The Journal of Family Practice

The biopsy results indicated that the lesion was a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)—a malignant fibrotic tumor of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Note that the shiny surface and multilobular appearance can be characteristic of DFSP, but not all DFSPs present this way. Some may just present as a growing, firm, subcutaneous painful tumor.

DFSPs resemble a large irregular dermatofibroma, but a dermatofibroma is not a precursor to this. A DFSP is a separate malignant tumor, and not the result of a dermatofibroma that is growing out of control. While DFSPs typically do not metastasize, they can be locally aggressive, with a high recurrence rate after standard surgery. Because of this, the FP referred the patient to a Mohs surgeon to perform the excision. Mohs surgery allowed the surgeon to look at all margins of the lesion under a microscope to get the highest possible cure rate.

Two years later, this patient had no signs of regrowth. The most important lesson with this case was that one should not rely on incomplete biopsy sampling, especially when there is continued growth and symptoms that suggest an undiagnosed malignancy.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The biopsy results indicated that the lesion was a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)—a malignant fibrotic tumor of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Note that the shiny surface and multilobular appearance can be characteristic of DFSP, but not all DFSPs present this way. Some may just present as a growing, firm, subcutaneous painful tumor.

DFSPs resemble a large irregular dermatofibroma, but a dermatofibroma is not a precursor to this. A DFSP is a separate malignant tumor, and not the result of a dermatofibroma that is growing out of control. While DFSPs typically do not metastasize, they can be locally aggressive, with a high recurrence rate after standard surgery. Because of this, the FP referred the patient to a Mohs surgeon to perform the excision. Mohs surgery allowed the surgeon to look at all margins of the lesion under a microscope to get the highest possible cure rate.

Two years later, this patient had no signs of regrowth. The most important lesson with this case was that one should not rely on incomplete biopsy sampling, especially when there is continued growth and symptoms that suggest an undiagnosed malignancy.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The biopsy results indicated that the lesion was a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP)—a malignant fibrotic tumor of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Note that the shiny surface and multilobular appearance can be characteristic of DFSP, but not all DFSPs present this way. Some may just present as a growing, firm, subcutaneous painful tumor.

DFSPs resemble a large irregular dermatofibroma, but a dermatofibroma is not a precursor to this. A DFSP is a separate malignant tumor, and not the result of a dermatofibroma that is growing out of control. While DFSPs typically do not metastasize, they can be locally aggressive, with a high recurrence rate after standard surgery. Because of this, the FP referred the patient to a Mohs surgeon to perform the excision. Mohs surgery allowed the surgeon to look at all margins of the lesion under a microscope to get the highest possible cure rate.

Two years later, this patient had no signs of regrowth. The most important lesson with this case was that one should not rely on incomplete biopsy sampling, especially when there is continued growth and symptoms that suggest an undiagnosed malignancy.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The dermatoscope revealed a fine reticular network around a central scar, which confirmed a diagnosis of dermatofibroma. A dermatofibroma is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor found in the mid dermis, composed of a mixture of fibroblastic and histiocytic cells. It represents a fibrous reaction triggered by trauma, a viral infection, or an insect bite. Many dermatofibromas have a hyperpigmented halo around a central hypopigmented fibrous scar.

Dermoscopy is a very useful diagnostic technique for dermatofibroma. The most common pattern found is a peripheral reticular pigment network with a central hypopigmented stellate area.

No treatment is necessary unless the diagnosis is uncertain or symptoms warrant it. Dermatofibromas can be removed using punch excision for small lesions or an elliptical (fusiform) excision down to the subcutaneous fat for larger lesions. Cryotherapy is one option to shrink the lesion, but the cure rate is low and lesions may regrow.

The patient was relieved that the lesion was not cancer and opted to leave it be, as it was not bothering him.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The dermatoscope revealed a fine reticular network around a central scar, which confirmed a diagnosis of dermatofibroma. A dermatofibroma is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor found in the mid dermis, composed of a mixture of fibroblastic and histiocytic cells. It represents a fibrous reaction triggered by trauma, a viral infection, or an insect bite. Many dermatofibromas have a hyperpigmented halo around a central hypopigmented fibrous scar.

Dermoscopy is a very useful diagnostic technique for dermatofibroma. The most common pattern found is a peripheral reticular pigment network with a central hypopigmented stellate area.

No treatment is necessary unless the diagnosis is uncertain or symptoms warrant it. Dermatofibromas can be removed using punch excision for small lesions or an elliptical (fusiform) excision down to the subcutaneous fat for larger lesions. Cryotherapy is one option to shrink the lesion, but the cure rate is low and lesions may regrow.

The patient was relieved that the lesion was not cancer and opted to leave it be, as it was not bothering him.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The dermatoscope revealed a fine reticular network around a central scar, which confirmed a diagnosis of dermatofibroma. A dermatofibroma is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor found in the mid dermis, composed of a mixture of fibroblastic and histiocytic cells. It represents a fibrous reaction triggered by trauma, a viral infection, or an insect bite. Many dermatofibromas have a hyperpigmented halo around a central hypopigmented fibrous scar.

Dermoscopy is a very useful diagnostic technique for dermatofibroma. The most common pattern found is a peripheral reticular pigment network with a central hypopigmented stellate area.

No treatment is necessary unless the diagnosis is uncertain or symptoms warrant it. Dermatofibromas can be removed using punch excision for small lesions or an elliptical (fusiform) excision down to the subcutaneous fat for larger lesions. Cryotherapy is one option to shrink the lesion, but the cure rate is low and lesions may regrow.

The patient was relieved that the lesion was not cancer and opted to leave it be, as it was not bothering him.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Usatine R. Dermatofibroma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 935-939.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been gaining greater traction in recent years as a way to quickly (and cost-effectively) assess for conditions including systolic dysfunction, pleural effusion, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It involves limited and specific ultrasound protocols performed at the bedside by the health care provider who is trying to answer a specific question and, thus, help guide treatment of the patient.

POCUS was first widely used by emergency physicians starting in the early 1990s with the widespread adoption of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan.^1,2 Since that time, POCUS has expanded beyond trauma applications and into family medicine.

One study assessed physicians’ perceptions of POCUS after its integration into a military family medicine clinic. The study showed that physicians perceived POCUS to be relatively easy to use, not overly time consuming, and of high value to the practice.³ In fact, the literature tells us that POCUS can help decrease the cost of health care and improve outcomes,^4-7 while requiring a relatively brief training period.

If residencies are any indication, POCUS may be headed your way

Ultrasound units are becoming smaller and more affordable, and medical schools are increasingly incorporating ultrasound curricula into medical student training.⁸ As of 2016, only 6% of practicing FPs reported using non-obstetric POCUS in their practices.⁹ Similarly, a survey from 2015 reported that only 2% of family medicine residency programs had established POCUS curricula.¹⁰ However, 50% of respondents in the 2015 survey reported early-stage development or interest in developing a POCUS curriculum.

Since then a validated family medicine residency curriculum has been published,¹¹ and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recently released a POCUS Curriculum Guideline for residencies (https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint290D_POCUS.pdf).

[polldaddy:9928416]

The potential applications of POCUS in family medicine are numerous and have been reviewed in several recent publications.^12,13 In this article, we will review the evidence for the use of POCUS in 4 areas: the cardiovascular exam (FIGURES 1 and 2), the lung exam (FIGURES 3-6), the screening exam for AAAs (FIGURE 7), and the evaluation for DVT (FIGURES 8 and 9). (Obstetric and musculoskeletal applications have been sufficiently covered elsewhere.^14-17) For all of these applications, POCUS is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by non-radiology specialists, including FPs (TABLEs 1 and 2).

Just 2 hours of cardio POCUS training enhanced Dx accuracy

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) issued an expert consensus statement for focused cardiac ultrasound in 2013.¹⁸ The guideline supports non-cardiologists utilizing POCUS to assess for pericardial effusion and right and left ventricular enlargement, as well as to review global cardiac systolic function and intravascular volume status. Cardiovascular POCUS protocols are relatively easy to learn; even small amounts of training and practice can yield competency.

Point-of-care ultrasound is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by family physicians.

For example, a 2013 study showed that after 2 hours of training with a pocket ultrasound device, medical students and junior physicians inexperienced with POCUS were able to improve their diagnostic accuracy for heart failure from 50% to 75%.¹⁹ In another study, internal medicine residents with limited cardiac ultrasound training (ie, 20 practice exams) were able to detect decreased left ventricular ejection fraction using a handheld ultrasound device with 94% sensitivity and specificity in patients admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure.²⁰ Similarly, after only 8 hours of training, a group of Norwegian general practitioners were able to obtain measurements of systolic function with a pocket ultrasound device that were not statistically different from a cardiologist’s measurements.²¹

In another study, rural FPs attended a 4-day course and then performed focused cardiac ultrasounds on primary care patients with a clinical indication for an echocardiogram.²² The scans were uploaded to a Web-based program for remote interpretation by a cardiologist. There was high concordance between the FPs’ interpretations of the focused cardiac ultrasounds and the cardiologist’s interpretations. Only 32% of the patients in the study group required a formal follow-up echocardiogram.

Kimura et al published a POCUS protocol for the rapid assessment of patients with heart failure, called the Cardiopulmonary Limited Ultrasound Exam (CLUE).²³ The CLUE protocol utilizes 4 views to assess left ventricular systolic and diastolic function along with signs of pulmonary edema or systemic volume overload (TABLE 3²³). The presence of pulmonary edema or a plethoric inferior vena cava (IVC) was highly prognostic of in-hospital mortality. The CLUE protocol has been successfully used by novices including internal medicine residents after brief training (ie, up to 60 supervised scans) and can be performed in less than 5 minutes.^24,25

More sensitive, specific than x-rays for pulmonary diagnoses

The chest x-ray has traditionally been the imaging modality of choice to evaluate primary care pulmonary complaints. However, POCUS can be more sensitive and specific than a chest x-ray for evaluating several pulmonary diagnoses including pleural effusion, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema.

