Multiple Sclerosis Hub

BERLIN—Data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data (BMSD) Network indicate that the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to prevent the long-term accumulation of disability is within six months of disease onset. This finding was presented by Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, and colleagues at ECTRIMS 2018. Dr. Iaffaldano is Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of Bari, Italy.

Many randomized clinical trials support the early start of disease-modifying therapies in MS. However, there is still an ongoing discussion on the optimal timing of treatment. For insight into this and other questions, the Danish, Italian, and Swedish national MS registries, MSBase, and the OFSEP of France pooled data for specific research projects in the BMSD Network. One question they sought to answer with this large, real-world data set was the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy to prevent long-term disability accumulation in MS.

A cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had 10 or more years of follow-up, three or more years of cumulative disease-modifying therapy exposure, and three or more Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score evaluations was selected from the pooled cohort of the BMSD Network. The researchers conducted a set of pairwise (1:1) propensity score matching analyses with 10 different cut-offs for early versus delayed treatment (> 0.5 year up to > 5.0 years, using 0.5-year intervals) to allow an unbiased comparison between groups. The logistic model to predict propensity score included the following covariates: age at onset of the disease, sex, baseline EDSS, number of relapses in the two years before disease-modifying therapy start, number of EDSS evaluations, decade of birth, and registry source. To estimate the risk of reaching 12 months-confirmed EDSS progression (EDSSpr), a set of Cox models, adjusted for disease duration and relapses after disease-modifying therapy start as time-dependent covariates, was calculated.

A cohort of 11,871 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (71.0% female) was retrieved from the pooled BMSD Network database. The median (interquartile range) age at onset was 27.7 (22.3–34.6), median follow-up was 13.2 (11.4–15.4) years, and median time to the first disease-modifying therapy start was 3.8 (1.5–8.5) years. During the follow-up, an EDSSpr was reached by 4,138 (34.9%) patients. The lowest hazard ratio (HR) with relative 95% confidence interval (CI) for the propensity score matched models was obtained by a cutoff of treatment start within six months from disease onset (n = 873 per group). Early treatment significantly reduced the risk of reaching an EDSSpr (HR, 0.72 ). All subsequent comparisons between early and delayed treatment were not statistically significant.

This project was supported by Biogen International (Zug, Switzerland) on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the BMSD Network.

BERLIN—Data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data (BMSD) Network indicate that the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to prevent the long-term accumulation of disability is within six months of disease onset. This finding was presented by Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, and colleagues at ECTRIMS 2018. Dr. Iaffaldano is Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of Bari, Italy.

Many randomized clinical trials support the early start of disease-modifying therapies in MS. However, there is still an ongoing discussion on the optimal timing of treatment. For insight into this and other questions, the Danish, Italian, and Swedish national MS registries, MSBase, and the OFSEP of France pooled data for specific research projects in the BMSD Network. One question they sought to answer with this large, real-world data set was the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy to prevent long-term disability accumulation in MS.

A cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had 10 or more years of follow-up, three or more years of cumulative disease-modifying therapy exposure, and three or more Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score evaluations was selected from the pooled cohort of the BMSD Network. The researchers conducted a set of pairwise (1:1) propensity score matching analyses with 10 different cut-offs for early versus delayed treatment (> 0.5 year up to > 5.0 years, using 0.5-year intervals) to allow an unbiased comparison between groups. The logistic model to predict propensity score included the following covariates: age at onset of the disease, sex, baseline EDSS, number of relapses in the two years before disease-modifying therapy start, number of EDSS evaluations, decade of birth, and registry source. To estimate the risk of reaching 12 months-confirmed EDSS progression (EDSSpr), a set of Cox models, adjusted for disease duration and relapses after disease-modifying therapy start as time-dependent covariates, was calculated.

A cohort of 11,871 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (71.0% female) was retrieved from the pooled BMSD Network database. The median (interquartile range) age at onset was 27.7 (22.3–34.6), median follow-up was 13.2 (11.4–15.4) years, and median time to the first disease-modifying therapy start was 3.8 (1.5–8.5) years. During the follow-up, an EDSSpr was reached by 4,138 (34.9%) patients. The lowest hazard ratio (HR) with relative 95% confidence interval (CI) for the propensity score matched models was obtained by a cutoff of treatment start within six months from disease onset (n = 873 per group). Early treatment significantly reduced the risk of reaching an EDSSpr (HR, 0.72 ). All subsequent comparisons between early and delayed treatment were not statistically significant.

This project was supported by Biogen International (Zug, Switzerland) on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the BMSD Network.

BERLIN—Data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data (BMSD) Network indicate that the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to prevent the long-term accumulation of disability is within six months of disease onset. This finding was presented by Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, and colleagues at ECTRIMS 2018. Dr. Iaffaldano is Assistant Professor of Neurology at the University of Bari, Italy.

Many randomized clinical trials support the early start of disease-modifying therapies in MS. However, there is still an ongoing discussion on the optimal timing of treatment. For insight into this and other questions, the Danish, Italian, and Swedish national MS registries, MSBase, and the OFSEP of France pooled data for specific research projects in the BMSD Network. One question they sought to answer with this large, real-world data set was the optimal time to start disease-modifying therapy to prevent long-term disability accumulation in MS.

A cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had 10 or more years of follow-up, three or more years of cumulative disease-modifying therapy exposure, and three or more Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score evaluations was selected from the pooled cohort of the BMSD Network. The researchers conducted a set of pairwise (1:1) propensity score matching analyses with 10 different cut-offs for early versus delayed treatment (> 0.5 year up to > 5.0 years, using 0.5-year intervals) to allow an unbiased comparison between groups. The logistic model to predict propensity score included the following covariates: age at onset of the disease, sex, baseline EDSS, number of relapses in the two years before disease-modifying therapy start, number of EDSS evaluations, decade of birth, and registry source. To estimate the risk of reaching 12 months-confirmed EDSS progression (EDSSpr), a set of Cox models, adjusted for disease duration and relapses after disease-modifying therapy start as time-dependent covariates, was calculated.

A cohort of 11,871 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (71.0% female) was retrieved from the pooled BMSD Network database. The median (interquartile range) age at onset was 27.7 (22.3–34.6), median follow-up was 13.2 (11.4–15.4) years, and median time to the first disease-modifying therapy start was 3.8 (1.5–8.5) years. During the follow-up, an EDSSpr was reached by 4,138 (34.9%) patients. The lowest hazard ratio (HR) with relative 95% confidence interval (CI) for the propensity score matched models was obtained by a cutoff of treatment start within six months from disease onset (n = 873 per group). Early treatment significantly reduced the risk of reaching an EDSSpr (HR, 0.72 ). All subsequent comparisons between early and delayed treatment were not statistically significant.

This project was supported by Biogen International (Zug, Switzerland) on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the BMSD Network.

BERLIN – The optimal time to start disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is within 6 months of disease onset, according to real-world data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

Receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) within 6 months of diagnosis was associated with a 28% reduction in the risk of reaching an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0 or more for the first time at 12 months versus receiving treatment after 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.90; P = .003).

Results were not significant, looking at all the other periods tested at 6-month intervals from 1 year up to 5 years after diagnosis. HRs (95% CIs) comparing a first DMT given at 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 years, 2.5 years, 3 years, 3.5 years, 4 years, 4.5 years, and 5 years were a respective 0.90 (0.78-1.03), 0.89 (0.79-1.01), 0.99 (0.88-1.11), 0.95 (0.85-1.06), 1.01 (0.90-1.12), 0.97 (0.86-1.09), 1.09 (0.96-1.22), 1.11 (0.98-1.25), and 1.06 (0.93-1.20).

“To date, these data represent the largest RRMS cohort with the longest follow-up ever analyzed to determine the long-term effectiveness of the early start of DMTs,” said Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“This study also provides evidence that data sharing from MS registries and databases is feasible,” noted Dr. Iaffaldano, who is assistant professor of neurology at the University of Bari (Italy). Such an approach can provide enough statistical power to detect the impact of treatment on disability outcomes in the long term, he suggested.

For the study, a cohort of 11,934 patients was obtained by screening more than 149,636 patients from five large registries and databases of MS patients – the Italian MS Registry, the Swedish MS Registry, the Danish MS Registry, OFSEP (Observatoire Français de al Sclérose en Plaques), and MSBase. Patients were included in the current analysis if they had at least 10 years of follow-up, had at least three EDSS evaluations, and at least one DMT prescription.

“It is well known that randomized, controlled trials support the early start of treatment in MS, but open-label extensions of the same trials reported inconsistent results about the long-term benefit on disability accumulation,” Dr. Iaffaldano explained. Further, recent observational studies have suggested that initiating DMTs early might not only delay the accumulation of disability but perhaps also death.

The aim of the research was thus to look at what effect the time interval from disease onset to the first administration of a DMT might have on long-term disability accumulation, as measured by the EDSS, in patients with RRMS.

The population of patients studied was mostly (71%) female, with a median age of 27 years at disease onset. The number of relapses prior to starting a DMT was two and the baseline EDSS was 2.0. In almost all (98.9%) cases, DMT was used as first-line treatment (second line in 1.1% of cases). The median follow-up was 13.2 years and cumulative DMT exposure was 10.5 years.

The work was supported by Biogen International on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network. Dr. Iaffaldano has served on scientific advisory boards for and received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen and other companies that market DMTs for MS. Several study authors are employees of Biogen, and other study authors also reported financial ties to Biogen and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Iaffaldano P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):71-2, Abstract 204.

BERLIN – The optimal time to start disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is within 6 months of disease onset, according to real-world data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

Receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) within 6 months of diagnosis was associated with a 28% reduction in the risk of reaching an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0 or more for the first time at 12 months versus receiving treatment after 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.90; P = .003).

Results were not significant, looking at all the other periods tested at 6-month intervals from 1 year up to 5 years after diagnosis. HRs (95% CIs) comparing a first DMT given at 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 years, 2.5 years, 3 years, 3.5 years, 4 years, 4.5 years, and 5 years were a respective 0.90 (0.78-1.03), 0.89 (0.79-1.01), 0.99 (0.88-1.11), 0.95 (0.85-1.06), 1.01 (0.90-1.12), 0.97 (0.86-1.09), 1.09 (0.96-1.22), 1.11 (0.98-1.25), and 1.06 (0.93-1.20).

