. For example, the presence of damage reduced HRQOL in one domain, and high disease activity, defined as SLEDAI-2k of 8 or more, strongly reduced HRQOL in four of eight domains. Changes in physical appearance lowered HRQOL in seven of eight domains.

“HRQOL of adults with cSLE is impaired and affected by other factors than disease activity or damage alone. By identifying and addressing these factors, like physical appearance and potentially coping styles, HRQOL may be improved,” they advised.

The study was supported financially by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation and the Dutch national patient association for lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, scleroderma, and mixed connective tissue diseases.

SOURCE: Groot N et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 27. doi: 10.1002/art.40697

 

The majority of adults with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus in a longitudinal Dutch study developed significant damage at a young age, remain on corticosteroids in adulthood, and have an impaired health-related quality of life.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/doktorinternet/Creative Commons License

The findings in the study, dubbed Childhood-Onset SLE in the Netherlands (CHILL-NL), highlighted the need for preventive screening measures to be put in place before the age of 30 to facilitate a better outcome for patients, who still face high morbidity from childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) despite improved survival. Such information is helpful to “answer questions from children and parents regarding the future course of the disease,” wrote Noortje Groot, PhD, of the department of pediatric rheumatology at Erasmus Medical Center–Sophia Children’s Hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and her colleagues. The report is in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The current study included all adult SLE patients treated in any Dutch public hospital during the period of November 2013 to April 2016 who were diagnosed with the autoimmune disease prior to their 18th birthday.

All 111 patients involved in the study were seen for a 1.5-hour visit at Erasmus University Medical Center or a local hospital of their choice. During the appointment, a medical history was taken, a physical examination was performed, and the patients completed questionnaires on health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

The average age of patients at the study visit was 33 years, 91% were female, and 72% were white. Median disease duration was 20 years and disease activity was low (median SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 [SLEDAI-2k] = 4). Low complement (32%), skin rashes (14%), and proteinuria (13%) were the most common SLEDAI items reported.

Overall, 68% of the cohort (n = 76) were taking hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), 29% of whom (n = 22) were taking it as monotherapy.

Furthermore, 68% of patients at the study visit were taking corticosteroids and/or non-HCQ disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and just over half (51%) of patients (n = 56) were taking corticosteroids either alone or with a non-HCQ DMARD.

“This [finding] is worrying as corticosteroids are associated with the development of damage. Patients are certainly eager to limit corticosteroid use, as almost all patients in the CHILL-NL cohort reported to have negative experiences with prednisone regarding their physical appearance and or mental well-being,” the study authors wrote.

Results also showed that 62% of the patients had damage, predominantly in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, and renal systems.

Most organ systems became involved within the first 2 years of diagnosis, but after 5 years of disease the nature of disease manifestations tended to shift to damage such as myocardial infarctions.

Notably, after 10-20 years, when cSLE patients were in their early 20s and 30s, significant damage had occurred in more than half of the patients, the authors noted.

“This shift to damage has also been observed in adult-onset SLE patients and urges for preventative screening measures of such (cardiovascular) damage and healthy lifestyle advice (healthy diet, regular exercise, abstinence from smoking),” they wrote.

Multivariate logistic regression showed that damage accrual was associated with disease duration (odds ratio, 1.15; P less than .001), antiphospholipid‐antibody positivity (OR, 3.56; P = .026), and hypertension (OR, 3.21; P = .043). On the other hand, current HCQ monotherapy was associated with an SLICC-Damage Index score of 0 (OR, 0.16; P = .009).

The HRQOL of the cohort, assessed via the Short Form–36, was also impaired compared with the general population, the researchers discovered. For example, the presence of damage reduced HRQOL in one domain, and high disease activity, defined as SLEDAI-2k of 8 or more, strongly reduced HRQOL in four of eight domains. Changes in physical appearance lowered HRQOL in seven of eight domains.

“HRQOL of adults with cSLE is impaired and affected by other factors than disease activity or damage alone. By identifying and addressing these factors, like physical appearance and potentially coping styles, HRQOL may be improved,” they advised.

The study was supported financially by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation and the Dutch national patient association for lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, scleroderma, and mixed connective tissue diseases.

SOURCE: Groot N et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 27. doi: 10.1002/art.40697

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The majority of adults with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus develop significant damage at a young age.

Major finding: Among 111 patients, 62% had damage, predominantly in the musculoskeletal, neuropsychiatric, and renal systems.

Study details: Adult SLE patients diagnosed prior to their 18th birthday who were treated during November 2013 to April 2016 in any Dutch public hospital.

Disclosures: The study was supported financially by the Dutch Arthritis Foundation and the Dutch national patient association for lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, scleroderma, and mixed connective tissue diseases.

Source: Groot N et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Aug 27. doi: 10.1002/art.40697.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Study supports effects of smoking, drinking on SLE risk in black women

Article Type
Changed

 

Black women who smoke cigarettes are at increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), while those who drink alcohol in moderation have a decreased risk, data from the prospective Black Women’s Health Study suggests.

The current findings among black women, who are the demographic group at the highest risk of SLE in the U.S. population, are consistent with the previously reported positive association of cigarette smoking with risk of SLE and inverse association of alcohol consumption with SLE,” lead researchers Yvette Cozier, DSc, and Medha Barbhaiya, MD, and their colleagues wrote in a study published in Arthritis Care & Research.

“The role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of SLE is of great interest, as genetic factors do not explain a major portion of the incidence. Cigarette smoking has been associated with SLE risk in several, but not all, past studies,” wrote Dr. Cozier of the Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University and Dr. Barbhaiya of the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, and their coauthors.

Their analysis of data from the Black Women’s Health Study, a prospective study following 59,000 black women in the United States since 1995, identified 127 new cases of SLE between 1995 and 2015 that were confirmed by medical records.

At baseline, 8,851 women (16%) were current smokers, and 10,447 (18%) were past smokers. A total of 14,001 (25%) were current drinkers, and 10,255 (18%) were past drinkers.

The researchers reported that, compared with never smokers, women who had ever smoked had a 45% higher risk for SLE than did never smokers (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.18), but the finding was not statistically significant.


The risk of SLE was greater among current smokers (52% higher risk) than among past smokers (41% higher risk), and greater for 20 or more pack-years of smoking (60% higher risk) than for less than 20 pack-years of smoking (37% higher risk), although the authors noted that none of these differences were statistically significant.

Current and past alcohol consumption were associated with nonsignificant reductions in risk for SLE, 29% and 21%, respectively. However, “moderate” current alcohol consumption, measured as four or more drinks per week, was associated with a 57% reduction in risk for SLE (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.96).

The researchers said that the associations between cigarette smoking and alcohol intake with SLE risk were biologically plausible and may lead to insights into SLE pathogenesis. For example, exposure to toxic components from cigarette smoke was associated with increased oxidative stress and stimulation of autoantibody production, and such exposure can directly damage endogenous proteins and DNA. Alcohol suppresses the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and may inhibit DNA synthesis.

The small number of lupus cases in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort limited the statistical power of the analysis. Smoking and alcohol use were also relatively uncommon among women in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort, the investigators said.

“Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the biologic mechanisms by which cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption influence the risk of SLE in this population and others,“ they wrote.

The study was supported by individual investigators’ grant awards from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and the Lupus Foundation of America. The authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cozier Y et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/acr.23703.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Black women who smoke cigarettes are at increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), while those who drink alcohol in moderation have a decreased risk, data from the prospective Black Women’s Health Study suggests.

The current findings among black women, who are the demographic group at the highest risk of SLE in the U.S. population, are consistent with the previously reported positive association of cigarette smoking with risk of SLE and inverse association of alcohol consumption with SLE,” lead researchers Yvette Cozier, DSc, and Medha Barbhaiya, MD, and their colleagues wrote in a study published in Arthritis Care & Research.

“The role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of SLE is of great interest, as genetic factors do not explain a major portion of the incidence. Cigarette smoking has been associated with SLE risk in several, but not all, past studies,” wrote Dr. Cozier of the Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University and Dr. Barbhaiya of the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, and their coauthors.

Their analysis of data from the Black Women’s Health Study, a prospective study following 59,000 black women in the United States since 1995, identified 127 new cases of SLE between 1995 and 2015 that were confirmed by medical records.

At baseline, 8,851 women (16%) were current smokers, and 10,447 (18%) were past smokers. A total of 14,001 (25%) were current drinkers, and 10,255 (18%) were past drinkers.

The researchers reported that, compared with never smokers, women who had ever smoked had a 45% higher risk for SLE than did never smokers (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.18), but the finding was not statistically significant.


The risk of SLE was greater among current smokers (52% higher risk) than among past smokers (41% higher risk), and greater for 20 or more pack-years of smoking (60% higher risk) than for less than 20 pack-years of smoking (37% higher risk), although the authors noted that none of these differences were statistically significant.

Current and past alcohol consumption were associated with nonsignificant reductions in risk for SLE, 29% and 21%, respectively. However, “moderate” current alcohol consumption, measured as four or more drinks per week, was associated with a 57% reduction in risk for SLE (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.96).

The researchers said that the associations between cigarette smoking and alcohol intake with SLE risk were biologically plausible and may lead to insights into SLE pathogenesis. For example, exposure to toxic components from cigarette smoke was associated with increased oxidative stress and stimulation of autoantibody production, and such exposure can directly damage endogenous proteins and DNA. Alcohol suppresses the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and may inhibit DNA synthesis.

The small number of lupus cases in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort limited the statistical power of the analysis. Smoking and alcohol use were also relatively uncommon among women in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort, the investigators said.

“Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the biologic mechanisms by which cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption influence the risk of SLE in this population and others,“ they wrote.

The study was supported by individual investigators’ grant awards from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and the Lupus Foundation of America. The authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cozier Y et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/acr.23703.

 

Black women who smoke cigarettes are at increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), while those who drink alcohol in moderation have a decreased risk, data from the prospective Black Women’s Health Study suggests.

The current findings among black women, who are the demographic group at the highest risk of SLE in the U.S. population, are consistent with the previously reported positive association of cigarette smoking with risk of SLE and inverse association of alcohol consumption with SLE,” lead researchers Yvette Cozier, DSc, and Medha Barbhaiya, MD, and their colleagues wrote in a study published in Arthritis Care & Research.

“The role of environmental factors in the pathogenesis of SLE is of great interest, as genetic factors do not explain a major portion of the incidence. Cigarette smoking has been associated with SLE risk in several, but not all, past studies,” wrote Dr. Cozier of the Slone Epidemiology Center at Boston University and Dr. Barbhaiya of the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, and their coauthors.

Their analysis of data from the Black Women’s Health Study, a prospective study following 59,000 black women in the United States since 1995, identified 127 new cases of SLE between 1995 and 2015 that were confirmed by medical records.

At baseline, 8,851 women (16%) were current smokers, and 10,447 (18%) were past smokers. A total of 14,001 (25%) were current drinkers, and 10,255 (18%) were past drinkers.

The researchers reported that, compared with never smokers, women who had ever smoked had a 45% higher risk for SLE than did never smokers (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-2.18), but the finding was not statistically significant.


The risk of SLE was greater among current smokers (52% higher risk) than among past smokers (41% higher risk), and greater for 20 or more pack-years of smoking (60% higher risk) than for less than 20 pack-years of smoking (37% higher risk), although the authors noted that none of these differences were statistically significant.

Current and past alcohol consumption were associated with nonsignificant reductions in risk for SLE, 29% and 21%, respectively. However, “moderate” current alcohol consumption, measured as four or more drinks per week, was associated with a 57% reduction in risk for SLE (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.19-0.96).

The researchers said that the associations between cigarette smoking and alcohol intake with SLE risk were biologically plausible and may lead to insights into SLE pathogenesis. For example, exposure to toxic components from cigarette smoke was associated with increased oxidative stress and stimulation of autoantibody production, and such exposure can directly damage endogenous proteins and DNA. Alcohol suppresses the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines and may inhibit DNA synthesis.

The small number of lupus cases in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort limited the statistical power of the analysis. Smoking and alcohol use were also relatively uncommon among women in the Black Women’s Health Study cohort, the investigators said.

“Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the biologic mechanisms by which cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption influence the risk of SLE in this population and others,“ they wrote.

The study was supported by individual investigators’ grant awards from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and the Lupus Foundation of America. The authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cozier Y et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/acr.23703.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Like Asian and white women, black women are at an increased risk of SLE if they smoke and at a decreased risk with moderate alcohol consumption.

Major finding: There was an estimated 45% increase in risk of SLE for ever smoking relative to never smoking, but the finding was of borderline statistical significance. Moderate current alcohol consumption, measured as four or more drinks per week, was associated with a 57% reduction in SLE risk.

Study details: Analysis of data from 59,000 women enrolled in the prospective Black Women’s Health Study between 1995 and 2015.

Disclosures: The study was supported by individual investigators’ grant awards from the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and the Lupus Foundation of America. The authors declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

Source: Cozier Y et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Aug 9. doi: 10.1002/acr.23703.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Prolonged antimalarial therapy linked to elevated cardiac biomarkers, cardiomyopathy

Article Type
Changed

 

People with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) taking antimalarials, particularly for prolonged periods, could be at risk for cardiomyopathy, and measuring specific myocardial biomarkers could help identify patients at particularly high risk, researchers have suggested.

Writing in the Journal of Rheumatology, the research team led by Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, of the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, noted that antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy (AMIC) had been reported in 47 patients to date, 19 of whom had SLE, with duration and cumulative use of antimalarials thought to be the cause.

The authors suggested that AMIC could be underrecognized because antimalarials were currently recommended for all patients with SLE (without known contraindications) for prolonged periods. It was speculated that the mechanism by which AMIC occurred involved the deposition of antimalarials in the myocardial fibers and that this could lead to chronic, subclinical tissue necrosis, a process which, if not reversed, could lead to heart failure.

“Heart-specific biomarkers, such as cardiac troponin (for the assessment of myocardial necrosis) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; for the assessment of volume and/or pressure overload), may be of value in identifying subclinical heart damage,” the research team suggested.

The current study involved 151 consecutive patients with SLE who had no prior cardiac disease and were attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic from March to May 2016.

During the course of the disease, 28 of the patients had been taking chloroquine, and 137 had been taking hydroxychloroquine (14 patients had been treated with both drugs at different time periods). In the study, normal range was less than 26 ng/mL for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and less than 100 pg/mL for BNP.

Overall, 16 patients (10.6%) had abnormal BNP, of whom 9 (6%) also had abnormal cTnI. Prolonged antimalarial use (greater than 5.6 yrs) was associated with increased risk for these elevated biomarkers, regardless of age and SLE disease duration.

“Because duration of AM [antimalarial] treatment is the critical predictor of AMIC, the majority of patients with SLE should be considered at risk because most of them receive long-term maintenance therapy,” the researchers wrote.

They said that elevations of the biomarkers implicated possible active myocardial necrosis (elevated cTnI) and/or increased intracardiac ventricular pressure (elevated BNP).

“In this context, AM deposition in the myocardium, leading over time to overt cardiomyopathy, may be an important contributing factor. Indeed, 6 out of 16 of these patients were ultimately diagnosed with definite or possible AMIC, while 3 of them were completely asymptomatic, and their investigation was initiated because of the abnormal biomarkers,” they wrote.

The researchers also found that persistent creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was also an important predictor for elevated cardiac biomarkers.

“We showed that chronic AM use is associated with a more than threefold increased risk for elevated CPK (after excluding patients with active myositis and statin therapy). ... It is not known whether elevated CPK may predict patients at risk for development of AMIC or whether certain patients are predisposed to AM-related muscle damage,” they said.

“Prolonged AM therapy and persistent CPK elevation conferred an increased risk for abnormal BNP and cTnI, which might predict AMIC,” they concluded.

Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged that expensive and invasive investigation was unjustified in asymptomatic individuals. They therefore suggested that identifying heart-specific biomarkers for the detection of subclinical heart damage could allow patients to be stratified according to their risk.

“Cardiac biomarkers could become a screening test for patients with SLE using AM for longer than 5.6 years and/or who have persistently elevated CPK levels. Further research is needed to delineate the differential toxicity of CQ [chloroquine] and HCQ [hydroxychloroquine],” they suggested.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou and Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Tselios is financially supported by Lupus Ontario.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. J Rheumatol. 2018. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171436.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

People with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) taking antimalarials, particularly for prolonged periods, could be at risk for cardiomyopathy, and measuring specific myocardial biomarkers could help identify patients at particularly high risk, researchers have suggested.

Writing in the Journal of Rheumatology, the research team led by Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, of the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, noted that antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy (AMIC) had been reported in 47 patients to date, 19 of whom had SLE, with duration and cumulative use of antimalarials thought to be the cause.

The authors suggested that AMIC could be underrecognized because antimalarials were currently recommended for all patients with SLE (without known contraindications) for prolonged periods. It was speculated that the mechanism by which AMIC occurred involved the deposition of antimalarials in the myocardial fibers and that this could lead to chronic, subclinical tissue necrosis, a process which, if not reversed, could lead to heart failure.

“Heart-specific biomarkers, such as cardiac troponin (for the assessment of myocardial necrosis) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; for the assessment of volume and/or pressure overload), may be of value in identifying subclinical heart damage,” the research team suggested.

The current study involved 151 consecutive patients with SLE who had no prior cardiac disease and were attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic from March to May 2016.

During the course of the disease, 28 of the patients had been taking chloroquine, and 137 had been taking hydroxychloroquine (14 patients had been treated with both drugs at different time periods). In the study, normal range was less than 26 ng/mL for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and less than 100 pg/mL for BNP.

Overall, 16 patients (10.6%) had abnormal BNP, of whom 9 (6%) also had abnormal cTnI. Prolonged antimalarial use (greater than 5.6 yrs) was associated with increased risk for these elevated biomarkers, regardless of age and SLE disease duration.

“Because duration of AM [antimalarial] treatment is the critical predictor of AMIC, the majority of patients with SLE should be considered at risk because most of them receive long-term maintenance therapy,” the researchers wrote.

They said that elevations of the biomarkers implicated possible active myocardial necrosis (elevated cTnI) and/or increased intracardiac ventricular pressure (elevated BNP).

“In this context, AM deposition in the myocardium, leading over time to overt cardiomyopathy, may be an important contributing factor. Indeed, 6 out of 16 of these patients were ultimately diagnosed with definite or possible AMIC, while 3 of them were completely asymptomatic, and their investigation was initiated because of the abnormal biomarkers,” they wrote.

The researchers also found that persistent creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was also an important predictor for elevated cardiac biomarkers.

“We showed that chronic AM use is associated with a more than threefold increased risk for elevated CPK (after excluding patients with active myositis and statin therapy). ... It is not known whether elevated CPK may predict patients at risk for development of AMIC or whether certain patients are predisposed to AM-related muscle damage,” they said.

