NEW ORLEANS – In the opinion of Paul A. Offit, MD, pushback against antivaccination campaigns and advocates is stronger than ever.

The shift began with the measles outbreak in Southern California in late 2014, he said. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 125 measles cases with rash that occurred between Dec. 28, 2014, and Feb. 8, 2015, were confirmed in U.S. residents. Of these, 100 were California residents (MMWR. 2015 Feb 20;64[06];153-4).

“This outbreak spread ultimately to 25 states and involved 189 people,” Dr. Offit said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “It was in the news almost every day. As a consequence, there were measles outbreaks in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Oregon, and Texas, and Washington, which began to turn the public sentiment against the antivaccine movement.”

Even longstanding skeptics are changing their tune. Dr. Offit, professor of pediatrics in the division of infectious diseases at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, cited a recent study from the Autism Science Foundation which found that 85% of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder don’t believe that vaccines cause the condition. “Although there will be parents who continue to believe that vaccines cause autism, most parents of children with autism don’t believe that,” he said. “Also, it’s a little hard to make your case that vaccines are dangerous and that you shouldn’t get them in the midst of outbreaks.”

Perhaps the greatest pushback against antivaccination efforts has been made in the legal arena. In 2019 alone, legislators in California banned parents from not vaccinating their kids because of personal beliefs, while lawmakers in New York repealed the religious exemption to vaccinate, those in Maine repealed the religious and philosophical exemption, those in New Jersey required detailed written explanation for religious exemption, and those in Washington State repealed the philosophical exemption for the MMR vaccine.

Pushback also is apparent on various social media platforms. For example, Dr. Offit said, Pinterest restricts vaccine search results to curb the spread of misinformation, YouTube removes ads from antivaccine channels, Amazon Prime has pulled antivaccination documentaries from its video service, and Facebook has taken steps to curb misinformation about vaccines. “With outbreaks and with children suffering, the media and public sentiment has largely turned against those who are vehemently against vaccines,” he said. “I’m talking about an angry, politically connected, lawyer-backed group of people who are conspiracy theorists, [those] who no matter what you say, they’re going to believe there’s a conspiracy theory to hurt their children and not believe you. When that group becomes big enough and you start to see outbreaks like we’ve seen, then it becomes an issue. That’s where it comes down to legislation. Is it your inalienable right as a U.S. citizen to allow your child to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection? That’s what we’re struggling with now.”

When meeting with parents who are skeptical about vaccines or refuse their children to have them, Dr. Offit advises clinicians to “go down swinging” in favor of vaccination. He shared how his wife, Bonnie, a pediatrician who practices in suburban Philadelphia, counsels parents who raise such concerns. “The way she handled it initially was to do the best she could to eventually get people vaccinated,” he said. “She was successful about one-quarter of the time. Then she drew a line. She started saying to parents, ‘Look; don’t put me in a position where you are asking me to practice substandard care. I can’t send them out of this room knowing that there’s more measles out there, knowing that there’s mumps out there, knowing that there’s whooping cough out there, knowing that there’s pneumococcus and varicella out there. If this child leaves this office and is hurt by any of those viruses or bacteria and I knew I could have done something to prevent it, I couldn’t live with myself. If you’re going to let this child out without being vaccinated I can’t see you anymore because I’m responsible for the health of this child.’ With that [approach], she has been far more successful. Because at some level, if you continue to see that patient, you’re tacitly agreeing that it’s okay to [not vaccinate].”

In 2000, Dr. Offit and colleagues created the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, which provides complete, up-to-date, and reliable information about vaccines to parents and clinicians. It summarizes the purpose of each vaccine, and the relative risks and benefits in easy-to-read language. The CDC also maintains updated information about vaccines and immunizations on its web site. For his part, Dr. Offit tells parents that passing on an opportunity to vaccinate their child is not a risk-free choice. “If you choose not to get a vaccine you probably will get away with it, but you might not,” he said. “You are playing a game of Russian roulette. It may not be five empty chambers and one bullet, but maybe it’s 100,000 empty chambers and one bullet. There’s a bullet there.”

Dr. Offit reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

NEW ORLEANS – In the opinion of Paul A. Offit, MD, pushback against antivaccination campaigns and advocates is stronger than ever.

The shift began with the measles outbreak in Southern California in late 2014, he said. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 125 measles cases with rash that occurred between Dec. 28, 2014, and Feb. 8, 2015, were confirmed in U.S. residents. Of these, 100 were California residents (MMWR. 2015 Feb 20;64[06];153-4).

“This outbreak spread ultimately to 25 states and involved 189 people,” Dr. Offit said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “It was in the news almost every day. As a consequence, there were measles outbreaks in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Oregon, and Texas, and Washington, which began to turn the public sentiment against the antivaccine movement.”

Even longstanding skeptics are changing their tune. Dr. Offit, professor of pediatrics in the division of infectious diseases at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, cited a recent study from the Autism Science Foundation which found that 85% of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder don’t believe that vaccines cause the condition. “Although there will be parents who continue to believe that vaccines cause autism, most parents of children with autism don’t believe that,” he said. “Also, it’s a little hard to make your case that vaccines are dangerous and that you shouldn’t get them in the midst of outbreaks.”

Perhaps the greatest pushback against antivaccination efforts has been made in the legal arena. In 2019 alone, legislators in California banned parents from not vaccinating their kids because of personal beliefs, while lawmakers in New York repealed the religious exemption to vaccinate, those in Maine repealed the religious and philosophical exemption, those in New Jersey required detailed written explanation for religious exemption, and those in Washington State repealed the philosophical exemption for the MMR vaccine.

Pushback also is apparent on various social media platforms. For example, Dr. Offit said, Pinterest restricts vaccine search results to curb the spread of misinformation, YouTube removes ads from antivaccine channels, Amazon Prime has pulled antivaccination documentaries from its video service, and Facebook has taken steps to curb misinformation about vaccines. “With outbreaks and with children suffering, the media and public sentiment has largely turned against those who are vehemently against vaccines,” he said. “I’m talking about an angry, politically connected, lawyer-backed group of people who are conspiracy theorists, [those] who no matter what you say, they’re going to believe there’s a conspiracy theory to hurt their children and not believe you. When that group becomes big enough and you start to see outbreaks like we’ve seen, then it becomes an issue. That’s where it comes down to legislation. Is it your inalienable right as a U.S. citizen to allow your child to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection? That’s what we’re struggling with now.”

When meeting with parents who are skeptical about vaccines or refuse their children to have them, Dr. Offit advises clinicians to “go down swinging” in favor of vaccination. He shared how his wife, Bonnie, a pediatrician who practices in suburban Philadelphia, counsels parents who raise such concerns. “The way she handled it initially was to do the best she could to eventually get people vaccinated,” he said. “She was successful about one-quarter of the time. Then she drew a line. She started saying to parents, ‘Look; don’t put me in a position where you are asking me to practice substandard care. I can’t send them out of this room knowing that there’s more measles out there, knowing that there’s mumps out there, knowing that there’s whooping cough out there, knowing that there’s pneumococcus and varicella out there. If this child leaves this office and is hurt by any of those viruses or bacteria and I knew I could have done something to prevent it, I couldn’t live with myself. If you’re going to let this child out without being vaccinated I can’t see you anymore because I’m responsible for the health of this child.’ With that [approach], she has been far more successful. Because at some level, if you continue to see that patient, you’re tacitly agreeing that it’s okay to [not vaccinate].”

In 2000, Dr. Offit and colleagues created the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, which provides complete, up-to-date, and reliable information about vaccines to parents and clinicians. It summarizes the purpose of each vaccine, and the relative risks and benefits in easy-to-read language. The CDC also maintains updated information about vaccines and immunizations on its web site. For his part, Dr. Offit tells parents that passing on an opportunity to vaccinate their child is not a risk-free choice. “If you choose not to get a vaccine you probably will get away with it, but you might not,” he said. “You are playing a game of Russian roulette. It may not be five empty chambers and one bullet, but maybe it’s 100,000 empty chambers and one bullet. There’s a bullet there.”

Dr. Offit reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

NEW ORLEANS – In the opinion of Paul A. Offit, MD, pushback against antivaccination campaigns and advocates is stronger than ever.

The shift began with the measles outbreak in Southern California in late 2014, he said. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 125 measles cases with rash that occurred between Dec. 28, 2014, and Feb. 8, 2015, were confirmed in U.S. residents. Of these, 100 were California residents (MMWR. 2015 Feb 20;64[06];153-4).

“This outbreak spread ultimately to 25 states and involved 189 people,” Dr. Offit said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics. “It was in the news almost every day. As a consequence, there were measles outbreaks in New York, New Jersey, Florida, Oregon, and Texas, and Washington, which began to turn the public sentiment against the antivaccine movement.”

Even longstanding skeptics are changing their tune. Dr. Offit, professor of pediatrics in the division of infectious diseases at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, cited a recent study from the Autism Science Foundation which found that 85% of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder don’t believe that vaccines cause the condition. “Although there will be parents who continue to believe that vaccines cause autism, most parents of children with autism don’t believe that,” he said. “Also, it’s a little hard to make your case that vaccines are dangerous and that you shouldn’t get them in the midst of outbreaks.”

Perhaps the greatest pushback against antivaccination efforts has been made in the legal arena. In 2019 alone, legislators in California banned parents from not vaccinating their kids because of personal beliefs, while lawmakers in New York repealed the religious exemption to vaccinate, those in Maine repealed the religious and philosophical exemption, those in New Jersey required detailed written explanation for religious exemption, and those in Washington State repealed the philosophical exemption for the MMR vaccine.

Pushback also is apparent on various social media platforms. For example, Dr. Offit said, Pinterest restricts vaccine search results to curb the spread of misinformation, YouTube removes ads from antivaccine channels, Amazon Prime has pulled antivaccination documentaries from its video service, and Facebook has taken steps to curb misinformation about vaccines. “With outbreaks and with children suffering, the media and public sentiment has largely turned against those who are vehemently against vaccines,” he said. “I’m talking about an angry, politically connected, lawyer-backed group of people who are conspiracy theorists, [those] who no matter what you say, they’re going to believe there’s a conspiracy theory to hurt their children and not believe you. When that group becomes big enough and you start to see outbreaks like we’ve seen, then it becomes an issue. That’s where it comes down to legislation. Is it your inalienable right as a U.S. citizen to allow your child to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection? That’s what we’re struggling with now.”

When meeting with parents who are skeptical about vaccines or refuse their children to have them, Dr. Offit advises clinicians to “go down swinging” in favor of vaccination. He shared how his wife, Bonnie, a pediatrician who practices in suburban Philadelphia, counsels parents who raise such concerns. “The way she handled it initially was to do the best she could to eventually get people vaccinated,” he said. “She was successful about one-quarter of the time. Then she drew a line. She started saying to parents, ‘Look; don’t put me in a position where you are asking me to practice substandard care. I can’t send them out of this room knowing that there’s more measles out there, knowing that there’s mumps out there, knowing that there’s whooping cough out there, knowing that there’s pneumococcus and varicella out there. If this child leaves this office and is hurt by any of those viruses or bacteria and I knew I could have done something to prevent it, I couldn’t live with myself. If you’re going to let this child out without being vaccinated I can’t see you anymore because I’m responsible for the health of this child.’ With that [approach], she has been far more successful. Because at some level, if you continue to see that patient, you’re tacitly agreeing that it’s okay to [not vaccinate].”

In 2000, Dr. Offit and colleagues created the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, which provides complete, up-to-date, and reliable information about vaccines to parents and clinicians. It summarizes the purpose of each vaccine, and the relative risks and benefits in easy-to-read language. The CDC also maintains updated information about vaccines and immunizations on its web site. For his part, Dr. Offit tells parents that passing on an opportunity to vaccinate their child is not a risk-free choice. “If you choose not to get a vaccine you probably will get away with it, but you might not,” he said. “You are playing a game of Russian roulette. It may not be five empty chambers and one bullet, but maybe it’s 100,000 empty chambers and one bullet. There’s a bullet there.”

Dr. Offit reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

[email protected]

Psoriasis management in children involves attention not only to treatment of the physical condition but also psychosocial wellness and quality of life, according to a new clinical guideline on the management of pediatric psoriasis from the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation.

Psoriasis affects approximately 1% of children, either alone or associated with comorbid conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Alan Menter, MD, of Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, and coauthors of the guideline.

In the guideline, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the multidisciplinary work group identified screening tools to measure disease severity, strategies for management of comorbidities, and the safety and effectiveness of topical, systemic, and phototherapy treatments.

To assess disease severity, the work group recommended not only the use of body surface area (BSA), similar to measurement of severity in adults, but also the use of the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index, a 10-question quality of life survey, as BSA alone does not account for the potential negative impact of the disease on quality of life in terms of physical, emotional, social, and psychological function.

“For example, a child with psoriasis limited to the face or the entire scalp does not have severe disease based on BSA definitions, but if this involvement causes shame, social withdrawal, or bullying, it satisfies criteria for severe disease based on impact beyond the skin,” they said.

The work group stated that a variety of conditions may trigger or exacerbate psoriasis in children, including infections, cutaneous trauma, or physiological, emotional, and environmental stressors.