Pleural effusion can be difficult to detect with a physical exam alone. A systematic review showed that the physical exam is not sensitive for effusions <300 mL and can have even lower utility in obese patients.²⁸ While an upright lateral chest x-ray can accurately detect effusions as small as 50 mL, portable x-rays have sensitivities of only 53% to 71% for small- or moderate-sized effusions.^29,30 Ultrasound, however, has a sensitivity of 97% for small effusions.³¹

A 2016 meta-analysis showed that POCUS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 98%, respectively, for pleural effusions, while chest x-ray had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 51% and 91%, respectively, when compared with computed tomography (CT) and expert sonography.³² POCUS evaluation for pleural effusion is technically simple, and at least one study showed that even novice users can achieve high diagnostic accuracy after only 3 hours of training.³³

Pneumonia is the eighth leading cause of death in the United States and the single leading cause of infectious disease death in children worldwide.^34-36 Pneumonia is a difficult diagnosis to make based on a history and physical examination alone, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends diagnostic imaging to make the diagnosis.³⁷

The adult and pediatric literature clearly demonstrate that lung ultrasound is accurate at diagnosing pneumonia. In a 2015 meta-analysis of the pediatric literature, lung ultrasound had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 93% and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 15.3 and 0.06, respectively.³⁸ In adults, a 2016 meta-analysis of lung ultrasound showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 88%, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 6.6 and 0.08, respectively.³⁹

In 2015, a prospective study compared the accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray using CT as the gold standard.⁴⁰ Lung ultrasound had a significantly better sensitivity of 82% compared to a sensitivity of 64% for chest x-ray. Specificities were comparable at 94% for ultrasound and 90% for chest x-ray.⁴⁰

At least one study found novice sonographers to be accurate with lung POCUS for the diagnosis of pneumonia after only two 90-minute training sessions.⁴¹ Moreover, ultrasound has a more favorable safety profile, greater portability, and lower cost compared with chest x-ray and CT.

Pulmonary edema. Lung ultrasound can identify interstitial pulmonary edema via artifacts called B lines, which are produced by the reverberation of sound waves from the pleura due to the widening of the fluid-filled interlobular septa. These are distinctly different from the A-line pattern of repeating horizontal lines that is seen with normal lungs, making lung ultrasound more accurate than chest x-ray for identification of pulmonary edema.^42,43 When final diagnosis via blinded chart review is used as the reference standard, bilateral B lines on a lung ultrasound image have a sensitivity of 86% to 100% and a specificity of 92% to 98% for the diagnosis of pulmonary edema compared to chest x-ray’s sensitivity of 56.9% and specificity of 89.2%.⁴⁴ There is also a linear correlation between the number of B lines present and the extent of pulmonary edema.^42,45,46 The number of B lines decreases in real time as volume is removed in dialysis patients.⁴⁷

POCUS evaluation for B lines can be learned very quickly. Exams of novices who have performed only 5 prior exams correlate highly with those of experts who have performed more than 100 exams.⁴⁸

Simple, efficient screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm

AAAs are present in up to 7% of men over the age of 50.⁴⁹ The mortality rate of a ruptured AAA is as high as 80% to 95%.⁵⁰ There is, however, a long prodromal period when interventions can make a significant difference, which is why accurate screening is so important.

AAA screening with ultrasound has been shown to decrease mortality.⁵¹ The current recommendation of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a one-time AAA screening for all men ages 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked (Grade B).⁵² Despite the recommendations of the USPSTF, screening rates are low. One study found that only 9% of eligible patients in primary care practices received appropriate screening.⁵¹

Ultrasound performed by specialists is known to be an excellent screening test for AAA with a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.9%.⁵³ POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians for the evaluation of symptomatic AAA is well established in the literature. A meta-analysis including 7 studies and 655 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 98%.⁵⁴ Multiple studies also support primary care physicians performing POCUS AAA screening in the clinic setting.

For example, a 2012 prospective, observational study performed in Canada compared office-based ultrasound screening exams performed by a rural FP to scans performed in the hospital on the same patients.⁵⁵ The physician completed 50 training examinations. The average discrepancy in aorta diameters between the 2 was only 2 mm, which is clinically insignificant, and the office-based scans had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Similarly, a second FP study performed in Barcelona, showed that an FP who performed POCUS AAA screening had 100% concordance with a radiologist.⁵⁶ Additionally, POCUS screening for AAA was not time consuming; it was performed in under 4 minutes per patient.^55,57

Ruling out DVT

DVT is a relatively rare occurrence in the ambulatory setting. However, patients who present with a painful, swollen lower extremity are much more common, and DVT must be considered and ruled out in these situations.

Although isolated distal DVTs that occur in the calf veins are usually self-limited and have a very low risk of embolization, they can progress to proximal DVTs of the thigh veins up to 20% of time.^58,59 Similarly, thrombophlebitis of the superficial lower extremity veins rarely embolizes, but can progress to a proximal DVT, especially if large segments are involved or if the segments are within 5 cm of the junction to the deep venous system.⁵⁹ The risk of missing a proximal leg DVT is high because embolization occurs up to 60% of the time if the DVT is left untreated.⁶⁰

The current standard for diagnosis of DVT is the lower extremity Doppler ultrasound examination, but obtaining same-day Doppler evaluations can be difficult in the ambulatory setting. In these instances, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends that even low-risk patients receive anticoagulation pending the evaluation if it cannot be obtained in the first 24 hours.⁵⁹ This approach not only increases the cost of care, but also exposes patients—many of whom will not be diagnosed with thrombosis in the end—to the risks of anticoagulation.

D-dimer blood tests have drawbacks, too. While a negative high-sensitivity D-dimer blood test in a patient with a low pre-test probability of DVT can effectively rule out a DVT, laboratory testing is not always immediately available in the ambulatory setting either.⁶¹ Additionally, false-positive rates are high, and positive D-dimer exams still require evaluation by Doppler ultrasound.

Given these limitations, performing an ultrasound at the bedside or in the exam room can allow for more timely and cost-effective care. In fact, research shows that a limited ultrasound, called the 2-region compression exam, which follows along the course of the common femoral vein and popliteal vein only, ignoring the femoral and calf veins, is highly accurate in assessing for proximal leg DVTs. As such, it has been adopted for POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians.⁶²

Multiple studies show that physicians with minimal training can perform the 2-region compression exam with a high degree of accuracy when full-leg Doppler ultrasound was used as the gold standard.^63,64 In these studies, hands-on training times ranged from only 10 minutes to 5 hours, and the exam could be performed in less than 4 minutes. A systematic review of 6 studies comparing emergency physician-performed ultrasound with radiology-performed ultrasound calculated an overall sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) for those performed by emergency physicians.⁶⁵

The main concern with the 2-region compression exam is that it can miss a distal leg DVT. As stated earlier, distal DVTs are relatively benign and tend to resolve without treatment; however, up to 20% can progress to become a dangerous proximal leg DVT.⁵⁸ Researchers have validated several methods by prospective trials to address this limitation.

Point-of-care ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be performed in less than 4 minutes.

Specifically, researchers have demonstrated that patients with a low pre-test probability of DVT per the Wells scoring system could have DVT effectively ruled out with a single 2-region compression ultrasound without further evaluation.⁶⁶ In another study, researchers evaluated all patients (regardless of pretest probability) with a 2-point compression exam and found that those with negative exams could be followed with a second exam in 7 to 10 days without initiating anticoagulation. If the second one was negative, no further evaluation was needed.^67,68

And finally, researchers demonstrated that a negative 2-point compression ultrasound in combination with a concurrent negative D-dimer test was effective at ruling out DVT, regardless of pre-test probability.^69,70

A preferred approach

Given this data and the fact that in the ambulatory setting it is often easier and faster to perform a 2-region compression examination than to obtain a D-dimer laboratory test or a formal full-leg Doppler ultrasound, what follows is our preferred approach to a patient with suspected DVT in the outpatient setting (FIGURE 10).

We first assess pre-test probability using the Wells scoring system. We then perform the 2-region compression ultrasound. If the patient has low pre-test risk according to the Wells score, we rule out DVT. If the patient has moderate or high risk with a negative 2-region compression ultrasound, the patient gets a D-dimer test. If the D-dimer test is negative, we rule out DVT. If the D-dimer test is positive, we schedule the patient for a repeat 2-region compression ultrasound in 7 to 10 days. If at any time the 2-region compression evaluation is positive, we treat the patient for DVT.

CORRESPONDENCE
Paul Bornemann, MD, Palmetto Health Family Medicine Residency, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 3209 Colonial Drive, Columbia, SC 29203; [email protected].

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been gaining greater traction in recent years as a way to quickly (and cost-effectively) assess for conditions including systolic dysfunction, pleural effusion, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It involves limited and specific ultrasound protocols performed at the bedside by the health care provider who is trying to answer a specific question and, thus, help guide treatment of the patient.

POCUS was first widely used by emergency physicians starting in the early 1990s with the widespread adoption of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan.^1,2 Since that time, POCUS has expanded beyond trauma applications and into family medicine.

One study assessed physicians’ perceptions of POCUS after its integration into a military family medicine clinic. The study showed that physicians perceived POCUS to be relatively easy to use, not overly time consuming, and of high value to the practice.³ In fact, the literature tells us that POCUS can help decrease the cost of health care and improve outcomes,^4-7 while requiring a relatively brief training period.

If residencies are any indication, POCUS may be headed your way

Ultrasound units are becoming smaller and more affordable, and medical schools are increasingly incorporating ultrasound curricula into medical student training.⁸ As of 2016, only 6% of practicing FPs reported using non-obstetric POCUS in their practices.⁹ Similarly, a survey from 2015 reported that only 2% of family medicine residency programs had established POCUS curricula.¹⁰ However, 50% of respondents in the 2015 survey reported early-stage development or interest in developing a POCUS curriculum.

Since then a validated family medicine residency curriculum has been published,¹¹ and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recently released a POCUS Curriculum Guideline for residencies (https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint290D_POCUS.pdf).

