User login
Direct pharmacy dispensing of naloxone linked to drop in fatal overdoses
investigators reported.
By contrast, state laws that stopped short of allowing pharmacists to directly dispense the opioid antagonist did not appear to impact mortality, according to the report, which appears in JAMA Internal Medicine (2019 May 6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272).
The report, based on state-level trends tracked from 2005 to 2016, indicates that fatal opioid overdoses fell by nearly one-third in states that adopted direct dispensing laws as compared with states that adopted other naloxone laws.
That finding suggests that the policy type determines whether a naloxone law is useful in combating fatal opioid overdoses, said Rahi Abouk, PhD, of William Paterson University, Wayne, N.J. and co-authors of the paper.
“Enabling distribution through various sources, or requiring gatekeepers, will not be as beneficial,” Dr. Abouk and co-authors said in their report.
The current rate of deaths from fentanyl, heroin, and prescription analgesic overdose has outpaced all previous drug epidemics on record, and even surpasses the number of deaths in the peak year of the HIV epidemic of the 1980s, Dr. Abouk and colleagues wrote in their paper.
The number of states with naloxone access laws grew from just 2 in 2005 to 47 by 2016, including 9 states that granted direct authority to pharmacists and 38 that granted indirect authority, according to the researchers.
The analysis of overdose trends from 2005 to 2016 was based on naloxone distribution data from state Medicaid agencies and opioid-related mortality data from a national statistics system. Forty percent of nonelderly adults with an opioid addiction are covered by Medicaid, the researchers said.
They found that naloxone laws granting pharmacists direct dispensing authority were linked to a drop in opioid deaths that increased in magnitude over time, according to researchers. The mean number of opioid deaths dropped by 27% in the second year after adoption of direct authority laws, relative to opioid deaths in states with indirect access laws, while in subsequent years, deaths dropped by 34%.
Emergency department visits related to opioids increased by 15% in direct authority states 3 or more years after adoption, as compared to states that did not adopt direct authority laws. According to investigators, that translated into 15 additional opioid-related emergency department visits each month.
That increase suggests that, alongside direct dispensing laws, “useful interventions” and connections to treatment are needed for the emergency department, according to Dr. Abouk and colleagues.
“This is the location where such programs may be the most effective,” they said in their report.
Future research should be done to determine whether removing gatekeepers increases the value of naloxone distribution policies, they concluded in the report.
Dr. Abouk had no disclosures. Co-authors on the study reported funding and conflict of interest disclosures related to the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
SOURCE: Abouk R, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 6. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272.
investigators reported.
By contrast, state laws that stopped short of allowing pharmacists to directly dispense the opioid antagonist did not appear to impact mortality, according to the report, which appears in JAMA Internal Medicine (2019 May 6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272).
The report, based on state-level trends tracked from 2005 to 2016, indicates that fatal opioid overdoses fell by nearly one-third in states that adopted direct dispensing laws as compared with states that adopted other naloxone laws.
That finding suggests that the policy type determines whether a naloxone law is useful in combating fatal opioid overdoses, said Rahi Abouk, PhD, of William Paterson University, Wayne, N.J. and co-authors of the paper.
“Enabling distribution through various sources, or requiring gatekeepers, will not be as beneficial,” Dr. Abouk and co-authors said in their report.
The current rate of deaths from fentanyl, heroin, and prescription analgesic overdose has outpaced all previous drug epidemics on record, and even surpasses the number of deaths in the peak year of the HIV epidemic of the 1980s, Dr. Abouk and colleagues wrote in their paper.
The number of states with naloxone access laws grew from just 2 in 2005 to 47 by 2016, including 9 states that granted direct authority to pharmacists and 38 that granted indirect authority, according to the researchers.
The analysis of overdose trends from 2005 to 2016 was based on naloxone distribution data from state Medicaid agencies and opioid-related mortality data from a national statistics system. Forty percent of nonelderly adults with an opioid addiction are covered by Medicaid, the researchers said.
They found that naloxone laws granting pharmacists direct dispensing authority were linked to a drop in opioid deaths that increased in magnitude over time, according to researchers. The mean number of opioid deaths dropped by 27% in the second year after adoption of direct authority laws, relative to opioid deaths in states with indirect access laws, while in subsequent years, deaths dropped by 34%.
Emergency department visits related to opioids increased by 15% in direct authority states 3 or more years after adoption, as compared to states that did not adopt direct authority laws. According to investigators, that translated into 15 additional opioid-related emergency department visits each month.
That increase suggests that, alongside direct dispensing laws, “useful interventions” and connections to treatment are needed for the emergency department, according to Dr. Abouk and colleagues.
“This is the location where such programs may be the most effective,” they said in their report.
Future research should be done to determine whether removing gatekeepers increases the value of naloxone distribution policies, they concluded in the report.
Dr. Abouk had no disclosures. Co-authors on the study reported funding and conflict of interest disclosures related to the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
SOURCE: Abouk R, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 6. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272.
investigators reported.
By contrast, state laws that stopped short of allowing pharmacists to directly dispense the opioid antagonist did not appear to impact mortality, according to the report, which appears in JAMA Internal Medicine (2019 May 6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272).
The report, based on state-level trends tracked from 2005 to 2016, indicates that fatal opioid overdoses fell by nearly one-third in states that adopted direct dispensing laws as compared with states that adopted other naloxone laws.
That finding suggests that the policy type determines whether a naloxone law is useful in combating fatal opioid overdoses, said Rahi Abouk, PhD, of William Paterson University, Wayne, N.J. and co-authors of the paper.
“Enabling distribution through various sources, or requiring gatekeepers, will not be as beneficial,” Dr. Abouk and co-authors said in their report.
The current rate of deaths from fentanyl, heroin, and prescription analgesic overdose has outpaced all previous drug epidemics on record, and even surpasses the number of deaths in the peak year of the HIV epidemic of the 1980s, Dr. Abouk and colleagues wrote in their paper.
The number of states with naloxone access laws grew from just 2 in 2005 to 47 by 2016, including 9 states that granted direct authority to pharmacists and 38 that granted indirect authority, according to the researchers.
The analysis of overdose trends from 2005 to 2016 was based on naloxone distribution data from state Medicaid agencies and opioid-related mortality data from a national statistics system. Forty percent of nonelderly adults with an opioid addiction are covered by Medicaid, the researchers said.
They found that naloxone laws granting pharmacists direct dispensing authority were linked to a drop in opioid deaths that increased in magnitude over time, according to researchers. The mean number of opioid deaths dropped by 27% in the second year after adoption of direct authority laws, relative to opioid deaths in states with indirect access laws, while in subsequent years, deaths dropped by 34%.
Emergency department visits related to opioids increased by 15% in direct authority states 3 or more years after adoption, as compared to states that did not adopt direct authority laws. According to investigators, that translated into 15 additional opioid-related emergency department visits each month.
That increase suggests that, alongside direct dispensing laws, “useful interventions” and connections to treatment are needed for the emergency department, according to Dr. Abouk and colleagues.
“This is the location where such programs may be the most effective,” they said in their report.
Future research should be done to determine whether removing gatekeepers increases the value of naloxone distribution policies, they concluded in the report.
Dr. Abouk had no disclosures. Co-authors on the study reported funding and conflict of interest disclosures related to the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
SOURCE: Abouk R, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 6. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272.
FROM JAMA Internal Medicine
Key clinical point: State laws granting pharmacists direct authority to dispense naloxone were linked to significant drops in opioid-related fatal overdoses.
Major finding: The mean number of opioid deaths dropped by 27% in the second year after adoption of direct authority laws relative to opioid deaths in states with indirect access laws, while in subsequent years, deaths dropped by 34%.
Study details: Analysis of naloxone distribution data and opioid-related mortality data from 2005 to 2016 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Disclosures: Study authors reported funding and conflict of interest disclosures related to the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Source: Abouk R, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 6.
Brain volumes after TBI correlate with clinical features
PHILADELPHIA – ” according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) damages brain tissue and causes subsequent volume loss, which may result in clinical symptoms. It is a prevalent worldwide health problem caused by a mechanical insult to the head, resulting in transient or permanent alteration to brain tissue and/or function. Standard neuroimaging with computerized cranial tomography (CT) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often unrevealing during the evaluation of patients with TBI, particularly those classified as mild TBI. I
In this study, James Rock, MD, of Penn Presbyterian Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania, and his colleagues sought to examine the value of quantitative analysis of regional brain volumes in the evaluation of TBI. The investigators reviewed the medical records and MRI imaging from 44 patients with TBI evaluated at a Level I trauma center. They also read clinical notes to assess reported symptoms and physical findings.
Regional volumes from TBI subjects were derived using the software package Freesurfer image analysis suite, which utilizes a T1-weighted structural scan to calculate volumetric information. A machine learning algorithm, random forests, was employed across volume measurements from 25 regions of interest to determine the most important regions for classifying subjects based on clinical outcome and symptomology.
Basal ganglia volume showed the highest variable importance with regards to classifying subjects who exhibited symptoms of cognitive dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 1.067, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 5.966e-03) in quantitative analysis. Left lateral ventricle volume was important in classifying subjects with motor and vestibular alterations (Mean Decrease in Gini = 2.037, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 2.92e-02). Left choroid plexus volume was the most important region for classifying subjects with sensation and somatic dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 0.271, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 4.82e-03).
The researchers noted that their study is ongoing, in an abstract. “It will be extended to a larger cohort to determine whether volume changes in specific [regions of interest] can act as useful clinical biomarkers for chronic symptoms,” they said.
Dr. Diaz-Arrastia received personal compensation from Neural Analytics, Inc, BrainBox Solutions, Inc, and Bioscience Pharma Partners. Dr. Diaz-Arrastia holds stock and/or stock options in Neural Analytics, Inc. and has received research support from BrainBox Solutions. The other authors reported not having anything to disclose..
SOURCE: Rock J et al. AAN 2019. Abstract S2.006 .
PHILADELPHIA – ” according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) damages brain tissue and causes subsequent volume loss, which may result in clinical symptoms. It is a prevalent worldwide health problem caused by a mechanical insult to the head, resulting in transient or permanent alteration to brain tissue and/or function. Standard neuroimaging with computerized cranial tomography (CT) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often unrevealing during the evaluation of patients with TBI, particularly those classified as mild TBI. I
In this study, James Rock, MD, of Penn Presbyterian Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania, and his colleagues sought to examine the value of quantitative analysis of regional brain volumes in the evaluation of TBI. The investigators reviewed the medical records and MRI imaging from 44 patients with TBI evaluated at a Level I trauma center. They also read clinical notes to assess reported symptoms and physical findings.
Regional volumes from TBI subjects were derived using the software package Freesurfer image analysis suite, which utilizes a T1-weighted structural scan to calculate volumetric information. A machine learning algorithm, random forests, was employed across volume measurements from 25 regions of interest to determine the most important regions for classifying subjects based on clinical outcome and symptomology.
Basal ganglia volume showed the highest variable importance with regards to classifying subjects who exhibited symptoms of cognitive dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 1.067, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 5.966e-03) in quantitative analysis. Left lateral ventricle volume was important in classifying subjects with motor and vestibular alterations (Mean Decrease in Gini = 2.037, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 2.92e-02). Left choroid plexus volume was the most important region for classifying subjects with sensation and somatic dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 0.271, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 4.82e-03).
The researchers noted that their study is ongoing, in an abstract. “It will be extended to a larger cohort to determine whether volume changes in specific [regions of interest] can act as useful clinical biomarkers for chronic symptoms,” they said.
Dr. Diaz-Arrastia received personal compensation from Neural Analytics, Inc, BrainBox Solutions, Inc, and Bioscience Pharma Partners. Dr. Diaz-Arrastia holds stock and/or stock options in Neural Analytics, Inc. and has received research support from BrainBox Solutions. The other authors reported not having anything to disclose..
SOURCE: Rock J et al. AAN 2019. Abstract S2.006 .
PHILADELPHIA – ” according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) damages brain tissue and causes subsequent volume loss, which may result in clinical symptoms. It is a prevalent worldwide health problem caused by a mechanical insult to the head, resulting in transient or permanent alteration to brain tissue and/or function. Standard neuroimaging with computerized cranial tomography (CT) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often unrevealing during the evaluation of patients with TBI, particularly those classified as mild TBI. I
In this study, James Rock, MD, of Penn Presbyterian Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania, and his colleagues sought to examine the value of quantitative analysis of regional brain volumes in the evaluation of TBI. The investigators reviewed the medical records and MRI imaging from 44 patients with TBI evaluated at a Level I trauma center. They also read clinical notes to assess reported symptoms and physical findings.
Regional volumes from TBI subjects were derived using the software package Freesurfer image analysis suite, which utilizes a T1-weighted structural scan to calculate volumetric information. A machine learning algorithm, random forests, was employed across volume measurements from 25 regions of interest to determine the most important regions for classifying subjects based on clinical outcome and symptomology.
Basal ganglia volume showed the highest variable importance with regards to classifying subjects who exhibited symptoms of cognitive dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 1.067, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 5.966e-03) in quantitative analysis. Left lateral ventricle volume was important in classifying subjects with motor and vestibular alterations (Mean Decrease in Gini = 2.037, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 2.92e-02). Left choroid plexus volume was the most important region for classifying subjects with sensation and somatic dysfunction (Mean Decrease in Gini = 0.271, Mean Decrease in Accuracy = 4.82e-03).
The researchers noted that their study is ongoing, in an abstract. “It will be extended to a larger cohort to determine whether volume changes in specific [regions of interest] can act as useful clinical biomarkers for chronic symptoms,” they said.
Dr. Diaz-Arrastia received personal compensation from Neural Analytics, Inc, BrainBox Solutions, Inc, and Bioscience Pharma Partners. Dr. Diaz-Arrastia holds stock and/or stock options in Neural Analytics, Inc. and has received research support from BrainBox Solutions. The other authors reported not having anything to disclose..
SOURCE: Rock J et al. AAN 2019. Abstract S2.006 .
REPORTING FROM AAN 2019
Fremanezumab cut headache days in migraine patients vs. placebo
PHILADELPHIA – , according to a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
To assess the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with migraine who had not received relief from trying at least one prior preventive migraine medication, Peter McAllister, MD and colleagues analyzed data from 2 phase 3 trials (HALO EM and HALO CM). Trial participants had either episodic or chronic migraine, confirmed during a 28-day pretreatment baseline period, then received subcutaneous fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg at baseline and placebo at weeks 4 and 8), monthly (for chronic migraine: 675 mg at baseline and 225 mg at weeks 4 and 8; for episodic migraine: 225 mg at baseline and weeks 4 and 8), or placebo (at baseline and weeks 4 and 8).
The present analysis included data from 186 patients with episodic migraine and 407 patients with chronic migraine, which represents the subgroup of study participants in the larger HALO trials who had failed at least one prior preventive migraine medication. Dr. McAllister, who is cofounder and chief medical officer at the New England Institute for Clinical Research in Stamford, Connecticut, and his colleagues, assessed mean changes from baseline in the monthly average number of headache days of at least moderate severity or the monthly average number of migraine days during the 12-week treatment period.
In patients with chronic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly [least-squares mean change]: –4.0, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –4.5, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –4.1, P = 0.0027; monthly: –4.8, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–2.3).
In patients with episodic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly: –3.1, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –3.2, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–0.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –3.3, P = 0.0015; monthly: –3.7, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.3).
“The phase 3 HALO CM and HALO EM trials showed that fremanezumab is efficacious in patients who failed one or more prior preventive medication, a potentially difficult-to-treat population,” Dr. McAllister and colleagues said in their poster.
“Effect sizes in this subgroup were greater than those in the overall trial population,” they said. In addition, “both quarterly and monthly fremanezumab were well-tolerated in this subgroup.”
This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.
SOURCE: McAllister P et al. AAN 2019. P1.10-011.
PHILADELPHIA – , according to a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
To assess the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with migraine who had not received relief from trying at least one prior preventive migraine medication, Peter McAllister, MD and colleagues analyzed data from 2 phase 3 trials (HALO EM and HALO CM). Trial participants had either episodic or chronic migraine, confirmed during a 28-day pretreatment baseline period, then received subcutaneous fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg at baseline and placebo at weeks 4 and 8), monthly (for chronic migraine: 675 mg at baseline and 225 mg at weeks 4 and 8; for episodic migraine: 225 mg at baseline and weeks 4 and 8), or placebo (at baseline and weeks 4 and 8).
The present analysis included data from 186 patients with episodic migraine and 407 patients with chronic migraine, which represents the subgroup of study participants in the larger HALO trials who had failed at least one prior preventive migraine medication. Dr. McAllister, who is cofounder and chief medical officer at the New England Institute for Clinical Research in Stamford, Connecticut, and his colleagues, assessed mean changes from baseline in the monthly average number of headache days of at least moderate severity or the monthly average number of migraine days during the 12-week treatment period.
In patients with chronic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly [least-squares mean change]: –4.0, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –4.5, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –4.1, P = 0.0027; monthly: –4.8, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–2.3).
In patients with episodic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly: –3.1, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –3.2, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–0.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –3.3, P = 0.0015; monthly: –3.7, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.3).
“The phase 3 HALO CM and HALO EM trials showed that fremanezumab is efficacious in patients who failed one or more prior preventive medication, a potentially difficult-to-treat population,” Dr. McAllister and colleagues said in their poster.
“Effect sizes in this subgroup were greater than those in the overall trial population,” they said. In addition, “both quarterly and monthly fremanezumab were well-tolerated in this subgroup.”
This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.
SOURCE: McAllister P et al. AAN 2019. P1.10-011.
PHILADELPHIA – , according to a poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
To assess the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with migraine who had not received relief from trying at least one prior preventive migraine medication, Peter McAllister, MD and colleagues analyzed data from 2 phase 3 trials (HALO EM and HALO CM). Trial participants had either episodic or chronic migraine, confirmed during a 28-day pretreatment baseline period, then received subcutaneous fremanezumab quarterly (675 mg at baseline and placebo at weeks 4 and 8), monthly (for chronic migraine: 675 mg at baseline and 225 mg at weeks 4 and 8; for episodic migraine: 225 mg at baseline and weeks 4 and 8), or placebo (at baseline and weeks 4 and 8).
The present analysis included data from 186 patients with episodic migraine and 407 patients with chronic migraine, which represents the subgroup of study participants in the larger HALO trials who had failed at least one prior preventive migraine medication. Dr. McAllister, who is cofounder and chief medical officer at the New England Institute for Clinical Research in Stamford, Connecticut, and his colleagues, assessed mean changes from baseline in the monthly average number of headache days of at least moderate severity or the monthly average number of migraine days during the 12-week treatment period.
In patients with chronic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly [least-squares mean change]: –4.0, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –4.5, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –4.1, P = 0.0027; monthly: –4.8, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–2.3).
In patients with episodic migraine, fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity (quarterly: –3.1, P less than 0.0001; monthly: –3.2, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–0.8). There were similar reductions in the number of migraine days (quarterly: –3.3, P = 0.0015; monthly: –3.7, P less than 0.0001) compared with placebo (–1.3).
“The phase 3 HALO CM and HALO EM trials showed that fremanezumab is efficacious in patients who failed one or more prior preventive medication, a potentially difficult-to-treat population,” Dr. McAllister and colleagues said in their poster.
“Effect sizes in this subgroup were greater than those in the overall trial population,” they said. In addition, “both quarterly and monthly fremanezumab were well-tolerated in this subgroup.”
This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.
SOURCE: McAllister P et al. AAN 2019. P1.10-011.
REPORTING FROM AAN 2019
Key clinical point: Fremanezumab reduced headache days in patients with chronic or episodic migraine.
Major finding: In patients with chronic migraine, fremanezumab reduced the number of headache days (least-squares mean change = -4.0) compared with placebo (-1.8).
Study details: Subgroup analysis of data from two phase 3 studies - HALO EM and HALO CM - including 186 patients with episodic migraine and 407 patients with chronic migraine.
Disclosures: This study was funded by Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Source: McAllister P et al. AAN 2019. P1.10-011.
Multiple sclerosis may not flare up after pregnancy
PHILADELPHIA – according to a study to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
“We did not observe any rebound disease activity,” said Annette Langer-Gould, MD, PhD, and her research colleagues in their report.
The findings contrast with those of 20-year-old studies that first identified a lower risk of relapse during pregnancy but signficant rebound disease activity in the early postpartum period. The initial studies were conducted before disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) were available and before neurologists used MRI to help diagnose MS after one attack, noted Dr. Langer-Gould in a statement.
In the large, contemporary cohort of patients with MS, the annualized relapse rate was 0.39 pre-pregnancy, 0.07-0.14 during pregnancy, 0.27 in the first 3 months postpartum, and 0.37 at 4-6 months postpartum. Exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduced the risk of postpartum relapses by 42% (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58). Women who supplemented breast milk with formula within 2 months of delivery had the same risk of relapse as women who did not breastfeed, however.
“These results are exciting, as MS is more common among women of childbearing age than in any other group,” said Dr. Langer-Gould, who is regional lead for clinical and translational neuroscience at Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, in the statement. “This shows us that women with MS today can have children, breastfeed, and resume their treatment without experiencing an increased risk of relapses during the postpartum period.”
To describe the risk of postpartum relapses and identify potential risk factors for relapse the investigators analyzed prospectively collected data from 466 pregnancies among 375 women with MS from the complete electronic health record at Kaiser Permanente Southern and Northern California between 2008 and 2016. The researchers also used surveys to collect information about treatment history, breastfeeding, and relapses. They used multivariable models to account for intraclass clustering and disease severity.
In 38% of the pregnancies, the mother had not received treatment in the year before conception. In 14.6%, the mother had a clinically isolated syndrome; in 8.4%, the mother had a relapse during pregnancy.
Resuming modestly effective DMTs such as interferon-betas and glatiramer acetate did not affect relapse risk.
In the postpartum year, 26.4% of mothers relapsed, 87% breastfed, 35% breastfed exclusively, and 41.2% resumed using DMT.
The lack of rebound disease activity in this cohort could be related to the high rate of exclusive breastfeeding, as well as the inclusion of women from a population-based setting and the inclusion of women who had incorrectly been diagnosed with MS after a single relapse. Few patients in this cohort had been treated with natalizumab or fingolimod prior to pregnancy, so the study does not address the potential harms of stopping these drugs or the potential benefits of breastfeeding among patients treated with these drugs.
The study was supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. The researchers had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Langer-Gould A et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S6.007.
PHILADELPHIA – according to a study to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
“We did not observe any rebound disease activity,” said Annette Langer-Gould, MD, PhD, and her research colleagues in their report.
The findings contrast with those of 20-year-old studies that first identified a lower risk of relapse during pregnancy but signficant rebound disease activity in the early postpartum period. The initial studies were conducted before disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) were available and before neurologists used MRI to help diagnose MS after one attack, noted Dr. Langer-Gould in a statement.
In the large, contemporary cohort of patients with MS, the annualized relapse rate was 0.39 pre-pregnancy, 0.07-0.14 during pregnancy, 0.27 in the first 3 months postpartum, and 0.37 at 4-6 months postpartum. Exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduced the risk of postpartum relapses by 42% (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58). Women who supplemented breast milk with formula within 2 months of delivery had the same risk of relapse as women who did not breastfeed, however.
“These results are exciting, as MS is more common among women of childbearing age than in any other group,” said Dr. Langer-Gould, who is regional lead for clinical and translational neuroscience at Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, in the statement. “This shows us that women with MS today can have children, breastfeed, and resume their treatment without experiencing an increased risk of relapses during the postpartum period.”
To describe the risk of postpartum relapses and identify potential risk factors for relapse the investigators analyzed prospectively collected data from 466 pregnancies among 375 women with MS from the complete electronic health record at Kaiser Permanente Southern and Northern California between 2008 and 2016. The researchers also used surveys to collect information about treatment history, breastfeeding, and relapses. They used multivariable models to account for intraclass clustering and disease severity.
In 38% of the pregnancies, the mother had not received treatment in the year before conception. In 14.6%, the mother had a clinically isolated syndrome; in 8.4%, the mother had a relapse during pregnancy.
Resuming modestly effective DMTs such as interferon-betas and glatiramer acetate did not affect relapse risk.
In the postpartum year, 26.4% of mothers relapsed, 87% breastfed, 35% breastfed exclusively, and 41.2% resumed using DMT.
The lack of rebound disease activity in this cohort could be related to the high rate of exclusive breastfeeding, as well as the inclusion of women from a population-based setting and the inclusion of women who had incorrectly been diagnosed with MS after a single relapse. Few patients in this cohort had been treated with natalizumab or fingolimod prior to pregnancy, so the study does not address the potential harms of stopping these drugs or the potential benefits of breastfeeding among patients treated with these drugs.
The study was supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. The researchers had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Langer-Gould A et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S6.007.
PHILADELPHIA – according to a study to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
“We did not observe any rebound disease activity,” said Annette Langer-Gould, MD, PhD, and her research colleagues in their report.
The findings contrast with those of 20-year-old studies that first identified a lower risk of relapse during pregnancy but signficant rebound disease activity in the early postpartum period. The initial studies were conducted before disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) were available and before neurologists used MRI to help diagnose MS after one attack, noted Dr. Langer-Gould in a statement.
In the large, contemporary cohort of patients with MS, the annualized relapse rate was 0.39 pre-pregnancy, 0.07-0.14 during pregnancy, 0.27 in the first 3 months postpartum, and 0.37 at 4-6 months postpartum. Exclusive breastfeeding significantly reduced the risk of postpartum relapses by 42% (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58). Women who supplemented breast milk with formula within 2 months of delivery had the same risk of relapse as women who did not breastfeed, however.
“These results are exciting, as MS is more common among women of childbearing age than in any other group,” said Dr. Langer-Gould, who is regional lead for clinical and translational neuroscience at Kaiser Permanente Southern California in Pasadena, in the statement. “This shows us that women with MS today can have children, breastfeed, and resume their treatment without experiencing an increased risk of relapses during the postpartum period.”
To describe the risk of postpartum relapses and identify potential risk factors for relapse the investigators analyzed prospectively collected data from 466 pregnancies among 375 women with MS from the complete electronic health record at Kaiser Permanente Southern and Northern California between 2008 and 2016. The researchers also used surveys to collect information about treatment history, breastfeeding, and relapses. They used multivariable models to account for intraclass clustering and disease severity.
In 38% of the pregnancies, the mother had not received treatment in the year before conception. In 14.6%, the mother had a clinically isolated syndrome; in 8.4%, the mother had a relapse during pregnancy.
Resuming modestly effective DMTs such as interferon-betas and glatiramer acetate did not affect relapse risk.
In the postpartum year, 26.4% of mothers relapsed, 87% breastfed, 35% breastfed exclusively, and 41.2% resumed using DMT.
The lack of rebound disease activity in this cohort could be related to the high rate of exclusive breastfeeding, as well as the inclusion of women from a population-based setting and the inclusion of women who had incorrectly been diagnosed with MS after a single relapse. Few patients in this cohort had been treated with natalizumab or fingolimod prior to pregnancy, so the study does not address the potential harms of stopping these drugs or the potential benefits of breastfeeding among patients treated with these drugs.
The study was supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. The researchers had no disclosures.
SOURCE: Langer-Gould A et al. AAN 2019, Abstract S6.007.
FROM AAN 2019
Experts propose new definition and recommendations for Alzheimer’s-like disorder
An international group of experts has proposed a new name, staging criteria, and recommendations for a recently recognized brain disorder that mimics Alzheimer’s disease and is marked by a proteinopathy caused by malformed transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43).
The term limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) was coined in an effort to raise awareness and kick-start research into this “pathway to dementia,” the experts wrote in a report appearing in Brain.
“As there is currently no universally agreed-upon terminology or staging system for common age-related TDP-43 proteinopathy, this condition is understudied and not well recognized, even among investigators in the field of dementia research,” wrote the authors of the report, led by Peter T. Nelson, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington.
LATE neuropathologic changes, associated with a progressive amnesia syndrome that mimics Alzheimer’s, are seen in more than 20% of individuals past the age of 80 years, according to large, community-based autopsy series. It coexists with Alzheimer’s disease in many patients, lowering the threshold for developing dementia, authors said.
The term LATE is designed to encompass several other terms related to TDP-43 pathology, including hippocampal sclerosis and cerebral age-related TDP-43 with sclerosis, Dr. Nelson and coauthors noted in their report.
The TDP-43 protein is encoded by the TARDBP gene and provides several functions related to the regulation of gene expression, the authors wrote.
Misfolded TDP-43 was known to play a causative role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, the authors noted, and then was also identified in the brains of older individuals with hippocampal sclerosis or Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes.
The authors proposed a three-stage classification system for LATE neuropathologic change based on TDP-43 immunohistochemistry performed during routine autopsy evaluation of the amygdala, hippocampus, and middle frontal gyrus.
The amygdala is an area affected early in the course of the disease (Stage 1), whereas involvement of the hippocampus represents a more intermediate stage (Stage 2), and the middle frontal gyrus is more affected in advanced stages of the disease (Stage 3), according to the schema.
Five genes have been identified with risk alleles for LATE neuropathologic changes, authors said. Of note, several groups have found that the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele, known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and Lewy body disease, is also linked to increased risk of TDP-43 proteinopathy.
There are no established biomarkers specific to TDP-43 proteinopathy yet, which hampers development of clinical trials designed to test interventions to treat or prevent LATE, Dr. Nelson and colleagues said in their report.
LATE could also obscure the effects of potentially disease-modifying agents being tested in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials, which can complicate the interpretation of study results, they added.
“Until there are biomarkers for LATE, clinical trials should be powered to account for TDP-43 proteinopathy,” they wrote.
Dr. Nelson and coauthors of the report in Brain reported no competing interests.
SOURCE: Nelson PT, et al. Brain. 2019 Apr 30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz099
Alois Alzheimer’s original patient was 51 years old, and for roughly 70 years Alzheimer’s disease was considered a rare disease that caused presenile dementia. In the 1970s, Robert Katzman, MD, and Robert D. Terry, MD, equated the neuropathologic features of Alzheimer’s disease with the more common senile dementia, and since then we have recognized Alzheimer’s disease as the most common form of dementia. Autopsy studies of patients dying in their 80s and 90s, however, has revealed that far more common than pure Alzheimer’s disease is a mixed neuropathologic picture. In addition, with the advent of biomarker studies a substantial number of individuals have “suspected non-Alzheimer pathology.”
Interestingly, the authors identify the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele as a predisposing factor for LATE, although given the advanced age of the LATE patient population, one could argue that a certain degree of resilience extended their lives into the LATE age range.
In contrast, in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project, among those with autopsy confirmation, the prevalence of APOE4 in Braak stage 5-6 declines with succeeding decades so that, by the 80s and 90s, the prevalence of APOE2 is actually higher at 7.3% vs. 4.1% with APOE4 for ages 80 to younger than 85 years, 9.3% with APOE2 vs. 8.6% with APOE4 for 85 to younger than 90 years, and 16.7% with APOE2 vs. 6.9% with APOE4 for ages 90 years and above.
Our understanding of age-related cognitive decline, from the normal to the pathological ends of the spectrum, continues to evolve, and LATE is simply the latest addition to our growing knowledge base that will further inform clinical diagnosis, research, and experimental therapeutics.
Richard J. Caselli, MD, is professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic Arizona in Scottsdale and associate director and clinical core director of the Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Center.
Alois Alzheimer’s original patient was 51 years old, and for roughly 70 years Alzheimer’s disease was considered a rare disease that caused presenile dementia. In the 1970s, Robert Katzman, MD, and Robert D. Terry, MD, equated the neuropathologic features of Alzheimer’s disease with the more common senile dementia, and since then we have recognized Alzheimer’s disease as the most common form of dementia. Autopsy studies of patients dying in their 80s and 90s, however, has revealed that far more common than pure Alzheimer’s disease is a mixed neuropathologic picture. In addition, with the advent of biomarker studies a substantial number of individuals have “suspected non-Alzheimer pathology.”
Interestingly, the authors identify the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele as a predisposing factor for LATE, although given the advanced age of the LATE patient population, one could argue that a certain degree of resilience extended their lives into the LATE age range.
In contrast, in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project, among those with autopsy confirmation, the prevalence of APOE4 in Braak stage 5-6 declines with succeeding decades so that, by the 80s and 90s, the prevalence of APOE2 is actually higher at 7.3% vs. 4.1% with APOE4 for ages 80 to younger than 85 years, 9.3% with APOE2 vs. 8.6% with APOE4 for 85 to younger than 90 years, and 16.7% with APOE2 vs. 6.9% with APOE4 for ages 90 years and above.
Our understanding of age-related cognitive decline, from the normal to the pathological ends of the spectrum, continues to evolve, and LATE is simply the latest addition to our growing knowledge base that will further inform clinical diagnosis, research, and experimental therapeutics.
Richard J. Caselli, MD, is professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic Arizona in Scottsdale and associate director and clinical core director of the Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Center.
Alois Alzheimer’s original patient was 51 years old, and for roughly 70 years Alzheimer’s disease was considered a rare disease that caused presenile dementia. In the 1970s, Robert Katzman, MD, and Robert D. Terry, MD, equated the neuropathologic features of Alzheimer’s disease with the more common senile dementia, and since then we have recognized Alzheimer’s disease as the most common form of dementia. Autopsy studies of patients dying in their 80s and 90s, however, has revealed that far more common than pure Alzheimer’s disease is a mixed neuropathologic picture. In addition, with the advent of biomarker studies a substantial number of individuals have “suspected non-Alzheimer pathology.”
Interestingly, the authors identify the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele as a predisposing factor for LATE, although given the advanced age of the LATE patient population, one could argue that a certain degree of resilience extended their lives into the LATE age range.
In contrast, in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project, among those with autopsy confirmation, the prevalence of APOE4 in Braak stage 5-6 declines with succeeding decades so that, by the 80s and 90s, the prevalence of APOE2 is actually higher at 7.3% vs. 4.1% with APOE4 for ages 80 to younger than 85 years, 9.3% with APOE2 vs. 8.6% with APOE4 for 85 to younger than 90 years, and 16.7% with APOE2 vs. 6.9% with APOE4 for ages 90 years and above.
Our understanding of age-related cognitive decline, from the normal to the pathological ends of the spectrum, continues to evolve, and LATE is simply the latest addition to our growing knowledge base that will further inform clinical diagnosis, research, and experimental therapeutics.
Richard J. Caselli, MD, is professor of neurology at the Mayo Clinic Arizona in Scottsdale and associate director and clinical core director of the Arizona Alzheimer’s Disease Center.
An international group of experts has proposed a new name, staging criteria, and recommendations for a recently recognized brain disorder that mimics Alzheimer’s disease and is marked by a proteinopathy caused by malformed transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43).
The term limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) was coined in an effort to raise awareness and kick-start research into this “pathway to dementia,” the experts wrote in a report appearing in Brain.
“As there is currently no universally agreed-upon terminology or staging system for common age-related TDP-43 proteinopathy, this condition is understudied and not well recognized, even among investigators in the field of dementia research,” wrote the authors of the report, led by Peter T. Nelson, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington.
LATE neuropathologic changes, associated with a progressive amnesia syndrome that mimics Alzheimer’s, are seen in more than 20% of individuals past the age of 80 years, according to large, community-based autopsy series. It coexists with Alzheimer’s disease in many patients, lowering the threshold for developing dementia, authors said.
The term LATE is designed to encompass several other terms related to TDP-43 pathology, including hippocampal sclerosis and cerebral age-related TDP-43 with sclerosis, Dr. Nelson and coauthors noted in their report.
The TDP-43 protein is encoded by the TARDBP gene and provides several functions related to the regulation of gene expression, the authors wrote.
Misfolded TDP-43 was known to play a causative role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, the authors noted, and then was also identified in the brains of older individuals with hippocampal sclerosis or Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes.
The authors proposed a three-stage classification system for LATE neuropathologic change based on TDP-43 immunohistochemistry performed during routine autopsy evaluation of the amygdala, hippocampus, and middle frontal gyrus.
The amygdala is an area affected early in the course of the disease (Stage 1), whereas involvement of the hippocampus represents a more intermediate stage (Stage 2), and the middle frontal gyrus is more affected in advanced stages of the disease (Stage 3), according to the schema.
Five genes have been identified with risk alleles for LATE neuropathologic changes, authors said. Of note, several groups have found that the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele, known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and Lewy body disease, is also linked to increased risk of TDP-43 proteinopathy.
There are no established biomarkers specific to TDP-43 proteinopathy yet, which hampers development of clinical trials designed to test interventions to treat or prevent LATE, Dr. Nelson and colleagues said in their report.
LATE could also obscure the effects of potentially disease-modifying agents being tested in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials, which can complicate the interpretation of study results, they added.
“Until there are biomarkers for LATE, clinical trials should be powered to account for TDP-43 proteinopathy,” they wrote.
Dr. Nelson and coauthors of the report in Brain reported no competing interests.
SOURCE: Nelson PT, et al. Brain. 2019 Apr 30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz099
An international group of experts has proposed a new name, staging criteria, and recommendations for a recently recognized brain disorder that mimics Alzheimer’s disease and is marked by a proteinopathy caused by malformed transactive response DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43).
The term limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE) was coined in an effort to raise awareness and kick-start research into this “pathway to dementia,” the experts wrote in a report appearing in Brain.
“As there is currently no universally agreed-upon terminology or staging system for common age-related TDP-43 proteinopathy, this condition is understudied and not well recognized, even among investigators in the field of dementia research,” wrote the authors of the report, led by Peter T. Nelson, MD, PhD, of the University of Kentucky, Lexington.
LATE neuropathologic changes, associated with a progressive amnesia syndrome that mimics Alzheimer’s, are seen in more than 20% of individuals past the age of 80 years, according to large, community-based autopsy series. It coexists with Alzheimer’s disease in many patients, lowering the threshold for developing dementia, authors said.
The term LATE is designed to encompass several other terms related to TDP-43 pathology, including hippocampal sclerosis and cerebral age-related TDP-43 with sclerosis, Dr. Nelson and coauthors noted in their report.
The TDP-43 protein is encoded by the TARDBP gene and provides several functions related to the regulation of gene expression, the authors wrote.
Misfolded TDP-43 was known to play a causative role in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration, the authors noted, and then was also identified in the brains of older individuals with hippocampal sclerosis or Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes.
The authors proposed a three-stage classification system for LATE neuropathologic change based on TDP-43 immunohistochemistry performed during routine autopsy evaluation of the amygdala, hippocampus, and middle frontal gyrus.
The amygdala is an area affected early in the course of the disease (Stage 1), whereas involvement of the hippocampus represents a more intermediate stage (Stage 2), and the middle frontal gyrus is more affected in advanced stages of the disease (Stage 3), according to the schema.
Five genes have been identified with risk alleles for LATE neuropathologic changes, authors said. Of note, several groups have found that the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) allele, known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and Lewy body disease, is also linked to increased risk of TDP-43 proteinopathy.
There are no established biomarkers specific to TDP-43 proteinopathy yet, which hampers development of clinical trials designed to test interventions to treat or prevent LATE, Dr. Nelson and colleagues said in their report.
LATE could also obscure the effects of potentially disease-modifying agents being tested in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials, which can complicate the interpretation of study results, they added.
“Until there are biomarkers for LATE, clinical trials should be powered to account for TDP-43 proteinopathy,” they wrote.
Dr. Nelson and coauthors of the report in Brain reported no competing interests.
SOURCE: Nelson PT, et al. Brain. 2019 Apr 30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz099
FROM BRAIN
What do patients want in a migraine preventive?
, according to the results of a study published in Headache. When offered hypothetical preventive migraine medicines with a wide array of attributes, patients leaned toward those with a reduction in migraine days and an avoidance of weight gain, according to an analysis of responses to a discrete-choice experiment survey.
“We found that respondents had a significant willingness to pay for medicines with higher efficacy and less-severe adverse events,” wrote Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in North Carolina, and coauthors.
To evaluate patient preferences for theoretical migraine medicine, the researchers conducted a discrete-choice experiment via a web-based survey. Respondents met eligibility criteria if they were adults aged 18 years or older who self-reported 6 or more migraine days per month and completed the survey in full. They were asked to choose between options defined by six attributes: reduction in headache days per month, frequency of limitations with physical activities, cognition problems, weight gain, how the medicine is taken, and monthly out-of-pocket cost.
Of the 300 respondents included in the analysis, 72% indicated that migraines make physical activities difficult all or most of the time, and 81% had taken a prescription migraine preventive in the last 6 months. Respondents reported, on average, approximately 16 headache days per month. Among noncost attributes, respondents valued a change from a 10% reduction in migraine days to a 50% reduction more highly than avoiding the worst levels of adverse events – defined as memory problems and 10% weight gain – but were willing to trade off efficacy for less-severe adverse events. Avoiding memory problems was more important than avoiding thinking problems. Avoiding a 10% weight gain was more important than avoiding thinking and memory problems. Respondents preferred a once-monthly injection or daily pill to twice-monthly injections. Respondents, on average, were willing to pay $116 per month for an improvement from 10% to 50% in reduced headache days (95% confidence interval [CI], $91-$141) and $43 for an improvement from 10% to 25% (95% CI, $34-$53). They were also willing to pay $84 per month to avoid a 10% weight gain (95% CI, $64-$103), $59 per month to avoid memory problems (95% CI, $42-$76), and $32 per month to avoid thinking problems (95% CI, $18-$46).
The coauthors acknowledged their study’s limitations, including all migraine diagnoses being self-reported and the study sample not necessarily being representative of patients with migraine overall. In addition, though the potential medicinal attributes used were prominent in clinical literature and focus groups, they could choose only a limited amount and so their analysis “did not address other attributes that may be important to patients.”
Given their findings, the researchers recommended that “clinicians should work with patients to select treatments that meet each patient’s needs.”
Amgen and Novartis funded the study. The authors reported numerous conflicts of interest, including receiving grants, consulting fees, and royalties from pharmaceutical companies and organizations. During the study, three of the authors were employed at RTI Health Solutions, a non-for-profit organization that conducts research with pharmaceutical companies such as the study’s sponsor.
SOURCE: Mansfield C et al. Headache. 2019 May;59(5):715-26. doi: 10.1111/head.13498.
, according to the results of a study published in Headache. When offered hypothetical preventive migraine medicines with a wide array of attributes, patients leaned toward those with a reduction in migraine days and an avoidance of weight gain, according to an analysis of responses to a discrete-choice experiment survey.
“We found that respondents had a significant willingness to pay for medicines with higher efficacy and less-severe adverse events,” wrote Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in North Carolina, and coauthors.
To evaluate patient preferences for theoretical migraine medicine, the researchers conducted a discrete-choice experiment via a web-based survey. Respondents met eligibility criteria if they were adults aged 18 years or older who self-reported 6 or more migraine days per month and completed the survey in full. They were asked to choose between options defined by six attributes: reduction in headache days per month, frequency of limitations with physical activities, cognition problems, weight gain, how the medicine is taken, and monthly out-of-pocket cost.
Of the 300 respondents included in the analysis, 72% indicated that migraines make physical activities difficult all or most of the time, and 81% had taken a prescription migraine preventive in the last 6 months. Respondents reported, on average, approximately 16 headache days per month. Among noncost attributes, respondents valued a change from a 10% reduction in migraine days to a 50% reduction more highly than avoiding the worst levels of adverse events – defined as memory problems and 10% weight gain – but were willing to trade off efficacy for less-severe adverse events. Avoiding memory problems was more important than avoiding thinking problems. Avoiding a 10% weight gain was more important than avoiding thinking and memory problems. Respondents preferred a once-monthly injection or daily pill to twice-monthly injections. Respondents, on average, were willing to pay $116 per month for an improvement from 10% to 50% in reduced headache days (95% confidence interval [CI], $91-$141) and $43 for an improvement from 10% to 25% (95% CI, $34-$53). They were also willing to pay $84 per month to avoid a 10% weight gain (95% CI, $64-$103), $59 per month to avoid memory problems (95% CI, $42-$76), and $32 per month to avoid thinking problems (95% CI, $18-$46).
The coauthors acknowledged their study’s limitations, including all migraine diagnoses being self-reported and the study sample not necessarily being representative of patients with migraine overall. In addition, though the potential medicinal attributes used were prominent in clinical literature and focus groups, they could choose only a limited amount and so their analysis “did not address other attributes that may be important to patients.”
Given their findings, the researchers recommended that “clinicians should work with patients to select treatments that meet each patient’s needs.”
Amgen and Novartis funded the study. The authors reported numerous conflicts of interest, including receiving grants, consulting fees, and royalties from pharmaceutical companies and organizations. During the study, three of the authors were employed at RTI Health Solutions, a non-for-profit organization that conducts research with pharmaceutical companies such as the study’s sponsor.
SOURCE: Mansfield C et al. Headache. 2019 May;59(5):715-26. doi: 10.1111/head.13498.
, according to the results of a study published in Headache. When offered hypothetical preventive migraine medicines with a wide array of attributes, patients leaned toward those with a reduction in migraine days and an avoidance of weight gain, according to an analysis of responses to a discrete-choice experiment survey.
“We found that respondents had a significant willingness to pay for medicines with higher efficacy and less-severe adverse events,” wrote Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in North Carolina, and coauthors.
To evaluate patient preferences for theoretical migraine medicine, the researchers conducted a discrete-choice experiment via a web-based survey. Respondents met eligibility criteria if they were adults aged 18 years or older who self-reported 6 or more migraine days per month and completed the survey in full. They were asked to choose between options defined by six attributes: reduction in headache days per month, frequency of limitations with physical activities, cognition problems, weight gain, how the medicine is taken, and monthly out-of-pocket cost.
Of the 300 respondents included in the analysis, 72% indicated that migraines make physical activities difficult all or most of the time, and 81% had taken a prescription migraine preventive in the last 6 months. Respondents reported, on average, approximately 16 headache days per month. Among noncost attributes, respondents valued a change from a 10% reduction in migraine days to a 50% reduction more highly than avoiding the worst levels of adverse events – defined as memory problems and 10% weight gain – but were willing to trade off efficacy for less-severe adverse events. Avoiding memory problems was more important than avoiding thinking problems. Avoiding a 10% weight gain was more important than avoiding thinking and memory problems. Respondents preferred a once-monthly injection or daily pill to twice-monthly injections. Respondents, on average, were willing to pay $116 per month for an improvement from 10% to 50% in reduced headache days (95% confidence interval [CI], $91-$141) and $43 for an improvement from 10% to 25% (95% CI, $34-$53). They were also willing to pay $84 per month to avoid a 10% weight gain (95% CI, $64-$103), $59 per month to avoid memory problems (95% CI, $42-$76), and $32 per month to avoid thinking problems (95% CI, $18-$46).
The coauthors acknowledged their study’s limitations, including all migraine diagnoses being self-reported and the study sample not necessarily being representative of patients with migraine overall. In addition, though the potential medicinal attributes used were prominent in clinical literature and focus groups, they could choose only a limited amount and so their analysis “did not address other attributes that may be important to patients.”
Given their findings, the researchers recommended that “clinicians should work with patients to select treatments that meet each patient’s needs.”
Amgen and Novartis funded the study. The authors reported numerous conflicts of interest, including receiving grants, consulting fees, and royalties from pharmaceutical companies and organizations. During the study, three of the authors were employed at RTI Health Solutions, a non-for-profit organization that conducts research with pharmaceutical companies such as the study’s sponsor.
SOURCE: Mansfield C et al. Headache. 2019 May;59(5):715-26. doi: 10.1111/head.13498.
FROM HEADACHE
Only 1.5% of individuals at high risk of opioid overdose receive naloxone
The vast majority of individuals at high risk for opioid overdose do not receive naloxone, despite numerous opportunities, according to Sarah Follman and associates from the University of Chicago.
In a retrospective study published in JAMA Network Open, the study authors analyzed data from individuals in the Truven Health MarketScan Research Database who had ICD-10 codes related to opioid use, misuse, dependence, and overdose. Data from Oct. 1, 2015, through Dec. 31, 2016, were included; a total of 138,108 high-risk individuals were identified as interacting with the health care system nearly 1.2 million times (88,618 hospitalizations, 229,680 ED visits, 298,058 internal medicine visits, and 568,448 family practice visits).
Of the 138,108 individuals in the study, only 2,135 (1.5%) were prescribed naloxone during the study period. Patients who had prior diagnoses of both opioid misuse/dependence and overdose were significantly more likely to receive naloxone than were those who only had a history of opioid dependence (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-2.72; P less than .001). In addition, having a history of overdose alone was associated with a decreased chance of receiving naloxone, compared with those with a history of opioid misuse alone (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01).
Other factors that significantly reduced the odds of receiving naloxone included being aged 30-44 years and being from the Midwest or West. Factors that reduced the odds include having received treatment for opioid use disorder, visiting a detoxification facility, receiving other substance use disorder treatment; and having received outpatient care from a pain specialist, psychologist, or surgeon.
“Most individuals at high risk of opioid overdose do not receive naloxone through direct prescribing,” Ms. Follman and associates wrote. “Clinicians can address this gap by regularly prescribing naloxone to eligible patients. To address barriers to prescribing, hospital systems and medical schools can support clinicians by improving education on screening and treating substance use disorders, clarifying legal concerns, and developing policies and protocols to guide implementation of increased prescribing.
No conflicts of interest were reported; one coauthor reported receiving a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Follman S et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3209.
The vast majority of individuals at high risk for opioid overdose do not receive naloxone, despite numerous opportunities, according to Sarah Follman and associates from the University of Chicago.
In a retrospective study published in JAMA Network Open, the study authors analyzed data from individuals in the Truven Health MarketScan Research Database who had ICD-10 codes related to opioid use, misuse, dependence, and overdose. Data from Oct. 1, 2015, through Dec. 31, 2016, were included; a total of 138,108 high-risk individuals were identified as interacting with the health care system nearly 1.2 million times (88,618 hospitalizations, 229,680 ED visits, 298,058 internal medicine visits, and 568,448 family practice visits).
Of the 138,108 individuals in the study, only 2,135 (1.5%) were prescribed naloxone during the study period. Patients who had prior diagnoses of both opioid misuse/dependence and overdose were significantly more likely to receive naloxone than were those who only had a history of opioid dependence (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-2.72; P less than .001). In addition, having a history of overdose alone was associated with a decreased chance of receiving naloxone, compared with those with a history of opioid misuse alone (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01).
Other factors that significantly reduced the odds of receiving naloxone included being aged 30-44 years and being from the Midwest or West. Factors that reduced the odds include having received treatment for opioid use disorder, visiting a detoxification facility, receiving other substance use disorder treatment; and having received outpatient care from a pain specialist, psychologist, or surgeon.
“Most individuals at high risk of opioid overdose do not receive naloxone through direct prescribing,” Ms. Follman and associates wrote. “Clinicians can address this gap by regularly prescribing naloxone to eligible patients. To address barriers to prescribing, hospital systems and medical schools can support clinicians by improving education on screening and treating substance use disorders, clarifying legal concerns, and developing policies and protocols to guide implementation of increased prescribing.
No conflicts of interest were reported; one coauthor reported receiving a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Follman S et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3209.
The vast majority of individuals at high risk for opioid overdose do not receive naloxone, despite numerous opportunities, according to Sarah Follman and associates from the University of Chicago.
In a retrospective study published in JAMA Network Open, the study authors analyzed data from individuals in the Truven Health MarketScan Research Database who had ICD-10 codes related to opioid use, misuse, dependence, and overdose. Data from Oct. 1, 2015, through Dec. 31, 2016, were included; a total of 138,108 high-risk individuals were identified as interacting with the health care system nearly 1.2 million times (88,618 hospitalizations, 229,680 ED visits, 298,058 internal medicine visits, and 568,448 family practice visits).
Of the 138,108 individuals in the study, only 2,135 (1.5%) were prescribed naloxone during the study period. Patients who had prior diagnoses of both opioid misuse/dependence and overdose were significantly more likely to receive naloxone than were those who only had a history of opioid dependence (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.98-2.72; P less than .001). In addition, having a history of overdose alone was associated with a decreased chance of receiving naloxone, compared with those with a history of opioid misuse alone (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94; P = .01).
Other factors that significantly reduced the odds of receiving naloxone included being aged 30-44 years and being from the Midwest or West. Factors that reduced the odds include having received treatment for opioid use disorder, visiting a detoxification facility, receiving other substance use disorder treatment; and having received outpatient care from a pain specialist, psychologist, or surgeon.
“Most individuals at high risk of opioid overdose do not receive naloxone through direct prescribing,” Ms. Follman and associates wrote. “Clinicians can address this gap by regularly prescribing naloxone to eligible patients. To address barriers to prescribing, hospital systems and medical schools can support clinicians by improving education on screening and treating substance use disorders, clarifying legal concerns, and developing policies and protocols to guide implementation of increased prescribing.
No conflicts of interest were reported; one coauthor reported receiving a grant from the National Institutes of Health.
SOURCE: Follman S et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3209.
FROM JAMA NETWORK OPEN
Isradipine for Parkinson’s disease fails in phase 3 study
PHILADELPHIA - There was no significant difference in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores between patients who received the calcium channel blocker isradipine and those who received placebo, according to the final results of the STEADY-PD III study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Use of the drug to treat high blood pressure has been linked to lower risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, said study author Tanya Simuni, MD, a professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, in a news release.
“Unfortunately, the people who were taking isradipine did not have any difference in their Parkinson’s symptoms over the 3 years of the study, compared with the people who took a placebo,” Dr. Simuni said in the press release.
Hopes were high that isradipine might be the first drug to slow progression of Parkinson’s disease after promising animal studies and a phase 2 study showing no safety concerns, according to the news release.
The STEADY-PD III study, which was conducted at 54 Parkinson Study Group sites in the United States and Canada, included 336 participants with early Parkinson’s disease randomized to isradipine 10 mg daily or placebo. The median age of patients in the study was 62 years, and 68% were male. The median time from diagnosis was 0.9 years, and the mean UPDRS I-III score at baseline was 23.1, according to an abstract describing the study results.
The primary endpoint was change in UPDRS Part I-III score measured in the ON state from baseline to month 36 of treatment. That change over 36 months was 2.99 points in the isradipine arm and 3.26 points in the placebo arm, for a treatment effect of 0.27 points (95% confidence interval, –2.5 to 3.0; P = 0.85), investigators reported in the abstract. Adjustment for use of symptomatic therapy did not affect the comparison, the researchers noted.
Isradipine had no effect on secondary outcomes, including change in UPDRS-III in the OFF state, use of dopaminergic therapy, motor complications, or quality of life, investigators said in the abstract. Edema was the most notable side effect of isradipine treatment, investigators said.
These findings are “disappointing” but will not deter researchers in their work to find a treatment that will slow Parkinson’s disease progression, Dr. Simuni said in the news release. “Negative results are important because they provide a clear answer, especially for a drug that is commercially available,” she added.
Secondary analyses in progress will explore “biological and clinical correlates of disease progression” among the study participants, researchers said in their study abstract.
The study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and also received some funding from The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Simuni reported disclosures related to AbbVie, Acadia, Accorda, Adamas, Allergan, Anavex, Biogen, Denali, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, Neurocrine, NeuroDerm, NINDS, the Parkinson Foundation, PhotoPharmics, Revance, Roche, Sanofi, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Teva, Voyager, and US World Meds.
PHILADELPHIA - There was no significant difference in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores between patients who received the calcium channel blocker isradipine and those who received placebo, according to the final results of the STEADY-PD III study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Use of the drug to treat high blood pressure has been linked to lower risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, said study author Tanya Simuni, MD, a professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, in a news release.
“Unfortunately, the people who were taking isradipine did not have any difference in their Parkinson’s symptoms over the 3 years of the study, compared with the people who took a placebo,” Dr. Simuni said in the press release.
Hopes were high that isradipine might be the first drug to slow progression of Parkinson’s disease after promising animal studies and a phase 2 study showing no safety concerns, according to the news release.
The STEADY-PD III study, which was conducted at 54 Parkinson Study Group sites in the United States and Canada, included 336 participants with early Parkinson’s disease randomized to isradipine 10 mg daily or placebo. The median age of patients in the study was 62 years, and 68% were male. The median time from diagnosis was 0.9 years, and the mean UPDRS I-III score at baseline was 23.1, according to an abstract describing the study results.
The primary endpoint was change in UPDRS Part I-III score measured in the ON state from baseline to month 36 of treatment. That change over 36 months was 2.99 points in the isradipine arm and 3.26 points in the placebo arm, for a treatment effect of 0.27 points (95% confidence interval, –2.5 to 3.0; P = 0.85), investigators reported in the abstract. Adjustment for use of symptomatic therapy did not affect the comparison, the researchers noted.
Isradipine had no effect on secondary outcomes, including change in UPDRS-III in the OFF state, use of dopaminergic therapy, motor complications, or quality of life, investigators said in the abstract. Edema was the most notable side effect of isradipine treatment, investigators said.
These findings are “disappointing” but will not deter researchers in their work to find a treatment that will slow Parkinson’s disease progression, Dr. Simuni said in the news release. “Negative results are important because they provide a clear answer, especially for a drug that is commercially available,” she added.
Secondary analyses in progress will explore “biological and clinical correlates of disease progression” among the study participants, researchers said in their study abstract.
The study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and also received some funding from The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Simuni reported disclosures related to AbbVie, Acadia, Accorda, Adamas, Allergan, Anavex, Biogen, Denali, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, Neurocrine, NeuroDerm, NINDS, the Parkinson Foundation, PhotoPharmics, Revance, Roche, Sanofi, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Teva, Voyager, and US World Meds.
PHILADELPHIA - There was no significant difference in Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores between patients who received the calcium channel blocker isradipine and those who received placebo, according to the final results of the STEADY-PD III study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.
Use of the drug to treat high blood pressure has been linked to lower risk of developing Parkinson’s disease, said study author Tanya Simuni, MD, a professor of neurology at Northwestern University, Chicago, in a news release.
“Unfortunately, the people who were taking isradipine did not have any difference in their Parkinson’s symptoms over the 3 years of the study, compared with the people who took a placebo,” Dr. Simuni said in the press release.
Hopes were high that isradipine might be the first drug to slow progression of Parkinson’s disease after promising animal studies and a phase 2 study showing no safety concerns, according to the news release.
The STEADY-PD III study, which was conducted at 54 Parkinson Study Group sites in the United States and Canada, included 336 participants with early Parkinson’s disease randomized to isradipine 10 mg daily or placebo. The median age of patients in the study was 62 years, and 68% were male. The median time from diagnosis was 0.9 years, and the mean UPDRS I-III score at baseline was 23.1, according to an abstract describing the study results.
The primary endpoint was change in UPDRS Part I-III score measured in the ON state from baseline to month 36 of treatment. That change over 36 months was 2.99 points in the isradipine arm and 3.26 points in the placebo arm, for a treatment effect of 0.27 points (95% confidence interval, –2.5 to 3.0; P = 0.85), investigators reported in the abstract. Adjustment for use of symptomatic therapy did not affect the comparison, the researchers noted.
Isradipine had no effect on secondary outcomes, including change in UPDRS-III in the OFF state, use of dopaminergic therapy, motor complications, or quality of life, investigators said in the abstract. Edema was the most notable side effect of isradipine treatment, investigators said.
These findings are “disappointing” but will not deter researchers in their work to find a treatment that will slow Parkinson’s disease progression, Dr. Simuni said in the news release. “Negative results are important because they provide a clear answer, especially for a drug that is commercially available,” she added.
Secondary analyses in progress will explore “biological and clinical correlates of disease progression” among the study participants, researchers said in their study abstract.
The study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and also received some funding from The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Simuni reported disclosures related to AbbVie, Acadia, Accorda, Adamas, Allergan, Anavex, Biogen, Denali, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, Neurocrine, NeuroDerm, NINDS, the Parkinson Foundation, PhotoPharmics, Revance, Roche, Sanofi, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Teva, Voyager, and US World Meds.
FROM AAN 2019
Cluster headache is associated with increased suicidality
Short- and long-term cluster headache disease burden, as well as depressive symptoms, contributes to suicidality, according to research published online Cephalalgia. Development of treatments that reduce the headache-related burden and prevent future bouts could reduce suicidality, said the researchers.
Although cluster headache has been called the “suicide headache,” few studies have examined suicidality in patients with cluster headache. Research by Rozen et al. found that the rate of suicidal attempt among patients was similar to that among the general population. The results have not been replicated, however, and the investigators did not examine whether suicidality varied according to the phases of the disorder.
A prospective, multicenter study
Mi Ji Lee, MD, PhD, clinical assistant professor of neurology at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, and colleagues conducted a prospective study to investigate the suicidality associated with cluster headache and the factors associated with increased suicidality in that disorder. The researchers enrolled 193 consecutive patients with cluster headache between September 2016 and August 2018 at 15 hospitals. They examined the patients and used the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder–7 item scale (GAD-7) screening tools. During the ictal and interictal phases, the researchers asked the patients whether they had had passive suicidal ideation, active suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, or suicidal attempt. Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with high ictal suicidality, which was defined as two or more positive responses during the ictal phase. Participants were followed up during the between-bout phase.
The researchers excluded 18 patients from analysis because they were between bouts at enrollment. The mean age of the remaining 175 patients was 38.4 years. Mean age at onset was 29.9 years. About 85% of the patients were male. The diagnosis was definite cluster headache for 87.4% of the sample and probable cluster headache for 12.6%. In addition, 88% of the population had episodic cluster headache.
Suicidal ideation increased during the ictal phase
During the ictal phase, 64.2% of participants reported passive suicidal ideation, and 35.8% reported active suicidal ideation. Furthermore, 5.8% of patients had a suicidal plan, and 2.3% attempted suicide. In the interictal phase, 4.0% of patients reported passive suicidal ideation, and 3.5% reported active suicidal ideation. Interictal suicidal planning was reported by 2.9% of participants, and 1.2% of participants attempted suicide interictally. The results were similar between patients with definite and probable cluster headache.
The ictal phase increased the odds of passive suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 42.46), active suicidal ideation (OR, 15.55), suicidal planning (OR, 2.06), and suicidal attempt (OR, 2.02), compared with the interictal phase. The differences in suicidal planning and suicidal attempt between the ictal and interictal phases, however, were not statistically significant.
Longer disease duration, higher attack intensity, higher Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) score, GAD-7 score, and PHQ-9 score were associated with high ictal suicidality. Disease duration, HIT-6, and PHQ-9 remained significantly associated with high ictal suicidality in the multivariate analysis. Younger age at onset, longer disease duration, total number of lifetime bouts, and higher GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly associated with interictal suicidality in the univariable analysis. The total number of lifetime bouts and the PHQ-9 scores remained significant in the multivariable analysis.
In all, 54 patients were followed up between bouts. None reported passive suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported active suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported suicidal planning, and none reported suicidal attempt. Compared with the between-bouts period, the ictal phase was associated with significantly higher odds of active suicidal ideation (OR, 37.32) and nonsignificantly increased suicidal planning (OR, 3.20).
Patients need a disease-modifying treatment
Taken together, the study results underscore the importance of proper management of cluster headache to reduce its burden, said the authors. “Given that greater headache-related impact was independently associated with ictal suicidality, an intensive treatment to reduce the headache-related impact might be beneficial to prevent suicide in cluster headache patients,” they said. In addition to reducing headache-related impact and headache intensity, “a disease-modifying treatment to prevent further bouts is warranted to decrease suicidality in cluster headache patients.”
Although patients with cluster headache had increased suicidality in the ictal and interictal phases, they had lower suicidality between bouts, compared with the general population. This result suggests that patients remain mentally healthy when the bouts are over, and that “a strategy to shorten the length of bout is warranted,” said Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues. Furthermore, the fact that suicidality did not differ significantly between patients with definite cluster headache and those with probable cluster headache “prompts clinicians for an increased identification and intensive treatment strategy for probable cluster headache.”
The current study is the first prospective investigation of suicidality in the various phases of cluster headache, according to the investigators. It nevertheless has several limitations. The prevalence of chronic cluster headache was low in the study population, and not all patients presented for follow-up during the period between bouts. In addition, the data were obtained from recall, and consequently may be less accurate than those gained from prospective recording. Finally, Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues did not gather information on personality disorders, insomnia, substance abuse, or addiction, even though these factors can influence suicidality in patients with chronic pain.
The investigators reported no conflicts of interest related to their research. The study was supported by a grant from the Korean Neurological Association.
SOURCE: Ji Lee M et al. Cephalalgia. 2019 Apr 24. doi: 10.1177/0333102419845660.
Short- and long-term cluster headache disease burden, as well as depressive symptoms, contributes to suicidality, according to research published online Cephalalgia. Development of treatments that reduce the headache-related burden and prevent future bouts could reduce suicidality, said the researchers.
Although cluster headache has been called the “suicide headache,” few studies have examined suicidality in patients with cluster headache. Research by Rozen et al. found that the rate of suicidal attempt among patients was similar to that among the general population. The results have not been replicated, however, and the investigators did not examine whether suicidality varied according to the phases of the disorder.
A prospective, multicenter study
Mi Ji Lee, MD, PhD, clinical assistant professor of neurology at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, and colleagues conducted a prospective study to investigate the suicidality associated with cluster headache and the factors associated with increased suicidality in that disorder. The researchers enrolled 193 consecutive patients with cluster headache between September 2016 and August 2018 at 15 hospitals. They examined the patients and used the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder–7 item scale (GAD-7) screening tools. During the ictal and interictal phases, the researchers asked the patients whether they had had passive suicidal ideation, active suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, or suicidal attempt. Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with high ictal suicidality, which was defined as two or more positive responses during the ictal phase. Participants were followed up during the between-bout phase.
The researchers excluded 18 patients from analysis because they were between bouts at enrollment. The mean age of the remaining 175 patients was 38.4 years. Mean age at onset was 29.9 years. About 85% of the patients were male. The diagnosis was definite cluster headache for 87.4% of the sample and probable cluster headache for 12.6%. In addition, 88% of the population had episodic cluster headache.
Suicidal ideation increased during the ictal phase
During the ictal phase, 64.2% of participants reported passive suicidal ideation, and 35.8% reported active suicidal ideation. Furthermore, 5.8% of patients had a suicidal plan, and 2.3% attempted suicide. In the interictal phase, 4.0% of patients reported passive suicidal ideation, and 3.5% reported active suicidal ideation. Interictal suicidal planning was reported by 2.9% of participants, and 1.2% of participants attempted suicide interictally. The results were similar between patients with definite and probable cluster headache.
The ictal phase increased the odds of passive suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 42.46), active suicidal ideation (OR, 15.55), suicidal planning (OR, 2.06), and suicidal attempt (OR, 2.02), compared with the interictal phase. The differences in suicidal planning and suicidal attempt between the ictal and interictal phases, however, were not statistically significant.
Longer disease duration, higher attack intensity, higher Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) score, GAD-7 score, and PHQ-9 score were associated with high ictal suicidality. Disease duration, HIT-6, and PHQ-9 remained significantly associated with high ictal suicidality in the multivariate analysis. Younger age at onset, longer disease duration, total number of lifetime bouts, and higher GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly associated with interictal suicidality in the univariable analysis. The total number of lifetime bouts and the PHQ-9 scores remained significant in the multivariable analysis.
In all, 54 patients were followed up between bouts. None reported passive suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported active suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported suicidal planning, and none reported suicidal attempt. Compared with the between-bouts period, the ictal phase was associated with significantly higher odds of active suicidal ideation (OR, 37.32) and nonsignificantly increased suicidal planning (OR, 3.20).
Patients need a disease-modifying treatment
Taken together, the study results underscore the importance of proper management of cluster headache to reduce its burden, said the authors. “Given that greater headache-related impact was independently associated with ictal suicidality, an intensive treatment to reduce the headache-related impact might be beneficial to prevent suicide in cluster headache patients,” they said. In addition to reducing headache-related impact and headache intensity, “a disease-modifying treatment to prevent further bouts is warranted to decrease suicidality in cluster headache patients.”
Although patients with cluster headache had increased suicidality in the ictal and interictal phases, they had lower suicidality between bouts, compared with the general population. This result suggests that patients remain mentally healthy when the bouts are over, and that “a strategy to shorten the length of bout is warranted,” said Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues. Furthermore, the fact that suicidality did not differ significantly between patients with definite cluster headache and those with probable cluster headache “prompts clinicians for an increased identification and intensive treatment strategy for probable cluster headache.”
The current study is the first prospective investigation of suicidality in the various phases of cluster headache, according to the investigators. It nevertheless has several limitations. The prevalence of chronic cluster headache was low in the study population, and not all patients presented for follow-up during the period between bouts. In addition, the data were obtained from recall, and consequently may be less accurate than those gained from prospective recording. Finally, Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues did not gather information on personality disorders, insomnia, substance abuse, or addiction, even though these factors can influence suicidality in patients with chronic pain.
The investigators reported no conflicts of interest related to their research. The study was supported by a grant from the Korean Neurological Association.
SOURCE: Ji Lee M et al. Cephalalgia. 2019 Apr 24. doi: 10.1177/0333102419845660.
Short- and long-term cluster headache disease burden, as well as depressive symptoms, contributes to suicidality, according to research published online Cephalalgia. Development of treatments that reduce the headache-related burden and prevent future bouts could reduce suicidality, said the researchers.
Although cluster headache has been called the “suicide headache,” few studies have examined suicidality in patients with cluster headache. Research by Rozen et al. found that the rate of suicidal attempt among patients was similar to that among the general population. The results have not been replicated, however, and the investigators did not examine whether suicidality varied according to the phases of the disorder.
A prospective, multicenter study
Mi Ji Lee, MD, PhD, clinical assistant professor of neurology at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, and colleagues conducted a prospective study to investigate the suicidality associated with cluster headache and the factors associated with increased suicidality in that disorder. The researchers enrolled 193 consecutive patients with cluster headache between September 2016 and August 2018 at 15 hospitals. They examined the patients and used the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) and the General Anxiety Disorder–7 item scale (GAD-7) screening tools. During the ictal and interictal phases, the researchers asked the patients whether they had had passive suicidal ideation, active suicidal ideation, suicidal planning, or suicidal attempt. Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with high ictal suicidality, which was defined as two or more positive responses during the ictal phase. Participants were followed up during the between-bout phase.
The researchers excluded 18 patients from analysis because they were between bouts at enrollment. The mean age of the remaining 175 patients was 38.4 years. Mean age at onset was 29.9 years. About 85% of the patients were male. The diagnosis was definite cluster headache for 87.4% of the sample and probable cluster headache for 12.6%. In addition, 88% of the population had episodic cluster headache.
Suicidal ideation increased during the ictal phase
During the ictal phase, 64.2% of participants reported passive suicidal ideation, and 35.8% reported active suicidal ideation. Furthermore, 5.8% of patients had a suicidal plan, and 2.3% attempted suicide. In the interictal phase, 4.0% of patients reported passive suicidal ideation, and 3.5% reported active suicidal ideation. Interictal suicidal planning was reported by 2.9% of participants, and 1.2% of participants attempted suicide interictally. The results were similar between patients with definite and probable cluster headache.
The ictal phase increased the odds of passive suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR], 42.46), active suicidal ideation (OR, 15.55), suicidal planning (OR, 2.06), and suicidal attempt (OR, 2.02), compared with the interictal phase. The differences in suicidal planning and suicidal attempt between the ictal and interictal phases, however, were not statistically significant.
Longer disease duration, higher attack intensity, higher Headache Impact Test–6 (HIT-6) score, GAD-7 score, and PHQ-9 score were associated with high ictal suicidality. Disease duration, HIT-6, and PHQ-9 remained significantly associated with high ictal suicidality in the multivariate analysis. Younger age at onset, longer disease duration, total number of lifetime bouts, and higher GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores were significantly associated with interictal suicidality in the univariable analysis. The total number of lifetime bouts and the PHQ-9 scores remained significant in the multivariable analysis.
In all, 54 patients were followed up between bouts. None reported passive suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported active suicidal ideation, 1.9% reported suicidal planning, and none reported suicidal attempt. Compared with the between-bouts period, the ictal phase was associated with significantly higher odds of active suicidal ideation (OR, 37.32) and nonsignificantly increased suicidal planning (OR, 3.20).
Patients need a disease-modifying treatment
Taken together, the study results underscore the importance of proper management of cluster headache to reduce its burden, said the authors. “Given that greater headache-related impact was independently associated with ictal suicidality, an intensive treatment to reduce the headache-related impact might be beneficial to prevent suicide in cluster headache patients,” they said. In addition to reducing headache-related impact and headache intensity, “a disease-modifying treatment to prevent further bouts is warranted to decrease suicidality in cluster headache patients.”