“Prolonged AM therapy and persistent CPK elevation conferred an increased risk for abnormal BNP and cTnI, which might predict AMIC,” they concluded.

Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged that expensive and invasive investigation was unjustified in asymptomatic individuals. They therefore suggested that identifying heart-specific biomarkers for the detection of subclinical heart damage could allow patients to be stratified according to their risk.

“Cardiac biomarkers could become a screening test for patients with SLE using AM for longer than 5.6 years and/or who have persistently elevated CPK levels. Further research is needed to delineate the differential toxicity of CQ [chloroquine] and HCQ [hydroxychloroquine],” they suggested.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou and Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Tselios is financially supported by Lupus Ontario.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. J Rheumatol. 2018. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171436.

 

People with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) taking antimalarials, particularly for prolonged periods, could be at risk for cardiomyopathy, and measuring specific myocardial biomarkers could help identify patients at particularly high risk, researchers have suggested.

Writing in the Journal of Rheumatology, the research team led by Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, of the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, noted that antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy (AMIC) had been reported in 47 patients to date, 19 of whom had SLE, with duration and cumulative use of antimalarials thought to be the cause.

The authors suggested that AMIC could be underrecognized because antimalarials were currently recommended for all patients with SLE (without known contraindications) for prolonged periods. It was speculated that the mechanism by which AMIC occurred involved the deposition of antimalarials in the myocardial fibers and that this could lead to chronic, subclinical tissue necrosis, a process which, if not reversed, could lead to heart failure.

“Heart-specific biomarkers, such as cardiac troponin (for the assessment of myocardial necrosis) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; for the assessment of volume and/or pressure overload), may be of value in identifying subclinical heart damage,” the research team suggested.

The current study involved 151 consecutive patients with SLE who had no prior cardiac disease and were attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic from March to May 2016.

During the course of the disease, 28 of the patients had been taking chloroquine, and 137 had been taking hydroxychloroquine (14 patients had been treated with both drugs at different time periods). In the study, normal range was less than 26 ng/mL for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and less than 100 pg/mL for BNP.

Overall, 16 patients (10.6%) had abnormal BNP, of whom 9 (6%) also had abnormal cTnI. Prolonged antimalarial use (greater than 5.6 yrs) was associated with increased risk for these elevated biomarkers, regardless of age and SLE disease duration.

“Because duration of AM [antimalarial] treatment is the critical predictor of AMIC, the majority of patients with SLE should be considered at risk because most of them receive long-term maintenance therapy,” the researchers wrote.

They said that elevations of the biomarkers implicated possible active myocardial necrosis (elevated cTnI) and/or increased intracardiac ventricular pressure (elevated BNP).

“In this context, AM deposition in the myocardium, leading over time to overt cardiomyopathy, may be an important contributing factor. Indeed, 6 out of 16 of these patients were ultimately diagnosed with definite or possible AMIC, while 3 of them were completely asymptomatic, and their investigation was initiated because of the abnormal biomarkers,” they wrote.

The researchers also found that persistent creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was also an important predictor for elevated cardiac biomarkers.

“We showed that chronic AM use is associated with a more than threefold increased risk for elevated CPK (after excluding patients with active myositis and statin therapy). ... It is not known whether elevated CPK may predict patients at risk for development of AMIC or whether certain patients are predisposed to AM-related muscle damage,” they said.

“Prolonged AM therapy and persistent CPK elevation conferred an increased risk for abnormal BNP and cTnI, which might predict AMIC,” they concluded.

Nevertheless, the authors acknowledged that expensive and invasive investigation was unjustified in asymptomatic individuals. They therefore suggested that identifying heart-specific biomarkers for the detection of subclinical heart damage could allow patients to be stratified according to their risk.

“Cardiac biomarkers could become a screening test for patients with SLE using AM for longer than 5.6 years and/or who have persistently elevated CPK levels. Further research is needed to delineate the differential toxicity of CQ [chloroquine] and HCQ [hydroxychloroquine],” they suggested.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou and Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Tselios is financially supported by Lupus Ontario.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. J Rheumatol. 2018. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171436.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Patients with SLE who receive prolonged antimalarial treatment (greater than 5.6 years) are at increased risk for elevated cardiac biomarkers (BNP/cTnI), particularly when persistently elevated creatine phosphokinase is present. These biomarkers could be used to predict antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy.

Major finding: Of a cohort of 151 patients with SLE, 10% had elevated myocardial biomarkers in the absence of prior cardiac disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. One-third of the patients were diagnosed with antimalarial-induced cardiomyopathy.

Study details: The study enrolled 151 consecutive patients attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic from March to May 2016.

Disclosures: The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou and Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Tselios is financially supported by Lupus Ontario.

Source: Tselios K et al. J Rheumatol. 2018. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171436.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Low disease activity in SLE compares favorably with clinical remission as an acceptable goal

Article Type
Changed

 

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who achieve prolonged low disease activity have damage accrual over 10 years similar to patients in sustained clinical remission, Canadian researchers report.

The findings endorse the endpoint used to define low disease activity in the study – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) of 2 or less – as a meaningful treat-to-target outcome in SLE and also help to fill in missing information about the long-term longitudinal status of patients with recent-onset disease who enter either low disease activity or clinical remission status, first author Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, and coauthors at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases at the University Health Network’s Toronto Lupus Clinic, wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

The concept of low disease activity (LDA) has emerged because it is rare for SLE patients to achieve sustained complete remission, the authors said. Existing studies on the outcomes of LDA and clinical remission have demonstrated comparable outcomes between the two in terms of damage accrual after 2 years, but they enrolled patients with prevalent disease, many of whom were in late stages.

“Given that disease duration has a significant impact on disease activity, the prevalence and characteristics of complete remission and LDA might have been affected,” they wrote.

The investigators therefore conducted the current study to assess damage accrual, medications used, flare rate, and mortality in inception patients who sustained complete remission and LDA status for 10 years.

The study involved 267 patients attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic who had at least 10 years of follow-up and no time interval between clinic visits exceeding 18 months. All patients fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE classification or had three criteria and a supportive biopsy. The patients all had either LDA or clinical remission (SLEDAI-2K = 0, excluding serology) within the first 5 years since enrollment and maintained that status for 10 consecutive years, regardless of therapy.

A total of 10.1% of patients (n = 27) achieved prolonged clinical remission. Clinical manifestations at baseline included mucocutaneous disease in 70.4%, arthritis in 59.3%, cytopenias in 55.6%, nephritis in 25.9%, and central nervous involvement in 25.9%. Nephritis was class II in three patients, class III in one, and class IV in three.

For the 18% of patients (n = 48) who achieved sustained LDA, clinical manifestations included mucocutaneous disease in 81.3%, cytopenias in 66.7%, arthritis in 60.4%, serositis in 29.2%, nephritis in 22.9%, and central nervous system disease in 8.3%. The nephritis was class II in two patients, class III in four, class IV in two, and class VI in one. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline, but mean prednisone dose was higher in the remission group and more patients in the LDA group were taking antimalarials.

Time to remission and time to LDA were 1.2 years in both groups. After 10 years of follow-up, the mean SLEDAI was 1.2 in the remission group and 1.6 in the LDA group (P = .31) and 3.7 among patients not achieving either goal (n = 192; P less than .001).

Moreover, serology (complement C3/C4 and anti-double stranded DNA positivity) and antiextractable nuclear antigen antibody profile were similar in both groups.

No differences in flare rate or mortality emerged. Disease flares were observed in 25.9% of the remission group and 31.2% of the LDA group (P = .63) and flare rates were 0.038/patient-year and 0.065/patient-year, respectively (P = .23). Mortality after 10 years was 11.1% in the remission group and 10.4% in the LDA group (P = .93).

“Maintenance of this state could be an acceptable target for the long-term management of SLE. The concept of LDA is relatively new in SLE. Since complete remission has not been strictly defined yet and is rare, a more realistic target, such as LDA, may be of value in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical trials,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that the study was limited by the relatively low number of patients.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou & Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/acr.23720

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who achieve prolonged low disease activity have damage accrual over 10 years similar to patients in sustained clinical remission, Canadian researchers report.

The findings endorse the endpoint used to define low disease activity in the study – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) of 2 or less – as a meaningful treat-to-target outcome in SLE and also help to fill in missing information about the long-term longitudinal status of patients with recent-onset disease who enter either low disease activity or clinical remission status, first author Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, and coauthors at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases at the University Health Network’s Toronto Lupus Clinic, wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

The concept of low disease activity (LDA) has emerged because it is rare for SLE patients to achieve sustained complete remission, the authors said. Existing studies on the outcomes of LDA and clinical remission have demonstrated comparable outcomes between the two in terms of damage accrual after 2 years, but they enrolled patients with prevalent disease, many of whom were in late stages.

“Given that disease duration has a significant impact on disease activity, the prevalence and characteristics of complete remission and LDA might have been affected,” they wrote.

The investigators therefore conducted the current study to assess damage accrual, medications used, flare rate, and mortality in inception patients who sustained complete remission and LDA status for 10 years.

The study involved 267 patients attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic who had at least 10 years of follow-up and no time interval between clinic visits exceeding 18 months. All patients fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE classification or had three criteria and a supportive biopsy. The patients all had either LDA or clinical remission (SLEDAI-2K = 0, excluding serology) within the first 5 years since enrollment and maintained that status for 10 consecutive years, regardless of therapy.

