Psoriatic Arthritis on the Rise

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:58
Display Headline
Psoriatic Arthritis on the Rise

The primary comorbidity of psoriasis is psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The true incidence of PsA has long been an issue of debate. To estimate the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis and to identify risk factors for its development, Eder at al conducted a prospective cohort study involving psoriasis patients without arthritis at study entry that was published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The investigators collected information from patients concerning lifestyle habits, comorbidities, psoriasis activity, and medications. The patients were evaluated at enrollment and annually. A general physical examination, assessment of psoriasis severity, and assessment for the development of musculoskeletal symptoms were conducted at each visit. A diagnosis of PsA was determined by a rheumatologist on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data; patients also had to fulfill the CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria (confirmed cases). The annual incidence of PsA was estimated using an event per person-years analysis.

The results from 464 patients who were followed for 8 years were analyzed. The annual incidence of confirmed PsA was 2.7 per 100 patients with psoriasis (95% CI, 2.1-3.6). Overall, 51 patients developed PsA over the course of the study and an additional 9 were considered suspect cases.

The following baseline variables were associated with the development of PsA in multivariate analysis: severe psoriasis (relative risk [RR], 5.4; P=.006), low level of education (college/university vs high school incomplete: RR, 4.5; P=.005; high school education vs high school incomplete: RR, 3.3; P=.049), and use of retinoid medications (RR, 3.4; P=.02). In addition, psoriatic nail pitting (RR, 2.5; P=.002) and uveitis (RR, 31.5; P<.001) were time-dependent predictors for PsA development.

The authors concluded that the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis was higher than previously reported. Possible factors for this finding might include differences in patient recruitment as well as self-reported PsA diagnoses.

What’s the issue?

This prospective analysis is interesting. The incidence of PsA was higher than reported. It reinforces the need for continual evaluation of joint symptoms in patients with psoriasis, even if they have had psoriasis for many years. How will this analysis impact your evaluation of psoriatic patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, arthritis, joints, psoriasis comorbidity
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Related Articles

The primary comorbidity of psoriasis is psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The true incidence of PsA has long been an issue of debate. To estimate the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis and to identify risk factors for its development, Eder at al conducted a prospective cohort study involving psoriasis patients without arthritis at study entry that was published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The investigators collected information from patients concerning lifestyle habits, comorbidities, psoriasis activity, and medications. The patients were evaluated at enrollment and annually. A general physical examination, assessment of psoriasis severity, and assessment for the development of musculoskeletal symptoms were conducted at each visit. A diagnosis of PsA was determined by a rheumatologist on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data; patients also had to fulfill the CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria (confirmed cases). The annual incidence of PsA was estimated using an event per person-years analysis.

The results from 464 patients who were followed for 8 years were analyzed. The annual incidence of confirmed PsA was 2.7 per 100 patients with psoriasis (95% CI, 2.1-3.6). Overall, 51 patients developed PsA over the course of the study and an additional 9 were considered suspect cases.

The following baseline variables were associated with the development of PsA in multivariate analysis: severe psoriasis (relative risk [RR], 5.4; P=.006), low level of education (college/university vs high school incomplete: RR, 4.5; P=.005; high school education vs high school incomplete: RR, 3.3; P=.049), and use of retinoid medications (RR, 3.4; P=.02). In addition, psoriatic nail pitting (RR, 2.5; P=.002) and uveitis (RR, 31.5; P<.001) were time-dependent predictors for PsA development.

The authors concluded that the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis was higher than previously reported. Possible factors for this finding might include differences in patient recruitment as well as self-reported PsA diagnoses.

What’s the issue?

This prospective analysis is interesting. The incidence of PsA was higher than reported. It reinforces the need for continual evaluation of joint symptoms in patients with psoriasis, even if they have had psoriasis for many years. How will this analysis impact your evaluation of psoriatic patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

The primary comorbidity of psoriasis is psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The true incidence of PsA has long been an issue of debate. To estimate the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis and to identify risk factors for its development, Eder at al conducted a prospective cohort study involving psoriasis patients without arthritis at study entry that was published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology.

The investigators collected information from patients concerning lifestyle habits, comorbidities, psoriasis activity, and medications. The patients were evaluated at enrollment and annually. A general physical examination, assessment of psoriasis severity, and assessment for the development of musculoskeletal symptoms were conducted at each visit. A diagnosis of PsA was determined by a rheumatologist on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data; patients also had to fulfill the CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria (confirmed cases). The annual incidence of PsA was estimated using an event per person-years analysis.

The results from 464 patients who were followed for 8 years were analyzed. The annual incidence of confirmed PsA was 2.7 per 100 patients with psoriasis (95% CI, 2.1-3.6). Overall, 51 patients developed PsA over the course of the study and an additional 9 were considered suspect cases.

The following baseline variables were associated with the development of PsA in multivariate analysis: severe psoriasis (relative risk [RR], 5.4; P=.006), low level of education (college/university vs high school incomplete: RR, 4.5; P=.005; high school education vs high school incomplete: RR, 3.3; P=.049), and use of retinoid medications (RR, 3.4; P=.02). In addition, psoriatic nail pitting (RR, 2.5; P=.002) and uveitis (RR, 31.5; P<.001) were time-dependent predictors for PsA development.

The authors concluded that the incidence of PsA in patients with psoriasis was higher than previously reported. Possible factors for this finding might include differences in patient recruitment as well as self-reported PsA diagnoses.

What’s the issue?

This prospective analysis is interesting. The incidence of PsA was higher than reported. It reinforces the need for continual evaluation of joint symptoms in patients with psoriasis, even if they have had psoriasis for many years. How will this analysis impact your evaluation of psoriatic patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriatic Arthritis on the Rise
Display Headline
Psoriatic Arthritis on the Rise
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, arthritis, joints, psoriasis comorbidity
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, arthritis, joints, psoriasis comorbidity
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Psoriasis for Seniors

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:59
Display Headline
Psoriasis for Seniors

The evaluation and treatment of psoriasis in older patients have long been issues of interest among clinicians. This population is at risk from comorbidities associated with psoriasis. In addition, the potential for increased side effects of therapies in this population has been a concern.

Takeshita et al1 recently published a study evaluating the prevalence of psoriasis and its treatments in the elderly population. The authors point out that despite major advances in the field of psoriasis, there are large gaps in knowledge among the increasing elderly population. The authors noted that this study is the first to evaluate the epidemiology and treatment of psoriasis in the US population using Medicare.1

Utilizing 8 different algorithms, claims-based psoriasis prevalence was calculated for 799,607 beneficiaries in the 2011 Medicare 5% sample (random 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries) and was found to range from 0.51% to 1.23%. For the main analyses, a diagnosis of psoriasis was established by the presence of at least 2 inpatient or outpatient claims for psoriasis.1

The authors reported the following characteristics for the study population1: the mean age was 68.6 years; 43.2% of the participants were male; 88.8% were white; 5.1% were black; 2.2% were Hispanic; and 3.9% were other or unknown race. Regional distribution of residence was as follows: 24.0% in the northeast, 23.0% in the Midwest, 36.2% in the south, and 16.6% in the west. County-level mean per capita income was $40,115; 63.6% of beneficiaries qualified for Medicare based on age alone; 58.4% were not receiving a Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS); and 19.0% were receiving Part D plans with enhanced alternative coverage. The most commonly coded comorbidities were cardiometabolic disorders (67.6% hypertension; 59.9% dyslipidemia; 32.4% diabetes); 23.5% had atherosclerotic outcomes. The prevalence of obesity was relatively low at 9.3% and the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis was 9.4%. Other comorbid diseases of interest included depression (17.1%), renal disease (9.8%), liver disease (5.1%), and inflammatory bowel disease (1.2%).1

The analysis of psoriatic therapy revealed that topical therapies were used by 76.6% of the total psoriasis sample, the majority of which were topical corticosteroids.1 Phototherapy was used by 7% and oral systemic medications were used by 14.3% (the majority received methotrexate). Biologics were received by 10.2%, and of those patients, 44.4% received etanercept, 34.2% adalimumab, 22.7% infliximab, and 7.9% ustekinumab.1

There were several interesting findings in the analysis.1 Oral systemic medications such as methotrexate were the most common therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, followed by biologics.1 Associated comorbidities for which biologic therapy is indicated (ie, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis) were associated with greater odds of receiving treatment with biologics. Individuals lacking LIS under the Part D plan had 70% lower odds of receiving biologics compared with those with LIS that allowed for lower out-of-pocket costs. The odds of having received biologics were 69% lower for black individuals compared to white patients.1

This study helps us to further understand the patterns of psoriasis and its treatment in the elderly population. Some of the findings are in line with our current thinking regarding comorbidities and therapies used, while other observations, such as a lower number of untreated patients than expected, are more surprising. Interestingly, this study identified potential financial and racial barriers to the receipt of biologic therapies. These barriers are important issues to address as we strive to better care for our psoriatic population.

References
  1. Takeshita J, Gelfand JM, Li P, et al. Psoriasis in the US Medicare population: prevalence, treatment, and factors associated with biologic use [published online July 27, 2015]. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2955-2963. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.296.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
83
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, senior, medicare, elderly, psoriatic arthritis
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The evaluation and treatment of psoriasis in older patients have long been issues of interest among clinicians. This population is at risk from comorbidities associated with psoriasis. In addition, the potential for increased side effects of therapies in this population has been a concern.

Takeshita et al1 recently published a study evaluating the prevalence of psoriasis and its treatments in the elderly population. The authors point out that despite major advances in the field of psoriasis, there are large gaps in knowledge among the increasing elderly population. The authors noted that this study is the first to evaluate the epidemiology and treatment of psoriasis in the US population using Medicare.1

Utilizing 8 different algorithms, claims-based psoriasis prevalence was calculated for 799,607 beneficiaries in the 2011 Medicare 5% sample (random 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries) and was found to range from 0.51% to 1.23%. For the main analyses, a diagnosis of psoriasis was established by the presence of at least 2 inpatient or outpatient claims for psoriasis.1

The authors reported the following characteristics for the study population1: the mean age was 68.6 years; 43.2% of the participants were male; 88.8% were white; 5.1% were black; 2.2% were Hispanic; and 3.9% were other or unknown race. Regional distribution of residence was as follows: 24.0% in the northeast, 23.0% in the Midwest, 36.2% in the south, and 16.6% in the west. County-level mean per capita income was $40,115; 63.6% of beneficiaries qualified for Medicare based on age alone; 58.4% were not receiving a Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS); and 19.0% were receiving Part D plans with enhanced alternative coverage. The most commonly coded comorbidities were cardiometabolic disorders (67.6% hypertension; 59.9% dyslipidemia; 32.4% diabetes); 23.5% had atherosclerotic outcomes. The prevalence of obesity was relatively low at 9.3% and the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis was 9.4%. Other comorbid diseases of interest included depression (17.1%), renal disease (9.8%), liver disease (5.1%), and inflammatory bowel disease (1.2%).1

The analysis of psoriatic therapy revealed that topical therapies were used by 76.6% of the total psoriasis sample, the majority of which were topical corticosteroids.1 Phototherapy was used by 7% and oral systemic medications were used by 14.3% (the majority received methotrexate). Biologics were received by 10.2%, and of those patients, 44.4% received etanercept, 34.2% adalimumab, 22.7% infliximab, and 7.9% ustekinumab.1

There were several interesting findings in the analysis.1 Oral systemic medications such as methotrexate were the most common therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, followed by biologics.1 Associated comorbidities for which biologic therapy is indicated (ie, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis) were associated with greater odds of receiving treatment with biologics. Individuals lacking LIS under the Part D plan had 70% lower odds of receiving biologics compared with those with LIS that allowed for lower out-of-pocket costs. The odds of having received biologics were 69% lower for black individuals compared to white patients.1

This study helps us to further understand the patterns of psoriasis and its treatment in the elderly population. Some of the findings are in line with our current thinking regarding comorbidities and therapies used, while other observations, such as a lower number of untreated patients than expected, are more surprising. Interestingly, this study identified potential financial and racial barriers to the receipt of biologic therapies. These barriers are important issues to address as we strive to better care for our psoriatic population.

The evaluation and treatment of psoriasis in older patients have long been issues of interest among clinicians. This population is at risk from comorbidities associated with psoriasis. In addition, the potential for increased side effects of therapies in this population has been a concern.

Takeshita et al1 recently published a study evaluating the prevalence of psoriasis and its treatments in the elderly population. The authors point out that despite major advances in the field of psoriasis, there are large gaps in knowledge among the increasing elderly population. The authors noted that this study is the first to evaluate the epidemiology and treatment of psoriasis in the US population using Medicare.1

Utilizing 8 different algorithms, claims-based psoriasis prevalence was calculated for 799,607 beneficiaries in the 2011 Medicare 5% sample (random 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries) and was found to range from 0.51% to 1.23%. For the main analyses, a diagnosis of psoriasis was established by the presence of at least 2 inpatient or outpatient claims for psoriasis.1

The authors reported the following characteristics for the study population1: the mean age was 68.6 years; 43.2% of the participants were male; 88.8% were white; 5.1% were black; 2.2% were Hispanic; and 3.9% were other or unknown race. Regional distribution of residence was as follows: 24.0% in the northeast, 23.0% in the Midwest, 36.2% in the south, and 16.6% in the west. County-level mean per capita income was $40,115; 63.6% of beneficiaries qualified for Medicare based on age alone; 58.4% were not receiving a Medicare Part D low-income subsidy (LIS); and 19.0% were receiving Part D plans with enhanced alternative coverage. The most commonly coded comorbidities were cardiometabolic disorders (67.6% hypertension; 59.9% dyslipidemia; 32.4% diabetes); 23.5% had atherosclerotic outcomes. The prevalence of obesity was relatively low at 9.3% and the prevalence of psoriatic arthritis was 9.4%. Other comorbid diseases of interest included depression (17.1%), renal disease (9.8%), liver disease (5.1%), and inflammatory bowel disease (1.2%).1

The analysis of psoriatic therapy revealed that topical therapies were used by 76.6% of the total psoriasis sample, the majority of which were topical corticosteroids.1 Phototherapy was used by 7% and oral systemic medications were used by 14.3% (the majority received methotrexate). Biologics were received by 10.2%, and of those patients, 44.4% received etanercept, 34.2% adalimumab, 22.7% infliximab, and 7.9% ustekinumab.1

There were several interesting findings in the analysis.1 Oral systemic medications such as methotrexate were the most common therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis, followed by biologics.1 Associated comorbidities for which biologic therapy is indicated (ie, ankylosing spondylitis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriatic arthritis) were associated with greater odds of receiving treatment with biologics. Individuals lacking LIS under the Part D plan had 70% lower odds of receiving biologics compared with those with LIS that allowed for lower out-of-pocket costs. The odds of having received biologics were 69% lower for black individuals compared to white patients.1

This study helps us to further understand the patterns of psoriasis and its treatment in the elderly population. Some of the findings are in line with our current thinking regarding comorbidities and therapies used, while other observations, such as a lower number of untreated patients than expected, are more surprising. Interestingly, this study identified potential financial and racial barriers to the receipt of biologic therapies. These barriers are important issues to address as we strive to better care for our psoriatic population.