The majority of children with PsA develop joint inflammation before skin disease, the work group wrote. In addition, children with psoriasis are at increased risk for rheumatoid arthritis, so clinicians may need to distinguish between a combination of psoriasis and musculoskeletal issues and cases of either psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis in young patients.

The cardiovascular risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome are greater in children with psoriasis, compared with children without psoriasis, the work group noted. In addition, pediatric psoriasis patients have a higher prevalence of obesity than children without psoriasis, and they recommended that children with psoriasis be monitored for the development of obesity, and that obese children with psoriasis should be referred for weight management.

The work group noted that data are insufficient in children to support the link between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease that has been documented in adults with psoriasis. However, “patients with pediatric psoriasis should have American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)–recommended age-related cardiovascular screening regardless of the presence of signs or symptoms,” they said.

The guideline also recommends screening for dyslipidemia and hypertension according to AAP guidelines and educating pediatric psoriasis patients about the risk of diabetes and regularly screening for diabetes and insulin resistance in those who are obese. Overweight children with psoriasis may be screened at the provider’s discretion, they wrote. Patients with signs of inflammatory bowel disease, which also is associated with psoriasis in adults, should be considered for referral to a gastroenterologist, they noted.

Children with psoriasis should be screened regularly for mental health conditions regardless of age, and they should be asked about substance abuse, according to the guideline, and those with concerns should be referred for additional assessment and management.

The guideline divides treatment of psoriasis in children into three categories: topical, phototherapy and photochemotherapy, and systemic treatments (nonbiologic or biologic).

For topicals, the guideline recommendations include corticosteroids as an off-label therapy, as well as ultra-high-potency topical corticosteroids as monotherapy. Overall, “selection of a therapeutic routine (potency, delivery vehicle, frequency of application) should take into account sites of involvement, type and thickness of psoriasis, age of the patient, total BSA of application, anticipated occlusion, and disease acuity, among other patient-, disease-, and drug-related factors,” the authors wrote. Other topical options included in the recommendations: calcineurin inhibitors, topical vitamin D analogues, tazarotene (off label), anthralin, and coal tar.

Phototherapy has a history of use in psoriasis treatment and remains part of the current recommendations, although data in children are limited, and data on the use of phototherapy for pustular psoriasis in children are insufficient to make specific treatment and dosing recommendations, the work group noted. The researchers also noted that in-office phototherapy may not be feasible for many patients, but that in-home ultraviolet light equipment or natural sunlight in moderation could be recommended as an alternative.

The use of systemic, nonbiologic treatments for pediatric psoriasis should be “based on baseline severity of disease, subtype of psoriasis, speed of disease progression, lack of response to more conservative therapies such as topical agents and phototherapy (when appropriate), impaired physical or psychological functioning or [quality of life] due to disease extent, and the presence of comorbidities such as PsA,” the workgroup said.

Options for systemic treatment include methotrexate, cyclosporine (notably for pustular as well as plaque and erythrodermic psoriasis), and systemic retinoids. In addition, fumaric acid esters may be an option for children with moderate to severe psoriasis, with recommended clinical and laboratory monitoring.

The increasing safety and efficacy data on biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients support their consideration among first-line systemic treatments, the work group suggested. “Etanercept and ustekinumab are now [Food and Drug Administration] approved for patients with psoriasis 4 years and older and 12 years and older, respectively,” they said, and infliximab and adalimumab have been used off label in children.

The work group concluded that research and knowledge gaps about pediatric psoriasis persist and include mechanism of disease onset, development of comorbidities, and identification of ideal dosing for various treatments.

Finally, the work group emphasized the importance of collaboration between dermatologists and primary care providers for managing psoriasis in children, as well as the importance of patient education.

“Dermatologists should be mindful of the unique aspects of the emotional development of children and the social dynamics of having a visible difference,” they wrote. “Shared decision making with the patient (if age appropriate) and the caregivers is a useful approach, particularly as related to the use of off-label medications to treat severe disease,” they said.

“This is the first time that pediatric psoriasis has been discussed as an independent topic within the guideline,” said one of the guideline authors, Dawn M.R. Davis, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., in an interview. “Children have unique physiology and psychosocial aspects to their care relative to adults. In addition, psoriasis has some clinical manifestations that are oftentimes distinctly seen in children,” she commented. “Creation of a guideline specific to children allows us to summarize the similarities and differences of disease presentation and management. It also allows an opportunity to clarify what research data (especially therapeutics) have been studied in children and their uses, safety profiles, and dosing,” she noted.

Psoriasis can be a psychosocially debilitating disease, she emphasized. “In children, for example, isolated or prominent facial involvement is common, which can be embarrassing and impact relationships.”

The take-home message for clinicians, Dr. Davis said, is to keep in mind the multisystemic nature of psoriasis. “It is not limited to the skin,” she said. “Treating a patient with psoriasis necessitates practicing whole-person care” and considering the multiple comorbidities that impact quality of life and overall health in children, as well as adults with psoriasis, she commented. “Dermatologists can empower patients and their caregivers by educating them on the multifocal, complex nature of the disease.” She added, “We have much to learn regarding psoriasis in the pediatric population. More research into therapeutics, topical and systemic, is necessary to optimize patient care.”

The guideline was based on studies published in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases from January 2011 through December 31, 2017.

Dr. Menter and Craig A. Elmets, MD, professor of dermatology, at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, were cochairs of the work group. The pediatric guideline is the latest in a multipart series of AAD-NPF guidelines on psoriasis being published this year in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Many of the guideline authors, including lead author Dr. Menter, disclosed relationships with multiple companies; however, a minimum 51% of workgroup members had no relevant conflicts of interest in accordance with AAD policy. There was no funding source. Dr. Davis disclosed serving as an investigator for Regeneron, with no compensation.

SOURCE: Menter et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.049.

Psoriasis management in children involves attention not only to treatment of the physical condition but also psychosocial wellness and quality of life, according to a new clinical guideline on the management of pediatric psoriasis from the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation.

Psoriasis affects approximately 1% of children, either alone or associated with comorbid conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Alan Menter, MD, of Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, and coauthors of the guideline.

In the guideline, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the multidisciplinary work group identified screening tools to measure disease severity, strategies for management of comorbidities, and the safety and effectiveness of topical, systemic, and phototherapy treatments.

To assess disease severity, the work group recommended not only the use of body surface area (BSA), similar to measurement of severity in adults, but also the use of the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index, a 10-question quality of life survey, as BSA alone does not account for the potential negative impact of the disease on quality of life in terms of physical, emotional, social, and psychological function.

“For example, a child with psoriasis limited to the face or the entire scalp does not have severe disease based on BSA definitions, but if this involvement causes shame, social withdrawal, or bullying, it satisfies criteria for severe disease based on impact beyond the skin,” they said.

The work group stated that a variety of conditions may trigger or exacerbate psoriasis in children, including infections, cutaneous trauma, or physiological, emotional, and environmental stressors.

The majority of children with PsA develop joint inflammation before skin disease, the work group wrote. In addition, children with psoriasis are at increased risk for rheumatoid arthritis, so clinicians may need to distinguish between a combination of psoriasis and musculoskeletal issues and cases of either psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis in young patients.

The cardiovascular risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome are greater in children with psoriasis, compared with children without psoriasis, the work group noted. In addition, pediatric psoriasis patients have a higher prevalence of obesity than children without psoriasis, and they recommended that children with psoriasis be monitored for the development of obesity, and that obese children with psoriasis should be referred for weight management.

The work group noted that data are insufficient in children to support the link between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease that has been documented in adults with psoriasis. However, “patients with pediatric psoriasis should have American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)–recommended age-related cardiovascular screening regardless of the presence of signs or symptoms,” they said.

The guideline also recommends screening for dyslipidemia and hypertension according to AAP guidelines and educating pediatric psoriasis patients about the risk of diabetes and regularly screening for diabetes and insulin resistance in those who are obese. Overweight children with psoriasis may be screened at the provider’s discretion, they wrote. Patients with signs of inflammatory bowel disease, which also is associated with psoriasis in adults, should be considered for referral to a gastroenterologist, they noted.

Children with psoriasis should be screened regularly for mental health conditions regardless of age, and they should be asked about substance abuse, according to the guideline, and those with concerns should be referred for additional assessment and management.

The guideline divides treatment of psoriasis in children into three categories: topical, phototherapy and photochemotherapy, and systemic treatments (nonbiologic or biologic).

For topicals, the guideline recommendations include corticosteroids as an off-label therapy, as well as ultra-high-potency topical corticosteroids as monotherapy. Overall, “selection of a therapeutic routine (potency, delivery vehicle, frequency of application) should take into account sites of involvement, type and thickness of psoriasis, age of the patient, total BSA of application, anticipated occlusion, and disease acuity, among other patient-, disease-, and drug-related factors,” the authors wrote. Other topical options included in the recommendations: calcineurin inhibitors, topical vitamin D analogues, tazarotene (off label), anthralin, and coal tar.

Phototherapy has a history of use in psoriasis treatment and remains part of the current recommendations, although data in children are limited, and data on the use of phototherapy for pustular psoriasis in children are insufficient to make specific treatment and dosing recommendations, the work group noted. The researchers also noted that in-office phototherapy may not be feasible for many patients, but that in-home ultraviolet light equipment or natural sunlight in moderation could be recommended as an alternative.

The use of systemic, nonbiologic treatments for pediatric psoriasis should be “based on baseline severity of disease, subtype of psoriasis, speed of disease progression, lack of response to more conservative therapies such as topical agents and phototherapy (when appropriate), impaired physical or psychological functioning or [quality of life] due to disease extent, and the presence of comorbidities such as PsA,” the workgroup said.

Options for systemic treatment include methotrexate, cyclosporine (notably for pustular as well as plaque and erythrodermic psoriasis), and systemic retinoids. In addition, fumaric acid esters may be an option for children with moderate to severe psoriasis, with recommended clinical and laboratory monitoring.

The increasing safety and efficacy data on biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients support their consideration among first-line systemic treatments, the work group suggested. “Etanercept and ustekinumab are now [Food and Drug Administration] approved for patients with psoriasis 4 years and older and 12 years and older, respectively,” they said, and infliximab and adalimumab have been used off label in children.

The work group concluded that research and knowledge gaps about pediatric psoriasis persist and include mechanism of disease onset, development of comorbidities, and identification of ideal dosing for various treatments.

Finally, the work group emphasized the importance of collaboration between dermatologists and primary care providers for managing psoriasis in children, as well as the importance of patient education.

“Dermatologists should be mindful of the unique aspects of the emotional development of children and the social dynamics of having a visible difference,” they wrote. “Shared decision making with the patient (if age appropriate) and the caregivers is a useful approach, particularly as related to the use of off-label medications to treat severe disease,” they said.

“This is the first time that pediatric psoriasis has been discussed as an independent topic within the guideline,” said one of the guideline authors, Dawn M.R. Davis, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., in an interview. “Children have unique physiology and psychosocial aspects to their care relative to adults. In addition, psoriasis has some clinical manifestations that are oftentimes distinctly seen in children,” she commented. “Creation of a guideline specific to children allows us to summarize the similarities and differences of disease presentation and management. It also allows an opportunity to clarify what research data (especially therapeutics) have been studied in children and their uses, safety profiles, and dosing,” she noted.

Psoriasis can be a psychosocially debilitating disease, she emphasized. “In children, for example, isolated or prominent facial involvement is common, which can be embarrassing and impact relationships.”

The take-home message for clinicians, Dr. Davis said, is to keep in mind the multisystemic nature of psoriasis. “It is not limited to the skin,” she said. “Treating a patient with psoriasis necessitates practicing whole-person care” and considering the multiple comorbidities that impact quality of life and overall health in children, as well as adults with psoriasis, she commented. “Dermatologists can empower patients and their caregivers by educating them on the multifocal, complex nature of the disease.” She added, “We have much to learn regarding psoriasis in the pediatric population. More research into therapeutics, topical and systemic, is necessary to optimize patient care.”

The guideline was based on studies published in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases from January 2011 through December 31, 2017.

Dr. Menter and Craig A. Elmets, MD, professor of dermatology, at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, were cochairs of the work group. The pediatric guideline is the latest in a multipart series of AAD-NPF guidelines on psoriasis being published this year in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Many of the guideline authors, including lead author Dr. Menter, disclosed relationships with multiple companies; however, a minimum 51% of workgroup members had no relevant conflicts of interest in accordance with AAD policy. There was no funding source. Dr. Davis disclosed serving as an investigator for Regeneron, with no compensation.

SOURCE: Menter et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.049.

Psoriasis management in children involves attention not only to treatment of the physical condition but also psychosocial wellness and quality of life, according to a new clinical guideline on the management of pediatric psoriasis from the American Academy of Dermatology and the National Psoriasis Foundation.

Psoriasis affects approximately 1% of children, either alone or associated with comorbid conditions such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), wrote Alan Menter, MD, of Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, and coauthors of the guideline.

In the guideline, published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, the multidisciplinary work group identified screening tools to measure disease severity, strategies for management of comorbidities, and the safety and effectiveness of topical, systemic, and phototherapy treatments.

