User login
Medical treatment for appendicitis effective long-term
TOPLINE:
Most patients who receive antibiotics rather than surgical treatment for appendicitis have successful long-term outcomes, but some may require surgery up to 20 years later.
METHODOLOGY:
- Follow-up on 292 patients involved in two randomized controlled trials conducted in the 1990s by the Swedish National Patient Registry
- Both trials divided patients into two groups: those who underwent appendectomy and those who received antibiotic treatment for appendicitis.
- Researchers looked at rates of recurrent appendicitis that required surgery later in life.
TAKEAWAY:
- 29% of patients in the nonoperative group who were discharged successfully during the initial study eventually underwent surgery.
- Some patients who initially received antibiotics required surgery up to 20 years later.
- 9.5% of patients who didn’t undergo surgery went to a surgical outpatient clinic for abdominal pain, compared with 0.01% of those who had surgery.
IN PRACTICE:
“More than half of the patients treated nonoperatively did not experience recurrence and avoided surgery over approximately 2 decades. There is no evidence for long-term risks of nonoperative management other than that of recurrence of appendicitis,” the authors report.
SOURCE:
Simon Eaton, PhD, of UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health in London, was the corresponding author of the study, published online in JAMA Surgery. The study was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Swedish Research Council.
LIMITATIONS:
The data were retrospective, so the researchers could not track how patients’ circumstances and characteristics changed over time. Most patients were male, and the researchers lacked histopathology results for patients for whom nonsurgical treatment succeeded initially but who later required appendectomy. They also relied on diagnostic standards used in the 1990s, when the initial studies were performed; these were less sophisticated and accurate than recent standards.
DISCLOSURES:
Coauthor Jan Svensson, MD, PhD, reported receiving grants from the Lovisa Foundation during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Most patients who receive antibiotics rather than surgical treatment for appendicitis have successful long-term outcomes, but some may require surgery up to 20 years later.
METHODOLOGY:
- Follow-up on 292 patients involved in two randomized controlled trials conducted in the 1990s by the Swedish National Patient Registry
- Both trials divided patients into two groups: those who underwent appendectomy and those who received antibiotic treatment for appendicitis.
- Researchers looked at rates of recurrent appendicitis that required surgery later in life.
TAKEAWAY:
- 29% of patients in the nonoperative group who were discharged successfully during the initial study eventually underwent surgery.
- Some patients who initially received antibiotics required surgery up to 20 years later.
- 9.5% of patients who didn’t undergo surgery went to a surgical outpatient clinic for abdominal pain, compared with 0.01% of those who had surgery.
IN PRACTICE:
“More than half of the patients treated nonoperatively did not experience recurrence and avoided surgery over approximately 2 decades. There is no evidence for long-term risks of nonoperative management other than that of recurrence of appendicitis,” the authors report.
SOURCE:
Simon Eaton, PhD, of UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health in London, was the corresponding author of the study, published online in JAMA Surgery. The study was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Swedish Research Council.
LIMITATIONS:
The data were retrospective, so the researchers could not track how patients’ circumstances and characteristics changed over time. Most patients were male, and the researchers lacked histopathology results for patients for whom nonsurgical treatment succeeded initially but who later required appendectomy. They also relied on diagnostic standards used in the 1990s, when the initial studies were performed; these were less sophisticated and accurate than recent standards.
DISCLOSURES:
Coauthor Jan Svensson, MD, PhD, reported receiving grants from the Lovisa Foundation during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
Most patients who receive antibiotics rather than surgical treatment for appendicitis have successful long-term outcomes, but some may require surgery up to 20 years later.
METHODOLOGY:
- Follow-up on 292 patients involved in two randomized controlled trials conducted in the 1990s by the Swedish National Patient Registry
- Both trials divided patients into two groups: those who underwent appendectomy and those who received antibiotic treatment for appendicitis.
- Researchers looked at rates of recurrent appendicitis that required surgery later in life.
TAKEAWAY:
- 29% of patients in the nonoperative group who were discharged successfully during the initial study eventually underwent surgery.
- Some patients who initially received antibiotics required surgery up to 20 years later.
- 9.5% of patients who didn’t undergo surgery went to a surgical outpatient clinic for abdominal pain, compared with 0.01% of those who had surgery.
IN PRACTICE:
“More than half of the patients treated nonoperatively did not experience recurrence and avoided surgery over approximately 2 decades. There is no evidence for long-term risks of nonoperative management other than that of recurrence of appendicitis,” the authors report.
SOURCE:
Simon Eaton, PhD, of UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health in London, was the corresponding author of the study, published online in JAMA Surgery. The study was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital and the Swedish Research Council.
LIMITATIONS:
The data were retrospective, so the researchers could not track how patients’ circumstances and characteristics changed over time. Most patients were male, and the researchers lacked histopathology results for patients for whom nonsurgical treatment succeeded initially but who later required appendectomy. They also relied on diagnostic standards used in the 1990s, when the initial studies were performed; these were less sophisticated and accurate than recent standards.
DISCLOSURES:
Coauthor Jan Svensson, MD, PhD, reported receiving grants from the Lovisa Foundation during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Folic acid supplementation for birth defects reaffirmed
Taking folic acid supplements before conception and in the first trimester of pregnancy continues to be a major line of defense against neural tube defects.
In a statement published in JAMA, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended that all people planning on becoming pregnant or who could become pregnant take a daily supplement of 0.4-0.8 mg (400-800 mcg) of folic acid to prevent neural tube defects.
The task force also found that folic acid is not associated with maternal cancer or autism, which were the concerns of some researchers. The current findings regarding potential harm align with earlier evidence examining possible risks.
The recommendation also aligns with previous recommendations from the USPSTF and is supported by 12 more recent observational studies. Neural tube defects occur in an estimated 3,000 pregnancies per year.
Folic acid deficiency is common due to diet, impaired folate metabolism, and poor nutrient uptake as a result of medications or bariatric surgery.
“As much as we’ve been trying to get the word out there, we still need to get it out there even more,” Wanda Nicholson, MD, MPH, MBA, vice chair of the USPSTF, told this news organization. “It’s so simple and straightforward and can be so impactful for the health of the baby.”
Neural tube formation occurs 26-28 days after fertilization. Folic acid supplementation is essential for all people who may become pregnant, considering half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, according to the USPSTF.