References
  1. Takeshita J, Gelfand JM, Li P, et al. Psoriasis in the US Medicare population: prevalence, treatment, and factors associated with biologic use [published online July 27, 2015]. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2955-2963. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.296.
References
  1. Takeshita J, Gelfand JM, Li P, et al. Psoriasis in the US Medicare population: prevalence, treatment, and factors associated with biologic use [published online July 27, 2015]. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2955-2963. doi:10.1038/jid.2015.296.
Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Issue
Cutis - 97(2)
Page Number
83
Page Number
83
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Psoriasis for Seniors
Display Headline
Psoriasis for Seniors
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, senior, medicare, elderly, psoriatic arthritis
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, senior, medicare, elderly, psoriatic arthritis
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Price Explosion

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:59
Display Headline
Price Explosion

One of the biggest burdens of modern clinical dermatology practice is the ability to obtain appropriate drug therapy for patients. In the current health care environment, insurance formularies have become increasingly restrictive and more individuals have to deal with high-deductible insurance plans.

In a JAMA Dermatology study published online on November 25, Rosenberg and Rosenberg sought to determine changes in the prices of commonly prescribed dermatologic medications since 2009 and identify trends in price increases for different classes of drugs. To perform this analysis, they sent surveys to 4 national chain pharmacies requesting price information for commonly prescribed dermatologic therapies in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015. The initial survey requested information on 72 brand-name drugs.

The findings of the analysis were staggering. Of the 19 brand-name drugs analyzed, the retail prices of 7 drugs more than quadrupled over the study period. The mean price increase for this group of drugs was 401% during the entire survey period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg grouped the price increase by therapeutic class. Prices of topical antineoplastic therapies had the largest mean absolute and percentage increase ($10,926.58 [1240%]). Prices of drugs in the anti-infective class had the smallest mean absolute increase ($333.99); prices of psoriasis medications had the smallest mean percentage increase (180%). Prices of acne and rosacea medications had a mean increase of 195%, and prices of topical corticosteroids experienced a mean increase of 290%. Selected generic drugs examined in 2011 and 2014 also increased a mean of 279% during the 3-year period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg noted that the increases for commonly prescribed medications greatly outpaced inflation, national health expenditure growth, and increases in reimbursements for physician services. They did not detect any specific trend to explain the substantial increase in the costs of dermatologic prescription drugs and they did not investigate reasons for the price increases.

What’s the issue?

Price increases for psoriatic and other therapies are creating barriers to both our appropriate treatment of patients and our ability to effectively practice medicine. How are you coping with this challenge in your practice?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, price, therapy, increase, barriers
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Related Articles

One of the biggest burdens of modern clinical dermatology practice is the ability to obtain appropriate drug therapy for patients. In the current health care environment, insurance formularies have become increasingly restrictive and more individuals have to deal with high-deductible insurance plans.

In a JAMA Dermatology study published online on November 25, Rosenberg and Rosenberg sought to determine changes in the prices of commonly prescribed dermatologic medications since 2009 and identify trends in price increases for different classes of drugs. To perform this analysis, they sent surveys to 4 national chain pharmacies requesting price information for commonly prescribed dermatologic therapies in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015. The initial survey requested information on 72 brand-name drugs.

The findings of the analysis were staggering. Of the 19 brand-name drugs analyzed, the retail prices of 7 drugs more than quadrupled over the study period. The mean price increase for this group of drugs was 401% during the entire survey period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg grouped the price increase by therapeutic class. Prices of topical antineoplastic therapies had the largest mean absolute and percentage increase ($10,926.58 [1240%]). Prices of drugs in the anti-infective class had the smallest mean absolute increase ($333.99); prices of psoriasis medications had the smallest mean percentage increase (180%). Prices of acne and rosacea medications had a mean increase of 195%, and prices of topical corticosteroids experienced a mean increase of 290%. Selected generic drugs examined in 2011 and 2014 also increased a mean of 279% during the 3-year period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg noted that the increases for commonly prescribed medications greatly outpaced inflation, national health expenditure growth, and increases in reimbursements for physician services. They did not detect any specific trend to explain the substantial increase in the costs of dermatologic prescription drugs and they did not investigate reasons for the price increases.

What’s the issue?

Price increases for psoriatic and other therapies are creating barriers to both our appropriate treatment of patients and our ability to effectively practice medicine. How are you coping with this challenge in your practice?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

One of the biggest burdens of modern clinical dermatology practice is the ability to obtain appropriate drug therapy for patients. In the current health care environment, insurance formularies have become increasingly restrictive and more individuals have to deal with high-deductible insurance plans.

In a JAMA Dermatology study published online on November 25, Rosenberg and Rosenberg sought to determine changes in the prices of commonly prescribed dermatologic medications since 2009 and identify trends in price increases for different classes of drugs. To perform this analysis, they sent surveys to 4 national chain pharmacies requesting price information for commonly prescribed dermatologic therapies in 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2015. The initial survey requested information on 72 brand-name drugs.

The findings of the analysis were staggering. Of the 19 brand-name drugs analyzed, the retail prices of 7 drugs more than quadrupled over the study period. The mean price increase for this group of drugs was 401% during the entire survey period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg grouped the price increase by therapeutic class. Prices of topical antineoplastic therapies had the largest mean absolute and percentage increase ($10,926.58 [1240%]). Prices of drugs in the anti-infective class had the smallest mean absolute increase ($333.99); prices of psoriasis medications had the smallest mean percentage increase (180%). Prices of acne and rosacea medications had a mean increase of 195%, and prices of topical corticosteroids experienced a mean increase of 290%. Selected generic drugs examined in 2011 and 2014 also increased a mean of 279% during the 3-year period.

Rosenberg and Rosenberg noted that the increases for commonly prescribed medications greatly outpaced inflation, national health expenditure growth, and increases in reimbursements for physician services. They did not detect any specific trend to explain the substantial increase in the costs of dermatologic prescription drugs and they did not investigate reasons for the price increases.

What’s the issue?

Price increases for psoriatic and other therapies are creating barriers to both our appropriate treatment of patients and our ability to effectively practice medicine. How are you coping with this challenge in your practice?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Price Explosion
Display Headline
Price Explosion
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, price, therapy, increase, barriers
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, price, therapy, increase, barriers
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Bump in the Road

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 14:59
Display Headline
Bump in the Road

On October 14, 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration declined to approve tofacitinib citrate, an oral rheumatoid arthritis drug, for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The FDA communicated its decision to the manufacturer in the form of a complete response letter, which typically outlines concerns and conditions that must be addressed in order to gain FDA approval following initial review of an application.

A recent press release indicated that the manufacturer is committed to pursuing approval of the product based on the strength of the clinical data for its treatment of psoriasis. The FDA generally does not disclose the contents of its complete response letters, but the manufacturer reported it has been asked to provide additional safety analyses of the drug for psoriasis and that it will work closely with the agency to gain the additional approval for treatment of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

What’s the Issue?

With the increasing number of psoriasis drugs on the market and in the pipeline, the risk-benefit profile of all drugs needs to be evaluated very carefully. Therefore, safety is the focal issue in all new drug development. Hopefully these issues with the FDA approval of tofacitinib citrate will be worked out so that we may have another oral option for our psoriasis patients. How will this development influence your approach to new therapies?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg has served as an advisor for Pfizer Inc.

Issue
Cutis - 96(5)
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
oral, psoriasis, FDA, safety, therapy
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg has served as an advisor for Pfizer Inc.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg has served as an advisor for Pfizer Inc.

Related Articles

On October 14, 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration declined to approve tofacitinib citrate, an oral rheumatoid arthritis drug, for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The FDA communicated its decision to the manufacturer in the form of a complete response letter, which typically outlines concerns and conditions that must be addressed in order to gain FDA approval following initial review of an application.

A recent press release indicated that the manufacturer is committed to pursuing approval of the product based on the strength of the clinical data for its treatment of psoriasis. The FDA generally does not disclose the contents of its complete response letters, but the manufacturer reported it has been asked to provide additional safety analyses of the drug for psoriasis and that it will work closely with the agency to gain the additional approval for treatment of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

What’s the Issue?

With the increasing number of psoriasis drugs on the market and in the pipeline, the risk-benefit profile of all drugs needs to be evaluated very carefully. Therefore, safety is the focal issue in all new drug development. Hopefully these issues with the FDA approval of tofacitinib citrate will be worked out so that we may have another oral option for our psoriasis patients. How will this development influence your approach to new therapies?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

On October 14, 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration declined to approve tofacitinib citrate, an oral rheumatoid arthritis drug, for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. The FDA communicated its decision to the manufacturer in the form of a complete response letter, which typically outlines concerns and conditions that must be addressed in order to gain FDA approval following initial review of an application.

A recent press release indicated that the manufacturer is committed to pursuing approval of the product based on the strength of the clinical data for its treatment of psoriasis. The FDA generally does not disclose the contents of its complete response letters, but the manufacturer reported it has been asked to provide additional safety analyses of the drug for psoriasis and that it will work closely with the agency to gain the additional approval for treatment of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis.

What’s the Issue?

With the increasing number of psoriasis drugs on the market and in the pipeline, the risk-benefit profile of all drugs needs to be evaluated very carefully. Therefore, safety is the focal issue in all new drug development. Hopefully these issues with the FDA approval of tofacitinib citrate will be worked out so that we may have another oral option for our psoriasis patients. How will this development influence your approach to new therapies?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Issue
Cutis - 96(5)
Issue
Cutis - 96(5)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Bump in the Road
Display Headline
Bump in the Road
Legacy Keywords
oral, psoriasis, FDA, safety, therapy
Legacy Keywords
oral, psoriasis, FDA, safety, therapy
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Depression and Psoriasis

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Depression and Psoriasis

While psoriasis is a known risk factor for depression, depression can also exacerbate or trigger psoriasis. This relationship between depression and psoriasis, however, remains to be fully explored.

In an article published online on September 30 in JAMA Dermatology , Cohen et al examined the association between psoriasis and major depression in the US population. The authors conducted a population-based study that utilized individuals who were participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009 through 2012.

The authors identified 351 (2.8%) cases of psoriasis and 968 (7.8%) cases of major depression in the 12,382 participants included in the study. Of the patients with psoriasis, 58 (16.5%) met criteria for major depression. The mean (standard deviation) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score was significantly higher among patients with a history of psoriasis than those without psoriasis (4.54 [5.7] vs 3.22 [4.3], P<.001). After adjustment for sex, age, race, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking history, alcohol use, history of myocardial infarction, history of stroke, and history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.41–3.11], P<.001), psoriasis was significantly associated with major depression. Having a history of cardiovascular events did not modify the risk of major depression for patients with psoriasis. The investigators also found that the risk of major depression was not significantly different between patients with limited vs extensive psoriasis (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.18–2.44], P=.53).

What’s the Issue?

We know that psoriasis is associated with depression. This study, however, has some surprising findings. The severity of psoriasis was unrelated to the risk of major depression. Additionally, cardiovascular events did not seem to impact major depression in participants with psoriasis. Therefore, all patients with psoriasis, regardless of severity, may be at risk for major depression. Will these findings impact your evaluation of psychological issues in individuals with psoriasis?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, depression, cardiovascular, comorbidity, major depression
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Related Articles

While psoriasis is a known risk factor for depression, depression can also exacerbate or trigger psoriasis. This relationship between depression and psoriasis, however, remains to be fully explored.

In an article published online on September 30 in JAMA Dermatology , Cohen et al examined the association between psoriasis and major depression in the US population. The authors conducted a population-based study that utilized individuals who were participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009 through 2012.

The authors identified 351 (2.8%) cases of psoriasis and 968 (7.8%) cases of major depression in the 12,382 participants included in the study. Of the patients with psoriasis, 58 (16.5%) met criteria for major depression. The mean (standard deviation) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score was significantly higher among patients with a history of psoriasis than those without psoriasis (4.54 [5.7] vs 3.22 [4.3], P<.001). After adjustment for sex, age, race, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking history, alcohol use, history of myocardial infarction, history of stroke, and history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.41–3.11], P<.001), psoriasis was significantly associated with major depression. Having a history of cardiovascular events did not modify the risk of major depression for patients with psoriasis. The investigators also found that the risk of major depression was not significantly different between patients with limited vs extensive psoriasis (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.18–2.44], P=.53).

What’s the Issue?

We know that psoriasis is associated with depression. This study, however, has some surprising findings. The severity of psoriasis was unrelated to the risk of major depression. Additionally, cardiovascular events did not seem to impact major depression in participants with psoriasis. Therefore, all patients with psoriasis, regardless of severity, may be at risk for major depression. Will these findings impact your evaluation of psychological issues in individuals with psoriasis?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

While psoriasis is a known risk factor for depression, depression can also exacerbate or trigger psoriasis. This relationship between depression and psoriasis, however, remains to be fully explored.

In an article published online on September 30 in JAMA Dermatology , Cohen et al examined the association between psoriasis and major depression in the US population. The authors conducted a population-based study that utilized individuals who were participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2009 through 2012.

The authors identified 351 (2.8%) cases of psoriasis and 968 (7.8%) cases of major depression in the 12,382 participants included in the study. Of the patients with psoriasis, 58 (16.5%) met criteria for major depression. The mean (standard deviation) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score was significantly higher among patients with a history of psoriasis than those without psoriasis (4.54 [5.7] vs 3.22 [4.3], P<.001). After adjustment for sex, age, race, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking history, alcohol use, history of myocardial infarction, history of stroke, and history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.41–3.11], P<.001), psoriasis was significantly associated with major depression. Having a history of cardiovascular events did not modify the risk of major depression for patients with psoriasis. The investigators also found that the risk of major depression was not significantly different between patients with limited vs extensive psoriasis (odds ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.18–2.44], P=.53).

What’s the Issue?