[polldaddy:9928416]

The potential applications of POCUS in family medicine are numerous and have been reviewed in several recent publications.^12,13 In this article, we will review the evidence for the use of POCUS in 4 areas: the cardiovascular exam (FIGURES 1 and 2), the lung exam (FIGURES 3-6), the screening exam for AAAs (FIGURE 7), and the evaluation for DVT (FIGURES 8 and 9). (Obstetric and musculoskeletal applications have been sufficiently covered elsewhere.^14-17) For all of these applications, POCUS is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by non-radiology specialists, including FPs (TABLEs 1 and 2).

Just 2 hours of cardio POCUS training enhanced Dx accuracy

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) issued an expert consensus statement for focused cardiac ultrasound in 2013.¹⁸ The guideline supports non-cardiologists utilizing POCUS to assess for pericardial effusion and right and left ventricular enlargement, as well as to review global cardiac systolic function and intravascular volume status. Cardiovascular POCUS protocols are relatively easy to learn; even small amounts of training and practice can yield competency.

Point-of-care ultrasound is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by family physicians.

For example, a 2013 study showed that after 2 hours of training with a pocket ultrasound device, medical students and junior physicians inexperienced with POCUS were able to improve their diagnostic accuracy for heart failure from 50% to 75%.¹⁹ In another study, internal medicine residents with limited cardiac ultrasound training (ie, 20 practice exams) were able to detect decreased left ventricular ejection fraction using a handheld ultrasound device with 94% sensitivity and specificity in patients admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure.²⁰ Similarly, after only 8 hours of training, a group of Norwegian general practitioners were able to obtain measurements of systolic function with a pocket ultrasound device that were not statistically different from a cardiologist’s measurements.²¹

In another study, rural FPs attended a 4-day course and then performed focused cardiac ultrasounds on primary care patients with a clinical indication for an echocardiogram.²² The scans were uploaded to a Web-based program for remote interpretation by a cardiologist. There was high concordance between the FPs’ interpretations of the focused cardiac ultrasounds and the cardiologist’s interpretations. Only 32% of the patients in the study group required a formal follow-up echocardiogram.

Kimura et al published a POCUS protocol for the rapid assessment of patients with heart failure, called the Cardiopulmonary Limited Ultrasound Exam (CLUE).²³ The CLUE protocol utilizes 4 views to assess left ventricular systolic and diastolic function along with signs of pulmonary edema or systemic volume overload (TABLE 3²³). The presence of pulmonary edema or a plethoric inferior vena cava (IVC) was highly prognostic of in-hospital mortality. The CLUE protocol has been successfully used by novices including internal medicine residents after brief training (ie, up to 60 supervised scans) and can be performed in less than 5 minutes.^24,25

More sensitive, specific than x-rays for pulmonary diagnoses

The chest x-ray has traditionally been the imaging modality of choice to evaluate primary care pulmonary complaints. However, POCUS can be more sensitive and specific than a chest x-ray for evaluating several pulmonary diagnoses including pleural effusion, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema.

Pleural effusion can be difficult to detect with a physical exam alone. A systematic review showed that the physical exam is not sensitive for effusions <300 mL and can have even lower utility in obese patients.²⁸ While an upright lateral chest x-ray can accurately detect effusions as small as 50 mL, portable x-rays have sensitivities of only 53% to 71% for small- or moderate-sized effusions.^29,30 Ultrasound, however, has a sensitivity of 97% for small effusions.³¹

A 2016 meta-analysis showed that POCUS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 98%, respectively, for pleural effusions, while chest x-ray had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 51% and 91%, respectively, when compared with computed tomography (CT) and expert sonography.³² POCUS evaluation for pleural effusion is technically simple, and at least one study showed that even novice users can achieve high diagnostic accuracy after only 3 hours of training.³³

Pneumonia is the eighth leading cause of death in the United States and the single leading cause of infectious disease death in children worldwide.^34-36 Pneumonia is a difficult diagnosis to make based on a history and physical examination alone, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends diagnostic imaging to make the diagnosis.³⁷

The adult and pediatric literature clearly demonstrate that lung ultrasound is accurate at diagnosing pneumonia. In a 2015 meta-analysis of the pediatric literature, lung ultrasound had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 93% and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 15.3 and 0.06, respectively.³⁸ In adults, a 2016 meta-analysis of lung ultrasound showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 88%, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 6.6 and 0.08, respectively.³⁹

In 2015, a prospective study compared the accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray using CT as the gold standard.⁴⁰ Lung ultrasound had a significantly better sensitivity of 82% compared to a sensitivity of 64% for chest x-ray. Specificities were comparable at 94% for ultrasound and 90% for chest x-ray.⁴⁰

At least one study found novice sonographers to be accurate with lung POCUS for the diagnosis of pneumonia after only two 90-minute training sessions.⁴¹ Moreover, ultrasound has a more favorable safety profile, greater portability, and lower cost compared with chest x-ray and CT.

Pulmonary edema. Lung ultrasound can identify interstitial pulmonary edema via artifacts called B lines, which are produced by the reverberation of sound waves from the pleura due to the widening of the fluid-filled interlobular septa. These are distinctly different from the A-line pattern of repeating horizontal lines that is seen with normal lungs, making lung ultrasound more accurate than chest x-ray for identification of pulmonary edema.^42,43 When final diagnosis via blinded chart review is used as the reference standard, bilateral B lines on a lung ultrasound image have a sensitivity of 86% to 100% and a specificity of 92% to 98% for the diagnosis of pulmonary edema compared to chest x-ray’s sensitivity of 56.9% and specificity of 89.2%.⁴⁴ There is also a linear correlation between the number of B lines present and the extent of pulmonary edema.^42,45,46 The number of B lines decreases in real time as volume is removed in dialysis patients.⁴⁷

POCUS evaluation for B lines can be learned very quickly. Exams of novices who have performed only 5 prior exams correlate highly with those of experts who have performed more than 100 exams.⁴⁸

Simple, efficient screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm

AAAs are present in up to 7% of men over the age of 50.⁴⁹ The mortality rate of a ruptured AAA is as high as 80% to 95%.⁵⁰ There is, however, a long prodromal period when interventions can make a significant difference, which is why accurate screening is so important.

AAA screening with ultrasound has been shown to decrease mortality.⁵¹ The current recommendation of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a one-time AAA screening for all men ages 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked (Grade B).⁵² Despite the recommendations of the USPSTF, screening rates are low. One study found that only 9% of eligible patients in primary care practices received appropriate screening.⁵¹

Ultrasound performed by specialists is known to be an excellent screening test for AAA with a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.9%.⁵³ POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians for the evaluation of symptomatic AAA is well established in the literature. A meta-analysis including 7 studies and 655 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 98%.⁵⁴ Multiple studies also support primary care physicians performing POCUS AAA screening in the clinic setting.

For example, a 2012 prospective, observational study performed in Canada compared office-based ultrasound screening exams performed by a rural FP to scans performed in the hospital on the same patients.⁵⁵ The physician completed 50 training examinations. The average discrepancy in aorta diameters between the 2 was only 2 mm, which is clinically insignificant, and the office-based scans had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Similarly, a second FP study performed in Barcelona, showed that an FP who performed POCUS AAA screening had 100% concordance with a radiologist.⁵⁶ Additionally, POCUS screening for AAA was not time consuming; it was performed in under 4 minutes per patient.^55,57

Ruling out DVT

DVT is a relatively rare occurrence in the ambulatory setting. However, patients who present with a painful, swollen lower extremity are much more common, and DVT must be considered and ruled out in these situations.

Although isolated distal DVTs that occur in the calf veins are usually self-limited and have a very low risk of embolization, they can progress to proximal DVTs of the thigh veins up to 20% of time.^58,59 Similarly, thrombophlebitis of the superficial lower extremity veins rarely embolizes, but can progress to a proximal DVT, especially if large segments are involved or if the segments are within 5 cm of the junction to the deep venous system.⁵⁹ The risk of missing a proximal leg DVT is high because embolization occurs up to 60% of the time if the DVT is left untreated.⁶⁰

The current standard for diagnosis of DVT is the lower extremity Doppler ultrasound examination, but obtaining same-day Doppler evaluations can be difficult in the ambulatory setting. In these instances, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends that even low-risk patients receive anticoagulation pending the evaluation if it cannot be obtained in the first 24 hours.⁵⁹ This approach not only increases the cost of care, but also exposes patients—many of whom will not be diagnosed with thrombosis in the end—to the risks of anticoagulation.

D-dimer blood tests have drawbacks, too. While a negative high-sensitivity D-dimer blood test in a patient with a low pre-test probability of DVT can effectively rule out a DVT, laboratory testing is not always immediately available in the ambulatory setting either.⁶¹ Additionally, false-positive rates are high, and positive D-dimer exams still require evaluation by Doppler ultrasound.

Given these limitations, performing an ultrasound at the bedside or in the exam room can allow for more timely and cost-effective care. In fact, research shows that a limited ultrasound, called the 2-region compression exam, which follows along the course of the common femoral vein and popliteal vein only, ignoring the femoral and calf veins, is highly accurate in assessing for proximal leg DVTs. As such, it has been adopted for POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians.⁶²

Multiple studies show that physicians with minimal training can perform the 2-region compression exam with a high degree of accuracy when full-leg Doppler ultrasound was used as the gold standard.^63,64 In these studies, hands-on training times ranged from only 10 minutes to 5 hours, and the exam could be performed in less than 4 minutes. A systematic review of 6 studies comparing emergency physician-performed ultrasound with radiology-performed ultrasound calculated an overall sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) for those performed by emergency physicians.⁶⁵

The main concern with the 2-region compression exam is that it can miss a distal leg DVT. As stated earlier, distal DVTs are relatively benign and tend to resolve without treatment; however, up to 20% can progress to become a dangerous proximal leg DVT.⁵⁸ Researchers have validated several methods by prospective trials to address this limitation.

Point-of-care ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be performed in less than 4 minutes.