“To date, these data represent the largest RRMS cohort with the longest follow-up ever analyzed to determine the long-term effectiveness of the early start of DMTs,” said Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“This study also provides evidence that data sharing from MS registries and databases is feasible,” noted Dr. Iaffaldano, who is assistant professor of neurology at the University of Bari (Italy). Such an approach can provide enough statistical power to detect the impact of treatment on disability outcomes in the long term, he suggested.

For the study, a cohort of 11,934 patients was obtained by screening more than 149,636 patients from five large registries and databases of MS patients – the Italian MS Registry, the Swedish MS Registry, the Danish MS Registry, OFSEP (Observatoire Français de al Sclérose en Plaques), and MSBase. Patients were included in the current analysis if they had at least 10 years of follow-up, had at least three EDSS evaluations, and at least one DMT prescription.

“It is well known that randomized, controlled trials support the early start of treatment in MS, but open-label extensions of the same trials reported inconsistent results about the long-term benefit on disability accumulation,” Dr. Iaffaldano explained. Further, recent observational studies have suggested that initiating DMTs early might not only delay the accumulation of disability but perhaps also death.

The aim of the research was thus to look at what effect the time interval from disease onset to the first administration of a DMT might have on long-term disability accumulation, as measured by the EDSS, in patients with RRMS.

The population of patients studied was mostly (71%) female, with a median age of 27 years at disease onset. The number of relapses prior to starting a DMT was two and the baseline EDSS was 2.0. In almost all (98.9%) cases, DMT was used as first-line treatment (second line in 1.1% of cases). The median follow-up was 13.2 years and cumulative DMT exposure was 10.5 years.

The work was supported by Biogen International on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network. Dr. Iaffaldano has served on scientific advisory boards for and received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen and other companies that market DMTs for MS. Several study authors are employees of Biogen, and other study authors also reported financial ties to Biogen and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Iaffaldano P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):71-2, Abstract 204.

BERLIN – The optimal time to start disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is within 6 months of disease onset, according to real-world data from the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

Receiving disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) within 6 months of diagnosis was associated with a 28% reduction in the risk of reaching an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.0 or more for the first time at 12 months versus receiving treatment after 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.90; P = .003).

Results were not significant, looking at all the other periods tested at 6-month intervals from 1 year up to 5 years after diagnosis. HRs (95% CIs) comparing a first DMT given at 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 years, 2.5 years, 3 years, 3.5 years, 4 years, 4.5 years, and 5 years were a respective 0.90 (0.78-1.03), 0.89 (0.79-1.01), 0.99 (0.88-1.11), 0.95 (0.85-1.06), 1.01 (0.90-1.12), 0.97 (0.86-1.09), 1.09 (0.96-1.22), 1.11 (0.98-1.25), and 1.06 (0.93-1.20).

“To date, these data represent the largest RRMS cohort with the longest follow-up ever analyzed to determine the long-term effectiveness of the early start of DMTs,” said Pietro Iaffaldano, MD, at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“This study also provides evidence that data sharing from MS registries and databases is feasible,” noted Dr. Iaffaldano, who is assistant professor of neurology at the University of Bari (Italy). Such an approach can provide enough statistical power to detect the impact of treatment on disability outcomes in the long term, he suggested.

For the study, a cohort of 11,934 patients was obtained by screening more than 149,636 patients from five large registries and databases of MS patients – the Italian MS Registry, the Swedish MS Registry, the Danish MS Registry, OFSEP (Observatoire Français de al Sclérose en Plaques), and MSBase. Patients were included in the current analysis if they had at least 10 years of follow-up, had at least three EDSS evaluations, and at least one DMT prescription.

“It is well known that randomized, controlled trials support the early start of treatment in MS, but open-label extensions of the same trials reported inconsistent results about the long-term benefit on disability accumulation,” Dr. Iaffaldano explained. Further, recent observational studies have suggested that initiating DMTs early might not only delay the accumulation of disability but perhaps also death.

The aim of the research was thus to look at what effect the time interval from disease onset to the first administration of a DMT might have on long-term disability accumulation, as measured by the EDSS, in patients with RRMS.

The population of patients studied was mostly (71%) female, with a median age of 27 years at disease onset. The number of relapses prior to starting a DMT was two and the baseline EDSS was 2.0. In almost all (98.9%) cases, DMT was used as first-line treatment (second line in 1.1% of cases). The median follow-up was 13.2 years and cumulative DMT exposure was 10.5 years.

The work was supported by Biogen International on the basis of a sponsored research agreement with the Big Multiple Sclerosis Data Network. Dr. Iaffaldano has served on scientific advisory boards for and received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Biogen and other companies that market DMTs for MS. Several study authors are employees of Biogen, and other study authors also reported financial ties to Biogen and other pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Iaffaldano P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):71-2, Abstract 204.

BERLIN—Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are clinically relevant, and data suggest cut points to enable disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to research described at ECTRIMS 2018.

Various investigations have indicated that sNfL is associated with disease activity and predicts long-term clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) reduce sNfL levels in these patients. “The integration of sNfL into clinical practice will require a standardized, validated assay and defined, clinically meaningful cut points validated with real-world data,” said Peter Calabresi, MD, Director of the Division of Neuroimmunology at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, and colleagues.

Dr. Calabresi and colleagues conducted a study to define the sNfL levels relevant to disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting MS using samples and data from phase III clinical studies supported by Biogen. They measured sNfL with a single-molecule array Advantage kit or laboratory method in serial samples from more than 1,000 patients enrolled in four studies.

In the ADVANCE trial (which examined peginterferon beta-1a in 594 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline, every three months until Year 2, and then every six months until Year 4. In the CHAMPS trial (which analyzed interferon beta 1a in 319 patients with clinically isolated syndrome), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 48. In the MSCRG study (which examined interferon beta 1a in 164 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at Years 3 and 4. In SENTINEL (which examined natalizumab in 122 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 96. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, analysis of variance, chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.

Baseline sNfL levels were associated with the number of enhancing lesions and accumulation of new T2 lesions over time. Patients with no evident disease activity had consistently low sNfL levels, but those with active disease, especially with high brain atrophy rates, had elevated sNfL levels. Dr. Calabresi’s group found that an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL indicated a high probability of disease activity over the following year (positive predictive values of 92% and 95% in test and verification cohorts, respectively). Using the average of sNfL levels at baseline and Months 3 and 6 further improved the positive predictive value. Similarly, an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL was associated long-term with worse clinical and imaging outcomes, including progression of Expanded Disability Status Scale score (12 years), increase in T2 lesion volume (10 years), and brain atrophy (five years). DMTs lowered sNfL levels. Natalizumab reduced sNfL below 16 pg/mL in 96% of patients.

The study was sponsored by Biogen.

BERLIN—Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are clinically relevant, and data suggest cut points to enable disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to research described at ECTRIMS 2018.

Various investigations have indicated that sNfL is associated with disease activity and predicts long-term clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) reduce sNfL levels in these patients. “The integration of sNfL into clinical practice will require a standardized, validated assay and defined, clinically meaningful cut points validated with real-world data,” said Peter Calabresi, MD, Director of the Division of Neuroimmunology at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, and colleagues.

Dr. Calabresi and colleagues conducted a study to define the sNfL levels relevant to disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting MS using samples and data from phase III clinical studies supported by Biogen. They measured sNfL with a single-molecule array Advantage kit or laboratory method in serial samples from more than 1,000 patients enrolled in four studies.

In the ADVANCE trial (which examined peginterferon beta-1a in 594 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline, every three months until Year 2, and then every six months until Year 4. In the CHAMPS trial (which analyzed interferon beta 1a in 319 patients with clinically isolated syndrome), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 48. In the MSCRG study (which examined interferon beta 1a in 164 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at Years 3 and 4. In SENTINEL (which examined natalizumab in 122 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 96. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, analysis of variance, chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.

Baseline sNfL levels were associated with the number of enhancing lesions and accumulation of new T2 lesions over time. Patients with no evident disease activity had consistently low sNfL levels, but those with active disease, especially with high brain atrophy rates, had elevated sNfL levels. Dr. Calabresi’s group found that an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL indicated a high probability of disease activity over the following year (positive predictive values of 92% and 95% in test and verification cohorts, respectively). Using the average of sNfL levels at baseline and Months 3 and 6 further improved the positive predictive value. Similarly, an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL was associated long-term with worse clinical and imaging outcomes, including progression of Expanded Disability Status Scale score (12 years), increase in T2 lesion volume (10 years), and brain atrophy (five years). DMTs lowered sNfL levels. Natalizumab reduced sNfL below 16 pg/mL in 96% of patients.

The study was sponsored by Biogen.

BERLIN—Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are clinically relevant, and data suggest cut points to enable disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to research described at ECTRIMS 2018.

Various investigations have indicated that sNfL is associated with disease activity and predicts long-term clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) reduce sNfL levels in these patients. “The integration of sNfL into clinical practice will require a standardized, validated assay and defined, clinically meaningful cut points validated with real-world data,” said Peter Calabresi, MD, Director of the Division of Neuroimmunology at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, and colleagues.

Dr. Calabresi and colleagues conducted a study to define the sNfL levels relevant to disease severity stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with relapsing-remitting MS using samples and data from phase III clinical studies supported by Biogen. They measured sNfL with a single-molecule array Advantage kit or laboratory method in serial samples from more than 1,000 patients enrolled in four studies.

In the ADVANCE trial (which examined peginterferon beta-1a in 594 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline, every three months until Year 2, and then every six months until Year 4. In the CHAMPS trial (which analyzed interferon beta 1a in 319 patients with clinically isolated syndrome), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 48. In the MSCRG study (which examined interferon beta 1a in 164 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at Years 3 and 4. In SENTINEL (which examined natalizumab in 122 patients with relapsing-remitting MS), sNfL was measured at baseline and Week 96. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, analysis of variance, chi-squared test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.

Baseline sNfL levels were associated with the number of enhancing lesions and accumulation of new T2 lesions over time. Patients with no evident disease activity had consistently low sNfL levels, but those with active disease, especially with high brain atrophy rates, had elevated sNfL levels. Dr. Calabresi’s group found that an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL indicated a high probability of disease activity over the following year (positive predictive values of 92% and 95% in test and verification cohorts, respectively). Using the average of sNfL levels at baseline and Months 3 and 6 further improved the positive predictive value. Similarly, an sNfL level greater than 16 pg/mL was associated long-term with worse clinical and imaging outcomes, including progression of Expanded Disability Status Scale score (12 years), increase in T2 lesion volume (10 years), and brain atrophy (five years). DMTs lowered sNfL levels. Natalizumab reduced sNfL below 16 pg/mL in 96% of patients.

