Background: Aspirin is beneficial in secondary prevention of stroke and MI. There is no consensus on its role in primary prevention of the same.

Bottom line: Aspirin for primary prevention lowers risk of CV events and increases risk of major bleeding. Health care providers should include this as part of informed decision-making discussions with patients about the use of aspirin for primary prevention.

Citation: Zheng S et al. Association of aspirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):277-87.
 

Dr. Radhakrishnan is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Background: Aspirin is beneficial in secondary prevention of stroke and MI. There is no consensus on its role in primary prevention of the same.

Bottom line: Aspirin for primary prevention lowers risk of CV events and increases risk of major bleeding. Health care providers should include this as part of informed decision-making discussions with patients about the use of aspirin for primary prevention.

Citation: Zheng S et al. Association of aspirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):277-87.
 

Dr. Radhakrishnan is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Background: Aspirin is beneficial in secondary prevention of stroke and MI. There is no consensus on its role in primary prevention of the same.

Bottom line: Aspirin for primary prevention lowers risk of CV events and increases risk of major bleeding. Health care providers should include this as part of informed decision-making discussions with patients about the use of aspirin for primary prevention.

Citation: Zheng S et al. Association of aspirin use for primary prevention with cardiovascular events and bleeding events: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):277-87.
 

Dr. Radhakrishnan is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

Tumor microenvironment (TME) profiles could help tailor treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with the TME profile of the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC making it the most susceptible to the effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

“This study allowed us to gain more insight into the complex interactions between tumor cells and their microenvironment, in particular immune cells,” wrote a team of Belgian and Canadian researchers. Their report is in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

At least five molecular subtypes of TNBC have been identified but little was previously known about the heterogeneity of their surroundings, noted Yacine Bareche, MSc, of Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, and associates. They looked at a series of 1,512 TNBC samples from four large and publicly available transcriptomic and genomic datasets and their TME, which is made up of many cell types – fibroblasts, adipose, and immune-inflammatory cells – and blood and lymphatic vascular networks.

The researchers explained that each of the four TNBC subtypes identified so far have “distinct mutational profiles, genomic alterations, and biological processes” which were matched by differences in their surrounding environments.

For instance, the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC was associated with high expression of “adaptive immune-related gene signatures and a fully inflamed spatial pattern appearing to be the optimal candidate for immune check-point inhibitors.” By contrast, Mr. Bareche and coauthors said that “most mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor TNBC tumors had an immunosuppressive phenotype with high expression levels of stromal gene signatures.”

The findings include “novel evidence” of how TNBC tumors may become resistant to the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The results demonstrate that each TNBC subtype is associated with specific TME profiles, “setting the ground for a rationale tailoring of immunotherapy in TNBC patients,” the researchers noted. Mr. Bareche and associates cautioned, however, that “prospective validation of our findings is warranted before their clinical implementation.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. The researchers had no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Bareche Y et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Oct 29. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz208.

Tumor microenvironment (TME) profiles could help tailor treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with the TME profile of the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC making it the most susceptible to the effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

“This study allowed us to gain more insight into the complex interactions between tumor cells and their microenvironment, in particular immune cells,” wrote a team of Belgian and Canadian researchers. Their report is in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

At least five molecular subtypes of TNBC have been identified but little was previously known about the heterogeneity of their surroundings, noted Yacine Bareche, MSc, of Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, and associates. They looked at a series of 1,512 TNBC samples from four large and publicly available transcriptomic and genomic datasets and their TME, which is made up of many cell types – fibroblasts, adipose, and immune-inflammatory cells – and blood and lymphatic vascular networks.

The researchers explained that each of the four TNBC subtypes identified so far have “distinct mutational profiles, genomic alterations, and biological processes” which were matched by differences in their surrounding environments.

For instance, the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC was associated with high expression of “adaptive immune-related gene signatures and a fully inflamed spatial pattern appearing to be the optimal candidate for immune check-point inhibitors.” By contrast, Mr. Bareche and coauthors said that “most mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor TNBC tumors had an immunosuppressive phenotype with high expression levels of stromal gene signatures.”

The findings include “novel evidence” of how TNBC tumors may become resistant to the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The results demonstrate that each TNBC subtype is associated with specific TME profiles, “setting the ground for a rationale tailoring of immunotherapy in TNBC patients,” the researchers noted. Mr. Bareche and associates cautioned, however, that “prospective validation of our findings is warranted before their clinical implementation.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. The researchers had no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Bareche Y et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Oct 29. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz208.

Tumor microenvironment (TME) profiles could help tailor treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with the TME profile of the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC making it the most susceptible to the effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

“This study allowed us to gain more insight into the complex interactions between tumor cells and their microenvironment, in particular immune cells,” wrote a team of Belgian and Canadian researchers. Their report is in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

At least five molecular subtypes of TNBC have been identified but little was previously known about the heterogeneity of their surroundings, noted Yacine Bareche, MSc, of Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, and associates. They looked at a series of 1,512 TNBC samples from four large and publicly available transcriptomic and genomic datasets and their TME, which is made up of many cell types – fibroblasts, adipose, and immune-inflammatory cells – and blood and lymphatic vascular networks.