“In many cases, neural tube formation has already occurred, or not occurred appropriately, before someone realizes that they’re pregnant,” Dr. Nicholson said. “That’s why it’s so important to start taking folic acid one month prior to conception if you’re planning on becoming pregnant, and if you’re capable of being pregnant but not planning pregnancy, yes, we’re advocating that you also proceed with folic acid supplementation.”
Primary care physicians play a key role in patient education and ensuring that all patients receive adequate folic acid, according to Spencer McClelland, MD, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Denver Health, who was not involved in the statement. Dr. McClelland advised that clinicians recommend patients who are or could get pregnant take a multivitamin, because most brands will contain the recommended dosage of folic acid.
“There’s some confusion about folic acid,” he said. “Many patients know that they should be on a prenatal vitamin, but most don’t know that the reason we’re recommending a prenatal vitamin is almost entirely because of the value of folic acid, and everything else in the prenatal vitamin is kind of icing on the cake.”
For patients trying to get pregnant, the risk for neural tube defects “is one of many examples of the importance of preconception counseling,” Dr. McClelland said.
Dr. Nicholson noted that the recommended 0.4-0.8 mg of folic acid per day is for patients without heightened deficiency due to medications or bariatric surgery. At-risk patients should receive counseling from their physician to determine the correct amount to take.
The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Taking folic acid supplements before conception and in the first trimester of pregnancy continues to be a major line of defense against neural tube defects.
In a statement published in JAMA, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended that all people planning on becoming pregnant or who could become pregnant take a daily supplement of 0.4-0.8 mg (400-800 mcg) of folic acid to prevent neural tube defects.
The task force also found that folic acid is not associated with maternal cancer or autism, which were the concerns of some researchers. The current findings regarding potential harm align with earlier evidence examining possible risks.
The recommendation also aligns with previous recommendations from the USPSTF and is supported by 12 more recent observational studies. Neural tube defects occur in an estimated 3,000 pregnancies per year.
Folic acid deficiency is common due to diet, impaired folate metabolism, and poor nutrient uptake as a result of medications or bariatric surgery.
“As much as we’ve been trying to get the word out there, we still need to get it out there even more,” Wanda Nicholson, MD, MPH, MBA, vice chair of the USPSTF, told this news organization. “It’s so simple and straightforward and can be so impactful for the health of the baby.”
Neural tube formation occurs 26-28 days after fertilization. Folic acid supplementation is essential for all people who may become pregnant, considering half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, according to the USPSTF.
“In many cases, neural tube formation has already occurred, or not occurred appropriately, before someone realizes that they’re pregnant,” Dr. Nicholson said. “That’s why it’s so important to start taking folic acid one month prior to conception if you’re planning on becoming pregnant, and if you’re capable of being pregnant but not planning pregnancy, yes, we’re advocating that you also proceed with folic acid supplementation.”
Primary care physicians play a key role in patient education and ensuring that all patients receive adequate folic acid, according to Spencer McClelland, MD, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Denver Health, who was not involved in the statement. Dr. McClelland advised that clinicians recommend patients who are or could get pregnant take a multivitamin, because most brands will contain the recommended dosage of folic acid.
“There’s some confusion about folic acid,” he said. “Many patients know that they should be on a prenatal vitamin, but most don’t know that the reason we’re recommending a prenatal vitamin is almost entirely because of the value of folic acid, and everything else in the prenatal vitamin is kind of icing on the cake.”
For patients trying to get pregnant, the risk for neural tube defects “is one of many examples of the importance of preconception counseling,” Dr. McClelland said.
Dr. Nicholson noted that the recommended 0.4-0.8 mg of folic acid per day is for patients without heightened deficiency due to medications or bariatric surgery. At-risk patients should receive counseling from their physician to determine the correct amount to take.
The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Taking folic acid supplements before conception and in the first trimester of pregnancy continues to be a major line of defense against neural tube defects.
In a statement published in JAMA, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended that all people planning on becoming pregnant or who could become pregnant take a daily supplement of 0.4-0.8 mg (400-800 mcg) of folic acid to prevent neural tube defects.
The task force also found that folic acid is not associated with maternal cancer or autism, which were the concerns of some researchers. The current findings regarding potential harm align with earlier evidence examining possible risks.
The recommendation also aligns with previous recommendations from the USPSTF and is supported by 12 more recent observational studies. Neural tube defects occur in an estimated 3,000 pregnancies per year.
Folic acid deficiency is common due to diet, impaired folate metabolism, and poor nutrient uptake as a result of medications or bariatric surgery.
“As much as we’ve been trying to get the word out there, we still need to get it out there even more,” Wanda Nicholson, MD, MPH, MBA, vice chair of the USPSTF, told this news organization. “It’s so simple and straightforward and can be so impactful for the health of the baby.”
Neural tube formation occurs 26-28 days after fertilization. Folic acid supplementation is essential for all people who may become pregnant, considering half of the pregnancies in the United States are unplanned, according to the USPSTF.
“In many cases, neural tube formation has already occurred, or not occurred appropriately, before someone realizes that they’re pregnant,” Dr. Nicholson said. “That’s why it’s so important to start taking folic acid one month prior to conception if you’re planning on becoming pregnant, and if you’re capable of being pregnant but not planning pregnancy, yes, we’re advocating that you also proceed with folic acid supplementation.”
Primary care physicians play a key role in patient education and ensuring that all patients receive adequate folic acid, according to Spencer McClelland, MD, an obstetrician-gynecologist at Denver Health, who was not involved in the statement. Dr. McClelland advised that clinicians recommend patients who are or could get pregnant take a multivitamin, because most brands will contain the recommended dosage of folic acid.
“There’s some confusion about folic acid,” he said. “Many patients know that they should be on a prenatal vitamin, but most don’t know that the reason we’re recommending a prenatal vitamin is almost entirely because of the value of folic acid, and everything else in the prenatal vitamin is kind of icing on the cake.”
For patients trying to get pregnant, the risk for neural tube defects “is one of many examples of the importance of preconception counseling,” Dr. McClelland said.
Dr. Nicholson noted that the recommended 0.4-0.8 mg of folic acid per day is for patients without heightened deficiency due to medications or bariatric surgery. At-risk patients should receive counseling from their physician to determine the correct amount to take.
The authors report no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM JAMA
Stiff arteries may cause metabolic syndrome
New research published in the American Journal of Physiology found that arterial stiffness occurred before the presence of metabolic syndrome. A progressive rise in stiffness was associated with a cumulative increase in risk for the condition among the 3,862 people studied over a 7-year period starting in late adolescence.
Results revealed a notable sex difference: Arterial stiffness increased the risk for metabolic syndrome by 9% for males but only by 1% for females. Males were also five times more likely than females to have metabolic syndrome.
“It seems metabolic syndrome has a new risk factor we haven’t thought about,” said author Andrew O. Agbaje, MD, clinical epidemiologist and researcher, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.
Arterial stiffness previously was associated with metabolic syndrome in numerous studies. But the new work is the first to find evidence for causality, Dr. Agbaje said in an interview.
“Interventions have focused on addressing the components of metabolic syndrome such as obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension,” Dr. Agbaje said. “But arterial stiffness may independently cause metabolic syndrome in 1 out of 10 male teens. I encourage clinicians to think about its role in preventing and managing metabolic syndrome, not just as a consequence but as a cause.”
The results have important implications for physicians, according to Sissi Cossio, MD, pediatric endocrinologist, Pediatrix Medical Group, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
“The fact that arterial stiffness progression preceded metabolic syndrome is important because it could be used as an earlier detection marker of disease,” Dr. Cossio said.
To conduct the study, Dr. Agbaje and his research team used data collected by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children at the University of Bristol in England. Arterial stiffness was measured using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the speed of blood flow from the upper to the lower aorta. They assessed for metabolic syndrome by the presence of three or more risk factors, including high cholesterol, high triglycerides, and high trunk fat mass.
Participants were studied starting in gestation in the early 1990s, and were measured for arterial stiffness and metabolic syndrome starting at age 17 through age 24.
The overall risk for metabolic syndrome doubled within the 7-year study period of follow-up between 2009 and 2017, indicating that early intervention during adolescence is essential.
Dr. Agbaje recommended that physicians start treating arterial stiffness and other markers of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, noting that, “potentially irreversible cardiovascular health damage might occur after age 17.”
Arterial stiffness can be negated through physical activity and dietary changes that lower inflammation. Physicians should refer at-risk teens to a preventative clinic where they can be monitored and receive repeated measurements of arterial stiffness, lipid levels, blood pressure, glucose levels, and obesity every 3 months, Dr. Agbaje said.
“The health progress made after a year would be an indicator for physicians whether a more aggressive therapeutic approach is needed since it takes about 7 years for the risk of metabolic syndrome attributed to arterial stiffness to worsen remarkably in the young population,” he said.
Dr. Agbaje pointed to a few potential pathways through which arterial stiffness might create a disease cascade. Stiffer arteries disrupt blood flow to the liver and pancreas, which could adversely affect their functioning, he said. Damage to these organs may increase insulin and LDL cholesterol blood levels, increasing the risk for metabolic syndrome.
Arterial stiffness also can lead to higher blood pressure and insulin resistance, potentially inducing musculogenesis and vasculogenesis. The resulting excessive muscle mass may also increase the risk for the condition, he said.
Dr. Cossio acknowledged that treatments for metabolic syndrome become less effective with age, but emphasized that reversal is possible in adults with lifestyle changes and medications.
“Early detection will give patients the best chance at reversing the disease, and [primary care physicians] are a key factor in this process,” she said.
Dr. Cossio said that at-risk teens should receive treatment in a weight loss or endocrinology clinic. Treatment may include behavioral, surgical, and pharmacotherapeutic interventions.
“Teens with signs of insulin resistance and impaired fasting glucose, acanthosis, or prediabetes, should start metformin as the first line of therapy,” Dr. Cossio said.
For weight management, she recommends antiobesity medications such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and the combination of phentermine/topiramate in children aged 12 years or older. In teenagers 16 years or older, phentermine alone is another option.
The research group that conducted the study reported received funding from the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, the North Savo Regional Fund and Central Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Aarne Koskelo Foundation, the Foundation for Pediatric Research, and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
New research published in the American Journal of Physiology found that arterial stiffness occurred before the presence of metabolic syndrome. A progressive rise in stiffness was associated with a cumulative increase in risk for the condition among the 3,862 people studied over a 7-year period starting in late adolescence.
Results revealed a notable sex difference: Arterial stiffness increased the risk for metabolic syndrome by 9% for males but only by 1% for females. Males were also five times more likely than females to have metabolic syndrome.
“It seems metabolic syndrome has a new risk factor we haven’t thought about,” said author Andrew O. Agbaje, MD, clinical epidemiologist and researcher, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.
Arterial stiffness previously was associated with metabolic syndrome in numerous studies. But the new work is the first to find evidence for causality, Dr. Agbaje said in an interview.
“Interventions have focused on addressing the components of metabolic syndrome such as obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension,” Dr. Agbaje said. “But arterial stiffness may independently cause metabolic syndrome in 1 out of 10 male teens. I encourage clinicians to think about its role in preventing and managing metabolic syndrome, not just as a consequence but as a cause.”
The results have important implications for physicians, according to Sissi Cossio, MD, pediatric endocrinologist, Pediatrix Medical Group, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
“The fact that arterial stiffness progression preceded metabolic syndrome is important because it could be used as an earlier detection marker of disease,” Dr. Cossio said.
To conduct the study, Dr. Agbaje and his research team used data collected by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children at the University of Bristol in England. Arterial stiffness was measured using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the speed of blood flow from the upper to the lower aorta. They assessed for metabolic syndrome by the presence of three or more risk factors, including high cholesterol, high triglycerides, and high trunk fat mass.
Participants were studied starting in gestation in the early 1990s, and were measured for arterial stiffness and metabolic syndrome starting at age 17 through age 24.
The overall risk for metabolic syndrome doubled within the 7-year study period of follow-up between 2009 and 2017, indicating that early intervention during adolescence is essential.
Dr. Agbaje recommended that physicians start treating arterial stiffness and other markers of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, noting that, “potentially irreversible cardiovascular health damage might occur after age 17.”
Arterial stiffness can be negated through physical activity and dietary changes that lower inflammation. Physicians should refer at-risk teens to a preventative clinic where they can be monitored and receive repeated measurements of arterial stiffness, lipid levels, blood pressure, glucose levels, and obesity every 3 months, Dr. Agbaje said.
“The health progress made after a year would be an indicator for physicians whether a more aggressive therapeutic approach is needed since it takes about 7 years for the risk of metabolic syndrome attributed to arterial stiffness to worsen remarkably in the young population,” he said.
Dr. Agbaje pointed to a few potential pathways through which arterial stiffness might create a disease cascade. Stiffer arteries disrupt blood flow to the liver and pancreas, which could adversely affect their functioning, he said. Damage to these organs may increase insulin and LDL cholesterol blood levels, increasing the risk for metabolic syndrome.
Arterial stiffness also can lead to higher blood pressure and insulin resistance, potentially inducing musculogenesis and vasculogenesis. The resulting excessive muscle mass may also increase the risk for the condition, he said.
Dr. Cossio acknowledged that treatments for metabolic syndrome become less effective with age, but emphasized that reversal is possible in adults with lifestyle changes and medications.
“Early detection will give patients the best chance at reversing the disease, and [primary care physicians] are a key factor in this process,” she said.
Dr. Cossio said that at-risk teens should receive treatment in a weight loss or endocrinology clinic. Treatment may include behavioral, surgical, and pharmacotherapeutic interventions.
“Teens with signs of insulin resistance and impaired fasting glucose, acanthosis, or prediabetes, should start metformin as the first line of therapy,” Dr. Cossio said.
For weight management, she recommends antiobesity medications such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and the combination of phentermine/topiramate in children aged 12 years or older. In teenagers 16 years or older, phentermine alone is another option.
The research group that conducted the study reported received funding from the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, the North Savo Regional Fund and Central Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Aarne Koskelo Foundation, the Foundation for Pediatric Research, and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
New research published in the American Journal of Physiology found that arterial stiffness occurred before the presence of metabolic syndrome. A progressive rise in stiffness was associated with a cumulative increase in risk for the condition among the 3,862 people studied over a 7-year period starting in late adolescence.
Results revealed a notable sex difference: Arterial stiffness increased the risk for metabolic syndrome by 9% for males but only by 1% for females. Males were also five times more likely than females to have metabolic syndrome.
“It seems metabolic syndrome has a new risk factor we haven’t thought about,” said author Andrew O. Agbaje, MD, clinical epidemiologist and researcher, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.
Arterial stiffness previously was associated with metabolic syndrome in numerous studies. But the new work is the first to find evidence for causality, Dr. Agbaje said in an interview.
“Interventions have focused on addressing the components of metabolic syndrome such as obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension,” Dr. Agbaje said. “But arterial stiffness may independently cause metabolic syndrome in 1 out of 10 male teens. I encourage clinicians to think about its role in preventing and managing metabolic syndrome, not just as a consequence but as a cause.”
The results have important implications for physicians, according to Sissi Cossio, MD, pediatric endocrinologist, Pediatrix Medical Group, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
“The fact that arterial stiffness progression preceded metabolic syndrome is important because it could be used as an earlier detection marker of disease,” Dr. Cossio said.
To conduct the study, Dr. Agbaje and his research team used data collected by the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children at the University of Bristol in England. Arterial stiffness was measured using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, the speed of blood flow from the upper to the lower aorta. They assessed for metabolic syndrome by the presence of three or more risk factors, including high cholesterol, high triglycerides, and high trunk fat mass.
Participants were studied starting in gestation in the early 1990s, and were measured for arterial stiffness and metabolic syndrome starting at age 17 through age 24.
The overall risk for metabolic syndrome doubled within the 7-year study period of follow-up between 2009 and 2017, indicating that early intervention during adolescence is essential.
Dr. Agbaje recommended that physicians start treating arterial stiffness and other markers of metabolic syndrome as early as possible, noting that, “potentially irreversible cardiovascular health damage might occur after age 17.”
Arterial stiffness can be negated through physical activity and dietary changes that lower inflammation. Physicians should refer at-risk teens to a preventative clinic where they can be monitored and receive repeated measurements of arterial stiffness, lipid levels, blood pressure, glucose levels, and obesity every 3 months, Dr. Agbaje said.
“The health progress made after a year would be an indicator for physicians whether a more aggressive therapeutic approach is needed since it takes about 7 years for the risk of metabolic syndrome attributed to arterial stiffness to worsen remarkably in the young population,” he said.
Dr. Agbaje pointed to a few potential pathways through which arterial stiffness might create a disease cascade. Stiffer arteries disrupt blood flow to the liver and pancreas, which could adversely affect their functioning, he said. Damage to these organs may increase insulin and LDL cholesterol blood levels, increasing the risk for metabolic syndrome.
Arterial stiffness also can lead to higher blood pressure and insulin resistance, potentially inducing musculogenesis and vasculogenesis. The resulting excessive muscle mass may also increase the risk for the condition, he said.
Dr. Cossio acknowledged that treatments for metabolic syndrome become less effective with age, but emphasized that reversal is possible in adults with lifestyle changes and medications.
“Early detection will give patients the best chance at reversing the disease, and [primary care physicians] are a key factor in this process,” she said.
Dr. Cossio said that at-risk teens should receive treatment in a weight loss or endocrinology clinic. Treatment may include behavioral, surgical, and pharmacotherapeutic interventions.
“Teens with signs of insulin resistance and impaired fasting glucose, acanthosis, or prediabetes, should start metformin as the first line of therapy,” Dr. Cossio said.
For weight management, she recommends antiobesity medications such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and the combination of phentermine/topiramate in children aged 12 years or older. In teenagers 16 years or older, phentermine alone is another option.
The research group that conducted the study reported received funding from the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, the North Savo Regional Fund and Central Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Aarne Koskelo Foundation, the Foundation for Pediatric Research, and the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, among others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
Weighing childhood obesity interventions
A teenager who weighed 300 lb and was homeschooled because he was too big to fit in a classroom chair is among the patients Manal Habib, MD, has seen in her pediatric endocrinology practice.
The boy, a social butterfly who hated isolation and blamed himself for his “poor choices,” turned out to have an MC4R mutation that interfered with proper metabolism and satiation signals.
“People often blame obese and overweight people for not having enough willpower, but it’s often a physiological problem,” said Dr. Habib, who works at the University of California, Los Angeles.
She is among the clinicians offering more aggressive forms of weight management, prescribing medications, including metformin, semaglutide, and liraglutide – often off-label – to help children and teens with obesity who do not respond to lifestyle changes.
The results of intensive interventions can be life-changing: The teen Dr. Habib treated is back at school, playing sports, and no longer needs drugs to reduce cholesterol and blood pressure. He now takes a low maintenance dose of a weight-loss medication.
But the long-term effects of these new agents on children and teens are poorly understood, and both medication and surgery are associated with significant complications. Pediatricians treating kids pre- or post-intervention should be alert to a range of physical, psychological, and behavioral risks and complications.
Keeping bones healthy
Pediatricians should be aware of the risk to bone health in patients who undergo surgery, according to Misra Madhusmita, MD, chief of pediatric endocrinology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In a recent study, Dr. Madhusmita and her colleagues found that sleeve gastrectomy reduced vertebral bone strength in adolescents and young adults.
“This is a time of life when bone mass is typically accruing rapidly,” Dr. Madhusmita told this news organization. “A deleterious effect on bone accrual at this time of life raises concerns about suboptimal acquisition of peak bone mass, which is typically attained in early adult life and is a key factor determining bone health and fracture risk in later life.”
Reduced skeletal loading and muscle mass can weaken bones, as can malabsorption of nutrients. Fat loss can trigger lower levels of bioavailable androgens and their subsequent conversion to estrogen, negatively affecting bone density. And sleeve gastrectomy in particular lowers ghrelin, another hormone influencing skeletal health.
Clinicians should advise patients who have had surgery to follow a healthy diet and consume sufficient levels of calcium and vitamin D, said Dr. Madhusmita. Weight-bearing exercises, weight training, and resistance training are also imperative to build bone mass and muscle. Any preexisting conditions or lifestyle factors that weaken the bones should be taken into consideration.
Managing expectations
The long-term effects of weight loss medications on children are less documented than with surgery, according to Caren Mangarelli, MD, a former primary care physician who is now medical director of both the adolescent bariatric program and the children’s wellness and weight management clinic at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago, Ill.
But one significant known risk is the potential for rebound weight gain and the complications like high blood pressure and high blood sugar that go with it if the patient stops medication. Dr. Mangarelli said that many clinicians lack the training required to safely facilitate weight loss medications for kids.
“We have to remember that obesity is a chronic disease, especially for those with more severe forms,” she said. “They’re not likely to outgrow it. It’s not like, ‘Oh, we’ll just put a patient on medication, they’ll lose weight, and we’ll take them off of it,’ because you could create a bad cycle of losing weight, followed by metabolism slowing down, hunger cues going up, and weight going back up.”
Making the risks of stopping medication clear and supporting compliance are essential, especially when it comes to injectables like semaglutide, which can be more burdensome than taking pills, requiring weekly subcutaneous injections. Pediatricians should ensure that families understand that medication is a long-term solution, Dr. Habib said.
Many families and patients “want a quick result. They’re focused on a specific size or weight, and they want to take the medication for a short period without changing anything else,” Dr. Habib said.
But children with genetic abnormalities or severe obesity could be on medication for their entire lives. Patients who make significant healthy lifestyle changes have a greater chance of weaning off drug therapy.
But “it’s hard with children because they’re dependent on their family,” Dr. Habib said. “One of the first things that I talk about with families is that it’s very important for everyone to be involved in making healthy changes, especially the parents, because the kids are going to follow their lifestyle and choices, not necessarily what they tell them to do.”
The behavioral and mental
One of Dr. Habib’s most striking cases was a 6-year-old patient with autism spectrum disorder experiencing early-onset puberty. Her condition made it difficult for her parents to enforce behavioral and lifestyle changes, making medication the best option to normalize the young girl’s body.
“The goal in this case is not necessarily to help her lose weight, but to prevent her from having severe health risks at such a young age,” said Habib.
Though medication may be the best solution when other options have failed, the ease of using medication may mean clinicians fail to address the complex emotional and psychosocial factors that can both cause and result from obesity.
“A lot of families think that if just this one thing were better, everything else would fall into place,” Habib said. “But there often are multiple layers to treating the patient.”
According to Cambria Garrell, MD, a pediatrician at the UCLA Fit for Healthy Weight Program in Los Angeles, pediatricians should be aware of the psychosocial and mental health factors such as undiagnosed mental illness or family dysfunction.
Dr. Garrell sometimes cares for children with undiagnosed mental health disorders. Children with conditions like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorders may struggle with eating because of impulse control and sensory processing issues. Family functioning, issues at school, and lack of sleep are also major contributors to obesity to screen for.
“We really like to think about the environmental and psychosocial factors contributing to obesity instead of just pathologizing the weight,” Dr. Garrell said.
Risk for alcohol abuse
Bariatric and metabolic surgeries are associated with an increased risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Pediatricians treating children pre- or post-op should ensure that patients receive behavioral and mental health services to minimize the risk for alcohol abuse.
The risk for AUD is likely the result of changes to the way the body metabolizes alcohol, resulting in heightened sensitivity to it, although research is not conclusive, according to Dr. Mangarelli.
The risk for AUD is likely multifactorial, Dr. Mangarelli said.
“We don’t totally understand all of it, but if you’re experiencing a high more easily, that may lead to misuse,” Dr. Mangarelli said. “It’s also important to remember that this population of patients has experienced stigma for a very long time, and they often have associated mental health and body image issues.”
“Those problems don’t disappear on their own,” she added. “You want to make sure that patients are hooked into behavioral and mental health services before surgery so that they have somebody who’s following them after surgery.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A teenager who weighed 300 lb and was homeschooled because he was too big to fit in a classroom chair is among the patients Manal Habib, MD, has seen in her pediatric endocrinology practice.
The boy, a social butterfly who hated isolation and blamed himself for his “poor choices,” turned out to have an MC4R mutation that interfered with proper metabolism and satiation signals.
“People often blame obese and overweight people for not having enough willpower, but it’s often a physiological problem,” said Dr. Habib, who works at the University of California, Los Angeles.
She is among the clinicians offering more aggressive forms of weight management, prescribing medications, including metformin, semaglutide, and liraglutide – often off-label – to help children and teens with obesity who do not respond to lifestyle changes.
The results of intensive interventions can be life-changing: The teen Dr. Habib treated is back at school, playing sports, and no longer needs drugs to reduce cholesterol and blood pressure. He now takes a low maintenance dose of a weight-loss medication.
But the long-term effects of these new agents on children and teens are poorly understood, and both medication and surgery are associated with significant complications. Pediatricians treating kids pre- or post-intervention should be alert to a range of physical, psychological, and behavioral risks and complications.
Keeping bones healthy
Pediatricians should be aware of the risk to bone health in patients who undergo surgery, according to Misra Madhusmita, MD, chief of pediatric endocrinology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In a recent study, Dr. Madhusmita and her colleagues found that sleeve gastrectomy reduced vertebral bone strength in adolescents and young adults.
“This is a time of life when bone mass is typically accruing rapidly,” Dr. Madhusmita told this news organization. “A deleterious effect on bone accrual at this time of life raises concerns about suboptimal acquisition of peak bone mass, which is typically attained in early adult life and is a key factor determining bone health and fracture risk in later life.”
Reduced skeletal loading and muscle mass can weaken bones, as can malabsorption of nutrients. Fat loss can trigger lower levels of bioavailable androgens and their subsequent conversion to estrogen, negatively affecting bone density. And sleeve gastrectomy in particular lowers ghrelin, another hormone influencing skeletal health.
Clinicians should advise patients who have had surgery to follow a healthy diet and consume sufficient levels of calcium and vitamin D, said Dr. Madhusmita. Weight-bearing exercises, weight training, and resistance training are also imperative to build bone mass and muscle. Any preexisting conditions or lifestyle factors that weaken the bones should be taken into consideration.
Managing expectations
The long-term effects of weight loss medications on children are less documented than with surgery, according to Caren Mangarelli, MD, a former primary care physician who is now medical director of both the adolescent bariatric program and the children’s wellness and weight management clinic at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago, Ill.
But one significant known risk is the potential for rebound weight gain and the complications like high blood pressure and high blood sugar that go with it if the patient stops medication. Dr. Mangarelli said that many clinicians lack the training required to safely facilitate weight loss medications for kids.
“We have to remember that obesity is a chronic disease, especially for those with more severe forms,” she said. “They’re not likely to outgrow it. It’s not like, ‘Oh, we’ll just put a patient on medication, they’ll lose weight, and we’ll take them off of it,’ because you could create a bad cycle of losing weight, followed by metabolism slowing down, hunger cues going up, and weight going back up.”
Making the risks of stopping medication clear and supporting compliance are essential, especially when it comes to injectables like semaglutide, which can be more burdensome than taking pills, requiring weekly subcutaneous injections. Pediatricians should ensure that families understand that medication is a long-term solution, Dr. Habib said.
Many families and patients “want a quick result. They’re focused on a specific size or weight, and they want to take the medication for a short period without changing anything else,” Dr. Habib said.
But children with genetic abnormalities or severe obesity could be on medication for their entire lives. Patients who make significant healthy lifestyle changes have a greater chance of weaning off drug therapy.
But “it’s hard with children because they’re dependent on their family,” Dr. Habib said. “One of the first things that I talk about with families is that it’s very important for everyone to be involved in making healthy changes, especially the parents, because the kids are going to follow their lifestyle and choices, not necessarily what they tell them to do.”
The behavioral and mental
One of Dr. Habib’s most striking cases was a 6-year-old patient with autism spectrum disorder experiencing early-onset puberty. Her condition made it difficult for her parents to enforce behavioral and lifestyle changes, making medication the best option to normalize the young girl’s body.
“The goal in this case is not necessarily to help her lose weight, but to prevent her from having severe health risks at such a young age,” said Habib.
Though medication may be the best solution when other options have failed, the ease of using medication may mean clinicians fail to address the complex emotional and psychosocial factors that can both cause and result from obesity.
“A lot of families think that if just this one thing were better, everything else would fall into place,” Habib said. “But there often are multiple layers to treating the patient.”
According to Cambria Garrell, MD, a pediatrician at the UCLA Fit for Healthy Weight Program in Los Angeles, pediatricians should be aware of the psychosocial and mental health factors such as undiagnosed mental illness or family dysfunction.
Dr. Garrell sometimes cares for children with undiagnosed mental health disorders. Children with conditions like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorders may struggle with eating because of impulse control and sensory processing issues. Family functioning, issues at school, and lack of sleep are also major contributors to obesity to screen for.
“We really like to think about the environmental and psychosocial factors contributing to obesity instead of just pathologizing the weight,” Dr. Garrell said.
Risk for alcohol abuse
Bariatric and metabolic surgeries are associated with an increased risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Pediatricians treating children pre- or post-op should ensure that patients receive behavioral and mental health services to minimize the risk for alcohol abuse.
The risk for AUD is likely the result of changes to the way the body metabolizes alcohol, resulting in heightened sensitivity to it, although research is not conclusive, according to Dr. Mangarelli.
The risk for AUD is likely multifactorial, Dr. Mangarelli said.
“We don’t totally understand all of it, but if you’re experiencing a high more easily, that may lead to misuse,” Dr. Mangarelli said. “It’s also important to remember that this population of patients has experienced stigma for a very long time, and they often have associated mental health and body image issues.”
“Those problems don’t disappear on their own,” she added. “You want to make sure that patients are hooked into behavioral and mental health services before surgery so that they have somebody who’s following them after surgery.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A teenager who weighed 300 lb and was homeschooled because he was too big to fit in a classroom chair is among the patients Manal Habib, MD, has seen in her pediatric endocrinology practice.
The boy, a social butterfly who hated isolation and blamed himself for his “poor choices,” turned out to have an MC4R mutation that interfered with proper metabolism and satiation signals.
“People often blame obese and overweight people for not having enough willpower, but it’s often a physiological problem,” said Dr. Habib, who works at the University of California, Los Angeles.
She is among the clinicians offering more aggressive forms of weight management, prescribing medications, including metformin, semaglutide, and liraglutide – often off-label – to help children and teens with obesity who do not respond to lifestyle changes.
The results of intensive interventions can be life-changing: The teen Dr. Habib treated is back at school, playing sports, and no longer needs drugs to reduce cholesterol and blood pressure. He now takes a low maintenance dose of a weight-loss medication.
But the long-term effects of these new agents on children and teens are poorly understood, and both medication and surgery are associated with significant complications. Pediatricians treating kids pre- or post-intervention should be alert to a range of physical, psychological, and behavioral risks and complications.
Keeping bones healthy
Pediatricians should be aware of the risk to bone health in patients who undergo surgery, according to Misra Madhusmita, MD, chief of pediatric endocrinology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. In a recent study, Dr. Madhusmita and her colleagues found that sleeve gastrectomy reduced vertebral bone strength in adolescents and young adults.
“This is a time of life when bone mass is typically accruing rapidly,” Dr. Madhusmita told this news organization. “A deleterious effect on bone accrual at this time of life raises concerns about suboptimal acquisition of peak bone mass, which is typically attained in early adult life and is a key factor determining bone health and fracture risk in later life.”
Reduced skeletal loading and muscle mass can weaken bones, as can malabsorption of nutrients. Fat loss can trigger lower levels of bioavailable androgens and their subsequent conversion to estrogen, negatively affecting bone density. And sleeve gastrectomy in particular lowers ghrelin, another hormone influencing skeletal health.
Clinicians should advise patients who have had surgery to follow a healthy diet and consume sufficient levels of calcium and vitamin D, said Dr. Madhusmita. Weight-bearing exercises, weight training, and resistance training are also imperative to build bone mass and muscle. Any preexisting conditions or lifestyle factors that weaken the bones should be taken into consideration.
Managing expectations
The long-term effects of weight loss medications on children are less documented than with surgery, according to Caren Mangarelli, MD, a former primary care physician who is now medical director of both the adolescent bariatric program and the children’s wellness and weight management clinic at Lurie Children’s Hospital in Chicago, Ill.
But one significant known risk is the potential for rebound weight gain and the complications like high blood pressure and high blood sugar that go with it if the patient stops medication. Dr. Mangarelli said that many clinicians lack the training required to safely facilitate weight loss medications for kids.
“We have to remember that obesity is a chronic disease, especially for those with more severe forms,” she said. “They’re not likely to outgrow it. It’s not like, ‘Oh, we’ll just put a patient on medication, they’ll lose weight, and we’ll take them off of it,’ because you could create a bad cycle of losing weight, followed by metabolism slowing down, hunger cues going up, and weight going back up.”
Making the risks of stopping medication clear and supporting compliance are essential, especially when it comes to injectables like semaglutide, which can be more burdensome than taking pills, requiring weekly subcutaneous injections. Pediatricians should ensure that families understand that medication is a long-term solution, Dr. Habib said.
Many families and patients “want a quick result. They’re focused on a specific size or weight, and they want to take the medication for a short period without changing anything else,” Dr. Habib said.
But children with genetic abnormalities or severe obesity could be on medication for their entire lives. Patients who make significant healthy lifestyle changes have a greater chance of weaning off drug therapy.
But “it’s hard with children because they’re dependent on their family,” Dr. Habib said. “One of the first things that I talk about with families is that it’s very important for everyone to be involved in making healthy changes, especially the parents, because the kids are going to follow their lifestyle and choices, not necessarily what they tell them to do.”
The behavioral and mental
One of Dr. Habib’s most striking cases was a 6-year-old patient with autism spectrum disorder experiencing early-onset puberty. Her condition made it difficult for her parents to enforce behavioral and lifestyle changes, making medication the best option to normalize the young girl’s body.
“The goal in this case is not necessarily to help her lose weight, but to prevent her from having severe health risks at such a young age,” said Habib.
Though medication may be the best solution when other options have failed, the ease of using medication may mean clinicians fail to address the complex emotional and psychosocial factors that can both cause and result from obesity.
“A lot of families think that if just this one thing were better, everything else would fall into place,” Habib said. “But there often are multiple layers to treating the patient.”
According to Cambria Garrell, MD, a pediatrician at the UCLA Fit for Healthy Weight Program in Los Angeles, pediatricians should be aware of the psychosocial and mental health factors such as undiagnosed mental illness or family dysfunction.
Dr. Garrell sometimes cares for children with undiagnosed mental health disorders. Children with conditions like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorders may struggle with eating because of impulse control and sensory processing issues. Family functioning, issues at school, and lack of sleep are also major contributors to obesity to screen for.
“We really like to think about the environmental and psychosocial factors contributing to obesity instead of just pathologizing the weight,” Dr. Garrell said.
Risk for alcohol abuse
Bariatric and metabolic surgeries are associated with an increased risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Pediatricians treating children pre- or post-op should ensure that patients receive behavioral and mental health services to minimize the risk for alcohol abuse.
The risk for AUD is likely the result of changes to the way the body metabolizes alcohol, resulting in heightened sensitivity to it, although research is not conclusive, according to Dr. Mangarelli.
The risk for AUD is likely multifactorial, Dr. Mangarelli said.
“We don’t totally understand all of it, but if you’re experiencing a high more easily, that may lead to misuse,” Dr. Mangarelli said. “It’s also important to remember that this population of patients has experienced stigma for a very long time, and they often have associated mental health and body image issues.”
“Those problems don’t disappear on their own,” she added. “You want to make sure that patients are hooked into behavioral and mental health services before surgery so that they have somebody who’s following them after surgery.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Medical cannabis does not reduce use of prescription meds
TOPLINE:
, according to a new study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.
METHODOLOGY:
- Cannabis advocates suggest that legal medical cannabis can be a partial solution to the opioid overdose crisis in the United States, which claimed more than 80,000 lives in 2021.
- Current research on how legalized cannabis reduces dependence on prescription pain medication is inconclusive.
- Researchers examined insurance data for the period 2010-2022 from 583,820 adults with chronic noncancer pain.
- They drew from 12 states in which medical cannabis is legal and from 17 in which it is not legal to create a hypothetical randomized trial. The control group simulated prescription rates where medical cannabis was not available.
- Authors evaluated prescription rates for opioids, nonopioid painkillers, and pain interventions, such as physical therapy.
TAKEAWAY:
In a given month during the first 3 years after legalization, for states with medical cannabis, the investigators found the following:
- There was an average decrease of 1.07 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any opioid prescription, compared to a 1.12 percentage point decrease in the control group.
- There was an average increase of 1.14 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any nonopioid prescription painkiller, compared to a 1.19 percentage point increase in the control group.
- There was a 0.17 percentage point decrease in the proportion of patients who received any pain procedure, compared to a 0.001 percentage point decrease in the control group.
IN PRACTICE:
“This study did not identify important effects of medical cannabis laws on receipt of opioid or nonopioid pain treatment among patients with chronic noncancer pain,” according to the researchers.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Emma E. McGinty, PhD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, and was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators used a simulated, hypothetical control group that was based on untestable assumptions. They also drew data solely from insured individuals, so the study does not necessarily represent uninsured populations.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. McGinty reports receiving a grant from NIDA. Her coauthors reported receiving support from NIDA and the National Institutes of Health.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
, according to a new study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.
METHODOLOGY:
- Cannabis advocates suggest that legal medical cannabis can be a partial solution to the opioid overdose crisis in the United States, which claimed more than 80,000 lives in 2021.
- Current research on how legalized cannabis reduces dependence on prescription pain medication is inconclusive.
- Researchers examined insurance data for the period 2010-2022 from 583,820 adults with chronic noncancer pain.
- They drew from 12 states in which medical cannabis is legal and from 17 in which it is not legal to create a hypothetical randomized trial. The control group simulated prescription rates where medical cannabis was not available.
- Authors evaluated prescription rates for opioids, nonopioid painkillers, and pain interventions, such as physical therapy.
