Psoriasis

Key clinical point: Treatment modification was frequently observed in a cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), highlighting the need for more effective therapies.

Major finding: Overall, 57.3% of patients were treated with biologic DMARDs either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD), whereas 37.7% and 4.4% of patients were treated with csDMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs, respectively. Treatment modifications in the previous year were reported by 48.4% of patients, with major reasons being lack of efficacy (38%) and remission or major improvement in the disease (14%).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational cross-sectional study including 316 adults with established PsA and psoriasis who received DMARD treatment for at least 183 days in the previous year.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb, Germany. Some of the authors declared receiving speaker’s fees and compensation for consultancy or board memberships from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Daamen and Dr. Rothnie declared being current or previous employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Source: Behrens F et al. Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 26. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1816597.

Key clinical point: Treatment modification was frequently observed in a cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), highlighting the need for more effective therapies.

Major finding: Overall, 57.3% of patients were treated with biologic DMARDs either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD), whereas 37.7% and 4.4% of patients were treated with csDMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs, respectively. Treatment modifications in the previous year were reported by 48.4% of patients, with major reasons being lack of efficacy (38%) and remission or major improvement in the disease (14%).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational cross-sectional study including 316 adults with established PsA and psoriasis who received DMARD treatment for at least 183 days in the previous year.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb, Germany. Some of the authors declared receiving speaker’s fees and compensation for consultancy or board memberships from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Daamen and Dr. Rothnie declared being current or previous employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Source: Behrens F et al. Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 26. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1816597.

Key clinical point: Treatment modification was frequently observed in a cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), highlighting the need for more effective therapies.

Major finding: Overall, 57.3% of patients were treated with biologic DMARDs either as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD), whereas 37.7% and 4.4% of patients were treated with csDMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs, respectively. Treatment modifications in the previous year were reported by 48.4% of patients, with major reasons being lack of efficacy (38%) and remission or major improvement in the disease (14%).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational cross-sectional study including 316 adults with established PsA and psoriasis who received DMARD treatment for at least 183 days in the previous year.

Disclosures: This work was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb, Germany. Some of the authors declared receiving speaker’s fees and compensation for consultancy or board memberships from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Daamen and Dr. Rothnie declared being current or previous employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Source: Behrens F et al. Mod Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 26. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1816597.

Key clinical point: Exposure-response analysis predicted 15 mg upadacitinib daily would achieve robust efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with a limited decrease in hemoglobin or occurrence of serious infections.

Major finding: The potential benefits of increasing upadacitinib plasma exposure beyond 15 mg daily were not consistent, with 8% and 7% higher percentage of patients predicted to achieve 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response levels, respectively, with 30 mg upadacitinib compared to 15 mg at week 12 but not at week 24. At week 24, the percentage of patients with serious infection was 2% for both upadacitinib doses, and the percentage of patients with hemoglobin decrease >2 g/dL was 3% and 4% for 15 mg and 30 mg upadacitinib, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of two phase 3 studies, SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2, including 1,916 patients with PsA with an inadequate response to biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Disclosures: This work was funded by AbbVie. The authors declared being current/former employees of AbbVie and may hold stocks/stock options.

Source: Muensterman E et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 31. doi: 10.1111/cts.13146.

Key clinical point: Exposure-response analysis predicted 15 mg upadacitinib daily would achieve robust efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with a limited decrease in hemoglobin or occurrence of serious infections.

Major finding: The potential benefits of increasing upadacitinib plasma exposure beyond 15 mg daily were not consistent, with 8% and 7% higher percentage of patients predicted to achieve 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response levels, respectively, with 30 mg upadacitinib compared to 15 mg at week 12 but not at week 24. At week 24, the percentage of patients with serious infection was 2% for both upadacitinib doses, and the percentage of patients with hemoglobin decrease >2 g/dL was 3% and 4% for 15 mg and 30 mg upadacitinib, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of two phase 3 studies, SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2, including 1,916 patients with PsA with an inadequate response to biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Disclosures: This work was funded by AbbVie. The authors declared being current/former employees of AbbVie and may hold stocks/stock options.

Source: Muensterman E et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 31. doi: 10.1111/cts.13146.

Key clinical point: Exposure-response analysis predicted 15 mg upadacitinib daily would achieve robust efficacy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with a limited decrease in hemoglobin or occurrence of serious infections.