The researchers explained that each of the four TNBC subtypes identified so far have “distinct mutational profiles, genomic alterations, and biological processes” which were matched by differences in their surrounding environments.

For instance, the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC was associated with high expression of “adaptive immune-related gene signatures and a fully inflamed spatial pattern appearing to be the optimal candidate for immune check-point inhibitors.” By contrast, Mr. Bareche and coauthors said that “most mesenchymal stem-like and luminal androgen receptor TNBC tumors had an immunosuppressive phenotype with high expression levels of stromal gene signatures.”

The findings include “novel evidence” of how TNBC tumors may become resistant to the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The results demonstrate that each TNBC subtype is associated with specific TME profiles, “setting the ground for a rationale tailoring of immunotherapy in TNBC patients,” the researchers noted. Mr. Bareche and associates cautioned, however, that “prospective validation of our findings is warranted before their clinical implementation.”

The study was supported by a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. The researchers had no conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Bareche Y et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Oct 29. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz208.

This month’s cover story on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning provides a glimpse into the future of medical care. The article’s title, “An FP’s guide to AI-enabled clinical decision support” points to the fact that practical and useful applications of AI and machine learning are making inroads into medicine. However, other industries are far ahead of medicine when it comes to AI.

For example, I met with a financial advisor last week, and our discussion included a display of the likelihood that my wife and I would have sufficient funds in our retirement account based on a Monte Carlo simulation using 500 trials! In other words, our advisor used a huge database of financial information, analyzed that data with a sophisticated statistical technique, and applied the results to our personal situation. (No, we won’t run out of money—with 99% certainty.)

So as physicians, how can we further increase our certainty in the diagnoses we make and the guidance we offer our patients?

Artificial intelligence will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making.

Halamka and Cerrato provide some insights. They discuss 2 clinical applications of AI and machine learning that are ready to use in primary care: screening for diabetic retinopathy and risk assessment for colon cancer. The first is an example of using AI for diagnosis and the second for risk assessment; both are core functions of primary care clinicians. These tools were developed with very sophisticated computer programs, but they are not unlike a plethora of clinical decision aids already widely used in primary care for diagnosis and risk assessment, such as the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the Gail Model for breast cancer risk, the FRAX tool for osteoporosis-related fracture risk, the ASCVD Risk Calculator for cardiovascular risk, and the CHA₂DS₂-VASC score for prediction of thrombosis and bleeding risk from anticoagulation therapy.

Some express concern that sophisticated AI could eventually replace primary care clinicians, similar to how automation reduces the need for routine labor in manufacturing. I think this is highly unlikely, but I do think AI will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making. For example, the colon cancer risk calculator may actually help some patients decide NOT to be screened because their personal risk is so low.

It’s incumbent upon us, then, to familiarize ourselves with the potential that these AI tools offer. It’s time to get to know AI.

This month’s cover story on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning provides a glimpse into the future of medical care. The article’s title, “An FP’s guide to AI-enabled clinical decision support” points to the fact that practical and useful applications of AI and machine learning are making inroads into medicine. However, other industries are far ahead of medicine when it comes to AI.

For example, I met with a financial advisor last week, and our discussion included a display of the likelihood that my wife and I would have sufficient funds in our retirement account based on a Monte Carlo simulation using 500 trials! In other words, our advisor used a huge database of financial information, analyzed that data with a sophisticated statistical technique, and applied the results to our personal situation. (No, we won’t run out of money—with 99% certainty.)

So as physicians, how can we further increase our certainty in the diagnoses we make and the guidance we offer our patients?

Artificial intelligence will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making.

Halamka and Cerrato provide some insights. They discuss 2 clinical applications of AI and machine learning that are ready to use in primary care: screening for diabetic retinopathy and risk assessment for colon cancer. The first is an example of using AI for diagnosis and the second for risk assessment; both are core functions of primary care clinicians. These tools were developed with very sophisticated computer programs, but they are not unlike a plethora of clinical decision aids already widely used in primary care for diagnosis and risk assessment, such as the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the Gail Model for breast cancer risk, the FRAX tool for osteoporosis-related fracture risk, the ASCVD Risk Calculator for cardiovascular risk, and the CHA₂DS₂-VASC score for prediction of thrombosis and bleeding risk from anticoagulation therapy.

Some express concern that sophisticated AI could eventually replace primary care clinicians, similar to how automation reduces the need for routine labor in manufacturing. I think this is highly unlikely, but I do think AI will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making. For example, the colon cancer risk calculator may actually help some patients decide NOT to be screened because their personal risk is so low.

It’s incumbent upon us, then, to familiarize ourselves with the potential that these AI tools offer. It’s time to get to know AI.