Specifically, researchers have demonstrated that patients with a low pre-test probability of DVT per the Wells scoring system could have DVT effectively ruled out with a single 2-region compression ultrasound without further evaluation.⁶⁶ In another study, researchers evaluated all patients (regardless of pretest probability) with a 2-point compression exam and found that those with negative exams could be followed with a second exam in 7 to 10 days without initiating anticoagulation. If the second one was negative, no further evaluation was needed.^67,68

And finally, researchers demonstrated that a negative 2-point compression ultrasound in combination with a concurrent negative D-dimer test was effective at ruling out DVT, regardless of pre-test probability.^69,70

A preferred approach

Given this data and the fact that in the ambulatory setting it is often easier and faster to perform a 2-region compression examination than to obtain a D-dimer laboratory test or a formal full-leg Doppler ultrasound, what follows is our preferred approach to a patient with suspected DVT in the outpatient setting (FIGURE 10).

We first assess pre-test probability using the Wells scoring system. We then perform the 2-region compression ultrasound. If the patient has low pre-test risk according to the Wells score, we rule out DVT. If the patient has moderate or high risk with a negative 2-region compression ultrasound, the patient gets a D-dimer test. If the D-dimer test is negative, we rule out DVT. If the D-dimer test is positive, we schedule the patient for a repeat 2-region compression ultrasound in 7 to 10 days. If at any time the 2-region compression evaluation is positive, we treat the patient for DVT.

CORRESPONDENCE
Paul Bornemann, MD, Palmetto Health Family Medicine Residency, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 3209 Colonial Drive, Columbia, SC 29203; [email protected].

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been gaining greater traction in recent years as a way to quickly (and cost-effectively) assess for conditions including systolic dysfunction, pleural effusion, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It involves limited and specific ultrasound protocols performed at the bedside by the health care provider who is trying to answer a specific question and, thus, help guide treatment of the patient.

POCUS was first widely used by emergency physicians starting in the early 1990s with the widespread adoption of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) scan.^1,2 Since that time, POCUS has expanded beyond trauma applications and into family medicine.

One study assessed physicians’ perceptions of POCUS after its integration into a military family medicine clinic. The study showed that physicians perceived POCUS to be relatively easy to use, not overly time consuming, and of high value to the practice.³ In fact, the literature tells us that POCUS can help decrease the cost of health care and improve outcomes,^4-7 while requiring a relatively brief training period.

If residencies are any indication, POCUS may be headed your way

Ultrasound units are becoming smaller and more affordable, and medical schools are increasingly incorporating ultrasound curricula into medical student training.⁸ As of 2016, only 6% of practicing FPs reported using non-obstetric POCUS in their practices.⁹ Similarly, a survey from 2015 reported that only 2% of family medicine residency programs had established POCUS curricula.¹⁰ However, 50% of respondents in the 2015 survey reported early-stage development or interest in developing a POCUS curriculum.

Since then a validated family medicine residency curriculum has been published,¹¹ and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) recently released a POCUS Curriculum Guideline for residencies (https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/medical_education_residency/program_directors/Reprint290D_POCUS.pdf).

[polldaddy:9928416]

The potential applications of POCUS in family medicine are numerous and have been reviewed in several recent publications.^12,13 In this article, we will review the evidence for the use of POCUS in 4 areas: the cardiovascular exam (FIGURES 1 and 2), the lung exam (FIGURES 3-6), the screening exam for AAAs (FIGURE 7), and the evaluation for DVT (FIGURES 8 and 9). (Obstetric and musculoskeletal applications have been sufficiently covered elsewhere.^14-17) For all of these applications, POCUS is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by non-radiology specialists, including FPs (TABLEs 1 and 2).

Just 2 hours of cardio POCUS training enhanced Dx accuracy

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) issued an expert consensus statement for focused cardiac ultrasound in 2013.¹⁸ The guideline supports non-cardiologists utilizing POCUS to assess for pericardial effusion and right and left ventricular enlargement, as well as to review global cardiac systolic function and intravascular volume status. Cardiovascular POCUS protocols are relatively easy to learn; even small amounts of training and practice can yield competency.

Point-of-care ultrasound is safe, accurate, and beneficial and can be performed with a relatively small amount of training by family physicians.

For example, a 2013 study showed that after 2 hours of training with a pocket ultrasound device, medical students and junior physicians inexperienced with POCUS were able to improve their diagnostic accuracy for heart failure from 50% to 75%.¹⁹ In another study, internal medicine residents with limited cardiac ultrasound training (ie, 20 practice exams) were able to detect decreased left ventricular ejection fraction using a handheld ultrasound device with 94% sensitivity and specificity in patients admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure.²⁰ Similarly, after only 8 hours of training, a group of Norwegian general practitioners were able to obtain measurements of systolic function with a pocket ultrasound device that were not statistically different from a cardiologist’s measurements.²¹

In another study, rural FPs attended a 4-day course and then performed focused cardiac ultrasounds on primary care patients with a clinical indication for an echocardiogram.²² The scans were uploaded to a Web-based program for remote interpretation by a cardiologist. There was high concordance between the FPs’ interpretations of the focused cardiac ultrasounds and the cardiologist’s interpretations. Only 32% of the patients in the study group required a formal follow-up echocardiogram.

Kimura et al published a POCUS protocol for the rapid assessment of patients with heart failure, called the Cardiopulmonary Limited Ultrasound Exam (CLUE).²³ The CLUE protocol utilizes 4 views to assess left ventricular systolic and diastolic function along with signs of pulmonary edema or systemic volume overload (TABLE 3²³). The presence of pulmonary edema or a plethoric inferior vena cava (IVC) was highly prognostic of in-hospital mortality. The CLUE protocol has been successfully used by novices including internal medicine residents after brief training (ie, up to 60 supervised scans) and can be performed in less than 5 minutes.^24,25

More sensitive, specific than x-rays for pulmonary diagnoses

The chest x-ray has traditionally been the imaging modality of choice to evaluate primary care pulmonary complaints. However, POCUS can be more sensitive and specific than a chest x-ray for evaluating several pulmonary diagnoses including pleural effusion, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema.

Pleural effusion can be difficult to detect with a physical exam alone. A systematic review showed that the physical exam is not sensitive for effusions <300 mL and can have even lower utility in obese patients.²⁸ While an upright lateral chest x-ray can accurately detect effusions as small as 50 mL, portable x-rays have sensitivities of only 53% to 71% for small- or moderate-sized effusions.^29,30 Ultrasound, however, has a sensitivity of 97% for small effusions.³¹

A 2016 meta-analysis showed that POCUS had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 98%, respectively, for pleural effusions, while chest x-ray had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 51% and 91%, respectively, when compared with computed tomography (CT) and expert sonography.³² POCUS evaluation for pleural effusion is technically simple, and at least one study showed that even novice users can achieve high diagnostic accuracy after only 3 hours of training.³³

Pneumonia is the eighth leading cause of death in the United States and the single leading cause of infectious disease death in children worldwide.^34-36 Pneumonia is a difficult diagnosis to make based on a history and physical examination alone, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends diagnostic imaging to make the diagnosis.³⁷

The adult and pediatric literature clearly demonstrate that lung ultrasound is accurate at diagnosing pneumonia. In a 2015 meta-analysis of the pediatric literature, lung ultrasound had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 93% and positive and negative likelihood ratios of 15.3 and 0.06, respectively.³⁸ In adults, a 2016 meta-analysis of lung ultrasound showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 88%, respectively, with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 6.6 and 0.08, respectively.³⁹

In 2015, a prospective study compared the accuracy of lung ultrasound and chest x-ray using CT as the gold standard.⁴⁰ Lung ultrasound had a significantly better sensitivity of 82% compared to a sensitivity of 64% for chest x-ray. Specificities were comparable at 94% for ultrasound and 90% for chest x-ray.⁴⁰

At least one study found novice sonographers to be accurate with lung POCUS for the diagnosis of pneumonia after only two 90-minute training sessions.⁴¹ Moreover, ultrasound has a more favorable safety profile, greater portability, and lower cost compared with chest x-ray and CT.

Pulmonary edema. Lung ultrasound can identify interstitial pulmonary edema via artifacts called B lines, which are produced by the reverberation of sound waves from the pleura due to the widening of the fluid-filled interlobular septa. These are distinctly different from the A-line pattern of repeating horizontal lines that is seen with normal lungs, making lung ultrasound more accurate than chest x-ray for identification of pulmonary edema.^42,43 When final diagnosis via blinded chart review is used as the reference standard, bilateral B lines on a lung ultrasound image have a sensitivity of 86% to 100% and a specificity of 92% to 98% for the diagnosis of pulmonary edema compared to chest x-ray’s sensitivity of 56.9% and specificity of 89.2%.⁴⁴ There is also a linear correlation between the number of B lines present and the extent of pulmonary edema.^42,45,46 The number of B lines decreases in real time as volume is removed in dialysis patients.⁴⁷

POCUS evaluation for B lines can be learned very quickly. Exams of novices who have performed only 5 prior exams correlate highly with those of experts who have performed more than 100 exams.⁴⁸

Simple, efficient screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm

AAAs are present in up to 7% of men over the age of 50.⁴⁹ The mortality rate of a ruptured AAA is as high as 80% to 95%.⁵⁰ There is, however, a long prodromal period when interventions can make a significant difference, which is why accurate screening is so important.

AAA screening with ultrasound has been shown to decrease mortality.⁵¹ The current recommendation of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a one-time AAA screening for all men ages 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked (Grade B).⁵² Despite the recommendations of the USPSTF, screening rates are low. One study found that only 9% of eligible patients in primary care practices received appropriate screening.⁵¹

Ultrasound performed by specialists is known to be an excellent screening test for AAA with a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.9%.⁵³ POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians for the evaluation of symptomatic AAA is well established in the literature. A meta-analysis including 7 studies and 655 patients showed a pooled sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 98%.⁵⁴ Multiple studies also support primary care physicians performing POCUS AAA screening in the clinic setting.