A total of 10.1% of patients (n = 27) achieved prolonged clinical remission. Clinical manifestations at baseline included mucocutaneous disease in 70.4%, arthritis in 59.3%, cytopenias in 55.6%, nephritis in 25.9%, and central nervous involvement in 25.9%. Nephritis was class II in three patients, class III in one, and class IV in three.

For the 18% of patients (n = 48) who achieved sustained LDA, clinical manifestations included mucocutaneous disease in 81.3%, cytopenias in 66.7%, arthritis in 60.4%, serositis in 29.2%, nephritis in 22.9%, and central nervous system disease in 8.3%. The nephritis was class II in two patients, class III in four, class IV in two, and class VI in one. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline, but mean prednisone dose was higher in the remission group and more patients in the LDA group were taking antimalarials.

Time to remission and time to LDA were 1.2 years in both groups. After 10 years of follow-up, the mean SLEDAI was 1.2 in the remission group and 1.6 in the LDA group (P = .31) and 3.7 among patients not achieving either goal (n = 192; P less than .001).

Moreover, serology (complement C3/C4 and anti-double stranded DNA positivity) and antiextractable nuclear antigen antibody profile were similar in both groups.

No differences in flare rate or mortality emerged. Disease flares were observed in 25.9% of the remission group and 31.2% of the LDA group (P = .63) and flare rates were 0.038/patient-year and 0.065/patient-year, respectively (P = .23). Mortality after 10 years was 11.1% in the remission group and 10.4% in the LDA group (P = .93).

“Maintenance of this state could be an acceptable target for the long-term management of SLE. The concept of LDA is relatively new in SLE. Since complete remission has not been strictly defined yet and is rare, a more realistic target, such as LDA, may be of value in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical trials,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that the study was limited by the relatively low number of patients.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou & Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/acr.23720

 

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who achieve prolonged low disease activity have damage accrual over 10 years similar to patients in sustained clinical remission, Canadian researchers report.

The findings endorse the endpoint used to define low disease activity in the study – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) of 2 or less – as a meaningful treat-to-target outcome in SLE and also help to fill in missing information about the long-term longitudinal status of patients with recent-onset disease who enter either low disease activity or clinical remission status, first author Konstantinos Tselios, MD, PhD, and coauthors at the Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases at the University Health Network’s Toronto Lupus Clinic, wrote in Arthritis Care & Research.

The concept of low disease activity (LDA) has emerged because it is rare for SLE patients to achieve sustained complete remission, the authors said. Existing studies on the outcomes of LDA and clinical remission have demonstrated comparable outcomes between the two in terms of damage accrual after 2 years, but they enrolled patients with prevalent disease, many of whom were in late stages.

“Given that disease duration has a significant impact on disease activity, the prevalence and characteristics of complete remission and LDA might have been affected,” they wrote.

The investigators therefore conducted the current study to assess damage accrual, medications used, flare rate, and mortality in inception patients who sustained complete remission and LDA status for 10 years.

The study involved 267 patients attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic who had at least 10 years of follow-up and no time interval between clinic visits exceeding 18 months. All patients fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE classification or had three criteria and a supportive biopsy. The patients all had either LDA or clinical remission (SLEDAI-2K = 0, excluding serology) within the first 5 years since enrollment and maintained that status for 10 consecutive years, regardless of therapy.

A total of 10.1% of patients (n = 27) achieved prolonged clinical remission. Clinical manifestations at baseline included mucocutaneous disease in 70.4%, arthritis in 59.3%, cytopenias in 55.6%, nephritis in 25.9%, and central nervous involvement in 25.9%. Nephritis was class II in three patients, class III in one, and class IV in three.

For the 18% of patients (n = 48) who achieved sustained LDA, clinical manifestations included mucocutaneous disease in 81.3%, cytopenias in 66.7%, arthritis in 60.4%, serositis in 29.2%, nephritis in 22.9%, and central nervous system disease in 8.3%. The nephritis was class II in two patients, class III in four, class IV in two, and class VI in one. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline, but mean prednisone dose was higher in the remission group and more patients in the LDA group were taking antimalarials.

Time to remission and time to LDA were 1.2 years in both groups. After 10 years of follow-up, the mean SLEDAI was 1.2 in the remission group and 1.6 in the LDA group (P = .31) and 3.7 among patients not achieving either goal (n = 192; P less than .001).

Moreover, serology (complement C3/C4 and anti-double stranded DNA positivity) and antiextractable nuclear antigen antibody profile were similar in both groups.

No differences in flare rate or mortality emerged. Disease flares were observed in 25.9% of the remission group and 31.2% of the LDA group (P = .63) and flare rates were 0.038/patient-year and 0.065/patient-year, respectively (P = .23). Mortality after 10 years was 11.1% in the remission group and 10.4% in the LDA group (P = .93).

“Maintenance of this state could be an acceptable target for the long-term management of SLE. The concept of LDA is relatively new in SLE. Since complete remission has not been strictly defined yet and is rare, a more realistic target, such as LDA, may be of value in daily clinical practice as well as in clinical trials,” the investigators wrote.

The authors noted that the study was limited by the relatively low number of patients.

The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou & Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests.

SOURCE: Tselios K et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/acr.23720

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Low disease activity, as defined by a SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score of 2 or less, appears to be a meaningful treat-to-target outcome in SLE.

Major finding: SLE patients with either prolonged clinical remission or prolonged low disease activity had comparable damage accrual, flare rate, and mortality in a 10-year period after enrollment.

Study details: 267 patients attending the University of Toronto Lupus Clinic who had at least 10 years of follow-up.

Disclosures: The University of Toronto Lupus Research Program is supported by the University Health Network, Lou & Marissa Rocca, and the Lupus Foundation of Ontario. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests.

Source: Tselios K et al. Arthritis Care Res. 2018 Jul 28. doi: 10.1002/acr.23720

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Autoimmune connective tissue disease predicted by interferon status, family history

Article Type
Changed

Patients at risk of autoimmune connective tissue disease who progressed to actual disease had elevated interferon scores and a family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease, suggesting the interferon scores could be used to predict disease progression, according to results from a prospective, observational study published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Dr. Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof, MBChB, of the Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine at the University of Leeds (England) and his colleagues evaluated long-term data from musculoskeletal ultrasound and blood and skin biopsy samples of 118 patients at risk of developing autoimmune connective tissue disease (AI-CTD). They compared exams and samples from baseline as well as 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months against data from 49 healthy patients and 114 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients were at risk of developing AI-CTD if they had one or fewer symptoms of clinical SLE, displayed symptoms for less than 12 months, were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive, and had not been treated previously for AI-CTD. The researchers analyzed blood and biopsy results for two continuous interferon (IFN) expression scores, IFN-Score-A and IFN-Score-B.

“Referrals of ANA-positive individuals to rheumatologists has increased over the last decade. Concerns are that these at-risk individuals may be discharged prematurely or be observed in an inefficient ‘watch and wait’ fashion until the diagnosis is clear, by which time the potential to prevent disease and confer the most benefit may be lost,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote in their study.

There were 19 of 118 patients who progressed to AI-CTD after 12 months of follow-up; of these patients, 14 developed SLE and 5 developed primary Sjögren’s syndrome. The researchers noted no significant differences among baseline characteristics or findings from ultrasound, compared with other groups. Compared with healthy controls, IFN-Score-A increased in 105 at-risk patients (fold difference = 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.00; P = .005) and in all 114 patients in the SLE group (fold difference = 7.81; 95% CI, 4.33-14.04; P less than .001). IFN-Score-A was also increased in the SLE group, compared with the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.54; 95% CI, 2.22-5.63; P less than .001). For IFN-Score-B, there was no difference between rates in the healthy control group and the at-risk group. However, IFN-Score-B was increased in the SLE group, compared with the healthy control group (fold difference = 3.85; 95% CI, 2.60-5.72; P less than .001) and the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.93; 95% CI, 2.87-5.37; P less than .001).

Independent baseline predictors of AI-CTD progression in a multivariate analysis included family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease (odds ratio, 8.20; P = .012) and IFN-Score-B (OR, 3.79; P = .005), researchers said.

“Although we could not confirm which IFN pathways predominate, our findings suggest that progression to AI-CTD may not be exclusively driven by IFN-I [type I interferon] but by a synergistic activation of [interferon-stimulated genes] induced by a range of IFNs and IFN-Score-B [that] could act as a biomarker for more diverse immune activation,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote.

Dr. Yusof is a U.K. National Institute for Health Research doctoral fellow at the University of Leeds. Several other authors reported financial support from range of pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Yusof MYM et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 21 Jun 2018. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213386.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Patients at risk of autoimmune connective tissue disease who progressed to actual disease had elevated interferon scores and a family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease, suggesting the interferon scores could be used to predict disease progression, according to results from a prospective, observational study published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Dr. Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof, MBChB, of the Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine at the University of Leeds (England) and his colleagues evaluated long-term data from musculoskeletal ultrasound and blood and skin biopsy samples of 118 patients at risk of developing autoimmune connective tissue disease (AI-CTD). They compared exams and samples from baseline as well as 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months against data from 49 healthy patients and 114 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients were at risk of developing AI-CTD if they had one or fewer symptoms of clinical SLE, displayed symptoms for less than 12 months, were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive, and had not been treated previously for AI-CTD. The researchers analyzed blood and biopsy results for two continuous interferon (IFN) expression scores, IFN-Score-A and IFN-Score-B.

“Referrals of ANA-positive individuals to rheumatologists has increased over the last decade. Concerns are that these at-risk individuals may be discharged prematurely or be observed in an inefficient ‘watch and wait’ fashion until the diagnosis is clear, by which time the potential to prevent disease and confer the most benefit may be lost,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote in their study.

