IBD & Intestinal Disorders

AUSTIN, TEX. – A quality improvement initiative aimed at patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations by 20% or more and slashed opioid use by half, according to study results presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the  Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

After 15 months, the quality improvement program saw emergency department visit rates decline from 18% to 14%, a 22% relative decrease, Gil Y. Melmed, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said. Additionally, the study documented a similar decrease in the rate of hospitalization, declining from 14% to 11%, while opioid utilization rates declined from 8% to 4%. “We also found decreases in special-cause variation in other measures of interest, including CT scan utilization as well as corticosteroid use, which was reduced 29% during the course of the program,” he said.

The quality initiative was conducted through the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation as an outgrowth of its IBD Qorus quality improvement program. The 15-month study involved 20,392 patient visits at 15 academic and 11 private/community practices from January 2018 to April 2019. “This specific project within Qorus is focused specifically around the concept of improving access during times of urgent care need,” Dr. Melmed told this news organization. The goal was to identify practice changes that can drive improvement.

The intervention consisted of 19 different strategies, called a “Change Package,” and participating sites could choose to test and implement one or more of them, Dr. Melmed said. Some examples included designating urgent care slots in the clinic schedule, installing a nurse hotline, a weekly “huddle” to review high-risk patients, and patient education on using urgent care.

One of the drivers of the program was to provide immediate care improvement to patients, Dr. Melmed said in the interview. “As opposed to investments into the cure of IBD that we need, but which can take years to develop, this research has immediate, practical applicability for patients today,” he said.

“The fact that we were able to demonstrate reduction in emergency room utilization and hospitalization, steroid use, and narcotic use has really energized the work that we were doing. We can now show that very-low-cost process changes at a site level lead to robust improvement in patient outcomes. These changes are potentially implementable in any practice setting,” Dr. Melmed said in the interview.

After Dr. Melmed’s presentation, Maria T. Abreu, MD, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at the University of Miami, asked about the cost of the interventions. Dr. Melmed said the costs were nominal, such as paying for a new phone line for a patient hotline. “But overall the cost really involved in the program was the time that it took to review the high-risk list on a weekly basis with the team, and that is essentially a 15-minute huddle,” he said.

Later, Dr. Abreu said in an interview that the program was “a terrific example of how measuring outcomes and sharing ideas can make huge impacts in the lives of patients.” She added, “An enormous amount of money is spent on clinical trials of expensive biologics which have revolutionized treatment, yet the humanistic aspects of our care have just as great of an impact. In this study, each center focused on ways they could lower ER visits and hospitalizations. One size did not fit all, yet they could learn from each other. The very platform they used to conduct the study is a model for all of us.”

Corey A. Siegel, MD, of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and Dr. Melmed's coprincipal investigator on Qorus, said the quality initiative now includes 49 GI practices across the country with plans to grow to 60 by the end of the year. "We have created this 'collaboratory' for providers from actross the country to work togetherr to learn how to best deliver high-qulaity care for patients with IBD," he said.

Another feature of the quality initiative allowed participating sites to see how they compared with others anonymously, Dr. Melmed said. “Using the data, we called out high-performing sites to teach the rest of us what they were doing that enabled them to improve, so that all of us could learn from their successes,” he said.

The researchers are aiming to evaluate costs and identify the most successful interventions, with the plan to present the latter at Digestive Disease Week^® 2020 and use them to develop a toolkit practices can use. “Ultimately,” said Dr. Melmed, “this is scalable.”

Dr. Melmed disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Jannsen, GSK, Medtronic, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda, and Techlab; IBD Qorus receives support from Abbvie, AMAG, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Janssen, Nephoroceuticals, Pfizer, Takeda, and UCB.

SOURCE: Melmed GT et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session 28.

AUSTIN, TEX. – A quality improvement initiative aimed at patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations by 20% or more and slashed opioid use by half, according to study results presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the  Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

After 15 months, the quality improvement program saw emergency department visit rates decline from 18% to 14%, a 22% relative decrease, Gil Y. Melmed, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said. Additionally, the study documented a similar decrease in the rate of hospitalization, declining from 14% to 11%, while opioid utilization rates declined from 8% to 4%. “We also found decreases in special-cause variation in other measures of interest, including CT scan utilization as well as corticosteroid use, which was reduced 29% during the course of the program,” he said.

The quality initiative was conducted through the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation as an outgrowth of its IBD Qorus quality improvement program. The 15-month study involved 20,392 patient visits at 15 academic and 11 private/community practices from January 2018 to April 2019. “This specific project within Qorus is focused specifically around the concept of improving access during times of urgent care need,” Dr. Melmed told this news organization. The goal was to identify practice changes that can drive improvement.

The intervention consisted of 19 different strategies, called a “Change Package,” and participating sites could choose to test and implement one or more of them, Dr. Melmed said. Some examples included designating urgent care slots in the clinic schedule, installing a nurse hotline, a weekly “huddle” to review high-risk patients, and patient education on using urgent care.

One of the drivers of the program was to provide immediate care improvement to patients, Dr. Melmed said in the interview. “As opposed to investments into the cure of IBD that we need, but which can take years to develop, this research has immediate, practical applicability for patients today,” he said.

“The fact that we were able to demonstrate reduction in emergency room utilization and hospitalization, steroid use, and narcotic use has really energized the work that we were doing. We can now show that very-low-cost process changes at a site level lead to robust improvement in patient outcomes. These changes are potentially implementable in any practice setting,” Dr. Melmed said in the interview.

After Dr. Melmed’s presentation, Maria T. Abreu, MD, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at the University of Miami, asked about the cost of the interventions. Dr. Melmed said the costs were nominal, such as paying for a new phone line for a patient hotline. “But overall the cost really involved in the program was the time that it took to review the high-risk list on a weekly basis with the team, and that is essentially a 15-minute huddle,” he said.

Later, Dr. Abreu said in an interview that the program was “a terrific example of how measuring outcomes and sharing ideas can make huge impacts in the lives of patients.” She added, “An enormous amount of money is spent on clinical trials of expensive biologics which have revolutionized treatment, yet the humanistic aspects of our care have just as great of an impact. In this study, each center focused on ways they could lower ER visits and hospitalizations. One size did not fit all, yet they could learn from each other. The very platform they used to conduct the study is a model for all of us.”

Corey A. Siegel, MD, of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and Dr. Melmed's coprincipal investigator on Qorus, said the quality initiative now includes 49 GI practices across the country with plans to grow to 60 by the end of the year. "We have created this 'collaboratory' for providers from actross the country to work togetherr to learn how to best deliver high-qulaity care for patients with IBD," he said.

Another feature of the quality initiative allowed participating sites to see how they compared with others anonymously, Dr. Melmed said. “Using the data, we called out high-performing sites to teach the rest of us what they were doing that enabled them to improve, so that all of us could learn from their successes,” he said.

The researchers are aiming to evaluate costs and identify the most successful interventions, with the plan to present the latter at Digestive Disease Week^® 2020 and use them to develop a toolkit practices can use. “Ultimately,” said Dr. Melmed, “this is scalable.”

Dr. Melmed disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Jannsen, GSK, Medtronic, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda, and Techlab; IBD Qorus receives support from Abbvie, AMAG, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Janssen, Nephoroceuticals, Pfizer, Takeda, and UCB.

SOURCE: Melmed GT et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session 28.

AUSTIN, TEX. – A quality improvement initiative aimed at patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations by 20% or more and slashed opioid use by half, according to study results presented at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the  Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

After 15 months, the quality improvement program saw emergency department visit rates decline from 18% to 14%, a 22% relative decrease, Gil Y. Melmed, MD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, said. Additionally, the study documented a similar decrease in the rate of hospitalization, declining from 14% to 11%, while opioid utilization rates declined from 8% to 4%. “We also found decreases in special-cause variation in other measures of interest, including CT scan utilization as well as corticosteroid use, which was reduced 29% during the course of the program,” he said.

The quality initiative was conducted through the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation as an outgrowth of its IBD Qorus quality improvement program. The 15-month study involved 20,392 patient visits at 15 academic and 11 private/community practices from January 2018 to April 2019. “This specific project within Qorus is focused specifically around the concept of improving access during times of urgent care need,” Dr. Melmed told this news organization. The goal was to identify practice changes that can drive improvement.

The intervention consisted of 19 different strategies, called a “Change Package,” and participating sites could choose to test and implement one or more of them, Dr. Melmed said. Some examples included designating urgent care slots in the clinic schedule, installing a nurse hotline, a weekly “huddle” to review high-risk patients, and patient education on using urgent care.

One of the drivers of the program was to provide immediate care improvement to patients, Dr. Melmed said in the interview. “As opposed to investments into the cure of IBD that we need, but which can take years to develop, this research has immediate, practical applicability for patients today,” he said.

“The fact that we were able to demonstrate reduction in emergency room utilization and hospitalization, steroid use, and narcotic use has really energized the work that we were doing. We can now show that very-low-cost process changes at a site level lead to robust improvement in patient outcomes. These changes are potentially implementable in any practice setting,” Dr. Melmed said in the interview.

After Dr. Melmed’s presentation, Maria T. Abreu, MD, director of the Crohn’s and Colitis Center at the University of Miami, asked about the cost of the interventions. Dr. Melmed said the costs were nominal, such as paying for a new phone line for a patient hotline. “But overall the cost really involved in the program was the time that it took to review the high-risk list on a weekly basis with the team, and that is essentially a 15-minute huddle,” he said.

Later, Dr. Abreu said in an interview that the program was “a terrific example of how measuring outcomes and sharing ideas can make huge impacts in the lives of patients.” She added, “An enormous amount of money is spent on clinical trials of expensive biologics which have revolutionized treatment, yet the humanistic aspects of our care have just as great of an impact. In this study, each center focused on ways they could lower ER visits and hospitalizations. One size did not fit all, yet they could learn from each other. The very platform they used to conduct the study is a model for all of us.”

Corey A. Siegel, MD, of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, N.H., and Dr. Melmed's coprincipal investigator on Qorus, said the quality initiative now includes 49 GI practices across the country with plans to grow to 60 by the end of the year. "We have created this 'collaboratory' for providers from actross the country to work togetherr to learn how to best deliver high-qulaity care for patients with IBD," he said.

Another feature of the quality initiative allowed participating sites to see how they compared with others anonymously, Dr. Melmed said. “Using the data, we called out high-performing sites to teach the rest of us what they were doing that enabled them to improve, so that all of us could learn from their successes,” he said.

The researchers are aiming to evaluate costs and identify the most successful interventions, with the plan to present the latter at Digestive Disease Week^® 2020 and use them to develop a toolkit practices can use. “Ultimately,” said Dr. Melmed, “this is scalable.”

Dr. Melmed disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Jannsen, GSK, Medtronic, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda, and Techlab; IBD Qorus receives support from Abbvie, AMAG, Helmsley Charitable Trust, Janssen, Nephoroceuticals, Pfizer, Takeda, and UCB.

SOURCE: Melmed GT et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session 28.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been around for decades, but typically excluded patients having surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recent studies have shown strategies to optimize these patients, including presurgery carbohydrate loading and early postsurgery feeding, can improve outcomes, according to a review of evidence presented at the annual congress of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Richard Mark Kirkner/MDedge News

“It’s really important that we implement strategies to help mitigate the impact that malnutrition is going to have on our perioperative patients, and one of the ways we do that is by using an ERAS or enhanced recovery after surgery protocol,” said Kelly Issokson, MS, RD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. She noted that patients with IBD are five times more likely to be malnourished than non-IBD patients, and those with fistulizing Crohn’s disease and bowel resections are at greatest risk (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1139-46).

“I constantly see patients who are kept NPO [nothing by mouth] 12 or 24 hours before surgery, maybe even longer sometimes, unfortunately,” she said. “We should really be minimizing that NPO to help mitigate the catabolic effect that surgery has on our patients and help them recover more quickly.”

To screen surgery patients for nutrition risk, Ms. Issokson said that gastroenterologists can ask two questions from the malnutrition screening tool: Did the patient have recent unintentional weight loss, and is the patient eating less because of poor appetite? A yes to either question merits referral to a registered dietician. Malnutrition, weight loss of 5%-10% of total body weight, and sarcopenia are predictors of surgical complications for IBD patients, the latter an independent predictor in patients aged 40 years and older.

The ERAS protocol involves optimizing preoperative and postoperative nutrition, she said. It has been linked with improved outcomes in elective colorectal surgery (World J Surg. 2014;38:1531-41), although the evidence in IBD isn’t as robust. She cited a retrospective study reported at the 2019 annual Digestive Disease Week of patients with Crohn’s disease that found no difference in readmissions, complications, or reoperations between ERAS and standard-care patients.

Preoperative nutrition optimization in ERAS involves anemia and fluid management, oral nutrition supplementation, and – based on European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) 2017 guidelines – delaying the operation where possible if the patient is malnourished. “Patients who receive preoperative nutrition support have been shown to have better outcomes postoperatively,” Ms. Issokson said, citing a meta-analysis of 1,111 Crohn’s disease patients that reported the complication rate was 20% in patients on nutrition support versus 60% for those on standard care; in those on enteral nutrition, the disparity was more pronounced: 21% versus 73% (Eur J Gastro Hep. 2018;30:997-1002).

Gastroenterologists should not be afraid of implementing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) perioperatively in these patients, Ms. Issokson said. “This can really help to improve outcomes and quality of life in our patients, and it’s something that we really should not shy away from,” she added in an interview. “If our patients are malnourished and meet the criteria for TPN, then we should really not be withholding it.” Patients with severe IBD who are not absorbing from their gut and can’t meet 60% of their needs by mouth are prime candidates for TPN, she said, referencing a 2019 study that reported that preoperative TPN in malnourished IBD patients resulted in a rate of overall noninfectious complications half that of no-TPN patients: 8.3% versus 16.8% (Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Apr;7:107-14).

Carbohydrate loading before surgery is a big part of ERAS in these patients. “Surgery has a huge impact on the catabolic state of a patient,” Ms. Issokson said. “It’s similar to running a marathon; you wouldn’t go out and run a marathon without fueling up the night before with a whole bunch of carbohydrates. So we use this same strategy in our surgical patients.”

ERAS society guidelines call for 100 g of carbohydrates the night before and 50 g 2 hours before surgery in the form of a clear liquid beverage, along with permitting a light meal up to 6 hours before, with exceptions in gastroparesis, motility disorders, and emergency surgery.

Another key component of ERAS in IBD is early postoperative feeding. “Postoperatively we want to feed our patients as soon as possible,” Ms. Issokson said. ESPEN guidelines call for feeding patients with new nondiverted colorectal anastomosis within 4 hours. “Studies show that patients aren’t able to eat enough calories to help them recover postoperatively, so implementing an oral nutrition supplement might be helpful there,” she added.

Ms. Issokson is a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation board member, and disclosed financial relationships with Orgain, RMEI, and Medscape.

SOURCE: Issokson K et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp83.
 

AUSTIN, TEX. – Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been around for decades, but typically excluded patients having surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recent studies have shown strategies to optimize these patients, including presurgery carbohydrate loading and early postsurgery feeding, can improve outcomes, according to a review of evidence presented at the annual congress of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Richard Mark Kirkner/MDedge News

“It’s really important that we implement strategies to help mitigate the impact that malnutrition is going to have on our perioperative patients, and one of the ways we do that is by using an ERAS or enhanced recovery after surgery protocol,” said Kelly Issokson, MS, RD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. She noted that patients with IBD are five times more likely to be malnourished than non-IBD patients, and those with fistulizing Crohn’s disease and bowel resections are at greatest risk (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1139-46).

“I constantly see patients who are kept NPO [nothing by mouth] 12 or 24 hours before surgery, maybe even longer sometimes, unfortunately,” she said. “We should really be minimizing that NPO to help mitigate the catabolic effect that surgery has on our patients and help them recover more quickly.”

To screen surgery patients for nutrition risk, Ms. Issokson said that gastroenterologists can ask two questions from the malnutrition screening tool: Did the patient have recent unintentional weight loss, and is the patient eating less because of poor appetite? A yes to either question merits referral to a registered dietician. Malnutrition, weight loss of 5%-10% of total body weight, and sarcopenia are predictors of surgical complications for IBD patients, the latter an independent predictor in patients aged 40 years and older.

The ERAS protocol involves optimizing preoperative and postoperative nutrition, she said. It has been linked with improved outcomes in elective colorectal surgery (World J Surg. 2014;38:1531-41), although the evidence in IBD isn’t as robust. She cited a retrospective study reported at the 2019 annual Digestive Disease Week of patients with Crohn’s disease that found no difference in readmissions, complications, or reoperations between ERAS and standard-care patients.

Preoperative nutrition optimization in ERAS involves anemia and fluid management, oral nutrition supplementation, and – based on European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) 2017 guidelines – delaying the operation where possible if the patient is malnourished. “Patients who receive preoperative nutrition support have been shown to have better outcomes postoperatively,” Ms. Issokson said, citing a meta-analysis of 1,111 Crohn’s disease patients that reported the complication rate was 20% in patients on nutrition support versus 60% for those on standard care; in those on enteral nutrition, the disparity was more pronounced: 21% versus 73% (Eur J Gastro Hep. 2018;30:997-1002).

Gastroenterologists should not be afraid of implementing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) perioperatively in these patients, Ms. Issokson said. “This can really help to improve outcomes and quality of life in our patients, and it’s something that we really should not shy away from,” she added in an interview. “If our patients are malnourished and meet the criteria for TPN, then we should really not be withholding it.” Patients with severe IBD who are not absorbing from their gut and can’t meet 60% of their needs by mouth are prime candidates for TPN, she said, referencing a 2019 study that reported that preoperative TPN in malnourished IBD patients resulted in a rate of overall noninfectious complications half that of no-TPN patients: 8.3% versus 16.8% (Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Apr;7:107-14).

Carbohydrate loading before surgery is a big part of ERAS in these patients. “Surgery has a huge impact on the catabolic state of a patient,” Ms. Issokson said. “It’s similar to running a marathon; you wouldn’t go out and run a marathon without fueling up the night before with a whole bunch of carbohydrates. So we use this same strategy in our surgical patients.”

ERAS society guidelines call for 100 g of carbohydrates the night before and 50 g 2 hours before surgery in the form of a clear liquid beverage, along with permitting a light meal up to 6 hours before, with exceptions in gastroparesis, motility disorders, and emergency surgery.

Another key component of ERAS in IBD is early postoperative feeding. “Postoperatively we want to feed our patients as soon as possible,” Ms. Issokson said. ESPEN guidelines call for feeding patients with new nondiverted colorectal anastomosis within 4 hours. “Studies show that patients aren’t able to eat enough calories to help them recover postoperatively, so implementing an oral nutrition supplement might be helpful there,” she added.

Ms. Issokson is a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation board member, and disclosed financial relationships with Orgain, RMEI, and Medscape.

SOURCE: Issokson K et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp83.
 

AUSTIN, TEX. – Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been around for decades, but typically excluded patients having surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, recent studies have shown strategies to optimize these patients, including presurgery carbohydrate loading and early postsurgery feeding, can improve outcomes, according to a review of evidence presented at the annual congress of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

Richard Mark Kirkner/MDedge News

“It’s really important that we implement strategies to help mitigate the impact that malnutrition is going to have on our perioperative patients, and one of the ways we do that is by using an ERAS or enhanced recovery after surgery protocol,” said Kelly Issokson, MS, RD, of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles. She noted that patients with IBD are five times more likely to be malnourished than non-IBD patients, and those with fistulizing Crohn’s disease and bowel resections are at greatest risk (Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1139-46).

“I constantly see patients who are kept NPO [nothing by mouth] 12 or 24 hours before surgery, maybe even longer sometimes, unfortunately,” she said. “We should really be minimizing that NPO to help mitigate the catabolic effect that surgery has on our patients and help them recover more quickly.”

To screen surgery patients for nutrition risk, Ms. Issokson said that gastroenterologists can ask two questions from the malnutrition screening tool: Did the patient have recent unintentional weight loss, and is the patient eating less because of poor appetite? A yes to either question merits referral to a registered dietician. Malnutrition, weight loss of 5%-10% of total body weight, and sarcopenia are predictors of surgical complications for IBD patients, the latter an independent predictor in patients aged 40 years and older.

The ERAS protocol involves optimizing preoperative and postoperative nutrition, she said. It has been linked with improved outcomes in elective colorectal surgery (World J Surg. 2014;38:1531-41), although the evidence in IBD isn’t as robust. She cited a retrospective study reported at the 2019 annual Digestive Disease Week of patients with Crohn’s disease that found no difference in readmissions, complications, or reoperations between ERAS and standard-care patients.

Preoperative nutrition optimization in ERAS involves anemia and fluid management, oral nutrition supplementation, and – based on European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) 2017 guidelines – delaying the operation where possible if the patient is malnourished. “Patients who receive preoperative nutrition support have been shown to have better outcomes postoperatively,” Ms. Issokson said, citing a meta-analysis of 1,111 Crohn’s disease patients that reported the complication rate was 20% in patients on nutrition support versus 60% for those on standard care; in those on enteral nutrition, the disparity was more pronounced: 21% versus 73% (Eur J Gastro Hep. 2018;30:997-1002).

Gastroenterologists should not be afraid of implementing total parenteral nutrition (TPN) perioperatively in these patients, Ms. Issokson said. “This can really help to improve outcomes and quality of life in our patients, and it’s something that we really should not shy away from,” she added in an interview. “If our patients are malnourished and meet the criteria for TPN, then we should really not be withholding it.” Patients with severe IBD who are not absorbing from their gut and can’t meet 60% of their needs by mouth are prime candidates for TPN, she said, referencing a 2019 study that reported that preoperative TPN in malnourished IBD patients resulted in a rate of overall noninfectious complications half that of no-TPN patients: 8.3% versus 16.8% (Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Apr;7:107-14).

Carbohydrate loading before surgery is a big part of ERAS in these patients. “Surgery has a huge impact on the catabolic state of a patient,” Ms. Issokson said. “It’s similar to running a marathon; you wouldn’t go out and run a marathon without fueling up the night before with a whole bunch of carbohydrates. So we use this same strategy in our surgical patients.”

ERAS society guidelines call for 100 g of carbohydrates the night before and 50 g 2 hours before surgery in the form of a clear liquid beverage, along with permitting a light meal up to 6 hours before, with exceptions in gastroparesis, motility disorders, and emergency surgery.

Another key component of ERAS in IBD is early postoperative feeding. “Postoperatively we want to feed our patients as soon as possible,” Ms. Issokson said. ESPEN guidelines call for feeding patients with new nondiverted colorectal anastomosis within 4 hours. “Studies show that patients aren’t able to eat enough calories to help them recover postoperatively, so implementing an oral nutrition supplement might be helpful there,” she added.

Ms. Issokson is a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation board member, and disclosed financial relationships with Orgain, RMEI, and Medscape.

SOURCE: Issokson K et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp83.
 

In most cases, a biopsy is no longer required to diagnose celiac disease in children, according to new guidance from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). The authors recommend that the diagnosis be established with a two-stage blood test instead of an endoscopy, which children often find distressing.

The guidance was published in the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. The document is an update of ESPGHAN’s 2012 guidance.

About half of children with suspected celiac disease undergo a biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. By reducing the number of biopsies, and the anesthesia required to perform them, the new guidelines could reduce European health care costs.

Steffen Husby, MD, of Odense (Denmark) University Hospital, and colleagues recommend testing for total IgA and anti-intestinal transglutaminase 2 (TGA-IgA) antibodies as initial screening in children with suspected celiac disease. An IgG-based test is indicated only when total IgA is low or undetectable, according to the authors. Physicians should refer children with positive results to a pediatric gastroenterologist. If the level of TGA-IgA is 10 or more times the upper limit of normal, and the family agrees, the physician may diagnose celiac disease without a biopsy, provided that endomysial antibodies test positive in a second blood sample, according to the guidance. For children with a positive TGA-IgA level of less than 10 times the upper limit of normal, however, at least four biopsies from the distal duodenum and at least one from the bulb are required to establish the diagnosis.

Physicians can diagnose celiac disease in children with no symptoms without the need for a biopsy using the same criteria as they use for symptomatic children, wrote Dr. Husby and colleagues. Clinicians, parents, and, when appropriate, children should participate in the decision about whether to perform a biopsy.

Celiac disease is the most prevalent food-related chronic disease in European children, but as much as 80% of children with celiac disease are undiagnosed. The prevalence of celiac disease is increasing, and undiagnosed children with this disease are at risk of nutritional and developmental problems, as well as long-term health complications. Although celiac disease is easy to detect and treat, 10-13 years may elapse between symptom onset and the time of diagnosis. The new guidelines are intended to facilitate diagnosis and increase its accuracy, thus enabling earlier diagnosis and improved detection, according to ESPGHAN.

“These new guidelines mean that more than half of all children being investigated for celiac disease will no longer need to have an invasive biopsy,” said Luisa Mearin Manrique, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics at Leiden (the Netherlands) University and senior author of the guidelines, in a press release. “This is a big step forward in our mission to ensure that children can be diagnosed and effectively treated for celiac disease. It is scandalous that so many children go so long, often up to 10 years, without diagnosis. Removing the need for biopsy in order to achieve diagnosis will reduce the stresses associated with such an invasive procedure and mean that diagnoses are quicker and cheaper for health care systems.”

No conflicts of interest were reported.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Husby S et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141-56.

In most cases, a biopsy is no longer required to diagnose celiac disease in children, according to new guidance from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). The authors recommend that the diagnosis be established with a two-stage blood test instead of an endoscopy, which children often find distressing.

The guidance was published in the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. The document is an update of ESPGHAN’s 2012 guidance.

About half of children with suspected celiac disease undergo a biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. By reducing the number of biopsies, and the anesthesia required to perform them, the new guidelines could reduce European health care costs.

Steffen Husby, MD, of Odense (Denmark) University Hospital, and colleagues recommend testing for total IgA and anti-intestinal transglutaminase 2 (TGA-IgA) antibodies as initial screening in children with suspected celiac disease. An IgG-based test is indicated only when total IgA is low or undetectable, according to the authors. Physicians should refer children with positive results to a pediatric gastroenterologist. If the level of TGA-IgA is 10 or more times the upper limit of normal, and the family agrees, the physician may diagnose celiac disease without a biopsy, provided that endomysial antibodies test positive in a second blood sample, according to the guidance. For children with a positive TGA-IgA level of less than 10 times the upper limit of normal, however, at least four biopsies from the distal duodenum and at least one from the bulb are required to establish the diagnosis.

Physicians can diagnose celiac disease in children with no symptoms without the need for a biopsy using the same criteria as they use for symptomatic children, wrote Dr. Husby and colleagues. Clinicians, parents, and, when appropriate, children should participate in the decision about whether to perform a biopsy.

Celiac disease is the most prevalent food-related chronic disease in European children, but as much as 80% of children with celiac disease are undiagnosed. The prevalence of celiac disease is increasing, and undiagnosed children with this disease are at risk of nutritional and developmental problems, as well as long-term health complications. Although celiac disease is easy to detect and treat, 10-13 years may elapse between symptom onset and the time of diagnosis. The new guidelines are intended to facilitate diagnosis and increase its accuracy, thus enabling earlier diagnosis and improved detection, according to ESPGHAN.

“These new guidelines mean that more than half of all children being investigated for celiac disease will no longer need to have an invasive biopsy,” said Luisa Mearin Manrique, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics at Leiden (the Netherlands) University and senior author of the guidelines, in a press release. “This is a big step forward in our mission to ensure that children can be diagnosed and effectively treated for celiac disease. It is scandalous that so many children go so long, often up to 10 years, without diagnosis. Removing the need for biopsy in order to achieve diagnosis will reduce the stresses associated with such an invasive procedure and mean that diagnoses are quicker and cheaper for health care systems.”

No conflicts of interest were reported.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Husby S et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141-56.

In most cases, a biopsy is no longer required to diagnose celiac disease in children, according to new guidance from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). The authors recommend that the diagnosis be established with a two-stage blood test instead of an endoscopy, which children often find distressing.

The guidance was published in the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. The document is an update of ESPGHAN’s 2012 guidance.

About half of children with suspected celiac disease undergo a biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. By reducing the number of biopsies, and the anesthesia required to perform them, the new guidelines could reduce European health care costs.

Steffen Husby, MD, of Odense (Denmark) University Hospital, and colleagues recommend testing for total IgA and anti-intestinal transglutaminase 2 (TGA-IgA) antibodies as initial screening in children with suspected celiac disease. An IgG-based test is indicated only when total IgA is low or undetectable, according to the authors. Physicians should refer children with positive results to a pediatric gastroenterologist. If the level of TGA-IgA is 10 or more times the upper limit of normal, and the family agrees, the physician may diagnose celiac disease without a biopsy, provided that endomysial antibodies test positive in a second blood sample, according to the guidance. For children with a positive TGA-IgA level of less than 10 times the upper limit of normal, however, at least four biopsies from the distal duodenum and at least one from the bulb are required to establish the diagnosis.

Physicians can diagnose celiac disease in children with no symptoms without the need for a biopsy using the same criteria as they use for symptomatic children, wrote Dr. Husby and colleagues. Clinicians, parents, and, when appropriate, children should participate in the decision about whether to perform a biopsy.

Celiac disease is the most prevalent food-related chronic disease in European children, but as much as 80% of children with celiac disease are undiagnosed. The prevalence of celiac disease is increasing, and undiagnosed children with this disease are at risk of nutritional and developmental problems, as well as long-term health complications. Although celiac disease is easy to detect and treat, 10-13 years may elapse between symptom onset and the time of diagnosis. The new guidelines are intended to facilitate diagnosis and increase its accuracy, thus enabling earlier diagnosis and improved detection, according to ESPGHAN.

“These new guidelines mean that more than half of all children being investigated for celiac disease will no longer need to have an invasive biopsy,” said Luisa Mearin Manrique, MD, PhD, professor of pediatrics at Leiden (the Netherlands) University and senior author of the guidelines, in a press release. “This is a big step forward in our mission to ensure that children can be diagnosed and effectively treated for celiac disease. It is scandalous that so many children go so long, often up to 10 years, without diagnosis. Removing the need for biopsy in order to achieve diagnosis will reduce the stresses associated with such an invasive procedure and mean that diagnoses are quicker and cheaper for health care systems.”

No conflicts of interest were reported.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Husby S et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141-56.

AUSTIN, TEX. – With the increase in the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease worldwide approaching pandemic proportions, personalized medicine targeting diet and the microbiome may contribute to a halt or even a reversal of the trend, a leading researcher from Israel and proponent of the Mediterranean diet reported at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

“Inflammatory bowel disease is turning into a pandemic around the world,” said Iris Dotan, MD, of the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva, Israel, citing research reported at the 2015 meeting of the European Crohn’s & Colitis Organization that showed the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Israel increasing almost 400% from 1991 to 2015, up to 460 per 100,000. “The rising incidence highlights the role of environmental factors,” she added.

She reported on her work with the Rabin Medical Center Pouch Cohort, which is studying the ileal pouch as a man-made model of IBD to get answers. “We believe that when patients progress from having a pouch that is normal to having pouchitis it actually resembles Crohn’s disease and can be used as a model to identify processes that are ongoing in these patients,” she said.

The study is following an unspecified number of ileal pouch patients prospectively, evaluating their biomaterial with stool samples and mucosal biopsies, and tracking their diet and psychosocial status to gain insight into what sets off episodes of pouchitis.

Already, the study has provided insight into how antibiotics may contribute to IBD. “Pouch disease is a very antibiotic-responsive disease,” she said in an interview. “Antibiotics are clinically effective. However, as we dive deeper into this and understand the mechanistics of it, we see that antibiotics cause more dysbiosis, which is something that is unwanted in patients with a pouch.”

A similar response has been shown in Crohn’s disease, she said. With antibiotics, “you’re doing something that might be helpful clinically for the short term; however, it might be harmful in the long term.”

When these patients stop antibiotic therapy, their dysbiosis increases and resistance wanes, she said. “These patients are replenished by other bacteria, probably some from the oral cavity, causing this circle so they would need recurrent courses of antibiotics.”

Evidence is accumulating that the Mediterranean diet can break that cycle, Dr. Dotan said, citing unpublished findings from her group that showed pouchitis patients consumed less fruit than counterparts without the disease. Dr. Dotan also cited a study published this year that found the Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk of Crohn’s disease later in life (Gut. 2020 Jan 3. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319505).

Dr. Dotan’s research has shown that patients don’t have to adhere completely to the Mediterranean diet but can make less-drastic but significant changes. “You don’t need the whole program,” she said. “If you tell patients to start with something – increase fruits and vegetables – that’s not too complex. Then try to change some of the protein with legumes or other protein sources; that also would be helpful.” Another strategy is to direct patients away from processed foods with additives and preservatives.

“Microbial modifications, including antibiotics, probiotics, diet, and fecal microbial transplantation may have variable effects on specific patient populations, so we can’t be too long simplistic about these options,” she said.

Personalization of diet and microbial manipulations may do more than provide short-term treatment for patients, she said. “It might contribute to halting or even reversing the global increase we’ve seen in IBD recurrence over the past few years.”

Dr. Dotan disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Neopharm, and Gilead.

SOURCE: Dotan I. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Presentation Sp75.

AUSTIN, TEX. – With the increase in the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease worldwide approaching pandemic proportions, personalized medicine targeting diet and the microbiome may contribute to a halt or even a reversal of the trend, a leading researcher from Israel and proponent of the Mediterranean diet reported at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

“Inflammatory bowel disease is turning into a pandemic around the world,” said Iris Dotan, MD, of the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva, Israel, citing research reported at the 2015 meeting of the European Crohn’s & Colitis Organization that showed the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Israel increasing almost 400% from 1991 to 2015, up to 460 per 100,000. “The rising incidence highlights the role of environmental factors,” she added.

She reported on her work with the Rabin Medical Center Pouch Cohort, which is studying the ileal pouch as a man-made model of IBD to get answers. “We believe that when patients progress from having a pouch that is normal to having pouchitis it actually resembles Crohn’s disease and can be used as a model to identify processes that are ongoing in these patients,” she said.

The study is following an unspecified number of ileal pouch patients prospectively, evaluating their biomaterial with stool samples and mucosal biopsies, and tracking their diet and psychosocial status to gain insight into what sets off episodes of pouchitis.

Already, the study has provided insight into how antibiotics may contribute to IBD. “Pouch disease is a very antibiotic-responsive disease,” she said in an interview. “Antibiotics are clinically effective. However, as we dive deeper into this and understand the mechanistics of it, we see that antibiotics cause more dysbiosis, which is something that is unwanted in patients with a pouch.”

A similar response has been shown in Crohn’s disease, she said. With antibiotics, “you’re doing something that might be helpful clinically for the short term; however, it might be harmful in the long term.”

When these patients stop antibiotic therapy, their dysbiosis increases and resistance wanes, she said. “These patients are replenished by other bacteria, probably some from the oral cavity, causing this circle so they would need recurrent courses of antibiotics.”

Evidence is accumulating that the Mediterranean diet can break that cycle, Dr. Dotan said, citing unpublished findings from her group that showed pouchitis patients consumed less fruit than counterparts without the disease. Dr. Dotan also cited a study published this year that found the Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk of Crohn’s disease later in life (Gut. 2020 Jan 3. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319505).

Dr. Dotan’s research has shown that patients don’t have to adhere completely to the Mediterranean diet but can make less-drastic but significant changes. “You don’t need the whole program,” she said. “If you tell patients to start with something – increase fruits and vegetables – that’s not too complex. Then try to change some of the protein with legumes or other protein sources; that also would be helpful.” Another strategy is to direct patients away from processed foods with additives and preservatives.

“Microbial modifications, including antibiotics, probiotics, diet, and fecal microbial transplantation may have variable effects on specific patient populations, so we can’t be too long simplistic about these options,” she said.

Personalization of diet and microbial manipulations may do more than provide short-term treatment for patients, she said. “It might contribute to halting or even reversing the global increase we’ve seen in IBD recurrence over the past few years.”

Dr. Dotan disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Neopharm, and Gilead.

SOURCE: Dotan I. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Presentation Sp75.

AUSTIN, TEX. – With the increase in the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease worldwide approaching pandemic proportions, personalized medicine targeting diet and the microbiome may contribute to a halt or even a reversal of the trend, a leading researcher from Israel and proponent of the Mediterranean diet reported at the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

“Inflammatory bowel disease is turning into a pandemic around the world,” said Iris Dotan, MD, of the Rabin Medical Center in Petah Tikva, Israel, citing research reported at the 2015 meeting of the European Crohn’s & Colitis Organization that showed the prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Israel increasing almost 400% from 1991 to 2015, up to 460 per 100,000. “The rising incidence highlights the role of environmental factors,” she added.

She reported on her work with the Rabin Medical Center Pouch Cohort, which is studying the ileal pouch as a man-made model of IBD to get answers. “We believe that when patients progress from having a pouch that is normal to having pouchitis it actually resembles Crohn’s disease and can be used as a model to identify processes that are ongoing in these patients,” she said.

The study is following an unspecified number of ileal pouch patients prospectively, evaluating their biomaterial with stool samples and mucosal biopsies, and tracking their diet and psychosocial status to gain insight into what sets off episodes of pouchitis.

Already, the study has provided insight into how antibiotics may contribute to IBD. “Pouch disease is a very antibiotic-responsive disease,” she said in an interview. “Antibiotics are clinically effective. However, as we dive deeper into this and understand the mechanistics of it, we see that antibiotics cause more dysbiosis, which is something that is unwanted in patients with a pouch.”

A similar response has been shown in Crohn’s disease, she said. With antibiotics, “you’re doing something that might be helpful clinically for the short term; however, it might be harmful in the long term.”

When these patients stop antibiotic therapy, their dysbiosis increases and resistance wanes, she said. “These patients are replenished by other bacteria, probably some from the oral cavity, causing this circle so they would need recurrent courses of antibiotics.”

Evidence is accumulating that the Mediterranean diet can break that cycle, Dr. Dotan said, citing unpublished findings from her group that showed pouchitis patients consumed less fruit than counterparts without the disease. Dr. Dotan also cited a study published this year that found the Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk of Crohn’s disease later in life (Gut. 2020 Jan 3. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319505).

Dr. Dotan’s research has shown that patients don’t have to adhere completely to the Mediterranean diet but can make less-drastic but significant changes. “You don’t need the whole program,” she said. “If you tell patients to start with something – increase fruits and vegetables – that’s not too complex. Then try to change some of the protein with legumes or other protein sources; that also would be helpful.” Another strategy is to direct patients away from processed foods with additives and preservatives.

“Microbial modifications, including antibiotics, probiotics, diet, and fecal microbial transplantation may have variable effects on specific patient populations, so we can’t be too long simplistic about these options,” she said.

Personalization of diet and microbial manipulations may do more than provide short-term treatment for patients, she said. “It might contribute to halting or even reversing the global increase we’ve seen in IBD recurrence over the past few years.”

Dr. Dotan disclosed financial relationships with AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Genentech/Roche, Neopharm, and Gilead.

SOURCE: Dotan I. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Presentation Sp75.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Early results from a cohort study that aims to characterize the brain-gut relationship in ulcerative colitis (UC) have identified potential structural and functional brain changes consistent with the effect chronic bowel inflammation has on the brain and found two subgroups of patients that differed in how they respond to stress. These findings may provide further insight into the role of the brain in symptom flares, the study leader reported the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

So far, the study has shown that, based on validated measures of perceived stress or neuroticism, patients with UC in clinical remission are clustered on two ends of the stress spectrum, with high and low stress responsiveness, said Emeran A. Mayer, MD, who is coprincipal investigator of the study with Jenny Sauk, MD, both of the University of California, Los Angeles.

The goal of the longitudinal follow-up study is to identify brain, gut microbiome, and stress signatures that predict the risk of flares for up to 2 years in UC patients in clinical remission, he said. Patients’ clinical, microbiome, and stress-psychological measures are evaluated quarterly. The intent is to enroll 100- 120 patients between ages 18 years and 65 years. Questionnaire and symptom data on 70 patients have been analyzed so far.

“What we found so far is that, at baseline using the questionnaire data and clustering analysis, you can identify two distinct subgroups: one characterized by stress hyperresponsiveness and one that does not have that feature,” Dr. Mayer said in an interview. “Then we found in the stress hyperresponsive group there are more flares reported and documented during a mean follow-up of 8.1 months.”

The findings so far have also determined that the differences in stress responsiveness and flare frequency don’t seem to be related to baseline fecal calprotectin levels, said Dr. Mayer, who is director of the G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience (CNSR) and codirector of the CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center.

Early findings show the incidence of clinical flares in the high stress responsiveness group was 27.4% vs. 9.3% in the low-stress group, and the rate of symptomatic flares was 11.8% vs. 4.6%, respectively.

With regard to baseline biological measures, there were no significant differences in cardiovagal tone or morning salivary cortisol measures between the two clusters, Dr. Mayer noted, although the high stress responsiveness cluster had higher sympathetic tone before, during, and after a brief psychological stress.

He noted that the same clustering into low and high stress responsiveness was confirmed in a different data set of 66 UC subjects and that the two clusters showed significant differences in anatomical connectivity of the default mode network in the brain, a set of regions involved in chronic pain and emotion regulation.

By identifying factors that contribute to inflammatory bowel disease, the study may ultimately simplify the process of identifying IBD patients in remission who are at highest risk of flares, Dr. Mayer said. “Patients won’t need to undergo brain imaging or assessment of microbiome parameters; they can just answer a short questionnaire,” he said. Another potential benefit of the study would be to identify changes in the brain–gut microbiome interactions associated with flares, he said.

Full study results would be available in about 2 years, Dr. Mayer said, with more data on biological parameters expected next year.

The study is funded with a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation grant. Dr. Mayer disclosed financial relationships with Amare, Axial Biotherapeutics, Bloom Science, Danone, Mahana Therapeutics, Pendulum, Ubiome, and Viome.

SOURCE: Mayer EA et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp74.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Early results from a cohort study that aims to characterize the brain-gut relationship in ulcerative colitis (UC) have identified potential structural and functional brain changes consistent with the effect chronic bowel inflammation has on the brain and found two subgroups of patients that differed in how they respond to stress. These findings may provide further insight into the role of the brain in symptom flares, the study leader reported the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

So far, the study has shown that, based on validated measures of perceived stress or neuroticism, patients with UC in clinical remission are clustered on two ends of the stress spectrum, with high and low stress responsiveness, said Emeran A. Mayer, MD, who is coprincipal investigator of the study with Jenny Sauk, MD, both of the University of California, Los Angeles.

The goal of the longitudinal follow-up study is to identify brain, gut microbiome, and stress signatures that predict the risk of flares for up to 2 years in UC patients in clinical remission, he said. Patients’ clinical, microbiome, and stress-psychological measures are evaluated quarterly. The intent is to enroll 100- 120 patients between ages 18 years and 65 years. Questionnaire and symptom data on 70 patients have been analyzed so far.

“What we found so far is that, at baseline using the questionnaire data and clustering analysis, you can identify two distinct subgroups: one characterized by stress hyperresponsiveness and one that does not have that feature,” Dr. Mayer said in an interview. “Then we found in the stress hyperresponsive group there are more flares reported and documented during a mean follow-up of 8.1 months.”

The findings so far have also determined that the differences in stress responsiveness and flare frequency don’t seem to be related to baseline fecal calprotectin levels, said Dr. Mayer, who is director of the G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience (CNSR) and codirector of the CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center.

Early findings show the incidence of clinical flares in the high stress responsiveness group was 27.4% vs. 9.3% in the low-stress group, and the rate of symptomatic flares was 11.8% vs. 4.6%, respectively.

With regard to baseline biological measures, there were no significant differences in cardiovagal tone or morning salivary cortisol measures between the two clusters, Dr. Mayer noted, although the high stress responsiveness cluster had higher sympathetic tone before, during, and after a brief psychological stress.

He noted that the same clustering into low and high stress responsiveness was confirmed in a different data set of 66 UC subjects and that the two clusters showed significant differences in anatomical connectivity of the default mode network in the brain, a set of regions involved in chronic pain and emotion regulation.

By identifying factors that contribute to inflammatory bowel disease, the study may ultimately simplify the process of identifying IBD patients in remission who are at highest risk of flares, Dr. Mayer said. “Patients won’t need to undergo brain imaging or assessment of microbiome parameters; they can just answer a short questionnaire,” he said. Another potential benefit of the study would be to identify changes in the brain–gut microbiome interactions associated with flares, he said.

Full study results would be available in about 2 years, Dr. Mayer said, with more data on biological parameters expected next year.

The study is funded with a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation grant. Dr. Mayer disclosed financial relationships with Amare, Axial Biotherapeutics, Bloom Science, Danone, Mahana Therapeutics, Pendulum, Ubiome, and Viome.

SOURCE: Mayer EA et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp74.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Early results from a cohort study that aims to characterize the brain-gut relationship in ulcerative colitis (UC) have identified potential structural and functional brain changes consistent with the effect chronic bowel inflammation has on the brain and found two subgroups of patients that differed in how they respond to stress. These findings may provide further insight into the role of the brain in symptom flares, the study leader reported the Crohn’s & Colitis Congress^®, a partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and the American Gastroenterological Association.

So far, the study has shown that, based on validated measures of perceived stress or neuroticism, patients with UC in clinical remission are clustered on two ends of the stress spectrum, with high and low stress responsiveness, said Emeran A. Mayer, MD, who is coprincipal investigator of the study with Jenny Sauk, MD, both of the University of California, Los Angeles.

The goal of the longitudinal follow-up study is to identify brain, gut microbiome, and stress signatures that predict the risk of flares for up to 2 years in UC patients in clinical remission, he said. Patients’ clinical, microbiome, and stress-psychological measures are evaluated quarterly. The intent is to enroll 100- 120 patients between ages 18 years and 65 years. Questionnaire and symptom data on 70 patients have been analyzed so far.

“What we found so far is that, at baseline using the questionnaire data and clustering analysis, you can identify two distinct subgroups: one characterized by stress hyperresponsiveness and one that does not have that feature,” Dr. Mayer said in an interview. “Then we found in the stress hyperresponsive group there are more flares reported and documented during a mean follow-up of 8.1 months.”

The findings so far have also determined that the differences in stress responsiveness and flare frequency don’t seem to be related to baseline fecal calprotectin levels, said Dr. Mayer, who is director of the G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience (CNSR) and codirector of the CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Center.

Early findings show the incidence of clinical flares in the high stress responsiveness group was 27.4% vs. 9.3% in the low-stress group, and the rate of symptomatic flares was 11.8% vs. 4.6%, respectively.

With regard to baseline biological measures, there were no significant differences in cardiovagal tone or morning salivary cortisol measures between the two clusters, Dr. Mayer noted, although the high stress responsiveness cluster had higher sympathetic tone before, during, and after a brief psychological stress.

He noted that the same clustering into low and high stress responsiveness was confirmed in a different data set of 66 UC subjects and that the two clusters showed significant differences in anatomical connectivity of the default mode network in the brain, a set of regions involved in chronic pain and emotion regulation.

By identifying factors that contribute to inflammatory bowel disease, the study may ultimately simplify the process of identifying IBD patients in remission who are at highest risk of flares, Dr. Mayer said. “Patients won’t need to undergo brain imaging or assessment of microbiome parameters; they can just answer a short questionnaire,” he said. Another potential benefit of the study would be to identify changes in the brain–gut microbiome interactions associated with flares, he said.

Full study results would be available in about 2 years, Dr. Mayer said, with more data on biological parameters expected next year.

The study is funded with a Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation grant. Dr. Mayer disclosed financial relationships with Amare, Axial Biotherapeutics, Bloom Science, Danone, Mahana Therapeutics, Pendulum, Ubiome, and Viome.

SOURCE: Mayer EA et al. Crohn’s & Colitis Congress 2020, Session Sp74.

The Food and Drug Administration is strengthening a previous warning regarding the uncommon risk of serious bowel complications associated with the schizophrenia medication clozapine (Clozaril, FazaClo ODT, Versacloz).

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

According to the FDA press release, dated Jan. 28, clozapine affects bowel function in a majority of patients, and constipation is a common adverse event associated with clozapine use. This can uncommonly progress to serious bowel complications, including complete bowel blockage, and can result in hospitalization or even death if the constipation is not diagnosed and treated quickly.

Patients should contact their health care clinician if their bowel movements are less frequent, they have a bowel movement less than three times a week, they have hard or dry stool, or they have difficulty passing gas. Urgent care is needed if patients are experiencing nausea, vomiting, belly pain, or bloating, according to the FDA.

In addition, health care clinicians should evaluate bowel function before beginning clozapine treatment, avoid coprescribing with other anticholinergic medicines, advise and question patients about the risks of clozapine and their bowel movements, monitor patients for complications, and consider prophylactic laxative treatment in patients with a history of constipation or bowel obstruction, the FDA added.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration is strengthening a previous warning regarding the uncommon risk of serious bowel complications associated with the schizophrenia medication clozapine (Clozaril, FazaClo ODT, Versacloz).

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

According to the FDA press release, dated Jan. 28, clozapine affects bowel function in a majority of patients, and constipation is a common adverse event associated with clozapine use. This can uncommonly progress to serious bowel complications, including complete bowel blockage, and can result in hospitalization or even death if the constipation is not diagnosed and treated quickly.

Patients should contact their health care clinician if their bowel movements are less frequent, they have a bowel movement less than three times a week, they have hard or dry stool, or they have difficulty passing gas. Urgent care is needed if patients are experiencing nausea, vomiting, belly pain, or bloating, according to the FDA.

In addition, health care clinicians should evaluate bowel function before beginning clozapine treatment, avoid coprescribing with other anticholinergic medicines, advise and question patients about the risks of clozapine and their bowel movements, monitor patients for complications, and consider prophylactic laxative treatment in patients with a history of constipation or bowel obstruction, the FDA added.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration is strengthening a previous warning regarding the uncommon risk of serious bowel complications associated with the schizophrenia medication clozapine (Clozaril, FazaClo ODT, Versacloz).

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

According to the FDA press release, dated Jan. 28, clozapine affects bowel function in a majority of patients, and constipation is a common adverse event associated with clozapine use. This can uncommonly progress to serious bowel complications, including complete bowel blockage, and can result in hospitalization or even death if the constipation is not diagnosed and treated quickly.

Patients should contact their health care clinician if their bowel movements are less frequent, they have a bowel movement less than three times a week, they have hard or dry stool, or they have difficulty passing gas. Urgent care is needed if patients are experiencing nausea, vomiting, belly pain, or bloating, according to the FDA.

In addition, health care clinicians should evaluate bowel function before beginning clozapine treatment, avoid coprescribing with other anticholinergic medicines, advise and question patients about the risks of clozapine and their bowel movements, monitor patients for complications, and consider prophylactic laxative treatment in patients with a history of constipation or bowel obstruction, the FDA added.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved fidaxomicin (Dificid) for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile–associated diarrhea in children aged 6 months and older.

Approval was based on results from SUNSHINE, a phase 3, multicenter, investigator-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in 142 pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 18 years with confirmed C. difficile infection who received either fidaxomicin or vancomycin for 10 days. Clinical response 2 days after the conclusion of treatment was similar in both groups (77.6% for fidaxomicin vs. 70.5% for vancomycin), and fidaxomicin had a superior sustained response 30 days after the conclusion of treatment (68.4% vs. 50.0%).

The safety of fidaxomicin was assessed in a pair of clinical trials involving 136 patients; the most common adverse events were pyrexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, increased aminotransferases, and rash. Four patients discontinued fidaxomicin treatment because of adverse events, and four patients died during the trials, though all deaths were in patients aged younger than 2 years and seemed to be related to other comorbidities.

“C. difficile is an important cause of health care– and community-associated diarrheal illness in children, and sustained cure is difficult to achieve in some patients. The fidaxomicin pediatric trial was the first randomized, controlled trial of C. difficile infection treatment in children,” Larry K. Kociolek, MD, associate medical director of infection prevention and control at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, said in the press release from Merck, manufacturer of fidaxomicin.

*This story was updated on 1/27/2020. 

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved fidaxomicin (Dificid) for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile–associated diarrhea in children aged 6 months and older.

Approval was based on results from SUNSHINE, a phase 3, multicenter, investigator-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in 142 pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 18 years with confirmed C. difficile infection who received either fidaxomicin or vancomycin for 10 days. Clinical response 2 days after the conclusion of treatment was similar in both groups (77.6% for fidaxomicin vs. 70.5% for vancomycin), and fidaxomicin had a superior sustained response 30 days after the conclusion of treatment (68.4% vs. 50.0%).

The safety of fidaxomicin was assessed in a pair of clinical trials involving 136 patients; the most common adverse events were pyrexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, increased aminotransferases, and rash. Four patients discontinued fidaxomicin treatment because of adverse events, and four patients died during the trials, though all deaths were in patients aged younger than 2 years and seemed to be related to other comorbidities.

“C. difficile is an important cause of health care– and community-associated diarrheal illness in children, and sustained cure is difficult to achieve in some patients. The fidaxomicin pediatric trial was the first randomized, controlled trial of C. difficile infection treatment in children,” Larry K. Kociolek, MD, associate medical director of infection prevention and control at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, said in the press release from Merck, manufacturer of fidaxomicin.

*This story was updated on 1/27/2020. 

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved fidaxomicin (Dificid) for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile–associated diarrhea in children aged 6 months and older.

Approval was based on results from SUNSHINE, a phase 3, multicenter, investigator-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in 142 pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 18 years with confirmed C. difficile infection who received either fidaxomicin or vancomycin for 10 days. Clinical response 2 days after the conclusion of treatment was similar in both groups (77.6% for fidaxomicin vs. 70.5% for vancomycin), and fidaxomicin had a superior sustained response 30 days after the conclusion of treatment (68.4% vs. 50.0%).

The safety of fidaxomicin was assessed in a pair of clinical trials involving 136 patients; the most common adverse events were pyrexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, increased aminotransferases, and rash. Four patients discontinued fidaxomicin treatment because of adverse events, and four patients died during the trials, though all deaths were in patients aged younger than 2 years and seemed to be related to other comorbidities.

“C. difficile is an important cause of health care– and community-associated diarrheal illness in children, and sustained cure is difficult to achieve in some patients. The fidaxomicin pediatric trial was the first randomized, controlled trial of C. difficile infection treatment in children,” Larry K. Kociolek, MD, associate medical director of infection prevention and control at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, said in the press release from Merck, manufacturer of fidaxomicin.

*This story was updated on 1/27/2020. 

[email protected]

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive opioids while hospitalized are three times as likely to be prescribed opioids after discharge, based on a retrospective analysis of more than 800 patients.

Awareness of this dose-dependent relationship and IBD-related risks of opioid use should encourage physicians to consider alternative analgesics, according to lead author Rahul S. Dalal, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and colleagues.

“Recent evidence has demonstrated that opioid use is associated with severe infections and increased mortality among IBD patients,” the investigators wrote in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. “Despite these concerns, opioids are commonly prescribed to IBD patients in the outpatient setting and to as many as 70% of IBD patients who are hospitalized.”

To look for a possible relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use, the investigators reviewed electronic medical records of 862 IBD patients who were treated at three urban hospitals in the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The primary outcome was opioid prescription within 12 months of discharge, including prescriptions at time of hospital dismissal.

During hospitalization, about two-thirds (67.6%) of patients received intravenous opioids. Of the total population, slightly more than half (54.6%) received intravenous hydromorphone and about one-quarter (25.9%) received intravenous morphine. Following discharge, almost half of the population (44.7%) was prescribed opioids, and about 3 out of 4 patients (77.9%) received an additional opioid prescription within the same year.

After accounting for confounders such as IBD severity, preadmission opioid use, pain scores, and psychiatric conditions, data analysis showed that inpatients who received intravenous opioids had a threefold (odds ratio [OR], 3.3) increased likelihood of receiving postdischarge opioid prescription, compared with patients who received no opioids while hospitalized. This association was stronger among those who had IBD flares (OR, 5.4). Furthermore, intravenous dose was positively correlated with postdischarge opioid prescription.

Avoiding intravenous opioids had no impact on the relationship between inpatient and outpatient opioid use. Among inpatients who received only oral or transdermal opioids, a similarly increased likelihood of postdischarge opioid prescription was observed (OR, 4.2), although this was a small cohort (n = 67).

Compared with other physicians, gastroenterologists were the least likely to prescribe opioids. Considering that gastroenterologists were also most likely aware of IBD-related risks of opioid use, the investigators concluded that more interdisciplinary communication and education are needed.

“Alternative analgesics such as acetaminophen, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, and celecoxib could be advised, as many of these therapies have been deemed relatively safe and effective in this population,” they wrote.The investigators disclosed relationships with Abbott, Gilead, Romark, and others.

SOURCE: Dalal RS et al. Clin Gastro Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.024.

SAN ANTONIO – A course of hyperbaric oxygen appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of medically refractory inflammatory ileal pouch disorders, Hamna Fahad, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Fahad, of the Cleveland Clinic, presented a retrospective case series of 21 consecutive clinic patients who presented with inflammatory bowel disease, a surgically created ileal pouch–anal anastomosis, and medically refractory pouchitis. All patients received 30 hyperbaric oxygen treatment sessions, each an hour long, over the course of 2 months. This intensive regimen worked out to 3-5 sessions per week involving 100% oxygen pressurized to 2.4-3.0 ATA.

Overall, 19 of 21 patients experienced improvement in their modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) score. The mean total mPDAI at baseline was 8.71, improving significantly to 5 post treatment. The mPDAI symptoms subscore also showed significant improvement in response to a course of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, decreasing from 4 points to 2. The cuff subscore fell from 3 to 0, and the pouch body subscore improved from 3 to 2.

Thirteen of 21 patients reported subjective symptomatic improvement in stool frequency, bleeding, urgency, and fevers, including 6 with complete symptomatic remission. Seventeen patients demonstrated significant endoscopic improvement upon blinded assessment. Seven of 9 patients with fistulae experienced healing of the fistula tract.

The treatment entailed no side effects. However, the benefits weren’t uniformly durable. Several patients underwent a second 30-session round of hyperbaric oxygen therapy within a year because of recurrent pouchitis symptoms refractory to corticosteroids, biologics, and other medications.

Dr. Fahad said the mechanism of benefit for hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pouchitis is probably severalfold: reversal of a disordered microbiome through inhibition of the growth of anaerobes, reduced production of tumor necrosis factor–alpha and other inflammatory cytokines, and increased plasma oxygen, which reduces ischemia at the tissue level, thereby promoting tissue healing.

Audience members had a practical question: How can they get this treatment paid for? One gastroenterologist said she has encountered considerable payer resistance when she has sought coverage of hyperbaric oxygen for patients with ulcerative colitis and fistulae, even though there is already published evidence of benefit. But Dr. Fahad’s groundbreaking study provides the first such evidence in pouchitis. So how did she and her coworkers do it? Eighty percent of the pouchitis patients obtained payer approval only upon appeal, which was readily granted, she explained.

Dr. Fahad reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, conducted without commercial support.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fahad H. ACG 2019 Abstract 38.

SAN ANTONIO – A course of hyperbaric oxygen appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of medically refractory inflammatory ileal pouch disorders, Hamna Fahad, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Fahad, of the Cleveland Clinic, presented a retrospective case series of 21 consecutive clinic patients who presented with inflammatory bowel disease, a surgically created ileal pouch–anal anastomosis, and medically refractory pouchitis. All patients received 30 hyperbaric oxygen treatment sessions, each an hour long, over the course of 2 months. This intensive regimen worked out to 3-5 sessions per week involving 100% oxygen pressurized to 2.4-3.0 ATA.

Overall, 19 of 21 patients experienced improvement in their modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) score. The mean total mPDAI at baseline was 8.71, improving significantly to 5 post treatment. The mPDAI symptoms subscore also showed significant improvement in response to a course of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, decreasing from 4 points to 2. The cuff subscore fell from 3 to 0, and the pouch body subscore improved from 3 to 2.

Thirteen of 21 patients reported subjective symptomatic improvement in stool frequency, bleeding, urgency, and fevers, including 6 with complete symptomatic remission. Seventeen patients demonstrated significant endoscopic improvement upon blinded assessment. Seven of 9 patients with fistulae experienced healing of the fistula tract.

The treatment entailed no side effects. However, the benefits weren’t uniformly durable. Several patients underwent a second 30-session round of hyperbaric oxygen therapy within a year because of recurrent pouchitis symptoms refractory to corticosteroids, biologics, and other medications.

Dr. Fahad said the mechanism of benefit for hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pouchitis is probably severalfold: reversal of a disordered microbiome through inhibition of the growth of anaerobes, reduced production of tumor necrosis factor–alpha and other inflammatory cytokines, and increased plasma oxygen, which reduces ischemia at the tissue level, thereby promoting tissue healing.

Audience members had a practical question: How can they get this treatment paid for? One gastroenterologist said she has encountered considerable payer resistance when she has sought coverage of hyperbaric oxygen for patients with ulcerative colitis and fistulae, even though there is already published evidence of benefit. But Dr. Fahad’s groundbreaking study provides the first such evidence in pouchitis. So how did she and her coworkers do it? Eighty percent of the pouchitis patients obtained payer approval only upon appeal, which was readily granted, she explained.

Dr. Fahad reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, conducted without commercial support.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fahad H. ACG 2019 Abstract 38.

SAN ANTONIO – A course of hyperbaric oxygen appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of medically refractory inflammatory ileal pouch disorders, Hamna Fahad, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Fahad, of the Cleveland Clinic, presented a retrospective case series of 21 consecutive clinic patients who presented with inflammatory bowel disease, a surgically created ileal pouch–anal anastomosis, and medically refractory pouchitis. All patients received 30 hyperbaric oxygen treatment sessions, each an hour long, over the course of 2 months. This intensive regimen worked out to 3-5 sessions per week involving 100% oxygen pressurized to 2.4-3.0 ATA.

Overall, 19 of 21 patients experienced improvement in their modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) score. The mean total mPDAI at baseline was 8.71, improving significantly to 5 post treatment. The mPDAI symptoms subscore also showed significant improvement in response to a course of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, decreasing from 4 points to 2. The cuff subscore fell from 3 to 0, and the pouch body subscore improved from 3 to 2.

Thirteen of 21 patients reported subjective symptomatic improvement in stool frequency, bleeding, urgency, and fevers, including 6 with complete symptomatic remission. Seventeen patients demonstrated significant endoscopic improvement upon blinded assessment. Seven of 9 patients with fistulae experienced healing of the fistula tract.

The treatment entailed no side effects. However, the benefits weren’t uniformly durable. Several patients underwent a second 30-session round of hyperbaric oxygen therapy within a year because of recurrent pouchitis symptoms refractory to corticosteroids, biologics, and other medications.

Dr. Fahad said the mechanism of benefit for hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic inflammatory pouchitis is probably severalfold: reversal of a disordered microbiome through inhibition of the growth of anaerobes, reduced production of tumor necrosis factor–alpha and other inflammatory cytokines, and increased plasma oxygen, which reduces ischemia at the tissue level, thereby promoting tissue healing.

Audience members had a practical question: How can they get this treatment paid for? One gastroenterologist said she has encountered considerable payer resistance when she has sought coverage of hyperbaric oxygen for patients with ulcerative colitis and fistulae, even though there is already published evidence of benefit. But Dr. Fahad’s groundbreaking study provides the first such evidence in pouchitis. So how did she and her coworkers do it? Eighty percent of the pouchitis patients obtained payer approval only upon appeal, which was readily granted, she explained.

Dr. Fahad reported having no financial conflicts regarding her study, conducted without commercial support.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Fahad H. ACG 2019 Abstract 38.

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

[email protected]

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

[email protected]

SAN ANTONIO – Eluxadoline proved highly effective for alleviation of a multitude of symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea in patients for whom loperamide was ineffective in the phase 4 RELIEF trial, Darren M. Brenner, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

“From the totality of the clinical trials data we have now, we believe that eluxadoline can be effective both in patients who are naive to other treatments and in patients who have failed loperamide therapy,” concluded Dr. Brenner, a gastroenterologist at Northwestern University, Chicago.

Eluxadoline (Viberzi) is a novel mixed mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist and delta-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. In contrast, loperamide, a mu-opioid receptor agonist, is not approved for that indication. Yet loperamide is widely prescribed for this purpose, despite the fact that both the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the ACG now recommend against this practice.

“There is a lack of conclusive evidence to support the use of loperamide for the relief of global IBS-D symptoms. It works on the stool symptoms – stool frequency and texture – but has never been shown to be beneficial for the abdominal pain symptoms or discomfort or bloating. That being said, as practitioners we continue to see loperamide used as a first-line agent,” Dr. Brenner noted.

RELIEF was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind study which randomized 346 patients with moderate to severe IBS-D to eluxadoline at 100 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. All participants were required to have an intact gallbladder as per the drug’s labeling guidance, and all had a self-reported recent inadequate response to loperamide.

The primary composite endpoint in the RELIEF trial was a 40% or greater improvement from baseline in the 11-point Daily Worst Abdominal Pain score plus a Bristol Stool Form score below 5 on the same day for at least 50% of study days. At baseline, participants had an average Worst Abdominal Pain score of 6.2 on the 0-10 scale and a Bristol score of 6.2. The primary endpoint was achieved at week 12 in 23% of the eluxadoline group, significantly better than the 10% rate in controls. The eluxadoline group also showed significantly greater improvement on the many secondary endpoints having to do with urgency-free days, stool consistency, bowel movement frequency, abdominal discomfort, bloating, and the experience of adequate relief of symptoms.

The safety profile of eluxadoline mirrored that of placebo, with no serious adverse events recorded in either study arm and a 2.9% study discontinuation rate because of treatment-emergent adverse events in the eluxadoline group. Asked why he thinks eluxadoline was effective in improving the full range of IBS-D symptoms when loperamide wasn’t, even though both drugs are mu-opioid receptor agonists, Dr. Brenner replied, “The problem is mu receptors line the entire GI tract, so you can actually push somebody from diarrhea to opioid-induced constipation – and that’s not the goal. What delta does is alleviate some of the adverse events by binding to the receptor, which results in increased transit time, reduced secretion, and increased absorption. Delta brings things back towards the center. We also believe antagonism of delta potentiates analgesic effects at the mu receptor, improves the pain component, gut symptoms, and stool symptoms.”

Dr. Brenner reported serving as a consultant to and member of a speaker’s bureau for Allergan, which markets eluxadoline and sponsored the RELIEF trial.

[email protected]