We know that psoriasis is associated with depression. This study, however, has some surprising findings. The severity of psoriasis was unrelated to the risk of major depression. Additionally, cardiovascular events did not seem to impact major depression in participants with psoriasis. Therefore, all patients with psoriasis, regardless of severity, may be at risk for major depression. Will these findings impact your evaluation of psychological issues in individuals with psoriasis?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Depression and Psoriasis
Display Headline
Depression and Psoriasis
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, depression, cardiovascular, comorbidity, major depression
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, depression, cardiovascular, comorbidity, major depression
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Multiple Sclerosis: A Closer Look

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Multiple Sclerosis: A Closer Look

With the advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, one of the major topics of discussion is the relationship of the drug class with new or worsening multiple sclerosis (MS). Exacerbation of previously quiescent MS and the onset of other demyelinating diseases such as optic neuritis have been reported in patients taking TNF inhibitors. Symptoms included paraesthesia, visual disturbance, and confusion.

Therefore, controversy surrounds the use of TNF-α inhibitors in patients who are more predisposed to developing MS, specifically first-degree relatives of MS patients. The American Academy of Dermatology guidelines for TNF inhibitors state the following: “Because there is an association between anti-TNF therapy and demyelinating diseases (ie, MS), TNF inhibitors should not be used in patients with MS or other demyelinating diseases; first-degree relatives of patients with MS have an increased risk of developing MS, with a sibling relative risk of between 18 and 36, evidence strongly suggests that TNF inhibitors should not be used in first-degree relatives of patients with MS.”

Mansouri et al (J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:876-878) presented data suggesting that the number needed to treat is at least an order of magnitude smaller than the number needed to harm across all comparisons of anti–TNF-α agents and first-degree relative relationships. Based on these data, the authors suggest that physicians could weigh the treatment options available and work closely with neurological colleagues when prescribing anti–TNF-α therapy in this patient population, which could be an alternative approach to practicing absolute prohibition of anti–TNF-α agents in patients who have a first-degree relative with MS.

What’s the issue?

This article presents interesting data concerning the risk-benefit of using TNF inhibitors in a potential at-risk population. We are fortunate to have many treatment options available, but in many cases, a TNF inhibitor may be preferable. How will this information affect your use of TNF inhibitors in patients with a first-degree relative with MS?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, TNF, neurologic, multiple sclerosis, tumor necrosis factor, MS
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

Related Articles

With the advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, one of the major topics of discussion is the relationship of the drug class with new or worsening multiple sclerosis (MS). Exacerbation of previously quiescent MS and the onset of other demyelinating diseases such as optic neuritis have been reported in patients taking TNF inhibitors. Symptoms included paraesthesia, visual disturbance, and confusion.

Therefore, controversy surrounds the use of TNF-α inhibitors in patients who are more predisposed to developing MS, specifically first-degree relatives of MS patients. The American Academy of Dermatology guidelines for TNF inhibitors state the following: “Because there is an association between anti-TNF therapy and demyelinating diseases (ie, MS), TNF inhibitors should not be used in patients with MS or other demyelinating diseases; first-degree relatives of patients with MS have an increased risk of developing MS, with a sibling relative risk of between 18 and 36, evidence strongly suggests that TNF inhibitors should not be used in first-degree relatives of patients with MS.”

Mansouri et al (J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:876-878) presented data suggesting that the number needed to treat is at least an order of magnitude smaller than the number needed to harm across all comparisons of anti–TNF-α agents and first-degree relative relationships. Based on these data, the authors suggest that physicians could weigh the treatment options available and work closely with neurological colleagues when prescribing anti–TNF-α therapy in this patient population, which could be an alternative approach to practicing absolute prohibition of anti–TNF-α agents in patients who have a first-degree relative with MS.

What’s the issue?

This article presents interesting data concerning the risk-benefit of using TNF inhibitors in a potential at-risk population. We are fortunate to have many treatment options available, but in many cases, a TNF inhibitor may be preferable. How will this information affect your use of TNF inhibitors in patients with a first-degree relative with MS?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

With the advent of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, one of the major topics of discussion is the relationship of the drug class with new or worsening multiple sclerosis (MS). Exacerbation of previously quiescent MS and the onset of other demyelinating diseases such as optic neuritis have been reported in patients taking TNF inhibitors. Symptoms included paraesthesia, visual disturbance, and confusion.

Therefore, controversy surrounds the use of TNF-α inhibitors in patients who are more predisposed to developing MS, specifically first-degree relatives of MS patients. The American Academy of Dermatology guidelines for TNF inhibitors state the following: “Because there is an association between anti-TNF therapy and demyelinating diseases (ie, MS), TNF inhibitors should not be used in patients with MS or other demyelinating diseases; first-degree relatives of patients with MS have an increased risk of developing MS, with a sibling relative risk of between 18 and 36, evidence strongly suggests that TNF inhibitors should not be used in first-degree relatives of patients with MS.”

Mansouri et al (J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:876-878) presented data suggesting that the number needed to treat is at least an order of magnitude smaller than the number needed to harm across all comparisons of anti–TNF-α agents and first-degree relative relationships. Based on these data, the authors suggest that physicians could weigh the treatment options available and work closely with neurological colleagues when prescribing anti–TNF-α therapy in this patient population, which could be an alternative approach to practicing absolute prohibition of anti–TNF-α agents in patients who have a first-degree relative with MS.

What’s the issue?

This article presents interesting data concerning the risk-benefit of using TNF inhibitors in a potential at-risk population. We are fortunate to have many treatment options available, but in many cases, a TNF inhibitor may be preferable. How will this information affect your use of TNF inhibitors in patients with a first-degree relative with MS?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Multiple Sclerosis: A Closer Look
Display Headline
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Multiple Sclerosis: A Closer Look
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, TNF, neurologic, multiple sclerosis, tumor necrosis factor, MS
Legacy Keywords
psoriasis, TNF, neurologic, multiple sclerosis, tumor necrosis factor, MS
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Uveitis and Psoriasis

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Uveitis and Psoriasis

We are all aware of the association of psoriasis with systemic comorbidities. Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and uveitis are inflammatory disorders that have notable overlap in their inflammatory pathways. In an article published online on July 29 in JAMA Dermatology, Egeberg et al investigated the potential bidirectional relationship between psoriatic disease and uveitis.

The researchers conducted a study (1997-2011) of 74,129 patients aged 18 years and older with incident psoriasis who were identified through administrative registries. There also were 13,114 patients with uveitis identified from the study cohort.

Incidence rates for uveitis per 10,000 person-years were 2.02 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.99-2.06) for the reference population, 2.88 (95% CI, 2.33-3.56) for patients with mild psoriasis, 4.23 (2.40-7.45) for severe psoriasis, and 5.49 (95% CI, 3.36-8.96) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for the reference population, which included participants without uveitis, were 9.37 (95% CI, 9.30-9.45) for patients with mild psoriasis, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.10-1.15) for severe psoriasis, and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.06) for PsA. Patients with uveitis had corresponding incidence rates of 15.51 (95% CI, 12.92-18.62) for mild psoriasis, 2.66 (95% CI, 1.72-4.13) for severe psoriasis, and 4.25 (95% CI, 3.00-6.01) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for patients with uveitis were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.32-1.91) for mild psoriasis, 2.17 (95% CI, 1.40-3.38) for severe psoriasis, and 3.77 (95% CI, 2.66-5.34) for PsA.

The authors concluded that there is a bidirectional association between psoriatic disease and uveitis. They noted that increased focus on ocular symptoms in patients with psoriasis and PsA and on cutaneous and joint symptoms in patients with prior or current uveitis may be appropriate.

What’s the issue?

This research adds to the potential comorbidities of psoriasis and also adds a potential comorbidity of uveitis itself. Therefore, it would be helpful to add ocular symptoms to our review of systems in those with psoriatic disease. How will this information affect your workup of psoriasis patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, uveitis, ocular, comorbidity
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post.

Related Articles

We are all aware of the association of psoriasis with systemic comorbidities. Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and uveitis are inflammatory disorders that have notable overlap in their inflammatory pathways. In an article published online on July 29 in JAMA Dermatology, Egeberg et al investigated the potential bidirectional relationship between psoriatic disease and uveitis.

The researchers conducted a study (1997-2011) of 74,129 patients aged 18 years and older with incident psoriasis who were identified through administrative registries. There also were 13,114 patients with uveitis identified from the study cohort.

Incidence rates for uveitis per 10,000 person-years were 2.02 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.99-2.06) for the reference population, 2.88 (95% CI, 2.33-3.56) for patients with mild psoriasis, 4.23 (2.40-7.45) for severe psoriasis, and 5.49 (95% CI, 3.36-8.96) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for the reference population, which included participants without uveitis, were 9.37 (95% CI, 9.30-9.45) for patients with mild psoriasis, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.10-1.15) for severe psoriasis, and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.06) for PsA. Patients with uveitis had corresponding incidence rates of 15.51 (95% CI, 12.92-18.62) for mild psoriasis, 2.66 (95% CI, 1.72-4.13) for severe psoriasis, and 4.25 (95% CI, 3.00-6.01) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for patients with uveitis were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.32-1.91) for mild psoriasis, 2.17 (95% CI, 1.40-3.38) for severe psoriasis, and 3.77 (95% CI, 2.66-5.34) for PsA.

The authors concluded that there is a bidirectional association between psoriatic disease and uveitis. They noted that increased focus on ocular symptoms in patients with psoriasis and PsA and on cutaneous and joint symptoms in patients with prior or current uveitis may be appropriate.

What’s the issue?

This research adds to the potential comorbidities of psoriasis and also adds a potential comorbidity of uveitis itself. Therefore, it would be helpful to add ocular symptoms to our review of systems in those with psoriatic disease. How will this information affect your workup of psoriasis patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

We are all aware of the association of psoriasis with systemic comorbidities. Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and uveitis are inflammatory disorders that have notable overlap in their inflammatory pathways. In an article published online on July 29 in JAMA Dermatology, Egeberg et al investigated the potential bidirectional relationship between psoriatic disease and uveitis.

The researchers conducted a study (1997-2011) of 74,129 patients aged 18 years and older with incident psoriasis who were identified through administrative registries. There also were 13,114 patients with uveitis identified from the study cohort.

Incidence rates for uveitis per 10,000 person-years were 2.02 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.99-2.06) for the reference population, 2.88 (95% CI, 2.33-3.56) for patients with mild psoriasis, 4.23 (2.40-7.45) for severe psoriasis, and 5.49 (95% CI, 3.36-8.96) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for the reference population, which included participants without uveitis, were 9.37 (95% CI, 9.30-9.45) for patients with mild psoriasis, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.10-1.15) for severe psoriasis, and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.06) for PsA. Patients with uveitis had corresponding incidence rates of 15.51 (95% CI, 12.92-18.62) for mild psoriasis, 2.66 (95% CI, 1.72-4.13) for severe psoriasis, and 4.25 (95% CI, 3.00-6.01) for PsA. Incidence rate ratios per 10,000 person-years for patients with uveitis were 1.59 (95% CI, 1.32-1.91) for mild psoriasis, 2.17 (95% CI, 1.40-3.38) for severe psoriasis, and 3.77 (95% CI, 2.66-5.34) for PsA.

The authors concluded that there is a bidirectional association between psoriatic disease and uveitis. They noted that increased focus on ocular symptoms in patients with psoriasis and PsA and on cutaneous and joint symptoms in patients with prior or current uveitis may be appropriate.

What’s the issue?

This research adds to the potential comorbidities of psoriasis and also adds a potential comorbidity of uveitis itself. Therefore, it would be helpful to add ocular symptoms to our review of systems in those with psoriatic disease. How will this information affect your workup of psoriasis patients?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Uveitis and Psoriasis
Display Headline
Uveitis and Psoriasis
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, uveitis, ocular, comorbidity
Legacy Keywords
Psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, uveitis, ocular, comorbidity
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Treating Psoriasis in Pregnant Women

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Treating Psoriasis in Pregnant Women

What do your patients need to know at the first visit?

Pregnant patients need to know that it is important to carefully monitor them throughout their pregnancy. Although many drugs are not contraindicated, it is still important for the dermatologist to consult with the patient’s obstetrician to discuss risks and benefits of different therapies. Some women see an improvement in the severity of their psoriasis during pregnancy, while others report their condition gets worse. Changes in severity of psoriasis vary by individual and from pregnancy to pregnancy.

What are your go-to treatments? What are the side effects?

UV therapy, particularly narrowband UVB, is a good choice during pregnancy. Excimer laser is another good choice. Topical therapies are standardly employed. Although many of these topical therapies are pregnancy category C, we still employ them regularly in consultation with the patient’s obstetrician. Most biologic therapies are pregnancy category B. We still use these drugs with caution in the setting of pregnancy. If a pregnant patient does wish to continue a biologic therapy, close monitoring and enrollment in a pregnancy registry (http: //www.pregnancystudies.org) would be good options. This registry is analyzing whether medications that are used to treat autoimmune diseases are safe to take during pregnancy. Specifically, the investigators are looking at medications used to treat Crohn disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Generally speaking, systemic and biologic drugs should be avoided while pregnant or breastfeeding unless there is a clear medical need. Women of childbearing potential should avoid oral retinoids, methotrexate, and cyclosporine due to a link to birth defects with each of those treatments.

How do you keep patients compliant with treatment?

We see the patients regularly, and I am always available to take telephone calls if any questions arise.

What do you do if patients refuse treatment?

We keep the dialogue ongoing and monitor their condition. They may change their attitude if their condition worsens.

What resources do you recommend to patients for more information?

Patients should consult the National Psoriasis Foundation (http://www.psoriasis.org).


Quick access to more resources on our PSORIASIS page

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is Associate Clinical Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 96(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
80
Legacy Keywords
practice peals, psoriasis, pregnancy, dermatoses of pregnancy, psoriasis treatment
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is Associate Clinical Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is Associate Clinical Professor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

What do your patients need to know at the first visit?

Pregnant patients need to know that it is important to carefully monitor them throughout their pregnancy. Although many drugs are not contraindicated, it is still important for the dermatologist to consult with the patient’s obstetrician to discuss risks and benefits of different therapies. Some women see an improvement in the severity of their psoriasis during pregnancy, while others report their condition gets worse. Changes in severity of psoriasis vary by individual and from pregnancy to pregnancy.

What are your go-to treatments? What are the side effects?

UV therapy, particularly narrowband UVB, is a good choice during pregnancy. Excimer laser is another good choice. Topical therapies are standardly employed. Although many of these topical therapies are pregnancy category C, we still employ them regularly in consultation with the patient’s obstetrician. Most biologic therapies are pregnancy category B. We still use these drugs with caution in the setting of pregnancy. If a pregnant patient does wish to continue a biologic therapy, close monitoring and enrollment in a pregnancy registry (http: //www.pregnancystudies.org) would be good options. This registry is analyzing whether medications that are used to treat autoimmune diseases are safe to take during pregnancy. Specifically, the investigators are looking at medications used to treat Crohn disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Generally speaking, systemic and biologic drugs should be avoided while pregnant or breastfeeding unless there is a clear medical need. Women of childbearing potential should avoid oral retinoids, methotrexate, and cyclosporine due to a link to birth defects with each of those treatments.