There were 19 of 118 patients who progressed to AI-CTD after 12 months of follow-up; of these patients, 14 developed SLE and 5 developed primary Sjögren’s syndrome. The researchers noted no significant differences among baseline characteristics or findings from ultrasound, compared with other groups. Compared with healthy controls, IFN-Score-A increased in 105 at-risk patients (fold difference = 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.00; P = .005) and in all 114 patients in the SLE group (fold difference = 7.81; 95% CI, 4.33-14.04; P less than .001). IFN-Score-A was also increased in the SLE group, compared with the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.54; 95% CI, 2.22-5.63; P less than .001). For IFN-Score-B, there was no difference between rates in the healthy control group and the at-risk group. However, IFN-Score-B was increased in the SLE group, compared with the healthy control group (fold difference = 3.85; 95% CI, 2.60-5.72; P less than .001) and the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.93; 95% CI, 2.87-5.37; P less than .001).

Independent baseline predictors of AI-CTD progression in a multivariate analysis included family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease (odds ratio, 8.20; P = .012) and IFN-Score-B (OR, 3.79; P = .005), researchers said.

“Although we could not confirm which IFN pathways predominate, our findings suggest that progression to AI-CTD may not be exclusively driven by IFN-I [type I interferon] but by a synergistic activation of [interferon-stimulated genes] induced by a range of IFNs and IFN-Score-B [that] could act as a biomarker for more diverse immune activation,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote.

Dr. Yusof is a U.K. National Institute for Health Research doctoral fellow at the University of Leeds. Several other authors reported financial support from range of pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Yusof MYM et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 21 Jun 2018. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213386.

Patients at risk of autoimmune connective tissue disease who progressed to actual disease had elevated interferon scores and a family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease, suggesting the interferon scores could be used to predict disease progression, according to results from a prospective, observational study published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Dr. Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof, MBChB, of the Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine at the University of Leeds (England) and his colleagues evaluated long-term data from musculoskeletal ultrasound and blood and skin biopsy samples of 118 patients at risk of developing autoimmune connective tissue disease (AI-CTD). They compared exams and samples from baseline as well as 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months against data from 49 healthy patients and 114 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients were at risk of developing AI-CTD if they had one or fewer symptoms of clinical SLE, displayed symptoms for less than 12 months, were antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive, and had not been treated previously for AI-CTD. The researchers analyzed blood and biopsy results for two continuous interferon (IFN) expression scores, IFN-Score-A and IFN-Score-B.

“Referrals of ANA-positive individuals to rheumatologists has increased over the last decade. Concerns are that these at-risk individuals may be discharged prematurely or be observed in an inefficient ‘watch and wait’ fashion until the diagnosis is clear, by which time the potential to prevent disease and confer the most benefit may be lost,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote in their study.

There were 19 of 118 patients who progressed to AI-CTD after 12 months of follow-up; of these patients, 14 developed SLE and 5 developed primary Sjögren’s syndrome. The researchers noted no significant differences among baseline characteristics or findings from ultrasound, compared with other groups. Compared with healthy controls, IFN-Score-A increased in 105 at-risk patients (fold difference = 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.00; P = .005) and in all 114 patients in the SLE group (fold difference = 7.81; 95% CI, 4.33-14.04; P less than .001). IFN-Score-A was also increased in the SLE group, compared with the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.54; 95% CI, 2.22-5.63; P less than .001). For IFN-Score-B, there was no difference between rates in the healthy control group and the at-risk group. However, IFN-Score-B was increased in the SLE group, compared with the healthy control group (fold difference = 3.85; 95% CI, 2.60-5.72; P less than .001) and the at-risk group (fold difference = 3.93; 95% CI, 2.87-5.37; P less than .001).

Independent baseline predictors of AI-CTD progression in a multivariate analysis included family history of autoimmune rheumatic disease (odds ratio, 8.20; P = .012) and IFN-Score-B (OR, 3.79; P = .005), researchers said.

“Although we could not confirm which IFN pathways predominate, our findings suggest that progression to AI-CTD may not be exclusively driven by IFN-I [type I interferon] but by a synergistic activation of [interferon-stimulated genes] induced by a range of IFNs and IFN-Score-B [that] could act as a biomarker for more diverse immune activation,” Dr. Yusof and his colleagues wrote.

Dr. Yusof is a U.K. National Institute for Health Research doctoral fellow at the University of Leeds. Several other authors reported financial support from range of pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Yusof MYM et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 21 Jun 2018. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213386.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

FROM ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
171443
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Elevated levels of two different interferon scores as well as family history predicted the likelihood of patients at risk of autoimmune connective tissue disease progressing to actual disease.

Major finding: Of 118 patients at risk, 14 patients developed SLE and 5 patients developed primary Sjögren’s syndrome.

Study details: A prospective, observational study of 118 patients at risk of developing autoimmune connective tissue disease.

Disclosures: Dr. Yusof is a U.K. National Institute for Health Research doctoral fellow at the University of Leeds. Several other authors reported financial support from range of pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Yusof MYM et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 21 Jun 2018. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213386.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Abatacept loses ALLURE in lupus nephritis

Article Type
Changed

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.
 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE EULAR 2018 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Abatacept treatment did not improve the complete renal response rate versus placebo.

Major finding: A complete renal response rate at 1 year was seen in 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73).

Study details: The phase 3 ALLURE study, a 2-year, randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.
 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

SLE flares linked to air temperature, pollution

Article Type
Changed

 

– Both air temperature and air pollution levels affected the likelihood of experiencing a flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) organ-specific disease activity in a study presented at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

For every 1° F increase in temperature, there was an increase in the odds of experiencing a skin flare (odds ratio, 1.0075), joint flare (OR, 1.0110), or neurologic flare (OR, 1.0096), reported George Stojan, MD, and associates during one of the poster sessions. Conversely, renal flares were less likely to occur with rising temperature (OR, 0.9960). The latter is something previously reported, Dr. Stojan said in an interview, “as we found most renal flares occur in the winter, not in the summer months.”

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. George Stojan

Furthermore, for every 1 mcg per cubic meter increase in fine particulate matter pollution (PM2.5), there were increases in serositis (OR, 1.0240) and hematologic flares (OR, 1.011).

There were two reasons for looking at the role of these environmental factors in relation to SLE flares, said Dr. Stojan, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The first was a clinical observation – I was getting clusters of patients with certain disease manifestations, for example with serositis or joint flares, and there wasn’t a random distribution.”

The second was a patient observation, added Dr. Stojan, who is also codirector of the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center. Every year, patients treated at the Center have the opportunity to meet each other and hear about the research being done by the team, and it was at this meeting that patients said they felt they were experiencing similar disease flares.

To look at the underlying role of environmental exposures in the development of SLE and possible associations with disease activity, Dr. Stojan and associates used a method known as cluster detection, which is commonly used in public health studies.

The investigators used a 350-km radial zone around the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center for the analysis as this was an area where a uniform number of patients treated by the center were living. They obtained data on 1,261 patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, spanning a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009, and used SaTScan software to identify clusters of disease activity occurring during 3 separate monthly time intervals in different counties. The researchers then linked these clusters to average temperature and PM2.5 data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency for the 10 days prior to patients’ visits.

“The SaTScan system predicts how many flares per organ system you would expect in a county based on the number of patients and based on the total flares we have in our cohort,” Dr. Stojan explained. Previously, the system helped to identify areas that had a higher flare incidence for each organ system that lasted for about 2-3 years, did not overlap, and could not be explained. So, the next step was to look for potential environmental triggers.

“Basically, the SaTScan adjusts the data that’s inputted for temperature and small particulate pollution. If the cluster moves in space and time then these did affect it,” Dr. Stojan said. “It seems that these do affect certain types of organ flares,” even after adjustment for other variables such as patients’ age, gender, income, ethnicity, and living situation (rural or urban).

Flares in skin symptoms during the summer have been identified before, he acknowledged, but the link to joint flares or neurologic flares have not. The latter includes things like seizures, neuropathy, or abnormal brain imaging rather than mood changes or mild cognitive dysfunction.

These data could have an impact on how clinical trials are designed, Dr. Stojan added, suggesting that factoring in where patients live and how close they are to areas of pollution could ensure a uniform population of patients is studied.

From a more practical perspective, these data might help to develop predictive models to help understand when patients are likely to experience a flare and if any action can be taken to ameliorate the effects of exposure.

The next step is a collaboration with patients to develop software or a mobile application where patients could input information about any disease flares. This would enable a finer view of what could be happening, Dr. Stojan said, as while daily readings are available for the environmental factors studied, disease activity data is only available during 3 separate monthly intervals. It would also allow other environmental factors to be considered.

“I think this is an important step in figuring out environmental factors and their influence on lupus,” he said. “There has been an extensive amount of research into viral causes and potential infectious triggers, but spatial-temporal analysis of environmental variables have never been done before in lupus.”

The study received no commercial funding, and Dr. Stojan reported having no disclosures.

 

 

SOURCE: Stojan G et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):1191. Abstract SAT0685.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Both air temperature and air pollution levels affected the likelihood of experiencing a flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) organ-specific disease activity in a study presented at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

For every 1° F increase in temperature, there was an increase in the odds of experiencing a skin flare (odds ratio, 1.0075), joint flare (OR, 1.0110), or neurologic flare (OR, 1.0096), reported George Stojan, MD, and associates during one of the poster sessions. Conversely, renal flares were less likely to occur with rising temperature (OR, 0.9960). The latter is something previously reported, Dr. Stojan said in an interview, “as we found most renal flares occur in the winter, not in the summer months.”