Major finding: The potential benefits of increasing upadacitinib plasma exposure beyond 15 mg daily were not consistent, with 8% and 7% higher percentage of patients predicted to achieve 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response levels, respectively, with 30 mg upadacitinib compared to 15 mg at week 12 but not at week 24. At week 24, the percentage of patients with serious infection was 2% for both upadacitinib doses, and the percentage of patients with hemoglobin decrease >2 g/dL was 3% and 4% for 15 mg and 30 mg upadacitinib, respectively.

Study details: Findings are from an analysis of two phase 3 studies, SELECT-PsA 1 and SELECT-PsA 2, including 1,916 patients with PsA with an inadequate response to biologic or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Disclosures: This work was funded by AbbVie. The authors declared being current/former employees of AbbVie and may hold stocks/stock options.

Source: Muensterman E et al. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 31. doi: 10.1111/cts.13146.

Key clinical point: Golimumab was effective for both musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations along with good drug persistence in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concomitant psoriasis in a long-term real-life clinical setting.

Major finding: Disease activity in PsA score (P < .0001) and psoriasis activity and severity index score (P < .01) improved significantly after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. The retention rate of golimumab was 82.8%, 73.4%, 62.0%, and 54.4% at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. The major reasons for drug discontinuation were primary/secondary inefficacy.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 105 patients with moderate-to-severe PsA and concomitant psoriasis with high disease activity and elevated prevalence of comorbidities and who started treatment with golimumab.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chimenti MS et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05874-6.

Key clinical point: Golimumab was effective for both musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations along with good drug persistence in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concomitant psoriasis in a long-term real-life clinical setting.

Major finding: Disease activity in PsA score (P < .0001) and psoriasis activity and severity index score (P < .01) improved significantly after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. The retention rate of golimumab was 82.8%, 73.4%, 62.0%, and 54.4% at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. The major reasons for drug discontinuation were primary/secondary inefficacy.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 105 patients with moderate-to-severe PsA and concomitant psoriasis with high disease activity and elevated prevalence of comorbidities and who started treatment with golimumab.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chimenti MS et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05874-6.

Key clinical point: Golimumab was effective for both musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations along with good drug persistence in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and concomitant psoriasis in a long-term real-life clinical setting.

Major finding: Disease activity in PsA score (P < .0001) and psoriasis activity and severity index score (P < .01) improved significantly after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. The retention rate of golimumab was 82.8%, 73.4%, 62.0%, and 54.4% at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. The major reasons for drug discontinuation were primary/secondary inefficacy.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study including 105 patients with moderate-to-severe PsA and concomitant psoriasis with high disease activity and elevated prevalence of comorbidities and who started treatment with golimumab.

Disclosures: This study did not report any source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chimenti MS et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05874-6.

Key clinical point: The chances of counseling or education for modifiable lifestyle risk factors were rare during psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or psoriasis outpatient visits, with rates being even lower among dermatologists compared to nondermatologists.

Major finding: Overall, low rates of counseling were observed for any modifiable lifestyle risk factor (11.1%; 95% CI 7.9%-15.3%), tobacco (4.8%; 95% CI 2.8%-8.0%), and obesity (2.8%; 95% CI 1.7%-4.5%). Moreover, counseling rates for any modifiable risk factor were lower for dermatologists compared to nondermatologists visits (0.9% vs. 22.6%; P < .001).

Study details: This study used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2016) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2011) conducted in the United States to assess the frequency of education/counseling for modifiable risk factors in an estimated 41.8 million psoriasis or PsA outpatient visits.

Disclosures: Dr. Barbieri is supported by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and receives partial support from Pfizer. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Taylor MT et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.034.

Key clinical point: The chances of counseling or education for modifiable lifestyle risk factors were rare during psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or psoriasis outpatient visits, with rates being even lower among dermatologists compared to nondermatologists.

Major finding: Overall, low rates of counseling were observed for any modifiable lifestyle risk factor (11.1%; 95% CI 7.9%-15.3%), tobacco (4.8%; 95% CI 2.8%-8.0%), and obesity (2.8%; 95% CI 1.7%-4.5%). Moreover, counseling rates for any modifiable risk factor were lower for dermatologists compared to nondermatologists visits (0.9% vs. 22.6%; P < .001).

Study details: This study used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2016) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2011) conducted in the United States to assess the frequency of education/counseling for modifiable risk factors in an estimated 41.8 million psoriasis or PsA outpatient visits.

