Neuro-oncology

The Food and Drug Administration has approved bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev) – a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin) – for the treatment of five cancers: metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); recurrent glioblastoma; metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC); and persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

Approval was based on “review of a comprehensive data package which demonstrated biosimilarity of [bevacizumab-bvzr] to the reference product,” Pfizer said in a statement announcing the approval.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is the second bevacizumab biosimilar to be approved, following approval of Amgen’s bevacizumab-awwb (Mvasi) in 2017.

Warnings and precautions with the biosimilars, as with bevacizumab, include serious and sometimes fatal gastrointestinal perforation, surgery and wound healing complications, and sometimes serious and fatal hemorrhage.

The most common adverse events observed in bevacizumab patients are epistaxis, headache, hypertension, rhinitis, proteinuria, taste alteration, dry skin, rectal hemorrhage, lacrimation disorder, back pain, and exfoliative dermatitis.

Specific indications for the biosimilar are as follows:

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with intravenous fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is indicated for the first- or second-line treatment of patients with mCRC.

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin–based chemotherapy, is indicated for the second-line treatment of patients with mCRC who have progressed on a first-line bevacizumab product–containing regimen.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

First-line nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC.

Recurrent glioblastoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr is indicated for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma in adults.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with interferon alfa, is indicated for the treatment of metastatic RCC.

Persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin or paclitaxel and topotecan, is indicated for the treatment of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Complete prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev) – a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin) – for the treatment of five cancers: metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); recurrent glioblastoma; metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC); and persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

Approval was based on “review of a comprehensive data package which demonstrated biosimilarity of [bevacizumab-bvzr] to the reference product,” Pfizer said in a statement announcing the approval.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is the second bevacizumab biosimilar to be approved, following approval of Amgen’s bevacizumab-awwb (Mvasi) in 2017.

Warnings and precautions with the biosimilars, as with bevacizumab, include serious and sometimes fatal gastrointestinal perforation, surgery and wound healing complications, and sometimes serious and fatal hemorrhage.

The most common adverse events observed in bevacizumab patients are epistaxis, headache, hypertension, rhinitis, proteinuria, taste alteration, dry skin, rectal hemorrhage, lacrimation disorder, back pain, and exfoliative dermatitis.

Specific indications for the biosimilar are as follows:

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with intravenous fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is indicated for the first- or second-line treatment of patients with mCRC.

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin–based chemotherapy, is indicated for the second-line treatment of patients with mCRC who have progressed on a first-line bevacizumab product–containing regimen.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

First-line nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC.

Recurrent glioblastoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr is indicated for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma in adults.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with interferon alfa, is indicated for the treatment of metastatic RCC.

Persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin or paclitaxel and topotecan, is indicated for the treatment of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Complete prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved bevacizumab-bvzr (Zirabev) – a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin) – for the treatment of five cancers: metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); recurrent glioblastoma; metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC); and persistent, recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

Approval was based on “review of a comprehensive data package which demonstrated biosimilarity of [bevacizumab-bvzr] to the reference product,” Pfizer said in a statement announcing the approval.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is the second bevacizumab biosimilar to be approved, following approval of Amgen’s bevacizumab-awwb (Mvasi) in 2017.

Warnings and precautions with the biosimilars, as with bevacizumab, include serious and sometimes fatal gastrointestinal perforation, surgery and wound healing complications, and sometimes serious and fatal hemorrhage.

The most common adverse events observed in bevacizumab patients are epistaxis, headache, hypertension, rhinitis, proteinuria, taste alteration, dry skin, rectal hemorrhage, lacrimation disorder, back pain, and exfoliative dermatitis.

Specific indications for the biosimilar are as follows:

Metastatic colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with intravenous fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, is indicated for the first- or second-line treatment of patients with mCRC.

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin–based chemotherapy, is indicated for the second-line treatment of patients with mCRC who have progressed on a first-line bevacizumab product–containing regimen.

Bevacizumab-bvzr is not indicated for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

First-line nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, is indicated for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC.

Recurrent glioblastoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr is indicated for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma in adults.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with interferon alfa, is indicated for the treatment of metastatic RCC.

Persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

Bevacizumab-bvzr, in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin or paclitaxel and topotecan, is indicated for the treatment of patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.

Complete prescribing information can be found on the FDA website.

GENEVA – Liquid biopsy appears inadequate to detect molecular aberrations in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression, according to investigators.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis detected molecular abnormalities in almost all patients with systemic disease progression, compared with just two out of five patients with isolated brain lesions, reported lead author Mihaela Aldea, MD, who presented findings at the European Lung Cancer Conference.

Dr. Aldea, of Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, said that “central nervous system progression is an example of hard-to-biopsy disease and is common in oncogene addicted non–small cell lung cancer, making it a potential setting to employ ctDNA analysis.” However, Dr. Aldea noted that the blood-brain barrier limits passage of molecules such as ctDNA into systemic circulation, leading to hypothetical skepticism within the medical community, despite “very limited” data.

“Currently, the actual performance of ctDNA in patients with lung cancer and isolated CNS progression remains largely unknown,” Dr. Aldea said, “so this is the question that we put in our study.”

Dr. Aldea and her colleagues screened 959 patients with NSCLC who were involved in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy between 2016 and 2018. Study inclusion required that patients have a molecular alteration detected via tissue sample and at least 1 ctDNA sample available from the time of CNS progression. Molecular alterations included ALK, EGFR, KRAS, ROS1, HER2, BRAF, TP53, and MET. Through these criteria, the study population was narrowed to 58 patients and 66 ctDNA samples, of which 21 were from patients with isolated CNS (I-CNS) progression and 45 were from patients with systemic disease progression (S-CNS). CtDNA was conducted with next generation sequencing and compared with imaging, molecular, and clinical patient data.

Most patients in the I-CNS group were female (94%), compared with about half of the S-CNS group (59%). Rates of adenocarcinoma and smoking history were relatively similar between I-CNS and S-CNS patients; in contrast, S-CNS patients had a median of two metastatic sites, compared with one in the I-CNS group. Rates of ALK, KRAS, and EGFR aberrations were slightly higher in the I-CNS group, whereas HER2, TP53, MET, and BRAF abnormalities were found only in the S-CNS group. Relating to the central hypothesis, 98% of S-CNS patients tested positive for at least one actionable driver via ctDNA analysis, compared with just 38% of I-CNS patients (P less than .0001). Resistance mutations were detected more commonly in the S-CNS group, although not significantly, which Dr. Aldea attributed to small population size.

“Plasma liquid biopsy is not a reliable marker for analyzing the molecular landscape of CNS progression,” Dr. Aldea concluded, adding that patients with isolated brain lesions may need to be treated with “more potent drugs” even when resistance mutations are not detected.

The investigators disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, and others.

SOURCE: Aldea et al. ELCC 2019. Abstract 110O.

GENEVA – Liquid biopsy appears inadequate to detect molecular aberrations in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression, according to investigators.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis detected molecular abnormalities in almost all patients with systemic disease progression, compared with just two out of five patients with isolated brain lesions, reported lead author Mihaela Aldea, MD, who presented findings at the European Lung Cancer Conference.

Dr. Aldea, of Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, said that “central nervous system progression is an example of hard-to-biopsy disease and is common in oncogene addicted non–small cell lung cancer, making it a potential setting to employ ctDNA analysis.” However, Dr. Aldea noted that the blood-brain barrier limits passage of molecules such as ctDNA into systemic circulation, leading to hypothetical skepticism within the medical community, despite “very limited” data.

“Currently, the actual performance of ctDNA in patients with lung cancer and isolated CNS progression remains largely unknown,” Dr. Aldea said, “so this is the question that we put in our study.”