For example, a 2012 prospective, observational study performed in Canada compared office-based ultrasound screening exams performed by a rural FP to scans performed in the hospital on the same patients.⁵⁵ The physician completed 50 training examinations. The average discrepancy in aorta diameters between the 2 was only 2 mm, which is clinically insignificant, and the office-based scans had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Similarly, a second FP study performed in Barcelona, showed that an FP who performed POCUS AAA screening had 100% concordance with a radiologist.⁵⁶ Additionally, POCUS screening for AAA was not time consuming; it was performed in under 4 minutes per patient.^55,57

Ruling out DVT

DVT is a relatively rare occurrence in the ambulatory setting. However, patients who present with a painful, swollen lower extremity are much more common, and DVT must be considered and ruled out in these situations.

Although isolated distal DVTs that occur in the calf veins are usually self-limited and have a very low risk of embolization, they can progress to proximal DVTs of the thigh veins up to 20% of time.^58,59 Similarly, thrombophlebitis of the superficial lower extremity veins rarely embolizes, but can progress to a proximal DVT, especially if large segments are involved or if the segments are within 5 cm of the junction to the deep venous system.⁵⁹ The risk of missing a proximal leg DVT is high because embolization occurs up to 60% of the time if the DVT is left untreated.⁶⁰

The current standard for diagnosis of DVT is the lower extremity Doppler ultrasound examination, but obtaining same-day Doppler evaluations can be difficult in the ambulatory setting. In these instances, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends that even low-risk patients receive anticoagulation pending the evaluation if it cannot be obtained in the first 24 hours.⁵⁹ This approach not only increases the cost of care, but also exposes patients—many of whom will not be diagnosed with thrombosis in the end—to the risks of anticoagulation.

D-dimer blood tests have drawbacks, too. While a negative high-sensitivity D-dimer blood test in a patient with a low pre-test probability of DVT can effectively rule out a DVT, laboratory testing is not always immediately available in the ambulatory setting either.⁶¹ Additionally, false-positive rates are high, and positive D-dimer exams still require evaluation by Doppler ultrasound.

Given these limitations, performing an ultrasound at the bedside or in the exam room can allow for more timely and cost-effective care. In fact, research shows that a limited ultrasound, called the 2-region compression exam, which follows along the course of the common femoral vein and popliteal vein only, ignoring the femoral and calf veins, is highly accurate in assessing for proximal leg DVTs. As such, it has been adopted for POCUS use by emergency medicine physicians.⁶²

Multiple studies show that physicians with minimal training can perform the 2-region compression exam with a high degree of accuracy when full-leg Doppler ultrasound was used as the gold standard.^63,64 In these studies, hands-on training times ranged from only 10 minutes to 5 hours, and the exam could be performed in less than 4 minutes. A systematic review of 6 studies comparing emergency physician-performed ultrasound with radiology-performed ultrasound calculated an overall sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) for those performed by emergency physicians.⁶⁵

The main concern with the 2-region compression exam is that it can miss a distal leg DVT. As stated earlier, distal DVTs are relatively benign and tend to resolve without treatment; however, up to 20% can progress to become a dangerous proximal leg DVT.⁵⁸ Researchers have validated several methods by prospective trials to address this limitation.

Point-of-care ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm can be performed in less than 4 minutes.

Specifically, researchers have demonstrated that patients with a low pre-test probability of DVT per the Wells scoring system could have DVT effectively ruled out with a single 2-region compression ultrasound without further evaluation.⁶⁶ In another study, researchers evaluated all patients (regardless of pretest probability) with a 2-point compression exam and found that those with negative exams could be followed with a second exam in 7 to 10 days without initiating anticoagulation. If the second one was negative, no further evaluation was needed.^67,68

And finally, researchers demonstrated that a negative 2-point compression ultrasound in combination with a concurrent negative D-dimer test was effective at ruling out DVT, regardless of pre-test probability.^69,70

A preferred approach

Given this data and the fact that in the ambulatory setting it is often easier and faster to perform a 2-region compression examination than to obtain a D-dimer laboratory test or a formal full-leg Doppler ultrasound, what follows is our preferred approach to a patient with suspected DVT in the outpatient setting (FIGURE 10).

We first assess pre-test probability using the Wells scoring system. We then perform the 2-region compression ultrasound. If the patient has low pre-test risk according to the Wells score, we rule out DVT. If the patient has moderate or high risk with a negative 2-region compression ultrasound, the patient gets a D-dimer test. If the D-dimer test is negative, we rule out DVT. If the D-dimer test is positive, we schedule the patient for a repeat 2-region compression ultrasound in 7 to 10 days. If at any time the 2-region compression evaluation is positive, we treat the patient for DVT.

CORRESPONDENCE
Paul Bornemann, MD, Palmetto Health Family Medicine Residency, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 3209 Colonial Drive, Columbia, SC 29203; [email protected].

A 49-year-old Hispanic woman presented with a 4-month history of scaling and a macerated rash localized between her toes (FIGURE 1). The rash was malodorous, mildly erythematous, and sometimes associated with pruritus. The patient had no relevant medical history. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing was performed and found to be negative. So a Wood’s lamp was used to examine the patient’s toes—and it revealed the diagnosis.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The Wood’s lamp revealed a coral-red fluorescence in the interdigital spaces (FIGURE 2), which led us to a diagnosis of erythrasma.

The coral-red fluorescence seen under the Wood’s lamp is due to porphyrins produced by Corynebacterium minutissimum. The organism invades the stratum corneum where it proliferates and causes erythrasma. Erythrasma typically appears as delineated, dry, red-brown patches in intertriginous areas, such as the axilla, groin, interdigital spaces, intergluteal cleft, perianal skin, and inframammary area.^1,2

Interdigital erythrasma is more common than previously thought; in one study of 151 patients with erythrasma, the most common site was the toe webs (64.9%), followed by the inguinal region (17.9%), the axillary region (14.6%), and the inframammary region (2.6%).² Erythrasma affects 4% of the population; risk factors include poor hygiene, hyperhidrosis, obesity, warm climate, diabetes, and an immunocompromised state.³

Differential includes “athlete’s foot”

The differential diagnosis for a pruritic rash between the toes includes:

Tinea pedis. Erythrasma is often mistaken for tinea pedis, because both conditions cause scaling between the toes. A Wood’s lamp exam can quickly differentiate between the 2,¹ as tinea pedis does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light.

Contact dermatitis mimics many conditions, but a negative Wood’s lamp exam and history of worsening with contact to specific substances helps to make this diagnosis.

Prevention and Tx hinge on good hygiene, topical agents

First-line management of erythrasma includes both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic modalities. Good hygiene and, depending on the area affected, loose-fitting cotton undergarments can help treat and prevent erythrasma.

Topical 2% miconazole bid for 2 weeks has resulted in clearance rates as high as 88%.⁴ Its affordable price, over-the-counter availability, and lack of adverse effects make miconazole a reasonable choice.^4,5 It is also a smart treatment choice when erythrasma is coexisting with tinea, because it can treat both conditions. This is not uncommon in the interdigital spaces between the toes and in the groin.

Topical 1% clindamycin or 2% erythromycin solution or gel bid for 2 weeks can also be used to treat the condition.^3,6 However, given that topical antibiotics are more expensive than single-dose oral treatment and are no better than the oral formulations of these antibiotics,⁶ clarithromycin 1 g taken once orally may be preferred.^2,6

Our patient was treated with a single dose of clarithromycin 1 g. At follow-up, her erythrasma was clear.

CORRESPONDENCE
Richard P. Usatine, MD, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229; [email protected].

A 49-year-old Hispanic woman presented with a 4-month history of scaling and a macerated rash localized between her toes (FIGURE 1). The rash was malodorous, mildly erythematous, and sometimes associated with pruritus. The patient had no relevant medical history. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing was performed and found to be negative. So a Wood’s lamp was used to examine the patient’s toes—and it revealed the diagnosis.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The Wood’s lamp revealed a coral-red fluorescence in the interdigital spaces (FIGURE 2), which led us to a diagnosis of erythrasma.

The coral-red fluorescence seen under the Wood’s lamp is due to porphyrins produced by Corynebacterium minutissimum. The organism invades the stratum corneum where it proliferates and causes erythrasma. Erythrasma typically appears as delineated, dry, red-brown patches in intertriginous areas, such as the axilla, groin, interdigital spaces, intergluteal cleft, perianal skin, and inframammary area.^1,2

Interdigital erythrasma is more common than previously thought; in one study of 151 patients with erythrasma, the most common site was the toe webs (64.9%), followed by the inguinal region (17.9%), the axillary region (14.6%), and the inframammary region (2.6%).² Erythrasma affects 4% of the population; risk factors include poor hygiene, hyperhidrosis, obesity, warm climate, diabetes, and an immunocompromised state.³

Differential includes “athlete’s foot”

The differential diagnosis for a pruritic rash between the toes includes:

Tinea pedis. Erythrasma is often mistaken for tinea pedis, because both conditions cause scaling between the toes. A Wood’s lamp exam can quickly differentiate between the 2,¹ as tinea pedis does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light.

Contact dermatitis mimics many conditions, but a negative Wood’s lamp exam and history of worsening with contact to specific substances helps to make this diagnosis.

Prevention and Tx hinge on good hygiene, topical agents

First-line management of erythrasma includes both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic modalities. Good hygiene and, depending on the area affected, loose-fitting cotton undergarments can help treat and prevent erythrasma.

Topical 2% miconazole bid for 2 weeks has resulted in clearance rates as high as 88%.⁴ Its affordable price, over-the-counter availability, and lack of adverse effects make miconazole a reasonable choice.^4,5 It is also a smart treatment choice when erythrasma is coexisting with tinea, because it can treat both conditions. This is not uncommon in the interdigital spaces between the toes and in the groin.

Topical 1% clindamycin or 2% erythromycin solution or gel bid for 2 weeks can also be used to treat the condition.^3,6 However, given that topical antibiotics are more expensive than single-dose oral treatment and are no better than the oral formulations of these antibiotics,⁶ clarithromycin 1 g taken once orally may be preferred.^2,6

Our patient was treated with a single dose of clarithromycin 1 g. At follow-up, her erythrasma was clear.