Disclosures: Dr. Barbieri is supported by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and receives partial support from Pfizer. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Taylor MT et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.034.

Key clinical point: The chances of counseling or education for modifiable lifestyle risk factors were rare during psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or psoriasis outpatient visits, with rates being even lower among dermatologists compared to nondermatologists.

Major finding: Overall, low rates of counseling were observed for any modifiable lifestyle risk factor (11.1%; 95% CI 7.9%-15.3%), tobacco (4.8%; 95% CI 2.8%-8.0%), and obesity (2.8%; 95% CI 1.7%-4.5%). Moreover, counseling rates for any modifiable risk factor were lower for dermatologists compared to nondermatologists visits (0.9% vs. 22.6%; P < .001).

Study details: This study used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2016) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2002-2011) conducted in the United States to assess the frequency of education/counseling for modifiable risk factors in an estimated 41.8 million psoriasis or PsA outpatient visits.

Disclosures: Dr. Barbieri is supported by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and receives partial support from Pfizer. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Taylor MT et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Aug 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.034.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis with higher vs. lower affected body surface area (BSA) were at an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the incidence of PsA was 5.4 cases per 1,000 person years. Compared with BSA < 3%, BSA > 10% (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% CI 1.29-3.13) and BSA = 3%-10% (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03) were associated with incident PsA.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, population-based cohort study including 9,056 patients with at least 1 code for psoriasis (mild to severe) and 90,547 matched general population controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultant or co-patent holder or receiving grants, honoraria, or payments for medical education from several sources.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab622.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis with higher vs. lower affected body surface area (BSA) were at an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the incidence of PsA was 5.4 cases per 1,000 person years. Compared with BSA < 3%, BSA > 10% (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% CI 1.29-3.13) and BSA = 3%-10% (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03) were associated with incident PsA.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, population-based cohort study including 9,056 patients with at least 1 code for psoriasis (mild to severe) and 90,547 matched general population controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultant or co-patent holder or receiving grants, honoraria, or payments for medical education from several sources.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab622.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis with higher vs. lower affected body surface area (BSA) were at an increased risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Major finding: During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the incidence of PsA was 5.4 cases per 1,000 person years. Compared with BSA < 3%, BSA > 10% (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% CI 1.29-3.13) and BSA = 3%-10% (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03) were associated with incident PsA.

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, population-based cohort study including 9,056 patients with at least 1 code for psoriasis (mild to severe) and 90,547 matched general population controls.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health. Some authors declared serving as consultant or co-patent holder or receiving grants, honoraria, or payments for medical education from several sources.

Source: Ogdie A et al. Rheumatology. 2021 Sep 11. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab622.

Key clinical point: Treating skin manifestations with biologics significantly reduced the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.

Major finding: The risk of developing PsA was significantly higher in patients who did not receive treatment with biologics vs. the biological treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39; 95% CI 1.03-1.87).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort including 1,326 patients with psoriasis without PsA, of which 663 patients received biological treatment and 663 patients did not receive biological treatment.

Disclosures: This study did not report any external funding. Dr. Pavlovsky declared serving as investigator, advisor, consultant, and invited lecturer for various sources.

Source: Rosenthal YS et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 23. doi: 10.1002/art.41946.

Key clinical point: Treating skin manifestations with biologics significantly reduced the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.

Major finding: The risk of developing PsA was significantly higher in patients who did not receive treatment with biologics vs. the biological treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39; 95% CI 1.03-1.87).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort including 1,326 patients with psoriasis without PsA, of which 663 patients received biological treatment and 663 patients did not receive biological treatment.

Disclosures: This study did not report any external funding. Dr. Pavlovsky declared serving as investigator, advisor, consultant, and invited lecturer for various sources.

Source: Rosenthal YS et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 23. doi: 10.1002/art.41946.

Key clinical point: Treating skin manifestations with biologics significantly reduced the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in patients with psoriasis.

Major finding: The risk of developing PsA was significantly higher in patients who did not receive treatment with biologics vs. the biological treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39; 95% CI 1.03-1.87).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort including 1,326 patients with psoriasis without PsA, of which 663 patients received biological treatment and 663 patients did not receive biological treatment.

Disclosures: This study did not report any external funding. Dr. Pavlovsky declared serving as investigator, advisor, consultant, and invited lecturer for various sources.