Dr. Aldea and her colleagues screened 959 patients with NSCLC who were involved in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy between 2016 and 2018. Study inclusion required that patients have a molecular alteration detected via tissue sample and at least 1 ctDNA sample available from the time of CNS progression. Molecular alterations included ALK, EGFR, KRAS, ROS1, HER2, BRAF, TP53, and MET. Through these criteria, the study population was narrowed to 58 patients and 66 ctDNA samples, of which 21 were from patients with isolated CNS (I-CNS) progression and 45 were from patients with systemic disease progression (S-CNS). CtDNA was conducted with next generation sequencing and compared with imaging, molecular, and clinical patient data.

Most patients in the I-CNS group were female (94%), compared with about half of the S-CNS group (59%). Rates of adenocarcinoma and smoking history were relatively similar between I-CNS and S-CNS patients; in contrast, S-CNS patients had a median of two metastatic sites, compared with one in the I-CNS group. Rates of ALK, KRAS, and EGFR aberrations were slightly higher in the I-CNS group, whereas HER2, TP53, MET, and BRAF abnormalities were found only in the S-CNS group. Relating to the central hypothesis, 98% of S-CNS patients tested positive for at least one actionable driver via ctDNA analysis, compared with just 38% of I-CNS patients (P less than .0001). Resistance mutations were detected more commonly in the S-CNS group, although not significantly, which Dr. Aldea attributed to small population size.

“Plasma liquid biopsy is not a reliable marker for analyzing the molecular landscape of CNS progression,” Dr. Aldea concluded, adding that patients with isolated brain lesions may need to be treated with “more potent drugs” even when resistance mutations are not detected.

The investigators disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, and others.

SOURCE: Aldea et al. ELCC 2019. Abstract 110O.

GENEVA – Liquid biopsy appears inadequate to detect molecular aberrations in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have isolated central nervous system (CNS) progression, according to investigators.

Will Pass/MDedge News

Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis detected molecular abnormalities in almost all patients with systemic disease progression, compared with just two out of five patients with isolated brain lesions, reported lead author Mihaela Aldea, MD, who presented findings at the European Lung Cancer Conference.

Dr. Aldea, of Gustave Roussy Institute in Villejuif, France, said that “central nervous system progression is an example of hard-to-biopsy disease and is common in oncogene addicted non–small cell lung cancer, making it a potential setting to employ ctDNA analysis.” However, Dr. Aldea noted that the blood-brain barrier limits passage of molecules such as ctDNA into systemic circulation, leading to hypothetical skepticism within the medical community, despite “very limited” data.

“Currently, the actual performance of ctDNA in patients with lung cancer and isolated CNS progression remains largely unknown,” Dr. Aldea said, “so this is the question that we put in our study.”

Dr. Aldea and her colleagues screened 959 patients with NSCLC who were involved in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy between 2016 and 2018. Study inclusion required that patients have a molecular alteration detected via tissue sample and at least 1 ctDNA sample available from the time of CNS progression. Molecular alterations included ALK, EGFR, KRAS, ROS1, HER2, BRAF, TP53, and MET. Through these criteria, the study population was narrowed to 58 patients and 66 ctDNA samples, of which 21 were from patients with isolated CNS (I-CNS) progression and 45 were from patients with systemic disease progression (S-CNS). CtDNA was conducted with next generation sequencing and compared with imaging, molecular, and clinical patient data.

Most patients in the I-CNS group were female (94%), compared with about half of the S-CNS group (59%). Rates of adenocarcinoma and smoking history were relatively similar between I-CNS and S-CNS patients; in contrast, S-CNS patients had a median of two metastatic sites, compared with one in the I-CNS group. Rates of ALK, KRAS, and EGFR aberrations were slightly higher in the I-CNS group, whereas HER2, TP53, MET, and BRAF abnormalities were found only in the S-CNS group. Relating to the central hypothesis, 98% of S-CNS patients tested positive for at least one actionable driver via ctDNA analysis, compared with just 38% of I-CNS patients (P less than .0001). Resistance mutations were detected more commonly in the S-CNS group, although not significantly, which Dr. Aldea attributed to small population size.

“Plasma liquid biopsy is not a reliable marker for analyzing the molecular landscape of CNS progression,” Dr. Aldea concluded, adding that patients with isolated brain lesions may need to be treated with “more potent drugs” even when resistance mutations are not detected.

The investigators disclosed financial relationships with Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, and others.

SOURCE: Aldea et al. ELCC 2019. Abstract 110O.

For patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), adding rituximab to combination high-dose methotrexate and temozolomide significantly boosted the 5-year overall survival rate, according to a retrospective study.

The triplet combination could be a safe and effective first-line option for patients with PCNSL, particularly the frail and elderly, who may have issues with toxicity when receiving current standard care, reported lead author Cui Chen, MD, of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and his colleagues.

“An increasing number of studies and meta‐analyses have investigated the effect of rituximab in PCNSL, indicating that rituximab can robustly enhance the response rate and possibly improve survival,” the investigators wrote in Cancer Medicine. “However, data regarding the addition of rituximab to [methotrexate and temozolomide] for PCNSL are limited, and no study has directly compared the efficacy of [rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide] to that of [high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide].”

The study involved 62 patients with untreated PCNSL who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Out of the 62 patients, 32 received rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (RMT) and 30 received high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (MT). Patients received up to eight cycles of therapy, with discontinuation upon disease progression or toxicity.

The results showed that patients treated with RMT had significantly better outcomes than those who received MT, first marked by objective response rates, which were 93.7% for RMT and 69.0% for MT.

Survival rates also showed the advantage of rituximab. For the RMT group, 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.3%, respectively, compared with 46.5% and 29.1% for patients receiving MT.

Most importantly, rituximab boosted overall survival to a significant and notable extent, with higher rates at 2 years (82.3% vs. 65.7%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 50.0%).

Efficacy did not diminish safety, as no significant differences in toxicity were found between treatment types. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic; most commonly, this entailed neutropenia, which occurred in about one-quarter of patients.

“Given its outstanding efficacy and favorable toxicity, we consider RMT to be a feasible and safe therapeutic approach as a first‐line treatment for PCNSL. Moreover, RMT is an ideal regimen for elderly patients and frail populations who may not tolerate [whole‐brain radiation therapy] or [autologous stem‐cell transplantation],” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Chen C et al. Cancer Med. 2019 Mar 1. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1906.

For patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), adding rituximab to combination high-dose methotrexate and temozolomide significantly boosted the 5-year overall survival rate, according to a retrospective study.

The triplet combination could be a safe and effective first-line option for patients with PCNSL, particularly the frail and elderly, who may have issues with toxicity when receiving current standard care, reported lead author Cui Chen, MD, of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and his colleagues.

“An increasing number of studies and meta‐analyses have investigated the effect of rituximab in PCNSL, indicating that rituximab can robustly enhance the response rate and possibly improve survival,” the investigators wrote in Cancer Medicine. “However, data regarding the addition of rituximab to [methotrexate and temozolomide] for PCNSL are limited, and no study has directly compared the efficacy of [rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide] to that of [high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide].”

The study involved 62 patients with untreated PCNSL who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Out of the 62 patients, 32 received rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (RMT) and 30 received high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (MT). Patients received up to eight cycles of therapy, with discontinuation upon disease progression or toxicity.

The results showed that patients treated with RMT had significantly better outcomes than those who received MT, first marked by objective response rates, which were 93.7% for RMT and 69.0% for MT.

Survival rates also showed the advantage of rituximab. For the RMT group, 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.3%, respectively, compared with 46.5% and 29.1% for patients receiving MT.

Most importantly, rituximab boosted overall survival to a significant and notable extent, with higher rates at 2 years (82.3% vs. 65.7%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 50.0%).

Efficacy did not diminish safety, as no significant differences in toxicity were found between treatment types. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic; most commonly, this entailed neutropenia, which occurred in about one-quarter of patients.

“Given its outstanding efficacy and favorable toxicity, we consider RMT to be a feasible and safe therapeutic approach as a first‐line treatment for PCNSL. Moreover, RMT is an ideal regimen for elderly patients and frail populations who may not tolerate [whole‐brain radiation therapy] or [autologous stem‐cell transplantation],” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Chen C et al. Cancer Med. 2019 Mar 1. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1906.

For patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), adding rituximab to combination high-dose methotrexate and temozolomide significantly boosted the 5-year overall survival rate, according to a retrospective study.

The triplet combination could be a safe and effective first-line option for patients with PCNSL, particularly the frail and elderly, who may have issues with toxicity when receiving current standard care, reported lead author Cui Chen, MD, of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, and his colleagues.

“An increasing number of studies and meta‐analyses have investigated the effect of rituximab in PCNSL, indicating that rituximab can robustly enhance the response rate and possibly improve survival,” the investigators wrote in Cancer Medicine. “However, data regarding the addition of rituximab to [methotrexate and temozolomide] for PCNSL are limited, and no study has directly compared the efficacy of [rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide] to that of [high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide].”

The study involved 62 patients with untreated PCNSL who were diagnosed between 2005 and 2015. Out of the 62 patients, 32 received rituximab/high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (RMT) and 30 received high-dose methotrexate/temozolomide (MT). Patients received up to eight cycles of therapy, with discontinuation upon disease progression or toxicity.

The results showed that patients treated with RMT had significantly better outcomes than those who received MT, first marked by objective response rates, which were 93.7% for RMT and 69.0% for MT.

Survival rates also showed the advantage of rituximab. For the RMT group, 2-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.3%, respectively, compared with 46.5% and 29.1% for patients receiving MT.

Most importantly, rituximab boosted overall survival to a significant and notable extent, with higher rates at 2 years (82.3% vs. 65.7%) and 5 years (82.3% vs. 50.0%).

Efficacy did not diminish safety, as no significant differences in toxicity were found between treatment types. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic; most commonly, this entailed neutropenia, which occurred in about one-quarter of patients.

“Given its outstanding efficacy and favorable toxicity, we consider RMT to be a feasible and safe therapeutic approach as a first‐line treatment for PCNSL. Moreover, RMT is an ideal regimen for elderly patients and frail populations who may not tolerate [whole‐brain radiation therapy] or [autologous stem‐cell transplantation],” the researchers wrote.

The study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Chen C et al. Cancer Med. 2019 Mar 1. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1906.

Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.

“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”

This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.

T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.

No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.

“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”

The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.

—Will Pass

Suggested Reading

Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.

Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.

“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”

This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.

T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.

No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.

“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”

The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.

—Will Pass

Suggested Reading

Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.

Infusion of allogeneic BK virus-specific T cells may be an effective treatment for patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), according to a report in the October 11 New England Journal of Medicine. The infusion cleared JC virus from the CSF of two patients and reduced viral load in the third, reported lead author Muharrem Muftuoglu, MD, of the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and colleagues. One of the patients completely recovered and returned to work; this outcome was unprecedented in PML therapy.

“Several approaches for the treatment of PML, including the use of antiviral medications and mirtazapine, have been tested, with poor results,” the investigators said. Although virus-specific T-cell infusion is a novel approach to treating PML, this method has been used for other conditions. “Several groups, including ours, have successfully used viral-specific T cells to treat BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation,” the investigators said. “Because BK virus and JC virus are genetically similar to one another and share a number of immunogenic proteins with a substantial degree of sequence homology ... we hypothesized that T cells developed against BK virus may also be effective against JC virus infection.”

This hypothesis proved correct. The investigators infused three patients with PML with “cryopreserved, third-party–produced, viral-specific T cells that had been designed for the treatment of patients with BK virus infection after stem-cell transplantation.” Each patient presented with a different condition and PML-precipitating therapy. The first patient was a 32-year-old woman with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia who had received a cord-blood transplantation, the second a 73-year-old woman with JAK2-positive myeloproliferative neoplasia on ruxolitinib therapy, and the third a 35-year-old man with HIV who had received highly active antiretroviral therapy.

T-cell infusions cleared JC virus from the CSF of the woman with leukemia (three infusions) and the man with HIV (four infusions). These patients recovered to different degrees.The woman had full resolution of symptoms, while the man had slurred speech and walked with a cane. Treatment reduced JC viral load in the elderly woman with myeloproliferative neoplasia (two infusions), but she did not clear the virus and died about eight months later.

No adverse events occurred, but two patients developed immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. This outcome was likely caused by the T-cell infusion, since absolute T-cell counts remained steady and white matter enhancement was detected on MRI within four weeks of treatment. Still, the investigators were optimistic about future potential.

“Third-party–produced, ‘off-the-shelf,’ partially HLA-matched, BK virus–specific T cells may serve as therapy for PML,” the investigators concluded. “Further study in a larger group of patients is required to determine the success rate, durability, and longer-term adverse events associated with this treatment.”

The study was funded by the MD Anderson Cancer Center Moon Shots Program and the National Institutes of Health.

—Will Pass

Suggested Reading

Muftuoglu M, Olson A, Marin D, et al. Allogeneic BK specific T cells for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1443-1451.

Telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS mutations, and p53 mutations can be used to mechanistically classify clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma, according to investigators.

Genomic analysis of neuroblastomas showed that the aforementioned markers were strongly associated with outcome and other disease characteristics, reported Sandra Ackermann, MD, of the department of experimental pediatric oncology at the University Children’s Hospital of Cologne (Germany), and her colleagues.

Although previous studies have shown relationships between genetic alterations and behavior of neuroblastomas, “to date, these genomic data have not produced a coherent model of pathogenesis that can explain the extremely divergent clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma,” the investigators wrote in Science.

The present study involved genomic sequencing of 416 pretreatment neuroblastomas, with tests for telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS-pathway mutations, and p53-pathway mutations.

Based on existing data, the investigators first devised a panel based on 17 genes related to the RAS pathway (11 genes included ALK) and 6 related to the p53 pathway. In 198 cases, 28 tested positive for RAS- or p53-pathway abnormalities (17.8%). Positivity was more common in high-risk tumors than non–high-risk tumors (21.3% vs. 13.3%; P = .048), and in both risk groups, positivity was associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 2.056; P = .001).

However, because clinical courses varied widely among non–high-risk patients with RAS/p53 mutations, the investigators recognized that a piece of the puzzle was missing. They hypothesized that telomere maintenance mechanisms could also be playing a role. Following several intervening experiments, the investigators devised telomere maintenance mechanism testing, defined by MYCN amplification or TERT rearrangements, elevated TERT expression if negative for these abnormalities, or presence of ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Subsequent testing revealed that positivity for these parameters was associated with a HR of 5.184 (P less than .001), thereby confirming that telomere maintenance mechanisms could independently predict survival.

“Together, our findings demonstrate that the divergent clinical phenotypes of human neuroblastoma are driven by molecular alterations affecting telomere maintenance and RAS or p53 pathways, suggesting a mechanistic classification of this malignancy,” the authors concluded.

The proposed classification scheme also includes associations with other genetic features (tumor cell ploidy, segmental copy number alterations, MYCN/TERT/ATRX alterations, and gene expression favorability) and clinical characteristics (stage of disease and age at diagnosis).

The study was funded by the German Cancer Aid, the German Ministry of Science and Education, the MYC-NET, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Berlin Institute of Health, the European Union, and others. One coauthor reported financial relationships with Biogazelle and pxlence, and another reported consulting fees from NEO New Oncology.

SOURCE: Ackermann S et al. Science. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6768.

Telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS mutations, and p53 mutations can be used to mechanistically classify clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma, according to investigators.

Genomic analysis of neuroblastomas showed that the aforementioned markers were strongly associated with outcome and other disease characteristics, reported Sandra Ackermann, MD, of the department of experimental pediatric oncology at the University Children’s Hospital of Cologne (Germany), and her colleagues.

Although previous studies have shown relationships between genetic alterations and behavior of neuroblastomas, “to date, these genomic data have not produced a coherent model of pathogenesis that can explain the extremely divergent clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma,” the investigators wrote in Science.

The present study involved genomic sequencing of 416 pretreatment neuroblastomas, with tests for telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS-pathway mutations, and p53-pathway mutations.

Based on existing data, the investigators first devised a panel based on 17 genes related to the RAS pathway (11 genes included ALK) and 6 related to the p53 pathway. In 198 cases, 28 tested positive for RAS- or p53-pathway abnormalities (17.8%). Positivity was more common in high-risk tumors than non–high-risk tumors (21.3% vs. 13.3%; P = .048), and in both risk groups, positivity was associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 2.056; P = .001).

However, because clinical courses varied widely among non–high-risk patients with RAS/p53 mutations, the investigators recognized that a piece of the puzzle was missing. They hypothesized that telomere maintenance mechanisms could also be playing a role. Following several intervening experiments, the investigators devised telomere maintenance mechanism testing, defined by MYCN amplification or TERT rearrangements, elevated TERT expression if negative for these abnormalities, or presence of ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Subsequent testing revealed that positivity for these parameters was associated with a HR of 5.184 (P less than .001), thereby confirming that telomere maintenance mechanisms could independently predict survival.

“Together, our findings demonstrate that the divergent clinical phenotypes of human neuroblastoma are driven by molecular alterations affecting telomere maintenance and RAS or p53 pathways, suggesting a mechanistic classification of this malignancy,” the authors concluded.

The proposed classification scheme also includes associations with other genetic features (tumor cell ploidy, segmental copy number alterations, MYCN/TERT/ATRX alterations, and gene expression favorability) and clinical characteristics (stage of disease and age at diagnosis).

The study was funded by the German Cancer Aid, the German Ministry of Science and Education, the MYC-NET, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Berlin Institute of Health, the European Union, and others. One coauthor reported financial relationships with Biogazelle and pxlence, and another reported consulting fees from NEO New Oncology.

SOURCE: Ackermann S et al. Science. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6768.

Telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS mutations, and p53 mutations can be used to mechanistically classify clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma, according to investigators.

Genomic analysis of neuroblastomas showed that the aforementioned markers were strongly associated with outcome and other disease characteristics, reported Sandra Ackermann, MD, of the department of experimental pediatric oncology at the University Children’s Hospital of Cologne (Germany), and her colleagues.

Although previous studies have shown relationships between genetic alterations and behavior of neuroblastomas, “to date, these genomic data have not produced a coherent model of pathogenesis that can explain the extremely divergent clinical phenotypes of neuroblastoma,” the investigators wrote in Science.

The present study involved genomic sequencing of 416 pretreatment neuroblastomas, with tests for telomere maintenance mechanisms, RAS-pathway mutations, and p53-pathway mutations.

Based on existing data, the investigators first devised a panel based on 17 genes related to the RAS pathway (11 genes included ALK) and 6 related to the p53 pathway. In 198 cases, 28 tested positive for RAS- or p53-pathway abnormalities (17.8%). Positivity was more common in high-risk tumors than non–high-risk tumors (21.3% vs. 13.3%; P = .048), and in both risk groups, positivity was associated with poor outcome (hazard ratio, 2.056; P = .001).

However, because clinical courses varied widely among non–high-risk patients with RAS/p53 mutations, the investigators recognized that a piece of the puzzle was missing. They hypothesized that telomere maintenance mechanisms could also be playing a role. Following several intervening experiments, the investigators devised telomere maintenance mechanism testing, defined by MYCN amplification or TERT rearrangements, elevated TERT expression if negative for these abnormalities, or presence of ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Subsequent testing revealed that positivity for these parameters was associated with a HR of 5.184 (P less than .001), thereby confirming that telomere maintenance mechanisms could independently predict survival.

“Together, our findings demonstrate that the divergent clinical phenotypes of human neuroblastoma are driven by molecular alterations affecting telomere maintenance and RAS or p53 pathways, suggesting a mechanistic classification of this malignancy,” the authors concluded.

The proposed classification scheme also includes associations with other genetic features (tumor cell ploidy, segmental copy number alterations, MYCN/TERT/ATRX alterations, and gene expression favorability) and clinical characteristics (stage of disease and age at diagnosis).

The study was funded by the German Cancer Aid, the German Ministry of Science and Education, the MYC-NET, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Berlin Institute of Health, the European Union, and others. One coauthor reported financial relationships with Biogazelle and pxlence, and another reported consulting fees from NEO New Oncology.

SOURCE: Ackermann S et al. Science. 2018 Dec 7. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6768.

People with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) should be offered entry into clinical trials whenever possible, say the authors of the British Society for Haematology’s guidelines for the diagnosis and management of primary central nervous system diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.

PCNSL, implicated in some 3% of all brain tumors, is complex to diagnose and treat. People with suspected PCNSL must receive quick and coordinated attention from a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, hematologist-oncologists, and ocular specialists, according to the guidelines, published in the British Journal of Haematology.

Christopher P. Fox, MD, of the Nottingham (England) University Hospitals NHS Trust, and his colleagues, stress the importance of early multidisciplinary attention, aggressive induction treatment, helping patients into trials, universal screening for eye involvement, attaining histological diagnoses in addition to imaging findings, and avoidance or discontinuation of any corticosteroids before biopsy, as even a short course of steroids can impede diagnosis.

The guidelines incorporate findings from studies published since the society’s last comprehensive PCNSL guideline was issued more than a decade ago.

Dr. Fox and his colleagues say definitive treatment for PCNSL – induction of remission followed by consolidation – should start within 2 weeks of diagnosis and that a treatment regimen should be chosen according to a patient’s physiological fitness, not age. The fittest patients, who have better organ function and fewer comorbidities, should be eligible for intensive combination immunochemotherapy incorporating high-dose methotrexate (optimally four cycles of HD-MTX, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab). Those deemed unfit for this regimen should be offered induction treatment with HD-MTX, rituximab and procarbazine, the guidelines’ authors say.

If patients cannot tolerate HD-MTX, oral chemotherapy and/or whole-brain radiotherapy may be offered. Response should be assessed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Consolidation therapy should be initiated after induction for all patients with nonprogressive disease, and high-dose thiotepa-based chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant is the recommended first-line option for consolidation. Response to consolidation, again measured with contrast-enhanced MRI, should be carried out at between 1 and 2 months after therapy is completed, and patients should be referred for neuropsychological testing to assess cognitive function.

Patients with relapsed or refractory disease should be approached with maximum urgency – the guidelines offer an algorithm for retreatment options – and offered clinical trial entry wherever possible.

The PCNSL guideline writing process was sponsored by the British Society for Haematology, and some coauthors, including the lead author, disclosed receiving fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers Adienne or F. Hoffman-La Roche.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fox et al. Br J Haematol. 2018 Nov 23 doi: 10.1111/bjh.15661.

People with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) should be offered entry into clinical trials whenever possible, say the authors of the British Society for Haematology’s guidelines for the diagnosis and management of primary central nervous system diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.

PCNSL, implicated in some 3% of all brain tumors, is complex to diagnose and treat. People with suspected PCNSL must receive quick and coordinated attention from a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, hematologist-oncologists, and ocular specialists, according to the guidelines, published in the British Journal of Haematology.

Christopher P. Fox, MD, of the Nottingham (England) University Hospitals NHS Trust, and his colleagues, stress the importance of early multidisciplinary attention, aggressive induction treatment, helping patients into trials, universal screening for eye involvement, attaining histological diagnoses in addition to imaging findings, and avoidance or discontinuation of any corticosteroids before biopsy, as even a short course of steroids can impede diagnosis.

The guidelines incorporate findings from studies published since the society’s last comprehensive PCNSL guideline was issued more than a decade ago.

Dr. Fox and his colleagues say definitive treatment for PCNSL – induction of remission followed by consolidation – should start within 2 weeks of diagnosis and that a treatment regimen should be chosen according to a patient’s physiological fitness, not age. The fittest patients, who have better organ function and fewer comorbidities, should be eligible for intensive combination immunochemotherapy incorporating high-dose methotrexate (optimally four cycles of HD-MTX, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab). Those deemed unfit for this regimen should be offered induction treatment with HD-MTX, rituximab and procarbazine, the guidelines’ authors say.

If patients cannot tolerate HD-MTX, oral chemotherapy and/or whole-brain radiotherapy may be offered. Response should be assessed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Consolidation therapy should be initiated after induction for all patients with nonprogressive disease, and high-dose thiotepa-based chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant is the recommended first-line option for consolidation. Response to consolidation, again measured with contrast-enhanced MRI, should be carried out at between 1 and 2 months after therapy is completed, and patients should be referred for neuropsychological testing to assess cognitive function.

Patients with relapsed or refractory disease should be approached with maximum urgency – the guidelines offer an algorithm for retreatment options – and offered clinical trial entry wherever possible.

The PCNSL guideline writing process was sponsored by the British Society for Haematology, and some coauthors, including the lead author, disclosed receiving fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers Adienne or F. Hoffman-La Roche.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fox et al. Br J Haematol. 2018 Nov 23 doi: 10.1111/bjh.15661.

People with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) should be offered entry into clinical trials whenever possible, say the authors of the British Society for Haematology’s guidelines for the diagnosis and management of primary central nervous system diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma.

PCNSL, implicated in some 3% of all brain tumors, is complex to diagnose and treat. People with suspected PCNSL must receive quick and coordinated attention from a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, hematologist-oncologists, and ocular specialists, according to the guidelines, published in the British Journal of Haematology.

Christopher P. Fox, MD, of the Nottingham (England) University Hospitals NHS Trust, and his colleagues, stress the importance of early multidisciplinary attention, aggressive induction treatment, helping patients into trials, universal screening for eye involvement, attaining histological diagnoses in addition to imaging findings, and avoidance or discontinuation of any corticosteroids before biopsy, as even a short course of steroids can impede diagnosis.

The guidelines incorporate findings from studies published since the society’s last comprehensive PCNSL guideline was issued more than a decade ago.

Dr. Fox and his colleagues say definitive treatment for PCNSL – induction of remission followed by consolidation – should start within 2 weeks of diagnosis and that a treatment regimen should be chosen according to a patient’s physiological fitness, not age. The fittest patients, who have better organ function and fewer comorbidities, should be eligible for intensive combination immunochemotherapy incorporating high-dose methotrexate (optimally four cycles of HD-MTX, cytarabine, thiotepa, and rituximab). Those deemed unfit for this regimen should be offered induction treatment with HD-MTX, rituximab and procarbazine, the guidelines’ authors say.

If patients cannot tolerate HD-MTX, oral chemotherapy and/or whole-brain radiotherapy may be offered. Response should be assessed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Consolidation therapy should be initiated after induction for all patients with nonprogressive disease, and high-dose thiotepa-based chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant is the recommended first-line option for consolidation. Response to consolidation, again measured with contrast-enhanced MRI, should be carried out at between 1 and 2 months after therapy is completed, and patients should be referred for neuropsychological testing to assess cognitive function.

Patients with relapsed or refractory disease should be approached with maximum urgency – the guidelines offer an algorithm for retreatment options – and offered clinical trial entry wherever possible.

The PCNSL guideline writing process was sponsored by the British Society for Haematology, and some coauthors, including the lead author, disclosed receiving fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers Adienne or F. Hoffman-La Roche.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fox et al. Br J Haematol. 2018 Nov 23 doi: 10.1111/bjh.15661.

Bacteremic sepsis during acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment may contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction later in life, results of a cohort study suggest.

Xavier_S/Thinkstock

Pediatric ALL survivors who had sepsis while on treatment performed worse on measures of intelligence, attention, executive function, and processing speed than survivors with no sepsis history, according to study results.

Links between sepsis and impaired neurocognitive function found in this study have “practice-changing implications” for cancer survivors, investigators reported in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Prevention of infection, early recognition and appropriate management of sepsis, and preemptive neurocognitive interventions should be prioritized, because these might prevent or ameliorate neurologic damage,” said Joshua Wolf, MBBS, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, and the coauthors of the report.

The study included 212 children who, at a median age of 5 years, had received risk-adapted chemotherapy for ALL with no hematopoietic cell transplant or cranial irradiation.

Sixteen of the patients (7.5%) had a history of bacteremic sepsis during ALL therapy, according to retrospectively obtained data.

As a part of the study, all participants participated in neurocognitive testing, which was done at a median of 7.7 years after diagnosis.

Patients with a history of bacteremic sepsis performed poorly on multiple measures of neurocognitive function, as compared with all other participants, according to results of analyses that were adjusted for multiple potentially confounding factors, such as age, race, and leukemia risk category.

Although not all neurocognitive measures were significantly different between groups, survivors with a sepsis history performed worse on evaluations of spatial planning (difference, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.00), verbal fluency (0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.62), and attention (0.63; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95), among other measures, investigators said.

This is believed to be the first published study looking at potential links between sepsis during ALL treatment and long-term neurocognitive dysfunction, investigators said. However, similar observations have been made in other patient populations, they added.

Exactly how sepsis might lead to neurocognitive deficits remains unclear. “In the population of children with cancer, these mechanisms might be augmented by increased blood-brain barrier permeability to neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs,” they said in their report.

Further study is needed to look at potential brain injury mechanisms, and to validate the current findings in other ALL patient cohorts, they concluded.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cheung YT et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 24. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2500.

Bacteremic sepsis during acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment may contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction later in life, results of a cohort study suggest.

Xavier_S/Thinkstock

Pediatric ALL survivors who had sepsis while on treatment performed worse on measures of intelligence, attention, executive function, and processing speed than survivors with no sepsis history, according to study results.

Links between sepsis and impaired neurocognitive function found in this study have “practice-changing implications” for cancer survivors, investigators reported in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Prevention of infection, early recognition and appropriate management of sepsis, and preemptive neurocognitive interventions should be prioritized, because these might prevent or ameliorate neurologic damage,” said Joshua Wolf, MBBS, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, and the coauthors of the report.

The study included 212 children who, at a median age of 5 years, had received risk-adapted chemotherapy for ALL with no hematopoietic cell transplant or cranial irradiation.

Sixteen of the patients (7.5%) had a history of bacteremic sepsis during ALL therapy, according to retrospectively obtained data.

As a part of the study, all participants participated in neurocognitive testing, which was done at a median of 7.7 years after diagnosis.

Patients with a history of bacteremic sepsis performed poorly on multiple measures of neurocognitive function, as compared with all other participants, according to results of analyses that were adjusted for multiple potentially confounding factors, such as age, race, and leukemia risk category.

Although not all neurocognitive measures were significantly different between groups, survivors with a sepsis history performed worse on evaluations of spatial planning (difference, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.00), verbal fluency (0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.62), and attention (0.63; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95), among other measures, investigators said.

This is believed to be the first published study looking at potential links between sepsis during ALL treatment and long-term neurocognitive dysfunction, investigators said. However, similar observations have been made in other patient populations, they added.

Exactly how sepsis might lead to neurocognitive deficits remains unclear. “In the population of children with cancer, these mechanisms might be augmented by increased blood-brain barrier permeability to neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs,” they said in their report.

Further study is needed to look at potential brain injury mechanisms, and to validate the current findings in other ALL patient cohorts, they concluded.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cheung YT et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 24. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2500.

Bacteremic sepsis during acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment may contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction later in life, results of a cohort study suggest.

Xavier_S/Thinkstock

Pediatric ALL survivors who had sepsis while on treatment performed worse on measures of intelligence, attention, executive function, and processing speed than survivors with no sepsis history, according to study results.

Links between sepsis and impaired neurocognitive function found in this study have “practice-changing implications” for cancer survivors, investigators reported in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Prevention of infection, early recognition and appropriate management of sepsis, and preemptive neurocognitive interventions should be prioritized, because these might prevent or ameliorate neurologic damage,” said Joshua Wolf, MBBS, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, and the coauthors of the report.

The study included 212 children who, at a median age of 5 years, had received risk-adapted chemotherapy for ALL with no hematopoietic cell transplant or cranial irradiation.

Sixteen of the patients (7.5%) had a history of bacteremic sepsis during ALL therapy, according to retrospectively obtained data.

As a part of the study, all participants participated in neurocognitive testing, which was done at a median of 7.7 years after diagnosis.

Patients with a history of bacteremic sepsis performed poorly on multiple measures of neurocognitive function, as compared with all other participants, according to results of analyses that were adjusted for multiple potentially confounding factors, such as age, race, and leukemia risk category.

Although not all neurocognitive measures were significantly different between groups, survivors with a sepsis history performed worse on evaluations of spatial planning (difference, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.00), verbal fluency (0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.62), and attention (0.63; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95), among other measures, investigators said.

This is believed to be the first published study looking at potential links between sepsis during ALL treatment and long-term neurocognitive dysfunction, investigators said. However, similar observations have been made in other patient populations, they added.

Exactly how sepsis might lead to neurocognitive deficits remains unclear. “In the population of children with cancer, these mechanisms might be augmented by increased blood-brain barrier permeability to neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs,” they said in their report.

Further study is needed to look at potential brain injury mechanisms, and to validate the current findings in other ALL patient cohorts, they concluded.

The study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Cheung YT et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 24. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.2500.

Since the Food and Drug Administration first approved checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI) and BRAF^V600-targeted therapy in 2011, survival times for patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) have significantly improved, with a 91% increase in 4-year overall survival (OS) from 7.4% to 14.1%.

“The management of advanced melanoma has traditionally been tempered by limited responses to conventional therapies, resulting in a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year,” wrote J. Bryan Iorgulescu, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and his colleagues. The report was published in Cancer Immunology Research. “The landscape of advanced melanoma treatment was revolutionized” by the approval of immunotherapy agents, beginning in 2011.

The current, retrospective study involved 2,753 patients with stage IV melanoma. Patient data were drawn from the National Cancer Database, with diagnoses made between 2010 and 2015. Patient management, overall survival, and disease characteristics were evaluated.

During initial review, the researchers found that 35.8% of patients with stage IV melanoma had brain involvement. These patients were further categorized by those with MBM only (39.7%) versus those with extracranial metastatic disease (60.3%), which included involvement of lung (82.9%), liver (8.1%), bone (6.0%), and lymph nodes or distant subcutaneous skin (3%). MBM-only disease was independently predicted by both younger age and geographic location.

Patients receiving first-line CBI therapy demonstrated improved 4-year OS (28.1% vs. 11.1%; P less than.001) and median OS (12.4 months vs. 5.2 months; P less than .001).

Improvements with CBI were most dramatic in patients with MBM-only disease. In these cases, 4-year OS improved from 16.9% to 51.5% (P less than .001), while median OS jumped from 7.7 months to 56.4 months (P less than .001).

Improved OS was also associated with fewer comorbidities, younger age, management at an academic cancer center, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, and resection of the MBM.

“Our findings help bridge the gaps in early clinical trials of CBIs that largely excluded stage IV melanoma patients with MBMs, with checkpoint immunotherapy demonstrating a more than doubling of the median and 4-year OS of MBMs,” the authors concluded.

SOURCE: Iorgulescu et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 July 12 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0067.

Since the Food and Drug Administration first approved checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI) and BRAF^V600-targeted therapy in 2011, survival times for patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) have significantly improved, with a 91% increase in 4-year overall survival (OS) from 7.4% to 14.1%.

“The management of advanced melanoma has traditionally been tempered by limited responses to conventional therapies, resulting in a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year,” wrote J. Bryan Iorgulescu, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and his colleagues. The report was published in Cancer Immunology Research. “The landscape of advanced melanoma treatment was revolutionized” by the approval of immunotherapy agents, beginning in 2011.

The current, retrospective study involved 2,753 patients with stage IV melanoma. Patient data were drawn from the National Cancer Database, with diagnoses made between 2010 and 2015. Patient management, overall survival, and disease characteristics were evaluated.

During initial review, the researchers found that 35.8% of patients with stage IV melanoma had brain involvement. These patients were further categorized by those with MBM only (39.7%) versus those with extracranial metastatic disease (60.3%), which included involvement of lung (82.9%), liver (8.1%), bone (6.0%), and lymph nodes or distant subcutaneous skin (3%). MBM-only disease was independently predicted by both younger age and geographic location.

Patients receiving first-line CBI therapy demonstrated improved 4-year OS (28.1% vs. 11.1%; P less than.001) and median OS (12.4 months vs. 5.2 months; P less than .001).

Improvements with CBI were most dramatic in patients with MBM-only disease. In these cases, 4-year OS improved from 16.9% to 51.5% (P less than .001), while median OS jumped from 7.7 months to 56.4 months (P less than .001).

Improved OS was also associated with fewer comorbidities, younger age, management at an academic cancer center, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, and resection of the MBM.

“Our findings help bridge the gaps in early clinical trials of CBIs that largely excluded stage IV melanoma patients with MBMs, with checkpoint immunotherapy demonstrating a more than doubling of the median and 4-year OS of MBMs,” the authors concluded.

SOURCE: Iorgulescu et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 July 12 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0067.

Since the Food and Drug Administration first approved checkpoint blockade immunotherapy (CBI) and BRAF^V600-targeted therapy in 2011, survival times for patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) have significantly improved, with a 91% increase in 4-year overall survival (OS) from 7.4% to 14.1%.

“The management of advanced melanoma has traditionally been tempered by limited responses to conventional therapies, resulting in a median overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year,” wrote J. Bryan Iorgulescu, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and his colleagues. The report was published in Cancer Immunology Research. “The landscape of advanced melanoma treatment was revolutionized” by the approval of immunotherapy agents, beginning in 2011.

The current, retrospective study involved 2,753 patients with stage IV melanoma. Patient data were drawn from the National Cancer Database, with diagnoses made between 2010 and 2015. Patient management, overall survival, and disease characteristics were evaluated.

During initial review, the researchers found that 35.8% of patients with stage IV melanoma had brain involvement. These patients were further categorized by those with MBM only (39.7%) versus those with extracranial metastatic disease (60.3%), which included involvement of lung (82.9%), liver (8.1%), bone (6.0%), and lymph nodes or distant subcutaneous skin (3%). MBM-only disease was independently predicted by both younger age and geographic location.

Patients receiving first-line CBI therapy demonstrated improved 4-year OS (28.1% vs. 11.1%; P less than.001) and median OS (12.4 months vs. 5.2 months; P less than .001).

Improvements with CBI were most dramatic in patients with MBM-only disease. In these cases, 4-year OS improved from 16.9% to 51.5% (P less than .001), while median OS jumped from 7.7 months to 56.4 months (P less than .001).

Improved OS was also associated with fewer comorbidities, younger age, management at an academic cancer center, single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery, and resection of the MBM.

“Our findings help bridge the gaps in early clinical trials of CBIs that largely excluded stage IV melanoma patients with MBMs, with checkpoint immunotherapy demonstrating a more than doubling of the median and 4-year OS of MBMs,” the authors concluded.

SOURCE: Iorgulescu et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 July 12 doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0067.

Treatment with the recombinant poliovirus vaccine PVSRIPO in patients with recurrent glioblastoma can be delivered at a safe dose with efficacy that compares favorably with historical data, recently reported results of a phase 1, nonrandomized study suggest.

The survival rate at 36 months after intratumoral infusion of PVSRIPO was 21%, versus 4% in a control group of patients who would have met the study’s eligibility criteria, investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

There was no evidence of virus shedding or viral neuropathogenicity in the study, which included 61 patients with recurrent World Health Organization grade IV malignant glioma. “Further investigations are warranted,” wrote Annick Desjardins, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.

The prognosis of WHO grade IV malignant glioma remains dismal despite aggressive therapy and decades of research focused on advanced surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted agents, Dr. Desjardins and her colleagues said.

Accordingly, they sought to evaluate the potential of PVSRIPO, a live-attenuated poliovirus type 1 vaccine with its viral internal ribosome entry site replaced by one of human rhinovirus type. The engineered virus gains entry via the CD155 receptor, which is upregulated in solid tumors such as glioblastomas and expressed in antigen-presenting cells.

“Tumor cytotoxic effects, interferon-dominant activation of antigen-presenting cells, and the profound inflammatory response to poliovirus may counter tumor-induced immunosuppression and instigate antitumor immunity,” the investigators wrote.

With a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the median overall survival for PVSRIPO-treated patients was 12.5 months, longer than the 11.3 months seen in the historical control group. It was also longer than the 6.6 months found in a second comparison group of patients who underwent therapy with tumor-treating fields, which involves application of alternating electrical current to the head.

Survival hit a “plateau” in the PVSRIPO-treated patients, investigators said, with an overall survival rate of 21% at both 24 and 36 months. That stood in contrast to a decline in the historical control group from 14% at 24 months to 4% at 36 months, and a decline from 8% to 3% in the tumor-treating-fields group.

The phase 1 study had a dose-escalation phase including 9 patients and a dose-expansion phase with 52 patients. In the dose-expansion phase, 19% of patients had grade 3 or greater adverse events attributable to PVSRIPO, according to the report.

Of all 61 patients, 69% had a vaccine-related grade 1 or 2 event as their most severe adverse event.

One patient death caused by complications from an intracranial hemorrhage was attributed to bevacizumab. As part of a study protocol amendment, bevacizumab at half the standard dose was allowed to control symptoms of locoregional inflammation, investigators said.

In an ongoing, phase 2, randomized trial, PVSRIPO is being evaluated alone or with lomustine in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV malignant glioma. The Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough therapy designation to PVSRIPO in May 2016.

Seven study authors reported equity in Istari Oncology, a biotechnology company that is developing PVSRIPO. Authors also reported disclosures related to Genentech/Roche, Celgene, Celldex, and Eli Lilly, among other entities. The study was supported by grants from the Brain Tumor Research Charity, the Tisch family through the Jewish Communal Fund, the National Institutes of Health, and others.

SOURCE: Desjardins A et al .N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716435.

Treatment with the recombinant poliovirus vaccine PVSRIPO in patients with recurrent glioblastoma can be delivered at a safe dose with efficacy that compares favorably with historical data, recently reported results of a phase 1, nonrandomized study suggest.

The survival rate at 36 months after intratumoral infusion of PVSRIPO was 21%, versus 4% in a control group of patients who would have met the study’s eligibility criteria, investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

There was no evidence of virus shedding or viral neuropathogenicity in the study, which included 61 patients with recurrent World Health Organization grade IV malignant glioma. “Further investigations are warranted,” wrote Annick Desjardins, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.

The prognosis of WHO grade IV malignant glioma remains dismal despite aggressive therapy and decades of research focused on advanced surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted agents, Dr. Desjardins and her colleagues said.

Accordingly, they sought to evaluate the potential of PVSRIPO, a live-attenuated poliovirus type 1 vaccine with its viral internal ribosome entry site replaced by one of human rhinovirus type. The engineered virus gains entry via the CD155 receptor, which is upregulated in solid tumors such as glioblastomas and expressed in antigen-presenting cells.

“Tumor cytotoxic effects, interferon-dominant activation of antigen-presenting cells, and the profound inflammatory response to poliovirus may counter tumor-induced immunosuppression and instigate antitumor immunity,” the investigators wrote.

With a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the median overall survival for PVSRIPO-treated patients was 12.5 months, longer than the 11.3 months seen in the historical control group. It was also longer than the 6.6 months found in a second comparison group of patients who underwent therapy with tumor-treating fields, which involves application of alternating electrical current to the head.

Survival hit a “plateau” in the PVSRIPO-treated patients, investigators said, with an overall survival rate of 21% at both 24 and 36 months. That stood in contrast to a decline in the historical control group from 14% at 24 months to 4% at 36 months, and a decline from 8% to 3% in the tumor-treating-fields group.

The phase 1 study had a dose-escalation phase including 9 patients and a dose-expansion phase with 52 patients. In the dose-expansion phase, 19% of patients had grade 3 or greater adverse events attributable to PVSRIPO, according to the report.

Of all 61 patients, 69% had a vaccine-related grade 1 or 2 event as their most severe adverse event.

One patient death caused by complications from an intracranial hemorrhage was attributed to bevacizumab. As part of a study protocol amendment, bevacizumab at half the standard dose was allowed to control symptoms of locoregional inflammation, investigators said.

In an ongoing, phase 2, randomized trial, PVSRIPO is being evaluated alone or with lomustine in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV malignant glioma. The Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough therapy designation to PVSRIPO in May 2016.

Seven study authors reported equity in Istari Oncology, a biotechnology company that is developing PVSRIPO. Authors also reported disclosures related to Genentech/Roche, Celgene, Celldex, and Eli Lilly, among other entities. The study was supported by grants from the Brain Tumor Research Charity, the Tisch family through the Jewish Communal Fund, the National Institutes of Health, and others.

SOURCE: Desjardins A et al .N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716435.

Treatment with the recombinant poliovirus vaccine PVSRIPO in patients with recurrent glioblastoma can be delivered at a safe dose with efficacy that compares favorably with historical data, recently reported results of a phase 1, nonrandomized study suggest.

The survival rate at 36 months after intratumoral infusion of PVSRIPO was 21%, versus 4% in a control group of patients who would have met the study’s eligibility criteria, investigators wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine.

There was no evidence of virus shedding or viral neuropathogenicity in the study, which included 61 patients with recurrent World Health Organization grade IV malignant glioma. “Further investigations are warranted,” wrote Annick Desjardins, MD, of Duke University, Durham, N.C., and her coauthors.

The prognosis of WHO grade IV malignant glioma remains dismal despite aggressive therapy and decades of research focused on advanced surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and targeted agents, Dr. Desjardins and her colleagues said.

Accordingly, they sought to evaluate the potential of PVSRIPO, a live-attenuated poliovirus type 1 vaccine with its viral internal ribosome entry site replaced by one of human rhinovirus type. The engineered virus gains entry via the CD155 receptor, which is upregulated in solid tumors such as glioblastomas and expressed in antigen-presenting cells.

“Tumor cytotoxic effects, interferon-dominant activation of antigen-presenting cells, and the profound inflammatory response to poliovirus may counter tumor-induced immunosuppression and instigate antitumor immunity,” the investigators wrote.

With a median follow-up of 27.6 months, the median overall survival for PVSRIPO-treated patients was 12.5 months, longer than the 11.3 months seen in the historical control group. It was also longer than the 6.6 months found in a second comparison group of patients who underwent therapy with tumor-treating fields, which involves application of alternating electrical current to the head.

Survival hit a “plateau” in the PVSRIPO-treated patients, investigators said, with an overall survival rate of 21% at both 24 and 36 months. That stood in contrast to a decline in the historical control group from 14% at 24 months to 4% at 36 months, and a decline from 8% to 3% in the tumor-treating-fields group.

The phase 1 study had a dose-escalation phase including 9 patients and a dose-expansion phase with 52 patients. In the dose-expansion phase, 19% of patients had grade 3 or greater adverse events attributable to PVSRIPO, according to the report.

Of all 61 patients, 69% had a vaccine-related grade 1 or 2 event as their most severe adverse event.

One patient death caused by complications from an intracranial hemorrhage was attributed to bevacizumab. As part of a study protocol amendment, bevacizumab at half the standard dose was allowed to control symptoms of locoregional inflammation, investigators said.

In an ongoing, phase 2, randomized trial, PVSRIPO is being evaluated alone or with lomustine in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV malignant glioma. The Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough therapy designation to PVSRIPO in May 2016.