How do you keep patients compliant with treatment?

We see the patients regularly, and I am always available to take telephone calls if any questions arise.

What do you do if patients refuse treatment?

We keep the dialogue ongoing and monitor their condition. They may change their attitude if their condition worsens.

What resources do you recommend to patients for more information?

Patients should consult the National Psoriasis Foundation (http://www.psoriasis.org).


Quick access to more resources on our PSORIASIS page

What do your patients need to know at the first visit?

Pregnant patients need to know that it is important to carefully monitor them throughout their pregnancy. Although many drugs are not contraindicated, it is still important for the dermatologist to consult with the patient’s obstetrician to discuss risks and benefits of different therapies. Some women see an improvement in the severity of their psoriasis during pregnancy, while others report their condition gets worse. Changes in severity of psoriasis vary by individual and from pregnancy to pregnancy.

What are your go-to treatments? What are the side effects?

UV therapy, particularly narrowband UVB, is a good choice during pregnancy. Excimer laser is another good choice. Topical therapies are standardly employed. Although many of these topical therapies are pregnancy category C, we still employ them regularly in consultation with the patient’s obstetrician. Most biologic therapies are pregnancy category B. We still use these drugs with caution in the setting of pregnancy. If a pregnant patient does wish to continue a biologic therapy, close monitoring and enrollment in a pregnancy registry (http: //www.pregnancystudies.org) would be good options. This registry is analyzing whether medications that are used to treat autoimmune diseases are safe to take during pregnancy. Specifically, the investigators are looking at medications used to treat Crohn disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and multiple sclerosis. Generally speaking, systemic and biologic drugs should be avoided while pregnant or breastfeeding unless there is a clear medical need. Women of childbearing potential should avoid oral retinoids, methotrexate, and cyclosporine due to a link to birth defects with each of those treatments.

How do you keep patients compliant with treatment?

We see the patients regularly, and I am always available to take telephone calls if any questions arise.

What do you do if patients refuse treatment?

We keep the dialogue ongoing and monitor their condition. They may change their attitude if their condition worsens.

What resources do you recommend to patients for more information?

Patients should consult the National Psoriasis Foundation (http://www.psoriasis.org).


Quick access to more resources on our PSORIASIS page

Issue
Cutis - 96(2)
Issue
Cutis - 96(2)
Page Number
80
Page Number
80
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Treating Psoriasis in Pregnant Women
Display Headline
Treating Psoriasis in Pregnant Women
Legacy Keywords
practice peals, psoriasis, pregnancy, dermatoses of pregnancy, psoriasis treatment
Legacy Keywords
practice peals, psoriasis, pregnancy, dermatoses of pregnancy, psoriasis treatment
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Undiagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Undiagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis

Of all the comorbidities associated with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common and one of the most problematic. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of PsA can help prevent or limit extensive joint damage that occurs in later stages of the disease. Because cutaneous psoriasis precedes the onset of PsA in 84% of patients with psoriasis, it is incumbent upon dermatologists to be the first line of defense in the screening for joint problems. However, the efficacy of PsA screening remains unknown.

In a recent article published online on June 5 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Villani et al performed an analysis to determine the point prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis, utilizing a systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis. Searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, the authors identified 394 studies for review. None of the studies sought to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis.

The investigators made the assumption that the prevalence of newly diagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis at the time they sought medical care could be a reasonable estimate of this value. Seven epidemiological studies and 5 studies on PsA screening questionnaires were selected for review and were used to clearly identify patients with newly diagnosed PsA.

The authors found that the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA was 15.5% when all studies were analyzed and 10.1% when only epidemiological studies were included. The high prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis reinforces the recommendation that dermatologists need to screen all patients with psoriasis for PsA.

 

What’s the issue?

The findings of this study are not surprising. Therefore, it is important that we double our efforts to screen patients for PsA to address this comorbidity as early as possible. Improved algorithms for screening of patients for PsA would be a welcome advancement. How will you improve your screening methods for PsA?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post. 

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, screening, comorbidity
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post. 

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Weinberg is from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Dr. Weinberg reports no conflicts of interest in relation to this post. 

Related Articles

Of all the comorbidities associated with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common and one of the most problematic. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of PsA can help prevent or limit extensive joint damage that occurs in later stages of the disease. Because cutaneous psoriasis precedes the onset of PsA in 84% of patients with psoriasis, it is incumbent upon dermatologists to be the first line of defense in the screening for joint problems. However, the efficacy of PsA screening remains unknown.

In a recent article published online on June 5 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Villani et al performed an analysis to determine the point prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis, utilizing a systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis. Searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, the authors identified 394 studies for review. None of the studies sought to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis.

The investigators made the assumption that the prevalence of newly diagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis at the time they sought medical care could be a reasonable estimate of this value. Seven epidemiological studies and 5 studies on PsA screening questionnaires were selected for review and were used to clearly identify patients with newly diagnosed PsA.

The authors found that the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA was 15.5% when all studies were analyzed and 10.1% when only epidemiological studies were included. The high prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis reinforces the recommendation that dermatologists need to screen all patients with psoriasis for PsA.

 

What’s the issue?

The findings of this study are not surprising. Therefore, it is important that we double our efforts to screen patients for PsA to address this comorbidity as early as possible. Improved algorithms for screening of patients for PsA would be a welcome advancement. How will you improve your screening methods for PsA?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Of all the comorbidities associated with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the most common and one of the most problematic. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of PsA can help prevent or limit extensive joint damage that occurs in later stages of the disease. Because cutaneous psoriasis precedes the onset of PsA in 84% of patients with psoriasis, it is incumbent upon dermatologists to be the first line of defense in the screening for joint problems. However, the efficacy of PsA screening remains unknown.

In a recent article published online on June 5 in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Villani et al performed an analysis to determine the point prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis, utilizing a systematic search of the literature and meta-analysis. Searching PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, the authors identified 394 studies for review. None of the studies sought to determine the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis.

The investigators made the assumption that the prevalence of newly diagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis at the time they sought medical care could be a reasonable estimate of this value. Seven epidemiological studies and 5 studies on PsA screening questionnaires were selected for review and were used to clearly identify patients with newly diagnosed PsA.

The authors found that the prevalence of undiagnosed PsA was 15.5% when all studies were analyzed and 10.1% when only epidemiological studies were included. The high prevalence of undiagnosed PsA in patients with psoriasis reinforces the recommendation that dermatologists need to screen all patients with psoriasis for PsA.

 

What’s the issue?

The findings of this study are not surprising. Therefore, it is important that we double our efforts to screen patients for PsA to address this comorbidity as early as possible. Improved algorithms for screening of patients for PsA would be a welcome advancement. How will you improve your screening methods for PsA?

We want to know your views! Tell us what you think.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Undiagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis
Display Headline
Undiagnosed Psoriatic Arthritis
Legacy Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, screening, comorbidity
Legacy Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, screening, comorbidity
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME

Novel Psoriasis Therapies and Patient Outcomes, Part 3: Systemic Medications

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:00
Display Headline
Novel Psoriasis Therapies and Patient Outcomes, Part 3: Systemic Medications

Evolving knowledge of the underlying pathogenesis of psoriasis has afforded the development of a broad spectrum of nonbiologic systemic medications with therapeutic potential in moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The targets for these medications are antagonists of proinflammatory mediators such as tyrosine kinase, protein kinase, Janus kinase (JAK), p38α mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4), calcineurin, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) 2, cytochrome P450 26 (CYP26), and purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP); agonists of anti-inflammatory mediators such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) and adeno-sine A3 receptor; and myriad other mechanisms. A brief introduction to some of these therapies presently in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials are presented (Table).1

Masitinib (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor)

Masitinib (formerly known as AB1010)(AB Sciences) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is purported to decrease inflammation by inhibiting stem cell factor receptor (c-kit) and consequently limiting mast cell degranulation.2 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study evaluating its efficacy as an oral formulation was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT01045577).

Ponesimod (S1P1 Receptor Agonist)

Ponesimod (formerly known as ACT-128800)(Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc) is an orally formulated S1P1 receptor agonist. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 is necessary for lymphoid chemotaxis.3 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 326 patients demonstrated 75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score at week 16 in 13.4%, 46.0%, and 48.1% of participants receiving placebo, ponesimod 20 mg, and ponesimod 40 mg, respectively.4 At week 28, PASI 75 scores for participants transitioned from ponesimod 40 mg to placebo or ponesimod 20 mg to placebo and those maintained on ponesimod 20 mg and 40 mg were 40.4%, 42.2%, 77.4%, and 71.4%, respectively. This study demonstrated benefit of treatment with ponesimod versus placebo with increased efficacy using maintenance therapy.4

Sotrastaurin (Protein Kinase C Inhibitor)

Sotrastaurin (formerly known as AEB071)(Novartis AG) is an oral medication that inhibitsprotein kinase C, thereby limiting CD28-induced activation of T cells. Furthermore, it increases forkhead box P3 expression, which is important, as proinflammatory IL-17 production is stimulated in regulatory T cells with lost forkhead box P3 expression.5 In a study of 32 patients who received placebo or sotrastaurin 25, 100, 200, or 300 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, the mean PASI score was reduced by 69% for the 300-mg group versus 5.3% for placebo.6 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study was completed for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00885196).

Alitretinoin (Retinoid)

Alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid; Stiefel, a GSK company) is an oral retinoid with purported promise for patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis recalcitrant to conventional therapies. In one study, 7 participants with palmoplantar psoriasis received alitretinoin 30 mg daily for 12 weeks with 60% to 90% clinical improvement noted using the visual analog scale and palmoplantar pustular PASI to assess response.7 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of alitretinoin assessing the success of alitretinoin in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis recalcitrant to topical treatments was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01245140).

Apo805K1 (Unknown Mechanism of Action)

Apo805K1 (ApoPharma Inc) is an oral agent whose mechanism of action has not been disclosed. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with a treatment duration of 14 days has been completed. For 12 weeks there was a daily dosing regimen of Apo805K1 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg or placebo, with 12 patients in each treatment group. The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 was 16.7%, 0%, 0%, 8.3%, and 16.7%, respectively (P=.1975). The number of participants with adverse events reported ranged between 4 to 7, with the greatest number of adverse events reported in the 30-mg subset.8 It may be of interest to repeat the study with a larger sample size.

ASP015K (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

ASP015K (Astellas Pharma US, Inc) is the first of the JAK inhibitors that will be discussed in this section. Janus kinase inhibitors represent a group of tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine-mediated signaling pathways through the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins via phosphorylation in the cytoplasm, which in turn control the transcription of genes that generate inflammation. ASP015K and tofacitinib (formerly known as CP-690550)(Pfizer, Inc) inhibit JAK 1 and JAK 3, whereas GSK2586184 (GlaxoSmithKline) inhibits JAK 1 and baricitinib (formerly known as LY3009104 or INCB28050)(Eli Lilly and Company) inhibits JAK 1 and JAK 2.9 In a 6-week, dose-escalation phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, ASP015K showed a dose-dependent decline in PASI, psoriasis static global assessment, and body surface area.10

BMS-582949 (p38α MAP Kinase Inhibitor)

BMS-582949 (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) is an oral p38α MAP kinase inhibitor.11 Along with c-Jun N-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2, MAP kinase plays a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.12 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-week phase 2a study of placebo versus BMS-582949 dosed at 10, 30, and 100 mg has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00399906).

Apremilast (PDE-4 Inhibitor)

Apremilast (formerly known as CC-10004)(Celgene Corporation) is an oral PDE-4 inhibitor that acts to inhibit the degradation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis13 and is a particularly good treatment for patients with recalcitrant disease.14 Several studies on apremilast have been published, including a phase 2 trial of 204 participants receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg or 40 mg twice daily with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement response of 11.8%, 35.8%, and 43.5%, respectively.15 The phase 3 PALACE 1, 2, 3, and 4 trials also demonstrated therapeutic efficacy.16 In PALACE 1, 504 patients receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg twice daily had an ACR20 of 19%, 31%, and 40%, respectively. In the PALACE 4 study, ACR20 was achieved by 58% of participants at week 52, but the ACR50 and ACR70 rates were less impressive.16

Lestaurtinib (Multikinase Inhibitor)

Lestaurtinib (formerly known as CEP-701)(Teva Pharmaceutical Industries) is an oral multikinase inhibitor for which a 12-week, nonrandomized, dose-escalation phase 2 study was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00236119).

CF101 (Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonist)

CF101 (IB-MECA; Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd) is an oral adenosine A3 receptor agonist. Adenosine A3 is a G protein–coupled receptor that has an anti-inflammatory role, which lends itself to the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.17 In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 75 patients who received placebo or CF101 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, PASI 50 or greater was reported in 35.3% of participants in the 2-mg group, which was statistically significant at weeks 8 (P=.047) and 12 (P=.031).18 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 16-week phase 2/phase 3 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with CF101 2 mg twice daily versus placebo is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01265667).

 

 

Tofacitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

Tofacitinib is a JAK 1 and JAK 3 inhibitor that is available in both topical and oral formulations. Many studies have been published on tofacitinib, including a dose-ranging phase 2b trial of 197 patients randomized to placebo or tofacitinib 2, 5, or 15 mg daily in which 2.0%, 25.0% (P<.001), 40.8% (P<.0001), and 66.7% (P<.0001) of participants in each treatment group, respectively, achieved PASI 75 at week 12.19 Another 12-week phase 2b trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis explored the effectiveness of oral formulations of tofacitinib based on body location, namely the head and neck, arms, trunk, and legs.20 Designed with twice-daily placebo and tofacitinib 2-, 5-, and 15-mg treatment arms, the target plaque severity score demonstrated a statistically significant dose-responsive improvement in each of the 4 anatomic regions (P<.01).