Source: Rosenthal YS et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Aug 23. doi: 10.1002/art.41946.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommended marketing authorization this week for two new adalimumab biosimilars, Hukyndra and Libmyris.

The biosimilars, both developed by STADA Arzneimittel AG, will be available as a 40-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe and pre-filled pen and 80-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. Both biosimilars will have 15 indications:

• rheumatoid arthritis
• polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
• enthesitis-related arthritis
• ankylosing spondylitis
• axial spondyloarthritis without radiographic evidence of ankylosing spondylitis
• psoriatic arthritis
• chronic plaque psoriasis (adults and children)
• hidradenitis suppurativa
• Crohn’s disease (adults and children)
• ulcerative colitis (adults and children)
• uveitis (adults and children)

Data show that both Hukyndra and Libmyris are highly similar to the reference product Humira (adalimumab), a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, and have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommended marketing authorization this week for two new adalimumab biosimilars, Hukyndra and Libmyris.

The biosimilars, both developed by STADA Arzneimittel AG, will be available as a 40-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe and pre-filled pen and 80-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. Both biosimilars will have 15 indications:

• rheumatoid arthritis
• polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
• enthesitis-related arthritis
• ankylosing spondylitis
• axial spondyloarthritis without radiographic evidence of ankylosing spondylitis
• psoriatic arthritis
• chronic plaque psoriasis (adults and children)
• hidradenitis suppurativa
• Crohn’s disease (adults and children)
• ulcerative colitis (adults and children)
• uveitis (adults and children)

Data show that both Hukyndra and Libmyris are highly similar to the reference product Humira (adalimumab), a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, and have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommended marketing authorization this week for two new adalimumab biosimilars, Hukyndra and Libmyris.

The biosimilars, both developed by STADA Arzneimittel AG, will be available as a 40-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe and pre-filled pen and 80-mg solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. Both biosimilars will have 15 indications:

• rheumatoid arthritis
• polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis
• enthesitis-related arthritis
• ankylosing spondylitis
• axial spondyloarthritis without radiographic evidence of ankylosing spondylitis
• psoriatic arthritis
• chronic plaque psoriasis (adults and children)
• hidradenitis suppurativa
• Crohn’s disease (adults and children)
• ulcerative colitis (adults and children)
• uveitis (adults and children)

Data show that both Hukyndra and Libmyris are highly similar to the reference product Humira (adalimumab), a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha, and have comparable quality, safety, and efficacy.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Key clinical point: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was positively associated with the risk of developing psoriasis.

Major finding: Compared with PPI use of 30 or less cumulative defined daily doses (cDDD), PPI use of 120-365 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.76) and higher than 365 (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.93) was associated with a significantly higher risk for psoriasis. Lansoprazole (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41), but not pantoprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, or omeprazole, significantly contributed to psoriasis risk.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide nested case-control study including 5,756 patients with prior exposure to PPIs, of which 2,878 patients had psoriasis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Li CY et al. Dermatology. 2021 Sep 2. doi: 10.1159/000517515.

Key clinical point: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was positively associated with the risk of developing psoriasis.

Major finding: Compared with PPI use of 30 or less cumulative defined daily doses (cDDD), PPI use of 120-365 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.76) and higher than 365 (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.93) was associated with a significantly higher risk for psoriasis. Lansoprazole (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41), but not pantoprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, or omeprazole, significantly contributed to psoriasis risk.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide nested case-control study including 5,756 patients with prior exposure to PPIs, of which 2,878 patients had psoriasis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Li CY et al. Dermatology. 2021 Sep 2. doi: 10.1159/000517515.

Key clinical point: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use was positively associated with the risk of developing psoriasis.

Major finding: Compared with PPI use of 30 or less cumulative defined daily doses (cDDD), PPI use of 120-365 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.76) and higher than 365 (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.22-1.93) was associated with a significantly higher risk for psoriasis. Lansoprazole (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.41), but not pantoprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, or omeprazole, significantly contributed to psoriasis risk.

Study details: Findings are from a nationwide nested case-control study including 5,756 patients with prior exposure to PPIs, of which 2,878 patients had psoriasis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Li CY et al. Dermatology. 2021 Sep 2. doi: 10.1159/000517515.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis displayed enhanced susceptibility to psychiatric diseases with the highest risk for those with severe psoriasis, necessitating the simultaneous treatment of both conditions.