This month’s cover story on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning provides a glimpse into the future of medical care. The article’s title, “An FP’s guide to AI-enabled clinical decision support” points to the fact that practical and useful applications of AI and machine learning are making inroads into medicine. However, other industries are far ahead of medicine when it comes to AI.

For example, I met with a financial advisor last week, and our discussion included a display of the likelihood that my wife and I would have sufficient funds in our retirement account based on a Monte Carlo simulation using 500 trials! In other words, our advisor used a huge database of financial information, analyzed that data with a sophisticated statistical technique, and applied the results to our personal situation. (No, we won’t run out of money—with 99% certainty.)

So as physicians, how can we further increase our certainty in the diagnoses we make and the guidance we offer our patients?

Artificial intelligence will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making.

Halamka and Cerrato provide some insights. They discuss 2 clinical applications of AI and machine learning that are ready to use in primary care: screening for diabetic retinopathy and risk assessment for colon cancer. The first is an example of using AI for diagnosis and the second for risk assessment; both are core functions of primary care clinicians. These tools were developed with very sophisticated computer programs, but they are not unlike a plethora of clinical decision aids already widely used in primary care for diagnosis and risk assessment, such as the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the Gail Model for breast cancer risk, the FRAX tool for osteoporosis-related fracture risk, the ASCVD Risk Calculator for cardiovascular risk, and the CHA₂DS₂-VASC score for prediction of thrombosis and bleeding risk from anticoagulation therapy.

Some express concern that sophisticated AI could eventually replace primary care clinicians, similar to how automation reduces the need for routine labor in manufacturing. I think this is highly unlikely, but I do think AI will be widely deployed in clinical tools that improve our diagnostic accuracy and provide better personalized data to inform shared decision making. For example, the colon cancer risk calculator may actually help some patients decide NOT to be screened because their personal risk is so low.

It’s incumbent upon us, then, to familiarize ourselves with the potential that these AI tools offer. It’s time to get to know AI.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

Share AGA’s patient education content on NAFLD to help your patients understand the condition. Visit https://www.gastro.org/practice-guidance/gi-patient-center/topic/nonalcoholic-steatohepatitis-nash to learn more.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

Share AGA’s patient education content on NAFLD to help your patients understand the condition. Visit https://www.gastro.org/practice-guidance/gi-patient-center/topic/nonalcoholic-steatohepatitis-nash to learn more.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

Share AGA’s patient education content on NAFLD to help your patients understand the condition. Visit https://www.gastro.org/practice-guidance/gi-patient-center/topic/nonalcoholic-steatohepatitis-nash to learn more.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – For most patients with chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, combination therapy with lonafarnib, ritonavir, and peginterferon may significantly decrease viral loads, based on interim results from the phase IIa LIFT trial.

After 6 months of therapy, more than one-third of evaluable patients (37%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA in serum, according to lead author Christopher Koh, MD, of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health and colleagues.

The open-label LIFT trial, which is ongoing, initially recruited 26 patients with HDV RNA who had serum levels of at least 40 IU/mL (lower limit of quantification). After starting tenofovir or entecavir, patients began a combination regimen of twice-daily oral lonafarnib (50 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) plus weekly subcutaneous injections of Peginterferon Lambda-1a (180 mcg).

The median patient age was 40 years, with a slightly higher proportion of male participants (60%). Approximately half of the patients were of Asian descent (52%), followed by patients who were white (32%), or African (16%). The investigators reported median baseline measurements of modified histology activity index (9) and Ishak fibrosis stage (3), as well as serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (64 IU/mL), aspartate aminotransferase (47 IU/mL), hepatitis B virus DNA (less than 21 IU/mL), and log HDV RNA (4.74 IU/mL), with this latter measurement serving as a key determinant of efficacy.

After 12 weeks of therapy, the median decrease in HDV RNA among 21 evaluable patients was 3.6 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.6 to 4.2 (P less than .0001). Of these patients, 5 (24%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA, while another 5 tested below the lower limit of quantification.

Following an additional 12 weeks of therapy, 19 patients remained evaluable, among whom the median decrease in HDV RNA was 3.4 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.9 to 4.5 (P less than .0001). Seven of these patients (37%) achieved undetectable HDV RNA, whereas 3 others fell below the lower limit of quantification. Furthermore, 18 out of 19 of these patients (95%) experienced a decline in HDV RNA of more than 2 log IU/mL.

According to the investigators, the trial regimen was safe and well tolerated. Adverse events were mild to moderate; most common were anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, weight loss, and gastrointestinal issues. Doses were reduced in three patients while four others discontinued therapy prematurely.

“These interim results support continued exploration of this therapeutic combination in HDV,” the investigators concluded.

The above findings will be presented in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The investigators disclosed relationships with I-Cubed Therapeutics, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Riboscience, and others.

SOURCE: Koh C et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LO8.