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. George Stojan

Furthermore, for every 1 mcg per cubic meter increase in fine particulate matter pollution (PM2.5), there were increases in serositis (OR, 1.0240) and hematologic flares (OR, 1.011).

There were two reasons for looking at the role of these environmental factors in relation to SLE flares, said Dr. Stojan, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The first was a clinical observation – I was getting clusters of patients with certain disease manifestations, for example with serositis or joint flares, and there wasn’t a random distribution.”

The second was a patient observation, added Dr. Stojan, who is also codirector of the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center. Every year, patients treated at the Center have the opportunity to meet each other and hear about the research being done by the team, and it was at this meeting that patients said they felt they were experiencing similar disease flares.

To look at the underlying role of environmental exposures in the development of SLE and possible associations with disease activity, Dr. Stojan and associates used a method known as cluster detection, which is commonly used in public health studies.

The investigators used a 350-km radial zone around the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center for the analysis as this was an area where a uniform number of patients treated by the center were living. They obtained data on 1,261 patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, spanning a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009, and used SaTScan software to identify clusters of disease activity occurring during 3 separate monthly time intervals in different counties. The researchers then linked these clusters to average temperature and PM2.5 data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency for the 10 days prior to patients’ visits.

“The SaTScan system predicts how many flares per organ system you would expect in a county based on the number of patients and based on the total flares we have in our cohort,” Dr. Stojan explained. Previously, the system helped to identify areas that had a higher flare incidence for each organ system that lasted for about 2-3 years, did not overlap, and could not be explained. So, the next step was to look for potential environmental triggers.

“Basically, the SaTScan adjusts the data that’s inputted for temperature and small particulate pollution. If the cluster moves in space and time then these did affect it,” Dr. Stojan said. “It seems that these do affect certain types of organ flares,” even after adjustment for other variables such as patients’ age, gender, income, ethnicity, and living situation (rural or urban).

Flares in skin symptoms during the summer have been identified before, he acknowledged, but the link to joint flares or neurologic flares have not. The latter includes things like seizures, neuropathy, or abnormal brain imaging rather than mood changes or mild cognitive dysfunction.

These data could have an impact on how clinical trials are designed, Dr. Stojan added, suggesting that factoring in where patients live and how close they are to areas of pollution could ensure a uniform population of patients is studied.

From a more practical perspective, these data might help to develop predictive models to help understand when patients are likely to experience a flare and if any action can be taken to ameliorate the effects of exposure.

The next step is a collaboration with patients to develop software or a mobile application where patients could input information about any disease flares. This would enable a finer view of what could be happening, Dr. Stojan said, as while daily readings are available for the environmental factors studied, disease activity data is only available during 3 separate monthly intervals. It would also allow other environmental factors to be considered.

“I think this is an important step in figuring out environmental factors and their influence on lupus,” he said. “There has been an extensive amount of research into viral causes and potential infectious triggers, but spatial-temporal analysis of environmental variables have never been done before in lupus.”

The study received no commercial funding, and Dr. Stojan reported having no disclosures.

 

 

SOURCE: Stojan G et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):1191. Abstract SAT0685.

 

– Both air temperature and air pollution levels affected the likelihood of experiencing a flare in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) organ-specific disease activity in a study presented at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

For every 1° F increase in temperature, there was an increase in the odds of experiencing a skin flare (odds ratio, 1.0075), joint flare (OR, 1.0110), or neurologic flare (OR, 1.0096), reported George Stojan, MD, and associates during one of the poster sessions. Conversely, renal flares were less likely to occur with rising temperature (OR, 0.9960). The latter is something previously reported, Dr. Stojan said in an interview, “as we found most renal flares occur in the winter, not in the summer months.”

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. George Stojan

Furthermore, for every 1 mcg per cubic meter increase in fine particulate matter pollution (PM2.5), there were increases in serositis (OR, 1.0240) and hematologic flares (OR, 1.011).

There were two reasons for looking at the role of these environmental factors in relation to SLE flares, said Dr. Stojan, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. “The first was a clinical observation – I was getting clusters of patients with certain disease manifestations, for example with serositis or joint flares, and there wasn’t a random distribution.”

The second was a patient observation, added Dr. Stojan, who is also codirector of the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center. Every year, patients treated at the Center have the opportunity to meet each other and hear about the research being done by the team, and it was at this meeting that patients said they felt they were experiencing similar disease flares.

To look at the underlying role of environmental exposures in the development of SLE and possible associations with disease activity, Dr. Stojan and associates used a method known as cluster detection, which is commonly used in public health studies.

The investigators used a 350-km radial zone around the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center for the analysis as this was an area where a uniform number of patients treated by the center were living. They obtained data on 1,261 patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, spanning a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009, and used SaTScan software to identify clusters of disease activity occurring during 3 separate monthly time intervals in different counties. The researchers then linked these clusters to average temperature and PM2.5 data obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency for the 10 days prior to patients’ visits.

“The SaTScan system predicts how many flares per organ system you would expect in a county based on the number of patients and based on the total flares we have in our cohort,” Dr. Stojan explained. Previously, the system helped to identify areas that had a higher flare incidence for each organ system that lasted for about 2-3 years, did not overlap, and could not be explained. So, the next step was to look for potential environmental triggers.

“Basically, the SaTScan adjusts the data that’s inputted for temperature and small particulate pollution. If the cluster moves in space and time then these did affect it,” Dr. Stojan said. “It seems that these do affect certain types of organ flares,” even after adjustment for other variables such as patients’ age, gender, income, ethnicity, and living situation (rural or urban).

Flares in skin symptoms during the summer have been identified before, he acknowledged, but the link to joint flares or neurologic flares have not. The latter includes things like seizures, neuropathy, or abnormal brain imaging rather than mood changes or mild cognitive dysfunction.

These data could have an impact on how clinical trials are designed, Dr. Stojan added, suggesting that factoring in where patients live and how close they are to areas of pollution could ensure a uniform population of patients is studied.

From a more practical perspective, these data might help to develop predictive models to help understand when patients are likely to experience a flare and if any action can be taken to ameliorate the effects of exposure.

The next step is a collaboration with patients to develop software or a mobile application where patients could input information about any disease flares. This would enable a finer view of what could be happening, Dr. Stojan said, as while daily readings are available for the environmental factors studied, disease activity data is only available during 3 separate monthly intervals. It would also allow other environmental factors to be considered.

“I think this is an important step in figuring out environmental factors and their influence on lupus,” he said. “There has been an extensive amount of research into viral causes and potential infectious triggers, but spatial-temporal analysis of environmental variables have never been done before in lupus.”

The study received no commercial funding, and Dr. Stojan reported having no disclosures.

 

 

SOURCE: Stojan G et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):1191. Abstract SAT0685.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE EULAR 2018 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
170008
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Temperature and air pollution affected the likelihood of experiencing a flare in systemic lupus erythematosus organ-specific disease activity.

Major finding: For every 1° F increase in temperature, the risk for skin, joint, or neurologic flares increased.

Study details: A spatial-time cluster analysis of 1,261 patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort linking disease activity to temperature changes and fine particulate matter pollution.

Disclosures: The study received no commercial funding, and Dr. Stojan reported having no disclosures.

Source: Stojan G et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(Suppl 2):1191. Abstract SAT0685.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

CRISS hailed as transforming systemic sclerosis drug development

Article Type
Changed

– A new way to assess clinically meaningful, multiorgan changes in patients receiving treatment for systemic sclerosis has transformed the way new drugs for this disease are judged.

The Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) “will change how we look at drugs” for systemic sclerosis, Daniel E. Furst, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Daniel E. Furst
Dr. Furst was one of several researchers who collaborated on developing the CRISS (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68[2]:299-311). As the authors said in their 2016 report, the CRISS “was developed with the goal of summarizing changes in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes in a single composite score that conveys the likelihood (or probability) that a patient with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis [dcSSc] has improved. The purpose of the CRISS is to assess whether new pharmacologic agents have an impact on overall disease activity/severity. Our hope is that its use in clinical trials of dcSSc will greatly facilitate the interpretation of results and form the basis for drug approvals.”

The CRISS was close to 10 years in the making. “First we had to decide what measures were important, then we had to run a prospective study entering all the data, and then we had to do a very sophisticated statistical analysis and put the results in front of experts and ask: Does this make sense?” Dr. Furst recalled in an interview. Now the combined endpoint measure has been “fully validated,” and is under consideration by the Food and Drug Administration as an endpoint for drug trials, he noted.

“I think that now, after 10 years, we finally came up with what will be the equivalent” of the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR 20) in core-set measures of rheumatoid arthritis (Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 3;16[1]:101). “I think CRISS will make a huge difference because when you do a combined measure, like the ACR 20, it becomes more clinically and statistically powerful,” said Dr. Furst, professor of medicine (emeritus) at the University of California, Los Angeles, an adjunct professor at the University of Washington, Seattle, and research professor at the University of Florence (Italy). He is also in part-time practice in Los Angeles and Seattle.

In a talk he gave at the meeting on recent clinical studies of new drugs for treating patients with systemic sclerosis, many of the reports included CRISS as a measure of patient response to treatment.

The CRISS involves a two-step assessment of how a patient has responded to therapy. First, patients are considered not improved by their treatment if they develop any one of these four outcomes following treatment if it appears linked to the disease process:
  • A new scleroderma renal crisis.
  • A decline in forced vital capacity of 15% or more of predicted.
  • A new decline of left ventricular ejection fraction to 45% or less.
  • New onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension that requires treatment.
 