Two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of tofacitinib have been completed. One trial compared the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib and etanercept in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.21 The 329 participants were randomized to treatment with oral tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily with placebo subcutaneous (SQ) injections twice weekly; oral placebo twice daily with etanercept 50-mg SQ injections twice weekly; or oral placebo twice daily with placebo SQ injection twice weekly. At week 12, PASI 75 was achieved in 39.51%, 63.64%, 58.81%, and 5.61% of participants in each treatment group, respectively. Thus, tofacitinib 10 mg and etanercept 50 mg were the first and second best performers in this study design.21

In the other phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, and subsequent resumption of treatment with tofacitinib was examined in 290 patients who received either tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks.22 In the withdrawal period, the percentage of patients who maintained a PASI 75 response in the tofacitinib 5-mg group was 56.2% versus 23.3% in the placebo group at week 16 (P<.0008). In the 10-mg group, 62.3% of participants maintained PASI 75 at week 16 versus 26.1% in the placebo group (P<.0001). During the re-treatment period for those who showed a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI during treatment withdrawal (N=102), 50.0% of the tofacitinib 5-mg group showed PASI 75 versus 31.58% of the placebo group at week 16. In the tofacitinib 10-mg group, PASI 75 was seen in 0% versus 50.85% in the placebo group. Of note, only 5 participants who demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI response following withdrawal of therapy were in the tofacitinib 5- or 10-mg groups, as the rest were in the placebo group.22

FP187 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

FP187 (Forward Pharma A/S) is an oral fumaric acid ester whose underlying mechanism is thought to be elevation of glutathione levels that decreases the amount of inflammatory cytokines by blocking the translocation of nuclear factor κB. Other fumaric acid esters such as monoethyl fumarate and dimethyl fumarate have been used in Europe for the management of psoriasis.23 A phase 2 study of the safety and effectiveness of FP187 for moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01230138). A phase 3 trial examining the efficacy of FP187 in managing moderate to severe psoriasis was not yet open for participant recruitment at the time of publication (NCT01815723).

Doxercalciferol (Vitamin D2 Analogue)

Doxercalciferol (1α-hydroxyvitamin D2; Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi company) is an oral prodrug of vitamin D.24 Topical preparations of vitamin D analogues approved by the US Food and Drug Administration such as calcipotriene are mainstays in psoriasis management. Doxercalciferol has been used for other therapeutic applications such as decreasing elevated parathyroid hormone levels.25 Research has demonstrated that CYP24A1 can extrahepatically regulate the activation of vitamin D prodrugs in cutaneous tissues.26 In a phase 2 study examining the efficacy and safety of doxercalciferol in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, 111 patients were randomized to placebo or doxercalciferol 2.5, 5, or 7.5 mg daily for 24 weeks (NCT00601107). At week 12, PASI 50 was similar regardless of the treatment administered, reported at 20.0%, 20.0%, 17.9%, and 20.0%, respectively (P=1.000).27

GSK2586184 (JAK 1 Inhibitor)

GSK2586184 is an oral JAK 1 inhibitor. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 study of GSK2586184 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who were randomized to placebo or GSK2586184 100, 200, and 400 mg twice daily for 84 days has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01782664). Of note, despite clinical promise, due to potential adverse effects of the medication that included a possible interaction with statin medication, the manufacturer decided against pursuing GSK2586184 as a treatment in the management of psoriasis.28

Voclosporin (Calcineurin Inhibitor)

Voclosporin (formerly known as ISA247)(Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc) is an oral calcineurin inhibitor that is purported to be as effective as cyclospor-ine A with less associated toxicity. A 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial demonstrated PASI 75 in 0%, 18.2%, and 66.7% of 201 participants receiving placebo, voclospo-rin 0.5 mg/kg, and voclosporin 1.5 mg/kg twice daily, respectively (P<.0001). Elevated serum creatinine levels within the high range of normal were noted in the 1.5-mg/kg group.29 A 12-week phase 3 study of 451 patients randomized to placebo or voclospo-rin 0.2-, 0.3-, or 0.4-mg/kg treatment groups similarly demonstrated a dose-responsive PASI 75 of 4%, 16%, 25%, and 47%, respectively, that was maintained at week 24. Mild to moderate decreases in glomerular filtration rates were noted in 8 patients in the 0.3- and 0.4-mg/kg subsets.30 Another phase 2 study of voclosporin in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis showed improvements according to the psoriasis disability index and dermatology life quality index.31

Three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials have been completed for voclosporin, but the results were not available at the time of publication. The phase 3 ESSENCE trial compared voclosporin to placebo and ciclosporin controls (NCT00408187). Two phase 3 trials known as the SPIRIT trials—one a 12-week study (NCT00244842) and the other a 36-week extension trial (NCT00258713)—compared the efficacy of placebo to voclosporin administered at 0.2-, 0.3-, and 0.4-mg/kg doses.

KD025 (ROCK 2 Inhibitor)

KD025 (Kadmon Corporation, LLC) is an oral ROCK 2 inhibitor. The inhibition of ROCK in the ras homolog gene family, member A/ROCK pathway has been targeted therapeutically for pulmonary arterial hypertension,32 glaucoma,33 and many other uses. A phase 2a study assessing the tolerability and safety profile of KD025 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT02106195).

LAS41008 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

LAS41008 (Almirall, S.A.) is purported to be an oral dimethyl fumarate that inhibits endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation.34 A phase 3 trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of LAS41008, LASW1835 (an active comparator), and placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01726933).

LEO 22811 (Anti-inflammatory)

LEO 22811 (LEO Pharma) is an oral anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of psoriasis. Two clinical trials have been completed, the results of which have not yet been published. A phase 1 trial assessing the tolerability and safety profile of LEO 22811 (NCT00833872) and a phase 2 proof-of-concept study assessing dose response of LEO 22811 versus placebo (NCT01116895) were completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication.

Baricitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 2 Inhibitor)

As noted above, baricitinib (LY3009104 or INCB28050) is a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor. A phase 2b trial examining dose response for LY3009104 or baricitinib administration in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01490632).

Talarozole (CYP26 Inhibitor)

Talarozole (formerly known as R115866)(GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral CYP26 inhibitor that could serve to regulate the degradation of all-trans retinoic acid in the management of conditions such as acne and psoriasis. One phase 2 nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT00725348) and another phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent trial examining the effectiveness and safety profile of 12-week talarozole treatment in patients with severe plaque psoriasis have been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00716144).

R3421 or BCX-4208 (PNP Inhibitor)

R3421 or BCX-4208 (BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc/Hoffman–La Roche) is an oral PNP inhibitor that may help regulate apoptosis of T cells and B cells.35 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00504270).

RWJ-445380 (Cathepsin S Inhibitor)

RWJ-445380 (Alza Corporation, DE) is an oral cathepsin S inhibitor. Cathepsin S is produced by antigen-presenting cells and activates CD4+ T cells via presentation of antigen by class II major histocompatibility complex.36 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial evaluating the tolerability, safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of RWJ-445380 in patients with plaque psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00396422).

SRT2104 (Sirtuin 1 Activator)

SRT2104 (GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral NAD+-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1 activator. Sirtuins help regulate apoptosis, inflammation, and other important cellular mechanisms.37 A randomized, open-label phase 1 trial examining drug bioavailability (NCT01702493) and a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial studying the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of SRT2104 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis have been completed (NCT01154101), but the results were not available at the time of publication.

VB-201 (Oxidized Phospholipid)

VB-201 (VBL Therapeutics) is an orally administered oxidized phospholipid analogue with anti-inflammatory effects.38 Oxidized phospholipids are another element in the intricate spectrum of inflammatory mediators. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 20 mg or 80 mg daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01001468). Another randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 80 mg and 160 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01837420).

Conclusion

We are living in an exciting time in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, with promising novel therapies afforded by the discovery of new therapeutic targets. In this 3-part series, we have reviewed topical, systemic, and biologic therapies that currently are in phase 2 through phase 4 clinical trials or have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of psoriasis and PsA. These treatments offer patients and their caregivers the prospect of more targeted therapeutic regimens that offer enhanced clinical outcomes with more favorable side-effect profiles. As clinicians and researchers build upon this knowledge in the years to come, we can offer psoriasis patients an increasingly diverse and powerful therapeutic armamentarium.

References

 

1. Lu PD, Mazza JM. Research pipeline III: biologic therapies. In: Weinberg JM, Lebwohl M, eds. Advances in Psoriasis. New York, NY: Springer; 2014:227-242.

2. Humbert M, de Blay F, Garcia G, et al. Masitinib, a c-kit/PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improves disease control in severe corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics. Allergy. 2009;64:1194-1201.

3. Krause A, Brossard P, D’Ambrosio D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2014;41:261-278.

4. Vaclavkova A, Chimenti S, Arenberger P, et al. Oral ponesimod in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:2036-2045.

5. He X, Koenen HJ, Smeets RL, et al. Targeting PKC in human T cells using sotrastaurin (AEB071) preserves regulatory T cells and prevents IL-17 production. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:975-983.

6. Skvara H, Dawid M, Kleyn E, et al. The PKC inhibitor AEB071 may be a therapeutic option for psoriasis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3151-3159.

7. Irla N, Navarini AA, Yawalkar N. Alitretinoin abrogates innate inflammation in palmoplantar pustular psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:1170-1174.

8. Study to evaluate Apo805K1 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01483924). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01483924&Search=Search. Updated February 9, 2015. Accessed June 23, 2015.

9. Kofoed K, Skov L, Zachariae C. New drugs and treatment targets in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95:133-139.

10. Gooderham M. Small molecules: an overview of emerging therapeutic options in the treatment of psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2013;18:1-4.

11. Liu C, Lin J, Wrobleski ST, et al. Discovery of 4-(5-(cyclopropylcarbamoyl)-2-methylphenylamino)-5-methyl-N-propylpyrrolo[1,2-f][1,2,4]triazine-6-carboxamide (BMS-582949), a clinical p38a MAP kinase inhibitor for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J Med Chem. 2010;53:6629-6639.

12. Mavropoulos A, Rigopoulou EI, Liaskos C, et al. The role of p38 MAPK in the aetiopathogenesis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:569751.

13. Oral OTEZLA® (apremilast) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [news release]. Summit, NJ: Celegene Corporation; September 23, 2014.   http://ir.celgene.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=872240. Accessed June 23, 2015.

14. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Menter A, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:888-897.

15. Moustafa F, Feldman SR. A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20:22608.

16. Huynh D, Kavanaugh A. Psoriatic arthritis: current therapy and future approaches. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:20-28.

17. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Liang BT, et al. Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of A3 adenosine receptor agonists. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:359-366.

18. David M, Akerman L, Ziv M, et al. Treatment of plaque-type psoriasis with oral CF101: data from an exploratory randomized phase 2 clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:361-367.

19. Papp KA, Menter A, Strober B, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of psoriasis: a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:668-677.

20. Menter A, Papp KA, Tan H, et al. Efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, on clinical signs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in different body regions. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:252-256.

21. A phase 3, multi site, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study of the efficacy and safety comparing CP-690,550 and etanercept in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01241591). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01241591?term=01241591&rank=1. Updated May 8, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

22. A study to evaluate the effects and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, followed by re-treatment with CP-690,550 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01186744). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01186744?term=01186744&rank=1. Updated May 14, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

23. Rostami Yazdi M, Mrowietz U. Fumaric acid esters. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:522-526.

24. Kubodera N. A new look at the most successful prodrugs for active vitamin D (D hormone): alfacalcidol and doxercalciferol. Molecules. 2009;14:3869-3880.

25. Brown AJ. Therapeutic uses of vitamin D analogues. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(5 suppl 5):S3-S19.

26. Masuda S, Strugnell SA, Knutson JC, et al. Evidence for the activation of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D2 by 25-hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase: delineation of pathways involving 1alpha,24-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761:221-234.

27. A study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of doxercalciferol capsules in participants with moderate to severe psoriasis (NCT00601107). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00601107?term=00601107&rank=1. Updated April 2, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

28. GSK discloses good efficacy in psoriasis with GSK2856184 [news release]. Mechelen, Belgium: Galapagos NV; November 6, 2014. http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2014/11/06/680358/10106744/en/GSK-discloses-good-efficacy-in-psoriasis-with-GSK2856184.html. Accessed June 24, 2015.

29. Bissonnette R, Papp K, Poulin Y, et al. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ISA247 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:472-478.

30. Papp K, Bissonnette R, Rosoph L, et al. Efficacy of ISA247 in plaque psoriasis: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Lancet. 2008;371:1337-1342.

31. Gupta AK, Langley RG, Lynde C, et al. ISA247: quality of life results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Cutan Med Surg. 2008;12:268-275.

32. Antoniu SA. Targeting RhoA/ROCK pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:355-363.

33. Challa P, Arnold JJ. Rho-kinase inhibitors offer a new approach in the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:81-95.

34. National Institute for Health Research Horizon Scanning Centre. Dimethyl fumarate for plaque psoriasis. http://www.hsc.nihr.ac.uk/files/downloads/2228/2526.163fbff8.Dimethylfumarate_Nov13.pdf. Published November 2013. Accessed June 15, 2015.

35. Bantia S, Parker C, Upshaw R, et al. Potent orally bioavailable purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor BCX-4208 induces apoptosis in B- and T-lymphocytes—a novel treatment approach for autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation and hematologic malignancies. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010;10:784-790.

36. García-Pérez ME, Stevanovic T, Poubelle PE. New therapies under development for psoriasis treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25:480-487.

37. Villalba JM, Alcaín FJ. Sirtuin activators and inhibitors. Biofactors. 2012;38:349-359.

38. Feige E, Mendel I, George J, et al. Modified phospholipids as anti-inflammatory compounds. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010;21:525-529. 

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Meghan A. Feely, MD; Barry L. Smith, MD; Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt and Beth Israel Medical Centers of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Drs. Feely and Smith report no conflict of interest. Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

This article is the third of a 3-part series.

Correspondence: Meghan A. Feely, MD, Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt, 1090 Amsterdam Ave, Ste 11B, New York, NY 10025 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
47-53
Legacy Keywords
Masitinib, Ponesimod, Sotrastaurin, Alitretinoin, therapies, Psoriasis, Apo805K1, ASP015K, BMS-582949, Apremilast, Lestaurtinib, CF101, Tofacitinib, FP187, Doxercalciferol, GSK2586184, Voclosporin, KD025, LAS41008, LEO 22811, Baricitinib, Talarozole, R3421 or BCX-4208, RWJ-445380, SRT2104, VB-201
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Meghan A. Feely, MD; Barry L. Smith, MD; Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt and Beth Israel Medical Centers of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Drs. Feely and Smith report no conflict of interest. Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

This article is the third of a 3-part series.

Correspondence: Meghan A. Feely, MD, Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt, 1090 Amsterdam Ave, Ste 11B, New York, NY 10025 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Meghan A. Feely, MD; Barry L. Smith, MD; Jeffrey M. Weinberg, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt and Beth Israel Medical Centers of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Drs. Feely and Smith report no conflict of interest. Dr. Weinberg is an investigator and speaker for AbbVie Inc and Amgen Inc.