Although patients with cluster headache had increased suicidality in the ictal and interictal phases, they had lower suicidality between bouts, compared with the general population. This result suggests that patients remain mentally healthy when the bouts are over, and that “a strategy to shorten the length of bout is warranted,” said Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues. Furthermore, the fact that suicidality did not differ significantly between patients with definite cluster headache and those with probable cluster headache “prompts clinicians for an increased identification and intensive treatment strategy for probable cluster headache.”
The current study is the first prospective investigation of suicidality in the various phases of cluster headache, according to the investigators. It nevertheless has several limitations. The prevalence of chronic cluster headache was low in the study population, and not all patients presented for follow-up during the period between bouts. In addition, the data were obtained from recall, and consequently may be less accurate than those gained from prospective recording. Finally, Dr. Ji Lee and colleagues did not gather information on personality disorders, insomnia, substance abuse, or addiction, even though these factors can influence suicidality in patients with chronic pain.
The investigators reported no conflicts of interest related to their research. The study was supported by a grant from the Korean Neurological Association.
SOURCE: Ji Lee M et al. Cephalalgia. 2019 Apr 24. doi: 10.1177/0333102419845660.
FROM CEPHALAGIA
Key clinical point: Cluster headache is associated with increased suicidality during attacks and within the active period.
Major finding: Cluster headache attacks increased the risk of active suicidal ideation (odds ratio, 15.55).
Study details: A prospective, multicenter study of 175 patients with cluster headache.
Disclosures: The study was supported by a grant from the Korean Neurological Association.
Source: Ji Lee M et al. Cephalalgia. 2019 Apr 24. doi: 10.1177/0333102419845660.
Out-of-pocket costs for neurologic medications rise sharply
The out-of-pocket cost of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments increased the most, with a 20-fold increase during that time. The average out-of-pocket cost for MS therapy was $15/month in 2004, compared with $309/month in 2016. Patients also had to pay more for brand name medications for peripheral neuropathy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease, researchers said.
“Out-of-pocket costs vary widely both across and within conditions,” said study author Brian C. Callaghan, MD, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and research colleagues. “To minimize patient financial burden, neurologists require access to precise cost information when making treatment decisions.”
Prior studies have found that high drug costs “can create burdens such as medical debt, skipping food or other essentials, or even not taking drugs as often as necessary,” Dr. Callaghan said in a news release.
To assess how out-of-pocket costs affect patients with neurologic conditions, the investigators analyzed data from a large, privately insured health care claims database. They determined medication costs for patients with MS, peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease who were seen by outpatient neurologists. They also compared costs for high-deductible and traditional plans and explored cumulative out-of-pocket costs during the first 2 years after diagnosis.
The analysis examined the five most commonly prescribed drugs by neurologists for each condition based on Medicare data. In addition, the researchers included in their analysis all approved MS medications, lacosamide as a brand name epilepsy drug, and venlafaxine, a peripheral neuropathy medication that transitioned from brand to generic.
In all, the study population included 105,355 patients with MS, 314,530 with peripheral neuropathy, 281,073 with epilepsy, 120,720 with dementia, and 90,801 with Parkinson’s disease.
In 2016, patients in high-deductible health plans had an average monthly out-of-pocket expense that was approximately twice that of patients not in those plans – $661 versus $246 among patients with MS, and $40 versus $18 among patients with epilepsy.
In the 2 years after diagnosis in 2012 or 2013, cumulative out-of-pocket costs for patients with MS were a mean of $2,238, but costs varied widely. Cumulative costs were no more than $90 for patients in the bottom 5% of expenses, whereas they exceeded $9,800 for patients in the top 5% of expenses. Among patients with epilepsy, cumulative out-of-pocket costs were $230 in the 2 years after diagnosis.
“In 2004, out-of-pocket costs were of such low magnitude that physicians could typically ignore these costs for most patients and not adversely affect the financial status of patients or their adherence to medications. However, by 2016, out-of-pockets costs have risen to the point where neurologists should consider out-of-pocket costs for most medications and for most patients,” Dr. Callaghan and colleagues wrote.
Ralph L. Sacco, MD, president of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), said in a news release that the AAN has created a Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is advocating for better drug-pricing policies. “This study provides important information to help us better understand how these problems can directly affect our patients,” Dr. Sacco said.
“Everyone deserves affordable access to the medications that will be most beneficial, but if the drugs are too expensive, people may simply not take them, possibly leading to medical complications and higher costs later,” Dr. Sacco said.
The study was supported by the AAN. Several authors are supported by National Institutes of Health grants. Dr. Callaghan receives research support from Impeto Medical and performs consulting work.
SOURCE: Callaghan BC et al. Neurology. 2019 May 1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007564.
The out-of-pocket cost of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments increased the most, with a 20-fold increase during that time. The average out-of-pocket cost for MS therapy was $15/month in 2004, compared with $309/month in 2016. Patients also had to pay more for brand name medications for peripheral neuropathy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease, researchers said.
“Out-of-pocket costs vary widely both across and within conditions,” said study author Brian C. Callaghan, MD, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and research colleagues. “To minimize patient financial burden, neurologists require access to precise cost information when making treatment decisions.”
Prior studies have found that high drug costs “can create burdens such as medical debt, skipping food or other essentials, or even not taking drugs as often as necessary,” Dr. Callaghan said in a news release.
To assess how out-of-pocket costs affect patients with neurologic conditions, the investigators analyzed data from a large, privately insured health care claims database. They determined medication costs for patients with MS, peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease who were seen by outpatient neurologists. They also compared costs for high-deductible and traditional plans and explored cumulative out-of-pocket costs during the first 2 years after diagnosis.
The analysis examined the five most commonly prescribed drugs by neurologists for each condition based on Medicare data. In addition, the researchers included in their analysis all approved MS medications, lacosamide as a brand name epilepsy drug, and venlafaxine, a peripheral neuropathy medication that transitioned from brand to generic.
In all, the study population included 105,355 patients with MS, 314,530 with peripheral neuropathy, 281,073 with epilepsy, 120,720 with dementia, and 90,801 with Parkinson’s disease.
In 2016, patients in high-deductible health plans had an average monthly out-of-pocket expense that was approximately twice that of patients not in those plans – $661 versus $246 among patients with MS, and $40 versus $18 among patients with epilepsy.
In the 2 years after diagnosis in 2012 or 2013, cumulative out-of-pocket costs for patients with MS were a mean of $2,238, but costs varied widely. Cumulative costs were no more than $90 for patients in the bottom 5% of expenses, whereas they exceeded $9,800 for patients in the top 5% of expenses. Among patients with epilepsy, cumulative out-of-pocket costs were $230 in the 2 years after diagnosis.
“In 2004, out-of-pocket costs were of such low magnitude that physicians could typically ignore these costs for most patients and not adversely affect the financial status of patients or their adherence to medications. However, by 2016, out-of-pockets costs have risen to the point where neurologists should consider out-of-pocket costs for most medications and for most patients,” Dr. Callaghan and colleagues wrote.
Ralph L. Sacco, MD, president of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), said in a news release that the AAN has created a Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is advocating for better drug-pricing policies. “This study provides important information to help us better understand how these problems can directly affect our patients,” Dr. Sacco said.
“Everyone deserves affordable access to the medications that will be most beneficial, but if the drugs are too expensive, people may simply not take them, possibly leading to medical complications and higher costs later,” Dr. Sacco said.
The study was supported by the AAN. Several authors are supported by National Institutes of Health grants. Dr. Callaghan receives research support from Impeto Medical and performs consulting work.
SOURCE: Callaghan BC et al. Neurology. 2019 May 1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007564.
The out-of-pocket cost of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments increased the most, with a 20-fold increase during that time. The average out-of-pocket cost for MS therapy was $15/month in 2004, compared with $309/month in 2016. Patients also had to pay more for brand name medications for peripheral neuropathy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease, researchers said.
“Out-of-pocket costs vary widely both across and within conditions,” said study author Brian C. Callaghan, MD, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, and research colleagues. “To minimize patient financial burden, neurologists require access to precise cost information when making treatment decisions.”
Prior studies have found that high drug costs “can create burdens such as medical debt, skipping food or other essentials, or even not taking drugs as often as necessary,” Dr. Callaghan said in a news release.
To assess how out-of-pocket costs affect patients with neurologic conditions, the investigators analyzed data from a large, privately insured health care claims database. They determined medication costs for patients with MS, peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease who were seen by outpatient neurologists. They also compared costs for high-deductible and traditional plans and explored cumulative out-of-pocket costs during the first 2 years after diagnosis.
The analysis examined the five most commonly prescribed drugs by neurologists for each condition based on Medicare data. In addition, the researchers included in their analysis all approved MS medications, lacosamide as a brand name epilepsy drug, and venlafaxine, a peripheral neuropathy medication that transitioned from brand to generic.
In all, the study population included 105,355 patients with MS, 314,530 with peripheral neuropathy, 281,073 with epilepsy, 120,720 with dementia, and 90,801 with Parkinson’s disease.
In 2016, patients in high-deductible health plans had an average monthly out-of-pocket expense that was approximately twice that of patients not in those plans – $661 versus $246 among patients with MS, and $40 versus $18 among patients with epilepsy.
In the 2 years after diagnosis in 2012 or 2013, cumulative out-of-pocket costs for patients with MS were a mean of $2,238, but costs varied widely. Cumulative costs were no more than $90 for patients in the bottom 5% of expenses, whereas they exceeded $9,800 for patients in the top 5% of expenses. Among patients with epilepsy, cumulative out-of-pocket costs were $230 in the 2 years after diagnosis.
“In 2004, out-of-pocket costs were of such low magnitude that physicians could typically ignore these costs for most patients and not adversely affect the financial status of patients or their adherence to medications. However, by 2016, out-of-pockets costs have risen to the point where neurologists should consider out-of-pocket costs for most medications and for most patients,” Dr. Callaghan and colleagues wrote.
Ralph L. Sacco, MD, president of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), said in a news release that the AAN has created a Neurology Drug Pricing Task Force and is advocating for better drug-pricing policies. “This study provides important information to help us better understand how these problems can directly affect our patients,” Dr. Sacco said.
“Everyone deserves affordable access to the medications that will be most beneficial, but if the drugs are too expensive, people may simply not take them, possibly leading to medical complications and higher costs later,” Dr. Sacco said.
The study was supported by the AAN. Several authors are supported by National Institutes of Health grants. Dr. Callaghan receives research support from Impeto Medical and performs consulting work.
SOURCE: Callaghan BC et al. Neurology. 2019 May 1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007564.
FROM NEUROLOGY