The study was sponsored by Biogen.

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.

BERLIN – Depression and bipolar disorder are major risk factors for worsening disability in people with multiple sclerosis, according to the results of a large Swedish registry-based study.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News

The presence of depression increased the risk of having a sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 3.0 by 54% and 4.0 by 87%, and it doubled the risk of an EDSS of 6.0.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment also upped the risk of greater disability, with patients exposed to SSRIs having a 40% increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 3.0, a 97% chance of having a sustained EDSS of 4.0, and 2.2-fold increased risk of a sustained EDSS of 6.0.

“We know that mood disorders are highly prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis,” Stefanie Binzer, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. She gave her presentation at the meeting on Oct. 10, which was World Mental Health Day.

The presence of mood disorders is associated with reduced quality of life, said Dr. Binzer of the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. Furthermore, depression is the major risk factor for suicidality in patients with MS. However, before this study the effect of having a comorbid mood disorder on MS patients’ disability levels had not been established.

The investigators analyzed data from 5,875 patients in the Swedish MS registry between 2001 and 2014. By matching these patients to records in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Swedish National Prescribed Drug Registry, they found that 8.5% (n = 502) had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), code for depression. Of these, 261 had received a diagnosis of depression before their diagnosis of MS.

Of 3,817 patients with MS onset between 2005 and 2014, 27.4% (n = 1,048) had collected at least one prescription for an SSRI.

“What we found was that MS patients with either an ICD code for depression or having been exposed to SSRIs had a significantly increased risk of reaching EDSS 3.0,” Dr. Binzer reported. The age at which patients reached these milestones were younger in both groups when compared with MS patients without depression, she observed.

“The difference between the groups [MS with and MS without depression] seemed to increased with EDSS,” Dr. Binzer said.

Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for patients with depression to be more likely to convert to secondary progressive MS, with a hazard ratio of 1.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-2.1).

“For a sensitivity analysis, we found that those who had depression prior to their first MS symptom, the median age when they reached EDSS 3.0 and 4.0 was reduced by 3 and 7 years, respectively,” Dr. Binzer said, adding that, unfortunately, there wasn’t enough power to look at the other endpoints.

In regard to bipolar disorder, 1.5% (n = 200) of 13,125 MS patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2014 were identified with this mood disorder. Its presence significantly increased the risk of MS patients reaching an EDSS score of 4.0 by 58% (95% CI, 1.1-2.28), but not EDSS 3.0 (HR = 1.34; 95% CI, 0.94-1.92) or 6.0 (HR = 1.16; 95% CI, 0.79-1.69). The latter could be due to smaller sample size, Dr. Binzer suggested.

The investigators’ analysis of the results stratified by sex, conducted because men tend to fare worse than women with MS and progress faster, showed that for both depression and bipolar disorder, men were at significantly higher risk of reaching sustained disability milestones. Indeed, compared with women, men with depression had a 61% increased risk and those with bipolar disorder a 31% increased risk of reaching an EDSS score of 6.0. They also had 51% and 32% increased risks of conversion to secondary progressive MS.

“We don’t know the mechanisms that underlie these associations,” Dr. Binzer noted. “Irrespective of the underlying mechanisms, [the study] clearly shows that it’s imperative that we recognize, early, mood disorders in MS patients, and manage them effectively in order to provide better care and hopefully reduce MS disability worsening.”

The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council and the Swedish Brain Foundation. Dr. Binzer has received speaker fees and travel grants from Biogen.

SOURCE: Binzer S et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):41. Abstract 99.

BERLIN – The 2017 McDonald criteria boosted the rate of definitive multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in children by 40%, compared with the 2010 criteria.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The increased accuracy largely hinged on a positive finding of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid – a diagnostic hallmark that was not included in the earlier criteria, Georgina Arrambide, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“Application to children of the new diagnostic criteria is limited,” said Dr. Arrambide, of the University Hospital Vall d’Hebron Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Barcelona. “And there are still some uncertainties with regard to fluid biomarkers and how they predict or confirm a diagnosis of MS in children, and also their relationship to the disease evolution.”

The updated McDonald criteria are intended to boost early, definitive MS diagnosis, leading to earlier initiation of therapy. They are intended primarily for patients aged 11 years and older who present with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and high probability of MS (Lancet Neurol. 2018;17[2]:162-73).

Dr. Arrambide and her colleagues used the revamped criteria to reassess MS diagnoses in a prospective Spanish cohort of children who experienced an acute first demyelinating event and were diagnosed with the 2010 criteria. The Kids-METOMS-MOGBCN Study enrolls children aged younger than 18 years within 1 year of a first acute demyelinating episode. It includes demographic, clinical, and imaging data, as well as data on oligoclonal bands and antibodies against aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MoG). Of these fluid biomarkers, only oligoclonal bands are included in the new McDonald criteria.

The 55 children in Dr. Arrambide’s analysis were followed for a mean of 16 months. They included 25 (45%) girls with an overall median age of 6 years at the first acute event. Oligoclonal bands were present in 56%, and both anti-MoG and anti–aquaporin-4 antibodies in 82%.

All children had abnormal brain MRI at baseline, with about 33% having gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions. Spinal cord MRI was abnormal in 50%, with 39% having gadolinium-enhancing lesions. According to the 2010 criteria, only three had a definitive MS diagnosis at baseline. The diagnosis was acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in 51%, clinically isolated syndrome in 31%, radiologically isolated syndrome in 2%, and nonencephalopathic disseminated encephalomyelitis in the remainder.

At baseline, three of those had a definitive MS diagnosis, displaying dissemination in both space and time as required by both the 2010 and 2017 criteria. The addition of oligoclonal band positivity added one more patient over the 2010 criteria, and assessing the cohort with the complete 2017 criteria added three more definitive diagnoses. This was a significant increase in definitive MS diagnoses when compared against the earlier criteria (70% vs. 30%).

Diagnoses changed in 10 other patients during follow-up. The single patient with radiologically isolated syndrome was definitively diagnosed with MS. Of the seven with clinically isolated syndrome, six were diagnosed with MS and one with a relapsing optic neuritis. Of the 28 with a nonencephalopathic encephalitis, 2 were diagnosed with optic neuritis.

The study also confirmed the benefit of adding oligoclonal bands as a diagnostic marker in children. Of those with an MS diagnosis at last follow-up, 71% were positive for the cerebrospinal fluid finding, compared with just 4% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. However, none of those children had anti-MoG antibodies, compared with 58% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. None of the patients were positive for anti–aquaporin-4, regardless of diagnosis.

That finding does not necessarily mean that the absence of anti-MoG antibodies can rule out an MS diagnosis in children, Dr. Arrambide cautioned. Nevertheless, the finding is a useful clinical marker during a diagnostic work-up.

“The presence of oligoclonal bands and the absence of MOG-IgG are both useful biomarkers when evaluating the risk of MS in children with a first demyelinating event,” she said.

She disclosed financial relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Arrambide G et al. ECTRIMS 2018, Abstract 64

BERLIN – The 2017 McDonald criteria boosted the rate of definitive multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in children by 40%, compared with the 2010 criteria.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The increased accuracy largely hinged on a positive finding of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid – a diagnostic hallmark that was not included in the earlier criteria, Georgina Arrambide, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“Application to children of the new diagnostic criteria is limited,” said Dr. Arrambide, of the University Hospital Vall d’Hebron Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Barcelona. “And there are still some uncertainties with regard to fluid biomarkers and how they predict or confirm a diagnosis of MS in children, and also their relationship to the disease evolution.”

The updated McDonald criteria are intended to boost early, definitive MS diagnosis, leading to earlier initiation of therapy. They are intended primarily for patients aged 11 years and older who present with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and high probability of MS (Lancet Neurol. 2018;17[2]:162-73).

Dr. Arrambide and her colleagues used the revamped criteria to reassess MS diagnoses in a prospective Spanish cohort of children who experienced an acute first demyelinating event and were diagnosed with the 2010 criteria. The Kids-METOMS-MOGBCN Study enrolls children aged younger than 18 years within 1 year of a first acute demyelinating episode. It includes demographic, clinical, and imaging data, as well as data on oligoclonal bands and antibodies against aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MoG). Of these fluid biomarkers, only oligoclonal bands are included in the new McDonald criteria.

The 55 children in Dr. Arrambide’s analysis were followed for a mean of 16 months. They included 25 (45%) girls with an overall median age of 6 years at the first acute event. Oligoclonal bands were present in 56%, and both anti-MoG and anti–aquaporin-4 antibodies in 82%.

All children had abnormal brain MRI at baseline, with about 33% having gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions. Spinal cord MRI was abnormal in 50%, with 39% having gadolinium-enhancing lesions. According to the 2010 criteria, only three had a definitive MS diagnosis at baseline. The diagnosis was acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in 51%, clinically isolated syndrome in 31%, radiologically isolated syndrome in 2%, and nonencephalopathic disseminated encephalomyelitis in the remainder.

At baseline, three of those had a definitive MS diagnosis, displaying dissemination in both space and time as required by both the 2010 and 2017 criteria. The addition of oligoclonal band positivity added one more patient over the 2010 criteria, and assessing the cohort with the complete 2017 criteria added three more definitive diagnoses. This was a significant increase in definitive MS diagnoses when compared against the earlier criteria (70% vs. 30%).

Diagnoses changed in 10 other patients during follow-up. The single patient with radiologically isolated syndrome was definitively diagnosed with MS. Of the seven with clinically isolated syndrome, six were diagnosed with MS and one with a relapsing optic neuritis. Of the 28 with a nonencephalopathic encephalitis, 2 were diagnosed with optic neuritis.

The study also confirmed the benefit of adding oligoclonal bands as a diagnostic marker in children. Of those with an MS diagnosis at last follow-up, 71% were positive for the cerebrospinal fluid finding, compared with just 4% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. However, none of those children had anti-MoG antibodies, compared with 58% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. None of the patients were positive for anti–aquaporin-4, regardless of diagnosis.

That finding does not necessarily mean that the absence of anti-MoG antibodies can rule out an MS diagnosis in children, Dr. Arrambide cautioned. Nevertheless, the finding is a useful clinical marker during a diagnostic work-up.

“The presence of oligoclonal bands and the absence of MOG-IgG are both useful biomarkers when evaluating the risk of MS in children with a first demyelinating event,” she said.