This article is the third of a 3-part series.

Correspondence: Meghan A. Feely, MD, Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s-Roosevelt, 1090 Amsterdam Ave, Ste 11B, New York, NY 10025 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Evolving knowledge of the underlying pathogenesis of psoriasis has afforded the development of a broad spectrum of nonbiologic systemic medications with therapeutic potential in moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The targets for these medications are antagonists of proinflammatory mediators such as tyrosine kinase, protein kinase, Janus kinase (JAK), p38α mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4), calcineurin, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) 2, cytochrome P450 26 (CYP26), and purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP); agonists of anti-inflammatory mediators such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) and adeno-sine A3 receptor; and myriad other mechanisms. A brief introduction to some of these therapies presently in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials are presented (Table).1

Masitinib (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor)

Masitinib (formerly known as AB1010)(AB Sciences) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is purported to decrease inflammation by inhibiting stem cell factor receptor (c-kit) and consequently limiting mast cell degranulation.2 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study evaluating its efficacy as an oral formulation was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT01045577).

Ponesimod (S1P1 Receptor Agonist)

Ponesimod (formerly known as ACT-128800)(Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc) is an orally formulated S1P1 receptor agonist. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 is necessary for lymphoid chemotaxis.3 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 326 patients demonstrated 75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score at week 16 in 13.4%, 46.0%, and 48.1% of participants receiving placebo, ponesimod 20 mg, and ponesimod 40 mg, respectively.4 At week 28, PASI 75 scores for participants transitioned from ponesimod 40 mg to placebo or ponesimod 20 mg to placebo and those maintained on ponesimod 20 mg and 40 mg were 40.4%, 42.2%, 77.4%, and 71.4%, respectively. This study demonstrated benefit of treatment with ponesimod versus placebo with increased efficacy using maintenance therapy.4

Sotrastaurin (Protein Kinase C Inhibitor)

Sotrastaurin (formerly known as AEB071)(Novartis AG) is an oral medication that inhibitsprotein kinase C, thereby limiting CD28-induced activation of T cells. Furthermore, it increases forkhead box P3 expression, which is important, as proinflammatory IL-17 production is stimulated in regulatory T cells with lost forkhead box P3 expression.5 In a study of 32 patients who received placebo or sotrastaurin 25, 100, 200, or 300 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, the mean PASI score was reduced by 69% for the 300-mg group versus 5.3% for placebo.6 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study was completed for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00885196).

Alitretinoin (Retinoid)

Alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid; Stiefel, a GSK company) is an oral retinoid with purported promise for patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis recalcitrant to conventional therapies. In one study, 7 participants with palmoplantar psoriasis received alitretinoin 30 mg daily for 12 weeks with 60% to 90% clinical improvement noted using the visual analog scale and palmoplantar pustular PASI to assess response.7 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of alitretinoin assessing the success of alitretinoin in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis recalcitrant to topical treatments was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01245140).

Apo805K1 (Unknown Mechanism of Action)

Apo805K1 (ApoPharma Inc) is an oral agent whose mechanism of action has not been disclosed. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with a treatment duration of 14 days has been completed. For 12 weeks there was a daily dosing regimen of Apo805K1 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg or placebo, with 12 patients in each treatment group. The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 was 16.7%, 0%, 0%, 8.3%, and 16.7%, respectively (P=.1975). The number of participants with adverse events reported ranged between 4 to 7, with the greatest number of adverse events reported in the 30-mg subset.8 It may be of interest to repeat the study with a larger sample size.

ASP015K (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

ASP015K (Astellas Pharma US, Inc) is the first of the JAK inhibitors that will be discussed in this section. Janus kinase inhibitors represent a group of tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine-mediated signaling pathways through the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins via phosphorylation in the cytoplasm, which in turn control the transcription of genes that generate inflammation. ASP015K and tofacitinib (formerly known as CP-690550)(Pfizer, Inc) inhibit JAK 1 and JAK 3, whereas GSK2586184 (GlaxoSmithKline) inhibits JAK 1 and baricitinib (formerly known as LY3009104 or INCB28050)(Eli Lilly and Company) inhibits JAK 1 and JAK 2.9 In a 6-week, dose-escalation phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, ASP015K showed a dose-dependent decline in PASI, psoriasis static global assessment, and body surface area.10

BMS-582949 (p38α MAP Kinase Inhibitor)

BMS-582949 (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) is an oral p38α MAP kinase inhibitor.11 Along with c-Jun N-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2, MAP kinase plays a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.12 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-week phase 2a study of placebo versus BMS-582949 dosed at 10, 30, and 100 mg has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00399906).

Apremilast (PDE-4 Inhibitor)

Apremilast (formerly known as CC-10004)(Celgene Corporation) is an oral PDE-4 inhibitor that acts to inhibit the degradation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis13 and is a particularly good treatment for patients with recalcitrant disease.14 Several studies on apremilast have been published, including a phase 2 trial of 204 participants receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg or 40 mg twice daily with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement response of 11.8%, 35.8%, and 43.5%, respectively.15 The phase 3 PALACE 1, 2, 3, and 4 trials also demonstrated therapeutic efficacy.16 In PALACE 1, 504 patients receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg twice daily had an ACR20 of 19%, 31%, and 40%, respectively. In the PALACE 4 study, ACR20 was achieved by 58% of participants at week 52, but the ACR50 and ACR70 rates were less impressive.16

Lestaurtinib (Multikinase Inhibitor)

Lestaurtinib (formerly known as CEP-701)(Teva Pharmaceutical Industries) is an oral multikinase inhibitor for which a 12-week, nonrandomized, dose-escalation phase 2 study was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00236119).

CF101 (Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonist)

CF101 (IB-MECA; Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd) is an oral adenosine A3 receptor agonist. Adenosine A3 is a G protein–coupled receptor that has an anti-inflammatory role, which lends itself to the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.17 In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 75 patients who received placebo or CF101 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, PASI 50 or greater was reported in 35.3% of participants in the 2-mg group, which was statistically significant at weeks 8 (P=.047) and 12 (P=.031).18 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 16-week phase 2/phase 3 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with CF101 2 mg twice daily versus placebo is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01265667).

 

 

Tofacitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

Tofacitinib is a JAK 1 and JAK 3 inhibitor that is available in both topical and oral formulations. Many studies have been published on tofacitinib, including a dose-ranging phase 2b trial of 197 patients randomized to placebo or tofacitinib 2, 5, or 15 mg daily in which 2.0%, 25.0% (P<.001), 40.8% (P<.0001), and 66.7% (P<.0001) of participants in each treatment group, respectively, achieved PASI 75 at week 12.19 Another 12-week phase 2b trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis explored the effectiveness of oral formulations of tofacitinib based on body location, namely the head and neck, arms, trunk, and legs.20 Designed with twice-daily placebo and tofacitinib 2-, 5-, and 15-mg treatment arms, the target plaque severity score demonstrated a statistically significant dose-responsive improvement in each of the 4 anatomic regions (P<.01).

Two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of tofacitinib have been completed. One trial compared the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib and etanercept in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.21 The 329 participants were randomized to treatment with oral tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily with placebo subcutaneous (SQ) injections twice weekly; oral placebo twice daily with etanercept 50-mg SQ injections twice weekly; or oral placebo twice daily with placebo SQ injection twice weekly. At week 12, PASI 75 was achieved in 39.51%, 63.64%, 58.81%, and 5.61% of participants in each treatment group, respectively. Thus, tofacitinib 10 mg and etanercept 50 mg were the first and second best performers in this study design.21

In the other phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, and subsequent resumption of treatment with tofacitinib was examined in 290 patients who received either tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks.22 In the withdrawal period, the percentage of patients who maintained a PASI 75 response in the tofacitinib 5-mg group was 56.2% versus 23.3% in the placebo group at week 16 (P<.0008). In the 10-mg group, 62.3% of participants maintained PASI 75 at week 16 versus 26.1% in the placebo group (P<.0001). During the re-treatment period for those who showed a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI during treatment withdrawal (N=102), 50.0% of the tofacitinib 5-mg group showed PASI 75 versus 31.58% of the placebo group at week 16. In the tofacitinib 10-mg group, PASI 75 was seen in 0% versus 50.85% in the placebo group. Of note, only 5 participants who demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI response following withdrawal of therapy were in the tofacitinib 5- or 10-mg groups, as the rest were in the placebo group.22

FP187 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

FP187 (Forward Pharma A/S) is an oral fumaric acid ester whose underlying mechanism is thought to be elevation of glutathione levels that decreases the amount of inflammatory cytokines by blocking the translocation of nuclear factor κB. Other fumaric acid esters such as monoethyl fumarate and dimethyl fumarate have been used in Europe for the management of psoriasis.23 A phase 2 study of the safety and effectiveness of FP187 for moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01230138). A phase 3 trial examining the efficacy of FP187 in managing moderate to severe psoriasis was not yet open for participant recruitment at the time of publication (NCT01815723).

Doxercalciferol (Vitamin D2 Analogue)

Doxercalciferol (1α-hydroxyvitamin D2; Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi company) is an oral prodrug of vitamin D.24 Topical preparations of vitamin D analogues approved by the US Food and Drug Administration such as calcipotriene are mainstays in psoriasis management. Doxercalciferol has been used for other therapeutic applications such as decreasing elevated parathyroid hormone levels.25 Research has demonstrated that CYP24A1 can extrahepatically regulate the activation of vitamin D prodrugs in cutaneous tissues.26 In a phase 2 study examining the efficacy and safety of doxercalciferol in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, 111 patients were randomized to placebo or doxercalciferol 2.5, 5, or 7.5 mg daily for 24 weeks (NCT00601107). At week 12, PASI 50 was similar regardless of the treatment administered, reported at 20.0%, 20.0%, 17.9%, and 20.0%, respectively (P=1.000).27

GSK2586184 (JAK 1 Inhibitor)

GSK2586184 is an oral JAK 1 inhibitor. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 study of GSK2586184 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who were randomized to placebo or GSK2586184 100, 200, and 400 mg twice daily for 84 days has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01782664). Of note, despite clinical promise, due to potential adverse effects of the medication that included a possible interaction with statin medication, the manufacturer decided against pursuing GSK2586184 as a treatment in the management of psoriasis.28

Voclosporin (Calcineurin Inhibitor)

Voclosporin (formerly known as ISA247)(Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc) is an oral calcineurin inhibitor that is purported to be as effective as cyclospor-ine A with less associated toxicity. A 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial demonstrated PASI 75 in 0%, 18.2%, and 66.7% of 201 participants receiving placebo, voclospo-rin 0.5 mg/kg, and voclosporin 1.5 mg/kg twice daily, respectively (P<.0001). Elevated serum creatinine levels within the high range of normal were noted in the 1.5-mg/kg group.29 A 12-week phase 3 study of 451 patients randomized to placebo or voclospo-rin 0.2-, 0.3-, or 0.4-mg/kg treatment groups similarly demonstrated a dose-responsive PASI 75 of 4%, 16%, 25%, and 47%, respectively, that was maintained at week 24. Mild to moderate decreases in glomerular filtration rates were noted in 8 patients in the 0.3- and 0.4-mg/kg subsets.30 Another phase 2 study of voclosporin in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis showed improvements according to the psoriasis disability index and dermatology life quality index.31

Three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials have been completed for voclosporin, but the results were not available at the time of publication. The phase 3 ESSENCE trial compared voclosporin to placebo and ciclosporin controls (NCT00408187). Two phase 3 trials known as the SPIRIT trials—one a 12-week study (NCT00244842) and the other a 36-week extension trial (NCT00258713)—compared the efficacy of placebo to voclosporin administered at 0.2-, 0.3-, and 0.4-mg/kg doses.

KD025 (ROCK 2 Inhibitor)

KD025 (Kadmon Corporation, LLC) is an oral ROCK 2 inhibitor. The inhibition of ROCK in the ras homolog gene family, member A/ROCK pathway has been targeted therapeutically for pulmonary arterial hypertension,32 glaucoma,33 and many other uses. A phase 2a study assessing the tolerability and safety profile of KD025 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT02106195).

LAS41008 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

LAS41008 (Almirall, S.A.) is purported to be an oral dimethyl fumarate that inhibits endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation.34 A phase 3 trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of LAS41008, LASW1835 (an active comparator), and placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01726933).

LEO 22811 (Anti-inflammatory)

LEO 22811 (LEO Pharma) is an oral anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of psoriasis. Two clinical trials have been completed, the results of which have not yet been published. A phase 1 trial assessing the tolerability and safety profile of LEO 22811 (NCT00833872) and a phase 2 proof-of-concept study assessing dose response of LEO 22811 versus placebo (NCT01116895) were completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication.

Baricitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 2 Inhibitor)

As noted above, baricitinib (LY3009104 or INCB28050) is a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor. A phase 2b trial examining dose response for LY3009104 or baricitinib administration in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01490632).

Talarozole (CYP26 Inhibitor)

Talarozole (formerly known as R115866)(GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral CYP26 inhibitor that could serve to regulate the degradation of all-trans retinoic acid in the management of conditions such as acne and psoriasis. One phase 2 nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT00725348) and another phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent trial examining the effectiveness and safety profile of 12-week talarozole treatment in patients with severe plaque psoriasis have been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00716144).

R3421 or BCX-4208 (PNP Inhibitor)

R3421 or BCX-4208 (BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc/Hoffman–La Roche) is an oral PNP inhibitor that may help regulate apoptosis of T cells and B cells.35 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00504270).

RWJ-445380 (Cathepsin S Inhibitor)

RWJ-445380 (Alza Corporation, DE) is an oral cathepsin S inhibitor. Cathepsin S is produced by antigen-presenting cells and activates CD4+ T cells via presentation of antigen by class II major histocompatibility complex.36 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial evaluating the tolerability, safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of RWJ-445380 in patients with plaque psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00396422).

SRT2104 (Sirtuin 1 Activator)

SRT2104 (GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral NAD+-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1 activator. Sirtuins help regulate apoptosis, inflammation, and other important cellular mechanisms.37 A randomized, open-label phase 1 trial examining drug bioavailability (NCT01702493) and a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial studying the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of SRT2104 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis have been completed (NCT01154101), but the results were not available at the time of publication.

VB-201 (Oxidized Phospholipid)

VB-201 (VBL Therapeutics) is an orally administered oxidized phospholipid analogue with anti-inflammatory effects.38 Oxidized phospholipids are another element in the intricate spectrum of inflammatory mediators. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 20 mg or 80 mg daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01001468). Another randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 80 mg and 160 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01837420).