Seven study authors reported equity in Istari Oncology, a biotechnology company that is developing PVSRIPO. Authors also reported disclosures related to Genentech/Roche, Celgene, Celldex, and Eli Lilly, among other entities. The study was supported by grants from the Brain Tumor Research Charity, the Tisch family through the Jewish Communal Fund, the National Institutes of Health, and others.

SOURCE: Desjardins A et al .N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716435.

LOS ANGELES—About one-third of neurologic patients has a high risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and approximately one-quarter has significant symptoms of insomnia, according to data presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The presence of insomnia symptoms is associated with worse neurologic status in movement disorders and epilepsy populations, researchers said.

“Given the high prevalence of sleep disorder symptoms, further investigation into the role of sleep therapies on disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations is warranted,” said Thapanee Somboon, MD, a neurologist at Prasat Neurological Institute in Bangkok, Thailand, and research fellow at the Cleveland Clinic Sleep Disorders Center, and colleagues.

Analyzing STOP and Insomnia Severity Index Scores

OSA and insomnia are highly prevalent in the general population and may be more common in patients with neurologic conditions. To examine the association between sleep instrument scores and disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations, Dr. Somboon and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 19,052 adult initial visits to the psychiatry, brain tumor, movement disorders, cerebrovascular, and epilepsy centers at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2015 and October 2016.

In all, 7,762 patients had completed the snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, and high blood pressure (STOP) questionnaire, and 8,530 patients had completed the Insomnia Severity Index. A STOP score of 2 or greater predicted a high risk of OSA, and an Insomnia Severity Index score of 15 or greater indicated significant insomnia symptoms.

The crude prevalence of high-risk OSA was 47.9% in the cerebrovascular center, 44.1% in the movement disorders center, 34% in the brain tumor center, 33% in the epilepsy center, 29.8% in the psychiatry center, and 36.7% overall.

The crude prevalence of significant insomnia symptoms was 33.6% in the psychiatry center, 26.1% in the epilepsy center, 20.7% in the brain tumor center, 20% in the movement disorders center, 19.5% in the cerebrovascular center, and 25.5% overall.

Disease-Specific Outcomes

The researchers used regression models to adjust for patients’ age, sex, race, marital status, self-reported sleep duration, income, tobacco use, and comorbid conditions. Multivariate models evaluated the associations between abnormal sleep scores and scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; from all centers), Karnofsky Performance Status (from the brain tumor center), Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS II; from the movement disorders center), modified Rankin Scale (from the cerebrovascular center), and Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (from the epilepsy center).

Patients with a STOP score of 2 or greater were older, more likely to be male, more likely to be a current or former smoker, had greater PHQ-9 scores, and had more comorbidities.

Patients with Insomnia Severity Index scores of 15 or greater were younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be a current or former smoker, and had a higher prevalence of depression.

OSA and insomnia were significantly associated with PHQ-9 scores. In addition, insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale and UPDRS II scores.

—Jake Remaly

LOS ANGELES—About one-third of neurologic patients has a high risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and approximately one-quarter has significant symptoms of insomnia, according to data presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The presence of insomnia symptoms is associated with worse neurologic status in movement disorders and epilepsy populations, researchers said.

“Given the high prevalence of sleep disorder symptoms, further investigation into the role of sleep therapies on disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations is warranted,” said Thapanee Somboon, MD, a neurologist at Prasat Neurological Institute in Bangkok, Thailand, and research fellow at the Cleveland Clinic Sleep Disorders Center, and colleagues.

Analyzing STOP and Insomnia Severity Index Scores

OSA and insomnia are highly prevalent in the general population and may be more common in patients with neurologic conditions. To examine the association between sleep instrument scores and disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations, Dr. Somboon and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 19,052 adult initial visits to the psychiatry, brain tumor, movement disorders, cerebrovascular, and epilepsy centers at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2015 and October 2016.

In all, 7,762 patients had completed the snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, and high blood pressure (STOP) questionnaire, and 8,530 patients had completed the Insomnia Severity Index. A STOP score of 2 or greater predicted a high risk of OSA, and an Insomnia Severity Index score of 15 or greater indicated significant insomnia symptoms.

The crude prevalence of high-risk OSA was 47.9% in the cerebrovascular center, 44.1% in the movement disorders center, 34% in the brain tumor center, 33% in the epilepsy center, 29.8% in the psychiatry center, and 36.7% overall.

The crude prevalence of significant insomnia symptoms was 33.6% in the psychiatry center, 26.1% in the epilepsy center, 20.7% in the brain tumor center, 20% in the movement disorders center, 19.5% in the cerebrovascular center, and 25.5% overall.

Disease-Specific Outcomes

The researchers used regression models to adjust for patients’ age, sex, race, marital status, self-reported sleep duration, income, tobacco use, and comorbid conditions. Multivariate models evaluated the associations between abnormal sleep scores and scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; from all centers), Karnofsky Performance Status (from the brain tumor center), Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS II; from the movement disorders center), modified Rankin Scale (from the cerebrovascular center), and Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (from the epilepsy center).

Patients with a STOP score of 2 or greater were older, more likely to be male, more likely to be a current or former smoker, had greater PHQ-9 scores, and had more comorbidities.

Patients with Insomnia Severity Index scores of 15 or greater were younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be a current or former smoker, and had a higher prevalence of depression.

OSA and insomnia were significantly associated with PHQ-9 scores. In addition, insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale and UPDRS II scores.

—Jake Remaly

LOS ANGELES—About one-third of neurologic patients has a high risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and approximately one-quarter has significant symptoms of insomnia, according to data presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. The presence of insomnia symptoms is associated with worse neurologic status in movement disorders and epilepsy populations, researchers said.

“Given the high prevalence of sleep disorder symptoms, further investigation into the role of sleep therapies on disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations is warranted,” said Thapanee Somboon, MD, a neurologist at Prasat Neurological Institute in Bangkok, Thailand, and research fellow at the Cleveland Clinic Sleep Disorders Center, and colleagues.

Analyzing STOP and Insomnia Severity Index Scores

OSA and insomnia are highly prevalent in the general population and may be more common in patients with neurologic conditions. To examine the association between sleep instrument scores and disease-specific outcomes in neurologic populations, Dr. Somboon and colleagues conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 19,052 adult initial visits to the psychiatry, brain tumor, movement disorders, cerebrovascular, and epilepsy centers at the Cleveland Clinic between March 2015 and October 2016.

In all, 7,762 patients had completed the snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, and high blood pressure (STOP) questionnaire, and 8,530 patients had completed the Insomnia Severity Index. A STOP score of 2 or greater predicted a high risk of OSA, and an Insomnia Severity Index score of 15 or greater indicated significant insomnia symptoms.

The crude prevalence of high-risk OSA was 47.9% in the cerebrovascular center, 44.1% in the movement disorders center, 34% in the brain tumor center, 33% in the epilepsy center, 29.8% in the psychiatry center, and 36.7% overall.

The crude prevalence of significant insomnia symptoms was 33.6% in the psychiatry center, 26.1% in the epilepsy center, 20.7% in the brain tumor center, 20% in the movement disorders center, 19.5% in the cerebrovascular center, and 25.5% overall.

Disease-Specific Outcomes

The researchers used regression models to adjust for patients’ age, sex, race, marital status, self-reported sleep duration, income, tobacco use, and comorbid conditions. Multivariate models evaluated the associations between abnormal sleep scores and scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; from all centers), Karnofsky Performance Status (from the brain tumor center), Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS II; from the movement disorders center), modified Rankin Scale (from the cerebrovascular center), and Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (from the epilepsy center).

Patients with a STOP score of 2 or greater were older, more likely to be male, more likely to be a current or former smoker, had greater PHQ-9 scores, and had more comorbidities.

Patients with Insomnia Severity Index scores of 15 or greater were younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be a current or former smoker, and had a higher prevalence of depression.

OSA and insomnia were significantly associated with PHQ-9 scores. In addition, insomnia symptoms were significantly associated with Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale and UPDRS II scores.

—Jake Remaly