She disclosed financial relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Arrambide G et al. ECTRIMS 2018, Abstract 64

BERLIN – The 2017 McDonald criteria boosted the rate of definitive multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis in children by 40%, compared with the 2010 criteria.

Michele G. Sullivan/MDedge News

The increased accuracy largely hinged on a positive finding of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid – a diagnostic hallmark that was not included in the earlier criteria, Georgina Arrambide, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

“Application to children of the new diagnostic criteria is limited,” said Dr. Arrambide, of the University Hospital Vall d’Hebron Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Barcelona. “And there are still some uncertainties with regard to fluid biomarkers and how they predict or confirm a diagnosis of MS in children, and also their relationship to the disease evolution.”

The updated McDonald criteria are intended to boost early, definitive MS diagnosis, leading to earlier initiation of therapy. They are intended primarily for patients aged 11 years and older who present with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and high probability of MS (Lancet Neurol. 2018;17[2]:162-73).

Dr. Arrambide and her colleagues used the revamped criteria to reassess MS diagnoses in a prospective Spanish cohort of children who experienced an acute first demyelinating event and were diagnosed with the 2010 criteria. The Kids-METOMS-MOGBCN Study enrolls children aged younger than 18 years within 1 year of a first acute demyelinating episode. It includes demographic, clinical, and imaging data, as well as data on oligoclonal bands and antibodies against aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MoG). Of these fluid biomarkers, only oligoclonal bands are included in the new McDonald criteria.

The 55 children in Dr. Arrambide’s analysis were followed for a mean of 16 months. They included 25 (45%) girls with an overall median age of 6 years at the first acute event. Oligoclonal bands were present in 56%, and both anti-MoG and anti–aquaporin-4 antibodies in 82%.

All children had abnormal brain MRI at baseline, with about 33% having gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions. Spinal cord MRI was abnormal in 50%, with 39% having gadolinium-enhancing lesions. According to the 2010 criteria, only three had a definitive MS diagnosis at baseline. The diagnosis was acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in 51%, clinically isolated syndrome in 31%, radiologically isolated syndrome in 2%, and nonencephalopathic disseminated encephalomyelitis in the remainder.

At baseline, three of those had a definitive MS diagnosis, displaying dissemination in both space and time as required by both the 2010 and 2017 criteria. The addition of oligoclonal band positivity added one more patient over the 2010 criteria, and assessing the cohort with the complete 2017 criteria added three more definitive diagnoses. This was a significant increase in definitive MS diagnoses when compared against the earlier criteria (70% vs. 30%).

Diagnoses changed in 10 other patients during follow-up. The single patient with radiologically isolated syndrome was definitively diagnosed with MS. Of the seven with clinically isolated syndrome, six were diagnosed with MS and one with a relapsing optic neuritis. Of the 28 with a nonencephalopathic encephalitis, 2 were diagnosed with optic neuritis.

The study also confirmed the benefit of adding oligoclonal bands as a diagnostic marker in children. Of those with an MS diagnosis at last follow-up, 71% were positive for the cerebrospinal fluid finding, compared with just 4% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. However, none of those children had anti-MoG antibodies, compared with 58% of those with a non-MS diagnosis. None of the patients were positive for anti–aquaporin-4, regardless of diagnosis.

That finding does not necessarily mean that the absence of anti-MoG antibodies can rule out an MS diagnosis in children, Dr. Arrambide cautioned. Nevertheless, the finding is a useful clinical marker during a diagnostic work-up.

“The presence of oligoclonal bands and the absence of MOG-IgG are both useful biomarkers when evaluating the risk of MS in children with a first demyelinating event,” she said.

She disclosed financial relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Arrambide G et al. ECTRIMS 2018, Abstract 64

BERLIN – The risk of cancer – and breast cancer in particular – was not elevated above background levels in a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients taking disease-modifying therapies.

Those findings from the large Nordic cohort study COMBAT-MS stand in contrast to previous work showing an elevated cancer risk for some monoclonal antibodies.

After statistical adjustment and use of rituximab (Rituxan) as the standard, the hazard ratio (HR) for any malignancy with fingolimod (Gilenya) was 1.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab (Tysabri), the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10), said Peter Alping, a PhD student in the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.

Only limited data exist for real-world multiple sclerosis (MS) cohorts who have been exposed to novel disease-modifying therapies, said Mr. Alping, presenting the findings at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. Rituximab has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but the treatment regimens differ, as do patient characteristics, he noted. However, surveillance for risk of malignancy is important in these therapies, he said, “since modern disease-modifying therapies exert a more profound effect on the immune system, and we know that the immune system is vital in fighting and preventing cancers.”

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was studied in the ORATORIO trial. “There, they saw an imbalance in the numbers of breast cancers between the ocrelizumab and placebo groups,” said Mr. Alping, with raw data showing four breast cancers in the ocrelizumab population. However, this would translate to 26.1 cancers per 10,000 person-years, as opposed to the zero breast cancers seen in the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:209-20).

“To what degree is cancer risk a concern with novel [disease-modifying therapy] use in MS?” Mr. Alping asked.

To answer the question, he and his colleagues from the Karolinska Institute sought to compare the risk of cancer in MS patients who were treated with rituximab, fingolimod, and natalizumab.

To do this, they conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Swedish MS registry, looking at treatment episodes between 2011 and 2016. In Sweden, the MS registry is also linked to the overall patient registry, as well as registries for cancer and prescription drug use. In addition, patient data are linked to national census data.

Mr. Alping and his colleagues looked at data for the first instance of use for an MS patient of rituximab, natalizumab, and/or fingolimod between the years 2011 and 2016. Then, they matched patient records from the general population by age, sex, and geographic location, enrolling the matched controls at the same time point as the MS match entered the study.

Patients treated with mitoxantrone, those who emigrated, and those who died during the study period were excluded from the study.

The statistical analysis, Mr. Alping said, used an ever-treated approach and didn’t attempt to weight exposure duration or dose. However, statistical adjustments were made for patient and control demographics and medical history, for any previous history of cancer, and for MS disease characteristics.

At baseline, 1,558 patients had been treated with fingolimod, 1,761 with natalizumab, and 3,012 with rituximab. A little less than one-third of the patients (26.3%-31.6%) were male, and the mean age was 35-43 years. Most patients (66%-86%) had undergone one or two previous therapies. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.20-2.88. Few patients (0.9%-1.7%) had any history of previous cancer.

Overall, the incidence of cancer in the MS cohort ranged from 23.09 per 10,000 person-years for rituximab ever-takers to 46.28 for those who had ever taken fingolimod. Among the general population, rates of any malignancy were 29.62 per 10,000 person-years.

Looking just at breast cancer, rates in the MS cohort ranged from 2.19 to 2.92/10,000 person-years. For the general population, the rate was 12.07/10,000 person-years.

However, using a Cox regression analysis employing MS-specific covariates and using rituximab as the reference, Mr. Alping and his colleagues calculated an inverse proportion-weighted hazard ratio for any malignancy under the various treatment conditions. Using this analysis, the HR for any cancer with fingolimod was 1.74 (95% CI, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab, the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10).

Among just women taking rituximab, 2,274 therapy starts occurred, and one breast cancer was seen in 4,050 person-years. This yielded an incidence of 2.32 cancers per 10,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.06-12.9). This contrasts with the adjusted incidence rate in the general female population of 11.06 breast cancers per 10,000 person-years.

Looking at all the therapy episodes captured in the cohort study, there were 6,660 incidences of therapy initiation, and 52 malignancies were seen over 17,283 person-years, Mr. Alping said.

“For malignant cancer of any type, we found no increased risk for rituximab, compared to fingolimod and natalizumab,” Mr. Alping said, pointing to the wide confidence intervals in all the adjusted data. The incidence of breast cancer in women who have taken rituximab, he said, is “comparable to, or possibly lower than, that of the general female population, and lower than the incidence rate reported in the ORATORIO trial for ocrelizumab.

“The overall cancer risk and risk of breast cancer might not be major concerns short term when treating MS patients with rituximab relative to other disease-modifying therapies,” he said.

The study was partially funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Mr. Alping reported no conflicts of interest. One study author reported relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alping P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):36. Abstract 89.

BERLIN – The risk of cancer – and breast cancer in particular – was not elevated above background levels in a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients taking disease-modifying therapies.

Those findings from the large Nordic cohort study COMBAT-MS stand in contrast to previous work showing an elevated cancer risk for some monoclonal antibodies.

After statistical adjustment and use of rituximab (Rituxan) as the standard, the hazard ratio (HR) for any malignancy with fingolimod (Gilenya) was 1.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab (Tysabri), the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10), said Peter Alping, a PhD student in the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.

Only limited data exist for real-world multiple sclerosis (MS) cohorts who have been exposed to novel disease-modifying therapies, said Mr. Alping, presenting the findings at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. Rituximab has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but the treatment regimens differ, as do patient characteristics, he noted. However, surveillance for risk of malignancy is important in these therapies, he said, “since modern disease-modifying therapies exert a more profound effect on the immune system, and we know that the immune system is vital in fighting and preventing cancers.”

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was studied in the ORATORIO trial. “There, they saw an imbalance in the numbers of breast cancers between the ocrelizumab and placebo groups,” said Mr. Alping, with raw data showing four breast cancers in the ocrelizumab population. However, this would translate to 26.1 cancers per 10,000 person-years, as opposed to the zero breast cancers seen in the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:209-20).

“To what degree is cancer risk a concern with novel [disease-modifying therapy] use in MS?” Mr. Alping asked.

To answer the question, he and his colleagues from the Karolinska Institute sought to compare the risk of cancer in MS patients who were treated with rituximab, fingolimod, and natalizumab.

To do this, they conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Swedish MS registry, looking at treatment episodes between 2011 and 2016. In Sweden, the MS registry is also linked to the overall patient registry, as well as registries for cancer and prescription drug use. In addition, patient data are linked to national census data.

Mr. Alping and his colleagues looked at data for the first instance of use for an MS patient of rituximab, natalizumab, and/or fingolimod between the years 2011 and 2016. Then, they matched patient records from the general population by age, sex, and geographic location, enrolling the matched controls at the same time point as the MS match entered the study.

Patients treated with mitoxantrone, those who emigrated, and those who died during the study period were excluded from the study.

The statistical analysis, Mr. Alping said, used an ever-treated approach and didn’t attempt to weight exposure duration or dose. However, statistical adjustments were made for patient and control demographics and medical history, for any previous history of cancer, and for MS disease characteristics.

At baseline, 1,558 patients had been treated with fingolimod, 1,761 with natalizumab, and 3,012 with rituximab. A little less than one-third of the patients (26.3%-31.6%) were male, and the mean age was 35-43 years. Most patients (66%-86%) had undergone one or two previous therapies. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.20-2.88. Few patients (0.9%-1.7%) had any history of previous cancer.

Overall, the incidence of cancer in the MS cohort ranged from 23.09 per 10,000 person-years for rituximab ever-takers to 46.28 for those who had ever taken fingolimod. Among the general population, rates of any malignancy were 29.62 per 10,000 person-years.

Looking just at breast cancer, rates in the MS cohort ranged from 2.19 to 2.92/10,000 person-years. For the general population, the rate was 12.07/10,000 person-years.

However, using a Cox regression analysis employing MS-specific covariates and using rituximab as the reference, Mr. Alping and his colleagues calculated an inverse proportion-weighted hazard ratio for any malignancy under the various treatment conditions. Using this analysis, the HR for any cancer with fingolimod was 1.74 (95% CI, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab, the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10).

Among just women taking rituximab, 2,274 therapy starts occurred, and one breast cancer was seen in 4,050 person-years. This yielded an incidence of 2.32 cancers per 10,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.06-12.9). This contrasts with the adjusted incidence rate in the general female population of 11.06 breast cancers per 10,000 person-years.

Looking at all the therapy episodes captured in the cohort study, there were 6,660 incidences of therapy initiation, and 52 malignancies were seen over 17,283 person-years, Mr. Alping said.

“For malignant cancer of any type, we found no increased risk for rituximab, compared to fingolimod and natalizumab,” Mr. Alping said, pointing to the wide confidence intervals in all the adjusted data. The incidence of breast cancer in women who have taken rituximab, he said, is “comparable to, or possibly lower than, that of the general female population, and lower than the incidence rate reported in the ORATORIO trial for ocrelizumab.

“The overall cancer risk and risk of breast cancer might not be major concerns short term when treating MS patients with rituximab relative to other disease-modifying therapies,” he said.

The study was partially funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Mr. Alping reported no conflicts of interest. One study author reported relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alping P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):36. Abstract 89.

BERLIN – The risk of cancer – and breast cancer in particular – was not elevated above background levels in a large cohort of multiple sclerosis patients taking disease-modifying therapies.

Those findings from the large Nordic cohort study COMBAT-MS stand in contrast to previous work showing an elevated cancer risk for some monoclonal antibodies.

After statistical adjustment and use of rituximab (Rituxan) as the standard, the hazard ratio (HR) for any malignancy with fingolimod (Gilenya) was 1.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab (Tysabri), the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10), said Peter Alping, a PhD student in the department of clinical neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm.

Only limited data exist for real-world multiple sclerosis (MS) cohorts who have been exposed to novel disease-modifying therapies, said Mr. Alping, presenting the findings at the annual congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. Rituximab has been studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but the treatment regimens differ, as do patient characteristics, he noted. However, surveillance for risk of malignancy is important in these therapies, he said, “since modern disease-modifying therapies exert a more profound effect on the immune system, and we know that the immune system is vital in fighting and preventing cancers.”

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was studied in the ORATORIO trial. “There, they saw an imbalance in the numbers of breast cancers between the ocrelizumab and placebo groups,” said Mr. Alping, with raw data showing four breast cancers in the ocrelizumab population. However, this would translate to 26.1 cancers per 10,000 person-years, as opposed to the zero breast cancers seen in the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017;376:209-20).

“To what degree is cancer risk a concern with novel [disease-modifying therapy] use in MS?” Mr. Alping asked.

To answer the question, he and his colleagues from the Karolinska Institute sought to compare the risk of cancer in MS patients who were treated with rituximab, fingolimod, and natalizumab.

To do this, they conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Swedish MS registry, looking at treatment episodes between 2011 and 2016. In Sweden, the MS registry is also linked to the overall patient registry, as well as registries for cancer and prescription drug use. In addition, patient data are linked to national census data.

Mr. Alping and his colleagues looked at data for the first instance of use for an MS patient of rituximab, natalizumab, and/or fingolimod between the years 2011 and 2016. Then, they matched patient records from the general population by age, sex, and geographic location, enrolling the matched controls at the same time point as the MS match entered the study.

Patients treated with mitoxantrone, those who emigrated, and those who died during the study period were excluded from the study.

The statistical analysis, Mr. Alping said, used an ever-treated approach and didn’t attempt to weight exposure duration or dose. However, statistical adjustments were made for patient and control demographics and medical history, for any previous history of cancer, and for MS disease characteristics.

At baseline, 1,558 patients had been treated with fingolimod, 1,761 with natalizumab, and 3,012 with rituximab. A little less than one-third of the patients (26.3%-31.6%) were male, and the mean age was 35-43 years. Most patients (66%-86%) had undergone one or two previous therapies. The mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.20-2.88. Few patients (0.9%-1.7%) had any history of previous cancer.

Overall, the incidence of cancer in the MS cohort ranged from 23.09 per 10,000 person-years for rituximab ever-takers to 46.28 for those who had ever taken fingolimod. Among the general population, rates of any malignancy were 29.62 per 10,000 person-years.

Looking just at breast cancer, rates in the MS cohort ranged from 2.19 to 2.92/10,000 person-years. For the general population, the rate was 12.07/10,000 person-years.

However, using a Cox regression analysis employing MS-specific covariates and using rituximab as the reference, Mr. Alping and his colleagues calculated an inverse proportion-weighted hazard ratio for any malignancy under the various treatment conditions. Using this analysis, the HR for any cancer with fingolimod was 1.74 (95% CI, 0.92-3.28). For natalizumab, the malignancy HR was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.53-2.10).

Among just women taking rituximab, 2,274 therapy starts occurred, and one breast cancer was seen in 4,050 person-years. This yielded an incidence of 2.32 cancers per 10,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.06-12.9). This contrasts with the adjusted incidence rate in the general female population of 11.06 breast cancers per 10,000 person-years.

Looking at all the therapy episodes captured in the cohort study, there were 6,660 incidences of therapy initiation, and 52 malignancies were seen over 17,283 person-years, Mr. Alping said.

“For malignant cancer of any type, we found no increased risk for rituximab, compared to fingolimod and natalizumab,” Mr. Alping said, pointing to the wide confidence intervals in all the adjusted data. The incidence of breast cancer in women who have taken rituximab, he said, is “comparable to, or possibly lower than, that of the general female population, and lower than the incidence rate reported in the ORATORIO trial for ocrelizumab.

“The overall cancer risk and risk of breast cancer might not be major concerns short term when treating MS patients with rituximab relative to other disease-modifying therapies,” he said.

The study was partially funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Mr. Alping reported no conflicts of interest. One study author reported relationships with several pharmaceutical companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Alping P et al. Mult Scler. 2018;24(Suppl 2):36. Abstract 89.

New evidence provides estimates of the pregnancy rates for American women with multiple sclerosis (MS), their complication rates, and the rates of relapse and disease-modifying drug treatment during different phases before and after pregnancy.

The two new studies, conducted by Maria K. Houtchens, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and her colleagues involved retrospective mining of U.S. commercial health plan data in the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims–U.S. database between Jan. 1, 2006, and June 30, 2015.

The mean age of pregnant women in the nine annual cohorts during that period was just over 32 years for those with MS and just over 29 years for those without. The percentage of women without MS who had a pregnancy-related claim in the database declined from 8.83% in 2006 to 7.75% in 2014 after adjusting for age, region, payer, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, whereas the percentage increased in women with MS during the same period, from 7.91% to 9.47%. The investigators matched 2,115 women with MS and 2,115 without MS who had live births for a variety of variables and found that women with MS had higher rates of premature labor (31.4% vs. 27.4%; P = .005), infection in pregnancy (13.3% vs. 10.9%; P = .016), maternal cardiovascular disease (3.0% vs. 1.9%; P = .028), anemia or acquired coagulation disorder (2.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .007), neurologic complications in pregnancy (1.6% vs. 0.6%; P = .005), and sexually transmitted diseases in pregnancy (0.4% vs. 0%; P = .045). During labor and delivery, women with MS who had a live birth more often had a claim for acquired damage to the fetus (27.8% vs. 23.5%; P = .002) and congenital fetal malformations (13.2% vs. 10.3%; P = .004) than did women without MS.

In the second study, Dr. Houtchens and two coauthors from the first study of the database reported on a set of 2,158 women who had a live birth during the study period and had 1 year of continuous insurance eligibility before and after pregnancy. The odds for having an MS relapse declined during pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.623; 95% confidence interval, 0.521-0.744), rose during the 6-week postpartum puerperium (OR, 1.710; 95% CI, 1.358-2.152), and leveled off during the last three postpartum quarters to remain at a higher level than before pregnancy (OR, 1.216; 95% CI, 1.052-1.406). Disease-modifying drug treatment followed the same pattern with 20% using it before pregnancy, dropping to about 2% in the second trimester, and peaking in about a quarter of all patients 9-12 months post partum.

[email protected]

SOURCES: Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006382; Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006384.

New evidence provides estimates of the pregnancy rates for American women with multiple sclerosis (MS), their complication rates, and the rates of relapse and disease-modifying drug treatment during different phases before and after pregnancy.

The two new studies, conducted by Maria K. Houtchens, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and her colleagues involved retrospective mining of U.S. commercial health plan data in the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims–U.S. database between Jan. 1, 2006, and June 30, 2015.

The mean age of pregnant women in the nine annual cohorts during that period was just over 32 years for those with MS and just over 29 years for those without. The percentage of women without MS who had a pregnancy-related claim in the database declined from 8.83% in 2006 to 7.75% in 2014 after adjusting for age, region, payer, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, whereas the percentage increased in women with MS during the same period, from 7.91% to 9.47%. The investigators matched 2,115 women with MS and 2,115 without MS who had live births for a variety of variables and found that women with MS had higher rates of premature labor (31.4% vs. 27.4%; P = .005), infection in pregnancy (13.3% vs. 10.9%; P = .016), maternal cardiovascular disease (3.0% vs. 1.9%; P = .028), anemia or acquired coagulation disorder (2.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .007), neurologic complications in pregnancy (1.6% vs. 0.6%; P = .005), and sexually transmitted diseases in pregnancy (0.4% vs. 0%; P = .045). During labor and delivery, women with MS who had a live birth more often had a claim for acquired damage to the fetus (27.8% vs. 23.5%; P = .002) and congenital fetal malformations (13.2% vs. 10.3%; P = .004) than did women without MS.