 

If none of these apply, the next step is to assess treatment response by measuring changes in five parameters and then integrating them into a single number using a mathematical formula. The five elements in the equation are:

  • Modified Rodnan skin score.
  • Percent of predicted forced vital capacity.
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index.
  • Patient’s global assessment.
  • Physician’s global assessment.

When factored together, changes in these five measures determine the probability that the patient responded to the intervention.

One limitation of the CRISS is that it only measures change from baseline, which makes it similar to the ACR 20, Dr. Furst noted. Another useful score would be one that reflects the status of a patient with systemic sclerosis at a specific point in time, a type of disease activity score. Dr. Furst said that he and others active in the systemic sclerosis field would like to develop a method that provides this type of patient assessment. Another addition would be to develop a “minimally clinically important change” in the score, which would make the CRISS more intuitive to understand.

Dr. Furst has received research support from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corbus, Genentech-Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Furst DE. EULAR 2018. Abstract SP0012.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

– A new way to assess clinically meaningful, multiorgan changes in patients receiving treatment for systemic sclerosis has transformed the way new drugs for this disease are judged.

The Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) “will change how we look at drugs” for systemic sclerosis, Daniel E. Furst, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Daniel E. Furst
Dr. Furst was one of several researchers who collaborated on developing the CRISS (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68[2]:299-311). As the authors said in their 2016 report, the CRISS “was developed with the goal of summarizing changes in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes in a single composite score that conveys the likelihood (or probability) that a patient with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis [dcSSc] has improved. The purpose of the CRISS is to assess whether new pharmacologic agents have an impact on overall disease activity/severity. Our hope is that its use in clinical trials of dcSSc will greatly facilitate the interpretation of results and form the basis for drug approvals.”

The CRISS was close to 10 years in the making. “First we had to decide what measures were important, then we had to run a prospective study entering all the data, and then we had to do a very sophisticated statistical analysis and put the results in front of experts and ask: Does this make sense?” Dr. Furst recalled in an interview. Now the combined endpoint measure has been “fully validated,” and is under consideration by the Food and Drug Administration as an endpoint for drug trials, he noted.

“I think that now, after 10 years, we finally came up with what will be the equivalent” of the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR 20) in core-set measures of rheumatoid arthritis (Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 3;16[1]:101). “I think CRISS will make a huge difference because when you do a combined measure, like the ACR 20, it becomes more clinically and statistically powerful,” said Dr. Furst, professor of medicine (emeritus) at the University of California, Los Angeles, an adjunct professor at the University of Washington, Seattle, and research professor at the University of Florence (Italy). He is also in part-time practice in Los Angeles and Seattle.

In a talk he gave at the meeting on recent clinical studies of new drugs for treating patients with systemic sclerosis, many of the reports included CRISS as a measure of patient response to treatment.

The CRISS involves a two-step assessment of how a patient has responded to therapy. First, patients are considered not improved by their treatment if they develop any one of these four outcomes following treatment if it appears linked to the disease process:
  • A new scleroderma renal crisis.
  • A decline in forced vital capacity of 15% or more of predicted.
  • A new decline of left ventricular ejection fraction to 45% or less.
  • New onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension that requires treatment.
 

 

If none of these apply, the next step is to assess treatment response by measuring changes in five parameters and then integrating them into a single number using a mathematical formula. The five elements in the equation are:

  • Modified Rodnan skin score.
  • Percent of predicted forced vital capacity.
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index.
  • Patient’s global assessment.
  • Physician’s global assessment.

When factored together, changes in these five measures determine the probability that the patient responded to the intervention.

One limitation of the CRISS is that it only measures change from baseline, which makes it similar to the ACR 20, Dr. Furst noted. Another useful score would be one that reflects the status of a patient with systemic sclerosis at a specific point in time, a type of disease activity score. Dr. Furst said that he and others active in the systemic sclerosis field would like to develop a method that provides this type of patient assessment. Another addition would be to develop a “minimally clinically important change” in the score, which would make the CRISS more intuitive to understand.

Dr. Furst has received research support from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corbus, Genentech-Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Furst DE. EULAR 2018. Abstract SP0012.

– A new way to assess clinically meaningful, multiorgan changes in patients receiving treatment for systemic sclerosis has transformed the way new drugs for this disease are judged.

The Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) “will change how we look at drugs” for systemic sclerosis, Daniel E. Furst, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Daniel E. Furst
Dr. Furst was one of several researchers who collaborated on developing the CRISS (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68[2]:299-311). As the authors said in their 2016 report, the CRISS “was developed with the goal of summarizing changes in clinical and patient‐reported outcomes in a single composite score that conveys the likelihood (or probability) that a patient with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis [dcSSc] has improved. The purpose of the CRISS is to assess whether new pharmacologic agents have an impact on overall disease activity/severity. Our hope is that its use in clinical trials of dcSSc will greatly facilitate the interpretation of results and form the basis for drug approvals.”

The CRISS was close to 10 years in the making. “First we had to decide what measures were important, then we had to run a prospective study entering all the data, and then we had to do a very sophisticated statistical analysis and put the results in front of experts and ask: Does this make sense?” Dr. Furst recalled in an interview. Now the combined endpoint measure has been “fully validated,” and is under consideration by the Food and Drug Administration as an endpoint for drug trials, he noted.

“I think that now, after 10 years, we finally came up with what will be the equivalent” of the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR 20) in core-set measures of rheumatoid arthritis (Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 3;16[1]:101). “I think CRISS will make a huge difference because when you do a combined measure, like the ACR 20, it becomes more clinically and statistically powerful,” said Dr. Furst, professor of medicine (emeritus) at the University of California, Los Angeles, an adjunct professor at the University of Washington, Seattle, and research professor at the University of Florence (Italy). He is also in part-time practice in Los Angeles and Seattle.

In a talk he gave at the meeting on recent clinical studies of new drugs for treating patients with systemic sclerosis, many of the reports included CRISS as a measure of patient response to treatment.

The CRISS involves a two-step assessment of how a patient has responded to therapy. First, patients are considered not improved by their treatment if they develop any one of these four outcomes following treatment if it appears linked to the disease process:
  • A new scleroderma renal crisis.
  • A decline in forced vital capacity of 15% or more of predicted.
  • A new decline of left ventricular ejection fraction to 45% or less.
  • New onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension that requires treatment.
 

 

If none of these apply, the next step is to assess treatment response by measuring changes in five parameters and then integrating them into a single number using a mathematical formula. The five elements in the equation are:

  • Modified Rodnan skin score.
  • Percent of predicted forced vital capacity.
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index.
  • Patient’s global assessment.
  • Physician’s global assessment.

When factored together, changes in these five measures determine the probability that the patient responded to the intervention.

One limitation of the CRISS is that it only measures change from baseline, which makes it similar to the ACR 20, Dr. Furst noted. Another useful score would be one that reflects the status of a patient with systemic sclerosis at a specific point in time, a type of disease activity score. Dr. Furst said that he and others active in the systemic sclerosis field would like to develop a method that provides this type of patient assessment. Another addition would be to develop a “minimally clinically important change” in the score, which would make the CRISS more intuitive to understand.

Dr. Furst has received research support from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corbus, Genentech-Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and Novartis.

SOURCE: Furst DE. EULAR 2018. Abstract SP0012.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE EULAR 2018 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

ACR and EULAR to review new criteria for classifying vasculitis

Article Type
Changed

 

– New classification criteria for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides have been drafted and now need formal review by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism before they can be put into practice.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Joanna Robson
These draft criteria – which are based on data collected via the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) observational study – focus on how to classify three main types of ANCA-associated vasculitis: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

According to Joanna Robson, MBBS, PhD, the chair of the DCVAS steering committee, these new criteria better “reflect current practice by incorporating, but not relying on, ANCA testing and advanced imaging.”

“The old criteria were actually produced in the early 1990s and since then we’ve had further thinking about the different subtypes of systemic vasculitis,” explained Dr. Robson of the University of the West of England in Bristol. There has also been a consensus conference held at Chapel Hill (Arthritis Rheum 2013;65[1]:1-11) which identified MPA as a separate entity, and ANCA testing has become routine practice. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are also now used to help differentiate between the different vasculitides.

“This really has been a collaborative, multinational effort,” Dr. Robson said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. To develop the draft criteria, data collated from 135 sites in 32 countries on more than 2,000 patients were used. These had been collected as part of the ACR/EULAR–run DCVAS study, which has been coordinated at the University of Oxford since 2011.

Three phases were used to develop these criteria: first an expert panel reviewed all cases in the DCVAS to identify those that they felt were attributable to small vessel vasculitis. Second, variables that might be appropriate to use in the models were examined, with more than 8,000 individual DVCAS items considered and then whittled down to 91 items and then sifted again to form a clear set of 10 or fewer items. Third, statistical analyses combined with expert review were used to develop the criteria and then validate these.

Dr. Robson reported that of 2,871 cases identified as ANCA-associated vasculitis, 2,072 (72%) were agreed upon by the expert review panel. Of these, there were 724 cases of GPA, 291 of MPA, 226 of EGPA, and around 300 cases of other small vessel vasculitis or polyarteritis nodosa. To develop the criteria the GPA cases were used as the “cases” and the other types of vasculitis as the comparators, Dr. Robson explained.