Conclusion

We are living in an exciting time in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, with promising novel therapies afforded by the discovery of new therapeutic targets. In this 3-part series, we have reviewed topical, systemic, and biologic therapies that currently are in phase 2 through phase 4 clinical trials or have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of psoriasis and PsA. These treatments offer patients and their caregivers the prospect of more targeted therapeutic regimens that offer enhanced clinical outcomes with more favorable side-effect profiles. As clinicians and researchers build upon this knowledge in the years to come, we can offer psoriasis patients an increasingly diverse and powerful therapeutic armamentarium.

Evolving knowledge of the underlying pathogenesis of psoriasis has afforded the development of a broad spectrum of nonbiologic systemic medications with therapeutic potential in moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The targets for these medications are antagonists of proinflammatory mediators such as tyrosine kinase, protein kinase, Janus kinase (JAK), p38α mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4), calcineurin, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) 2, cytochrome P450 26 (CYP26), and purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP); agonists of anti-inflammatory mediators such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) and adeno-sine A3 receptor; and myriad other mechanisms. A brief introduction to some of these therapies presently in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials are presented (Table).1

Masitinib (Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor)

Masitinib (formerly known as AB1010)(AB Sciences) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is purported to decrease inflammation by inhibiting stem cell factor receptor (c-kit) and consequently limiting mast cell degranulation.2 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study evaluating its efficacy as an oral formulation was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT01045577).

Ponesimod (S1P1 Receptor Agonist)

Ponesimod (formerly known as ACT-128800)(Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc) is an orally formulated S1P1 receptor agonist. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 is necessary for lymphoid chemotaxis.3 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 326 patients demonstrated 75% improvement in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score at week 16 in 13.4%, 46.0%, and 48.1% of participants receiving placebo, ponesimod 20 mg, and ponesimod 40 mg, respectively.4 At week 28, PASI 75 scores for participants transitioned from ponesimod 40 mg to placebo or ponesimod 20 mg to placebo and those maintained on ponesimod 20 mg and 40 mg were 40.4%, 42.2%, 77.4%, and 71.4%, respectively. This study demonstrated benefit of treatment with ponesimod versus placebo with increased efficacy using maintenance therapy.4

Sotrastaurin (Protein Kinase C Inhibitor)

Sotrastaurin (formerly known as AEB071)(Novartis AG) is an oral medication that inhibitsprotein kinase C, thereby limiting CD28-induced activation of T cells. Furthermore, it increases forkhead box P3 expression, which is important, as proinflammatory IL-17 production is stimulated in regulatory T cells with lost forkhead box P3 expression.5 In a study of 32 patients who received placebo or sotrastaurin 25, 100, 200, or 300 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, the mean PASI score was reduced by 69% for the 300-mg group versus 5.3% for placebo.6 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 study was completed for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00885196).

Alitretinoin (Retinoid)

Alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid; Stiefel, a GSK company) is an oral retinoid with purported promise for patients with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis recalcitrant to conventional therapies. In one study, 7 participants with palmoplantar psoriasis received alitretinoin 30 mg daily for 12 weeks with 60% to 90% clinical improvement noted using the visual analog scale and palmoplantar pustular PASI to assess response.7 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of alitretinoin assessing the success of alitretinoin in patients with palmoplantar psoriasis recalcitrant to topical treatments was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01245140).

Apo805K1 (Unknown Mechanism of Action)

Apo805K1 (ApoPharma Inc) is an oral agent whose mechanism of action has not been disclosed. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis with a treatment duration of 14 days has been completed. For 12 weeks there was a daily dosing regimen of Apo805K1 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg or placebo, with 12 patients in each treatment group. The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 was 16.7%, 0%, 0%, 8.3%, and 16.7%, respectively (P=.1975). The number of participants with adverse events reported ranged between 4 to 7, with the greatest number of adverse events reported in the 30-mg subset.8 It may be of interest to repeat the study with a larger sample size.

ASP015K (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

ASP015K (Astellas Pharma US, Inc) is the first of the JAK inhibitors that will be discussed in this section. Janus kinase inhibitors represent a group of tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine-mediated signaling pathways through the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins via phosphorylation in the cytoplasm, which in turn control the transcription of genes that generate inflammation. ASP015K and tofacitinib (formerly known as CP-690550)(Pfizer, Inc) inhibit JAK 1 and JAK 3, whereas GSK2586184 (GlaxoSmithKline) inhibits JAK 1 and baricitinib (formerly known as LY3009104 or INCB28050)(Eli Lilly and Company) inhibits JAK 1 and JAK 2.9 In a 6-week, dose-escalation phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, ASP015K showed a dose-dependent decline in PASI, psoriasis static global assessment, and body surface area.10

BMS-582949 (p38α MAP Kinase Inhibitor)

BMS-582949 (Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) is an oral p38α MAP kinase inhibitor.11 Along with c-Jun N-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2, MAP kinase plays a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.12 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 12-week phase 2a study of placebo versus BMS-582949 dosed at 10, 30, and 100 mg has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00399906).

Apremilast (PDE-4 Inhibitor)

Apremilast (formerly known as CC-10004)(Celgene Corporation) is an oral PDE-4 inhibitor that acts to inhibit the degradation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis13 and is a particularly good treatment for patients with recalcitrant disease.14 Several studies on apremilast have been published, including a phase 2 trial of 204 participants receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg or 40 mg twice daily with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement response of 11.8%, 35.8%, and 43.5%, respectively.15 The phase 3 PALACE 1, 2, 3, and 4 trials also demonstrated therapeutic efficacy.16 In PALACE 1, 504 patients receiving placebo or apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg twice daily had an ACR20 of 19%, 31%, and 40%, respectively. In the PALACE 4 study, ACR20 was achieved by 58% of participants at week 52, but the ACR50 and ACR70 rates were less impressive.16

Lestaurtinib (Multikinase Inhibitor)

Lestaurtinib (formerly known as CEP-701)(Teva Pharmaceutical Industries) is an oral multikinase inhibitor for which a 12-week, nonrandomized, dose-escalation phase 2 study was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00236119).

CF101 (Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonist)

CF101 (IB-MECA; Can-Fite BioPharma Ltd) is an oral adenosine A3 receptor agonist. Adenosine A3 is a G protein–coupled receptor that has an anti-inflammatory role, which lends itself to the treatment of inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.17 In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial of 75 patients who received placebo or CF101 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, PASI 50 or greater was reported in 35.3% of participants in the 2-mg group, which was statistically significant at weeks 8 (P=.047) and 12 (P=.031).18 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 16-week phase 2/phase 3 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with CF101 2 mg twice daily versus placebo is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01265667).

 

 

Tofacitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 3 Inhibitor)

Tofacitinib is a JAK 1 and JAK 3 inhibitor that is available in both topical and oral formulations. Many studies have been published on tofacitinib, including a dose-ranging phase 2b trial of 197 patients randomized to placebo or tofacitinib 2, 5, or 15 mg daily in which 2.0%, 25.0% (P<.001), 40.8% (P<.0001), and 66.7% (P<.0001) of participants in each treatment group, respectively, achieved PASI 75 at week 12.19 Another 12-week phase 2b trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis explored the effectiveness of oral formulations of tofacitinib based on body location, namely the head and neck, arms, trunk, and legs.20 Designed with twice-daily placebo and tofacitinib 2-, 5-, and 15-mg treatment arms, the target plaque severity score demonstrated a statistically significant dose-responsive improvement in each of the 4 anatomic regions (P<.01).

Two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of tofacitinib have been completed. One trial compared the safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib and etanercept in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.21 The 329 participants were randomized to treatment with oral tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily with placebo subcutaneous (SQ) injections twice weekly; oral placebo twice daily with etanercept 50-mg SQ injections twice weekly; or oral placebo twice daily with placebo SQ injection twice weekly. At week 12, PASI 75 was achieved in 39.51%, 63.64%, 58.81%, and 5.61% of participants in each treatment group, respectively. Thus, tofacitinib 10 mg and etanercept 50 mg were the first and second best performers in this study design.21

In the other phase 3 trial, the efficacy and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, and subsequent resumption of treatment with tofacitinib was examined in 290 patients who received either tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks.22 In the withdrawal period, the percentage of patients who maintained a PASI 75 response in the tofacitinib 5-mg group was 56.2% versus 23.3% in the placebo group at week 16 (P<.0008). In the 10-mg group, 62.3% of participants maintained PASI 75 at week 16 versus 26.1% in the placebo group (P<.0001). During the re-treatment period for those who showed a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI during treatment withdrawal (N=102), 50.0% of the tofacitinib 5-mg group showed PASI 75 versus 31.58% of the placebo group at week 16. In the tofacitinib 10-mg group, PASI 75 was seen in 0% versus 50.85% in the placebo group. Of note, only 5 participants who demonstrated a greater than 50% reduction in week 24 PASI response following withdrawal of therapy were in the tofacitinib 5- or 10-mg groups, as the rest were in the placebo group.22

FP187 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

FP187 (Forward Pharma A/S) is an oral fumaric acid ester whose underlying mechanism is thought to be elevation of glutathione levels that decreases the amount of inflammatory cytokines by blocking the translocation of nuclear factor κB. Other fumaric acid esters such as monoethyl fumarate and dimethyl fumarate have been used in Europe for the management of psoriasis.23 A phase 2 study of the safety and effectiveness of FP187 for moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01230138). A phase 3 trial examining the efficacy of FP187 in managing moderate to severe psoriasis was not yet open for participant recruitment at the time of publication (NCT01815723).

Doxercalciferol (Vitamin D2 Analogue)

Doxercalciferol (1α-hydroxyvitamin D2; Genzyme Corporation, a Sanofi company) is an oral prodrug of vitamin D.24 Topical preparations of vitamin D analogues approved by the US Food and Drug Administration such as calcipotriene are mainstays in psoriasis management. Doxercalciferol has been used for other therapeutic applications such as decreasing elevated parathyroid hormone levels.25 Research has demonstrated that CYP24A1 can extrahepatically regulate the activation of vitamin D prodrugs in cutaneous tissues.26 In a phase 2 study examining the efficacy and safety of doxercalciferol in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, 111 patients were randomized to placebo or doxercalciferol 2.5, 5, or 7.5 mg daily for 24 weeks (NCT00601107). At week 12, PASI 50 was similar regardless of the treatment administered, reported at 20.0%, 20.0%, 17.9%, and 20.0%, respectively (P=1.000).27

GSK2586184 (JAK 1 Inhibitor)

GSK2586184 is an oral JAK 1 inhibitor. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 study of GSK2586184 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who were randomized to placebo or GSK2586184 100, 200, and 400 mg twice daily for 84 days has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01782664). Of note, despite clinical promise, due to potential adverse effects of the medication that included a possible interaction with statin medication, the manufacturer decided against pursuing GSK2586184 as a treatment in the management of psoriasis.28

Voclosporin (Calcineurin Inhibitor)

Voclosporin (formerly known as ISA247)(Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc) is an oral calcineurin inhibitor that is purported to be as effective as cyclospor-ine A with less associated toxicity. A 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial demonstrated PASI 75 in 0%, 18.2%, and 66.7% of 201 participants receiving placebo, voclospo-rin 0.5 mg/kg, and voclosporin 1.5 mg/kg twice daily, respectively (P<.0001). Elevated serum creatinine levels within the high range of normal were noted in the 1.5-mg/kg group.29 A 12-week phase 3 study of 451 patients randomized to placebo or voclospo-rin 0.2-, 0.3-, or 0.4-mg/kg treatment groups similarly demonstrated a dose-responsive PASI 75 of 4%, 16%, 25%, and 47%, respectively, that was maintained at week 24. Mild to moderate decreases in glomerular filtration rates were noted in 8 patients in the 0.3- and 0.4-mg/kg subsets.30 Another phase 2 study of voclosporin in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis showed improvements according to the psoriasis disability index and dermatology life quality index.31

Three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trials have been completed for voclosporin, but the results were not available at the time of publication. The phase 3 ESSENCE trial compared voclosporin to placebo and ciclosporin controls (NCT00408187). Two phase 3 trials known as the SPIRIT trials—one a 12-week study (NCT00244842) and the other a 36-week extension trial (NCT00258713)—compared the efficacy of placebo to voclosporin administered at 0.2-, 0.3-, and 0.4-mg/kg doses.

KD025 (ROCK 2 Inhibitor)

KD025 (Kadmon Corporation, LLC) is an oral ROCK 2 inhibitor. The inhibition of ROCK in the ras homolog gene family, member A/ROCK pathway has been targeted therapeutically for pulmonary arterial hypertension,32 glaucoma,33 and many other uses. A phase 2a study assessing the tolerability and safety profile of KD025 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT02106195).

LAS41008 (Fumaric Acid Ester)

LAS41008 (Almirall, S.A.) is purported to be an oral dimethyl fumarate that inhibits endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation.34 A phase 3 trial comparing the safety and effectiveness of LAS41008, LASW1835 (an active comparator), and placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis is ongoing but not recruiting participants (NCT01726933).

LEO 22811 (Anti-inflammatory)

LEO 22811 (LEO Pharma) is an oral anti-inflammatory agent for the treatment of psoriasis. Two clinical trials have been completed, the results of which have not yet been published. A phase 1 trial assessing the tolerability and safety profile of LEO 22811 (NCT00833872) and a phase 2 proof-of-concept study assessing dose response of LEO 22811 versus placebo (NCT01116895) were completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication.

Baricitinib (JAK 1 and JAK 2 Inhibitor)

As noted above, baricitinib (LY3009104 or INCB28050) is a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor. A phase 2b trial examining dose response for LY3009104 or baricitinib administration in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01490632).

Talarozole (CYP26 Inhibitor)

Talarozole (formerly known as R115866)(GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral CYP26 inhibitor that could serve to regulate the degradation of all-trans retinoic acid in the management of conditions such as acne and psoriasis. One phase 2 nonrandomized, open-label study (NCT00725348) and another phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent trial examining the effectiveness and safety profile of 12-week talarozole treatment in patients with severe plaque psoriasis have been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00716144).

R3421 or BCX-4208 (PNP Inhibitor)

R3421 or BCX-4208 (BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc/Hoffman–La Roche) is an oral PNP inhibitor that may help regulate apoptosis of T cells and B cells.35 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00504270).

RWJ-445380 (Cathepsin S Inhibitor)

RWJ-445380 (Alza Corporation, DE) is an oral cathepsin S inhibitor. Cathepsin S is produced by antigen-presenting cells and activates CD4+ T cells via presentation of antigen by class II major histocompatibility complex.36 A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial evaluating the tolerability, safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of RWJ-445380 in patients with plaque psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT00396422).