In the second study, Dr. Houtchens and two coauthors from the first study of the database reported on a set of 2,158 women who had a live birth during the study period and had 1 year of continuous insurance eligibility before and after pregnancy. The odds for having an MS relapse declined during pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.623; 95% confidence interval, 0.521-0.744), rose during the 6-week postpartum puerperium (OR, 1.710; 95% CI, 1.358-2.152), and leveled off during the last three postpartum quarters to remain at a higher level than before pregnancy (OR, 1.216; 95% CI, 1.052-1.406). Disease-modifying drug treatment followed the same pattern with 20% using it before pregnancy, dropping to about 2% in the second trimester, and peaking in about a quarter of all patients 9-12 months post partum.

[email protected]

SOURCES: Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006382; Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006384.

New evidence provides estimates of the pregnancy rates for American women with multiple sclerosis (MS), their complication rates, and the rates of relapse and disease-modifying drug treatment during different phases before and after pregnancy.

The two new studies, conducted by Maria K. Houtchens, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and her colleagues involved retrospective mining of U.S. commercial health plan data in the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims–U.S. database between Jan. 1, 2006, and June 30, 2015.

The mean age of pregnant women in the nine annual cohorts during that period was just over 32 years for those with MS and just over 29 years for those without. The percentage of women without MS who had a pregnancy-related claim in the database declined from 8.83% in 2006 to 7.75% in 2014 after adjusting for age, region, payer, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score, whereas the percentage increased in women with MS during the same period, from 7.91% to 9.47%. The investigators matched 2,115 women with MS and 2,115 without MS who had live births for a variety of variables and found that women with MS had higher rates of premature labor (31.4% vs. 27.4%; P = .005), infection in pregnancy (13.3% vs. 10.9%; P = .016), maternal cardiovascular disease (3.0% vs. 1.9%; P = .028), anemia or acquired coagulation disorder (2.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .007), neurologic complications in pregnancy (1.6% vs. 0.6%; P = .005), and sexually transmitted diseases in pregnancy (0.4% vs. 0%; P = .045). During labor and delivery, women with MS who had a live birth more often had a claim for acquired damage to the fetus (27.8% vs. 23.5%; P = .002) and congenital fetal malformations (13.2% vs. 10.3%; P = .004) than did women without MS.

In the second study, Dr. Houtchens and two coauthors from the first study of the database reported on a set of 2,158 women who had a live birth during the study period and had 1 year of continuous insurance eligibility before and after pregnancy. The odds for having an MS relapse declined during pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.623; 95% confidence interval, 0.521-0.744), rose during the 6-week postpartum puerperium (OR, 1.710; 95% CI, 1.358-2.152), and leveled off during the last three postpartum quarters to remain at a higher level than before pregnancy (OR, 1.216; 95% CI, 1.052-1.406). Disease-modifying drug treatment followed the same pattern with 20% using it before pregnancy, dropping to about 2% in the second trimester, and peaking in about a quarter of all patients 9-12 months post partum.

[email protected]

SOURCES: Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006382; Houtchens MK et al. Neurology. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006384.

A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.

Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.

“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.

Not Typical MS

They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).

Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.

Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.

On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.

The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS

“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”

The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.

The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].

A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.

Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.

“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.

Not Typical MS

They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).

Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.

Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.

On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.

The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS

“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”

The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.

The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].

A new subtype of multiple sclerosis (MS) called myelocortical MS is characterized by demyelination only in the spinal cord and cerebral cortex and not in the cerebral white matter, according to a study published online ahead of print August 21 in Lancet Neurology. The findings are based on an examination of the brains and spinal cords of 100 patients who died of MS.

Bruce D. Trapp, PhD, the Morris R. and Ruth V. Graham Endowed Chair in Biomedical Research at the Lerner Research Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and his coauthors said that while the demyelination of cerebral white matter is a pathologic hallmark of MS, previous research has found that only around half of cerebral T2-weighted hyperintense white matter lesions are demyelinated, and these lesions account for less than a third of variance in the rate of brain atrophy.

“In the absence of specific MRI metrics for demyelination, the relationship between cerebral white-matter demyelination and neurodegeneration remains speculative,” they said.

Not Typical MS

They found that while individuals with myelocortical MS did not have demyelinated lesions in the cerebral white matter, they had areas of demyelinated lesions in the cerebral cortex similar to those of individuals with typical MS (median 4.45% vs 9.74%, respectively). However, the individuals with myelocortical MS had a significantly smaller area of spinal cord demyelination (median 3.81% vs 13.81%).

Individuals with myelocortical MS also had significantly lower mean cortical neuronal densities, compared with healthy control brains, in layer III, layer V, and layer VI. But individuals with typical MS only had a lower cortical neuronal density in layer V when compared with controls.

Dr. Trapp and colleagues also saw that in typical MS, neuronal density decreased as the area of brain white-matter demyelination increased. However, this negative linear correlation was not seen in myelocortical MS.

On MRI, researchers were still able to see abnormalities in the cerebral white matter in individuals with myelocortical MS, in T2-weighted, T1-weighted, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTR) images. They also found similar total T2-weighted and T1-weighted lesion volumes in individuals with myelocortical MS and those with typical MS, although individuals with typical MS had significantly greater MTR lesion volumes.

The Hallmarks of Myelocortical MS

“We propose that myelocortical MS is characterized by spinal cord demyelination, subpial cortical demyelination, and an absence of cerebral white-matter demyelination,” Dr. Trapp and colleagues wrote. “Our findings indicate that abnormal cerebral white-matter T2-T1-MTR regions of interest are not always demyelinated, and this pathologic evidence suggests that cerebral white-matter demyelination and cortical neuronal degeneration can be independent events in myelocortical MS.”

The authors acknowledged that one limitation of their study may have been selection bias, as all the patients in the study died from complications of advanced MS. They suggested that it was therefore not appropriate to conclude that the prevalence of myelocortical MS seen in their sample would be similar across the entire MS population, nor were the findings likely to apply to pateints with earlier stage disease.

The study received funding from the NIH and the National MS Society. One author is an employee of Renovo Neural, and three authors are employees of Biogen. One author declared a pending patent related to automated lesion segmentation from MRI images, and four authors declared funding, fees, and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies.

—Bianca Nogrady

Suggested Reading

Trapp BD, Vignos M, Dudman J, et al. Cortical neuronal densities and cerebral white matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Aug 21 [Epub ahead of print].

HILTON HEAD, SC—Given the lack of a definitive diagnostic test for multiple sclerosis (MS), diagnosing the disease can prove difficult. When considering symptoms, signs, and MRI findings that are suggestive of MS, clinicians must rely on their clinical judgment and experience, skillful interpretation of tests, and knowledge of and willingness to consider alternative diagnoses. Because of the subjective judgments involved and the many conditions that may mimic MS, it is not surprising that physicians sometimes misdiagnose MS, said Harold Moses, MD, at Vanderbilt University’s 41st Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

A study by Solomon et al suggests ways to reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, said Dr. Moses, Associate Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. “Neurologists should … avoid overreliance on MRI changes as the principal support for an MS diagnosis,” he said. “Nonspecific or atypical MRI findings should be interpreted cautiously. A diagnosis of MS should not be made or reinforced in patients with psychiatric conditions without evidence for MS.”

For patients with emotional distress and psychologically based functional disability who do not meet diagnostic criteria for MS, a diagnosis of MS should be avoided. When MS remains a possibility, the patient should be informed of that fact and followed with clinical assessment and, if appropriate, MRI, Dr. Moses added. “Neurologists should be open in admitting and discussing uncertainty with patients,” he said. “It’s important to be honest in … indicating the need for further testing or observation over time. When emotional factors are thought to contribute [to a patient’s symptoms], treatments should be directed at these issues concurrently.”

First, Do No Harm

Psychiatrists and other therapists may be able to help patients when the diagnosis remains an open question. “MS disease-modifying drugs should be prescribed only for patients who have definitive evidence for MS or for those who present with classical clinically isolated syndromes—optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and brainstem events—accompanied by appropriate changes on MRI,” Dr. Moses said.

Challenging cases include asymptomatic patients with MRI findings; patients with a first occurrence of symptoms, especially when the presentation is atypical; and patients with mimics of MS, such as vasculitis. Neurologists should be vigilant to identify mimics, particularly because these conditions may be treatable. The presence of psychiatric illness also may create challenging clinical scenarios.

“Psychologic and psychiatric factors may be present, but that patient may still have MS…. The question is, how do you tease out why that person is not doing well—that discordance, if you will, between how their MRI and exam are versus how they feel and how they are functioning.”

A Survey of Specialists

Solomon et al conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey of 242 MS specialists. Of the 50.4% of physicians who responded, 95% reported evaluating within the past year at least one patient who had been diagnosed with MS but who they felt strongly did not have the disease. More than 90% of respondents reported the use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in a proportion of these patients, and 94% found clinical encounters with these patients to be of an equal or greater challenge than making a new diagnosis of MS. A smaller proportion of respondents (14%) reported that, in some cases, they withheld telling a patient their opinion that the patient did not have MS.

As the study’s authors observed, evidence of therapeutic benefit from early initiation of DMT in patients with MS generates a sense of urgency to diagnose the disease early and begin therapy, Dr. Moses said. However, misdiagnosis in many cases may have resulted from—in place of prudent clinical and laboratory monitoring—an overreliance on MRI findings in patients with syndromes for which established MS diagnostic imaging criteria have not been validated. “Ultimately, MS remains a clinical diagnosis,” said Dr. Moses. “You use an MRI as an adjunct to help you confirm a diagnosis.”

Misdiagnosis of MS can cause serious harm. For example, conditions such as neuromyelitis optica and cervical spondylosis can lead to irreversible disability if unrecognized and inappropriately treated. Use of DMT in patients without MS exposes them to unnecessary health risks and financial costs. Dr. Moses cited the case of a 45-year-old woman who probably did not have MS but whose treatment with interferon beta-1a likely resulted in her going on dialysis. “These drugs are not benign,” he said. “[Such an outcome] is a very rare thing, but keep in mind that if a patient does not have MS, he or she should not be on MS therapy.”

Invested in the Diagnosis

As discussed by Boissy and Ford, neurologists may be inclined to use a medically inaccurate label, such as “a touch of MS,” “mild MS,” “benign MS,” or “MS by history,” when talking with patients who have received a misdiagnosis of MS, Dr. Moses said. Patients who have attributed psychogenic symptoms to misdiagnosed MS often resist a psychogenic explanation. In addition, they may be invested physically, emotionally, and financially in the diagnosis of MS—making treatment challenging for clinicians, Dr. Moses said.

Therapeutic mislabeling raises ethical issues, however. Mislabeling may expose patients to risky therapies, lead to an inappropriate use of resources, compromise the credibility of the clinician, and cause psychologic harm to the patient.

Neurologists would do better to consider scheduling multiple visits to explore psychogenic factors, as well as the patient’s fears and emotions, with the aim of developing a rapport and encouraging appropriate evaluations, Dr. Moses said. “If physicians endorse an inaccurate diagnosis, this undoubtedly conflicts with their professional obligations for truth telling, avoiding harming patients, … acting in the patient’s best interest, and stewardship of medical resources,” he said.

—Fred Balzac

Suggested Reading

Boissy AR, Ford PJ. A touch of MS: therapeutic mislabeling. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1981-1985.

Solomon AJ, Bourdette DN, Cross AH, et al. The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology. 2016;87(13):1393-1399.

Solomon AJ, Klein EP, Bourdette D. “Undiagnosing” multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1986-1991.

HILTON HEAD, SC—Given the lack of a definitive diagnostic test for multiple sclerosis (MS), diagnosing the disease can prove difficult. When considering symptoms, signs, and MRI findings that are suggestive of MS, clinicians must rely on their clinical judgment and experience, skillful interpretation of tests, and knowledge of and willingness to consider alternative diagnoses. Because of the subjective judgments involved and the many conditions that may mimic MS, it is not surprising that physicians sometimes misdiagnose MS, said Harold Moses, MD, at Vanderbilt University’s 41st Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

A study by Solomon et al suggests ways to reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, said Dr. Moses, Associate Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. “Neurologists should … avoid overreliance on MRI changes as the principal support for an MS diagnosis,” he said. “Nonspecific or atypical MRI findings should be interpreted cautiously. A diagnosis of MS should not be made or reinforced in patients with psychiatric conditions without evidence for MS.”

For patients with emotional distress and psychologically based functional disability who do not meet diagnostic criteria for MS, a diagnosis of MS should be avoided. When MS remains a possibility, the patient should be informed of that fact and followed with clinical assessment and, if appropriate, MRI, Dr. Moses added. “Neurologists should be open in admitting and discussing uncertainty with patients,” he said. “It’s important to be honest in … indicating the need for further testing or observation over time. When emotional factors are thought to contribute [to a patient’s symptoms], treatments should be directed at these issues concurrently.”

First, Do No Harm

Psychiatrists and other therapists may be able to help patients when the diagnosis remains an open question. “MS disease-modifying drugs should be prescribed only for patients who have definitive evidence for MS or for those who present with classical clinically isolated syndromes—optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and brainstem events—accompanied by appropriate changes on MRI,” Dr. Moses said.

Challenging cases include asymptomatic patients with MRI findings; patients with a first occurrence of symptoms, especially when the presentation is atypical; and patients with mimics of MS, such as vasculitis. Neurologists should be vigilant to identify mimics, particularly because these conditions may be treatable. The presence of psychiatric illness also may create challenging clinical scenarios.

“Psychologic and psychiatric factors may be present, but that patient may still have MS…. The question is, how do you tease out why that person is not doing well—that discordance, if you will, between how their MRI and exam are versus how they feel and how they are functioning.”

A Survey of Specialists

Solomon et al conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey of 242 MS specialists. Of the 50.4% of physicians who responded, 95% reported evaluating within the past year at least one patient who had been diagnosed with MS but who they felt strongly did not have the disease. More than 90% of respondents reported the use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in a proportion of these patients, and 94% found clinical encounters with these patients to be of an equal or greater challenge than making a new diagnosis of MS. A smaller proportion of respondents (14%) reported that, in some cases, they withheld telling a patient their opinion that the patient did not have MS.

As the study’s authors observed, evidence of therapeutic benefit from early initiation of DMT in patients with MS generates a sense of urgency to diagnose the disease early and begin therapy, Dr. Moses said. However, misdiagnosis in many cases may have resulted from—in place of prudent clinical and laboratory monitoring—an overreliance on MRI findings in patients with syndromes for which established MS diagnostic imaging criteria have not been validated. “Ultimately, MS remains a clinical diagnosis,” said Dr. Moses. “You use an MRI as an adjunct to help you confirm a diagnosis.”

Misdiagnosis of MS can cause serious harm. For example, conditions such as neuromyelitis optica and cervical spondylosis can lead to irreversible disability if unrecognized and inappropriately treated. Use of DMT in patients without MS exposes them to unnecessary health risks and financial costs. Dr. Moses cited the case of a 45-year-old woman who probably did not have MS but whose treatment with interferon beta-1a likely resulted in her going on dialysis. “These drugs are not benign,” he said. “[Such an outcome] is a very rare thing, but keep in mind that if a patient does not have MS, he or she should not be on MS therapy.”

Invested in the Diagnosis

As discussed by Boissy and Ford, neurologists may be inclined to use a medically inaccurate label, such as “a touch of MS,” “mild MS,” “benign MS,” or “MS by history,” when talking with patients who have received a misdiagnosis of MS, Dr. Moses said. Patients who have attributed psychogenic symptoms to misdiagnosed MS often resist a psychogenic explanation. In addition, they may be invested physically, emotionally, and financially in the diagnosis of MS—making treatment challenging for clinicians, Dr. Moses said.

Therapeutic mislabeling raises ethical issues, however. Mislabeling may expose patients to risky therapies, lead to an inappropriate use of resources, compromise the credibility of the clinician, and cause psychologic harm to the patient.

Neurologists would do better to consider scheduling multiple visits to explore psychogenic factors, as well as the patient’s fears and emotions, with the aim of developing a rapport and encouraging appropriate evaluations, Dr. Moses said. “If physicians endorse an inaccurate diagnosis, this undoubtedly conflicts with their professional obligations for truth telling, avoiding harming patients, … acting in the patient’s best interest, and stewardship of medical resources,” he said.

—Fred Balzac

Suggested Reading

Boissy AR, Ford PJ. A touch of MS: therapeutic mislabeling. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1981-1985.

Solomon AJ, Bourdette DN, Cross AH, et al. The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology. 2016;87(13):1393-1399.

Solomon AJ, Klein EP, Bourdette D. “Undiagnosing” multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1986-1991.

HILTON HEAD, SC—Given the lack of a definitive diagnostic test for multiple sclerosis (MS), diagnosing the disease can prove difficult. When considering symptoms, signs, and MRI findings that are suggestive of MS, clinicians must rely on their clinical judgment and experience, skillful interpretation of tests, and knowledge of and willingness to consider alternative diagnoses. Because of the subjective judgments involved and the many conditions that may mimic MS, it is not surprising that physicians sometimes misdiagnose MS, said Harold Moses, MD, at Vanderbilt University’s 41st Annual Contemporary Clinical Neurology Symposium.

A study by Solomon et al suggests ways to reduce the likelihood of misdiagnosis, said Dr. Moses, Associate Professor of Neurology at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. “Neurologists should … avoid overreliance on MRI changes as the principal support for an MS diagnosis,” he said. “Nonspecific or atypical MRI findings should be interpreted cautiously. A diagnosis of MS should not be made or reinforced in patients with psychiatric conditions without evidence for MS.”

For patients with emotional distress and psychologically based functional disability who do not meet diagnostic criteria for MS, a diagnosis of MS should be avoided. When MS remains a possibility, the patient should be informed of that fact and followed with clinical assessment and, if appropriate, MRI, Dr. Moses added. “Neurologists should be open in admitting and discussing uncertainty with patients,” he said. “It’s important to be honest in … indicating the need for further testing or observation over time. When emotional factors are thought to contribute [to a patient’s symptoms], treatments should be directed at these issues concurrently.”

First, Do No Harm

Psychiatrists and other therapists may be able to help patients when the diagnosis remains an open question. “MS disease-modifying drugs should be prescribed only for patients who have definitive evidence for MS or for those who present with classical clinically isolated syndromes—optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and brainstem events—accompanied by appropriate changes on MRI,” Dr. Moses said.

Challenging cases include asymptomatic patients with MRI findings; patients with a first occurrence of symptoms, especially when the presentation is atypical; and patients with mimics of MS, such as vasculitis. Neurologists should be vigilant to identify mimics, particularly because these conditions may be treatable. The presence of psychiatric illness also may create challenging clinical scenarios.

“Psychologic and psychiatric factors may be present, but that patient may still have MS…. The question is, how do you tease out why that person is not doing well—that discordance, if you will, between how their MRI and exam are versus how they feel and how they are functioning.”

A Survey of Specialists

Solomon et al conducted a cross-sectional, internet-based survey of 242 MS specialists. Of the 50.4% of physicians who responded, 95% reported evaluating within the past year at least one patient who had been diagnosed with MS but who they felt strongly did not have the disease. More than 90% of respondents reported the use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in a proportion of these patients, and 94% found clinical encounters with these patients to be of an equal or greater challenge than making a new diagnosis of MS. A smaller proportion of respondents (14%) reported that, in some cases, they withheld telling a patient their opinion that the patient did not have MS.

As the study’s authors observed, evidence of therapeutic benefit from early initiation of DMT in patients with MS generates a sense of urgency to diagnose the disease early and begin therapy, Dr. Moses said. However, misdiagnosis in many cases may have resulted from—in place of prudent clinical and laboratory monitoring—an overreliance on MRI findings in patients with syndromes for which established MS diagnostic imaging criteria have not been validated. “Ultimately, MS remains a clinical diagnosis,” said Dr. Moses. “You use an MRI as an adjunct to help you confirm a diagnosis.”

Misdiagnosis of MS can cause serious harm. For example, conditions such as neuromyelitis optica and cervical spondylosis can lead to irreversible disability if unrecognized and inappropriately treated. Use of DMT in patients without MS exposes them to unnecessary health risks and financial costs. Dr. Moses cited the case of a 45-year-old woman who probably did not have MS but whose treatment with interferon beta-1a likely resulted in her going on dialysis. “These drugs are not benign,” he said. “[Such an outcome] is a very rare thing, but keep in mind that if a patient does not have MS, he or she should not be on MS therapy.”

Invested in the Diagnosis

As discussed by Boissy and Ford, neurologists may be inclined to use a medically inaccurate label, such as “a touch of MS,” “mild MS,” “benign MS,” or “MS by history,” when talking with patients who have received a misdiagnosis of MS, Dr. Moses said. Patients who have attributed psychogenic symptoms to misdiagnosed MS often resist a psychogenic explanation. In addition, they may be invested physically, emotionally, and financially in the diagnosis of MS—making treatment challenging for clinicians, Dr. Moses said.

Therapeutic mislabeling raises ethical issues, however. Mislabeling may expose patients to risky therapies, lead to an inappropriate use of resources, compromise the credibility of the clinician, and cause psychologic harm to the patient.

Neurologists would do better to consider scheduling multiple visits to explore psychogenic factors, as well as the patient’s fears and emotions, with the aim of developing a rapport and encouraging appropriate evaluations, Dr. Moses said. “If physicians endorse an inaccurate diagnosis, this undoubtedly conflicts with their professional obligations for truth telling, avoiding harming patients, … acting in the patient’s best interest, and stewardship of medical resources,” he said.

—Fred Balzac

Suggested Reading

Boissy AR, Ford PJ. A touch of MS: therapeutic mislabeling. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1981-1985.

Solomon AJ, Bourdette DN, Cross AH, et al. The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: a multicenter study. Neurology. 2016;87(13):1393-1399.

Solomon AJ, Klein EP, Bourdette D. “Undiagnosing” multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS. Neurology. 2012;78(24):1986-1991.

BALTIMORE—Objective and subjective sleep measures are associated with fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a meta-analysis presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies.

Evidence suggests that individuals with MS have disruptions in sleep that are associated with and may contribute to fatigue, said Jagriti “Jackie” Bhattarai, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the MS Rehabilitation Research Laboratory at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Baltimore. Among the sleep parameters investigated, sleep staging, sleep-related movement, and subjective insomnia had moderate associations with fatigue. Other sleep parameters examined in the study were not statistically significantly associated with fatigue, she said.

A Major Factor in Disability

Fatigue is a leading contributor to disability in patients with MS. Although fatigue is a complex symptom with multiple neurologic and behavioral causes, emerging evidence suggests that “sleep disturbance may have a significant role in the development or maintenance of fatigue in MS,” Dr. Bhattarai said. The relationship between sleep parameters and fatigue in people with MS is not well understood, however, she said.

To examine the relationship between commonly used sleep parameters and fatigue in MS, Dr. Bhattarai and colleagues identified studies that included at least one validated measure of fatigue and one validated measure of sleep disturbance. They included studies that reported the effect sizes of the associations between sleep and fatigue or provided enough data for the investigators to compute the effect sizes.

Their meta-analysis included 37 studies with 6,129 participants. Participants had an average age of 42 and MS duration of 9.5 years. About 80% of the sample had relapsing-remitting MS.

Sleep measures included polysomnography, actigraphy, and the multiple sleep latency test, as well as subjective measures such as the Insomnia Severity Index, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale.

Fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale, the modified Fatigue Impact Scale, or the Neurological Fatigue Index for MS.

Effect sizes varied across studies, as did the parameters examined within each study. The mean effect size was the largest for the association between REM sleep onset latency (ie, the time between sleep onset and initiation of REM sleep) and fatigue (r = 0.42), though this effect size was based on only two studies, and the association requires further investigation. “Shorter REM sleep onset latency has been associated with depression and narcolepsy,” both of which are more common in people with MS than in the general population, Dr. Bhattarai said. Subjective insomnia (r = 0.36) and objective sleep-related movement (r = 0.34) also yielded moderate effect sizes. “The shorter the REM sleep onset latency and the more subjective complaints that individuals have about their sleep, the greater the level of fatigue people with MS reported,” she said. “The more sleep-related movement that people have, the greater their level of MS-related fatigue.”

Potential to Inform Treatment Approach

The association between fatigue and objective sleep-disordered breathing was not statistically significant. Subjective sleep-disordered breathing, objective nocturnal arousals, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and sleep duration had weak effect sizes. These problems are common and require treatment, however, Dr. Bhattarai said.

“When treating patients with MS who are experiencing MS-related fatigue, interventions geared toward improving patients’ perceived sleep quality and addressing MS symptoms that might disrupt sleep (eg, nocturia and periodic leg movements) may offer an avenue for improving fatigue,” said Dr. Bhattarai. “However, these effects remain to be shown in a randomized controlled trial.”

—Jake Remaly

BALTIMORE—Objective and subjective sleep measures are associated with fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a meta-analysis presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies.

Evidence suggests that individuals with MS have disruptions in sleep that are associated with and may contribute to fatigue, said Jagriti “Jackie” Bhattarai, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the MS Rehabilitation Research Laboratory at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Baltimore. Among the sleep parameters investigated, sleep staging, sleep-related movement, and subjective insomnia had moderate associations with fatigue. Other sleep parameters examined in the study were not statistically significantly associated with fatigue, she said.

A Major Factor in Disability

Fatigue is a leading contributor to disability in patients with MS. Although fatigue is a complex symptom with multiple neurologic and behavioral causes, emerging evidence suggests that “sleep disturbance may have a significant role in the development or maintenance of fatigue in MS,” Dr. Bhattarai said. The relationship between sleep parameters and fatigue in people with MS is not well understood, however, she said.

To examine the relationship between commonly used sleep parameters and fatigue in MS, Dr. Bhattarai and colleagues identified studies that included at least one validated measure of fatigue and one validated measure of sleep disturbance. They included studies that reported the effect sizes of the associations between sleep and fatigue or provided enough data for the investigators to compute the effect sizes.

Their meta-analysis included 37 studies with 6,129 participants. Participants had an average age of 42 and MS duration of 9.5 years. About 80% of the sample had relapsing-remitting MS.

Sleep measures included polysomnography, actigraphy, and the multiple sleep latency test, as well as subjective measures such as the Insomnia Severity Index, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale.

Fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale, the modified Fatigue Impact Scale, or the Neurological Fatigue Index for MS.

Effect sizes varied across studies, as did the parameters examined within each study. The mean effect size was the largest for the association between REM sleep onset latency (ie, the time between sleep onset and initiation of REM sleep) and fatigue (r = 0.42), though this effect size was based on only two studies, and the association requires further investigation. “Shorter REM sleep onset latency has been associated with depression and narcolepsy,” both of which are more common in people with MS than in the general population, Dr. Bhattarai said. Subjective insomnia (r = 0.36) and objective sleep-related movement (r = 0.34) also yielded moderate effect sizes. “The shorter the REM sleep onset latency and the more subjective complaints that individuals have about their sleep, the greater the level of fatigue people with MS reported,” she said. “The more sleep-related movement that people have, the greater their level of MS-related fatigue.”

Potential to Inform Treatment Approach

The association between fatigue and objective sleep-disordered breathing was not statistically significant. Subjective sleep-disordered breathing, objective nocturnal arousals, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and sleep duration had weak effect sizes. These problems are common and require treatment, however, Dr. Bhattarai said.

“When treating patients with MS who are experiencing MS-related fatigue, interventions geared toward improving patients’ perceived sleep quality and addressing MS symptoms that might disrupt sleep (eg, nocturia and periodic leg movements) may offer an avenue for improving fatigue,” said Dr. Bhattarai. “However, these effects remain to be shown in a randomized controlled trial.”

—Jake Remaly

BALTIMORE—Objective and subjective sleep measures are associated with fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a meta-analysis presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies.

Evidence suggests that individuals with MS have disruptions in sleep that are associated with and may contribute to fatigue, said Jagriti “Jackie” Bhattarai, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the MS Rehabilitation Research Laboratory at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine’s Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in Baltimore. Among the sleep parameters investigated, sleep staging, sleep-related movement, and subjective insomnia had moderate associations with fatigue. Other sleep parameters examined in the study were not statistically significantly associated with fatigue, she said.

A Major Factor in Disability

Fatigue is a leading contributor to disability in patients with MS. Although fatigue is a complex symptom with multiple neurologic and behavioral causes, emerging evidence suggests that “sleep disturbance may have a significant role in the development or maintenance of fatigue in MS,” Dr. Bhattarai said. The relationship between sleep parameters and fatigue in people with MS is not well understood, however, she said.

To examine the relationship between commonly used sleep parameters and fatigue in MS, Dr. Bhattarai and colleagues identified studies that included at least one validated measure of fatigue and one validated measure of sleep disturbance. They included studies that reported the effect sizes of the associations between sleep and fatigue or provided enough data for the investigators to compute the effect sizes.

Their meta-analysis included 37 studies with 6,129 participants. Participants had an average age of 42 and MS duration of 9.5 years. About 80% of the sample had relapsing-remitting MS.

Sleep measures included polysomnography, actigraphy, and the multiple sleep latency test, as well as subjective measures such as the Insomnia Severity Index, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale.

Fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale, the modified Fatigue Impact Scale, or the Neurological Fatigue Index for MS.

Effect sizes varied across studies, as did the parameters examined within each study. The mean effect size was the largest for the association between REM sleep onset latency (ie, the time between sleep onset and initiation of REM sleep) and fatigue (r = 0.42), though this effect size was based on only two studies, and the association requires further investigation. “Shorter REM sleep onset latency has been associated with depression and narcolepsy,” both of which are more common in people with MS than in the general population, Dr. Bhattarai said. Subjective insomnia (r = 0.36) and objective sleep-related movement (r = 0.34) also yielded moderate effect sizes. “The shorter the REM sleep onset latency and the more subjective complaints that individuals have about their sleep, the greater the level of fatigue people with MS reported,” she said. “The more sleep-related movement that people have, the greater their level of MS-related fatigue.”

Potential to Inform Treatment Approach

The association between fatigue and objective sleep-disordered breathing was not statistically significant. Subjective sleep-disordered breathing, objective nocturnal arousals, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and sleep duration had weak effect sizes. These problems are common and require treatment, however, Dr. Bhattarai said.

“When treating patients with MS who are experiencing MS-related fatigue, interventions geared toward improving patients’ perceived sleep quality and addressing MS symptoms that might disrupt sleep (eg, nocturia and periodic leg movements) may offer an avenue for improving fatigue,” said Dr. Bhattarai. “However, these effects remain to be shown in a randomized controlled trial.”

—Jake Remaly