BOSTON – For most patients with chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, combination therapy with lonafarnib, ritonavir, and peginterferon may significantly decrease viral loads, based on interim results from the phase IIa LIFT trial.

After 6 months of therapy, more than one-third of evaluable patients (37%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA in serum, according to lead author Christopher Koh, MD, of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health and colleagues.

The open-label LIFT trial, which is ongoing, initially recruited 26 patients with HDV RNA who had serum levels of at least 40 IU/mL (lower limit of quantification). After starting tenofovir or entecavir, patients began a combination regimen of twice-daily oral lonafarnib (50 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) plus weekly subcutaneous injections of Peginterferon Lambda-1a (180 mcg).

The median patient age was 40 years, with a slightly higher proportion of male participants (60%). Approximately half of the patients were of Asian descent (52%), followed by patients who were white (32%), or African (16%). The investigators reported median baseline measurements of modified histology activity index (9) and Ishak fibrosis stage (3), as well as serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (64 IU/mL), aspartate aminotransferase (47 IU/mL), hepatitis B virus DNA (less than 21 IU/mL), and log HDV RNA (4.74 IU/mL), with this latter measurement serving as a key determinant of efficacy.

After 12 weeks of therapy, the median decrease in HDV RNA among 21 evaluable patients was 3.6 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.6 to 4.2 (P less than .0001). Of these patients, 5 (24%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA, while another 5 tested below the lower limit of quantification.

Following an additional 12 weeks of therapy, 19 patients remained evaluable, among whom the median decrease in HDV RNA was 3.4 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.9 to 4.5 (P less than .0001). Seven of these patients (37%) achieved undetectable HDV RNA, whereas 3 others fell below the lower limit of quantification. Furthermore, 18 out of 19 of these patients (95%) experienced a decline in HDV RNA of more than 2 log IU/mL.

According to the investigators, the trial regimen was safe and well tolerated. Adverse events were mild to moderate; most common were anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, weight loss, and gastrointestinal issues. Doses were reduced in three patients while four others discontinued therapy prematurely.

“These interim results support continued exploration of this therapeutic combination in HDV,” the investigators concluded.

The above findings will be presented in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The investigators disclosed relationships with I-Cubed Therapeutics, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Riboscience, and others.

SOURCE: Koh C et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LO8.

BOSTON – For most patients with chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, combination therapy with lonafarnib, ritonavir, and peginterferon may significantly decrease viral loads, based on interim results from the phase IIa LIFT trial.

After 6 months of therapy, more than one-third of evaluable patients (37%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA in serum, according to lead author Christopher Koh, MD, of the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health and colleagues.

The open-label LIFT trial, which is ongoing, initially recruited 26 patients with HDV RNA who had serum levels of at least 40 IU/mL (lower limit of quantification). After starting tenofovir or entecavir, patients began a combination regimen of twice-daily oral lonafarnib (50 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) plus weekly subcutaneous injections of Peginterferon Lambda-1a (180 mcg).

The median patient age was 40 years, with a slightly higher proportion of male participants (60%). Approximately half of the patients were of Asian descent (52%), followed by patients who were white (32%), or African (16%). The investigators reported median baseline measurements of modified histology activity index (9) and Ishak fibrosis stage (3), as well as serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (64 IU/mL), aspartate aminotransferase (47 IU/mL), hepatitis B virus DNA (less than 21 IU/mL), and log HDV RNA (4.74 IU/mL), with this latter measurement serving as a key determinant of efficacy.

After 12 weeks of therapy, the median decrease in HDV RNA among 21 evaluable patients was 3.6 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.6 to 4.2 (P less than .0001). Of these patients, 5 (24%) achieved undetectable levels of HDV RNA, while another 5 tested below the lower limit of quantification.

Following an additional 12 weeks of therapy, 19 patients remained evaluable, among whom the median decrease in HDV RNA was 3.4 log IU/mL with an interquartile range from 2.9 to 4.5 (P less than .0001). Seven of these patients (37%) achieved undetectable HDV RNA, whereas 3 others fell below the lower limit of quantification. Furthermore, 18 out of 19 of these patients (95%) experienced a decline in HDV RNA of more than 2 log IU/mL.

According to the investigators, the trial regimen was safe and well tolerated. Adverse events were mild to moderate; most common were anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, weight loss, and gastrointestinal issues. Doses were reduced in three patients while four others discontinued therapy prematurely.

“These interim results support continued exploration of this therapeutic combination in HDV,” the investigators concluded.

The above findings will be presented in an oral abstract session at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The investigators disclosed relationships with I-Cubed Therapeutics, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Riboscience, and others.

SOURCE: Koh C et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LO8.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – A new bispecific antibody, BFKB8488A, may be able to reduce hepatic fat fraction and improve liver health in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), according to investigators.

In a phase 1b trial, treatment with tolerable doses of the antibody reduced hepatic fat fraction by a mean of 38%, reported lead author Rebecca Kunder, MD, PhD, medical director at Genentech in San Francisco, and colleagues.

According to the investigators, BFKB8488A, which is also being tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, binds two adipocyte proteins: fibroblast growth factor receptor type 1c and Klotho beta, thereby mimicking metabolic hormone FGF21.

The present trial involved 63 patients with NAFLD who had at least 10% hepatic fat fraction based on MRI. Patients were randomized and for 12 weeks received placebo, one of four doses ranging from 50 to 130 mg given every 2 weeks, a dose of 250 mg given every 4 weeks, or an escalating dose regimen (the results of which were not reported). Treatments were blinded and delivered subcutaneously.

BFKB8488A was generally safe; the trial finished without life-threatening adverse events or deaths. Still, gastrointestinal issues became more common with higher doses, leading the investigators to identify well-tolerated doses as those of 100 mg or less, given every 2 weeks.

The investigators reported efficacy results for patients who received these lower doses, with outcomes presented as mean percentage changes in biomarkers from baseline to 12 weeks.

Adipose-specific pharmacodynamic effect was demonstrated by a mean increase in adiponectin of up to 17%. Positive cardiometabolic effects were also reported, with HDL cholesterol increasing 14% and triglyceride decreasing 24%. In addition, several other markers of liver health improved. Patients with baseline elevations of ALT had decreases in this marker of 10%-30%; plasma type 3 collagen propeptide, which is a measure of fibrosis, fell by 37%; and hepatic fat fraction, as previously stated, decreased by 38%, with a standard deviation of 25%. In contrast, treatment with placebo was associated with a mean 0% change in fat fraction, with a standard deviation of 28%.

“In patients with NAFLD, well-tolerated doses of BFKB8488A were highly effective at decreasing hepatic fat fraction and improving liver health,” the investigators concluded in an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

According to the investigators, clinical efficacy of the antibody will be assessed in a phase 2 trial involving patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

The investigators reported financial relationships with Genentech and Gilead.

SOURCE: Kunder R et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LP8.

BOSTON – Treatment with novel agent DUR-928 may be able to reduce mortality rates among patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, investigators predicted.

In an open-label, phase IIa trial, 89% of patients with alcoholic hepatitis responded to treatment with the new therapy, reported lead author Tarek Hassanein, MD, of Southern California Research Center in Coronado, Calif., and colleagues.

In an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the investigators explained the urgent need for an agent such as DUR-928: “The mortality of severe alcoholic hepatitis remains high in the absence of effective treatment,” they wrote, noting that corticosteroids are only suitable for select patients. According to the investigators, DUR-928 is an endogenous sulfated oxysterol that has been shown to control lipotoxicity and inflammation while increasing hepatic regeneration and cell survival.

The agent was tested among 19 patients with alcoholic hepatitis, many of whom had severe disease; at baseline, 15 had Maddrey’s discriminant function (DF) scores of 32 or less, 12 had Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores between 12 and 30, and 11 had serum bilirubin levels higher than 8 mg/dL.

Via intravenous infusion, three dose levels were given: 30 mg, 90 mg, or 150 mg. All patients received at least one dose on day 1, and if still hospitalized, a second dose on day 4, with a total follow-up of 28 days. Treatment response was defined by a Lille score of less than 0.45.

DUR-928 was well tolerated; no serious drug-related adverse events occurred and all patients survived the 28-day follow-up period. Across the population, the response rate was 89%. This figure fell slightly to 87% when considering only patients with severe disease (DF scores of 32 or less), and marginally further still to 83% for those with MELD scores between 21 and 30. Among patients with severe disease, MELD scores decreased by a median of 17.5% (P = .01) over the 28-day period, and in cases with bilirubin starting higher than 8 mg/dL, levels dropped by a median of 25.1% (P = .02) within the first week.

A comparison of these results with historical data revealed that treatment with DUR-928 led to significantly better Lille scores than previously reported (P less than .0001).

“These initial findings are encouraging for further development of DUR-928 in patients with alcoholic hepatitis, including severe alcoholic hepatitis,” the investigators concluded.

The investigators disclosed relationships with DURECT Corporation, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead, and others.

SOURCE: Hassanein T et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LO9.

BOSTON – Treatment with novel agent DUR-928 may be able to reduce mortality rates among patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, investigators predicted.

In an open-label, phase IIa trial, 89% of patients with alcoholic hepatitis responded to treatment with the new therapy, reported lead author Tarek Hassanein, MD, of Southern California Research Center in Coronado, Calif., and colleagues.

In an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the investigators explained the urgent need for an agent such as DUR-928: “The mortality of severe alcoholic hepatitis remains high in the absence of effective treatment,” they wrote, noting that corticosteroids are only suitable for select patients. According to the investigators, DUR-928 is an endogenous sulfated oxysterol that has been shown to control lipotoxicity and inflammation while increasing hepatic regeneration and cell survival.