CORRESPONDENCE
Richard P. Usatine, MD, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229; [email protected].

A 49-year-old Hispanic woman presented with a 4-month history of scaling and a macerated rash localized between her toes (FIGURE 1). The rash was malodorous, mildly erythematous, and sometimes associated with pruritus. The patient had no relevant medical history. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) testing was performed and found to be negative. So a Wood’s lamp was used to examine the patient’s toes—and it revealed the diagnosis.

WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS?
HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?

The Wood’s lamp revealed a coral-red fluorescence in the interdigital spaces (FIGURE 2), which led us to a diagnosis of erythrasma.

The coral-red fluorescence seen under the Wood’s lamp is due to porphyrins produced by Corynebacterium minutissimum. The organism invades the stratum corneum where it proliferates and causes erythrasma. Erythrasma typically appears as delineated, dry, red-brown patches in intertriginous areas, such as the axilla, groin, interdigital spaces, intergluteal cleft, perianal skin, and inframammary area.^1,2

Interdigital erythrasma is more common than previously thought; in one study of 151 patients with erythrasma, the most common site was the toe webs (64.9%), followed by the inguinal region (17.9%), the axillary region (14.6%), and the inframammary region (2.6%).² Erythrasma affects 4% of the population; risk factors include poor hygiene, hyperhidrosis, obesity, warm climate, diabetes, and an immunocompromised state.³

Differential includes “athlete’s foot”

The differential diagnosis for a pruritic rash between the toes includes:

Tinea pedis. Erythrasma is often mistaken for tinea pedis, because both conditions cause scaling between the toes. A Wood’s lamp exam can quickly differentiate between the 2,¹ as tinea pedis does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light.

Contact dermatitis mimics many conditions, but a negative Wood’s lamp exam and history of worsening with contact to specific substances helps to make this diagnosis.

Prevention and Tx hinge on good hygiene, topical agents

First-line management of erythrasma includes both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic modalities. Good hygiene and, depending on the area affected, loose-fitting cotton undergarments can help treat and prevent erythrasma.

Topical 2% miconazole bid for 2 weeks has resulted in clearance rates as high as 88%.⁴ Its affordable price, over-the-counter availability, and lack of adverse effects make miconazole a reasonable choice.^4,5 It is also a smart treatment choice when erythrasma is coexisting with tinea, because it can treat both conditions. This is not uncommon in the interdigital spaces between the toes and in the groin.

Topical 1% clindamycin or 2% erythromycin solution or gel bid for 2 weeks can also be used to treat the condition.^3,6 However, given that topical antibiotics are more expensive than single-dose oral treatment and are no better than the oral formulations of these antibiotics,⁶ clarithromycin 1 g taken once orally may be preferred.^2,6

Our patient was treated with a single dose of clarithromycin 1 g. At follow-up, her erythrasma was clear.

CORRESPONDENCE
Richard P. Usatine, MD, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX 78229; [email protected].

THE CASE

A 25-year-old man, who was an active duty US Navy sailor, went to his ship’s medical department complaining of a mild cough that he’d had for 2 days. He denied having any fevers, chills, night sweats, angina, or dyspnea. He said he hadn’t experienced any exertional fatigue or difficulty completing the rigorous physical tasks of his occupation as an engineman on the ship. The patient had no medical or surgical history of significance, and he wasn’t taking any medications or supplements.

On exam, he was not in acute distress and his vital signs were within normal limits. Auscultation revealed mild wheezing throughout the upper lung fields and loud heart sounds throughout his chest that were audible even with gentle contact of the stethoscope diaphragm. He had no discernible murmurs, rubs, or gallops.

In light of the unusually loud heart sounds heard on exam, we performed an electrocardiogram. The EKG revealed a normal sinus rhythm, slight right axis deviation indicated by tall R-waves in V1 (also suggestive of right ventricular hypertrophy), an incomplete right bundle branch block, and a crochetage sign (a notch in the R-waves of the inferior leads).¹ A chest x-ray (FIGURE 1) revealed a normal-sized heart and dilated pulmonary vasculature suggestive of pulmonary hypertension.

THE DIAGNOSIS

To further evaluate the cardiopulmonary findings, ultrasound studies (transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography) were performed. These demonstrated a very large secundum-type atrial septal defect (ASD), measuring at its largest point about 30 × 48 mm (FIGURE 2 and FIGURE 3C). Doppler flow analysis and a bubble study (VIDEOS 1 and 2) demonstrated significant shunting across the ASD. Gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) was also used to characterize the ASD (FIGURE 3). It revealed that the superior and posterior rims of the ASD were essentially absent and that the right atrium and ventricle were severely enlarged, while the left chambers were normal in size and function with an ejection fraction >55%. The notching of the R-waves of the inferior leads, seen in our patient’s EKG, is typically seen with large ASDs.^1,2

DISCUSSION

ASDs are typically uncovered on exam via auscultation of heart sounds, which might reveal a split of the second heart sound (S2) and diastolic murmurs. ASDs are typically classified by size, and their management depends on this factor, along with the patient’s age and symptoms. In children with small defects (<6 mm), treatment usually consists of conservative observation, as more than half of these ASDs will spontaneously close.³ But, as children age, they are more likely to engage in exertional activity (work, recreational sports) and an unrepaired ASD may yield symptoms (angina, dyspnea, fatigue, other cardiopulmonary strain). With such symptoms and when closure is not spontaneously achieved by adolescence or adulthood, an invasive approach is often necessary to correct the defect.

ASD repair. Traditionally, repair has involved some form of open thoracotomy. More recently, several minimally invasive techniques have been developed. Catheter-based device closure, in which a catheter is percutaneously guided to the defect and a patch is deployed to seal the ASD, is a technique that has been shown to successfully correct large ASDs of up to 40 mm in size.⁴ Robotic procedures have also been developed to correct ASDs through much smaller incisions.⁵ Both of these techniques require a significant rim of residual septal tissue around the defect.

Individualized approach. Since our patient had a rather large ASD that did not have sufficient residual septal rim tissue, percutaneous and robotic approaches were not feasible. Instead, he required more invasive cardiothoracic surgery. In cases such as this, the exact technique and type of incision (sternotomy vs access through the lateral chest wall) depend on age, gender, and the presence of other comorbidities.⁶

Our patient. Because there was concern that any approach other than a median one might not afford enough space to fix an ASD of such considerable size, our patient underwent a median sternotomy by a pediatric cardiothoracic surgeon who specialized in these repairs (in children as well as young adults). During the procedure, the ASD was accessed and confirmed to be as large as predicted by diagnostic imaging. A surgical patch was sutured in place to correct the defect. There were no intra-operative or postop complications.

Four weeks later, the patient had a mild pericardial effusion that was managed medically with daily furosemide and aspirin. At his 8-week postop appointment, the fluid accumulation had resolved, and he was completely asymptomatic. The patient returned to full-time active duty in the US Navy.

THE TAKEAWAY

Adults with rather large ASDs can present in a relatively asymptomatic manner and report none of the classic complaints (angina, dyspnea, fatigue). They may even engage in heavy exertional activity with no difficulty. The underlying defect may be discovered incidentally on exam by noting a split of the S2 on auscultation. If pulmonary hypertension exists, the clinician may also note a loud S2. An exam that raises suspicion for an ASD can then be followed by tests that solidify the diagnosis. Surgery is usually necessary to correct an ASD in an adult who is symptomatic or exhibits significant cardiopulmonary strain.

THE CASE

A 25-year-old man, who was an active duty US Navy sailor, went to his ship’s medical department complaining of a mild cough that he’d had for 2 days. He denied having any fevers, chills, night sweats, angina, or dyspnea. He said he hadn’t experienced any exertional fatigue or difficulty completing the rigorous physical tasks of his occupation as an engineman on the ship. The patient had no medical or surgical history of significance, and he wasn’t taking any medications or supplements.

On exam, he was not in acute distress and his vital signs were within normal limits. Auscultation revealed mild wheezing throughout the upper lung fields and loud heart sounds throughout his chest that were audible even with gentle contact of the stethoscope diaphragm. He had no discernible murmurs, rubs, or gallops.

In light of the unusually loud heart sounds heard on exam, we performed an electrocardiogram. The EKG revealed a normal sinus rhythm, slight right axis deviation indicated by tall R-waves in V1 (also suggestive of right ventricular hypertrophy), an incomplete right bundle branch block, and a crochetage sign (a notch in the R-waves of the inferior leads).¹ A chest x-ray (FIGURE 1) revealed a normal-sized heart and dilated pulmonary vasculature suggestive of pulmonary hypertension.

THE DIAGNOSIS

To further evaluate the cardiopulmonary findings, ultrasound studies (transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography) were performed. These demonstrated a very large secundum-type atrial septal defect (ASD), measuring at its largest point about 30 × 48 mm (FIGURE 2 and FIGURE 3C). Doppler flow analysis and a bubble study (VIDEOS 1 and 2) demonstrated significant shunting across the ASD. Gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) was also used to characterize the ASD (FIGURE 3). It revealed that the superior and posterior rims of the ASD were essentially absent and that the right atrium and ventricle were severely enlarged, while the left chambers were normal in size and function with an ejection fraction >55%. The notching of the R-waves of the inferior leads, seen in our patient’s EKG, is typically seen with large ASDs.^1,2

DISCUSSION

ASDs are typically uncovered on exam via auscultation of heart sounds, which might reveal a split of the second heart sound (S2) and diastolic murmurs. ASDs are typically classified by size, and their management depends on this factor, along with the patient’s age and symptoms. In children with small defects (<6 mm), treatment usually consists of conservative observation, as more than half of these ASDs will spontaneously close.³ But, as children age, they are more likely to engage in exertional activity (work, recreational sports) and an unrepaired ASD may yield symptoms (angina, dyspnea, fatigue, other cardiopulmonary strain). With such symptoms and when closure is not spontaneously achieved by adolescence or adulthood, an invasive approach is often necessary to correct the defect.