Major finding: Patients with psoriasis were at a higher risk for depression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.26), anxiety disorders (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26), and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34) than healthy controls. Patients with moderate-to-severe vs. mild disease showed a higher risk of developing depression (aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54 vs aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27) and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.26-2.03 vs aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.28).

Study details: The data come from a nationwide, prospective cohort study including 10,868 patients with psoriasis and 1,620,055 nonpsoriasis patients followed up for a maximum period of 15 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Ministry of Education. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Oh J et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16115.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis displayed enhanced susceptibility to psychiatric diseases with the highest risk for those with severe psoriasis, necessitating the simultaneous treatment of both conditions.

Major finding: Patients with psoriasis were at a higher risk for depression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.26), anxiety disorders (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26), and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34) than healthy controls. Patients with moderate-to-severe vs. mild disease showed a higher risk of developing depression (aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54 vs aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27) and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.26-2.03 vs aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.28).

Study details: The data come from a nationwide, prospective cohort study including 10,868 patients with psoriasis and 1,620,055 nonpsoriasis patients followed up for a maximum period of 15 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Ministry of Education. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Oh J et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16115.

Key clinical point: Patients with psoriasis displayed enhanced susceptibility to psychiatric diseases with the highest risk for those with severe psoriasis, necessitating the simultaneous treatment of both conditions.

Major finding: Patients with psoriasis were at a higher risk for depression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.26), anxiety disorders (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26), and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34) than healthy controls. Patients with moderate-to-severe vs. mild disease showed a higher risk of developing depression (aHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54 vs aHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27) and somatoform disorders (aHR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.26-2.03 vs aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.28).

Study details: The data come from a nationwide, prospective cohort study including 10,868 patients with psoriasis and 1,620,055 nonpsoriasis patients followed up for a maximum period of 15 years.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Ministry of Education. The authors declared no potential conflict of interests.

Source: Oh J et al. J Dermatol. 2021 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16115.

Key clinical point: Secukinumab caused substantial and sustained skin clearance irrespective of prior treatment, leading to high patient satisfaction in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Major finding: Overall, 82.3% of patients endorsed the skin clearing effect of secukinumab at 6 months, which persisted through 12 (81.7%), 18 (83.3%), and 24 (81.4%) months. Biologic-experienced/naive and systemic-experienced/naive patients showed similar results. Of those dissatisfied at baseline, 77.9% of patients reported satisfaction at 6 months, which lasted through 12 (74.4%), 18 (82.8%), and 24 (71.4%) months.

Study details: The study included 3,680 patients aged 18 years or above with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who received secukinumab.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ. AW Armstrong and PS Yamauchi declared serving as an investigator/consultant/advisor/speaker for various organizations. D Patil, E Levi, and E Nguyen declared being employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Source: Armstrong AW et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00599-5.

Key clinical point: Secukinumab caused substantial and sustained skin clearance irrespective of prior treatment, leading to high patient satisfaction in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Major finding: Overall, 82.3% of patients endorsed the skin clearing effect of secukinumab at 6 months, which persisted through 12 (81.7%), 18 (83.3%), and 24 (81.4%) months. Biologic-experienced/naive and systemic-experienced/naive patients showed similar results. Of those dissatisfied at baseline, 77.9% of patients reported satisfaction at 6 months, which lasted through 12 (74.4%), 18 (82.8%), and 24 (71.4%) months.

Study details: The study included 3,680 patients aged 18 years or above with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who received secukinumab.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ. AW Armstrong and PS Yamauchi declared serving as an investigator/consultant/advisor/speaker for various organizations. D Patil, E Levi, and E Nguyen declared being employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Source: Armstrong AW et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00599-5.

Key clinical point: Secukinumab caused substantial and sustained skin clearance irrespective of prior treatment, leading to high patient satisfaction in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Major finding: Overall, 82.3% of patients endorsed the skin clearing effect of secukinumab at 6 months, which persisted through 12 (81.7%), 18 (83.3%), and 24 (81.4%) months. Biologic-experienced/naive and systemic-experienced/naive patients showed similar results. Of those dissatisfied at baseline, 77.9% of patients reported satisfaction at 6 months, which lasted through 12 (74.4%), 18 (82.8%), and 24 (71.4%) months.

Study details: The study included 3,680 patients aged 18 years or above with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who received secukinumab.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ. AW Armstrong and PS Yamauchi declared serving as an investigator/consultant/advisor/speaker for various organizations. D Patil, E Levi, and E Nguyen declared being employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Source: Armstrong AW et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00599-5.