For GPA, MPA, and EGPA a set of items (10, 6, and 7, respectively) were derived and scored, positively or negatively, and a cutoff determined at which a classification of the particular vasculitis could be made. During discussion, Dr. Robson noted that the threshold score for a classification of EGPA (greater than or equal to 6) had been set slightly higher than for GPA or MPA (both greater than or equal to 5) “because of the clinical problem of there being very close comparators which can actually mimic EGPA.” This is where the negative scoring of some items used in these criteria are very important, she said.
 

 

The 10-item GPA criteria included three clinical (such as the presence of bloody nasal discharge upon examination) and seven investigational (such as cANCA positivity) items. These criteria were found to have a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (94%) for identifying GPA.

The six-item MPA criteria included one clinical item (bloody nasal discharge, which was this time attributed a negative score) and five investigational items (with ANCA testing given a higher positive score than for GPA). The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were a respective 91% and 94%.

Finally, the seven-item EGPA criteria included three clinical items (including obstructive airways disease and nasal polyps) and four investigational items (with ANCA positivity given a negative score). These criteria had an 85% sensitivity and 99% specificity for EGPA.

Dr. Robson emphasized that all of these classification criteria were to be used only after exclusion of other possible causes of vasculitis, such as infection, malignancy, or other autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, and a “diagnosis of small- or medium-vessel vasculitis has been made.” 

These criteria are to help classify into the subtypes of vasculitis “primarily for the purpose of clinical trials,” she said. “The next steps are review by the EULAR and ACR committee, and only on final approval will these criteria be ready to use.”

DCVAS is sponsored by the University of Oxford (England) with funding from the European League Against Rheumatism, the American College of Rheumatology, and the Vasculitis Foundation. Dr. Robson had no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Robson JC et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0021.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– New classification criteria for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides have been drafted and now need formal review by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism before they can be put into practice.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Joanna Robson
These draft criteria – which are based on data collected via the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) observational study – focus on how to classify three main types of ANCA-associated vasculitis: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

According to Joanna Robson, MBBS, PhD, the chair of the DCVAS steering committee, these new criteria better “reflect current practice by incorporating, but not relying on, ANCA testing and advanced imaging.”

“The old criteria were actually produced in the early 1990s and since then we’ve had further thinking about the different subtypes of systemic vasculitis,” explained Dr. Robson of the University of the West of England in Bristol. There has also been a consensus conference held at Chapel Hill (Arthritis Rheum 2013;65[1]:1-11) which identified MPA as a separate entity, and ANCA testing has become routine practice. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are also now used to help differentiate between the different vasculitides.

“This really has been a collaborative, multinational effort,” Dr. Robson said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. To develop the draft criteria, data collated from 135 sites in 32 countries on more than 2,000 patients were used. These had been collected as part of the ACR/EULAR–run DCVAS study, which has been coordinated at the University of Oxford since 2011.

Three phases were used to develop these criteria: first an expert panel reviewed all cases in the DCVAS to identify those that they felt were attributable to small vessel vasculitis. Second, variables that might be appropriate to use in the models were examined, with more than 8,000 individual DVCAS items considered and then whittled down to 91 items and then sifted again to form a clear set of 10 or fewer items. Third, statistical analyses combined with expert review were used to develop the criteria and then validate these.

Dr. Robson reported that of 2,871 cases identified as ANCA-associated vasculitis, 2,072 (72%) were agreed upon by the expert review panel. Of these, there were 724 cases of GPA, 291 of MPA, 226 of EGPA, and around 300 cases of other small vessel vasculitis or polyarteritis nodosa. To develop the criteria the GPA cases were used as the “cases” and the other types of vasculitis as the comparators, Dr. Robson explained.

For GPA, MPA, and EGPA a set of items (10, 6, and 7, respectively) were derived and scored, positively or negatively, and a cutoff determined at which a classification of the particular vasculitis could be made. During discussion, Dr. Robson noted that the threshold score for a classification of EGPA (greater than or equal to 6) had been set slightly higher than for GPA or MPA (both greater than or equal to 5) “because of the clinical problem of there being very close comparators which can actually mimic EGPA.” This is where the negative scoring of some items used in these criteria are very important, she said.
 

 

The 10-item GPA criteria included three clinical (such as the presence of bloody nasal discharge upon examination) and seven investigational (such as cANCA positivity) items. These criteria were found to have a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (94%) for identifying GPA.

The six-item MPA criteria included one clinical item (bloody nasal discharge, which was this time attributed a negative score) and five investigational items (with ANCA testing given a higher positive score than for GPA). The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were a respective 91% and 94%.

Finally, the seven-item EGPA criteria included three clinical items (including obstructive airways disease and nasal polyps) and four investigational items (with ANCA positivity given a negative score). These criteria had an 85% sensitivity and 99% specificity for EGPA.

Dr. Robson emphasized that all of these classification criteria were to be used only after exclusion of other possible causes of vasculitis, such as infection, malignancy, or other autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, and a “diagnosis of small- or medium-vessel vasculitis has been made.” 

These criteria are to help classify into the subtypes of vasculitis “primarily for the purpose of clinical trials,” she said. “The next steps are review by the EULAR and ACR committee, and only on final approval will these criteria be ready to use.”

DCVAS is sponsored by the University of Oxford (England) with funding from the European League Against Rheumatism, the American College of Rheumatology, and the Vasculitis Foundation. Dr. Robson had no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Robson JC et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0021.

 

– New classification criteria for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitides have been drafted and now need formal review by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism before they can be put into practice.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Joanna Robson
These draft criteria – which are based on data collected via the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) observational study – focus on how to classify three main types of ANCA-associated vasculitis: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).

According to Joanna Robson, MBBS, PhD, the chair of the DCVAS steering committee, these new criteria better “reflect current practice by incorporating, but not relying on, ANCA testing and advanced imaging.”

“The old criteria were actually produced in the early 1990s and since then we’ve had further thinking about the different subtypes of systemic vasculitis,” explained Dr. Robson of the University of the West of England in Bristol. There has also been a consensus conference held at Chapel Hill (Arthritis Rheum 2013;65[1]:1-11) which identified MPA as a separate entity, and ANCA testing has become routine practice. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are also now used to help differentiate between the different vasculitides.

“This really has been a collaborative, multinational effort,” Dr. Robson said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. To develop the draft criteria, data collated from 135 sites in 32 countries on more than 2,000 patients were used. These had been collected as part of the ACR/EULAR–run DCVAS study, which has been coordinated at the University of Oxford since 2011.

Three phases were used to develop these criteria: first an expert panel reviewed all cases in the DCVAS to identify those that they felt were attributable to small vessel vasculitis. Second, variables that might be appropriate to use in the models were examined, with more than 8,000 individual DVCAS items considered and then whittled down to 91 items and then sifted again to form a clear set of 10 or fewer items. Third, statistical analyses combined with expert review were used to develop the criteria and then validate these.

Dr. Robson reported that of 2,871 cases identified as ANCA-associated vasculitis, 2,072 (72%) were agreed upon by the expert review panel. Of these, there were 724 cases of GPA, 291 of MPA, 226 of EGPA, and around 300 cases of other small vessel vasculitis or polyarteritis nodosa. To develop the criteria the GPA cases were used as the “cases” and the other types of vasculitis as the comparators, Dr. Robson explained.

For GPA, MPA, and EGPA a set of items (10, 6, and 7, respectively) were derived and scored, positively or negatively, and a cutoff determined at which a classification of the particular vasculitis could be made. During discussion, Dr. Robson noted that the threshold score for a classification of EGPA (greater than or equal to 6) had been set slightly higher than for GPA or MPA (both greater than or equal to 5) “because of the clinical problem of there being very close comparators which can actually mimic EGPA.” This is where the negative scoring of some items used in these criteria are very important, she said.
 

 

The 10-item GPA criteria included three clinical (such as the presence of bloody nasal discharge upon examination) and seven investigational (such as cANCA positivity) items. These criteria were found to have a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (94%) for identifying GPA.

The six-item MPA criteria included one clinical item (bloody nasal discharge, which was this time attributed a negative score) and five investigational items (with ANCA testing given a higher positive score than for GPA). The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were a respective 91% and 94%.

Finally, the seven-item EGPA criteria included three clinical items (including obstructive airways disease and nasal polyps) and four investigational items (with ANCA positivity given a negative score). These criteria had an 85% sensitivity and 99% specificity for EGPA.

Dr. Robson emphasized that all of these classification criteria were to be used only after exclusion of other possible causes of vasculitis, such as infection, malignancy, or other autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, and a “diagnosis of small- or medium-vessel vasculitis has been made.” 

These criteria are to help classify into the subtypes of vasculitis “primarily for the purpose of clinical trials,” she said. “The next steps are review by the EULAR and ACR committee, and only on final approval will these criteria be ready to use.”

DCVAS is sponsored by the University of Oxford (England) with funding from the European League Against Rheumatism, the American College of Rheumatology, and the Vasculitis Foundation. Dr. Robson had no relevant financial disclosures.

SOURCE: Robson JC et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0021.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE EULAR 2018 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: New classification criteria for ANCA-associated vasculitides have been drafted and now need formal review before they are ready to use.

Major finding: Analysis of the 10-, 6-, and 7-item GPA, MPA, and EGPA criteria showed a respective 92%, 94%, and 91% sensitivity and 94%, 85%, and 99% specificity.

Study details: The Diagnostic and Classification Criteria in Vasculitis (DCVAS) observational study of more than 6,000 cases of vasculitides and comparators.

Disclosures: DCVAS is sponsored by the University of Oxford (England) with funding from the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Vasculitis Foundation. Dr. Robson had no relevant financial disclosures.

Source: Robson JC et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0021.
 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica