Heidi Splete

Smoking a water pipe, or hookah, can result in significant inhalation of toxins and an increased risk for short- and long-term cardiovascular health problems, according to a scientific statement issued by the American Heart Association on March 8.

Gina Smith/Thinkstock

In the statement, published in the journal Circulation, Aruni Bhatnagar, PhD, of the University of Louisville (Ky.) and his colleagues reviewed the potential dangers of water pipe use and offered strategies for prevention.

Data from the 2016 National Youth Tobacco Survey showed that current use (defined as use within the past 30 days) of water pipes by high school students increased in a nonlinear trend from 4.1% in 2011 to 4.8% in 2016, with a peak of 9.4% in 2014. Water pipe tobacco is sold in flavors such as cherry, chocolate, and coffee that appeal to younger consumers, and epidemiology data suggest that youth view water pipes as safer than conventional cigarettes because the water “filters out toxins” according to the statement.

Findings from the National Adult Tobacco Survey showed an increase as well, from 1.5% during 2009-2010 to 3.2% during 2013-2014. Adults cite cultural and social influences, as well as psychological benefits of reduced stress and anger and improved concentration, which may be attributable to nicotine, the researchers noted.

Water pipe smoking involves placing charcoal briquettes on top of a tobacco-filled bowl with a stem immersed in water such that the smoke is pulled through and bubbles up through the water into a mouthpiece. The harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) involved in water pipe are similar to those in standard cigarettes and include tar, phenanthrene, carbon monoxide, heavy metals, and arsenic, as well as nicotine.

The patterns of exposure to toxins during water pipe smoking are unclear, the authors noted.

However, the risks for both short-term and long-term health effects are similar to those associated with cigarettes. “Overall, the short-term cardiovascular effects are consistent with the sympathomimetic effects of nicotine,” according to the statement.

Data on the long-term effects of water pipe smoking on cardiovascular health are limited, but “lifetime exposures exceeding 40 water pipe–years (2 water pipes per day for a total of 20 years or 1 water pipe for 40 years) are associated with a threefold increase in the odds of angiographically diagnosed coronary artery stenosis,” according to the statement. Additional research on long-term health effects may help guide regulation of water pipe products, the authors suggested.

The AHA statement encourages health care providers to take a proactive approach in addressing hookah use by asking patients about it, by advising those who use water pipes to quit, by assisting those who want to quit by providing counseling and social support, and by referring water pipe smokers to legitimate resources for information on the potential for addiction and health risks.

Dr. Bhatnagar received funding from the National Institutes of Health, but he had no other financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Bhatnagar A et al. Circulation. 2019 Mar 8. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000671.

Smoking a water pipe, or hookah, can result in significant inhalation of toxins and an increased risk for short- and long-term cardiovascular health problems, according to a scientific statement issued by the American Heart Association on March 8.

Gina Smith/Thinkstock

In the statement, published in the journal Circulation, Aruni Bhatnagar, PhD, of the University of Louisville (Ky.) and his colleagues reviewed the potential dangers of water pipe use and offered strategies for prevention.

Data from the 2016 National Youth Tobacco Survey showed that current use (defined as use within the past 30 days) of water pipes by high school students increased in a nonlinear trend from 4.1% in 2011 to 4.8% in 2016, with a peak of 9.4% in 2014. Water pipe tobacco is sold in flavors such as cherry, chocolate, and coffee that appeal to younger consumers, and epidemiology data suggest that youth view water pipes as safer than conventional cigarettes because the water “filters out toxins” according to the statement.

Findings from the National Adult Tobacco Survey showed an increase as well, from 1.5% during 2009-2010 to 3.2% during 2013-2014. Adults cite cultural and social influences, as well as psychological benefits of reduced stress and anger and improved concentration, which may be attributable to nicotine, the researchers noted.

Water pipe smoking involves placing charcoal briquettes on top of a tobacco-filled bowl with a stem immersed in water such that the smoke is pulled through and bubbles up through the water into a mouthpiece. The harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) involved in water pipe are similar to those in standard cigarettes and include tar, phenanthrene, carbon monoxide, heavy metals, and arsenic, as well as nicotine.

The patterns of exposure to toxins during water pipe smoking are unclear, the authors noted.

However, the risks for both short-term and long-term health effects are similar to those associated with cigarettes. “Overall, the short-term cardiovascular effects are consistent with the sympathomimetic effects of nicotine,” according to the statement.

Data on the long-term effects of water pipe smoking on cardiovascular health are limited, but “lifetime exposures exceeding 40 water pipe–years (2 water pipes per day for a total of 20 years or 1 water pipe for 40 years) are associated with a threefold increase in the odds of angiographically diagnosed coronary artery stenosis,” according to the statement. Additional research on long-term health effects may help guide regulation of water pipe products, the authors suggested.

The AHA statement encourages health care providers to take a proactive approach in addressing hookah use by asking patients about it, by advising those who use water pipes to quit, by assisting those who want to quit by providing counseling and social support, and by referring water pipe smokers to legitimate resources for information on the potential for addiction and health risks.

Dr. Bhatnagar received funding from the National Institutes of Health, but he had no other financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Bhatnagar A et al. Circulation. 2019 Mar 8. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000671.

Smoking a water pipe, or hookah, can result in significant inhalation of toxins and an increased risk for short- and long-term cardiovascular health problems, according to a scientific statement issued by the American Heart Association on March 8.

Gina Smith/Thinkstock

In the statement, published in the journal Circulation, Aruni Bhatnagar, PhD, of the University of Louisville (Ky.) and his colleagues reviewed the potential dangers of water pipe use and offered strategies for prevention.

Data from the 2016 National Youth Tobacco Survey showed that current use (defined as use within the past 30 days) of water pipes by high school students increased in a nonlinear trend from 4.1% in 2011 to 4.8% in 2016, with a peak of 9.4% in 2014. Water pipe tobacco is sold in flavors such as cherry, chocolate, and coffee that appeal to younger consumers, and epidemiology data suggest that youth view water pipes as safer than conventional cigarettes because the water “filters out toxins” according to the statement.

Findings from the National Adult Tobacco Survey showed an increase as well, from 1.5% during 2009-2010 to 3.2% during 2013-2014. Adults cite cultural and social influences, as well as psychological benefits of reduced stress and anger and improved concentration, which may be attributable to nicotine, the researchers noted.

Water pipe smoking involves placing charcoal briquettes on top of a tobacco-filled bowl with a stem immersed in water such that the smoke is pulled through and bubbles up through the water into a mouthpiece. The harmful or potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) involved in water pipe are similar to those in standard cigarettes and include tar, phenanthrene, carbon monoxide, heavy metals, and arsenic, as well as nicotine.

The patterns of exposure to toxins during water pipe smoking are unclear, the authors noted.

However, the risks for both short-term and long-term health effects are similar to those associated with cigarettes. “Overall, the short-term cardiovascular effects are consistent with the sympathomimetic effects of nicotine,” according to the statement.

Data on the long-term effects of water pipe smoking on cardiovascular health are limited, but “lifetime exposures exceeding 40 water pipe–years (2 water pipes per day for a total of 20 years or 1 water pipe for 40 years) are associated with a threefold increase in the odds of angiographically diagnosed coronary artery stenosis,” according to the statement. Additional research on long-term health effects may help guide regulation of water pipe products, the authors suggested.

The AHA statement encourages health care providers to take a proactive approach in addressing hookah use by asking patients about it, by advising those who use water pipes to quit, by assisting those who want to quit by providing counseling and social support, and by referring water pipe smokers to legitimate resources for information on the potential for addiction and health risks.

Dr. Bhatnagar received funding from the National Institutes of Health, but he had no other financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Bhatnagar A et al. Circulation. 2019 Mar 8. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000671.

The preferred medication in children with hypertension varied among three common medications in n-of-1 studies with repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring that allowed for individualized treatment plans.

Purestock/Thinkstock

“In usual care, the choice of specific antihypertensive regimen is based on physician preference with little or no systematic assessment of treatment benefits and hazards,” wrote Joyce P. Samuel, MD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Pediatrics, the researchers assessed 32 hypertensive children who participated in n-of-1 studies at a single center. The children underwent repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (APBM) to compare the effects of three medications: lisinopril, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide. The children were at least 9 years old, and their primary referring physician had recommended antihypertensive treatment.

The preferred medication was defined as the one that yielded both a normal ambulatory blood pressure and the greatest reduction in average systolic blood pressure when awake for two treatment periods with no unacceptable side effects. If more than one medication met these criteria, the one with the least side effects was chosen.

Overall, the preferred medication was lisinopril for 16 patients (49%), amlodipine for 8 patients (24%), and hydrochlorothiazide for 4 patients (12%); 4 patients remained uncontrolled on monotherapy.

Each of the three medications was taken for 2 weeks, and patients were assessed with a 24-hour ABPM and a side-effect questionnaire during the final 24 hours of each treatment. A total of 27 patients reported at least one side effect during the study. Unacceptable side effects were most frequent on hydrochlorothiazide (25%), compared with 16% for lisinopril and 13% for amlodipine. None of the patients experienced hypertensive crisis, hypotension, hyperkalemia, or an increase in serum creatinine levels of more than 20% from baseline.

No single medication was preferred for at least 80% of the patients. “Within-patient variation in BP (blood pressure) response was considerable because the best-performing medication decreased the BP by about 12 mm Hg more than the worst-performing medication,” the researchers wrote.

The findings were limited by the possibility that a 2-week trial might be insufficient to evaluate medication effects, and more research is needed to refine the methods of the trials and the generalizability of the n-of-1 approach, the researchers noted. However, “this individualized approach to antihypertensive medication selection holds potential value by involving patients in their own care and facilitating informed treatment decisions,” they said.

“A randomized trial in which researchers compare usual care to routine use of n-of-1 trials with ABPM is needed to assess effects on treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, long-term BP control assessed with ABPM, and hypertensive target organ damage,” Dr. Samuel and her associates advised.

The study was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Samuel JP et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar 6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1818.

The preferred medication in children with hypertension varied among three common medications in n-of-1 studies with repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring that allowed for individualized treatment plans.

Purestock/Thinkstock

“In usual care, the choice of specific antihypertensive regimen is based on physician preference with little or no systematic assessment of treatment benefits and hazards,” wrote Joyce P. Samuel, MD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Pediatrics, the researchers assessed 32 hypertensive children who participated in n-of-1 studies at a single center. The children underwent repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (APBM) to compare the effects of three medications: lisinopril, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide. The children were at least 9 years old, and their primary referring physician had recommended antihypertensive treatment.

The preferred medication was defined as the one that yielded both a normal ambulatory blood pressure and the greatest reduction in average systolic blood pressure when awake for two treatment periods with no unacceptable side effects. If more than one medication met these criteria, the one with the least side effects was chosen.

Overall, the preferred medication was lisinopril for 16 patients (49%), amlodipine for 8 patients (24%), and hydrochlorothiazide for 4 patients (12%); 4 patients remained uncontrolled on monotherapy.

Each of the three medications was taken for 2 weeks, and patients were assessed with a 24-hour ABPM and a side-effect questionnaire during the final 24 hours of each treatment. A total of 27 patients reported at least one side effect during the study. Unacceptable side effects were most frequent on hydrochlorothiazide (25%), compared with 16% for lisinopril and 13% for amlodipine. None of the patients experienced hypertensive crisis, hypotension, hyperkalemia, or an increase in serum creatinine levels of more than 20% from baseline.

No single medication was preferred for at least 80% of the patients. “Within-patient variation in BP (blood pressure) response was considerable because the best-performing medication decreased the BP by about 12 mm Hg more than the worst-performing medication,” the researchers wrote.

The findings were limited by the possibility that a 2-week trial might be insufficient to evaluate medication effects, and more research is needed to refine the methods of the trials and the generalizability of the n-of-1 approach, the researchers noted. However, “this individualized approach to antihypertensive medication selection holds potential value by involving patients in their own care and facilitating informed treatment decisions,” they said.

“A randomized trial in which researchers compare usual care to routine use of n-of-1 trials with ABPM is needed to assess effects on treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, long-term BP control assessed with ABPM, and hypertensive target organ damage,” Dr. Samuel and her associates advised.

The study was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Samuel JP et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar 6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1818.

The preferred medication in children with hypertension varied among three common medications in n-of-1 studies with repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring that allowed for individualized treatment plans.

Purestock/Thinkstock

“In usual care, the choice of specific antihypertensive regimen is based on physician preference with little or no systematic assessment of treatment benefits and hazards,” wrote Joyce P. Samuel, MD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, and her colleagues.

In a study published in Pediatrics, the researchers assessed 32 hypertensive children who participated in n-of-1 studies at a single center. The children underwent repeated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (APBM) to compare the effects of three medications: lisinopril, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide. The children were at least 9 years old, and their primary referring physician had recommended antihypertensive treatment.

The preferred medication was defined as the one that yielded both a normal ambulatory blood pressure and the greatest reduction in average systolic blood pressure when awake for two treatment periods with no unacceptable side effects. If more than one medication met these criteria, the one with the least side effects was chosen.

Overall, the preferred medication was lisinopril for 16 patients (49%), amlodipine for 8 patients (24%), and hydrochlorothiazide for 4 patients (12%); 4 patients remained uncontrolled on monotherapy.

Each of the three medications was taken for 2 weeks, and patients were assessed with a 24-hour ABPM and a side-effect questionnaire during the final 24 hours of each treatment. A total of 27 patients reported at least one side effect during the study. Unacceptable side effects were most frequent on hydrochlorothiazide (25%), compared with 16% for lisinopril and 13% for amlodipine. None of the patients experienced hypertensive crisis, hypotension, hyperkalemia, or an increase in serum creatinine levels of more than 20% from baseline.

No single medication was preferred for at least 80% of the patients. “Within-patient variation in BP (blood pressure) response was considerable because the best-performing medication decreased the BP by about 12 mm Hg more than the worst-performing medication,” the researchers wrote.

The findings were limited by the possibility that a 2-week trial might be insufficient to evaluate medication effects, and more research is needed to refine the methods of the trials and the generalizability of the n-of-1 approach, the researchers noted. However, “this individualized approach to antihypertensive medication selection holds potential value by involving patients in their own care and facilitating informed treatment decisions,” they said.

“A randomized trial in which researchers compare usual care to routine use of n-of-1 trials with ABPM is needed to assess effects on treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, long-term BP control assessed with ABPM, and hypertensive target organ damage,” Dr. Samuel and her associates advised.

The study was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Samuel JP et al. Pediatrics. 2019 Mar 6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1818.

Serious infections from Staphylococcus aureus caused nearly 20,000 deaths and 119,000 illnesses in the United States in 2017, according to data from a Vital Signs report issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data include both methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).

Although MRSA infections in health care settings declined by approximately 17% during 2005-2012, rates plateaued during 2012-2017, Anne Schuchat, MD, principal deputy director of the CDC, said in a teleconference March 5 to present the findings. The report emphasizes the potential for serious illness and death with any staph infection and the need for ongoing vigilance on the part of clinicians, she said.

In addition, community-onset MSSA infections increased by 3.9%/year during 2012-2017. Data from previous studies suggest that this increase may be connected to the opioid epidemic, said Dr. Schuchat.

“People who inject drugs are 16% more likely to develop a staph infection” than are those who don’t inject drugs, she said.

Community-onset MRSA declined by 6.9% during 2001-2016, attributed to declines in health care–associated infections, according to Vital Signs author Athena P. Kourtis, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, and her colleagues. Rates of hospital-associated MSSA infection remained essentially unchanged (P = .11). The overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality among patients with S. aureus bloodstream infections over the study period was 18%.

The data for the report were collected from electronic health records at more than 400 acute care hospitals, as well as population-based surveillance data from the CDC’s Emerging Infections Program.

Most people carry staph on their skin with no ill effects, but the bacteria become dangerous when they enter the bloodstream, Dr. Schuchat emphasized. “We hope the new data today will refocus the nation’s efforts to protect patients from staph infections,” she said.

SOURCE: Kourtis AP et al. MMWR. 2019 Mar 5; 68:1-6.

Serious infections from Staphylococcus aureus caused nearly 20,000 deaths and 119,000 illnesses in the United States in 2017, according to data from a Vital Signs report issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data include both methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).

Although MRSA infections in health care settings declined by approximately 17% during 2005-2012, rates plateaued during 2012-2017, Anne Schuchat, MD, principal deputy director of the CDC, said in a teleconference March 5 to present the findings. The report emphasizes the potential for serious illness and death with any staph infection and the need for ongoing vigilance on the part of clinicians, she said.

In addition, community-onset MSSA infections increased by 3.9%/year during 2012-2017. Data from previous studies suggest that this increase may be connected to the opioid epidemic, said Dr. Schuchat.

“People who inject drugs are 16% more likely to develop a staph infection” than are those who don’t inject drugs, she said.

Community-onset MRSA declined by 6.9% during 2001-2016, attributed to declines in health care–associated infections, according to Vital Signs author Athena P. Kourtis, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, and her colleagues. Rates of hospital-associated MSSA infection remained essentially unchanged (P = .11). The overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality among patients with S. aureus bloodstream infections over the study period was 18%.

The data for the report were collected from electronic health records at more than 400 acute care hospitals, as well as population-based surveillance data from the CDC’s Emerging Infections Program.

Most people carry staph on their skin with no ill effects, but the bacteria become dangerous when they enter the bloodstream, Dr. Schuchat emphasized. “We hope the new data today will refocus the nation’s efforts to protect patients from staph infections,” she said.

SOURCE: Kourtis AP et al. MMWR. 2019 Mar 5; 68:1-6.

Serious infections from Staphylococcus aureus caused nearly 20,000 deaths and 119,000 illnesses in the United States in 2017, according to data from a Vital Signs report issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data include both methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).

Although MRSA infections in health care settings declined by approximately 17% during 2005-2012, rates plateaued during 2012-2017, Anne Schuchat, MD, principal deputy director of the CDC, said in a teleconference March 5 to present the findings. The report emphasizes the potential for serious illness and death with any staph infection and the need for ongoing vigilance on the part of clinicians, she said.

In addition, community-onset MSSA infections increased by 3.9%/year during 2012-2017. Data from previous studies suggest that this increase may be connected to the opioid epidemic, said Dr. Schuchat.

“People who inject drugs are 16% more likely to develop a staph infection” than are those who don’t inject drugs, she said.

Community-onset MRSA declined by 6.9% during 2001-2016, attributed to declines in health care–associated infections, according to Vital Signs author Athena P. Kourtis, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, and her colleagues. Rates of hospital-associated MSSA infection remained essentially unchanged (P = .11). The overall unadjusted in-hospital mortality among patients with S. aureus bloodstream infections over the study period was 18%.

The data for the report were collected from electronic health records at more than 400 acute care hospitals, as well as population-based surveillance data from the CDC’s Emerging Infections Program.

Most people carry staph on their skin with no ill effects, but the bacteria become dangerous when they enter the bloodstream, Dr. Schuchat emphasized. “We hope the new data today will refocus the nation’s efforts to protect patients from staph infections,” she said.

SOURCE: Kourtis AP et al. MMWR. 2019 Mar 5; 68:1-6.

Poor sleep quality, but not sleep duration, was significantly associated with active atopic dermatitis in a longitudinal study of more than 13,000 children.

The itching associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) may interfere with children’s sleep, and sleep studies suggest that children with active disease are more restless at night, wrote Faustine D. Ramirez of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues. Their report is in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Acute and chronic sleep disturbances have been associated with a wide range of cognitive, mood, and behavioral impairments and have been linked to poor educational performance,” the researchers noted.

To determine the impact of active AD on children’s sleep, the researchers reviewed data from 13,988 children followed for a median of 11 years. Of these, 4,938 children met the definition for AD between age 2 and 16 years.

Overall, children with active AD were approximately 50% more likely to experience poor sleep quality than were those without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48). Sleep quality was even worse for children with severe active AD (aOR, 1.68), and active AD plus asthma or allergic rhinitis (aOR 2.15). Sleep quality was significantly worse in children reporting mild AD (aOR, 1.40) or inactive AD (aOR, 1.41), compared with children without AD. Nighttime sleep duration was similar throughout childhood for children with and without AD.

“In addition to increased nighttime awakenings and difficulty falling asleep, we found that children with active atopic dermatitis were more likely to report nightmares and early morning awakenings, which has not been previously studied,” Ms. Ramirez and her associates said.

Total sleep duration was statistically shorter overall for children with AD, compared with those without AD, but the difference was not clinically significant, they noted.

The participants were from a longitudinal study in the United Kingdom in which pregnant women were recruited between 1990 and 1992. For those with children alive at 1 year, their children were followed for approximately 16 years. Sleep quality was assessed at six time points with four standardized questionnaires between ages 2 and 10 years, and sleep duration was assessed at eight time points between ages 2 and 16 years with standardized questionnaires.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including some missing data and patient attrition, as well as possible misclassification bias because of the use of parent and patient self-reports, and a possible lack of generalizability to other populations, the researchers noted.

However, the results support the need for developing clinical outcome measures to address sleep quality in children with AD, they said. “Additional work should investigate interventions to improve sleep quality and examine the association between atopic dermatitis treatment and children’s sleep.”

The study was funded primarily by a grant from the National Eczema Association. Ms. Ramirez disclosed a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two other investigators received grants, one from NIH and the other Wellcome Senior Clinical Fellowship in Science. One coauthor reported receiving multiple grants, as well as paid consulting for TARGETPharma, a company developing a prospective atopic dermatitis registry.

SOURCE: Ramirez FD al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Mar 4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0025.

Poor sleep quality, but not sleep duration, was significantly associated with active atopic dermatitis in a longitudinal study of more than 13,000 children.

The itching associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) may interfere with children’s sleep, and sleep studies suggest that children with active disease are more restless at night, wrote Faustine D. Ramirez of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues. Their report is in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Acute and chronic sleep disturbances have been associated with a wide range of cognitive, mood, and behavioral impairments and have been linked to poor educational performance,” the researchers noted.

To determine the impact of active AD on children’s sleep, the researchers reviewed data from 13,988 children followed for a median of 11 years. Of these, 4,938 children met the definition for AD between age 2 and 16 years.

Overall, children with active AD were approximately 50% more likely to experience poor sleep quality than were those without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48). Sleep quality was even worse for children with severe active AD (aOR, 1.68), and active AD plus asthma or allergic rhinitis (aOR 2.15). Sleep quality was significantly worse in children reporting mild AD (aOR, 1.40) or inactive AD (aOR, 1.41), compared with children without AD. Nighttime sleep duration was similar throughout childhood for children with and without AD.

“In addition to increased nighttime awakenings and difficulty falling asleep, we found that children with active atopic dermatitis were more likely to report nightmares and early morning awakenings, which has not been previously studied,” Ms. Ramirez and her associates said.

Total sleep duration was statistically shorter overall for children with AD, compared with those without AD, but the difference was not clinically significant, they noted.

The participants were from a longitudinal study in the United Kingdom in which pregnant women were recruited between 1990 and 1992. For those with children alive at 1 year, their children were followed for approximately 16 years. Sleep quality was assessed at six time points with four standardized questionnaires between ages 2 and 10 years, and sleep duration was assessed at eight time points between ages 2 and 16 years with standardized questionnaires.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including some missing data and patient attrition, as well as possible misclassification bias because of the use of parent and patient self-reports, and a possible lack of generalizability to other populations, the researchers noted.

However, the results support the need for developing clinical outcome measures to address sleep quality in children with AD, they said. “Additional work should investigate interventions to improve sleep quality and examine the association between atopic dermatitis treatment and children’s sleep.”

The study was funded primarily by a grant from the National Eczema Association. Ms. Ramirez disclosed a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two other investigators received grants, one from NIH and the other Wellcome Senior Clinical Fellowship in Science. One coauthor reported receiving multiple grants, as well as paid consulting for TARGETPharma, a company developing a prospective atopic dermatitis registry.

SOURCE: Ramirez FD al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Mar 4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0025.

Poor sleep quality, but not sleep duration, was significantly associated with active atopic dermatitis in a longitudinal study of more than 13,000 children.

The itching associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) may interfere with children’s sleep, and sleep studies suggest that children with active disease are more restless at night, wrote Faustine D. Ramirez of the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues. Their report is in JAMA Pediatrics.

“Acute and chronic sleep disturbances have been associated with a wide range of cognitive, mood, and behavioral impairments and have been linked to poor educational performance,” the researchers noted.

To determine the impact of active AD on children’s sleep, the researchers reviewed data from 13,988 children followed for a median of 11 years. Of these, 4,938 children met the definition for AD between age 2 and 16 years.

Overall, children with active AD were approximately 50% more likely to experience poor sleep quality than were those without AD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48). Sleep quality was even worse for children with severe active AD (aOR, 1.68), and active AD plus asthma or allergic rhinitis (aOR 2.15). Sleep quality was significantly worse in children reporting mild AD (aOR, 1.40) or inactive AD (aOR, 1.41), compared with children without AD. Nighttime sleep duration was similar throughout childhood for children with and without AD.

“In addition to increased nighttime awakenings and difficulty falling asleep, we found that children with active atopic dermatitis were more likely to report nightmares and early morning awakenings, which has not been previously studied,” Ms. Ramirez and her associates said.

Total sleep duration was statistically shorter overall for children with AD, compared with those without AD, but the difference was not clinically significant, they noted.

The participants were from a longitudinal study in the United Kingdom in which pregnant women were recruited between 1990 and 1992. For those with children alive at 1 year, their children were followed for approximately 16 years. Sleep quality was assessed at six time points with four standardized questionnaires between ages 2 and 10 years, and sleep duration was assessed at eight time points between ages 2 and 16 years with standardized questionnaires.

The study findings were limited by several factors, including some missing data and patient attrition, as well as possible misclassification bias because of the use of parent and patient self-reports, and a possible lack of generalizability to other populations, the researchers noted.

However, the results support the need for developing clinical outcome measures to address sleep quality in children with AD, they said. “Additional work should investigate interventions to improve sleep quality and examine the association between atopic dermatitis treatment and children’s sleep.”

The study was funded primarily by a grant from the National Eczema Association. Ms. Ramirez disclosed a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two other investigators received grants, one from NIH and the other Wellcome Senior Clinical Fellowship in Science. One coauthor reported receiving multiple grants, as well as paid consulting for TARGETPharma, a company developing a prospective atopic dermatitis registry.

SOURCE: Ramirez FD al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Mar 4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0025.

WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.

Vidyard Video

Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.

The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.

Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.

In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.

Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.

Vidyard Video

Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.

The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.

Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.

In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.

Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

WASHINGTON – The American Contact Dermatitis Society has selected isobornyl acrylate the contact allergen of the year. It is an acrylic monomer used as an adhesive.

Vidyard Video

Among other applications, isobornyl acrylate is often used in medical devices. The selection was made based in part on multiple case reports of diabetes patients developing contact allergies to their diabetes devices, such as insulin pumps, explained Golara Honari, MD, of Stanford (Calif.) University, who presented the selection at the ACDS annual meeting.

The significance of this allergen is that testing through routine panels does not identify it, so clinician awareness is especially important, Dr. Honari noted in a video interview at the meeting.

Most of the reported contact allergen cases have been in patients with diabetes, but clinicians should think about other possible sources, such as acrylic nails, she said. As for treatment, clinicians and patients can consider alternative diabetes devices without isobornyl acrylate, she said.

In the future, close collaboration between clinicians and the medical device industry to develop appropriate labeling can help increase awareness of the potential for allergic reactions, she added.

Dr. Honari had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

A booster dose for pre-exposure prophylaxis with an anthrax vaccine may be given at 3 years after an initial series for individuals not currently at risk who wish to maintain protection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Carolina K. Smith, MD/Fotolia.com

In a unanimous 15-0 vote at the February meeting, ACIP committee members agreed on the recommendation after adjusting the wording to reflect a permissive, rather than mandated, guidance.

William Bower, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), presented data on Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) to support its protective effects over a longer booster dose interval.

The recommendations apply to persons aged 18 years or older who are not currently at high risk of exposure to Bacillus anthracis, but who might need to deploy to a high-risk area quickly, such as military personnel, Dr. Bower said.

In addition, data suggest that adults who have started, but not completed the pre-exposure priming series, can transition to the postexposure schedule prior to entering a high-risk area, he noted.

The previous pre-exposure anthrax vaccination schedule was a three-dose priming series at 0, 1, and 3 months, followed by a booster at 12 months and 18 months, then annually.

Data from several human immunogenicity studies showed a robust immune response following a delayed anthrax booster dose, with “sustained immunological memory to at least month 42,” and suggested that even longer intervals between boosters may be possible, Dr. Bower said.

A dosing schedule of intramuscular injections at 0 and at 1 month and 6 months, with a booster at 42 months yielded survival estimates of approximately 84%-93%.

Dr. Bower noted that a new vaccine, AV7909, has demonstrated safety and effectiveness similar to AVA and could be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis if AVA is not available. AVA remains the preferred option, but ultimately will be replaced by AV7909, when the current AVA stockpile is exhausted.

Additional safety data on AV7909 will be reviewed by ACIP as they become available, and future guidance from the CDC will include statements on dosing for special populations including pregnant and breastfeeding women, said Dr. Bower.

“We anticipate that this [anthrax vaccine] work group will reconvene in 2021 to review data from pending studies” of AV7909, he said.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.

A booster dose for pre-exposure prophylaxis with an anthrax vaccine may be given at 3 years after an initial series for individuals not currently at risk who wish to maintain protection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Carolina K. Smith, MD/Fotolia.com

In a unanimous 15-0 vote at the February meeting, ACIP committee members agreed on the recommendation after adjusting the wording to reflect a permissive, rather than mandated, guidance.

William Bower, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), presented data on Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) to support its protective effects over a longer booster dose interval.

The recommendations apply to persons aged 18 years or older who are not currently at high risk of exposure to Bacillus anthracis, but who might need to deploy to a high-risk area quickly, such as military personnel, Dr. Bower said.

In addition, data suggest that adults who have started, but not completed the pre-exposure priming series, can transition to the postexposure schedule prior to entering a high-risk area, he noted.

The previous pre-exposure anthrax vaccination schedule was a three-dose priming series at 0, 1, and 3 months, followed by a booster at 12 months and 18 months, then annually.

Data from several human immunogenicity studies showed a robust immune response following a delayed anthrax booster dose, with “sustained immunological memory to at least month 42,” and suggested that even longer intervals between boosters may be possible, Dr. Bower said.

A dosing schedule of intramuscular injections at 0 and at 1 month and 6 months, with a booster at 42 months yielded survival estimates of approximately 84%-93%.

Dr. Bower noted that a new vaccine, AV7909, has demonstrated safety and effectiveness similar to AVA and could be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis if AVA is not available. AVA remains the preferred option, but ultimately will be replaced by AV7909, when the current AVA stockpile is exhausted.

Additional safety data on AV7909 will be reviewed by ACIP as they become available, and future guidance from the CDC will include statements on dosing for special populations including pregnant and breastfeeding women, said Dr. Bower.

“We anticipate that this [anthrax vaccine] work group will reconvene in 2021 to review data from pending studies” of AV7909, he said.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.

A booster dose for pre-exposure prophylaxis with an anthrax vaccine may be given at 3 years after an initial series for individuals not currently at risk who wish to maintain protection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Carolina K. Smith, MD/Fotolia.com

In a unanimous 15-0 vote at the February meeting, ACIP committee members agreed on the recommendation after adjusting the wording to reflect a permissive, rather than mandated, guidance.

William Bower, MD, of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), presented data on Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA) to support its protective effects over a longer booster dose interval.

The recommendations apply to persons aged 18 years or older who are not currently at high risk of exposure to Bacillus anthracis, but who might need to deploy to a high-risk area quickly, such as military personnel, Dr. Bower said.

In addition, data suggest that adults who have started, but not completed the pre-exposure priming series, can transition to the postexposure schedule prior to entering a high-risk area, he noted.

The previous pre-exposure anthrax vaccination schedule was a three-dose priming series at 0, 1, and 3 months, followed by a booster at 12 months and 18 months, then annually.

Data from several human immunogenicity studies showed a robust immune response following a delayed anthrax booster dose, with “sustained immunological memory to at least month 42,” and suggested that even longer intervals between boosters may be possible, Dr. Bower said.

A dosing schedule of intramuscular injections at 0 and at 1 month and 6 months, with a booster at 42 months yielded survival estimates of approximately 84%-93%.

Dr. Bower noted that a new vaccine, AV7909, has demonstrated safety and effectiveness similar to AVA and could be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis if AVA is not available. AVA remains the preferred option, but ultimately will be replaced by AV7909, when the current AVA stockpile is exhausted.

Additional safety data on AV7909 will be reviewed by ACIP as they become available, and future guidance from the CDC will include statements on dosing for special populations including pregnant and breastfeeding women, said Dr. Bower.

“We anticipate that this [anthrax vaccine] work group will reconvene in 2021 to review data from pending studies” of AV7909, he said.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Vaccination against Japanese encephalitis is recommended for persons moving to endemic areas, or who travel to these areas frequently or for long-term visits, according to a vote at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus and those at risk for infection include travelers to countries where JE is endemic, as well as laboratory personnel who work with the virus.

The committee voted unanimously 15-0 in favor of the recommendations, which also advised vaccination for those whose travels in endemic areas are uncertain, but not for travelers with low-risk itineraries “such as shorter term travel limited to urban areas or travel that occurs outside of a well-defined JE virus transmission season.”

Susan Hills, MD, of the of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, presented data in support of the recommendations.

A second unanimous vote confirmed recommendations for a primary series schedule for JE vaccination for adults aged 18-65 years as “two doses of vaccine administered on days 0 and 7-28.”

The third vote, also a unanimous 15-0, updated recommendations for a JE booster dose. The new recommendation is that adults and children receive a booster dose (a third dose) at least a year after completion of the primary JE vaccine series “if ongoing exposure or re-exposure to JE virus is expected.”

The currently available Japanese encephalitis vaccine in the United States is an inactivated Vero cell culture-derived vaccine marketed as IXIARO that was approved in March 2009 for individuals aged 17 years and older and approved in May 2013 for children aged 2 months through 16 years.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.
 

Vaccination against Japanese encephalitis is recommended for persons moving to endemic areas, or who travel to these areas frequently or for long-term visits, according to a vote at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus and those at risk for infection include travelers to countries where JE is endemic, as well as laboratory personnel who work with the virus.

The committee voted unanimously 15-0 in favor of the recommendations, which also advised vaccination for those whose travels in endemic areas are uncertain, but not for travelers with low-risk itineraries “such as shorter term travel limited to urban areas or travel that occurs outside of a well-defined JE virus transmission season.”

Susan Hills, MD, of the of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, presented data in support of the recommendations.

A second unanimous vote confirmed recommendations for a primary series schedule for JE vaccination for adults aged 18-65 years as “two doses of vaccine administered on days 0 and 7-28.”

The third vote, also a unanimous 15-0, updated recommendations for a JE booster dose. The new recommendation is that adults and children receive a booster dose (a third dose) at least a year after completion of the primary JE vaccine series “if ongoing exposure or re-exposure to JE virus is expected.”

The currently available Japanese encephalitis vaccine in the United States is an inactivated Vero cell culture-derived vaccine marketed as IXIARO that was approved in March 2009 for individuals aged 17 years and older and approved in May 2013 for children aged 2 months through 16 years.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.
 

Vaccination against Japanese encephalitis is recommended for persons moving to endemic areas, or who travel to these areas frequently or for long-term visits, according to a vote at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus and those at risk for infection include travelers to countries where JE is endemic, as well as laboratory personnel who work with the virus.

The committee voted unanimously 15-0 in favor of the recommendations, which also advised vaccination for those whose travels in endemic areas are uncertain, but not for travelers with low-risk itineraries “such as shorter term travel limited to urban areas or travel that occurs outside of a well-defined JE virus transmission season.”

Susan Hills, MD, of the of the CDC’s National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, presented data in support of the recommendations.

A second unanimous vote confirmed recommendations for a primary series schedule for JE vaccination for adults aged 18-65 years as “two doses of vaccine administered on days 0 and 7-28.”

The third vote, also a unanimous 15-0, updated recommendations for a JE booster dose. The new recommendation is that adults and children receive a booster dose (a third dose) at least a year after completion of the primary JE vaccine series “if ongoing exposure or re-exposure to JE virus is expected.”

The currently available Japanese encephalitis vaccine in the United States is an inactivated Vero cell culture-derived vaccine marketed as IXIARO that was approved in March 2009 for individuals aged 17 years and older and approved in May 2013 for children aged 2 months through 16 years.

The ACIP members had no financial conflicts to disclose.
 

A triple test was a significantly more effective predictor of preeclampsia than was either angiogenic placental growth factor (PlGF) alone or the antiangiogenic factor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(sFLT)/PlGF ratio, based on data from more than 15,000 pregnancies.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

The use of either PlGF or sFLT/PlGF alone to predict preeclampsia fails to account for individual maternal risk factors or the measurement of blood pressure at presentation, wrote Anca Ciobanu, MD, of King’s College London, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the researchers reviewed data from 15,247 singleton pregnancies with live births of healthy babies and compared the preeclampsia detection rates of PlGF, sFLT/PlGF and a competing risks model that included a combination of maternal factors and median values of PlGF, sFLT, and mean arterial pressure (triple test). Preeclampsia developed in 2.1% of pregnancies.

Overall, the triple-test detection rate for delivery with preeclampsia was 10% higher than the sFLT/PlGF ratio and 20% higher than PlGF alone based on assessment at 2 weeks or less or 4 weeks or less before delivery. The negative predictive value was similar for the three tests.

At 2 weeks or less before delivery, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for preeclampsia was significantly higher for the combination model (0.975), compared with PlGF (0.900) or the sFLT/PlGF ratio (0.932), with P less than .0001 in each case. Similarly, at 4 weeks or less before delivery, the AUROC for preeclampsia was 0.907 for the triple test, 0.827 for PlGF alone, and 0.857 for the sFLT/PlGF ratio, with P less than .0001 in each case.

The competing risks model allows clinicians more flexibility to identify patients at increased risk by considering factors including maternal characteristics and variations from normal blood pressure, Dr. Ciobanu and her associates noted. Also, the combination model, “can form the basis of future research that would quantify and incorporate into the model, symptoms such as headache and epigastric pain, as well as proteinuria, creatinine, liver enzymes and platelets.”

The study findings were limited by several factors including the potential predictive value of screening for women with hypertensive symptoms attending specialist clinics, and whether mean arterial pressure would be an effective measure in patients seen at these clinics, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of the competing risks model, which “provides a personalized risk for delivery with preeclampsia that could lead to personalized stratification of the intensity of monitoring and timing of delivery.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Fetal Medicine Foundation; Thermo Fisher Scientific provided the reagents and equipment. The researchers had no financial conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ciobanu A et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb 7. doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.235.

A triple test was a significantly more effective predictor of preeclampsia than was either angiogenic placental growth factor (PlGF) alone or the antiangiogenic factor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(sFLT)/PlGF ratio, based on data from more than 15,000 pregnancies.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

The use of either PlGF or sFLT/PlGF alone to predict preeclampsia fails to account for individual maternal risk factors or the measurement of blood pressure at presentation, wrote Anca Ciobanu, MD, of King’s College London, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the researchers reviewed data from 15,247 singleton pregnancies with live births of healthy babies and compared the preeclampsia detection rates of PlGF, sFLT/PlGF and a competing risks model that included a combination of maternal factors and median values of PlGF, sFLT, and mean arterial pressure (triple test). Preeclampsia developed in 2.1% of pregnancies.

Overall, the triple-test detection rate for delivery with preeclampsia was 10% higher than the sFLT/PlGF ratio and 20% higher than PlGF alone based on assessment at 2 weeks or less or 4 weeks or less before delivery. The negative predictive value was similar for the three tests.

At 2 weeks or less before delivery, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for preeclampsia was significantly higher for the combination model (0.975), compared with PlGF (0.900) or the sFLT/PlGF ratio (0.932), with P less than .0001 in each case. Similarly, at 4 weeks or less before delivery, the AUROC for preeclampsia was 0.907 for the triple test, 0.827 for PlGF alone, and 0.857 for the sFLT/PlGF ratio, with P less than .0001 in each case.

The competing risks model allows clinicians more flexibility to identify patients at increased risk by considering factors including maternal characteristics and variations from normal blood pressure, Dr. Ciobanu and her associates noted. Also, the combination model, “can form the basis of future research that would quantify and incorporate into the model, symptoms such as headache and epigastric pain, as well as proteinuria, creatinine, liver enzymes and platelets.”

The study findings were limited by several factors including the potential predictive value of screening for women with hypertensive symptoms attending specialist clinics, and whether mean arterial pressure would be an effective measure in patients seen at these clinics, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of the competing risks model, which “provides a personalized risk for delivery with preeclampsia that could lead to personalized stratification of the intensity of monitoring and timing of delivery.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Fetal Medicine Foundation; Thermo Fisher Scientific provided the reagents and equipment. The researchers had no financial conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ciobanu A et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb 7. doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.235.

A triple test was a significantly more effective predictor of preeclampsia than was either angiogenic placental growth factor (PlGF) alone or the antiangiogenic factor soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1(sFLT)/PlGF ratio, based on data from more than 15,000 pregnancies.

Jovanmandic/Getty Images

The use of either PlGF or sFLT/PlGF alone to predict preeclampsia fails to account for individual maternal risk factors or the measurement of blood pressure at presentation, wrote Anca Ciobanu, MD, of King’s College London, and her colleagues.

In a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, the researchers reviewed data from 15,247 singleton pregnancies with live births of healthy babies and compared the preeclampsia detection rates of PlGF, sFLT/PlGF and a competing risks model that included a combination of maternal factors and median values of PlGF, sFLT, and mean arterial pressure (triple test). Preeclampsia developed in 2.1% of pregnancies.

Overall, the triple-test detection rate for delivery with preeclampsia was 10% higher than the sFLT/PlGF ratio and 20% higher than PlGF alone based on assessment at 2 weeks or less or 4 weeks or less before delivery. The negative predictive value was similar for the three tests.

At 2 weeks or less before delivery, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) for preeclampsia was significantly higher for the combination model (0.975), compared with PlGF (0.900) or the sFLT/PlGF ratio (0.932), with P less than .0001 in each case. Similarly, at 4 weeks or less before delivery, the AUROC for preeclampsia was 0.907 for the triple test, 0.827 for PlGF alone, and 0.857 for the sFLT/PlGF ratio, with P less than .0001 in each case.

The competing risks model allows clinicians more flexibility to identify patients at increased risk by considering factors including maternal characteristics and variations from normal blood pressure, Dr. Ciobanu and her associates noted. Also, the combination model, “can form the basis of future research that would quantify and incorporate into the model, symptoms such as headache and epigastric pain, as well as proteinuria, creatinine, liver enzymes and platelets.”

The study findings were limited by several factors including the potential predictive value of screening for women with hypertensive symptoms attending specialist clinics, and whether mean arterial pressure would be an effective measure in patients seen at these clinics, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of the competing risks model, which “provides a personalized risk for delivery with preeclampsia that could lead to personalized stratification of the intensity of monitoring and timing of delivery.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Fetal Medicine Foundation; Thermo Fisher Scientific provided the reagents and equipment. The researchers had no financial conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Ciobanu A et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb 7. doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.235.

Newly diagnosed ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially during the first year after diagnosis, according to a population-based study of 7,190 cases.

SOURCE: Aviña-Zubieta JA et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb 8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214388.

Newly diagnosed ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially during the first year after diagnosis, according to a population-based study of 7,190 cases.

SOURCE: Aviña-Zubieta JA et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb 8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214388.

Newly diagnosed ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially during the first year after diagnosis, according to a population-based study of 7,190 cases.

SOURCE: Aviña-Zubieta JA et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb 8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214388.

Pregnant and postpartum women who are at increased risk of developing perinatal depression should undergo a counseling intervention, according to a B recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

monkeybusinessimages/Thinkstock

The Task Force determined that counseling interventions are effective in preventing perinatal depression, defined as a major or minor depressive episode during pregnancy or within the first year after delivery. The condition affects an estimated 12% of new mothers in the United States each year, according to lead author Susan J. Curry, PhD, of the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and her colleagues.

The recommendation, published in JAMA, applies to “pregnant persons and persons who are less than 1 year postpartum who do not have a current diagnosis of depression but are at increased risk of developing depression,” according to the authors (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):580-7).

Risk factors for development of perinatal depression include:

• Past history of depression.
• Current depressive symptoms (that do not reach a diagnostic threshold).
• History of physical or sexual abuse.
• Unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
• Stressful life events.
• Lack of social and financial support.
• Intimate partner violence.
• Pregestational or gestational diabetes.
• Complications during pregnancy.
• Adolescent parenthood.
• Low socioeconomic status.
• Lack of social support.

After reviewing the evidence, the USPSTF found a moderate net benefit for counseling interventions, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy, for preventing perinatal depression in women at risk. Counseling sessions reviewed for this recommendation ranged from 4 to 20 meetings (median, 8 meetings).

The USPSTF found inadequate evidence to assess the harms and benefits of other noncounseling interventions, including pharmacologic therapy.

In the evidence review accompanying the recommendations, Elizabeth A. O’Connor, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Ore., and her colleagues analyzed data from 50 studies including 22,385 individuals; 20 of these studies were randomized, controlled trials of counseling interventions (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):588-601).

Overall, the likelihood of perinatal depression was significantly lower among women who received counseling, compared with controls, among more than 3,000 women in those studies (pooled risk ratio 0.61). Absolute risk differences for perinatal depression ranged from a 1% increased reduction in controls to a 32% increased reduction among women who received counseling. The effects were strongest for cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy as interventions. No adverse events were reported in the counseling intervention studies.

In three studies of health system interventions, the researchers found a benefit for interventions vs. controls, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Trials of most other alternative interventions including infant sleep advice, birth-experience postpartum debriefing, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, expressive writing, antidepressants, and yoga did not show statistical significance in benefit for reducing perinatal depression.

Only one of three randomized controlled trials of physical activity found a statistically significant group difference.

A trial of nortriptyline to prevent perinatal depression showed no benefit, compared with placebo. A sertraline study of found “a smaller percentage of participants taking sertraline had a depression recurrence, compared with those taking placebo,” the investigators wrote. In these two studies, women who took nortriptyline showed no adverse effects, and those in a trial involving sertraline reported significantly more dizziness and drowsiness compared with placebo patients.

The evidence review was limited by the small number of quality studies, especially studies of alternative interventions. More research is needed; however, the findings support data from similar reviews and support the potential for counseling to prevent perinatal depression, particularly in women at increased risk for perinatal depression, Dr. O’Connor and her associates said.

The USPSTF is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Coauthor Dr. Michelle L. Henninger reported receiving grants from Pfizer IGLC (Independent Grants for Learning & Change) outside the submitted work. Coauthor Dr. Bradley N. Gaynes reported receiving personal fees from LivaNova and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. The remaining researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Curry SJ et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):580-7; O’Connor E et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):588-601.

Pregnant and postpartum women who are at increased risk of developing perinatal depression should undergo a counseling intervention, according to a B recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

monkeybusinessimages/Thinkstock

The Task Force determined that counseling interventions are effective in preventing perinatal depression, defined as a major or minor depressive episode during pregnancy or within the first year after delivery. The condition affects an estimated 12% of new mothers in the United States each year, according to lead author Susan J. Curry, PhD, of the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and her colleagues.

The recommendation, published in JAMA, applies to “pregnant persons and persons who are less than 1 year postpartum who do not have a current diagnosis of depression but are at increased risk of developing depression,” according to the authors (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):580-7).

Risk factors for development of perinatal depression include:

• Past history of depression.
• Current depressive symptoms (that do not reach a diagnostic threshold).
• History of physical or sexual abuse.
• Unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
• Stressful life events.
• Lack of social and financial support.
• Intimate partner violence.
• Pregestational or gestational diabetes.
• Complications during pregnancy.
• Adolescent parenthood.
• Low socioeconomic status.
• Lack of social support.

After reviewing the evidence, the USPSTF found a moderate net benefit for counseling interventions, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy, for preventing perinatal depression in women at risk. Counseling sessions reviewed for this recommendation ranged from 4 to 20 meetings (median, 8 meetings).

The USPSTF found inadequate evidence to assess the harms and benefits of other noncounseling interventions, including pharmacologic therapy.

In the evidence review accompanying the recommendations, Elizabeth A. O’Connor, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Ore., and her colleagues analyzed data from 50 studies including 22,385 individuals; 20 of these studies were randomized, controlled trials of counseling interventions (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):588-601).

Overall, the likelihood of perinatal depression was significantly lower among women who received counseling, compared with controls, among more than 3,000 women in those studies (pooled risk ratio 0.61). Absolute risk differences for perinatal depression ranged from a 1% increased reduction in controls to a 32% increased reduction among women who received counseling. The effects were strongest for cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy as interventions. No adverse events were reported in the counseling intervention studies.

In three studies of health system interventions, the researchers found a benefit for interventions vs. controls, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Trials of most other alternative interventions including infant sleep advice, birth-experience postpartum debriefing, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, expressive writing, antidepressants, and yoga did not show statistical significance in benefit for reducing perinatal depression.

Only one of three randomized controlled trials of physical activity found a statistically significant group difference.

A trial of nortriptyline to prevent perinatal depression showed no benefit, compared with placebo. A sertraline study of found “a smaller percentage of participants taking sertraline had a depression recurrence, compared with those taking placebo,” the investigators wrote. In these two studies, women who took nortriptyline showed no adverse effects, and those in a trial involving sertraline reported significantly more dizziness and drowsiness compared with placebo patients.

The evidence review was limited by the small number of quality studies, especially studies of alternative interventions. More research is needed; however, the findings support data from similar reviews and support the potential for counseling to prevent perinatal depression, particularly in women at increased risk for perinatal depression, Dr. O’Connor and her associates said.

The USPSTF is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Coauthor Dr. Michelle L. Henninger reported receiving grants from Pfizer IGLC (Independent Grants for Learning & Change) outside the submitted work. Coauthor Dr. Bradley N. Gaynes reported receiving personal fees from LivaNova and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. The remaining researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Curry SJ et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):580-7; O’Connor E et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):588-601.

Pregnant and postpartum women who are at increased risk of developing perinatal depression should undergo a counseling intervention, according to a B recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

monkeybusinessimages/Thinkstock

The Task Force determined that counseling interventions are effective in preventing perinatal depression, defined as a major or minor depressive episode during pregnancy or within the first year after delivery. The condition affects an estimated 12% of new mothers in the United States each year, according to lead author Susan J. Curry, PhD, of the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and her colleagues.

The recommendation, published in JAMA, applies to “pregnant persons and persons who are less than 1 year postpartum who do not have a current diagnosis of depression but are at increased risk of developing depression,” according to the authors (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):580-7).

Risk factors for development of perinatal depression include:

• Past history of depression.
• Current depressive symptoms (that do not reach a diagnostic threshold).
• History of physical or sexual abuse.
• Unplanned or unwanted pregnancy.
• Stressful life events.
• Lack of social and financial support.
• Intimate partner violence.
• Pregestational or gestational diabetes.
• Complications during pregnancy.
• Adolescent parenthood.
• Low socioeconomic status.
• Lack of social support.

After reviewing the evidence, the USPSTF found a moderate net benefit for counseling interventions, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy, for preventing perinatal depression in women at risk. Counseling sessions reviewed for this recommendation ranged from 4 to 20 meetings (median, 8 meetings).

The USPSTF found inadequate evidence to assess the harms and benefits of other noncounseling interventions, including pharmacologic therapy.

In the evidence review accompanying the recommendations, Elizabeth A. O’Connor, PhD, of Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Ore., and her colleagues analyzed data from 50 studies including 22,385 individuals; 20 of these studies were randomized, controlled trials of counseling interventions (JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):588-601).

Overall, the likelihood of perinatal depression was significantly lower among women who received counseling, compared with controls, among more than 3,000 women in those studies (pooled risk ratio 0.61). Absolute risk differences for perinatal depression ranged from a 1% increased reduction in controls to a 32% increased reduction among women who received counseling. The effects were strongest for cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy as interventions. No adverse events were reported in the counseling intervention studies.

In three studies of health system interventions, the researchers found a benefit for interventions vs. controls, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Trials of most other alternative interventions including infant sleep advice, birth-experience postpartum debriefing, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, expressive writing, antidepressants, and yoga did not show statistical significance in benefit for reducing perinatal depression.

Only one of three randomized controlled trials of physical activity found a statistically significant group difference.

A trial of nortriptyline to prevent perinatal depression showed no benefit, compared with placebo. A sertraline study of found “a smaller percentage of participants taking sertraline had a depression recurrence, compared with those taking placebo,” the investigators wrote. In these two studies, women who took nortriptyline showed no adverse effects, and those in a trial involving sertraline reported significantly more dizziness and drowsiness compared with placebo patients.

The evidence review was limited by the small number of quality studies, especially studies of alternative interventions. More research is needed; however, the findings support data from similar reviews and support the potential for counseling to prevent perinatal depression, particularly in women at increased risk for perinatal depression, Dr. O’Connor and her associates said.

The USPSTF is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Coauthor Dr. Michelle L. Henninger reported receiving grants from Pfizer IGLC (Independent Grants for Learning & Change) outside the submitted work. Coauthor Dr. Bradley N. Gaynes reported receiving personal fees from LivaNova and Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. The remaining researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Curry SJ et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):580-7; O’Connor E et al. JAMA. 2019;321(6):588-601.