The agent was tested among 19 patients with alcoholic hepatitis, many of whom had severe disease; at baseline, 15 had Maddrey’s discriminant function (DF) scores of 32 or less, 12 had Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores between 12 and 30, and 11 had serum bilirubin levels higher than 8 mg/dL.

Via intravenous infusion, three dose levels were given: 30 mg, 90 mg, or 150 mg. All patients received at least one dose on day 1, and if still hospitalized, a second dose on day 4, with a total follow-up of 28 days. Treatment response was defined by a Lille score of less than 0.45.

DUR-928 was well tolerated; no serious drug-related adverse events occurred and all patients survived the 28-day follow-up period. Across the population, the response rate was 89%. This figure fell slightly to 87% when considering only patients with severe disease (DF scores of 32 or less), and marginally further still to 83% for those with MELD scores between 21 and 30. Among patients with severe disease, MELD scores decreased by a median of 17.5% (P = .01) over the 28-day period, and in cases with bilirubin starting higher than 8 mg/dL, levels dropped by a median of 25.1% (P = .02) within the first week.

A comparison of these results with historical data revealed that treatment with DUR-928 led to significantly better Lille scores than previously reported (P less than .0001).

“These initial findings are encouraging for further development of DUR-928 in patients with alcoholic hepatitis, including severe alcoholic hepatitis,” the investigators concluded.

The investigators disclosed relationships with DURECT Corporation, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead, and others.

SOURCE: Hassanein T et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LO9.

BOSTON – Treatment with novel agent DUR-928 may be able to reduce mortality rates among patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, investigators predicted.

In an open-label, phase IIa trial, 89% of patients with alcoholic hepatitis responded to treatment with the new therapy, reported lead author Tarek Hassanein, MD, of Southern California Research Center in Coronado, Calif., and colleagues.

In an abstract that will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the investigators explained the urgent need for an agent such as DUR-928: “The mortality of severe alcoholic hepatitis remains high in the absence of effective treatment,” they wrote, noting that corticosteroids are only suitable for select patients. According to the investigators, DUR-928 is an endogenous sulfated oxysterol that has been shown to control lipotoxicity and inflammation while increasing hepatic regeneration and cell survival.

The agent was tested among 19 patients with alcoholic hepatitis, many of whom had severe disease; at baseline, 15 had Maddrey’s discriminant function (DF) scores of 32 or less, 12 had Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores between 12 and 30, and 11 had serum bilirubin levels higher than 8 mg/dL.

Via intravenous infusion, three dose levels were given: 30 mg, 90 mg, or 150 mg. All patients received at least one dose on day 1, and if still hospitalized, a second dose on day 4, with a total follow-up of 28 days. Treatment response was defined by a Lille score of less than 0.45.

DUR-928 was well tolerated; no serious drug-related adverse events occurred and all patients survived the 28-day follow-up period. Across the population, the response rate was 89%. This figure fell slightly to 87% when considering only patients with severe disease (DF scores of 32 or less), and marginally further still to 83% for those with MELD scores between 21 and 30. Among patients with severe disease, MELD scores decreased by a median of 17.5% (P = .01) over the 28-day period, and in cases with bilirubin starting higher than 8 mg/dL, levels dropped by a median of 25.1% (P = .02) within the first week.

A comparison of these results with historical data revealed that treatment with DUR-928 led to significantly better Lille scores than previously reported (P less than .0001).

“These initial findings are encouraging for further development of DUR-928 in patients with alcoholic hepatitis, including severe alcoholic hepatitis,” the investigators concluded.

The investigators disclosed relationships with DURECT Corporation, Assembly Biosciences, Gilead, and others.

SOURCE: Hassanein T et al. The Liver Meeting 2019, Abstract LO9.

BOSTON – Specifically in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection and compensated cirrhosis, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) was safe and had high efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial, echoing an earlier report describing clinical results for the fixed-dose combination in multiple other genotypes.

Treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was safe and produced high rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) for the genotype 3 patients and compensated cirrhosis in the recent results from the EXPEDITION-8 study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

In a previous report from EXPEDITION-8, investigators said that the treatment was well tolerated and effective in patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6.

“The availability of an 8-week, pangenotypic regimen for all treatment-naive HCV-infected patients regardless of cirrhosis status may simplify the HCV care pathway, furthering progress towards HCV elimination,” said investigator Robert S. Brown Jr., MD, MPH, and coinvestigators in a late-breaking abstract of the latest study results.

The nonrandomized, multicenter, phase 3b study included 343 adults with HCV genotypes 1-6 who received glecaprevir 300 mg and pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 63% of patients were male, 83% were white; 18% had HCV genotype 3, while the majority (67%) had HCV genotype 1.

For the genotype 3 patients, SVR12 rates were 95.2% in the intention-to-treat population, and 98.4% in the per-protocol population, Dr. Brown and coauthors said in their report on the study. For genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 patients, the intention-to-treat and per-protocol SVR12 rates were 98.2% and 100%.