To assess disease severity, the work group recommended not only the use of body surface area (BSA), similar to measurement of severity in adults, but also the use of the Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index, a 10-question quality of life survey, as BSA alone does not account for the potential negative impact of the disease on quality of life in terms of physical, emotional, social, and psychological function.

“For example, a child with psoriasis limited to the face or the entire scalp does not have severe disease based on BSA definitions, but if this involvement causes shame, social withdrawal, or bullying, it satisfies criteria for severe disease based on impact beyond the skin,” they said.

The work group stated that a variety of conditions may trigger or exacerbate psoriasis in children, including infections, cutaneous trauma, or physiological, emotional, and environmental stressors.

The majority of children with PsA develop joint inflammation before skin disease, the work group wrote. In addition, children with psoriasis are at increased risk for rheumatoid arthritis, so clinicians may need to distinguish between a combination of psoriasis and musculoskeletal issues and cases of either psoriatic or rheumatoid arthritis in young patients.

The cardiovascular risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome are greater in children with psoriasis, compared with children without psoriasis, the work group noted. In addition, pediatric psoriasis patients have a higher prevalence of obesity than children without psoriasis, and they recommended that children with psoriasis be monitored for the development of obesity, and that obese children with psoriasis should be referred for weight management.

The work group noted that data are insufficient in children to support the link between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease that has been documented in adults with psoriasis. However, “patients with pediatric psoriasis should have American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)–recommended age-related cardiovascular screening regardless of the presence of signs or symptoms,” they said.

The guideline also recommends screening for dyslipidemia and hypertension according to AAP guidelines and educating pediatric psoriasis patients about the risk of diabetes and regularly screening for diabetes and insulin resistance in those who are obese. Overweight children with psoriasis may be screened at the provider’s discretion, they wrote. Patients with signs of inflammatory bowel disease, which also is associated with psoriasis in adults, should be considered for referral to a gastroenterologist, they noted.

Children with psoriasis should be screened regularly for mental health conditions regardless of age, and they should be asked about substance abuse, according to the guideline, and those with concerns should be referred for additional assessment and management.

The guideline divides treatment of psoriasis in children into three categories: topical, phototherapy and photochemotherapy, and systemic treatments (nonbiologic or biologic).

For topicals, the guideline recommendations include corticosteroids as an off-label therapy, as well as ultra-high-potency topical corticosteroids as monotherapy. Overall, “selection of a therapeutic routine (potency, delivery vehicle, frequency of application) should take into account sites of involvement, type and thickness of psoriasis, age of the patient, total BSA of application, anticipated occlusion, and disease acuity, among other patient-, disease-, and drug-related factors,” the authors wrote. Other topical options included in the recommendations: calcineurin inhibitors, topical vitamin D analogues, tazarotene (off label), anthralin, and coal tar.

Phototherapy has a history of use in psoriasis treatment and remains part of the current recommendations, although data in children are limited, and data on the use of phototherapy for pustular psoriasis in children are insufficient to make specific treatment and dosing recommendations, the work group noted. The researchers also noted that in-office phototherapy may not be feasible for many patients, but that in-home ultraviolet light equipment or natural sunlight in moderation could be recommended as an alternative.

The use of systemic, nonbiologic treatments for pediatric psoriasis should be “based on baseline severity of disease, subtype of psoriasis, speed of disease progression, lack of response to more conservative therapies such as topical agents and phototherapy (when appropriate), impaired physical or psychological functioning or [quality of life] due to disease extent, and the presence of comorbidities such as PsA,” the workgroup said.

Options for systemic treatment include methotrexate, cyclosporine (notably for pustular as well as plaque and erythrodermic psoriasis), and systemic retinoids. In addition, fumaric acid esters may be an option for children with moderate to severe psoriasis, with recommended clinical and laboratory monitoring.

The increasing safety and efficacy data on biologics in pediatric psoriasis patients support their consideration among first-line systemic treatments, the work group suggested. “Etanercept and ustekinumab are now [Food and Drug Administration] approved for patients with psoriasis 4 years and older and 12 years and older, respectively,” they said, and infliximab and adalimumab have been used off label in children.

The work group concluded that research and knowledge gaps about pediatric psoriasis persist and include mechanism of disease onset, development of comorbidities, and identification of ideal dosing for various treatments.

Finally, the work group emphasized the importance of collaboration between dermatologists and primary care providers for managing psoriasis in children, as well as the importance of patient education.

“Dermatologists should be mindful of the unique aspects of the emotional development of children and the social dynamics of having a visible difference,” they wrote. “Shared decision making with the patient (if age appropriate) and the caregivers is a useful approach, particularly as related to the use of off-label medications to treat severe disease,” they said.

“This is the first time that pediatric psoriasis has been discussed as an independent topic within the guideline,” said one of the guideline authors, Dawn M.R. Davis, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., in an interview. “Children have unique physiology and psychosocial aspects to their care relative to adults. In addition, psoriasis has some clinical manifestations that are oftentimes distinctly seen in children,” she commented. “Creation of a guideline specific to children allows us to summarize the similarities and differences of disease presentation and management. It also allows an opportunity to clarify what research data (especially therapeutics) have been studied in children and their uses, safety profiles, and dosing,” she noted.

Psoriasis can be a psychosocially debilitating disease, she emphasized. “In children, for example, isolated or prominent facial involvement is common, which can be embarrassing and impact relationships.”

The take-home message for clinicians, Dr. Davis said, is to keep in mind the multisystemic nature of psoriasis. “It is not limited to the skin,” she said. “Treating a patient with psoriasis necessitates practicing whole-person care” and considering the multiple comorbidities that impact quality of life and overall health in children, as well as adults with psoriasis, she commented. “Dermatologists can empower patients and their caregivers by educating them on the multifocal, complex nature of the disease.” She added, “We have much to learn regarding psoriasis in the pediatric population. More research into therapeutics, topical and systemic, is necessary to optimize patient care.”

The guideline was based on studies published in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases from January 2011 through December 31, 2017.

Dr. Menter and Craig A. Elmets, MD, professor of dermatology, at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, were cochairs of the work group. The pediatric guideline is the latest in a multipart series of AAD-NPF guidelines on psoriasis being published this year in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Many of the guideline authors, including lead author Dr. Menter, disclosed relationships with multiple companies; however, a minimum 51% of workgroup members had no relevant conflicts of interest in accordance with AAD policy. There was no funding source. Dr. Davis disclosed serving as an investigator for Regeneron, with no compensation.

SOURCE: Menter et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.049.

A real-world study of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis provided safety and effectiveness results similar to clinical trial results in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, in a report published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

“The safety profile of secukinumab was similar to that reported in previous clinical trials, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed,” according to Diamant Thaci, MD, of the Comprehensive Centre of Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck (Germany) and coauthors. Moreover, effectiveness in those who started treatment with secukinumab at baseline, they added, “was comparable to that observed in Phase 3 trials. High levels of effectiveness were observed also in subjects who had received previous biologic therapies, although the response rates were numerically lower, as might be expected in a difficult to treat population. In addition, lower baseline PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] in patients with prior biologic treatment could also reduce the relative decrease in PASI observed over the course of the study.”

They reported on an interim analysis of the first 1,988 patients enrolled in the PROSPECT study, an observational 24-week study conducted in Germany; 1,323 patients completed the 24 week study; total cumulative exposure to secukinumab was 746.3 patient-years. Their mean baseline PASI was 17.7, slightly lower than those in typical clinical trials, and most (91%) had received systemic therapies before.

Almost half the patients (46%) experienced an adverse event during treatment, and about 4% experienced a serious adverse event; only 1% of serious adverse events were considered related to the study drug. About 7% discontinued treatment with secukinumab because of an adverse event. The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of benefit in 2.4%, psoriasis in 2.3%, and upper respiratory tract viral infection in 0.5%.

The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.7%), pruritus (2.9%), and headache (2.4%). Rates of neoplastic disorders and major cerebrovascular events were similar to published data, with 5 patients (0.3%) experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event and 10 (0.5%) experiencing a malignancy. Four patients (0.2%) developed inflammatory bowel disease, 42 (2.1%) developed Candida infection, 2 (0.1%) developed hepatotoxicity, and 11 (0.6%) an injection-site reaction. There were three deaths, determined not to be related to secukinumab, the authors wrote.

Efficacy was also similar to that observed in earlier studies, they noted, with positive results regardless of concomitant medication. Overall, 44% of the cohort used concomitant medications.

Of the 829 patients using concomitant topical treatments, 73% had started before baseline. In all, 110 patients were also using conventional systemic medications and phototherapy; 77 started treatment before baseline. The most commonly employed concomitant therapies were topical steroids and phototherapy.

Overall, most patients (86%) achieved a PASI 75 by week 24, with 68.5% achieving a PASI 90, and 40% achieving a PASI 100 at that time point.

Secukinumab was most effective among the 83 patients who were naive to systemic therapies; in these patients, results at week 24 were as follows: PASI 75, 93%; PASI 90, 84%; and PASI 100, 66%. Among patients who had previously received a biologic, scores were slightly lower: PASI 75, 78%; PASI 90, 55%; and PASI 100, 29%.

“These interim data from PROSPECT confirm the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the routine clinical setting, in a large cohort of psoriasis patients with high disease severity,” the investigators concluded.

Initially approved in the United States in 2015, secukinumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, is indicated for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, adults with psoriatic arthritis, and adults with active ankylosing spondylitis.

The study was funded by Novartis, Germany; four authors are employees of the company. Dr. Thaci has served as an investigator and/or consultant for multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis, AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Celgene. Other authors also disclosed serving as investigators, consultants, and/or speakers for Novartis and other companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Sep 21. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15962.




 

A real-world study of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis provided safety and effectiveness results similar to clinical trial results in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, in a report published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

“The safety profile of secukinumab was similar to that reported in previous clinical trials, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed,” according to Diamant Thaci, MD, of the Comprehensive Centre of Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck (Germany) and coauthors. Moreover, effectiveness in those who started treatment with secukinumab at baseline, they added, “was comparable to that observed in Phase 3 trials. High levels of effectiveness were observed also in subjects who had received previous biologic therapies, although the response rates were numerically lower, as might be expected in a difficult to treat population. In addition, lower baseline PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] in patients with prior biologic treatment could also reduce the relative decrease in PASI observed over the course of the study.”

They reported on an interim analysis of the first 1,988 patients enrolled in the PROSPECT study, an observational 24-week study conducted in Germany; 1,323 patients completed the 24 week study; total cumulative exposure to secukinumab was 746.3 patient-years. Their mean baseline PASI was 17.7, slightly lower than those in typical clinical trials, and most (91%) had received systemic therapies before.

Almost half the patients (46%) experienced an adverse event during treatment, and about 4% experienced a serious adverse event; only 1% of serious adverse events were considered related to the study drug. About 7% discontinued treatment with secukinumab because of an adverse event. The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of benefit in 2.4%, psoriasis in 2.3%, and upper respiratory tract viral infection in 0.5%.

The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.7%), pruritus (2.9%), and headache (2.4%). Rates of neoplastic disorders and major cerebrovascular events were similar to published data, with 5 patients (0.3%) experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event and 10 (0.5%) experiencing a malignancy. Four patients (0.2%) developed inflammatory bowel disease, 42 (2.1%) developed Candida infection, 2 (0.1%) developed hepatotoxicity, and 11 (0.6%) an injection-site reaction. There were three deaths, determined not to be related to secukinumab, the authors wrote.

Efficacy was also similar to that observed in earlier studies, they noted, with positive results regardless of concomitant medication. Overall, 44% of the cohort used concomitant medications.

Of the 829 patients using concomitant topical treatments, 73% had started before baseline. In all, 110 patients were also using conventional systemic medications and phototherapy; 77 started treatment before baseline. The most commonly employed concomitant therapies were topical steroids and phototherapy.

Overall, most patients (86%) achieved a PASI 75 by week 24, with 68.5% achieving a PASI 90, and 40% achieving a PASI 100 at that time point.

Secukinumab was most effective among the 83 patients who were naive to systemic therapies; in these patients, results at week 24 were as follows: PASI 75, 93%; PASI 90, 84%; and PASI 100, 66%. Among patients who had previously received a biologic, scores were slightly lower: PASI 75, 78%; PASI 90, 55%; and PASI 100, 29%.

“These interim data from PROSPECT confirm the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the routine clinical setting, in a large cohort of psoriasis patients with high disease severity,” the investigators concluded.

Initially approved in the United States in 2015, secukinumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, is indicated for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, adults with psoriatic arthritis, and adults with active ankylosing spondylitis.

The study was funded by Novartis, Germany; four authors are employees of the company. Dr. Thaci has served as an investigator and/or consultant for multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis, AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Celgene. Other authors also disclosed serving as investigators, consultants, and/or speakers for Novartis and other companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Sep 21. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15962.




 

A real-world study of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis provided safety and effectiveness results similar to clinical trial results in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, in a report published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

“The safety profile of secukinumab was similar to that reported in previous clinical trials, and no new or unexpected safety signals were observed,” according to Diamant Thaci, MD, of the Comprehensive Centre of Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck (Germany) and coauthors. Moreover, effectiveness in those who started treatment with secukinumab at baseline, they added, “was comparable to that observed in Phase 3 trials. High levels of effectiveness were observed also in subjects who had received previous biologic therapies, although the response rates were numerically lower, as might be expected in a difficult to treat population. In addition, lower baseline PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] in patients with prior biologic treatment could also reduce the relative decrease in PASI observed over the course of the study.”

They reported on an interim analysis of the first 1,988 patients enrolled in the PROSPECT study, an observational 24-week study conducted in Germany; 1,323 patients completed the 24 week study; total cumulative exposure to secukinumab was 746.3 patient-years. Their mean baseline PASI was 17.7, slightly lower than those in typical clinical trials, and most (91%) had received systemic therapies before.

Almost half the patients (46%) experienced an adverse event during treatment, and about 4% experienced a serious adverse event; only 1% of serious adverse events were considered related to the study drug. About 7% discontinued treatment with secukinumab because of an adverse event. The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of benefit in 2.4%, psoriasis in 2.3%, and upper respiratory tract viral infection in 0.5%.

The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.7%), pruritus (2.9%), and headache (2.4%). Rates of neoplastic disorders and major cerebrovascular events were similar to published data, with 5 patients (0.3%) experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event and 10 (0.5%) experiencing a malignancy. Four patients (0.2%) developed inflammatory bowel disease, 42 (2.1%) developed Candida infection, 2 (0.1%) developed hepatotoxicity, and 11 (0.6%) an injection-site reaction. There were three deaths, determined not to be related to secukinumab, the authors wrote.

Efficacy was also similar to that observed in earlier studies, they noted, with positive results regardless of concomitant medication. Overall, 44% of the cohort used concomitant medications.

Of the 829 patients using concomitant topical treatments, 73% had started before baseline. In all, 110 patients were also using conventional systemic medications and phototherapy; 77 started treatment before baseline. The most commonly employed concomitant therapies were topical steroids and phototherapy.

Overall, most patients (86%) achieved a PASI 75 by week 24, with 68.5% achieving a PASI 90, and 40% achieving a PASI 100 at that time point.

Secukinumab was most effective among the 83 patients who were naive to systemic therapies; in these patients, results at week 24 were as follows: PASI 75, 93%; PASI 90, 84%; and PASI 100, 66%. Among patients who had previously received a biologic, scores were slightly lower: PASI 75, 78%; PASI 90, 55%; and PASI 100, 29%.

“These interim data from PROSPECT confirm the effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in the routine clinical setting, in a large cohort of psoriasis patients with high disease severity,” the investigators concluded.

Initially approved in the United States in 2015, secukinumab, an interleukin-17A antagonist, is indicated for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy, adults with psoriatic arthritis, and adults with active ankylosing spondylitis.

The study was funded by Novartis, Germany; four authors are employees of the company. Dr. Thaci has served as an investigator and/or consultant for multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis, AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Celgene. Other authors also disclosed serving as investigators, consultants, and/or speakers for Novartis and other companies.

[email protected]

SOURCE: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Sep 21. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15962.




 

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

A high level of hepatitis B core–related antigen (HBcrAg) was a complementary risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a retrospective cohort study of more than 2,600 noncirrhotic adults with untreated hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a median of 16 years of follow-up.

SOURCE: AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

“Patients with an intermediate viral load and high levels of HBcrAg had a risk for hepatocellular carcinoma that did not differ significantly from that of patients with a high viral load. [An] HBcrAg of 10 KU/mL may serve as a novel biomarker for the management of patients with intermediate viral load in our clinical practice,” wrote Tai-Chung Tseng, MD, PhD, of National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei and associates in Gastroenterology.

Deciding whether to start antiviral therapy is controversial for some patients with HBV infection. Typically, monitoring without treatment is recommended for patients who have both low hepatitis B surface antigen levels (less than 1,000 IU/mL) and low levels of HBV DNA (less than 2,000 IU/mL), and early antiviral therapy is recommended for patients who have high levels of HBV DNA (20,000 IU/mL or more). However, there is no clear evidence that early antiviral therapy benefits patients who have intermediate levels of HBV DNA (2,000-19,999 IU/mL) and are negative for hepatitis B e antigen. Biomarkers for risk-stratifying these patients also are lacking, the researchers noted.

Therefore, they studied a cohort of 2,666 adults who had tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and were followed at National Taiwan University Hospital from 1985 through 2000. No patient had cirrhosis at baseline. In all, 209 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding an incidence rate of 4.91 cases per 1,000 person-years.

Hepatitis B core–related antigen level remained an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma after accounting for age, sex, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, FIB-4 index, hepatitis B e antigen status, hepatitis B genotype (B, C, or undetermined), and HBV DNA level. Compared with patients whose HBcrAg level was less than 10 KU, a level of 10-99 KU/mL was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.67-4.80), and this risk rose even further as HBcrAg levels increased.

In the subgroup of patients who tested negative for hepatitis B e antigen, had an intermediate HBV DNA load (2,000-19,999 IU/mL), and had a normal baseline ALT level (less than 40 U/L), a high HBcrAg level (10 KU/mL or more) was tied to a nearly fivefold greater risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.18-10.93). This approximated the risk that is observed with high viral load (20,000 IU/mL), the researchers noted. In contrast, a low HBcrAg level was associated with a risk similar to that of minimal risk carriers (annual incidence rate, 0.10%; 95% CI, 0.04%-0.24%).

“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report HBcrAg level as an independent viral biomarker to stratify hepatocellular risks in a large number of patients with intermediate viral load,” the researchers commented. Among the study limitations, 412 patients received antiviral therapy during follow-up. “This is a retrospective cohort study including Asian HBV patients with genotype B or C infection,” the investigators added. “It is unclear whether this finding could be extrapolated to populations with other HBV genotype infections. Nonetheless, we had a sound cohort, as several HBsAg-related clinical findings based on our cohort have already been validated by other prospective cohort studies, implying that our data were unlikely to be biased by the study design.”

Funders included National Taiwan University Hospital, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan in Taiwan, and National Health Research Institutes. The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tseng T-C et al. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 27. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.028.

The Diagnosis: Sclerosing Perineurioma 

Sclerosing perineurioma, first described in 1997 by Fetsch and Miettinen,¹ is a subtype of perineurioma with a strong predilection for the fingers and palms of young adults. Rare cases involving extra-acral sites including the forearm, elbow, axilla, back, neck, lower leg, thigh, knee, lips, nose, and mouth have been reported.^2-4 Perineurioma is a relatively uncommon and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor with exclusive perineurial differentiation.⁵ Perineurioma is divided into intraneural and extraneural types; the latter are further subclassified into soft tissue, sclerosing, reticular, and plexiform types. Other rare forms include the sclerosing, Pacinian corpuscle-like perineurioma, lipomatous perineurioma, perineurioma with xanthomatous areas, and perineurioma with granular cells.^6,7  

Clinically, sclerosing perineurioma usually presents as a solitary lesion; however, rare cases of multiple lesions have been reported.⁸ Our patient presented with a solitary papule on the nose. Histopathologically, sclerosing perineurioma demonstrates slender spindle cells in a whorled growth pattern (onion skin) embedded in a hyalinized, lamellar, and dense collagenous stroma with intervening cleftlike spaces. Immunohistochemically, the spindle cells of our case stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (quiz images). Other positive immunostains for perineurioma include claudin-1 and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Perineurioma lacks expression of S-100 but can express CD34.² As a benign tumor, the prognosis of sclerosing perineurioma is excellent. Complete local excision is considered curative.¹  

Angiofibroma, also known as fibrous papule, is a common and benign lesion located primarily on or in close proximity to the nose.⁹ Angiofibromas can be associated with genodermatoses such as tuberous sclerosis, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, or Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. When angiofibromas involve the penis, they are called pearly penile papules. Ungual angiofibroma, also known as Koenen tumor, occurs underneath the nail.^10-12 Both facial angiofibromas (>3) and ungual angiofibromas (>2) are independent major criteria for tuberous sclerosis.¹³ Clinically, angiofibroma presents as a small, dome-shaped, pink papule arising on the lower portion of the nose or nearby area of the central face. Histopathologically, angiofibromas classically demonstrate increased dilated vessels and fibrosis in the dermis. Stellate, plump, spindle-shaped, and multinucleated cells can be seen in the collagenous stroma. The collagen fibers around hair follicles are arranged concentrically, resulting in an onion skin-like appearance. The epidermal rete ridges can be effaced (Figure 1). Increased numbers of single-unit melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction can be seen in some cases. Immunohistochemically, a variable number of spindled and multinucleated cells in the dermis stain with factor XIIIa. There are at least 7 histologic variants of angiofibroma including hypercellular, pigmented, inflammatory, pleomorphic, clear cell, granular cell, and epithelioid.^9,14 

Palisaded encapsulated neuroma, also referred to as solitary circumscribed neuroma, was first described by Reed et al²¹ in 1972. It is a benign and solitary, firm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papule that occurs in middle-aged adults, predominately near mucocutaneous junctions of the face. Other locations include the oral mucosa, eyelid, nasal fossa, shoulder, arm, hand, foot, and glans penis.^22,23 Histopathologically, palisaded encapsulated neuroma demonstrates a solitary, well-circumscribed, partially encapsulated, intradermal nodule composed of interweaving fascicles of spindle cells with prominent clefts (Figure 3). Rarely, palisaded encapsulated neuroma may have a plexiform or multinodular architecture.²⁴ Immunohistochemically, tumor cells stain positively for S-100 protein, type IV collagen, and vimentin. The capsule, composed of perineural cells, stains positive for epithelial membrane antigen. A neurofilament stain will highlight axons within the tumor.^24,25 Currently, palisaded encapsulated neuroma does not have a well-established link to known neurocutaneous or inherited syndromes. Excision is curative with a low risk of recurrence.²⁶ 

Sclerotic fibromas (SFs) were first reported by Weary et al²⁷ as multiple tumors involving the tongues of patients with Cowden syndrome. Sporadic or solitary SFs of the skin in patients without Cowden syndrome have been reported, and both multiple and solitary SFs present with similar pathologic changes.^28-30 Clinically, the solitary variant manifests as a well-demarcated, flesh-colored to erythematous, waxy papule or nodule with no site or sex predilection.^30,31 Histologically, SF demonstrates a well-demarcated, nonencapsulated dermal nodule composed of hypocellular and sclerotic collagen bundles with scattered spindled cells and prominent clefts resembling Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night or plywood (Figure 4). Immunohistochemically, the spindled cells strongly express CD34. Factor XIIIa and markers of melanocytic, neural, and muscular differentiation are negative. When rendering a diagnosis in a patient with multiple SFs, a comment regarding the possibility of Cowden syndrome should be mentioned.³² 

The Diagnosis: Sclerosing Perineurioma 

Sclerosing perineurioma, first described in 1997 by Fetsch and Miettinen,¹ is a subtype of perineurioma with a strong predilection for the fingers and palms of young adults. Rare cases involving extra-acral sites including the forearm, elbow, axilla, back, neck, lower leg, thigh, knee, lips, nose, and mouth have been reported.^2-4 Perineurioma is a relatively uncommon and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor with exclusive perineurial differentiation.⁵ Perineurioma is divided into intraneural and extraneural types; the latter are further subclassified into soft tissue, sclerosing, reticular, and plexiform types. Other rare forms include the sclerosing, Pacinian corpuscle-like perineurioma, lipomatous perineurioma, perineurioma with xanthomatous areas, and perineurioma with granular cells.^6,7  

Clinically, sclerosing perineurioma usually presents as a solitary lesion; however, rare cases of multiple lesions have been reported.⁸ Our patient presented with a solitary papule on the nose. Histopathologically, sclerosing perineurioma demonstrates slender spindle cells in a whorled growth pattern (onion skin) embedded in a hyalinized, lamellar, and dense collagenous stroma with intervening cleftlike spaces. Immunohistochemically, the spindle cells of our case stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (quiz images). Other positive immunostains for perineurioma include claudin-1 and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Perineurioma lacks expression of S-100 but can express CD34.² As a benign tumor, the prognosis of sclerosing perineurioma is excellent. Complete local excision is considered curative.¹  

Angiofibroma, also known as fibrous papule, is a common and benign lesion located primarily on or in close proximity to the nose.⁹ Angiofibromas can be associated with genodermatoses such as tuberous sclerosis, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, or Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. When angiofibromas involve the penis, they are called pearly penile papules. Ungual angiofibroma, also known as Koenen tumor, occurs underneath the nail.^10-12 Both facial angiofibromas (>3) and ungual angiofibromas (>2) are independent major criteria for tuberous sclerosis.¹³ Clinically, angiofibroma presents as a small, dome-shaped, pink papule arising on the lower portion of the nose or nearby area of the central face. Histopathologically, angiofibromas classically demonstrate increased dilated vessels and fibrosis in the dermis. Stellate, plump, spindle-shaped, and multinucleated cells can be seen in the collagenous stroma. The collagen fibers around hair follicles are arranged concentrically, resulting in an onion skin-like appearance. The epidermal rete ridges can be effaced (Figure 1). Increased numbers of single-unit melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction can be seen in some cases. Immunohistochemically, a variable number of spindled and multinucleated cells in the dermis stain with factor XIIIa. There are at least 7 histologic variants of angiofibroma including hypercellular, pigmented, inflammatory, pleomorphic, clear cell, granular cell, and epithelioid.^9,14 

Palisaded encapsulated neuroma, also referred to as solitary circumscribed neuroma, was first described by Reed et al²¹ in 1972. It is a benign and solitary, firm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papule that occurs in middle-aged adults, predominately near mucocutaneous junctions of the face. Other locations include the oral mucosa, eyelid, nasal fossa, shoulder, arm, hand, foot, and glans penis.^22,23 Histopathologically, palisaded encapsulated neuroma demonstrates a solitary, well-circumscribed, partially encapsulated, intradermal nodule composed of interweaving fascicles of spindle cells with prominent clefts (Figure 3). Rarely, palisaded encapsulated neuroma may have a plexiform or multinodular architecture.²⁴ Immunohistochemically, tumor cells stain positively for S-100 protein, type IV collagen, and vimentin. The capsule, composed of perineural cells, stains positive for epithelial membrane antigen. A neurofilament stain will highlight axons within the tumor.^24,25 Currently, palisaded encapsulated neuroma does not have a well-established link to known neurocutaneous or inherited syndromes. Excision is curative with a low risk of recurrence.²⁶ 

Sclerotic fibromas (SFs) were first reported by Weary et al²⁷ as multiple tumors involving the tongues of patients with Cowden syndrome. Sporadic or solitary SFs of the skin in patients without Cowden syndrome have been reported, and both multiple and solitary SFs present with similar pathologic changes.^28-30 Clinically, the solitary variant manifests as a well-demarcated, flesh-colored to erythematous, waxy papule or nodule with no site or sex predilection.^30,31 Histologically, SF demonstrates a well-demarcated, nonencapsulated dermal nodule composed of hypocellular and sclerotic collagen bundles with scattered spindled cells and prominent clefts resembling Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night or plywood (Figure 4). Immunohistochemically, the spindled cells strongly express CD34. Factor XIIIa and markers of melanocytic, neural, and muscular differentiation are negative. When rendering a diagnosis in a patient with multiple SFs, a comment regarding the possibility of Cowden syndrome should be mentioned.³² 

The Diagnosis: Sclerosing Perineurioma 

Sclerosing perineurioma, first described in 1997 by Fetsch and Miettinen,¹ is a subtype of perineurioma with a strong predilection for the fingers and palms of young adults. Rare cases involving extra-acral sites including the forearm, elbow, axilla, back, neck, lower leg, thigh, knee, lips, nose, and mouth have been reported.^2-4 Perineurioma is a relatively uncommon and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor with exclusive perineurial differentiation.⁵ Perineurioma is divided into intraneural and extraneural types; the latter are further subclassified into soft tissue, sclerosing, reticular, and plexiform types. Other rare forms include the sclerosing, Pacinian corpuscle-like perineurioma, lipomatous perineurioma, perineurioma with xanthomatous areas, and perineurioma with granular cells.^6,7  

Clinically, sclerosing perineurioma usually presents as a solitary lesion; however, rare cases of multiple lesions have been reported.⁸ Our patient presented with a solitary papule on the nose. Histopathologically, sclerosing perineurioma demonstrates slender spindle cells in a whorled growth pattern (onion skin) embedded in a hyalinized, lamellar, and dense collagenous stroma with intervening cleftlike spaces. Immunohistochemically, the spindle cells of our case stained positive for epithelial membrane antigen (quiz images). Other positive immunostains for perineurioma include claudin-1 and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1). Perineurioma lacks expression of S-100 but can express CD34.² As a benign tumor, the prognosis of sclerosing perineurioma is excellent. Complete local excision is considered curative.¹  

Angiofibroma, also known as fibrous papule, is a common and benign lesion located primarily on or in close proximity to the nose.⁹ Angiofibromas can be associated with genodermatoses such as tuberous sclerosis, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, or Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. When angiofibromas involve the penis, they are called pearly penile papules. Ungual angiofibroma, also known as Koenen tumor, occurs underneath the nail.^10-12 Both facial angiofibromas (>3) and ungual angiofibromas (>2) are independent major criteria for tuberous sclerosis.¹³ Clinically, angiofibroma presents as a small, dome-shaped, pink papule arising on the lower portion of the nose or nearby area of the central face. Histopathologically, angiofibromas classically demonstrate increased dilated vessels and fibrosis in the dermis. Stellate, plump, spindle-shaped, and multinucleated cells can be seen in the collagenous stroma. The collagen fibers around hair follicles are arranged concentrically, resulting in an onion skin-like appearance. The epidermal rete ridges can be effaced (Figure 1). Increased numbers of single-unit melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction can be seen in some cases. Immunohistochemically, a variable number of spindled and multinucleated cells in the dermis stain with factor XIIIa. There are at least 7 histologic variants of angiofibroma including hypercellular, pigmented, inflammatory, pleomorphic, clear cell, granular cell, and epithelioid.^9,14 

Palisaded encapsulated neuroma, also referred to as solitary circumscribed neuroma, was first described by Reed et al²¹ in 1972. It is a benign and solitary, firm, dome-shaped, flesh-colored papule that occurs in middle-aged adults, predominately near mucocutaneous junctions of the face. Other locations include the oral mucosa, eyelid, nasal fossa, shoulder, arm, hand, foot, and glans penis.^22,23 Histopathologically, palisaded encapsulated neuroma demonstrates a solitary, well-circumscribed, partially encapsulated, intradermal nodule composed of interweaving fascicles of spindle cells with prominent clefts (Figure 3). Rarely, palisaded encapsulated neuroma may have a plexiform or multinodular architecture.²⁴ Immunohistochemically, tumor cells stain positively for S-100 protein, type IV collagen, and vimentin. The capsule, composed of perineural cells, stains positive for epithelial membrane antigen. A neurofilament stain will highlight axons within the tumor.^24,25 Currently, palisaded encapsulated neuroma does not have a well-established link to known neurocutaneous or inherited syndromes. Excision is curative with a low risk of recurrence.²⁶ 

Sclerotic fibromas (SFs) were first reported by Weary et al²⁷ as multiple tumors involving the tongues of patients with Cowden syndrome. Sporadic or solitary SFs of the skin in patients without Cowden syndrome have been reported, and both multiple and solitary SFs present with similar pathologic changes.^28-30 Clinically, the solitary variant manifests as a well-demarcated, flesh-colored to erythematous, waxy papule or nodule with no site or sex predilection.^30,31 Histologically, SF demonstrates a well-demarcated, nonencapsulated dermal nodule composed of hypocellular and sclerotic collagen bundles with scattered spindled cells and prominent clefts resembling Vincent van Gogh's Starry Night or plywood (Figure 4). Immunohistochemically, the spindled cells strongly express CD34. Factor XIIIa and markers of melanocytic, neural, and muscular differentiation are negative. When rendering a diagnosis in a patient with multiple SFs, a comment regarding the possibility of Cowden syndrome should be mentioned.³² 

Average out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s disease were more than 2.7 times higher than for enrollees overall in 2016, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Out-of-pocket spending for Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia was higher than any other chronic condition, averaging $14,913 in 2016 (the latest year for which data are available), compared with $5,460 for all beneficiaries in traditional Medicare, Kaiser investigators said in a recent report based on data for 5,369 respondents to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Those totals were divided between services – including long-term care facilities, medical providers and supplies, and prescription drugs – and premiums for Medicare and other types of supplemental insurance. The premium associated with Alzheimer’s, $1,643, was the lowest of any major chronic condition, but the average cost for services, $13,269, was almost twice as high as the next most expensive condition, Parkinson’s disease, and more than four times higher than the overall Medicare average, Juliette Cubanski, PhD, and associates said.

Out-of-pocket costs are higher for patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s because “these beneficiaries are more likely to reside in a long-term care facility than those with other conditions,” they said. In 2016, out-of-pocket spending on long-term care facility services averaged over $27,000 for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s and other dementia and over $28,000 for those with Parkinson’s disease. For all traditional Medicare beneficiaries, average out-of-pocket spending on such services was $1,014.

“The fact that traditional Medicare does not have an annual out-of-pocket limit and does not cover certain services that older adults are more likely to need may undermine the financial security that Medicare provides, especially for people with significant needs and limited incomes. Addressing these gaps would help to alleviate the financial burden of health care for people with Medicare, although doing so would also increase federal spending and taxes,” Dr. Cubanski and associates wrote.

[email protected]

Average out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s disease were more than 2.7 times higher than for enrollees overall in 2016, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Out-of-pocket spending for Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia was higher than any other chronic condition, averaging $14,913 in 2016 (the latest year for which data are available), compared with $5,460 for all beneficiaries in traditional Medicare, Kaiser investigators said in a recent report based on data for 5,369 respondents to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Those totals were divided between services – including long-term care facilities, medical providers and supplies, and prescription drugs – and premiums for Medicare and other types of supplemental insurance. The premium associated with Alzheimer’s, $1,643, was the lowest of any major chronic condition, but the average cost for services, $13,269, was almost twice as high as the next most expensive condition, Parkinson’s disease, and more than four times higher than the overall Medicare average, Juliette Cubanski, PhD, and associates said.

Out-of-pocket costs are higher for patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s because “these beneficiaries are more likely to reside in a long-term care facility than those with other conditions,” they said. In 2016, out-of-pocket spending on long-term care facility services averaged over $27,000 for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s and other dementia and over $28,000 for those with Parkinson’s disease. For all traditional Medicare beneficiaries, average out-of-pocket spending on such services was $1,014.

“The fact that traditional Medicare does not have an annual out-of-pocket limit and does not cover certain services that older adults are more likely to need may undermine the financial security that Medicare provides, especially for people with significant needs and limited incomes. Addressing these gaps would help to alleviate the financial burden of health care for people with Medicare, although doing so would also increase federal spending and taxes,” Dr. Cubanski and associates wrote.

[email protected]

Average out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s disease were more than 2.7 times higher than for enrollees overall in 2016, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Out-of-pocket spending for Alzheimer’s disease or other dementia was higher than any other chronic condition, averaging $14,913 in 2016 (the latest year for which data are available), compared with $5,460 for all beneficiaries in traditional Medicare, Kaiser investigators said in a recent report based on data for 5,369 respondents to the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey.

Those totals were divided between services – including long-term care facilities, medical providers and supplies, and prescription drugs – and premiums for Medicare and other types of supplemental insurance. The premium associated with Alzheimer’s, $1,643, was the lowest of any major chronic condition, but the average cost for services, $13,269, was almost twice as high as the next most expensive condition, Parkinson’s disease, and more than four times higher than the overall Medicare average, Juliette Cubanski, PhD, and associates said.

Out-of-pocket costs are higher for patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s because “these beneficiaries are more likely to reside in a long-term care facility than those with other conditions,” they said. In 2016, out-of-pocket spending on long-term care facility services averaged over $27,000 for Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer’s and other dementia and over $28,000 for those with Parkinson’s disease. For all traditional Medicare beneficiaries, average out-of-pocket spending on such services was $1,014.

“The fact that traditional Medicare does not have an annual out-of-pocket limit and does not cover certain services that older adults are more likely to need may undermine the financial security that Medicare provides, especially for people with significant needs and limited incomes. Addressing these gaps would help to alleviate the financial burden of health care for people with Medicare, although doing so would also increase federal spending and taxes,” Dr. Cubanski and associates wrote.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – New acne treatment options include a tetracycline antibiotic and a recently approved topical formulation of minocycline, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, who reviewed the data on these two therapies, as well as cannabidiol (CBD) and an androgen receptor antagonist, which are currently in clinical trials, at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

When considering antibiotic therapy for patients with moderate to severe acne, sarecycline, approved for that indication in October 2018, has improved anti-inflammatory properties and a narrower spectrum of activity, compared with other tetracycline-class antibiotics used for the condition, according to Dr. Stein Gold, director of dermatology research at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. In two identically designed, 12-week randomized trials, SC 1401 and SC1402, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of an approximate 1.5–mg/kg per day dose of sarecycline in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate to severe facial acne aged 9-45 years (J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Sept 1;17[9]:987-96). “We started to see separation in the inflammatory lesions as early as week 3, and a nice separation versus placebo over the course of 12 weeks,” said Dr. Stein Gold, one of the study investigators. “In all, 22% of patients got clear or almost clear with monotherapy. That’s fairly good.”

She noted that there was consistency in the reductions of lesion count achieved in both studies. Improvements were seen through to 12 weeks, with statistically significant reduction seen as early as 3 weeks in both studies. Sarecycline was also statistically superior to placebo at every time point studied in both trials.

In order to be judged a successful outcome, the subject had to have a 12-week Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score with a 2-point or greater decrease (improvement) from baseline score on the IGA in each location, for patients who have a baseline IGA of 2 or greater, and to be clear (0) or almost clear (1). The same IGA scale was used for the chest and back assessments as was used for facial acne; the researchers observed statistically significant improvements in IGA score for both chest and back acne across both studies at week 12.

Sarecycline also had a favorable safety profile, with no treatment-emergent vertigo or tinnitus adverse events, she noted. Treatment-emergent vestibular and phototoxic adverse events both occurred in fewer than 1% of sarecycline patients. Among females, rates of yeast infections were low. When she recommends a course of this drug for her patients, “I never overpromise,” she said. “I tell my acne patients, ‘We measure your success in weeks and months, not days.’ I always tell them, ‘Take a selfie today and take a selfie every few weeks. When you come back in, we’ll review your progress and see how things went.’ ”

Researchers have also been studying topical minocycline as a treatment option. Minocycline is a large molecule that Dr. Stein Gold characterized as being “very challenging” to deliver topically. “It’s also challenging to keep it stable in a topical formulation.” However, results from two identical phase 3 trials found 4% topical minocycline foam significantly reduced both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and improved IGA scores in patients with moderate to severe acne when treated daily for 12 weeks (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80[1]:168-77).

“This drug has an interesting vehicle,” said Dr. Stein Gold, who was one of the study investigators. “If you take the vehicle itself and you put it next to sebum, it causes sebum to melt at lower temperatures. Why does this matter? If you’re dissolving sebum, maybe you’re creating an easier pathway for the drug to get delivered into the skin and into the hair follicles. We don’t know all the details.” In the two trials, 15%-31% of patients achieved clearance or near clearance of all lesions. “How did it do in terms of decreasing papules and pustules? It did pretty well,” she said. “We want drugs to meet their match in everything that we do.” In terms of tolerability, skin-related adverse events were reported in fewer than 1% of subjects treated with 4% topical minocycline foam. She noted that by delivering minocycline topically, “we get huge concentrations in the skin, but almost negligible amounts in the systemic circulation, which is important. We want to keep [the drug] in the skin; we don’t want it in our system.”

(The Food and Drug Administration approved minocycline foam 4% in October 2019 for treating inflammatory lesions associated with non-nodular moderate to severe acne).

Another potential treatment on the horizon is cortexolone 17a-propionate, a novel androgen receptor antagonist that inhibits production of lipids and inflammatory cytokines from sebocytes in vitro. “When used around the sebaceous gland, we find that the amount of sebum produced goes down,” she said, noting that phase 3 trials of the agent have been completed.

“We also find that abnormal keratinization subsequently goes down. Just putting this on the skin significantly reduced acne as monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe acne. We were able to get them to clear or almost clear. It worked on comedones, papules, and pustules. Hopefully, it will get FDA approval. This fills the one unmet need we haven’t had topically in terms of decreasing sebum production.”

Clinical trials of CBD are also under way for acne and atopic dermatitis. “It could work for acne because there are some studies showing that might work on sebaceous glands to decrease sebum production,” she said. “CBD has been shown to have positive effects on abnormal keratinization, and it has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Maybe we’ll have another mechanism of action for acne.”

Dr. Gold disclosed that she is on the speakers bureau for Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Regeneron. She is a consultant for Dermavant, Foamix, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, and holds stock/stock options in AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Foamix, Galderma, Incyte, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sol-Gel.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – New acne treatment options include a tetracycline antibiotic and a recently approved topical formulation of minocycline, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, who reviewed the data on these two therapies, as well as cannabidiol (CBD) and an androgen receptor antagonist, which are currently in clinical trials, at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

When considering antibiotic therapy for patients with moderate to severe acne, sarecycline, approved for that indication in October 2018, has improved anti-inflammatory properties and a narrower spectrum of activity, compared with other tetracycline-class antibiotics used for the condition, according to Dr. Stein Gold, director of dermatology research at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. In two identically designed, 12-week randomized trials, SC 1401 and SC1402, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of an approximate 1.5–mg/kg per day dose of sarecycline in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate to severe facial acne aged 9-45 years (J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Sept 1;17[9]:987-96). “We started to see separation in the inflammatory lesions as early as week 3, and a nice separation versus placebo over the course of 12 weeks,” said Dr. Stein Gold, one of the study investigators. “In all, 22% of patients got clear or almost clear with monotherapy. That’s fairly good.”

She noted that there was consistency in the reductions of lesion count achieved in both studies. Improvements were seen through to 12 weeks, with statistically significant reduction seen as early as 3 weeks in both studies. Sarecycline was also statistically superior to placebo at every time point studied in both trials.

In order to be judged a successful outcome, the subject had to have a 12-week Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score with a 2-point or greater decrease (improvement) from baseline score on the IGA in each location, for patients who have a baseline IGA of 2 or greater, and to be clear (0) or almost clear (1). The same IGA scale was used for the chest and back assessments as was used for facial acne; the researchers observed statistically significant improvements in IGA score for both chest and back acne across both studies at week 12.

Sarecycline also had a favorable safety profile, with no treatment-emergent vertigo or tinnitus adverse events, she noted. Treatment-emergent vestibular and phototoxic adverse events both occurred in fewer than 1% of sarecycline patients. Among females, rates of yeast infections were low. When she recommends a course of this drug for her patients, “I never overpromise,” she said. “I tell my acne patients, ‘We measure your success in weeks and months, not days.’ I always tell them, ‘Take a selfie today and take a selfie every few weeks. When you come back in, we’ll review your progress and see how things went.’ ”

Researchers have also been studying topical minocycline as a treatment option. Minocycline is a large molecule that Dr. Stein Gold characterized as being “very challenging” to deliver topically. “It’s also challenging to keep it stable in a topical formulation.” However, results from two identical phase 3 trials found 4% topical minocycline foam significantly reduced both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and improved IGA scores in patients with moderate to severe acne when treated daily for 12 weeks (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80[1]:168-77).

“This drug has an interesting vehicle,” said Dr. Stein Gold, who was one of the study investigators. “If you take the vehicle itself and you put it next to sebum, it causes sebum to melt at lower temperatures. Why does this matter? If you’re dissolving sebum, maybe you’re creating an easier pathway for the drug to get delivered into the skin and into the hair follicles. We don’t know all the details.” In the two trials, 15%-31% of patients achieved clearance or near clearance of all lesions. “How did it do in terms of decreasing papules and pustules? It did pretty well,” she said. “We want drugs to meet their match in everything that we do.” In terms of tolerability, skin-related adverse events were reported in fewer than 1% of subjects treated with 4% topical minocycline foam. She noted that by delivering minocycline topically, “we get huge concentrations in the skin, but almost negligible amounts in the systemic circulation, which is important. We want to keep [the drug] in the skin; we don’t want it in our system.”

(The Food and Drug Administration approved minocycline foam 4% in October 2019 for treating inflammatory lesions associated with non-nodular moderate to severe acne).

Another potential treatment on the horizon is cortexolone 17a-propionate, a novel androgen receptor antagonist that inhibits production of lipids and inflammatory cytokines from sebocytes in vitro. “When used around the sebaceous gland, we find that the amount of sebum produced goes down,” she said, noting that phase 3 trials of the agent have been completed.

“We also find that abnormal keratinization subsequently goes down. Just putting this on the skin significantly reduced acne as monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe acne. We were able to get them to clear or almost clear. It worked on comedones, papules, and pustules. Hopefully, it will get FDA approval. This fills the one unmet need we haven’t had topically in terms of decreasing sebum production.”

Clinical trials of CBD are also under way for acne and atopic dermatitis. “It could work for acne because there are some studies showing that might work on sebaceous glands to decrease sebum production,” she said. “CBD has been shown to have positive effects on abnormal keratinization, and it has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Maybe we’ll have another mechanism of action for acne.”

Dr. Gold disclosed that she is on the speakers bureau for Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Regeneron. She is a consultant for Dermavant, Foamix, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, and holds stock/stock options in AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Foamix, Galderma, Incyte, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sol-Gel.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

LAS VEGAS – New acne treatment options include a tetracycline antibiotic and a recently approved topical formulation of minocycline, according to Linda Stein Gold, MD, who reviewed the data on these two therapies, as well as cannabidiol (CBD) and an androgen receptor antagonist, which are currently in clinical trials, at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

When considering antibiotic therapy for patients with moderate to severe acne, sarecycline, approved for that indication in October 2018, has improved anti-inflammatory properties and a narrower spectrum of activity, compared with other tetracycline-class antibiotics used for the condition, according to Dr. Stein Gold, director of dermatology research at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. In two identically designed, 12-week randomized trials, SC 1401 and SC1402, researchers evaluated the efficacy and safety of an approximate 1.5–mg/kg per day dose of sarecycline in comparison with placebo in patients with moderate to severe facial acne aged 9-45 years (J Drugs Dermatol. 2018 Sept 1;17[9]:987-96). “We started to see separation in the inflammatory lesions as early as week 3, and a nice separation versus placebo over the course of 12 weeks,” said Dr. Stein Gold, one of the study investigators. “In all, 22% of patients got clear or almost clear with monotherapy. That’s fairly good.”

She noted that there was consistency in the reductions of lesion count achieved in both studies. Improvements were seen through to 12 weeks, with statistically significant reduction seen as early as 3 weeks in both studies. Sarecycline was also statistically superior to placebo at every time point studied in both trials.

In order to be judged a successful outcome, the subject had to have a 12-week Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score with a 2-point or greater decrease (improvement) from baseline score on the IGA in each location, for patients who have a baseline IGA of 2 or greater, and to be clear (0) or almost clear (1). The same IGA scale was used for the chest and back assessments as was used for facial acne; the researchers observed statistically significant improvements in IGA score for both chest and back acne across both studies at week 12.

Sarecycline also had a favorable safety profile, with no treatment-emergent vertigo or tinnitus adverse events, she noted. Treatment-emergent vestibular and phototoxic adverse events both occurred in fewer than 1% of sarecycline patients. Among females, rates of yeast infections were low. When she recommends a course of this drug for her patients, “I never overpromise,” she said. “I tell my acne patients, ‘We measure your success in weeks and months, not days.’ I always tell them, ‘Take a selfie today and take a selfie every few weeks. When you come back in, we’ll review your progress and see how things went.’ ”

Researchers have also been studying topical minocycline as a treatment option. Minocycline is a large molecule that Dr. Stein Gold characterized as being “very challenging” to deliver topically. “It’s also challenging to keep it stable in a topical formulation.” However, results from two identical phase 3 trials found 4% topical minocycline foam significantly reduced both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and improved IGA scores in patients with moderate to severe acne when treated daily for 12 weeks (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80[1]:168-77).

“This drug has an interesting vehicle,” said Dr. Stein Gold, who was one of the study investigators. “If you take the vehicle itself and you put it next to sebum, it causes sebum to melt at lower temperatures. Why does this matter? If you’re dissolving sebum, maybe you’re creating an easier pathway for the drug to get delivered into the skin and into the hair follicles. We don’t know all the details.” In the two trials, 15%-31% of patients achieved clearance or near clearance of all lesions. “How did it do in terms of decreasing papules and pustules? It did pretty well,” she said. “We want drugs to meet their match in everything that we do.” In terms of tolerability, skin-related adverse events were reported in fewer than 1% of subjects treated with 4% topical minocycline foam. She noted that by delivering minocycline topically, “we get huge concentrations in the skin, but almost negligible amounts in the systemic circulation, which is important. We want to keep [the drug] in the skin; we don’t want it in our system.”

(The Food and Drug Administration approved minocycline foam 4% in October 2019 for treating inflammatory lesions associated with non-nodular moderate to severe acne).

Another potential treatment on the horizon is cortexolone 17a-propionate, a novel androgen receptor antagonist that inhibits production of lipids and inflammatory cytokines from sebocytes in vitro. “When used around the sebaceous gland, we find that the amount of sebum produced goes down,” she said, noting that phase 3 trials of the agent have been completed.

“We also find that abnormal keratinization subsequently goes down. Just putting this on the skin significantly reduced acne as monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe acne. We were able to get them to clear or almost clear. It worked on comedones, papules, and pustules. Hopefully, it will get FDA approval. This fills the one unmet need we haven’t had topically in terms of decreasing sebum production.”

Clinical trials of CBD are also under way for acne and atopic dermatitis. “It could work for acne because there are some studies showing that might work on sebaceous glands to decrease sebum production,” she said. “CBD has been shown to have positive effects on abnormal keratinization, and it has been shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Maybe we’ll have another mechanism of action for acne.”

Dr. Gold disclosed that she is on the speakers bureau for Almirall, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Regeneron. She is a consultant for Dermavant, Foamix, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, and holds stock/stock options in AbbVie, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Foamix, Galderma, Incyte, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer, and Sol-Gel.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

[email protected]

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

Taking daily aspirin may help keep nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from progressing to liver fibrosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), suggest the results of a prospective study of 361 adults.

Previously, preclinical evidence had linked aspirin to fibrogenesis prevention in fatty liver disease, but this is the first report of a prospective study to do so. Daily aspirin use “was associated with less severe histologic features of NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) at study enrollment and with significantly lower risk for advanced fibrosis over time in a duration-dependent manner,” wrote Tracey G. Simon, MD, MPH, and her associates. Their report is in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The study comprised 361 adults with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD who were enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital NAFLD Repository between 2006 and 2015. At baseline, 151 individuals were already on daily aspirin, usually to reduce the primary (54%) or secondary (30%) risk of cardiovascular disease. Median duration of aspirin use was 2.5 years. After a median 7.4 years of follow-up (which was similar between aspirin users and nonusers), daily aspirin use was associated with significantly lower odds of NASH (adjusted odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.89) and fibrosis (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).

The researchers did not find a similar protective effect for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin (adjusted hazard ratio for advanced fibrosis, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81–1.05). This might be because of differences between how aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs affect COX isoforms – aspirin does so irreversibly, while other NSAIDs have a reversible effect, they added. “Nonaspirin NSAIDs also disrupt the intestinal barrier, increasing delivery of proinflammatory cytokines to the liver,” they wrote. “Finally, aspirin uniquely modulates bioactive lipids by stimulating the biosynthesis of pro-resolving mediators and inhibiting proinflammatory lipids, which in turn may prevent progressive liver damage.”

In this study, a single blinded hepatopathologist interpreted baseline liver biopsy specimens, and patients were followed every 3-6 months with clinical examinations and serial calculations of FIB-4, NFS, and APRI scores. All patients were followed for at least a year. Patients were classified as users of nonaspirin NSAIDs if they reported using an NSAID besides aspirin at least twice weekly, or if they had been prescribed drugs such as ibuprofen, naproxen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, or indomethacin.

In a longitudinal analysis of the 317 patients who had early-stage (F0-2) fibrosis at baseline, 86 developed new-onset advanced fibrosis over a median of 3,692 person-years, the researchers said. In all, 26 individuals developed hepatic decompensation and 18 patients died, including eight from liver-related causes. Importantly, the link between aspirin and decreased risk of fibrosis progression seemed to depend on duration of use (adjusted P trend = .026), with the greatest benefit seen with 4 years or more of use (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.73). Although subgroup analyses were limited by lack of power, daily aspirin use was associated with a 36% lower odds of incident advanced fibrosis among the 72 study participants who had paired biopsy samples, even after accounting for the effect of age, sex, baseline fibrosis stage, and time between biopsies (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.80).

“Our findings add to the growing literature supporting the potential hepatoprotective effects of aspirin in NAFLD,” the researchers concluded. “Research to uncover the mechanisms by which aspirin might prevent fibrogenesis could help develop urgently needed antifibrotic therapies for NAFLD.”

Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the AASLD Foundation. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Simon TG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May 8.

Strong feelings – such as intense anxiety, irritability, or depressed mood – may affect every child for brief periods of time during their development. Parents and pediatricians are wise to not treat them as psychiatric disorders unless they persist for weeks, impair functioning, or are dramatically severe. Psychosis – marked by hallucinations, perceptual distortions, or profoundly disorganized thinking and behavior – typically looks dramatically severe. Even when psychotic symptoms are mild or brief, they can cause very serious distress for parents and clinicians. The worry is that they may represent a “first break,” a psychotic episode that requires much work for recovery, or the beginning of a lifelong struggle with schizophrenia or other chronic psychotic illness.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

While it is important to recognize schizophrenia early – because early interventions are thought to improve the course of the disease – schizophrenia in childhood is rare. It is not commonly recognized that psychotic or psychoticlike symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia. In childhood, psychosis is three times more common than in adults, and can indicate a number of different psychiatric or medical problems. While it is important to begin a thoughtful evaluation when a child or teenager presents with psychosis, it also is important to know that the majority of young people who experience psychotic symptoms do not have schizophrenia or other psychotic illness.

Psychosis describes symptoms in which there has been some “break with reality,” often in the form of hallucinations (seeing or hearing things which are not objectively present) or of distorted perceptions (such as paranoia or grandiosity). “Subsyndromal psychotic symptoms” occur when a person experiences these perceptual disturbances but has doubt about whether or not they are real. In frank psychosis, patients have a “fixed and firm” belief in the truth or accuracy of their perceptions, no matter the evidence against them. The voices they hear or hallucinations they see are “real” and there is a wholehearted belief that what the voice says or what they are seeing is as true as what you or I see and hear.

Schizophrenia is a diagnosis that requires the presence of both these “positive” psychotic symptoms and “negative” symptoms of flat affect; loss of motivation, social, or motor abilities; and cognitive impairment. These symptoms typically emerge in late adolescence (median age, 18 years) in males and early adulthood (median age, 25 years) in females, with another (smaller) peak in incidence in middle age. Importantly, the negative symptoms often emerge first so there often is a history of subtle cognitive decline and social withdrawal, one of the most common patterns in children, before psychosis emerges. Schizophrenia is quite rare, with a prevalence of slightly under 1% of the global population, an annual incidence of approximately 15 people per 100,000, and 1 in 40,000 in children under 13 years old, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. Psychotic symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia, affecting approximately 5% of the adult population at any point in time. They are even more common in children and adolescents. A meta-analysis of population-based studies of psychotic symptoms in youth demonstrated a median prevalence of 17% in children aged 9-12 years and 7.5% in adolescents aged 13-18 years.¹ Of course, as with all statistics, much depends on the definitions used to identify this high prevalence rate.

Children and adolescents who report psychotic symptoms are at increased risk for developing schizophrenia, compared with the general population, but most youth with psychotic symptoms will not go on to develop schizophrenia. They are more likely to indicate other, nonpsychotic psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety or mood disorders, including depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and PTSD. In younger children, these symptoms may prove to be benign, but in adolescents they usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness. In one study, 57% of children aged 11-13 years with psychotic symptoms were found to have a nonpsychotic psychiatric illness, but the rate jumped to 80% for those aged 13-15 years with psychotic symptoms.² So while psychosis in teenagers only rarely indicates schizophrenia, these symptoms usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness, and a psychiatric evaluation should be initiated.

If a child in your practice presents with psychotic symptoms, it is appropriate to assess their safety and then start a medical work-up. Find out from your patient or their parents if their behavior has been affected by their perceptual disturbances. Are they frightened and avoiding school? Are they withdrawing from social relationships? Is their sleep disrupted? Have they been more impulsive or unpredictable? If their behavior has been affected, you should refer to a child psychiatrist to perform a full diagnostic evaluation and help with management of these symptoms.

Your medical work-up should include a drug screen, blood count, metabolic panel, and thyroid function test. Medications, particularly stimulants, steroids, and anticholinergics can cause psychotic symptoms in high doses or vulnerable patients (such as those with a developmental disorder or traumatic brain injury). If the physical or neurologic exam are suggestive, further investigation of the many potential medical sources of psychotic symptoms in youth can be pursued to rule out autoimmune illnesses, endocrine disorders, metabolic illnesses, heavy metal poisoning, neurologic diseases, infectious diseases, and nutritional deficits. It is worth noting that childhood sleep disorders also can present with psychosis. Persistent psychotic symptoms in children are very hard to evaluate and may be the harbinger of a serious psychiatric disorder, so even if the medical work-up is negative and the persistent symptoms are mild and not causing a safety concern, a referral to a child psychiatrist for a full mental health evaluation is appropriate.

Psychotic symptoms in an adolescent sometimes are easier to assess, more worrisome for serious mental illness, and are a high-risk category for self-destructive behavior and substance use. Before you begin a medical work-up, you always should assess for safety, including suicide risk, if your adolescent patient presents with psychotic symptoms. Screening for symptoms of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders also can help reveal the nature of their presenting problem. If your adolescent patient is using drugs, that does not rule out the possibility of an underlying mood, anxiety, or thought disorder. While intoxication with many drugs may precipitate psychotic symptoms (including stimulants, hallucinogens, and marijuana), others may precipitate psychosis in withdrawal states (alcohol, benzodiazepines, and other CNS depressants). It also is important to note that adolescents with emerging schizophrenia have very high rates of comorbid substance abuse (as high as 60%), so their drug use may not be the cause of their psychotic symptoms. There also is emerging evidence that use of certain drugs during sensitive developmental periods can significantly increase the likelihood of developing schizophrenia in vulnerable populations, such as with regular marijuana use in adolescents who have a family history of schizophrenia.

For those rare pediatric patients who present with both negative and positive symptoms of emerging schizophrenia, early diagnosis and treatment has shown promise in improving the course of the disease. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis has shown promise in lowering the rates of conversion to schizophrenia in select patient populations. This therapy teaches strategies for improving reality testing, cognitive flexibility, and social skills. The social skills appear to be especially important for improving adaptive function, even in those patients who progress to schizophrenia. Family therapies, focused on improving family cohesion, communication, and adaptive functioning, appear to improve family well-being and the course of the patient’s illness (such as fewer and less severe psychotic episodes and improved mood and adaptive function). Early use of antipsychotic medications also appears to improve the course of the illness.

While schizophrenia is not curable, early detection (perhaps by a pediatrician), referral, and treatment can be powerfully protective for patients and their families.
 

Dr. Swick is physician in chief at Ohana, Center for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health, Community Hospital of the Monterey (Calif.) Peninsula. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

References

1. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1857-63.

2. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;201(1):26-32.

Strong feelings – such as intense anxiety, irritability, or depressed mood – may affect every child for brief periods of time during their development. Parents and pediatricians are wise to not treat them as psychiatric disorders unless they persist for weeks, impair functioning, or are dramatically severe. Psychosis – marked by hallucinations, perceptual distortions, or profoundly disorganized thinking and behavior – typically looks dramatically severe. Even when psychotic symptoms are mild or brief, they can cause very serious distress for parents and clinicians. The worry is that they may represent a “first break,” a psychotic episode that requires much work for recovery, or the beginning of a lifelong struggle with schizophrenia or other chronic psychotic illness.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

While it is important to recognize schizophrenia early – because early interventions are thought to improve the course of the disease – schizophrenia in childhood is rare. It is not commonly recognized that psychotic or psychoticlike symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia. In childhood, psychosis is three times more common than in adults, and can indicate a number of different psychiatric or medical problems. While it is important to begin a thoughtful evaluation when a child or teenager presents with psychosis, it also is important to know that the majority of young people who experience psychotic symptoms do not have schizophrenia or other psychotic illness.

Psychosis describes symptoms in which there has been some “break with reality,” often in the form of hallucinations (seeing or hearing things which are not objectively present) or of distorted perceptions (such as paranoia or grandiosity). “Subsyndromal psychotic symptoms” occur when a person experiences these perceptual disturbances but has doubt about whether or not they are real. In frank psychosis, patients have a “fixed and firm” belief in the truth or accuracy of their perceptions, no matter the evidence against them. The voices they hear or hallucinations they see are “real” and there is a wholehearted belief that what the voice says or what they are seeing is as true as what you or I see and hear.

Schizophrenia is a diagnosis that requires the presence of both these “positive” psychotic symptoms and “negative” symptoms of flat affect; loss of motivation, social, or motor abilities; and cognitive impairment. These symptoms typically emerge in late adolescence (median age, 18 years) in males and early adulthood (median age, 25 years) in females, with another (smaller) peak in incidence in middle age. Importantly, the negative symptoms often emerge first so there often is a history of subtle cognitive decline and social withdrawal, one of the most common patterns in children, before psychosis emerges. Schizophrenia is quite rare, with a prevalence of slightly under 1% of the global population, an annual incidence of approximately 15 people per 100,000, and 1 in 40,000 in children under 13 years old, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. Psychotic symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia, affecting approximately 5% of the adult population at any point in time. They are even more common in children and adolescents. A meta-analysis of population-based studies of psychotic symptoms in youth demonstrated a median prevalence of 17% in children aged 9-12 years and 7.5% in adolescents aged 13-18 years.¹ Of course, as with all statistics, much depends on the definitions used to identify this high prevalence rate.

Children and adolescents who report psychotic symptoms are at increased risk for developing schizophrenia, compared with the general population, but most youth with psychotic symptoms will not go on to develop schizophrenia. They are more likely to indicate other, nonpsychotic psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety or mood disorders, including depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and PTSD. In younger children, these symptoms may prove to be benign, but in adolescents they usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness. In one study, 57% of children aged 11-13 years with psychotic symptoms were found to have a nonpsychotic psychiatric illness, but the rate jumped to 80% for those aged 13-15 years with psychotic symptoms.² So while psychosis in teenagers only rarely indicates schizophrenia, these symptoms usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness, and a psychiatric evaluation should be initiated.

If a child in your practice presents with psychotic symptoms, it is appropriate to assess their safety and then start a medical work-up. Find out from your patient or their parents if their behavior has been affected by their perceptual disturbances. Are they frightened and avoiding school? Are they withdrawing from social relationships? Is their sleep disrupted? Have they been more impulsive or unpredictable? If their behavior has been affected, you should refer to a child psychiatrist to perform a full diagnostic evaluation and help with management of these symptoms.

Your medical work-up should include a drug screen, blood count, metabolic panel, and thyroid function test. Medications, particularly stimulants, steroids, and anticholinergics can cause psychotic symptoms in high doses or vulnerable patients (such as those with a developmental disorder or traumatic brain injury). If the physical or neurologic exam are suggestive, further investigation of the many potential medical sources of psychotic symptoms in youth can be pursued to rule out autoimmune illnesses, endocrine disorders, metabolic illnesses, heavy metal poisoning, neurologic diseases, infectious diseases, and nutritional deficits. It is worth noting that childhood sleep disorders also can present with psychosis. Persistent psychotic symptoms in children are very hard to evaluate and may be the harbinger of a serious psychiatric disorder, so even if the medical work-up is negative and the persistent symptoms are mild and not causing a safety concern, a referral to a child psychiatrist for a full mental health evaluation is appropriate.