ASD repair. Traditionally, repair has involved some form of open thoracotomy. More recently, several minimally invasive techniques have been developed. Catheter-based device closure, in which a catheter is percutaneously guided to the defect and a patch is deployed to seal the ASD, is a technique that has been shown to successfully correct large ASDs of up to 40 mm in size.⁴ Robotic procedures have also been developed to correct ASDs through much smaller incisions.⁵ Both of these techniques require a significant rim of residual septal tissue around the defect.

Individualized approach. Since our patient had a rather large ASD that did not have sufficient residual septal rim tissue, percutaneous and robotic approaches were not feasible. Instead, he required more invasive cardiothoracic surgery. In cases such as this, the exact technique and type of incision (sternotomy vs access through the lateral chest wall) depend on age, gender, and the presence of other comorbidities.⁶

Our patient. Because there was concern that any approach other than a median one might not afford enough space to fix an ASD of such considerable size, our patient underwent a median sternotomy by a pediatric cardiothoracic surgeon who specialized in these repairs (in children as well as young adults). During the procedure, the ASD was accessed and confirmed to be as large as predicted by diagnostic imaging. A surgical patch was sutured in place to correct the defect. There were no intra-operative or postop complications.

Four weeks later, the patient had a mild pericardial effusion that was managed medically with daily furosemide and aspirin. At his 8-week postop appointment, the fluid accumulation had resolved, and he was completely asymptomatic. The patient returned to full-time active duty in the US Navy.

THE TAKEAWAY

Adults with rather large ASDs can present in a relatively asymptomatic manner and report none of the classic complaints (angina, dyspnea, fatigue). They may even engage in heavy exertional activity with no difficulty. The underlying defect may be discovered incidentally on exam by noting a split of the S2 on auscultation. If pulmonary hypertension exists, the clinician may also note a loud S2. An exam that raises suspicion for an ASD can then be followed by tests that solidify the diagnosis. Surgery is usually necessary to correct an ASD in an adult who is symptomatic or exhibits significant cardiopulmonary strain.

THE CASE

A 25-year-old man, who was an active duty US Navy sailor, went to his ship’s medical department complaining of a mild cough that he’d had for 2 days. He denied having any fevers, chills, night sweats, angina, or dyspnea. He said he hadn’t experienced any exertional fatigue or difficulty completing the rigorous physical tasks of his occupation as an engineman on the ship. The patient had no medical or surgical history of significance, and he wasn’t taking any medications or supplements.

On exam, he was not in acute distress and his vital signs were within normal limits. Auscultation revealed mild wheezing throughout the upper lung fields and loud heart sounds throughout his chest that were audible even with gentle contact of the stethoscope diaphragm. He had no discernible murmurs, rubs, or gallops.

In light of the unusually loud heart sounds heard on exam, we performed an electrocardiogram. The EKG revealed a normal sinus rhythm, slight right axis deviation indicated by tall R-waves in V1 (also suggestive of right ventricular hypertrophy), an incomplete right bundle branch block, and a crochetage sign (a notch in the R-waves of the inferior leads).¹ A chest x-ray (FIGURE 1) revealed a normal-sized heart and dilated pulmonary vasculature suggestive of pulmonary hypertension.

THE DIAGNOSIS

To further evaluate the cardiopulmonary findings, ultrasound studies (transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography) were performed. These demonstrated a very large secundum-type atrial septal defect (ASD), measuring at its largest point about 30 × 48 mm (FIGURE 2 and FIGURE 3C). Doppler flow analysis and a bubble study (VIDEOS 1 and 2) demonstrated significant shunting across the ASD. Gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) was also used to characterize the ASD (FIGURE 3). It revealed that the superior and posterior rims of the ASD were essentially absent and that the right atrium and ventricle were severely enlarged, while the left chambers were normal in size and function with an ejection fraction >55%. The notching of the R-waves of the inferior leads, seen in our patient’s EKG, is typically seen with large ASDs.^1,2

DISCUSSION

ASDs are typically uncovered on exam via auscultation of heart sounds, which might reveal a split of the second heart sound (S2) and diastolic murmurs. ASDs are typically classified by size, and their management depends on this factor, along with the patient’s age and symptoms. In children with small defects (<6 mm), treatment usually consists of conservative observation, as more than half of these ASDs will spontaneously close.³ But, as children age, they are more likely to engage in exertional activity (work, recreational sports) and an unrepaired ASD may yield symptoms (angina, dyspnea, fatigue, other cardiopulmonary strain). With such symptoms and when closure is not spontaneously achieved by adolescence or adulthood, an invasive approach is often necessary to correct the defect.

ASD repair. Traditionally, repair has involved some form of open thoracotomy. More recently, several minimally invasive techniques have been developed. Catheter-based device closure, in which a catheter is percutaneously guided to the defect and a patch is deployed to seal the ASD, is a technique that has been shown to successfully correct large ASDs of up to 40 mm in size.⁴ Robotic procedures have also been developed to correct ASDs through much smaller incisions.⁵ Both of these techniques require a significant rim of residual septal tissue around the defect.

Individualized approach. Since our patient had a rather large ASD that did not have sufficient residual septal rim tissue, percutaneous and robotic approaches were not feasible. Instead, he required more invasive cardiothoracic surgery. In cases such as this, the exact technique and type of incision (sternotomy vs access through the lateral chest wall) depend on age, gender, and the presence of other comorbidities.⁶

Our patient. Because there was concern that any approach other than a median one might not afford enough space to fix an ASD of such considerable size, our patient underwent a median sternotomy by a pediatric cardiothoracic surgeon who specialized in these repairs (in children as well as young adults). During the procedure, the ASD was accessed and confirmed to be as large as predicted by diagnostic imaging. A surgical patch was sutured in place to correct the defect. There were no intra-operative or postop complications.

Four weeks later, the patient had a mild pericardial effusion that was managed medically with daily furosemide and aspirin. At his 8-week postop appointment, the fluid accumulation had resolved, and he was completely asymptomatic. The patient returned to full-time active duty in the US Navy.

THE TAKEAWAY

Adults with rather large ASDs can present in a relatively asymptomatic manner and report none of the classic complaints (angina, dyspnea, fatigue). They may even engage in heavy exertional activity with no difficulty. The underlying defect may be discovered incidentally on exam by noting a split of the S2 on auscultation. If pulmonary hypertension exists, the clinician may also note a loud S2. An exam that raises suspicion for an ASD can then be followed by tests that solidify the diagnosis. Surgery is usually necessary to correct an ASD in an adult who is symptomatic or exhibits significant cardiopulmonary strain.

THE CASE

A 34-year-old woman was referred to the hepatology clinic for evaluation of an increased serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level. She was gravida 5 and in her 38th week of gestation. Her obstetric history was significant for 2 uncomplicated spontaneous term vaginal deliveries resulting in live births and 2 spontaneous abortions. The patient reported generalized pruritus for 2 months prior to the visit. She had no comorbidities and denied any other symptoms. She reported no family history of liver disease or complications during pregnancy in relatives. The patient did not smoke or drink, and had come to our hospital for her prenatal care visits.

The physical exam revealed normal vital signs, no jaundice, a gravid uterus, and acanthosis nigricans on the neck and axilla with scattered excoriations on the arms, legs, and abdomen. Her serum ALP level was 1093 U/L (normal: 50-136 U/L). Immediately before this pregnancy, her serum ALP had been normal at 95 U/L, but it had since been increasing with a peak value of 1134 U/L by 37 weeks’ gestation. Serum transaminase activities and albumin and bilirubin concentrations were normal, as was her prothrombin time. The rest of her lab tests were also normal, including her fasting serum bile acid concentration, which was 9 mcmol/L (normal: 4.5-19.2 mcmol/L).

THE DIAGNOSIS

Although cholestasis of pregnancy was considered, the patient’s markedly elevated serum ALP level suggested the presence of another cholestatic liver disease. Additional tests revealed an antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer of 1:320 (normal: <1:20) and immunoglobulin A, G, and M levels within normal limits. Accordingly, we diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

The patient delivered vaginally at another institution uneventfully and returned to the hepatology clinic 7 months postpartum. Repeat laboratory tests (TABLE) revealed increased AMA titer and immunoglobulin M levels from baseline (38 weeks’ gestation). The physical exam was notable for the absence of both jaundice and stigmata of chronic liver disease. A liver ultrasound was normal. The patient still reported pruritus, as well as a new symptom—fatigue. A liver biopsy was performed, and findings were consistent with PBC, stage 1 (FIGURE).

PBC, historically known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic, likely immune-mediated, cholestatic liver disease characterized by the progressive inflammatory destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. The disease has a female to male predominance of 10:1, with age of diagnosis most often between 40 and 50 years, although about a quarter of female patients present during their reproductive years.^1,2

PBC in pregnant women

During pregnancy, the profound physiologic changes and adaptations in the endocrine, metabolic, and immune systems that are necessary for normal fetal development can affect the maternal hepatobiliary system. In patients with prior autoimmune liver disease, the liver is known to adapt itself to these physiologic changes by entering a state of immune tolerance. This is induced by relative hypercortisolism, a shift from predominantly cell-mediated immunity to humoral immunity, and inhibition of T-cell activation. These changes can result in remission of autoimmune disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum flaring when these protective mechanisms are lost (although neither remission nor postpartum flaring occurred in this patient’s case).^1-3

While a well-compensated state is associated with better fetal and maternal outcomes than a decompensated condition, cirrhosis is not a contraindication to pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is generally safe for patients with PBC, and studies have reported no childbirth complications or adverse maternal outcomes.^1,3,4

The approved treatment for PBC, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), was classified as a category B agent according to the Food and Drug Administration’s now defunct classification system for drugs used during pregnancy and lactation. It’s considered to be the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but there are no recommendations for its use in pregnant patients with PBC. Several studies have observed no significant teratogenic effect in babies whose mothers were treated with UDCA for PBC during pregnancy.^1-4 Postpartum, 60% to 70% of PBC patients have been reported to exhibit biochemical disease activity,^1,3 and in one case, a liver transplant was required due to liver failure.⁵

Look for AMA, elevated ALP

The diagnosis of the disease in this case was made by the detection of AMA, which has a specificity of 98% for PBC. However, isolated instances of the presence of AMA are not uncommon; they have been documented in up to 64% of healthy individuals.⁶ In addition, while one would expect to see a 2- to 4-fold rise in ALP levels during pregnancy (due to placental isoenzyme production),^2,7 our patient’s serum ALP level was much higher, suggesting probable cholestatic liver disease such as PBC. The diagnosis in this case was confirmed by liver biopsy.