TAKEAWAY:
In a given month during the first 3 years after legalization, for states with medical cannabis, the investigators found the following:
- There was an average decrease of 1.07 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any opioid prescription, compared to a 1.12 percentage point decrease in the control group.
- There was an average increase of 1.14 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any nonopioid prescription painkiller, compared to a 1.19 percentage point increase in the control group.
- There was a 0.17 percentage point decrease in the proportion of patients who received any pain procedure, compared to a 0.001 percentage point decrease in the control group.
IN PRACTICE:
“This study did not identify important effects of medical cannabis laws on receipt of opioid or nonopioid pain treatment among patients with chronic noncancer pain,” according to the researchers.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Emma E. McGinty, PhD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, and was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators used a simulated, hypothetical control group that was based on untestable assumptions. They also drew data solely from insured individuals, so the study does not necessarily represent uninsured populations.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. McGinty reports receiving a grant from NIDA. Her coauthors reported receiving support from NIDA and the National Institutes of Health.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
, according to a new study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.
METHODOLOGY:
- Cannabis advocates suggest that legal medical cannabis can be a partial solution to the opioid overdose crisis in the United States, which claimed more than 80,000 lives in 2021.
- Current research on how legalized cannabis reduces dependence on prescription pain medication is inconclusive.
- Researchers examined insurance data for the period 2010-2022 from 583,820 adults with chronic noncancer pain.
- They drew from 12 states in which medical cannabis is legal and from 17 in which it is not legal to create a hypothetical randomized trial. The control group simulated prescription rates where medical cannabis was not available.
- Authors evaluated prescription rates for opioids, nonopioid painkillers, and pain interventions, such as physical therapy.
TAKEAWAY:
In a given month during the first 3 years after legalization, for states with medical cannabis, the investigators found the following:
- There was an average decrease of 1.07 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any opioid prescription, compared to a 1.12 percentage point decrease in the control group.
- There was an average increase of 1.14 percentage points in the proportion of patients who received any nonopioid prescription painkiller, compared to a 1.19 percentage point increase in the control group.
- There was a 0.17 percentage point decrease in the proportion of patients who received any pain procedure, compared to a 0.001 percentage point decrease in the control group.
IN PRACTICE:
“This study did not identify important effects of medical cannabis laws on receipt of opioid or nonopioid pain treatment among patients with chronic noncancer pain,” according to the researchers.
SOURCE:
The study was led by Emma E. McGinty, PhD, of Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, and was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
LIMITATIONS:
The investigators used a simulated, hypothetical control group that was based on untestable assumptions. They also drew data solely from insured individuals, so the study does not necessarily represent uninsured populations.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. McGinty reports receiving a grant from NIDA. Her coauthors reported receiving support from NIDA and the National Institutes of Health.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
COVID vaccines safe for young children, study finds
TOPLINE:
COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech are safe for children under age 5 years, according to findings from a study funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data came from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which gathers information from eight health systems in the United States.
- Analyzed data from 135,005 doses given to children age 4 and younger who received the Pfizer-BioNTech , and 112,006 doses given to children aged 5 and younger who received the Moderna version.
- Assessed for 23 safety outcomes, including myocarditis, pericarditis, and seizures.
TAKEAWAY:
- One case of hemorrhagic stroke and one case of pulmonary embolism occurred after vaccination but these were linked to preexisting congenital abnormalities.
IN PRACTICE:
“These results can provide reassurance to clinicians, parents, and policymakers alike.”
STUDY DETAILS:
The study was led by Kristin Goddard, MPH, a researcher at the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center in Oakland, Calif., and was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
LIMITATIONS:
The researchers reported low statistical power for early analysis, especially for rare outcomes. In addition, fewer than 25% of children in the database had received a vaccine at the time of analysis.
DISCLOSURES:
A coauthor reported receiving funding from Janssen Vaccines and Prevention for a study unrelated to COVID-19 vaccines. Another coauthor reported receiving grants from Pfizer in 2019 for clinical trials for coronavirus vaccines, and from Merck, GSK, and Sanofi Pasteur for unrelated research.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech are safe for children under age 5 years, according to findings from a study funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data came from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which gathers information from eight health systems in the United States.
- Analyzed data from 135,005 doses given to children age 4 and younger who received the Pfizer-BioNTech , and 112,006 doses given to children aged 5 and younger who received the Moderna version.
- Assessed for 23 safety outcomes, including myocarditis, pericarditis, and seizures.
TAKEAWAY:
- One case of hemorrhagic stroke and one case of pulmonary embolism occurred after vaccination but these were linked to preexisting congenital abnormalities.
IN PRACTICE:
“These results can provide reassurance to clinicians, parents, and policymakers alike.”
STUDY DETAILS:
The study was led by Kristin Goddard, MPH, a researcher at the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center in Oakland, Calif., and was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
LIMITATIONS:
The researchers reported low statistical power for early analysis, especially for rare outcomes. In addition, fewer than 25% of children in the database had received a vaccine at the time of analysis.
DISCLOSURES:
A coauthor reported receiving funding from Janssen Vaccines and Prevention for a study unrelated to COVID-19 vaccines. Another coauthor reported receiving grants from Pfizer in 2019 for clinical trials for coronavirus vaccines, and from Merck, GSK, and Sanofi Pasteur for unrelated research.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech are safe for children under age 5 years, according to findings from a study funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data came from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which gathers information from eight health systems in the United States.
- Analyzed data from 135,005 doses given to children age 4 and younger who received the Pfizer-BioNTech , and 112,006 doses given to children aged 5 and younger who received the Moderna version.
- Assessed for 23 safety outcomes, including myocarditis, pericarditis, and seizures.
TAKEAWAY:
- One case of hemorrhagic stroke and one case of pulmonary embolism occurred after vaccination but these were linked to preexisting congenital abnormalities.
IN PRACTICE:
“These results can provide reassurance to clinicians, parents, and policymakers alike.”
STUDY DETAILS:
The study was led by Kristin Goddard, MPH, a researcher at the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center in Oakland, Calif., and was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
LIMITATIONS:
The researchers reported low statistical power for early analysis, especially for rare outcomes. In addition, fewer than 25% of children in the database had received a vaccine at the time of analysis.
DISCLOSURES:
A coauthor reported receiving funding from Janssen Vaccines and Prevention for a study unrelated to COVID-19 vaccines. Another coauthor reported receiving grants from Pfizer in 2019 for clinical trials for coronavirus vaccines, and from Merck, GSK, and Sanofi Pasteur for unrelated research.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM PEDIATRICS