Psychotic symptoms in an adolescent sometimes are easier to assess, more worrisome for serious mental illness, and are a high-risk category for self-destructive behavior and substance use. Before you begin a medical work-up, you always should assess for safety, including suicide risk, if your adolescent patient presents with psychotic symptoms. Screening for symptoms of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders also can help reveal the nature of their presenting problem. If your adolescent patient is using drugs, that does not rule out the possibility of an underlying mood, anxiety, or thought disorder. While intoxication with many drugs may precipitate psychotic symptoms (including stimulants, hallucinogens, and marijuana), others may precipitate psychosis in withdrawal states (alcohol, benzodiazepines, and other CNS depressants). It also is important to note that adolescents with emerging schizophrenia have very high rates of comorbid substance abuse (as high as 60%), so their drug use may not be the cause of their psychotic symptoms. There also is emerging evidence that use of certain drugs during sensitive developmental periods can significantly increase the likelihood of developing schizophrenia in vulnerable populations, such as with regular marijuana use in adolescents who have a family history of schizophrenia.

For those rare pediatric patients who present with both negative and positive symptoms of emerging schizophrenia, early diagnosis and treatment has shown promise in improving the course of the disease. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis has shown promise in lowering the rates of conversion to schizophrenia in select patient populations. This therapy teaches strategies for improving reality testing, cognitive flexibility, and social skills. The social skills appear to be especially important for improving adaptive function, even in those patients who progress to schizophrenia. Family therapies, focused on improving family cohesion, communication, and adaptive functioning, appear to improve family well-being and the course of the patient’s illness (such as fewer and less severe psychotic episodes and improved mood and adaptive function). Early use of antipsychotic medications also appears to improve the course of the illness.

While schizophrenia is not curable, early detection (perhaps by a pediatrician), referral, and treatment can be powerfully protective for patients and their families.
 

Dr. Swick is physician in chief at Ohana, Center for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health, Community Hospital of the Monterey (Calif.) Peninsula. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

References

1. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1857-63.

2. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;201(1):26-32.

Strong feelings – such as intense anxiety, irritability, or depressed mood – may affect every child for brief periods of time during their development. Parents and pediatricians are wise to not treat them as psychiatric disorders unless they persist for weeks, impair functioning, or are dramatically severe. Psychosis – marked by hallucinations, perceptual distortions, or profoundly disorganized thinking and behavior – typically looks dramatically severe. Even when psychotic symptoms are mild or brief, they can cause very serious distress for parents and clinicians. The worry is that they may represent a “first break,” a psychotic episode that requires much work for recovery, or the beginning of a lifelong struggle with schizophrenia or other chronic psychotic illness.

KatarzynaBialasiewicz/iStock/Getty Images Plus

While it is important to recognize schizophrenia early – because early interventions are thought to improve the course of the disease – schizophrenia in childhood is rare. It is not commonly recognized that psychotic or psychoticlike symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia. In childhood, psychosis is three times more common than in adults, and can indicate a number of different psychiatric or medical problems. While it is important to begin a thoughtful evaluation when a child or teenager presents with psychosis, it also is important to know that the majority of young people who experience psychotic symptoms do not have schizophrenia or other psychotic illness.

Psychosis describes symptoms in which there has been some “break with reality,” often in the form of hallucinations (seeing or hearing things which are not objectively present) or of distorted perceptions (such as paranoia or grandiosity). “Subsyndromal psychotic symptoms” occur when a person experiences these perceptual disturbances but has doubt about whether or not they are real. In frank psychosis, patients have a “fixed and firm” belief in the truth or accuracy of their perceptions, no matter the evidence against them. The voices they hear or hallucinations they see are “real” and there is a wholehearted belief that what the voice says or what they are seeing is as true as what you or I see and hear.

Schizophrenia is a diagnosis that requires the presence of both these “positive” psychotic symptoms and “negative” symptoms of flat affect; loss of motivation, social, or motor abilities; and cognitive impairment. These symptoms typically emerge in late adolescence (median age, 18 years) in males and early adulthood (median age, 25 years) in females, with another (smaller) peak in incidence in middle age. Importantly, the negative symptoms often emerge first so there often is a history of subtle cognitive decline and social withdrawal, one of the most common patterns in children, before psychosis emerges. Schizophrenia is quite rare, with a prevalence of slightly under 1% of the global population, an annual incidence of approximately 15 people per 100,000, and 1 in 40,000 in children under 13 years old, according to the National Institute of Mental Health. Psychotic symptoms are much more common than schizophrenia, affecting approximately 5% of the adult population at any point in time. They are even more common in children and adolescents. A meta-analysis of population-based studies of psychotic symptoms in youth demonstrated a median prevalence of 17% in children aged 9-12 years and 7.5% in adolescents aged 13-18 years.¹ Of course, as with all statistics, much depends on the definitions used to identify this high prevalence rate.

Children and adolescents who report psychotic symptoms are at increased risk for developing schizophrenia, compared with the general population, but most youth with psychotic symptoms will not go on to develop schizophrenia. They are more likely to indicate other, nonpsychotic psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety or mood disorders, including depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and PTSD. In younger children, these symptoms may prove to be benign, but in adolescents they usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness. In one study, 57% of children aged 11-13 years with psychotic symptoms were found to have a nonpsychotic psychiatric illness, but the rate jumped to 80% for those aged 13-15 years with psychotic symptoms.² So while psychosis in teenagers only rarely indicates schizophrenia, these symptoms usually indicate the presence of a psychiatric illness, and a psychiatric evaluation should be initiated.

If a child in your practice presents with psychotic symptoms, it is appropriate to assess their safety and then start a medical work-up. Find out from your patient or their parents if their behavior has been affected by their perceptual disturbances. Are they frightened and avoiding school? Are they withdrawing from social relationships? Is their sleep disrupted? Have they been more impulsive or unpredictable? If their behavior has been affected, you should refer to a child psychiatrist to perform a full diagnostic evaluation and help with management of these symptoms.

Your medical work-up should include a drug screen, blood count, metabolic panel, and thyroid function test. Medications, particularly stimulants, steroids, and anticholinergics can cause psychotic symptoms in high doses or vulnerable patients (such as those with a developmental disorder or traumatic brain injury). If the physical or neurologic exam are suggestive, further investigation of the many potential medical sources of psychotic symptoms in youth can be pursued to rule out autoimmune illnesses, endocrine disorders, metabolic illnesses, heavy metal poisoning, neurologic diseases, infectious diseases, and nutritional deficits. It is worth noting that childhood sleep disorders also can present with psychosis. Persistent psychotic symptoms in children are very hard to evaluate and may be the harbinger of a serious psychiatric disorder, so even if the medical work-up is negative and the persistent symptoms are mild and not causing a safety concern, a referral to a child psychiatrist for a full mental health evaluation is appropriate.

Psychotic symptoms in an adolescent sometimes are easier to assess, more worrisome for serious mental illness, and are a high-risk category for self-destructive behavior and substance use. Before you begin a medical work-up, you always should assess for safety, including suicide risk, if your adolescent patient presents with psychotic symptoms. Screening for symptoms of mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders also can help reveal the nature of their presenting problem. If your adolescent patient is using drugs, that does not rule out the possibility of an underlying mood, anxiety, or thought disorder. While intoxication with many drugs may precipitate psychotic symptoms (including stimulants, hallucinogens, and marijuana), others may precipitate psychosis in withdrawal states (alcohol, benzodiazepines, and other CNS depressants). It also is important to note that adolescents with emerging schizophrenia have very high rates of comorbid substance abuse (as high as 60%), so their drug use may not be the cause of their psychotic symptoms. There also is emerging evidence that use of certain drugs during sensitive developmental periods can significantly increase the likelihood of developing schizophrenia in vulnerable populations, such as with regular marijuana use in adolescents who have a family history of schizophrenia.

For those rare pediatric patients who present with both negative and positive symptoms of emerging schizophrenia, early diagnosis and treatment has shown promise in improving the course of the disease. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis has shown promise in lowering the rates of conversion to schizophrenia in select patient populations. This therapy teaches strategies for improving reality testing, cognitive flexibility, and social skills. The social skills appear to be especially important for improving adaptive function, even in those patients who progress to schizophrenia. Family therapies, focused on improving family cohesion, communication, and adaptive functioning, appear to improve family well-being and the course of the patient’s illness (such as fewer and less severe psychotic episodes and improved mood and adaptive function). Early use of antipsychotic medications also appears to improve the course of the illness.

While schizophrenia is not curable, early detection (perhaps by a pediatrician), referral, and treatment can be powerfully protective for patients and their families.
 

Dr. Swick is physician in chief at Ohana, Center for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health, Community Hospital of the Monterey (Calif.) Peninsula. Dr. Jellinek is professor emeritus of psychiatry and pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Email them at [email protected].

References

1. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1857-63.

2. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;201(1):26-32.

BARCELONA – A progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention improved the android:gynoid fat ratio (AGFR) in breast cancer survivors, which could provide important health benefits.

AGFR is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in breast cancer survivors, therefore exercise-induced AGFR improvement may reduce the risk for such comorbid conditions, Christina Dieli-Conwright, PhD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, and colleagues reported in a poster at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.

A significant decrease in AGFR from baseline was noted in 50 survivors of stage I-III breast cancer who participated in the exercise intervention, compared with 50 such survivors randomized to a usual care group (P less than .001), and strong correlations were found between AGFR and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; r = 0.95; P less than .01), the investigators found.

Study participants had a mean age of 53 years, 54% were overweight (body mass index greater than 25 kg/m²), 63% were Hispanic, 90% had undergone a mastectomy, and 76% received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Adherence to the intervention, which involved three weekly sessions of supervised, progressive, moderate-to-vigorous aerobic and resistance exercise for 16 weeks, was 95%.

AGFR was calculated using whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and HOMA-IR was calculated using fasting insulin and glucose levels.

“Exercise reduces fat mass in breast cancer survivors, however, few studies have focused on AGFR,” the investigators wrote.

The findings of the current study suggest that a progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention is an effective strategy for decreasing AGFR in breast cancer survivors, they concluded.

The National Cancer Institute funded the study. The authors reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Dieli-Conwright C et al. ESMO 2019, Abstract 228P.

BARCELONA – A progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention improved the android:gynoid fat ratio (AGFR) in breast cancer survivors, which could provide important health benefits.

AGFR is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in breast cancer survivors, therefore exercise-induced AGFR improvement may reduce the risk for such comorbid conditions, Christina Dieli-Conwright, PhD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, and colleagues reported in a poster at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.

A significant decrease in AGFR from baseline was noted in 50 survivors of stage I-III breast cancer who participated in the exercise intervention, compared with 50 such survivors randomized to a usual care group (P less than .001), and strong correlations were found between AGFR and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; r = 0.95; P less than .01), the investigators found.

Study participants had a mean age of 53 years, 54% were overweight (body mass index greater than 25 kg/m²), 63% were Hispanic, 90% had undergone a mastectomy, and 76% received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Adherence to the intervention, which involved three weekly sessions of supervised, progressive, moderate-to-vigorous aerobic and resistance exercise for 16 weeks, was 95%.

AGFR was calculated using whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and HOMA-IR was calculated using fasting insulin and glucose levels.

“Exercise reduces fat mass in breast cancer survivors, however, few studies have focused on AGFR,” the investigators wrote.

The findings of the current study suggest that a progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention is an effective strategy for decreasing AGFR in breast cancer survivors, they concluded.

The National Cancer Institute funded the study. The authors reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Dieli-Conwright C et al. ESMO 2019, Abstract 228P.

BARCELONA – A progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention improved the android:gynoid fat ratio (AGFR) in breast cancer survivors, which could provide important health benefits.

AGFR is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in breast cancer survivors, therefore exercise-induced AGFR improvement may reduce the risk for such comorbid conditions, Christina Dieli-Conwright, PhD, of the University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, and colleagues reported in a poster at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.

A significant decrease in AGFR from baseline was noted in 50 survivors of stage I-III breast cancer who participated in the exercise intervention, compared with 50 such survivors randomized to a usual care group (P less than .001), and strong correlations were found between AGFR and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; r = 0.95; P less than .01), the investigators found.

Study participants had a mean age of 53 years, 54% were overweight (body mass index greater than 25 kg/m²), 63% were Hispanic, 90% had undergone a mastectomy, and 76% received chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Adherence to the intervention, which involved three weekly sessions of supervised, progressive, moderate-to-vigorous aerobic and resistance exercise for 16 weeks, was 95%.

AGFR was calculated using whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and HOMA-IR was calculated using fasting insulin and glucose levels.

“Exercise reduces fat mass in breast cancer survivors, however, few studies have focused on AGFR,” the investigators wrote.

The findings of the current study suggest that a progressive aerobic and resistance exercise intervention is an effective strategy for decreasing AGFR in breast cancer survivors, they concluded.

The National Cancer Institute funded the study. The authors reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Dieli-Conwright C et al. ESMO 2019, Abstract 228P.