Taken together, the SVR12 rates for all genotypes were 97.7% and 99.7%, respectively, for the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, according to the investigators.

There were no virologic failures on treatment, and one patients with genotype 3 relapsed in week 4 posttreatment, while one genotype 1 patient discontinued treatment though not because of adverse events, they said.

Most adverse events were grade 1 in severity, and included fatigue, pruritus, headache, and nausea. There were no liver-related toxicities, and no serious adverse events that were related to the study treatment, according to the investigators.

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is indicated for patients aged 12 years and older with treatment-naive HCV genotype 1-6 infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, and in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection previously treated with an HCV NS5A inhibitor or an NS3/4A protease inhibitor.

Dr. Brown reported disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies including AbbVie, which markets Mavyret.

SOURCE: Brown RS et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP9.

BOSTON – Specifically in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection and compensated cirrhosis, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) was safe and had high efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial, echoing an earlier report describing clinical results for the fixed-dose combination in multiple other genotypes.

Treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was safe and produced high rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) for the genotype 3 patients and compensated cirrhosis in the recent results from the EXPEDITION-8 study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

In a previous report from EXPEDITION-8, investigators said that the treatment was well tolerated and effective in patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6.

“The availability of an 8-week, pangenotypic regimen for all treatment-naive HCV-infected patients regardless of cirrhosis status may simplify the HCV care pathway, furthering progress towards HCV elimination,” said investigator Robert S. Brown Jr., MD, MPH, and coinvestigators in a late-breaking abstract of the latest study results.

The nonrandomized, multicenter, phase 3b study included 343 adults with HCV genotypes 1-6 who received glecaprevir 300 mg and pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 63% of patients were male, 83% were white; 18% had HCV genotype 3, while the majority (67%) had HCV genotype 1.

For the genotype 3 patients, SVR12 rates were 95.2% in the intention-to-treat population, and 98.4% in the per-protocol population, Dr. Brown and coauthors said in their report on the study. For genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 patients, the intention-to-treat and per-protocol SVR12 rates were 98.2% and 100%.

Taken together, the SVR12 rates for all genotypes were 97.7% and 99.7%, respectively, for the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, according to the investigators.

There were no virologic failures on treatment, and one patients with genotype 3 relapsed in week 4 posttreatment, while one genotype 1 patient discontinued treatment though not because of adverse events, they said.

Most adverse events were grade 1 in severity, and included fatigue, pruritus, headache, and nausea. There were no liver-related toxicities, and no serious adverse events that were related to the study treatment, according to the investigators.

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is indicated for patients aged 12 years and older with treatment-naive HCV genotype 1-6 infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, and in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection previously treated with an HCV NS5A inhibitor or an NS3/4A protease inhibitor.

Dr. Brown reported disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies including AbbVie, which markets Mavyret.

SOURCE: Brown RS et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP9.

BOSTON – Specifically in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection and compensated cirrhosis, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) was safe and had high efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial, echoing an earlier report describing clinical results for the fixed-dose combination in multiple other genotypes.

Treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was safe and produced high rates of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) for the genotype 3 patients and compensated cirrhosis in the recent results from the EXPEDITION-8 study, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

In a previous report from EXPEDITION-8, investigators said that the treatment was well tolerated and effective in patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6.

“The availability of an 8-week, pangenotypic regimen for all treatment-naive HCV-infected patients regardless of cirrhosis status may simplify the HCV care pathway, furthering progress towards HCV elimination,” said investigator Robert S. Brown Jr., MD, MPH, and coinvestigators in a late-breaking abstract of the latest study results.

The nonrandomized, multicenter, phase 3b study included 343 adults with HCV genotypes 1-6 who received glecaprevir 300 mg and pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily for 8 weeks. A total of 63% of patients were male, 83% were white; 18% had HCV genotype 3, while the majority (67%) had HCV genotype 1.

For the genotype 3 patients, SVR12 rates were 95.2% in the intention-to-treat population, and 98.4% in the per-protocol population, Dr. Brown and coauthors said in their report on the study. For genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 patients, the intention-to-treat and per-protocol SVR12 rates were 98.2% and 100%.

Taken together, the SVR12 rates for all genotypes were 97.7% and 99.7%, respectively, for the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations, according to the investigators.

There were no virologic failures on treatment, and one patients with genotype 3 relapsed in week 4 posttreatment, while one genotype 1 patient discontinued treatment though not because of adverse events, they said.

Most adverse events were grade 1 in severity, and included fatigue, pruritus, headache, and nausea. There were no liver-related toxicities, and no serious adverse events that were related to the study treatment, according to the investigators.

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is indicated for patients aged 12 years and older with treatment-naive HCV genotype 1-6 infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis, and in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection previously treated with an HCV NS5A inhibitor or an NS3/4A protease inhibitor.