SRT2104 (Sirtuin 1 Activator)

SRT2104 (GlaxoSmithKline) is a selective oral NAD+-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1 activator. Sirtuins help regulate apoptosis, inflammation, and other important cellular mechanisms.37 A randomized, open-label phase 1 trial examining drug bioavailability (NCT01702493) and a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial studying the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of SRT2104 in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis have been completed (NCT01154101), but the results were not available at the time of publication.

VB-201 (Oxidized Phospholipid)

VB-201 (VBL Therapeutics) is an orally administered oxidized phospholipid analogue with anti-inflammatory effects.38 Oxidized phospholipids are another element in the intricate spectrum of inflammatory mediators. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 20 mg or 80 mg daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01001468). Another randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-dependent phase 2 trial of VB-201 80 mg and 160 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been completed, but the results were not available at the time of publication (NCT01837420).

Conclusion

We are living in an exciting time in the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, with promising novel therapies afforded by the discovery of new therapeutic targets. In this 3-part series, we have reviewed topical, systemic, and biologic therapies that currently are in phase 2 through phase 4 clinical trials or have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of psoriasis and PsA. These treatments offer patients and their caregivers the prospect of more targeted therapeutic regimens that offer enhanced clinical outcomes with more favorable side-effect profiles. As clinicians and researchers build upon this knowledge in the years to come, we can offer psoriasis patients an increasingly diverse and powerful therapeutic armamentarium.

References

 

1. Lu PD, Mazza JM. Research pipeline III: biologic therapies. In: Weinberg JM, Lebwohl M, eds. Advances in Psoriasis. New York, NY: Springer; 2014:227-242.

2. Humbert M, de Blay F, Garcia G, et al. Masitinib, a c-kit/PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improves disease control in severe corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics. Allergy. 2009;64:1194-1201.

3. Krause A, Brossard P, D’Ambrosio D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2014;41:261-278.

4. Vaclavkova A, Chimenti S, Arenberger P, et al. Oral ponesimod in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:2036-2045.

5. He X, Koenen HJ, Smeets RL, et al. Targeting PKC in human T cells using sotrastaurin (AEB071) preserves regulatory T cells and prevents IL-17 production. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:975-983.

6. Skvara H, Dawid M, Kleyn E, et al. The PKC inhibitor AEB071 may be a therapeutic option for psoriasis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3151-3159.

7. Irla N, Navarini AA, Yawalkar N. Alitretinoin abrogates innate inflammation in palmoplantar pustular psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:1170-1174.

8. Study to evaluate Apo805K1 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01483924). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01483924&Search=Search. Updated February 9, 2015. Accessed June 23, 2015.

9. Kofoed K, Skov L, Zachariae C. New drugs and treatment targets in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95:133-139.

10. Gooderham M. Small molecules: an overview of emerging therapeutic options in the treatment of psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2013;18:1-4.

11. Liu C, Lin J, Wrobleski ST, et al. Discovery of 4-(5-(cyclopropylcarbamoyl)-2-methylphenylamino)-5-methyl-N-propylpyrrolo[1,2-f][1,2,4]triazine-6-carboxamide (BMS-582949), a clinical p38a MAP kinase inhibitor for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J Med Chem. 2010;53:6629-6639.

12. Mavropoulos A, Rigopoulou EI, Liaskos C, et al. The role of p38 MAPK in the aetiopathogenesis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:569751.

13. Oral OTEZLA® (apremilast) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [news release]. Summit, NJ: Celegene Corporation; September 23, 2014.   http://ir.celgene.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=872240. Accessed June 23, 2015.

14. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Menter A, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:888-897.

15. Moustafa F, Feldman SR. A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20:22608.

16. Huynh D, Kavanaugh A. Psoriatic arthritis: current therapy and future approaches. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:20-28.

17. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Liang BT, et al. Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of A3 adenosine receptor agonists. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:359-366.

18. David M, Akerman L, Ziv M, et al. Treatment of plaque-type psoriasis with oral CF101: data from an exploratory randomized phase 2 clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:361-367.

19. Papp KA, Menter A, Strober B, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of psoriasis: a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:668-677.

20. Menter A, Papp KA, Tan H, et al. Efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, on clinical signs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in different body regions. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:252-256.

21. A phase 3, multi site, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study of the efficacy and safety comparing CP-690,550 and etanercept in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01241591). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01241591?term=01241591&rank=1. Updated May 8, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

22. A study to evaluate the effects and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, followed by re-treatment with CP-690,550 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01186744). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01186744?term=01186744&rank=1. Updated May 14, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

23. Rostami Yazdi M, Mrowietz U. Fumaric acid esters. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:522-526.

24. Kubodera N. A new look at the most successful prodrugs for active vitamin D (D hormone): alfacalcidol and doxercalciferol. Molecules. 2009;14:3869-3880.

25. Brown AJ. Therapeutic uses of vitamin D analogues. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(5 suppl 5):S3-S19.

26. Masuda S, Strugnell SA, Knutson JC, et al. Evidence for the activation of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D2 by 25-hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase: delineation of pathways involving 1alpha,24-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761:221-234.

27. A study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of doxercalciferol capsules in participants with moderate to severe psoriasis (NCT00601107). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00601107?term=00601107&rank=1. Updated April 2, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

28. GSK discloses good efficacy in psoriasis with GSK2856184 [news release]. Mechelen, Belgium: Galapagos NV; November 6, 2014. http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2014/11/06/680358/10106744/en/GSK-discloses-good-efficacy-in-psoriasis-with-GSK2856184.html. Accessed June 24, 2015.

29. Bissonnette R, Papp K, Poulin Y, et al. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ISA247 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:472-478.

30. Papp K, Bissonnette R, Rosoph L, et al. Efficacy of ISA247 in plaque psoriasis: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Lancet. 2008;371:1337-1342.

31. Gupta AK, Langley RG, Lynde C, et al. ISA247: quality of life results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Cutan Med Surg. 2008;12:268-275.

32. Antoniu SA. Targeting RhoA/ROCK pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:355-363.

33. Challa P, Arnold JJ. Rho-kinase inhibitors offer a new approach in the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:81-95.

34. National Institute for Health Research Horizon Scanning Centre. Dimethyl fumarate for plaque psoriasis. http://www.hsc.nihr.ac.uk/files/downloads/2228/2526.163fbff8.Dimethylfumarate_Nov13.pdf. Published November 2013. Accessed June 15, 2015.

35. Bantia S, Parker C, Upshaw R, et al. Potent orally bioavailable purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor BCX-4208 induces apoptosis in B- and T-lymphocytes—a novel treatment approach for autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation and hematologic malignancies. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010;10:784-790.

36. García-Pérez ME, Stevanovic T, Poubelle PE. New therapies under development for psoriasis treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25:480-487.

37. Villalba JM, Alcaín FJ. Sirtuin activators and inhibitors. Biofactors. 2012;38:349-359.

38. Feige E, Mendel I, George J, et al. Modified phospholipids as anti-inflammatory compounds. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010;21:525-529. 

References

 

1. Lu PD, Mazza JM. Research pipeline III: biologic therapies. In: Weinberg JM, Lebwohl M, eds. Advances in Psoriasis. New York, NY: Springer; 2014:227-242.

2. Humbert M, de Blay F, Garcia G, et al. Masitinib, a c-kit/PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improves disease control in severe corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics. Allergy. 2009;64:1194-1201.

3. Krause A, Brossard P, D’Ambrosio D, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ponesimod, a selective S1P1 receptor modulator. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2014;41:261-278.

4. Vaclavkova A, Chimenti S, Arenberger P, et al. Oral ponesimod in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:2036-2045.

5. He X, Koenen HJ, Smeets RL, et al. Targeting PKC in human T cells using sotrastaurin (AEB071) preserves regulatory T cells and prevents IL-17 production. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:975-983.

6. Skvara H, Dawid M, Kleyn E, et al. The PKC inhibitor AEB071 may be a therapeutic option for psoriasis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3151-3159.

7. Irla N, Navarini AA, Yawalkar N. Alitretinoin abrogates innate inflammation in palmoplantar pustular psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:1170-1174.

8. Study to evaluate Apo805K1 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01483924). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=NCT01483924&Search=Search. Updated February 9, 2015. Accessed June 23, 2015.

9. Kofoed K, Skov L, Zachariae C. New drugs and treatment targets in psoriasis. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95:133-139.

10. Gooderham M. Small molecules: an overview of emerging therapeutic options in the treatment of psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2013;18:1-4.

11. Liu C, Lin J, Wrobleski ST, et al. Discovery of 4-(5-(cyclopropylcarbamoyl)-2-methylphenylamino)-5-methyl-N-propylpyrrolo[1,2-f][1,2,4]triazine-6-carboxamide (BMS-582949), a clinical p38a MAP kinase inhibitor for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J Med Chem. 2010;53:6629-6639.

12. Mavropoulos A, Rigopoulou EI, Liaskos C, et al. The role of p38 MAPK in the aetiopathogenesis of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013;2013:569751.

13. Oral OTEZLA® (apremilast) approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis [news release]. Summit, NJ: Celegene Corporation; September 23, 2014.   http://ir.celgene.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=872240. Accessed June 23, 2015.

14. Gottlieb AB, Matheson RT, Menter A, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of apremilast in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis: a phase II open-label study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:888-897.

15. Moustafa F, Feldman SR. A review of phosphodiesterase-inhibition and the potential role for phosphodiesterase 4-inhibitors in clinical dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20:22608.

16. Huynh D, Kavanaugh A. Psoriatic arthritis: current therapy and future approaches. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54:20-28.

17. Fishman P, Bar-Yehuda S, Liang BT, et al. Pharmacological and therapeutic effects of A3 adenosine receptor agonists. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:359-366.

18. David M, Akerman L, Ziv M, et al. Treatment of plaque-type psoriasis with oral CF101: data from an exploratory randomized phase 2 clinical trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:361-367.

19. Papp KA, Menter A, Strober B, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of psoriasis: a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:668-677.

20. Menter A, Papp KA, Tan H, et al. Efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, on clinical signs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in different body regions. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:252-256.

21. A phase 3, multi site, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study of the efficacy and safety comparing CP-690,550 and etanercept in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01241591). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01241591?term=01241591&rank=1. Updated May 8, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

22. A study to evaluate the effects and safety of treatment, treatment withdrawal, followed by re-treatment with CP-690,550 in subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis (NCT01186744). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01186744?term=01186744&rank=1. Updated May 14, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

23. Rostami Yazdi M, Mrowietz U. Fumaric acid esters. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:522-526.

24. Kubodera N. A new look at the most successful prodrugs for active vitamin D (D hormone): alfacalcidol and doxercalciferol. Molecules. 2009;14:3869-3880.

25. Brown AJ. Therapeutic uses of vitamin D analogues. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38(5 suppl 5):S3-S19.

26. Masuda S, Strugnell SA, Knutson JC, et al. Evidence for the activation of 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D2 by 25-hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase: delineation of pathways involving 1alpha,24-dihydroxyvitamin D2 and 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761:221-234.

27. A study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of doxercalciferol capsules in participants with moderate to severe psoriasis (NCT00601107). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00601107?term=00601107&rank=1. Updated April 2, 2014. Accessed June 16, 2015.

28. GSK discloses good efficacy in psoriasis with GSK2856184 [news release]. Mechelen, Belgium: Galapagos NV; November 6, 2014. http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2014/11/06/680358/10106744/en/GSK-discloses-good-efficacy-in-psoriasis-with-GSK2856184.html. Accessed June 24, 2015.

29. Bissonnette R, Papp K, Poulin Y, et al. A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of ISA247 in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:472-478.

30. Papp K, Bissonnette R, Rosoph L, et al. Efficacy of ISA247 in plaque psoriasis: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Lancet. 2008;371:1337-1342.

31. Gupta AK, Langley RG, Lynde C, et al. ISA247: quality of life results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Cutan Med Surg. 2008;12:268-275.

32. Antoniu SA. Targeting RhoA/ROCK pathway in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:355-363.

33. Challa P, Arnold JJ. Rho-kinase inhibitors offer a new approach in the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2014;23:81-95.

34. National Institute for Health Research Horizon Scanning Centre. Dimethyl fumarate for plaque psoriasis. http://www.hsc.nihr.ac.uk/files/downloads/2228/2526.163fbff8.Dimethylfumarate_Nov13.pdf. Published November 2013. Accessed June 15, 2015.

35. Bantia S, Parker C, Upshaw R, et al. Potent orally bioavailable purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor BCX-4208 induces apoptosis in B- and T-lymphocytes—a novel treatment approach for autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation and hematologic malignancies. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010;10:784-790.

36. García-Pérez ME, Stevanovic T, Poubelle PE. New therapies under development for psoriasis treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25:480-487.

37. Villalba JM, Alcaín FJ. Sirtuin activators and inhibitors. Biofactors. 2012;38:349-359.

38. Feige E, Mendel I, George J, et al. Modified phospholipids as anti-inflammatory compounds. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2010;21:525-529. 

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Page Number
47-53
Page Number
47-53
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Novel Psoriasis Therapies and Patient Outcomes, Part 3: Systemic Medications
Display Headline
Novel Psoriasis Therapies and Patient Outcomes, Part 3: Systemic Medications
Legacy Keywords
Masitinib, Ponesimod, Sotrastaurin, Alitretinoin, therapies, Psoriasis, Apo805K1, ASP015K, BMS-582949, Apremilast, Lestaurtinib, CF101, Tofacitinib, FP187, Doxercalciferol, GSK2586184, Voclosporin, KD025, LAS41008, LEO 22811, Baricitinib, Talarozole, R3421 or BCX-4208, RWJ-445380, SRT2104, VB-201
Legacy Keywords
Masitinib, Ponesimod, Sotrastaurin, Alitretinoin, therapies, Psoriasis, Apo805K1, ASP015K, BMS-582949, Apremilast, Lestaurtinib, CF101, Tofacitinib, FP187, Doxercalciferol, GSK2586184, Voclosporin, KD025, LAS41008, LEO 22811, Baricitinib, Talarozole, R3421 or BCX-4208, RWJ-445380, SRT2104, VB-201
Sections
Inside the Article

   Practice Points

 

  • A wide spectrum of promising nonbiologic systemic medications presently are in development or were recently approved for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
  • Systemic medications broaden the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with psoriasis and PsA, offering targeted therapeutic regimens that afford enhanced clinical outcomes with favorable side-effect profiles.
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media