Our patient was started on UDCA 13 to 15 mg/kg/d. She remained clinically stable at subsequent follow-ups.

THE TAKEAWAY

Typically seen in middle-aged women, PBC can be detected by the presence of AMA and elevated ALP levels. Pregnant patients with chronic liver disease, including PBC, should be followed by a hepatologist and a high-risk obstetrician. They should be carefully monitored and frequently reassessed throughout the pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum period, even though studies have documented favorable outcomes for both mother and baby.^1,3,4

THE CASE

A 34-year-old woman was referred to the hepatology clinic for evaluation of an increased serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level. She was gravida 5 and in her 38th week of gestation. Her obstetric history was significant for 2 uncomplicated spontaneous term vaginal deliveries resulting in live births and 2 spontaneous abortions. The patient reported generalized pruritus for 2 months prior to the visit. She had no comorbidities and denied any other symptoms. She reported no family history of liver disease or complications during pregnancy in relatives. The patient did not smoke or drink, and had come to our hospital for her prenatal care visits.

The physical exam revealed normal vital signs, no jaundice, a gravid uterus, and acanthosis nigricans on the neck and axilla with scattered excoriations on the arms, legs, and abdomen. Her serum ALP level was 1093 U/L (normal: 50-136 U/L). Immediately before this pregnancy, her serum ALP had been normal at 95 U/L, but it had since been increasing with a peak value of 1134 U/L by 37 weeks’ gestation. Serum transaminase activities and albumin and bilirubin concentrations were normal, as was her prothrombin time. The rest of her lab tests were also normal, including her fasting serum bile acid concentration, which was 9 mcmol/L (normal: 4.5-19.2 mcmol/L).

THE DIAGNOSIS

Although cholestasis of pregnancy was considered, the patient’s markedly elevated serum ALP level suggested the presence of another cholestatic liver disease. Additional tests revealed an antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer of 1:320 (normal: <1:20) and immunoglobulin A, G, and M levels within normal limits. Accordingly, we diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

The patient delivered vaginally at another institution uneventfully and returned to the hepatology clinic 7 months postpartum. Repeat laboratory tests (TABLE) revealed increased AMA titer and immunoglobulin M levels from baseline (38 weeks’ gestation). The physical exam was notable for the absence of both jaundice and stigmata of chronic liver disease. A liver ultrasound was normal. The patient still reported pruritus, as well as a new symptom—fatigue. A liver biopsy was performed, and findings were consistent with PBC, stage 1 (FIGURE).

PBC, historically known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic, likely immune-mediated, cholestatic liver disease characterized by the progressive inflammatory destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. The disease has a female to male predominance of 10:1, with age of diagnosis most often between 40 and 50 years, although about a quarter of female patients present during their reproductive years.^1,2

PBC in pregnant women

During pregnancy, the profound physiologic changes and adaptations in the endocrine, metabolic, and immune systems that are necessary for normal fetal development can affect the maternal hepatobiliary system. In patients with prior autoimmune liver disease, the liver is known to adapt itself to these physiologic changes by entering a state of immune tolerance. This is induced by relative hypercortisolism, a shift from predominantly cell-mediated immunity to humoral immunity, and inhibition of T-cell activation. These changes can result in remission of autoimmune disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum flaring when these protective mechanisms are lost (although neither remission nor postpartum flaring occurred in this patient’s case).^1-3

While a well-compensated state is associated with better fetal and maternal outcomes than a decompensated condition, cirrhosis is not a contraindication to pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is generally safe for patients with PBC, and studies have reported no childbirth complications or adverse maternal outcomes.^1,3,4

The approved treatment for PBC, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), was classified as a category B agent according to the Food and Drug Administration’s now defunct classification system for drugs used during pregnancy and lactation. It’s considered to be the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but there are no recommendations for its use in pregnant patients with PBC. Several studies have observed no significant teratogenic effect in babies whose mothers were treated with UDCA for PBC during pregnancy.^1-4 Postpartum, 60% to 70% of PBC patients have been reported to exhibit biochemical disease activity,^1,3 and in one case, a liver transplant was required due to liver failure.⁵

Look for AMA, elevated ALP

The diagnosis of the disease in this case was made by the detection of AMA, which has a specificity of 98% for PBC. However, isolated instances of the presence of AMA are not uncommon; they have been documented in up to 64% of healthy individuals.⁶ In addition, while one would expect to see a 2- to 4-fold rise in ALP levels during pregnancy (due to placental isoenzyme production),^2,7 our patient’s serum ALP level was much higher, suggesting probable cholestatic liver disease such as PBC. The diagnosis in this case was confirmed by liver biopsy.

Our patient was started on UDCA 13 to 15 mg/kg/d. She remained clinically stable at subsequent follow-ups.

THE TAKEAWAY

Typically seen in middle-aged women, PBC can be detected by the presence of AMA and elevated ALP levels. Pregnant patients with chronic liver disease, including PBC, should be followed by a hepatologist and a high-risk obstetrician. They should be carefully monitored and frequently reassessed throughout the pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum period, even though studies have documented favorable outcomes for both mother and baby.^1,3,4

THE CASE

A 34-year-old woman was referred to the hepatology clinic for evaluation of an increased serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level. She was gravida 5 and in her 38th week of gestation. Her obstetric history was significant for 2 uncomplicated spontaneous term vaginal deliveries resulting in live births and 2 spontaneous abortions. The patient reported generalized pruritus for 2 months prior to the visit. She had no comorbidities and denied any other symptoms. She reported no family history of liver disease or complications during pregnancy in relatives. The patient did not smoke or drink, and had come to our hospital for her prenatal care visits.

The physical exam revealed normal vital signs, no jaundice, a gravid uterus, and acanthosis nigricans on the neck and axilla with scattered excoriations on the arms, legs, and abdomen. Her serum ALP level was 1093 U/L (normal: 50-136 U/L). Immediately before this pregnancy, her serum ALP had been normal at 95 U/L, but it had since been increasing with a peak value of 1134 U/L by 37 weeks’ gestation. Serum transaminase activities and albumin and bilirubin concentrations were normal, as was her prothrombin time. The rest of her lab tests were also normal, including her fasting serum bile acid concentration, which was 9 mcmol/L (normal: 4.5-19.2 mcmol/L).

THE DIAGNOSIS

Although cholestasis of pregnancy was considered, the patient’s markedly elevated serum ALP level suggested the presence of another cholestatic liver disease. Additional tests revealed an antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer of 1:320 (normal: <1:20) and immunoglobulin A, G, and M levels within normal limits. Accordingly, we diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

The patient delivered vaginally at another institution uneventfully and returned to the hepatology clinic 7 months postpartum. Repeat laboratory tests (TABLE) revealed increased AMA titer and immunoglobulin M levels from baseline (38 weeks’ gestation). The physical exam was notable for the absence of both jaundice and stigmata of chronic liver disease. A liver ultrasound was normal. The patient still reported pruritus, as well as a new symptom—fatigue. A liver biopsy was performed, and findings were consistent with PBC, stage 1 (FIGURE).

PBC, historically known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic, likely immune-mediated, cholestatic liver disease characterized by the progressive inflammatory destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. The disease has a female to male predominance of 10:1, with age of diagnosis most often between 40 and 50 years, although about a quarter of female patients present during their reproductive years.^1,2

PBC in pregnant women

During pregnancy, the profound physiologic changes and adaptations in the endocrine, metabolic, and immune systems that are necessary for normal fetal development can affect the maternal hepatobiliary system. In patients with prior autoimmune liver disease, the liver is known to adapt itself to these physiologic changes by entering a state of immune tolerance. This is induced by relative hypercortisolism, a shift from predominantly cell-mediated immunity to humoral immunity, and inhibition of T-cell activation. These changes can result in remission of autoimmune disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum flaring when these protective mechanisms are lost (although neither remission nor postpartum flaring occurred in this patient’s case).^1-3

While a well-compensated state is associated with better fetal and maternal outcomes than a decompensated condition, cirrhosis is not a contraindication to pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is generally safe for patients with PBC, and studies have reported no childbirth complications or adverse maternal outcomes.^1,3,4

The approved treatment for PBC, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), was classified as a category B agent according to the Food and Drug Administration’s now defunct classification system for drugs used during pregnancy and lactation. It’s considered to be the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, but there are no recommendations for its use in pregnant patients with PBC. Several studies have observed no significant teratogenic effect in babies whose mothers were treated with UDCA for PBC during pregnancy.^1-4 Postpartum, 60% to 70% of PBC patients have been reported to exhibit biochemical disease activity,^1,3 and in one case, a liver transplant was required due to liver failure.⁵

Look for AMA, elevated ALP

The diagnosis of the disease in this case was made by the detection of AMA, which has a specificity of 98% for PBC. However, isolated instances of the presence of AMA are not uncommon; they have been documented in up to 64% of healthy individuals.⁶ In addition, while one would expect to see a 2- to 4-fold rise in ALP levels during pregnancy (due to placental isoenzyme production),^2,7 our patient’s serum ALP level was much higher, suggesting probable cholestatic liver disease such as PBC. The diagnosis in this case was confirmed by liver biopsy.

Our patient was started on UDCA 13 to 15 mg/kg/d. She remained clinically stable at subsequent follow-ups.

THE TAKEAWAY

Typically seen in middle-aged women, PBC can be detected by the presence of AMA and elevated ALP levels. Pregnant patients with chronic liver disease, including PBC, should be followed by a hepatologist and a high-risk obstetrician. They should be carefully monitored and frequently reassessed throughout the pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum period, even though studies have documented favorable outcomes for both mother and baby.^1,3,4