Dr. Brown reported disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies including AbbVie, which markets Mavyret.

SOURCE: Brown RS et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP9.

BOSTON – A prime-boost hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine regimen did not protect against chronic infection, but it did evoke immune responses and differences in viral trajectory, according to investigators in what is believed to be the first randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in this setting.

copyright wildpixel/Thinkstock

There were no apparent safety concerns with the vaccine according to investigators, led by Kimberly Page, PhD, MPH, of the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

“A safe and effective vaccine to prevent chronic hepatitis C virus infection is essential to reduce transmission,” Dr. Page and coauthors said in a late-breaking abstract of the study results, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The phase 1/2 trial described by Dr. Page and colleagues included 455 adults at risk of HCV infection because of injection drug use. They were randomized to vaccine, which consisted of a recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus-3 vectored vaccine prime plus a recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara boost, or to two doses of placebo at days 0 and 56 of the study.

There was no difference in chronic HCV infection at 6 months, the primary endpoint of the study. There were 14 chronically infected participants in the vaccine group, as well as 14 in the placebo group, for an overall incidence of infection of 13.0/100 person-years, Dr. Page and coauthors reported in the abstract.

However, there were significant differences in HCV RNA geometric mean peak at 1 month, which was 193,795 IU/L in the vaccine group and 1,078,092 IU/L in the placebo group, according to investigators. Similarly, geometric mean fold rise after infection was 0.2 in the vaccine group and 13.5 in the placebo group.

A total of 78% of vaccinated individuals had T-cell responses to at least one vaccine antigen pool, investigators said, adding that the vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and not associated with any serious adverse events.

Dr. Page had no disclosures related to the abstract.

SOURCE: Page K et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP17.

BOSTON – A prime-boost hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine regimen did not protect against chronic infection, but it did evoke immune responses and differences in viral trajectory, according to investigators in what is believed to be the first randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in this setting.

copyright wildpixel/Thinkstock

There were no apparent safety concerns with the vaccine according to investigators, led by Kimberly Page, PhD, MPH, of the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

“A safe and effective vaccine to prevent chronic hepatitis C virus infection is essential to reduce transmission,” Dr. Page and coauthors said in a late-breaking abstract of the study results, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The phase 1/2 trial described by Dr. Page and colleagues included 455 adults at risk of HCV infection because of injection drug use. They were randomized to vaccine, which consisted of a recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus-3 vectored vaccine prime plus a recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara boost, or to two doses of placebo at days 0 and 56 of the study.

There was no difference in chronic HCV infection at 6 months, the primary endpoint of the study. There were 14 chronically infected participants in the vaccine group, as well as 14 in the placebo group, for an overall incidence of infection of 13.0/100 person-years, Dr. Page and coauthors reported in the abstract.

However, there were significant differences in HCV RNA geometric mean peak at 1 month, which was 193,795 IU/L in the vaccine group and 1,078,092 IU/L in the placebo group, according to investigators. Similarly, geometric mean fold rise after infection was 0.2 in the vaccine group and 13.5 in the placebo group.

A total of 78% of vaccinated individuals had T-cell responses to at least one vaccine antigen pool, investigators said, adding that the vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and not associated with any serious adverse events.

Dr. Page had no disclosures related to the abstract.

SOURCE: Page K et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP17.

BOSTON – A prime-boost hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine regimen did not protect against chronic infection, but it did evoke immune responses and differences in viral trajectory, according to investigators in what is believed to be the first randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial in this setting.

copyright wildpixel/Thinkstock

There were no apparent safety concerns with the vaccine according to investigators, led by Kimberly Page, PhD, MPH, of the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

“A safe and effective vaccine to prevent chronic hepatitis C virus infection is essential to reduce transmission,” Dr. Page and coauthors said in a late-breaking abstract of the study results, which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

The phase 1/2 trial described by Dr. Page and colleagues included 455 adults at risk of HCV infection because of injection drug use. They were randomized to vaccine, which consisted of a recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus-3 vectored vaccine prime plus a recombinant Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara boost, or to two doses of placebo at days 0 and 56 of the study.

There was no difference in chronic HCV infection at 6 months, the primary endpoint of the study. There were 14 chronically infected participants in the vaccine group, as well as 14 in the placebo group, for an overall incidence of infection of 13.0/100 person-years, Dr. Page and coauthors reported in the abstract.

However, there were significant differences in HCV RNA geometric mean peak at 1 month, which was 193,795 IU/L in the vaccine group and 1,078,092 IU/L in the placebo group, according to investigators. Similarly, geometric mean fold rise after infection was 0.2 in the vaccine group and 13.5 in the placebo group.

A total of 78% of vaccinated individuals had T-cell responses to at least one vaccine antigen pool, investigators said, adding that the vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and not associated with any serious adverse events.

Dr. Page had no disclosures related to the abstract.

SOURCE: Page K et al. The Liver Meeting 2019. Abstract LP17.